John Gerretsen Ministry of the Attorney General McMurtry-Scott Building 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor Toronto, ON M7A

2S9 attorneygeneral@ontario.ca From accused Frank Gallagher 34 Riverglen Drive Keswick Ont L4P 2P8 frankly1@rogers.com Re: Incident # 12-154994 Reference www.frankygoestocourt.info Dear John It's about your negligence Law Society Admits Bar Association Admits Top Judge Admits Dear Attorney General Striving to reach a state of poverty worthy of Justice seems defeatist yet I try Scared skinny Senator threatens or warns

Public Guardian there to finish me off, by the time I hit the streets won't remember how I got there nor my justice objective that began 8 years ago Sum thin about keeping head above water fending off alligators because you not only refuse to drain the swamp, but create it sealing all leaks http://www.scribd.com/doc/150452608/Police-Can-File-Charges-Against-Attorney-General-Then-HisDecision-to-Proceed-Against-Self For your attention and intention The Attorney General is the chief law officer of the Executive Council. The responsibilities stemming from this role are unlike those of any other Cabinet member.

The role has been referred to as

"judicial-like" and as the "guardian of the public interest".

A key component of the Attorney General's responsibilities to ensure the administration of justice in the province is the administration of the courts and as a result the responsibility for maintaining liaison with the judiciary. Given the fundamental importance of

the independence of the judiciary,

the responsibility for courts administration is often a very sensitive and delicate issue. Great care and respect for

the principles of judicial independence

must be exercised in this area. www.Tag13.com Independent Judiciary

?
The responsibility is to

present the case fairly

- not necessarily to convict. This is a fundamental precept of criminal law,

even if it is not a particularly well-understood concept among the general public.

One of the Attorney General's responsibilities in fostering public respect for the rule of law, is to assist the public in understanding

the nature and limits of the prosecutorial function.

As chief law officer, the Attorney General has

a special responsibility to be the guardian of

that most elusive concept
- the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define.

It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties. Rule of Law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law. Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process. The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy. According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become

meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and

general over- use"

GO POE General Over-use Proclamations Only Elusivity publicly disclosed laws 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency,

of no force or effect.
Ultimately the Attorney General is accountable to the people of the province, through the Legislature, for decisions relating to criminal prosecutions. Such accountability can only occur, of course, once the prosecution is completed or when a final decision has been made not to prosecute. The sub judicae rule bars any comment on a matter before the courts that is likely to influence the matter. The sub judicae rule strictly prohibits the Attorney General from commenting on prosecutions that are before the courts. Given the stature of the Attorney General's position, any public comment coming from the office would be seen as an attempt to influence the case. Influencing the case is a BROOM Back Room Obstruction Ordinance Manifest

The Attorney General does not, however, direct or cause charges to be laid. While the Attorney General and the Attorney General's agents may provide legal advice to the police,

the ultimate decision

whether or not to lay charges is for the police. Once the charge is laid

the decision
as to whether the prosecution should proceed, and in what manner, is for the Attorney General and the Crown Attorney. OJ Obstruction Justice www.Justice13.com www.cdfji13.ca www.rcmp13.com www.docket13.com www.FrankyGoesToCourt.info An important part of the Crown's - and thus the Attorney General's responsibility in conducting criminal prosecutions is associated with the responsibility to represent the public interest -

which includes not only the community as a whole

and

the victim,
but also

the accused.
The Crown has a distinct responsibility to the court to present all the credible evidence available.
The Crown Attorney has refused to deal with the evidence that irrefutably proves justice will be denied Although the Attorney general can become involved in decision-making in relation to individual criminal cases, such a practice would leave the Minister vulnerable to accusations of political interference. Accordingly, it is traditional to leave the day-to-day decision-making in the hands of the Attorney General's agents, the Crown Attorneys, except in cases of exceptional importance where the public would expect the Attorney General to be briefed. The Attorney General has been briefed http://www.scribd.com/doc/163394940/Franky-Goes-to-Court-Making-It-Clear-What-They-Must-DoKill-Franky