Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Daniel J Smith,
PhD
Department of Immunology, The Forsyth Institute, 140 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115, USA Tel.: +1 617 892 8309 Fax: +1 617 892 8437 dsmith@forsyth.org
The WHO has estimated that more than 5 billion people have experienced tooth decay.
Dental caries remains one of the most pervasive infectious diseases of mankind, despite the availability of preventive measures such as fluoride supplements, regular dental care, sealants and knowledge of the bacterial etiology of the disease. The WHO has estimated that more than 5 billion people have experienced tooth decay [1] . In addition, epidemiologic studies in the USA have noted that after many years of declining caries rates, there has been a recent increase in childhood caries [2] . Clearly, the disease is still with us in a major way. caries experience. For this reason, different approaches are required to address this deficit in oral health [3] . Infectious diseases have long been intercepted by enabling host defense mechanisms through immunization prior to infection. This approach has often been successful, is generally cost effective and can reach a large percentage of the population. Thus, active and passive immunization strategies have been pursued to deal with infections leading to dental caries. Although several microorganisms have been associated with various forms of dental caries, mutans streptococci, especially Streptococcus mutans [4] , have been the foci of these immunological approaches, owing to the high frequency of their recovery in pediatric forms of the disease. These streptococci also offer obvious cell wall and extracellular targets that are central to their attachment and accumulation in the oral biofilm. As the oral microbiome becomes more fully catalogued, other acidogenic microorganisms, separately or in combination, may be found to participate in the end result of dental caries. Nonetheless, S. mutans remains prominent in most molecular genetic profiles of incipient dental disease, and thus continues as a reasonable candidate for elimination [5] .
One questions why this is so, as populations within developed societies, most of whom have access to public and private health measures, now enjoy relatively good oral health. However, without recent disease experience, factors leading to the accumulation of a cariogenic flora, such as refined sugar intake, are underappreciated. Thus, dietary vigilance declines. Even within these societies, the recently immigrated, urban and some rural populations have poorer access to good denwithout recent disease tal healthcare for reasons of economics experience, factors leading to and/or infrastructure; thus these com- the accumulation of a cariogenic munities have more experience of caries. flora are underappreciated. These issues are magnified in developing countries, as a larger percentage of Over the last four decades, many experithe population is economically deprived, ments, performed by a surprisingly small contributing to more broad-based dental number of laboratories, used various
www.expert-reviews.com 10.1586/ERV.09.143 2010 Expert Reviews Ltd ISSN 1476-0584
Editorial
Smith
adaptive immune regimes to explore the protective effect of salivary IgA antibody to S.mutans or Streptococcus sobrinus [6] . Mutans streptococcal components that participate in adhesion, glucan formation or binding, or cell wall synthesis, alone or in combination, have been shown to inhibit experimental dental caries formation in rats or mice. Protection was observed with intact proteins, derived recombinant or synthetic peptides, and DNA vaccines encoding one or more of these antigens or their fragments. Mucosal routes, which would be expected to increase salivary antibody levels and also be more acceptable to children, could be used effectively in these models with the appropriate adjuvant. Clearly, proof of principle exists for a dental caries vaccine. However, despite the use of human-derived S.mutans pathogens, several features of the experimental animal model, including antibiotic alteration of oral flora, elevated dietary sucrose, large infectious doses and coprophagic rodent behavior, must be taken into account when evaluating the transfer of this approach tohumans.
to good dental care. Clearly, both US and international surveys indicate otherwise for the great majority of underserved children worldwide. There is some concern that mucosal-based vaccines may not induce host responses that are strong enough or are of sufficient duration to block colonization of cariogenic streptococci. The chief rebuttal to this concern is that we will not know until we have tried, since there is very little experience with human mucosal immunization applications using nonreplicating components. Certainly replicating oral (Sabin poliovirus) and nasal (FluMist , MedImmune, Inc., MD, USA) vaccines have been quite successful. The current search for more effective adjuvants for mucosal vaccines should benefit dental caries vaccine strategies [10] . Recent data also suggest that salivary IgA antibody to pioneer flora epitopes that are shared with mutans streptococci can impede the subsequent colonization by cariogenic mutans [11] . Not only does this suggest that dental caries vaccines may indeed be effective in young children, but it also identifies a potential pathway for vaccine enhancement. The nature of the bacteria that would fill the biofilm niche normally occupied by mutans streptococci has also been an issue in the dental caries vaccine debate. The short answer to this concern is that mutans streptococci are confirmed pathogens, fulfilling most, if not all, of Kochs postulates. There is longstanding evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in Sweden indicating that individuals with low or nondetectable levels of mutans streptococci early in life enjoy better dental health as they mature. Furthermore, the number and variety of streptococcal species that colonize the oral biofilm prior to mutans streptococcal accumulation would suggest that at least one of these commensal species would outcompete vaccinetargeted cariogenic mutans streptococci as these niches emerge during tooth eruption.
Grant support for the authors research has come from the US Public Health Service (DE-06153, TW-06324, DE-04733 and DE/AI-12434). The author has no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Expert Rev. Vaccines 9(1), (2010)
Editorial
References
1
Petersen P. Research for oral health in developing countries. Presented at: WHOGlobal Forum for Health Research. Mexico City, Mexico, 1620November 2004. Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V et al. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988 1994 and 19992004. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 11(248), 192 (2007). Taubman MA, Nash D. The scientific and public-health imperative for a vaccine against dental caries. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 555563 (2006). Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol. Rev. 50, 353380 (1986).
Kohler B, Andreen I, Jonsson B. The earlier the colonization by mutans streptococci, the higher the caries prevalence at 4 years of age. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 3, 1417 (1988). Smith DJ, Mattos-Graner RO. Secretory immunity following mutans streptococcal infection or immunization. In: Antibodies in Infectious Diseases, Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. Manser T (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, 319, 131156 (2007). Smith DJ, Godiska R. Passive approaches for dental caries prevention. In: The Amazing Egg. Sim JS, Sunwoo HH (Eds). University of Alberta Press, AB, Canada, 341354 (2006). Ma JK, Hikmat BY, Wycoff K et al. Characterization of a recombinant plant monoclonal secretory antibody and
Weintraub JA, Hilton JF, White JM et al. Clinical trial of a plant-derived antibody on recolonization of mutans streptococci. Caries Res. 39, 241250 (2005). Mestecky J, Nguyen H, Czerkinsky C, Kiyono H. Oral immunization: an update. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 24, 713719 (2008). Nogueira RD, Alves AC, Napimoga MH, Smith DJ, Mattos-Graner RO. Characterization of salivary IgA responses in children heavily exposed to the oral bacteria Streptococcus mutans : influence of specific antigen recognition in infection. Infect. Immun. 73, 56755684 (2005).
10
11
www.expert-reviews.com