You are on page 1of 28

Parameters of Care: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (AAOMS ParCare 2012)

TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY

Copyright 2012 by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. This document may not be copied or reproduced without the express written permission of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeions. All rights reserved. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:e204-e231, 2012, Suppl 3 THIS SECTION IS 1 OF 11 CLINICAL SECTIONS INCLUDED IN AAOMS PARCARE 2012, WHICH IS VIEWED AS A LIVING DOCUMENT APPLICABLE TO THE PRACTICE OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY. IT WILL BE UPDATED AT DESIGNATED INTERVALS TO REFLECT NEW INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PRACTICE OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY.

e204

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e205

INTRODUCTION
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery is indicated for the treatment of a wide range of pathologic conditions, including developmental and acquired deformities, internal derangements, arthritis, functional abnormalities, ankylosis, and infection. Parameters of care related to management of tumors of the TMJ are in the Diagnosis and Management of Pathological Conditions chapter, and those for fractures of the mandibular condyle are in the Trauma Surgery chapter. It is recognized that many patients undergoing TMJ surgeries have unique pain control requirements. As such, it may be appropriate to discuss a specic plan for postoperative pain control management. Such therapy might include the surgeon managing the patients pain with narcotic prescriptions for a specied period, followed by referral to a pain control center. Some surgeons may wish to develop a contract with these patients that reviews the planning, timing and other specics of such therapy. The parameters for TMJ surgery are based on the descriptions of pathologic entities and modalities for their treatment that have appeared in peer-reviewed medical literature. This eld has undergone a considerable evolution during the past 15 to 20 years. Basic and clinical research is continuing to increase the potential for successful surgical results.

GENERAL CRITERIA, PARAMETERS, AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY


INFORMED CONSENT: All surgery must be preceded by the patients or legal guardians consent, unless an emergent situation dictates otherwise. These circumstances should be documented in the patients record. Informed consent is obtained after the patient or the legal guardian has been informed of the indications for the procedure(s), the goals of treatment, the known benets and risks of the procedure(s), the factors that may affect the risk, the treatment options, and the favorable outcomes. PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY: In certain circumstances, the use of antimicrobial rinses and systemic antibiotics may be indicated to prevent infections related to surgery. The decision to employ prophylactic perioperative antibiotics is at the discretion of the treating surgeon and should be based on the patients clinical condition as well as other comorbidities which may be present. USE OF IMAGING MODALITIES: Imaging modalities may include panoramic radiograph, periapical and/or occlusal radiographs, maxillary and/or mandibular radiographs, computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography, positron emission tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. In determining studies to be performed for imaging purposes, principles of ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) should be followed. DOCUMENTATION: The AAOMS ParCare 2012 includes documentation of objective ndings, diagnoses, and patient management interventions. The ultimate judgment regarding the appropriateness of any specic procedure must be made by the individual surgeon in light of the circumstances presented by each patient. Understandably, there may be good clinical reasons to deviate from these parameters. When a surgeon chooses to deviate from an applicable parameter based on the circumstances of a particular patient, he/she is well advised to note in the patients record the reason for the procedure followed. Moreover, it should be understood that adherence to the parameters does not guarantee a favorable outcome. GENERAL THERAPEUTIC GOALS FOR TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY: A. Improve function and form B. Limited period of disability C. Improved range of jaw motion and/or function D. Appropriate understanding by patient (family) of treatment options and acceptance of treatment plan E. Appropriate understanding and acceptance by patient (family) of favorable outcomes and known risks and complications GENERAL FACTORS AFFECTING RELATIVE RISK DURING TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY: A. Degree of patient and/or family understanding of the origin and natural course of the condition or disorder and therapeutic goals and acceptance of proposed treatment B. Presence of coexisting major systemic disease (eg, disease that increases a patients American Society of Anesthesiologists classication to II, III, or IV as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter

e206

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. O.

Age of patient Presence of concomitant facial pain (eg, dental pain, earache, headache) Presence of parafunctional habit Existing drug or alcohol dependence Issues of secondary gain (eg, pending litigation) Chronic pain disorders (eg, pain in excess of 6 months duration) Presence of malocclusion Presence of deformity or pathology of the TMJ Presence of concomitant skeletal deformity History of previous orthodontics, orthognathic surgery, or TMJ surgery History of sensory or motor nerve abnormality (eg, temporary or permanent) History of infection of surgical site Presence of local or systemic conditions that may interfere with the normal healing process and subsequent tissue homeostasis (eg, previously irradiated tissue, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, liver disease, blood disorder, pregnancy, steroid therapy, contraceptive medication, immunosuppression, malnutrition, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, bromyalgia) P. Prolonged period of TMJ disuse (eg, ankylosis) Q. History of maxillofacial trauma

GENERAL FAVORABLE THERAPEUTIC OUTCOMES FOR TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY: A. Improved masticatory function and facial form B. A level of pain that is of little or no concern to the patient and preferably measured objectively (eg, visual analog scale) C. Improved mandibular function that is compatible with mastication, deglutition, speech, and oral hygiene D. A stable occlusion E. Limited period of disability F. Limit further morbidity G. Patient (family) acceptance of procedure and understanding of outcomes GENERAL KNOWN RISKS AND COMPLICATIONS OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY: A. Unplanned admission to intensive care unit after elective surgery Comment and Exception: Planned admission should be documented in the patients record before surgery. B. Unplanned intubation for longer than 12 hours after surgery Comment and Exception: Planned intubation longer than 12 hours should be documented in the patients record before surgery. C. Reintubation or tracheostomy after surgery D. Emergency tracheostomy (eg, ankylosis, trismus, unable to maintain airway). E. Use of parenteral drugs and/or uids for longer than 72 hours after elective surgery Comment and Exception: Procedures in which long-term parenteral drugs and/or uids are indicated as part of the original treatment plan should be documented in the patients record. F. Failure to ambulate within 48 hours of elective surgery G. Facial and/or trigeminal nerve dysfunction after surgery (eg, temporary or permanent facial muscle weakness resulting from surgery). The most common resulting problems are an inability to wrinkle the brow, raise the eyebrow, or gain tight closure of the eyelids and numbness (temporary or permanent) of certain areas of the skin in the region of the joint and sometimes in more remote areas of the face and scalp. Comment and Exception: When postoperative nerve dysfunction is common, anticipated decits should be noted in the patients record before surgery (eg, trigeminal nerve dysfunction after sagittal split osteotomies, dysfunction of the temporal branch of facial nerve after TMJ procedures). H. Facial fracture during or after surgery Comment and Exception: A fractured bone that may be a sequela to surgery should be documented in the patients record before surgery. I. Unplanned exploratory procedures associated with surgery J. Dental injury during surgery K. Ocular injury during surgery and postoperative sequelae (eg, corneal abrasion, keratoconjunctivitis, blindness)

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e207

L. Repeat Oral and/or Maxillofacial Surgery Comment and Exception: Staged procedures that are part of the original treatment plan should be documented before the initial procedure. M. Core temperature of greater than 101F 72 hours after elective surgery N. Postsurgical radiograph indicating presence of foreign body Comment and Exception: Foreign bodies (eg, plates, screws, wires, prosthetic replacements) that are anticipated as a normal course of the surgical procedures (eg, total joint replacement) should be noted in the patients record. O. Unplanned transfusion(s) of blood or blood components during or after surgery P. Readmission for complications or incomplete management of problems on previous hospitalization Comments and Exceptions: Complication or incomplete management occurring at another hospital or involving a physician who is not on the medical staff. Readmission for chronic disease (eg, intractable asthma, recurrent congestive heart failure, cancer); service-specic criteria required for this exception. Planned admissions for secondary procedures needed to complete treatment. Q. Development of chronic pain disorder R. Increased and/or persistent pain S. Postoperative development of adhesions, heterotopic bone (reactive bone), or ankylosis within the joint space, which may cause continued jaw dysfunction, decreased range of jaw movement, difculty chewing, and pain requiring further treatment T. Development of TMJ internal derangement U. New or worsened malocclusion V. Imaging evidence of further degenerative joint changes and development of adhesions (scar tissue), joint arthritis (contralateral joint in unilateral cases), or osteomyelitis of the jaw (bone infection) W. Signicant joint noise associated with increased pain and/or dysfunction X. Ear pain and/or dysfunction Y. Development or worsening of a parafunctional habit Z. Abnormal mandibular growth (eg, excessive, restricted) AA. Prolonged period of disability BB. Infection CC. Development of complex regional pain syndrome DD. Foreign body reaction or allergic reaction and rejection of the implant, wear, displacement, breakage, or loosening of alloplastic device components EE. Ear problems, including inammation of the canal, middle or inner ear infections, perforation of the ear drum, temporary or permanent hearing loss, ringing in the ears, or equilibrium problems FF. Postoperative and/or future treatments are not limited to but may include the following: physical therapy, bite splint therapy, restorative or reconstructive dentistry, orthodontia, orthognathic surgery (jaw repositioning surgery), and further reconstructive TMJ surgery GG. Respiratory and/or cardiac arrest HH. Death

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PEDIATRIC TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY


Orofacial pains due to TMJ conditions are less common in young children compared with teenagers and adults. Internal derangements are uncommon. TMJ conditions other than congenital deformities (eg, hemifacial microsomia) or acquired anatomical abnormalities (eg, fractures, bony ankylosis, or idiopathic condylar resorption) are very uncommon in children. When painful TMJ conditions do occur, underlying psychopathologic factors are more frequent. Informed consent issues specic to children as discussed in the Patient Assessment chapter are applicable for TMJ surgery. Masticatory muscle hyperactivity in children may present as nighttime grinding or bruxism, and this is common in the deciduous or mixed dentition stages of dental development. Children may complain of headaches, earaches, or jaw stiffness in the morning on awakening. Usually this can be managed with a night guard or biofeedback and appropriate medications, when indicated. Symptomatic clicking generally can be eliminated or diminished with midline hinge axis

e208

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

opening exercises to overcome an abnormal opening pattern. The origin of headache in the pediatric patient is primarily related to the sinus, eye, or vascular system. Any operative procedure on the TMJ of a growing child must consider the ultimate effect of the treatment on growth and development of the mandible and face. Management of ankylosis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, degenerative joint disease (very rare in children), infectious arthritis, mandibular dislocation, and condylar resorption is similar in children and adults. When reconstructing the TMJ and ramus-condyle unit in children, the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon must provide both normal functioning anatomy and an environment in which normal growth may occur. This is true regardless of the underlying condition (eg, tumor, traumatic defect, developmental defect). Therefore, autogenous donor sites with growth potential (eg, costochondral grafts) are recommended. The use of allogenic materials should be carefully considered in children.

MASTICATORY MUSCLE DISORDERS


Masticatory muscle disorders can result in myofascial pain and/or muscle splinting. These disorders are the most common expression of temporomandibular disorders and may occur in combination with joint abnormalities or other pathologic conditions. Management of these disorders is nonsurgical, especially in children. When masticatory muscle disorders occur in combination with joint abnormalities or other pathologic conditions, the management of these disorders must be incorporated into the overall treatment plan. Pretreatment therapeutic goals are determined individually for each patient. I. Indications for Therapy for Masticatory Muscle Disorders May include one or more of the following: A. B. C. D. E. II. Extra-articular pain related to muscles of the head and neck region Earaches, headaches, masticatory or facial myalgias Restricted masticatory function Restricted range of jaw motion Associated TMJ abnormalities or pathology

Specic Therapeutic Goals for Masticatory Muscle Disorders The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Improved range of jaw motion and/or function C. Adequate control of pain in muscles of the head and neck region

III.

Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Masticatory Muscle Disorders Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complications: A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. History of previous maxillofacial trauma

IV.

Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Masticatory Muscle Disorders Some reduction in symptoms is expected within 3 months. If the symptoms persist or escalate during this period, further assessment of contributing etiologic and risk factors should be considered. A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. A focused history and physical examination of the TMJ region to determine if pathology is present 3. An imaging examination, if indicated, based on the history and physical ndings. The examination may include but is not limited to the following: screening panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, arthrography, computed tomography (CT), cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The following procedures for the management of masticatory muscle disorders are not listed in order of preference:

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e209

MASTICATORY MUSCLE DISORDERS (continued)


B. Nonsurgical Management 1. Patient education (eg, stress reduction, dietary recommendations, jaw rest, control of parafunctional jaw habits) 2. Medication (eg, nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs [NSAIDs], analgesics, muscle relaxants) 3. Physical medicine (eg, physical therapy, massage, heat, cold, ultrasonography, trigger point injections, neuromuscular blocking agents) 4. Behavioral modication (eg, stress reduction, work modication, counseling, biofeedback, psychotherapy) 5. Orthopedic appliances (eg, splints) 6. Management of dental abnormalities 7. Surgery, other than manipulative treatment therapy, is not indicated for these disorders. 8. Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up IV. Outcome Assessment Indices for Masticatory Muscle Disorders Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation. A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Known risks and complications associated with therapy Presence of a general known risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

INTERNAL DERANGEMENT
Surgical intervention for internal derangement is indicated only when nonsurgical therapy has been ineffective and pain and/or dysfunction are moderate to severe. Surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients. Surgery also is not indicated for preventive reasons in patients without pain and with satisfactory function. Pretreatment therapeutic goals are determined individually for each patient. I. Indications for Therapy for Internal Derangement May include one or more of the following: A. Moderate-to-severe pain 1. Temporomandibular pain 2. Preauricular pain 3. Referred pain (eg, earaches) 4. Masticatory muscle pain (see Masticatory Muscle Disorders section) B. Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of the following: 1. Restricted range of jaw motion (eg, locking of the joint: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 2. Excessive range of jaw motion (eg, hypermobility; chronic dislocation: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 3. Joint noises (eg, clicking, popping, crepitation) associated with pain 4. Abnormal masticatory function (eg, painful chewing) C. Imaging evidence of internal derangement D. Arthroscopic evidence of internal derangement II. Specic Therapeutic Goals for Internal Derangement The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Improved function C. Limited pain in the joint

e210

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

INTERNAL DERANGEMENT (continued)


D. Elimination or reduction of noise in the joint III. Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Internal Derangement Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complications: A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Presence of alloplast or autograft C. History of previous temporomandibular operative procedures D. History of previous maxillofacial trauma IV. Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Internal Derangement A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. A focused history and physical examination of the TMJ region to determine the presence of indications for care for internal derangement and to identify factors affecting risks 3. An imaging examination, if indicated, based on the history and physical ndings. The examination may include but is not limited to the following: panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, arthrography, CT, cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and/or MRI. The following procedures for the management of internal derangement are not listed in order of preference: B. Nonsurgical management 1. Patient education (eg, stress reduction, dietary recommendations, jaw rest) 2. Medication (eg, NSAIDs, analgesics, muscle relaxants) 3. Physical medicine (eg, physical therapy, massage, heat, cold, ultrasonography, trigger point injections) 4. Intracapsular diagnostic and therapeutic injections 5. Behavioral modication (eg, stress reduction, work modication, counseling, biofeedback, psychotherapy) 6. Orthopedic appliances (eg, splints) 7. Management of dental abnormalities 8. Diagnostic records to determine progression of the disease (eg, serial bite registration and models, imaging studies in selected cases) C. Surgical management 1. Examination and observation under anesthesia 2. Manipulation 3. Arthrocentesis 4. Arthroscopic surgery 5. Arthrotomy or arthroplasty a. Disk repair procedures b. Diskectomy without replacement c. Diskectomy with replacement d. Articular surface recontouring (condyle/eminence) 6. Mandibular condylotomy 7. Orthognathic surgery as an adjunct to the management of temporomandibular joint disorders. Correction of skeletal jaw deformities may be indicated before or after denitive joint treatment. D. Posttreatment management 1. Wound care 2. Physical therapy 3. Pain management 4. Diet and oral hygiene management 5. Orthotic appliance 6. Patient reassessment

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e211

INTERNAL DERANGEMENT (continued)


7. Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up V. Outcome Assessment Indices for Internal Derangement Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation. A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes 1. General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Improved mandibular function 3. Acceptable clinical appearance (eg, absence of motor decits, absence of hypertrophic scar formation, absence of facial asymmetry or deformity) B. Known risks and complications associated with therapy 1. Presence of a general known risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Removal of autograft or alloplast 3. Ankylosis 4. Need for additional surgical intervention

DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE


Surgical intervention is indicated only when nonsurgical therapy has been ineffective and pain and/or dysfunction are moderate to severe. Surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients. Surgery also is not indicated for preventive reasons in patients without pain and with satisfactory function. Pretreatment therapeutic goals are determined individually for each patient. I. Indications for Therapy for Degenerative Joint Disease May include one or more of the following: A. Moderate-to-severe pain 1. Temporomandibular pain 2. Preauricular pain 3. Referred pain (eg, earaches) 4. Masticatory muscle pain (see Masticatory Muscle Disorders section) B. Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of the following: 1. Restricted range of jaw motion (eg, locking of the joint: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 2. Excessive range of jaw motion (eg, hypermobility; chronic dislocation: acute, chronic, intermittent, and persistent) 3. Joint noises (eg, clicking, popping, crepitation) 4. Abnormal masticatory function (eg, painful chewing) C. Imaging evidence of arthritic condition D. Arthroscopic evidence of arthritic condition E. Failed alloplastic implants F. Failed prior TMJ surgery II. Specic Therapeutic Goals for Degenerative Joint Disease The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Improved function C. Improved pain in the joint D. Improved maxillomandibular relationship E. Limited progression of the disease

e212

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE (continued)


III. Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Degenerative Joint Disease Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complications: A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Presence of an alloplast or autograft C. History of previous maxillofacial trauma D. Degenerative disease affecting other joints E. Prior temporomandibular joint surgery IV. Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Degenerative Joint Disease A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. Focused history and physical examination of the TMJ region to determine the presence of indications for care for degenerative joint disease and to identify factors affecting risks 3. An imaging examination, if indicated, based on the history and physical ndings. The examination may include but is not limited to the following: panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, arthrography, CT, cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and/or MRI. The following procedures for the management of degenerative joint disease are not listed in order of preference: B. Nonsurgical management 1. Patient education (eg, stress reduction, dietary recommendations, jaw rest) 2. Medication (eg, NSAIDs, analgesics, muscle relaxants, antiarthritics, steroids) 3. Physical medicine (eg, physical therapy, massage, heat, cold, ultrasonography, trigger point injections) 4. Intracapsular diagnostic and therapeutic injections 5. Behavioral modication (eg, stress reduction, work modication, counseling, biofeedback, psychotherapy) 6. Orthopedic appliances (eg, splints) 7. Management of dental abnormalities 8. Appropriate diagnostic records to determine progression of the disease (eg, serial bite registration and models, imaging studies in selected cases) C. Surgical management 1. Manipulation 2. Arthrocentesis 3. Arthroscopic surgery 4. Arthrotomy or arthroplasty a. Disk repair procedures b. Diskectomy without replacement c. Diskectomy with replacement d. Arthroplasty e. Removal of failed alloplastic implant 5. Condylectomy (partial or total, with or without replacement) 6. Orthognathic surgery (the correction of skeletal jaw deformities may be indicated before or after denitive joint treatment as an adjunct to the management of temporomandibular disorders) 7. Total alloplastic or autogenous joint replacement D. Posttreatment management 1. Wound care 2. Pain management 3. Diet and oral hygiene management 4. Physical therapy 5. Occlusal management

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e213

DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE (continued)


6. Patient reassessment 7. Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up V. Outcome Assessment Indices for Degenerative Joint Disease Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation. A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes 1. General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Acceptable clinical appearance (eg, absence of motor decits, absence of hypertrophic scar formation, absence of facial asymmetry or deformity) 3. Improved mandibular function (eg, maximum incisal opening, lateral and protrusive excursions) B. Known risks and complications associated with therapy 1. Presence of a general know risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Removal of autograft or alloplast 3. Ankylosis

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
Rheumatoid arthritis is one of a constellation of systemic autoimmune diseases that may affect the TMJ. In many cases, these conditions should be managed with the close cooperation of the patients physician and/or rheumatologist. It is important to distinguish whether the condylar resorption is active (progressive) or stable (nonprogressive). In its most severe form, rheumatoid arthritis may result in ankylosis and/or condylar destruction with resultant mandibular retrognathism, anterior skeletal open bite, and painful limitation of function. Surgical intervention for arthritic conditions is indicated only when nonsurgical therapy has been ineffective and pain and/or dysfunction are moderate to severe. Surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients. Surgery also is not indicated for preventive reasons in patients without pain and with satisfactory function. Pretreatment therapeutic goals are determined individually for each patient. I. Indications for Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis May include one or more of the following: A. Moderate-to-severe pain 1. Temporomandibular pain 2. Preauricular pain 3. Referred pain (eg, earaches) 4. Masticatory muscle pain (see Masticatory Muscle Disorders section) B. Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of the following: 1. Restricted range of jaw motion (eg, locking of the joint: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 2. Excessive range of jaw motion (eg, hypermobility, chronic dislocation: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 3. Joint noises (eg, clicking, popping, crepitation) 4. Abnormal masticatory function (eg, painful chewing, malocclusion) 5. Joint swelling and/or effusion C. Imaging evidence of arthritic process D. Maxillofacial deformity II. Specic Therapeutic Goals for Rheumatoid Arthritis The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Limited pain in the joint

e214

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (continued)


C. Improved maxillomandibular function D. Corrected or improved associated maxillofacial relationship E. Limited progression of the disease III. Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Rheumatoid Arthritis Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complications: A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Active process of resorption C. Ankylosis D. Presence of alloplast or autograft E. Rheumatoid disease affecting other joints IV. Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Rheumatoid Arthritis A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. Focused history and physical examination of the TMJ region to determine the presence of indications for care for rheumatoid arthritis and to identify factors affecting risks 3. Appropriate laboratory studies to conrm the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (eg, antinuclear antibody, sedimentation rate, rheumatoid factor) 4. An imaging examination, if indicated, based on the history and physical ndings. The examination may include but is not limited to the following: panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, arthrography, CT, cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and/or MRI. 5. Appropriate diagnostic records to determine progression of the disease (eg, serial bite registration and models, imaging studies, laboratory studies) The following procedures for the management of rheumatoid arthritis are not listed in order of preference: B. Nonsurgical management 1. Patient education (eg, stress reduction, dietary recommendations, jaw rest) 2. Medication (eg, NSAIDs, analgesics, muscle relaxants, antiarthritics, steroids) 3. Physical medicine (eg, physical therapy, massage, heat, cold, ultrasonography, trigger point injections) 4. Intracapsular diagnostic and therapeutic injections 5. Behavioral modication (eg, stress reduction, work modication, counseling, biofeedback, psychotherapy) 6. Orthopedic appliances (eg, splints) 7. Management of dental abnormalities 8. Appropriate diagnostic records to determine progression of the disease (eg, serial bite registration and models, imaging studies in selected cases) C. Surgical management The activity of the systemic disease must be considered prior to surgical management of the TMJ. 1. Active (progressive) TMJ disease a. Arthrocentesis b. Arthroscopic surgery c. Biopsy d. Arthroplasty e. Total alloplastic or autogenous graft joint replacement 2. Stable (nonprogressive) TMJ disease a. Arthrocentesis b. Arthroscopic surgery c. Biopsy d. Arthroplasty e. Orthognathic surgery f. Total alloplastic or autogenous graft joint replacement

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e215

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (continued)


D. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. V. Posttreatment management Wound care Pain management Diet and oral hygiene management Physical therapy Ongoing rheumatologic management Occlusal management Patient reassessment Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up

Outcome Assessment Indices for Rheumatoid Arthritis Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation. A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes 1. General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Acceptable clinical appearance (eg, absence of motor decits, absence of hypertrophic scar formation, absence of facial asymmetry or deformity) 3. Improved mandibular function (eg, maximum incisal opening, lateral and protrusive excursions) B. Known risks and complications associated with therapy 1. Presence of a general known risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Removal of autograft or alloplast 3. Ankylosis

INFECTIOUS ARTHRITIS
The management of infectious arthritis depends on whether the condition is acute or chronic and primary or secondary. Treatment objectives are directed toward the elimination of causes. Surgical intervention for infectious arthritis is indicated only when nonsurgical therapy has been ineffective and pain and/or dysfunction are moderate to severe. Pretreatment therapeutic goals are determined individually for each patient. I. Indications for Therapy for Infectious Arthritis May include one or more of the following: A. Evidence of localized or systemic infection B. Moderate-to-severe pain 1. Temporomandibular pain 2. Preauricular pain 3. Referred pain (eg, earaches) 4. Masticatory muscle pain (see Masticatory Muscle Disorders section) C. Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of the following: 1. Restricted range of jaw motion (eg, hypomobility: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 2. Joint noises (eg, crepitation) 3. Abnormal masticatory function (eg, painful chewing, malocclusion) 4. Swelling, erythema, suppuration, and/or joint effusion D. Imaging evidence of infectious process, failed prosthesis, or foreign body E. Maxillofacial deformity II. Specic Therapeutic Goals for Infectious Arthritis The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e216

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

INFECTIOUS ARTHRITIS (continued)


B. C. D. E. F. G. H. III. Elimination of infection Removal of any foreign body Alleviation or reduction in pain in the joint Elimination or reduction in noise in the joint Limited progression of disease Corrected malocclusion Corrected or improved associated maxillofacial deformity

Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Infectious Arthritis Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complications: A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Virulence of microorganisms C. Compromised host defenses D. Presence of alloplast or autograft E. Extent of infection

IV.

Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Infectious Arthritis The source of the infection (eg, extension of an otologic infection), systemic manifestations of the infection (eg, septicemia), presence of systemic disease (eg, diabetes mellitus), and host response (eg, human immunodeciency virus infection, immunosuppression) all must be considered before surgical management of the infected TMJ. A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. Focused history and physical examination of the TMJ region to determine the presence of indications for care for infectious arthritis and to identify factors affecting risks 3. Appropriate laboratory studies to conrm the diagnosis of infectious arthritis (eg, white blood cell count by serum or aspiration, Gram stain, bacterial culture, and sensitivity) 4. An imaging examination, if indicated, based on the history and physical ndings. The examination may include but is not limited to the following: panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, arthrography, CT, cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and/or MRI. The following procedures for the management of infectious arthritis are not listed in order of preference: B. Nonsurgical management 1. Patient education (eg, dietary recommendations, jaw rest) 2. Antibiotic therapy 3. Pain management 4. Physical therapy 5. Supportive therapy (eg, hydration, antipyretics) C. Surgical management 1. Acute infection a. Aspiration and/or arthrocentesis b. Incision and drainage with culture and sensitivity studies c. Identication and elimination of etiology d. Arthroscopic surgery e. Removal of implant or foreign body 2. Chronic infection a. Aspiration and/or arthrocentesis b. Incision and drainage with culture and sensitivity studies c. Identication and elimination of etiology d. Arthroscopic surgery e. Biopsy f. Arthroplasty

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e217

INFECTIOUS ARTHRITIS (continued)


1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. V. g. Alloplastic joint replacement D. Posttreatment management Ongoing medical management of infection Wound care Pain management Diet and oral hygiene management Physical therapy Reassessment of infectious process Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up Management of residual deformity after elimination of infectious process (eg, orthognathic surgery, joint reconstruction)

Outcome Assessment Indices for Infectious Arthritis Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation. A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes 1. General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Elimination of infection 3. Limited period of disability 4. Acceptable clinical appearance (eg, absence of motor decits, absence of hypertrophic scar formation, absence of facial asymmetry or deformity) 5. Improved mandibular function (eg, maximum incisal opening, lateral and protrusive excursions) B. Known risks and complications associated with surgery 1. Presence of a general known risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Need to remove an autograft or alloplast 3. Ankylosis 4. Progression of infection (eg, osteomyelitis, sepsis, deep space infection) 5. Adherent unacceptable scar formation

MANDIBULAR DISLOCATION: RECURRENT OR PERSISTENT


Mandibular dislocation can be acute, recurrent, or persistent. All of these refer to the dislocation of the intact nonfractured condyle. Acute dislocation describes blockage of the condyle by the eminence that prevents its return to the glenoid fossa, thus causing inability to close the mouth. Recurrent dislocation describes multiple episodes of dislocation during a specic period. Persistent dislocation describes a long-term blockage of the condyle by the eminence and may be associated with irreversible intracapsular pathology. This section addresses the therapy for recurrent or persistent dislocation. Acute dislocation is addressed in the Trauma Surgery chapter. I. Indications for Therapy for Mandibular Dislocation: Recurrent or Persistent May include one or more of the following: A. Moderate-to-severe pain 1. Temporomandibular pain 2. Preauricular pain 3. Masticatory muscle pain (see Masticatory Muscle Disorders section) B. Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of the following: 1. Restricted range of jaw motion 2. Excessive range of jaw motion in patients who relocate after the dislocation 3. Joint noises (eg, clicking, popping, crepitation) 4. Abnormal masticatory function (eg, painful chewing, malocclusion) 5. Displaced autograft or alloplastic implant C. Imaging evidence of dislocation and/or displaced autograft or alloplastic implant

e218

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

MANDIBULAR DISLOCATION: RECURRENT OR PERSISTENT (continued)


II. Specic Therapeutic Goals for Mandibular Dislocation: Recurrent or Persistent The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Correction and prevention of dislocation C. Limited pain in the joint D. Elimination or reduction of noise in the joint III. Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Mandibular Dislocation: Recurrent or Persistent Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complications: A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Status and/or degree of abnormal condylar and/or articular eminence growth and development C. Presence of autograft and/or alloplastic implant D. Therapeutic use of medications causing extrapyramidal reactions IV. Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Mandibular Dislocation: Recurrent or Persistent A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. Focused history and physical examination of the TMJ region to determine the presence of indications for care of mandibular dislocation and to identify factors affecting risks 3. An imaging examination, based on the history and physical ndings, may include but is not limited to the following: panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, arthrography, CT, cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and/or MRI. The following procedures for the management of mandibular dislocation are not listed in order of preference: B. Nonsurgical management 1. Patient education (eg, dietary recommendations, jaw rest, decreased range of motion) 2. Discontinuation of use of medications causing extrapyramidal reactions 3. Medication (eg, drugs used to manage tremors, NSAIDs, analgesics, muscle relaxants, steroids) 4. Physical medicine (eg, physical therapy, massage, heat, cold, ultrasonography) 5. Intracapsular diagnostic and therapeutic injections 6. Behavioral modication (eg, counseling, biofeedback, psychotherapy) C. Surgical management 1. Manipulation and relocation of the condyle 2. Application of maxillomandibular xation 3. Arthroscopic surgery 4. Arthrotomy or arthroplasty a. Disk repair procedures b. Diskectomy without replacement c. Diskectomy with replacement d. Articular surface recontouring (condyle/eminence) e. Removal of displaced autograft or alloplastic implant 5. Autogenous graft to limit condylar movement 6. Temporalis muscle scarication 7. Inferomedial fracture of zygomatic arch 8. Orthognathic surgery (eg, modied condylotomy) 9. Autogenous or alloplastic joint replacement 10. Neuromuscular blocking agents D. Posttreatment management 1. Wound care 2. Pain management

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e219

MANDIBULAR DISLOCATION: RECURRENT OR PERSISTENT (continued)


3. 4. 5. 6. 7. IV. Diet and oral hygiene management Physical therapy Occlusal management Patient reassessment Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up

Outcome Assessment Indices for Mandibular Dislocation: Recurrent or Persistent Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation. A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes 1. General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Absence of recurrent or persistent mandibular dislocation B. Known risks and complications associated with therapy 1. Presence of a general known risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Need to remove an autograft or alloplast 3. Continued dislocation

ANKYLOSIS AND RESTRICTED JAW MOTION


Intra-articular and extra-articular processes may restrict jaw motion severely. Ankylosis of the TMJ is an intra-articular process characterized by brous, bro-osseous, or osseous obliteration of the joint space. Extracapsular causes of restricted jaw motion (pseudoankylosis) include but are not limited to coronoid-zygomatic fusion, coronoid hypertrophy, and muscular brosis. Surgical intervention for ankylosis is indicated only when nonsurgical therapy has been ineffective and pain and/or dysfunction are moderate to severe. Pretreatment therapeutic goals are determined individually for each patient. I. Indications for Therapy for Ankylosis and Restricted Jaw Motion May include one or more of the following: A. Severely restricted jaw motion accompanied by one or more of the following: 1. Inadequate masticatory function 2. Abnormal speech (eg, constrained) 3. Inability to undergo dental and/or medical care (eg, dental preventive and/or restorative, oral or pharyngeal surgery, endoscopy) 4. Compromised anesthetic management (eg, intubation) 5. Inhibited facial growth 6. Imaging evidence of osseous or soft tissue abnormality 7. Clinical and/or imaging evidence of restriction or obstruction unrelated to the TMJ (eg, coronoidzygomatic fusion, coronoid hypertrophy) II. Specic Therapeutic Goals for Ankylosis and Restricted Jaw Motion The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Release of ankylosis C. Access for dental and/or medical care D. Improved speech E. Improved masticatory function F. Relief or reduction of pain

e220

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

ANKYLOSIS AND RESTRICTED JAW MOTION (continued)


III. Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Ankylosis and Restricted Jaw Motion Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complications: A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Type of ankylosis (eg, brous or bony) C. Etiology of the ankylosis (eg, traumatic or inammatory) D. Extent and duration of ankylosis E. Degree of preexisting muscular atrophy F. Ankylosis in a growing child G. Previous placement of alloplastic joint IV. Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Ankylosis and Restricted Jaw Motion A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. Focused history and physical examination of the TMJ region to determine the presence of indications for care of ankylosis and restricted jaw motion and to identify factors affecting risks 3. An imaging examination, based on the history and physical ndings. The examination may include but is not limited to the following: panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, CT, 3-dimensional CT, cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and/or MRI. The following procedures for the management of ankylosis and restricted jaw motion are not listed in order of preference: B. Nonsurgical management (usually not helpful in bony ankylosis) 1. Medication (eg, NSAIDs, analgesics, muscle relaxants, antiarthritics, steroids) 2. Physical therapy 3. Management of dental abnormalities C. Surgical management 1. Brisement (forceful manipulation of jaw under general anesthesia) 2. Arthroplasty 3. Condylectomy, partial or total and with or without replacement 4. Gap arthroplasty with autogenous or alloplastic replacement (eg with autogenous fat grafting) 5. Coronoidectomy or coronoidotomy 6. Osteotomy of zygoma or zygomatic arch 7. Myotomy 8. Scar revision (eg, intraoral and/or extraoral) 9. Orthognathic surgery for residual maxillofacial deformity (see the Surgical Correction of Maxillofacial Skeletal Deformities chapter) 10. Excision of heterotopic bone or gap arthroplasty with reconstruction of the ramus-condyle unit by distraction osteogenesis D. Posttreatment management 1. Wound care 2. Physical therapy 3. Pain management 4. Diet and oral hygiene management 5. Occlusal management 6. Appropriate diagnostic records to determine progression of the disease (eg, serial bite registration and models, imaging studies in select cases) 7. Patient reassessment 8. Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up Outcome Assessment Indices for Ankylosis and Restricted Jaw Motion Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation.

V.

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e221

ANKYLOSIS AND RESTRICTED JAW MOTION (continued)


A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes 1. General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. In a growing child, continued symmetric growth of the mandible in proper relationship to the midface 3. Acceptable clinical appearance (eg, absence of motor decits, absence of hypertrophic scar formation, absence of facial asymmetry or deformity) 4. Improved mandibular function (eg, maximum incisal opening, lateral and protrusive excursions) B. Known risks and complications associated with therapy 1. Presence of a general known risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Need to remove an autograft or alloplast 3. Recurrence of ankylosis

CONDYLAR HYPERPLASIA OR HYPOPLASIA


Abnormal condylar size or conguration characterizes condylar hyperplasia or hypoplasia, which may be associated with abnormal mandibular and/or maxillary growth or changing skeletal relationships. Surgical intervention for condylar hyperplasia or hypoplasia is indicated when nonsurgical therapy has been ineffective and/or considered inappropriate and pain, dysfunction, or deformity is moderate to severe. Pretreatment therapeutic goals are determined individually for each patient. The clinical and imaging characteristics of the condylar abnormality may mimic those of a neoplasm or other pathologic process, necessitating further evaluation. I. Indications for Therapy for Condylar Hyperplasia or Hypoplasia May include one or more of the following: A. Moderate-to-severe pain 1. Temporomandibular pain 2. Preauricular pain 3. Referred pain (eg, earache) 4. Masticatory muscle pain (see Masticatory Muscle Disorders section) B. Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of the following: 1. Restricted range of jaw motion (eg, hypomobility: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 2. Excessive range of jaw motion (eg, hypermobility: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 3. Joint noises (eg, clicking, popping, crepitation) 4. Abnormal masticatory function (eg, painful chewing, malocclusion) C. Imaging evidence of condylar hyperplasia or hypoplasia D. Maxillofacial deformity E. Continued abnormal growth II. Specic Therapeutic Goals for Condylar Hyperplasia or Hypoplasia The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Limited pain in the joint C. Elimination or reduction of noise in the joint D. Limited progression of the disease E. Corrected malocclusion F. Corrected or improved associated maxillofacial deformity III. Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Condylar Hyperplasia or Hypoplasia Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complication:

e222

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

CONDYLAR HYPERPLASIA OR HYPOPLASIA (continued)


A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Status and/or degree of abnormal condylar growth IV. Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Condylar Hyperplasia or Hypoplasia A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. Regional history and physical examination to determine the presence of indications for care for condylar hyperplasia or hypoplasia and to identify factors affecting risks 3. An imaging examination, if indicated, based on the history and physical ndings. The examination may include but is not limited to the following: panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, arthrography, CT, cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and/or MRI. 4. Appropriate diagnostic records to determine progression of the disease (eg, serial bite registration and models, imaging studies in selected cases) The following procedures for the management of condylar hyperplasia or hypoplasia are not listed in order of preference: B. Surgical management 1. Incisional or excisional biopsy 2. Partial or total condylectomy 3. Arthroplasty 4. Partial or total joint reconstruction (eg, autogenous graft, allogeneic graft, alloplastic implant) 5. Osseous reduction or augmentation 6. Soft tissue reduction or augmentation 7. Orthognathic surgery (see the Surgical Correction of Maxillofacial Skeletal Deformities chapter) C. Posttreatment management 1. Wound care 2. Pain management 3. Diet and oral hygiene management 4. Physical therapy 5. Occlusal management 6. Patient reassessment 7. Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up Outcome Assessment Indices for Condylar Hyperplasia or Hypoplasia Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation. A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes 1. General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Acceptable clinical appearance B. Known risks and complications associated with therapy 1. Presence of a general known risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Removal of autograft or alloplast 3. Infection 4. Continued growth 5. Continued asymmetry

V.

GOUTY ARTHRITIS
Gouty arthritis (arthritis, hyperuricemia) is a metabolic disease that may affect the TMJ. The disease may be primary or secondary to another disease and/or medication that causes an increase in serum uric acid. In acute gouty arthritis,

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e223

GOUTY ARTHRITIS (continued)


urate crystals can be precipitated in the synovial uid of the TMJ, causing a severely painful inammation. This condition should be treated with the close cooperation of the physician managing the overall systemic disease. Gout occurs in less than 0.5% of the population and is more common in males than in females. The disease, when present, usually occurs in people older than 40 years. Although the large toe is the joint most commonly involved, the TMJ can also be affected. A synovial uid analysis demonstrating urate crystals is necessary to conrm the diagnosis. Symptoms include severe TMJ pain, swelling, erythema, joint noise, and restricted mandibular mobility. Surgical intervention for arthritic conditions is indicated only when nonsurgical therapy has been ineffective and pain and/or dysfunction are moderate to severe. Surgery is not indicated for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients. Surgery also is not indicated for preventive reasons in patients without pain and with satisfactory function. Pretreatment therapeutic goals are determined individually for each patient. I. Indications for Therapy for Gouty Arthritis May include one or more of the following: A. Moderate-to-severe pain 1. Temporomandibular joint pain 2. Preauricular pain 3. Referred pain (eg, earaches) 4. Masticatory muscle pain (see Masticatory Muscle Disorders section) B. Dysfunction that is disabling and characterized by any of the following: 1. Restricted range of jaw motion (eg, locking of the joint: acute, chronic, intermittent, persistent) 2. Joint noises (eg, clicking, popping, crepitation) 3. Abnormal masticatory function (eg, painful chewing, malocclusion) 4. Joint swelling and/or effusion 5. Erythema of skin over the TMJ region C. Imaging evidence of arthritic process D. Maxillofacial deformity II. Specic Therapeutic Goals for Gouty Arthritis The goal of therapy is to restore form and/or function. However, risk factors and potential complications may preclude complete restoration of form and/or function. A. Presence of a general therapeutic goal, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Limited pain in the joint gouty arthritis C. Decreased systemic uric acid level D. Improved function E. Elimination or reduction in noise in the joint F. Limited progression of the disease G. Corrected or improved associated maxillofacial deformity III. Specic Factors Affecting Risk for Gouty Arthritis Severity factors that increase risk and the potential for known complications: A. Presence of a general factor affecting risk, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery B. Active process of condylar cortical erosions, bone spurs, and exostoses C. Presence of alloplast or autograft D. Gouty arthritis affecting other joints III. Indicated Therapeutic Parameters for Gouty Arthritis A. The pretreatment assessment includes, at a minimum: 1. General history and physical examination, as detailed in the Patient Assessment chapter 2. Focused history and physical examination of the TMJ region to determine the presence of indications for care for gouty arthritis and to identify factors affecting risks

e224

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

GOUTY ARTHRITIS (continued)


3. Appropriate laboratory studies to conrm the diagnosis of gouty arthritis (eg, identication of uric acid crystals in the synovial uid, serum uric acid level, and, in acute cases, leukocytosis and an elevated sedimentation rate) 4. An imaging examination, if indicated, based on the history and physical ndings. The examination may include but is not limited to the following: panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography, conventional tomography, arthrography, CT, cone beam computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and/or MRI. 5. Appropriate diagnostic records to determine progression of the disease (eg, laboratory studies, synovial aspirate analysis, imagining studies in selected cases) The following procedures for the management of gouty arthritis are not listed in order of preference: B. Nonsurgical management 1. Medication (eg, colchicine, indomethacin, NSAIDs, analgesics) 2. Physical medicine (eg, physical therapy, cold) 3. Intracapsular diagnostic synovial uid aspiration 4. Medical management (eg, steroid injections, evaluation of medications that can increase uric acid) 5. Orthopedic appliances (eg, splints) C. Surgical management 1. Synovial uid aspiration 2. Arthrocentesis 3. Arthroscopic surgery 4. Biopsy 5. Arthroplasty 6. Partial or total joint reconstruction (eg, autogenous graft, allogeneic graft, alloplastic implant) E. Posttreatment management 1. Wound care 2. Pain management 3. Diet and oral hygiene management 4. Physical therapy 5. Laboratory studies 6. Occlusal management 7. Patient reassessment 8. Instructions for posttreatment care and follow-up IV. Outcome Assessment Indices for Gouty Arthritis Indices are used by the specialty to assess aggregate outcomes of care. Outcomes are assessed through clinical evaluation and may include an imaging evaluation. A. Favorable therapeutic outcomes 1. General favorable therapeutic outcomes, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Acceptable clinical appearance (eg, absence of motor decits, absence of hypertrophic scar formation, absence of facial asymmetry or deformity) 3. Improved mandibular function (eg, maximum incisal opening, lateral and protrusive excursions) B. Known risks and complications associated with therapy 1. Presence of a general known risk and/or complication, as listed in the section entitled General Criteria, Parameters, and Considerations for Temporomandibular Joint Surgery 2. Removal of autograft or alloplast 3. Ankylosis

SELECTED REFERENCES TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY


This list of selected references is intended only to acknowledge some of the sources of information drawn on in the preparation of this document. Citation of the reference material is not meant to imply endorsement of any statement contained in the reference material. The list is not an exhaustive compilation of information on the topic. Readers should consult other sources to obtain a complete bibliography.

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PEDIATRIC TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT SURGERY

e225

1. Adair SM, Hecht C: Association of generalized joint hypermobility with history, signs, and symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction in children. Pediatr Dent 15:323, 1993 2. Ajike SO, Chom ND, Amanyeiwe UE, et al: Non-syndromal, true congenital ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a case report. West Indian Med J 55:444, 2006 3. Akama MK, Guthua S, Chindia ML, et al: Management of bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children: a case report. East Afr Med J 86:45, 2009 4. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Guideline on acquired temporomandibular disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. (Adopted 1990, revised 2010.) Chicago, IL, AAPD, 2010. Available at: http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/G_TMD.pdf#xmlhttp://prdtsearch001.americaneagle.com/service/search.asp?cmdpdfhits&DocId103&IndexF%3a%5cdtSearch%5caapd%2eorg&HitCount29&hits 1d67acb6b9d813617717b1f021b39e45547051c5335cf5d95e762b63164264b6516b57e6 85189fb5c&hc61&reqtmj. Accessed June 6, 2011. 5. Barr T, Carmichael NM, Sandor GK: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a chronic pediatric musculoskeletal condition with signicant orofacial manifestations. J Can Dent Assoc 74:813, 2008 6. Behnia H, Motamedia MH, Tehranchi A: Use of activation appliances in pediatric patients treated with costochondral grafts for temporomandibular joint ankylosis: analysis of 13 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:1408, 1997 7. Bodner L, Miller UJ: Temporomandibular joint dysfunction in children: evaluation of treatment. Int J Pediatr Otolaryngol 44:133, 1998 8. Cahill AM, Baskin KM, Kaye RD, et al: CT-guided percutaneous steroid injection for management of inammatory arthropathy of the temporomandibular joint in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:182, 2007 9. Canter HI, Kayikcioglu A, Saglam-Aydinatay B, et al: Mandibular reconstruction in Goldenhar syndrome using temporalis muscle osteofascial ap. J Craniofac Surg 19:165, 2008 10. Deleyiannis FW, Vecchione L, Martin B, et al: Open reduction and internal xation of dislocated condylar fractures in children: long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 57:495, 2006 11. Gupta RK, Jadhav V, Gupta A, et al: Congenital alveolar fusion. J Pediatr Surg 43:1421, 2008 12. Kaban LB, Bouchard C, Troulis MJ: A protocol for management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1966, 2009 13. Kaban LB, Treves ST: Skeletal scintigraphy for assessment of mandibular growth and asymmetry. In Treves ST, ed.: Pediatric Nuclear Medicine. New York, NY, Springer-Verlag, 1985 14. Katzberg RW, Tallents RH, Hayakawa K, et al: Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: ndings in the pediatric age group. Radiology 154:125, 1985 15. Krieborg S, Bakke M, Kirkeby S, et al: Facial growth and oral function in a case of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis during an 8-year period. Eur J Orthod 12:119, 1990 16. Krishnan B: Autogenous auricular cartilage graft in temporomandibular joint ankylosisan evaluation. Oral Maxillofac Surg 12:189, 2008 17. Kuseler A, Pedersen TK, Gelineck J, et al: A 2 year followup study of enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination of the temporomandibular joint in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol 32:162, 2005 18. Kuseler A, Pederson TK, Herlin T, et al: Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a method to diagnose early inammatory changes in the temporomandibular joint in children with juvenile chronic arthritis. J Rheumatol 25:1406, 1998 19. Lifschultz BD, Kenny JP, Sturgis CD, et al: Fatal intracranial hemorrhage following oral surgical procedures. J Forensic Sci 40:131, 1995 20. Lopez EN, Dogliotti PL: Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in children: is it necessary to perform mandibular distraction simultaneously? J Craniofac Surg 15:879, 2004 21. Mandall NA, Gray R, OBrien KD, et al: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): a screening study to measure class II skeletal pattern, TMJ PDS and use of systemic corticosteroids. J Orthod 37:6, 2010 22. Medra AM: Follow up of mandibular costochondral grafts after release of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joints. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:118, 2005 23. Mehrotra D, Dhasmanaa S, Kumar S: Management of temporomandibular ankylosis with temporal fascia inter-positional arthroplasty and distraction osteogenesis: report of 30 cases. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 19:139, 2009 24. Mercuri LG, Swift JQ: Considerations for the use of alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement in the growing patient. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1979, 2009 25. Miller UJ, Bodner L: Temporomandibular joint dysfunction in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinlaryngol 38:215, 1997 26. Montazem AH, Anastassov G: Management of condylar fractures. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 17:55, 2009 27. Muller L, Kellenberger CJ, Cannizzaro E, et al: Early diagnosis of temporomandibular joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study comparing clinical examination and ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging. Rheumatology (Oxford) 48:680, 2009 28. Obwegeser HL, Obwegeser JA: New clinical-based evidence for the existence of 2 growth regulators in mandibular condyles: hemimandibular elongation in hemifacial microsomia mandible. J Craniofac Surg 21:1595, 2010 29. Okeson JP, ODonnell JP: Standards for temporomandibular evaluation in the pediatric patient. Pediatr Dent 11:329, 1989 30. Pedersen TK, Kuseler A, Gelineck J, et al: A prospective study of magnetic resonance and radiographic imaging in relation to symptoms and clinical ndings of the temporomandibular joint in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol 35:1668, 2008 31. Posnick JC, Goldstein JA: Surgical management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis in the pediatric population. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:791, 1993 32. Rao K, Kumar S, Kumar V, et al: The role of simultaneous gap arthroplasty and distraction osteogenesis in the management of temporomandibular deformity in children. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 32:38, 2004 33. Sayan NB, Karasu HA, Uyanik LO, et al: Two-stage treatment of TMJ ankylosis by early surgical approach and distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 18:212, 2007 34. Steinberg B, Nelson US, Feinberg SE, et al: Incidence of maxillofacial involvement in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:156, 1996 35. Subramanian B, Agrawal K, Panda K: Congenital fusion of the jaws: a management protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:925, 2010 36. Tallents RH, Catania J, Sommers E: Temporomandibular joint ndings in pediatric populations and young adults: a critical review. Angle Orthod 61:7, 1991 37. Twilt M, Mobers SM, Arends LR, et al: Temporomandibular involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol 31:1418, 2004 38. Weiss PF, Arabshahi B, Johnson A, et al: High prevalence of temporomandibular joint arthritis at disease onset in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, as detected by magnetic resonance imaging but not by ultrasound. Arthritis Rheum 58:1189, 2008 39. Yu H, Shen G, Zhang S, et al: Gap arthroplasty combined with distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of unilateral ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint and micrognathia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:200, 2009

e226

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

40. Yu HB, Shen GF, Zhang SL, et al: Navigation-guided gap arthroplasty in the treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1030, 2009

MASTICATORY MUSCLE DISORDERS


41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. Adler RC, Adachi NY: Physical medicine in the management of myofascial pain and dysfunction. Oral Maxillofac Clin North Am 7:99, 1995 Block SL: Differential diagnosis of masticatory muscle pain and dysfunction. Oral Maxillofac Clin North Am 7:29, 1995 Dionne RA. Pharmacological treatments for temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83:134, 1997 Dolwick MF: Clinical diagnosis of temporomandibular joint internal derangement and myofascial pain and dysfunction. Oral Maxillofac Clin North Am 1:1, 1989 Greene CS, Laskin DM: Long-term status of TMJ clicking in patients with myofascial pain and dysfunction. J Am Dent Assoc 117:461, 1988 Laskin DM, Green CS, Hylander WL: TMD: an evidence based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 2006 Lobbezoo F, van Selms MK, Naeije M: Masticatory muscle pain and disordered jaw motor behaviour: literature review over the past decade. Arch Oral Biol 51:713, 2006 Lund JP: Persistent pain and motor dysfunction. In Sessle BJ, Lavigne GJ, Lund JP, et al, eds.: Orofacial Pain: from basic science to clinical management. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 2008, p. 217 Lund JP, Donga R, Widmer CG, et al: The pain-adaptation model: a discussion of the relationship between chronic musculoskeletal pain and motor activity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 69: 683, 1991 Marciani RD, Haley JV, Moody PM, et al: Identication of patients at risk for unnecessary or excessive TMJ surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64:533, 1987 Mense S, Simons DG: Muscle Pain. Understanding Its Nature, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Baltimore, MD, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001 Murray GM, Peck CC: Orofacial pain and jaw muscle activity: a new model. J Orofac Pain 21:263, 2007 Stohler CS: Craniofacial pain and motor function: pathogenesis, clinical correlates, and implications. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 10:504, 1999 Svensson P: What can human experimental pain models teach us about clinical TMD? Arch Oral Biol 52:391, 2007 Svensson P, Graven-Nielsen T: Craniofacial muscle pain: review of mechanisms and clinical manifestations. J Orofac Pain 15:117, 2001 Syrop SB: Pharmacologic management of myofascial pain and dysfunction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 7:87, 1995 Turp JC, Hugger A, Sommer C., eds.: The Puzzle of Orofacial Pain: integrated research into clinical management. Basel, Karger, 2007

INTERNAL DERANGEMENT
58. Abramowicz S, Dolwick MF: 20-year follow-up study of disc repositioning surgery for temporomandibular joint internal derangement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:239, 2010 59. Adame CG, Monje F, Offnoz M, et al: Effusion in magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a study of 123 joints. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:314, 1998 60. Al-Belasy FA, Dolwick MF: Arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint closed lock: a review article. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:773, 2007 61. Al-Riyami S, Cunningham SJ, Moles DR: Orthognathic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. Part 2. Signs and symptoms and meta-analyses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:626, 2009 62. Barrett MB, Smith PH: Bone imaging with 99Tc in polyphosphate: a comparison with 18F and skeletal radiography. Br J Radiol 17:387, 1974 63. Bell WH, Yamaguchi Y, Poor MR: Treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg 5:9, 1990 64. Buckley MJ, Merrill RG, Braun TW: Surgical management of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:20, 1993 65. Campos MI, Campos PS, Cangussu MC, et al: Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and pain in temporomandibular joints with and without degenerative changes of the condyle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:529, 2008 66. Carter JB, Schwaber MK: Temporomandibular joint arthroscopy: complications and their management. Oral Maxillofac Clin North Am 1:185, 1989 67. de Leeuw R: Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 20:159, 2008 68. de Leeuw R, Boering G, Stegenga B, et al: Symptoms of temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement 30 years after non-surgical treatment. Cranio 13:81, 1995 69. de Leeuw R, Boering G, Stegenga B, et al: TMJ articular disc position and conguration 30 years after initial diagnosis of internal derangement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:234, 1995 70. Dolwick MF: The role of temporomandibular joint surgery in the treatment patients with internal derangement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83:150, 1997 71. Dolwick MF, Dimitroulis G: A re-evaluation of the importance of disc position in temporomandibular disorders. Aust Dent J 41:184, 1996 72. Dolwick MF, Nitzan DW: The role of disc-repositioning surgery for internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:271, 1994 73. Dolwick MF, Sanders B: TMJ Internal Derangement and Arthrosis: surgical atlas. St. Louis, MO, CV Mosby; 1985 74. Eriksson L, Westesson PL: Long-term evaluation of meniscectomy of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:263, 1985 75. Eriksson L, Westesson PL: The need for disc replacement after discectomy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:295, 1994 76. Feinberg SE, Larsen PE: The use of a pedicled temporalis muscle-pericranial ap for replacement of the TMJ disc: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:42, 1989 77. Gonzalez-Garcia R, Rodriguez-Campo FJ, Monje F, et al: Operative versus simple arthroscopic surgery for chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint: a clinical study of 334 arthroscopic procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:790, 2008 78. Grushka M, Ching VW, Epstein JB, et al: Radiographic and clinical features of temporomandibular dysfunction in patients following indirect trauma: a retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:772, 2007 79. Hall HD: Meniscectomy for damaged disks of the temporomandibular joint. South Med J 78:569, 1985 80. Hall HD: Modication of the modied condylotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:551, 1996 81. Hall HD: The role of discectomy for treating internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:287, 1994 82. Hall HD, Nickerson JW Jr, McKenna SJ: Modied condylotomy for treatment of the painful temporomandibular joint with a reducing disc. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:133, 1993 83. Hall HD, Werther JR: Results of reoperation after failed modied condylotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:1250, 1997

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e227

84. Hall MB: Meniscoplasty of the displaced temporomandibular meniscus without violating the inferior joint space. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:788, 1984 85. Herbosa EG. Rotskoff KS: Composite temporalis pedicle ap as an interpositional graft in temporomandibular joint arthroplasty: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:1049, 1990 86. Holmlund A, Axelsson S: Diskectomy in treatment of disk derangement: a one and three year follow-up. Swed Dent J 14:213, 1990 87. Holmlund AB, Axelsson S, Gynther GW: A comparison of discectomy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage for the treatment of chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint: a randomized outcome study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:972, 2001 88. Iizuka T, Lindqvist C, Hallikainen D, et al: Severe bone resorption and osteoarthrosis after miniplate xation of high condylar fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72:400, 1991 89. Indresano T: Arthroscopic surgery of the temporomandibular joint: report of 64 patients with long-term follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:439, 1989 90. Israel H, Roser S: Patient response to temporomandibular joint arthroscopy: preliminary ndings in 24 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:570, 1989 91. Kaminishi R: Intracapsular brosis related to pain and dysfunction. In Clark G, Sanders B, Bertolami C, eds.: Advances in Diagnostic and Surgical Arthroscopy of the Temporomandibular Joint. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders Co, 1993 92. Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF, Helms CA, et al: Arthrotomography of the temporomandibular joint. Am J Roentgenol 134:995, 1980 93. Katzberg RW, Westesson PL, Tallents RH, et al: Temporomandibular joint: MR assessment of rotational and sideways disk displacements. Radiology 169:741, 1988 94. Kearnes GJ, Perrott DH, Kaban LB: A protocol for the management of failed alloplastic temporomandibular joint disc implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1240, 1995 95. Kim YK, Yun PY, Ahn JY, et al: Changes in the temporomandibular joint disc position after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:15, 2009 96. Kondoh T, Westesson PL, Takahashi T, et al: Prevalence of morphological changes in the surfaces of the temporomandibular joint disc associated with internal derangement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:343, 1998 97. Kramer A, Lee, L, Beirne, O: Meta-analysis of TMJ discectomy with or without autogenous/alloplastic interpositional materials: comparative analysis of functional outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(suppl 1):69, 2005 98. Kubota E, Kubota T, Matsumoto J, et al: Synovial uid cytokines and proteinases as markers of temporomandibular joint disease. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:192, 1998 99. Kurita K, Westesson PL, Tasaki M, et al: Diagnosis of medial temporomandibular joint disc displacement with dual space anterior posterior arthrotomography: correlation to cryosectional morphology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:618, 1992 100. Kurita K, Westesson PL, Tasaki M, et al: Temporomandibular joint: diagnosis of medial and lateral disc displacement with anteroposterior arthrotomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 73:364, 1992 101. Laskin DM: Diagnosis of pathology of the temporomandibular joint. Clinical and imaging perspectives. Radiol Clin North Am 31:135, 1993 102. Laskin DM: Etiology and pathogenesis of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:217, 1994 103. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L: Agreement between research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders and magnetic resonance diagnosis of temporomandibular disc displacement in a patient population. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:612, 2008 104. Manzione JV, Katzberg RW, Brodsky GL, et al: Internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: diagnosis by direct sagittal computed tomography. Radiology 150:111, 1984 105. Marciani RD, Haley JV, Moody PM, et al: Identication of patients at risk for unnecessary or excessive TMJ surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64:533, 1987 106. Matteson SR, Proft WR, Terry BC, et al: Bone scanning with 99m-technetium phosphate to assess condylar hyperplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:356, 1985 107. McCain JP: Principles and Practice of Temporomandibular Joint Arthroscopy. St. Louis, MO, Mosby Year Book, Inc; 1996 108. McCain JP, de la Rua H, Le Blanc WG: Correlation of clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic ndings in internal derangements of the TMJ. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:913, 1989 109. McCain JP, Podrasky A, Zabiegalski N: Arthroscopic disc repositioning and suturing: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:568, 1992 110. McCain JP, Sanders B, Koslin M, et al: Temporomandibular joint arthroscopy: a 6 year multicenter retrospective study of 4,831 joints. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:926, 1992 111. McCarty WL, Farrar WB: Surgery for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. J Prosthet Dent 42:191, 1979 112. McKenna, SJ: Modied mandibular condylotomy. Oral and Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 18: 369, 2006 113. Mercuri LG, Campbell RL, Shamaskin RG: Intra-articular meniscus dysfunction surgery: a preliminary report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 54:613, 1982 114. Mercuri LG, Laskin DM: Indications for surgical treatment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:223, 1994 115. Meyer RA: The autogenous dermal graft in temporomandibular joint disc surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:948, 1988 116. Miloro M, Henriksen B: Discectomy as the primary surgical option for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:782, 2010 117. Montgomery MT, Van Sickels JE, Harms SE: Success of temporomandibular joint arthroscopy in disk displacement with and without reduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 7:651, 1991 118. Montgomery MT, Van Sickels JE, Harms SE, et al: Arthroscopic TMJ surgery: effects on signs, symptoms, and disc position. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:1263, 1989 119. Moore KE, Gooris PJJ, Stoelinga PJW: The contributing role of condylar resorption to skeletal relapse following mandibular advancement surgery: report of ve cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:448, 1991 120. Mosby E: Efcacy of temporomandibular joint arthroscopy: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:17, 1993 121. Moses J, Poker I: TMJ arthroscopic surgery: an analysis of 237 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:790, 1989 122. Moses JJ, Sartoris D, Glass R, et al: The effect of arthroscopic surgical lysis and lavage of the superior joint space on TMJ disk position and mobility. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:674, 1989 123. Murakami KI, Matsuki M, Iizuka T, et al: Diagnostic arthroscopy of the TMJ: differential diagnoses in patients with limited jaw opening. J Craniomandib Pract 4:118, 1986 124. Murakami KI, Matsuki M, Iizuka T, et al: Recapturing the persistent anterior displaced disk by mandibular manipulation after pumping and hydraulic pressure to the upper joint cavity of the temporomandibular joint. J Craniomandib Pract 5:18, 1987 125. Murakami KI, Moriya Y, Goto K, et al: Four year follow-up study of temporomandibular joint arthroscopic surgery for advanced stage internal derangements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:285, 1996 126. Murakami KI, Nishida M, Bessho K, et al: MRI evidence of high signal intensity and temporomandibular arthralgia and relating pain. Does the high signal correlate to the pain? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:220, 1996

e228

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

127. Murakami KI, Segami N, Fujimura K, et al: Correlation between pain and synovitis in patients with internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:159, 1991 128. Murakami KI, Shibata T, Kubota E, et al: Intra-articular levels of prostaglandin E2, hyaluronic acid, and chondroitin-4 and 6 sulfates in the temporomandibular joint synovial uid of patients with internal derangement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:199, 1998 129. Murakami KI, Tsuboi Y, Bessho K, et al: Outcome of arthroscopic surgery to the temporomandibular joint correlates with stage of internal derangement: ve-year follow-up study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:30, 1998 130. Myamoto, H, Sakashita H, Miyata M, et al: Arthroscopic surgery of the temporomandibular joint: comparison of two successful techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:397, 1999 131. Nickerson, JW: The role of condylotomy for treating internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:277, 1994 132. Nishioka GJ, Van Sickels JE, Tilson HB: Hemophilic arthropathy of the temporomandibular joint: review of the literature, a case report, and discussion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 65:145, 1988 133. Nitzan, DW: Arthrocentesis incentives for using this minimally invasive approach for TMD. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 18:311, 2006 134. Nitzan DW: Arthrocentesis for management of severe closed lock of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:245, 1994 135. Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF: An alternative explanation for the genesis of closed-lock symptoms in the internal derangement process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:810, 1991 136. Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Heft MW: Arthroscopic lavage and lysis of the temporomandibular joint: a change in perspective. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:796, 1990 137. Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GA: Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplied treatment for severe limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:1163, 1991 138. Nitzan DW, Marmary Y: The anchored disc phenomenon: a proposed etiology for sudden-onset, severe, and persistent closed lock of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:797, 1997 139. Ohnuki, T; Fukuda M, Iino M, et al: Magnetic resonance evaluation of the disk before and after arthroscopic surgery for temporomandibular joint disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96:141, 2003 140. Pereia F, Lundh H, Eriksson L, et al: Microscopic changes in the retrodiscal tissues of painful temporomandibular joints. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:461, 1996 141. Philips RM, Bell WH: Atrophy of mandibular condyles after sagittal ramus split osteotomy: report of case. J Oral Surg 36:45, 1978 142. Pogrel MA: Quantitative assessment of isotope activity in the temporomandibular joint regions as a means of assessing unilateral condylar hypertrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:15, 1985 143. Pogrel MA, Kopf J, Dodson TB, et al: A comparison of single-photon emission computed tomography and planar imaging for quantitative skeletal scintigraphy of the mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 80:226, 1995 144. Rao VM: Imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 16:513, 1995 145. Reston, JT, Turkelson, CM: Meta-analysis of surgical treatment for temporomandibular articular disorders J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:3, 2003 146. Robinson PD, Harris K, Coghlan KC, et al: Bone scans and the timing of treatment for condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:243, 1990 147. Roser SM, Mena I: Diphosphonate dynamic imaging of experimental bone grafts and soft tissue injury. Int J Oral Surg 7:488, 1978 148. Sanders B: Arthroscopic management of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:259, 1994 149. Sanders B: Arthroscopic surgery of the temporomandibular joint: treatment of internal derangement with persistent closed lock. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62:361, 1986 150. Sanders B, Buoncristiani R: A 5-year experience with arthroscopic lysis and lavage for the treatment of painful temporomandibular joint hypomobility. In Clark G, Sanders B, Bertolami C, eds.: Advances in Diagnostic and Surgical Arthroscopy of the Temporomandibular Joint. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders Co, 1993 151. Sanders B, Buoncristiani R: Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint: clinical experience with 137 procedures over a 2-year period. J Craniomandib Disord 1:202, 1987 152. Sandler NA, Buckley MJ, Cillo JE, et al: Correlation of inammatory cytokines with arthroscopic ndings in patients with temporomandibular joint internal derangements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:534, 1998 153. Sato S, Kawamura H, Motegi K, et al: Management of nonreducing temporomandibular joint disk displacement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:384, 1995 154. Scapino R: Histopathology associated with malposition of the human temporomandibular joint disc. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55:382, 1983 155. Scrivani SJ, Keith DA, Kaban LB: Temporomandibular Disorders. N Engl J Med 359:2693, 2008 156. Segami N, Murakami KI, Iizuka T: Arthrographic evaluation of disk position following mandibular manipulation technique for internal derangement with closed lock of the temporomandibular joint. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 4:99, 1990 157. Sesenna E, Raffaini M: Bilateral condylar atrophy after combined osteotomy for correction of mandibular retrusion. J Maxillofac Surg 13:263, 1985 158. Silberstein EB, Saenger EL, Tofe AJ, et al: Imaging of bone metastases with 99m-Tc-Sn-EHDP (diphosphate), 18F and skeletal radiography. Radiology 107:551, 1973 159. Smolka, W, Iizuka: Arthroscopic lysis and lavage in different stages of internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint: correlation of preoperative staging to arthroscopic ndings and treatment outcome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:471, 2005 160. Smolka W, Yanai C, Smolka K, et al: Efciency of arthroscopic lysis and lavage for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint correlated with Wilkes classication. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 106:317, 2008 161. Stevenson JS, Bright RW, Dunson GL, et al: Technetium 99m phosphate bone imaging: a method for bone graft healing. Radiology 110:391, 1974 162. Tarro AW: Arthroscopic treatment of anterior disc displacement: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:353, 1989 163. Tarro AW: TMJ arthroscopic diagnosis and surgery: clinical experience with 152 procedures over a 2 year period. Cranio 9:107, 1991 164. Tarro AW: TMJ Arthroscopy: a diagnosis and surgical atlas. Philadelphia, PA, JB Lippincott Co, 1993 165. Tucker MR: Use of autogenous dermal grafts in treating internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:323, 1994 166. Walker RJ: Condylar hyperplasia. In Bell WH, Proft WR, White RB, eds.: Surgical Correction of Dentofacial Deformities. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 1980 167. Westesson PL: Diagnostic imaging of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 6:227, 1994 168. Westesson PL, Brooks SL: Temporomandibular joint: relationship between MR evidence of effusion and the presence of pain and disk displacement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:559, 1992

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e229

169. Westesson PL, Eriksson L: Diskectomy of the temporomandibular joint: a double-contrast arthrotomographic follow-up study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 59:435, 1985 170. White RD: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive surgical arthroscopies of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:1014, 1989 171. Widmark G, Grondahl HG, Kahnberg KE, et al: Radiographic morphology in the temporomandibular joint after diskectomy. Cranio 14:37, 1996 172. Wilkes CH: Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115:469, 1989 173. Woldford LM, Cardenas L: Idiopathic condylar resorption: diagnosis, treatment protocol and outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116:667, 1999 174. Woldford LM, Mehra P, Reiche-Fischel O, et al: Efcacy of high condylectomy for management of condylar hyperplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:136, 2002 175. Zardenta G, Milam SB, Schmitz JP: Elution of proteins by continuous temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:709, 1997

DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE


176. Bates RE, Gremillion HA, Stewart CM: Degenerative joint disease. Part II: symptoms and examination ndings. Cranio 12:88, 1994 177. Campos MI, Campos PS, Cangussu MC, et al: Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and pain in temporomandibular joints with and without degenerative changes of the condyle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:529, 2008 178. Donlon WC: Total temporomandibular joint reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 12:1, 2000 179. Gynther GW, Holmlund AB, Reinholt FP, et al: Temporomandibular joint involvement in generalized osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical, arthroscopic, histologic, and immunohistochemical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:10, 1997 180. Haskin CL, Milam SB, Cameron IL: Pathogenesis of degenerative joint disease in the human temporomandibular joint. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6:248, 1995 181. Lanigan DT, Mayall RW, West RA, et al: Condylysis in a patient with a mixed collagen vascular disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 48:198, 1979 182. Laskin DM, Rotskoff KS, Ryan DE, et al: Recommendations for management of patients with temporomandibular joint implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:1164, 1993 183. Lindqvist C, Soderholm AL, Hallikainen D, et al: Erosion and heterotopic bone formation after alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:942, 1992 184. Kaminishi R: Intracapsular brosis related to pain and dysfunction. In Clark G, Sanders B, Bertolami C, eds.: Advances in Diagnostic and Surgical Arthroscopy of the Temporomandibular Joint. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders Co, 1993 185. Kearnes GJ, Perrott DH, Kaban LB: A protocol for the management of failed alloplastic temporomandibular joint disc implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1240, 1995 186. Kreutziger KL, Mahan PE: Temporomandibular degenerative joint disease. Part I. Anatomy, pathophysiology and clinical description. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 40:165, 1975 187. Kreutziger KL, Mahan PE: Temporomandibular degenerative joint disease. Part II. Diagnostic procedure and comprehensive management. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 40:297, 1975 188. Mercuri LG: Osteoarthritis, osteoarthrosis, idiopathic condylar resorption. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 20:169, 2008 189. Mercuri LG: Surgical management of TMJ arthritis. In Laskin DM, Greene CS, Hylander WL, eds.: Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 2006 190. Murakami KI, Matsuki M, Iizuka T, et al: Diagnostic arthroscopy of the TMJ: differential diagnoses in patients with limited jaw opening. J Craniomandib Pract 4:118, 1986 191. Rabey GP: Bilateral mandibular condylysis a morphanalytic diagnosis. Br J Oral Surg. 15:121, 1997 192. Ramon Y, Samra H, Oberman M: Mandibular condylysis and apertognathia as presenting symptoms in progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 63:269, 1987 193. Stegenga B, deBont LG, Boering G: Osteoarthrosis as the cause of craniomandibular pain and dysfunction: a unifying concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:249, 1989 194. Tanaka E, Detamore M, Mercuri LG: Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. J Dent Res 87:296, 2008 195. Zingg M, Iizuka T, Geering AH, et al: Degenerative temporomandibular joint disease: surgical treatment and long-term results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:1149, 1994

RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
196. Adame CG, Monje F, Offnoz M, et al: Effusion in magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a study of 123 joints. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:314, 1998 197. Akerman S, Jonsson K, Kopp S, et al: Radiologic changes in temporomandibular, hand, and foot joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72:245, 1991 198. Akerman S, Kopp S, Nilner M, et al: Relationship between clinical and radiologic ndings of the temporomandibular joint in rheumatoid arthritis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 66:639, 1988 199. Goupille P, Fouquet B, Goga D, et al: The temporomandibular joint in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlations between clinical and tomographic features. J Dent 21:141, 1993 200. Gynther GW, Holmlund AB: Efcacy of arthroscopic lysis and lavage in patients with temporomandibular joint symptoms associated with generalized osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:147, 1998 201. Gynther GW, Holmlund AB, Reinholt FP, et al: Temporomandibular joint involvement in generalized osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical, arthroscopic, histologic, and immunohistochemical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:10, 1997 202. Larheim TA, Smith HJ, Aspestrand F: Temporomandibular joint abnormalities associated with rheumatic disease: comparison between MR imaging and arthrotomography. Radiology 183:221, 1992 203. Murakami K, Nishida M, Bessho K, et al: MRI evidence of high signal intensity and temporomandibular arthralgia and relating pain. Does the high signal correlate to the pain? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:220, 1996 204. Nishioka GJ, Van Sickels JE, Tilson HB: Hemophilic arthropathy of the temporomandibular joint: review of the literature, a case report, and discussion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 65:145, 1988 205. Ogden GR: Complete resorption of the mandibular condyles in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Dent J 160:95, 1986 206. Ogus H: Rheumatoid arthritis of the temporomandibular joint. Br J Oral Surg 12:275, 1975

e230

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

207. Osial TA, Avakian A, Sassouni V, et al: Resorption of the mandibular condyles and coronoid processes in progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum 24:729, 1981 208. Westesson PL, Brooks SL: Temporomandibular joint: relationship between MR evidence of effusion and the presence of pain and disk displacement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:559, 1992

INFECTIOUS ARTHRITIS
209. Adame CG, Monje F, Offnoz M, et al: Effusion in magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a study of 123 joints. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:314, 1998 210. Bessa-Nogueira RV, Vasconcelos BC, Duarte AP, et al: Targeted assessment of the temporomandibular joint in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:1804, 2008 211. Bounds GA, Hopkins R, Sugar A: Septic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint a problematic diagnosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:61, 1987 212. Cai XY, Yang C, Zhang ZY, et al: Septic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint: a retrospective review of 40 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:731, 2010 213. Kaandorf CJ, Van Schaardenburg P, et al: Risk factors for septic arthritis in patients with joint disease: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 38:1819, 1995 214. Leighty SM, Spach DH, Myall RW, et al: Septic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint: review of the literature and report of two cases in children. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:292, 1993 215. Mercuri LG: Surgical management of TMJ arthritis. In Laskin DM; Greene CS; Hylander WL, eds.: Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 2006 216. Murakami K, Nishida M, Bessho K, et al: MRI evidence of high signal intensity and temporomandibular arthralgia and relating pain. Does the high signal correlate to the pain? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:220, 1996 217. Murakami KI, Matsuki M, Iizuka T, et al: Diagnostic arthroscopy of the TMJ: differential diagnoses in patients with limited jaw opening. J Craniomandib Pract 4:118, 1986 218. Nishioka GJ, Van Sickels JE, Tilson HB: Hemophilic arthropathy of the temporomandibular joint: review of the literature, a case report, and discussion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 65:145, 1988 219. Norman JE, Bramley P: Textbook and Color Atlas of the Temporomandibular Joint. St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 1990 220. Oye F, Bjornland T, Store G: Mandibular osteotomies in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritic disease. Scand J Rheum 32:168, 2003 221. Parmar J: Care Report: septic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint in a neonate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:505, 2008. 222. Scott AS, Frew AL Jr: Bilateral enlargement of the mandibular coronoid processes in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis of the temporomandibular joints. J Oral Surg 33:787, 1975 223. Sinn DP: Mandibular deciency secondary to juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. In Bell WH, ed.: Modern Practice in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Surgery. Vol 3. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1992 224. Svensson B, Adell R: Costochondral grafts to replace mandibular condyles in juvenile chronic arthritis patients: long-term effects on facial growth. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26:275, 1998 225. Thomson HG: Septic arthritis of the temporomandibular joint complicating otitis externa. J Laryngol Otol 103:319, 1989 226. Westesson PL, Brooks SL: Temporomandibular joint: relationship between MR evidence of effusion and the presence of pain and disk displacement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:559, 1992

MANDIBULAR DISLOCATION: RECURRENT OR PERSISTENT


227. 228. 229. 230. 231. 232. 233. 234. 235. 236. Bouwman JP, Kerstens HC, Tuinzing DB: Condylar resorption in orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78:138, 1994 Bray RJ, Sloan P, Quayle AA, et al: Histopathological and scintigraphic features of condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:65, 1990 Camniti, MF, Weinberg S: Chronic mandibular dislocation: the role of non-surgical and surgical treatment. J Can Dent Assoc 64:484, 1998 Cisneros G, Kaban LB: Computerized skeletal scintigraphy for assessment of mandibular asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:513, 1984 Donoff RB, Jeffcoat MK, Kaplan ML: Use of miniaturized detector in facial bone scanning. Int J Oral Surg 7:482, 1978 Lieberman J: Treating acute mandibular dislocations. Postgrad Med 85:136, 1989 Luyk NH, Larsen PE: The diagnosis and treatment of the dislocated mandible. Am J Emerg Med 7:329, 1989 Merrill RG: Mandibular dislocation and hypermobility. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1:399, 1989 Ohnishi M: Arthroscopic surgery for hypermobility and recurrent mandibular dislocation. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1:153, 1989 Vzquez Bouso O, Forteza Gonzlez G, Mommsen J, et al: Neurogenic temporomandibular joint dislocation treated with botulinum toxin: report of 4 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e33, 2010

ANKYLOSIS AND RESTRICTED JAW MOTION


237. Chase DC, Hudson JW, Gerard DA, et al: The Christensen prosthesis. A retrospective clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:273, 1995 238. Feinberg SE, Larsen PE: The use of a pedicled temporalis muscle-pericranial ap for replacement of the TMJ disc: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:42, 1989 239. Israel HA, Syrop SB: The important role of motion in the rehabilitation of patients with mandibular hypomobility: a review of the literature. Cranio 15:74, 1997 240. Kearnes GJ, Perrott DH, Kaban LB: A protocol for the management of failed alloplastic temporomandibular joint disc implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1240, 1995 241. Laskin DM: Diagnosis of pathology of the temporomandibular joint. Clinical and imaging perspectives. Radiol Clin North Am 31:135, 1993 242. Macintosh RB: Current spectrum of costochondral and dermal grafting. In Bell WH, ed.: Modern Practice in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders Co, 1992 243. Matsuura, H et al: Effect of partial immobilization on reconstruction of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint with an autogenous costochondral graft: an experimental study in sheep. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:196, 2001 244. Mercuri LG: Alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:6, 1998 245. Mercuri LG: Microbial biolms: a potential source of alloplastic device failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1303, 2006 246. Mercuri LG: TMJ reconstruction. In Fonseca RJ, Turvey TA, Marcaini RD: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, Elsevier/ Saunders, 2008

AAOMS ParCare 2012 Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

e231

247. Mercuri LG, Ali FA, Woolson R: Outcomes of total alloplastic replacement with periarticular autogenous fat grafting for management of reankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:1794, 2008 248. Mercuri LG, Anspach WE 3rd: Principles for the revision of total alloplastic TMJ prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:353, 2003 249. Mercuri LG, Edibam NR, Giobbie-Hurder A: Fourteen-year follow-up of a patient-tted total temporomandibular joint reconstruction system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1140, 2007 250. Mercuri LG, Giobbe-Hurder A: Long-term outcomes after total alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction following exposure to failed materials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1088, 2004 251. Mercuri LG, Wolford LM, Sanders B, et al: Custom CAD/CAM total temporomandibular joint reconstruction system: preliminary multicenter report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:106, 1995 252. Moses J, Poker I: TMJ arthroscopic surgery: an analysis of 237 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:790, 1989 253. Murakami KI, Matsuki M, Iizuka T, et al: Diagnostic arthroscopy of the TMJ: differential diagnoses in patients with limited jaw opening. J Craniomandib Pract 4:118, 1986 254. Recommendations for management of patients with temporomandibular joint implants. Temporomandibular Joint Surgery Workshop. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:1164, 1993 255. Saeed NR, Hensher R, McLeod N, et al: Reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint autogenous compared with alloplastic. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:296, 2002 256. Saeed, NR, Kent, JN: A retrospective study of the costochondral graft in TMJ reconstruction Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32: 606; 2003 257. Sanders B, Buoncristiani R: A 5-year experience with arthroscopic lysis and lavage for the treatment of painful temporomandibular joint hypomobility. In Clark G, Sanders B, Bertolami C, eds.: Advances in Diagnostic and Surgical Arthroscopy of the Temporomandibular Joint. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders Co, 1993 258. Spagnoli, DB, Gollehon, SG: Distraction osteogenesis in reconstruction of the mandible and temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 18:383, 2006 259. Wolford LM, Karras SC: Autologous fat transplantation around temporomandibular joint total joint prostheses: preliminary treatment outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:245, 1997

CONDYLAR HYPERPLASIA OR HYPOPLASIA


260. Arnett GW, Milam SB, Gottesman L: Progressive mandibular retrusionidiopathic condylar resorption. Part I Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110:8, 1996 261. Arnett GW, Milam SB, Gottesman L: Progressive mandibular retrusionidiopathic condylar resorption. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110:117, 1996 262. Bertolini F, Bianchi B, DeRiu G, et al: Hemimandibular hyperplasia treated by early high condylectomy: a case report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 16:227, 2001 263. Bouwman JP, Kerstens HC, Tuinzing DB: Condylar resorption in orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78:138, 1994 264. Gray RJ, Horner K, Testa HJ, et al: Condylar hyperplasia: correlation of histological and scintigraphic features. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23:103, 1994 265. Gray RJ, Sloan P, Quayle A, et al: Histopathological and scintigraphic features of condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:65, 1990 266. Gunson MJ, Arnett GW, Formby B, et al: Oral contraceptive pill use and abnormal menstrual cycles in women with severe condylar resorption: a case for low serum 17 beta-estradiol as a major factor in progressive condylar resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136:772, 2009 267. Harris SA, Quayle AA, Testa HJ: Radionuclide bone scanning in the diagnosis and management of condylar hyperplasia. Nucl Med Commun 5:373, 1984 268. Hovell JH: Condylar hyperplasia. Br J Oral Surg 1:105, 1963 269. Hung YL, Progrel MA, Kaban LB: Diagnosis and management of condylar resorption. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 55:114, 1997 270. Mercuri LG: A rationale for total alloplastic temporomandibular joint reconstruction in the management of idiopathic/progressive condylar resorption. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1600, 2007 271. Nitzan DW, Katsnelson A, Bermanis I, et al: The clinical characteristics of condylar hyperplasia: experience with 61 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:312, 2008 272. Saridin CP et al: No signs of metabolic hyperactivity in patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia: an in vitro position emission tomography study J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:576, 2009 273. Westesson PL, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, et al: Radiographic assessment of symmetry of the mandible. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:991, 1994 274. Wolford LM, Cardenas L: Idiopathic condylar resorption: diagnosis, treatment, protocols and outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116:667, 1999

GOUTY ARTHRITIS
275. Abubaker AO: Differential diagnosis of arthritis of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin 7:17, 1995 276. Abubaker AO, Laskin DM: Nonsurgical management of arthritis of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin 7:51, 1995 277. Adame CG, Monje F, Offnoz M, et al: Effusion in magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a study of 123 joints. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:314, 1998 278. Gross BD, Williams RB, DiCosimo CJ, et al: Gout and pseudogout of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 63:551, 1987 279. Kaplan AS, Buchbinder D: Arthritis. In Kaplan AS, Assael LA, eds.: Temporomandibular Disorders: diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders Co, 1991 280. Murakami K, Nishida M, Bessho K, et al: MRI evidence of high signal intensity and temporomandibular arthralgia and relating pain. Does the high signal correlate to the pain? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:220, 1996 281. Nishioka GJ, Van Sickels JE, Tilson HB: Hemophilic arthropathy of the temporomandibular joint: review of the literature, a case report, and discussion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 65:145, 1993 282. Okeson JP: Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. St. Louis, MO, Mosby Year Book, Inc, 1993 283. Shen H, Thomas M: Systemic inammatory arthritides with temporomandibular joint involvement. In Thomas M, Bronstein SL, eds.: Arthroscopy of the Temporomandibular Joint. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders Co, 1991 284. Westesson PL, Brooks SL: Temporomandibular joint: relationship between MR evidence of effusion and the presence of pain and disk displacement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 159:559, 1992 285. Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Sessle BJ, et al: Temporomandibular Joint and Masticatory Muscle Disorders. St. Louis, MO, Mosby Year Book Inc, 1995

You might also like