Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Supervisors
Sources:
Team Building: Current Issues and New Alternatives, William G. Dyer, Addison-Wesley, Reading,
Massachusetts, 1995, pp. 15-16.
Team Development Manual, 2nd edn, Mike Woodcock, Gower, Aldershot, UK, 1989, pp. 13, 33.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 1
Characteristics of an Effective Team Leader
2. Planning
3. Meetings
• Plan team meetings, including organising the agenda, venue and attendance of
members
• Facilitate meetings and team contributions by drawing out quieter members and
quietening those who are louder
• Ensure that all team members are heard
• Initiate discussions by directing the team towards its purpose
• Direct discussions around topic areas, not personalities
• Keep the team focused on its tasks and goals
• Summarise and clarify the main points of discussion, enabling the team to move
forward
• Monitor time well for meetings, tasks and project deadlines
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 2
4. Decision Making
5. Communication
6. Development
7. Support
8. Problem-Solving
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 3
9. Evaluation
Sources:
How to Lead and Motivate Others: Key Skills for Effective Leadership, Iris Barrow, Reed, Auckland, NZ,
1995, p. 121.
360 Degree Feedback: Strategies, Tactics and Techniques for Developing Leaders, John L. Jones & William
Bearley, Lakewood Publications, Minneapolis, Minnesota & HRD Press, Amherst, Massachusetts, 1996, pp.
171-175.
Communicating in Groups and Teams: Sharing Leadership, 2nd edn, Gay Lumsden & Donald Lumsden,
Wadsworth, California, 1997, p. 315.
Team Development Manual, Mike Woodcock, Gower, Aldershot, UK, 1989, pp. 36-37.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 4
Characteristics of Effective Team Members
Each team member should play an effective role in a team. This means that everyone is
equally responsible for ensuring that the team works well together.
2. Planning
3. Meetings
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 5
4. Communication
• Be a good listener
• Give feedback
• Acknowledge feedback from others
• Give praise and recognition when warranted
• Criticise ideas, not people
• View criticism as an opportunity to learn
• Confront in a positive way when appropriate and necessary
5. Support
6. Problem Solving
7. Monitoring
Sources:
The Leader’s Window: Mastering the Four Styles of Leadership to Build High-Performing Teams, John Beck
& Neil Yeager, Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 16-17.
The Encyclopedia of Team Development Activities, ed. J. William Pfeiffer, Pfeiffer, San Diego, California,
1991, pp. 285-286.
Working in a Team, TAFE NSW, Sydney, n.d., pp. 27-28.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 6
Team Planning and Review
To gain acceptance of and commitment to team goals and strategies, the team leader
should involve the whole team in the planning session.
SWOT Analysis
It is important that a team identify any internal strengths and weaknesses and external
opportunities and threats before developing a team plan. This is called a SWOT analysis:
Vision
The team can then form a shared vision of some future state that it would like to achieve. A
vision answers the following questions:
Action Plan
The next step is to formulate an action plan to achieve its vision by:
• Building on strengths
• Eliminating or reducing weaknesses
• Taking advantage of opportunities
• Avoiding or overcoming threats.
NOTE: It is important that the team plan is consistent with and supports the Division’s or
Faculty’s plan. It should also include ways in which the team can benefit from the
diversity of its membership.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 7
Continuous Improvement
The action plan should be monitored on an ongoing basis, with adjustments made to ensure
the success of the plan. The plan should then be reviewed after 12 months to determine:
Planning
Improvement Implementation
Review
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 8
Source: Leadership and the One Minute Manager: Study Guide/Action Planner, Kenneth Blanchard, Patricia
Zigarmi, & Drea Zigarmi, Blanchard Management Corporation & Zigarmi Associates Inc., Escondido,
California, 1985, p. 62.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 9
Directive Behaviour … Supportive Behaviour
Directive Behaviour
Anytime a leader:
Supportive Behaviour
Anytime a leader:
Source: Leadership and the One Minute Manager: Study Guide/Action Planner, Kenneth Blanchard, Patricia
Zigarmi and Drea Zigarmi, Blanchard Management Corporation & Zigarmi Associates Inc., Escondido,
California, 1985, p. 12.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 10
Situational Leadership
Situational leadership theory is based on the premise that you will be a stronger and more
effective leader if you choose your leadership style to suit the needs of individual
employees at a given time. There is no “best” leadership style – what is appropriate will
vary, depending on the situation. Effective leaders use a variety of styles, matching their
style to the needs of the individual, the situation and associated variables.
• Directive behaviour - clearly telling people what to do, how to do it, where to do it,
when to do it, and then closely supervising their performance. Structure – Control –
Supervise
• Supportive behaviour – listening to people, providing support and encouragement for
their efforts, and then facilitating their involvement in problem-solving and decision-
making. Praise – Listen – Facilitate
• Style 1: Directing
(High direction, low support, leader in charge of decision making.)
The supervisor provides specific instructions and closely supervises task
accomplishment.
• Style 2: Coaching
(High direction, high support, leader and follower are involved in decision making but
the leader has the final say.)
The supervisor continues to direct and closely supervise task accomplishment, but also
explains decisions, solicits suggestions and supports progress. The supervisor
schedules regular meetings to provide direction and support.
• Style 3: Supporting
(Low direction, high support, follower plays a major role in decision-making with the
support and encouragement of the leader.)
The supervisor facilitates and supports the employee’s efforts towards task
accomplishment and shares responsibility for decision-making with them. The
supervisor occasionally checks performance.
• Style 4: Delegating
(Low direction, low support, follower in charge of decision-making.)
The supervisor turns over responsibility for decision-making and problem-solving to
the employee. The employee asks the supervisor for help when needed.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 11
When deciding which leadership style to use, it is necessary to consider the employee’s
development level. The development level is task-specific and depends on 2 factors:
• Competence: knowledge and skills gained from education, training and/or experience;
and
• Commitment: a combination of confidence (self-assuredness of being able to do a
task) and motivation (enthusiasm and interest in doing a task).
• D1 – the employee has low competence and high commitment (the “enthusiastic
beginner”), therefore the supervisor needs to provide direction (S1 - directing).
• D2 – the employee has some competence and low commitment (the “disillusioned
learner”), therefore the supervisor needs to provide both direction and support (S2 -
coaching).
• D3 – the employee has high competence and variable commitment, therefore the
supervisor needs to provide support (S3 - supporting).
• D4 – the employee has high competence and high commitment, therefore the
supervisor does not need to provide direction or support (S4 - delegating).
• The supervisor could observe the employee’s performance and attitude, analyse their
level of competence and commitment, and then select the appropriate leadership style
OR
• The supervisor and employee could contract for the appropriate leadership style. This
process involves:
- Agreeing on goals. Goals start performance in the right direction and permit a
supervisor to analyse an employee’s competence and commitment to perform well.
The supervisor should make sure that performance standards are clear and
understood by the employee – if the supervisor can’t measure it, they can’t manage
it!
- Agreeing on the employee’s development level for the task.
- Matching the leadership style to the employee’s development level.
- Planning for how you are going to work together.
- Following through – i.e. delivering the appropriate leadership style and adjusting it
as progress is made or difficulties are encountered.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 12
As progress is made, the employee moves to the next development level. The supervisor’s
leadership style should likewise move:
Remember that each employee will have different needs and move through the
development levels at different speeds. If a temporary setback is experienced, the
supervisor should move backwards through the steps:
There are five steps to follow to develop an employee’s competence and commitment:
1. Goals start performance in the right direction and permit a manager to analyse a
person’s competence and commitment (development level) to perform well. Agree on
three to five goals and use different leadership styles to supervise performance in
relation to those goals.
2. Praisings foster improvements in the development level of individuals and permit a
manager to change his/her leadership style gradually from more direction (directing) to
less direction and more support (coaching and supporting) to less direction and less
support (delegating).
3. Reprimands stop poor performance and may mean that a manager has to move back
gradually from less direction and less support (delegating) to more support (supporting)
or more direction (coaching and directing). NOTE: Reprimands are not a training tool
but a way to deal with competent people whose performance has dropped because of
motivation or attitude problems.
“The true test of an effective leader is not what happens when you’re there, but what
happens when you’re not!” (Kenneth Blanchard)
Source: Leadership and the One Minute Manager: Increasing Effectiveness through Situational Leadership,
Kenneth Blanchard, Patricia Zigarmi, & Drea Zigarmi, 1985, Collins, London, 1985.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 13
Team Roles
For effective team operation, the team should have a balance of task and maintenance
behaviours, and self-oriented behaviours should be eliminated.
1. Initiator
Initiates or proposes tasks or goals; offers new ideas; new definitions of a team
problem; new attack on a problem; suggests solutions to problems.
2. Information Seeker
Seeks information or opinions; requests facts or an estimate; seeks relevant information
about a team concern; seeks suggestions or ideas; asks for clarification of information,
values, suggestions or ideas.
3. Information Giver
Gives information or opinions; offers facts or generalisations; provides relevant
information about a team concern; states a belief about a matter before the team; gives
suggestions or ideas; relates own experience to the team problem to illustrate points.
4. Expert
Has and provides specialist advice.
5. Clarifier
Clarifies and elaborates or interprets ideas or suggestions; clears up confusions; defines
terms; gives examples; indicates alternatives and issues before the team; tries to
envision how a proposal might work if adopted.
6. Coordinator
Combines ideas or suggestions; shows relationships among various ideas or
suggestions; offers a decision or conclusion for the team to accept or reject; coordinates
activities; tries to draw together activities of various subgroups or members.
7. Ideas Summariser
Summarises ideas; restates suggestions after the team has discussed them.
8. Consensus Tester
Tests for consensus; asks to see whether the team is nearing a decision; sends up a
“trial balloon” to test a possible conclusion.
9. Evaluator
Assesses the quality of suggestions, solutions or norms; assesses progress; analyses
problems.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 14
10. Implementer
Focuses on implementation details, timing and methods.
12. Representative
Speaks, liaises or negotiates on behalf of the team.
1. Exemplar
Exemplifies the team’s ideals in personality, attitudes and behaviour.
2. Harmoniser
Attempts to reconcile disagreements; reduces tensions; mediates; conciliates
differences in points of view; proposes compromise solutions.
3. Gate Keeper
Helps keep communication channels open; encourages participation by others and
sharing of ideas; suggests procedures that permit sharing remarks; suggests time limits
so that everyone will have a chance to be heard.
4. Feelings Summariser
Summarises what the team feeling is sensed to be; describes reactions of the team to
ideas or solutions.
5. Encourager
Is friendly, warm and responsive to others; indicates by facial expression or remarks
the acceptance of others’ contributions; encourages cohesiveness and warmth; praises
and accepts others’ ideas; supports; empathises.
6. Compromiser
When one’s idea or status is involved in a conflict, offers a compromise that yields
status; admits error; modifies in the interests of team cohesion or growth.
7. Standard Setter
Helps set goals and standards; expresses standards for the team to use in choosing its
content or procedures or in evaluating its decisions; tests the team’s effectiveness by
offering observations on team process, and pointing out examples of constructive
behaviours and effective procedures; reminds the team to avoid decisions that conflict
with team standards.
8. Confronter
Brings conflicts out into the open.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 15
9. Tension reliever
Reduces formality; drains off negative feeling by jesting or pouring oil on troubled
waters; putting a tense situation in context.
10. Follower
Agrees with decisions of the team; thoughtfully accepts others’ ideas; serves as an
audience during team discussion.
1. Blocker
Resists stubbornly; negative; returns to rejected issues.
2. Recognition-seeker
Calls attention to self by boasting, bragging or acting superior; highlights own
achievements.
3. Dominator
Manipulates the team; interrupts others; gains attention; seeks to dominate discussion
and to impose own views/objectives.
4. Aggressor
Attacks others; ridicules; hostile; sarcastic.
5. Avoider
Remains apart from others; resists passively.
6. Absentee
Withdrawn; uninvolved.
7. Smotherer
Compulsively nice; stifles attention to conflict.
8. Confessor
Reveals personal fears and failings; uses team as therapy session.
Sources:
“Team Dynamics”, Ian Brooks, New Zealand Universities Administration Course, 1-6 Sep. 2002, pp. 6-7.
Dunphy 1981 quoted in Organisational Behaviour: An Organisational Analysis Perspective, Richard
Dunford, Addison-Wesley, Sydney, 1992, p. 110.
Benne & Sheats 1948 quoted in A Diagnostic Approach to Organizational Behavior, 2nd edn, Judith Gordon,
Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1987, p. 282.
Communication in the Workplace, Leah Shmerling, Macmillan, South Melbourne, 1996, pp. 251-252.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 16
The Four Stages of Team Development
What a Team is Doing in This Stage If a Team in This Stage, It Might Feel:
Stage 1: Forming
• Getting to know the task and one • Excited about being part of something
another new
• Learning each other’s skills and • Anxious about the goals and what it
expectations takes to achieve them
• Testing each other’s commitment and • Suspicious about what’s expected of
attitude them
• Beginning to define tasks and roles • Unsure about how their contribution
• Focusing on symptoms and problems will fit in with the team’s mission and
not related to the task goals
Stage 2: Storming
After a new team is formed, its members typically go through some rough times.
• Set unrealistic goals • Frustrated that progress isn’t being
• Rely on only one person’s experience made as fast as expected
and ideas • Angry that ideas are criticised or
• Resist working together ignored
• Make little progress • Impatient with members who are slow
• Compete for control or who don’t pull their weight
• Focus on the task or goal, not on how to • Jealous of others who might have more
get it done rewarding or easier responsibilities
Stage 3: Norming
The team gets on course and identifies how its members can work together effectively.
• The team is having some difficulty, but • Respect for other members’ needs and
is making progress toward reaching the capabilities
goal • Relief that the team is making progress
• Use each other’s ideas • A growing sense of trust because
• Give and receive constructive feedback everyone is committed
• Set, and usually follow, team ground • Increasingly comfortable working
rules and norms together
• Value individual differences
Stage 4: Performing
The team is now fully functioning.
• Make progress toward the goal with • Pride in their work
speed and efficiency • Excited about being part of the team
• Work together to diagnose and • Enjoyment in working together and
overcome obstacles meeting goals
• Use feedback to make changes • Fully committed to the team
• Find ways to continuously improve how • Secure in relying on other members
they work together
Source: Working in Teams, Development Dimensions International, n.d., Pittsburgh, pp.11-14.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 17
Helping Teams through the Stages of Team Development
Team leaders and trainers need to help their teams move through the various stages of team
development and, while the path may not be entirely predictable, there are actions which
can be taken to enhance progress at each stage.
Summary - Skills for Effective Team Leadership V5.0 October/November 2003 Page 18