Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DCD 08-cv-2234
------------------------------------x
)
Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No.: 08-2234 (RJL)
)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, )
)
Defendant. )
)
------------------------------------x
§1746 as follows:
the defendant’s time to answer filed 2/19/09 and entered into the Docket at Item 11, and that I
hereby extend the fourteen Exhibits appended to my Affidavit in support affirmed February 3,
2. That Declarant in sur-reply to each allegation in the order presented by the Defendant’s
3. That Declarant acknowledges that the Court as of February 11, 2009 filed a supplement
being a “Amended Complaint” [Dkt. #9]; and that such supplement having been received by the
Court as of January 6, 2009 as shown by affiant’s Exhibit 4, and by the parties involved.
(“DOS”) having primary liability to provide the requested FOIA material and to answer for its
agents and or employee(s), also has an interest when Declarant seeks to add the United States
matter exclusively under it jurisdiction may be related to the DOS FOIA and involve the recent
discovery that there is questionable use of Social Security numbers by the subjects of the DOS
5. That Declarant believes that although as a formal matter as substance over form, issuance
of a supplement summons, which is exclusively under the courts control in that Plaintiff is
prohibited for its use as an equal protection under pro se informa pauperism relief prohibited
from use otherwise provided to attorneys and those paying regular fees and providing
independent service, I contend is a matter of ministerial actions of the government under Title 5
section 552, that statutorily presuppose a formal summons and nevertheless by the service of the
original complaint and the supplement by the USPS has already sufficed and arguably goes to
the ample ministerial discretion of the Court to resolve as a matter for conservation of time,
calendar and expenses in this matter; and Declarant will abide by such discretion.
6. That Declarant contends that DHS has been formally served and in response provided an
7. That my December 25, 2008 FOIA request of DHS, shown as Exhibit 3 sub-exhibit I in
the Supplement to the Verified Complaint and Petition for Writ of Mandamus under FOIA, and
1
respondeat superior . The common law doctrine holding an employer or principal liable for the employee’s or
agents actions (including torts) committed during the scope of employment ,---Also termed maser-servant rule.
as now entered as of February 11, 2009 as Docket item 9, was responded to by the Department of
8. That on January 9, 2009 the DHS and or its agent at “FOIA Appeals” acknowledged
receipt of both my FOIA request of December 25, 2008 and the proposed supplement containing
a copy at Exhibit I, were duly served by the USPS certified with a request for return receipt
9. That the February 3, 2009 DHS response shown as Exhibit 15, is an untimely answer /
response, and does not address the matter of abusive use of social security numbers.
10. that Declarant opposes the suggestion that as the government submits that it will advance
the interests of judicial efficiency for DHS and the Department of State to respond to the
Amended Complaint jointly, to the contrary their jurisdictional and authority matters for which
each must respond separately, and especially the DOS in regards to spoliation of records for
which it has alleged to have had its Office of Inspector General public report in the matter of
passport record access in 2008, culminating July 3, 2008 in a press conference (see Exhibit 17)
and by withholding of vital information from the public in regards to matters germane to the
FOIA request herein have redacted the matters therein deemed “Sensitive” and “unclassified”
QUESTION: …I understand that some of this should be answered - asked of the OIG people, but I
wanted to ask, did anyone try to get them down here with you? Did you - who's - you know, you're
talking about a report by the 0 – the IG, and they're not here. They've blacked out sections of this
report and we don't know why they've blacked out, because it's not classified. So what's going on?
Why are they -
MR. KIRBY: Well, in terms of why they redacted the report, the redaction is consistent with 5 USC,
Section 552 to prevent further unauthorized breeches. And I'm - you know, you're asking a question;
I'm giving you what -- the answer that they provided, that - if certain parts hadn't been redacted - in
order to make a good report, we have to know all of the vulnerabilities, alright? And they provided us
with a clear idea of all the vulnerabilities.
But at the same time, if you describe to everyone all of the vulnerabilities, then people can
take advantage of those vulnerabilities. So they redacted it in such a way that people couldn't take
advantages of the vulnerabilities. That, I think. is a logical redaction. It put the - a primer on how to
take advantage of a system, which doesn't make sense to then lay out and -- for people to take
advantage of. So that was the basis for that, and the law - you know, the U.S. code is the - is the
basis for the reason they could do that and felt they should do that… (emphasis added)
12. That on February 20, 2009, Declarant filed an additional FOIA request of DOS (see
2009 DOS press conference shown as Exhibit 17 in regards to the referenced OIG Report with
major redaction related to the Office of the OIG Spokesman Washington, DC that on July 3,
2008 gave a Special Briefing on the State Department Inspector General's Report on Passport
Records Access in re 20081545 Released on July 4,2008, and the fact that there is no Report
available on line that can be found; and that for a resolution of the requests before this Court
must be resolved with at least an in camera review by the Court with Plaintiff of the entire OIG
Report un-redacted.
13. That Declarant agrees that Defendant DOS and DHS must seriously investigate and
prepare responses to Plaintiff’s various allegations; however, under a Court ordered schedule for
discovery.
14. That Declarant’s motion does comply with LCvR 7(m), because as shown by Exhibit 8
through Exhibit 10, and that Declarant has complied with the imposed duty to confer with
15. That the Declarant / Plaintiff Supplement is not an amended complaint per se, qualifies as
a “supplement” pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d). as shown in the Mot. for Recons. Ex. at 3.
16. The supplement adds mere factual allegations occurring “after the date of the pleading to
be supplemented” and as explained above the additional defendant (DHS) is to clarify use of
social security numbers and differs as with the role of the National Archives and DHS as a mere
repository of requested information for which DOS is responsible for delivering to the Court.
17. That Declarant based upon information and belief contends for economy of the Court’s
calendar that in light of the allegations supported by Exhibit 11 that Mr. Brennan and Mr. Obama
must at least be served with a subpoena by the court with provision of transactional immunity
from prosecution for any event or transaction described in the compelled testimony, in that this is
18. That Declarant certifies that according to evidence requested and discovered by
investigation conducted by agents of the California based non-profit corporation Defend Our
Freedoms Foundation, Inc., whose President is Dr. Orly Taitz, DDS Esq., that the supplemental
request is warranted and shows a pattern of action by Mr. Brennan and Mr. Obama that goes to
the need for a Writ of Mandamus of DOS for full and complete disclosure at least in camera with
19. That Declarant in request for sanctions and reimbursement of expenses in this matter has
received an invoice from Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, see Exhibit 20, and upon issuance
of an order by the Court for a schedule of submission of complete expenses associated with this
20. Now if the Court determines that issuance of an order for a subpoena with transactional
immunity is not sufficient and requires Declarant provide an actual Amended Complaint with
Mr. Brennan and Mr. Soetoro as Defendants so be it and that Declarant is prepared based upon a
schedule of submission for such amended complaint within 7-days of such order by the Court.
21. Based upon the foregoing Declarant prays of the Court for an Order to alter or amend the
Order or a Judgment pursuant to FRCvP Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in
regards to the order granting a 60-day extension of time to answer or respond to the Complaint
a) That the Court compel Defendant response under FOIA as its response is untimely
b) That the Court compel that Defendant respondeat superior shall obtain copies of all
including but not limited to, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, National
Archives and Records Administration and or other agency(ies), and that all
c) That affiant’s request for a summons to be issued is granted in the matter of the
d) That affiant be granted FOIA discovery of all records without bar as a matter of
spoliation activities.
f) That affiant be granted reimbursement of all expenses related to this action granted as
g) That the Court take jurisdiction over the default of Barack Hussein Obama to answer
h) That the Court order a schedule for discovery with subpoena issued with transaction
i) That the Court order an amended complaint filed in lieu of a transaction immunity
j) That the Court grant further and additional relief deemed necessary for justice herein.
That Declarant has not requested this relief before and has no other venue
to seek equity in this matter having exhausted all administrative remedy, and
laws, the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein
to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information
and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
U.S.Customs and
Border Protection
February 3,2009
Christopher E. Strunk
593 Vanderbilt Avenue. #28 1
Brooklyn. New York 1 1238
Concerning President Obama's travel records, please be advised that DHS regulations
require, in the case of third party information requests. a statement from the individual
verifying his or her identity and certifying that individual's ageenlent that records
concerning him or her may be accessed, analyzed and released to a third party. See 6
C.F.R. 5 5.21(f). Because you have not provided this documentation with your request,
we are unable to initiate a search for responsive records. Please provide the requested
documentation within 30 days from the date of this letter. or \ve will assume you are no
longer interested in this FOIAIPA request, and the case will be administratively closed.
This is not a denial of your request. Upon receipt of a perfected request. you will be
advised as to the status of your request.
With regard to records pertaining to Stanley Ann Dunham, who is widely kno\tn as a
matter of public record to be deceased, you requested docun~entspertaining to Ms.
Dunham involving entry and exits into and out of United States from January 01, 1960
through December 3 1. 1975. and January 1.1979 through December 3 1.1985. There
are no entrylexit records available prior to 1982, either in electronic or paper format.
A search for documents responsive to your request produced a total of one page. CBP
has determined that the one page is partially releasable pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C. 5 552
(b)(2)(high), (b)(2)(low), (b)(6), and (b)(7). Enclosed is one page mith certain
info~nlationwithheld as described below.
FOIA Esemption Z(low) protects information applicable to internal administrative
personnel matters to the extent that the infornlation is of a relatively trivial nature and
there is no public interest in the document.
FOIA Exemption 6 exempts from disclosure personnel or medical files and similar files
the release of which lvould cause a clearly unwarranted invasion of' personal privacy.
This requires a balancing of the public's right to disclosure against the individual's right
privacy. The privacy interests of the individuals in the records you have requested
outweigh any minimal public interest in disclosure of the information. Any private
interest you may have in that information does not factor into the aforementioned
balancing test.
Esemption 7(C) protects records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes
that could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy. This exemption takes particular note of the strong interests of individuals.
whether they arc suspects. witnesses, or investigators, in not being unwarrantably
associated with alleged criminal activity. That interest extends to persons who are not
only the subjects of the investigation. but those who may have their privacy invaded by
having their identities and information about them revealed in connection uith an
investigation. Bascd upon the traditional recognition of strong privacy interest in law
enforcement records. categorical withholding of information that identifies third parties
in law enforcenlent records is ordinarily appropriate. As such, I have determined that the
privacy interest in the identities of individuals in the records you have requested clearly
outweigh any minimal public interest in disclosure of the information. Please note that
any private interest you may have in that information does not factor into this
determination.
You have the right to appeal the above detern~inationregarding Ms. Dunham's records.
Should you wish to do so, you must send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 60
days of the date of this letter to: FOIA Appeals. Policy and Litigation Branch. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, 799 9" Street, NW. Mint Annex, Washington. DC
20229, following the procedures outlined in the DHS regulations at 6 CFR § 5.9. Your
envelope and letter should be marked "FOIA Appeal." Copies of the FOIA and DHS
regulations are available at ~~vw.dhs.gov/foia.
Provisioils of the FOIA allow us to recover part of the cost of complying with your
request. In this instance, because the cost is negligible, there is no charge. 6 CFR
$5.1 l(d)(4).
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter, please feel free to contact
this office at 202-325-0150. For ease of reference, please notate file number 2009F6291.
Sincerely.
Mark Hanson
Director
FOIA Division
Office of International Trade
14:27
mm#a
TECSII - PRIMARY Q m R Y HISTORY
PASSENGER ACTIVITY
------ QUERY - - - - - LNE
01142009 mIm
PAGE NO. 0001
TERM/
NAME DOB DATE TIME AGN RSLT TYP REF LAICE API DIM
I
DUNHAM, STANLEY 112942 081084 1538 AIR N N
A321-HONOLULU, AIRPORT DOC : INSP :
DUNHAM, STANLEY 112942 080483 1501 AIR N N
A321-HONOLULU, AIRPORT DOC : INSP :
DUNHAM, STANLEY 112942 061382 1411 AIR N N
A321-HONOLULU, AIRPORT DOC : INSP :
U.S. Customs and
Border Protection
FOlA Divisicn
7 9 0 9TH STREET NW. -
WASHINGTON. DC 20229
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENAI.'TY FOR PRIVATE USE 5300
Christopher E. Strunk
593 Vanderbilt Avenue, #281
Brocklyn, New York 11238
UNITEDSTATESPOSTAL
SERVICE F~rst-ClassMa11
Postage & Fees Pa~d
Permit No. G I 0
Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box
ecelpt for -M
2. Article Number
( I i i e r h m service fabet)
7008 1140 0000 7400 7832
PS Form 3811, February 2004 ~omesticReturn Recelpt 102595-02-M-1540
RXHIBIT 1 6
Special Briefing
Office of the Spokesman
Washington, DC
July 3, 2008
MR. DONAHUE: Okay. Good afternoon. My name is David Donahue. I'm the Public Affairs - Director of Public Affairs
in the Office of Consular Affairs. And today, we have our Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Consular
Affairs Michael D. Kirby - I think regular spelling on that - and our acting Managing Director of Passport Services
Florence Fultz, F-u-I-t-z.And she will be our subject matter expert today. And we're here - we do have a short
schedule. We have to be out of here by 10 afler 4:OO.
EXHIBIT 17
QUESTION: Have you found that those more than 4,000 accesses, that any of them was inappropriate? I
can imagine circumstances under which you might actually need to go into somebody's file two dozen
times if it's a very complicated case. That said, you know, the report gives this - the appendix gives this
table where it describes the number of individuals on the high - fit the high profile list, and there are nine
of them where there were 101 or more hits to their passport files.
-
MS. FULTZ: The ones if I could just jump in. First of all, the 4,000 is a little bit misleading because -
and I think it explains it in a footnote. If you go in to even locate whether or not there is a passport record,
that's one hit. If you then open the record and look at it, that's at least two hits because there are two
pages, at least. So if you print it out, that's another hit on the same record.
But what has happened is that of the review that the OIG did, the ones that they thought looked most
egregious or least likely to have been authorized, they referred those for further investigation. So OIG is
still investigating those and we have not yet heard definitively if those were authorized or unauthorized.
QUESTION: In your own investigations, have they - have they come to any conclusion about whether
any of those were authorized or unauthorized?
MS. FULTZ: We are just now at the point where we are separating out the ones that 01G is not
investigating. And we've assembled a team and we're starting to go through that to determine if they were
authorized or not.
QUESTION: Can you tell us how many are being looked at that are questionable. or that are questionable
and are suspicious enough that you would go and look --
MS. FULTZ: The only thing I can tell you is the same thing that you see in the report, the numbers that
OIG reported. Until we go through and look at them, we won't know for sure if they were authorized or
not.
QUESTION: But you just said that you already had. You already were looking.
MS. FULTZ: We've started the process of doing it, yes.
QUESTION: And so thus far, how many appear suspicious?
MS. FULTZ: We haven't completed reviewing all of them.
QUESTION: Can you give us a ballpark so far --
MS. FULTZ: No.
QUESTION: -- of how many?
MS. FULTZ: No.
QUESTION: I mean, a percentage or --
QUESTION: Can you tell us how many OIG found suspicious enough to warrant further investigation?
MS. FULTZ: I think that's in the report.
MR. DONAHUE: All we have is what's in the report there.
QUESTION: So why don't you tell - can you tell us what it is?
QUESTION: Well, to be frank, I mean, the report is just filled with --
QUESTION: Yeah.
QUESTION: -- lots of nothing.
QUESTION: Lots of - lots of -- so could you tell us what those are, just to sort of --
QUESTION: Can I follow up on Arshad's question just for a second first, though? You mentioned that
you're now doing random audits of employees' and contractors' access. My understanding is that back
when this first happened, the Department told us that you already did random check - audits of
access. What - is - can you square those two?
MS. FULTZ: We have and have had a system in place where - it's called the monitor list, where certain
high profile individuals were - their records were flagged so that if it was accessed, someone would follow
up to make sure it was authorized. And that's how the original cases came to anyone's attention.
QUESTION: Is that the list of the 38 names?
MS. FULTZ: No. It's --
QUESTION: Or is it bigger than that?
MS. FULTZ: The original cases in March that started the - started to generate attention.
QUESTION: Right - no, no, but what I was trying to understand is whether the list of - that you were just
describing, the circumstances under which -well, two things. One, that's not random monitoring, okay?
MS. FULTZ: No, it's not.
QUESTION: That's - okay.
MS. FULTZ: Right.
QUESTION: So was there - here's a simple question, just to get back to Viola's question. Was there
random monitoring prior to your colleague just saying that you had started random monitoring? Was there
previously random monitoring or no? Do you know?
MS. FULTZ: I'm not aware of what would have been referred to as random monitoring.
QUESTION: Well -- so, wait a minute. You just said -you told us that you've initiated random monitoring.
MS. FULTZ: Mm-hmm.
QUESTION: Did I misunderstand you, sir?
MR. KIRBY: I said we now conduct random audits.
QUESTION: Random audits?
MR. KIRBY: I can't tell you - or monitoring audits. I can't tell you the date it started. I apologize. I can't tell
you that.
QUESTION: Was it post the March disclosures of the presidential candidates' files being improperly
accessed? I mean, is it since this erupted in the public, or did you do it before? I don't need the date. I'm
just wondering when it occurred to you that'd be a good idea.
MR. KIRBY: In order for me to get you that answer, I would have to take the question and get back to
you.
MS. FULTZ: Right.
MR. KIRBY: I'm - and we'll take that and get back to you, but I can't give you a correct answer because I
don't know that today, at this time.
QUESTION: I don't understand how - if you can't tell us how many of these accesses or hits are -that
you think are improper, how you know that there's such a huge problem? I mean, is it possible that every
single one of these viewings of the passport records was legitimate -- was for a legitimate reason?
MS. FULTZ: I guess it's possible, but I think it's unlikely that - some of the numbers that are reported
there -- the records that were accessed numerous times. That's probably not likely an authorized access.
QUESTION: Okay. Can you give us a better idea of who these 150 people are, other than -
MS. FULTZ: No. That would be privacy protected.
QUESTION: Would that be privacy protected? You people pull these things off the internet. How is that -
and from Spolts Illustrated.
MR. KIRBY: I'm sorry --
QUESTION: How is that privacy protected?
MR. KIRBY: I thought the question of who was doing access was what you were asking, or were you
asking --
QUESTION: No, no, no. Who -whose names? Like, when - it says that nine individuals had their records
hit 101 or more times. Who would these nine people be?
MR. KIRBY: That, in our view, is privacy protected. We're not going to tell you it's this person or that
person's record. That's -that's - that is, as our understanding of it, protected by privacy.
QUESTION: Then can you give us a little better idea of -- other than saying that they're from the Forbes
hundred celebrities and richest Americans list, or whatever, I mean, who these people are? I mean, there
is a great debate about who is a celebrity and who is not, you know. So --
MR. DONAHUE: I think the whole point is this is a -this was an investigation by the IG that they wanted
to see how the system was working. They selected 150 names. It wasn't the 150 most important people,
it wasn't the 150 - they made up a list of 150. There are thousands and thousands of people who are
significant that could have been on that list.
QUESTION: Right. But - but --
MR. DONAHUE: And they used that as a test. So it's just a group of people that help us --
QUESTION: Yeah, but --
MR. DONAHUE: -- audit our system.
QUESTION: Well, I understand, but, I mean, some people in the IG, I don't know who they might think are
famous, but, I mean, they could be very different ideas of notoriety for different people. So how do -- you
know - we need to - I don't know if it's possible we can get a better idea of who these people -
MR. KIRBY: I wouldn't think -- I mean, I'm sorry. OIG had its own methodology. That would be a question
for OIG on their methodology. I'm sorry, that was --
QUESTION: Sure, but you guys know who they are, right? They had to tell you, didn't they?
MR. KIRBY: No, I don't know.
QUESTION: The 150?
MS. FULTZ: They have to - because we're doing --
QUESTION: Well, okay, can you tell us this? Why - what is the difference between the 150 the OIG
picked and the 38 that were on your list from before, other than it being bigger?
MS. FULTZ: I mean, you saw that - I think the report, the OIG report talks about the, sort of, broad
categories of people that they put in there; people that were in the news -
QUESTION: Right.
MS. FULTZ: -- people that were in Sports Illustrated, people that were on the Forbes list. Those are the -
to expand a bit.
QUESTION: But the 38 who were on your list before were not?
MS. FULTZ: They fell into -they were well-known people. I mean, we know - you know who three of
them are because they were reported in the press, three of the presidential candidates. So --
QUESTION: Well, I know four, because there was the Anna Nicole Smith --
QUESTION: Can I follow up to that?
QUESTION: Yeah, I just wanted to be sure - you're asking - we're asking questions and I understand
that some of this should be answered - asked of the OIG people, but I wanted to ask, did anyone try to
get them down here with you? Did you - who's - you know, you're talking about a report by the 0 - the
IG, and they're not here. They've blacked out sections of this report and we don't know why they've
blacked out, because it's not classified. So what's going on? Why are they -
MR. KIRBY: Well, in terms of why they redacted the report, the redaction is consistent with 5 USC,
Section 552 to prevent further unauthorized breeches. And I'm - you know, you're asking a question; I'm
giving you what -- the answer that they provided, that - if certain parts hadn't been redacted - in order to
make a good report, we have to know all of the vulnerabilities, alright? And they provided us with a clear
idea of all the vulnerabilities.
But at the same time, if you describe to everyone all of the vulnerabilities, then people can take
advantage of those vulnerabilities. So they redacted it in such a way that people couldn't take advantages
of the vulnerabilities. That, I think. is a logical redaction. It put the - a primer on how to take advantage of
a system, which doesn't make sense to then lay out and -- for people to take advantage of. So that was
the basis for that, and the law - you know, the U.S. code is the - is the basis for the reason they could do
that and felt they should do that.
QUESTION: Can I ask a question quick, just --
QUESTION: One more follow-up quickly on that -
MR. KIRBY: We'll go here, and then we'll go there.
QUESTION: You said that you've eliminated almost half of the users, so would that be half of the 20,500 -
20081545
Released on July 4, 2008
FOlA Request Letter B8984 Fr~day,February 20, 2009 8:59 PM
From: "FOIA Request" <FOIA@state.gov>
To: "Christopher-Earl Strunk" ccestrunck@yahoo.com>
Thank you for filing your FOlA request online on 212012009. The process for completing your request will now begin.
Here is a review of your request.
I am an individual seeking information for personal use and not for commercial use.
My additional comments are as follows: Requires an expedite in regards to current ongoing FOlA case in DCD 08-
2234-cv
Christopher-Earl Strunk
cestrunck@yahoo.com
593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281
Brooklyn
New York
11238
845-901-6767
EXHIBIT I g
- - -
- -
-
Friday, February 13. 2009 9:21 PM
Senator Thune Et Al
From: "Dr. Orly TeiU' cdr-taitz@yahoo.com>
To: 'cestrunck@yahoo.com" ccest~nck@yahoo.com>
Defend0urFreedoms.US
Open Letter
Via e-mail
February 11.2009
5338-20.5Adoption; foreign born persons. (a) The department of health shall establish a Hawaii certificate of birth for a
person born in a foreign country and for whom a final decree of adoption has been entered in a court of competent
jurisdiction in Hawaii, when it receives the following:
( 1 ) A properly certified copy of the adoption decree, or certified abstract thereof on a form approved by the department: and
(2) A copy of any investigatory report and recommendation which may have been prepared by the director of social services:
and
(3) A report on a form to be approved by the department of health setting forth the following:
(A) Date of assumption of custody;
(B) Sex:
(E) Name and address of the person or persons adopting said child:
The true or probable country of birth shall be known as the place of birth, and the date of birth shall be determined by
approximation. This report shall constitute an original certificate of blrth: and
(b) After preparation of the new certificate of birth in the new name of the adopted person. the department of health shall
seal and file the certified copy of the adoptive decree, the investigatory report and recommendation of the director of human
services if any, the report constituting the orlglnal certificate of birth, and the request for a new certificate of birth. The
sealed documents may be opened by the department only by an order of a court of record or when requested in accordance
with section 578-14.5 or 578-15. The new certificate of birth shall show the true or probable foreign country of birth, and
that the certificate is not evidence of United States citizenship for the child for whom it is issued or for the adoptive parents.
[L 1 9 7 9 , c 2 0 3 . 5 3 : a m L 1 9 9 0 , c 338,431
9 3 3 8 4 1 Issuance: procedure. (a) The department of health may make regulations respecting the form of Hawaiian birth
certificates and certified copies of such certificates and other matters relating to Hawaii birth certificates as appear
necessary and the regulations, when approved and made in accordance with chapter 9 l , shall have the force of law. The
department shall furnish the form of the certificates and copies made therefrom.
(b) Any certificate of Hawaiian birth issued heretofore under or by virtue of any law of the Territory of Hawaii or the State,
shall be prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated, [L 1911, c 96, 91: a m L 1 9 2 3 , c 246, 51; RL 1 9 2 5 , 5 1 9 6 : a m L
1 9 2 7 , c 2 0 2 . 5 1 ; RL 1 9 3 5 , 57610; RL 1 9 4 5 . § 1 2 9 1 0 : a m L 1951. c 1 3 2 . 5 1 : RL 1955.557-40: a m L Sp 1 9 5 9 2d. c 1 , 9 9 ;
a m L 1 9 6 5 . c 9 6 , 5 3 9 : HRS 9338-41: a m L 1 9 7 0 . c ll,4% am L 1972, c 6 6 , 51(4)]
Case Notes
Prima facie evidence overcome by competent evidence of nonidentification. 4 U.S.D.C. Haw. 258.
Certificate not controlling upon U.S. immigration officials re admission of Chinese. 2 1 7 F. 48: 3 5 Op. U.S. Att. Gen. 69.
OBAMA REFUSE'S TO SHOW HIS 'VAULTED BIRTH CERTIFICATE, PASSPORT. COLLEGE. AND COMPLETE MEDICAL RECORD'S.
Read or Glance at many of the Laws on Hawaii Statutes:
i111p 11 11 ~ i p ~ ii7t11i
o l ail q01 111 ibil2
z!rr->t~t C ' I I O ~ O I - O I!R.YO.T:C~
~ ~ S ~ HRS-0.5 7,s-hint
or complete list of laws
!ill/? I t 11 I 1 L ~ , I ~ I ll(l1l
[ o ~ L1:I tqol
had "personallyseen and verified that the Haw-aii State Department of Health has Senator Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance
with state policies and procedures."That statementfailed to resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation and press accounts.
Being "on record" could mean either that its contents are in the computer database of the department or there is an actual *vault"original."
Further, the report does not say whether (he birth certificate in the "record" is a Certification of Live Birth, Certificate of Live Birth,or a Certificate
of Hawaiian Birth. In Hawaii ,a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation, including a signature of an attending physician, is
different f m m a C e d c a t e of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior t o 1972,a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated
testimony o f one witness and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up to one year from the date of the child's birth.
For that reason, its value as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome i f any of the allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside
Hawaii can be obtained.
The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Ifawaiian Statute 883.176
allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in
Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault C e r w c a t e of Live Birth contains a question,
whether the birth was in Hawcn'i or another State or Country. Therefore.
the only w a y to verify the exact location of birth is to reviau a cerrged
copy o r the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of
the hospital and the narne and the signature of the doctor against tlte
birthing records onfile at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the
Live Birth.
X . O R G REPORTED:
- Q
August 29.2008
J U S ~the Facts! Home .Does Barack Obama have Kenyan citizenship?
Factcheck Home
Factcheck Archive
Q= The Rocky Mountain News has reported (below) that Barack Obama "Holds
both American and Kenyan (since-1963) citizenship."Is this true?
The Rocky Mountain News
Ask FactCheck Home
August 6,2008
Ask FactCheck
Archive Entered Haward Law School in 1988. was elected the first African-American editor of
the Haward Law Review. He graduated magna cum laude in 1991.
Won two Grammys for Best Spoken Word Albums for an autobiography in 1995
'
"Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance"and his second book. 'The
Get the Email Audaaty of Hope: Thoughts on Redaiming the American Dream," published in October
2006.
Get the Feed Mother Ann Dunham died of ovarian cancer in 1995. Father Barack Obama Sr. was
killed in a car wreck in 1982.
Favorite movies: 'The Godfather' (Parts I and II) and 'Lawrence of Arabia."
According to his memoirs, he admitted using alcohol, marijuana and cocaine in his
youth.
His first name comes from the word that means 'blessed by God" in Arabic.
At his wife's suggestion, he quit smoking before his campaign to win the Democratic
nomination began.
Named one of Time magazine's '100 most influential people in the world' list in 2005
and 2007
Chosen as one of '10 people would change the world' by New Statesman magazine
(2005).
.
Source: biography.com , lnternet Movie Database, Atlanta Journal Constitution
No. H e h e l d b o t h U.S. a n d K e n y a n citizenship a s a child, b u t
A.
l o s t his K e n y a n citizenship automatically on his 21st birthday.
The Rocky Mountain News did in fact run an online article asserting that
Barack Obarna holds both American and Kenyan citizenship. The article was
incorrect, and the paper removed the Item from the article and ran a correction.
The paper's editor, John Temple, formally apolog~zedfor the error in an Aug.
15. 2007, column. Neither the correction nor the apology has prevented the
column from circulating across the Internet as part of the latest set of
baseless rumors that Obarna is ineligible to run for president.
There was a grain of truth to what the Rocky Mountain News reported,
though understanding why requires a brief history lesson.
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, i n Honolulu, Kenya
was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom's dwindling
empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject
whose citizenship Status was governed by The British Nationality Act of
1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children:
British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part 11, Section 5): Subject to the
provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this
Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if
his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of
the birth.
In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a
U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the
United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a
father who was a citizen of the UKC.
But the paper failed to note that the Kenyan Constitution prohibiis dual
citizensh~pfor adults. Kenya recognizes dual citizenship for children, but
Kenya's Constitution specifies that at age 21, Kenyan citizens who
possesses citizenship in more than one country automatically lose their
Kenyan citizenship unless they formally renounce any non-Kenyan
citizenship and swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an
oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on
Aug. 4,1982.
- Joe Miller
Sources
Rocky Mountain Yews Staff. " T ~ , L C J E YOU :.::gn: ::N Xnc.-. Abcl?r ?ar;r;
C33md." 6 August 2007. The Rocky Mountain News. 24 August
2008.
-
CopyngM 0 2OOJ 2W9. A n n e r k q Pubis Wlcy Center d the UNVMIity of Penmylvarua
FadChedr erg's stafl, not me AMenterg Center, 15rsrponslble lor thrs materUl
Article I1 o f the Constitution does not r?llo\v for dual-citizenship or allegiance to another country.
In addition to the above, Obama uould have been a U.S. citizen, 8 USC tj 1481(a)(2) provides loss o f nationality by native born citizens upon "taking
...
an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration o f allegiance to a foreign state after having attained the age o f eighteen years." i n
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a)(I). Simply put, since Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship, if Obama got that passport i n 1981, when he was 20
years old, he effectively renounced any U.S. citizenship he may have had
"So, ifthe experrs are right. Obamaforged a Cemficarion ofLive Birth tofi~olAmerica. In addition to the auton?aticIndonesian citizenship granted
to a child acknow,ledged as a ''son" by an Indonesian male citizen. and the Indonesian citizettship listed in Obama's school record!, Obama then
traveled to a place where Americans weren't allo~cedto go, but citizens of Indonesia were. Ifhe obtained an Indonesian passport on his trip in 1981.
he eflectively renounced any American citkenship he may have had and cannot senJeas president (or "rrtle"crs president, os members of his
campaign have stared). These are seriorcs questions thar must hme ansnlers.
But beyond the birth certificate issue, there's the nratter that Obama traveled lo Indonesia, Pakistan, Sozrthern India and Kenya in 1981. He said he
went to Indonesia to see his mother. This seemedplausible, exceptfor thefact that his mother returned to Hmvaii in August of 1980 toflejbr a
divorcefiom her second husband. Lolo Soetoro. Unless she went back to pal around with the man she divorced, she wasn't there at the time of
Obama's visit.
There's another problent. No record of Obama holding an American passport prior ro the one he received once becoming a US. senator has been
found. If he traveled to Pakistcnt with an Americanpassport, he ~vouldn'thave been allolc,ed in - since Pakistan was in rurnloil in 1981 and rotder
martial Imv. It ~ v a salso on the State Department's f r a ~ vban
l listfor LLS. citizens.
l f h e couldn'r get into Pakistan with a US. passport. perhaps he went there with an Indonesian passport. But the only way you can get one of those is
ifyou are an htdonesim citizen.
that!^ quite possible since under Indonesian Imr: when a nrale acho~vledgesa child as his son, it deems the son - in this case Obama - to be an
Indonesian state citizen. which was also recorded by Obama 's school record.
So, ifhe didn't go to Itrdonesia in I981 to visit mom (who had returned to flmvaii by then), might it have sonrething to do with thejbct that
Indonesian passports expire evetyfwe years ond it ~vasrimefor renen*al?"Solirce (Worl&etDaily, November 25, 2008)
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in
the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registrationcommit the crime for him?
It's either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine. who is a retired
federal agent. spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freecom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling. finally received it
and released it to me.
But the release of Obama's draft registration and an accompanying document. posted below. raises more questions than it answers. And it s h w many signs of
fraud, not to mention putting Me lie to Obama's daim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
Rogisfration Form
~ U L ) ? I ) N A C Y ACISTAIULLN~OU u~vru~s I
i t * -
8d
.- 4 ,@-
- --- st.:
PRESS: CLEAR ==> BND P?? =a> P A M BACKWARD PF8 ==> PAGE FORWARD
The official campaign for President may be over. But Barack Obama's Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show that questions
about him are not only NOT over, but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our next Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008,
well within the statute of limitations on the matter. If it is not his, then it's proof positive that our next Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective
Service as required by law. By law, he was required to register and was legally able to do so until the age of 26.
But the Selective Service System registration ("SSS Form 1") and accompanying computer print-out ("SSS Print-out). below, released by the Selective Service
show the following oddities and irregularities, all of which indicate the document was created in 2008 and backdated:
' Document Location Number Indicates Obarna Selective Service Form was Created i n 2008
First. there is the Document Location Number (DLN) on the form. In the upper right hand corner of the Selective Service form SSS Form 1. there is the standard
Bates-stamped DLN, in this case "0897080632."which I've labeled as "A" on both the SSS Form and the computer printout document. On the form, it reflects a
2008 creation. but on the printout, an extra eight was added in front of the number to make it look like it is from 1980,when it was actually created in 2008.
Having worked for the Federal Government for several decades, I know that the standardization of DLNs have the first two digits of the DLN representing the year
of issue. That would mean that this DLN was issued in 2008. The DLN on the computer screen printout is the exact same number, except an 8 has been added to
make it look like it is from 1980 and give it a 1980 DLN number. And 1980 is the year SenatorlPresident Elect Obama is said to have timely registered. So, why
does the machine-stamped DLN reflect this year (2008) and the DLN in the database (which was manually input) reflect a "corrected" DLN year of 1980? Were all
the DLNs issued in 1980 erroneously marked with a 2008 DLN year or does the Selective Service use a different DLN system then the rest of the Federal
Government? Or was the SSS Form 1 actually processed in 2008 and not 19807
It's quite a "coincidence" . . . that is, if you believe in coincidences, especially in this case.
Far more likely is that someone made up a fake Selective Service registration to cover Obama's lack of having done so, and that the person stamping the form
forgot (or was unable to) change the year to "80" instead of the current "08". They either forgot to fake the DLN number or couldn't do so.
And guess where the Selective Service registrations are marked and recorded? Lucky for Obama, it's his native Chicago. From an article entitled. "Post Office
Registration Process'. on the Selective Service website:
When a young man reaches 18 he can go to any of the 35.000 post offices nationwide to register with Selective Service. There he completes a simple registration
card and mails it to the Selective Service System. This begins a multi-step process which results in the man's registration.
Each week approximately 6.000 completed registration cards are sent to the Selective Service System's Data Management System (DMC) near Chicago, Ill.
At the DMC these cards are grouped into manageable quantities. Each card i s then microfilmed and stamped with a sequential document locator number.
The processed microfilm is reviewed lo account for all documents and to ensure that the film quality is within strict standards. After microfilming. the cards are
keyed and then verified by a different data transcriber.
The Dowment Locator Number (DLN) is an automatic function (Selective Service record-keeping, specifically the DLN is described on pages 7-8 of this Federal
Register document), with the first two digits comprising the year, and it was not changed to "08" in error. So if the form was filed and processed in 1980, how did it
get a 2008 DLN?!
* Obama's Selective Service Registration Form i s Apparently 1990 Form Altered t o Appear Like 1980 Form
On the SSS Form 1. in the lower left hand corner is the form number (SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form. labeled as "B". On this particular
Form 1. it clearly shows the month as "FEB" (February), and the year is either '80" or "90". The retired federal agent investigated further:
Magnification of the form both physically (with a l o x glass) or with different image software does not reflect a dear cut result of either a "80" or a "90"
But. checking the history of SSS Form 1 (see http:1lwww.reginfo.gov/publiddo1PRAWewlCR?refnb198002-3240-001#), it's apparent that in February 1980, the
Selective Service agency withdrew a "Request for a new OMB control number" for SSS Form 1 (see also, here)-meaning the agency canceled its previous
request for a new form, and one was never issued in "FEE 1980".
Since under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-51 1, 94 Stat. 2812 (Dec. 11, 1980). codified in part at Subchapter I of Chapter 35 of Title 44 a
federal agency can not use a form not approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget), it's nearly impossible for SenatorIPresident-Eled Obama's SSS
Form 1 to be dated 'Feb 1980." And since that makes it almost certainly dated "Feb 1990," then how could Barack Obama sign it and the postal clerk stamp it
almost ten (10) years before its issue?! Simply not possible.
The lower right hand corner reflects that the Obama SSS form Iwas approved by OMB with an approval number of 19??0002, labeled as "C". The double
question marks (??) reflect digits that are not completely clear.
Barack Obama's Signature is Dated After Postal Stamp Certifying His Signature
Barack H. Obama signed the SSS Form 1's "Today's date" as July 30.1980, labeled "D. But the Postal Stamp reflects the PREVIOUS day's date of July 29,
1980. labeled "E. Yes. Obama could have mistakenly written the wrong date, but it is rare and much more unlikely for someone to put a Mure date than a past
date. (Also note how Barry made such a "cute" peace sign with the "b" inside the "O'of his signature. Touching.)
Then, there is the question as to whether the Postal Stamp is real. The 'postmark" stamp-labeled '€-is hard to read. but it is dear that at the bottom is 'USPO
which stands typically for United States Post Office. However. current 'postmark' validator, registry, or round dater stamps (item 570 per the Postal Operations
Manual) shows "USPS' for United States Postal Service. The change from Post Office to Postal Service occurred on August 12, 1970, when President Nixon
signed into law the most comprehensive postal legislation since the founding of the Republic-Public Law 91-375. The new Postal Service officially began
operations on July 1.1971.
Why was an old. obsolete postmark round dater stamp used almost ten (10) yeavsafter the fact to validate a legal document . . . that just happened to be Barack
Obama's suspicious Selective Service registration form?
The SSS Form 1 states "NO ID'. labeled "F". Since that's the case. then how did the Hawaiian postal clerk know that the submitter was really Barack H. Obama.
who may have been on summer break from attending Occidental College in Caliiomia. How would they determine whether the registrant was truty registering and
not a relative, friend, or other imposter?
The Selective Service Data Mgt. Center Stonewalled for Almost a Year on Obama Registration, Until Right Before the Election.
The retired federal agent who FOIA'd Barack Obama's Selective Service Registration Form notes:
Early this year. when I first started questioning whether Obama registered I was told:
Sir. There may be an error in his file or many other reasons why his registration cannot be confirmed on-line. However. I did confirm with our Data Management
Center that he is, indeed, registered with the Selective Service System, in compliance with Federal law.
Sincerely,
Janice L HugheslSSS
Then. they suddenly found the record on September 9, 2008 (prior to my October 13, 2008 request), and stated that his record was filed on September 4, 1980.
Did they temporarily change the date on the computer database?
On the previous FOlA response, they stated that it was filed on September 4. 1960. In my second request I mentioned that Obama could not have filed it in Hawaii
on September 4. 1980 as he was attending Occidental College in California, the dasses of which commenced August 24, 1980.
' Other Questions: Missing Selective Service Number, FOlA Response Dated Prior to FOlA Request, Missing Printout Page
And the retired federal agent notes that the Selective Service Data Management Center prepared its response to his FOlA request prior to the request having
been made:
The last transaction date is 09/04/80 [DS: labeled "G'J. but the date of the printout is 09/09/08 [DS: labeled 'H7. My FOlA was dated October 13 so why did they
prepare the printout BEFORE I submitted my FOIA? I gave them no 'heads up" that I was sending it. In fact it was not mailed until late October-around the 25th.
Also,notice the printout was page 1 of 2 [DS: labeled -17.
Hmmm . . . where is the other page, and what's on it?
A lot of questions here. And a lot of huge hints that this government-released. official Barack Obama Selective Service registration was faked. Either he signed the
fake backdated document, or someone else faked his signature and he never registered for the draft (and lied about it).
Which is it?
It's incredible that our impending Commander-in-Chief either didn't register for the draft or did so belatedly and fraudulently.
The recently ret~redfederal agent has requested that I disdose his identity so that there is no question as to the source of the information.
His name is Stephen Coffman. He retired last year from the position of the Resident Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Galveston.
Texas office. He has over 32 years of government service and has held a Secret or higher security dearance for the majority of those years.
He filed the FOlA with Selective Service and has the original letter and the attachments. He first notified the Selective Service of his findings and they ignored the
questions.
UPDATE 11117108: Below are scans of the letter and envelope that accompanied Barack Obama's fraudulent registration for the draR (I've cropped the blank
white space):
October 29.2008
Also. ihe enclosed computer inquiry screen indicates that his registration number is
61-1125539-1, as previously provided to you.
Thank you for your inquiry. If we may be of further assistance, please do not
hesitateto contad the Office of Public and lntergovemmentaiAffairs at the above address.
Our telephone number is (703) 605-4100.
Richard S. ~lakavan .
Associate Director for Public &
lnfergovemmental Affairs
Enclosures
552001-zpid f
hnp://www.zillow.com/homedetlils/15ZS-S-Sa~ga~mon-St-UNIT-708-P-Chicago-IL~60608~6f
-
5307,000 1525 S. Sangamon St. Unit 304, Ekaterina Klyachko to Rahsaan A.Johnson
Barakat, Osama
1525 5 Sangamon St
Chicago, IL 60608
(312) 265-0707
.
Chicago IL
Oak Lawn. IL Bader Barakat
Palos Hills IL. Jawdat Barakat
Hickory Hills , IL John A Barakat
Burr Ridge IL
Norridge. lL
. Ream G Barakat
Shadia H Barakat
Worth. IL
hlaylen Appraisal Group, LLC 1525 S. Sanganlon Street Suite 312 Chicago, IL 60608-1069
Job title:
unavaikbk
Company:
Be-!, Pamela C
1525 S Sangamon St, Unit 7 1 1
Chicago, I L 60608-2248
(312) 265-0744
Burlew Plumbing
http://www.burlewplurnblng.com/AboutUs.htm
- -
\Dunham Foreign Profit Businesses -- --
3 [ X M a Name s FORD FOUNDATION TIA REST ASSOC 320 E 4Y1D ST. NYC. NY 1 - JSA Secured Pa- Nanes VI TWRIlNE COFFEE CO 520 SECAUCUS R W . SECAUCUS. NJ 0 7 M -
3000 USA Fde m F& Date LapM Dale FILW Type Pages image 085317 042211998 O.tR2i2OO5 Fmlurg Stam& I HA '
2DeWor Names THE FORD FOUNDATION3iU EAST 43RD ST. NEW YORK NY 10017416.Uy Sew& Pz.* Names iBhq CORPORATION 1 NORTH CASTLE DRNE ARIKWU( NY 10504-2575.USA
F&M hk Dale Lapse Dale Flrnp Typc Pagm lmoge 002485 O I H H R O O ) O l M W W 5 Fnanong Sutearem 1Nk-014123OlRMOOO OllOYZOOS TmnMion 1 Nk'
cs d mai obame naght b. trying to ndc real bnae deawYJsundef an assumed name?Is mts uyn-g ig ask questions abwl Obama Vansa&Mls ltke ha 1993 condomrnarm deal mat m on can wderSland - and
novr the sqrrrnek nature of ha 1 65 m~lllonrnamtonwhcm lbe deed 1s m Ux name of MUem MreL Is ma! where ths a headed? I
Iako nobced undsr the address search lha bevdss Orram. M Baraka1 there is a Osamah k 6arahr in llfinos alx, rnth muntple addresses I also noted the re!abve$olOsama M Barakat appear to be
PaksfmMn Is lhal wham (ha 9 bad&? A PLO k k ?
Or a thus mfo trjmg B bnk to even mom cm~sterelements - moaning Al Qaeda where A1 Barakat e afinanc~alarm of Al Oaeda Al Barakalwas foundca m Mogadahuby Ahmed Nu4 All Jcm'ab and eStabl~shed
hheadquarte~ m Dubal Its pnnapal ac(~ul(ns
include running a lelecom sewlce In Somal~aand =era1 other munVnes, a bank and a maney recn~nance(or Hawab) system The U S Treasury Depanmen
charged thal the company skimmed lees Imm remttlances sen1 by expamate Somalls 3n0 used Lha! mcney lo finance a1Oaeda termr~stacl~des.Al Bankeal's hsvala operam reportedly spread through some
40 munlrtes It was es(lmaledthat Al Eoraknat handled8om $140 mllfiona year In tnnsmlted payrnenh Sewlce charges ranged from 2% to 5% Thm may have gsnoraled revenues In tho mllllons for al
Qaeda [46]In .
to provldingpenuefor al Oaeda,al Btrakaat am-provided a dlscrete channtl lor the transfer aeslnbullo? of al Qaeda funds I471 (SWCe Strategoclnsghls I
T h e deed for the house that the Obama's purchased for S300k less than the asking price is from Frederic Wondisford and hls wlfe. Sally Radovic, to the Obama's
Ncilhem Trust Company Land Trust #I0209 (established as such for 'confid~ntiality")is dated 15 June 2005 and is recorded 21 June 2005 as Document #0517233010.
Dedared value is S1.650.000.W.
The deed for the vacant lot is from Wond~sford/Radovclo Rtta M. Rezko. Th~sdeed is dated 15 June 2005 and recorded a day earlier, on 20 June 2005 as Document
#0517133004.
Dedared value is $625.000.00.
Examination of the Cook County records very dearly indicates that Rita M. Ruko conveyed the entire lot to Obama's Northern T ~ sCompany t Land Trust #I0209 on 11
January 2006 and recorded 16 February 2006 as Document W 7 3 3 1 6 2 .
Dedared value is 5104.500.00.
VERY IMPORTANTLY,thorough and careful exam~nationof all Codc h n t y land records fads to locate a deed back to Rita M. Rezko from the Obama's Northern T ~ s t
Company Land Trust #lOZOB.There is a wild' deed indicated from R~ta M. R u k o to '5050 S. Greenwwd LLC'. This is an Illinois i~mitedI t a b i i corparalion with the
same address as Rezmar Corporation Vlat is registeredto the indicted Tony Rezko. (Thndeed is consdered 'wtld' because r l is not suppaled by any ownership deed
from the Obarna's Land Trust.)
F u ~ e r m o r eTony
. Rezko's reglslered corporatron. 5050 S. Greenwood LLC, then pledges the entire vacant lot in favor of a mortgage THAT IS STILL OPEN with Fifth
Third Bank for the amount of S375.000.00.
This is Document W703357023 recorded 2 February 2007.
THUS. THE ENTIRE VACANT LOT IS TITLED TO SEN. BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA (IN THEIR LAND TRUST FOR CONFIDENTIALITY)AND ALLOWED BY
SENATOR BARACK AND MICHELLE OBAMA TO BE PLEDGED BY A TONY REZKO CORPORATION TO SECURE A LOAN.
Thin is contrary to what has been stated by Senator Ohama; contrary to what has been stated by Senator Obama's campaign staff, and contrary to what has been
reported. It must be noted that a seemingly intelligent Haward educated attorney does not make such unknmng errors as staled above. The above is obvious intent.
not 'oversight'.
The home property description is 20-11-115-034-0000 The (ent~re)b t descr~ptionis 20-1 1-1150350000.
Originally, the entire piece of property was one description...sothat the Ohma's muld afford purchase, they pressed for the split. To do this. the county had to assign
two property descriplmns for each conveyance... and so thal they could cime on the same day as insisted by seller.
Thus, to answer questions, w h ~ &can very easily be determined...to sell only a portion of the lot. there would have to be assigned two (new) property descriptions for the
lot ...but that was never done and, obviously, not desired or requested. Proof positive that Obama and Rezko are partners. Everything that he said was false...Note, too.
that Obama's campaign stated that Rita Rezko sold the lot to M~chae!Sreenam, one of her husband's attorneys.
HWBER OF C W Y I m E S
CMENDAR I RULES
FINANCE
COUYERCE
GOVERNLRWTDpEmnoNs
~ - --
U S 3 BETHESOADUPLEX ROAD
COLCEGE GROVE. TENNESSEE 1TW
CONSENT FORM
I agree to be one of rhe plaintiffs in a legal action tiled by Dr. Orly Taitz. Equire for a
W r i ~of Mandamus to obtain original birth certificate. immigration records, passports
and other vital records for Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama.
FRANK NICELEY
STAIEE P E s E I ( I A n K
rfmnacn
nKuQXanv
HOME OFFICE
!DUcs£ExROAD
RIBEFRI FWHS. w m r i
ccss)e.iuto
! d a s I W : O FAX
CONSENT FORM
STK;E*CAMPF€LD uLY.LRw-
m-t -A=
Jp.
T
CQ-
10
;)lmtw of prpnrtnMitrts -mz,%w
nQYt On
e sbfr of ' & t t t t ~ . ~ t e LLUWrM ORICI.
,uIU-UL)LI:
Cl'nYIEII u.C)(YU
m U 1 I R J - l - W W
mebP m?nm
Mi-?U
Illp yr=- .a-
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire
RE: Research - BARACK H. O B m W
Dear Doctor Taitz,
I am a Private Investigator, duly licensed in the State of California and have been so licensed for the past hventy five years. I am a Naturalized
American Citizen.
I am experienced in all types of Investigation, both Criminal and Civil, having spent hventy years in the British Police, serving as a Detective at irr'ew
Scotland Yard for many years. In the interest of our Country and in defense of our Constitution I have been assisting with Research and
Investigation \\,herever necessary.
During the course of the work I have been doing in the past six months, regarding the activities and qualifications of Mr. Obama, I have kept a
record of all of the addresses in regards to which I have seen the use of his name. The records and databases I use are many and varied being
accumulated for many different reasons but all are of Public Record and the documents I have used are available to the General Public, with, or
without the payment of fees.
I have compiled the below list which I have previously fonvarded to you:
.-.-.*................*-*.........
".................*.......*.**...".....**.-**~~~~*-**-*+
-
Name DmIIk\t, S T A N 1 . n A
Gender - Male
Street Address- 1 6 1 7 s BERETANIA S T APT too
-
City, State, Zip HONOLU1.U H I 96826-1106
Probable Cumnt Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Sodal SCCurity - 314-03-X.SS
kc-73
Date of Birth -Mar 2 3 , 1 9 1 8
Deceased-Yes
*...*...**................................*..*****~.*........~.****~*
Date Remrd Verified - J a n 9 5 -Jan 9 6
-we.........
Name - DUNHA??I,STANLEY A
Gender hlale -
Street Address- 1 6 1 7 s REKE1'ANIA SI'API' l o o 8
-
City, State, Zip IIONO1.UI.U E11968~6-1112
hobable Cbrrent Address - No
Telephone -
TelephoneAccountholder -
%dd%Clllity- 514-03-XXW
Age - 73
Date of Birth - M a r 23. 1918
Deceased-Yes
Date RecordVerified -
.*...................................................*.*.......................~...*.~*.*..~~.-.
Name - DUNEfAhl, STANLEY ANN
Gender - hlalc
-
Street Mdress 1617 S HEHIXANIA SS APT l o o 8
-
City, State, Zip HONOLULU HI 96826-11 12
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security 535-40-xsss-
Age - g z
-
Date of Birth Nov 29, 1942
Deceased- Yes
-
Date Record Verified Mar 8 7 - Dee 08
UUC.*.*..............................................**..*...~***.+~+--
Same - S m O R O , STA
Gender - Male
-
Street Address 1617 S BERETANIA ST AYS 1008
-
City, State, Zip HONOLULU HI 96826-1112
Probable Current Address Nn -
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social h@ - 535-40-.XXXX
W-67
Date of Birth - 1 9 ~
Deceased-So
-
Date RecordVerified Mar 8 7 Aug 0 7 -
~.r.......................................'....*r.r.*......~.........*...*....
-
Kame DUh'HhM. STANLEY ANN
Gender Male -
StreetAddress-C 0 hLADIiLYN 1)UNHAhl
-
City, State, Zip HONOI,UI,U 211 96826
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone -
Telephone Amuntholder
SocialSecurity - 5 ~ - g o - . x x x x
-
.Age - 52
Date of Birth - Nov 29, 1942
Deceased-Yes
*~*-*.~...........*-*.*......................**.*....*...........*.**.~*.*.......
Date Record Verified - Oct 9 5
Same - SUTORO. STA
Gender Male -
S m t Address - C 0 3IADELYN DUNH:\BI
City, State, Zip - HONOLULU HI 9 6 8 2 6
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
SocialSecurity - =5-40--
Age-67
Date of Birth - 1gq2
Deceased-h'o
Date Record Veritied Oct 9 5 -
~ . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r * . r . * . r r . . r . 1 . . . * . ~ . . . . . .
-
Name SUTORO, STA
Gender hlale -
Street Address- 8 W E 2 X S S A l T 4
C i State, Zip- N m r Y O R K h T rooo4-loo1
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone -
TelephoneAecountholder -
Sodal b r i t y - 535-40-.-
-
Age 6 7
Date of Birth - 1942
--No
Date Record Verified - Oct 9 4 - Jan 95
*~tH**.*.............................**...t.*....... t.r............*.*~*+********
%;of s i-
Deceased - No
Date Record Verified - J a n 90 Dec 91
**
.
~
,
*....
*~
.
1
(
*
.
+~
t
.
*...
**
..
*...
"+
*,
*+*
r
m*
..
r...
-
Name - DUNHAhI, STAN{-EYAN'N
Gender hlale -
Street Address 1512SPRECKELS ST APT 4 0 2 -
City, State. Zip HONOLULU HI 96822-4660 -
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone
TelepboneAavuntholder
- -
Sodal Security 5 3 5 . 4 0 - ~ W -
Age-52
Date of Birth No\ 2 9 . 1 9 ~ -
Deceased - Yes
Date Record Verified J a n 8 7
-**
-
................*........*~........................~......
-
Same DUNHAM, ST.&Nlm .WN
Gender Male -
Sheet Address 235 E 4oTH ST AI'T SF -
City, State, Zip - NEW Y O W NY 10016-1747
Probable Current Address- No
Telephone
TelephoneAcmuntholder -
-
Social Security 535-40-xxxx -
.4ge - 52
Date of B i i Nov 29,1942 -
Damased -Yes
..........
Date Record Verified
-
Same A I 5 R l hTSES. PHYLISS
*.*.......
-
Gender - Female
Street A d b 156TH ST SE -
City, State. Zip - BOTHEUW'A 98012-4-8
Probable Cunent Address No -
Telephone 425-485-8815 PST
Telephone Aecountholder-
- -
Social Security s - 4 0 - x x x x -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - No
-........................*.
Date Record Verified -
.
*
.
.
*
~
t
*.
.
.
.*
t
*
t
~
.
U
-
Same O B M M , B.%RACK
Street Address 4 0 TRANSFER ST -
City. State, Zip - DENVER CO 80207
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone 303-5-15-0199 hlST - -
Telephone Acmuntholder -
Social Security o t I-23-xxnx -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - No
......
Date Record Verified Sov 0 7 Mar 08 - -
*.t.*................~........-.....*...............*u~-**.*..*......
Same - O B M U , B.%IL&CK
Street Address 713 HART SEXATE -
CSty, Slate, Zip WASHINGTOX DC 20510-0001-
hobable Current Address No -
Telephone -
Telephone Acmuntholder -
Social Security Z ~ Z - ~ O - A X X A -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased No -
Date Record Verified Apr 0 8 Nov 0 8
..*.......*.................**+**I
- - ...........................................................+...+..
Xame - OBAAIA, &%RACK
Street Address 15 A tA -
City, State. Zip bLLV~utWkh'FL 33462 -
Robable Current Address - No
Telephone
Telephone AaounWder
- -
-
*-
Social Security
Date of Birth -
DgPared - No
.....
Date Record Verified -Jan 08 -May 0 8
*.*t...............**..-*......~~**.........................~..*............
-
Same OBAM.4, BARACK
-
Street Address 505 FAKR KD .MT C
-
City,State, Zip COLU3lBUS GA 3190--6275
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 420-67-xnx
-*- -
Date of Birth
Deceased-No
............................
- -
Date Record Verified Jan 08 Mar 0 8
* t t * * ~ * * . t * . r ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + + . * ~ t C * ~ * . . . . . . . .
-
Same OBAhL4. BARACK
Gender - Male
StreetAddress-14WERIEST
-
City, State. Zip CHICAGO IL 60610-5397
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
SocialSecurity-
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - No
Dale Record Verified - Feh 0 5 - J a n 0 6
*
t.
**
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
*.
..
t.
..
..
..
..
~.
..
..
..
..
..
*t
m+
t*
~*
.*
*.
..
..
.
..
..
..
.
I.
.*
.
..
*.
*
..
*H
-
Name O B M U , RARACK
Street Address - 1013153Rn ST E
City, State, Zip - CHICAGO IL 60615
Probable Current Address No -
-
Telephonc 217-782-5338 CST -
Telephone Accountholder -
-
-*-
Social Security 364-03-.-
Date of Biih -
Deceased No -
Date Record Verified - hlar 0 3 - J u l 0 3
a
............. t . . . . . . . . . . . . . * * * . ~ * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + r ~
Gender - Male
Street Address 5450 S EAST VIEW PARK NT- I
City, State, Zip- CHICAGO IL 60615-5916
Probable Currcnt Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Soci Security -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased-No
Date Record Verified Oct 02 May 05
a.......
-
~.....t*tmmm..~.....................~.........*.
-
Same - OBAMA, B M C K
Gender - Male
Street Address 5046 S GREG\7VOOD AVE -
City, State, Zip CHICAGO IL 60615-2806 -
Probable C u m t Address -Yes
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Soda1 Security O ~ Z - ~ ~ - . K L Y Y -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - No
.
*
.
H
.
~
*
+
m
..
.
*
+
m
.
+
m
"
*
Date Record Verified - J o n 0 5 Nov 05
i
.
.
.
*
~.
-
-
Name O B t W , BIULiCK
Gender AIale -
Street Address - 5046 S GREENWOOD AVE
City, State, Zip CHICAGO IL 60615-2806 -
Probable Current r\ddrrn No -
Telephone - 773-684-4809 W -
Telephone &countholder -
Social Security
. 0.
42-68-~~~~ -
e-
Date of Birth -
Deceared No -
Date Record Verified J u n 05 Nov 0 5
** ~ . .. .. .. ..... ......*..*.*~ m ......~***
-
+..........**......
-
..**..**...*....~,**.******.......
-
Name OBAMA, B M C K
Gender Male -
Street Address 7436 S EUCLID AVE -
-
City, State. Zip CI.iICAG0 IL 60649-3626
Probable Current Ad- No -
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Soda1Sauritv-
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased-No
..
Date Record Verified Aug 93 -
H * H . * * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . * ~ * . . . . . . * * * . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . ~ . . ~ . -
-
Name OBA??lA,BARACK
Strret Address-567WESTLYK
City, State, Zip hlOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 -
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
M a 1 Security
.Age -
-
Date of Ririh -
Deceased No -
*
*
*+
*
+.
.
..
.
..
r
~r
*
r*
.
..
"
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
*+
.
m+
.
r.
.
..
t
ft
*
*~
.
..
.
*+
.
.*
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
*
*t
t
*
Date Record Verified - O d 0 8 Nov 0 8
.
-
-
Same OBAMA, BAR4CK
Stre& .kldnss 610 E OLD WILLOW RD -
City, State. Zip - PROSPECT EIEIGHTS IL 60070-1913
Probable Current M d m s No -
Telephone -
Telephone&muntbolder -
Sodalseauity-
ARC -
Date of B i i -
Deceased - No
...
Date Record \'erified - Dee 0 6 - Apr 07
P.......*
-
Kame OBriM.4, BtULICK
Gender Male -
Street Address - 810 E 13TH AVE
City. State, Zip - EUGE-UE OR 97401-3:e
hobable Current Address -No
Telephone-
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security -
-\pe -
Date of B i i -
Derrased-So
........
Date Record Verified - Aug 0 8
**-...............*t,*.....~*~......~.*~*........**..............*.....***........-
-
.
-
Same OBAMA. B I ~ I C K
Street Address 100033RI)AVE NU' -
City, State, Zip FORT WORTH TX 76180 -
Probable Current Addrns - No
Telephone
Telephone Accountholder
- -
Sodalsecurity-
-w -
Date of Birth -
Deceased N o -
*. ***......................-
- -
Date Record Verified A p r 08 Aug 08
-
Name OBAMA, BARACK
m....m.tM*.*.....................~..........
-
Name OBN\IA, BARACh'
Strret Address PO BOX 1236 -
City, State, Zip - PROVO UT 84603-1236
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
TelephoneAomuntholder -
Social Scuuity 9 0 1 - 0 9 - ~ x -
%o:f Birth -
Dmased No -
..............
Date Recordverified J u n 0 7 - J a n 08
t
u
*
.
t
1
.
.
.
*-
)
.
*
.
.
)
.
*
)
.*
.
.
.
*
-
~
*
-
.~
.
.
.
*
~
-
Same - ORkMA, BARACK
Street Address 111 PENNSYLV--WIAA\% -
City, State. Zip - WASHINGTOS UT 84780
Probable Current ~d-F - No
Telephone -
TelephoneAccountholder-
Sodal Secwity - 799-89-XLS
E l o r Binb -
Deceased - No
-
.*
*.
.*
..
..
.*
..
tt
**
*.
t.
..
..
.t
X*
*f
**
..
..
..
..
..
*~
t*
..
..
..
..
t.
*U
c.
..
..
.r
..
..
..
..
..
*.
.*
*t .........
Date Record Verified - Jul 0 7 Feb 08 -
Name O B M , BAMCK-
Street A d h - 8521 311W D A LN
City, State. Zip \VOODBRIDGE VA 22191 -
Probable Current Mdress No -
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder-
Social security -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deaased-h'o
*.-+.*-
Date Record Lreri6ed Dec 08 Jan 0 9 - - H
.
..
..
.
..
+*
~
r.
+.
.
..
rr
.
..
..
.
..
..
.
r+
~*
r
+r
..
.
.r
.r
-
Name OB.4MA, BrUWCK
Street Address - OBAnlA LN
City, State, Zip - FkWKLlN M1j3132
Probable C u m t Addrrss No -
Telephone
Telephone Acmuntholder -
-
SocialSecurity-
$o:f Birth -
Deceased - No
.........
Date Record Verified Feb 08 - J u n 08 -
H-..............~*.....*~*.**..............~*~**.....-~*..........*tt.
-
S a m OB&\lA, BARACK ti
Street Address - 10% S BROAD ST
City, State. Zip - CARLINVILLE IL 62626-2122
Probable Current A d h - No
Telephone
Telephone Aaountbolder
- -
socinlsecu*-
ZC-of B* -
Deceased - No
Date RemrdVerified Dec 0 8 - J a n 09 -
rt.........**~*.......**tt*...t.*t........**~+....*..**.....~***+**.......******.........*...*
-
Name OBAMA, B.NUCK H
Gender Male -
St- A d k - 5450 S EAST VlEW PARK APT 1
City, State, Zip - CHICAGO 1L 60615-5916
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
23
'~clcphoneAcmuntholder -
Social Security - 0 4 2 - 6 8 - a x
-
Age 47
Date of Birth -Aug, 1961
Deceased No -
-
......*~*+*.........+
Date Record Verified
i.i**.....................**.**.......********..........~*+***...*.....*.
-
Same OBAMA, BAR4CK H
Gender Male -
Street Address - 5450 E W E \ V PARKS iW I
City.State. Zip - CHICAGO IL 60615
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 042-68-~1xx
Age - 47
Date of Birth Aug, 1961 -
Deceased No -
........
Date Record Verified -
*
t
.
.
.
~
*.
*
+
.
.
*~
.
*
+
.
"
.
+*
.
*
.
*
.
+*
*
.
..
t
-
~
*
.
..
-
Same O W L % , &UL4CK H
Gender - Male
-
Street Address 5429 S HARPER AVE !.IT I N
City,State, Zip - CHICAGO IL 60615-5518
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Semdy - 042-68-m-u
Age - 47
Date of Birth - Aug 04, 1961
Deceased No -
......
Date Record Verified Oct 86 -
+.-+*.......mN.......*~*.-........*.......*......*.*....*.....................*.~...
-
Name OWLS, BAR.4CK H
Gender Male -
Street -4ddress 5324 S KIMBARK A\% -
-
City,State, Zip CHICAGO 1L 60615-5287
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone~ ~ u n t h o l d-e r
Social Security 042-68-xccx2~ -
-
Age 47
Date of Birth - Aug 04.1961
Dereased-No
......
Date Record Verified Jun 88 Dec go
"
~
.
..
.
.~
.
.
..
.
..
.
+
t.
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
..
.
*.
.
.
..
.
.t
t
t
tt
*
tt
.
.
..
.
..
.
~
*~
t
..
.
.
..
t
UU
- -
Same - OELMA, R4RACK H
Gender Male -
Street Address N IN -
City.State, Zip CIIICAGO 1L 60615 -
Probable Current Addres - No
Telephone -
Telephone.kmuntMder -
Sodal Security - 042-68-xsxx
-
b e 47
Date of Birth - Aug 04, 1961
Deceased No -
........-
Date RecordVerilied Jan 88
-
..
.
..
..
.
..
..
.
* -
*.*
~ .
.
..
..
-.
..
.
..
*..
.
..
.
-
.
.
.**
..
.
..
.+.
.
..
..
.
..
..
.
+ ++.
.
..
..
.
,+u
-
Name OBAMA, BARACIC I1
Gender - hIde
S t m t A d k 5450 E VLEW PARK APT 1-
City, State, Zip - CHICAGO IL 60615
Probable Current Ad& No -
Telephone -
TelephoneAccountholder-
Sodol Security 042-68-urn -
Age -
Date of B i -
Deceased - No
Date Record Verified -
. * . . .-...*. . . . . -
Name - OBAMA. BARACK H
Gender - Male
Street Address 5.1~01SE VIEW Pw< -
City.Stale, Zip CHIC4GO 11.60615 -
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone -
TelephoneAccountholder -
Social security - 0*-68-uurx
43e
Date of Birth -
-
Deceased No -
Date Record Verified -
....+r-rr.......* r-**......*--.........*..+......*.*-.......*+*-.*....--u.....**-.
Gender hlalc -
Street Address 4 0 8 5 JACOBS LVDG -
City, State, Zip - S&\T CHAKLFS ll1O 63304-7495
Probable Current Address - N o
Telephone -
TelephoneAccountholder -
Social Security ggg-88-.ruxx -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased-so
. .
Date RecordVerified - O a 0 8 Dee 0 8
*
-
-
Name OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN
Gender Male -
Street Address - 300 hUSSACHUSEIlS AVE M V
City, State, Zip WASHINCTOX DC 20001-9629 -
Probable C m n t Addres - No
Telephone -
TelephoneAccountholder
SocialSecurity 042-68-nxx - -
.4ge -
Date of B i h -
Deceased - No
Datc Record Verified - S e p 05
I.....+~.....-...........-**....*-*...........~.....*H~u......~.........+..".+
.
-
Name O W ,R U U C K IIUSSEIN
Gender hlalc -
Strcet Ad-F - 180 N L\SAI.1.E !ST S'I'I:.2900
City. State, Zip - CIIIC4GO II.60601-z6io
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone -
TelephoneAmountholder -
Social Senuity - 0 4 2 - 6 8 - m x
h e-
Date of Birth -
Deceased-So
.........
Date Record\'erified - Feb 07 J u n 08
m-*......*.**....*.......***.*.*....~......*...**~.....t**-............1mt...-.**H*
-
Name - OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN
Gender Male -
S ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - S J S ~ S E W 1I ' \ ? E W P N U < ~
City. State. Zip CHIC4GO IL 60615-5916 -
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone-
Telephone Accountholder -
Sodal Security o w - 6 8 - n u u -
Age
Date of B i
- -
Deceased - No
-
......-..-.....--...-.....-*....-
Date Record Verified - J u l oz J u l 0 6
'..**....*H*..........,-**...wt...........*-
Name OBWW, B A M -
Street Address - 1009 DIGITAL mVY
City, State, Zip LOS AYGELES CA 90045 -
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone -
TelephoneA ~ u n t h o l d e r -
Social securit4.- 999-61-KXXX
%o:f Birth -
D -No d
.............
Date Kecord Verified - Dec 05 - Apr 0 6
~***....,...*~**~**...............*******"*.~..*w**~.***....tt.**~+.."..*.......***H
-
Name OBAIIU, BARAK
Street Address 1680 VIDEO DR -
-
City, State, Zip 1.0s .OTGEI.ESCA 90045
Probable Current Address N o -
Telephone -
Telephone Accounrhol&r -
Social Security - 999ggxxm
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - N o
......
Date Kecord Verified - Sov 05 Mar 06 -
H~......Cl..*~**........*...........................*++*............--
Name - O B M M . R m V i
Street Address 40 TRWSFER ST -
City, State, Zip DENVER CO 80207 -
Probable Current Address Nu
Telephone - 303-231-4876 MST
--
Telephone.4ccounBol&r -
Sociil seauhy -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Drreased No -
Date Record Verified Nov 0 7 Mar 08
.........---...*a ~*
-
...*
.
*
~
....
*
r+
.....
r
*~
....
r
H
~
+..
r
.H
*
m
r
*..
*t
~
*
-
-
Name OBAMA, B : W
Gender - Male
Street Address - 22 SCOTT RD
-
City. State, Zip SOUl-HINGTOS CT 06489
Pmbable Current Address N o -
Telephone -
'relephone Accountholder -
SocialSecuritY-
.& -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - Nu
.......
Date Record Verified Nov 08
-
"
.
..
-
t
*.
.
..
*
.
.r
.
r
.
..
.
-*
.
..
-
~
*
..
.
.+
-
.
*
..
.
*
-
.H
.
.
.-
+
-
-
Same O R W , B . m =
Gender - Male
S l m t Address - 123 SOLTH DK
City. State, Zip - MLMII SPKINGS FL 33166-5921
Pmbable Current Addrev N o -
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security 606-%-~xxx -
%;of Bii -
Deceased - No
.....-
Date Record Verified Ang 08 Dec 08
t
H
+
~
*H
.
.
~*
.
..
*
~.
.
..
..
.
*.
..
.
~.
.
*.
*
m
*.
.
.+
+
r
tr
*
.
.*
*
t~
.
- -
Name OBAbM, HARAK
Street Address 1234W P Y ST SE -
City, bate, Zip - CO\n-GTON W'A 98042
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 53s-22-xxxx
% - o f s i-
Deceased - N o
.
~~
..
.*
~*
**
*.
+*
*.
..
..
.+
~.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
........-
Date Remrd Verified - May of3 - Sep 08
.
.
..
tt
~
..
..
.
I*
HU
t
..
..
.
.*
~.
.
..
r.
.
r.
..
.
..
*
Name - O B M M , BhRAQ H
Street Address- 14300NE IH'I'II ST
-
City, State. Zip VANCOIJVER W.4 986847807
Pmbable Current Address - N o
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security-
&e -
Date of Birth -
D d NIB -
..............
Date Record Verified Mar 08 Jul08 - -
-.....*m_.....-+....*-~*....-~.....++u..+....*u+............r.-......
N m - OBAMA, BAROK E
Street Addrew - 535 WlSCONSlN
City. State, Zip CHEW CHASE hlD 20815 -
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - No
.....-.....*
Date Record Verified O d 06 Feb 07 - -
~.......~*.......~*...*~***...~**.....**..........+uu....u**....+~*..
-
Name OBkMA, BARRACK
Street Address - 123 V I I U G E DR
City, State, Zip - SHEI-TON C T 06484-1732
Probable Current Address - No
Tclephone
Telephone Accountholder
- -
Sodal Security -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased - No
.
.
~*
.
..
.
.-
.
..
.
..
*
.r
.
..
.
r.
.
..
.
*m
.
..
.
..
.
..
*
**
.
..
*
.*
.
..
.
*.
.
..
.
*~
.
..
.
mt
t
.*
.
..
t
+..
Date Record Verified May 08
u
t
..
.
'
%
of:: Bh, -
Deed No -
*
**.
...
.*-
...
...
*-*
*..
.-*
...
-..
..*
-*t
*..
.-.
...
.-. .... -
Date Record Verified Nov 08
Name OB.UL4, BARRACK
-
Gender - l t l d e
Street Address - 123 h W ST
City, State. Zip - COLUMBUS OH 43207
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone
Telephone Amuntholder -
-
Sodal Security y;-as-.- -
Age -
Date of Birth -
--No
.....
Date Record Verified - Aug 08 - Dec 0 8
~.....~....**~...**-*...~~.....*.*.....*........**i(*...-..***.....~~......*.*....
Same O B W BARRACK -
Street Address - 2323 .UUSTOTLE C T
City. State. Zip - FAIRFAX VA 22030
Probable Current Address No -
Telephone
TelephoneAcmuntholder -
-
Social Security 703-59-.=~ -
b e-
Date of B i i -
Dccsad-No
- -
....*-*.....**..........**.......*.....*-*....-....~-....*-......-*....-......**......
Date Record Verified O d oH Dee 08
Name OB.UfA, B m K -
S t ~.Add=
t - 611 N C.WITOI. AVE
City. State. Zip - INDIANAPOLIS Lh( 46204-1205
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Amountholder -
Social Security - 264-87-mxx
Age
Date of Biih
- -
Deceased No -
.
.
...
..
m
.+
*.
.
-.
.
*
.H
H
..
..
.
I~
.
..
..
.
~U
..
.
..
..
.
..
..
.
..
.r
m
*.
..
-
*.
.
Date Record Verified - Sov 0 8 Dec 08
.
~
..
..
.
*~
..
.
..
..
.
.r
.r
-
Name OBML4, BARR4K W JR -
Street Address 1001SE 1351'H AVE -
City, State. Zip - PORTLWD OR 9-33-1921
Probable Current Address No -
'Telephone -
TelephoneAccountholder -
SodalSenrrity-
Age
Date of Birth
- -
Dccsad - No
Date Record Verified Nov 0 8
......I.
-
u....*-....*-.....*-........**....-**...***.....**....*.*............**......***...
-
Name OBAMA, BERTRAND H
Gender - Xlale
Street Address - 1 1 2 s OAK LEAF DR MT 1-0
City, State, Zip - SILVERSPRING blD "ogo1-1:{18
Probable Current Address - N o
Telephone -
Telephone Aaounthdder -
Social Security - 578-1I-.-
Age 44 -
Date of Birth -Jan. 1965
Drreased-No
Date Record Verified - Dee 95 Feb 06 -
Same - OBhMA, BERTRAND H OBANG
Gender Xlale -
-
Street Address 11235OAK LEAF 1720 DR
-
City, State, Zlp SILVERSPRING 3111 20901
Probable Current Address - N o
-
Telephone 301-345-0961-FST
'I'elephone Accountholder -
Social Security 578-1I-ax- -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased Nu -
.
*
-
..
.
**
*
~
..
.
..
~
~
..
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
..
t
t.
.
.
..
Date Record Verified Sep 97 - hla) 04 - .
.
..
.
*.
*
**
.
.,
.
..
*
..
.
..
.
~.
.
..
.
.*
*
**
.
..
.
~t
f
..
.
.*
t
tH
-
Name O B W BFITY
Strect -Addnus - 123 MOHEGAN .4VE
-
City. State, Zip NORTH B M N F O R D CT 06471
Probable Current .Address - Nn
Telephone -
Telephone r\rcountholder -
Social Security -
Age -
Daleof Birth -
Deceased N o -
.
.t
t*
..
..
*-
..
-*
..
..
-.
..
.-
..
..
**
..
..
.*
t
Date Record Verified - Apr 08 XIaj- 08
t
-.
..
.
- *f....-.....~**t...***....
-
Name OBAMA, BOB
-
S t m t A d d m 5258 FAIRiilONT' DR
-
City, State, Zip NAPERVILLE 1L 60564
Probable Current Address - N o
'Telephone -
'Selephone Accountholder -
Soda1Security -
Age -
Date of Birth -
Decfased-No
...
Date Record Veriiied Scp 08 -
---.....*f........*.~.....*H*....**.*....***..*......***....~****..*~...*H*".,...**.....
-
Name OBAhIA, BOB A
Gender - Xiale
StrCCt Ad- -
5719 S CANAL # 4
-
City, State. Zip SPOKANE WA 99216
Probable Current A d d m - No
Telephone -
TelephoneAccountholder -
Social Security - 468-31-nxx
g i o f Birth -
Deceased-No
Date Record Verified Nov OR Dec 08
a * . -
- P
- . . . -*...**..........-**......+....-..***......
-
Name OBkMA, BORACK
Street Address - 222 ZOTHST
City. State. f p - S A X DIEGO CA 92102-3812
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Accountholder -
Social Security - 560-11-sxxx
Age -
Date of Birth -
Deceased No -
....-....
Dale Record Verified -Jan 08 May 08
-
Name O B A M h BOR4CK
-
t.+.*...*t+m.....**mm.....r*++......
-
Street -4ddress 1966 BROADII'AY ST NE
-
City.State. Zip SALEM OR 97301-8336
Probable Current Address - No
Telephone -
Telephone Aceountholder -
Soda1 Security -
Age -
Date of Birth -
D e c e a s No -
Date Record Verified May 08 Sep 08
*
...
.~*
~..
.tm
...
.~.
..~
~**
.*.
m..
...
..~
...
...
...
.*.
...
.
-
..
*..
...
..*
*..
...
.~*
*
-
..
...
.**
...
-
Name OBhMri, BRIA?\XA
Gender - Female
Street A d d m - 2612 BLALDEN DR
-
city,state. Zip N - u k n w ThT 3 7 1 0 - m . )
Probable CurrentAddress No -
Telephone -
Telephow Accountholder -
SocialSecurity-
Age -
Date of B i -
Dcccad - No
........
Date Record Verified No%-08 -
t**...*tHt...**~....*.~.........***...~*~*....**...*.....***".*,**~..*.*~.....~.*.....
This email was sent to cestrunck@yahoo.com. You can instantly unsubscribe from these ernails by clicking here.
Defend Our Freedoms
26302 La Paz ste 211
Mission Viejo CA 92691
EXHIBIT 2 0