BKF 2143/SEMESTER II 2011/2012

OVERALL MARKS:

140
FACULTY OF CHEMICAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING MINI PROJECTEVALUATION FORM COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR ENGINEERS COMPETITION
SECTION A: STUDENT DETAILS

Group Members and Matric ID: 1) .... 2) .... 3) .... 4) . 5) . 6) . Section: .. Project Title: . .. Abstract: (10 Marks)

BKF 2143/SEMESTER II 2011/2012

SECTION B: ASSESSMENT
Instruction: Please assess each item using the given scales. Fractional marks will be given for each category.
Item Assessed Content Project Introduction Problem statements, objectives, and project scopes are not clear or not related to engineering discipline. Problem statements, objectives, and project scopesare partially discussed and related to engineering discipline. Problem statements, objectives, and project scopesare explained and related to engineering discipline. Problem statements, objectives, and project scopesare clearly explained and related to engineering discipline. Problem statements, objectives, and project scopesare interesting and clearly explainedand related to chemical engineering discipline. X3 Unacceptable (1) Acceptable (2) Average (3) Very Good (4) Excellent (5) Score

Project contribution

Students do not explained what are their contributions towards chemical engineering or related engineering problems

Students briefly explain what are their contributions towards chemical engineering or related engineering problems

Students explained what their contributions towards chemical engineering or related engineering problems

Students clearly explained what are their contributions, implication and intention of their projectrelated to chemical engineering or engineering problems. Brief justification on why they want to execute their project. Students are able to create their own computer programming that relates to chemical engineering problems. The programming are user friendly and able to help others to have better understanding related to chemical engineering subjects.

Students clearly explained, what are their contributions, implication and intention of their projectrelated to chemical engineering or engineering problems. Good justification on why they want to execute their project. Students are able to create their own computer programming that relates to chemical engineering problems using interactive interface. The programming are very user friendly and able to help others to have better understanding relates to chemical engineering subjects. Students are able to produce complete flow diagrams that reflect each step involved in creative and interesting ways. Every steps involved is well explained that lead to the successful of the programming/outco mes.

X3

Originality & Creativity

Students are only reproduced related engineering problemscomputer programming from others work s.

Students are reproduced and make slightly adjustment to a related engineering problems computer programming from others work s.

Students are able to create their own computer programming that relates to engineering problems. The programming are easy to use and able to help others to have better understandingrelate d to engineering problems.

X5

Flow Diagram / Methodology

Students show the flow diagram but it is not related to the outcome of the programming.

Students are able to produce a flow diagram to show the steps involved, however it is not complete and not interesting.

Students are able to produce a complete flow diagram that shows the steps involved to the successful programming/outco mes.

Students are able to produce a complete flow diagram in interesting way and every steps involved is clearly explained that lead to the successful of the programming/outco mes.

X3

Programming Outcome / Results

The programming /outcomes done by the students are not work properly.

The programming /outcomes done by the students are working but has some arguments.

The programming /outcomes done by the students are working. Students are able to explain about the programming.

The programming /outcomes done by the students are working and operated smoothly and seem interesting. Students are able to clearly explain about the programming.

The programming /outcomes done by the students are working and operated smoothly. The programming is very creative and interactive and students are able to give a very good explanation about the programming.

X5

BKF 2143/SEMESTER II 2011/2012

Item Assessed Unacceptable (1) Acceptable (2) Average (3) Very Good (4) Excellent (5) Score

Conclusion/ Recommendati ons

Irrelevant conclusion and irrelevant recommendation given by the students.

The conclusion and the recommendationsis poorly explained by the students. Students are not confidence the programming itself.

The conclusion explained related to the programming. Some relevant recommendations also given. Students are quite confidence with the programming.

The conclusion is clearly explained and several recommendations are given with examples. Students are confidence with the programming with justification.

The conclusion is very well explained and several recommendations are given with suitable examples. Students are very confidence with the programming with strong justification.

X3

Presentation Skills Style and communication skills Students only read the slide/poster and no eye-contact. Less fluent on the material of presentation. Occasional but unsustained eyecontact. Some mumbling but audible most of the time, little eye contact. Clear articulation but not as polished. The slides/poster contributes to the quality of presentation. Good eye-contact. Students are capable to answer with some evidence or data in supporting the ideas. Clear articulation, confidence and good eye contact. The use of slide/poster enhanced the presentation. Students are answering the question with carefully planned answer, giving evidence or data to support the ideas. Confident with his/her answer. Excellence. Personal appearance is completely appropriate for the occasion and the audience.

Ability to answer question

Students are not able to understand the questions and not giving the related answer to the particular question given.

Students answers the question but still unclear about the subject.

Students are capable of answering and able to explain.

Personal appearance

Personal appearance is inappropriate for the occasion and audience.

Personal appearance is somewhat appropriate for the occasion and audience.

Good personal appearance, appropriate for the occasion and audience.

Very good personal appearance, appropriate for the occasion and

Slides/Poster Presentation

Poorly prepared slides/poster are hard to read and hard to follow. No facts and figures at all.

Slides/Poster are too busy or lettering too small. Have a few facts and figures only.

Slide/Poster lettering approaching acceptable size and presented with enough facts and figures.

Slide/Poster lettering is large enough for audience and presented interestingly and creatively with complete facts and figures.

Slide/Poster lettering is large enough for audience and presented excellently and creatively with complete facts and figures.

Total Marks

130

BKF 2143/SEMESTER II 2011/2012

Please give comments and suggestions for the improvement of the student.

Panels Signature: