You are on page 1of 7

Published in IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution

Received on 6th July 2012


Revised on 30th January 2013
Accepted on 17th February 2013
doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0379
ISSN 1751-8687
Novel location algorithm for single-line-to-ground
faults in transmission line with distributed parameters
Bin Wang, Xinzhou Dong, Lan Lan, Fei Xu
State Key Lab of Control and Simulation of Power Systems and Generation Equipments, Department of Electrical
Engineering, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, Peoples Republic of China
E-mail: binw_ee@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
Abstract: Precise fault location (FL) is denitely important for fast fault clearance and restoration of energy transmission. The single-
terminal FL is mostly met in applications because of its easy implementation, but the accuracies of all-type impedance FL algorithms
are not good because of the effects of fault resistance and variation of an opposite terminal equivalent system impedance. The recently
developed and assembled FL algorithm presented in this study, combining the stability of the impedance FL and precision of the
travelling waves FL, is an expected good solution. However, the key point to achieve accurate FL is to naturally couple these two
algorithms. As is known, the distributed parameters model is also the research base of these two algorithms. Hence, the impedance
FL algorithm in line with distributed parameters is proposed in this study. It is achieved on the discovery that the negative
sequence current at relay location maintains precisely the same phase to the voltage at fault point. The proposed algorithm is
immune to shunt capacitance because of modelling with distributed parameters, and is not disturbed by ground resistance when
calculated at zero-crossing moment of voltage at fault point. Simulations and tests prove its good performance.
1 Introduction
The precise fault location (FL) is denitely important for fast
fault clearance and restoration of energy transmission in
power system. The accurate single-terminal FL is mostly
met in applications as it is the easiest one to implement
[1, 2]. However, the accuracies of all-type single-terminal
impedance FL algorithms, especially in case of
single-line-to-ground fault (SLGF), are not good because of
the impacts of fault resistance and variation of an opposite
terminal equivalent system impedance [35]. The
acceptable accuracy of single-terminal FL algorithms based
on travelling waves can also not be guaranteed because of
the difculty of identication of the secondary waves
reected from the fault point in the complicated transient
wave propagation process [68].
The recently developed and assembled FL algorithm
combines the stability of the impedance FL and precision of
the travelling waves FL into an expected good solution,
where the reected waves front is searched for in a given
area assessed upon the result of an impedance FL algorithm
[9, 10]. However, the key point here is to couple these two
algorithms in a natural manner.
The distributed parameters power transmission line model is
widely used as the research base for investigating FL algorithms.
In case of the traditional impedance FL method case, the line
shunt capacitance is neglected and the line impedance
between the fault point and relays location is estimated to
linearly mirror the value of a fault distance. However, as
reported in [11, 12], the relation between line impedance and
fault distance is described with hyperbolic tangent function
when distributed parameter line models are used. Therefore as
the tiny difference in the value of measured impedance would
cause a large error in an assessment of a distance to a fault
and the performance of a herein developed FL algorithm
would be much more sensitive to fault resistance than those
achieved for lumped parameter line models. Traditionally, to
eliminate that strong dependence of impedance FL algorithms
on fault resistance, only reactance component-based FL
methods are proposed, but they all also fail since it is difcult
to theoretically decouple the resistance and reactance
components in a hyperbolic tangent function. Some other
schemes, for example, supposing the opposite system
impedance available or the fault current phase in relay
location same as that in fault branch, and some algorithms
based on articial intelligence are all invalid [1317].
In response to this question, a novel single-terminal
impedance FL algorithm derived from distributed parameter
line model is proposed in this paper. In Section 2, the
factors producing large errors in FL are analysed. The
accurate estimation of a voltage at the fault point is
proposed together with a novel FL algorithm in Section
3. EMTP-ATP simulations and test results in developed
HPR-7000 platform are presented in Section 4. In Section
5, the conclusions are drawn.
2 Fault location error analysis
2.1 SLGF in line with distributed parameters
analysis
Suppose a ground fault occurs at the point F as shown in
Fig. 1. The phase A voltage metered at the relays location
U
MA
is given as follows, with the derivation based on the
www.ietdl.org
560 IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, Vol. 7, Iss. 6, pp. 560566
& The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2013 doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0379
boundary conditions at point F in a distributed parameter
model [11].
U
MA
= U
FA
chg
1
l
K
+ I
MA
+PI
M0
_ _
Z
c1
thg
1
l
K
= 3I
F0
R
g
chg
1
l
K
+ I
MA
+PI
M0
_ _
Z
c1
thg
1
l
K
(1)
where U
MA
, U
FA
and I
MA
, 3I
F0
are voltages and fault currents
at the relays location and fault point, respectively; I
M0
is
zero-sequence current at the relays location; l
K
is fault
distance; R
g
is ground resistance; Z
c1
and Z
c0
are positive
and zero-sequence components of the wave impedance;
1
and
0
are positive and zero-sequence components of the
wave propagation constant; ch and th are hyperbolic
cosine and hyperbolic tangent functions.
P =
Z
c0
3Z
c1
T chg
1
l
K
+shg
0
l
K
T chg
0
l
K
shg
1
l
K
_ _
1 (2)
where T = U
M0
/(Z
c0
I
M0
), U
M0
is zero-sequence voltage at the
relays location; sh is the hyperbolic sine function.
The line impedance of fault distance Z
mea
is calculated as
Z
mea
=
U
MA
I
MA
+PI
M0
= Z
c1
thg
1
l
K
(3)
However, the line impedance in case of a lump parameter line
model can be expressed as
Z
mea
=
U
MA
I
MA
+KI
M0
= R
1
+jvL
1
_ _
l
K
(4)
where Z
mea
is the line impedance of fault distance; R
1
and L
1
are positive-sequence resistance and reactance in per unit
length; K is residual compensation coefcient and dened as
K = Z
0
Z
1
_ _
/ 3Z
1
_ _
(5)
where Z
0
, Z
1
is per unit line zero-sequence and
positive-sequence impedance based on lumped parameter
model.
Since the ground impedance is normally recognised as a
pure resistance, FL accuracy has been largely improved by
traditional impedance FL algorithms-only considering the
reactance part in (4). However, it is difcult to decouple the
resistance and reactance components in (3) because of
ambiguous characteristics of positive sequences of the wave
impedance and wave propagation constant.
Let us analyse (1). The feasible way to eliminate the effect
of a fault resistance is to use the natural relation decoupling of
both parts of (1). Since the ground resistance appears only in
its rst part: 3I
F0
R
g
ch
1
l
K
, then considering when the phase of
this expression crosses the zero allows for eliminating the
fault resistance from an FL calculation. To achieve it, all
the quantities in 3I
F0
R
g
ch
1
l
K
should be separately
addressed. As shown in Fig. 2, the phase of ch
1
l
K
is < 1
for the fault distance changing across wide range of values;
therefore this component can absolutely be neglected. Then
the challenge which is left is to accurately estimate the
phase of the current I
F0
in fault path.
2.2 Phase estimation error to I
F0
The zero-sequence equivalent circuit of the system pictured in
Fig. 1 is shown in Fig. 3. The phase current and
zero-sequence current at the relays location are often used
to estimate the phase of a current at the fault point.
It can be found in [11] that
I
FM0
= U

F0
/ Z
c0
thg
0
l
M
+l
K
_ _ _ _
(6)
where U
F0
is the zero-sequence voltage at the fault point;
I
FM0
is the zero-sequence current owing into M bus from
the fault point; l
M
is the apparent equivalent lines length
calculated with the upstream systems zero-sequence
impedance Z
M0
at the bus M
Z
M0
= Z
c0
thg
0
l
M
(7)
Similarly
I
FN0
= U

F0
/ Z
c0
thg
0
l
M
+l l
K
_ _ _ _
(8)
where I
FN0
is the zero-sequence current owing into the bus
bar N from the fault point; l
N
is the apparent equivalent
lines length calculated with the downstream systems
zero-sequence impedance Z
N0
at the bus N; l is the real
length of the whole line.
It is achieved with (6) and (8)
I
F0
I
FM0
=
I
FM0
+I
FN0
I
FM0
= 1
thg
0
l
M
+l
K
_ _
thg
0
l
N
+l l
K
)
_ (9)
Fig. 2 Phase characteristics of hyperbolic cosine function
Fig. 1 SLGF at F point in a transmission line
Fig. 3 Zero-sequence equivalent system conguration
www.ietdl.org
IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, Vol. 7, Iss. 6, pp. 560566 561
doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0379 & The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2013
Based on the system in Fig. 3, one has
U
M0
= U

F0
chg
0
l
K
I
FM0
Z
c0
shg
0
l
K
I
M0
= I
FM0
chg
0
l
K
+U

F0
/Z
c0
shg
0
l
K
_
(10)
Let us simplify (10) to
I
FM0
I
M0
= chg
0
l
K
thg
0
l
M
shg
0
l
K
(11)
and substitute (11) into (9) to receive
I
F0
I
M0
=chg
0
l
K
1 +
thg
0
l
M
+l
K
_ _
thg
0
l
N
+l l
K
_ _
_ _
1 +thg
0
l
M
thg
0
l
K
_ _
(12)
The analysis of the estimation error of phase expression th
(
0
l
K
) in (12) can be done with the magnitude and phase
characteristics. The one presented in Fig. 4 was achieved
for the actual parameters of the rst 1000 kV
JinDongNan-Nan Yang-JinMen Ultra High Voltage(UHV)
AC transmission line in China [18, 19].
Three parts can be differentiated in (12)
1 +thg
0
l
M
+l
K
_ _
/thg
0
l
N
+l l
K
_ _
(12a)
1 +thg
0
l
M
thg
0
l
K
(12b)
chg
0
l
K
(12c)
The phase angle of (12c) can be clearly assessed with the
second-order polynomial of the fault distance as shown in
Fig. 2, although the uctuations of phase angles of (12a)
and (12b) are more obvious. As the phase characteristic of
th
0
l
K
is nearly constant for lines lengths < 400 km as
shown in Fig. 4b. Then, the phases of the partial
expressions th
0
l
M
th
0
l
K
and th
0
(l
M
+ l
K
)/th
0
(l
N
+ l l
K
)
are trending in opposite directions. However, the
corresponding magnitudes of th
0
l
K
are no more than 1,
hence the values of phase angle of (12a) and (12b) are
mainly controlled by the number 1 in the expression.
Therefore the estimation error of a phase of I
F0
with I
M0
is
basically acceptable for short-length high voltage/extra high
voltage (HV/EHV) lines-no more than 400 km. However,
the effect of shunt capacitance in case of higher voltage
level, longer length transmission lines will be much larger
and the phase estimation error of the above mentioned
method will be unacceptable.
The estimation error for the 800 km in length 750 kV AC
transmission line in Southwest of China is shown in Fig. 5. As
can be seen, the phase difference between I
M0
and I
F0
can be
approximated with linear function of the fault distance and its
maximum value reaches up to 25.84 when a fault occurs at
the end of the line. There still is about 20 estimation error
even if the fault is at 300 km. It is obvious that FL accuracy
cannot be guaranteed on the basis of this premise.
3 Novel FL algorithm
3.1 Accurate estimate of fault voltages phase
The leakage current owing through shunt capacitance from
line to ground can make a signicant contribution to
zero-sequence current itself. However, in case of lineline
faults it is always negligibly small as compared with fault
currents and the positive and/or negative sequence
components of a current seem a much better choice to base
system identication procedures. The negative sequence
current component is suggested to be selected as it
additionally is hardly affected by load currents.
The negative sequence equivalent system is shown in Fig. 6
and it can be used to derive the following relation combining
the two negative sequence currents I
M2
metered at the relays
location and I
F2
at the fault place
I
K2
I
M2
= 1 +
thg
2
l

M
+l
K
_ _
thg
2
l

N
+l l
K
_ _
_ _
chg
2
l
K
+thg
2
l

M
shg
2
l
K
_ _
(13)
where l

M
, l

N
are virtual lines lengths corresponding to the
values of negative sequence impedances of equivalent
systems connected to buses M and N, respectively.
As shown in Fig. 4, the location of the saddle point of
module against fault distance characteristic of th(
2
l
K
) is
occurring at 1500 km, and the lengths of l
M
, l
N
are
signicantly less than those of l
M
, l
N
, since the equivalent
systems negative sequence impedances are less than those
of zero sequence ones. Hence, the variations of a magnitude
Fig. 5 Error of I
F0
angle estimation
Fig. 4 Magnitude and phase characteristics of a hyperbolic
tangent function
a Magnitude characteristics
b Phase characteristics Fig. 6 Negative sequence equivalent system conguration
www.ietdl.org
562 IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, Vol. 7, Iss. 6, pp. 560566
& The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2013 doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0379
and phase of th
2
l
K
are limited, and the phases of the
component parts th
2
l
M
th
2
l
K
and th
2
(l
M
+ l
K
)/th
2
(l
N
+ l
l
K
) are always trending in opposite directions. It can be
proved that in this case again the most dominate
contribution to the phase of the whole expression (12)
comes from the number 1, just as in the above analysed
zero-sequence case, as the phase angle difference of two
parts th
2
(l
M
+ l
K
)/th
2
(l
N
+ l l
K
) and th
2
l
M
th
2
l
K
will be
only slightly affecting on it. Considering that the ch
2
l
K
phase angle nears to zero as shown in Fig. 2, it is
reasonable to accept the value of the phase of I
M2
as
accurate estimate of the phase of the voltage at the fault point.
The developed methods estimation error of a phase of the
fault voltage in 750 kV line is shown in Fig. 5 and its
maximal value is no more than 2 for a fault at the lines
end (800 km), which directly approves very good quality of
the proposed estimate.
3.2 Accurate FL algorithm
A novel FL algorithm is then proposed on the basis of the
above analysis results. In order to overcome the inuence
of fault resistance, the calculation of FL is performed when
the fault voltage signal is crossing zero and the following
steps are included:
Step 1: The measurements of phase voltages and currents at
the relays location provide input quantities for computing
the values of a negative sequence current;
The matrix used in transformation from phase vectors to
the sequence vectors is [1]
f
1
f
2
f
0

=
1
3
1 a a
2
1 a
2
a
1 1 1

f
A
f
B
f
C

(14)
where represent current I or voltage U, and subscripts 1, 2
and 0 mean positive, negative and zero sequence; subscripts
A, B and C mean A-phase, B-phase and C-phase.
a = 0.5 +i
..
3

/2.
Step 2: The assessment of time t when the fault voltage is to
go across zero
t =
90

l
v
(15)
where is the initial angle of a negative sequence current at
the relays location and is the rated angular frequency of
a power system.
Step 3: Estimation of the value of the real part of the voltage,
which is named as U
mea_metre
, at the relays location at the
calculated time t in Step 2
U
mea metre
= U
w
cos 90

l +u
_ _
(16)
where U
j
and denote the magnitude and initial phase angle
of the fault-phase voltage.
Step 4: The calculation of a current I
J
corresponding to the
fault distance l
fault,
starting with l
fault
= 0 km as the initial
value
I
J
= I
w
+PI
0
= I
J
(cos(vt +h) +jsin(vt +h)) (17)
where I
j
, I
0
are the fault-phase and zero-sequence currents,
then I
J
and , which denote the magnitude and initial angle
of I
J
, can be available.
Step 5: Calculation of the lines impedance Z
fault
based on its
distributed parameters as
Z
fault
= Z
c1
thg
1
l
fault
= Z
relay
(cos(vt +t) +jsin(vt +t)) (18)
where Z
relay
is the module of calculated lines impedance
Z
fault
, and t is the angle of a lines impedance.
Step 6: The calculation of the value of the real part of fault
voltage, which is named as U
mea_cal
, with respect to the
results of steps 4 and 5 as
U
mea cal
= I
J
Z
relay
cos 90
o
l +t +h
_ _
(19)
Step 7: The calculation of the error between the results of
steps 3 and 6 as
Error = U
mea cal
U
mea metre

(20)
Step 8: Increment the actual value of fault distance l
fault
with
step S and go back to step 4. The procedure is to be nished
when l
fault
becomes larger than the length of the protected
zone if the relays tripping signal is available, otherwise the
whole lines length shall be processed. The FL is assumed
to be determined with the minimal value of the successively
calculated errors.
The choice of S is determined by the acceptable FL
accuracy. More accurate the FL smaller S step must be but
larger the number of corresponding calculations. Therefore
it is suggested to choose 1 km as S, which makes a good
compromise of the amount of calculations and satisfactory
accuracy of FL.
4 Case studies
4.1 Simulations
Some simulation cases are presented to verify the
performance of the proposed algorithm. The system model
was presented in Fig. 1 in Section 2. Its detailed parameters
are gathered in Table 1. The lines length is 800 km.
Electric potentials at buses M and N are 1.1062 and 1.1069
times the rated value (1000 kV), although N sides voltage
phase lags by 44 [18].
Fault points are set along the line every 10 km starting from
10 up to 600 km. The values of a fault resistance range from 5
Table 1 Simulation parameters for 1000 kV UHV transmission
system
Parameters Resistance,

Reactance,

Capacity
reactance,
M
line (per km) + seq. 0.00805 0.25913 0.22688
0 seq. 0.20489 0.74606 0.35251
M-side system
impedance
+ seq. 4.26430 85.1453
0 seq. 98.5330 260.790
N-side system
impedance
+ seq. 7.99560 159.647
0 seq. 184.749 488.981
www.ietdl.org
IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, Vol. 7, Iss. 6, pp. 560566 563
doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0379 & The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2013
to 155 with step 50 . The initial values of l
fault
and S
both equal to 1 km. Then the simulation result is grouped in
Fig. 7.
The index FL
error
covering Y-axis is dened as
FL
error
= (L
fault-cal
L
fault-real
)/800 100% (21)
where L
fault-cal
, L
fault-real
are the calculated and real fault
distances, respectively.
The traditional power frequency FL algorithm (Algorithm I
in [20]) is used as a reference, in which the angle difference of
currents in relay location and in fault path is neglected.
The simulation results are plotted in Fig. 7a. It can be seen
that FL accuracy is badly deteriorating as the values of fault
resistance and distance are increasing. The relative error
reaches 30% even for relatively small values of a fault
resistance (55 ) and exceeds 50% for larger ones.
The FL error curve shown in Fig. 7b was achieved with
application of the novel accurate FL method proposed in
this paper. The relative error is no more than 0.5% even for
any value of a fault resistance including the largest one
155 tests.
4.2 Tests on HPR7000 platform
To check the validity of the proposed algorithm, the test bed
including the HPR-7000 high precision fault recorder
platform, developed by the protective relaying group in
Tsinghua University China was achieved. The hardware
functional framework scheme and photo of the practical
installation of a developed device in Long-He 220 kV
substation, LangFang City, Hebei Province, China are
shown in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively.
The HPR-7000 system is composed of three parts as shown
in Fig. 8: (i) data acquisition system, (ii) GPS synchronous
clock and (iii) human machine interface (HMI) and analysis
software in industrial workstation.
The core of the analysis system is HPR-7000 fault recorder,
which provides a humanmachine interface as well as data
storage, processing and exchanging them with the data
acquisition system or communication with master server,
what was additionally shown in Fig. 9. It is constructed on
the basis of industrial workstation in order to record, save,
analyse and display fault waveforms as well as locate the
fault point using the proposed algorithm in this paper.
Fig. 7 FL error curve with impedance algorithm for UHV lines
a Traditional power frequency impedance algorithm
b Algorithm proposed in this paper
Fig. 8 Framework of the high precision fault recorder HPR-7000
Fig. 9 Photo of HPR-7000 application in Long-He 220 kV
substation
Fig. 10 Simulation model from the standard of DL/T663-1999,
China
Table 2 Simulation parameters for the 500 kV test system
Parameters Resistance,

Reactance,

Capacity
reactance,
M
line (per km) + seq. 0.018 0.28 0.23676
0 seq. 0.16 0.75 0.3505
system
impedance in
the maximal
operation
mode
+ seq. 0.2181 6.2462
0 seq. 0.6 18.7
system
impedance in
the minimal
operation
mode
+ seq. 0.87248 24.985
0 seq. 2.4 72
www.ietdl.org
564 IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, Vol. 7, Iss. 6, pp. 560566
& The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2013 doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0379
According to the standard of DL/T663-1999 (220500 kV
Power System Fault Dynamic Recording Device Certication
Standard) licensed by the Chinese government [21], the test
model and the parameters are presented in Fig. 10 and
Table 2. The fault locator is applied at the line terminal
near L bus. The line length is 400 km, and it is with 70%
compensation to the shunt charging current at the two
terminals.
The test results based on real time digital simulator (RTDS)
test system and HPR7000 fault recorders are shown in Table 3
with different fault distances and fault resistances. It is shown
that the precision of FL is less inuenced by the fault
distances, fault types and the system operation modes,
where the maximal relative error remains below 1.66%.
Since one of the best advantages of the proposed algorithm
in paper is immune to fault distance because of the FL
calculation at the moment of the zero-crossing point of fault
voltage, the real anti-resistance performance of the
algorithm is checked at the N terminal of line. It is seen
from the results shown in Table 4 that the relative error is
still below 3.75% even with 400 grounding. Figs. 11 and
12 show the original waveform from RTDS simulation and
the waveform recorded by the HPR-7000 system with
C-phase-to-ground fault with 100 resistance at the end of
the line.
Table 3 Fault location results based on RTDS testing system
Fault type Fault distance,
km
Fault resistance,

N-side system in the minimal operation


mode
N-side system in the maximal operation
mode
Calculated location,
km
Relative location
error, %
Calculated location,
km
Relative location
error, %
SLGF AG 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
BG 50 5 50 0.00 50 0.00
CG 100 10 100 0.00 100 0.00
AG 150 0 151 0.66 148 1.33
BG 200 5 199 0.50 199 0.50
CG 250 10 249 0.40 248 0. 80
AG 300 0 298 0.66 295 1.66
BG 350 5 346 1.14 346 1.14
CG 400 10 390 2.5 394 1.50
Fig. 12 Waveform recorded by the HPR-7000 system Fig. 11 Original waveform from RTDS simulation
Table 4 Results of anti-resistance performance tests
Fault
type
Fault
distance,
km
Fault
resistance,
ohm
N-side in the maximum
operation mode
Calculated
location, km
Relative
location
error, %
C-phase-
to-
ground
faults
400 10 394 1.50
20 392 2.00
30 391 2.25
50 390 2.50
100 389 2.75
200 385 3.75
400 386 3.50
www.ietdl.org
IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, Vol. 7, Iss. 6, pp. 560566 565
doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0379 & The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2013
5 Conclusion
The key assumption of the recently developed and assembled
FL algorithm is to combine the stability of the impedance FL
and the precision of the travelling waves one. The achieved
FL algorithm naturally couples the above mentioned
properties of these two types of FL algorithms. Thanks to
the observed fact that the phase of negative sequence
current at the relays location has obtained almost the same
value as that of the phase of the voltage at the fault point,
which is unavailable to measure, and therefore can be used
as its estimate. The algorithm is immune to a fault
resistance which was eliminated from calculations by
performing them with reference to time instance when a
fault voltage signal is expected to cross zero. It is a type of
fault point search algorithm, hence there is no need to
puzzle on the questions of false roots characteristic for
equation solving methods and/or convergence for iteration
ones. However, the location time of this algorithm is longer
than that of equation solving ones because of the searching
process; the result can be available in 3 min after fault
occurrence based on the general industry workstation.
Theoretical analysis, conducted simulations and tests prove
together that the proposed FL method can guarantee good
FL accuracy whereas the assembled FL device also fulls
the requirements allowing for eld application.
6 Acknowledgments
The authors thank funding by National Natural Science
Foundation of China under Grant 50937003, 51007045 and
51120175001.
7 References
1 Anderson, P.M.: Power system protection (IEEE Press, McGraw-Hill,
New York, 1999)
2 Lawrence, D.J., Waser, D.L.: Transmission line fault location using
digital fault recorders, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1988, 3, (2),
pp. 496502
3 Zimmerman, K., Costello, D.: Impedance-based fault location
experience. IEEE Rural Electric Power Conf., 2006, pp. 116
4 Thomas, D.W.P., Christopoulos, C., Tang, Y., Gale, P.: A single ended
fault location scheme. Developments in Power System Protection,
Conf., 2001, pp. 414417
5 Sadeh, J., Afradi, H.: A new and accurate fault location algorithm for
combined transmission lines using adaptive network-based fuzzy
inference system, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2009, 79, (11),
pp. 15381545
6 Ancell, G.B., Pahalawaththa, N.C.: Effects of frequency dependence
and line parameters on single ended travelling wave based fault
location schemes, IEE Proc. C, Gener. Transm. Distrib., 1992, 139,
(4), pp. 332342
7 Crossley, P., Davidson, M., Gale, P.: Fault location using
travelling waves, IEE Colloq. Instrum. Electr. Supply Ind., 1993, 1,
pp. 6/16/3
8 Magnago, F.H., Abur, A.: Fault location using wavelets, IEEE Trans.
Power Deliv., 1998, 13, (4), pp. 14751480
9 Xinzhou, D., Zheng, C., Xuanzhou, H., Kehong, W., Chengmu, L.:
Optimizing solution of fault location. Proc. IEEE PES Summer
Meeting, Chicago, USA, 2002, vol. 3, pp. 11131117
10 Pathirana, V., McLaren, P.G., Dirks, E.: Investigation of a hybrid
travelling wave/impedance relay principle. IEEE Canadian Conf.
Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2002, pp. 4853
11 Wang, B., Dong, X., Bo, Z., Klimek, A.: Residual compensation for
ground impedance relay with applications in UHV transmission lines,
IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2009, 24, (3), pp. 10721078
12 Wang, B., Dong, X., Bo, Z., Perks, A.: RTDS environment
development of ultra high voltage power system and relay protection
test, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2008, 23, (2), pp. 618623
13 Popovic, L.M.: A digital fault-location algorithm taking
into account the imaginary part of the grounding impedance
at the fault place, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2003, 18, (4),
pp. 14891496
14 Liao, Y., Elangovan, S.: Improved symmetrical component-based fault
distance estimation for digital distance protection, IEE Proc. Gener.
Transm. Distrib., 1998, 145, (6), pp. 739746
15 Yang, Q.S., Morison, I.F.: Microprocessor based algorithm for high
resistance earth-fault distance protection, IEE Proc. Gener. Transm.
Distrib., 1983, 130, (11), pp. 306310
16 Mardiana, R., Al Motairy, H., Su, C.Q.: Ground fault location on a
transmission line using high-frequency transient voltages, IEEE
Trans. Power Deliv., 2011, 26, (2), pp. 12981299
17 Girgis, A.A., Fallon, C.M.: Fault location techniques for radial and loop
transmission systems using digital fault recorded data, IEEE Trans.
Power Deliv., 1992, 7, (4), pp. 19361945
18 Xiaoli, Z., Zexin, Z., Yuling, W., et al.: Study on dynamic simulation of
1000 kV AC power transmission system, Power Syst. Technol., 2006,
30, (7), pp. 14
19 Zhenya, L.: Ultra-high voltage grid (China Economic Publishing
House, Beijing, 2005)
20 Yaozhong, G.: New types of protective relaying and fault
location-theory and techniques (Xian Jiaotong University Press,
Xian, China, 1996), pp. 226227
21 DL/T663-1999: 220500 kV Power system fault dynamic recording
device certication standard, China, 1999
www.ietdl.org
566 IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2013, Vol. 7, Iss. 6, pp. 560566
& The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2013 doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0379

You might also like