Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NIGERIA
OGAH.D M ./PhD/1966/06
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Poultry production is one area of animal production with significant contribution to human food
production. Consumers have high preference for poultry products. Beside preference; poultry
Nigeria is endowed with many poultry species which are local to the country .These have lived,
adapted and produced for several years in Nigeria environment(Momoh, 2005) .RIM (1992)
estimated poultry population to be about 33 million. With the ever growing population and
concomitant improvement in the living standard of Nigerians ,the demand for egg and other poultry
products will continue to grow thus overstretching the supply from chicken .Therefore,there is need
to explore other poultry species such as the duck to supplement the eggs and other poultry
products obtainable from the chickens. The duck is widely distributed and is prominent in the list of
They are essential part of many human societies around the world. They are reported to be
domesticated as early as 2500 BC (Farrel,1995).Today the domestic duck have come to serve a
variety of roles in modern society as source of food supply (meat and egg ),and in some other
societies as a species that is selectively bred for shows. They have several advantages over
other poultry species .These advantages include their disease tolerance , hardiness , excellent
foraging ability and easy to herd, particularly in wet lands since they tend to flock together
(Farrel,1995).
The population of ducks in Nigeria was put at approximately eleven million(11,000,000) and is
reported to be distributed all over the agro ecological zones of the country (FLDPcs,1992).Domestic
ducks were ranked third among various poultry species in Nigeria (Hassan and Mohammed,
2003). In spite of this positive score, very little attention has been paid to the genetic improvement
of the duck that will lead to increased productivity. There are little or no available information on
In Nigeria, different agro ecological zones exist; and for all species of livestock variations are
reported to exist in both phenotypic and genetic characteristics as a result of adaptations to these
different ecological zones. Numerous comparative studies have provided insight into the ecological
mechanism underlying evolutionary diversification across habitat gradient .This is evident in the
Adebambo et al. (1998) for cattle,Epstain(1990) and Wilson(1991) for sheep and goat. These
diversities constitute valuable animal genetic resource for use in animal breeding programme for
improvement of the productivity of the animal species, particularly domestic poultry and also in
In genetic studies various type of genetic makers are known, they include morphological,
chromosomal, biochemical and molecular makers. Morphological (e.g. pigmentation and other
features) and chromosomal (e.g. structural or numerical variations) makers usually show low level
analysis; the most common and cost effective is the Random amplified polymorphic DNA
technique. This technique has been used extensively in molecular characterisation of livestock
Ecotypes are developed through selection and adaptation and varied from one agro ecological zone
to another due to varied climatic characteristic such as humidity , temperature and rainfall
,though in some cases some ecotypes may be similar in all traits (Adedokun and Sonaiya ,2001)
Some research findings on ducks Ksiazkiewic (1995) and Farrell(1995) reported that they are very
susceptible to effective inbreeding and genetic drift if kept in a small population for few generation
.This genetic flexibility will suggest that variation can easily be found in different population at
.The genetic improvement of local ducks in Nigeria will first require investigation into their
The overall objectives of this study will be to evaluate the phenotypic and genetic characteristics, as
well as the potential of the local Muscovy ducks to contribute to egg and meat production in
Nigeria. This information will provide a frame work for the development of breeding programmes
for conservation and sustainable use of the Muscovy duck genetic resources in Nigeria.
3. To evaluate performance of the ducks from these zones in basic production traits, of growth
4. To estimate genetic parameters of growth, egg production and fertility traits of the ducks
5 To estimate genetic relatedness among the two ecotypes using random molecular techniques
.
2.0 Materials and Methods
Two approaches will be adopted for the research, field measurement or field data collection and on-
station experiment;
A field measurement to characterise indigenous Muscovy ducks will be carried out in two agro
ecological zones.
2.1.2 Study site- The two agro ecological zones will include Rainforest and Guinea savannah
areas.
The rainforest agro ecological zone lies at the southern part of Nigeria and data will be collected
from southern part of Cross River State, Akwa Ibom and Abia states.
Guinea savannah agro ecological zone – The data will be generated from rural areas of Benue,
adopted. The method will involve taking measurement of body morphology and external egg
1 Morphological data
Body weight
Body length
Beak width
Beak height
Wing length
Shank length
Bird height
2 Egg Characteristics
Egg weight
Egg length
Egg width
Shape index
On station experiment to evaluate the phenotypic, production and genetic characteristics of the
indigenous muscovy ducks from the two agro ecological zones , Rainforest and Guinea
savannah will be carried out in the Poultry Unit of College of Agriculture ,Lafia , Nasarawa
state of Nigeria.
2.2 .1 Screening of nondescript population of the Muscovy ducks from each of the agro
Ten adult drakes and seventy ducks (female) will be randomly gathered from rural areas of
Southern Cross River, Akwa Ibom and Abia states to make up the nondescript populations from
the Rainforest, while similar adult male and females will also be gathered from rural areas of
Benue, Nasarawa and Niger states to also form the nondescript population of the birds from
Guinea savannah zone. Only matured adult that have laid and can mount and are physically
2.2.2 Generation of experimental birds from the base population (random bred population)
The non descript population will be assigned into ten replicate pen per ecotype, in a mating ratio
of 1:7 (male /female) randomly and will be fed layers marsh .They will be allowed to lay eggs
At ten weeks of age the breeding groups will be selected to form each ecotype, ten males and
Seventy females and ten males foundation stocks of each ecotype obtain from a random bred
Population will be place in a mating ratio of 1:7 (i.e. one male to7female).This is to generate
The following traits will be measured for the phenotypic and genetic evaluations.
Growth trait
- Body weight –each genetic group will be weighed at 5 weeks interval from hatch to
35weeks of age
- Egg mass
- clutch size
- Laying intensity
Protocol/ procedure
-Blood sample of about 500ul will be collected from the brachial vein of 25 individual birds of
-Genomic DNA will be extracted by the use of phenol chloroform extraction method using the
-The pellet of DNA will be washed and dried. The concentration of the DNA and its purity
respectively.
The purified DNA from individual as well as pooled DNA from each ecotype will be used for
further analysis.
Where
Yijk=individual animal
Morphological data will be use to estimate genetic distance between the ecotypes.
body weight
body length
body width
neck length
beak length
beak width
beak height
shank length
head length
Using the means procedures of the SAS (1990) package (Statistical Analysis System Institute
Inc 1990) the simple descriptive statistics of each numerical variable will be obtain step wise
discriminatory analysis will be perform to assess the discriminatory power of each variable
,genetic distance will be obtain using Mahalanobis D² statistics using the means of each
D² =∑ ∑ Vij (xi-yi)(xj-yj)
Where
Vij=is the element of ith row and jth Column of the inverse matrix
- The morphological data will also be subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) for
Growth, egg production, and fertility data of each ecological group will be
Subjected to genetic analysis using the mixed model least square and maximum likelihood
Package Harvey (1990) to estimate genetic and phenotypic correlation as well as heritability
RAPD –PCR will be carried out with the pooled and the individual genomic DNA samples
.Five random primers will be use and amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).Each
The RAPD bands will be score for their presence (1) or absence (0) .The index for similarity
between ecotypes and within ecotype will be calculated using the formular developed by
(Lynch, 1990) .
Bab= 2Nab/Na+Nb
The genetic distance between the populations will be calculated based on band sharing between
the pooled sample profiles. The genetic distance between ecotypes will be calculated as
Dab=1/N.1- (Nab/Na+Nb-Nab)
N= number of primers
4.0 REFERENCES
Adebambo O, J.L.Williams, Sara Blot and Barbara Urquhart (1998) Genetic variation in Nigeria
Annual conference West Africa society for Animal Production .March 24-26pp
Chicken from three agro ecological zones Livestock Research for Rural Development 3(2)
34-39
Akinokun O.(1971) The problem of poultry production in Nigeria .Paper presented at the 7th
Ali B.A , Ahmed M.M.M. and Aly OM (2003) Relationship between genetic similarity and some
Production traits in local chicken strains. Africa Journal of Biotechnology 2 (2) 46 -47
Genetic variation within and Relationship among population of Asian goats (Capra
Chatterjee RN, Sharmer RP ,Reddy B LN, Niranja M, Shivaprasad and Mishra S k (2007)
80(4):569-575
Epstein H.(1990) The context and prospect for development of smallholder poultry production
In Africa. In small holder rural poultry production .proc CTA seminar G13
Thessalonica Greece35-50
Farrell D.J.(1995) Table egg laying ducks:nutritional requirement and current husbandry
FDLPCs (1991) Federal Department of Livestock and Pest Control services. Federal Government of
genetics117:41-55
Harvey W.R. (1990) Mixed model least squares and maximum likelihood computer programme .pc-
Hassan W.A and W.S. Mohammed (2003) Ecotypes of the Muscovy in the North West of Nigeria;
Variation in body weight and bill length .In proc. of 8th Ann. conf.of Animal
Ksiazkiewicz J. M (1995) Duck gene pool. International Symposium on conservation measures for
Hesfer M (1997) Targeted mapping of chicken genome PhD Theses submitted to University of
Hertfordshire
Lynch M (1990) The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting Mol. Biol 7:478-484
Momoh O. M (2005) Genetic and Phenotypic Evaluation of the Nigerian Heavy Chicken Ecotype
and Its Cross Bred with the Light Ecotype PhD Thesis University of agriculture
Makurdi.2005
Nwosu C .C, Gowen F. A, Obioha F.C., Akpan I. A.andOnuora (1985) A biometrical study of the
Nickolova M. 2003 Study on some major reproduction factors of Muscovy ducks (Cairina
Oluyemi J .A.Longe G.O.and Songu T. (1982) Requirement of the Nigerian indigenous fowl for
RIM (1992) Nigeria Livestock Resource vol.11National Synthesis Annex publication. Resource
Salako A K and Ngere L.O. (2001) Genetic distance between West African Dwarf (WAD) and
37-43
Saitbekova N, Gaillard C, Obexer-Ruff G, Dolf G (1990) Genetic diversity in Swiss goat breeds
SAS (1990) SAS user guide statistics SAS Inc Cary N C 633.
Wilson R. T (1991) Small Ruminant Production and the small ruminant genetic resource in tropical
Wilhan JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA , Tingey SV (1990) DNA Polymorphism
Amplified by arbitrary primers are used as genetic markers .Nucleic acid Research
18:6531-6535
Appendix
Body measurements
Body length- measure between the first cervical vertebrae and the pygostye
Bird height – measure from the legs on the ground up to the back of the body.
Body width – distance between the right to the left flank of the body.
Beak width – at the widest part of the beak between the right and the left distance
Shank length – from the knee or knuckle (hock joint)to the region of the tarsus
Wing length – measure as the distance from the caput humeri to the third carpal digit
Head length –as distance between the end of the beak and the end condylus occipitale
Neck length –measure between the first and the last cervical vertebrae