Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E
stablished 1 845
JHl
t
+
e. Economic efficiency a
a
-
+
aa
as
sa
aa
a
/ Approximately equal incomes
a
-
aa
sa
+ +
Z
-
aa
ss
as
:
st
+
| [
o. Nationalized industry a
-
s t a s
+
aa
a+
s
/ A large measure of independence for various
a
+ s a
a s
s
i
Strong apparatus of central power deciding
a
all important issues
-
as
as
ss
a
at
=
influence and initiative by al l citizens
-
s
t
+
a
s t a
t
. Fairly strongly differentiated incomes,
a
a
Broad development of various forms of
+
a s a s
s
-.
selfgovernment
a
. a
Limitation of freedom of action for adversaries
+
s s t
a
s
e
-
Absence of greater differentiation of views
+
s t t s
-
t
ss
a
46
1981 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC
tance between the standard and the per
ceived property of the object. Toward
most of the objects around them people
address an entire set of eval uation stan
dards; these constitute a multidimen
sional eval uation space in which the
standard addressed to each aspect of the
object places it at a certain distance on
one of the several eval uative dimen
sions. In the total eval uation of the ob
ject, however, people accord more im
portance to some standards than to oth
ers, with relative importance acting as a
psychological multiplier of the distance
of the object from a given standard. A
set of standards addressed to a single
object or to a class of objects therefore
tends to be a more or less consistent hi
erarchical subsystem in the entire value
system of the individual.
The hierarchical clusters of val ues ad
dressed to diferent classes of objects are
themselves usually hierarchically or
dered. Their order is determined pri
marily by the perceived relative impor
tance of the objects to which they are
addressed. For example, I may agree
that democratic structure of political in
stitutions is important for any country,
but the psychological multiplier applied
to this standard is much larger when I
am thinking about my own country than
it is when I am thinking about, say, Im
perial Rome. Health is an important
standard in evaluating the condition of
any human being, but it has compelling
force when the object in question is my
own child. The stratifcation of objects
by their relative importance is the basic
dimension of our value systems.
N
alues may motivate action if evalua
tion of an object leads to the conclu
sion that action is needed to sustain the
proper shape of the object, to improve it
or to eliminate it from the feld of our
experience. Action, however, calls for
considerations of another kind. In order
to decide to act, we must believe there
is some probability of success, some
chance of moving the object closer in
its evaluation space to the state corre
sponding to our likings or normative
standards. To a large extent the per
ceived probability necessarily depends
on external constraints imposed on our
freedom of action by the social system
in which we live and by our place in it.
When the society or the condition we
live in makes improbable the success of
an action indicated by our values, the
values may become analogous to reces
sive genes, which exist but do not act.
The values are embraced, but they fail
to motivate corresponding behavior. It
may well be asked whether such "behav
ioral recessive" values, describing mere
ly what people might like to have or
what they are inclined to dream about,
are a legitimate topic of sociological in
vestigation. I would venture the opinion
that they present signifcant questions
for research. They do exist in people' s
minds, are important to them and quali
fy their satisfaction with their own lives
and with the world around them. M'ore
over, they are worthy of study because,
as with latent genes under suitable con
ditions, latent values can become pow
erful factors in human behavior, acting
on the scale of the individual or of the
society. Contemporary Poland seems to
present itself as a case in point.
When my colleagues and I undertook
our frst surveys of attitudes and values,
in 1 957 and 1 958, we produced an as
tonishing fnding with respect to the in
ternal structure of the observed system
of val ues. What we found can be called
an "almost random statistical aggregate
of values and attitudes."
In the frst place, when we measured
on a quantitative or ranking scale the
degree to which people held a value, we
quite often found that the distribution of
the scores in the population tended to
approach what is called in statistics the
normal distri bution. If a bimodal distri
bution can be taken as indicating polari
zation of views and values in a society,
the normal distri bution indicates that
the more extreme a given view is, the
less common it is.
Our data showed, further, only weak
correlation between values and the de
mographic characteristics of the respon
dents. (Distinction by education and its
correlates provides the most visible ex
ception to this generalization. ) For the
most part the set of values found in a
given group, even if the group difers on
a given issue from other groups, must be
taken as a modifcation of the general
ly prevailing pattern rather than a spe
cial feature characterizing the group.
It is possible, in sum, to speak about
a system of values in Poland rather
than about systems.
Finally, we often found weak or zero
correlation among the various aspects
and dimensions in the value system even
of an individual respondent. Thus the
respondents hold sets of values with lit
tle internal consistency; there is no ideo
logical syndrome of views. This has an
important social consequence: if two
SYSTEM OF VALUES prevalent in Polish society has been documented over the past 25 years
by means of questionnaires and interviews. Here attributes of a social system are rated as desir
able (+) or undesirable ( -) by high school students and their parents in the cities of Kielce and
Warsaw and by students at the institutions of higher edncation in Warsaw. One notable conclu
sion drawn from the data is that there are not deep or systematic divisions in Polish society
over issues of this kind; for example, there is little evidence of a "generation gap." Hence it
is reasonable to speak of a single system of values in Poland rather than a multiple system.
Poles, on fnding that their views difer
strongly on one issue, continue their
conversation long enough, they will dis
cover they have similar views on many
other issues. Rarely would their encoun
ter array them in confrontation over dif
fering ue//anscbauungen.
J
he fnding of such unstructured ag
gregates gives one the sense that the
respondents had somehow absorbed
each value and attitude separately and
at random. The impression that we were
dealing with the almost random absorp
tion of freely circulating values was
strengthened by studies of the values of
parents and children that we did in the
early 1 970' s. We could not fnd a genera
tion gap, nor could we fnd signifcant
correlation between the values of par
ents and those of their children (with the
clear exception of religion, where intra
family correlations were strong). In peo
ple' s absorption of values their personal
and group identity seemed to play at
most the role of weak flters, not of in
dependent factors shaping the val ues.
This does not seem to be the usual
state of afairs. Although we do not have
survey results and comparable sys
tematic data for Polish society before
World War II, we can make inferences
from the programs of political parties
and from electoral statistics. From such
information we can infer that the social
and political views in the society cov
ered the entire spectrum from the ex
treme left to the extreme right. We can
also suppose the views held by people
corresponded in a syndromatic way, al
though very likely with less internal con
sistency, to the programs put forward by
their political parties. Furthermore, we
may accept what is a rather banal as
sumption of political sociology, namely
that various social classes and groups
were distinguished by diferent sets of
social and political ideas. This was prob
ably true also for the period immediate
ly after the war.
To explain the transformation from
such a hypothetical value system to the
one we found in the late 1 950' s it is nec
essary to bear in mind the salient fea
tures of the country' s social and political
transformation in the intervening years.
Aiming at the construction of a socialist
society, the new political leadership na
tionalized almost the entire economy
and eliminated the classes of owners of
large and small factories and, later on,
even those of small shops. Land reform
eliminated large private estates, and
the frst steps toward collectivization
went forward until in 1 956 they were
halted and reversed. As a result social
mobility, both horizontal and vertical,
increased to an unprecedented degree. It
was horizontal because changes in na
tional borders relocated millions of peo
ple from east to west. It was vertical be
cause of heavy losses of intelligentsia
during the war and, after the war, be-
47
1981 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC
a o e o s
o - - e
WARSAW
PARENTS
a. Equality of life opportunities regardless YOUTH
of social origin
KIELCE
PARENTS
YOUTH
WARSAW
PARENTS
o. Assurance of a proper standard of living for YOUTH
all citizens
PARENTS
KIELCE
YOUTH
WARSAW
PARENTS
c Freedom of speech; conditions under which YOUTH
differing views can be freely expressed
KIELCE
PARENTS
YOUTH
WARSAW
PARENTS
o Influence of all citizens on the way the YOUTH
society is governed
KIELCE
PARENTS
YOUTH
WARSAW
PARENTS
YOUTH
s Economic efficiency
PARENTS
KIELCE
YOUTH
WARSAW
PARENTS
Approximately equal incomes YOUTH
for all citizens
PARENTS
KIELCE
YOUTH
WARSAW
PARENTS
a.t
SKILLED WORKER s.t st.s
NON MANUAL WORKER :.z aa.z
INTELLIGENTSIA a.s
TOTAL SAMPLE a at.a
Are social distinctions between people of different groups in Poland generally greater
or smaller today than they were before the war?
RESPONDENTS
OCCUPATION GREATER SMALLER
UNSKILLED WORKER .s
t:I
SKILLED WORKER +s.a
C
NONMANUAL WORKER
INTELLIGENTSIA .
s
|
l
l
RANKING OF DIVISIVE INFLUENCES in Polish society pro
vides evidence that certain egalitarian ideals have long been com
mon but have not been satisfed. In 1961 diferences in earnings or
wealth were cited by more than 80 percent of the respondents as a di
visive infuence; by 1975 the proportion had increased to more than
90 percent. Other factors that bear directly on social standing, such
50
l
T
s+ +t st +t
l
s+ at a a+
sa as aa za
I
*
as a t
!
t s t z+
+s za za zs
!
os
:ors
as education and kind of work, were also selected more frequently
in the later survey. Meanwhile diferences in personal behavior, in
religious outlook and in political views diminished in importance.
Responses to another question in the 1961 survey indicate that most
people think social distinctions are too great, and a sizable num
ber express the view that such distinctions should disappear entirely.
1981 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC
tive pol itical freedom when new leader
ship was coming into power, and later
there was a tightening of political con
trol. After 1976 came a new phenome
non: political-opposition groups acting
openly and a periodical and book press
operating outside of censorship.
The social structure meanwhile went
through a marked change toward polar
ization of the economic conditions in
which people lived. There came an in
crease in the number of those who, in an
egalitarian socialist society, were "more
equal than others. " Particularly in the
last years of the Gierek regime, a newly
developing style of conspicuous con
sumption advertised the presence in the
society of people who could aford it.
In view of all this history, what chang
es did our later studies fnd in the val ue
system of our countrymen? The answer
is simple: Almost none at all! In survey
ing comparable samples of the popula
tion a few years or many years later,
whenever we repeated a set of ques
tions dealing with social val ues, we ob
tained substantially the same distri bu
tion of responses. Because the relation
between val ues and group characteris
tics remained weak, even the character
of the compared samples did not matter
much; the distri bution of responses to
questions about val ues was almost iden
tical in most studies.
In 1978 we repeated the study we had
made in 1958 of the social and political
val ues and attitudes of a random sample
of students at the university level in
Warsaw. Comparison of the responses
to the same questions 20 years apart
shows almost no signifcant changes.
Ideologically the 1978 students were al
most identical with their 1958 counter
parts, some of whom by then held posi
tions in the government, the economy,
the culture and the science of Poland.
RATHER
YES
NO
OPINION
NO
OPINION
Do you hold religious beliefs? Do you practice a religion?
e
BELIEVE
STRONGLY
BELIEVE
z
PRACTICE
REGULARLY
+
RATHER
NO
RATHER
NO
|
PRACTICE
IRREGULARLY
Do you think the highest incomes and salaries in Poland should be limited?
YES NO
NO OPINION
DEFINITELY
NO
DEFINITELY
NO
Are you in favor of unlimited free enterprise in any of the following areas of the national economy?
YES
NO
YES
a
NO
at
HANDCRAFTS
MEDIUM
INDUSTRIAL
ENTERPRISES
sa
z
SMALL-SCALE
TRADE
s
sa
FOREIGN
TRADE
SMALL
INDUSTRIAL
ENTERPRISES
s
z+
ts
LARGE
LANDHOLDINGS
z
t
WHOLESALE
TRADE
as
HEAVY
INDUSTRY
ENSEMBLE OF VALUES held by the Polish people cannot be understood as having stemmed
from a single ideological source. These data are for students in Warsaw in :9s8 (g:oy;and
:9z8 (coto:;. Most students favor "some form of socialism" and support policies associated
with socialism, such as limitation of the highest incomes. On the other hand, few identify them
selves as Marxists and many are religious. Private enterprise is considered appropriate in some
areas of the national economy but not in the more essential ones. Opinions on most such mat
ters have remained stable. The set of questions has been presented to Warsaw students three
times: in :9s8by Zifa J6zefowicz, the author and Anna Pawetczyiska; in :96:by the author,
and in :9z8by the author with Grzegorz Lindenberg, Pawet Karpowicz and Krzysztof Nowak.
ation" of primary groups united in a
national community. In actuality, of
course, the obj ective social structure of
Poland is as complex as that of other
industrial societies. It has a multilevel
system of national administration, qua
si-corporate industrial enterprises, pol it
ical organizations, professional associa
tions, ofcial state trade unions and so
on. None of these institutions, however,
seems to evoke on a mass scale the kind
of identifcation that comes out most
plainly in interviews when the respon
dent says "we. " Instead many of the
institutions set up feelings expressed
by the word "they, " even among people
who work in them or belong to them.
OUf studies thus revealed a kind of so
cial vacuum between the level of pri
mary groups and that of the nation.
Further, our studies showed quite
strong changes in people' s eval uation of
51
1981 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC
With which of the following
c at gories of people do you feel e
particularly strong bonds?
Family
Friends, close colleagues and
close acquaintances
Colleagues from your school
or workplace
The Polish nation
Acquaintances from your
neighborhood
People who are interested i n the
same things you are ( Youth)
People who have the same
occupation ( Parents)
People who think as you do
Mankind i n general
People of your age group
People of the same religion
Members of the same political
organization
People of the same economic
position
WARSAW
at
=
-=sss
:a
s
s
=
ss
a
KIELCE
a
-=sss
sa
s
a
s
.
s
I
HIERARCHY OF SOCIAL TIES represents a basic dim'ension of any value system. Family
comes frst iu Poland, as it does elsewhere. Apart from family, respondents in the generation
gap study of i9zz~z4reported strong bonds to friends and colleagues and to the Polish nation
as a whole. There was a notable lack of cohesive social institutions at a scale between that of
the circle of friends and that of the nation. This gap seems to have been flled in the past year
by the spontaneous development of the Independent Free Trade Unions, called Solidarity.
52
objects to which their otherwise stable
value systems were "addressed, " partic
ularly changes in their satisfaction with
the conditions of their own lives and
with the performance of the country' s
leadership. Their dissatisfaction has
been aggravated by shortages of con
sumer goods in the past few years. Com
bined with a housing shortage that has
kept many from having a fat of their
own, these circumstances have brought
people to an emotionally charged, nega
tive eval uation of their life situation.
The contrasting example of conspicu
ous consumption by those who can af
ford such consumption has given poig
nance to the frustration of the others,
inviting their condemnation of the situa
tion as being contrary to socialist stan
dards of social equality. Studies we did
in 196 1 and 1978 showed that dispar
ities in income and wealth were per
ceived by a great majority as the main
factor dividing people and as a primary
source of social tension.
In this connection, however, we found
that people's attitudes toward economic
equality were strongly related to their
own economic position. Those who had
a high income and privileges had a
much greater understanding of the ne
cessity for diferentiation in income and
privileges than those who did not. This
explains our fnding, mentioned earlier,
that ed ucated people are less egalitarian
in their views, because income in Polish
society is increasingly related to educa
tion. Educated and well-of people are
able to reconcile this attitude with their
"prosocialistic" views by saying that the
realization of a more egalitarian society
is the business of future generations.
Some rejected this ideal even for the fu
ture, but they did not see any contra
diction between that attitude and their
acceptance of socialism. On the other
hand, the same people showed a strong
attachment to various democratic val
ues. Thus the higher up the social ladder
the respondents were, the more demo
cratic and the less egalitarian they were.
C
ne important democratic value,
freedom of speech, proved to be
more highly prized among workers, and
particularly among highly skilled work
ers, than it was even among people with
a university education. At the same time
the highly skilled workers showed more
egalitarian attitudes with respect to dif
ferentiation in income and privileges. I
think this explains to some extent why
skilled workers are now the main social
force in Poland, demanding social and
economic j ustice and freedom of speech
at the same time.
Some other aspects of sociopsycho
logical reality also changed between the
1950' s and the 1970' s. A mood of in
creasing irritation that one could almost
feel in the air became widespread in the
population, particularly in the last few
years of the Gierek regime. The classic
1981 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC
coupling of frustration and aggression
could be seen in people's punitiveness
and intolerance of social deviance. Our
studies also revealed diminished interest
in social issues in general and increased
interest in private and personal afairs, a
"reprivatization" of the people's ideolo
gy attended by apathy and open cyni
cism. Cars and summer houses became
the engrossing topics of conversation
among intellectuals.
A striking expression of this drift in
people's attitudes emerged from our
surveys of university students in War
saw. In 1 958 one question elicited from
them the opinion that an individual
should be willing to risk his life for var
ious causes: for human life, family,
friends, truth, human dignity, mother
land, religion and, to a lesser degree, so
cial ideology. The willingness ranged
from 94 percent (human life) to 32 per
cent (social ideology) and averaged 67
percent. After 20 years the
'
percentages
had gone down sharply, and the decline
was most marked for values such as
truth, human dignity, religion and so
cial ideology. The percentage willing to
risk all for human life and for family
had also declined, but one value held
its ground: the motherland, at 82 per
cent in both surveys.
Apart from this afrmation of patriot
ism, the apathy otherwise observed in
Polish society was evident in this survey,
and indeed it afected a large area of the
value system of the students. With re
spect to the subjective importance of
most extrapersonal values, the students
of 1 978 were a completely diferent
population from those of 1 958. Yet with
respect to the kind of society they would
like to have they were almost identical
with their compatriots of 20 years earli
er. It was simply that their aspirations
and desires in that realm had become
less intense and less important to them.
Here, in the late 1 970' s, the Polish peo
ple were evincing political irritation and
social apathy at the same time. The
combination turned out a few years lat
er to be explosive.
J
he speed with which 10 million
Poles assembled in the Solidarity
movement testifes to the strength of the
needs the movement serves. People per
ceive the new free trade unions as nec
essary instruments for the implementa
tion of important social and individual
goals. To regard these unions as in
strumental associations only, however,
would greatly disparage their true na
ture; they are, at least now, communi
ties with their own self-fulflling emo
tional value. The speed of their devel
opment testifes also to the degree of
frustration, in the social vacuum of the
preceding period, of the need felt by so
many people to belong and to feel the
support of others.
The process of the reintegration of so
ciety can also be observed in other social
Do you believe one should risk one's l ife in the defense of . . .
human life?
ss
|
family?
:
"|
sz
country?
- - ,-
human dignity?
friends?
truth?
religion?
.:
f
' .
a social idea?
os
o
FRUSTRATION OF SOCIAL IDEALS could account for the changing patteru of responses
to a question included in the 1958 and 1978 surveys of the values of university students in War
saw. The proportion of the students who approved of the notion that one should risk one's life
for various causes declined sharply over the 20-year period in all instances but one: defense of
country. Since other survey results indicate little change in the values held by the students, the
diminished willingness to risk all can be interpreted as a result of the students' frustration at
the failure of the society to measure up to their values. Such frustration appears to have been
an important driving force in the recent restructuring, or "reintegratiou," of Polish society.
groups, such as among peasants and stu
dents. Many of the preexisting formal
organizations are undergoing democrat
ic rebirth. Many associations, for exam
ple, are electing their own boards and
defning policies and tasks by democrat
ic procedures without external control;
in this way the members of such organi
zations are flling their own social vacu
um with new social meanings.
By uniting and organizing, the people
also lose what might be called the com
plex of Lilliputian v. giant. They can
see that the newly organized unions
and democratically run organizations
give them the possibility of infuencing
things even at the national level. They
lose the feeling of powerlessness and re
place it with a feeling of dignity. There
are important concepts that are not easi
ly measured by batteries of indicators
but that nonetheless are necessary for
the proper understanding of some social
situations. One cannot understand the
events in Poland without reference to
restored human dignity.
Observation of everyday l ife in Po
land in the past few months indicates
that much of the interpersonal irritation
and aggressiveness has disappeared.
People are being nice to one another
even on the crowded tram at six o' clock
in the morning or in the long lines in
front of shops. If the elimination of the
symptoms of frustration and aggression
is confrmed by systematic surveys, it
will be shown that essential needs of
the people are being satisfed. Since the
needs cannot be economic ones (in this
respect the people are now more frus
trated than ever), we must look for an-
other explanation. In the end it may be
found in the reintegration of our atom
ized society, in the elimination of the
feeling of powerlessness and in the res
toration of people' s dignity.
It is possible now for people to artic
ulate in public and work for the entire
agenda of values they would like to see
realized in a "good" and "j ust" social
system. Consider the hierarchical order
of values we found in our "generation
gap" studies of 1 972-74, an agenda sim
ilar to that found in many other studies.
At the top of the list come "Equality of
life opportunities, " "Satisfaction of peo
ple' s basic needs, " "Freedom of speech"
and "Infuence of citizens on the way the
society is being governed. " Anyone who
has followed events in Poland is aware
that all these values also stood at the top
of the list of the demands of the workers
during the strikes of last summer and
fall. They are now written into the
agreements that the members of Soli
darity signed with the government to
end the strikes. A national opinion sur
vey conducted in the fall of 1 980
showed the same list of values in sub
stantially the same order. From a meth
odological point of view it can be said
that history has provided strong behav
ioral validation of our survey data.
Those who have been studying values
and attitudes in Polish society have ac
tually been studying social forces of
great importance. These forces were at
least partly shaped under the infuence
of the social system, but they have now
imprinted themselves on the shape of
the system itself and, at least to a certain
degree, have caused its transformation.
5J
1981 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC