Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Year
Lease
payment
(1)
Tax saving
(2)
After-tax
cash
outflow (3)
= (1)-(2)
PV at 8%
(4)
PV of cash
outflow
(5)=(3)*(4)
0 $23,210
$23,210 $1.0000 $23,210
1 $23,210 $11,605 $11,605 $0.9260 $10,745
14
2 $23,210 $11,605 $11,605 $0.8570 $9,949
3 $23,210 $11,605 $11,605 $0.7940 $9,212
4 $23,210 $11,605 $11,605 $0.7350 $8,530
5 $0 $11,605 ($11,605) $0.6810 ($7,898)
$53,749
Purchase: If the asset is purchased, the firm is assumed to finance it entirely with a
10% unsecured term loan. Straight line depreciation is used with no salvage value.
Therefore, the annual depreciation is $20,000 ($100,000 / 5 years). In this alternative,
first find the annual loan payment by using:
Then, calculate the interest by setting up a loan amortization schedule.
(1) (2) (3)=(2)(10%) (4)=(1)-(3) 5=(2)-(4)
Year
Loan
Payment ($)
Beginning
of Year
Principal ($)
Interest ($)
Principa
l ($)
End of
Year
Principal ($)
1 26,381 100,000 10,000 16,38
1
83,619
2 26,381 83,619 8,362 18,01
9
65,600
3 26,381 65,600 6,560 19,82
1
45,779
4 26,381 45,779 4,578 21,80
3
23,976
5 26,381 23,976 2,398 23,98
3
15
Loan
Payments
Interest
Expense
Depreciatio
n Expense
Net After Tax
Cash Buy
Present
Value
Discounted
Cash Flow
Year
(1) (2) (3)
(4)=(1){50
%*[(2)+(3)]}
(5) (6)= (4)(5)
1 $26,381 $10,000 $20,000 $11,381 0.9259 $10,538
2 26,381 8,362 $20,000 12,200 0.8573 10,459
3 26,381 6,560 $20,000 13,101 0.7938 10,400
4 26,381 4,578 $20,000 14,092 0.735 10,358
5 26,381 2,398 $20,000 15,182 0.6806 10,333
$131,905 $31,898 $100,000 $65,956 $52,087
Therefore PV of borrowing = $52,087 is less than PV of leasing = $53,749, so we
decide to purchase the asset because we can cost =$53,749 - $52,087 = $1,662
Question 4: CAPM and APT
a. Differentiate the CAPM and APT?
The fundamental assumption of APT is that the value of a stock is determined by a
number of factors that include several macro factors as well as those that are specific to a
company. First there are macro factors that are applicable to all companies and then there
are the company specific factors. The following equation is employed to find the
expected rate of return of a stock.
In an interesting way, the same formula is used to calculate the rate of return in case of
CAPM too, which is also known as the Capital Asset Pricing Model. But, the difference
16
is in the way a single non-company factor and a single measure correlation are used
among price of asset and the factor in case of CAPM while there are numerous aspects
and diverse measures of relationships between asset price and various factors in APT.
b. During a 5-year period, the relevant results for the aggregate market are that
the r
f
(risk-free rate) is 8 percent and the r
m
(return on market) is 14 percent. For
that period, the results of four portfolio managers are as follows:
Portfolio
Manager
Average Return (%) Beta
A 13 0.80
B 14 1.05
C 17 1.25
D 13 0.90
i. Calculate the expected rate of return for each portfolio manager and
compare the actual returns with the expected returns.
We have:
i
= R
f
+ *(
M
- R
f
)
Portfolio
Manager
Average
Return(%)
Beta
Expected Return as per
CAPM
A 13 0.80 12.8
17
B 14 1.05 14.3
C 17 1.25 15.5
D 13 0.90 13.4
ii. Based on your calculations, select the manager with the best performance.
Out of four portfolio manager, portfolio manager A and C have positive performance
because actual average return is higher than return as per CAPM but portfolio manager C
has best performance.
(The Portfolio Manager C with actual returns = 17% is higher than the expected return =
15.5%)
iii. What are the critical assumptions in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM)?
What are the implications of relaxing these assumptions?
The CAPM establishes a linear relationship between the required rate of return of a
security and its systematic or un diversifiable risk or beta.
R
s
stands for return expected on the security,
R
f
stands for risk-free return,
R
m
stands for return from the market portfolio and
stands for beta.
Ri = R
F
+
i
(R M R
F
)
The CAPM is based on a list of critical assumptions, some of which are as follows:
18
Investors are risk-averse and use the expected rate of return and standard deviation of
return as appropriate measures of risk and return for their portfolio. In other words, the
greater the perceived risk of a portfolio, the risk-averse investor expects a higher return to
compensate the risk.
Investors make their investment decisions based on a single-period horizon, i.e., the next
immediate time period.
Transaction costs in financial markets are low enough to ignore and assets can be bought
and sold in any unit desired. The investor is limited only by his wealth and the price of
the asset.
Taxes do not affect the choice of buying assets.
All individuals assume that they can buy assets at the going market price and they all
agree on the nature of the return and risk associated with each investment.
c. Suppose a three-factor APT holds and the risk-free rate is 6 percent. You are
interested in two particular stocks: A and B. the returns on both stocks are related
to factors 1 and factors 2 as follows: r = 0.06 + b1(0.09) b2(0.03) + b3(0.04)
The sensitivity coefficients for the two stocks are given below:
Stock b1 b2 b3
A 0.70 0.80 0.20
B 0.50 0.04 0.20
Calculate the expected returns on both stocks. Which stock requires a higher
return?
19
For Stock A: R
A
= 0.06 + (0.7)(0.09) (0.8)(0.03) + (0.2)(0.04) = 0.107
For Stock B: R
A
= 0.06 + (0.5)(0.09) (0.04)(0.03) + (0.20)(0.04) = 0.1118
Conclusion: Stock B requires a higher return, indicating that it is the riskier of the two.
Part of the reason is that its return is substantially more sensitive to the third economic
force than that of Stock A.
Question 5: Risk and returns of portfolios
The spreadsheet that comes with this assignment includes price data for 10
American stocks and the S&P 500. For all
a. Compute the returns for each stock and for the S&P500?
Return of IBM = (117.64 81.29)/81.29 = 45%
Return of CSCO = (21.88 20.92)/20.92 = 4.6%
Return of HPQ = (41.72 19.17)/19.17 = 117.6%
Return of GS = (164.72 84.44)/84.44 = 95%
Return of F = (6.78 13.58)/13.58 = -50%
Return of K = (47.92 36.78)/36.78 = 30%
Return of MRK = (30.99 36.51)/36.51 = -15%
Return of KR = (21.36 15.17)/15.17 = 40.8%
Return of BA = (42.37 46.07)/46.07 = -8%
Return of C = (2.73 36.51)/36.51 = -92.5%
Return of VFINX = (90.36 92.11)/92.11 = -2%
20
IBM
Cisco HP Goldma
n-Sachs
Ford Kellogg Merck Kroger Boein
g
Citigrou
p
S&P 500
VFINX
CSCO HPQ GS F K MRK KR BA C
Return 45% 4.6% 117.6
%
95% -50% 30% -15% 40.8% -8% -92.5% -2%
b. Compute the mean, variance, and standard deviation of each stock's return
(both monthly and annual)
Mean:
Variance:
Standard deviation:
COMPUTING THE RETURNS
Date IBM
Cisco
CSCO
Hewlett-
Packard
HPQ
Goldman-
Sachs
GS
Ford
F
Kellogg
K
Merck
MRK
Kroger
KR
Boeing
BA
Citigro
up
C
Vanguar
d Index
500 fund
VFINX
02-08-04 -2.57% -10.90% -11.90% 1.64% -4.21% 1.35% -0.85% 4.51% 3.25% 5.49% 0.39%
01-09-04 1.24% -3.58% 5.10% 3.93% -0.46% 1.62% -30.10% -6.31% -1.14% -5.43% 1.05%
01-10-04 4.57% 5.95% -0.45% 5.64% -6.70% 0.79% -5.25% -2.65% -3.39% 1.49% 1.51%
21
01-11-04 5.07% -2.42% 6.93% 6.28% 8.38% 2.18% -11.10% 6.79% 7.48% 0.86% 3.97%
01-12-04 4.50% 2.99% 5.10% -0.69% 3.21% 2.18% 15.07% 8.10% -3.40% 7.37% 3.34%
03-01-05 -5.38% -6.85% -6.79% 3.84% -9.80% -0.05% -13.59% -2.53% -2.28% 1.80% -2.49%
01-02-05 -0.71% -3.50% 5.99% 0.87% -4.05% -0.88% 12.22% 5.05% 8.74% -1.87% 2.08%
01-03-05 -1.31% 2.66% 5.75% 1.09% -10.96% -1.66% 3.28% -11.53% 6.16% -5.99% -1.78%
01-04-05 -17.93% -3.53% -6.96% -2.71% -20.75% 3.81% 4.64% -1.64% 1.79% 5.34% -1.93%
02-05-05 -0.83% 11.63% 9.53% -9.11% 9.08% 1.74% -4.42% 6.15% 7.52% 0.30% 3.12%
01-06-05 -1.80% -1.66% 4.69% 4.53% 2.61% -2.34% -4.00% 12.64% 3.24% -1.86% 0.13%
01-07-05 11.76% 0.37% 4.60% 5.45% 5.61% 1.95% 0.84% 4.23% 0.02% -5.11% 3.64%
01-08-05 -3.22% -8.33% 11.99% 3.39% -7.38% 0.66% -8.20% -0.58% 1.89% 0.61% -0.92%
01-09-05 -0.50% 1.69% 5.37% 8.95% -1.16% 1.73% -3.67% 4.24% 1.38% 3.94% 0.79%
03-10-05 2.05% -2.66% -4.07% 4.07% -15.72% -4.34% 3.63% -3.40% -4.98% 0.56% -1.68%
01-11-05 8.47% 0.51% 5.65% 2.03% -2.26% 0.40% 5.37% -2.28% 5.73% 6.85% 3.69%
01-12-05 -7.84% -2.42% -3.29% -0.97% -5.22% -1.95% 7.86% -2.99% 2.95% -0.05% 0.03%
03-01-06 -1.10% 8.13% 8.54% 10.26% 11.73% -0.74% 8.13% -2.57% -2.78% -4.10% 2.61%
01-02-06 -1.07% 8.61% 5.08% 0.03% -7.41% 3.85% 1.03% 8.51% 6.64% 0.62% 0.25%
01-03-06 2.75% 6.83% 0.50% 10.52% -0.13% -0.62% 2.16% 1.60% 6.96% 1.83% 1.23%
03-04-06 -0.15% -3.38% -1.29% 2.30% -12.13% 5.03% -2.33% -0.51% 6.84% 6.63% 1.33%
01-05-06 -2.65% -6.25% -0.28% -6.00% 3.00% 2.27% -2.18% -0.41% 0.10% -1.30% -2.94%
01-06-06 -3.94% -0.77% -1.92% -0.35% -3.29% 2.78% 9.02% 8.37% -1.62% -2.15% 0.13%
03-07-06 0.78% -8.83% 0.71% 1.77% -3.10% -0.54% 10.03% 4.77% -5.64% 0.12% 0.60%
01-08-06 4.89% 20.69% 13.63% -2.72% 22.70% 5.71% 1.61% 4.04% -2.92% 3.15% 2.34%
01-09-06 1.19% 4.40% 0.56% 12.93% -3.40% -2.36% 3.26% -2.87% 5.14% 0.63% 2.53%
02-10-06 11.94% 4.88% 5.45% 11.69% 2.32% 1.57% 8.08% -2.86% 1.27% 0.98% 3.19%
22
01-11-06 -0.12% 10.90% 1.83% 2.61% -1.83% -0.47% -2.04% -4.38% 10.66% -0.16% 1.87%
01-12-06 5.54% 1.55% 4.51% 2.31% -7.93% 0.56% -1.21% 7.24% 0.35% 11.61% 1.39%
03-01-07 2.04% -2.63% 4.95% 6.39% 7.93% -1.59% 2.61% 10.40% 0.81% -1.02% 1.48%
01-02-07 -6.17% -2.59% -9.53% -5.03% -2.74% 1.74% -1.35% 0.40% -2.21% -8.04% -1.99%
01-03-07 1.41% -1.59% 2.20% 2.39% -0.25% 3.15% 0.88% 9.71% 1.87% 1.89% 1.11%
02-04-07 8.10% 4.63% 4.85% 5.80% 1.88% 2.83% 15.25% 4.35% 4.50% 4.34% 4.32%
01-05-07 4.59% 0.67% 8.14% 5.44% 3.66% 2.56% 1.95% 2.96% 8.21% 2.62% 3.42%
01-06-07 -1.28% 3.40% -2.23% -6.29% 12.18% -4.15% -4.44% -7.49% -4.50% -6.05% -1.69%
02-07-07 5.01% 3.74% 3.09% -13.87% -10.16% 0.04% -0.31% -8.02% 7.29% -9.67% -3.14%
01-08-07 5.67% 9.90% 6.97% -6.77% -8.58% 6.43% 1.03% 2.65% -6.39% 1.82% 1.49%
04-09-07 0.94% 3.72% 1.06% 20.82% 8.35% 1.93% 3.76% 7.03% 8.22% -0.44% 3.66%
01-10-07 -1.43% -0.21% 3.72% 13.59% 4.38% -5.91% 11.97% 3.01% -6.29%
-
10.78% 1.57%
01-11-07 -9.54% -16.54% -1.01% -8.97% -16.64% 2.90% 1.86% -1.90% -5.98%
-
21.68% -4.28%
03-12-07 2.74% -3.45% -1.20% -5.25% -10.97% -3.02% -1.47% -7.37% -5.64%
-
12.32% -0.70%
02-01-08 -0.93% -9.98% -14.36% -7.31% -1.35% -9.23% -23.16% -4.82% -5.02% -3.25% -6.20%
01-02-08 6.50% -0.45% 8.86% -16.25% -1.67% 6.53% -3.98% -4.55% 0.01%
-
17.26% -3.30%
03-03-08 1.12% -1.24% -4.35% -2.53% -13.24% 3.56% -14.61% 4.63% -10.72%
-
10.16% -0.45%
01-04-08 4.72% 6.24% 1.49% 14.78% 36.75% -2.68% 0.25% 7.04% 13.20% 16.52% 4.75%
01-05-08 7.38% 4.13% 1.52% -8.14% -19.45% 1.87% 2.39% 1.74% -2.03%
-
13.07% 1.28%
02-06-08 -8.80% -13.87% -6.07% -0.86% -34.62% -7.61% -2.33% 4.35% -23.07%
-
26.71% -8.83%
23
01-07-08 7.67% -5.61% 1.32% 5.29% -0.21% 9.99% -13.59% -2.06% -7.28% 12.60% -0.83%
01-08-08 -4.62% 8.95% 4.62% -11.55% -7.35% 3.19% 8.09% -2.07% 7.64% 1.62% 1.43%
02-09-08 -3.99% -6.40% -1.28% -24.77% 15.35% 3.00% -11.12% -0.51% -13.36% 7.71% -9.31%
01-10-08 -22.95% -23.87% -18.89% -32.18% -86.48% -10.67% -1.97% -0.07% -8.99%
-
39.46% -18.39%
03-11-08 -12.49% -7.17% -8.17% -15.79% 20.56% -14.92% -14.68% 1.06% -19.94%
-
49.89% -7.45%
01-12-08 3.09% -1.46% 3.04% 6.62% -16.10% 1.73% 14.34% -4.63% 0.10%
-
21.20% 1.07%
02-01-09 8.52% -8.51% -4.33% -4.43% -20.26% -0.35% -6.30% -16.03% -0.84%
-
63.37% -8.78%
02-02-09 0.95% -2.71% -17.98% 12.61% 6.72% -10.70% -16.53% -8.07% -28.70%
-
86.15% -11.27%
02-03-09 5.15% 14.06% 10.23% 15.19% 27.38% -6.06% 11.69% 2.64% 12.37% 52.28% 8.41%
01-04-09 6.31% 14.15% 11.53% 19.23% 82.14% 13.95% -9.83% 1.88% 11.84% 18.69% 9.14%
01-05-09 3.46% -4.34% -4.62% 12.04% -3.92% 3.46% 12.89% 5.73% 12.30% 19.86% 5.46%
01-06-09 -1.77% 0.81% 12.00% 1.97% 5.42% 7.40% 2.76% -3.34% -5.38%
-
22.52% 0.22%
01-07-09 11.92% 15.97% 7.64% 11.08% 11.06% 2.86% 10.29% -3.18% -0.31% -8.43% 6.44%
Monthly
statistics
Mean 0.62% 0.07% 1.30% 1.11% -1.16% 0.44% -0.27% 0.57% -0.14% -4.32% -0.03%
Variance 0.0042 0.0062 0.0049 0.0096 0.0379 0.0023 0.0084 0.0032 0.0066 0.0369 0.0021
Standard
deviation 6.46% 7.89% 6.97% 9.81% 19.46% 4.81% 9.17% 5.62% 8.15% 19.20% 4.63%
Annuali
zed
statistics
Mean 7.39% 0.90% 15.55% 13.36% -13.89% 5.29% -3.28% 6.84% -1.67%
-
-0.38%
24
51.87%
Variance 0.0500 0.0746 0.0582 0.1154 0.4545 0.0278 0.1009 0.0379 0.0797 0.4424 0.0258
Standard
deviation 22.37% 27.32% 24.13% 33.98% 67.42% 16.66% 31.77% 19.47% 28.23% 66.51% 16.05%
c. Regress each stock's returns on the S&P500, computing: alpha, beta, R2
Regressions on S&P 500
IBM
Cisco
CSCO
Hewlett-
Packard
HPQ
Goldman-
Sachs
GS
Ford
F
Kellogg
K
Merck
MRK
Kroger
KR
Boeing
BA
Citigroup
C
Alpha 0.006428 0.001128 0.013293 0.011594 -0.01077 0.004578 -0.00247 0.005846 -0.00101 -0.04228
t-alpha 0.94867 0.152133 2.013376 1.222276 -0.52676 0.84024 -0.22549 0.851801 -0.12974 -2.37659
Beta 0.837844 1.188304 1.040223 1.43159 2.518985 0.525129 0.825129 0.445352 1.208069 2.936106
t-slope 5.729872 7.428523 7.300684 6.993229 5.708113 4.466613 3.493099 3.00707 7.197027 7.647191
R-
squared 0.361454 0.487555 0.478886 0.457464 0.3597 0.255939 0.17381 0.134877 0.471753 0.502058
d. For the first four stocks: IBM, Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, Goldman-Sachs;
Compute the variance covariance matrix of these four stocks
Variance-covariance matrix, uses VarCovarFunction
IBM CSCO HPQ GS
IBM 0.0042 0.0028 0.0024 0.0031
CSCO 0.0028 0.0063 0.0036 0.0032
25
HPQ 0.0024 0.0036 0.0049 0.0021
GS 0.0031 0.0032 0.0021 0.0098
Correlation matrix, uses C
IBM CSCO HPQ GS
IBM 1.0000 0.5461 0.5259 0.4765
CSCO 0.5461 1.0000 0.6455 0.4051
HPQ 0.5259 0.6455 1.0000 0.3086
GS 0.4765 0.4051 0.3086 1.0000
e. Using the mean return of each stock as its expected future return, compute
the mean,
variance and standard deviation of returns, covariance, and correlation for the
following
portfolios:
Variance-covariance matrix
IBM CSCO HPQ GS
26
IBM 0.004241 0.002828 0.002405 0.003069
CSCO 0.002828 0.006324 0.003606 0.003187
HPQ 0.002405 0.003606 0.004934 0.002144
GS 0.003069 0.003187 0.002144 0.009782
Port. A 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Port. B 0.6 0.25 0.4 -0.25
Port A Port B
Mean 0.007751 0.006283
Variance 0.003735 0.004299
Sigma 0.061113 0.065566
Covariance 0.00305
f. Draw the sigma/mean frontier for convex combinations of these two
portfolios?
27
g. Can you find a portfolio or stock which is superior to the portfolios in the
convex combination? If so, show it and explain how you found it. What does this
say about the efficiency of these two portfolios?
S&P
500
Portfolio Portfolio
Stock IBM Cisco HP GS Ford Kellogg Merck Kroger Boeing Citigroup VFINX A B
Mean 0.62% 0.07% 1.30% 1.11% -1.16% 0.44% -0.27% 0.57% -0.14% -4.32% -0.03% 0.78% 0.63%
SD 6.06% 7.89% 6.97% 9.81% 19.46% 4.81% 9.17% 5.62% 8.15% 19.20% 4.63% 6.06% 6.50%
CV 9.8378 105.455 5.3742 8.8066 -16.811 10.9074 -33.568 9.8522 -58.409 -4.4425 -144.94 7.8183 10.3481
Question 6: M&M Proposition I (with corporate taxes)
ACB Company expects an EBIT of $10,000 every year forever. ABC
can borrow at 7 percent. Suppose ABC currently has no debt, and its
cost of equity is 17 percent. If the corporate tax rate is 35 percent, what is
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
1.40%
4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% 11.00%
R
e
t
u
r
n
s
Sigma
GS
28
the value of the firm? What will the value be if ABC borrows $15,000 and
uses the proceeds to repurchase stock?
With no debt, ACB's WACC is 17%. This is also the unlevered cost of capital. The
after tax cash flow is $10,000*(1 - 0.35) = $6,500, so the value of ACB is
V
U
= $6,500/0.17 = $38,235.
After the debt issue, ACB will be worth the original $38,235 plus the present value
of the tax shield. According to M&M Proposition I with taxes, the present value of the
tax shield = T
C
x D = 0.35 x $15,000 = $5,250, so ACB is worth
V
U
= $38,235 + $5,250 = $43,485.
Question 7: Minimum level for EBIT
We can calculate the break-even EBIT. At any EBIT above this, the increased
financial leverage will increase EPS.
Under the old capital structure, the interest bill is $80,000,000 x 0.09 =
$7,200,000.
There are 10 million shares of stock, so, ignoring taxes, EPS =
(EBIT - $7,200,000)/10,000,000
Under the new capital structure, the interest expense will be $125,000,000 x
0.09 = $11,250,000. Furthermore, the debt rises = $125,000,000 - $80,000,000
= $45,000,000.
This amount is sufficient to repurchase = $45,000,000/$45 = 1,000,000 shares
of stock, leaving = (10,000,000 - 1,000,000) = 9,000,000 outstanding. EPS
is thus (EBIT - $11,250,000)/9,000,000
We set the two calculations equal to each other and solve for the break-
29
even EBIT: (EBIT - $7,200,000)/10,000,000 = (EBIT -
$11,250,000)/9,000,000
EBIT = $47,700,000
Verify that, in either case, EPS is $4.05 when EBIT is $47,700,000.
Question 8: Stock mergers and EPS
a. How does a merger differ from other acquisition forms?
Mergers and acquisitions (abbreviated M&A) is an aspect of corporate strategy, corporate
finance and management dealing with the buying, selling, dividing and combining of
different companies and similar entities that can help an enterprise grow rapidly in its
sector or location of origin, or a new field or new location, without creating a subsidiary,
other child entity or using a joint venture.
- The differences between merging and acquiring are important to valuing,
negotiating and structuring a clients transaction. Acquiring another business lets owners
- Establish a base. Obtain a going concern in a particular location.
- Establish a niche. Bring in more business of a certain type.
- I ncrease productivity and profitability. Increase output with unchanged fixed
costs, yielding higher profit.
- Expand geographic coverage. Obtain entry into adjacent market areas.
- I ncrease prestige. Drive company value up.
Merging offers the above advantages and additional ones, such as :
- Succession planning. A way to secure retirement though new ownership.
30
- Reduced work level. A way to share responsibility among more people.
- Security of a larger organization. A way to cope with larger competitors.
b. What is the difference between a purchase and a pooling of interests?
The several major differences between pooling and purchases method of business
combination accounting:
Item PURCHASE METHOD
POOLING OF
INTERESTS METHOD
Book Value Typically higher than
pooling method.
Typically lower than
purchase method, as no
goodwill asset is created.
Earnings Trend
Typically lower than the
pooling method because pre-
acquisition income
statements are not combined.
Typically higher than
purchase method because
income statements are
combined retroactively.
Sales Trend
Typically distorts growth
perception of the acquiring
company, as much of its
sales growth can be
attributed to the acquisition.
Typically more accurate than
the purchase method, as
income statements are
combined retroactively.
Earnings Per
Share
Typically lower than the
pooling method.
Typically higher than the
purchase method, as the
income statement is
combined for the entire
reporting period, rather than
31
as of the acquisition date.
ROA & ROE Typically lower. Typically higher.
c. What are the relevant incremental cash flows for evaluating a merger
candidate?
To determine the incremental value of an acquisition, we need to know the incremental
cash flows. These are the cash flows for the combined firm less what A and B could
generate separately. In other words, the incremental cash flow for evaluating a merger
is the difference between the cash flow of the combined company and the sum of the
cash flows for the two companies considered separately. We will label this incremental
cash flow as CF.
CF = EBIT + Depreciation - Tax Capital requirements
= Revenue - Cost - Tax Capital requirements
So, the merger will make sense only if one or more of these cash flow components are
beneficially affected by the merger. The possible cash flow benefits of mergers
and acquisitions thus fall into four basic categories: revenue enhancement, cost
reductions, lower taxes, and reductions in capital needs
+ Consider the following information for two all-equity firms, A and B:
Firm A Firm B
Total earnings $3,000 $1,100
Shares 600 400
32
outstanding
Price per share $70 $15
Firm A is acquiring Firm B by exchanging 100 of its shares for all the shares in B.
What is the cost of the merger if the merger firm is worth $63,000? What will
happen to Firm As EPS? Its PE ratio?
The firm A will have = 600 + 100 = 700 shares outstanding. Total value is $63,000, the
price per share is $63,000/700 = $90 higher than price of firm A = $70.
The f irm Bs stockholders end up with 100 shares in the merged firm, the cost of the
merger = 100 x $90 = $9,000.
The combined firm B will have = $3,000 + $1,100 = $4,100 in earnings, so Bs EPS =
$4,100/700 = $5.86 is higher than Firm A's EPS = $3,000/600 = $5.
The old PE ratio of Firm A was =$70/5 = 14%.
The new firm is = $90/5.86 = 15.36%
The end.
References:
+ Lectures in Corporate Finance of Dr. Tuan Tran
+ Stephen A. Ross, Randolph W. Westerfiel, Jeffrey Jaffe (2010): Corporate
33
finance (9
th
Ed), McGraw Hill.