You are on page 1of 64

CFO

JULY/AUGUST 2012 | WWW.CFO.COM


FINANCE
TRAINING THE
DELL WAY
THE 2012
WORKING
CAPITAL
SCORECARD
RECIPE
FOR PROFITS
AT POPEYES
No one ever thought
implementing Dodd-Frank
would be easy
At Exelis, Defense
Never Rests
Lessons From
JPMorgans
Botched Hedge
Unfinished
Business
In the United States, insurance coverages are underwritten by individual member companies of Zurich in North America, including Zurich American Insurance Company. Certain coverages are not
available in all states. Some coverages may be written on a non-admitted basis through licensed surplus lines brokers. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Risk engineering services are
Since 1912, our mission has been
to help build businesses. And our
passion has been to help sustain
our communities.
At Zurich, we have a rich history of helping our customers succeed.
Yet were equally proud of the work weve done to help our communities
ourish. Whether its organizing a blood drive, building homes or
donating our time, we care. And to celebrate our 100th anniversary in the
U.S., more than 16,000 employees in over 100 ofces are lending a hand in
100 Ways our charitable initiative to further help the areas in which
we live and work. Its all part of a company-wide philosophy to help
make our communities, and the greater community of America, stronger.
Insuring success since 1912. Visit zurichna.com/100
provided by Zurich Services Corporation.
Cover photo-illustration by Stephen Webster. This page, clockwise from top
left: Matthew Furman, David Plunkert, Stan Kaady
38
Unnished
Business
Two years after the passage
of the Dodd-Frank Act, the
laws implementation is
far behind schedule, and its
success is still in doubt.
By Randy Myers
46
Too Much Of
A Good Thing
Working capital is piling up at
Americas largest companies.
By Russ Banham
51 The 2012 Working
Capital Scorecard
The best and worst performers
in 20 industries.
Features
July/August 2012
Volume 28, No. 6
contents
D
o
D
D
-
f
r
a
n
k

a
c
t
Our business has four key
areas that align well with
where our government cus-
tomers are headed, based
on their public comments.
Peter Milligan, cfo of Exelis
34
34 On the Record
Defensive Maneuvers
Defense contractor Exelis
is ready to adjust to an era of
reduced Pentagon spending,
says CFO Peter Milligan.
Interview by Edward Teach
60 Take-Away
Recipe for Profits
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
CFO Mel Hope talks about
collaborating with franchisees
to grow the business.
Interview by Marielle Segarra
People to Watch
Mel Hope
1 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
2 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
From top to bottom: Miguel Davilla, courtesy Make Meaning, Bloomberg/Getty Images, Gordon Studer
contents
15 | Accounting & tAX
Renewed Concerns
About Renewables
Key tax credits for investments in
renewable-energy projects could soon
begin to expire. By Kathleen Hoffelder
The Second-Greatest Risk
CFOs of multinational companies rank
transfer-pricing risk just behind global
compliance. By Kathleen Hoffelder
18 | cApitAl MArkets
Finding Life after Debt
An acquisition saves a software
company from crushing leverage.
By Vincent Ryan
Private Equitys
Picky Appetite
PE firms are craving service and health-
care targets, according to a new survey.
By Vincent Ryan
21 | growth coMpAnies
Hands-On Growth
The finance chief of Make Meaning says
the start-up has what it takes to bring
customers through the door. Can it keep
them coming back?
By Marielle Segarra
23 | huMAn cApitAl
Training at Dell: Here,There,
And Everywhere
The computer giants financial-education
programs rely on a mix of long-distance
and local learning. By David McCann
26 | risk MAnAgeMent
The Hedge That Wasnt
JPMorgan Chases $2 billion trading
miscue is a costly lesson in how not to
protect against potential losses.
By Vincent Ryan
29 | strAtegy
Hawaiians Big Apple Venture
How Hawaiian Airliness CFO prepared
for the launch of an ambitious new
route. By David Rosenbaum
Euro Slide Sparks
M&A Interest
The weakening currency makes
European assets more attractive.
By Andrew Sawers
32 | technology
Digging Out from Big Data
Unstructured data is piling up in corpo-
rate computers, making compliance
and other tasks far more difficult.
By David Rosenbaum
Up Front
4 From the editor
7 letters
11 topline The Supreme Court upholds the Affordable Care Act FASB and
the IASB approve two accounting methods for lease expenses most
CFOs expect employees to delay retirement CEO turnover rises com-
panies have cash but wont spend it, says a recent survey and more.
55 business outlook
Duke University/CFO Survey Results
Muddling Through
CFOs continue to hire, but are less
optimistic. By Kate OSullivan
58 FielD notes
Perspectives from CFO Research
Putting Social Networks to Work
Companies are finding real economic value
in cooperation and social media.
By Josh Hyatt
By the Numbers
18
21
23
32
July/August 2012
Volume 28, No. 6
2.5%
The average by
which U.S. CFOs
say they will
expand their
full-time domes-
tic workforce
over the next
12 months.
2012 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, the AT&T logo and all other AT&T marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property and/or AT&T afliated companies.
R
E
P
A
I
R
E
D
W
R
E
C
K
E
D
It only takes a second for
an accident to happen.
Why should it take forever to fix it?
Business responds faster because
data does more in the AT&T network.
In here, intelligent data automates all the right
actions, at all the right points, all at the same time.
Details of the accident are collected and distributed.
Insurance claims are filed and reviewed. Parts are
preordered; paint colors are premixed.
In here, wrecks get repaired faster because the same
data that reports an accident is already at work fixing it.
Its the AT&T networka network of
possibilities teaching data how to do more.
To learn more, visit att.com/business
CFO, Vol. 28, No. 6 (ISSN 8756-7113), is published 10 times a year, with combined January/February and July/August issues, and distributed to qualified chief
financial officers by CFO Publishing LLC, 51 Sleeper St., Boston, MA 02210(executive and editorial offices). Copyright 2012, CFO Publishing LLC. All rights re-
served. Neither this publication nor any part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of CFO Publishing LLC. Requests for reprints and permissions should be
directed to FosteReprints, (866) 879-9144; E-mail: jkaletha@fostereprints.com; website: www.fostereprints.com. Subscriptions: U.S. and possessions: 1 year
$65; 2 years $100; 3 years $130; foreign, 1 year $120 U.S. funds only. Periodicals postage paid at Boston, MA, and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER:
Send address changes to CFO, P.O. Box 1233, Skokie, IL 60076-8233. CFO is a registered trademark of CFO Publishing LLC. SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: To order
a subscription or change your address, write to CFO, P.O. Box 1233, Skokie, IL 60076-8233, or call (800) 877-5416; or visit our website at www.cfo.com/
subscribe. For questions regarding your subscription, please contact subscription@cfo.com. To order back issues, call (617) 345-9700, ext. 3200. Back issues
are $15 per copy, prepaid, and VISA/MasterCard orders only. Mailing list: We make a portion of our mailing list available to reputable firms.
Kory Addis
leadership
General Mills CFO Don Mulligan
will explain how to build top-
notch finance teams at CFOs
CFO Rising: The Future of Fi-
nance conference in Las Vegas,
September 30October 3, 2012.
See www.cfo.com/conferences.
accounting
If you want expert advice on
presenting financials in an
easy-to-comprehend way, check
out Painting with Numbers, by
former high-tech CFO Randall
Bolten (John Wiley, April, $39.95).
Among other things, youll learn
why pie charts are bad, why
a natural P&L is good, and
why you should never, ever be
sleazy about the vertical axis.
See www.johnwiley.com.
global business
British economist Roger Boo-
tle won the 250,000 Wolfson
Economics Prize in July for his
analysis of how countries could
leave the euro with the least
amount of fuss. See How to
Break Up the Euro on cfo.com.
from the
editor
EdITORS PICkS
There have been numerous accom-
plishments (however controversial),
including the establishment of the
Financial Stability Oversight Council,
the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau, say on pay shareholder vot-
ing, and hedge-fund registration and
reporting. But some of the thorniest
provisions of the law remain on the
drawing board, such as the Volcker
Rule, which would limit banks propri-
etary trading. One seasoned observer
told Myers that implementing Dodd-
Frank wouldnt be finished until at
least well into 2013.
Even partial progress on Dodd-
Frank is too much for those who con-
tinue to insist that the law is unneces-
sary or worse and should be repealed,
either in whole or in part. One promi-
nent critic of the Volcker Rule has been
Jamie Dimon, the superstar CEO of
JPMorgan Chase. It was more than a lit-
tle embarrassing for Dimon, therefore,
when JPMorgan revealed in May that
its chief investment office had lost at
least $2 billion on an ill-advised trade
(The Hedge That Wasnt, page 26).
There have been many criticisms of
Dodd-Frankit goes too far, it doesnt
go far enough, its too complex, its a
brake on the economy, and so on. But
as Myers reminds us, its hard to fault
the motivation behind this sweeping
overhaul of the nations financial sys-
tem. After all, it wasnt long ago that
the government was forced to pump
trillions of dollars into the system to
keep it from failing, while millions of
people lost their jobs, their savings,
and their homes.
Elsewhere in this issue we offer the
latest installment of one of our most
popular features, the annual working
capital scorecard, done in cooperation
with REL Consulting (Too Much of a
Good Thing, page 46). See how your
company stacks up against some of the
best (and worst) performers in work-
ing capital management in Corporate
America. CFO
Edward Teach
Executive Editor
4 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act. Two years later, regulators are still hard at
work putting the mammoth law into effect. Although they
have written thousands of pages of rules, they are far from
finished, as contributing editor Randy Myers reports in our
cover story, Unfinished Business (page 38).
dodd-frank at two

PRUDeNTIAL CAPITAL GROUP


MANAGE MARKET
UNCERTAINTY WITH CONSISTENT
ACCESS TO PRIVATE CAPITAL.
Prudential Capital Group has consistently provided private
capital to middle-market companies for more than 70 years.
As one of the largest buy-and-hold capital providers, we
manage a $60 billion portfolio of private placements worldwide.*
Direct access to $10 billion of senior debt and mezzanine
fnancing in 2012
1,000 middle-market company relationships locally and
actively managed through all economic cycles
seasoned expertise and local knowledge consistently provided
by senior investment professionals with a 15- to 20-year
average tenure
To learn more about diversifying your sources of
private capital, visit www.PrudentialCapitalGroup.com/Diversify
2012. *As of 3/31/2012. Prudential Capital Group is a unit of Prudential Investment Management, Inc., a registered investment adviser and a Prudential Financial company. Prudential,
the Prudential logo, the Rock symbol and Bring Your Challenges are service marks of Prudential Financial, Inc., and its related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.
working. Jobs, and the skills needed
to perform them, are also changing,
so some jobs are becoming obsolete;
others are having some or all of the
tasks automated; and many jobs have
expanded the use of technology, thus
requiring workers to perform them in
new, and different, ways.
The anticipated drama of the baby
boomers exit hasnt really material-
ized, thanks in equal measure to the
poor economy, delayed retirement
plans, and unprecedented opportuni-
ties for older workers. While the age
wave may be hitting some industries
harder than others, the earlier con-
cerns simply havent come to pass. In
fact, many older workers have fared
better in the down economy than their
younger counterparts.
Dr. Katherine L. Y. Green
Green Consulting Group LLC
Chevy Chase, Maryland
wThe Bright Side of the Cloud
Cloud computing is a way that small
companies can allocate much-needed
resources to other, more beneficial top
drivers, such as sales and marketing
(Made for Each Other, June). When
smaller companies begin to realize that
software as a service is the best way to
manage data, they will see the inherent
benefit that the cloud presents.
Darrin Marion
Via E-mail
develop an integration process for the
postmerger period, a failure due to:
(1) not understanding how to achieve
revenue and cost synergies; (2) not re-
taining key employees and customers;
and (3) not understanding the corpo-
rate culture of the acquired company.
Can a company right a poor post-
integration process? The answer is yes,
but it will cost a heck of a lot of share-
holder value. Although there remain
questions about the value of M&A,
companies today need to continue
making acquisitions in order to stay
competitive.
Richard Summo
Via E-mail
wAnother Burden
The other burden, besides taxes, that is
even more significant to those affect-
ed is audits (Small Businesses Spend
wHow to Succeed at M&A
In my experience, the main reason for
merger failures is poor management
in the postmerger integration phase
(Do Mergers Add Value After All?
Strategy, June). Most companies fail to
Stephen Webster
LETTERS
7 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Go to The Real Reason Companies Arent Investing on cfo.com to see how
readers responded to this post (and to add your own thoughts as well).
Its the Equity Risk Premium,
Stupid
There are plenty of justifications companies can give
for why they arent allocating capital to new projects
or buying assets, but most of them tend to be pretty
vague. Uncertainty, whether due to the state of the
global economy, the European sovereign debt crisis,
or federal regulatory creep, is my least favorite excuse
that CFOs give.
The truth is, theres a far better apologia that com-
panies could present for not investing, and its rooted
in a classic principle of corporate finance. Im speak-
ing of the equity risk premium, a key ingredient in the calculations finance
departments make to decide whether to invest in a project. As Professor
Aswath Damodaran of New York University defines it, the ERP is the ex-
tra return that investors collectively demand for investing their money in
stocks instead of holding it in a riskless or close-to-riskless investment.
A key point is that the value of the ERP is affected by the entire stock
market, not just the individual companys shares. So the overall risk aver-
sion of equity investors affects the ERP.
And therein lies the problem. In the wake of the financial crisis, the
Facebook IPO debacle, and developments in high-frequency trading, the
perceived risk of holding an equity portfolio has increased. Investors want
a higher return to compensate for the risk. The equity markets, as embod-
ied in the ERP, are dampening business investment.
Best of
the Blogs
Vincent
Ryan
No Dire Straits
For Boomers
In regard to the worry
over baby boomers leav-
ing the workforce, the
institutional-knowledge
challenge is being solved
in many ways, and is cre-
ating less turmoil than projected by many business analysts
(When the Boomers Go, June). Many people age 50 and
over are staying on because they need, or want, to continue
Send to: The Editor, CFO, 51 Sleeper St., Boston, MA 02210,
or e-mail us at: letters@cfo.com
please include: Your full name, title, company name, address, and
telephone number. Letters are subject to editing for clarity and length.
C
FO
W
ELC
O
M
ES
Y
O
U
R

LET
T
ER
S
LETTERS
Subscriber Services
www.cfo.com/subscribe
or call 800-877-5416
51 Sleeper Street,
3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02210
(617) 345-9700
6 West 48th Street,
7th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 459-3004
CFO
chairman & ceo Alan Glass
eVP & Publisher Rob Stuart
Advertising Sales/
Product Development
sVP, chief sales officer Lissa Short
sVP, e-media, marketing, &
audience deVeloPment John E. Pal
sVP, Product deVeloPment Rich Rivera
editorial directors, Product deVeloPment:
David Arentsen, Marie Leone
VP, marketing Phillip LoFaso
senior marketing manager Danielle Balestra
online oPerations manager Jerry Xenos
online oPerations coordinator Matt Kopec
senior marketing manager Tiffany Coe
senior webcast Producer Joe Fleischer
webcast Producer Phil Lavanco
National Advertising Office
new York metro/new england/ohio/
PennsYlVania Dulce A. Chicn, (212) 488-4718;
fax: (212) 459-3007
new York/southeast Linda Hooper, (212) 488-4722;
fax: (212) 459-3007 or (212) 541-5567
midwest Benjamin Cairns, (312) 445-6524
account executiVes Jonathon Casalou,
Holly Karasinski, (646) 234-4101; fax: (212) 459-3007
business suPPort coordinator
Katie Banks, (646) 237-4104
CFO Conferences
director of sales, conferences Deborah Hatcher
senior marketing manager Joseph Zerbo
design director Charity Musielak
manager, conference oPerations &
sales suPPort Lisa Nelson
CFO Research
director of global research sales Mike Slomba
sales deVeloPment manager Jeffrey Stevens
Finance Department
sVP & cfo Peter Spinelli
controller Pete Badas
senior accountant Hana Deleuse
a/P coordinator Monique Madden
business manager Ryan Lightbody
Operations
senior director, audience deVeloPment &
Production Teresa A. Green
director of online deVeloPment Jiun Jye Chin
it manager Ben Radlinski
director of human resources Louise Daly
office manager & credit controller Lucy E. Bean
CFO Magazine/cfo.com
editorial director
Kate OSullivan (kateosullivan@cfo.com)
editor-in-chief, cfo.com
David M. Katz (davidkatz@cfo.com)
executiVe editor Edward Teach (edteach@cfo.com)
dePutY editors, online/mobile:
David McCann (davidmccann@cfo.com)
Vincent Ryan (vincentryan@cfo.com)
managing editor Susan Kron (susankron@cfo.com)
senior editors:
Kathleen Hoffelder (kathleenhoffelder@cfo.com)
Caroline McDonald (carolinemcdonald@cfo.com)
David Rosenbaum (davidrosenbaum@cfo.com)
associate editor
Marielle Segarra (mariellesegarra@cfo.com)
editorial intern
Bonnie Evans (bonnieevans@cfo.com)
editorial Production manager, online/mobile
Deana Colucci
contributing editors:
Russ Banham Randy Myers Alix Stuart
design/art director Robert Lesser
CFO Research
sVP & director of research Sam Knox
editorial director, research Celina Rogers
research director David Owens
associate research directors:
Mary Beth Findlay Josh Hyatt
research editor Matt Surka
manager of research oPerations Linda Klockner
contributing research editors:
Elizabeth Fry Eric Laursen Christopher Watts
Editorial Advisory Board
David W. Devonshire, EVPEVP/CFO Retired,
CFO, Motorola Inc.
Bruce Edwards, Chairman Emeritus,
Powerwave Technologies Inc.
David E. Farber, The RVH Group, Merrill Lynch
Frank R. Gatti, CFO & SVP, ETS
James C. Johnston, President, Johnston Co.
Stephen Payne, Americas Working Capital Leader,
Ernst & Young LLP
Albert A. Pimentel, CFO & COO, McAfee Inc.
Ellen B. Richstone, Former CFO, Rohr Inc.,
Sonus Networks, and Luminus Devices Inc.
Kenneth J. Sanginario, Principal, NorthStar
Management Partners
Debra Smithart-Oglesby, Former CFO,
First America Automotive
Editorial Offices
More Time on Taxes, Topline, June).
Sales-tax audits can be brutal, and
IRS audits can take months, a year, or
moreand large amounts of employee
and tax-attorney time.
Ronald J. Cappuccio, J.D., LL.M. (Tax)
Via E-mail
COLI Is A-OK
Your story Key-Person Insurance: A
Cash-Flow Caveat (May) provided
important information on this in-
creasingly popular tactic.
Corporate-owned life insurance
(COLI) has long provided numerous
benefits to shareholders and high-
producing, quality executives who
help to maximize shareholder value.
COLI provides nonqualified plan spon-
sors with a cost-efficient asset that
offsets the liability of the participants
account balances on the plan sponsors
balance sheet. For example, plan spon-
sors can use COLI policies to mirror
the rate plan that participants earn in
their voluntary nonqualified deferred-
compensation plans. As a result, COLI
helps companies reduce future liabili-
ties, with an asset that should consis-
tently grow in value. And with non-
qualified retirement plans increasingly
important for many executives earn-
ing more than $150,000 annually, COLI
facilitates effective asset-liability man-
agement.
Contrary to what is stated in the
articles last two paragraphs, there
was no 2004 regulation that led to the
COLI market being essentially dead
from 2004 to 2010. By contrast, COLI
has continued to grow in popularity
since that time. In 2004, the COLI Best
Practices Provision was first proposed
and later became law as part of the
Pension Protection Act of 2006. The
measure and its high standards were
widely supported by the industrys
leading practitioners.
Mike Powers
Executive Director
The Todd Organization
Cleveland
8 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
IBM, the IBM logo, ibm.com, Smarter Planet and the planet icon are trademarks of International Business Machines Corp. , registered in many jurisdictions worldwide. Other product and service names might be
trademarks of IBM or other companies. A current list of IBM trademarks is available on the Web at www.ibm.com/legal/copytrade. shtml. International Business Machines Corporation 2011. All rights reserved.
How a car dealer is driving a safer business.
As the world becomes more interconnected, threats and risks are growing exponentially. Fortunately, on
a smarter planet, we have the tools to help protect critical data and business continuity. Gruppo Intergea is
a midsize company with about 460 employees that sells cars in Northern Italy. They wanted to improve the
security of their IT infrastructure a critical part of their daily operations. With help from IBM and its Business
Partners, Gruppo Intergea implemented a smart security solution that can proactively scan their data across
their network to identify threats and block them before they can damage business operations. So Gruppo
Intergea can be protected not only from known security threats, but also from other vulnerabilities that may
not have been on their radar. As a result, their network can stay up, and their data stays safer. To see how IBM
and its Business Partners can help your midsize business work smarter, visit ibm.com/engines/auto.
Lets build a smarter planet.
Midsize businesses are the engines of a Smarter Planet.
Prudential retireMent
ITS TIME TO
RETHINK RISK.
2012.
1
Based on fund sponsor rankings in Pensions & Investments, February 2011.
2
Pensions & Investments
2011 annual Money Managers directory.
3
liMra Group annuity risk transfer Survey, 1Q12. Guarantees are
based on the claims-paying ability of the insurance company and are subject to certain limitations, terms and
conditions. Products issued by the Prudential insurance Company of america (PiCa), newark, nJ 07102.
Prudential, the Prudential logo and the rock symbol are service marks of Prudential Financial, inc. and its
related entities, registered in many jurisdictions worldwide.
0202597-00001-00
WE caN HElp yOuR db plaN
MEET THaT cHallENGE.
pENSION plaN RISKS aRE uNpREdIcTablE. Market risks
remain top of mind in a rapidly changing economic
environment. But asset/liability mismatch, rising life
expectancy and changing regulations will likely increase
volatility in the long run.
NOW IS THE TIME yOu aNd yOuR advISORS NEEd a
TRuSTEd paRTNER. at Prudential, were leading the way
with innovative risk transfer strategies, from a separate
account product that closes out pension liabilities, to
flexible new solutions for underfunded plans that enhance
participant security.
OvER 135 yEaRS, WEvE KEpT OuR pROMISES through
sound money management and superior financial
strength. For strategies that meet the challenges of
managing pension risk, Prudential is the company more
and more plan sponsors and advisors rely on.
Prudential FinanCial
Currently manages assets for 23 of the
largest 25 corporate plans
1
$118 billion in dB assets
2
7th largest dB money manager
2
2nd largest manager of uS
pension buy-outs
3
5th largest active institutional manager
of uS fixed income
2

to arrange a free market
assessment of your
organizations
pension risk, contact
Glenn OBrien, Managing
director, Prudential
Pension & Structured
Solutions, at 860-534-2440. download
our white paper on new dB solutions
at www.prudential.com/pensionrisk
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL
KEEPING PROMISES
New solutions for retirement benefit obligations
The U.S. Supreme
Courts ruling that
upheld the constitu-
tionality of virtually
the entire Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act will
have major repercussions
for businesses as they weigh
whether to change their em-
ployee benefit plans over the
next two years.
Many companies expect-
ed the court to strike down
the individual mandate, a
decision that could have un-
raveled the entire law. But
in a 5-4 decision issued on
June 28, the court ruled that
the mandate, which requires
most U.S. citizens to obtain
some health coverage if they
dont have it, is constitu-
tional because it falls under
Congresss taxing powers.
The court did strike down
part of the law, ruling that
states have the option to
keep their current Medicaid
funding even if they decline
to expand their Medicaid
programs.
Starting in January 2014,
firms with more than 50 em-
ployees that forgo providing
health insurance to full-time
employees will be required
to pay a no coverage pen-
alty. That per-employee
penalty, however, will be
less than what virtually all
employers currently pay
for providing health insur-
ance. Employees that do not
receive insurance through
their companies may be able
to purchase it through fed-
erally subsidized insurance
exchanges in each state.
While the courts deci-
sion creates some certainty
for companies, CFOs ini-
tial reaction to the law was
largely unfavorable. Some
worried that the law opens
the door for more federal
regulation, which they said
is preventing businesses
from investing in expansion.
They also said the complex-
ity of the law will make it
hard to calculate the cost of
hiring additional employees
as they enter into the bud-
geting process for 2013.
Despite the ruling, the
Affordable Care Act is sure
to remain a contentious is-
sue both in Congress and
in the upcoming November
elections. vincent ryan
Topline
StatS
of
the
month
Kevin Dietsch/Landov
health care
Annual rate of sales
of new homes in
May, the highest
monthly rate since
April 2010.
369K
Rise of new auto
sales in June from
a year earlier.
22%
Increase in orders
for durable goods
in May, after two
consecutive monthly
decreases.
1.1%
High Court Upholds
Health-Care Reform
The Supreme Courts ruling leaves companies with decisions to make.
Protesters and supporters gath-
er in front of the U.S. Supreme
Court as they await a ruling on
the Affordable Care Act.
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau,
Autodata Corp.
11 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Topline
bookshelf
the best is
yet to come
Do you ever throw
down your newspaper or
iPad in disgust after read-
ing the latest news about
jobs or budget deficits
and fret about the inevi-
table decline of the United
states? stop worrying,
advises Daniel Gross, the
economics editor of Yahoo
finance. In his new book,
Better, Stronger, Faster:
The Myth of American
Decline...and the Rise of
a New Economy (simon &
schuster, $26), Gross as-
sures us that our current
economic slump is just a
temporary setback. Were
not Japan or the british
empire, he says, nor is
China quite the juggernaut
that its cracked up to be,
for that matter. bad things
have happened to the U.s.
economy many times be-
fore, yet it always emerg-
es from the experience,
well, better, stronger, and
faster.
Restructuring is a core
national competency,
Gross declares, pointing
out that the United states
rebounded faster from the
Great Recession than its
peers. Drawing on his ex-
tensive travels in the U.s.
and abroad, Gross pres-
ents much evidence of
new green shoots of pros-
perity.
CFO
After months of heat-
ed debate, the Fi-
nancial Accounting
Standards Board and
the International Account-
ing Standards Board split
their differences in June,
deciding to allow compa-
nies to account for lease
expenses on the balance
sheet using one of two ap-
proaches, depending on
the type of lease. The two
methods the standards-
setters agreed on were the
right of use approach
(Approach A) and the
whole-contract method
(Approach D).
The two approaches differ greatly
from each other, but together they seem
to satisfy a variety of constituents, as
well as the boards. Approach A takes the
right-of-use asset of a lease and amor-
tizes it in a straight-line fashion, while
Approach D lets the lessee allocate lease
payments evenly throughout the lease.
The boards decision clarifies how to
account for equipment leases and real es-
tate leases: equipment leases should fall
under the right-of-use approach, and real
estate leases should fall under the whole-
contract method. In earlier discussions
at the joint board meeting,
FASB originally opted for a
two-method model and the
IASB favored a one-method
model. But after a second
vote, both boards agreed on
the dual approach.
Several market partici-
pants say they would wel-
come the combination of
the two approaches. I be-
lieve it is the approach that
will appeal to the greatest
number of people affected
by the standard, says Dee
Mirando-Gould, a former
associate chief auditor with
the Public Company Ac-
counting Oversight Board and now direc-
tor at MorganFranklin, a business consult-
ing and technology solutions firm. The
two-lease model is closer to the econom-
ics of leases in that some leases transfer
ownership rights [for which the whole-
contract method is best], while others
merely transfer a right of use, adds Bill
Bosco, president of lease-accounting firm
Leasing 101 and a member of a FASB/
IASB working group that provides input
to the boards.
FASB and the IASB will publish a joint
exposure draft on the topic in the fourth
quarter of 2012. kathleen hoffelDeR
leasInG
Two Ways about It
FASB and the IASB have agreed to allow two approaches to
accounting for lease expenses on the balance sheet.
in
search
of the
next
big
thing
Is a percentage of your firms
budget invested in pursuit of
major innovations?
How much of the innovation
work is your firm doing?
Yes No
39% 61%
Transformational
Moderate
Incremental
44%
24%
32%
15%
If yes, what percentage?
I believe it is the
approach that will
appeal to the greatest
number of people af-
fected by the standard.
Dee Mirando-Gould,
formerly of the PCAOB

Source:
Duke University/
CFO Magazine
Global Business
Outlook Survey
12 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
from last year.
But not all is doom and
gloom, according to Jim
Morrison, CFO of plastics
compounding firm Teknor
Apex and chair of the
AICPAs Business Indus-
try Executive Committee.
Morrison does not con-
sider the 2-point drop that
dire, considering the index
has dropped 9 to 10 points
in some years. We might
have been in a holding pat-
tern for a while, but we are
going to resume growth,
Morrison says. It may not
happen right away. Theres
still optimism that over the next year, we
will be on a growth pattern rather than a
downward spiral. K.H.
CFOs looking for a promotion
may take heart from the latest
annual survey of CEO succes-
sion from consultancy Booz &
Co. Last year, the percentage of top
bosses who departed the worlds 2,500
largest companies rose to 14.2%
thats 355 CEOs who moved outfrom
11.6% in 2010.
The improved outlook for the econ-
omy may be partly responsible for the
acceleration in CEO turnover. Boards
are increasingly seeking new leaders
to help drive growth in a recovering
global economy, the survey authors
write. But theres at least a hard bar-
gain, if not a catch: the need to ride the
upswing places a distinct burden on
those newly elevated CEOs to prove
More
CEOs Go
A majority of executives surveyed by
the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants in the second quarter said
their companies have enough cash or
have increased their cash this year, but
they remain reluctant to deploy it.
Forty-three percent of the 1,250 senior
executives in the AICPA Business and
Industry Outlook Survey said their com-
panies have about the right amount of
cash currently, while 36% said cash as-
sets have increased from the first quar-
ter to the second quarter of 2012. Almost
half of those surveyed were CFOs, while
22% were controllers. Sixty-nine percent
represented privately owned firms.
But 24% of the total respondent base
said they were hesitant to
deploy their excess cash, an
increase from 20% who felt
that way last quarter. Only
12% said they would actu-
ally use it.
The reluctance to spend
cash may stem from an
overall negative take on
the economy. The AICPAs
CPA Outlook Index dropped
two points, to 67 from 69,
from the first quarter of
2012 to the second. Similar-
ly, expectations for revenue, profit, and
employment growth slid this quarter,
though they were essentially unchanged
Have Cash, Wont Spend
24%
of those surveyed
said they were hesi-
tant to deploy their
excess cash, up from
20% last quarter.
themselves early in their
tenure.
Overall, 2.2% of CEOs
lost their jobs because of
merger-and-acquisition ac-
tivity, 2.2% were forced out
for other reasons, and the re-
maining 9.8% planned their
departures.
Good news for CFOs
with their eye on the CEO
role: so-called insider CEOs,
those promoted from with-
in the firm rather than ap-
pointed from outside, serve
longer and, more important,
create more value for share-
holders. From 2009 to 2011,
these CEOs firms outper-
formed local market indexes by 4.4%,
compared with 0.5% for external CEOs.
The bad news: those insider promo-
tions are harder to get. In 2011, 22% of
CEOs were appointed from outside,
compared with just 14% back in 2007.
The Booz survey makes no mention
of the role of CFOs in succession plan-
ning. It does, however, carry advice to
newly appointed CEOs from Andre-
Michel Ballester, CEO of the Italian
company Sorin Group: The first is-
sue is to create a leadership team very
quickly, making decisions on who are
the keepers and who are the leavers in
the first few weeks.
And therein lies a warning: CFOs
who dont get the top job themselves
should quickly cement their relation-
ship with the successful CEO candi-
date. In fact, recent research by recruit-
ing firm Korn/Ferry suggests that 28%
of CFOs leave their company within
two years of an external CEOs ap-
pointment. If another internal candi-
date gets the CEO role, there is only a
10% chance the CFO will leave for new
pastures. AndrEW SAWErS
HuMAn CAPITAl

CASH FlOW
13 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
-0.6%
-2%

0

2

4

6%
Insider Outsider
-1.3%
3.9%
5.1%
3.6%
2.2%
4.4%
0.5%
09-11 06-08 03-05 00-02
Source: CEO Succession Report: 12
th
Annual Global
CEO Succession Study (Booz & Co.)
The Insiders Edge
Median shareholder returns of companies
where the outgoing CEO had been promoted
from within vs. recruited externally.
The bad news: insider
promotions are harder
to get. In 2011, 22% of CEOs
were appointed from out-
side, up 8% from 2007.
Thinkstock
Topline
Even employees who have tra-
ditional pensions will be work-
ing longer than they planned
and their bosses know it.
In a recent survey con-
ducted by CFO Research in
collaboration with Prudential
Financial, about 70% of senior
finance executives said they
believe their companies em-
ployees will be forced to delay retirement because of insufficient
savings. (CFO Research and Prudential conducted similar surveys in
2009 and 2010.) The 186 finance executives surveyed work at large
and midsize companies, all with defined-benefit (DB) pension plans
with assets of at least $250 million. Employers also said that employ-
ee benefits are critical to attracting and retaining talent, with three-
quarters agreeing that employee satisfaction with benefits is impor-
tant to the success of their company.
So whats a CFO to do? The survey suggests that finance execu-
tives are exploring new ways to manage those financial risks that
pose threats to both a companys bottom line and an employees
nest egg. This years survey found an increase in the percentage of
companies likely to transfer DB plan risk to a third-party insurer.
Because pension plans are guaranteed, employers have to pay extra
if the investments underperform. With that in mind, we are fig-
uring out a way to move future risks off of our companys balance
sheet, said the CFO of a health-care company. While only 5% of
respondents had transferred DB plan risk to a third-party insurer,
43% said they were likely to do so within two years, up from 30%
in 2010.
Finance executives in the study also said they will explore prod-
ucts that can dampen the markets volatility and encourage employ-
ees to keep their own investments in defined-contribution plans
intact. These executives are becoming more interested in exploring
how using strategies such as target-date funds, stable-value prod-
ucts, and guaranteed-income products might help bolster employee
retirement investments. Josh hyatt and david owens
retirement plans
To download the report, The Future of Retirement and
Employee Benefits, go to www.cfo.com/research
Retirement:
A Recalculated Risk
If you would like to submit a question to Bill
MrExcel Jelen, go to CFOs Spreadsheet
Community Center at www.cfo.com/spreadsheets.
A Refreshing
Change
Q: Ive discovered that
some of the underlying
data in my pivot table is
wrong. After I correct a
number, the pivot table
does not appear to include
the change. Why does this
happen, and how do I hold
on to my updates?
A: There is an important concept to understand
about pivot tables: When you create a pivot
table, all the data is loaded into memory to allow
it to calculate quick-
ly. Changing the
data on the original
worksheet does not
automatically up-
date the pivot table.
You need to se-
lect a cell in the
pivot table. The Piv-
otTable ribbon tabs will appear. On the Options
tab, click the Refresh icon to recalculate the pivot
table from the worksheet data (see Figure 1). The
result should be that the pivot table is updated.
One word of caution: Making changes to the
underlying data could cause the table to grow.
For example, if you reclassify some records from
the East region to the Southeast region, be aware
that clicking the Refresh button will cause the
table to grow by one column. If there happens to
be other data in that column, Excel will warn you
and ask if it is okay to overwrite those cells.
Ask
MrExcel
Bill Jelen
Figure #1
Anticipating
Delays
More than
two-thirds of
CFOs expect
employees to
have to put
off retirement.
0%
20
40
60
80%
Dont Know No Yes
14%
17%
69%
14 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
Thinkstock
Wind-project developers or solar-
facility owners typically have tax-eq-
uity partnerships with large-company
investors such as Google or Chevron,
where both sides benefit: the develop-
ers get necessary capital and the inves-
tors get big tax write-offs. Corporate
investors in wind, geothermal, and bio-
energy projects are currently eligible
for the production tax credit (PTC),
which provides an income-tax credit
of 2.2 cents per kilowatt hour for up
to the first 10 years a facility is open.
They can also take the investment tax
credit (ITC), a one-time tax break of
30% on their investments, or an equiv-
alent cash payment from the U.S. Trea-
sury Department.
But sooner or later, that could all
change. The PTC for wind projects,
which companies can exchange for a
cash grant, is set to expire at the end
of this year, while the geothermal and
other bioenergy PTCs expire at the
end of 2013. Treasurys 1603 grant,
which provides cash payments worth
30% of the total cost of a renewable
project, is also phasing out. Named
after Section 1603 of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, the grant is now available only
to projects that began construction in
2011. Solar ITCs, meanwhile, are set to
expire in 2016.
The uncertainty surrounding the
renewable-project market is already
slowing project development. Some
participants are hopeful that Congress
will extend the credits at the 11
th
hour,
but typically, when lawmakers do re-
new these credits, they tend to extend
them for no more than a year or two.
Demand for tax-equity financing
already exceeds the supply of funds
available. Only $3.6 billion in tax-equity
funds will be available for renewable-
energy projects in 2012, but the demand
for renewable-project financing in 2011
was $7.5 billion, according to an Ameri-
can Council on Renewable Energy
survey last year. That source of capi-
If long-standing renewable-energy credits expire as
scheduled starting this year, companies that have
taken advantage of those hefty tax breaks for wind and solar
financing will have to consider new alternatives.
Renewed Concerns
About Renewables
Key tax credits for investments in renewable-energy projects could
soon begin to expire. By Kathleen Hoffelder

Ferran Traite Soler


accounting
& tax
tal that is helping the industry grow
is going to slow down if those incen-
tives are not there, says Brent Stahl,
principal and partner at law firm Stahl,
Bernal & Davies. In fact, thats already
happening, as only those wind projects
already under way are
still receiving the tax
credits.
Investors have
been lured to the
projects in the past
few years, when the
tax savings increased
dramatically. The
cash-on-cash return
that a firm is paying
a tax-equity investor
may be 3%, but in sub-
stance the tax-equity
investor is earning a
very high return be-
cause its using these
tax attributes to shel-
ter or reduce the tax
burden on [its] other
income, says Mark
Regante, a partner at
law firm Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy. In the case of accelerated-
depreciation deductions, the benefit is
like an interest-free loan from the gov-
ernment.
Before the recession, investors in
solar facilities were earning a 6% to
8% aftertax internal rate of return;
The uncertainty surrounding the
renewable-project market is already
slowing project development. Some
are hopeful that Congress will extend
the tax credits at the 11
th
hour.
15 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
The Most Respected Companies
in North America Trust Ryan
PMS 288 Blue or CMYK = C100-M85-Y0-K43
PMS 1255 Ochre / Yellow or CMYK = C0-M35-Y85-K30
2012 Ryan, LLC. All rights reserved.
Business-Minded Tax Consultants
Ryan provides the most innovative approach to tax consulting available in the industry
today. Since 1991, weve become a leading global tax services frm, with the largest
indirect tax practice in North America and the seventh largest corporate tax practice in
the United States.
But, our value proposition is far greater than the industry-leading tax recovery services
that we are internationally recognized for. Were also focused on your overall tax
performanceproviding innovative solutions to the underlying causes of the errors
we identifyand creating greater opportunities to measure and improve your
efciency, develop a more strategic approach to tax, and deliver outstanding value
to your shareholders.
Please visit us at www.ryan.com or call 800.545.1856 to learn more about how our
services can beneft your business.
Ryan has been a
trusted partner of CBS
Corporation for many
years, consistently
delivering incredible value
and substantial savings.
Christopher Fontana
Director, State and Local Tax
Thinkstock
The Second-
Greatest Risk
CFOs of multinational
companies rank transfer-
pricing risk just behind
global compliance.

Multinational CFOs are increasing-


ly looking to avoid the double taxa-
tion that can occur from manufactur-
ing a product in one jurisdiction and
selling it in another. Transfer pricing,
the movement of goods and services in
order to allocate profits, has become
a high-ranking concern for finance
chiefs of multinational companies, ac-
cording to a survey by Alvarez & Mar-
sal Taxand.
Thirty percent of the 60 large-
company senior finance executives
surveyed ranked transfer pricing as
their greatest risk, just behind global
compliance, at 32%. Transfer pricing
now they can reap an IRR
of more than 10% on the
renewable deals. If the tax
credits expire, however,
other alternatives for in-
vesting in renewable proj-
ects could become more
popular. For example,
market participants have
started to discuss a master
limited partnership as a fi-
nancing vehicle, similar to
the model for pipeline busi-
nesses, says Stahl. The con-
cept would be a first for the
renewables sector.
Already-existing tax-
was also the second-highest risk for
the respondents from 158 smaller com-
panies with less than $1 billion in an-
nual revenue, with 20% saying transfer
pricing was their greatest risk, com-
pared with 23% who named global
compliance.
Once something goes wrong in
the transfer-pricing area, it becomes a
huge controversy very quickly, espe-
cially if there are two countries in-
volved, says Kent Wisner, managing
director of international tax at A&M
Taxand. Even in a lower tax jurisdic-
tion like Ireland, they need tax revenue
just like the United States does.
Staying one step ahead of the tax
penalties that may accompany trade
distortions involving tangible or in-
tangible assets, for example, is a key
concern of businesses today. The risks
become more pronounced as merger-
and-acquisition activity picks up.
Once a physical transfer-pricing
equity structures could
also draw new interest.
Sale-leaseback structures,
where a developer sells
a project to an investor,
could prove useful for in-
vestors with short-term
horizons. And inverted-
lease structures that let
an investor lease a proj-
ect directly from a devel-
oper could also become
more popular, say market
participants. Similarly,
accelerated-depreciation
federal-tax incentives, in-
cluding credits for solar-
project investments that extend over
a five-year period, are not expiring yet
and could be more appealing with the
traditional credits going away, Stahl
says. So far, relatively few companies
have taken advantage of these incen-
tives.
Interest in these alternatives varies
by market. The wind sector may need
more investor support, but the solar
industry is better equipped to stand
on its own because of its retail appeal,
says Milbanks Regante. There are
more tax-equity investors in the solar
market now than a year ago, he says,
and developers are finding ways to get
their projects financed. CFO
$7.5
billion
Demand for
renewable-energy
project financing
in 2011
$3.6
billion
Tax-equity financ-
ing available for
renewable-energy
projects in 2012
Source: American Council
on Renewable Energy
Financing
shortFall
structure is in place at a company,
however, keeping it operating often
becomes less of a burden to financial
executives, according to A&M Tax-
ands survey. Only 7% of the largest-
company executives surveyed saw
transfer pricing as a burden to their
ongoing operations. The survey in-
cluded responses from more than 300
financial executives, with more than
70% representing smaller companies.
K.H.
Even in
a lower tax
jurisdic-
tion like
Ireland,
they need
tax revenue
just like the U.S. does.
Kent Wisner, A&M Taxand
those lovely intangibles
The fact is that it is simply very difficult to identify or measure intangible
assets. High market-to-book ratios may provide indications of their existence
and value. However, after the excesses of the dot-com bubble, there is under-
standable reluctance to record them on the balance sheet.
hans hoogervorst, IASB chairman, in a June 20 speech
Verbatium
accounting & tax
17 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Finding Life after Debt
An acquisition saves a software company from crushing leverage. By Vincent Ryan
Miguel Davilla/theispot
capital
Markets
approaching 10 times was off the ta-
ble, says Samuelson.
By December 2010, Infor had a new
management team and profits were
growing again. But that didnt solve
the capital-structure problem: Infor
was still more than nine times lever-
aged. The company considered sev-
eral options for right-sizing its capital
structure and chose one true to its his-
tory: acquire a company that Infor and
Golden Gate could overequitize and
combine with Infor to bring leverage
levels down, Samuelson says.
Lawson to the Rescue
Publicly held Lawson Software, with
$800 million in revenues, had the scale
to help fix Infors capital structure. But
a take-private transaction for Lawson
still would not have brought Infors le-
verage down to a level that was palat-
able in the capital markets, says Sam-
uelson. And as the company was trying
to close the deal in 2011, the earthquake
in Japanese occurred and the euro-
zone crisis flared up, making the debt
markets difficult again.
As a result, Golden Gate Capital
financed the $2 billion Lawson unso-
licited takeover separately and kept
the company a stand-alone entity. But
the PE firm eventually combined the
companies this year, after it and Sum-
mit Partners kicked in $1 billion of new
equity. Infor used $600 million of that
sum to pay down debt. At the same
time, Infor obtained a $3.4 billion first-
lien bank loan and raised $1.9 billion
in a public bond issue, one of the larg-
est post-credit-crunch refinancings in
high tech.
Those transactions lowered the le-
verage of the combined Infor-Lawson
to 6.5 times EBITDA. The addition of
Lawsons cash flow also helped. Infor
Acquisitions have killed many companies, but Infor
may be one of the few saved by one. Leveraged to the
hilt two years ago, the company, which makes enterprise-
resource-planning software, has returned from the brink of
a major restructuring. A merger with fellow ERP software

recalls Samuelson; the debt was in-


credibly inexpensive, and we could get
as much as we wanted. So Infor went
from financing acquisitions almost en-
tirely with equity to a more tradition-
al leveraged-buyout-type capital struc-
ture, he says.
The companys pro forma lever-
age after the 2006 deals was 6.5 times
EBITDA (earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation, and amortization).
Then the economy nose-dived, and
Infor suffered large declines in EBIT-
DA and profits, pushing its leverage to
10 times EBITDA. Although servicing
debt was never an issue, the ability
to refinance debt certainly at anything
vendor Lawson Software, combined
with an injection of equity capital, was
the key factor in Infors revival.
I think a lot of people thought
the endgame would be bankruptcy or
some kind of negotiated restructuring
with existing lenders, says Infor CFO
Kevin Samuelson. But Infor avoided
that outcome.
How did Infor get so deep into
debt? In 2006, it was a four-year-old
company owned by private-equity firm
Golden Gate Capital and humming
along at a good clip. But that year it
spent $2.5 billion on acquisitions in a
short period of time. The credit mar-
kets had opened up to software firms,
18 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
Deposit and credit products provided through Fifth Third Bank. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender. Lending is subject to credit review and approval.
Fifth Third Bank 2012.
HOW CAN
SOMEONE HAVE
ALL YOUR ANSWERS
BEFORE THEY ASK
ANY QUESTIONS?
Clairvoyance isnt one of our skills.
But curiosity is.
Its what leads us to listen to you.
To think about what youre telling us.
And then ask thoughtful questions.
Its the only way to crack the puzzle.
Because the answers dont just jump out.
You have to dig. Subordinated debentures,
equity infusions and other solutions are
all well and good, but when is the right
time to use them?
And why?
Shouldnt your bank want to fnd out?
We do.
Learn more at 53.com/BusinessIdeas
Were Fifth Third Bank.
The curious bank.
QFRC08370000_Answers_4C_CFO(7.25x9.75).indd 1 6/29/12 2:20 PM
Stephen Webster
now has a window of six years be-
fore any meaningful maturities and
$350 million to $400 million of free
cash flow after debt service. The com-
pany is now looking to spend heavily
in international markets in the next 18
months, and going public is also on its
radar screen. With the proceeds of an
[initial public offering], we could pay
down debt and get to a more normal-
ized public-company debt level, says
Samuelson. For Infor, at least, there is
life after debt. CFO
Private Equitys
Picky Appetite
PE frms are craving
service and health-care
targets, according
to a new survey.

Private-equity firms have been


choosy investors this year, express-
ing a preference for service and health-
care companies for potential takeovers
and greater portfolio exposure. Ac-
cording to financial sponsors, both in-
dustries will provide superior value in
the current economic climate.
The second-quarter Rothstein Kass/
CFO Midsize Private-Equity Firm Ba-
rometer surveyed PE firms with assets
of $150 million to $1 billion and found
that 52% of deals these firms completed
so far in 2012 were in the service sector.
Health care, including pharmaceuticals
and biotech, came in second, at 31%.
A substantial chunk of the 85 PE
firms polled said they were weighing
service-industry deals, particularly
in the IT services, financial services,
and insurance subsectors. When asked
about catalysts for service-sector value
creation, 41% of survey participants
said service firms will get a lift from
the recovering economy this year. The
service sector is also offering reason-
able valuations and plentiful deal op-
portunities, participants said.
On the health-care front, a major-
ity of the PE managers (61%) said they
had either increased their holdings in
health care, were weighing deals, or
were investigating future investment.
By subsector, 34% of those surveyed
cited instruments and supply compa-
nies as targets; about 28%, diagnostics;
just under 24%, home health care; and
about 22%, appliances and equipment.
The PE managers surveyed were
mostly unified about what will spur
value creation in health care: the aging
populace. Health care is rapidly evolv-
ing, with advances in everything from
cancer-fighting drugs to noninvasive
diagnostics and health-care analytics,
says Jeff Somers, a principal in the
private-equity group practice at Roth-
stein Kass. These diverse and innova-
tive companies offer a wealth of op-
portunities to PE firms looking to take
nascent technologies to the next level.
Of course, by focusing too much on
services and health care, PE firms could
sow the seeds of lower returns. Somers
warns that a clustering of deals in
big dogs in derivatives
Six financial-services firms account for
an excess of 75% of derivative assets and
liabilities carried on the balance sheets
of a cross-industry sample of 100 U.S.
companies, according to Fitch Ratings.

The firms are JPMorgan
Chase, Bank of America,
Goldman Sachs, Citi-
group, Morgan Stanley,
and Wells Fargo.

The notional amount
of all derivatives held
by the 100 companies
was about $300 trillion
at year-end 2011.
Editors
Choice
services or health care could have an
impact on deal flow and valuations.
While PE firms are optimistic about
opportunities, the deals in front of
them obviously havent been com-
pelling enough to move them off the
M&A sidelines. The vast majority of
the 85 funds in the Rothstein Kass
survey have closed one or no deals to
date in 2012. Thirty-five percent have
closed two to three deals, and 11% have
done four to five transactions.
Rothstein Kass, a provider of pro-
fessional services to alternative invest-
ment firms, polls PE fund managers
quarterly. V.R.
capital markets
Source: Second-quarter Rothstein Kass/CFO
Midsize Private-Equity Firm Barometer
Top three reasons service companies
will provide value in 2012
Lift from
improving
economy
Reasonable
valuations
Plentiful
opportuni-
ties to do
deals
0%
20
40
60
80%
0%
80%
41%
38%
33%
Top three reasons health-care
companies will provide value in 2012
Aging
populace
Innovation in
drugs, treat-
ment, or
diagnostics
Health-care
legislation
0%
20
40
60
80%
0%

20

40

60

80%
66%
33%
22%
Where the Deals Are
PE firms say service and
health-care companies are the
best bets for 2012.
20 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
Now, Lipschitz is hoping his win-
ning streak will continue at Make
Meaning, a start-up experiential re-
tail chain where he is finance chief. At
Make Meaning stores, customers de-
sign, decorate, and make the products
they buy, whether candles, jewelry,
stationery, soap, or other crafts.
Experiential retail, says Lipschitz,
draws customers to stores by provid-
ing a hands-on, interactive experience
that they cant get elsewhere, includ-
ing (and especially) the Internet. The
idea isnt new; many chains have in-
corporated experiential retail into
their stores for years. Customers at
L.L. Beans flagship store in Freeport,
Maine, can take kayaking, archery, and
fishing classes. Children marvel at the
lifesize toy soldiers and giant floor pi-
ano at the FAO Schwarz store on Fifth
Avenue in Manhattan. Other chains
offering experiential retail include
American Girl, Lego, and Apple.
But Make Meaning is taking the idea
a step further. Although its stores do
sell cards, candy, and other products
for children, most of its business comes
from customers crafting their way to
the cash registerwhether putting
decorations on cakes, brushing paint
onto ceramics, or melting wax into can-
dles. And thats the whole point.
There is a big difference between
doing something for the experience,
which really is kind of the pottery-
store model, versus doing something
with a commerce objective in mind,
and basically letting you personalize
your product, says Sucharita Mul-
puru, retail analyst at Forrester. It
sounds like these guys are about activ-
ity first and commerce after.
Crafting a New Business
Since its launch less than two years
ago, Make Meaning has opened four
storesin Manhattan; Scottsdale, Ari-
zona; and Dedham, Massachusetts, a
Boston suburb. So far it has seen more
than 300,000 visitors, and 12,000 peo-
ple have signed on as members, at an
annual cost of $36 for individuals and
$149 for families. The firm now has
about 200 employees, and though Lip-
schitz wouldnt disclose sales numbers,
he says they have
exceeded manage-
ments expecta-
tions.
Like all growing
companies, Make
Meaning has had to take risks. One of
the biggest: offering so many activities,
each requiring niche expertise, un-
der one roof. To keep things operating
smoothly, the company has hired top-
tier consultants, such as Elisa Strauss of
Confetti Cakes, a well-known Manhat-
tan bakery. Make Meaning is also staff-
ing its corporate office with entertain-
ment-industry experts, including vice
president of operations Don Watson,
who held the same title at the House of
Blues chain of music clubs.
When Wayne Lipschitz was controller of Wolfgang
Puck Worldwide, the firm grew from 12 units to more
than 20. As controller of The Cheesecake Factory, he helped
the chain grow from 19 restaurants to over 40. And during
his time there as CFO, the Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf chain
grew from fewer than 100 stores to more than double that.

Images courtesy of Make Meaning


GROWTH
COMPANIES
Hands-On Growth
The fnance chief of Make Meaning says the start-up has what it takes to
bring customers through the door. Can it keep them coming back?
By Marielle Segarra
Visitors decorate
cakes and watch
their candles
cool at a Make
Meaning store.
21 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Shelling out for top talent was criti-
cal, says Lipschitz. Obviously, weve
taken a risk by bringing on the best
people, as opposed to growing as a
mom-and-pop, he says. But execution
is about bringing in the right people so
we can grow the concept as quickly as
possible. Where we had a corporate of-
fice of a couple of people not very long
ago, we now have an infrastructure
thats ready, willing, and able to sup-
port the growth ahead of us.
For now, the company is outsourc-
ing its accounting function, including
bill paying and dealing with vendors,
to a firm that specializes in multiunit
retail businesses. We do not have a big
team, so weve decided to really focus
on what we do best, serving up a cus-
tomer experience, Lipschitz says. As
the company grows larger, it will bring
accounting back in-house, he adds.
Fundamental Questions
As with any novel, experience-based
concept, keeping traffic and growth
steady could be a challenge for the
company, says Forresters Mulpuru.
The fundamental questions of a busi-
ness like this are: Can it scale, whats
the frequency of visitation, and whos
going to be their core customer? she
says. It cant be a place where you do
a candle once and never come back.
Its got to keep engaging you.
When it comes to customers, chil-
dren are a big part of Make Meanings
business, but the company also markets
to an older crowd, Lipschitz says. Our
challenge is to make sure that were of-
fering a lot for adults so that it doesnt
just become a kid concept, he says. To
that end, the company plans to obtain a
beer and wine license for each store.
Make Meaning also conducts mar-
ket research to determine what crafts it
should add to its offerings. We can add
and take out experiences all the time,
Lipschitz says. Indeed, the companys
newest addition, cake decorating, was a
result of such research, and it has al-
ready driven significant sales since it
was introduced this year, he says.
Lipschitz believes Make Meanings
intricate, specialty-based store expe-
rience will act as a barrier to entry to
other companies. There are many
moving pieces, from the time that you
walk in the door and are greeted by our
host to the time that the production
person pulls your glass or your ceramic
out of the kiln, he explains. For any-
one to develop this kind of concept,
were light-years ahead of where they
growth spurts
Private companies average annual sales growth jumped from
7.6% in March to 9.6% at the end of June, according to the Sageworks
Private Company Indicator. Average annual net profit margin also
rose, from 6.6% in March to 7.9% in May and June, its highest point
in at least five years.
Editors
Choice
would have to be to be a risk to us.
How far can Make Meaning grow
its own concept? Lipschitz says the
company is eyeing major markets
across the country, particularly those
with high-income demographics and
a solid base of children. Eventually,
he says, it hopes to open at least 800
stores globally. Those are high hopes,
given the state of the economy and the
reluctance of consumers to spend.
But Lipschitz is building Make
Meanings business to be scalable,
something he learned from his previ-
ous experience. He says he keeps the
big picture in view, constantly re-
minding his team, If were doing this
for two units, were going to have to
do it for several hundred, so we need
to make it a much easier and more ef-
ficient process. CFO
Are You Experienced?
Other companies have their own versions
of experiential retail.
Build-A-BEAr
At Build-A-Bear stores, customers construct their own stuffed ani-
mals, choosing the furry exteriors, adding in sound buttons and
hearts, and stuffing and clothing their new pals.
WinE And dEsign
At locations of this Raleigh, N.C.-based franchise, local artists teach
painting and customers bring their own wine. The stores also offer
programs for children, but BYOJB (bring your own juice box).
AmEricAn girl
At American Girl stores, children go on scavenger hunts, have after-
noon tea, and take their dolls to the hair salon.
FAO schWArz
Tourists flock to the FAO Schwarz flagship store in New York to see
the life-size toy soldiers, a giant floor piano, and other interactive
accoutrements.
l.l. BEAn
Customers can take kayaking, archery, and fishing classes at L.L.
Beans flagship store in Freeport, Maine.
lEgO
During monthly in-store events, children learn to build miniature
Lego models for free. They can also create their own custom
minifigures throughout the month.
Growth companies
22 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
Most Fortune 100 companies have substantial formal
programs for educating their top finance talent, and
Dell is no exception. But the Round Rock, Texas-based
computer giant may have a slight edge, thanks in part to its
use of a simple tactic.

Bloomberg/Getty Images
Human
capital
Training at Dell:
Here, There, and Everywhere
The computer giants fnancial-education programs rely on a mix of long-distance
and local learning. By David McCann
I dont know of anoth-
er company that combines
the two approaches, says
Tom Conine, founder of
TRI Corp., which helps
large companies design,
develop, and implement
financial-education pro-
grams (Dell is a client). Going for-
ward, decision-makers have to be able
to work both virtually and face-to-
face, and the team dynamics of the two
are very different, says Conine. He
credits the dual approach to Dell CFO
Brian Gladden and Alicia Davis, the
companys director of global finance
learning and development.
The approach supports three edu-
cation programs, geared toward fi-
nance professionals with varying lev-
els of experience. In addition to the
FDP, there is the Financial Rotation
Program (FRP), for top talent with 5
to 7 years experience, and the Global
Financial Excellence Program (GFEP),
generally for those with 10 to 12 years
experience who have just received or
are about to receive their first execu-
tive appointments.
Learning Through

Simulations
Dells educational effort began in 2009,
though the programs are still consid-
ered new in the companys culture.
These are contemporary programs
that deal with the realities of today,
says Gladden. To that end, all three
programs feature simulations, in which
participants form teams that make
business decisions for hypothetical
companies.
The simulations in-
crease in complexity from
one program level to the
next. They require partici-
pants to make decisions rel-
ative to the entire business,
about pricing, production,
cost, new products, market
direction, and more. Simu-
lations are effective because you learn
by doing, observes Conine. When
you do that, you make mistakes that
you learn a lot from. The simulations
are also competitive, and most finan-
cial people thrive around that.
The simulations force participants
to work under four different types of
These are contem-
porary programs
that deal with the
realities of today.
Brian Gladden,
CFO of Dell
Almost all companies of Dells size
are globalized, and most try to homog-
enize their training programs as much
as possible. They generally educate
their employees in one of two ways:
either virtually via the Internet or in
classrooms scattered around the world.
Dell, however, uses both of those meth-
ods. For example, for the third and
fourth semesters of the companys Fi-
nancial Development Program (FDP),
a two-year program for high-potential
recent college graduates and under-
graduate interns, teams work virtually
for several weeks and then convene for
a week in Austin, Texas.
23 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
stress. They have to deal with time
pressure, limited information, scarce
resources, and divergent opinions from
teammates. When you mix those ele-
ments together, observes Conine, it
makes for real-world decision making
under conditions of uncertainty. The
simulator runs the various decisions
made through an econometric model
and spits out hard-number results.
In addition to the simulations, the
FDP calls for participants to rotate
among roles that include segment and
operating-expense analysis, intercom-
pany accounting, cash-management
analysis, pricing, corporate planning,
competitive analysis, financial services,
credit analysis, external reporting, bud-
geting and forecasting, and logistics.
About 50 employees are enrolled
each year in the entry-level FDP,
which lasts two years. FDP graduates
branch off to internal audit or finance
roles. Within three years, they are eli-
gible for consideration in the Financial
Rotation Program. That lasts for three
years, with three different one-year as-
signments, many outside participants
home countries. Roles include investor
relations, assistant controllership, pro-
curement (where a person would be an
analyst for a commodity buyer), opex
roles such as supporting the marketing
budget, financial planning and analy-
sis, treasury, foreign exchange, and
cash management.
There is also a tax role, which Davis
calls relatively unique to our rotation,
to understand not necessarily how to
do an accrual but how value-added tax
or transfer pricing works. Participants
dont necessarily choose which assign-
ments they get, she adds, but they can
express a preference.
Thinkstock
it pays to be public
Three out of four CFOs (74%) received a raise in 2011, according to a survey
by Grant Thornton and the Financial Executives Research Foundation.
The average salary increase was 4%, compared with 3% in 2010. Public-
company CFOs received an average base salary of $286,500 last year, versus
$197,400 for private-company finance chiefs.
Editors
Choice
tion to certain nonfinancial-employee
groups. People from marketing, sales,
research and development, and infor-
mation technology will take four mod-
ules built around the income statement,
the balance sheet, factors affecting
profitability, and key financial ratios.
As a result of the programs, Dell is
now more consistently focused on a
core set of operational financial tools,
says Gladden. A good example is in-
come variance, driving a consistent set
of tools across the firm to measure the
results of our business units, he says.
Can the return on Dells investment
in the educational programs be quanti-
fied? Gladden says they pay for them-
selves through less reliance on recruit-
ers to find talent. Since he came to Dell
as CFO in 2008, Gladden has tried to
instill in his top staff the mind-set that
they are building a 25-year career at
the company, rather than just joining
to get a certain set of experiences to
make you more attractive in the ex-
ternal market, he says. This is about
developing a culture and leadership
capabilities for the long term. CFO
Studying

Financial Excellence
At the third program level, the Global
Financial Excellence Program, partici-
pants do benchmarking work at other
companies, which are selected based
on their reputation for maintaining
best practices. The Dell employees
work with the CFO and finance staff to
understand how the issues those com-
panies are dealing with relate to Dell.
In turn, those companies send finance
staffers to Dell for similar learning.
The GFEP participants also work on
a team project; they deliver the results
to Dell chairman and CEO Michael
Dell. Last years project focused on
purpose-driven companiesthose
companies that execute against strate-
gies that are clear, concise, and brand-
ed. Key take-aways included how ev-
ery team member lives the brand at
Coca-Cola, how the business-integra-
tion processes at Stanley Works func-
tion, and how executives are involved
in recruiting at Goldman Sachs.
Meanwhile, Dell is developing a
program to provide financial educa-
educating dell
Financial training at Dell comes in three parts.
Financial Development program. Two-year entry-level program for
high-potential recent college graduates and undergraduate interns.
Areas covered include segment and operating-expense analysis,
intercompany accounting, cash-management analysis, pricing, credit
analysis,external reporting, and logistics.
Financial rotation program. Three-year program for top employees
with 5 to 7 years experience. Consists of three one-year assignments,
often outside participants home countries. Areas covered include in-
vestor relations, assistant controllership, procurement,
financial planning and analysis, treasury, and foreign exchange.
global Financial excellence program. For employees with 10 to
12 years experience who have received (or are close to receiving)
their first executive appointments. Participants visit best-practices
companies to see how their CFOs and finance teams handle various
issues.
1.
3.
2.
24 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
2011 U.S. Worksite Sales, LIMRA. Allstate Benets is the marketing name used by American Heritage Life Insurance Company (Home Ofce, Jacksonville, FL), a subsidiary of The Allstate Corporation. 2012 Allstate Insurance Company
Life Disability Critical Illness Accident
allstatebenets.com
Allstate protects
employees, too.
Surprised? Allstate Benets is one of the fastest-growing
benets providers in America today, offering employees
the #1 Critical Illness product in the industry.
Let a leader in protection, protect your employees, too.
Call Walter Jones today at 904-992-3443.

Thats what experts are saying


about a trading loss that knocked more
than $20 billion off the banks market
value, sparked probes by the Justice
Department and the Securities and
Exchange Commission, forced cred-
it-rating agencies to issue negative
outlooks for the bank, and turned the
spotlight on a bank unit that was set up
to invest excess deposits but also gen-
erate a sizable profit.
According to JPMorgan, the banks
chief investment office was invest-
ing in a benchmark for credit-default
swaps designed to mitigate the banks
overall credit exposure, especially the
possibility of higher interest rates and
inflation. But the hedge was risky in
itself, and the positions in derivatives
were so large that they distorted the
market, experts say.
JPMorgan also may have failed to
fully understand its exposure because
it was relying too heavily on value at
risk (VaR), a common risk model that
estimates the potential loss in value of
a risky asset or portfolio over a certain
number of trading days.
In May, JPMorgan stated that the
trading positionsreportedly on a se-
ries of the 10-year Markit CDX North
American Investment Grade index
were riskier, more volatile, and less
effective as an economic hedge than
the firm previously believed. JPMor-
gan CEO Jamie Dimon admitted that
they were flawed, complex, poorly
reviewed, poorly executed, and poorly
monitored. Later that month at the
banks annual shareholder meeting in
Tampa, Dimon added that he couldnt
justify the mistake.
Improper from the Start
It screamed improper credit-risk
management to us from the very be-
ginning, says Matthew Streeter, a
product manager at FINCAD, speaking
of when he heard about the incident.
(FINCAD is a developer of derivatives
risk-management software.)
For one thing, the credit-index bets
introduced secondary risk exposures
that JPMorgan executives apparently
didnt take into account, says Streeter.
A key question to ask about hedging,
he says, is whether a hedge exposes
the insured to risk above and beyond
the risk the hedge is supposed to miti-
gate.
For another, the trades JPMorgan
was making were so large that they
were moving the market for the hedg-
ing instrument, concentrating a lot
of risk on one side of the trade. Any
hedge on a $650 billion book will abso-
lutely drive the market, Streeter says.
Also, JPMorgans chief investment
office was doing what Streeter calls
speculative hedging: hedging with
the intention of making a profit. As
Ryan Gibbons, managing partner of
GPS Capital Markets, told CFO two
The $2 billion trading loss at JPMorgan Chase that
came to light in May stemmed from fundamental mis-
takes by risk managersin particular, the belief that a hedge
on credit exposures could both reduce the banks risk and
earn billions of dollars at the same time.
The Hedge That Wasnt
JPMorgan Chases $2 billion trading miscue is a costly lesson in how not to protect
against potential losses. By Vincent Ryan

Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA /Landov


RISK
MANAGEMENT
The trading positions JPMorgan
Chase took were flawed, complex,
poorly reviewed, poorly executed,
and poorly monitored, according to
the firms CEO, Jamie Dimon.
26 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
years ago, big gains and losses from
hedging spell trouble (see Seven Pil-
lars of Hedging Wisdom, CFO.com).
When companies make money from
hedging, they tend to forget what their
core businesses are, said Gibbons. At
the high point of the chief investment
offices performance, in 2009, it man-
aged nearly 17% of the banks assets
and generated $3.1 billion in yearly
income.
But a former finance chief at JPMor-
gan takes the stand that hedging is in-
herently risky, and that if the firm was
taking a risk, it should have expected
to get paid for it. Who says you dont
earn money on a hedge? Dina Dublon,
finance chief of JPMorgan Chase from
1998 to 2004, asked CFO in May. The
only time hedging is not risk-taking is
when you sell the position you are try-
ing to hedge; anything else, youre tak-
ing risk.
Dublon said JPMorgans chief in-
vestment office was not a separate
entity when she was finance chief, but
was housed within the banks treasury
function. Whether or not her finance
department hedged credit risk depend-
ed on the price of the hedge, she said.
Sometimes you do, sometimes you
dont.
What Value at Risk?
When JPMorgan revealed the loss on
May 10, it said its risk measure had
underestimated the portfolios volatil-
ity. In the first quarter, JPMorgan was
monitoring its positions using a new
VaR model, which was indicating the
chief investment office unit value at
risk was $67 million. But JPMorgan
scrapped that model and returned to
an older version once the loss was dis-
covered. It restated the VaR for its first
quarter as $129 million.
A VaR of $67 million at a 95% con-
fidence level implies the [chief invest-
ment office] should not incur losses of
more than $67 million on more than
three business days during the quar-
ter, wrote CreditSights analyst David
Hendler in a report. But the restate-
ment meant that the office may have
incurred losses in excess of $129 mil-
lion on three days. Hendler concluded
that the losses put in question not only
the accuracy of JPMorgans VaR mod-
els but also the data being input into
those models.
A March 2008 report by a group
of senior global-banking regulators,
Observations on Risk Management
Practices During the Recent Market
Turbulence, noted that many banks
used VaR, but did so in conjunction
with notional limits, stress tests, and
forward-looking scenario analysis.
Firms that avoided significant un-
expected losses used a wide range of
risk measures to discuss and challenge
views on credit and market risk, said
the report.
Despite all the tools available, regu-
lators and large, complex banking or-
ganizations face a tough task in judging
the riskiness of many nontraditional
commercial-banking activities, testi-
fied Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
vice chair Thomas Hoenig to a Senate
committee in May. Trading and mar-
ket-making are high-frequency activi-
ties that can take place between [regu-
lator] exams with little evidence that
they ever occurred, he stated; moni-
toring trading on a high-frequency
basis would be costly for banks and
regulators.
Hoenig is proposing a strict divi-
sion of some of the banking functions
conducted by the big universal banks
like JPMorgan. Under his proposal,
commercial banks would be allowed
to perform some investment-banking
activities but would be prevented from
making markets in derivatives or secu-
rities and trading securities or deriva-
tives for their own account or a cus-
tomers.
But there is little enthusiasm on
Wall Street for such an arrangement.
Asked by a Senate committee in June
to comment about whether the Dodd-
Frank Acts so-called Volcker Rule,
which would limit banks proprietary
trading, could have prevented JPMor-
gans loss, CEO Dimon replied that the
rule was unnecessary. CFO
Thinkstock
ESSENTIAL KNOWLEDGE
What skill sets do risk managers need? An intimate knowledge of the
business and industry (cited by 67% of respondents) and a strategic
view of risk and risk managements role (64%) above all, according to
a February survey of C-suite members by the Risk and Insurance
Management Society and Marsh. Only 25% cited insurance knowledge.
Editors
Choice
The Real VaR Steps Up
Average value at risk
at JPMorgan Chases chief
investment office
Source: SEC filings
Restated
May 10
Reported
April 13
$0
30
60
90
120
$150
1Q
12
4Q
11
3Q
11
2Q
11
1Q
11
$129
$67
$69
$48
$51
$60
5 In $ millions
The FDICs
Hoenig would
bar commer-
cial banks from
trading securi-
ties or derivatives for their
own account.
Thomas Hoenig, vice chair of the FDIC
27 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
CFO MAGAZINE PRESENTS
0CT0R 2830, 20I2 jW MARRI0TT MIAMI, FL
RCI5TR N0W WWW.CF0C.C0M 855-287-7I57
THE SECOND ANNUAL
SSMMMMMALLLLLLLLLLLL & MMIIDSIZE BUUSSSSSINEESSSSSSS SSSUUUUUUUUMMMMMMIIIITTTTTT
jAM5 R. MCC0NCHY
CFO
Chobani
KATHLN W0LF
CFO
Atari Construction
jFF LA5HR
CFO
Crocs
LATINUM 50N50R: R0UN0TAL 50N50R:
ATTN0 TH 20I2 CF0 LAY00K F0R
RIVAT C0MANI5 AN0 Y0U WILL:
HAR from CFOs at high-growth companies
about how they manage and fund rapid expansion
LARNDERXWWKHODWHVWDQGJUHDWHVWQDQFLQJ
techniques for private companies
CATHR valuable perspective on the
economic outlook
NFIT by hearing from CFOs who have
successfully made dramatic changes to their
businesses for the post-recession world
ACQUIRDGYLFHDERXWKRZWRPDQDJHQDQFH
LQDVPDOOHURUIDPLO\RZQHGUP
CAIN from three days of networking
opportunities with your peers
ARTNR5:
jFF RICHAR0
CFO
Safety-Kleen
certain economic times like these. But
the airline is betting that the lure of
nonstop service to Hawaiicomplete
with a complimentary hot mealwill
pay off.
The airline business is fundamen-
tally a terribly difficult industry,
says Topping, who came to Hawaiian
in 2011 after spending 16 years at no-
frills carrier Southwest Airlines. Bank-
ruptcy is common; in the past 10 years
more than a dozen airlines, including
giants like American, United, North-
west, Delta, and US Airways, have filed
for Chapter 11 protection. Hawaiian
too filed for bankruptcy in 2003, but
it emerged 2 years later with, as one
observer noted, a better sense of who
they are.
Hawaiians Big Apple Venture
How Hawaiian Airliness CFO prepared for the launch of an ambitious new route.
By David Rosenbaum
Image courtesy of Hawaiian Airline
strategy
In June, Hawaiian Airlines launched its first daily non-
stop flight between New York and Honolulu. That may
not seem like much, yet it contributed to Hawaiian growing
its overall capacity by nearly 25%. Starting a new air route is
always a risk, says CFO Scott Topping, especially in un-

Source: Hawaiian Airlines 2011 annual report


Growth Gains Altitude
(in $ thousands) 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Operating revenue 1,650,459 1,310,093 1,183,306 1,210,865 982,555
Net income (loss) (2,649) 110,255 116,720 28,586 7,051
are usually packaged as part of a vaca-
tion sold through retail, says Robert
Mann, president of an eponymous air-
line analysis and consulting firm. This
means Topping must work closely with
the travel trade. Its an indirect ticket
sale with extensive costs: commissions
to retailers, dis-
counts to wholesal-
ers, high marketing
costs, says Mann.
Hawaiian also
partnered with Jet-
Blue Airways to get
its Honolulu flight
off the ground. Ha-
waiians planes will fly out of JetBlues
JFK terminal, and JetBlue will handle
some of the ground services, including
baggage handling. Hawaiian also has a
code-share agreement with JetBlue, in
which Hawaiian code is on connecting
JetBlue flights. And the airlines have
a reciprocal frequent-flier agreement,
which goes a long way toward mitigat-
ing Hawaiians risk.
Its the Planes
To fly from New York to Honolulu,
more than anything else, one needs to
have big, long-range, expensive planes.
By year-end, Hawaiian will have nine
295-seat Airbus A330 aircraft in its
fleet, at a cost of about $200 million
each, says Topping. Five more A330s
are coming in 2013. Thats not to men-
tion even bigger, more-expensive
Were focused on being a destina-
tion carrier, confirms Topping. We
bring people to Hawaii. We stick to
our knitting.
Launching Hawaiians nonstop
flight between Honolulu International
Airport and John F. Kennedy Interna-
tional Airport, however, entailed some
complicated financial stitching. For
starters, travel to Hawaii, like all pri-
marily leisure destinations, is largely
wholesaler driven; trips to the islands
Hawaiian
uses Airbus
A330s, costing
about $200
million each, to
fy nonstop be-
tween Honolulu
and New York.
29 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Give them training before they need it.
Build a smarter, faster finance team.
CFOlearning
TRAINING WITH A FINANCE FOCUS.
Get the targeted training
and education you and
your team need to stay
ahead of the curve.
Provide your team with
specialized training
programs that are:
Tailored to corporate finance
professionals
Focused on filling functional and
professional knowledge gaps
Presented by premier industry
experts
Get more
information about
CFO Learning at
cfo.com/learning
LIVE WEBCASTS
JUL 20 3 Hidden State Tax Benefts
JUL 25 3 Decoding the IRS Worker Classifcation:
Employee or Independent
JUL 30 3 How to Reduce Health Care Costs
While Keeping Existing Coverage
AUG 10 3 Excel Array Formulas for Advanced Users
AUG 13 3 How to Uncover Hidden Cash with an
Accounts Payable Audit
AUG 23 3 ACH Fraud Protection:
What Every Company Needs to Know
IN-PERSON TRAINING
JUL 24 3 Washington, DC:
Excel Power User Boot Camp
JUL 26 3 Washington, DC:
Excel Power User Boot Camp
AUG 13 3 New York City:
Accounts Payable Boot Camp
July 2012
S
1
8
15
22
29
M
2
9
15
23
30
T
3
10
17
24
31

W
4
11
18
25


T
5
12
19
26


F
6
13
20
27


S
7
14
21
28


July 2012
S
1
8
15
22
29
M
2
9
15
23
30
T
3
10
17
24
31

W
4
11
18
25


T
5
12
19
26


F
6
13
20
27


S
7
14
21
28


august 2012
S

5
12
19
26
M

6
13
20
27
T

7
14
21
28

W
1
8
15
22
29

T
2
9
16
23
30

F
3
10
17
24
31

S
4
11
18
25


august 2012
S

5
12
19
26
M

6
13
20
27
t

7
14
21
28

w
1
8
15
22
29

t
2
9
16
23
30

f
3
10
17
24
31

S
4
11
18
25


Thinkstock
Euro Slide Sparks
M&A Interest
The weakening currency
makes European assets
more attractive.

With the euro hitting record lows
against the U.S. dollar, currency ana-
lysts are getting out their rulers to
see how far they can extrapolate the
downward trend. Corporate strate-
gists, meanwhile, are eyeing ever
more affordable European targets for
acquisition.
The euro touched $1.23 at the
beginning of June, down from this
years high of $1.35 at the beginning
of March. That drop has prompted
some foreign-exchange experts to
say they cant rule out the possibility
of the euro hitting parity with the dol-
lar if Greece leaves the single Europe-
an currency. (Most experts agree that
parity following a so-called Grexit
would be an extreme scenario. More
likely, they believe, would be a fall of
about 10 cents from current levels.)
David Woo, head of global rates
and currencies research at Bank of
America Merrill Lynch, predicts the
euro will continue to slide to around
$1.20, then start recovering toward
$1.30 by year-end. He argues that
the situation will have to deteriorate
further before either Europe or the
United States issues any aggressive
policies in response. The only thing
that can stem the dollars rise is very
aggressive monetary easing from the
Fed, he says. I dont think thats on
the cards until things get worse.
Still, while the euro may not be a
particularly cheap currency at the
moment, underlying European as-
sets are cheap, Woo says. Not only is
the dividend yield of the Eurostoxx
50 index significantly above that of
the S&P 500, the differential is now
literally two standard deviations
from the historical norm, he says.
Moreover, the fact that Spanish gov-
ernment bond yields are at 6.5% or
more, compared with 1.5% yields for
10-year U.S. Treasuries, means the
market is basically discounting an
almost 60% devaluation of Spain over
the next 10 years, Woo says.
As the price of European assets
continues to slide, U.S. companies are
starting to consider acquisitions in
Europe, Woo says. These assets are
starting to look really attractive, he
says. They can purchase European
DIvErSITy DIvIDEND
Companies with more-diverse boards outperform their peers, according
to a recent McKinsey study of 180 publicly traded firms in the U.S., France,
Germany, and the UK. The study found that returns on equity were on
average 53% higher for companies in the top quartile of executive-board
diversity than they were for those in the bottom quartile.
Editors
Choice
planes, Airbus A350s, ordered for 2017.
Topping says one of his biggest du-
ties in supporting Hawaiians growth
strategy is making sure its adequately
funded. We have to be proactive in
trying to line up debt or lease financing
for the 2013 aircraft deliveries, he says.
The funding for three of those five
[planes] is already taken care of. Stay-
ing ahead of this is the biggest risk.
Hawaiian took a negative net-
income hit in 2011 after purchasing
15 airplanes it had on lease. The trans-
action was value-creating, but from an
accounting perspective there was a
$70 million one-time charge that hit
the books, says Topping. On the
bright side, if you look at cash flow
from leasing to owning, its positive.
Not surprisingly, given his South-
west Airlines pedigree, Topping keeps
a close eye on costs. But Hawaiian
does serve complimentary hot meals
in flight, making it the only American
carrier currently to do so. Why the
perk? We bring Hawaii to the world,
he replies. We understand hospitality.
The Hawaii vacation starts when you
get on the plane, not when you get off.
Besides, Topping says, its a long
flight. CFO
Hawaiians planes will fly
out of JetBlues JFK In-
ternational terminal, and
JetBlue will handle some of
the ground services.
The only thing
that can stem
the dollars rise
is very aggres-
sive monetary
easing coming
from the Fed.
I dont think
thats on the
cards until things get worse.
David Woo,
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
companies more cheaply than at any
time over the last 10 years. In March,
for example, UPS agreed to acquire
Dutch group TNT Express for 5.2 bil-
lion ($6.5 billion). In April, Watson
Pharmaceutical sealed a deal for Ac-
tavis for 4.25 billion from Deutsche
Bank, which took control of the in-
debted group in 2008.
Of course, if sentiment improves,
or if Europe introduces a policy to re-
duce the risk premium for European
assets, the euro might get a boost as
money flows in to scoop up European
assets, Woo adds. AndrEw SAwErS
is editor of Cfo european Briefing,
a Cfo online puBliCation.
strategy
31 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Industry Regulation Authority rules.
You have to retain electronic com-
munications for six years at least, says
Malone. And FINRA rules require
that you review 20% of the communi-
cations. I average about 80%. I dont
want to miss something.
The financial-services industry
is intensely regulated, which is one
reason why Malone is chained to his
desk. According to a recent CFO.com
report, FINRA regulators are paying
closer attention to broker-dealers than
ever before, even as the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission is turn-
ing up the heat on broker-dealer ac-
counting policies. (See Watchdogs
Put Closer Eye on Broker-Dealer Ac-
counting, CFO.com.)
Another reason Malone stays put
at lunch is the sheer volume of infor-
mation that streams across his screen.
Before he came to Crews in 2004,
Malone worked at a small firm with
18 employees. There, he simply ac-
cessed the companys Microsoft Ex-
change Server and performed keyword
searches for bad words. For me, he
says, a [bad] keyword is guarantee.
I dont want to see that word. I cant
have a salesperson, a stock broker, use
guarantee in a communication. The
other big bad word is complaint. If we
receive a complaint from a customer,
the salesperson is not supposed to
communicate with that customer. The
rule says the complaint has to go to the
salespersons supervisor and escalate
to the compliance department.
As for data retention, at his previ-
ous job that meant burning e-mails
and other communications to a CD. It
wasnt bad for 18 people, says Malone,
but when you get to 200 employees,
like Crews, it wouldnt be feasible.
Malone needs more-sophisticated
IT at Crews, which provides under-
writing and financial-advisory services
to debt issuers, among other banking
services. Every morning he fires up ZL
Technologiess Unified Archive Com-
pliance Manager tool and keeps it run-
ning all day, checking for noncompli-
ant communications that run counter
to company policies and could violate
federal regulations.
Malone doesnt have to search for
the bad words; the software extracts
and highlights them. Using ZL Tech-
nologiess eDiscovery product, which
goes beyond keyword searching into
concept searchingexposing patterns
that could signal fraudulent intent,
such as the misspellings spammers use
to confound spam filters or the cod-
ed communications that conspirators
tend to employMalone vets about
8,000 e-mails a day.
Businesses are struggling with
surging volumes of content, says Bri-
an Hill, principal analyst at Forrester,
Gordon Studer
TECHNOLOGY
Digging Out from Big Data
Unstructured data is piling up in corporate computers, making compliance and other
tasks far more diffcult. By David Rosenbaum
Carter Malone, vice president of compliance at invest-
ment bank Crews & Associates, never leaves his desk,
not even for lunch. Malones job is to review the content and
ensure the proper storage of all electronic communications
that come in and out of Crews pursuant to Financial

32 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com


an IT consultancy. Much of that con-
tent is unstructuredsuch as Word
documents, PDFs, e-mails, voice mails,
video, and, increasingly, social-media
inputs (tweets, Facebook likes, and
so on)and therefore is inaccessible
to traditional enterprise resource plan-
ning systems with their stored invoices
and tables of numbers.
Digital Landfills
All that data can cause organizations to
accumulate digital landfills that gen-
erate significant costs in storage, tax
IT resources, and clog up a companys
information pathways, creating knowl-
edge-management tangles, says Hill.
It can be difficult to gain access to the
data you need, he says, if your compa-
nys information systems have become
a digital dump site.
In the age of Big Data, its critical
for companies to have policies for data
disposal as well as retention, says Hill.
However, disposal needs to be done in
light of potential litigation concerns,
he points out, and needs to be suspend-
ed if legal matters are pending. In 2010,
for example, FINRA fined investment
bank Piper Jaffray $700,000 for its fail-
ure to produce requested e-mails.
Theres a substantial return on in-
vestment for businesses in digging out
from under digital landfills by using
new archiving and discovery technolo-
gies, says Hill. The return comes not
only in lower IT costs and improved
knowledge management, but also in
the reduced risk of lengthy, costly fo-
rensic data reviews prior to and dur-
ing lawsuits. Preparing adequately for
that alone can have a very significant
ROI, says Hill.
Thinkstock
STATE-SPONSORED HACKING
UK spy chief Jonathan Evans revealed in June that a British company suffered
lost revenues of about $1.25 billion because of a state-sponsored cyber-
attack against its computer systems. The loss involved intellectual property
and commercial disadvantage in contractual negotiations. (See State-led
Hacking Cost Company 1 Billion Euros, U.K. Spy Chief Says, CFO.com.)
Editors
Choice
Companies without
a plan for unstructured
data take on a whole lot
of risk, says Kon Leong,
CEO of ZL Technolo-
gies. The Securities and
Exchange Commission,
health-care regulations,
[and] the Federal Rules
on Civil Procedure that
weigh digital evidence
equally with physical evi-
dence are all requiring that everything
be kept forever.
As daunting a task as that may
seem, Leong illustrates its importance
by telling a story about using his own
technology to settle a dispute. We
had a trademark, he recalls. We saw
a competitor use it. We sent them a
[cease-and-desist] letter. They sent
one back claiming they used it first. It
took us 35 seconds to search through
the archive for our earliest use of it.
End of that argument.
Leong goes on to make a larger
point: that unstructured datawhat he
calls the sum total of all human com-
munications within an organization,
[representing] your corporate memo-
ryis a potential source of competi-
tive advantage. If you can harness and
extract value from that, youve gone
from gathering unstructured data as a
defensive measure for compliance, re-
cordkeeping, and litigation support to
an offensive position for competitive,
strategic advantage, says Leong.
A Simple Rule
Hill says a number of software provid-
ers offer products for searching, stor-
ing, archiving, and retaining Big Data.
They range from large enterprise ven-
dors such as Symantec, IBM, and HP
Autonomy to smaller providers such
as ZL Technologies. As is increasingly
the case, their products are offered in
both on-premise and software-as-a-
service flavors, with the SaaS offerings
lowering purchase and implementa-
tion costs and making this type of soft-
ware more accessible to smaller busi-
nesses.
But prevention may be as effective
as the cure. At Crews, Malone further
mitigates the investment banks risks
by banning instant messaging for his
salespeople, denying them voice mail,
blocking web-based e-mail, and put-
ting the kibosh on Facebook. There
are software providers that offer tech-
nological control over social-media
communications; Forresters Hill
cites Actiance as an example. But he
stresses that companies need to train
people on the permissible use of so-
cial media. There needs to be a strong
focus on policies.
For Malone, when it comes to pol-
icy, theres a simple rule to follow: I
tell all employees that every time they
write an e-mail, they should think about
reading it in front of a jury, he says.
That, he adds, seems to sink in. CFO
In the age of Big Data,
its critical for compa-
nies to have policies
for data disposal as
well as retention.
However, disposal
needs to be done in
light of potential litiga-
tion concerns.
Brian Hill, principal
analyst, Forrester
33 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Exelis has a very diversified mix
of products and services. Can you
briefly summarize it?
We do a broad range of things in what
we call the C4-ISR worldcommand,
control, communications, computers,
intelligence, surveillance, and recon-
naissance. We make electronic war-
fare systems, communications equip-
ment, force protection systems, radar
systems, sonar, night vision, space-
based imaging. Those are some of the
major products. On the services side
we do logistics solutions, training,
security, and support services. Lastly,
were in air-traffic management. So
it is a broad-based, highly diversified
business.
Lets talk about major develop-
ments affecting the defense indus-
try, starting with the winding down
of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
What effect is that having on your
business?
We supplied three main product lines
to the DoD in support of those war ef-
forts: tactical radios and communica-
tions equipment, night-vision goggles,
and counter-IED [improvised explo-
sive device] jammers. A lot of that has
come down over the last few years.
In 2009 almost a third of our revenue
came from those three products; in
2012, well less than 10%, probably clos-
er to 5%, of our revenue comes from
those same products. So weve already
absorbed a big piece of the impact of
that decline from the product side.
What about the services side?
We dont have any direct service con-
tracts in Iraq at this point, and we had
very little there throughout the war.
The defense industry is preparing for leaner
times, thanks to deep cuts in military spending.
Starting in fiscal 2012, the Budget Control Act
of 2011 will reduce the Pentagons budget by
$487 billion over the next 10 years. That number
could more than double because of sequestra-
tion, a deficit-reduction mechanism in the act
that will trigger $500 billion more in defense cuts
over the next decade unless Congress changes
the law.
Like other defense contractors, Exelis is brac-
ing for the cutbacks. Spun off from conglomerate
ITT in 2011, the publicly traded McLean, Virginia-
based firm relies on the Department of Defense
for about 70% of its revenues, which totaled
$5.8 billion in 2011. But CFO Peter Milligan says
the product portfolio of the diversified defense
electronics company is well suited to the smaller
and leaner military that Defense Secretary Leon
Panetta called for earlier this year. Exelis also
does a growing business with government agen-
cies like the Federal Aviation Administration and
NASA, Milligan notes, as well as with military cus-
tomers overseas and a small but growing num-
ber of commercial customers.
The 44-year-old Milligan came to ITT in 2006
from AT&T, where he headed investor relations.
He became CFO of ITT Defense in 2010, and the fol-
lowing year was named finance chief of the newly
spun off Exelis. In June, Milligan talked with CFO
about the companys strategy for adjusting to
an uncertain new world where the DoD will still
be Exeliss largest customer, but perhaps not as
large as before.
Defensive Maneuvers
Defense contractor Exelis is ready to adjust to an era of reduced
Pentagon spending, says CFO Peter Milligan.
Peter Milligan
CFO, Exelis
On the
recOrD
35 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Peter Milligan with an Exelis pointer/tracker,
which helps aircraft thwart heat-seeking missiles. M
a
t
t
h
e
w

F
u
r
m
a
n
We do have a couple of contracts in
Afghanistan.
Another development, of course,
is the huge cuts in the Defense bud-
get, which could reach nearly
$1 trillion over the next 10 years.
Yes, its making us think hard about
what we can do to proactively address
cost. Even though half of our business
is on the product side, we do have a
highly variable cost structure. So when
we see changes in throughputand
usually we have a number of quar-
ters to adjust for that, since we have
a backlog of business that goes back
many quarters in some caseswe can
quickly adjust. We have reduced our
footprint by about 10% over the last
three years. We have kept our employ-
ee head count fairly flat, but the mix of
those who are working on the product
side and in services has changed as the
profile of our business has changed.
A couple of years ago, before the
spin-off, the defense unit of ITT un-
derwent a transformation. We consoli-
dated a lot of our divisions, taking tens
of millions of dollars in costs out and
making the business-decision process
quicker and more streamlined. That
was the beginning of the company
positioning itself for what we knew at
some point was going to be a [slow-
down in the] top line of the DoD.
The challenge that I have, and that
everyone in my role has, is that when
you dont know which particular pro-
gram is going to get cut, you cant do
too much in terms of proactive deci-
sions. You have to wait for some defin-
itive answer and hopefully have as few
stranded costs as possible when you
try to adjust.
In January, Secretary Panetta said
he wanted the military to become
smaller and leaner, one that
would be rapidly deployable and
technologically advanced. Is this
an encouraging message for Exelis?
Yes, I think it is. Our business has four
36 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
Peter Milligan,
CFO, Exelis
ON THE
RECORD
key areas that align
well with where our
government customers
are headed, based on
their public comments.
Electronic warfare is
an important one; we
have a very strong po-
sition there. The ISR
market is another area.
The military collects
massive amounts of
data, and we make sen-
sors that help collect
it. We also make soft-
ware that helps ana-
lyze that data. So thats
the second big piece.
The third area is
important not only to
the DoD but also in the
commercial world, and
thats composites. The
aerospace market is becoming more
and more interested in composites; its
lightweight nature makes it more fuel
efficient. The government has a heavy-
lift helicopter in development thats
going to be made largely of compos-
ites. We have a position on that with
Sikorsky as the prime [contractor]. We
are also working hard to expand some
of our part numbers within Airbus and
Boeing and others.
The fourth area is air-traffic man-
agement. The FAA has a vision to
update the nations air-traffic con-
trol system. One of the first programs
designed to start that very big, prob-
ably $15 billion to $20 billion, effort
was ADS-B, for automatic dependent
surveillance-broadcast. Exelis was
awarded a $1.7 billion contract on that
program. That has made us a well-
recognized and leading air-traffic man-
agement provider.
As CFO you spend a fair amount
of time speaking with analysts.
Do you also talk to people in Wash-
ington?
Yes, and its something that I would
like to do more of. I re-
cently spoke to a couple
of people in Congress on
certain topics, and Ive
made a number of trips
to meet some of the se-
nior Army leadership
with Dave [CEO David
Melcher] and others.
What do you talk
about?
The best ways we can
serve them, quite hon-
estly. What can we do as
an important supplier to
help make their mission
easier? What can we offer
to them in terms of prod-
ucts and services that will
make their jobs easier,
and certainly easier and
safer for the soldiers?
Today, in mid-June, Exeliss stock
price is around $10, which is a little
lower than it was when the compa-
ny was spun off. Are you satisfied
with this? How often do you pay at-
tention to the stock price?
I wouldnt say I obsess over it, but its
certainly something that Ill glance at
each day. Right now theres just over-
hang in the industry. If you think about
the whole defense market, equity val-
ues have come down pretty signifi-
cantly over the last 60 days or so. As
we get closer to the sequestration, I
think there are some investors who are
thinking that defense stock is not the
most favored place. We have not been
disproportionately impacted by that.
In fact, if you look across our peer set,
our return year-to-date is third in the
industry.
Am I happy with where the stock
is? My job is in part to create value for
shareholders, and we do pay a strong
dividend, but we would certainly like
to find a way to have the shares ap-
preciate.
IntervIew by edward teach
Image courtesy of Exelis
Green day
Exelis is a major supplier of
night-vision systems for mili-
tary ground forces.
Follow Liberty Mutual Insurance. @lmbizinsurance
COMMERCI AL AUTO
GENERAL LI ABI LI TY
PROPERTY
WORKERS COMPENSATI ON
GROUP BENEFI TS
CASE SPECI FI CS:
While working, an employee at one of our customers
furniture factories recently had an accident. What
seemed like a fairly straightforward claim changed
when our VantageComp predictive model alerted
us early that the man had key triggers for type 2
diabetes. We were able to get our doctors and
other medical staff involved early to craft a plan
that treated the injury and helped the employee
manage his diagnosis. By combining innovative data
analytics with experienced talent, VantageComp
led us to the best solution for today and tomorrow.
To learn more, contact your agent or broker, or go to
libertymutualgroup.com/factory
I NDUSTRY:
MANUFACTURI NG
CUSTOMER:
FURNI TURE DESI GNER
CASE OBJECTI VE:
MANAGE UNRELATED COMPLI CATI ONS
OF AT- WORK I NJURY
BUT YOU CAN SEE
COMPLI CATI ONS COMI NG
A MI LE AWAY.

A
C
C
I DE
N
T
S
,
Y
O
U
C
AN T PRE
D
I C
T


2
0
1
2

L
i
b
e
r
t
y

M
u
t
u
a
l

I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
39 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Unfinished
Business
Two years after the passage of the
Dodd-Frank Act, the laws implemen-
tation is far behind schedule, and
its success is still in doubt.
By Randy MyeRs
photo-illustration by stephen Webster
Its easy to criticize
the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform
and Consumer
Protection Act of
2010, the contro-
versial legislation
aimed at strengthen-
ing the nations
financial system.
At 848 pages, the law
is frightfully obese,
yet crucial details
are missing. Like
most two-year-olds
(July 21 marks the
second anniversary
of its passage) the
law is still wobbly
on its feet, with prog-
ress measured in
baby steps. Propo-
nents laud it, while
critics see a law only
its creators could
love. Even many
who appreciate its
mission question
whether it will
ever be achieved.
No law can prevent incompetent management or fraud-
ulent management, warns Jeffrey Burchill, CFO of insur-
ance company FM Global. You can penalize people for
gross error or gross misconduct, but its very difficult to
prevent that conduct.
Dodd-Frank nonetheless aims to try. The most sweep-
ing regulatory overhaul of the financial services industry
since the Great Depression, the law created several over-
sight bodies and a deluge of rules for the industry. Yet be-
cause the legislation was drafted so hurriedly, and because
the matters it tackles are so complex, Congress left much
of the heavy lifting to regulators, saddling them with near-
ly 400 rulemaking requirements and calling upon them to
complete dozens of studies.
It didnt happen. By June 1 of this
year, understaffed and overwhelmed
regulatorsat the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Federal
Reserve, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (CFTC), the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
(FDIC), the Office of the Comptrol-
ler of the Currency, and elsewhere
had finalized only 110 of the 398
regulations they were tasked with
crafting, according to law firm Davis
Polk & Wardwell. They had missed
148 deadlines, including 21 for which
they had not even issued any pro-
posed rules. They faced another 140
future rulemaking deadlines, includ-
ing 123 where they had no proposed
rules on the table, and a clutch of
additional rulemaking requirements
for which they had been given no
deadline. Former SEC commissioner
Annette Nazareth, now an attorney
with Davis Polk, says it will probably
be at least well into 2013 before
rulemaking is completed. In some
cases, implementation could stretch
beyond that.
Dodd-Frank was easy to pass in
the aggregate, but implementing it
has been difficult, says former SEC
attorney John Sten, now a partner
at McDermott Will & Emery. Sten
blames not only the size of the task and
regulators budgetary constraints, but
also regulators efforts to make sure that
any rules they do hand down are both
workable and reflective of Congresss
intent. Toward that end, regulators have spent thousands
of hours meeting with business leaders and trade groups
to get their input on rulemaking. While some have blamed
business lobbying for holding up implementation of the law,
Nazareth, who has represented swap dealers, broker-deal-
ers, banks, and the Securities Industry and Financial Mar-
kets Association in talks with regulators, sees it differently.
I understand theres lobbying going on, but theres also
a huge amount of educa-
tional activity going on, she
says. This is a major exer-
cise, and regulators have to
meet with people to under-
stand what the issues are.
Regulators welcome that;
they really want to get it
right.
No law can prevent incompetent manage-
ment or fraudulent management. You can
penalize people for gross error or gross
misconduct, but its very difficult to prevent
that conduct. Jeffrey Burchill, CFO, FM GlObal
Unfinished
Business
40 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
41 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Now, as the third year of implementing Dodd-Frank be-
gins, significant pieces of the legislationsome of them ar-
guably the most controversial and hardest to implement
loom on the agenda. They include the so-called Volcker
Rule, which would bar banks from trading with their own
money; regulating the over-the-counter derivatives mar-
ket; designating systemically important nonbank finan-
cial institutions for greater oversight; and calculating bank
capital requirements.
Signature Accomplishments
ll this is not to downplay the signature accom-
plishments of Dodd-Frank to date. New regu-
latory authorities have been created, including
the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the
Federal Insurance Office, and the Consumer Financial Pro-
tection Bureau. Publicly traded companies must now give
shareholders a nonbinding say on pay indicating wheth-
er they support their companies executive-compensation
packages. Whistle-blowers now have incentives to bypass
internal compliance channels and report potentially illegal
or fraudulent activity directly to the SEC.
Hedge-fund advisers are now required to register with
the SEC. Beginning in June 2012, the largest funds must file
reports on the value of their assets under management,
their counterparty risk, their debts, and other key metrics.
Also beginning in June, the nations largest financial insti-
tutions must have living wills in place outlining how they
will wind down in the event they fail. In April of this year,
the SEC and the CFTC issued final rules defining the terms
swap dealer and major swap participant, a critical first
step in regulating the over-the-counter derivatives market.
A few of these early initiatives have already had an im-
pact on corporate behavior. In response to say-on-pay, notes
attorney James Hauser of Brown Rudnick, some companies
have been redesigning their compensation plans, revising
change-of-control agreements, eliminating tax gross-ups on
change-of-control payments, linking equity awards more
tightly to total shareholder returns or other performance
metrics, and providing more disclosure in their proxy state-
ments. Many observers surmised that General Electric was
seeking to head off negative say-on-pay votes in April of this
year when it announced that, in the wake of constructive
conversations with shareholders, it would retroactively ap-
ply performance measures to stock options it had awarded
Source: SEC (updated 6/20/12). Not all planned activity is listed above. Other regulators are also responsible for rulemaking.
Corporate Governance & Disclosure
Section 952: Report to Congress on study
and review of the use of compensation
consultants and the effects of such use.
Sections 953 and 955: Adopt rules regard-
ing disclosure of pay-for-performance,
pay ratios, and hedging by employees and
directors.
Section 954: Adopt rules regarding recov-
ery of executive compensation.
Credit Ratings
Section 932: Adopt rules regarding NRSRO
[nationally recognized statistical rating
organizations] reports of internal controls
over the ratings process, preventing sales
and marketing activities from influenc-
ing the production of ratings, providing
for a report to the SEC and look-back
when an entity subject to a rating employs
a person who previously worked for the
NRSRO.
Section 932: Adopt rules regarding trans-
parency of NRSRO ratings performance.
Section 936: Adopt rules establishing
training, experience, and competence
standards, and a testing program for
NRSRO analysts.
Section 939F: Report to Congress on study
on the rating process for structured fi-
nance products and associated conflicts
of interest, the feasibility of an assignment
system, metrics to determine the accuracy
of ratings, and alternative compensation
that creates incentives for accurate rat-
ings.
Derivatives
Section 719(d): Joint report to Congress
(with the CFTC) on study regarding stable
value contracts.
Sections 763 and 766: Adopt rules on trade
reporting, data elements, and real-time
public reporting for security-based swaps.
Section 763: Adopt antimanipulation rules
for security-based swaps.
Section 763: Adopt rules regarding the
registration and regulation of security-
based swap execution facilities.
Section 764: Adopt rules regarding the
registration and regulation of security-
based swap dealers and major security-
based swap participants.
Section 765: Adopt rules regarding con-
flicts of interest for clearing agencies, ex-
ecution facilities, and exchanges involved
in security-based swaps.
Market Oversight
Section 210: Jointly with other financial
regulators prescribe recordkeeping re-
quirements that will assist the FDIC when
acting as a receiver.
Section 417: Report to Congress on study
on the state of short selling on exchanges
and in the over-the-counter markets.
Section 619: Adopt rules to implement
prohibition on proprietary trading and
certain relationships with hedge funds
and private-equity funds (the Volcker
Rule).
Section 917: Report to Congress on study
to identify financial literacy among retail
investors.
Municipal Securities
Section 975: Adopt permanent rules for
the registration of municipal
advisers.
On The SeCS AgendA Upcoming rulemaking activity at the Securities and
Exchange Commission for implementing the Dodd-Frank Act (estimated JulyDecember 2012)
A
Bob O'Connor
to CEO Jeffrey Immelt in 2010.
Elsewhere, many banks have already taken steps to cut
their business ties to hedge funds, as will be required under
the Volcker Rule. And growing numbers of banks and busi-
nesses are already clearing more of their over-the-counter
derivatives trades as will be required by Dodd-Frank, even
as they await final rules from federal regulators on exactly
which trades must be cleared.
Preventing Too Big to Fail
till, many of these developments are but a side-
show to the real thrust of Dodd-Frank: to pre-
vent the unwieldy collapse of systemically im-
portant, too big to fail financial institutions.
The act attacks the problem from several anglescreat-
ing stiffer capital requirements for financial institutions, re-
quiring firms that securitize assets to retain some exposure
to the resulting securities, creating greater regulation and
transparency in the over-the-counter derivatives market,
increasing regulation and oversight of credit-rating agen-
cies, prohibiting speculative trading by banks, and creat-
ing the Financial Stability Oversight Council. (The FSOC
brings together the heads of the Treasury Department, the
Federal Reserve, the SEC, and other regulatory bodies to
monitor financial markets and identify potential threats to
U.S. financial stability.)
The FSOC is only getting started on its mission, though,
and regulators have made only partial progress on the other
fronts. Few of their tasks have proven more complicated or
controversial than implementing the Volcker Rule, which
prohibits proprietary trading by banks for their own ac-
counts, precludes Fed-regulated financial institutions from
owning or sponsoring hedge funds or private-equity funds,
and gives regulators the authority to impose additional
capital requirements on nonfinancial companies engaged in
proprietary trading. Dodd-Frank provides that the Volcker
Rule statutory provisions take effect on July 21 of this year,
yet regulators at the Fed, the SEC, the FDIC, and the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency were still debating the
necessary implementation rules heading into this summer,
and it is unlikely that implementation rules will be issued
by the deadline. The regulators issued interim guidance that
will apply until final rules are adopted.
The delay stemmed in part from the complexity of de-
ciding just what constitutes speculative trading and what
qualifies as hedging, which the Volcker Rule expressly
permits. Regulators also have been the target of vigorous
lobbying by bankers opposed to the rule, often led by JP-
Morgan Chase chairman and CEO Jamie Dimonalthough
JPMorgans announcement in May that it had lost $2 billion
trading credit-default swaps in its own account (with the
chance for that number to go much higher) renewed pres-
sure on regulators to issue final rules with real teeth. Still
at question is whether the JPMorgan Chase trading would
have been covered by the Volcker Rule; the bank insists it
S
Fang Zhe /Landov
42 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
Former Federal Reserve
chairman Paul Volcker inspired
the rule that would bar
proprietary trading by banks.
Regulators are still
hammering out the details
of the Volcker Rule, one
of Dodd-Franks most
controversial provisions.
would not, while skep-
tics wonder whether
it was, in fact, hedging
and not speculating.
Other major initia-
tives still on the docket include identify-
ing which nonbank financial institutions
will qualify as systemically important
financial institutions, or SIFIs, and
therefore be subject to heightened regu-
lation under Dodd-Frank; and imple-
menting all the rules and regulations
pertaining to the over-the-counter de-
rivatives, or swaps, market, where most
trades will have to be submitted for
clearing to central counterparties. The
FSOC spelled out in April how it will
identify SIFIs, but actually identifying
them is expected to take several more
months.
Regulating Swaps
mplementing Dodd-Franks
swaps regulations has
proved nearly as compli-
cated as parsing out regula-
tory language on the Volcker Rule, with
much of the controversy centered on
whom, and which types of transactions,
should be covered by the new rules. In
addition to instituting regulation of swap
dealers and major swap participants,
Dodd-Frank prohibits those entities from
receiving any federal assistance, such as
advances from a Federal Reserve credit
facility or discount window, that is not
part of a broad-based eligibility program.
Following the JPMorgan Chase loss,
the CFTC began looking into whether the
swaps regulations should be extended
to cover the overseas units of U.S. insti-
tutions, a situation U.S. banks have said
would hurt their ability to compete with
foreign-based rivals. The regulation of
swaps is still a work in progress, says
Sten. It may have a bigger impact on the
affected U.S. institutions than the Vol-
cker Rule.
Elsewhere, the SEC headed into sum-
mer still needing to issue final guidance
on how companies should go about re-
claiming incentive compensation in cases
where companies restate their financial
results due to material noncompliance
with accounting laws. The Sarbanes-

July also marks the an-


niversary of another
landmark piece of legisla-
tion: the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. Aimed at prevent-
ing a repeat of the egregious
accounting scandals that
had felled once high-flying
companies like Enron and
WorldCom, the law mandat-
ed rigorous internal control
procedures for publicly traded companies, assigned personal responsibility
for accurate financial statements to CEOs and CFOs, required rapid public
disclosure of material changes in a companys financial condition or opera-
tions, and imposed a host of other accounting and corporate-governance
mandates. Like the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, Sarbox was written hastily and
passed quickly in response to a crisis. Yet at just 66 pages, it was practically
a footnote compared with Dodd-Frank, which clocked in at 848 pages.
Ten years later, it is clear that Sarbox did not completely eliminate ac-
counting fraud or the sketchy use of off-balance-sheet bookkeeping to mask
a companys true financial condition. When commodities trader Refco col-
lapsed in 2005, for example, investigators discovered that its CEO and chair-
man had hidden approximately $430 million in bad debts from the companys
auditor and investors. And when Wall Street investment bank Lehman Broth-
ers fell in 2008, regulators discovered that it had been using off-balance-
sheet accounting to understate the leverage on its books.
Nor has Congress been completely satisfied with what it wrought. Earlier
this year, the JOBS (Jumpstart Our Business Startups) Act exempted emerg-
ing growth companies, which it identifies as those with annual revenues un-
der $1 billion, from certain provisions of both Dodd-Frank and Sarbox.
Still, it is also true that since Sarbox there has been no rash of accounting
scandals like the ones that prompted Congress to create the law. This held
even in the midst of the 2008 credit crisis, when any corporate executive in-
clined to shade the truth might have been tempted to whitewash what was
happening to the corporate balance sheet. The law has had value in bring-
ing more integrity and transparency to financial statements, says Carol
Beaumier, an executive vice president with Protiviti, a consulting and inter-
nal audit firm.
Whether Sarbox says anything about the future for Dodd-Frank is ques-
tionable. They are very different statutes, says Annette Nazareth, a former
SEC commissioner and now an attorney with Davis Polk & Wardwell. I think
Sarbanes-Oxley had a lot of merit, even though there were parts that didnt
work as well and took some time to resolve. Dodd-Frank was much more am-
bitious, and in a lot of places duplicative, with several provisions aimed at
solving the same problems. Is it going to make our financial system bet-
ter? We hope so, but its difficult to say. R.M.
10 years
after:
the
sarbanes-
Oxley act
I
Unfinished
Business
43 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Larry Downing /Landov
President George W. Bush signs the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act in the East Room of the White House, July 30, 2002.
Oxley Act of 2002 had a
similar but more forgiv-
ing clawback provision
that kicked in only if a
restatement was a result
of misconduct. The new law, says Hauser,
will likely require firms to amend many of
their existing compensation agreements.
Finally, banking regulators are still work-
ing on some of the rules needed to fully im-
plement the controversial Collins Amend-
ment to Dodd-Frank, which adjusts the way
bank capital requirements are calculated.
One challenge: figuring out how to recon-
cile differences between the capital require-
ments spelled out in Dodd-Frank and those
outlined in Basel III, the global regulatory
standard that phases in beginning in 2013.
Getting Dodd-Franks rules wrong could
impose unnecessary costs on the nations
financial system and exaggerate, rather
than mitigate, the risks the law was intend-
ed to minimize. But bad rules can be struck
down. Last July, the U.S. Court of Appeals
rejected an SEC rule that would have made
it easier for shareholders to nominate can-
didates to the boards of public companies,
arguing that the commission hadnt ad-
equately assessed its costs. Cost-benefit
analysis is extremely challenging, observes
Nazareth, who speculates that it could be-
come an issue with other rulemaking decisions, too.
Will It Work?
ith so much rulemaking yet to be done, it is
probably unfair to ask if Dodd-Frank has suc-
ceeded so far in creating a stronger and more
secure financial system in the United States. I
think weve got a long way to go before we can judge Dodd-
Frank, says Carol Beaumier, an executive vice president
with Protiviti, a consulting and internal audit firm.
Still, skeptics, and outright critics, are abundant. Con-
gressional Republicans, who opposed the law, have sub-
mitted numerous bills that would scrap all or parts of
Dodd-Frank, while Presidential candidate Mitt Romney has
vowed to repeal the law if he is elected, though most politi-
cal analysts consider that little more than campaign bra-
vado. Even if they captured the White House, Republicans
would need to muster 60 votes in the Senate, now con-
trolled by Democrats, to repeal the law.
That hasnt stopped the criticism. I think it [Dodd-
Frank] has done little to solve our problems, says Kevin
Williams, CFO of Jack Henry & Associates, a $967 million
provider of information-processing solutions to commu-
nity banks. In the two years since the laws passage, Wil-

Keeping track of
regulatory prog-
ress on implementing the
Dodd-Frank Act is no easy
matter. As one attorney
recently confessed, No
one really knows what
the hell is going on with
Dodd-Frank.
But there are study
aids. Law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell publishes a monthly progress
report available on its website at www.davispolk.com/Dodd-Frank-Rule-
making-Progress-Report/. For anyone just being introduced to the acts
intricacies, The Dodd-Frank Act: A Cheat Sheet, published by law firm
Morrison & Foerster, is still helpful. It can be found on the firms website
at www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/SummaryDoddFrankAct.pdf.
Meanwhile, many regulatory agencies are doing their best to keep the
public informed as well. The Securities and Exchange Commission has
more rulemaking requirements than any other agency, and it rou-
tinely publishes news on its latest activities. To see the page where
it spotlights its progress on Dodd-Frank, go to www.sec.gov/
spotlight/dodd-frank.shtml. R.M.
Keeping
TracK
of dodd-
franK
W
Unfinished
Business
liams notes, the nations biggest banks have gotten bigger,
not smaller, with the six largest holding assets equal to 63%
of the countrys gross domestic product. That makes their
potential failure an even bigger concern than it would have
been in the past, he contends.
Meanwhile, small community banks are being hurt
by the cost of complying with a law written in response
to problems created by large banks, says Williams. That
charge has been echoed by former FDIC chairman Bill
Isaac, now chairman of Fifth Third Bancorp., who has said
he wouldnt be surprised if half of the nations community
banks go out of business if they dont get some relief from
Dodd-Frank.
I think Dodd-Frank was a political response to an eco-
nomic problem, and history tells us that is not always the
best solution, says Isaac.
If Williams proves prescient, Dodd-Frank will have been
a large, costly, and ultimately misguided effort to strength-
en the financial markets. Yet in light of the ongoing devas-
tation wrought by the 2008 credit crisisto the financial
and housing markets and economies around the worldit
is probably unrealistic to expect that policymakers would
not have tried.
CFO

Randy MyeRs is a contributing editor at CFO.
Dodd-Frank co-sponsor Sen. Christopher Dodd (right)
retired from Congress in 2011; Rep. Barney Frank (left)
will leave in 2013.
44 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
Roger L. Wollenberg/Landov
September 30 - OctOber 3, 2012

red rOck reSOrt

LaS VegaS, NV
The
7
Th annual
CFO Rising WesT
SponSorS:
partnerS:

Dynamic insight from visionaries


on how to maximize the performance
of your fnance team

Senior fnance executives on hand


to answer your questions

Leadership advice from panels


and roundtable discussions

Practical solutions from leading


vendors on the exhibit foor

Three days of networking


opportunities with your peers

Up to 30 CPE credits
get a head start on
the future of fnance:
conference features:
DOn
Mulligan
CFO
General Mills
CuRT
espelanD
CFO
Eastman Chemical
anDRea
FReeDMan
CFO
Method
DOuglas
RushKOFF
Author
CNN Commentator
SpeaKerS:
www.cforisingwest.com
Hear how to recruit and
retain the best fnance
talent and improve your
leadership skills.
Discover best practices
for fnance professionals
at every level.
Learn how to make
your fnance team more
effcient and effective.

regiSter now

www.cforiSingweSt.com

1-800-772-1119
The FuTuRe OF FinanCe
Working capital is piling up
at Americas largest companies.
Too
Much
Of A

Good
Thing
CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com 46
By russ BAnhAm
illustrAtions By dAvid plunkert
the 2012
CFO/rel
Working
CApitAl
sCoreCArd

Its one of the most
important metrics
for gauging a compa-
nys efficiency and fi-
nancial health. So when
a new survey of 1,000 of
the largest public com-
panies in the United
States indicates that
their working capital
continues to be much
larger than is consid-
ered prudent, thats
cause for concern.
The annual survey,
conducted by REL
Consulting, reveals an
overall lack of sus-
tained working capital improvement among U.S. companies.
After a predictable decrease in working capital during the
Great Recession, when companies focused more on the bal-
ance sheet, working capital performance has leveled off.
Days working capital (DWC)the number of days it
takes to convert working capital into revenuedid decrease
marginally in 2011, from 37.7 days to 37 days. But REL down-
plays the improvement, attributing it in part to the compa-
nies 13% average revenue growth. To have a 1.9% decrease
is a positive, but not by a lot, says Prathima Iddamsetty, se-
nior manager of operations, research, and marketing at REL,
a working capital consultancy.
Cash on hand across the group of surveyed companies,
dubbed the REL U.S. 1,000, increased by $60.3 billion in 2011,
helped in part by companies taking advantage of low interest
rates to issue more debt, up by a record $233 billion year-over-
year. Those companies now have a staggering $910 billion in
excess working capital, including $425 billion in inventory,
according to REL. Way too much cash is being left on the
table and not being put toward growth objectives, says Id-
damsetty.
There is a wide gulf between top-performing companies
in the upper quartile of the survey and median performers.
On average, top performers have 49% less working capital
tied up in operations, collect from customers more than two
weeks faster, pay suppliers about 10 days slower, and hold
less than half the inventory than median companies. (The
2012 CFO/REL Working Capital Scorecard, which begins on
page 51, shows the best and worst companies in terms of
working capital performance in 20 industries.)
The research indicates little sustainability in working
capital improvement. Fewer than 8% of companies managed
to reduce days working capital over the past three years, and
no company surveyed improved all elements of DWCin-
ventory, receivables, and payablesover the period.
CFOs should care about these results, not just because
working capital is a reliable index of efficiency, but because
the world is getting more competitive. When global inves-
tors think about where to put their money, they look for
where theyre going to get the best return for a given amount
of risk, says Kevin Kaiser, professor of management prac-
tice at INSEAD, the international business school. Having
capital tied up is an inefficient use of their investments. In a
world where people have choices about where to send their
cash, theyre not going to invest it in companies with ineffi-
cient working capital practices.
Gains Not Sustained
REL also attributes the modest improvement in DWC to
companies doing several things (in addition to the revenue
growth already mentioned): collecting faster from custom-
ers, getting rid of excess inventory built up during the re-
cession, and tightening production. Although days inventory
Companies now have a stagg-
ering $910 billion in excess
working capital, including $425
billion in inventory, according
to REL. Way too much cash
is being left on the table.
Prathima iddamsetty,
senior manager of operations, reL ConsuLting
outstanding fell, the survey indicates that companies turned
inventory over slower in 2011 than in the prior year.
We are more or less back to where we were well before
the recession, says Iddamsetty. The long-term trends in-
dicate virtually no ability to make sustained working capital
improvements.
Many companies that improved working capital dur-
ing the recession havent continued to do so, says Ashley
Sparks, an REL associate. They made it a priority to get
working capital in order, but now they have so much cash
theyve shifted their focus from the balance sheet to the P&L
statement, emphasizing new products and revenue growth,
she says.
Overall, corporate efficiency declined in 2011: operating
expenses increased by 13%, gross margins decreased by 2.3%,
and profitability fell by 0.4%, according to REL. Sparks notes
that operating expenses are increasing in tandem with rev-
enue growth$1.2 trillion and $1.1 trillion, respectively, ac-
cording to the survey. Companies are failing to realize the
importance of a sustainable, significant, and reinforcing cash
flow, she says. Revenues are increasing, but so are oper-
ating expenses. There is a missed opportunity to limit the
48 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
the 2012 CFO/reL Working Capital scorecard
David Bowman
ix companies top the REL U.S.
1,000 list in terms of sustained
working capital performance:
Colgate-Palmolive, Cubic, Cytec Indus-
tries, Deluxe, PH Glatfelter, and Watts Wa-
ter Technologies. These companies either
improved working capital performance
(days working capital and its three major
elements) or sustained it (performance
did not deteriorate by more than 5%) each
year for three successive years.
Working capital performance is a
critical element of how we define suc-
cess here, says Bill McCartney, CFO of
Watts Water Technologies, a $1.5 billion
(in 2011 revenues) global manufacturer of
safety and control packages for residen-
tial and commercial applications. Half
our growth here has come from acquisi-
tions36 in the last 11 yearsand weve
been able to finance a lot of it through
At these companies, working capital is working well.
Capital Companies
internal cash flows. Weve been able to
achieve free cash flow in excess of net in-
come the last 4 years, thanks to effective-
ly managing working capital.
Working capital also is a key part of
the cash flow metrics at Cytec Industries,
where it is linked to employees annual
incentive compensation. The firm estab-
lished a target to reduce net working cap-
ital in 2009 and challenged the workforce
to achieve it. We linked 20% of every-
ones bonus to achieving the metric, says
CFO Dave Drillock. Theyve done it now
three years in a row.
The $3 billion specialty materials and
chemicals manufacturer did it by seg-
menting inventory to better track slow-
and fast-moving products, hunting down
late payers, and extending terms with
vendors. We did things like hiring more
collectors and urging them to make pro-
active phone calls to improve receiv-
ables, Drillock says. That took our days
past due from an average of 12 to 15 days
to 5. We then extended terms with ven-
dors from 45 days to 60 days, but prom-
ised wed always pay on time. And we de-
cided if a product moves slowly, it should
be made when needed, whereas we could
build inventory for products with a fast
turnover.
Constantly Chipping Away
Deluxe, a $1.42 billion provider of market-
ing tools and web services for small busi-
nesses and financial institutions, also has
what CFO Terry Peterson calls a diligent
accounts-receivable process. After a
certain number of days past due, we send
a letter and follow up with phone calls to
collect the balance, Peterson explains.
We also push customers to receive elec-
tronic invoices, which shaves several
days off the payment terms. Were also
more careful in extending credit to small
businesses, we reduced the number of
our SKUs, and we enhanced forecasting
with a new SAP tool to get our inventory
in line.
He adds, Were constantly chipping
away to get another inch of progress.
Like the other top-performing compa-
nies, $1.2 billion Cubic keeps close watch
on its key working capital metric: days
sales outstanding plus days inventory
outstanding minus days payable out-
standing. Were a systems integrator for
government and transportation, so we
dont have products, but when youre in
the services business its all about per-
formance, says John D. Thomas, Cubics
vice president of finance. You make de-
liveries on time, you get paid on time.
Cubic also links working capital to se-
nior employee compensation. Our man-
agements incentive pay has been very
good of late because of our high return
on net assets, Thomas says. People are
focused when they negotiate contracts,
building in terms they can meet and get-
ting advance payments where they can,
minimizing the amount of capital used per
transaction.
The CFOs were not surprised their
companies topped the REL U.S. 1,000. But
they cant offer any simple solutions for
their poorer-performing peers. Says Dril-
lock, Theres no magic to improving
working capital management. The key is
not to take your eye off the ball. R.B.
Theres no magic to improving
working capital management.
The key is not to take your eye
off the ball.
Dave Drillock, CFO, Cytec industries
S
49 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Making it

Work
To help create long-term,
sustainable working
capital improvements,
REL Consulting recom-
mends the following best
practices:
e Make working capital optimization and cash flow im-
provement a strategic priority, with visible senior ex-
ecutive backing.
r Link cash-flow performance and working capital man-
agement to the compensation structure.
t Make cash flow one of the key metrics for performance
management within operations and finance.
u Invest in improving demand forecasting and deployment
of effective sales and operations planning processes.
i Standardize customer and supplier payment terms, and
control exceptions through an escalation process.
o Segment customers and suppliers according to value
and risk to support a differentiated approach that ap-
plies the companys resources to those customers and
suppliers to improve cash flow.
p Automate and eliminate high-volume, low-value transac-
tions to free up resources to focus on high-value custom-
ers, suppliers, and transactions.
a Regularly review trade-receivables allowances accord-
ing to historical experience, creditworthiness, and age of
the trade-receivables balances.
s Create estimates and judgments for age of inventories
and other relevant issues that could affect the salable
condition of products and their estimated selling prices.
R.B.
amount of working capital it takes to generate revenue.
Kaiser notes that poor working capital performance and
inferior products may go together. A company with a poor
product will provide better payment terms to customers
than its competition45 days instead of 30, he says. It will
keep more inventory to provide that product on the spot to
a buyer. It will pay suppliers faster to make sure the inven-
tory is full. In effect, its working capital deficiency drives its
revenue growth, not the quality of its goods or services. If
this keeps up, it will eventually be overtaken.
Hoarding Cash
Why arent companies putting more energy into their work-
ing capital management? For the most part, they have strong
Companies have strong
balance sheets, record cash
on hand, and record cash flow
from operations over the
last five years, so theyre
thinking theyll just sustain
things as they are.
Dan GinsBeRG,
associate principal, rel consulting
balance sheets, record cash on hand, and record cash flow
from operations over the last five years, so theyre thinking
theyll just sustain things as they are, says REL associate
principal Dan Ginsberg. This is a common, but shortsighted,
attitude.
Indeed, cash is still king for the REL U.S. 1,000. This is
clearly evidenced by the $60 billion increase in cash on hand
and the $233 billion increase in debt in 2011. Over a three-
year period, cash on hand was $277 billion and accumulated
debt $268 billion.
But using debt instead of efficient working capital man-
agement to get more cash into the bank account comes with
a long-term cost: eventually they will have to pay [the debt]
down, points out Ginsberg. Theyll also have to generate a
return on their existing assets that exceeds the interest rate,
which is not what were seeing.
Its better to tap working capital as a funding source for
long-term growth strategies, says Ginsberg. REL Consulting
cites top performers in a broad range of industries, leverag-
ing working capital to open up new businesses in emerging
markets with growing consumer demand, for instance.
Top performers have very tight manufacturing time-
tables and inventory management practices, in addition to
strict collections and payment systems that are standardized
across all locations, says Michael K. Rellihan, an associate
principal at REL. The cash they generate from this high level
of working capital efficiency is then applied to the growth
agenda. Long-term, the result is a powerful benefit to the
bottom line.
Only process improvements will provide sustainable
cash flow benefits, adds RELs Sparks. This requires work-
ing more closely with customers, getting better information
to suppliers, and improving demand forecasting. You need to
have an underlying process in place to manage working capi-
tal on a day-to-day basis; if not, it will be difficult to sustain.
Kaiser has a similar view: Building a business with a sus-
tainable competitive advantage insists on working capital ef-
ficiency, he says. They go hand in hand. CFO
Russ Banham is a contributing editor at CFO.
50 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
The 2012 CFO/ReL Working Capital scorecard
N/M = not meaningful, because DWC moved from a positive to a negative number or vice versa.
Based on fnancial statements of 1,000 of the largest U.S. public companies (excluding the fnancial
sector), as reported by Capital IQ. Median shown is for the full industry. Source: REL Consulting
Aerospace & Defense
Northrop Grumman 41 -5% 43 12 4% 12 20 0% 20 33 -5% 34
Lockheed Martin 48 5% 45 19 3% 19 18 37% 13 49 -4% 51
Raytheon 66 4% 64 5 -6% 5 22 -1% 22 49 5% 47
Goodrich 61 5% 58 132 1% 131 35 29% 27 158 -2% 162
Spirit AeroSystems 19 15% 17 197 -10% 219 42 8% 39 175 -11% 197
BE Aerospace 49 -7% 53 216 -14% 252 29 -7% 31 236 -14% 274
Median 60 0% 60 57 5% 54 27 5% 26 90 1% 88
Airlines
Southwest Airlines 7 18% 6 9 28% 7 25 11% 22 (8) -8% (9)
SkyWest 8 -49% 16 12 -18% 14 22 -23% 29 (2) -277% 1
United Continental 13 -47% 25 6 -17% 7 20 -30% 28 (0) -106% 4
US Airways Group 9 -4% 10 7 -7% 7 11 -9% 12 5 3% 5
Hawaiian 21 25% 17 5 2% 5 18 -8% 19 8 230% 2
Republic Airways 11 12% 10 13 0% 13 6 -7% 6 19 9% 17
Median 10 -8% 11 6 -12% 7 17 -10% 19 (1) 19% (1)
Auto Components
Lear 48 -10% 54 16 -3% 17 52 -7% 56 13 -10% 14
TRW Automotive 50 -6% 53 19 -2% 19 52 -2% 53 17 -12% 19
Tenneco 47 -3% 49 30 -11% 34 59 -8% 64 18 0% 18
Federal-Mogul 63 -1% 63 50 2% 50 41 5% 39 73 -2% 74
Cooper Tire & Rubber 40 -12% 45 65 4% 63 32 -24% 42 73 11% 66
Exide Technologies 64 -3% 66 66 16% 57 53 16% 45 77 -1% 78
Median 51 -4% 54 30 -6% 32 47 -1% 47 35 -9% 39
Building Products
Masco 45 3% 43 38 5% 36 38 28% 29 45 -10% 50
USG 39 -4% 41 37 2% 36 28 4% 27 48 -4% 50
Armstrong World Industries 29 -3% 30 52 -6% 55 27 22% 22 53 -14% 62
Owens Corning 42 5% 40 54 20% 45 33 -4% 35 63 24% 51
Nortek 47 -13% 54 53 -14% 61 27 -19% 34 72 -12% 82
Griffon 68 -23% 89 53 -31% 76 37 -30% 52 84 -25% 113
Median 45 3% 43 45 8% 42 31 -5% 32 59 12% 53
2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010
DIO DWC DPO
The 2012 Working
Capital Scorecard
DSO
Best in Industry
Worst in Industry
Days Sales Outstanding (DSO): AR/(total revenue/365)
Year-end trade receivables net of allowance for doubtful accounts, plus financial
receivables, divided by one day of average revenue.
A decrease in DSO represents an improvement, an increase a deterioration.
Some companies have securitized receivables, which improve DSO through
financing alternatives without improving the underlying customer-to-cash
processes such as credit-risk assessment, billing, collections, and dispute
management. The scorecard eliminates this distortion by adding securitized
receivables back on the balance sheet before calculating DSO.
Days Inventory Outstanding: Inventory (DIO)/(total revenue/365)
Year-end inventory plus LIFO reserve, divided by one day of average revenue.
A decrease in DIO is an improvement, an increase a deterioration.
Days Payables Outstanding (DPO): AP/(total revenue/365)
Year-end trade payables divided by one day of average revenue.
An increase in DPO is an improvement, a decrease a deterioration. For purposes
of the survey, payables exclude accrued expenses.
Days Working Capital (DWC): (AR + inventory - AP)/(total revenue/365)
Year-end net working capital (trade receivables plus inventory, minus AP) divided by
one day of average revenue.
The lower the number of days, the better. The percentage change is marked N/M
(not meaningful) if DWC moved from a positive to a negative number or vice versa.
Note: Many companies use cost of goods sold instead of net sales when calculating DPO and DIO. Our methodology
uses net sales across the four working capital categories to allow a balanced comparison.
Companies in the survey are categorized using the Global Industry Classification Standard.
How
Working
Capital
Works
51 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
N/M = not meaningful, because DWC moved from a positive to a negative number or vice versa.
Based on fnancial statements of 1,000 of the largest U.S. public companies (excluding the fnancial
sector), as reported by Capital IQ. Median shown is for the full industry. Source: REL Consulting
Chemicals
TPC Group 28 -17% 34 12 -37% 19 23 -21% 29 17 -28% 24
CF Industries 16 -27% 22 18 -27% 25 6 -26% 8 28 -27% 39
PolyOne 41 0% 41 31 6% 29 38 0% 37 35 5% 33
Ecolab 112 88% 60 59 109% 28 44 109% 21 128 90% 67
Sensient Technologies 56 -7% 60 106 -2% 108 24 -9% 26 138 -3% 142
OM Group 51 8% 47 148 65% 90 41 27% 32 158 51% 105
Median 48 -5% 51 51 1% 51 29 -5% 31 70 0% 70
Communications Equipment
Qualcomm 24 0% 24 19 6% 18 24 -7% 25 19 18% 16
Juniper Networks 47 -11% 53 6 194% 2 27 2% 26 26 -9% 29
EchoStar 59 34% 44 9 92% 5 35 42% 25 32 37% 24
Netgear 81 -12% 92 51 -2% 52 36 0% 36 95 -11% 107
Ciena 87 -14% 101 48 -38% 77 33 -44% 59 103 -14% 119
Tellabs 90 18% 76 41 13% 36 28 1% 27 103 22% 85
Median 62 3% 61 21 -3% 21 28 7% 26 55 -1% 56
Computers & Peripherals
Apple 18 -41% 31 3 -56% 6 49 -27% 67 (29) -6% (31)
Dell 38 -1% 39 8 7% 8 69 2% 67 (22) 7% (21)
Western Digital 46 -1% 47 22 7% 21 59 6% 56 9 -20% 11
Imation 66 3% 65 59 16% 51 58 6% 55 67 11% 61
Diebold 53 2% 52 57 -1% 57 29 3% 28 82 -1% 82
NCR 66 1% 66 52 -8% 56 35 -7% 38 83 -1% 84
Median 52 13% 47 22 7% 21 42 2% 42 32 26% 26
Containers & Packaging
Crown 34 -7% 36 48 -1% 49 59 -2% 60 23 -8% 25
Graphic Packaging 33 2% 32 42 12% 37 36 11% 32 39 4% 37
Greif 49 -4% 51 37 -11% 42 42 -15% 49 44 2% 43
Rock-Tenn 75 85% 41 61 59% 39 53 72% 31 84 72% 49
AptarGroup 61 -3% 63 46 -6% 49 17 -22% 22 89 0% 90
Sealed Air 90 58% 57 55 24% 44 40 112% 19 105 28% 82
Median 47 6% 45 45 -4% 48 37 8% 34 56 -4% 58
Diversified Telecommunication Services
Level 3 Communications 55 107% 26 N/M N/M N/M 63 90% 33 (8) 22% (7)
Frontier Communications 39 -21% 49 N/M N/M N/M 36 -14% 42 3 -59% 7
TW Telecom 26 10% 23 N/M N/M N/M 14 -8% 15 12 44% 8
AT&T 39 -2% 40 3 -11% 4 25 13% 22 18 -19% 22
Verizon Communications 39 -4% 41 3 -20% 4 14 2% 13 28 -9% 31
Windstream 56 52% 37 7 26% 5 25 69% 15 37 38% 27
Median 39 6% 37 - N/M - 25 62% 16 14 -34% 21
Food Products
Darling International 19 -56% 44 10 -55% 23 12 -65% 35 18 -45% 32
Dean Foods 26 -1% 27 13 -1% 13 21 -9% 24 18 9% 16
Flowers Foods 22 3% 22 15 8% 14 15 5% 14 22 5% 21
Hain Celestial 46 2% 45 55 -12% 62 30 -17% 36 71 0% 72
J. M. Smucker 26 38% 19 65 26% 52 18 25% 14 74 30% 57
Seneca Foods 24 15% 21 167 7% 155 20 2% 19 171 9% 157
Median 26 1% 26 42 4% 40 23 -14% 26 45 14% 40
Health-Care Equipment & Supplies
Invacare 52 -5% 54 39 6% 37 30 -1% 30 61 0% 61
West Pharmaceutical Services 45 8% 42 46 -4% 49 27 32% 21 64 -8% 69
Idexx Laboratories 42 7% 40 40 -6% 42 11 46% 7 71 -4% 75
ResMed 81 6% 76 59 -5% 62 16 -16% 19 123 4% 119
Teleflex 68 -9% 75 71 -17% 86 16 -26% 22 124 -11% 140
Zimmer 69 2% 67 76 -6% 81 12 5% 11 133 -3% 137
Median 64 0% 64 49 4% 47 16 -7% 17 97 3% 94
Household Products
Procter & Gamble 28 12% 25 33 11% 30 35 6% 34 25 21% 21
Church & Dwight 35 7% 33 27 -2% 28 31 6% 29 32 0% 32
Clorox 37 -3% 38 29 14% 25 30 3% 29 36 5% 34
Spectrum Brands 41 -21% 52 50 -34% 75 35 -21% 44 55 -33% 83
Central Garden & Pet 44 -5% 46 74 8% 69 26 -3% 27 92 4% 88
Energizer 70 -1% 71 51 -10% 57 23 -2% 23 99 -6% 105
Median 38 -1% 39 39 1% 39 30 5% 29 47 -3% 49
2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010
DIO DWC DPO DSO
Best in Industry
Worst in Industry
52 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
The 2012 CFO/REL Working Capital Scorecard
N/M = not meaningful, because DWC moved from a positive to a negative number or vice versa.
Based on fnancial statements of 1,000 of the largest U.S. public companies (excluding the fnancial
sector), as reported by Capital IQ. Median shown is for the full industry. Source: REL Consulting
Machinery
Paccar 23 -3% 24 21 -23% 27 26 -5% 28 18 -23% 23
Deere 41 -23% 53 71 5% 67 93 -3% 96 19 -23% 25
Navistar International 32 7% 30 45 -5% 48 56 1% 56 22 -3% 22
Terex 66 2% 65 99 -18% 120 43 -9% 47 122 -11% 137
Kennametal 68 7% 63 94 14% 82 34 39% 24 128 5% 121
Joy Global 73 5% 70 111 40% 79 38 24% 30 146 23% 119
Median 56 -3% 58 57 1% 57 32 1% 32 82 -1% 83
Metals & Mining
Cliffs Natural Resources 12 -58% 28 43 5% 41 20 -2% 21 35 -28% 49
Alcoa 23 -17% 28 54 -6% 58 39 -3% 40 38 -16% 45
Sims Metal Management 21 -10% 24 40 6% 38 23 9% 21 39 -4% 41
Allegheny Technologies 50 2% 49 108 1% 107 35 -3% 36 124 2% 121
AM Castle 58 18% 50 132 35% 98 38 36% 28 153 28% 120
Carpenter Technology 57 -2% 57 149 -9% 163 37 -7% 40 168 -7% 181
Median 32 -9% 35 56 -4% 58 23 -6% 24 65 -7% 69
Multiline Retail
Family Dollar Stores N/M N/M N/M 49 3% 48 29 -7% 31 20 23% 16
Dollar General N/M N/M N/M 52 2% 51 26 -2% 27 26 6% 24
Dollar Tree N/M N/M N/M 48 -4% 50 16 -3% 16 32 -5% 34
Belk 4 20% 3 88 4% 84 21 5% 20 70 5% 67
Saks N/M N/M N/M 87 -1% 88 14 21% 12 73 -4% 76
Nordstrom 68 -11% 77 40 4% 38 32 -4% 33 76 -7% 82
Median - N/M - 62 -6% 66 25 9% 23 37 -14% 43
Paper & Forest Products
Verso Paper 27 12% 24 35 9% 32 23 -17% 28 39 37% 29
Louisiana-Pacific 15 2% 14 44 10% 40 16 11% 14 43 6% 41
International Paper 43 3% 41 37 -4% 39 35 -5% 37 45 4% 43
PH Glatfelter 31 -13% 35 52 -6% 55 25 1% 25 58 -12% 66
MeadWestvaco 47 -3% 48 50 -3% 51 38 1% 38 58 -6% 61
Clearwater Paper 33 -18% 41 46 -24% 61 12 -49% 24 67 -13% 77
Median 32 -16% 38 45 -1% 46 24 -9% 26 53 -7% 57
Pharmaceuticals
Bristol-Myers Squibb 57 0% 57 24 5% 23 45 20% 37 36 -15% 43
Allergan 49 2% 48 17 -1% 17 13 -18% 17 53 8% 49
Forest Laboratories 40 11% 36 38 -9% 41 16 39% 11 62 -6% 66
Endo Pharmaceuticals 98 -16% 117 35 -8% 38 35 -32% 51 98 -5% 103
Watson Pharmaceuticals 93 62% 57 71 10% 65 60 173% 22 103 3% 100
Hospira 58 2% 56 92 4% 89 22 -27% 30 128 11% 116
Median 61 6% 58 38 -11% 42 21 -3% 22 77 -1% 78
Software
Intuit 16 14% 14 N/M N/M N/M 12 -19% 15 4 -571% (1)
Take-Two Interactive Software 27 -21% 34 8 -30% 11 18 -14% 21 17 -30% 24
Electronic Arts 34 66% 21 8 -22% 10 23 155% 9 19 -13% 21
VMware 93 8% 86 N/M N/M N/M 5 -36% 8 88 13% 78
Parametric Technology 101 14% 89 N/M N/M N/M 5 25% 4 96 13% 85
salesforce.com 110 17% 94 N/M N/M N/M 5 34% 4 105 16% 90
Median 67 -3% 68 1 4% 1 9 -9% 10 58 -1% 59
Specialty Retail
Aarons 16 16% 14 N/M N/M N/M 41 0% 40 (25) -8% (27)
AutoZone 6 2% 6 111 -2% 114 125 3% 121 (7) 4991% (0)
Rent-A-Center 6 -15% 7 1 -28% 1 13 -21% 17 (7) -25% (9)
Mens Wearhouse 9 -17% 11 88 4% 84 19 -12% 22 77 5% 73
Zale N/M N/M N/M 158 -3% 163 30 -15% 35 128 1% 128
Tiffany 18 -16% 22 208 8% 192 11 5% 11 215 6% 203
Median 6 11% 5 52 -2% 53 23 -4% 24 35 1% 34
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Skechers USA 40 -18% 48 51 -29% 72 52 17% 45 39 -49% 76
Coach 13 14% 11 37 1% 37 10 -3% 11 39 6% 37
Liz Claiborne 29 -39% 47 46 -29% 65 35 -21% 44 41 -40% 68
Wolverine World Wide 57 -1% 57 65 1% 64 15 -21% 19 107 4% 103
Columbia Sportswear 76 3% 74 79 2% 77 32 0% 32 122 3% 119
Hanesbrands 37 -13% 42 127 13% 112 36 2% 35 128 7% 119
Median 40 -15% 47 56 -10% 62 25 1% 24 71 -16% 85
2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010 2011
1-yr. %
change 2010
DIO DWC DPO DSO
Best in Industry
Worst in Industry
53 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
UNCROSSING
THE WIRES
How closely connected
are CFOs and CIOs
when it comes to
understanding the role
technology plays in
supporting business
strategyand whos
really calling the shots?
3 Sponsored by
Cisco Systems
MADE TO
MEASURE
See what it takes to
measure up with the
companies who set
the benchmarks when
it comes to high-
performing fnancial
and administrative
processes.
3 Sponsored by
Genpact
WORKING
WELL
TOGETHER
Companies need
third parties to help
them explore growth
opportunities. But
with every partnership,
they are exposing their
companies to more
and dangerousrisks.
3 Sponsored by
Crowe Horwath
THE NEW ERA
OF VALUE
DISCIPLINE
In a global economy
racked by uncertainty,
theres a whole new
discipline to being an
effective fnance
executive.
3 Sponsored by
American Express
Download these reports now at cfo.com/research
Intelligence for Smarter Decision Making
At CFO Research, we conduct detailed surveys and interviews with senior
fnance executives from around the world. Using their insights and our in-depth
knowledge, we produce the intelligence you need to make better decisions.
CFO
research
CFO
research
CFO
research
CFO
research
CFO
research
CFO
research
AUTHORITATIVE.
INDEPENDENT.
FINANCE-DRIVEN.
JUST LIKE YOU.
You
answered.
77
We
asked.
7 7
55
60
65
70
Asia
Europe
US
Q2 12 Q1 12 Q4 11 Q3 11
40
50
60
70
Asia
Europe
US
Q2 12 Q1 12 Q411 Q3 11
55 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
Source for all charts: Duke University/CFO Magazine Global Business Outlook
Survey of 773 CFOs444 from the U.S., 102 from Europe, and 227 from Asia.
Even as the global economy
continues to send signals rang-
ing from mixed to downright
alarming, U.S. finance chiefs
say they still plan to hire at a rela-
tively strong pace, according to the
latest Duke University/CFO Maga-
zine Global Business Outlook Survey,
released in June. U.S. CFOs say they
will expand their full-time domestic
workforces by 2.5% on average over
the next 12 months, a bump that could
lower the unemployment rate to 7% by
the end of the year.
Of the more than 400 U.S. CFOs
surveyed in this 65
th
consecutive quar-
terly survey, nearly 30% say their em-
ployees are maxed out, and 60% are
looking to add staff. Finance chiefs will
also increase their hiring of temporary
employees by just under 1% and ex-
pand their offshore outsourced work-
forces by 4%.
Muddling Through
CFOs continue to hire but are less optimistic, according
to the latest Duke/CFO Business Outlook Survey.
By Kate OSullivan

2.5%
The average by which U.S.
CFOs say they will expand
their full-time domestic
workforce over the next
12 months.
Duke University/CFO Survey Results
Business
Outlook
lion in revenue planning to expand
their staffs by 6% on average in the
next year and those with $100 mil-
lion to $499 million in revenue plan-
ning to add 4%. Technology, soft-
ware, and biotech companies will add
more staff than any other sector, with
CFOs at those companies forecasting
a 5% increase in full-time workers.
Still, despite generally positive
hiring plans, the CFO Optimism In-
Tom Fitzsimmons, CFO of TMP
Worldwide, a New Yorkbased com-
munications firm focusing on recruit-
ment advertising programs, says his
company is hiring, mostly on the tech-
nology side. Fitzsimmons also has a
good window into overall hiring based
on clients plans. While TMP is seeing
some growth in its business, we can
attest that were not seeing rapid ex-
pansion in the private sector, especially
in larger corporations, he says. Well-
managed companies are continuing to
acquire talent and expand slowly. But
theres no sense of pressure on corpo-
rations to fill their open jobs.
The survey data supports Fitzsim-
monss impression: at companies with
more than $10 billion in annual rev-
enue, there are no plans to hire in the
next 12 months. Midsize companies
will be the most active recruiters, with
those with $500 million to $999 mil-
On the Home Front
CFOs rate their optimism about their companies
financial prospects compared with last quarter.

Own company

CFOs were asked to rate their optimism about their companies on a scale of
0100, with 0 being least optimistic.
Taking a Dip
CFOs rate their optimism about their domestic or
regional economy compared with last quarter.*
National/regional economy
*CFOs were asked to rate their optimism about the economy on a scale of 0100,
with 0 being least optimistic.
U.S.
Europe
Asia
U.S.
Europe
Asia
1.0%
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0%
Wages
Q2 12 Q1 12 Q4 11 Q3 11
0%
2
4
6
8
10%
A&M S
R&D S
TS
CS
Q2 12 Q1 12 Q4 11 Q3 11
Business
Outlook
dex fell in the second quarter, as the
773 finance chiefs surveyed around
the globe grew gloomier. U.S. CFOs
rate their optimism about the domes-
tic economy at 56 out of 100, compared
with 59 last quarter. The optimism of
Asias CFOs dropped notably, falling
from 65 last quarter to 58 in May. That
marked the first time in the history
of the survey that Asias CFOs, tradi-
tionally more optimistic, fell in line
with their U.S. counterparts. They cite
consumer demand, government poli-
cy, price pressure from competitors,
and global financial instability as top
concerns. Meanwhile, at 52 out of 100,
optimism in Europe lags more than in
other regions, not surprisingly given
the ongoing debt crisis.
U.S. CFOs cite consumer demand as
their top concern, followed by worries
about price pressure from competitors
and federal government policies. Glob-
al financial instability also continues to
weigh on finance chiefs.
Fitzsimmons says the continued
softness in the housing market is pro-
ducing emotional problems for the
economy. As long as people continue
to feel less wealthy, there will be cau-
tion in consumer spending, he says,
noting that deflated home prices mean
that many people have less personal
wealth than they did 10 years ago. We
also have a significant number of un-
employed or underemployed, he adds.
Still Spending
Finance chiefs in the United States
do continue to plan to spend money
in critical areas, however. Technol-
ogy leads the major spending catego-
ries, with CFOs reporting a planned
increase of 8% on tech spending over
the next 12 months, up from 6% last
quarter. CFOs also say their compa-
nies will increase capital spending
by 5% on average in the coming year,
down from 7% last quarter. Research-
and-development spending and mar-
keting-and-advertising spending will
both rise by 3%, in line with last quar-
ters plans.
As they look for growth, 39% of
finance chiefs say their companies
are spending money on the pursuit of
major innovationinvesting in proj-
ects that, if successful, would have a
significant impact on the business. On
average, CFOs say their companies are
Capital
spending
Technology
spending
R&D
spending
Marketing
& advertising
spending
Selective Spending
12-month % change predicted by U.S. CFOs
Wages: Little Movement
12-month % change predicted by U.S. CFOs
Note: Concerns that received identical scores are grouped together.
About the macro economy:
e
Consumer demand
r
Federal-government
agenda/policies
Price pressure from
competitors
t
Global financial
instability
OTheR COnCeRns inCluDe:
national employment outlook
Federal budget deficit
Cost of fuel
Credit markets/interest rates
state/local government
budget deficits
About their own companies:
e
Ability to maintain
margins
r
Attracting and retaining
qualified employees

Ability to forecast
results
t
Cost of health care
OTheR COnCeRns inCluDe:
Working capital
management
Maintaining morale/
productivity
supply-chain risk
Balance-sheet weakness
Managing iT systems
TOp COnCernS OF CFOs
56 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
-2%
0
2
4
6%
Number of domestic full-time employees
Number of domestic temporary employees
Number of offshore outsourced employees
Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2
Pricing Parity
Change in prices of own-company products
0%
1
2
3
4
5%
Ination
Q2 12 Q1 12 Q4 11 Q3 11
No. of offshore
outsourced
employees
No. of domestic
full-time
employees
No. of domestic
temporary
employees
Staffing Up, Slowly
12-month % change predicted by U.S. CFOs
2010 2011 2012
CaSh: Still King
Is it likely that your firm will begin to deploy its cash reserves
during the next 12 months?
60% Capital spending
41% Acquisitions
27% Pay down debt
25% Increase hiring
20%
Marketing &
advertising
45%
Need cash as
a liquidity buffer

42%
Lack excess cash
to deploy
32%
Holding cash until
economic
uncertainty declines
19%
Few attractive
investment
opportunities
4%
Want to avoid
repatriation tax
On what would cash
reserves be spent?
IF YES
Note: Multiple responses permitted.
0% 20 40 60 80 100%
Yes 48% No 52%
spending about 15% of their total bud-
get on innovation efforts.
Even with plans to spend, CFOs
continue to keep a careful watch on
cash, with cash holdings as a percent-
age of total assets rising from 16% to
17% over the past year. Slightly fewer
than half of respondents say they plan
the global view
In Europe, finance chiefs say hiring,
R&D, and advertising spending will
all be relatively flat over the next year,
while capital spending and earnings
are both expected to decline. European
CFOs plan to hold cash, citing liquidity
concerns and economic uncertainty in
the region, as well as a lack of attrac-
tive investment opportunities.
Asias finance chiefs plan to in-
crease capital spending by 7% on aver-
age over the next 12 months, and ex-
pect to increase R&D spending by 4%.
Forty percent of Asias CFOs say their
companies are spending a portion of
their budgets on major innovations, in
line with their U.S. counterparts. Com-
petition for workers in the region con-
tinues to be fierce, with finance chiefs
planning to boost wages by 7% on
average over the next year. CFOs also
plan to expand their full-time work-
forces in Asia by 3% over the same
time period. CFO
7Of those surveyed, the
amount of cash and market-
able securities that their firms
held as a percentage of total
assets was 17%.
Why not?
IF NO
to deploy some cash in the next 12
months, with capital spending winning
the largest share of the dollars, fol-
lowed by spending on acquisitions and
debt payments. Most of the finance
chiefs who plan to continue to hold
cash point to economic uncertainty,
saying that they need a liquidity buffer.
57 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
ternal networks outperformed their
rivals financially. Such capabilities
correlated, for instance, with rising
market share and thickening operating
margins. Twenty-seven percent of the
3,200 global executives in McKinseys
survey reported that they had gained
real economic value through collabora-
tive and social-media tools.
Those results were explored ear-
lier this year in a CFO Research study
sponsored by Ariba, the maker of busi-
ness software. Based on interviews
with 18 executives, academics, consul-
tants, and authors, the study examined
how companies have embraced the net-
work model of doing business, embed-
ding technological advances in every
job and using it to generate increased
productivity. Technology is serving
as the enabler, says Walter Wallace,
instructor in the department of mana-
gerial sciences at Georgia State Uni-
versitys Robinson School of Business.
Businesses now have the tools to take
trust to a whole new level.
Part of this development is due to
the emergence of easier-to-use techno-
logical tools for internal networking
tools that mimic the capabilities of, for
example, Twitter. A lot of the stuff
that is happening out on external social
networks is influencing the collabora-
tion systems that are being developed
for the inside of enterprises, says Da-
vid Armano, executive vice president
of innovation and integration at Edel-
man Digital, the interactive arm of the
Thinkstock
For some time now, executives
have been touting teamwork as
a competitive tool. The com-
plexity brought on by globaliza-
tion, they argue, creates challenges so
grand they can be addressed only by
multiple minds. And the rise of internal
networks and social-media tools makes
far-flung collaboration increasingly fea-
sible. Indeed, the knowledge that em-
ployees already devote so much time to
websites like Facebook and Twitter has
surely made more than one CFO won-
der: Why cant we work this way?
That turns out to be a better idea
than anyone may have realized. Two
years ago, in The Rise of the Net-
worked Enterprise: Web 2.0 Finds Its
Payday, McKinsey & Co. found that
companies that used internal and ex-
Putting Social
Networks to Work
Companies are fnding real economic value in
cooperation and social media.
By Josh Hyatt

To be effective, you
need to embed the
use of social media
across the fabric of
the company.
Richard Binhammer, director of
social media and community, Dell
Field
Notes
Perspectives from CFO Research
Source: Booz & Co./Buddy Media, 2011
Social Studies
Which social-media platforms
are priorities for large
companies?
public-relations firm. As those evolve,
they will change the way employees
will work together and the level at
which they collaborate.
Companies are also shifting their
goals for the technology, from mere-
ly reducing operating costs (travel,
for example, or communications) to
boosting capabilities such as time to
market and rate of innovation through
collaboration. The notion is that col-
laboration can be a competitive advan-
tage, says Bruce Weinberg, professor
of marketing at the Isenberg School of
Management at the University of Mas-
sachusetts Amherst. Its beyond hav-
ing a social-media strategy; it means
infusing the company with the kind of
collaborative spirit that can give the
business an edge.
Becoming Socially aware
Adopting collaboration technology
typically starts with the awareness of
its value as a marketing or customer-
service tool. Richard Binhammer, who
is now director of social media and
community at Dell, recalls that he first
0%
20
40
60
80
100%
YouTube Twitter Facebook
94%
77%
42%
58 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
More froM Cfo researCh:
To read the full report cited in this article, go to the research page
on www.cfo.com. Our research team regularly polls senior finance
executives on core aspects of financial management. Youre certain to
find insights that are relevant to your most pressing concerns.
Editors
Choice
sition through social-media tools re-
quires patience, flexibility, and adapt-
ability. New applications and tools
are constantly emerging (have you
pinned anything lately?). But by
sharing informationboth internally
and externallya company can tackle
problems more readily, collaborate
more freely, and compete more flex-
ibly.
Does all that teamwork slow things
down? Quite the opposite: Collabo-
ration speeds you up and gets you to
market. It gets you into the race faster
and better and cheaper, says Zach-
ary Tumin, a senior researcher at Har-
vard Universitys Kennedy School of
Government and co-author of a recent
book, Collaborate or Perish! Work-
ing Across Boundaries in a Networked
began responding to online posts (in
blogs, forums, and so on) about the
computer giant in 2006, when such
posts numbered about 4,000 a day.
Today, that figure is up to 25,000. The
company now offers formal social-
media training to employees.
We came to a very early realization
that the discussions that go on on the
Web touch every part of the business,
says Binhammer. To be effective, you
need to embed the use of social media
across the fabric of the company.
Chuck Hollis, vice president for
global marketing and chief technology
officer at data-storage company EMC,
says that about six years ago, he real-
ized that you could take just about
any fundamental process you might
care about and you could envision it in
a social-media world and how it might
look different and better. For exam-
ple, using social-networking tools to
identify the top candidates for a posi-
tion is cheaper than pursuing tradi-
tional routes. And an internal social
network can help new employees get
up to speed much quicker than weeks
of training can.
We do a lot of R&D and project
development, which is basically smart
people working together, says Hollis.
More and more those smart people
are scattered around the world, and
may or may not be badged employ-
ees of the company. So how do we
start doing collaborative product de-
velopment with the very best ideas
out there? This other theme, around
our core business processes, began to
emerge.
Fortifying a businesss value propo-
Making Connections
Users of Web 2.0 technologies report the following internal benefits:
Source: McKinsey & Co. survey of about 3,200 executives, reported
in The Rise of the Networked Enterprise: Web 2.0 Finds Its Payday,
McKinsey Quarterly, December 2010.
Increasing
speed of access to
knowledge
Reducing
communication
costs
Increasing speed
of access to
internal experts
Decreasing
travel costs
77% 60% 52% 44%
41% 40% 29% 28%
Increasing
employee
satisfaction
Reducing
operational costs
Reducing time
to market for
products/services
Increasing number
of successful
innovations in new
products/services
World. Its always been true that col-
laboration has given people tremen-
dous advantage. Today that advantage
is really decisive.
Thats because the pace of compe-
tition is constantly accelerating. Its
like the [wording] you see on the rear-
view mirror of your car: Objects may
be closer than they appear, says Joel
Babbit, co-founder and CEO of Mother
Nature Network, which supplies en-
vironmental news. Its much closer
than you think, and its coming up right
behind you at a speed much faster than
before. CFO
The full report on which this article
is based, Collaborate to Win, is avail-
able for downloading at www.cfo
.com/research.
59 cfo.com | July/August 2012 | CFO
TAKE
AWAY
HIS TAKE-AWAY: The Popeyes system is about 98% franchised. We have to be
attentive to our franchisees and their needs in order for the whole company
to thrive. We make money by capturing a royalty from their revenues. Some
companies might simply drive revenues by doing a lot of low-price offerings that
dont make a lot of money for the franchisees. But that works against you in time.
You might get a temporary bump by running a deeply discounted promotion,
but it would cost you a lot in terms of your credibility with your franchisees, and
you certainly wouldnt be
able to sustain it as a busi-
ness model. So weve fo-
cused on making our fran-
chisees more profitable.
We started analyzing
their P&Ls and pick-
ing out areas where they
could do better on
electricity, food, and labor
costs. Weve stripped out
about $32 million to $34
million of costs over the
last two to three years.
Saving our franchisees-
that money is a good
expression of our com-
mitment to a partnership.
interview by
marielle Segarra
Stan Kaady
Popeyes CFO Mel Hope
Recipe for Profts
nAmE Mel Hope
poSITIon CFO of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
prEvIouS poSITIonS SVP of finance and chief accounting officer
of AFC Enterprises, the parent company of Popeyes; CFO of First
Cambridge HCI Acquisitions, a real estate investment firm in
Alabama; accounting, auditing, and business advisory professional
for PwC.
noTAblE for Being finance chief of the worlds second-largest
fast-food fried-chicken chain. Popeyes has more than 2,000
restaurants in 45 states and 25 other countries.
60 CFO | July/August 2012 | cfo.com
Analyzing and interpreting fnancial rules and regulations are challenges you face every day.
Our comprehensive online resource provides access to full-text standards FASB, SEC,
PCAOB, IASB, AICPA, GASB so you have all the regulations at your fngertips. And we
connect you to news and analysis from some of the leading experts in the business.
Looks like those challenges just got a bit easier.
START YOUR FREE TRIAL TODAY.
CALL 800.372.1033 OR GO TO www.bna.com/acrc01
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
RESOURCE CENTER
www.publicaffairsbooks.com
available now in hardcover and e-book from PublicAffAirs
Afascinatingadditiontothestudyof
decision-making.Filealongside
MalcolmGladwell,DanAriely,
JonahLehrer.Kirkus STARRED review
Formoreinformation,visitwww.frankpartnoy.com
[A]trail-blazingbookexploring
thehiddencranniesandthe
treacherouspitfallsofhuman
decision-making.Iwhole-heartedly
recommendit.
RogER LowEnSTEin,
author of The End of wall Street
and when genius Failed
FrankPartnoyturnsconventional
wisdomonitsheadwiththis
counterintuitiveapproachto
decision-making....Waitisagreat
read,chockfulloffascinating
insights. DAniEL H. PinK,
author of Drive and
A whole new Mind
Waitisoneofthoserarebooksthat
willchangenotjustthewayyou
think,butthewayyouact.Thebook
isfullofideasthatarefascinating,
usefulandattimesmind-blowing.
Iwascaptivated.
BETHAny McLEAn,
coauthor of The Smartest guys in the
Room and All the Devils Are Here
Wait ad.indd 1 5/7/12 2:50 PM

You might also like