Professional Documents
Culture Documents
service
CollectiveActionvs.Functionalism?SomeRemarksConcerningHans
Joas'sCritique
CollectiveActionvs.Functionalism?SomeRemarksConcerningHansJoas's
Critique
byThomasSaretzki
Source:
PRAXISInternational(PRAXISInternational),issue:1/1988,pages:5272,onwww.ceeol.com.
Thomas Saretzki
1. Critical Social Theory and the "Project of Modernity"
The Theory of Communicative Action is not supposed to be a "metatheory"
but instead "the beginning of a social theory concerned to validate its own
critical standards."1 The explication of these critical standards is the goal of a
theory of rationality. In order to accomplish this task, the theory of rationality
must refer to social theory. Without referring to processes of societal
rationalization, the explication of the notion of "communicative rationality)' is
impossible (within the framework of formal pragmatics).2 It is hence one of
the main intentions of the Theory of Communicative Action to point out the
"internal connection between the theory of rationality and social theory".
3
As in the work of Max Weber, the problem of using a concept of rationality
(which always has normative implications) arises for every sociology which
claims to be a theory of society at three different levels:
4
a) on a metatheoretical level as the question of "a framework for action
conceived with a view to the rationalizable aspects of action";
b) on a methodological level as the question of "gaining access to the object
domain of symbolic objects through 'understanding''', whereby "under-
standing rational orientations of action became the reference point for
understanding all action orientations";
c) on the empirical-theoretical level as the question of "whether and in what
sense the modernization of a society can be described from the standpoint
of cultural and societal rationalization" and how these processes can be
adequately conceived of within the framework of an analysis of society.
5
The Theory of Communicative Action is not just meant to help clarify the
foundations of social theory, but also to make possible a conceptualization of
the social life context that is tailored to the paradoxes of modernity."6
*Corrected version; for critical comments and helpful remarks concerning the first draft of this article I
would like to thank Jean Cohen, Simone Dietz, Frank Nullmeier and Joachim Raschke. An earlier German
version appeared as discussion paper no. 14 of the series "Reports and Discussion Papers" of the Institute
of Political Science, University of Hamburg, Allende-Platz 1, D-2000 Hamburg 13. For helpful suggestions
to the first draft of the English translation I am grateful to Birgit Ermlich, Detlef Murphy, and Rolf
Schmidt.
Praxis International 8: 1April 1988 0260-8448 $2.00
Praxis International
53
Considering the general questions the Theory of Communicative Action aspires
to resolve, one can identify the problems of constructing a theory which
hopes
-to validate its own critical standards without wandering off into relativism
on the one hand, or falling "into the snares of foundationalism" on the other,
7