International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

Research Article

Quality of Life of Alcohol Dependents after Community Based Camp Intervention in the Treatment of Persons with Alcohol Dependence Syndrome

Authors
1UmeshTonse, 2Sinu.

Address for Correspondence:

1

Junior Research Fellow, 2Assistant Professor, Psychiatric Social Work, Department of

Psychiatry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal, India

INTRODUCTION Alcohol consumption is the worlds third largest risk factor for disease and disability; in middle-income countries. Alcohol is a causal factor in 60 types of diseases and injuries. Almost 4% of all deaths worldwide are attributed to alcohol, greater than deaths caused by HIV/AIDS, violence or tuberculosis. Alcohol is also associated with many serious social issues, including violence, child neglect and abuse, and absenteeism in the workplace. Quality of life has become a dominant theme in planning and evaluating services for people with alcohol dependence. It is recognised increasingly as an important component in the evaluation of alcohol treatment processes. Alcohol misuse is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and an important health care burden, the Quality of Life (QoL) of alcohol misusing subjects has been little studied to date. There are few studies of Quality of Life measures (QoL) in alcohol-misusing patients. When the literature was reviewed there were only 24 studies from 1993 2012 related to quality of life of alcohol dependents. These studies have shown that quality of life (QOL) is improved significantly when subjects do not relapse to heavy drinking, and QOL deteriorates significantly on prolonged relapse (Foster, 2000).

Subjects who sustained a 30% or greater decrease in drinks per month reported improvement in Physical and Mental health component had fewer alcohol-related consequences when compared to those with a <30% decrease( Kraemer 2002). The most important predictors

Email: esinu27@gmail.com , Corresponding &2nd author, contact in case of any consultation iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in 1

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

of baseline quality of life were severity of alcohol dependence, employment status, psychiatric history, quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption, attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous, global alcohol health status, age, gender, and education (Morgan, 2004). Frequent heavy drinking or episodic heavy drinking (e.g., five or more drinks per occasion) patterns were associated with reduced QoL. Alcohol dependents had lower levels of QoL compared with general population norms or with other chronic health conditions. Quality of life appears to be moderated by a number of socio-demographic and client characteristics, such as age, education, gender and co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Alcohol-dependent individuals experience improvements in QoL across treatment and with both short-term and long-term abstinence. Despite these improvements, many alcoholic individualsQoL is unlikely to equal or exceed that of normative groups. Also, among hazardous and harmful drinkers, achieving and maintaining a marked reduction in drinking, even without complete abstinence, is associated with significant increases in QoL (Dennis, 2005).

Treatment and Quality of Life of Alcohol Dependents At treatment initiation, Alcohol dependent patients had lower QOL total scores and they scored lower on several subscale scores than those without AD. CM treatment was associated with improvement in QOL regardless of Alcohol dependent status (Andrade, 2012). Extended-release naltrexone 380 mg in combination with psychosocial intervention was associated with improvements in QOL, specifically in the domains of mental health, social functioning, general health, and physical functioning (Pettinati, 2009). As an adjunct to medication compliance enhancement treatment, Topiramate (up to 300 mg/d) was superior to placebo at not only improving drinking outcomes but increasing overall well-being and quality of life and lessening dependence severity and its harmful consequences (Johnson, 2004; 2008). The combinations of naltrexone and combined behavioral intervention (CBI), and acamprosate and CBI, each predicted significantly improved physical QOL (Prisciandaro 2012). Treatment with acamprosate and psychosocial support, by promoting abstinence, improves the quality of life profile to levels comparable to those observed in healthy individuals. Literature Review
Sl.No AUTHOR 1. Beccaria (2012) METHODS Investigated the relationship between alcohol consumption and quality of life (QoL) on a representative sample of adults aged 25-34 living in France, Italy and Netherlands. (n=4841) evaluated longitudinal associations between treatment status, alcohol consumption, and QOL in the Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence (COMBINE) study RESULTS Impact of alcohol consumption on QoL depends mainly on predominant consumption style and drinking culture

2. Prisciandaro 2012

combinations of naltrexone and combined behavioral intervention (CBI) and acamprosate and CBI, each predicted significantly improved physical QOL

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

No significant association between alcohol-use disorders and HRQoL in Hospital outpatients. Intervention studies with hazardous drinkers were not able to identify treatmentrelated changes in global HRQoL. However, alcohol dependence was associated with poorer quality of life in physical, general health and mental health areas of functioning. At treatment initiation, Alcohol dependence patients had lower QOL total scores and they scored lower on several subscale scores Alcohol dependents with PD had lower quality of life over the entire course of the treatment compared to patients without PD. quality of life and craving at the initiation of the treatment predicted alcohol use during the first 3 months. Quality of life is not related to the duration of abstinence or the course of the addiction for patients with personality disorder and they perceive poorer quality of life in areas such as health status, mood, and social relations. Self-perception of quality of life is affected by psychological adjustment and beliefs about craving Among alcohol-dependent men with lifetime PTSD, a history of childhood emotional abuse contributes to impairment of QoL Female gender, age > 45 yrs, living alone, working as a labourer, somatic co-morbidity were associated with a low Physical Component of QOL. Psychiatric co-morbidity, smoking and suicidality were associated with a low Mental Component of QOL. Ex-Drinkers and high-risk drinkers generally had lower life satisfaction and low health-related quality of life.

Peltzer et al 3. 2012, South Africa

Examined the association of alcohol use and health related quality of life (HRQOL). N=1532 (56% M; 44% F) in different hospital out-patient settings

4.

Andrade et al 2012

Quality of life of alcohol dependents (N=390)

5.

Martinez et al 2011

Quality of life of alcohol dependent persons with personality disorder

6.

Martinez et al 2010

Quality of life in patients with alcohol dependence disorder with personality disorders: relation to psychological adjustment and craving

7.

Evren 2011

et

al

Lifetime PTSD and quality of life among alcohol-dependent men: impact of childhood emotional abuse Determinants of improvement in quality of life of alcohol-dependent patients during an inpatient withdrawal programme. N=414; prospective study Effects of alcohol consumption in spousal relationships on health-related quality of life and life satisfaction. n=3110 couples couples living in partner relationships. Alcohol treatment effects on secondary non-drinking outcomes and quality of life: the COMBINE study Clinical and psychosocial factors associated with quality of life in alcohol-dependent men with erectile dysfunction. N=101 Men; 18 -50 yrs Impact of anxiety and depression on quality of life of persons with alcohol

8.

Lahmek et al 2009

Livingston et al 9. 2009

10.

LoCastro et al 2009

11.

Ponizovsky et al 2008

12.

Saatcioque et al (2008)

A higher percentage of heavy drinking days, more drinks per drinking day, and lower percentage of days abstinent were associated with lower quality-of-life measures. ED and self-rated depressive symptoms, emotional distress, selfesteem, and perceived social support were found to be significantly associated with QoL of persons with Alcohol dependents Quality of life is low in alcohol dependence syndrome patients with

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

dependence syndrome depression. It was found high in alcohol dependence syndrome patients without depression or anxiety. There is no significant difference between hospital based treatment and community based treatment with regard to quality of life of persons with alcohol dependence syndrome. Longer recovery time was significantly associated with lower stress and with higher quality of life

13. Mary (2008)

Cross sectional study on disability and quality of life respondents with alcohol dependence in hospital based deaddiction services. N=60 Role of Social Supports, Spirituality, Religiousness, Life Meaning and Affiliation with 12-Step Fellowships in Quality of Life Satisfaction among Individuals in Recovery from Alcohol & drug problems (N = 353)

Laudet et al 14. 2006 New York

Kalman et al 15. 2004

Alcohol dependence, other psychiatric disorders, and health-related quality of life N= 127,308

Respondents with a history of alcohol dependence plus one or more other psychiatric disorders had significantly lower HRQoL in domains pertaining to psychological and social functioning than respondents with alcohol dependence only Health-related quality of life is severely impaired in dependent drinkers. The most important predictors of quality of life is abstinence duration QoL improves with abstinence and deteriorates with relapse. QoL in females is worse than in males, for comparable levels of dependency. Disturbed sleep with depression is a particular feature of the impaired QoL in female alcohol misusers Increase in alcohol related problems associated with lower quality of life

16.

Morgan et al 2004

Improvement in quality of life after treatment for alcohol dependence N=1216; 77% male;

17.

Peters et al 2003

Quality of life in alcohol misuse: comparison of men and women

Patience et al 18. 1997

The SECCAT Survey: II. The Alcohol Related Problems Questionnaire as a proxy for resource costs and quality of life in alcoholism treatment. N=212

19. Volk et al 1997

Alcohol use disorders, consumption patterns, and health-related quality of life of primary care patients. N=1333

20.

Daeppen et al 1998

Evaluating health-related quality of life in alcohol-dependent patients N=147; 77% males; 26 -78 yrs

Persons with alcohol dependence scored lower (poorer HRQOL) on the Mental Health Component. Binge drinkers and Frequent, High-Quantity Drinkers showed markedly lower scores in the areas of Role Functioning and Mental Health Alcohol-dependent patients perceived their problems more as psychological than physical. Severity of alcohol dependence and depression seemed to influence the perception of HRQoL negatively.

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

Factors associated with poor quality of life among alcohol dependents From the above table following inferences can be made; Quality of Life of alcoholdependents was very poor but improved as a result of abstinence, controlled or minimal drinking. Important factors associated with poor QoL of alcohol-dependents are psychiatric co-morbidity such as anxiety, depression(Saatcioque 2008; Daeppen et al 1998; Peters et 2003), personality disorders (Martinez 2010; 2011), Binge drinking, frequent drinking, high quantity drinking (Volk et al 1997), severity of alcohol dependence, increased alcohol related problems (Patience et al 1997), higher percentage of heavy drinking days, more drinks per days(Locastro 2009), more than one psychiatric disorders (Kalman et al 2004), relapse, disturbed sleep(Peters et al 2007), social environment, erectile dysfunction, emotional distress, reduced self-esteem (Ponizovsky 2008), female gender, persons aged above 45 years, living alone, labourers, smoking, somatic comorbidity (Lahmek et al 2009), life time PTSD and childhood emotional abuse (Evren et al 2011). Quicker aging among the persons with alcohol dependence traced in parallel with their low social functioning and quality of life (Guzova 2010).

Factors associated with Better quality of life among alcohol dependents Among the factors which predicted better quality of life were abstinence duration (Morgan 2004; Peters 2003), longer recovery (Laudet 2005), and perceived better social support (Ponizovsky 2008). Attenuated physical QoL improvements for patients with alcohol abuse histories are related to greater pain and physical deficits (Eshelman 2010). QoL improvement after a residential treatment was related to low QoL scores at admission. Improvement in physical component of QoL was related to baseline alcohol intake and good somatic status (Lahmek 2009). Greater alcohol use was related to poorer prescribed insulin injection compliance and stronger expectations of immediate, positive consequences of drinking alcohol were related to several indices of lower quality of life (Cox 2002). Alcohol use was shown to be associated with impaired levels of health-related quality of life in adolescents (Chen, 2007). PTSD, major depression, and alcohol use disorders all adversely influenced adolescent QOL (Clarke 1996). Children and youth with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum disorder have significantly lower HRQL than children and youth from the general Canadian population(Stade 2006). Apart from above inferences there were also few contradictory findings in the literature such as Persistent moderate drinkers had higher initial levels of health-related quality of life than persistent nonusers, persistent former users, decreasing users, unstable pattern of drinkers (U-shaped users, and inverted U-shaped users). (Kaplan 2012). Regular alcohol consumption is associated with increased quality of life in older men and women (Chan 2009). Being a nondrinker of alcohol was associated with greater risk of mortality and poorer physical HRQoL. Moderate alcohol consumption was not harmful, and may carry some health benefits for older women (Furya 2008). Negative associations between alcohol and well-being were observed on several measures for women consuming more than 173 g and men more than 229 g per week.

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

Former drinkers scored worst on most measures, even in comparison to the highest drinking. For men, all statistically significant associations between moderate drinking and well-being disappeared when socio-demographic factors and former drinkers were controlled for. For women, moderate alcohol use associated with better self-rated health as compared to abstainers. However, the possible health utility benefits associated with moderate alcohol consumption were of clinically insignificant magnitude. Possible health utility benefits of moderate alcohol use were clinically insignificant; it suffices to investigate mortality, when estimating the public health impact of moderate alcohol consumption using quality-adjusted life years (Saarni 2008). Women who did not consume alcohol or who drank rarely were more likely to die than women in the low-intake reference category (1-2 drinks per day, 3-6 days per week), or if they survived, they had lower health-related quality-of-life scores on the General Health and Physical Functioning Being a non-drinker of alcohol was associated with greater risk of death and poorer health-related quality of life. Other levels of alcohol intake indicated that moderate alcohol intake may carry some health benefits for older women in terms of survival and quality of life (Byles 2006). Alcohol drinkers rated their health as good in comparison with non-drinkers (Saitp 2005). Low level of alcohol consumption was associated with a better HRQOL and possibly with better lung function (Tang 2005). In a 29 year cohort study; male subjects of high socioeconomic status, only the highest alcohol consumption (>3 drinks/d) affected mortality and it was associated with worse quality of life in old age. Moderate alcohol consumption in middle age offered no special benefits compared with abstinence over the long term (Standberg 2004). Alcohol drinking was associated with significantly better physical and role functioning, and better global HRQL, plus less fatigue, pain, problems swallowing, dry mouth and feelings of illness in post-therapeutic head and neck cancer patients (Allison 2002).

MATERIALS AND METHODS Study setting: This study was conducted in 2 places for study purpose like study group and comparative group. Study group was taken in Sasthanavillage, KundapurTaluk, Udupi District (community based de-addiction camp (CBC) conducted by Shri K. shethra Dharmasthala Rural Development Programme) and comparative group was taken in Dr.A.VBaliga Hospital, Doddanagudde, Udupi District, Karnataka (hospital based de-addiction camp (HBC)).It was a QuasiExperimental Research Design pre and post test with control group was adopted. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. The objective of the study was to assess the quality of life of the person with alcohol dependence syndrome, before and after the de-addiction camp intervention in community as well as in hospital based camp intervention.

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that there would be a significant improvement in quality of life in person with ADS, those who were treated in hospital based de-addiction camp.

Quality of Life: World Health Organization defines Quality of life as an individuals perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns. It is a broad ranging concept affected in a complex way by the persons physical health, psychological state, personal beliefs, social relationships and their relationship to salient features of their environment (WHO, 1993).

Sample:30 Respondents were drawn from community based de-addiction camp(CBC) conducted by ShriKshethraDharmasthala Rural Development Programme, Sasthana Village KundapurTaluk, Udupi District and another 30 were drawn from hospital based de-addiction camp (HBC), conducted by Dr.A.VBaliga Hospital, Doddanagudde, UdupiDisitrict, Karnataka. Inclusion criteria:Persons who give consent for the study, Age ranged from 18 years to 65 years, Persons who meet the criteria of alcohol dependence syndrome according to ICD 10 and AUDIT. Exclusion Criteria:Persons with History of any psychiatric disorder other than anxiety and depression, Persons with mental retardation, Persons with other substance use disorder other than NDS, Persons with Severe medical complications and cognitive impairments. Study period: study was conducted from January 2012 to April 2012. Sampling process: Census Method was used in the study. Tools used: Socio Demographic Details; This was prepared by the investigator to get the details regarding name, age, educational status, occupation, socio economic status, religion, marital status and family type and head of the family and age of onset of alcohol consumption and age of dependence. Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (Audit)- Interview Version. (World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence, 1992).Who Quality Of Life (BREF)-1998 Procedure: After approval from the Kasturba Hospital ethics committee, alcohol dependent patients were contacted on the day of admission in both community camp and hospital based camp subsequently and explained about the nature of the study and its objectives. The respondents who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected and informed consent was taken from the subjects. Confidentiality of the information was assured. The study was done in the month of January 1 st to 10th in Dr.A.V.Baliga hospital and February 10th to 17th in Dharmasthala de-addiction camp in Sasthana, Kunadapura. The study was in a period of 4 months, from January of April.

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

Semi structured interview was administered initially to gather socio demographic data, history of alcohol intake, past history of abstinence and treatment and also AUDIT questionnaire also administered through interview process only. In the study process WHO-Quality of life questionnaire was administered before the camp intervention. After the pre assessment part patients were also followed up by attending their monthly meeting in the community which occurred in ShriKshethra Dharmasthala Rural Development Office, Sasthana. In the hospital based camp all patients those who have come for follow up comes in a different days except the first follow up after a week of the camp. In the 2nd month of the camp patients were contacted through phone and asked those to come to hospital for follow up in the day in which they were comfortable and they were reassessed on that particular day. For other respondents those who were not willing to come for follow up because of the fear (especially relapsed people), contacted them in their workplace or at in their home itself. Statistics Procedure: Chi square test,t test, one-way ANOVA, Survival analysis, Effect Size analysis, correlation and regression analysis. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants before the study. RESULTS: Mean age of the respondents in Community based de-addiction camp was 35 years and 40 years in Hospital based de-addiction camp respondents. Majority of the respondents had primary education in community based camp (mean years of education 5 years) whereas in Hospital based de-addiction camp mean years of education is 8 years. In the both group, majority of the respondents were married (63%). Majority of the respondents were belong to family of origin (60%) in hospital based de-addiction camp where as in community based camp more than half of the respondents (53%) were living with family of procreation. Majority of the respondents (93% in HBDC and 100% in CBDC) were Hindus. In the family developmental stage, more than one third of the respondents in both groups were in the stage of family with launching young adult stage. Majority of the respondents in the both the groups were employed, semiskilled labors and getting daily payment, satisfied with their work and most of them were working in private sector. Mean age at alcohol initiation is 21 years in both groups and had 8 to 11 years of alcohol dependence. It was found that majority of (66% in Community based de-addiction camp and 69% in Hospital based de-addiction camp) respondents had late onset of dependence and majority of the respondents (63% in CBDC and 89% in HBDC) had family history of alcohol dependence and no past de-addiction treatment before this camp. During the pre assessment In Quality of life the mean score was 82.06(S.D=9.08) in CBDC and 86.56(S.D=11.70) In HBDC, which shows that both the group had neither good nor poor quality of life. Paired t test revealed that there is no statistical significant difference between respondents in community based de-addiction camp and hospital based de-addiction camp with regard to physical health (t=1.20, p=.23), psychological health (t=.82, p=.41), and in social relationship (t=.77, p=.44), environment quality of life (t=1.66, p=.10), overall total quality of life (t=1.53.p=.13) after the camp intervention in both the group. Paired t test result showed that there was statistically significant difference within CBDC respondents quality of life during pre and post assessment (t=2.22, p=.034). iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in 8

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

In HBDC, the mean quality of life of the respondents during pre- assessment was 86.56(S.D=11.70) and in post assessment it was 83.60(S.D= 7.82).During post assessment there was deterioration of overall quality of life. It may be due to reason that respondents started to drink more amount of alcohol due to criticism from their relatives and friends, for being broken their hope that respondents would not drink after de-addiction treatment, it could be the one reason for the decrease in mean score of their quality of life when compare to pre assessment mean score of quality of life. TABLE 1: Pre and post assessment comparison of quality of life of the respondents in community based de-addiction camp and hospital based de-addiction camp
CAMP QUALITY OF LIFE Physical Health Psychological Health Social relationship Environment Total Physical health Psychological Health Social relationship Environment Total TEST MEAN Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post 23.4 21.2 19.0 19.4 10.2 10.6 26.2 27.9 82.0 86.2 22.10 20.66 17.40 19.00 10.46 9.73 24.90 27.00 86.56 83.60 S.D 3.82 .88 3.73 1.65 1.87 2.18 3.95 1.78 9.08 5.42 2.57 2.24 2.64 2.08 2.68 2.14 4.11 2.36 11.7 7.82 t p EFFECT VALUE VALUE SIZE 2.99 .39 .244 1.88 2.22 2.18 2.57 1.47 2.75 1.38 .006* .693 .809 .70 .034** .037** .016* .152 .010* .176 r=0.3 ---r=0.2 r=0.28 r=0.31 -r=0.29 --

CBDC

HBDC

Table 1 shows the respondents quality of life before and after CBDC and HBDC intervention. Mean score of the physical health of the respondents of both CBDC and HBDC decreased in post assessment. In CBDC the mean score of QOL in physical health was 23.46(S.D=3.82) and in post assessment it was 21.20(S.D=.88) whereas in HBDC it was 22.10(S.D=2.57) during the pre-assessment, it decreased during the post assessment 20.66(S.D=2.24). t test revealed that there is statistically significant difference within the g roup with regard to the physical quality of life. In HBDC respondents psychological health during the preassessment was 17.40 (S.D=2.64) and in post assessment the mean score was increased to 19.00(S.D=2.08) which shows that respondents psychological health improved after hospital deaddiction camp. In the HBDC; the environmental health mean score was 24.90(S.D=4.11) during pre- assessment and in post assessment it was increased to 27.00(S.D=2.36), this reveals that there is improvement in respondents environmental quality of life. The same result was found in CBDC respondents. iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in 9

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

Respondents mean score on total quality of life in CBDC during pre-assessment was 82.06(S.D=9.08) and in post assessment it increasedto86.26 (S.D=5.42) But in HBDC; it was 86.56 (S.D=11.70) during the pre-assessment and in post assessment it was decreased to 83.60(S.D=7.82).When compared to respondents in HBDC, respondents in CBDC have shown improvement in overall quality of life. There is medium effect size in CBDC with regard to physical health between before camp and after the camp approach (r=0.37), whereas in HBDC it was found small effect size in physical health of the respondents. In psychological health the HBDC respondents had medium level effect size (r=0.31) and small effect size in environment quality of life (r=0.29). It was also found that there is small effect size in overall quality of life of the respondents in CBDC (before and after camp intervention)

TABLE 2: Quality of life of Abstainers and relapsers in hospital based de-addiction camp and community based de-addiction camp
GROUP QUALITY OF ALCOHOL LIFE USE STATUS Physical health Psychological health CBDC Social relationship Environment Total Physical health Psychological health HBDC Social relationship Environment Total Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers Abstainers Relapsers N 22 8 22 8 22 8 22 8 22 8 17 13 17 13 17 13 17 13 17 13 MEAN 21.45 20.50 19.90 18.00 10.77 8.50 28.63 25.87 88.77 79.37 21.52 19.53 20.23 17.38 10.58 8.61 28.35 25.23 88.82 76.76 S.D .73 .92 1.23 1.92 1.90 2.13 1.39 .99 3.59 3.02 1.06 2.87 .97 2.06 1.80 2.10 1.16 2.38 2.57 7.07 t p EFFECT TEST VALUE SIZE 2.928 3.218 2.805 5.110 6.574 2.638 5.034 2.763 4.722 6.512 .007** .003** .009** <.001* <.001* .013* .00 .010** <.001* <.001* 0.48 0.51 0.46 0.69 0.72 0.44 0.68 0.46 0.66 0.77

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

10

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

Table 2 shows the quality of life of abstainers and relapsed Respondents. Mean score of the social relationship 8.50(S.D=2.13) in CBDC respondents who are relapsed during 2 months and it is comparatively less when compared to the respondents who are maintaining abstinence 10.77(S.D=1.90).It shows that when respondents relapsed after a camp; their social relationship was decreased. Overall quality of life of the respondents who were relapsed was less (mean=79.37, S.D=3.02) when compared to the respondents who were maintaining abstinence (mean=88.77, S.D=3.59). Mean score of the psychological health of the relapsed Respondents in HBDC was less 17.38(S.D=2.06) when compared to the respondents who are maintaining abstinence (20.23(S.D=.97). Mean score of social relationship of the relapsed respondents was 8.61(S.D=2.10) it was less score when compared to the Respondents who are maintaining abstinence 10.58(S.D=1.80). In the HBDC also the mean score of the overall quality of life of the relapsed Respondents was 76.76(S.D=7.07) and it was found to be less when compared to the respondents who were maintaining abstinence (Mean=88.82, S.D=2.57). CBD Camp intervention had medium effect on physical health (r=0.48), social relationship (r=0.46) and large effect size on psychological health(r=0.51), environment quality of life (r=0.69) and in overall quality of life(r=0.72). HBD Camp intervention had medium level of effect on physical health (r=0.44), social relationship (r=.010), and large level of effect size on psychological health(r=0.68), environmental quality of life(r=0.66) and in overall quality of life (r=0.77) of the respondents. There is a positive correlation between number of days of abstinence and physical quality of life (r=.387, p<0.001), psychological health (r=.409, p<0.001), and social relationship (r=.451, p<0.001), environment life (r=.628, p<0.001), overall quality of life(r=.654, p<0.001). Regression analysis revealed duration of abstinence predicts abstinence (F=16.52, p=<.001) in hospital and community based camp (F=30.85, p=<0.001). Duration of Abstinence (R Square) explains 52% variance in Abstinence in CBD camp and 37% variation in HBD camp.

Discussion
Quality of Life of persons with alcohol dependence With regard to quality of life of the respondents in both group scored less (82 in CBC and 86 in HBC) during pre-assessment. This finding is in parallel with Andrade et al (2012) where they reported during treatment initiation alcohol dependents had scored low scores in total QOL and subscales of QOL. There was no significant difference between both the camp respondents with regard to the overall quality of life before the camp intervention. This is in concordance with Mary &Pandian study (2008) in which they observed that there was no significant difference between respondents who were availing hospital based de-addiction service and community based de-addiction service. Overall quality of life of the respondents increased in community based de-addiction camp during postassessment but not in Hospital based camp. After the camp intervention both group respondents significantly scored less physical health QOL when compared pre-assessment score. It may be due to their physical withdrawal or iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in 11

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

before camp respondents were using alcohol to get rid of physical pain due to their hard work and but now they are not using alcohol and they feel the body pain. Respondents in Hospital based Camp showed significant improvement in their psychological, environmental quality of life during post-assessment. Parsimonious the reason could be that now they are getting their family members love and affection because they are not in intoxicate state and the respondents started to invest their money on valuable things which is needed to them as well as their family members and it may be the reason for what they are saying their environmental quality of life has improved. In the community based de-addiction camp majority of the respondents maintained abstinent and very few people had relapse; this may be the due to the community camp respondents involvement among themselves and their interest to help other group member to recover. In the present study it was found that majority of the respondents in hospital based deaddiction camp had low quality of psychological health and it was also found that their severity of alcohol dependence was high (x=39.53) when compared to the community based de-addiction camp (x=31.86) even though HBDC respondents reported of having good physical health in quality of life. Volk et al (1997) study reported that alcohol dependents scored poorer quality of life on the mental health component and binge drinkers and frequent, high quantity drinkers showed markedly lower scores in the areas of role functioning and mental health. Quality of life and Abstinence In the present study it was found that respondents in both the camp who maintained abstinence had shown significant improvement in quality of life than relapsers. There was significant difference between abstainers and relapsers with regard quality of life.Similar findings were reported by (Peters et al, 2003) they reported that quality of life improves with abstinence and deteriorates with relapse. There was a noteworthy finding from the study that there was inverse relationship between severity of alcohol dependence and quality of life. This is in concordance with previous studies. Where Daeppen et al (1998) reported that severity of alcohol dependence influenced lower health related quality of life and Patience et al (1997) reported that increase in alcohol related problems associated with poor quality of life. Present study revealed that duration of abstinence alone predicts 52% (R square) quality of life in CBC camp and in HBC it was 37% (R Square). This is finding is supported by Morgan et al (2004) in which they have stated that duration of abstinence is important predictor of quality of life of alcohol dependents. Changes in overall quality of life after camp approach In the present study it was observed that before camp community based de-addiction camp respondents had lower score (x=82.06) in their overall quality life than the hospital based de-addiction camp respondents (x=86.56) but after the camp intervention it was observed that community based de-addiction camp respondents had high score (x=86.26) than the hospital based de-addiction camp respondents (x=83.60) it might be due to the treatment process which the community camp respondent s had during their treatment approach and also the support they are getting from the community leaders and from the religion based group and the other group iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in 12

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

respondents with whom they identifies Nava Jeevana(New life) group but it was lacking in the respondents who were treated in hospital based de-addiction camp. These respondents do not have one particular group in their own community people who are living without drug addiction after the camp and also these respondents do not have contact among themselves with other people who were there with them during the camp. Conclusion This study revealed that both the camp approach intervention is effective in helping the people with alcohol dependence syndrome in maintaining abstinence. Community based deaddiction camp intervention shown small effect with regard to enhancing quality of life (r=0.27). References 1. Allison, P. J. Alcohol consumption is associated with improved health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 38(1), 81-86. 2002. 2. Andrade, L. F., Alessi, S. M., &Petry, N. M. (2012). The impact of contingency management on quality of life among cocaine abusers with and without alcohol dependence. Am.J.Addict., 21, 47-54. 3. Byles, J., Young, A., Furuya, H., and Parkinson, L. A drink to healthy aging: The association between older women's use of alcohol and their health-related quality of life. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 54(9), 1341-1347. 2006. 4. Chen, C. Y. and Storr, C. L. Alcohol use and health-related quality of life among youth in Taiwan. J.Adolesc.Health 39(5), 752-16. 2006. 5. Clark, D. B. and Kirisci, L. Posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, alcohol use disorders and quality of life in adolescents. Anxiety. 2(5), 226-233. 1996. 6. Cox, W. M., Blount, J. P., Crowe, P. A., and Singh, S. P. Diabetic patients' alcohol use and quality of life: relationships with prescribed treatment compliance among older males. Alcohol Clin.Exp.Res. 20(2), 327-331. 1996. 7. Daeppen, J. B., Krieg, M. A., Burnand, B., &Yersin, B. (1998). MOS-SF-36 in evaluating health-related quality of life in alcohol-dependent patients. Am.J.Drug Alcohol Abuse, 24, 685-694. 8. Dawson, D. A., Li, T. K., Chou, S. P., & Grant, B. F. (2009). Transitions in and out of alcohol use disorders: their associations with conditional changes in quality of life over a 3-year follow-up interval. Alcohol Alcohol, 44, 84-92. 9. Eshelman, A., Paulson, D., Meyer, T., Fischer, D., Moonka, D., Brown, K., and Abouljoud, M (2010). The influence of alcohol abuse history on the differential, longitudinal patterns of mental and physical quality of life following liver transplantation. Transplant.Proc. 42(10), 4145-4147. 10. Evren, C., Sar, V., Dalbudak, E., Cetin, R., Durkaya, M., Evren, B. et al. (2011). Lifetime PTSD and quality of life among alcohol-dependent men: impact of childhood emotional abuse and dissociation. Psychiatry Res., 186, 85-90. 11. Foster, J. H., Peters, T. J., & Kind, P. (2002). Quality of life, sleep, mood and alcohol consumption: a complex interaction. Addict.Biol., 7, 55-65. iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in 13

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

12. Foster, J. H., Peters, T. J., & Marshall, E. J. (2000). Quality of life measures and outcome in alcohol-dependent men and women. Alcohol, 22, 45-52. 13. Furuya, H., Young, A. F., Powers, J. R., and Byles, J. E. Alcohol consumption and physical health-related quality of life in older women using the transformation of SF-36 to account for death. Nihon ArukoruYakubutsuIgakkaiZasshi 43(2), 97-109. 2008. 14. Ginieri-Coccossis, M., Liappas, I. A., Tzavellas, E., Triantafillou, E., &Soldatos, C. (2007). Detecting changes in quality of life and psychiatric symptomatology following an in-patient detoxification programme for alcohol-dependent individuals: the use of WHOQOL-100. In Vivo, 21, 99-106. 15. Kalman, D., Lee, A., Chan, E., Miller, D. R., Spiro, A., III, Ren, X. S. et al. (2004). Alcohol dependence, other psychiatric disorders, and health-related quality of life: a replication study in a large random sample of enrollees in the Veterans Health Administration. Am.J.Drug Alcohol Abuse, 30, 473-487. 16. Kraemer, K. L., Maisto, S. A., Conigliaro, J., McNeil, M., Gordon, A. J., and Kelley, M. E. Decreased alcohol consumption in outpatient drinkers is associated with improved quality of life and fewer alcohol-related consequences. J.Gen.Intern.Med. 17(5), 382-386. 2002. 17. Lahmek, P., Berlin, I., Michel, L., Berghout, C., Meunier, N., &Aubin, H. J. (2009). Determinants of improvement in quality of life of alcohol-dependent patients during an inpatient withdrawal programme. Int.J.Med.Sci., 6, 160-167. 18. Laudet, A. B., Morgen, K., & White, W. L. (2006). The Role of Social Supports, Spirituality, Religiousness, Life Meaning and Affiliation with 12-Step Fellowships in Quality of Life Satisfaction Among Individuals in Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems. Alcohol Treat.Q., 24, 33-73. 19. Livingston, M. (2009). Effects of alcohol consumption in spousal relationships on healthrelated quality of life and life satisfaction. J.Stud.Alcohol Drugs, 70, 383-390. 20. LoCastro, J. S., Youngblood, M., Cisler, R. A., Mattson, M. E., Zweben, A., Anton, R. F. et al. (2009). Alcohol treatment effects on secondary nondrinking outcomes and quality of life: the COMBINE study. J.Stud.Alcohol Drugs, 70, 186-196. 21. Martinez Gonzalez, J. M., Grana Gomez, J. L., & Trujillo, M. H. (2010). [Quality of life in patients with alcohol dependence disorder with personality disorders: relation to psychological adjustment and craving]. Psicothema., 22, 562-567. 22. Martinez Gonzalez, J. M., Grana Gomez, J. L., & Trujillo, M. H. (2011). [Longitudinal study on quality of life, craving and psychological adjustment in alcohol-dependent patients: variations depending on the personality disorders]. Adicciones., 23, 227-235. 23. Mary and Pandian (2008). A comparative study on disability and quality of life of person with alcohol dependence seeking treatment in community and hospital. M.phil thesis, department of psychiatric social work. NIMHANS, Bangalore. 24. Morgan, M. Y., Landron, F., &Lehert, P. (2004). Improvement in quality of life after treatment for alcohol dependence with acamprosate and psychosocial support. Alcohol Clin.Exp.Res., 28, 64-77. 25. Patience, D., Buxton, M., Chick, J., Howlett, H., McKenna, M., &Ritson, B. (1997). The SECCAT Survey: II. The Alcohol Related Problems Questionnaire as a proxy for resource

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

14

International Journal of Applied Research & Studies ISSN 2278 9480

costs and quality of life in alcoholism treatment. Study of Socio-Economic Consequences and Costs of Alcoholism and Treatment. Alcohol Alcohol, 32, 79-84. 26. Peltzer, K. &Pengpid, S. (2012). Alcohol Use and Health-Related Quality of Life among Hospital Outpatients in South Africa. Alcohol Alcohol, 47, 291-295. 27. Peters, T. J., Millward, L. M., & Foster, J. (2003). Quality of life in alcohol misuse: comparison of men and women. Arch.WomensMent.Health, 6, 239-243. 28. Pettinati, H. M., Gastfriend, D. R., Dong, Q., Kranzler, H. R., and O'Malley, S. S. Effect of extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) on quality of life in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Clin.Exp.Res. 33(2), 350-356. 2009 29. Polak, K. (2001). [The evaluation of the quality of life among professional soldiers with diagnosed alcohol addiction syndrome]. Psychiatr.Pol., 35, 1057-1070. 30. Ponizovsky, A. M. (2008). Clinical and psychosocial factors associated with quality of life in alcohol-dependent men with erectile dysfunction. J.Sex Med., 5, 2347-2358. 31. Saarni, S. I., Joutsenniemi, K., Koskinen, S., Suvisaari, J., Pirkola, S., Sintonen, H., Poikolainen, K., and Lonnqvist, J. Alcohol consumption, abstaining, health utility, and quality of life--a general population survey in Finland. Alcohol Alcohol 43(3), 376-386. 2008 32. Saatcioglu, O., Yapici, A., &Cakmak, D. (2008). Quality of life, depression and anxiety in alcohol dependence. Drug Alcohol Rev., 27, 83-90. 33. Stade, B. C., Stevens, B., Ungar, W. J., Beyene, J., and Koren, G. Health-related quality of life of Canadian children and youth prenatally exposed to alcohol. Health Qual.Life Outcomes. 4, 81. 2006. 34. Strandberg, A. Y., Strandberg, T. E., Salomaa, V. V., Pitkala, K., and Miettinen, T. A. Alcohol consumption, 29-y total mortality, and quality of life in men in old age. Am.J.Clin.Nutr. 80(5), 1366-1371. 2004. 35. Tang, W. K., Lum, C. M., Ungvari, G. S., and Chiu, H. F. Alcohol consumption, lung function, and quality of life in pneumoconiosis. Alcohol Clin.Exp.Res. 29(7), 1230-1236. 2005. 36. Saito, I., Okamura, T., Fukuhara, S., Tanaka, T., Suzukamo, Y., Okayama, A., and Ueshima, H. A cross-sectional study of alcohol drinking and health-related quality of life among male workers in Japan. J.Occup.Health 47(6), 496-503. 2005. 37. Volk, R. J., Cantor, S. B., Steinbauer, J. R., & Cass, A. R. (1997). Alcohol use disorders, consumption patterns, and health-related quality of life of primary care patients. Alcohol Clin.Exp.Res., 21, 899-905.

Acknowledgement: Shri K.shethra Dharmasthala Rural Development Programme and Dr.A.VBaliga

Memorial Hospital, Doddanagudde, Udupi District, Karnataka.

iJARS/ Vol. I/Issue III/Dec, 2012/277 http://www.ijars.in

15