StockCentral Investor Education Library

www.stockcentral.com

Electronic Data:
Different Sources, Different Numbers, All Correct
by Ellis Traub
February 2008

Published by:
ICLUBcentral Inc.
1430 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-491-3300
www.iclub.com
StockCentral.com is an online
community that provides high-
quality data, insightful
discussion, and intuitive
software for the people who
need it most -- individual
investors. Whether you’re
managing your own portfolio,
running an investment club, or
helping to educate your fellow
investors, StockCentral gives
you the exclusive web-based
tools and support you need:
Community
Gain insight through peer
discussion and workshops led by
industry experts in our message About the Author
board forums.
Data Ellis Traub, renowned financial author and public
Examine historical data and speaker, is one of the most respected names in
detailed financial reports using the world of fundamental investing. After
the StockCentral Data Service, embracing the methodology behind qualitative
provided by Morningstar Inc. growth analysis, he was able to turn his financial
(used by Yahoo! Finance and life around and has since devoted himself to
Forbes).
helping educate other investors.
Screening & Analysis
Identify winners for your Ellis is also the author of the popular book Take
portfolio with the StockCentral Stock and its companion software, as well as the
Screener and then generate an original developer of the Investor’s Toolkit line of
Instant Stock Analysis with Take legacy stock analysis desktop software programs.
Stock Online. His company, Inve$tware Corp., merged with
Plus, you’ll have instant access ICLUBcentral in 2003. ICLUBcentral’s online
to other smart features like an investing community at StockCentral.com
investing Event Calendar, Doug features an online version of Ellis’ original Take
Gerlach’s Blog, an Investing Stock “Instant Stock Analysis” software.
Book Store, Member Discounts,
and much more! Now retired, Ellis lives with his wife in Davie,
Florida and maintains an active speaking schedule
Start your free full-featured and online education presence.
trial today at
www.stockcentral.com
 Electronic Data:
Different Sources, Different Numbers, All Correct
Ellis Traub

Today, investors using ICLUBcentral’s Investor’s Toolkit, Stock Analysis Plus, or Classic
software to analyze and select their stocks have their choice of three sources of electronic
data with which to work: NAIC’s OPS/SDS data, provided by S&P Compustat;
StockCentral’s data, provided by Hemscott; and AAII’s Stock Investor Pro data, provided
by Reuters.
These data sources also provide the data for ICLUBcentral’s desktop versions of Take
$tock (Compustat), Stock Central’s on-line version of Take $tock (Hemscott), software
products neither of which offers a choice of data sources. And their data is used in the
production of both of StockCentral’s services which provide investors with a list of
stocks suitable for consideration: the Complete Roster of Quality Companies
(Compustat), and the on-line Screener (Hemscott).
The first such data was provided by NAIC Computer Group director, Bill Thomas who,
with his wife, Rosemary, would manually type the data for 1,000 stocks from the Value
Line pages into data files that could be used in the software. There were relatively few
problems at that time because NAIC investors were accustomed to using Value Line and
appreciated not having to enter it into the software manually. There was nothing else to
compare it with, and the number of software products that could make use of it was
limited. Those files may have contained around 100 data items and were expected to
provide only the data required to fill out a Stock Selection Guide (SSG).
However, as time has passed, the number of software products using the data has grown
as has the variety of information they use. And, electronic data has become more
prevalent and competitive. The result of this increase in sources and products has caused
considerable confusion because the user can now compare the results using one source of
data with those of another. And, the results are often different—in some cases radically
different.
How can this be? If the data reported by companies is as strictly regulated as it seems to
be, and if the SEC is as demanding as we would hope them to be, shouldn’t the numbers
all be the same? And, therefore, shouldn’t the results be as well?
The answer is that the “strict” regulation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB), the body that sets the standards for accountants and analysts with respect to
reporting financial results, provides considerable latitude in the manner in which data is
reported. And there is considerable room for interpretation between the strict boundaries
they set.
Compounding that opportunity for differences is the fact that each data provider has a
slightly different profile for its typical client; and these clients run the gamut from the
accounting profession (which is concerned with historical accuracy) to the financial
analysts (whose concern is forecasting the future). Where the provider who serves
primarily the former will diligently include every financial event in the final report, those
serving the latter will work hard to exclude from the mainstream reporting those values
that are not likely to recur on a regular basis in the future. The former type of client wants
to see what actually happened, while the latter is more interested in pro forma figures.
There are also differences of opinion, from provider to provider, as to what data should
and should not be considered likely to recur. And, there are also differences in which line
items from the income statement or balance sheet should comprise revenues or which
should be mapped to extraordinary or non-recurring items—each requiring different
handling according to FASB rules.
As if that isn’t enough, the data providers do not produce the files that are used by the
ultimate user. Those entities, BI, StockCentral, and AAII, have the responsibility for
selecting the required data from the huge databases to which the providers give them
access. And it is they who ultimately decide which of the data should appear in the SSG
files, or the limited databases from which screening is performed.
While there is room for error at each of these levels, most of the data we get is correct,
even when it differs from its competitor’s data. However, as you will learn, it isn’t all
correct; and not all of it is even reliable. It is therefore prudent to be alert for both the raw
data, and the results derived from that data, that stand out and appear questionable. We
strongly recommend that due diligence be exercised in all such cases and the data
challenged rather than blindly accepted at face value.
With the assistance of Joe Craig, Jim Thomas, and Dave Forgianni, we have made a
rather comprehensive study of the data from all three sources; and my purpose in writing
this report is to share with you the results of that study.
I must also thank the representatives of all three data providers: Don Barsody of
Compustat, Magdalena McMahon at Hemscott; and Greg Sedgwick of Reuters, all of
whom went out of their way to be helpful and forthcoming. Some of what we have
learned has been surprising; all of it enlightening.
The Companies
What first aroused our interest, and then provided the keen motivation for doing this
study was the fact that the Complete Roster of Quality Companies (CRQC), using the
Compustat data, differed so radically from the result using the StockCentral Screener to
generate a list of companies that were either desirable or at least acceptable. What was so
vastly different was the Quality Index (QI), a metric used in both cases to score the
quality of a company on a scale from 1 to 10.
Being certain that the algorithms in each of the screening processes was the same—one,
in fact, copied directly from the other—it could mean only that the data that produced the
QI differed sufficiently to alter the result.
Since the data items that were used to produce that index were the most significant items
in our data files, and since the calculations used to make up the components of the QI
would tend to magnify any differences in the actual data points, we determined that a
good sample of data to use for the study would be the data for those companies that were
included in either the CRQC or the StockCentral Screening product.
Typically, there would be upwards of 120 companies in either group. However,
combining the two lists, we found differences sufficient to make the list grow to more

Page 2
than 160 companies. This meant that approximately 40 companies made each list that did
not appear on the other! Another way to view this was that fully a third of the companies
on one list did not make the cut for the other. They were too small, too young,
unavailable, or the data used in the calculation of the QI was sufficiently different to
produce a poor result in one instance and a good result in the other.
This was a serious concern as it would undermine any normal user’s confidence in these
products, in the validity of those lists, and ultimately in the quality of the data that was
used for those lists. And, it was difficult to overcome a bias, since the BI data had been
used for so long by so many—having replaced the Value Line data as the “gold standard”
for most users. Thus, the StockCentral data, as the “new kid on the block,” would likely
be viewed as the data most flawed.
It was necessary, therefore, to come up with a valid, unbiased, and completely objective
way to measure the quality of each data source. This is the result of that effort.
Basis for Comparison
There are three basic areas where the data may differ:
• Static Data – Data that is reported by the company with little or no
opportunity for changes to be made by the provider. This includes such
items as revenues, pre-tax profit, and balance sheet items. The differences
that can occur in the static data include:
‚ accuracy – typos, etc.
‚ quantity of data – the number of years, quarters reported
‚ whether or not the data is restated or reclassified
‚ “freshness” – how long before it reaches the user
‚ interpretation or definition of items – as an example, whether or
not consolidated income statements should include, as their own,
revenues from companies a majority of whose stock they own, or
just show the equity in that company as an asset.
‚ currency reported – some ADRs are reported by some providers in
the native currency, others consistently report in US Dollars.
• Dynamic Data – Data whose inclusion is at the discretion of the
distributor, such as data from discontinued operations, extraordinary data,
number of shares applied for dilution, etc. Such choices, made by BI,
ICLUBcentral, or AAII, as to which line items should comprise the data
presented in the files, are applied consistently in each data product but
may differ from product to product and can often be found by examining
the expanded data of each.
• Subjective Data – Data about which the providers’ analysts’ opinions
may differ as to which line items are non-recurring (infrequent or
unusual), which are extraordinary (infrequent and unusual), and how that
data affects pre-tax profit, net available to the shareholders, and ultimately
earnings per share. These are usually applied consistently by each
electronic data provider but may differ between them and can also be
spotted by examining the expanded data of each.

Page 3
The data files we use have a common layout. That is to say, the SSG file for each
company consists of 537 individual data items or fields, listed in the same order (See
Exhibit A). For example, the first ten fields of each file contain ten years of high prices
beginning with the oldest and ending with the most recent year. The second ten fields
contain ten years of the lowest prices in the same order.
The original files contained, perhaps, 100+ fields, since they were required to provide the
data for the SSG alone. Now, with more products doing more things such as portfolio
management and balance sheet analysis, the number and variety of data items that
comprise these files has grown to where it is today. So there is a great deal more
opportunity for data differences to occur.
We have concerned ourselves with only the data that is significant for arriving at a
conclusion about the quality of a company as defined by our common methodology, since
this is the most important determination we make. When George Nicholson bestowed
upon us his wonderful gift—this simple approach for analyzing companies—the criteria
he proposed evaluating were essentially the strength and stability of the growth of sales,
pre-tax profit, and earnings per share, and the trend in profit margins and return on
equity. This was based upon the important distinction he made between the need to study
just the results a company’s management achieved, versus the common, intimidating
misconception that one had to also look at all of the tools management used to achieve
those results. This makes our job much easier.
As it happens, the Quality Index, a metric produced by the Take $tock software,
evaluates just those items. We have therefore focused on differences in the Quality Index
produced by the various data sources to unearth the differences in data we have analyzed.
And, we have selected for our sample only those companies surviving screening by both
the engine producing the “Complete Roster of Quality Companies” from BI’s data, and
those surviving screening by StockCentral’s “Screener” which produced either a
satisfactory or a desirable Quality Index.
Note that we have not attempted to fine-tune those differences beyond the basic
categories: desirable (green), acceptable (yellow), unacceptable (red), or not available
(black). The last category includes data that is not included in the database, data that
indicates that a company is too small or too young to be of interest, and companies that
might be in the database but which are identified by different ticker symbols.
And, we have not considered as “different” basic data items whose values depart from
those of their counterparts by less than 5 percent.
The Method
At first, we simply imported the data files from BI, StockCentral, and AAII into a
spreadsheet, side-by-side and visually inspected them, highlighting those fields that
differed from one or the other, or both by more than 5 percent. It soon became apparent
that the time we would consume in visually analyzing all the differences for 160
companies would be interminable, and that the differences were greatly magnified
because of the timing. Because we used the data from around the time that most
companies were reporting the end of their fiscal years, there were too many differences

Page 4
caused by the fact that some companies had already reported new data, and others had
not.
While we waited for the providers to catch up with each other, we built a mechanism
using Microsoft’s Excel that passes each provider’s data through an identical process by
which the Quality Index is calculated, detects and measures all of the comparative
parameters, and produces a grade for each data file for each company. It then weighs and
aggregates the results, and produces a grade for each provider. And it points to most of
the anomalies in each file so we can reasonably quickly answer the question, “Which was
incorrect and why?” And a new data sample can be entered and the run completed in
about an hour.
The files are graded on the following parameters:
Quantity and Timeliness of Data
Number of Data Years – Ideally, the user would have ten years of data to work
with. Some companies have not reported that many years. Providers are graded
according to the number of years below the maximum reported by any provider.
Freshness of Data (Annual) – Some differences between data results arise due to
the difference in policy regarding the speed with which the data is published.
Providers lose points when their data is a year behind the timeliest.
Freshness of Data (Quarterly) – Essentially the same as annual data except
points are taken for each quarter behind. Preliminary data is rewarded; but the
provider is penalized when preliminary data is not complete.
Peer Agreement (Raw Data)
Sales Each provider’s data is compared with
Pretax Profit the data from the other two sources. The
Earnings per Share number of data points that differ by more
than 5 percent from either of their peers
are counted against each. When all agree,
each receives a 10.
Peer Agreement (Derived and Calculated Data)
EPS R-Squared (7-yr.) The items that comprise the Quality
Relevant Historical Sales Growth portion of Take $tock are roughly
Relevant Historical EPS Growth compared. Using certain thresholds, each
Recent (TTM) Sales Growth is assigned a color identifying it as
Recent (TTM) EPS Growth “Desirable,” “Acceptable,”
Profit Margin Trends “Unacceptable,” or “Other” (missing, too
Return on Equity Strength young, or too small). Each is compared
with the best of the three results and is
penalized 5 points for each color step it is
away from the highest.
Overall Grade
Each of the above parameters is weighted and combined into a final grade.

Page 5
Overall Grade
Each of the above parameters is weighted and combined into a final grade.
The accompanying exhibits should be self-explanatory after reading what has been
explained above:

Exhibit A: File layout for SSG files

Exhibit B: Matrix produced by the grading process. The columns are as follows:

1) Ticker Symbol 13) (3) S, B, R – Data Years

2) Company Name 14) (3) S, B, R – Freshness (Annual)
3) Exchange 15) (3) S, B, R – Freshness (Quarterly)
4) Industry 16) (3) S, B, R – Peer Agreement (Sales)
5) Market Sector 17) (3) S, B, R – Peer Agreement (PTP)
6) CUSIP – Industry Code 18) (3) S, B, R – Peer Agreement (EPS)
7) URL – Company’s home page 19) (3) S, B, R – EPS R2
8) StockCentral Screening QI Results 20) (3) S, B, R – Sales Growth - 10yr.
9) Complete Roster Quality Rating 21) (3) S, B, R – EPS Growth – 10yr.
10) (3) S, B, R - QI from spreadsheet 22) (3) S, B, R – Sales Growth (TTM)
calculation 23) (3) S, B, R – EPS Growth (TTM)
11) Criteria –ranking by QI Peer Agreement 24) (3) S, B, R - Profit Margins
12) (3) S, B, R – Overall Score 25) (3) S, B, R – Return on Equity
Note: “S” = Stock Central Data (Hemscott); “B” = BI Data (Compustat); “R” = AAII Data (Reuters)
Exhibit C: “Scorecard” for August 31 Run (Sept 15 Report)
Exhibit D: Discrepancy types and telltale fields with examples. [Note: Several such
pages have been included with this report to illustrate the information that we refer to;
however, a more comprehensive Exhibit D will follow at a later date as a separate report.
It has taken much too long for this to be made available and we do not wish to delay its
release any longer. ET]

Page 6
 Exhibit A: SSG File Layout

Field # Data Field # Data Field # Data

1 - 10 High Price (Oldest Year) 139 Projected Outstanding Shares 238 Exchange
11 - 20 Low Price (Oldest Year) 140 Prefferred Procedure E/S 239 Data Source
21 - 30 Sales (Oldest Year) 141 Visual E/S Estimate 240 Date of Data Creation
31 - 40 Tax Rate (Oldest Year) 142 Last CY Trend E/S 241 Reserved
41 - 50 PreTax Inc (Oldest Year) 143 Historic Sales Growth 242 Code
51 - 60 Net Income (Oldest Year) 144 Average ROE 243 Reserved
61 - 70 Book Value (Oldest Year) 145 Low Price Estimate 244 Industry
71 - 80 Earnings per Share (Primary)(Oldest) 146 Average Price Estimate 245 Split Ratio During Quarter
81 - 90 Dividend per Share (Oldest Year) 147 Sell Level Price 246 - 254 Reserved
91 Current Price 148 Projected Dividend Payout % 255 Latest Quarter Ending Date
92 Current P/E 149 Previous E/S 256 Date Last FY Ended
93 Current Dividend 150 New E/S Estimate 257 - 269 Reserved
94 Last Year of data 151 Projected High Price 270 Month of Latest Quarterly Data
95 Number of Data Years Used 152 Recent Cash on Hand 271 Year of Latest Quarterly Data
96 52 Week High Price 153 Current Accounts Receivables 272 - 275 Reserved
97 52 Week Low Price 154 Current Inventories 276 Software Version
98 Number of Common Shares Outstanding 155 Current Assets 277 - 278 Reserved
99 Number of Authorized Common Shares 156 Short Term Debt (Sum Last 4 Qtrs) 279 SIC Code
100 Number of Preferred Shares Outstanding 157 Current Liabilities 280 S & P Stock Rank
101 Number of Authorized Preferred Shares 158 Year Ago Current Cash 281 Financial Strength VL
102 Total Debt 159 Year Ago Accounts Receivables 282 Safety VL
103 Potential Dilution 160 Year Ago Inventories 283 - 285 Reserved
104 Latest Quarterly sales 161 Year Ago Current assets 286 Beta
105 Year Ago Quarterly sales 162 Year Ago Debt 287 - 314 Reserved
106 Latest Quarterly E/S 163 Year Ago Current liabilities 315 - 322 Quarterly Pre-Tax Income (Oldest)
107 Year Ago Quarterly E/S 164 Total Capitalization 323 - 330 Quarterly Net Income (Oldest)
108 Last CY of data +5 165 - 174 Long Term Debt (Oldest) 331 Last Monthly Closing Price Date
109 Outside E/S Estimate 175 - 184 Number shares outstanding (Oldest) 332 - 346 Reserved
110 Choice Low Price (5-Year Average Low) 185 - 194 Cash flow/share (Oldest) 347 E/S in 5 Yrs. Based on Ace Proj Growth Rate
111 Choice High PE 195 Total Assets 348 - 349 Reserved
112 Choice Low PE 196 Interest Coverage % 350 S&P Rating
113 High Yield 197 Total Return 351 - 353 Reserved
114 - 123 Add/Delete flag 198 Projected E/S Growth 354 Current Yield
124 Low E/S Estimate 199 Severe Low Price 355 Reserved
125 Quarterly E/S Growth 200 R Squared 356 Historical 5 Yr. Sales Growth Rate
126 Projected E/S Growth 201 Reserved 357 Historical 5 Yr E/S Growth R-Squared
127 Quarterly Sales Growth 202 - 209 Quarterly Sales (Oldest) 358 Industry Group
128 Projected Sales Growth 210 - 217 Quarterly E/S (Oldest) 359 - 363 Reserved
129 Current Yield 218 - 225 Quarterly Dividends (Oldest) 364 Next Year E/S estimate
130 Average Yield 226 Inside Ownership 365 Historical 5 Yr. Sales Growth R-Squared
131 Historic E/S Growth 227 Institutional Holdings 366 - 400 Reserved
132 Average PE 228 Reserved 401 Sector - or high level designation
133 U:D ratio 229 ACE 5 Year Estimate E/S Growth Rate 402 - 413 Sales (20 Qtr)
134 5-Year Sales Estimate 230 Predictability 414 - 425 EPS - Primary (20 Qtr)
135 Average Pre-Tax Profit 231 Long-Term Debt 426 - 437 Pretax Income (20 Qtr)
136 Income Tax Rate 232 Fiscal Year End Month 438 - 457 Common Shares Outstanding (20 Qtr)
137 Preferred Dividends 233 - 235 Reserved 458 - 477 Tax Rate Qtrly. (20 Qtr.) (oldest)
138 Projected Liabilities 236 Name 478 - 537 Closing prices (60 mo.) (oldest)
237 Symbol
Note: Greyed fields are primarily those utilized by Toolkit, Stock Analyst+, other products to store transient values. Yellow denotes fields compared in study.
 Exhibit B: Matrix of Companies
Ranked by Quality Index Peer Agreement
Page 1
179 ShowAll Grade It 179 Screene CRQC Overall Scores DataYears Freshness (FY) Freshness(Qtr) Peer Agmt. (Sales) Peer Agmt. (PTP) Peer Agmt. (EPS) EPS R-Sq Rel. Sales Gr. Rel. EPS Gr. TTM Sales Gr. TTM EPS Gr. Profit Mgns ROE
ticker company excimg_dsmgsic web_ Hems OPS HEMS OPSReutersCrit HSD OSD RSD H-DataO-DatR-DatH-Frsh
O-FrshR-FrshH-FQ O-FQ R-FQ H-PA O-PA R-PAH-PTPO-PTPR-PTPH-EPSO-EPSR-EPS H-R2 O-R2 R-R2 H-HS O-HS R-HS H-REPO-RE R-REPH-RSGO-RSG
R-RSGH-REGO-REG
R-REGH-PM O-PM R-PM H-RO O-RO R-ROE
QSII Quality Systems, Inc. M 1036 10 - 7372 http:/ 10 10 10 10 10 1 114 114 116 10 10 10 0 0 0 -3 -3 0 10 10 10 8.5 8.5 8 8.5 8 8.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
WRLD World Acceptance Corp. M 0703 07 - 6141 http:/ 6.8 6.8 10 10 10 1 118 116 117 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 9.5 9 9.5 9.5 9 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CTSH Cognizant Technology Solutions M 1036 10 - 7371 http:/ 10 10 9.5 10 9.5 1 110 110 105 9 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 9.5 9 8.5 8 8.5 8 7.5 6.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
FCFS First Cash Financial Services, M 0963 09 - 5932 http:/ 9.5 10 8.9 9.5 10 1 109 110 105 10 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 -1 8.5 8.5 8 7.5 7.5 7 7.5 8 7.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
MCO Moody'S Corporation N -0909 09 - 7323 http:/ 10 10 9.5 9.5 9.5 1 108 108 106 7 8.5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 7 8 8 7 7.5 7.5 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SBUX Starbucks Corporation M 0942 09 - 5812 http:/ 10 10 9.5 9.5 8.4 1 116 115 116 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 8.5 8 8.5 7.5 7 7.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
COH Coach, Inc. N -0403 04 - 3171 http:/ 9.5 9.5 8.9 8.9 9.5 1 102 104 106 7 8.25 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 7 6.5 5.5 6 4 5.5 5.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
EWBC East West Bancorp, Inc. M 0727 07 - 6712 http:/ 9.5 9.5 8.9 8.9 8.9 1 113 114 111 8 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7 7 9 9 8 9 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
INFY Infosys Technologies Limited M 1036 10 - 7371 http:/ 9.5 9.5 8.9 8.9 8.9 1 112 112 111 8 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 8 8 7 7 8.5 8 7.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
DNA Genentech, Inc. N -0803 08 - 2834 http:/ 10 3.2 9.5 8.4 9.5 1 106 105 103 9 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.5 8 5.5 5.5 4.5 5 4.5 3 4.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries M 0803 08 - 2833 http:/ 9.5 8.9 9.5 8.4 9.5 1 112 111 108 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 6.5 6.5 8 7 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
WLP Wellpoint, Inc. N -0706 07 - 6324 http:/ 9.5 8.9 9.5 8.4 8.4 1 97.5 98.3 101 6 7.25 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 6 5 5.5 5.5 5 5.5 5.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
DHR Danaher Corporation N -1030 10 - 3823 http:/ 6.8 8.9 6.8 8.4 6.8 1 107 102 106 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9.5 9.5 8 7.5 8.5 9 8 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
WIT Wipro Limited N -1018 10 - 7379 http:/ 8.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.4 1 87.5 96.8 98.5 7 8.75 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 3.5 3 3.5 4.5 0 3.5 3.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
MBT Mobile Telesystems Ojsc N -0915 09 - 4899 http:/ 6.8 7.9 6.8 7.4 6.8 1 98.5 93 98.5 7 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.5 7.5 7 4.5 3.5 3 7.5 7.5 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. N -0945 09 - 5651 http:/ 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 1 118 117 117 10 10 10 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 8.5 8.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ASFI Asta Funding, Inc. M 0721 07 - 6153 http:/ 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 1 113 112 111 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 9 9.5 9.5 8 8 8 7.5 7.5 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
HANS Hansen Natural Corporation M 0506 05 - 2086 http:/ 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 1 114 116 113 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 8 9 9 10 10 10 8.5 8.5 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
PETS Petmed Express, Inc. M 0954 09 - 5912 http:/ 3.2 5.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 1 99.5 96.5 100 8 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 7 5 5 5 5 5.5 5.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
GPN Global Payments Inc. N -0909 09 - 7389 http:/ 8.9 9.5 6.8 8.9 6.3 2 90.5 84.3 86.5 7 8.25 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 7 3.5 1 2.5 6 6 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
CHL China Mobile Ltd. N -0915 09 - 4812 http:/ 8.4 7.9 7.9 7.9 6.3 2 80.5 92 82.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0.5 4.5 5 4 6.5 6.5 2 4 5 5 5 0 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
AMX America Movil S.A.B De C.V. N -0915 09 - 4812 http:/ 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 3.2 3 84 90.5 86.5 6 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 5 4.5 1.5 2 2.5 1 3.5 3.5 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
LOGI Logitech International Sa M 1015 10 - 3577 http:/ 8.9 6.8 8.9 6.8 3.2 3 95.5 92 84.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 -3 -3 10 10 10 7 6 7 7.5 7.5 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
JOSB Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. M 0945 09 - 5611 http:/ 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 2.6 3 108 107 94 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
ARG Airgas, Inc. N -0103 01 - 5169 http:/ 6.3 6.3 5.8 6.3 6.3 6 102 106 106 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 6 6.5 5.5 7 6 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
BBY Best Buy Co., Inc. N -0966 09 - 5731 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6 117 118 117 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9.5 9.5 9 9.5 9.5 8.5 9 8.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
BFAM Bright Horizons Family Solutio M 0924 09 - 8351 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6 112 114 112 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CHRW C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. M 1109 11 - 4731 http:/ 6.8 6.8 6.3 6.3 6.3 6 116 118 118 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 8 8.5 8.5 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SYK Stryker Corporation N -0812 08 - 3842 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6 116 116 117 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 8 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.5 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
HUM Humana Inc. N -0706 07 - 6321 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 5.8 6 105 106 102 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 5.5 5.5 6 4.5 5 5.5 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
BAC Bank Of America Corporation N -0724 07 - 6712 http:/ 6.3 5.3 6.3 5.8 6.3 6 109 106 111 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9.5 9.5 8 9 9 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
KSS Kohl'S Corporation N -0951 09 - 5311 http:/ 6.3 5.8 6.3 5.8 6.3 6 113 110 114 10 10 10 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SPLS Staples, Inc. M 0963 09 - 5943 http:/ 6.3 5.8 6.3 5.8 6.3 6 105 99.5 106 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 9 9.5 9.5 8 7.5 7.5 5.5 4.5 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ECL Ecolab Inc. N -0521 05 - 2841 http:/ 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 6 114 117 117 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 5 7.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
IDXX Idexx Laboratories, Inc. M 0803 08 - 2835 http:/ 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 6 113 112 110 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 8.5 8 7.5 7 6 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
JEF Jefferies Group, Inc. N -0718 07 - 6211 http:/ 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 6 105 106 107 9 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8.5 8.5 6.5 5 6.5 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
WAG Walgreen Company N -0954 09 - 5912 http:/ 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 6 120 120 120 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
TGT Target Corporation N -0951 09 - 5331 http:/ 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 6 108 111 105 10 10 10 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 8 9 9 8.5 8.5 9 7 8.5 7.5 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
UTX United Technologies Corporatio N -0303 03 - 3585 http:/ 5.3 5.8 5.3 5.8 5.3 6 98.5 92 97.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 9 4 1.5 3.5 5.5 5 6.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
BBBY Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. M 0963 09 - 5719 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 6 120 120 120 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CTAS Cintas Corporation M 0924 09 - 7219 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 6 117 119 119 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9.5 9.5 9 9.5 9.5 9 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
FDX Fedex Corporation N -1103 11 - 4513 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 6 118 115 118 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 8.5 7 8.5 9 8 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
GD General Dynamics Corporation N -0203 02 - 3795 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 6 113 116 116 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 9 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
NKE Nike, Inc. N -0418 04 - 3021 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 6 117 117 116 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 9.5 9 9.5 8.5 8.5 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
TM Toyota Motor Corporation N -0412 04 - 3711 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 6 102 111 105 10 10 10 0 0 0 -3 0 -3 5 7.5 7.5 4.5 6 3.5 5 7 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
WMT Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. N -0951 09 - 5311 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 6 116 117 117 10 10 10 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 8 9 9 8.5 7.5 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
BRO Brown & Brown, Inc. N -0712 07 - 6411 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.7 6 100 108 103 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 8 7 8.5 8.5 6 8 8 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
JEC Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. N -0215 02 - 1611 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 3.2 7 110 111 107 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 8.5 8.5 9 6.5 7.5 8 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
LM Legg Mason, Inc. N -0718 07 - 6211 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 3.2 7 88 92 70 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 9 8 9 9 6 7.5 5.5 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10
SAP Sap Ag N -1036 10 - 7372 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 3.2 7 80.5 87 75 10 9.5 10 0 0 0 0 -1 0 2 6 6 4 6.5 6.5 1.5 5 4.5 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
LUX Luxottica Group S.P.A. N -0812 08 - 3851 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 2.6 7 76.5 87 67.5 10 10 9 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 2 6 6 3.5 6 6.5 2 6 6 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
MCRS Micros Systems, Inc. M 1036 10 - 7372 http:/ 5.8 6.3 6.3 1.6 7 90 92.3 69 10 9.25 10 0 0 -1 0 0 -1 9 9.5 9.5 6.5 8 7.5 7 7 7 5 5 0 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
KEX Kirby Corporation N -1118 11 - 4449 http:/ 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 3.2 7 107 110 106 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 8.5 8.5 5.5 7 7.5 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
TLK Pt Telekomunikasi Indonesia N -0915 09 - 4813 http:/ 6.3 5.8 6.3 5.8 3.2 7 87.5 83.5 89 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 -1 0 3.5 6 6.5 3.5 2 4.5 1.5 3.5 4 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
BDX Becton, Dickinson And Co. N -0812 08 - 3841 http:/ 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 3.2 7 103 99 90 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 5 7 6 5.5 4.5 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
WFC Wells Fargo & Company N -0724 07 - 6021 https 4.7 5.3 4.7 5.3 3.2 7 98.5 101 101 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 8 6 6.5 6.5 7 7 7 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
TJX Tjx Companies, Inc., The N -0945 09 - 5651 http:/ 5.8 5.3 5.8 5.3 2.6 7 101 94.5 88 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 10 10 10 9.5 9 9.5 7 7.5 7.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
RBA Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers N -0963 09 - 5999 http:/ 5.8 2.6 3.2 6.3 10 81.5 86 84.5 9 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 7 8.5 8 8.5 7 6 6 0 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. M 0812 08 - 5047 http:/ 5.8 3.2 3.2 5.3 10 98.5 93.5 94 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 8 9 9 6 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10
ACH Aluminum Corp. Of China Limite N -0124 01 - 3334 http:/ 8.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 11 79 82.8 85 5 6.75 9 -1 0 0 -2 0 0 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 1.5 1 0.5 0.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ESI Itt Educational Services, Inc. N -0969 09 - 8249 http:/ 6.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 11 120 120 120 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
NTES Netease.Com, Inc. M 1018 10 - 7375 http:/ 6.8 6.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 11 81 79.8 84.5 7 8.25 9 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 1.5 3 3.5 3 2 3 1 2.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
NTRI Nutrisystem Inc. M 0924 09 - 7299 http:/ 6.8 3.2 3.2 3.2 11 95.5 94.5 96 7 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 7 7 7 3.5 3 2.5 3 2.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
PRFT Perficient, Inc. M 1018 10 - 7374 http:/ 6.3 6.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 11 95.5 98.5 97 8 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 -1 6.5 7.5 7 4.5 4.5 4 4.5 4.5 4 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
RIO Companhia Vale Do Rio Doce N -0124 01 - 1011 http:/ 8.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 11 88 88.5 90.5 5 8 10 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 2.5 1.5 3 0.5 0.5 0 3.5 3 3.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
FTI Fmc Technologies, Inc. N -0612 06 - 3533 http:/ 6.3 3.2 3.2 2.6 11 71.5 79.5 73 6 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6.5 5.5 2 2.5 3.5 1.5 2.5 3 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
INT World Fuel Services Corporatio 6.3 3.2 3.2 2.6 11 88 95 83 10 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 -1 5 7.5 7.5 3.5 5 5.5 4 5.5 5.5 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CKFR Checkfree Corporation M 1018 10 - 7374 http:/ 5.3 2.1 3.2 2.1 11 77 66.3 60.5 10 9.75 10 0 0 -1 0 0 -1 9 9.5 9.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.5 2.5 3 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
GLYT Genlyte Group Incorporated, Th M 1024 10 - 3641 http:/ 6.3 2.1 3.2 2.1 11 96.5 84.5 98 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 2 1 2 4.5 3.5 6 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
NFLX Netflix, Inc. M 0936 09 - 7841 http:/ 6.8 2.6 3.2 2.1 11 70 67.5 73.5 5 7 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 5 1.5 1 1.5 1 2 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
TRAD Tradestation Group, Inc. M 0718 07 - 6211 http:/ 5.8 3.2 2.6 3.2 11 96.5 93.5 100 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8.5 8.5 5 4 5 4 3.5 4.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
COL Rockwell Collins, Inc. N -0203 02 - 3812 http:/ 5.8 3.2 2.6 2.6 11 85 88.8 86 6 6.75 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 6 6 4.5 4.5 5 4.5 4.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. N -0218 02 - 3569 http:/ 5.3 3.2 2.6 2.6 11 88 104 103 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8.5 8.5 6 8 8 7 8.5 7.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
NGPS Novatel Inc. M 1024 10 - 3699 http:/ 6.3 3.2 2.6 2.6 11 57 67.5 65.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 -2 -3 0 5 5 0.5 0.5 1 0 1.5 1.5 10 10 10 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
ALY Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc. N -0612 06 - 1381 http:/ 6.8 3.2 2.2 3.2 11 83 79.5 81.5 7.5 8.5 6 0 0 0 0 0 -1 6 7 7 1 1 1 2 1.5 1.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
EPAX Ambassadors Group, Inc. M 0924 09 - 4725 http:/ 5.8 3.2 2.1 3.2 11 81 83.5 78.5 5 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.5 6.5 5 6.5 6.5 5 6.5 6.5 5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
GMK Gruma S.A.B. De C.V. N -0515 05 - 2041 http:/ 6.3 3.2 1.6 2.6 11 49.5 51.5 57 9 9 10 0 0 0 -1 0 0 6 7.5 7.5 0.5 0.5 0 2 2 2 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 10 10 10
VDSI Vasco Data Security Internatio M 1036 10 - 7373 http:/ 6.3 3.2 1.1 1.1 11 97 98 100 8 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 7 3 2 3 2.5 2.5 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SNIC Sonic Solutions M 1012 10 - 7373 http:/ 6.8 3.2 2.1 TY 12 81.5 62 81.5 10 10 10 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0 5 0.5 5.5 2 0 2 1.5 0 1.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
KCI Kinetic Concepts, Inc. N -0812 08 - 3842 http:/ 6.3 TY TY TY 16 79.5 77 77.5 3 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.5 5.5 3 4 3.5 2.5 3.5 3.5 2 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
AIB Allied Irish Banks, Plc. 5.8 TY 16 20 -60 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
AMOV 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
BKUNA Bankunited Financial Corporati 8.4 TY 16 20 -55 15 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 5 5 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
BWLRF Breakwater Resources Ltd. O -0118 01 - 1044 http:/ 6.8 TY 16 20 -60 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
CRH Crh Plc N -0215 02 - 1542 http:/ 6.3 6.8 TY 16 20 -60 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
DCI Donaldson Company, Inc. 5.3 TY 16 20 -55 15 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 5 5 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
DVT 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
FMO. 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
FMS.P 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
HCG 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc. N -0430 04 - 3751 http:/ 5.8 5.3 TY 16 20 -55 15 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 5 5 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
HSE. 5.3 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
IGM. 4.7 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
IRE Bank Of Ireland 6.3 TY 16 20 -60 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
MOG.A 5.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
MOG.B 5.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
MOGA 6.3 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
 Exhibit B: Matrix of Companies
Ranked by Quality Index Peer Agreement
Page 2
MX. 6.3 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
PAG Penske Automotive Group, Inc. N -0963 09 - 5511 http:/ 5.8 TY 16 20 -60 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
PKI.U 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
PWF 5.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
SIF.U 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
SJ 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
STN. 10 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
SU. 6.8 16 50 -60 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 -10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10 10 -10 10
TISI Team, Inc. M 0909 09 - 7699 http:/ 6.8 TY 16 20 -60 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 0 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0 5 -10 0
ROP Roper Industries, Inc. N -1030 10 - 3823 http:/ 6.8 6.8 6.3 6.8 6.8 17 102 97 99 10 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 9 8 7.5 8.5 8 8 9 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CVH Coventry Health Care, Inc. N -0706 07 - 6324 http:/ 6.3 6.8 6.3 6.8 6.3 18 112 107 112 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 9.5 9.5 9 9.5 9 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
HIBB Hibbett Sports, Inc. M 0963 09 - 5941 http:/ 6.3 6.8 6.3 6.8 6.3 18 114 110 114 10 10 10 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
UTIW Uti Worldwide Inc. M 1109 11 - 4731 http:/ 6.3 6.8 6.3 6.8 3.2 19 66.5 77.5 70 7 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 3.5 1.5 1.5 2 2.5 4.5 4 5 5 0 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
ARO Aeropostale, Inc. N -0945 09 - 5611 http:/ 6.8 6.3 3.2 6.3 6.8 21 69 76.5 82.5 5 7 9 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 2.5 2.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ACL Alcon, Inc. N -0809 08 - 2834 http:/ 6.3 6.3 3.2 6.3 5.3 22 80.5 81.5 79 5 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 5 4.5 4 4.5 4 3.5 4.5 0 0 0 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
OMC Omnicom Group Inc. N -0903 09 - 7311 http:/ 5.8 3.2 5.8 5.8 22 97.5 103 105 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9.5 9.5 4.5 1.5 3 5 7.5 7.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
STT State Street Corporation N -0727 07 - 6712 http:/ 5.8 2.6 5.8 5.8 22 94.5 102 104 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7.5 8.5 8.5 7.5 8 8 7 7 0 5 5 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
PG Procter & Gamble Company, The N -0521 05 - 2841 http:/ 5.3 3.2 5.3 5.3 22 87.5 97.5 91 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 7.5 7 5.5 5 5.5 4.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SNV Synovus Financial Corp. N -0727 07 - 6712 http:/ 5.3 3.2 5.3 5.3 22 104 107 108 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.5 7.5 6 7.5 4 6.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10
KNX Knight Transportation N -1115 11 - 4213 http:/ 6.3 3.2 6.3 3.2 23 114 108 114 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 9.5 9 9.5 9.5 9 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
MEOH Methanex Corporation M 0103 01 - 2869 http:/ 6.3 3.2 6.3 3.2 23 104 96 104 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
MIDD Middleby Corporation, The M 0218 02 - 3589 http:/ 6.3 6.3 3.2 6.3 3.2 23 92 92.5 95.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 10 10 10 7 7 6 0 2.5 2.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CERN Cerner Corporation M 1012 10 - 7373 http:/ 6.3 3.2 6.3 2.6 23 100 92 93 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 8 6.5 4.5 6 5.5 4 5.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ABAX Abaxis, Inc. M 0803 08 - 2835 http:/ 5.3 2.1 6.3 2.1 23 87.5 71 89.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 -3 -3 0 10 10 10 5.5 5 5.5 3.5 3 3.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10
PPDI Pharmaceutical Product Develop M 0803 08 - 8731 http:/ 5.8 3.2 5.8 3.2 23 89.5 93 80.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 7 8.5 8.5 8 8.5 7.5 4.5 6 5.5 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
RESP Respironics, Inc. M 0812 08 - 3842 http:/ 5.8 2.1 5.8 3.2 23 53.5 62.5 65 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 6 5.5 3 5.5 3.5 2 3.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 10 10 10 0 5 5
IIVI Ii-Vi, Inc. M 1030 10 - 3827 http:/ 5.3 1.6 5.8 2.6 23 71.5 60.8 72.5 10 9.75 10 -1 0 -1 -1 0 -1 9.5 9 9.5 8 7 8 6.5 6 7.5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 0
AZN Astrazeneca Plc N -0809 08 - 2834 http:/ 5.3 2.6 5.3 3.2 23 71 79 79 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8.5 8.5 5 7.5 7.5 0 4 4 0 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
MDT Medtronic, Inc. N -0812 08 - 3845 http:/ 5.3 2.1 5.3 2.6 23 94 85.5 99.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 -3 0 9 9.5 9.5 7 7 7 9 8 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 0 5 5 10 10 10
ORLY O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. M 0963 09 - 5531 http:/ 5.3 2.6 5.3 2.6 23 110 99 110 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 9.5 9 9.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
UNFI United Natural Foods,Inc. M 0515 05 - 5141 http:/ 4.7 2.6 5.3 2.6 23 88 66 88 10 10 10 -1 0 -1 -1 0 -1 9 9 9 5.5 4.5 6 6.5 3.5 6 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
PDX Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc. N -0806 08 - 8069 http:/ 5.8 5.3 3.2 5.3 2.1 23 87.5 82 75.5 10 10 10 0 0 -1 0 0 -1 9 9 9 7.5 7.5 7 8.5 8.5 9 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
RL Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation N -0403 04 - 5137 http:/ 4.7 3.2 4.7 3.2 23 105 92.5 107 10 10 10 0 0 0 -3 -3 0 10 10 10 9.5 8 8.5 8 7.5 8.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation M 0963 09 - 5399 http:/ 4.7 2.6 4.7 2.6 23 104 94.5 104 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -0.3 10 10 10 7.5 8 8.5 8 8 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
RPM Rpm International Inc. N -0103 01 - 2851 http:/ 4.7 2.6 4.7 2.6 23 107 95 106 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 9 9 9 9 8 9 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SEIC Sei Investments Company M 0718 07 - 6282 http:/ 6.3 3.2 6.3 TY 24 106 95 104 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 8.5 8 8.5 8 8.5 7.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 5 0 5 10 10 10
ARD Arena Resources, Inc. N -0609 06 - 1311 http:/ 6.8 TY 3.2 TY 28 86.5 91.5 88 4 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 -1 5 5 4 4.5 4 3.5 2 3 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
BBL Bhp Billiton Plc N -0124 01 - 1099 http:/ 6.8 TY/TS 3.2 28 13 14 42 0 5 7 -2 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 5
BNS Bank Of Nova Scotia N -0727 07 - 6081 http:/ 5.8 3.2 TY 2.6 31 48 -20 45.5 5 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 3.5 1.5 2 2.5 2 0.5 5 0 5 0 -10 0 0 -10 0 5 -10 5 5 -10 5 10 10 10 5 -10 5
BHP Bhp Billiton Limited N -0124 01 - 1011 http:/ 6.3 3.2 TS 2.6 31 68 43.5 72.5 10 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.5 2.5 2.5 1.5 2 0.5 0 0.5 10 10 10 0 5 5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 -10 5 5 0 5
ALJ Alon Usa Energy, Inc. N -0609 06 - 2911 http:/ 9.5 3.2 TY TY 32 85 81 85 4 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 -1 4 4 4 2 0 2 1.5 0 1.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ITU Banco Itau Holding Financeira N -0727 07 - 6081 http:/ 6.8 3.2 32 12 -35 43 5 7 8 0 0 0 -3 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -10 5 0 -10 5 0 -10 5 0 -10 5 10 10 10 0 -10 5
EGN Energen Corporation N -1206 12 - 4924 http:/ 5.8 5.8 3.2 6.3 34 97.5 99.5 104 10 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9.5 9.5 7.5 8.5 8 7 7 8 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line M 1115 11 - 4213 http:/ 6.3 6.3 3.2 6.3 34 108 96.5 109 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 9.5 9 9.5 9 8.5 9.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
WFMI Whole Foods Market, Inc. M 0957 09 - 5411 http:/ 5.8 5.8 3.2 6.3 34 96 97 96 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 8 9 9 4.5 4.5 5 5.5 5 6.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
AMGN Amgen, Inc. M 0803 08 - 2836 http:/ 6.3 6.3 3.2 5.8 34 102 95.5 96.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 6 6 6 7.5 6 7.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
VAR Varian Medical Systems, Inc. N -0812 08 - 3845 http:/ 5.8 5.8 3.2 5.8 34 98.5 89 98.5 8 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 7 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 7 10 10 10 5 0 5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CHD Church & Dwight Co., Inc. N -0521 05 - 2841 http:/ 6.3 6.3 2.6 5.8 34 97 86 89 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 8 9 9 9 8.5 8.5 7 5.5 6.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
CDWC Cdw Corporation M 0948 09 - 5961 http:/ 4.7 4.7 2.6 4.7 34 105 88.5 104 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 9.5 9 9.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10
TSS Total System Services N -1018 10 - 7374 http:/ 6.3 6.3 1.6 6.3 34 84 62.5 88.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 9 2 5.5 5.5 9 8 9 10 10 10 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 10 10 10
GGB Gerdau S.A. N -0121 01 - 3325 http:/ 6.3 6.3 1.1 6.3 34 88 70.3 90 8 8.25 10 0 0 0 -1 0 -1 7 6.5 6.5 4.5 2.5 5 5.5 3 5.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
FCX Freeport-Mcmoran Copper & Gold N -0124 01 - 1021 http:/ 6.3 6.3 3.2 3.2 35 92.5 95.5 91 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 3 2 1 4 4 1 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
FSRV Firstservice Corporation M 0933 09 - 6531 http:/ 6.3 6.3 3.2 3.2 35 90 96 96 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 7 2.5 1 1.5 4 4.5 4.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
MSFT Microsoft Corporation M 1036 10 - 7372 http:/ 5.8 5.8 3.2 3.2 35 87.5 90 87.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9.5 9.5 6 6.5 6.5 3.5 5 3.5 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 5 0 5 10 10 10
HAR Harman International Industrie N -0409 04 - 3651 http:/ 6.3 6.3 3.2 2.6 35 81.5 85.5 76 10 10 10 0 0 -1 0 0 -1 9 9.5 9.5 7.5 6 7.5 7 6 8 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
FRC First Republic Bank N -0727 07 - 6022 http:/ 5.3 5.8 1.6 2.1 35 64.5 73.5 70 10 10 10 -1 0 0 0 -1 -1 9.5 9.5 9 5 4 3 6.5 5.5 4 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0
OSK Oshkosh Truck Corporation N -0412 04 - 3711 http:/ 7.4 6.8 7.4 6.3 6.8 37 96 98.5 103 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 6.5 7 6.5 6 7 7 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
TZOO Travelzoo Inc. M 1018 10 - 7375 http:/ 8.9 8.4 3.2 7.9 8.4 41 81.5 87 82.5 5 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 -1 6 6 5 3.5 3.5 1 4 3 4 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CEDC Central European Distribution M 0503 05 - 5181 http:/ 6.8 2.6 6.8 6.8 41 75 93 90 9 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 9 9 8 5 5.5 5.5 5.5 7.5 6 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 0 5 5 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
DKS Dick'S Sporting Goods, Inc. N -0963 09 - 5941 http:/ 6.8 6.8 3.2 6.8 6.8 41 84.5 92.5 89 5 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 6 6 5 6 6 5 5.5 5.5 4 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
EXPD Expeditors International Of Wa M 1109 11 - 4731 http:/ 6.8 3.2 6.8 6.3 42 82.5 89 74.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 8 9 9 8.5 8.5 8 7.5 8 6.5 5 5 0 10 10 10 0 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
SCSC Scansource, Inc. M 1015 10 - 5045 http:/ 6.3 2.1 6.8 6.3 42 77.5 93.3 85 10 9.75 10 0 0 -1 0 0 -1 9 9.5 9.5 9 9.5 9.5 8 7 7 10 10 10 5 5 0 0 5 5 10 10 10 0 5 5 0 5 5 10 10 10
FMS Fresenius Medical Care Ag & Co N -0806 08 - 8092 http:/ 6.8 3.2 6.8 5.8 42 87 83 88 9 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 6.5 6.5 5 4.5 4.5 4 5 0 5 10 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
FRGB First Regional Bancorp M 0727 07 - 6712 http:/ 5.8 3.2 6.8 3.2 43 108 104 107 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 9.5 9 9.5 9 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
KMX Carmax, Inc N -0963 09 - 5521 http:/ 6.8 2.6 6.8 3.2 43 87 84.5 90.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8.5 8.5 7 6 7 3 3.5 3.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
NGS Natural Gas Services Group, In A -0612 06 - 3533 http:/ 6.8 2.6 6.8 3.2 43 75.5 74 79.5 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 5.5 5.5 5 4.5 3.5 4 4 3.5 2.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SU Suncor Energy Inc. N -0606 06 - 2911 http:/ 6.8 2.6 6.8 3.2 43 73.8 74.5 71.5 9.75 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2.5 0.5 3 2.5 3.5 0.5 1 0.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
GWR Genesee & Wyoming Inc. N -1112 11 - 4011 http:/ 9.5 2.6 6.8 2.1 43 72 75 63 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 3.5 4.5 5 4.5 5 4.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 0
WOS Wolseley Plc N -0218 02 - 5074 http:/ 6.8 2.6 6.8 TY 44 59 61 65 6 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 3.5 3.5 1 1.5 1.5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
RY Royal Bank Of Canada N -0727 07 - 6029 http:/ 5.3 5.3 3.2 51 64.5 -7 61.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 3 1.5 2.5 2 2 0 10 10 10 0 -10 0 5 -10 5 5 -10 5 5 -10 5 10 10 10 5 -10 5
KNOT Knot, Inc., The M 1018 10 - 7375 http:/ 6.3 6.8 2.6 6.8 53 83 72 83 7 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 8 8 7 1.5 0 1.5 2.5 1 2.5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10
CEO Cnooc Limited N -0609 06 - 1311 http:/ 8.4 8.4 3.2 3.2 55 77 92.3 92.5 6 8.75 10 0 0 0 -2 0 0 1 3.5 3.5 4 4.5 4.5 1 3.5 3.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
FDS Factset Research Systems Inc. N -1018 10 - 7375 http:/ 6.8 6.8 3.2 3.2 55 106 111 109 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9.5 9.5 9 8.5 9.5 9 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10
JST Jinpan International Limited A -1024 10 - 3677 http:/ 6.3 6.8 3.2 3.2 55 79 91 91 9 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0.5 4 4.5 2.5 0.5 2 1.5 5.5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SAY Satyam Computer N -1036 10 - 7371 http:/ 7.4 6.8 3.2 3.2 55 73 77.5 76.5 6 8 10 0 0 0 -3 0 -3 6 6 6 3 2.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4 0 5 5 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
SRCL Stericycle, Inc. M 0975 09 - 4959 http:/ 6.8 6.8 3.2 3.2 55 98 97.5 97.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 7.5 7.5 5 8.5 8 6.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 5 5 10 10 10
STO Statoil Asa N -0606 06 - 1311 http:/ 6.8 6.8 3.2 3.2 55 50.5 60.5 57 6 7 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.5 3.5 1.5 1.5 0 1 2.5 2.5 0 5 5 5 5 0 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
PMTI Palomar Medical Technologies, M 0812 08 - 3841 http:/ 6.3 6.3 6.8 3.2 2.1 55 79.5 82 73 10 9.5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 1 0 1 3.5 3 3.5 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
PRAA Portfolio Recovery Associates, M 0909 09 - 7322 http:/ 6.8 TY 6.8 6.8 57 83 90 87.5 4 6.5 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.5 5.5 4 5.5 5.5 4 4.5 4.5 4 0 5 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
TS Tenaris S.A. N -0209 02 - 3317 http:/ 6.8 TY 6.8 6.3 58 74 75 81.5 4 6.5 10 0 0 0 0 -1 -1 3.5 4.5 3 4 2.5 2.5 3.5 3.5 3 0 5 5 5 0 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
CME Cme Group Inc. N -0718 07 - 6231 http:/ 8.9 TY 8.9 2.6 59 61 73 65 4 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5 3.5 3 4.5 4.5 4 4.5 4.5 4 0 5 5 0 5 5 10 10 10 5 5 0 5 5 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
CACB Cascade Bancorp M 0727 07 - 6712 http:/ 9.5 6.8 8.9 TS 8.9 61 89.5 10 89.5 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.5 1 5.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 -10 5 5 -10 5 5 -10 5 5 -10 5 10 10 10 5 -10 5

#### #### #### 1019 1076 1066 785 1070 935 1565 1035 1480 1355 765 1290 1560 995 1455 1335 705 1300 1610 1140 1595 1685 1150 1635
73.0 100.0 100.0 10.0 6.0 9.0 10.0 5.0 9.0 10.0 6.0 9.0 10.0 5.0 9.0 10.0 7.0 9.0 10.0 6.0 9.0
4.398 5.934 5.09 8.86 5.81 8.34 7.56 4.22 7.14 8.8 5.57 8.22 7.5 3.92 7.38 9.04 6.14 8.89 9.43 6.39 9.13

133.0 135.0 154.0

 Analysis of Electronic Financial Data Sources
Worksheet: MATRIX Study Date: Sep. 15, 2007
Data Date: Jul. 01, 2007 Total companies in run: 179

Companies are selected for study from those surviving screening for Hemscott Compustat Reuters
the Quality Index as defined by Take $tock using both BI and StockCentral. StockCentral BI AAII
Data. Reuters data is then accessed for those companies. Data originated: Aug. 31, 2007 Aug. 31, 2007 Aug. 03, 2007
Companies qualifying for the Roster 118 133 109
Companies found to be "Desirable" 51 61 70
Companies found to be "Acceptable" 67 72 39
Companies found to be "Unacceptable" 29 13 36
Companies found "Too Small," "Too Young," or both 15 5 6
Companies for which symbol was not in database 17 28 28
Total companies for which data was available 162 151 151
Data for three sources utilized by BI, StockCentral investors has been evaluated on the basis of
thirteen parameters and graded on each. The results, conformed to a scale of 1 to 10, appear below:
1) Quantity and Timeliness of Data
Number of Data Years - Ideally, the user would have ten years
of data to work with. Some companies have not reported that
many years. Providers are graded according to the number of
years below the maximum reported by any provider.
Freshness of Data (Fiscal Year) - Some differences between
data results arise due to the difference in policy regarding the
speed with which the data is published. Providers lose points
when their data is a year behind the timeliest.
Freshness of Data (Quarterly) - Essentially same as annual This (7/1) data was sufficiently beyond mid-year
data except points are taken for each quarter behind. Preliminary closings to have shown little difference between
data is rewarded; but the provider is penalized when preliminary providers. Earlier samples show greater disparity.
data Is not complete.
Number of Data Years 7.0 7.0 8.0
Freshness (Fiscal Year) 1.0 1.0 0.0
Freshness (Quarterly) 0.0 0.0 0.0
2) Peer Agreement (Raw Data)
Each provider's data is compared with the data from the other
two sources. The number of data points that differ more than 5%
from either of their peers are counted against each. When all
agree, each receives a 10.
Sales 6.2 6.6 6.5
Pre-tax Profit 5.1 4.9 5.1
Earnings per Share 4.8 4.9 5.0
5) Peer Agreement (Derived and Calculated Data)
The items that comprise the Quality portion of Take $tock are
roughly compared. Using certain thresholds, each is assigned a
color identifying it as "Desirable," "Acceptable," "Unacceptable,"
or "Other" (missing, too young, or too small). Each is compared
with the best of the three results and is penalized 5 points for
each color step it is away from the highest.
EPS R-Squared (7-yr) 4.4 6.0 5.2
Relevant Historical Sales Growth 8.7 5.8 8.3
Relevant Historical EPS Growth 7.6 4.3 7.2
Recent (TTM) Sales Growth 8.7 5.6 8.1
Recent (TTM) EPS Growth 7.5 3.9 7.3
Profit Margin Trends 9.0 6.4 8.9
ROE Strength 9.4 6.4 9.1
6) Overall Grade
Each of the above parameters is weighted and combined into a
final grade. 79.4 62.7 78.7
 1 1 O'REILLY AUTOMOTIVE, INC. ORLY
1 1 0963 - Retail (Specialty Non-Apparel) (09 - Services) 9/23/07
1 1
OPS Hemscott Reuters
## 1

Min. Growth: 7.9% Min. Growth: 7.9% Min. Growth: 7.9%

FY end: Dec 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
OPS 316.4 616.3 754.1 890.4 1,092.1 1,312.5 1,511.8 1,721.2 2,045.3 2,283.2
Sales

Hemscott 316.4 616.3 754.1 890.4 1,092.1 1,312.5 1,511.8 1,721.2 2,045.3 2,283.2
Reuters 316.4 616.3 754.1 890.4 1,092.1 1,312.5 1,511.8 1,721.2 2,045.3 2,283.2
0.00079 0.00079 0.00079
OPS 37.6 49.9 73.0 83.2 106.7 131.0 160.0 187.7 251.1 282.3
PTP

Hemscott 37.4 50.0 73.0 83.1 106.7 131.0 160.1 187.7 251.2 282.2
Reuters 37.6 49.9 73.0 83.2 106.7 131.0 160.0 187.7 251.1 282.3

OPS 0.27 0.36 0.46 0.50 0.63 0.77 0.92 1.06 1.39 1.55
EPS

Hemscott 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.50 0.63 0.76 0.92 1.06 1.45 1.55
Reuters 0.27 0.36 0.46 0.50 0.63 0.76 0.92 1.06 1.45 1.55

OPS 84.0 85.0 102.0 103.0 106.0 107.0 109.0 111.0 112.0 114.0
Shrs.

Hemscott 84.0 85.0 102.0 103.0 106.0 107.0 109.0 111.0 113.0 115.0
Reuters 84.2 85.0 97.3 102.3 104.2 106.2 107.8 110.0 111.6 113.3

OPS 11.9% 8.1% 9.7% 9.3% 9.8% 10.0% 10.6% 10.9% 12.3% 12.4%
Quality Ind %PTP

Hemscott 11.8% 8.1% 9.7% 9.3% 9.8% 10.0% 10.6% 10.9% 12.3% 12.4%
Reuters 11.9% 8.1% 9.7% 9.3% 9.8% 10.0% 10.6% 10.9% 12.3% 12.4%
0.017016 0.016987 0.0169898
Price 5yr Ago Revenue EPS R-Sq Hist.Sls Gr. Hist.EPS Gr. TTM Sls Gr. TTM EPS Gr. Prof. Mgn/Dif ROE Qual Index
OPS 18.625 2,283.2 99.0% 11.6% 11.5% 10.3% 9.3% 12.4% / 1.7% 15.2% 5.3
Hemscott 19.10 2,283.2 99.0% 11.6% 6.8% 10.3% 4.9% 12.4% / 1.7% 15.2% 2.6
Reuters 18.625 2,283.2 99.0% 11.6% 6.8% 10.3% 5.0% 12.4% / 1.7% 15.1% 2.6
Dates Alligned Sep-05 Dec-05 Mar-06 Jun-06 SALES Sep-06 Dec-06 Mar-07 Jun-07 (Q2 2007)
OPS 542.9 515.0 536.5 591.2 597.1 558.3 613.1 643.1 10.3%
Quarterly Data

Hemscott 542.9 515.0 536.5 591.2 597.1 558.3 613.1 643.1 10.3%
Reuters 542.9 515.0 536.5 591.2 597.1 558.3 613.1 643.1 10.3%
EPS
OPS 0.37 0.35 0.35 0.43 0.42 0.35 0.42 0.45 9.3%
Hemscott 0.43 0.35 0.35 0.43 0.42 0.35 0.42 0.45 4.9%
Reuters 0.43 0.35 0.35 0.43 0.42 0.35 0.42 0.45 5.0%

COMMENTS:

What caused the QI to be okay for BI result and not for the HEMS or Reuters? In the quarter ending 9/30/05,
Compustat recognized as non-recurring approximately $6.1 Million by which the provision for income taxes was
reduced as a result of resolving a matter for the taxes for which they had previously set aside money. Eliminating
that non-recurring, non-cash, increase in funds, reduces earnings by about 5 cents per share. That single quarter
difference knocked ORLY out of the roster as a result of the slight difference in growth rate between 2005 and 2006.
Award the kudos to Compustat this time for digging that information out of the footnotes and applying it.
 1 1 JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. JOSB
1 1 0945 - Retail (Apparel) (09 - Services) 9/23/07
1 1
OPS Hemscott Reuters
## 1

Min. Growth: 11.1% Min. Growth: 11.1% Min. Growth: 11.1%

FY end: Jan 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
OPS 172.2 187.2 193.5 206.3 211.0 243.4 299.7 372.5 464.6 546.4
Sales

Hemscott 172.2 187.2 193.5 206.3 211.0 243.4 299.7 372.5 464.6 546.4
Reuters 172.2 187.2 193.5 206.3 211.0 243.4 299.7 372.5 464.6 546.4
0.00111 0.00111 0.00111
OPS 4.1 7.4 5.3 8.0 10.3 18.6 28.9 40.4 60.0 72.2
PTP

Hemscott 4.1 7.4 5.3 8.4 10.7 18.6 28.9 40.3 60.1 72.2
Reuters 4.1 7.4 5.3 8.0 10.3 18.5 28.4 40.4 60.0 72.2

OPS 0.15 0.36 0.20 0.34 0.46 0.66 0.96 1.38 1.95 2.32
EPS

Hemscott 0.16 0.37 0.21 0.36 0.48 0.66 0.96 1.38 1.96 2.36
Reuters 0.15 0.36 0.20 0.34 0.46 0.66 0.94 1.38 1.96 2.36

OPS 16.0 16.0 16.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 18.0
Shrs.

Hemscott 16.0 16.0 16.0 15.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Reuters 15.9 15.9 15.9 14.4 14.0 14.4 15.3 16.7 17.0 18.0

OPS 2.4% 4.0% 2.8% 3.9% 4.9% 7.7% 9.6% 10.8% 12.9% 13.2%
Quality Ind %PTP

Hemscott 2.4% 4.0% 2.8% 4.1% 5.1% 7.7% 9.6% 10.8% 12.9% 13.2%
Reuters 2.4% 4.0% 2.8% 3.9% 4.9% 7.6% 9.5% 10.8% 12.9% 13.2%
0.029024 0.028979 0.0294378
Price 5yr Ago Revenue EPS R-Sq Hist.Sls Gr. Hist.EPS Gr. TTM Sls Gr. TTM EPS Gr. Prof. Mgn/Dif ROE Qual Index
OPS 11.665 546.4 99.0% 13.8% 18.9% 16.7% 29.2% 13.2% / 2.9% 26.1% 6.8
Hemscott 11.30 546.4 100.0% 13.8% 20.5% 16.7% 30.9% 13.2% / 2.9% 26.5% 6.8
Reuters 11.665 546.4 99.0% 13.8% 20.5% -2.8% 9.6% 13.2% / 2.9% 26.1% 2.6
Dates Alligned Jul-05 Oct-05 Jan-06 Apr-06 SALES Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 (Q1 2007)
OPS 98.6 105.6 163.8 113.7 119.1 119.5 194.1 129.5 16.7%
Quarterly Data

Hemscott 98.6 105.6 163.8 113.7 119.1 119.5 194.1 129.5 16.7%
Reuters 195.2 105.6 163.8 113.7 119.1 119.5 194.1 129.5 -2.8%
EPS
OPS 0.30 0.26 1.02 0.32 0.38 0.27 1.35 0.45 29.2%
Hemscott 0.30 0.26 1.03 0.32 0.38 0.30 1.36 0.46 30.9%
Reuters 0.67 0.26 1.02 0.32 0.38 0.30 1.36 0.46 9.6%

COMMENTS:

Here, Reuters has a typo. For the second quarter of 2005 (ending July 31st) the data entry clerk entered the six
months values for sales and earnings instead of the quarterly information. The inflated values for 2005 reduced the
apparent growth rate for the trailing twelve months from that year to the next—enough to knock JOSB out of the
ballpark for someone using Reuters information for her study.