You are on page 1of 14

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

RESIDUAL LIFE EVALUATION TEMPERATURE BOILER PIPING

AND

REPAIR

PROCEDURES FOR

HIGH

Isamu NONAKA Materials Department, Research Laboratory, Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries (IHI), Co., Ltd. Dr Isamu Nonaka is a general manager in the materials department of research laboratory at IHI Co., Ltd. He has around 26 years experience in the fields of creep, high temperature fatigue and life assessment for FBR materials and power boiler materials.
isamu_nonaka@ihi.co.jp

ABSTRACT First, Japanese guidelines for the residual life assessment techniques of power boiler materials are described which are applied to extend the intervals of periodic inspection in the aged power plants. Secondly, damage morphologies which are important in the long-term operating components are mentioned including creep-fatigue damage, type IV cracking and ligament cracking. Among these damages, the evaluation of crack growth should be allowed for creep-fatigue damage and ligament cracking, while it shouldnt be allowed for type IV cracking. Thirdly, the concepts of in-house maintenance procedures including repair welding are introduced for high temperature steam piping. Key words: residual life, boiler, maintenance, repair weld, creep-fatigue, crack growth 1. INTRODUCTION Some of the thermal power plants of Japanese utilities are in operation longer than their original design life, and thus, certain degrees of degradation of some parts of the plants may be progressing. The present economical requirements are that the plants shall be in operation as long as possible, however, safe operation of the plants must be ensured completely. This is the basic requirement for establishing an accurate technology for assessing the residual life of these plants. Figure 1 shows the difference between the life evaluation at the design stage of a boiler plant and the residual life assessment of the plant after being in operation. The life assessment at the design stage is based on a design diagram which is obtained by multiplying the average life of materials employed in the plant by safety factors. The remaining life assessment is to seek the time that the materials reach their actual life in operation. In Japan, the residual life assessment based on the guideline for extending intervals between the periodic inspection was conducted from 1987 to 1995 until the recommendation was deregulated. Then, the guideline for extending intervals between the periodic inspection was resumed in effect in 1999. The residual life assessment technology issued on the new guideline is shown in Fig.2. Here, the objective of the assessment is limited to creep damage to be induced in header and high temperature piping. Although appreciable damage has been rarely observed at headers and high temperature piping, the creep damage in these components is considered to represent the aging degradation of the boiler plant. The present paper reviews mainly the remaining life assessment technology for the creep damage and the repair procedures that is to be induced in header and high temperature piping.

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

Fig.1 Difference between design life evaluation and residual life evaluation

location waterwall header

damage mode

superheater header or main steam pipe

creep

reheater header or hot reheat pipe

Fig.2 Location and damage mode of residual life evaluation in Japanese guideline

Fig.3: Degradation mechanism and damage evaluation parameter for Cr-Mo steel

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

2. STATE OF RESIDUAL LIFE EVALUATION TECHNOLOGY IN JAPAN Since the time when the guideline was issued first in 1987 for extending intervals between the periodic inspection, many efforts have been conducted actively among industries, academic communities, and government organizations for clarifying mechanisms that were responsible for material deterioration and for developing remaining life assessment technologies. The degradation mechanism of aging of the major boiler steel containing chromium and molybdenum has been clarified. Measured damage parameters of the chromium and molybdenum steel based on the aging degradation mechanism with respect to creep damage is shown in Fig.3 [1]. The parameters include the microstructure of the alloy, and the mechanical damage with respect to deformation in steel matrices and welded joints. The microstructure is found to vary considerably in the first half of the damage, and it saturates gradually. The mechanical damage becomes predominant in the second half of the damage as the deformation of the base metal and the void formation in HAZ proceeds. Various nondestructive inspection techniques have been developed for measuring damage in materials due to aging during the development of the remaining life assessment technology. Figure 4 shows the nondestructive inspection techniques that appear on the 1999 edition of the guideline for extending intervals between the periodic inspection. These are selected during the development. The surviving techniques are that in principle they can measure the damage parameters in Fig.3 directly. Many of indirect measurement methods of the damage parameters need to be validated with regard to the relations between the measured values and the damage parameters. The main nondestructive inspection methods utilize the replication method to estimate creep damage by measuring deformation in base metal and void area ratios in HAZ, and converting these values to the damage based on calibration curves. Ultrasonic methods are employed for measuring the damage under surface. 3. EXAMPLES OF PRECISION IMPROVEMENTS AND LABOR SAVING IN IHI 3.1 Precision Improvement by Creep Rate Measurements The destructive test method specifies creep rupture tests to be conducted for the duration of about several thousand hours to assess the remaining life. Thus, test temperatures and stresses are changed for accelerating the tests. If the remaining life can be assessed based on creep rates that are measured during the creep tests, no rupture test is required. Thus, no appreciable changes of the creep temperature and stresses are needed in a given creep test time, and the precision of the test will be improved simultaneously. Figure 5 shows an example of this situation with the Omega procedure [2] for remaining life assessment. The omega value and the strain rate in an actual operation condition are required for obtaining the remaining life according to the method. The omega value depends on the test temperature and stress, and these values have been stored in a database on certain alloys. The strain rate under actual operating conditions is required to be extrapolated based on the values obtained by acceleration tests. The remaining life is assessed with higher accuracy by the assessment based on laboratory test data [3]. 3.2 Labor Saving in Site Measurement System The replication method can replicate relatively easily the fine microstructure of actual plant materials. Thus, this method is the main stream among the applicable methods. However, this method requires a scanning electron microscope to observe the microstructure including voids, and thus, the replicas shall be brought to a laboratory from the site. Therefore, the time required for calculating the residual life of the component is inevitably long, and thus, the direct response of the assessment results to the site is impossible. The author and others have developed a creep damage diagnosis system based on an laser microscope jointly with Chugoku Electric Power Company [4] for the site assessment of the remaining life to be practical. Figure 6 shows the system configuration in Fig.6(a), and the appearance in Fig.6(b). The time required for conducting the residual life assessment by the system is reduced to 40% of the original time required. Furthermore, another characteristic is that an automatic image recognition system is installed in the system for distinguishing voids present in the inspected field. The automatic system has made the recognition to be practical by an untrained inspector.

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

Fig. 4 Nondestructive evaluation procedures of creep damage

Fig.5 Residual life evaluation based on the Omega method

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

(a) system construction

(b) system appearance

Fig.6 Creep damage diagnosis system on site using laser microscope

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

4. DAMAGE MORPHOLOGIES TO BE CONSIDERED IN FUTURE 4.1 Creep-Fatigue Damage at Stress Concentrated Parts of Header and Piping Welds The header joints, piping joints, and Y-piece welded joints develop stress concentration at HAZ. Stresses originated during start-ups of a plant are usually relieved during steady operations . However, with increasing number of start-ups and shutdowns of the plant, the plant will be subjected to larger stresses each time. The fatigue damage thus must be considered and cannot be neglected, and the so-called creep fatigue damage becomes a problem. This is the possible reason for the recent detection of coexisting voids as creep damage and micro cracks as fatigue damage in these joints. Figure 7 shows an example of the damage in welded parts of a Y-piece of a main steam piping [5] . The optical micrograph shown in Fig.7(a) indicates voids and micro cracks to be present in HAZ. The scanning electron microscope image in Fig.7(b) shows micro cracks to be initiated probably at the voids. Similarly, Fig.8 shows a damage example of a stub weld of piping [5] . Voids are observed in the whole area of HAZ, as well as micro cracks of about 1 mm length to be in HAZ near the weld metal. 4.2 Type IV Cracking in High Temperature Piping Welds Type IV cracking is the damage occurring near the boundary between HAZ and the base metal as shown in Fig.9. This is often observed in girth welds of high temperature piping made of European-made Cr-Mo-V steel when they are subjected to system stresses. The damage is difficult to detect because it tends to initiate under the surface, and the time for the damage to reach the total fracture after being detected is short. The sensitivity of the joints to type IV cracking depends on the alloys used, and alloys like Cr-Mo-V steel and 1.25Cr-0.5Mo steel are said to be sensitive to the type IV damage. The Japanese-made 2.25Cr-1Mo steel that is one of the main alloys for high temperature piping has been considered to be less sensitive to the type IV cracking due to sufficient ductility. However, the alloy should not be considered to be free from type IV cracking, but should be considered to have a longer time period before the damage becomes appreciable. The dynamic factor for inducing the type IV damage is the excessive level of the system stress. The system stress may vary according to the structure that support the piping, and thus, no simplified FEM analysis can predict the system stress level accurately. Figure 10 is an example of the system stress calculated by elasto-plastic creep FEM analysis for hot reheat piping. The element No.85 is the circumferential joint between the Y-piece and the piping, and the residual stress in the element after stress relaxation is as high as 60 MPa. 4.3 Ligament Cracks in Headers In Europe and USA relatively large cracks have been reported to exist at superheater outlet headers although very limited reports exist in Japan. Figure 11 shows the illustration and a photograph of an actual ligament crack in a superheater outlet header. The crack initiates radiantly at the ligament area, and propagates to the outer surface of the piping after adjacent cracks to coalesce each other. The interconnected cracks may propagate to the stub welds and may cause steam to leak. The driving mechanism for the ligament cracking is the repeating excessive thermal transient stresses that are caused by start-ups and shutdowns of the plant, namely, by thermal fatigue. However, stress analyses being conducted on an actual plant that has experienced this type of cracking fail to detect any stress that is induced to be large enough for explaining the crack formation mechanism. These analyses indicate that the number of the start-ups and shutdowns of the plant that experienced this type of cracking is not directly related to this type of damage. Figure 12 shows an example of the stress analysis results in the superheater outlet header. The figure shows that when the temperature gradient in the thickness direction at a plant start-up is large, relatively large stress is induced there.

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

Main steam pipe

Fig.7 Creep-fatigue damage at HAZ in Y-piece of main steam pipe

Fig.8 Creep- fatigue damage at HAZ in weld stub of piping

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

Fig.9 Type IV cracking in high temperature piping

Fig.10 System stress calculated from FEM analysis in hot reheat piping

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

Fig.11 Ligament cracking in superheater outlet header

Fig. 12 Stress due to the temperature gradient at a plant start-up

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

10

5. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROCEDURES FOR PIPING IN IHI Figure 13 shows the flow diagram of life evaluation for high temperature piping in IHI. First, the damage on the surface of component is measured as the creep void area ratio by replica and also the damage under the surface is measured by ultrasonic noise method. The measured damage values are compared with the threshold values and are divided into four cases. Furthermore the cracks are detected by TOFD method and the crack growth rates are evaluated. As a result, damage levels are classified into four levels i.e. Level I , II, III and IV and repair procedures which correspond to each level are selected. Figure 14 shows the principle in the repair procedures for high temperature piping in IHI. Most concerned components are the seam weld in hot reheat straight pipe, the seam weld in hot reheat elbow and the girth welds in main steam pipe and hot reheat pipe. If the residual thickness after removal of defect is larger than the required value which is defined based on the design allowable stress, only the removal of defect on the surface by grinding is performed in site. If the residual thickness is less than the required design value, the repair welding after the removal of defect is performed in site for the girth weld and in factory for the seam weld. Pre-heating and post-heating are conducted in the repair welding both in site and in factory. 6. PLANT MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT IN THE FUTURE 6.1 Risk Ranking of Components and Inspection Intervals based on RBM Thus, the components and facilities to be subjected to remaining life assessment, remaining life assessment methods and the inspection intervals are conducted according to the experiences that are accumulated in actual plant operations and at accidents. Attempts are made in the US petrochemical industries to establish more quantitative and rational risk-based plant maintenance procedures. The move has activated similar activities for developing advanced maintenance standards in European and US thermal power plants. Figure 15 shows the definition of the risk and the qualitative ranking matrix. The risk is defined as follows: Risk = (likelihood of fracture) (safety severity). The risk is larger at the right hand corner in the figure. Each risk for a component is calculated, and the risk ranking is attributed for planning and executing maintenance and management plans. Figure 16 shows the method for deciding the maintenance interval based on the risk. The shorter the maintenance interval is, the higher the inspection cost is. However, the risk mentioned above decreases because the likelihood of fracture decreases. A suitable inspection interval is found to be decided from the minimum expenditure of the inspection cost and risk cost. The present method is applied to manage the total life of a plant. However, the remaining life assessment decides finally the next inspection time of a component, and the remaining life assessment technology still exists at the center of the maintenance and management of a plant. 6.2 Maintenance and Management based on Maintenance Standards The ASME pressure vessel code includes the Section III on the design standards for nuclear power plants, and the Section XI on the maintenance standards. The program to establish Japanese maintenance standards for nuclear power facilities is in progress at present. However, no maintenance standards exist for non-nuclear facilities including thermal power plants and petrochemical facilities in the world. Thus, a program for establishing the maintenance standard is in progress at US Petrochemical Society. The maintenance standard will be constituted with the inspection standard, defect assessment standard, and repairing technology standard. The defect assessment includes the assessment of propagation characteristics of defects, the crack propagation assessment, and fracture limit assessment. Japanese thermal power plant facilities do not permit any crack to propagate, although it may be permissible in the future as depending on the crack morphology. Figure 17 shows the damage morphology that may have permissible crack propagation, and that have no possibility in permissible crack propagation. The damage permissible crack propagation may be the ligament cracking in header with definite crack path under stabilized crack growth and the localized creep-fatigue damage at stress concentrated parts e.g. pipe stub welds, header stub welds and Y-piece welds. However, the damage impermissible crack propagation may be the type IV cracking in girth welds of high temperature piping under system stress and the damage in the seam welds of hot reheat piping subjected to internal pressure where the damage cant be detected easily and the fracture may be catastrophic as well.

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

11

Fig.13 Flow diagram of life evaluation for high temperature piping in IHI

Component Seam weld in hot reheat straight pipe Seam weld in hot reheat elbow Girth weld in main steam pipe and hot reheat pipe

Defect size tr > td tr < td tr > td tr < td tr > td tr < td

Repair procedure Removal of defect Repair weld after removal of defect with preheating and postheating Removal of defect Repair weld after removal of defect with preheating and postheating Removal of defect Repair weld after removal of defect with preheating and postheating

Location of repair In site In factory In site In factory

In site

Remark tr : residual thickness after removal of defect td: required thickness in design

Fig.14 Principle of repair procedures for high temperature piping in IHI

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

12

Fig. 15 Qualitative risk ranking matrix in RBM

Fig. 16. Maintenance interval based on RBM

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

13

Fig. 17. Damages of permissible or impermissible crack propagation

Residual Life Evaluation and Boiler Piping Repair

OMMI (Vol. 2, Issue 1)

April 2003

14

REFERENCES [1] I. Nonaka et al; Recent Techniques of Residual Life Estimation for Fossil Power Boiler Materilas, J. of High Pressure Technology Japan, Vol.34, No.3, 1996. [2] M. Prager; Development of the MPC Omega Method for Life Assessment in the Creep Range, J.of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol.117, 1995. [3] I. Nonaka et al; Evaluation of Creep Residual Life for Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel Based on Omega Method, J of the Society of Materials Science Japan, Vol.46, No.4, 1997. [4] I. Nonaka et al; Development of Creep Damage Assessment System for Aged Thermal Power Plant, Proc. of Baltica IV Conf., Vol.2, 1998 [5] I. Nonaka et al; Recent Techniques for Residual Life Assessment of Aged Fossil Power Materials, IHI Journal, Vol.36, No.4, 1996

You might also like