- THE ZEITGEIST MOVEMENT -

UNDERSTANDINGS

www.thezeitgeistmovement.com | www.thevenusproject.com

1 of 16
Part 1
- The Goal p.3

Part 2
- Synopsis p.7

Part 3
- Psychology p.8

Part 4
- Sociology p.9

Part 5
- Technology p.11

Part 6
- Sustainability p.13

Part 7
- Spirituality p.15

2 of 16
 - Part 1: The Goal -
The Means is the End:

We intend to restore the fundamental necessities and environmental awareness of the

species through the advocation of the most current understandings of who and what we
truly are, coupled with how science, nature and technology (rather than religion, politics
and money) hold the keys to our personal growth, not only as individual human beings,
but as a civilization, both structurally and spiritually. The central insights of this
awareness is the recognition of the Emergent and Symbiotic elements of natural law and
how aligning with these understandings as the bedrock of our personal and social
institutions, life on earth can and will flourish into a system which will continuously
grow in a positive way, where negative social consequences, such as social stratification,
war, biases, elitism and criminal activity will be constantly reduced and, idealistically,
eventually become nonexistent within the spectrum of human behavior itself.

This possibility is, of course, very difficult for most humans to consider, for we have
been conditioned by society to think that crime, corruption and dishonesty is "the way it
is" and that there will always be people who want to abuse, hurt and take advantage of
others. Religion is the largest promoter of this propaganda, for the "us and them" or
"good and evil" mentality promotes this false assumption.

The reality is that we live in a society that produces Scarcity. The consequence of this
scarcity is that human beings must behave in self preserving ways, even if it means they
have to cheat and steal in order to get what they want. Our research has concluded that
Scarcity is one of the most fundamental causes of aberrant human behavior, while also
leading to complex forms of neurosis in other ways. A statistical look at drug addiction,
crime and incarceration statistics, finds that poverty and unhealthy social conditions
comprise the life experience of those who engage in such behavior.

Human beings are not good or bad... they are running, forever changing compositions of
the life experience(s) that influences them. The "quality" of a human being ( if there was
such a thing ) is directly related to the upbringing and thus belief systems they have been
conditioned into.

This simple reality has been grossly overlooked and today people primitively think that
competition, greed and corruption are "hardwired" elements of human behavior and, in
turn, we must have prisons, police and hence a hierarchy of differential control in order
for society to deal with these "tendencies". This is totally illogical and false.

The bottom line is that in order to change things for the better fundamentally, you must
begin to address root causes. Our current society's system of "punishment" is outmoded,
inhumane, and unproductive. When a serial killer is caught, most people jump up and
down and scream for the death of that person. This is backwards. A truly sane society,
which understands what we are and how our value systems are created, would take the
individual and learn the reasons behind his or her violent actions. This information would

3 of 16
then go to a research department which considers how to stop such conditions from
occurring through education.

It is time to stop the patchwork. It is time to begin a new social approach which is
updated to present day knowledge. Sadly, society today is still largely based on outmoded,
superstitious dispositions and resolutions.

It is also important to point out that there are no utopias or endings. All evidence points to
perpetual change on all levels. In turn, it is our personal actions everyday of our lives that
mold and perpetuate the social systems we have in place. Yet, paradoxically, it is also our
environmental influences which create our perspectives and hence world views.
Therefore, true change will come not only from adjusting your personal understandings
and decisions, but equally from changing the social structures that influence these
understandings and decisions.

The elite power systems are little affected in the long run by traditional protest and
political movements. We must move beyond these 'establishment rebellions' and work
with a tool much more powerful:
We will stop supporting the system, while constantly advocating knowledge, peace, unity
and compassion. We cannot "fight the system". Hate, anger and the 'war' mentality are
failed means for change, for they perpetuate the same tools the corrupt, established power
systems use to maintain control to begin with.

The Distortion and Paralysis:

When we understand that all systems are Emergent and constantly in a state of evolution,
along with the reality that we are all Symbiotically connected to nature and each other in
the most simple yet profound ways, forcing the realization that our personal integrity is
only as high as the integrity of the rest of society, we then see how twisted and backwards
our social establishments are and how their perpetuation is largely the cause of the social
instability in society. For example, the Monetary System has been long deemed a positive
force in society due to its claim to produce incentive and progress. In actuality, the
monetary system has become a vehicle for division and totalitarian control.

It is the ultimate form of "Divide and Conquer" for at its very core are the assumptions
that (1) We must fight each other in order to survive. (2) Humans must have this reward
"Incentive" to do anything meaningful.

As far as Number 1 (We must fight each other in order to survive.), this characteristic of
'competition' in the system guarantees corruption in society on every level, for the basis is
"us against them". Many argue that the "free market system" is good... but it is corrupt in
the modern day due to bad policies, favoritism, bailouts, etc. They assume that if a "pure"
free market was allowed to flourish then it would be okay. This is false, for what you are
seeing today IS the Free market at work, with all its differential advantage and corruption.
No laws will ever stop the insider trading, collusion, monopoly, labor abuse, pollution,

4 of 16
planned obsolescence or the like... this is what the competition based system produces
without fail, for it is based on the premise of taking advantage of others for profit. Period.

We must begin to transition out of these oppressive ideals and move towards a system
which is "designed" to support human beings... not force them to fight in order to survive.
As far as Number 2, (Humans must have this reward "Incentive" to do anything
meaningful.) this is just a sad and an incredibly negative perspective of the human being
in general. To assume that a person must be "structurally motivated" or hence "forced"
into doing anything, is just absurd. Think back to when you were a child and had no idea
what money even was. You played, were curious and did many things... why? Because
you wanted to. However, as time goes on in our system, that natural curiosity and self-
motivation is stripped away from people, as they are forced to conform to the specialized,
compartmentalized, nearly predefined labor system in order to survive. This, in turn,
often creates a natural rebellion within the person due to the forced obligation, and this is
how we came up with "leisure" and "work" separations. The laziness assumed to exist by
the monetary system proponents (who claim it produces incentive) do not recognize this.
In a true society, people would follow their natural inclinations and work to contribute to
society not because they are "paid" for it, but because they have a greater awareness
which recognizes that contributing to society helps them just as much as everyone else.
This is the heightened state of awareness we hope to communicate. Your reward for
contributing to society is the well being of that society... which, in turn, furthers your well
being.

Now, putting things into perspective, it is important to understand that our world is
currently run, undeniably, by a small group of dominant men in high positions of those
institutions which are most dominant in society- Business and Finance. The establishment
of government is in tandem with the influence and power of corporations and banks. The
life blood is money, which is, in fact, an illusion that now has little relevance to society
and serves as a tool for manipulation and division along a kind of social organization that
guarantees elitism, crime, war and social stratification.

Simultaneously, individuals are taught that being "correct" is what creates their value as
human beings. This state of being "correct" is directly related to the prevailing values of
society itself. Therefore, those who accept and support the social system's views are
considered "normal", while those who disagree are considered "abnormal" or even
"subversive". Whether it is the dogma of a unique social tradition, or the alignment with a
worldwide establishment religion, the basis is the same: Intellectual Materialism.

As we realize that knowledge and hence our institutions are always evolving, we see that
any belief system which claims to "know" anything, without allowing for dispute, is a
failed perspective. Religion, with its foundation in faith, is the king of this distortion, as it
claims to know something definitively about the most complex and elusive origins of
human kind, and this simply is not possible in an emergent universe.
That being said, it is then realized that equally as dangerous as the Establishment Power
Structures, are the people who have been conditioned to completely accept the static
understandings put forth by these systems... therefore becoming: "Self Appointed

5 of 16
Guardians of the Status Quo". This applies to every system, especially political, financial
and religious systems. Since people's identities become associated with the doctrines of a
Country, Religion or Business ethic, it often becomes very difficult for a person to
change, for his or her identity has become combined with the ideologies which have been
imposed upon them.

Therefore, they perpetuate the doctrine of the institution, simply to maintain their
personal integrity, as they see it.

We must break this cycle, for it paralyses our growth not only as individuals, but as a
society.

The Truth and Transition

Once we understand that the integrity of our personal existences are directly related to the
integrity of the earth, life and all other human beings, we then have our path predefined
for us. In turn, once we realize that it is science, technology and hence human creativity
which creates progress in our lives, we are then able to recognize what our true priorities
are for social and personal growth and progress. These points denoted, we can then see
that Religion, Politics and the Money/Competition based Labor system are outdated
modes of social operation, which must now be addressed and outgrown. Our avocation is
to achieve a social system which operates without money or politics, while allowing
superstition to work itself out as education flourishes. It isn't the right of any person to
tell another what to believe, for no human has a full understanding of anything. However,
if we pay attention to the natural processes of life, we then see how we can align with
nature and thus our path becomes more clear.

For example, many people are worried about population growth on the planet, while very
spooky comments by despotic figures like Henry Kissinger claim that some kind of
"reduction" is needed. This is, of course, very scary. However, the real question remains:
Is population growth really that bad? The answer is that from a scientific perspective the
earth can handle many, many times more people if need be, once high technology is
harnessed. 70% of our planet is water and cities in the sea ( one of many projects by
Jacque Fresco ) are the next step. In turn, education about life operations will inform
people as to the ramifications of their reproductive interests and population growth will
naturally slow as people begin to realize how they are related to the planet and its
carrying capacity.

In fact, the only true "government" that can possibly exist is the earth and its resources.
From there, all possibilities can be assessed. This is why an intellectual unification of all
countries is needed, for the most important information we as a species can have is a full,
highly detailed assessment of what we have on this planet. Just as you would examine the
land and resources of an acre of land to see what you could do or grow on it, this is what
needs to happen with the planet in order to optimize what we are capable of as a species,
resource wise.

6 of 16
Of course, many who consider the ideas presented above will often ask: "How can we do
this considering the distorted value systems which are currently in operation.? How do
we make such a move or transition?" This is, of course, the most difficult question. The
answer: We have to start somewhere. There are many things that can be done by a single
person or community that can begin to shape this vision. The most important step is
education.

Thank you for your help.

- Part 2: Synopsis -
Fluid social change can only materialize if two circumstances are met. One, the human
value system, which consists of our understandings and beliefs, must be updated and
changed through education and thoughtful introspection. Two, the environment
surrounding that value system must change to support the new world view. The
interaction between a person's value system and their environment is what influences
human behavior.

For example, in our culture, "ethics" is really is a matter of degree, for our social system
promotes and rewards competition and self-interest. This perspective doesn't just "lead"
to aberrant behavior... it creates it directly. Corruption is the norm in our society and most
people do not see this, for since the society supports this behavior, it is considered right
and normal... or as a matter of degree.

Given this understanding, there is a fallacy that has emerged where certain groups are
deemed "corrupt" and everyone else is "good". This is the age old "us and them" world
view which has no basis empirically, for it is, again, all a matter of degree.

For example, there is a large movement of people who constantly talk about "The New
World Order" and this notion that there is an elite group of people who have been trying
to take over the world for a long time and have manipulated society in various ways to
further their goals.

This, of course, is true to a certain extent.

BUT, the failure of awareness is that this "group" is not a group at all. It is a tendency.

If you took out all the people at the top who are engaged in global hegemonic rule, it
would simply be a matter of time before another group stepped in to seek the same
ambition. Therefore, it isn't the individual people or groups that are the problem. It is
actually the conditions upon which those people have been accustomed and indoctrinated
by. Of course, many argue against this view with the escapist notion that it is "human
nature" that causes this competition and need for dominance. This is unsupported by the
facts. In reality, we are nearly clean slates when we are born and it is our environment
that shapes who we are and how we behave.

7 of 16
Therefore, in order for TRUE change to occur, we must spend less time battling the
products of this sick social structure and more time trying to change the root causes. As
difficult and daunting as it may be to think this way, it is the only way our world will
change for the better.

We can continue to stomp on the ants coming out from under the refrigerator, but until
we remove the spoiled food behind it, they are just going to keep coming.

- Part 3: Psychology -
Psychology is often defined as "The science that deals with mental processes and
behavior".

In the modern day, there are basically two prevailing schools of thought. 'Geneticists' and
'Behaviorists'... the old notion of "nature vs nurture."

The Geneticists are inclined to think that human behavior is derived from heredity and
instinct. Often on the news, reports detail how some study claims to find the 'genetic
predisposition' 'to being republican' or 'smoking cigarettes'. This supports the world view
that we are 'hardwired' in some way and that even subtle nuances of behavior, such as an
inclination for addiction, is genetic or "instinctual" in some way.

The Behaviorists, on the other hand, see the human being as a product of conditioning, as
based on the environmental exposure of that person. Therefore, the actions of a person
have a source that is derived from experience or a triggered train of thought, brought on
by a learned understanding. The mechanism of action/belief therefore is sourced in
learning, not heredity or instinct.

Which is more relevant? Obviously, both views are relevant in certain ways. Our interest
in surviving and reproducing is imprinted/genetic in some way, as it is directly associated
with fundamental survival. However, the means by which survival is obtained is entirely
based on the social conditioning of that person. If a person grows up in a scarce, poverty
stricken environment, with limited access to employment, they will have more of a
propensity to engage in illegal activity to survive... more so, then say a middle class
person who has basic needs met.

On the other side of the spectrum, if a person with great wealth has grown up in an elitist
family and is thus conditioned into thinking that his or her wealth/class serves as a status
symbol, they might often exploit those who work for them or perform illegal activities to
conform to the identity and social arrogance they think is real.

The bottom line is that it is environmental conditioning that really affects 99% of our
actions, and all diligent behavior studies have proven this time and time again.

8 of 16
People become alcoholics not because they have a genetic predisposition, but because of
the influence of their parents or friends. If you abuse a child, very often they grow up to
abuse other children. When the mass media promotes a certain idea in society, such as
"terrorism", the public is conditioned into believing this is true and a real threat,
regardless of reality. The fact is, we are emergent, vulnerable organisms and always
undergoing influence, conditioning and change to a certain degree.

That 'degree' is largely influenced by the social/ideological identifications which many

have been conditioned to think are immutable. This particular state of awareness is where
paralysis comes in, for there is nothing in nature to support the conclusion that anything
we think about today will not be outdated in the future, for one of the few patterns we can
stand behind with a certain degree of confidence(so far) is the reality that all elements of
nature are emergent. The 'identification' with a set understandings for the sake of ones
integrity is a serious distortion in our world, for it is considered a 'weakness' when a
person is proven wrong. This is, of course, absurd, for to be proven wrong is how most
learn and it should not be a feared circumstance.

Fritz Pearls once said that "The human species is the only species that has the ability to
interfere with their own growth". This is an important understanding, for our belief
systems, which we think we must keep to support our identities, often stand in the way of
new, changing understandings and personal growth.

The most dominant institutions which perpetuate this paralysis seem to be Theistic
Religion and The Monetary System. Theistic religion promotes a fixed world view, with
a "faith" based understanding that rejects logic and new information. The Monetary
System ( in all countries) is based on Competition for Labor and thus Labor for Money.
Very simply, the "competitive edge" can only be sustained through self-perpetuation, and
self-perpetuation/self interest naturally leads to a static institution which prefers not to
change, for it threatens the survival of that business, government or the like.

This is unsustainable.

- Part 4: Sociology -
Sociology is often defined as "The study of society; human social interaction".

This field considers social structures, both Cognitive and Material. An example of a
Cognitive Social Structure is the established institution of religion and how its operation
affects the collective awareness. For instance, Prolife Christians share a disposition that
human"life" is a separate element of nature and that killing an unborn fetus is wrong.
Concurrently, the competition based monetary system has proponents putting forth ideas
such as how competition is the most productive social state that humans can engage in.

Material Social Structures, on the other hand, are very obvious and they exist in the form
of corporations and governments, each having a strong influence on society. Of course,

9 of 16
all Material Social Structures bleed over into the Cognitive realm, for they always have
an ideology behind them.

Now, a common sociological issue has to do with "Human Nature" and its effect in a
collective sense. For instance, most people have been taught that human beings are
naturally competitive with each other, along with the assumption that social stratification
or hierarchy is also a "natural human tendency".

This is a fallacy.

If you look to, say, a pack of lions, you will see social hierarchy and violent competition
for food in most cases. This comparison is what leads people to think it is a natural
occurrence in human society as well (war, greed, ego, etc.). What is overlooked however,
are the Environmental Conditions present in each case. The pack of Lions exist in a world
of Scarcity. They do not have the ability to create traps for food, nor is food accessible in
an 'on demand' basis. They have to hunt and fight with each other. This creates
competition naturally, for in order to survive, the lions MUST be aggressive with each
other. In turn, hierarchy is developed for the strongest of these lions wins the most, and in
turn exert their dominance in a stratified way.

Likewise, in our current Human Society, the exact same thing is going on. Humans have
been living in the same sort of scarcity since the dawn of existence. However, as time has
gone on, we have become more and more "civilized" due to our ability to Create. Unlike
the Lions, humans are able to create tools and set in motion processes that free the human
being from a particular chore or problem, reducing Scarcity.

Given this "insight" we then see that on a fundamental level that if scarcity could be
eradicated, then human behavior would undergo a dramatic change, moving away from
competition, dominance and stratification.

Likewise, outmoded ideologies that do not stand up to the test of time, such as theistic
religion, compound this myth that humans/society are built a certain way. For example,
the Catholic ideology states that humans are "born with sin".

This is absurd, outmoded and based on a primitive understanding of human behavior.

There is no difference between a Ghandi baby or a Hitler baby... it is the environment

that shapes the person and hence the society (and vice versa).

Therefore, true Sociological change will come from removing the conditions that cause
the aberrant behavior patterns which pollute our societies. Prison, Police and Laws are
mere patchwork and, in fact, tend to make things worse over time.

Ultimately, it is going to take a redesign of our culture to change human behavior for the
better.

10 of 16
 - Part 5: Technology -
When we consider the relevance of our social structures and ideologies in society, very
often we view governments, politicians and corporations as the guiding organizational
and catalystic institutions responsible for the quality of our lives. This is, of course, true...
but only to a certain extent. As time has moved forward, human beings have become
more and more aware of nature, its processes, and thus have been able to derive inference
about how to imitate nature in all its creative glory.

The result has been Technology, which is what separates us humans from the other
species as far as functionality. We have the ability to create in very vast ways. If we don't
want to clean sewers, we can devise a machine to do it for us.

At the beginning of the Industrial Age, a great majority of people worked in factories.
Today, automation comprises 90% of nearly all factories. This has displaced humans and
created a large, artificial "service" industry in order to keep humans in employment for
money.

This pattern is very revealing. The implication is that machine automation is constantly
challenging the role of general human labor. This doesn't mean that humans will have
"nothing to do" as time moves on. Quite the contrary... this implication denotes the
freeing of humanity from jobs which humans do not care to engage in, so they will have
time to pursue what they choose to. As an aside, it is important to point out that society
today assumes a very negative posture towards humanity, retaining the belief that if
human beings were not "required" to do something, they would just sit around, be lazy,
and do nothing. This is absurd propaganda.

The notion of "leisure" is a monetary invention, created because of the oppressive, fascist
basis of the employment institution itself. Laziness is, in fact, a form of rejection of the
system. It is a quality that only exists due to the oppression and required servitude.

In a true society, there would be no such thing as the separation of "work and "leisure",
for humans should be allowed to pursue whatever they feel is relevant. To put it a
different way, consider the curiosity and interest of a child. He or she doesn't even know
what money is...Do they need to be motivated by money to go out and explore/create? No.
They have a personal interest and they pursue it without reward. In fact, the greatest
contributors to our society, such as Einstein, Newton or Galileo, pursued what they did
without any regard to money. They did it because they wanted to. The act of doing and
contributing was their reward.

The point here is that money is not a true incentive for anything and to think as such is to
assume that humans are inherently lazy and corrupt. Laziness and corruption are products
of the conditioning our social system creates.

Now, coming back to technology, we find that our quality of life, as far as functionality,
has been increased greatly by the benefits of the technological tools we create. From a

11 of 16
lawn mower to a pace maker, technology saves lives and decreases the amount of time
we need to spend on mundane, difficult or dangerous activities. In fact, if one steps back
far enough, it becomes clear that Technological development is the most important
institution we have and the pursuit of socially helpful technology(not weapons) should be
the highest priority of the culture.

At the same time, technological development is brought about by a particular train of

thought, or process... this could be called "The Scientific Method". Carl Sagan was once
quoted as saying something to the effect of "Society welcomes the gifts of science, but
rejects its methods".

This is very true in the modern age, for what the public fails to understand is that science
is not just a tool... it is a near universal functionality which can be applied to society in
ways many would not think about.

It seems obvious that technology improves our lives and serves as the greatest liberator of
human life in the material realm... so why aren't its methods applied to society as a
whole?

Obviously, the scientific method is used constantly for isolated systems, but it has never
been truly considered in the broadest ways. This is largely due to age old superstitions
which battle the logic of science in favor of a dogmatic, outdated and highly romanticized
world view.

If we had the option to rebuild a society from scratch, how would we do it to make it the
most efficient, sustainable and humane? This is our perspective. Obviously, we cannot
build a society from scratch but the point is clear. It is time we stop thinking about
monetary concerns and limitations, and begin to think about the possibilities we have
here on earth in the broadest sense.

It is this interest that has created the concept of a 'Resource Based Economy'. The Venus
project has been working on this concept for a long time and its foundation is very simple.
We survey, preserve and maximize our use of planetary resources in conjunction with
open information and technological development.

In this view, little is left to subjective interpretation, for it is a scientifically derived

strategy for social construction at the very core. From there, the scientific parameters
work themselves out as far as possibilities.

12 of 16
 - Part 6: Sustainability -
When we think of sustainability, often we think of durability, longevity and
environmental respect. In general, a sustainable practice is a practice that takes the health
of the future into consideration. However, this idea isn't just reserved for the physical,
material world- it also applies to thought, belief, human conduct and society as a whole.

An unsustainable practice is one that has an unbalanced negative effect, which, through
time, will adversely effect a person, society and/or the environment. A classic case is our
current use of Oil as a medium of energy. This could be considered unsustainable due to
the fact that oil is largely unrenewable and, when burned, is damaging to the environment.
Any practice that causes an irreversible resource depletion or long term environmental
pollution is an unsustainable practice.

Likewise, if a particular company outputs large amounts of waste byproducts during

production, polluting the environment, this would be considered an unsustainable practice
as well, regardless of what they are producing.

Similarly, if materials or knowledge used in the production of a particular kind of product

are not of the highest known quality, very often the integrity of that product is
compromised inherently, leading to the eventual creation of more waste when that
product fails or becomes obsolete. Given our current system of profit, most everything
that is produced is done so with a built in weakness, due to the need to compete for
market share. In other words, if two companies are each competing to create a certain
item, both will need to be strategic in the materials and designs they use, very often
compromising quality for the sake of affordability. The result is a product which breaks
down much faster than a product which was given the greatest care and highest quality
component materials.

This doesn't happen in our system for two reasons: 1) If a company was to use the best
known design and the best known materials, they would likely have a much higher
production cost and would likely lose a competitive edge. 2) If products were made to
last for extended periods of time, people would not need to repeatedly replace, update and
fix their items as much, and a vast amount of revenue and jobs would be lost by industry
at large, slowing the economy.

This is, of course, unsustainable by definition, for the inherent inefficiency of the
economic system eventually creates unnecessary multiplicities, waste and pollution.

And this leads us to unsustainable ideologies.

An unsustainable ideology is one that inherently leads a person or group to unsustainable

practices. For instance, the reason a production plant might use poor materials to create
unsustainable products, while also outputting a disproportionate amount of waste, is
really the result of a larger force, known as the Monetary or Profit System. In a Profit
System, there is no reward for sustainability, for the system is built upon competition and

13 of 16
regeneration. In such a circumstance, sustainability is always second to profit, for the
survival of a company is based on profit, and profit is partly based on reducing costs and
expanding income. Therefore, the unsustainable practices that exist in all industries are
the result of an underlying flaw in the ideological economic structure itself.

In theory, most would agree that having an abundance of resources, along with products
that are made of the most endurable materials for maximum sustainability and efficiency,
is a good thing. However, these notions are not rewarded in our current world monetary
system. What is rewarded is Scarcity. Scarcity and planned obsolescence are rewarded in
the short term, for it creates a 'turnover' of profit, while also making more jobs. Sadly,
this 'short term reward' is at the cost of 'long term destruction'.

The Free Enterprise System, along with all other subgroups, such as communism,
socialism and fascism, is an unsustainable ideology, for it has built into it a propensity for
environmental and social abuse. To put it more clearly, a world that is in competition
with itself for labor, resources, and survival is an unsustainable system inherently, for it
lacks an external conscience.

So then, what is an sustainable ideology?

While this question will always bring new answers as human evolution continues, in the
present day we have a concept called The Scientific Method. Very simply, the Scientific
Method is a process of investigation which, though the most modern methods of learning,
measurement, testing and experimentation, works to demonstrate the validity of a
particular understanding or possible resolution to a particular problem.

An example would be a problem with a car. If your car doesn't start, you would begin a
train of thought, based on logic, to find the source of the problem. Logic would guide
your focus, likely beginning with how much gas is in the car, moving towards the
ignition mechanism, etc. This is the scientific method applied to problem solving. A non
scientific method for such a problem would fall under the category of 'irrational'. For
instance if you car doesn't start, it would be irrational to start looking at the tires, for the
tires would likely have nothing to do with the mechanisms associated with the problem.

Sadly, our approach to social operation is largely without logic or methodology, but
rather it is submerged in tradition, superstition and outmoded methods of conduct. A
scientific approach to society, using logic and reason to assess and react to social issues
would have a natural gravitation towards sustainability, for nothing can be isolated or
detached in such an approach. In other words, we need to stop looking at the world
through the blinders of the systems and ideologies that have been created in the past, and
start looking at the world in the most broad, unbiased way we can. The only medium
which supports this approach, is Science, and the gifts of science have proved its validity
without question. Therefore, it is time we utilize the methods of science in our approach
to society itself.

14 of 16
A quick glance at the modes of operation used in the world today reflect a gross
negligence of reason, logic and scientific application. Our economic structures are based
on mediums of exchange and values which have little relationship to true resources and
reality. Religion continues to preach worldviews which have long been overridden by
progressive scientific thought. Our labor system is setup so that people must be
"employed" in order to gain money to survive, while the actual contribution that these
occupations have to society are highly suspect, showing that "jobs" often exist simply to
keep people doing "something" in order to live and support the economic structure. This
is a waste of human life...

There are many, many facets to the understanding that our current social institutions are
unsustainable. To summarize the issue, our life on earth must have a foundational
premise by which our operations relate. This premise must be as empirical as possible,
and not based on opinion or projection. From a scientific perspective, we see that
resources and human ingenuity are the most valuable issues at hand. Human intelligence
and awareness, coupled with the thoughtful management and utilization of earth
resources are really the only two core issues. Everything else is built upon this. Therefore,
we need to begin an approach which maximizes education, technology and resource
management.

Until this is done, sustainability will be in jeopardy. This is the goal of The Venus Project
and The Zeitgeist Movement.

- Part 7: Spirituality -
Spirituality has a different meaning to each of us, it seems. A standard definition would
be: "A sense of meaning and purpose; a sense of self and of a relationship with 'that
which is greater than self".

Currently, Religion and Mysticism seem to have the monopoly on Spirituality. Theistic
religion often regards a 'relationship with god' or divine creator, as a spiritual relationship,
while Mystics will often find a relationship to a 'supernatural' force or power. The bottom
line is that, almost universally, spirituality has to do with a 'relationship' on one level or
another. In most perspectives, it is associated with a person's 'place' or 'meaning' in life...
whatever that may be.

As subjective as these things can be, we begin to recognize changes in these notions, for
social progress tends to carve a path for understandings that stand the test of time. In the
modern age, we have the ability to look far in our past and examine what our ancestors
used to consider 'real', and then compare those ideas to what we understand today. Many
"spiritual practices" which have existed in the past, no longer exist due the
understandings that have come about in regard to natural phenomenon. As a base
example, early religions often 'sacrificed' animals for certain purposes... this rarely
happens today, as the relevance of such an act has proven pointless in its desired effect.
Likewise, rarely do people perform 'raindances' in order to influence the weather... today

15 of 16
we understand how weather patterns are created, and ritual practices have no provable
effect.

Similarly, the idea of 'praying' to a god for a particular request, has also statistically
proven to have little effect on an outcome, not to mention the evidence to support a
personified creator doesn't exist in any scientific way...rather it is often derived from
ancient historical literary speculation and tradition.

Establishment Religion, in many ways, seems to be rooted in a perceptual

misunderstanding about life's processes. For instance, it presents a worldview which
often puts the human on a different level than other elements of nature. This 'spiritual
ego' has led to dramatic conflicts for generations, not only between human beings, but
inadvertently between us and the environment itself.

However, as time has moved forward, Science has shown how human beings are subject
to the exact same forces of nature as everything else. We have learned that we all share
the same atomic substructure as trees, birds and all other forms of life. We have learned
that we cannot live without nature's elements... we need clean air to breathe, food to eat,
energy from the sun, etc. When we understand this Symbiotic relationship of life, we
begin to see that as far as 'relationships' are concerned, our relationship to the planet is the
most profound and important. The medium by which this is expressed, is Science, for the
Scientific Method has allowed us insight into these natural process, so we can better
understand how we 'fit' into this life system as a whole.

This could be called a 'spiritual' awakening.

This realization, which has been proven by science, is that humans are no different from
any other form of nature, while our integrity is only as good as the integrity of our
environment, to which we are a part. This understanding presents an entirely different
'spiritual' worldview, for it forces the idea of interdependence and connection, at its core.

The interconnection of the whole of life is undeniable in the most basic sense, and it is
this perpetual 'relationship' of total interconnectivity that is not fully realized by society
overall. Thus, our modes of conduct and perception are largely out of line with nature
itself... and hence destructive.

Nature itself is our teacher, and our social institutions and philosophies should be derived
from this foundational and, invariably, 'spiritual' understanding.

The faster this spiritual awakening spreads, the more sane, peaceful and productive
society will become.

16 of 16