Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
What is foreign direct investment? Foreign direct investment (FDI) occurs when a firm invests directly in new facilities to produce and/or market in a foreign country Once a firm undertakes FDI it becomes a multinational enterprise There are two forms of FDI 1 A greenfield in 1. investment estment (the establishment of a wholly new operation in a foreign country) 2. Acquisition or merging with an existing firm in the foreign country
Trends in FDI
Both the flow and stock of FDI in the world economy has increased over the last 20 years FDI has g grown more rapidly p y than world trade and world output because: firms still fear the threat of protectionism the general shift toward democratic political institutions and free market economies has encouraged FDI the th globalization l b li ti i is prompting ti fi firms t to undertake FDI to ensure they have a significant presence in many regions of the world
Trends in FDI
FDI Outflows 1982-2007
The Direction of FDI Historically, most FDI has been directed at the developed nations of the , with the United States being ga world, favorite target FDI inflows have remained high during the early 2000s for the United States, and also for the European Union South, South East, East and Southeast Asia Asia, and particularly China, are now seeing an increase of FDI inflows Latin America is also emerging as an important region for FDI
World
Developing economies
Source: http://unctadstat.unctad.org
{ The shift to services is being driven by general move in many y developed countries the g toward services Many services cannot be stored/exported--> produce them then and there --> hence need for FDI Liberalization of policies governing FDI in services Rise of Internet-based global telecom networks that have allowed some service enterprises to relocate some of their value creation activities to different nations to take advantage of favorable factor costs
Theories of Foreign Direct Investment Question: Why do firms prefer FDI to either ith exporting ti or licensing li i ( (granting ti a foreign entity the right to produce and sell the firms product in return for a royalty fee on every unit that the foreign entity sells)? To answer this question, we need to look at the limitations of exporting and licensing, and the advantages of FDI
y of an exporting p g strategy gy can be {The viability constrained by transportation costs and trade barriers When transportation costs are high, exporting can be unprofitable Foreign direct investment may be a response to actual or threatened trade barriers such as import tariffs or quotas
Internalization theory (also known as market imperfections) suggests that licensing has three major drawbacks 1. it may result in a firms giving away valuable technological know-how to a potential foreign competitor 2. it does not give a firm the tight control over manufacturing, marketing, and strategy in a foreign country that may be required to maximize its profitability 3. It may be difficult if the firms competitive advantage is not amendable to licensing
Starbucks in India
Starbucks, the world's largest coffee-shop chain, opened its first branch in India on 19 October, 2012. Two more branches including one in Mumbai's famous Taj Mahal Palace hotel, which has likewise seen dozens of people queuing for a frappuccino opened in the subsequent week (All the 3 outlets in Mumbai) With more than 17,600 branches in 61 countries, it is perhaps surprising that the Seattle-based company has only just arrived in India. It entered China in 1999 and has around 600 outlets there. Indian government in September, 2012 relaxed rules on local sourcing for foreign "single-brand retailers" shops that sell items belonging to one brand. Last November, it scrapped rules stating that such retailers needed to partner with a local company. Following these reforms, IKEA this month applied to open around 25 outlets. Starbucks has entered India through an $80m joint venture with Tata, one of the country's biggest conglomerates, having worked on this deal before the rules changed (guardian.co.uk, Monday 29 October 2012 ).
A firm will favor FDI over exporting p g as an entry y strategy when: 1. transportation costs are high 2. trade barriers are high A firm will favor FDI over licensing when 1. it wants control over its technological knowhow 2. it wants control over its operations and business strategy 3. the firms capabilities are not amenable to licensing
Theories of Foreign Direct Investment { It is common for firms in the same industry to: 1. have similar strategic behavior and undertake foreign direct investment around the same time 2. direct their investment activities towards certain locations at certain stages in the product life cycle
Knickerbocker explored the relationship between FDI and rivalry in oligopolistic industries (industries composed of a limited number of large firms) Knickerbocker suggested that FDI flows are a reflection of strategic rivalry between firms in the global marketplace y can be extended to embrace the This theory concept of multipoint competition (when two or more enterprises encounter each other in different regional markets, national markets, or industries)
Ideology toward FDI has ranged from a radical stance that is hostile to all FDI to the non-interventionist principle of free market economies Between these two extremes is an approach that might be called pragmatic nationalism
Pragmatic Nationalism The pragmatic nationalist view - FDI has both benefits, such as inflows of capital, it l t h l technology, skills kill and d jobs, and costs, such as repatriation of profits to the home country and a negative balance of payments effect According to this view, FDI should be allowed only if the benefits outweigh the costs
Shifting Ideology Recent years have seen a strong shift toward the free market economy worldwide, creating: a surge in the volume of FDI worldwide an increase of FDI directed at countries that have recently liberalized their regimes
1. 2. 3. 4 4.
the resource transfer effect the employment effect the balance of payments effect effects on competition and economic growth
Host Country Benefits 1. Resource Transfer Effects FDI can make a positive contribution to a host economy by supplying capital, technology, and management resources that would otherwise not be available 2. Employment Effects FDI can bring jobs to a host country that would otherwise not be created there
FDI in the form of greenfield investment increases the level of competition in a market drives down prices improves the welfare of consumers Increased competition can lead to increased prod productivity cti it gro growth th product and process innovation greater economic growth
Government Policy regarding FDI FDI can be regulated by both home and host countries Governments can implement policies to: 1. encourage FDI 2 discourage 2. di FDI
Outward FDI y nations now have government-backed g Many insurance programs to cover major types of foreign investment risk This type of policy can encourage firms to undertake FDI in politically unstable nations Eliminate double taxation of foreign income Lobby with host country govts. to relax restrictions on FDI
All countries, including the United St t States, h have exercised i d some control t l over outward FDI from time to time Some countries manipulate tax rules to make it more favorable for firms to invest at home Countries may restrict firms from investing in certain nations for political reasons
Host country y Governments offer various incentives to foreign firms to invest in their countries Incentives are motivated by:
a desire to gain from the resourcet transfer f and d employment l t effects ff t of f FDI, and to capture FDI away from other potential host countries
International Institutions and the Liberalization of FDI Until recently there has been no consistent involvement by y multinational institutions in the governing of FDI. The formation of the World Trade Organization in 1995 is changing this. The WTO has framed some universal set of rules to promote the liberalization of FDI
Government Policy
A host governments attitude toward FDI is an important in decisions about where to locate foreign production facilities and where to make a foreign direct investment A firms bargaining power with the host government is highest when: 1. the host government places a high value on what the firm has to offer 2. when there are few comparable alternatives available 3. when the firm has a long time to negotiate
India
China
Source: http://unctadstat.unctad.org
Inward FDI: India and China and Total World, 1979 2011 (USD Millions)
2007 2008 2009 35596 (3.0) 95000 (7.9) 519225 (43.3) 2010 2011
25506 43406 (1.3) (2.4) 83521 108312 China (4.2) (6.0) Developing 574311 650017 world (29.1) (36.3)
India
24159 31554 (1.8) (2.1) 114734 123985 (8.8) (8.1) 616661 684399 (47.1) (44.9)
Critical Discussion Question - 1 In 2004, inward FDI accounted for some 24 percent of gross capital formation in Ireland, but only 0.6 percent in Japan. Q. What do you think can explain this difference in FDI inflows into the two countries?
Critical Discussion Question - 2 Compare and contrast the following explanations of FDI: internalization theory, Vernons product life cycle theory, and Knickerbockers theory y of FDI. Which theory do you think offers the best explanation of the historical pattern of horizontal FDI? Why?
3. Cemex Case
Reread the Management Focus on Cemex and answer the following questions: a) Which theoretical explanation, or explanations, of FDI best
explains Cemex Cemexs s FDI? b) What is the value that Cemex brings to the host economy? Can you see any potential drawbacks of inward investment by Cemex in an economy? c) Cemex has a strong preference for acquisitions over greenfield ventures as an entry mode. Why? d) Why do you think Cemex decided to exit Indonesia after failing to gain majority control of Semen Gresik? Why is majority control so important to Cemex? e) Why do you think politicians in Indonesia tried to block Cemexs attempt to gain majority control over Semen Gresik? Do you think Indonesias best interests were served by limiting Cemexs FDI in the country?
be the worlds largest steel company in such a short time? How important were the companys foreign acquisitions to its success? 2. Why was Mittal Steels acquisition of Arcelor so controversial? Do you agree with those who opposed the acquisition? Why or why not? 3 In spite of being the largest steel producer in the 3. world, Mittal Steel doesnt operate in India. Explain Why?
Assignment
4. You are the international manager of a US business that has just invented a revolutionary new personal computer that can perform the same functions as PCs, but costs only half as much to manufacture. Your CEO has asked you to decide how to expand into the European Union market. Your options are: (i) export from the United States, (ii) license a European firm to manufacture and market the computer in Europe, and (iii) set up a wholly owned subsidiary in Europe. Evaluate the pros and cons of each alternative and suggest a course of action to your CEO.
Quiz
1. A company that establishes a new operation in a foreign country has made a) An acquisition b) A merger c) A greenfield investment d) A joint venture 2. Benefits of FDI include all of the following except a) The resource transfer effect b) The employment effect c) The balance of payments effect d) National sovereignty and autonomy
Quiz
3. Which of the following statements is true? a) Over the years, there has been a marked
decrease in the stock and flow of FDI b) Over the years, there has been a marked increase in the stock and flow of FDI c) Over the years, there has been a marked decrease in the stock and an increase in the flow of FDI d) Over the years, there has been a marked increase in the stock and an decrease in the flow of FDI
Quiz
4. Advantages that arise from using resource endowments or assets that are tied to a particular location and that a firm finds valuable to combine with its own unique assets are: a) First mover advantages
Starbucks
QUESTION 1: Initially Starbucks expanded internationally by licensing its format to foreign operators. It soon became disenchanted with this strategy. Why? Starbucks began its international expansion in Japan where it licensed its formula to a joint venture formed with a local company. Starbucks feared that a pure licensing agreement would not provide it with the control it felt was necessary to successfully replicate the look, feel, and experience of an American Starbucks. To help ensure continuity between its American stores, and its Japanese locations, Starbucks transferred American employees to the Japanese stores to help train workers in the Starbucks way. Starbucks shifted many of it arrangements to joint ventures and wholly owned subsidiaries in an effort to gain greater control over the operations. QUESTION 2: Why do you think Starbucks has now elected to expand internationally primarily through local joint ventures, to whom it licenses its format, as opposed to a pure licensing strategy? Probably because of the greater control that joint ventures provide over licensing arrangements. By using joint ventures to expand internationally, Starbucks can link up with local firms that know the market, but still maintain a greater degree of control. QUESTION 3: What are the advantages of a joint venture entry mode for Starbucks over entering through wholly owned subsidiaries? On occasion, Starbucks has chosen a wholly owned subsidiary to control its foreign expansion (e.g. in Britain and Thailand). Why? Using gj joint ventures has allowed Starbucks to share the cost and risk of developing p g its foreign g markets. While a wholly y owned subsidiary would give Starbucks complete control, it also implies that Starbucks would incur all of the cost and risk involved. In Britain, Starbucks did acquire an existing coffee chain that was modeled after Starbucks. Because the chain was already successful, some of the risk that would normally be associated with introducing a new concept to a foreign market was eliminated. Starbucks also shifted to a wholly owned operation in Thailand after its joint venture there experienced difficulty raising capital for further expansion. By acquiring the joint venture, Starbucks was able to gain control over the process QUESTION 4: Which theory of FDI best explains the international expansion strategy adopted by Starbucks? Internalization theory suggests that when licensing is difficult, foreign direct investment is appropriate. Starbucks seems to have followed this philosophy.