Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CROSSROADS
Founded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Macedonia. Filip II Makedonski 7, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia www.mfa.gov.mk Previous Editors-in-Chief: Pajo Avirovik, December 2006-April 2008; Zvonimir Popovik, May 2008-December 2009
Editor-in-Chief Vladimir Efremovski Editorial Board: Zuko Rizvanski Shaban Jashari Katerina STAVRESKA Olga Janevska Jovanovik Sejfullah Shaqiri Adviser: Beti KORUNOVSKA
Published by: Macedonian Information Centre (MIC) Dragan ANTONOV, Director N.N. Borce 73, 1000 Skopje Republic of Macedonia
www.micnews.com.mk
CROSSROADS
The Macedonian Foreign Policy Journal
Solidarity in Action
Contents
Nikola Poposki SEECP: Vision of Good-neighbourliness, Social and Economic Development, Walking together the Path towards European Future . . . . . . 5
SEECP as an Instrument for Cooperation and Solidarity in the Changing International Environment
Karl Erjavec THE SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN COOPERATION PROCESS AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR COOPERATION AND SOLIDARITY IN THE CHANGING INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
H.E. Mr. Nikola Poposki, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Macedonia
SEECP: Vision of Good-neighbourliness, Social and Economic Development, Walking Together the Path Towards European Future 5
SEECP: Vision of Good-neighbourliness, Social and Economic Development, Walking Together the Path Towards European Future
Some thoughts on regional cooperation
your next door neighbours. This is even more evident for smaller countries. Challenges exist there as everywhere. However, open, cool-headed, argumented dialogue does help, as does mutual interaction. Focusing on the future and the common interests of countries, rather than on divisive positions and sticking to collision courses are some of the tested recipes. It seems that this works in that region to the point of having a joint cross-border supranational airline. A very delicate area. Unthinkable still in the SEE context.
his is likely the most inspiring and challenging topic to write on. Especially when one comes from the southeast part of Europe...Regional cooperation - as you have rightfully presumed. A short break and afterwards I look through an airplane window. Below is the North Sea. Further to the right, there are lands I always gladly visit, even in winter time. That region sets benchmarks in many respects. Among them is the present topic. Still, just think about these countries: Some of them are in NATO, others are not. Some of them are in the EU, others are not. Some of them were empires, others have been ruled. Some of them use the euro, others do not. Some of them are rich with natural resources, others are not. Some understand each other, others do not. Some are monarchies, others are not... In policy-making terms, perhaps this is not the most compact group of countries. Still, their decisions allow them to grow ever more integrated. And there is a reason why. The official agendas of these countries rank regional meetings and initiatives right on the top. This is their priority. They are all very open economies and interact globally. But they have understood that in order to influence the world, you need rock-solid relations with
SEECP: Vision of Good-neighbourliness, Social and Economic Development, Walking Together the Path Towards European Future 7
H.E. Mr. Ahmet Davutolu, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey
A Forward Looking Vision for the Balkans Through the Prism of the South East European Cooperation Process 9
A Forward Looking Vision for the Balkans Through the Prism of the South East European Cooperation Process
s the successful Chairmanship of Macedonia draws to an end, I would like to use this opportunity to share my thoughts on the the South East European Cooperation Processs (SEECP) future reorganization towards increased cooperation in the Balkans. Despite its short history, SEECP, the unique home-grown initiative in the region, has become a prototypical forum of highlevel dialogue. As such, it provides a perfect conduit for the countries of the region in their quest to emancipate themselves from the bad memories of the 20th century and avoid the danger of being trapped in a vicious cycle of tensions, crises, conflicts and problems that were endemic to that particular era. It is high time for regional countries to reflect on the past years since the establishment of the SEECP and reassess the potential role this process could play in the future of the region. Let me be more clear by asking some questions: What was the joint vision that prompted the Balkan nations to initiate this process? What have been the achievements of the SEECP? What are the factors that render this process a vital component of regional affairs? What are the challenges that must be met for the further development of the SEECP? These are but a few questions that we, as the stakeholders in the creation of a peaceful and stable regional order in the Balkans, have to seriously ponder upon. Despite the argument that the forces of globalization will reduce local differences and facilitate the emergence of a single global society, we are still living in a world of regions where local and regional processes increasingly
gain prominence. The reality of regional or sub-regional cooperation has increasingly become a fact of the 21st century as many nations move towards closer cultural, economic, and political interaction, if not integration, at the regional level. The Balkan region, which traditionally has been referred to as the model of fragmentation and disintegration, now has a chance to emerge as yet another regional order in the making where a culture of cooperation prevails. This essay proposes an alternative vision of furthering regional cooperation around the SEECP, based on a set of methodology and policy principles, in an attempt to stimulate a wider debate on the subject in the intellectual and policy circles in the Balkan region. In particular, this essay outlines the normative bases and policy principles for regional cooperation as the Balkan nations contemplate how to reorganize their institutional architecture in this new era.
PRINCIPLES OF METHODOLOGY
The first methodology principle highlights the importance of having a vision-oriented approach as opposed to a crisis-oriented one. The leaders and peoples of the Balkan region still recall the crises, among others, in Bosnia- Herzegovina and Kosovo. A crisis-oriented approach remains fixated on the details of these past crises as they tackle contemporary problems, and as such, they, purposely or not, constantly reproduce the negative legacy of this bitter episode in different contexts. A vision-oriented approach, in contrast, seeks to move beyond these crises and proposes to handle todays issues with a new framework and a fresh vision. We need to pause and ask ourselves the question of what role we envisage for the region in global affairs in 2020 and beyond. The second methodology principle calls for adopting a forward-looking rather than a backward-looking approach. Societies and leaders interpret and make use of history in various ways. Arguably the most dangerous way is one that conceptualizes history as a burden of the past and a hindrance for the future. It is true that history is what makes the world of today. However, as actors possessing determination and free will, we are not bound by our past legacies as we build our future.
A Forward Looking Vision for the Balkans Through the Prism of the South East European Cooperation Process 11
Keeping that in mind, the Balkans need to have a view for the future rather than being captive to the past when addressing the challenges of the age. A vision-oriented approach proposes to handle todays issues with a new framework and a fresh vision. The third important methodology principle suggests a value-based approach rather than an ideology-based approach to regional problems. A value-based vision presumes that the Balkan nations agree on certain common values, regardless of ethnic, religious, or sectarian differences. This vision stands in contrast to the ideology-based approach which essentially reproduces an ideological dogmatism reminiscent of the Cold War era or the later ethno-nationalistic ideologies that have destroyed the region with a spillover effect on the neighboring areas. To sum up, a novel approach to regional cooperation is vision-oriented rather than crisis-oriented, forwardlooking rather than backward-looking, and its understanding is value-based rather than ideology-based. These principles may serve as guiding principles for the SEECP as a forum in dealing with the issues in this region. all live together in the next century, bringing their own richness to the table. The nations of the Balkan region are not only neighbors living side by side, but they also form one family with dense societal and cultural ties that bind them. Regional ownership and inclusiveness does not mean that there will never be any disagreements, but a family approach essentially requires that the countries of the region should manage crises with the spirit of a family. We can also name it as regional responsibility. Just as nobody can deny his or her brother or sister, we cannot simply turn our back on each other and go about our own ways. What we need is to develop ways and means to resolve problems. In this sense, we could call the trilateral mechanism between Turkey, Bosnia and Serbia a historic step. Nobody could even have imagined in the 1990s, for example, that Turkey and Serbia would be working together now. Similarly, there is the Turkey, Croatia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina trilateral mechanism, in addition to a Turkey, Greece, and Bulgaria one. The initiation of such bilateral, trilateral or other multilateral processes would pave the way for wider regional initiatives, which could be the leading focus of the SEECP forum. Policy makers should have the determination to turn the 21st century into a century of re-integration in the Balkan region. The second policy principle is regional reintegration. The 20th century was a century of division. In order to normalize the region to conform to the spirit of the time, policy makers should have the determination to turn the 21st century into a century of reintegration in the Balkan region. Instead of micro-level division, we need to bolster macro-level integration. On this point, having political dialogue is of paramount importance. There should be bilateral and multilateral high-level political dialogue mechanisms that meet on a regular basis, similar to the European Unions mechanisms. Instead of having one annual summit, the SEECP might hold two or three summits, supported by a number of relevant bilateral mechanisms and permanent committees. One possible example for regional high level dialogue mechanism is the Turkey-Greece High Level Cooperation Council (HLCC) Meeting. The establishment of the
POLICY PRINCIPLES
These methodology principles should be complemented by policy principles in order to be effective in practical terms. In this category, we could include four policy principles. The first one is regional ownership and inclusiveness. Our starting premise is that, this region belongs to the local peoples who have lived there for centuries and will continue to live there. All ethnic, sectarian and linguistic groups are an integral part of the region and will remain so in the years ahead. No one should contemplate any expulsion of a population or the exile of a single individual. The nations of the Balkan region are not only neighbors living side by side, but they also form one family with close societal and cultural ties that bind them. This region is like shorba, and it will only taste good if salt and all the ingredients are properly there. If one takes any of these out, that shorba will be tasteless; hence, the importance of regional ownership. Serbs, Albanians, Turks, Greeks, Bosnians, Bulgarians, Croats, Romanians, Macedonians among others, will
A Forward Looking Vision for the Balkans Through the Prism of the South East European Cooperation Process 13
Turkey today has free trade agreements with all Balkan countries except for Kosovo. As a result of this, Turkeys foreign trade with the Balkan countries has made impressive strides in recent years. Our total trade volume has increased from 2.9 billion dollars in 2000, to 18.4 billion dollars in 2012. Turkish direct investments in the Balkan countries are also showing an upward trend. Such policies go beyond their economic significance. This has not only helped our economy in weathering the storm during the crisis, it has also been used as an instrument to stabilize the political environment around us. Along the same line, I argue that by deepening economic interdependence, our region can not only overcome its imminent economic challanges but also move towards regional integration. In that respect, SEECPs operational arm, the RCC (Regional Cooperation Council) provides an important forum that needs to be strengthened. Now that the RCC Participants have agreed on a revised Statute to enhance the capabilities of the organization, RCC can be more instrumental in forging better cooperation means in the region. RCC, like other organizations must embrace every stakeholder in its target area. I am very happy that the rapprochement between Belgrade and Prishtina led to the resolution of representation issue in the RCC. Moreover the agreement reached after the latest round of talks of the Belgrade-Pristina dialogue process held in Brussels on April 19, 2013 will make important contributions to Serbia-Kosovo relations and to the peace and stability, particularly in the Balkans but also in the world at large. Furthermore this agreement will also strengthen Serbia and Kosovos European orientations. I believe that such an agreement, which marks a new chapter in the relations between Serbia and Kosovo, creates an opportunity not to be missed for constructing the Balkans common future. Such developments induce our hopes for a better regional cooperation, not only on the political sphere, but also in the economic area. Such a fresh approach to regional integration also requires a new look at the role of the cities in the region. Many cities have suffered from the divisions imposed upon the region throughout the course of history. For example, Thessaloniki was previously the center of economic activity in South Eastern Europe, serving as the cultural and economic gateway to its hinterland throughout centuries. It was similar to the role of Edirne, Adrianapolis, of Turkey, in this respect. While Thessaloniki was the port for the entire Balkans, today it is an important city of only Greece. Skopjes situation is no different. Now, those cities are far past their magnificent days. They can thrive and prosper again if the region prioritizes economic re-integration and removes barriers to closer interaction. I have for instance witnessed the progress in Skopje during my visit to this beautiful city in December 2012. We need regular airline connections, better highways and railroad connections in the Balkans so that our communities can be linked with each other closer. Such links will induce establishing a safe, secure and prosperous Balkans as an integral part of Europe. Thus, the Balkans will have a chance in moving towards becoming a sphere of well-being based on cooperation rather than competition. And as a genuine shareholder of this history and culture-rich geography, we believe that the target is within reach more than ever before. Another area where re-integration is long overdue, is in cultural and intellectual sphere. Lets state the obvious: More cultural and intellectual interaction is a sine qua non for any regional cooperation process. In order to lift the barriers erected by cultural prejudices, there needs to be more interaction in fields such as cooperation and exchange programs between universities, as well as educational and research institutions. Only then can we lay a solid foundation for bolstering the regional integration. The Balkans has the potential to present a model of cultural coexistence which may set an example for other European countries in dealing with the issues of multiculturalism. In that respect, I always use Macedonia as a good example of success. The third policy-relevant principle is the importance of taking the European integration process into account. Obviously, the regions past was immersed in the history of the wider European continent and its future will still be in Europe. Given the tight coupling of their destinies, the future of Europe will also be shaped by
CONCLUSION
The ideas and principles put forth in this essay, drawing on both methodology and policy principles, are a modest attempt on how to further the institutional architecture of regional cooperation in the Balkan region and could very well be expanded with relevant intellectual and policy insights from other stakeholders in the region. The thrust of the discussions in this essay is that policy makers need to adopt a new vision in tune with the spirit of the 21st century as they devise solutions to regional problems. A major step in the direction of creating a new future for the region would be to adopt certain new ideas, for instance: conducting regular meetings on the margins of international gatherings; strengthening the parliamentary dimension of the SEECP; working practically on cross-border projects especially in the areas of transport and energy; having the SEECP countries represent each other in different international fora, to which some of us are not members;
A Forward Looking Vision for the Balkans Through the Prism of the South East European Cooperation Process 15
establising a Wise Men Group to elaborate on all the suggestions put forward by SEECP member states; or forming an intellectual platform to bring together the eminent members of academic world, media and think-tank communities are a few to mention. Another idea that merits due consideration pertains to our relations with other regional and international organizations. In this regard, I would like to particularly highlight the importance of enhancing cooperation and coordination between the SEECP and BSEC, the members of which largely overlap.Overall, these ideas do not in any way aim at creating a new, cumbersome bureaucratic giant. We simply wish to inject new dynamism into SEECP. Furthermore I would like to elucidate on of wise-men idea. This group may assess the challenges of the 21st century and develop proposals for the improvement of regional cooperation. It has been called only a process up until now, but probably it is high time to deepen the institutional architecture of the SEECP so that it moves beyond a mere consultative forum or process. It needs to have a more institutionalized structure to be sustainable and effective. In that respect, one mandate of the group of wise-men, to be composed mainly of intellectuals, politicians, or diplomats from all member countries, could be to suggest ways to devise new institutional frameworks for the SEECP to guide the work of policy makers in the region. In short, the Group shall draft a report where its members find out how to make the SEECP more efficient to cope with and respond to the current political and economic challenges as we approach the 20th anniversary of SEECP in 2016. The Group would represent a broad spectrum of SEECP member states and offer a balanced combination of insiders and outsiders, including from the private sector, diplomatic circles, think tanks and the academic community, who are experienced in the regional affairs. The Foreign Ministers would agree on a list of members and the Heads of States and Governments would endorse it. The Group may perform a number of consultations with relevant stakeholders all along their work. Inspired by the similar works done before, the SEECP member states shall also be involved throughout the process by organizing seminars with the Group or drafting foodfor-thought papers. The Group shall be able to reconcile different views in the end and bring about a coherent work. The final outcome should set a clear future direction that each SEECP member state can endorse and that all will embrace for years to come. Our starting premise is that this region belongs to the local peoples who have lived there for centuries and will continue to live in this region. All ethnic, sectarian and linguistic groups are an integral part of the region and will remain so in the years ahead. No one should contemplate any expulsion of a population or the exile of a single individual. The nations of the Balkan region are not only neighbors living side by side, but they also form one family with dense societal and cultural ties that bind them. We all know that it is not only our common past or shared values, but a joint vision for the future that binds us together. No one questions that the future of the Balkans lies within the European and Euro-Atlantic structures. This region is like shorba, and it will only taste good if salt and all the ingredients are properly there. If one takes any of these out, that shorba will be tasteless; hence, the importance of regional ownership. Serbs, Albanians, Turks, Greeks, Bosnians, Bulgarians, Croats, Romanians, Macedonians among others, will all live together in the next century, bringing their own richness to the table.
Excerpts of this article has been printed by Center for Strategic Research of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey in its October 2011 Vision Papers series.
H.E. Ms. Vesna Pusi, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of the Republic of Croatia
or seventeen years now, we have been working within this process of cooperation in Southeast Europe, first to establish and then to develop and strengthen cooperation and good neighbourly relations, and we have proved that in spite of everything historical background, current circumstances, differing views and positions or precisely because of that it is possible, and imperative, to cooperate. Nobody will or can do it for us. It is us who must be aware of what our common interest is, meaning that we must jointly act to see it through. I am talking from the viewpoint of Croatia, a state on the verge of full membership of the European Union, and a state that is European, Central European, Mediterranean and Balkan all at once. The Balkans had all the negative connotations and image war, death, feud, disorganisation, crime and corruption. It primarily stood for fragmentation and inability to cooperate. All this, to a greater or lesser extent, really did characterise this area, Southeast Europe, and Croatia in it. It is, therefore, a huge challenge to change this perception by perseveringly working on ourselves, on reforms, on building state institutions, because only a well organised state can guarantee its citizens security and stability that translate to economic prosperity and better life for our citizens. For this reason the key interest of Croatia is the stability of the entire region, because without a stable region there is no lasting stability for Croatia either, irrespectively of our pending admission to full EU membership. By joining the European Union we are not moving to a different geographical location, we are
staying where we are, and we wish to use our geostrategic position as best we can to be of service to Europe and the region at large. Our twelve-year experience with the European integration processes can best be utilized in this region due to linguistic reasons, our common history, our life together in previous state organizations, and last but not least our common future. Undergoing the almost six-year long negotiating process, the key chapter was the one on justice, and Croatia was the first state to have had justice as a separate chapter. No state before us had this task, and we successfully completed it and showed it could be done. Through the negotiations and creation of acquis, i.e. the legislation that would become acquis communautaire to the future candidate states, and action plans, implementation of reforms, we were building the foundations for the institutions of the state. No part of society can function if there is no functional judiciary, or if laws do not apply equally to all, if some are more equal than others. Without healthy judiciary there is also no social or economic development, no investors and no investment. Among the last five generations in this area, nobody was born and died in the same state, although they remained in the same town the whole time. It is time to change that. It is finally time to leave well organized states to the generations to come. In this we need the cooperation of our neighbours, because in this small part of the globe everything is connected.
H.E. Mr. Ivan Mrki, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Serbia
The primary objective of the South-East European Cooperation Process SEECP - is to strengthen the good-neighbourly relations among all states in this region, for transforming this region into an area of peace, security, stability and cooperation. From the Bucharest Charter on Good Neighbourly Relations, Stability, Security Cooperation in South Eastern Europe, of February 2000
hen the Ministers for Foreign Affairs of the Countries of South-Eastern Europe gathered in Sofia, in July 1996, they expressed their strong conviction that the time has come for a new beginning of inter-State relations between the countries of South East Europe and for developing a modality for a comprehensive multilateral cooperation. In the Declaration adopted in Sofia, they committed themselves that every effort shall be made to transform the region into an area of stability, security and cooperation in line with the broader developments throughout Europe. These endeavours were aimed at contributing to the construction of a new Europe a Europe of democracy, peace, unity and stability, thus enabling all nations in the region to live together in peace with each other as good neighbours. Among the foremost reasons that emphasized the need for and drove the efforts to achieve an enhanced cooperation in South East Europe, the following need to be accentuated: A necessity to get closer to the European Union and other European and Euro-Atlantic integrations; At the same time, a clear intention to utilise cooperation within South East Europe as a positive contribution to the overall European architecture; An interdependence among neighbours, particularly in view of relatively limited national markets,
modest levels of economic development, a necessity to develop infrastructure and to regulate the growing number of economic and social issues at regional/international level; A need for a better exploitation of one or more common resources, and for market liberalization; External pressure by the European Union and other centres of influence on the Balkan states to set up a better and a more efficient bilateral and multilateral cooperation; Perceived benefit of following the models of other sub-regions in Europe and beyond (such as Benelux States, Scandinavia, Mediterranean or Baltic States). The Ministerial meeting and the Sofia Declaration of July 1996 launched the South-East European Cooperation Process - SEECP, as genuine Balkan cooperation forum, later recognized by the international community as the authentic voice of the region. The SEECP emerged as an expression of the will of the regions states to start a long-term process of multilateral cooperation covering a wide range of issues from security, economic cooperation, humanitarian, social and cultural cooperation, over the cooperation in the fields of justice and home affairs, but above all - to foster true political cooperation and dialogue. Could we, more than sixteen years later, agree whether the SEECP achieved its goals?
prove more costly to the Western Balkans and, in turn, the EU itself, than the actual costs of full membership status when objectively deserved. In the Western Balkans there remains a strong conviction of that decision makers in Brussels and the current members of the European Union are truly aware of how much energy is being invested here into the EU integration process, and . However, it is crucial to stress that these efforts do not have as their primary aim the European integration as such, but rather they are of the utmost importance for the unhindered continuation of the internal development and reform process of all Western Balkan countries the benefits of which, as well as the merits of which will bring about the integration into the European Union as well. This is precisely why it is very important that all Western Balkan countries proceed in a mutually supportive manner, taking the region of South Eastern Europe on a continued and sustained joint journey to further economic, social and political advancement, that must, in due time, result in deserved EU membership for all still outside of it.
H.E. Mr. Igor Luki, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and European Integration of Montenegro
here is an old Chinese malediction May God let you live in interesting times. The Region of South East Europe, world-wide known as the Balkans, by the old Persian term blkneh or blkhna, meaning high, above, or proud house, has experienced theseinteresting times throughout its unparallel history, as many times as a few other regions in the world. This proud house has every reason to be proud for all the things that made it the barrel of wisdom, as for the pearls of the antiquity, such as philosophy, drama, democracy, architecture and art. The birthplace of 17 Roman emperors, among which Constantine the Great, who split the empire half into the east and the west, by pen or by sword, right through the Balkans, has ever since been struggled by this dichotomy between the East & the West. Nevertheless, decent people from the Balkans can, and sometimes must, carry an unbearable burden of gilt and shame for all those reasons that turned it into the barrel of gun powder. Way too much blood, seldom the innocent ones, has been shed all over this marvellous piece of Earth. The shield that a Spartan mother gave her son before his first battle, with notorious Laconic With it, or on top of it seem to be overarching tumultuous history of this peninsula. A bristling fact that not more than 35 years of piece in a row has ever occurred around here, puts one in front of an epic dilemma whether the Balkan is the mountain of Sisyphus, because, each time the rolling stone reaches the top, by great efforts of great generations that appear around here every once
in a while, by some ugly coincidence, it stumbles down crushing one beautiful idea that is, I am sometimes afraid, just an illusion. Montenegro, in a way, summarises vast majority of Balkans typical features. It is small, yet proud. It has experienced on its own skin whips, as well as caresses, of all the major powers and civilizations of this part of the globe, which, each at its own peak, were often the major world powers. It has an incredible coast line and stunningly beautiful mountain ranges. The smallest population with the tallest people in Europe. Yet, it has certain specificities. By one German military history expert, Montenegrins are the second most successful warrior nation in the world, right afters Vietnamese. During the last war in the Balkans, Montenegro remained one single country of all ex-Yugoslav republics without a war on its territory. In this brutal decade, our doors were open for all those in need from each conflict area. In one moment, over 20% of all the people on our territory were refugees. This fact is still very strongly embedded in minds of many around the Region. Montenegro has exquisite relations with all the surrounding countries, as well as with, our friends from Macedonia, Greece, Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria or Slovenia. Thus, regional cooperation found its place, both factually and formally, among the three major foreign policy priorities of Montenegro. The first instance of political regional cooperation after the end of the war came with the formation of the South East European Cooperation Process in 1996. In the following dozen of years, large transformation of
H.E. Mr. Iurie LEANC, Acting Prime Minister of the Republic of Moldova
esigned to steer and foster intra-regional cooperation among participating countries, with a strong focus on accomplishing their European integration agenda, the South East European Cooperation Process (SEECP) has become since its inception an expression of regional ownership in identifying priorities and jointly promoting them for the benefit of the future development of the region. With a vision for solidarity and good-neighbourly relations, the SEECP consolidates the dialogue between representatives of the countries concerned in order to create a solid and genuine regional cooperation. Contributing to better defining common views and sharing experience, SEECP - as a forum for political and diplomatic dialogue, is subsequently converging into a single fascicle the endeavours of each of the participating states towards building the present and the future of the region. Focusing on the promotion of all-inclusiveness and regional ownership SEECP is enacting the spirit of solidarity and mutually beneficial collaboration in developing political, security, trade or cultural cooperation in the region. Partnership, dialogue and cooperation, it is, thus, the format which defines nowadays our cooperation in the South East Europe. Without any doubts, the enhancement of regional ownership is an essential instrument to ensure sustainability of the existing regional co-operation networks. At the same time, it is a unique arrangement that promotes the idea of lasting peace, stability and good-neighbourly relations in the region, paving the way towards the Euro-
pean integration of the south eastern European countries. Or, regional cooperation is one of the requirements of the EU enlargement process that has to be ensured by all the applicants. And what better platform and tool to overcome in a forward-looking approach the some of the remaining open issues in the region or share the best practices and accumulated experience in fulfilling the European integration benchmarks. Accordingly, the SEECP format and structures are shaped to support the reforms, hence contributing to the advancement of our countries on course of the European integration. For this reason, a special emphasis is put on deepening the political dialogue with EU and all its institutions, the activity of the Regional Cooperation Council, created under the SEECP umbrella, being instrumental in this regard. At the same time, new emerging challenges and rapidly evolving circumstances in the region and on the European continent make us particularly exigent in terms of quick and efficient responses. Moreover, building on achieved progress there is a need to continue the debate on rethinking the SEECP process in general, and of its institutionalization, in particular. This shall be an open-ended process which will shape the future contours of the SEECP, setting up new objectives and new mechanisms for the interaction of the countries of the region. Some of these priorities are already included in the RCC Strategy and Work Programme for 2014-2016. However we need to project our national objectives for the
Partnership, dialogue and cooperation, it is, thus, the format which defines nowadays our cooperation in the South East Europe.
Ms. Kristalina Georgieva, European Commissioner for International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response
his years summit of Heads of State and Government of the South-East European Cooperation Process countries is dedicated to Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation. This is a very timely and pressing issue for all of us. The SEECP is a unique combination of Member States of the European Union, Candidate countries and East European Partner countries, and therefore vitally important when it comes to extending cooperation on disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. I wholeheartedly support this initiative of the countries from South East Europe. Firstly, because I myself come from the region and I am keen to see it prospering and to see the countries cooperating closely in the building of a better, safer future. Second, because I have seen in person how cooperation can help countries and peoples walk together the path toward their European future making the steps of practical teamwork in one area has the power to lead to steps in other areas as well. And finally, because the topic of the summit - the prevention of natural and man-made disasters - is very close to my heart. Crisis response is my portfolio as European Commissioner, and since I started my mandate, I have become witness to any disaster imaginable. Having seen nature or mans mistakes can erase in seconds what society has taken decades to build, having seen how thousands of lives can be transformed by a single disaster and thousands of livelihoods can be erased, I am a firm believer in the need to work together to prepare ourselves, to protect our citizens and our assets, and
to give each other the helping hand of solidarity, this most precious of European values. I am glad that the South East European Co-operation Process offers a cooperation platform between the EU member states and the EU candidate countries and the potential candidates. This makes me trust that the work that we do on the EU level will be more easily transferred and adapted to the needs of all South East European countries including the Western Balkan region. From our side, the Commission is making budget available through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) not only for civil protection cooperation on disaster response, but also for joint activities in disaster risk reduction (DRR) with the candidate countries and potential candidates. The IPA beneficiaries are invited to share with the Commission what they think would be most beneficial for them to be included in the future programmes on DRR.
Conclusion
Europes ever-improving capacities in disaster response, and most notably the ERC, are the result of over a decade of experience we have accumulated jointly through our close cooperation with European countries and international organisations. We keep improving our capacities. The ERC is at the service of all of us, providing better protection for Europes citizens and supporting a more effective response to humanitarian catastrophes in third countries.
In the original text, the author is using the United Nations provisional reference when referring to the Republic of Macedonia. All changes by the publisher are clearly marked as [MIC ed.].
H.E. Mr. Karl Erjavec, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Slovenia
SEECP as an Instrument for Cooperation and Solidarity in the Changing International Environment
The South East European Cooperation Process as an Instrument for Cooperation and Solidarity in the Changing International Environment 45
The South East European Cooperation Process as an Instrument for Cooperation and Solidarity in the Changing International Environment
Introduction
n international relations regional cooperation is regarded as the best tool to promote good neighborly relations, coordinate areas of mutual interest and stirs countries and regions towards common future founded on common principles. In this respect its not surprising that regional cooperation holds such an important position in the geo strategic architecture of the SouthEastern Europe region (SEE), which has, over the course of history, seen its share of conflicts, instability and frozen relationships. In the last couple of decades the SEE region shared a common goal - the way towards the EU - which was a motor for necessary reforms within the countries and for enhanced cooperation among the countries. We must not forget that EU itself was constructed on the foundation of regional cooperation and this principle is enshrined into to very core of its structure. In this regard, the countries of the region had a good example of positive effects, which regional cooperation has on the improved neighborly relations, economic growth and strategic importance on the global arena. This knowledge was translated into concrete and viable regional cooperation mechanisms among the countries of the SEE, most notably SEECP, which today represents one of the most important frameworks for deepening and fostering cooperation in the context of SEE and also in providing a necessary tool for bringing the whole region closer to the EU integration processes.
A lot has been achieved, the region has emerged with a stronger regional identity in terms of trade, economic and political cooperation, but we have to be honest and fair: there is still a lot of work ahead of us. In this article I would like to outline the main challenges and questions of the regional cooperation in the context of SEE and also try to sketch few suggestions, which would enable the whole region to concretely benefit from the already established mechanisms.
The South East European Cooperation Process (SEECP), Regional Cooperation Council (RCC) and the European Union
Over the years, the SEECP has been active in promoting dialogue and good neighbourly relations based on economic, social and political partnerships, with common objectives: to contribute to the new European political, economic and security architecture; to improve national legal frameworks; to modernise economies and infrastructure and to streamline regional cooperation. These are serious challenges, but as always, it seems that the actual challenge arises in the implementation. Thus far, SEE has seen a plethora of regional initiatives, and it seems that the approach of the former Stability Pact for South East Europe overlapped with other forms of regional cooperation. The RCC is almost six years old, and the perception has been that its performance has
The main problem in the past was that the states in the region did not want a serious regional political structure, while major international donors did not want some other body to coordinate their aid or strategies for them. In general, organisations are subject to decisions taken by their membership under whatever voting arrangements exist.
Despite the economic and confidence crisis in the Eurozone, economies in the region are continuing to prosper, while more investment and development opportunities are arising. The region needs support to build infrastructure, but unfortunately many SEE governments lack resources. Recent years have seen many promising developments in the region. Last year it became evident that both the EU and the countries in the region are committed to deeper cooperation. Despite political and economic stability and the enhanced rule of law, the region is still facing many problems. However, comparing the current state of affairs in SEE with the conflicts of the past twenty years, the progress is visible. The countries wishing to join the EU are the most positive sign. Owing to the stabilisation and association process, EU membership has become a realistic objective. However, investors and financial institutions consider the Balkans a difficult environment. One of the strongest areas of cooperation in the past two or three years has been CEFTA3. Trade has emerged as a very positive sign for the regions integration, and support for the small and medium-sized enterprises has been enhanced. Compared to the previous three years, the European Investment Bank doubled the amount of loans in the last three years, totalling 4.5 billion euros. The second activity geared to increasing investment in the region has been public investment in the infrastructure, transport and environmental sectors. These on-going reforms, taking place under the pressure of alignment with the accession process supported by the European Commission, have had the positive effect of accelerating the realisation of projects, creating a more favourable business environment. This in turn has led to a significant increase in announcements of foreign direct investments in the region. I would also like to emphasise that the economic and financial crisis facing Europe is a challenge not only to the EU, but also to its enlargement. But, despite the signs of enlargement fatigue in some member states,
3
The South East European Cooperation Process as an Instrument for Cooperation and Solidarity in the Changing International Environment 47
the EU is not lessening its commitment and efforts to combat the possible delay in Europes integration process. Nobody is questioning whether it will continue, the question is only when. During the past few years, the process has become more complicated. To respond to the regions needs, the European Commission is proposing a new enforced approach to guarantee that, before and during negotiations, it is possible to ensure that the candidate countries are moving in the right direction. For example, the soundness of this approach was verified by the visa liberalisation process. The principle of conditionality laid down by the EU is justified when European institutions demand firm but reasonable conditions from potential candidates and also respond when these conditions are met. What is needed above all is a realistic vision for the future resulting from the concrete needs of the region as identified by the SEECP and with clear guidelines on how the RCC intends to use the available resources in an effective and target-oriented way to achieve the objectives. The added value of the RCC should be concrete operational relationship with the SEECP and with the key actor, namely the EU, thereby ensuring effective inclusiveness in regional cooperation for all parts of the region. The various bilateral problems can be resolved only through the implementation of concrete projects. A realistic vision for the future exists. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Slovenia welcomed the initiative to exchange views on the SEE 2020 Strategy,5 and to present proposals for the future development of the SEECP and the RCC. The SEE 2020 strategy is similar to the Europe 2020 Strategy, but adjusted to the regions specific needs. The members of the South East Europe Investment Committee (SEEIC) 6 supported a set of targets for integrated, smart, inclusive and sustainable regional growth by 2020. The ultimate objective is to make all SEEIC members more competitive and advance the EU membership of prospective countries. I am also confident that the dynamics of economic cooperation would be additionally intensified with the adoption of the RCC Strategy and Work Programme 20142016.
Future Cooperation through SEECP and RCC: more EU, more Euro-Atlantic integration and more enlargement
I am certain that the SEECP, together with the RCC, could play a role as an international forum for all interested parties, but this should not entail numerous meetings on practically every subject. The RCC should retain strategic ambitions in an agreed number of domains in key policy sectors, and the SEECP needs an authorised RCC which would represent the development and activities to the EU and other international players. This would help the EU deploy all its possible powers and resources to the region.4 SEECP membership should be regionally oriented, promoting donor co-ordination and focusing on sequenced technical assistance with fixed schedules. Where donors are involved, they should not be seeking an early exit, but be prepared for a sustained period of cooperation, especially when the main activity of an organisation relies on various projects.
4
Adoption of the South East Europe 2020 Strategy, which should improve the economic conditions and living standard of regions citizens, is expected to take place in November 2013. The SEEIC was established in 2007, based on a decision by members of the OECD and the countries of SEE to create a highlevel decision-making body to support and promote foreign and domestic investment in SEE. The RCC took over this responsibility over SEEIC in November 2011. The SEEIC has become a hub of regional cooperation.
The RCC would have the important role of ensuring the coherence of EU policies vis--vis the accession candidates with the task of defining how the whole region should best integrate in the medium to longterm, which is the only strategic option available.
Conclusion
In the future, I would like to see the region tackle the outstanding issues in a spirit of pragmatism, through the promotion of faster and all-inclusive regional integration on an equal footing. Mutual respect and trust are essential in achieving results. After more than twenty years, I am confident that active regional cooperation is the best way to secure stable and sustainable development. What we should aspire to is more than regional ownership. What we call for is, in reality, a regional partnership.
CROSSROADS
The articles published in CROSSROADS do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the publisher. The publisher is not liable for errors. All rights reserved. No parts of this publication may be reproduced in any form without permission from CROSSROADS.
CROSSROADS
Special Edition 2013
Solidarity in Action
Macedonian SEECP Chairmanship-in-Office 20122013