Professional Documents
Culture Documents
kj4j(Jl fJLAJi'jL^^
I (J /
PANEL: Warning of Transnational Threats
What is Warning?
(1) What are the essential principles and methods that the U.S. developed during the
Cold War for analyzing and preparing warnings of a surprise attack?
- Did the U.S. use these principles and methods before 9/11 concerning
terrorism?
(3) Has the threshold for warning of terrorist attacks been too low?
(4) Ms. McCarthy wrote in 1998 that "the likelihood of a cataclysmic warning failure
is growing." Do you believe that the attacks of 9/11 were "a cataclysmic warning
failure?"
Who is in Charge?
(5) Who was is in charge of warning of terrorist attacks against the U.S. prior to 9/11?
(6) What entities within the Intelligence Community should have some responsibility
for warning of terrorist attacks?
What is the division of labor among the Terrorist Threat Integration Center, the
CIA's Counterterrorist Center, the National Intelligence Center, and other
agencies?
(8) What is policymakers' role in the warning process, and what should their role be?
(9) What entities and mechanisms currently exist within the government to ensure that
warning is connecting to timely and effective responses?
(10) Are there other ways we can improve our government's ability to provide warning?
Congress
(11) Has Congress met its responsibility in establishing priorities, providing resources,
and conducting oversight of the Intelligence Community?
(2) Can the DCI fulfill his responsibilities as the President's principal advisor on
intelligence and head of the Intelligence Community if agencies responsible for
imagery intelligence, signals intelligence, and collection acquisition capabilities -
NIMA, NSA, and NRO respectively - are part of the Defense Department?
(3) Having served as both the DCI and the Secretary of Defense, what in your view is
the optimal relationship between these officials?
- First, should the DNI have increased authority over NSA, NRO, and NIMA -
such as the authority to execute appropriations, to reallocate funds within the
Intelligence Community without the Secretary of Defense's consent, and to
consolidate and standardize intelligence personnel systems?
(6) In the past, we have divided foreign and domestic intelligence, but global terrorism
is a transnational threat that transcends the U.S. border. Would the creation of a
Director of National Intelligence close that gap?
Should one official have responsibility for all foreign and domestic intelligence
related to counterterrorism?
(2) Can the DCI fulfill his responsibilities as the President's principal advisor on
intelligence and head of the Intelligence Community if agencies responsible for
imagery intelligence, signals intelligence, and collection acquisition capabilities -
NIMA, NSA, and NRO respectively - are part of the Defense Department?
(3) Having been the DCI and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, what is the optimal
relationship between the DCI and the Secretary and Deputy Secretaries of Defense?
- First, should the DNI have increased authority over NSA, NRO, and NIMA -
such as the authority to execute appropriations, to reallocate funds within the
Intelligence Community without the Secretary of Defense's consent, and to
consolidate and standardize intelligence personnel systems?
(6) hi the past, we have divided foreign and domestic intelligence, but global terrorism
is a transnational threat that transcends the U.S. border. Would the creation of a
Director of National Intelligence close that gap?
Should one official have responsibility for all foreign and domestic intelligence
related to counterterrorism?
(1) Given that you endorse the creation of a DNI, what specific authorities should a
DNI have vis-a-vis the Defense and the Homeland Security Departments - such as:
- the authority to execute appropriations,
to reallocate funds within the Intelligence Community without a cabinet
secretary's consent, and
- to consolidate and standardize intelligence personnel systems?
(2) You also argue that the U.S. needs a single individual with responsibility and
accountability for all counterterrorism information, both foreign and domestic.
What would this mean for entities within the Homeland Security Department
such as the Secret Service, the Customs Service, legacy-INS, and the Coast
Guard?
(3) You endorse the creation of a domestic security agency and note that placing the
agency in the Department of Homeland Security would connect the agency to other
homeland security functions, while having the agency report to the DNI would
make the agency independent from policy agencies.
Given that you call for a single official over all intelligence activities related to
counterterrorism, shouldn't the agency report to the DNI?
(4) You call for the handling of information to be decentralized and modeled on a
"network approach," and you also advocate greater centralization of authority
within the Intelligence Community and more broadly.
(5) You argue that effective counterterrorism requires dramatic organizational change
and recalibrating the balance between security and information-sharing. However,
the U.S. faces not just terrorism but also traditional state actors.
Do you believe that there are risks to civil liberties from the manner of
organizing U.S. intelligence capabilities, such as having one person in charge?
Does the nature of the terrorist and WMD threat outweigh such risks?