Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IMPEACHMENT
A Constitutional Primer
by Jason J. Vicente
Executive Summary
_____________________________________________________________
Introduction
Conclusion
Notes
1. See Peter S. Canellos, "Too Early to Tell A Likely
Outcome: The Clinton Allegations," Boston Globe, January
23, 1998, p. A1, quoting Boston University School of Law
Professor Tracey Maclin as stating that if Clinton lied at
his deposition about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky,
the House would likely impeach the president; Mark
Mueller, "Scandal Rocks Clinton: Congress Can Impeach if
Evidence Supports Allegations," Boston Herald, January 23,
1998, p. 4, quoting experts who state that perjury, sub-
orning perjury, and obstruction of justice would easily
meet constitutional impeachment standards. Professor
Maclin further asserts that such behavior "bring[s] into
disrepute the office of the presidency." Ibid. Yet, no
expert stated or suggested that the sexual impropriety
itself was an impeachable offense.
3. See Mueller, p. 3.
6. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
15. Ibid.
17. Ibid.
30. Ibid.
33. Ibid.
34. Ibid.
35. Ibid.
39. Ibid., p. 7.
Page 25
49. Ibid.
53. Ibid.
61. Ibid.
62. Ibid.
63. Ibid.
74. Ibid.
79. Ibid.
82. Ibid.
104. Ibid.
105. Ibid.
107. Ibid.
113. Ibid.
115. Ibid.
119. Ibid.
120. Ibid.
126. Ibid.
127. Ibid.
139. Ibid., p. 6.
146. Ibid.
154. Ibid.
156. Ibid., p. 2.
157. Ibid.