Professional Documents
Culture Documents
!."; . . . ,
" . 'I 4.. t , ,,
ht latratlon
_\ .: 1 . . ..
i :.. :-. 1 ..
H t 1: ' .,
: . .
; t: ... l r
.u ....
c::ntt.,,,.,i3=::,MJ.Mt4;: w
Access Copyright Offcc lnformatiof'
.\ . :
I< ., _ ) . '
.-r:. r . ... - .,
I
Caaef j Statue
, . . I
Closed
Closed
. . .
I
I
Closed
. ' , .. I
Closed
' .. c ' I
Worktng
. I Closed
, .. .
1::
Closed
I ; Worl<ing
- Closed
'I -- I' '
Oper
I
Oper>
t Open
. .
I.
Opctl'
'-1. I
;
.. ..-, r opor
I f ; , ! .. : Open
I !, ; Oper
1 > ,, - . Oper
I ..
I' Opon
.,
Oper
1 ,
Oper>
.. ... llf H..:r:tf
Home I . - I My Profile I Ue I Help J Log Out
VoUNumllsaue
Month
Type of Cue Feo Pale Oponed Tltlo
Year
311/2013 Garden Party - Tray 12- Classics Work of ti\C VISual Arts 795
31112013 Closing Night - Tray 8- Clossics Work of the VISual Arts 795.
311/2013 Casual Friday- Tray 6- Classics Work of tllC Vsuat Arts 795
311/2013 Ladies Luncl' Troy 3 - Cklssics Work of the VISual Arts 795.
3i112013 Wf'o and OINt - Tray 2- Classics Work oftho Visual Arts C.
31112013 W111e arrd Dinct - Tray 2 - Classics Work of tho Vsual Arts 795.
31112013 Opening Day Tray 1 Work of the VISual Ar1s 795.
31112013 (not providCld)
C.:
212612013 OA RopiOflish for Sabika: (1-DH4UOD) DA Replooish 0.1
111112013 Vllltagc Pearlized Large Drop Earrings SV218C-BOU Work of the VIsual Arts 35.1
111112013 Pear1izod Far>cy Drop Earrings S6SO
Work of the VISual Arts 35.1
1/11/2013 Edilbr Poarized Manhattan BracoletSE1177-PEA 'Work of the Vcsual Al1s 35.1
111112013 Pearized Flawof Necklace 5649
Work of tile Vsual Arts 35.1
111112013 Editioo Pearlized Manhanan Chokor SEB40-PEA
Wortc of the Visual Arts 35.\
1111/2013 'h!tage T-Shin PondarTtSV655
of the VIsual Arts 35.1
111112013 Edilbn T-Shirt Venna Earrings SE424-CRM
Work of the Visual Arts 35.1
111112013 Edilbn T -Stlirt Daisy Ring SE532-TSH
Work of tile Vual Arts 35.1
1/1112013 T-Shirt Stretch Bracelet 5652
'Work of the VIsual Al1s 35.(
1/11/2013 T-Shirt Turquoiso Stretcl\ Bracelet 5651
Work of the Visual Arts JS.(
1/1112013 Edilbn T-Shirt Vienna Choker SE335- TSH
Work of the Visual Arts 35.(
Ac1 _ :;e". ar :o!l& 1' c:J ,,. :ne 0cpyr9'1 O'ftoe . .,;;;.Qflally .&!nvfyotJQ ollfamr.ICYI :r\; foml"' a'ller 10 proe.;.;. ,;;:. coa,ngrn ---
!l) yo.. at'!! agMrtlg !i:orf:...!"'e -:aUS d< !"WW ot'famallOI\1hiltlfiCIIICe J).dliiCBt.C>'l :c;.gva :11981 natlc1tal yo..t COIIyrq\1 darma& -1t1111 !:ly 11 U.S.C, !fJ!>. 1: "'' BCPeat' .n Dfllllle ca;a,og.
If Oo 1101 :Yo.".-Je l'\i! " ' "VIOII f'IMI\IA!SII!d. I'I!IP5tfa:IOrl 'l'laf :.e 0' oetayed, ancJ you may no: an:ne.-: 1r;: :et'.a:!! 181111!0418, anc unoe- :'>& lilY-
C
a
s
e
1
:
1
3
-
c
v
-
0
0
8
4
8
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
3
3
-
1
F
i
l
e
d
0
6
/
2
5
/
1
3
P
a
g
e
3
1
o
f
9
3
P
a
g
e
I
D
#
:
1
5
8
'' COPYPICH':
Homo I - I My Prvnto I Con-.ct U1-l Hotp I Log Out I
-,\" ''' ..
'\li
, _ .. r ..
'. -, ;: II I
. ', f
I I I
M'
t f ; J ' I i
{ r' , t :r
; .. } .. '
f( , ;F ,: I
Vol/ Nurnlluuo
Month
Typo of C... Foe Pald
Cuo#l Stotus Oponod Tltlo
Year
J. ' I f :.' '
I
I ; : ; 1.; '
I
Open 1/1112013 Vintage TShlf1 Cross Nocklace MSJ Work 01 the VlsueiArt$
M
Open 1/1112013 Kurcno L.argi) Crop arnl'g5 S2160-LUG Work 01 ti'C V15Ulll Ans
Accosa Copy11gl't Oll.ee tnformotiOn
I
Opor 1/1112013 Kimono RO$o t:arrilgs $&43
Work Olthe Vosuol Arts / . I -
H ,, :
I
Open 1/1112013 KtmonQ 3 S10110 Rir.q S343LUG
Worlr. of II'IC VISual Arts
:- .. :
I
Opor 111112013 Kirnoro Marl\attol' BraeoiOt S1177-KIM
Work of the VISual Arts
I Closod 111112013 Vll'toQO !Ur.oro Couturo Cnoker M2?
Work of lhO VISU81 Atl$
I 111112013 Kimoro Cnokor
Work ol tho Vi5ual Arts
I
I
Opor 1/1112013 Krmono Extra I.Ong NOCICIOCO S600
Work ollllO VISUOI Art$
i
Opor 111112013 Potct-work Srr>aP Drop Earrin9s S3764 U>
Work of the VlsueiAr\S
I Open 1/11/2013 Pat::hwOrk TurQuOISO l.4lrgo Sluds S6S1TU
Work of t11o Vs1181 Ar1s
I
Opor 1/1112013 PatchwO!'k 3-Stono Studs 5648
Worto. of the VisuaiAns
1-
1/1112013 Vmlago Na<:klace S\'616
WOrtc althO Vsual Ar\$
I 0!)0<' 1/1112013 Potclllo.ork 3-Stone Nocklec:e 5611
Work of tho Visual Arts
! '
I Opot' 1/1112013 OptimiSm Small Drop E4rmgs S3754-FU
Work of tl\0 VtSual At1s
Opon 1/1112013 Optlrmsrr CIOYor Esrrings S610-0PT
Work of tile VIsual Arts
Opon 111112013 OptmtsiT' 3-Stor. Rit!g
of the VIsual Art&
0pOf'l 1/1112013 Vintage Opum.sm Lon<tQC! SV44G-OPT
Work of tho Vlsuel Ms
Opan 1/1112013
Vinlage Optrmsm Swarovski Chokor SV659
Work ci the Visual Arls
Open 1/11/2013 OpiJTIISrro Cross Nocklace S6l-'
Work of tho Vls118! Arts
Opan 1/1112013 Edilior Moder!' lr.luitoon Slatoment Studs SE6U.VOL
Wolk ci the Vl$uai Arls
r., . Aet Sc<::'""' 4()1!-'I : J <:>' ; 7 f:J liWI .)"le<: :::00. O'"oee lt.(.(!<:e<:! ! nt: -eq.....,.t..: \1fO IIU '.N .. .
Qy yo., 119 ..,...."9 !C> 4ft t:/1 N! md..e;t :e 9 .. t!CMIC!e cl .,_ Cla.m U by 17 U.S. C. 70!>. II Will IN Ofi1CU Cll!iM . .
:14 yO.. ILl lie! !'14 1'1911faL&> or<ltl4yecl, "lly 1'10'1 t.;, 6o' li'!!CO: !C. - M1<1 t>ene'o!i w"\\t' !1\or ....
35.C
35.C
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
C
a
s
e
1
:
1
3
-
c
v
-
0
0
8
4
8
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
3
3
-
1
F
i
l
e
d
0
6
/
2
5
/
1
3
P
a
g
e
3
2
o
f
9
3
P
a
g
e
I
D
#
:
1
5
9
, - ( ...... t ...
-t ,.
.:. i .: r: -
, I ' I
.
J
- .,.,_
' : :. ' 1-, ' J t. o'\ ; ':- 1,1
'
..1 . I I
.. , _ ,I" - "
.. !! M 1 I
Access Copyrigtn Off.::e lrforrratOI'
....
, . ,J ,J: -
r,' !, 1,. ::
1 - . '1":' f: Open
: .. I Opon
. !, .. , 0"'"11
- 1' "' - ....
. ;-- ; J' ' Open
.. Opel!
.. . Open
! , :: . t Opon
', . , J'<;;;..: Open
, ' .. ,j- j t75 Open
.
.; - - 1 . : Open
.,. , .. . 0,.,...,
., ,_ I _ ...__ , .,._,
; . : Open
1 . j;; : : : Open
1 Open
.... J c ' Open
! . i" .
Oponod
1i11:'2C 1 J
1i 11i2C13
1i11i.2C1J
1!11.12C13
1!11i2C13
1.'11:'2C13
1!11.12013
1!11:2C13
1i11:'2C13
1.' 11:2C1:!
1.'1112<:13
1i11!2!l13
1i11i2C1J
1/1112013
1."41."'1!\ ..
" ' 41.""1n1":l
Thle .
Moclern lntullioo Golf Earrings S2069 ASP
Modorn lmuillon Strctct> Bracelet 5639
Vtntage Modern lntuiliol' Ncckla::e SV!l23
Moclem lntullioo 1-Siooo Necklace 5622
Girly A1. Hoart 2-Stone Large Drop Earrings 5270-RP
Girty A1. Heart Mar.hllnar. Bracelet S11n-GAH
Girly At Hoart DaughUtr FlOwer Necklace S608
Girly At Heart Flower
Edition LaVe En Rose Large Drop Earrings SE2160-...
La Vit En Rose 2-Stonc Smal Drop Earrings SS40-VR
Edtior. En Roso Daisy Rirlg SE628
Edition La V10 En R05e LOO<!ol1 81'111:elet SE440-lVER
Edklon La VIe En Rose Mai'Nittar Bracelet SE1177-L
Editlorl La Vit En Rose Londor Choker SE259-LVER
Edition La V10 En Rose Marl\attar Choker
Walefcolofs X.Small Drop Earrir.gs 5550-LAZ
warercolor:s Golf Earrings 52069--LAM
r..t .. :-.- ,..,,_. ____ .___ ... _ ..., ___
\A.Lo..--'-- u .. -- ._, __ ,_,_-- _,....,_
--
C...,f'{PIC.H Hj:\2
Home I .. I My Profile I Contact u.l Hei;J I Log Out I
VoU NumJisauo
Month
Year
Typo of Case
Work of the VISual Arts
Work of tho Vsual Arts
Work of the VtSual Arts
Work of the VISual Arts
Work of the Vcsual Arts
Work d the Vsual Arts
\'1/ork of tile Vcsual Arts
Work of the V15 ual Arts
Work of the Vl&ual Ans
Work ofthe V.sual Arts
Work of tOO VISual Arts
Work of the Visual Arts
Worlc oC the VBual Arts
Work of the VBual Arts
Work oC the Visual Arts
Work of the VISual Arts
Work ot the Vsual Arts
Work of the VISual Arts
Work oC the VISual Arts
Feo Paid
35.0
35.0
35.C
35.0
35.C
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
C
a
s
e
1
:
1
3
-
c
v
-
0
0
8
4
8
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
3
3
-
1
F
i
l
e
d
0
6
/
2
5
/
1
3
P
a
g
e
3
3
o
f
9
3
P
a
g
e
I
D
#
:
1
6
0
....
!: , , :.
.,,-
t A !. eco.copyright.gov
back r ... :
1
.
I..
. -. I
....
'
i.\ C.C It ' PIG )oCT
. . .
4 61 - 80 of80
- .
:.
Access Copyrigl>t Offi::e IMo!mntion
t Status
I: : . . -. CbsO<!
. 'I' > ' Cbsoc!
.
1
. . CIO$ed
. Closccl
I
i , 4 .. Clo&od
I' . . ' . CIOSod
" ; - .' . Cnsod
- =
. ...
- . . Worll.r.g
I . ; Clcsod
I - , Closed
.. -F" .. Cbsed
> f. " c ' Closed
r .. ,._ '
- 'f Cnsed
Opened
1: 1112013
1.11i2C13
1i11i2013
111 1f2C13
1/1012013
1!10.'2013
1i10i2C13
1/10.'2013
1i1C..2013
1i10i2013
1!10!2013
1/10/2013
1i1012013
1i1012013
1/1012013
Tille .
Romami:: CurmntVIIlf'!na Earr"'9S 5424-Vl
V11tage R.omanlie Current 3 Stor>c r.rg SV343-VL
Romat>lic CUf111f't Swarovsk CllO!I:et 5656
Vnotage RomariC CurreN r !:lYre CI\Oitcr
Edilioo YouthfuiHerlage Ulge Dop Earrir>gs SE21...
Youttlful Heritage 2-SIDI!e Srnal Dtop Eamngs S6EO .. .
Edition Youthful Hefi!age Manllattaro Bracelet SE 117 .. .
Youlhtul Herllage 2-&ooe Smal Drop S6EO .. .
Edilion Youii'IM Heritage MafiNittar &acole'l SE1 17 .. .
YOU1tltul Necklace 5632
YOU1hful Henlage Necklace 5632
Ed ilion YOUihful Heriage Mal'hattar Choket SE84G- Y ...
Uptown Polish 2S1Dne Studs 5640-GS
Up:own Polish Fanc:y Drop Ear"'9S 5058-06
Uptown Polish Rilg 5621
Uptown Polish SwarOYSiti Cooker S605
Vol/ Numllssue
Month
Yoar
Type of Case
Work of ltlo V.uat Ar.s
Work of the VISual Am;
Work of ltle VISual Ans
Work of 'lhe Veual llr.s
Wort of the VISual Ar.s
WoOl of the V111ua1 Ar.s
Worll of lho VOiual t\r.s
Wor1t of ll1e V.sual Arts
of the VIsual Ar.s
ollho VIsual Ar.s
Wor1t of the Vaual AN
WOI1t of the Vlslllll Ans
Wcwk of lho Vl&ual Arts
Waft of the VL'Wal Ar.s
Work of 1he VtSwl Ar'.s
Wartt of the Vsval Arts
' . o '- Closed 1i101201:! Upta,vr. Poli&h 3-Row lollg Nccld!ICct S603 Work of lhe VIS1Jal Ar.s
- Closed 1110.'2013 E1r0f11css SQuare Eani'lgs 5602-AOU WoOl of lho. VIS1lal Arts
Closed 1i 1Q.o2013 Effortless Beaded Ean;..gs S63C Wort of the VIsual Ar1s
. Closed 1!1 (112() 13 Effortless Fun Bracelet S2584- Err Wen of the VISual An&
- -- - - --- __ .. _ - - . 1-- -- . ---- - --- - . - --- - .
Fcc P:lid
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35,0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0C
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
35.0:
.": 'lilT. ce: Sec: o-s '!: c:' f:'e l 1 o' tne .r ':110 S::ale& a;.tno- ze N Cclpyr>gl:l! 011ce :n aMec! lhll .-!r--:. ,..."""'"l'al '1!QuU'b1 on II - =a- :c cnx.ess. :ne .at:O'oCaban 'rY COllY"'It'=
:rr.q, . !ly D'li<.C"9 "'"'"'":.cr yo. are "9-""-"'G .. !!.es. rt :rw 1eg31 oa: :e o' 'fWr CDCYJ"19111 elM!! as I8QUlR!G Dy ! .J.S. C. i lC!: 1: "' 1 a:llleN or. :ha 0" 11 D"\ -.e
I! Y!>.o no: ::"1 "6':--"!S!ei:. "e?.Sifil:.all'lay tE '!!'..Sed 01' Cl!na.: . !"<l yo.. ll&y no: :;e :o cr.an "" e' . aN -.e!'o!s ...,. :he OOI:Y'V'C aw
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 34 of 93 PageID #: 161
EXHIBJT3
~ ,_ . - - ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ ~ " " . ~ r
C
a
s
e
1
:
1
3
-
c
v
-
0
0
8
4
8
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
3
3
-
1
F
i
l
e
d
0
6
/
2
5
/
1
3
P
a
g
e
3
5
o
f
9
3
P
a
g
e
I
D
#
:
1
6
2
SABIKA TRADEMARKS
OURDKT. TRADEMARK CLASS* SERIAL NO. FILING DATE REGISTRATION REGISTRATION
i
NO. NO. DATE
I
6120-6 Heart Design 14 85/843,540 February 7, 2013
6120-7 Golf 14 85/877,459 March 15, 2013
6120-8 Sabika Manhattan 14 85/879,755 March 19, 2013
6120-9 Fun 14 85/877,550 March 15, 2013
6120-10 London 14 85/877,506 March 15, 2013
6120-11 Vienna 14 85/877,570 March 15, 2013
6120-12 Sabika Love 35 85/889,533 March 28, 2013
6120-13 Sabika Classics 35 85/890,020 March 29, 2013
6120-18 Sabika 14&35 85/888,908 March 28, 2013
6120-19 Heart 14, 18, 25 & 35 85/343,470 June 10, 2011 4,077,226 December 27,2011
6120-20 Sabika 35 85/343,359 June 10, 2011 4,087,637 January 17, 2011
6120-21 Sabika 14 77/261,515 August 22, 2007 3,731,881 December 29, 2009
6120-22 Austrian Crystal Jewelry Sabika 35 85/343,406 June 10, 2011 4,189,055 May 29,2012
6120-23 Sabika is the Promise of A 35 85/321,647 May 16,2011 4,087,021 January 17, 2013
Smile, The Beginning of a Story
and the End of Going
Unnoticed
*Class 14 is for Jewelry; Class 18 is for Tote Bags; Class 25 is for Aprons & T-Shirts; and Class 35 is for Retail Services.
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 36 of 93 PageID #: 163
EXHIBIT4
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 37 of 93 PageID #: 164
I, Natalie E. Tennant, Secretary of State of the
State of West Virginia, hereby certify that
GOSHEN SPARKLING JEWELRY, LLC
Control Number: 99VQX
has filed its "Articles of Organization" in my office according to the provisions of West Virginia
Code 31B-2-203 and 206. I hereby declare the organization to be registered as a limited
liability company from its effective date of July 10,2012 until the expiration of the term or
termination of the company.
Therefore, I hereby issue this
CERTIFICATE OF A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Given under my hand and tire
Great Seal of the State of
West Virginia on this day of
July 10,2012
Secretary of State
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 38 of 93 PageID #: 165
Natalie E. Tennant
Secretary of State
1900 Kanawha Blvd E.
Bldg I, Suite 157-K
Charleston, WV 25305
Penney Barker, Manager
Corporations Division
Tel: (304)558-8000
Fax: (304)558-8381
www.wvsos.com
Hrs: 8:30a.m.- 5:00p.m. ET FILE ONE ORIGINAL
(Two want a nlecl
stamped copy returaecl to you)
FEE: $100,00 (see chart for
additional fees)
WEST VIRGINIA
ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION
OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
v
We, acting as organizers according to WV Code 31B2202, ndopt the following Articles of Organization for a West
Virsinia Limited Liability Company:
1. The name of the West Virginia limited liability
company shall be: [Tho name mun contain one of the
GOSHEN SPARKLING JEWELRY, LLC
lcnnS such u "limited liabilit)l company" or abbreviations such u "LLC" ----------------
"PLLC"- sec instructions for alill ohcccp!Bblo terms.]
2. The company will be a:
D Professional LLC for the profession or. -------
Street:
385 1/2 White Pines Road
3. The address of the initial designated
office ofthe company in WV, if any
will be:
located in the county of:
City/State/Zip: _P_rin_ce_to_n,_WV_2_47_3_9
Mercer JUL
4. The address of the principal office
of the company will be:
County:
Street:
385 1/2 White Pines
10
lOtz
OFF1c
Princeton, WV 24739
located in the county of:
The mailing address of the above
location, if different, will be:
City/State/Zip:
County:
Street/Box:
City/State/Zip:
Mercer
385 1/2 White Pines Road
WV 24739
5. The name and address of the penon Name:
Michelle Oxley
to whom notice of process may be
385 112 White Pines Road
sent, if any, will be: Street:
Princeton, WV 24739
City/State/Zip:
6. E-mail address where business correspondence may be received: lifelinedir@pcogwv.com
7. Website Address of the business, if any: QOShensparklingjewelry.webS.COm
8. The name and address of each organizer:
Name No. & Street Address City, State, Zio
Michelle Oxley 385 1/2 White Pines Road Princeton, WV 24739
Sheraine Gunnoe 223 Nice Street Princeton, WV 24 7 40
laued byrhe Oftlcc oflho Sccrewy orSIIIIC Rnioed 0"12
1111
k $188.88 87/U/2812 1887651
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 39 of 93 PageID #: 166
WEST VIRGINIA ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION
9. The company will be:
I 0. The company will be:
an at-will company, for an indefinite period
a term company, for the term of ___ years
member-managed
manager-managed
Pagel
List the name(s) of the member(s)/manager(s) ofthe company (attach additional pages if necessary)
Name Street Address City. State, Zip
Michelle Oxley
Sheraine Gunnoe
385 1/2 White Pines Road Princeton, VW 24739
223 Nice Street Princeton, VW 24740
II. All or specified members of a limited liability
company are liable in their capacity as members
for all or specified debts, obligations or liabilities
of the company.
ll1
D
No-All debts, obligations and liabilities are those
of the company
Yes-Those persons who are liable in their capacity
as members for all debts, obligations or
liability of the company have consented in
writing to the adoption of the provision or to be
bound by the provision.
12. The purpose for which this limited liability company is formed are as follows:
(Describe the typc(s) of business activity which will be conducted, fcor example, "real estate," of residential and commercial
"commercial printing," "professional practice ofarchilcclurc.")
To create, market and sell jewelry, trinkets and other collectibles, and shall Include the transaction
or any and all lawful business fo1 whlclllimited liability companies may be formed in West VIrginia.
13. Is the business a Scrap Metal Dealer?
D Yes [lf"Yes," you must complete the Scrap Metal Dealer Registration Form <Form SMD-1).
Proceed to question 14.].
I I' I No [Proceed to question 14.)
14. Other provisions which may be set forth in the operating agreement or matters not Inconsistent with law:
[See instructions for fUrther infonnation; usc exlnl pages if necessary.]
None
IS. The number of pages attached and Included in these Anicles is: _0 ___ _
16. The requested effective date is:
[Requested date may not bl! f!Qr/ler til an
filing nor latu than 90 da)'s after filing.]
FannLLD-1
I I' I the date & time of tiling
D the following date-------and time ____ _
Issued by lho Offieo of the Sccn:tary of SIBle Revised 05/12
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 40 of 93 PageID #: 167
WEST VIRGINIA ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION Pagel
17. Contact and Signature Information:
a. Contact person to reach in case there is a problem with filing: Michelle Oxley Phone# <
304
)
809
"
8111
b. Print name of person who is signing articles of organization: _M_ic_h_e_l_le_O_x_le_y _____ _
c. Signatw-e: ~ l . . Q J L t Q ~
Date: 06/19/2012
FormLLOI hsued by 1hc Offioe oflho Socnruy ofSrato Revised 03/ll
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 41 of 93 PageID #: 168
EXHIBIT 5
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 42 of 93 PageID #: 169
t
00.
T
~
'
~
~
:::c
0
~
~
n
~
I '
I "' 'f.
. : .-.. ft
. . ~ . ,. ;l) . ,.
~ . \ . ' '
1 ..,_
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 43 of 93 PageID #: 170
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 44 of 93 PageID #: 171
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 45 of 93 PageID #: 172
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 46 of 93 PageID #: 173
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 47 of 93 PageID #: 174
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 48 of 93 PageID #: 175
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 49 of 93 PageID #: 176
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 50 of 93 PageID #: 177
!I
"!il
00
)
~
~
""C
~
0
~
~
n
1-3
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 51 of 93 PageID #: 178
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 52 of 93 PageID #: 179
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 53 of 93 PageID #: 180
. "* .
..
.. ,.
..
' .
. '
.. .
. .
"'
:0 ' ~ . H) ., t '. ~ ~
' . ~ ' i ....
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 54 of 93 PageID #: 181
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 55 of 93 PageID #: 182
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 56 of 93 PageID #: 183
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 57 of 93 PageID #: 184
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 58 of 93 PageID #: 185
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 59 of 93 PageID #: 186
,,
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 60 of 93 PageID #: 187
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 61 of 93 PageID #: 188
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 62 of 93 PageID #: 189
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 63 of 93 PageID #: 190
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 64 of 93 PageID #: 191
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 65 of 93 PageID #: 192
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 66 of 93 PageID #: 193
C
a
s
e
1
:
1
3
-
c
v
-
0
0
8
4
8
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
3
3
-
1
F
i
l
e
d
0
6
/
2
5
/
1
3
P
a
g
e
6
7
o
f
9
3
P
a
g
e
I
D
#
:
1
9
4
+ 1J htrps i www.lattDOok.ccm
l!!l A,lple ICtoud Fottbook Twiner News"'
'.iobil e Uo oad
MoblloUplood
.. Goshen Sparkling
-'-" Mly 21 . 2011 V.l
L. \ce Co-nmcn S"\ ;,.
36 people tlu mts
Michelle L Oxley Thll photo docs not do t hi s.
t hoker j ustiu. It 1s. absolutetv beawtifuHII
M.ly2: 1. 20Uat933.1m Ukt
Coshen Sparttl1ng Yn
M.JY 21 2012 at 9 <\193m v.a mobile Uke
MAnn McPeak How much7 rw Qot
lolblka ntckqu ab HOne t un't believe h0111
--- much lhll l ooks li ke Y blka j tJ 1o0 preny
GOSHEN PRODUCT
M.Jy Zl 2012 ilt 9 vla mobl e Uke
Sandra Collins Smllh WCYW love It
May 21.2012 otlO liu .0 l
.. Coshen SpartLIIng ,tti t iUI, toniQ.hr onfy the
-- tatoe stont chokers wt n be ! 75.00. Hope to St-t:
you at the open house
M&y 21 2012 at 10 'ria mobile
Jtnlca Mann Mtl"t!lr. WOfll you hiV't Qreat
prices! .:,.
'-1ay 21 2012 at 10 32am mobHt UICA:
C..rol Scon Wish 1 could be there tNt
f'Y'I!! nl nlliJ.
l.'.av2:1 2012at 26ilm lib
jenny Gross Th'WalteJ 'Wh&t 11 nwne: ol che
tholur looks so pretty\
21 2012 at 1 .COprr 'lltol mobile
... Cot.hen Sparkl+ng 75 conlght only from 6 to 8
-- 21 1012 at 5 34pm v. Ub
VIckie Farmer Mikles Is thl s one pictured an
A./I lib tht VieMo1 Sl b.J.fu?
)une 1 2' 12 ar. 10 02pm Ukt
Vlc.kte Farmt:r Mikles Of' 11 tht1 Ught VhRl'
)une I, Z012 .tt JO 06pm Ukt
Chrl5ty Silk CArico Is lhl1 the Afl stOnH7
8 1012 at 1 16pm UkP
Coshen Sparkling This IS Vitral Ught
-- NOYembtr a. 2012 a.t 1 l&pm mobile Uke
Uncb Anthany loYe .. muM haw Ill
NOYember 8, 2012 "" 2 Ulw
,._ ..... .. - .... , ........... t .... , ..... ,
0
)(
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 68 of 93 PageID #: 195
EXHIBIT 6
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 69 of 93 PageID #: 196
c:
0
V\
.-1
.-1
Vl
...
ro
V1
Q)
V\
cu
"-
Q)
0
.-1
==
-
~
ro
c:
V) 0
V\
ro
Q)
V\
0
.-1
Vl
g:
==
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 70 of 93 PageID #: 197
EXHIBITB
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 71 of 93 PageID #: 198
Home
Homr Produ<U Ahoul Us. Fo\cf'book Homf' Con1u1 Ul fAf)
IJitus 3:5
J{e S(l'CJt?a US, 1l0t 6ecause ofngfi.teous tfiings 'We (uu{ aone, 6ut
6ecause of fiis mercy. :f{e sa-r.>ea zt.s tfirougfi. tfie washing of
re6irtli aua renewa{ 6y tlie Jli.>{y Spirit.
We{come to qoslien SparRfing Jewe(ry!
Page 1 of 1
Wc would like tu tllkc this oppormnity tn thank nil of our custom erg who hnve upponed our businc ewer the P""'t 10 months.
ofyuu, Goshen Sparkling Jrwdry has become a Kucccss >tnd in doing so, we h11vc become a L'lrgct of n multi million dollar business who
WIUIIll tu put smnll businesllcs out of opcnttion for their own finm1cial gnin.
Goshen Spnrking Jewelry been or copyright and trndtm:.uk infringement by Sabika. We not and will not infringe on
trodemarks or copyrights. No part& of our jewelry hns been ustd dh\t is " trademark or "opyright. There lul\'c been individuals who have
tried to entrap llS by coming to our shows nnd plncing special ordcro trying to get us to usc their protected copyrigbtund rrademnrk. If
this bax happened, nnintcmional and unknowingly done because '1\'C did nut know the items had been copyrighted or
This i a very low und scheming 111tempt to bring lcga.l action aguinst uR and mu business down. We nbsolutcly refuse
to be dueatened or intimidated by n large company and their nttomcyR. We hnve been amised by legnl counsel not to stop making d1is
heamiful jewelry but ruther to kel.'p our business moving forward Wr will continue \vith all scheduled shows and our products can be
purchased ns If you would like to buy Snbika products, arc webitcs, and conguJtants that you can contnct to do
so.
Tlmnks agnin for your SUJ>port prnycn;. \Vc look forwllrd to stcing you snon al a shuw nc11r you.
God bless you
Tht Goshen Sparkling ]l'"'eby ftmtily
Janu;m 22,l013
htto://goshensoarklingjewelrv .com/ 3/8/2013
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 72 of 93 PageID #: 199
EXHIBIT C
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 73 of 93 PageID #: 200
goshensparklingjewelry.com WHOJS domain registration information from Network Solu... Page I of 5
'\
Network Solutions >> Whois >> Results
L I
.
r\5
Search
Renew
Transfer
Features
Private Registration
Protect
Forward
WHOIS Results for goshensparklingjewelry.com
Available domain names similar to goshensparklingjewelry .com
Available Extensions
E1 gosbensparklingjewelry .net
0 gosbensparklingjewelry .org
EJ goshensparklingjewelry.us
D gosbensparklingjewelry.us.c
om
Available Domains
D goshen-sparkling-jewelry.com
0 goshensparklingjewel.com
D goshensparkl ingjewellery .co
m
[] goshen-sparkling-jewel.com
Premium Resale Domains
EJ jewelrymom.com $3,500
Ll jewelrybot.com $1,162
Ll oaklandjewelrystore.com $488
D seattlejewelrydealers.com $14,995
0 gosbensparklingjewelry.info
El
gosbensparklingj ewelry .mo
bi
[) gosbensparklingjewelry .biz
[] gosbensparklingjewelry .co.u
k
[J goshensparklingjewelry .pro
1C1 goshensparklingjt!welry.de
http://www .networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?doma in=goshensparklingjewelry .com 3/7/2013
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 74 of 93 PageID #: 201
goshensparklingjewelry.com WHOIS domain registration information from Network Solu... Page 2 of S
EJ goshen-sparkling-
jewellery .com
E1 gOshensparklingjewelry .com
[C) goshensparklingjewelrywhol
esale.com
F.l goshensparklingjewelwholesa
I e. com
[j goshensparkl ingjewellerywho
lesale.com
El goshensparklingjewelrygifts
.com
LJ jewelryny.com $2,495
E) jewelryart.net $507
EJ oaklandjewelrystores.com $488
View more
goshensparklingjewelry .com
Is this your domain name? Renew it now.
IMAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
0 :.;! _
Current
Registrar:
IP Address:
Lock Status:
GODADDY.COM, LLC
72.167.232.14 (ARlN & RIPE IP search)
clientDeleteProhibited
The data contained in GoDaddy . com, LLC's Whols database ,
while believed by the company to be reliable, is provided "as is"
with no guarantee or warranties regarding its accuracy. This
information is provided for the sole purpose of assisting you
in obtaining information about domain name registration records.
Any use of this data for any other purpose is expressly forbidden wit
permission of GoDaddy.com, LLC. By submitting an inquiry,
you agree to these terms of usage and limitations of warranty. In pa
you agree not to use this data to allow, enabl e, or otherwise make pc
dissemination or collection of this data, in part or in its entirety,
purpose, such as the transmission of unsolicited advertising and
and solicitations of any kind, including spam. You further agree
not to use this data to enable high volume, automated or robotic elec
processes designed to collect or compile this data for any purpose,
including mining this data for your own personal or commercia l purpos
Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified
in the "registrant" field. In most cases, GoDaddy.com, LLC
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/resultsJsp?domain=goshensparklingjewelry.com 3/7/2013
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 75 of 93 PageID #: 202
goshensparklingjewelry.com WHO IS domain registration information from Network Solu... Page 3 of 5
is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database.
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: GOSHENSPARKLINGJEWELRY.COM
Created on: 20-May-12
Expires on: 20-May-17
Last Updated on: 20-May-12
Registrant:
Goshen Sparkling Jewley
385 1/2 white pines road
Princeton, West Virginia 24740
United States
I { I ;::--, ( l
Administrative Contact: \ 'v'
Gunnoe, Sheraine Goshensparklingjewelry@gmail.com
Goshen Sparkling Jewley
385 1/2 white pines road
Princeton, West Virginia 24740
United States
3048098131
Technical Contact:
Gunnoe, Sheraine Goshensparklingjewelry@gmail.com
Goshen Sparkling Jewley
385 1/2 white pines road
Princeton, West Virginia 24740
United States
3048098131
Domain servers in listed order:
NS05.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS06.DOMAIN:ONTROL.COM
' ,.,
The previous information has been obtained either directly from the registrant or a registrar of the
domain name other than Network Solutions. Network Solutions, therefore, does not guarantee its
accuracy or completeness.
Show underlying registry data tbr this record
YOU PUT YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
INTO YOUR SMALL BUSINESS
WE'RE HERE TO INSURE IT
FAST FREE QUOTE ,
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=goshensparklingjewelry.com 3/7/2013
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 76 of 93 PageID #: 203
goshensparklingjewelry.com WHOIS domain registration information from Network Solu ... Page 4 of5
Make an instant, anonymous offer to the current domain registrant. Learn More
Search Again
Search again here ...
Search by either
http://www .networksol utions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=goshensparklingjewelry .com 3/7/2013
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 77 of 93 PageID #: 204
goshensparklingjewelry.com WHO IS domain registration information from Network Solu.. . Page 5 of 5
Processing ...
0
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain::::goshensparklingjewelry.com 3/7/2013
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 78 of 93 PageID #: 205
EXHIBITD
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 79 of 93 PageID #: 206
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
------------------------------------------------------){
SABIKA, INC., )
Plaintiff, )
)
)
v. )
GOSHEN SPARKLING JEWELRY; )
MICHELLE OXLEY; and )
SHERAINE GUNNOE )
)
Defendants. )
------------------------------------------------------){
Civil Action No. 1:13-0848
DECLARATION OF CHRISTY MCNEIL
Christy McNeil states and declares as follows:
1. I work in the corporate division of Sabika in Greensboro, North Carolina as Field
Services Manager overseeing consultants over a wide geographic area covering the town
of Bluefield, as well as the Blacksburg/New River Valley area.
2. I have worked for Sabika eight years. Before that, I was a sales consultant for Sabika in
southwest Virginia for eight years. I initially signed on as a consultant and served as a
consultant for seven years; I also worked as a corporate liaison for 6 of those 8 years.
Before I worked for Sabika, I was in human resources at a commercial vehicle group.
3. I started at Sabika as an entry level consultant. I was the first consultant in North
Carolina. After about a year and a half, my family moved to Blacksburg in southwest
Virginia. Business grew e){ponentially and I was promoted to a suitcase manager, which
means I oversaw 40 to 50 consultants.
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 80 of 93 PageID #: 207
4. My family then moved back to North Carolina and I was promoted to my current
managerial position overseeing the rest of the consultants in the United States.
5. I handle all of West Virginia, except for the Blacksburg/New River Valley area and
Bluefield, which are managed by Jeannette Boyd. Sabika's biggest areas for sales and for
number of consultants, out of all our operations in the US, are West Virginia, Virginia,
and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
6. I am familiar with products by Goshen Sparkling Jewelry ("Goshen"). Goshen and other
smaller imitators have troubled Sabika in areas where Sabika has become popular.
7. I have seen products from Goshen as well as Frost yourself and Christy's Crystals. I
know from some of my consultants that Goshen have been traveling to parking lots and
have been evicted because they do not have permission to be there. I have heard that
Goshen is trying to recruit consultants to operate in a similar manner to Sabika.
8. My consultants have seen Goshen in hotel conference rooms in North Carolina and have
told me that Goshen does not give receipts for their sales. Further, my consultants have
stated that Goshen uses the Sabika catalogues to show their customers the pieces they
will make for them. Goshen was using Sabika catalogues as recently as February and
March of2013.
9. Increasingly since the summer of 2012, I have received complaints from Sabika
consultants saying that Goshen has appeared in an area preying on their customer base
and damaging Sabika sales.
10. Consultants are losing customers to Goshen because their products are so much cheaper
and they look similar.
2
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 81 of 93 PageID #: 208
11. I heard about one Sabika customer who had a Sabika neckJace and went to Goshen to ask
them to make matching earrings. When she wore the Goshen earrings she got a terrible
infection all over her face and neck. Goshen refused to give her a refund. She came back
to her old Sabika consultant saying, "I guess you get what you pay for" and said she
would never buy from Goshen again.
12. Another customer said she bought a piece from Goshen and it broke the first time she
wore it. Goshen refused to fix it and told her to get a pair of pliers. Sabika, in contrast,
stands behind our products and offers a lifetime warranty.
13. I have seen Goshen and it looks cheap to me. The stones are not as bright and the metal
and the stones both look like plastic. The quality is not the same.
14. Swarovski has different grades ofcrysta1s, priced according to the stones' quality.
15. Sabika only buys the highest grade crystals from Swarovski because we have a good
relationship with Swarovski. Goshen claims their crystals are the same, but I have seen
them and do not believe they are of the same quality.
16. I know immediately when I see Sabika and when I see a knock-off. The knock-offs look
cheap and gaudy. The stones do not look real. The necklaces do not lie naturally around
the neck. Rather, they look stiff and you can tell they were constructed on a flat surface,
without the care Sabika puts into our products. When a Sabika neckJace lies on the neck,
it lies naturally on the contours of the body. Sabika has a process to use foil on the stones
to bring out their rich colors.
17. I have heard that Goshen uses Sabika catalogues to show their customers the pieces they
will make for them. They are clearly imitating Sabika by producing pieces which use the
same color schemes and designs that we have come up with independently. Sabika
3
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 82 of 93 PageID #: 209
works hard on designing appealing and unique color schemes and Goshen keeps coming
up with the same thing. It is clear they are copying the Sabika designs that they have
access to.
18. Sabika has been successful because we create opportunities for local people to start a
business within their own community.
19. Sabika is a family business that is ethically run and cares about its consultants and their
communities. We give training to our consultants and stand behind our products.
20. Goshen is a threat to Sabika because they undercut our prices by offering similar products
for no more than about $100: three to five times less than our prices.
21 . Sabika has been substantially negatively affected by Goshen.
22. Our first quarter in 2013 is down 20% from our first quarter in 2012 even though we now
have more consultants than at this time last year. Moreover, our parties have been
cancelled.
23. These effects are only increasing as Goshen moves out of its original area to expand its
business geographically.
24. In areas where Sabika is not yet threatened by knock-offs, our business is growing and
more individuals are signing on to become consultants in their communities.
25. Between this time last year and now, Sabika has easily lost over $100,000 in sales.
26. Because of Sabika's business model of working with local citizens in their own
communities, the detriment to Sabika's sales is not a problem affecting a faceless
corporation, it is a problem for local individuals whose personal lives and incomes are
affected.
4
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 83 of 93 PageID #: 210
~ ~ M " ~
Christy M7cil
Field Services Manager for Sabika,
s
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 84 of 93 PageID #: 211
EXHIBITE
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 85 of 93 PageID #: 212
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
------------------------------------------------------}{
SABIKA, INC.,
v.
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
)
)
GOSHEN SPARKLING JEWELRY;)
MICHELLE OXLEY; and )
SHERAINE GUNNOE )
)
Defendants. )
------------------------------------------------------}{
Civil Action No. 1:13-0848
DECLARATION OF BROOKE MULKEY
Brooke Mulkey states and declares as follows:
I am a Sabika consultant from Bluefield, Virginia. I sell in both Virginia and
West Virginia in an area of about 50 miles. I started selling Sabika eight years
ago.
After I graduated from school, I started teaching full time. I first heard about
Sabika when another teacher, Karen Frier, wore it to school. She had a heart
pendant and I asked her where she got it. She told me about Sabika and its
parties. Karen Frier was the first consultant in Virginia, where she still sells.
I have been ememely successful. I am a Silver Director. I have three directors
under me, one of which is a Star Director. I have fifteen personal recruits in total.
I have been a Silver Director for almost two years now.
1
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 86 of 93 PageID #: 213
I usually have fifty to eighty parties a year.
There have been about 10% fewer parties in 2013 than this time last year.
The decrease is definitely due to knock-offs like Goshen Sparkling Jewelry
("Goshen"), Frost Yourself, and Christy's Crystals. I know of smaller imitators
too, but Goshen is the biggest problem.
I know people who have been to Goshen parties and they tell me that Goshen
made available Sabika catalogues for people to look through and choose pieces
they want to order.
I have heard Goshen is looking for consultants in an effort to imitate the Sabika
business model.
I can tell when someone is wearing Sabika and when they are wearing a knock-
off. The fakes, including Goshen, do not have the same quality in metal or in
stones. Their colors are not as vibrant. I know people who are careful not to by
the non-Sabika pieces after seeing them because those pieces are such poor
quality.
One of my customers switched over to Goshen because she went to church with a
woman associated with Goshen. She had a Goshen party for the woman;
however, said everyone at the party asked for Sabika. She decided never to have
another Goshen party because their product was lower quality and she was
embarrassed.
After the Bluefield newspaper ran a story about the lawsuit, there was an initial
2
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 87 of 93 PageID #: 214
reaction in support of Goshen, but it died down and some people came back to
Sabika once they saw the difference in quality.
I have lost six recruits in the past year out of my fifteen total recruits because once
the knock-offs come out the recruits know they cannot keep their customer base.
One of my recruits used to be a very strong sales representative. She earned
anywhere from $3,000 to $5,000 per month since 2007. Now her customer base is
gone and she no longer sells at all.
Sabika is my livelihood and I depend on it to raise and support my own family. I
make more money selling Sabika that I do teaching. I put more money back into
our local economy because of my business.
I am a local business, I am a member of the community, and I was here before
Goshen.
Dated: /a /{o h::J
I I
~ M W k ~
Consultant for Sabika, Inc.
3
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 88 of 93 PageID #: 215
EXHIBITF
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 89 of 93 PageID #: 216
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
-----------------------------------------------------X
SABIKA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOSHEN SPARKLING JEWELRY;
MICHELLE OXLEY; and
SHERAINE GUNNOE
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
--------------------- ----------------------------X
Civil Action No. 1:13-0848
The Honorable David A. Faber
DECLARATION OF MARLENE RATLIFF
Marlene Ratliff states and declares as follows:
1. I am a consultant for Sabika, Inc. and I have been working for the company since October
2011 .
2. Before working for Sabika, I worked full time at New Peoples Bank for 17 years in
Honaker, Virginia I stopped once I had a child and our babysitter moved away.
3. I first learned about Sabika from Ginger Lawson who asked me to host a Sabika party for
her and explained the company and business opportunities.
4. I was a Sabika customer for about six to eight months before I joined Sabika as a
representative in October 2011. I bought my first piece, a necklace I still have and
wear, in 2010 in Bluefield, Virginia. It was expensive so I did not buy many more at that
time.
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 90 of 93 PageID #: 217
5. As a Sabika consultant, I work with Sabika to sell their products at private parties and I
have been very successful.
6. I am a Star Director at the company. In order to get to that level you need to have three
active recruited representatives under you. To be an active representative, each person
has to sell at least $500 per month. To be a Star Director, I have to sell $1500 per month
and the team as a whole has to sell $5,000 per month. I have been a Star Director since
September of2012.
7. No one in Rosedale, Virginia knew about Sabika when I first started there. I was the first
consultant in the area, although Sabika was known elsewhere. I continued to be a
representative selling in West Virginia, Virginia, and Tennessee and quickly became
successful as the product gained popularity.
8. I know Sabika products and can easily tell by looking at a piece if it is by Sabika or if it is
a knock-off There is a real difference in quality in terms of the metals used by Sabika
and the cheaper knock-offs.
9. Goshen Sparkling Jewelry (''Goshen") has been damaging to my business because they
offer identical or nearly identical products for a fraction of the cost.
10. I have seen Goshen's products and they are clearly cheaper knock-offs of Sabika. The
metal is not as high quality and the stones are not as luminous, even if they are the same
color. The color of the stones used by Goshen is not as rich and deep as Sabika's stones.
I am not sure Goshen's stones are from Swarovski.
11. I know that the similarity between Goshen's products and Sabika's products has caused
some customer confusion. One woman approached me at church and proudly showed off
2
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 91 of 93 PageID #: 218
her necklace asking if I liked the Sabika piece her daughter had given her. I had to let her
know that it was not Sabika, it was a knock-off.
12. One of my customers has a Sabika supernatural necklace and asked Goshen to make
inexpensive earrings to match. When she got the earrings from Goshen she came back to
me because the stones did not have the right color and vibrancy. Their stones do not have
the weight and the depth of color. They do not compare to Sabika in tenns of quality.
13. One of my customers came up to me at church, holding her hand over her neck. She said
she was so ashamed, asked me not to be angry, and confessed that she had bought from
Goshen because her husband had been laid off from his job and she could not spend
money on Sabika. I told her she should throw a Sabika party and she would get jewelry
from Sabika at a discount because of the party. She agreed and said she would never buy
from Goshen again because of their poor quality. One of our most popular stones is the
luminous green supernatural color. A customer had tried to get a green supernatural
piece from Goshen because it was cheaper, but she was not happy with it. After she
threw a Sabika party with me, she got $450 worth of Sabika jewelry.
14. I have seen Goshen jewelry several times and it is very low quality. Some of my
customers have bought from Goshen and then come back to Sabika. The Goshen
products look and feel cheaper.
15. I have heard about Goshen selling at churches and in parking lots or at parties and they
bring the Sabika catalogues with them so customers can look at the pieces and pick one
out. Goshen promises to make something as close as they can to the Sabika piece.
16. Goshen sales have definitely harmed my business. Since March of 2012, I have lost
customers more and more as they increase their sales area. In October, a customer of
3
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 92 of 93 PageID #: 219
mine who had scheduled a party called me to cancel because all her friends had bought
from Goshen already and so they did not see the point in buying more expensive jewelry
from Sabika.
17. The damage has only increased as Goshen is becoming increasingly bold in offering its
infringing products and copying the Sabika selling model by hosting private parties.
18. A recruit of mine had two scheduled parties cancelled on her in the spring of2013.
19. Since this time last year, I have lost about 20-25 customers not only to Goshen but to
other imitators as well: Country Sparkle and Frost Yourself. New imitators are showing
up every day. I have lost about 10% of my customer base.
20. Some of my customers who have been loyal Sabika buyers have told me that they
originally bought the pieces because they were unique and gave them a personal sense of
style. Now that there are so many imitators like Goshen, those customers have said they
do not feel special any more. Now everyone has a crystal choker like the original Sabika
pieces they bought years ago.
21 . At least two of my recruits, in Richland, Virginia and in Bluefield, West Virginia, are not
actively selling now because knock-offs have taken over their sales. One of my recruits
had no parties this month and all her co-workers are buying the knock-offs.
22. I have heard that Goshen is recruiting people to act as consultants, imitating the Sabika
business model.
23. I have worked as a consultant for Sabika in my community for years as a local business.
Goshen s continued damage to Sabika damages me and my local recruits. Our local
business is threatened by Goshen.
4
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 33-1 Filed 06/25/13 Page 93 of 93 PageID #: 220
Dated:? -2) U
5
- 11(!L7fcczU ; /
Marlene Rathff ?
Consultant for Sabika, Inc.
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 221
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
BLUEFIELD DIVISION
SABIKA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOSHEN SPARKLING JEWELRY, LLC;
MICHELLE OXLEY; and
SHERAINE GUNNOE,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:13-0848
The Honorable David A. Faber, Judge
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF SABIKA INC.'S
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Plaintiff Sabika, Inc. (hereinafter "Sabika"), by and through its undersigned counsel,
respectfully submits this Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion for a Preliminary
Injunction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a), against Defendants Goshen
Sparkling Jewelry, LLC, Michelle Oxley, and Sheraine Gunnoe (hereinafter "Defendants"),
based upon Defendants' continuing copyright and trade dress infringement in this District and
elsewhere.
INTRODUCTION
Sabika commenced this action on January 16, 2013, and brings the present motion for
preliminary injunction to stop Defendants' intentional, ongoing copyright and trade dress
infringement of Sabika's jewelry and accessories. Plaintiff Sabika sells high-quality costume
jewelry of distinctive and recognizable design.
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 2 of 17 PageID #: 222
Sabika has a long established reputation for being a high-quality costume jewelry
designer, selling multiple jewelry lines across the United States and heavily concentrated in
Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Virginia. Its jewelry and related accessories have distinct
designs that are either registered copyrights or are pending copyright applications, and that are
protected as trade dress on account of their widespread consumer recognition (secondary
meaning).
Defendants sell jewelry and related accessories that are either exact copies or
substantially similar to Sabika's protected jewelry designs. Substantial settlement discussions
over the past several months have failed to resolve this matter, and Defendants insist they have
the right to sell their imitative jewelry.
Defendants' unlawful infringement harms Sabika' s name, reputation, and good will, and
deprives it of sales it might otherwise make. The immediate and irreparable harm arising from
Defendants' intentional and ongoing infringement of Sabika's federally registered copyrights and
distinctive trade dress can be avoided only by an order enjoining Defendants from continuing
sales of their confusingly similar jewelry. Accordingly, a preliminary injunction should issue.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. The Parties
Sabika, a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal place of business in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, designs, markets, and sells jewelry and fashion accessories in many states in the
United States, including West Virginia and Virginia. This family business, founded in 2001,
developed a unique business method of partnering with over 600 independent sales agents or
"consultants" who currently are located in 37 states. Sabika's products have been sold in all 50
2
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 3 of 17 PageID #: 223
states. Sabika's consultants promote and sell Sabikajewelry at intimate social gatherings such as
hostess parties or in-home parties. Through this expansive network, attention to detail, and the
quality of its products, Sabika has been an immediate and continuing success. It has designed
and developed numerous popular jewelry lines, and through its carefully developed consultant
program, it has developed a loyal following of women consumers who favor these elegant
necklaces, chokers, earrings, and bracelets. (Schlieper Dec. at ,-r 11, attached hereto as Exhibit
A.)
Defendants Michelle Oxley and Sheraine Gunnoe operate Goshen Sparkling Jewelry.
According to statements contained on their website, Ms. Oxley and Ms. Gunnoe began their
business around March or April 2012. (See "Goshen Sparkling Jewelry Statement," attached
hereto as Exhibit B.) On May 20, 2012, Goshen Sparkling Jewelry, through Ms. Oxley and Ms.
Gunnoe, registered a website domain name, www.goshensparklingjewelry.webs.com, to market
their jewelry. (See "Domain Name Registration," attached hereto as Exhibit C.) Ms. Oxley and
Ms. Gunnoe later formed Goshen Sparkling Jewelry, LLC on July 10, 2012. Because they
copied Sabika's designs outright, their original website included a disclaimer to warn potential
customers that they were not selling Sabika' s jewelry. After this lawsuit commenced,
Defendants' shut down there website and registered a new website domain name for
www.goshensparklingjewelry.com.
B. Sabika's Copyright Registrations
Sabika now owns approximately 70 copyright registrations, 170 pending copyright
applications, and owns the trade dress related to its various jewelry designs. (Schlieper Dec. at
,-r 5, Exs. 2-3.) Sabika's registered copyrights include: Wine and Dine, Registration No. VA 1-
836-897; Ladies Lunch Heart Pendant, Registration No. VA 1-837-180; Vintage Supernatural
3
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 4 of 17 PageID #: 224
Manhattan Choker and Bracelet, Registration No. VA 1-837-314; Sabika Pink Party Earrings,
Registration No. VA 1-839-261; and Sabika Pink Party Choker, Registration No. VA 1-839-264.
(Jd. at , 6.) Sabika further has numerous pending copyright applications. In addition to
protecting its intellectual property through copyright (and trademark) registrations, Sabika has
established a distinctive trade dress for its jewelry designs that Defendants are imitating. (!d. at
,-r 5.)
C. Defendants' Infringing Activities and the Resulting Confusion
Defendants began selling their jewelry at "open houses" held at churches in West
Virginia and Virginia and are now copying Sabika's selling method by selling at home parties.
Many of Defendants' jewelry pieces clearly infringe the registered copyrights of Sabika. (Jd. at
,-r 14, Ex. 5.) Defendants have "hijacked" Sabika's copyrighted designs and trade dress, and
Defendants continue to sell their copycat jewelry without permission or justification. Defendants
are slavishly copying the Sabika business model through and through without any right to do so.
Sabika has not given Defendants permission to sell such items, and its cease and desist requests
have been ignored.
ARGUMENT
A. The Standard for a Preliminary Injunction
In this District, to obtain a preliminary injunction a plaintiff must: ( 1) clearly show that it
will likely succeed on the merits; (2) clearly show that plaintiff is likely to be irreparably harmed
absent preliminary relief; (3) show that the balance of equities tips in favor of plaintiff; and ( 4)
show that an injunction is in the public interest. Doe v. Wood County Bd. of Educ., 888 F.
Supp.2d 771, 774-75 (S.D.W. Va. 2012) (citing Winter v. Natural Res. Def Council, Inc., 555
4
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 5 of 17 PageID #: 225
U.S. 7, 20 (2008); The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. FEC, 575 F.3d 342, 346-47 (4th Cir.
2009), vacated on other grounds, 130 S.Ct. 2371 (2010). The U.S. Supreme Court has
emphasized that the district court must weigh all of these factors in deciding a motion for
preliminary injunction. Winter v. Natural Res. Def Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 720 (2008). The
Court cannot apply any looser standard. !d.
As shown below, Sabika can carry its burden necessary to obtain a preliminary injunction
under this standard. Defendants blatantly copied and continue to sell numerous copyrighted
Sabika jewelry designs and to infringe the distinctive and protectable trade dress of Sabika.
Defendants have no justification or defense to their copyright and trade dress infringement, and
each sale by Defendants takes potential sales from Sabika. The irreparable harm to Sabika is
manifest. As such, the balance of equities tip decidedly in Sabika's favor, and it is in the public
interest to stop Defendants' infringing conduct immediately.
B. Plaintiff is Likely to Succeed on the Merits of Its Claims for Copyright and Trade
Dress Infringement
1. Defendants have Infringed Numerous Copyrighted Designs
Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 106, a copyright holder has, among other rights, exclusive rights
to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, distribute, and display its registered work. See id.;
EM! April Music, Inc. v. White, 618 F. Supp. 2d 497, 504 (E.D. Va. 2009). Anyone who violates
any of the exclusive rights of a copyright owner is an infringer of the copyright. 17 U.S.C.
501(a); see EM! April Music, Inc., 618 F. Supp.2d at 504. To prove copyright infringement, "a
plaintiff must show: (1) that it [owns] a valid copyright, and (2) that the defendant copied
original elements of plaintiffs copyrighted work." EM! April Music, Inc., 618 F. Supp. 2d at 504
(internal citations omitted).
5
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 6 of 17 PageID #: 226
Sabika owns approximately 70 copyright registrations for its jewelry designs, and has
many others pending. (Schlieper Dec. at, 5-6, Ex. 2.) These designs are the original creations
of Sabika's resident jewelry designer, Alexandra Mayr-Gracik, and they have achieved starling
success in the market place. Indeed, Sabika, formed by the Mayr family in 2001, has grown to
annual sales in excess of $10 million through its original designs and the marketing efforts and
the hard work of its consultants. (I d. at , 19.) Further, the accompanying Exhibit 5 to the
Schlieper Declaration sets forth page after page of comparisons between the registered Sabika
design and the corresponding infringing copy being sold by Goshen.
Thus, Defendants' continuous sale of jewelry that clearly copies Sabika's registered
copyright pieces indisputably demonstrates that Sabika has a very high probability of success on
the merits of the claim for copyright infringement. See Hotaling v. Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter Day Saints, 118 F.3d 199, 203 (4th Cir. 1997); Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Reynolds, 911
F.2d 970, 979 (4th Cir. 1990).
2. Defendant Infringe Sabika's Trade Dress
a. The Lanham Act Provides Protection of Sabika's Trade Dress
Under 43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1125(a)), the design of a product may be
protected as trade dress. See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros., Inc., 529 U.S. 205, 209
(2000) (quoting 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)). To demonstrate a likelihood of success on a claim for
trade dress infringement, the moving party must show: (1) that the trade dress is non-functional;
(2) that it has acquired secondary meaning; and (3) the consuming public is likely to be
confused. See Fiji Water Co., LLC v. Fiji Mineral Water USA, LLC., 741 F. Supp. 2d 1165,
1172 (C.D. Cal. 2010).
6
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 7 of 17 PageID #: 227
Protectable trade dress consists of discrete elements that make up the "total image of a
product and may include features such as size, shape, color, color combinations, texture or
graphics." !d. at 1172 (quoting Int'l Jensen, Inc. v. Metrosound USA., Inc., 4 F.3d 819, 822
(9th Cir. 1993)). The trade dress must not be functional. See id.; see also Cosmos Jewelry Ltd.
v. Po Sun Han Co., 470 F. Supp. 2d 1072, 1085 (C.D. Cal. 2006), aff'd, 2009 WL766517 (9th
Cir. 2009) (use of yellow gold with a sand blasted matte finish on the petals and highly polished
shiny edge give "a subjectively aesthetic, rather than utilitarian advantage" with consumers).
Here, Sabika's trade dress is undisputedly nonfunctional. It is based entirely on aesthetic
elements that serve to identify Sabika as its source, most notably the colorful and elegant
Swarovski crystals mounted on specific colored cup chains. The Sabika necklaces, chokers,
earrings, and bracelets are all handmade and assembled by European artisans at considerably
more cost than other methods of jewelry manufacture. (Schlieper Dec. at, 18.) The Swarovski
crystals are of the higher quality and appearance than usually found in other costume jewelry,
giving a more refined, more distinctive look to Sabika jewelry. Swarovski offers different grades
of crystals each priced according to the level of quality. Sabika has a good relationship with
Swarovski and uses only the highest grade of crystal available. (McNeil Dec. at ,, 14-15,
attached hereto as Exhibit D.) Moreover, abundant alternative designs are available, so
protecting the exclusivity of Sabika's trade dress will not hinder competition. (Schlieper Dec. at
, 18.) Also, the design decisions underlying Sabika's designs were made for aesthetic reasons
and not because they were the only, the cheapest, or the most efficient manner of manufacture.
See Fiji Water, 741 F. Supp. 2d at 1190 (citing Clicks Billiards, Inc. v. Sixshooters, Inc., 251 F.
3d 1252, 1259 (9th Cir. 2001) ("We focus not on the individual elements, but rather on the
overall visceral impression that the combination and arrangement of those elements create.")).
7
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 8 of 17 PageID #: 228
Sabika's color combinations are well known and recognizable to its customer base.
Defendants continue to reproduce the same color combinations. Such products are copied from
Sabika's own catalog and are clearly based on Sabika designs to which Defendants have access.
Their customers place orders for items made by Defendants directly from the Sabika catalogs
that Defendants show them. (Mulkey Dec. at ,-r 8, attached hereto as Exhibit E; McNeil Dec. at
,-r 17.) A more brazen manner of copyright and trade dress infringement would be hard to
1magme.
So, here, where there are innumerable ways to make a necklace, choker, or bracelet, there
is no basis for concluding that Sabika's designs are functional. Defendants have chosen to
mimic Sabika not for functional reasons, but entirely because they wish to trade on Sabika's
well-known and sought after look and appearance. Functional features of a product are those
which are "essential to the use or purpose of the article or ... affect the cost or quality of the
articles that is, if exclusive use of the feature[s] would put competitors at a significant non-
reputation related disadvantage." Traffix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23,
32 (2001) (quoting Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Prods., 514 U.S. 159, 165 (1995)). Defendants
cannot be heard to argue that they need to make jewelry exactly as Sabika does for functional
reasons. As such there is no basis for concluding that the Sabika trade dress is functional.
b. Sabika' s Trade Dress Indisputably Has Acquired
Secondary Meaning
Secondary meaning is established when a plaintiff shows that "in the minds of the public,
the primary significance of a product feature or term is to identify the source of the product
rather than the product itself." Inwood Labs, Inc. v. Ives Labs, Inc., 456 U.S. 844, 851 n.11
( 1982) (internal citations omitted). Courts determine secondary meaning by weighing a number
of factors: (1) "the length or exclusivity of use of a mark," (2) "the size or prominence of
8
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 9 of 17 PageID #: 229
plaintiffs' enterprise," (3) "the existence of substantial advertising by plaintiff," (4) "the
product's established place in the market," and (5) "proof of intentional copying." J McCarthy,
McCarthy on Trademarks 15:30. "The secondary meaning analysis is primarily a subjective one,
looking into the minds of potential customers." !d. (citing Boston Athletic Ass'n v. Sullivan, 867
F.2d 22, 32 n.9 (1st Cir.1989); President & Trustees of Colby College v. Colby College-New
Hampshire, 508 F.2d 804, 809 (1st Cir. 1975)).
Sabika's jewelry designs have secondary meaning because Sabika has used its trade
dress exclusively and extensively for twelve years. (Schlieper Dec. at ,-r 1.) In these twelve
years, Sabika has established consumer recognition by promoting its trade dress though hundreds
of consultants, "Fall/Winter" and "Spring/Summer" catalogs, and by investing heavily in and
constantly updating and improving its website. (!d.) As a result, Sabika has received widespread
publicity and recognition by the public and in the media. (!d. at ,-r,-r 11, 20.) Sabika's jewelry
designs are readily recognizable by consumers as Sabika jewelry. (!d. at ,-r 18.) Equally
important, Defendants' slavish copying of numerous Sabika designs and the disclaimer on their
website demonstrate their intentional copying and provide further proof of the secondary
meaning of Sabika's trade dress. It is indisputable, therefore, that Sabika has protectable trade
dress complete with significant secondary meaning.
c. Defendants Unauthorized Copying is Likely to Cause Confusion
Once trade dress rights have been established, proving infringement requires a showing
that defendant's similar trade dress is likely to cause confusion as to the product's source. See
Yankee Candle Co., Inc. v. Bridgewater Candle Co., LLC, 259 F.3d 25, 38 (1st Cir. 2001). To
determine likelihood of confusion, the Fourth Circuit has identified the following nonexclusive
factors:
9
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 10 of 17 PageID #: 230
(1) the strength or distinctiveness of the plaintiffs mark;
(2) the similarity ofthe two marks;
(3) the similarity ofthe goods or services the marks identify;
( 4) the similarity of the facilities the two parties use in their businesses;
(5) the similarity of the advertising used by the two parties;
( 6) the defendant's intent; and
(7) actual confusion.
Bros. ofWheel MC. Executive Council, Inc. v. Mollohan, 2012 WL 5511726 at *29 (S.D.W. Va.
Nov. 14, 2012) (citing Louis Vuitton Malletier SA. v. Haute Diggity Dog, LLC, 507 F.3d 252,
259, 260-61 (4th Cir. 2007)), appeal dismissed, 2013 WL 1679440 (4th Cir. Apr. 18, 2013).
Although not all of the factors must be satisfied, actual confusion is "often paramount in the
likelihood of confusion analysis." !d.
The likelihood of confusion between Sabika's trade dress and Defendants' jewelry
designs is unmistakable. First, Sabika's trade dress is strong due to the acquired distinctiveness
from Sabika's longstanding sale and extensive promotion of its unique trade dress. Defendants'
designs are so similar as to be undistinguishable, which bears on both the similarity of the marks
and Defendants' intent. Defendants admit as much by posting disclaimers on their website in a
transparent attempt to trade on Sabika's distinctive trade dress. Second, Defendants have begun
using similar "facilities" to sell imitative jewelry: they are also selling their jewelry at home
parties through "consultants," a blatant imitation of Sabika's sales methods.
Both parties rely heavily on their website for promotion, another factor that points,
toward likelihood of confusion. Further, the postings on Defendants Facebook page captured by
Sabika demonstrate that the public is confused about the origin or sponsorship of Defendants'
jewelry. (Schlieper Dec. at ,-r,-r 21-22.) Defendants' intent is clear: to trade on the recognition of
Sabika's designs. (!d.) There have been instances of actual confusion: a woman who was given
a gift necklace, which she proudly showed off as being by Sabika, later found out that it was
10
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 11 of 17 PageID #: 231
actually a cheap knock-off by Goshen. (Ratliff Dec. a t ~ 11, attached hereto as Exhibit F.) Each
of the factors set forth by the Fourth Circuit points in favor of finding a likelihood of confusion.
As noted above, actual confusion, when it occurs, helps tip the balance decisively in favor of the
involving party. Plaintiff has amply demonstrated that the consuming public is likely to confuse
Defendants products as emanating from or sponsored by Sabika. Accordingly, Defendants
should be enjoined from further trade dress infringement forthwith.
C. Sabika Will Be Irreparably Harmed Absent Injunctive Relief
Sabika is presently suffering and will continue to suffer irreparable harm unless this
preliminary injunction is granted. Sabika has labored hard and long to establish its brand and its
reputation for quality in West Virginia and Virginia, among other places. Defendants are
engaging in on-going sales and advertisement of jewelry identical or nearly identical to Sabika's
jewelry. They are located in the heart of Sabika's customer base. They divert customers with
inferior quality goods bearing cheaper prices. The quality of the metals used by Defendants is
not as high as the quality of metals used by Sabika. (Ratliff Dec. at ~ 8; Mulkey Dec. at ~ 1 0;
McNeil Dec. a t ~ ~ 12-13.)
The same customers might have otherwise bought Sabika's jewelry. One customer
confessed that she had bought from Defendants because she wanted to buy a Sabika necklace,
but her husband had been laid off; as she could not afford Sabika, the customer bought the
cheaper jewelry instead. (Ratliff Dec. a t ~ 13.)
Defendants are clearly offering a lower quality product. Jewelry has broken or led to
infections, and Defendants offer no warranty or refund to those dissatisfied customers. (McNeil
Dec. a t ~ ~ 11-12.) Sabika cannot control the quality of Defendants' products, and dissatisfied
11
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 12 of 17 PageID #: 232
consumers may attribute their disapproval to Sabika. If Defendants' chains break or their
crystals crack or fall out, it may reflect adversely on Sabika's reputation.
Since 2001, Sabika has invested heavily in its jewelry lines by creating unique designs,
many pieces of which are the subject of copyright registrations or applications, and has
continuously used its trade dress, which has now become distinct and famous. Furthermore,
Sabika has built up and continues to build its strong reputation for selling unique, high-quality
jewelry products through a sales method which employs hundreds of consultants throughout 37
states. These consultants hold parties and distribute catalogs to build the Sabika brand. The
continued sale of Defendants' goods, which are indisputably infringing, injure Sabika's
reputation and damage the goodwill that Sabika has invested so heavily to create. Loyal
customers of Sabika who originally bought Sabika's jewelry because it was unique have stated
that they no longer feel the design is unique because there are so many cheap knock-offs
available. (Ratliff Dec. a t ~ 20.)
Thus, Defendants' actions not only directly infringe upon Sabika's copyrights and trade
dress, they are irreparably harming Sabika's goodwill and reputation. See SunEarth, Inc. v. Sun
Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd., 846 F. Supp.2d 1063, 1083 (N.D.Ca. 2012) (recognizing "that the
potential loss of goodwill or the loss of the ability to control one's reputation may constitute
irreparable harm for purposes of preliminary injunctive relief." (internal citations and quotations
omitted)); see also Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Ctr. v. BioPet Vet Lab Inc., 768 F.
Supp.2d 872, 881 (E.D. Va 2011) ("[W]hen the failure to grant preliminary relief creates the
possibility of permanent loss of customers to a competitor or the loss of goodwill, the irreparable
injury prong is satisfied" (citing Multi-Channel TV Cable Co. v. Charlottesville Quality Cable
Operating Co., 22 F.3d 546, 552 (4th Cir.1994)); Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc. v. Catton,
12
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 13 of 17 PageID #: 233
2010 WL 2572875, at *2 (W.D.N.C. 2010) ("[Plaintiff] will be harmed in the form of damage to
its goodwill and reputation with consumers, loss of customers, and corresponding lost sales.
Thus, [plaintiff] satisfies the irreparable harm element needed to obtain a preliminary junction.").
Sabika and over 600 independent consultants have suffered and continue to suffer loss of
sales, profits, clientele, reputation, goodwill, and other losses that are impossible to calculate and
that will continue during the pendency of this action unless enjoined by the Court. Therefore,
Sabika will continue to be irreparably harmed unless this preliminary injunction is issued.
D. The Balance of Hardship or Equities Tips Sharply in Favor of Sabika
The injuries to Sabika outweigh any harm Defendants might suffer in granting this
motion for preliminary injunction. First, Defendants knowingly infringed on Sabika's
copyrighted jewelry. See SunEarth, Inc., 846 F. Supp.2d at 1084 (citing Cadence Designs Sys. v.
Avant! Corp., 125 F.3d 824, 829 (9th Cir. 1997) ("[A] defendant who knowingly infringes
another's copyright cannot complain of the harm that will befall it when properly forced to desist
from its infringing activities[.]"). Second, Sabika's motion requests only that the Defendants
stop selling Sabika's copyrighted designs, as well as any designs that infringe its protected trade
dress. Defendants are free to sell dissimilar jewelry designs. Thus, any assertion by Defendants
that Sabika seeks to put them out of business is false. Sabika has no objection to fair competition
or the sale of non-infringing jewelry by Defendants. Defendants can sell any item of jewelry
they wish so long as it avoids Sabika's protected rights.
Moreover, Sabika's irreparable harm to its customer base and reputation, as well as its
carefully built brand recognition, all outweigh any alleged inconvenience Defendants may face if
Defendants are enjoined from further infringing acts. Defendants chose to embark on a path that
involved slavish copying of copyrighted designs and protectable trade dress. Defendants chose
13
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 14 of 17 PageID #: 234
to offer Sabika catalogs as sales material to their own customers. (Mulkey Dec. a t ~ 8; McNeil
Dec. a t ~ 17.) Having chosen this nefarious path, Defendants cannot now be heard to complain
of the alleged hardship or threat to their start up business. Fred Hutchinson, 768 F. Supp.2d at
8 82 ("[D]efendants' harm [as a small business] does not offset the elements of irreparable harm
to the plaintiffs; ... the balance of equities weighs in plaintiffs' favor because plaintiffs have an
established reputation and history of offering the products to [customers] that would be adversely
impacted by Defendants' sale of a potentially lesser product").
Sabika's irreparable harm from the obvious and intentional infringement of its copyrights
and trade dress, loss of sales, consumer confusion, damage to its highly regarded reputation, and
loss of its goodwill far outweigh any inconvenience Defendants may experience in creating
alternative non-infringing designs. Therefore, the balance of hardship and equities clearly tips in
Sabika's favor.
E. The Public Interest Favors Enjoining Defendants Infringement
Preventing customer confusion of similar products serves the public interest. In fact, "the
Lanham Act is at heart a consumer protection statute." See SunEarth, Inc., 846 F. Supp.2d at
1084 (citing TrajjicSchool.com v. Edriver Inc., 653 F.3d 820, 827 (9th Cir. 2011)). Protecting
Sabika's copyrights undisputed by serves the public interest by protecting and encouraging
original creations. See Janel Russell Designs, Inc. v. Mendelson & Associates, Inc., 114 F.
Supp.2d 856, 863 (D. Minn. 2000) (granting plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction
protecting its copyrighted jewelry design because "the public interest is always served by
upholding copyrights and thereby encouraging individual effort and creativity."). In addition,
failure to police copyright infringement would encourage dishonesty in business, contrary to the
public interest. See Graphic Design Marketing, Inc. v. Xtreme Enterprises, Inc., 772 F. Supp.2d
14
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 15 of 17 PageID #: 235
1029, 1035 (20 11) ("[T]he public interest will be furthered by affording meaningful protection to
its copyright rights and protection from ... market confusion.").
Customers who believe that they are buying Sabika products or that they are are
purchasing products which are of the same quality for a fraction of the cost have ended up with
no sales receipts, broken jewelry, and, in at least one case, a serious infection from wearing
Defendants' earrings. (Ratliff Dec. a t ~ 11; McNeil Dec. a t ~ ~ 11-12.) Sabika's unique sales
model of recruiting local consultants to serve within their own communities provides the
opportunity for individuals to start and prosper from a local business. Defendants' blatant
infringing activities threaten that local business. !d.
The public has no interest in permitting blatant copyright and trade dress infringement.
On the other hand, strong enforcement of the law of copyright and trade dress protects the public
and fosters honesty in the market place. Thus, public interest favors a preliminary injunction in
this matter.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the facts and authorities set forth above and in the accompanymg
declarations and exhibits thereto, Plaintiff Sabika respectfully submits that it has demonstrated
that the Court should issue an Order preliminarily enjoining Defendants from continued
copyright and trade dress infringement during the pendency of this action.
15
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 16 of 17 PageID #: 236
SABIKA, INC.
By Counsel
Is/Russell D. Jessee
Russell D. Jessee
Russell.jessee@steptoe-johnson.com
W.Va. Bar No. 10020
Lauren. palmer@ steptoe-johnson. com
W.Va. BarNo. 11964
STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC
P.O. Box 1588
707 Virginia Street E.
Charleston, WV 25326-1588
(304) 353-8000 (telephone)
(304) 353-8180 (facsimile)
and
Maxim H. Waldbaum (pro hac vice)
M waldbaum@evw.com
Robert D. Katz (pro hac vice)
Rkatz@evw.com
EATON & VAN WINKLE LLP
3 Park Ave., 16th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: 212.779.9910
Fax: 212.779.9928
Counsel to Plaintif!Sabika, Inc.
16
Case 1:13-cv-00848 Document 34 Filed 06/25/13 Page 17 of 17 PageID #: 237
SABIKA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
BLUEFIELD DIVISION
Civil Action No. 1:13-0848
The Honorable David A. Faber, Judge
GOSHEN SPARKLING JEWELRY, LLC;
MICHELLE OXLEY; and
SHERAINE GUNNOE,
Defendants.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on June 25, 2013, a copy of the foregoing "Plaintiff Sabika, Inc.'s
Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction" was filed electronically.
Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court's electronic filing system to all parties
indicated on the electronic filing receipt. There are no unrepresented parties.
Is/ Russell D. Jessee
Russell D. Jessee
russell. j essee@steptoe-j ohnson.com
W.Va. Bar No. 10020
STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC
P.O. Box 1588
707 Virginia Street E.
Charleston, WV 25326-1588
(304) 353-8000 (telephone)
(304) 353-8180 (facsimile)
17