You are on page 1of 14

HYPERLINK "http://www.americanchronicle.com" INCLUDEPICTURE "http://www.americanchronicle.com/images/logos/americanchronicle.png" \* MERGEFORMATINET Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:34:46 AM HYPERLINK "http://www.americanchronicle.com" Home | HYPERLINK "http://www.jdoqocy.

com/click-1750408-10389843" \t "_blank" Shop | HYPERLINK "http://www.americanchronicle.com/notices/submit-work" Send Us Info | HYPERLINK "http://www.americanchronicle.com/notices/subscribe" Subscribe | HYPERLINK "http://www.americanchronicle.com/notices/advertise" Advertise | HYPERLINK "http://www.americanchronicle.com/notices/help" Help | HYPERLINK "http://www.americanchronicle.com/notices/rss" INCLUDEPICTURE "http://www.americanchronicle.com/images/icon_rss.png" \* MERGEFORMATINET

Is the NSA Conducting Electronic Warfare On Americans?


Jonas Holmes May 19, 2006 CHRONICLE ARTICLE

Russ Tice, former NSA intelligence officer and current Whistleblower, was to testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee this week. Apparently the testimony, Mr. Tice wanted to give, makes General Haydens phone surveillance program look like very small potatoes. Mr. Tices testimony is expected to reveal further illegal activity overseen by General Michael Hayden which even loyal and patriotic NSA employees view as unlawful. I think the people I talk to next week are going to be shocked when I tell them what I have to tell them. ITS PRETTY HARD TO BELIEVE, Tice said. I hope that theyll clean up the abuses and have some oversight into these programs, which doesnt exist right now. According to Mr. Tice, what has been disclosed so far is only the tip of the iceberg. What in the world could Russ Tice be talking about! To figure it out let us take a look at Russ Tices work at the NSA. According to the Washington Times and numerous other sources, Mr. Tice worked on special access programs related to electronic intelligence gathering while working for the NSA and DIA, where he took part in space systems communications, non-communications signals, electronic warfare, satellite control, telemetry, sensors, and special capability systems. Special Access Programs or SAPs refer to Black Budgets or Black Operations. Black means that they are covert and hidden from everyone except the participants. Feasibly there would be no arena with a greater potential for abuse and misuse than Special Access Programs. Even now Congress and the Justice Department are being denied the ability to investigate these programs because they dont have clearance. To put it in CNNs Jack Caffertys words a top secret government agency, the NSA, the largest of its kind in the world, is denying oversight or investigation by the American people because investigators lack clearance. To add a layer of irony to the Black Ops cake this travesty is occurring in America, the supposed bastion of Freedom and Democracy, which we are currently trying to export to Iraq. It just gets scarier. The Black Ops that Mr. Tice was involved in related to electronic intelligence gathering via space systems communications, non-communications signals, electronic warfare, satellite control, telemetry, sensors, and special capability systems. For greater insight as to the impact of these programs readers should review decades old FOIA authenticated programs such as MKULTRA, BLUEBIRD, COINTELPRO and ARTICHOKE. Radar based Telemetry involves the ability to see through walls without thermal imaging. Electronic Warfare is even scarier if we take a look at the science. NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulation. NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MKUltra program of the early 1950's, which included neurological research into "radiation" (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The resulting secret technology is categorized at the National Security Archives as "Radiation Intelligence," defined as "information from unintentionally emanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not including radioactivity or nuclear detonation." Signals Intelligence implemented and kept this technology secret in the same manner as other electronic warfare programs

of the U.S. government. The NSA monitors available information about this technology and withholds scientific research from the public. There are also international intelligence agency agreements to keep this technology secret. The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated brain mapping can continuously monitor all the electrical activity in the brain continuously. The NSA records and decodes individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for Brain-to-computer link. (In military fighter aircraft, for example.) For electronic surveillance purposes electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject's verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain's auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia. Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject's brain and show images from the subject's brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject's eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex. bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject's brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes. Individual citizens occasionally targeted for surveillance by independently operating NSA personnel NSA personnel can control the lives of hundreds of thousands of individuals in the U.S. by using the NSA's domestic intelligence network and cover businesses. The operations independently run by them can sometimes go beyond the bounds of law. Long-term control and sabotage of tens of thousands of unwitting citizens by NSA operatives is likely to happen. NSA Domint has the ability to covertly assassinate U.S. citizens or run covert psychological control operations to cause subjects to be diagnosed with ill mental health. National Security Agency Signals Intelligence Electronic Brain Link Technology NSA SigInt can remotely detect, identify and monitor a person's bioelectric fields. The NSA's Signals Intelligence has the proprietary ability to remotely and noninvasively monitor information in the human brain by digitally decoding the evoked potentials in the 30-50 hz,.5 milliwatt electro-magnetic emissions from the brain. Neuronal activity in the brain creates a shifting electrical pattern that has a shifting magnetic flux. This magnetic flux puts out a constant 30-50 hz, .5 milliwatt electromagnetic (EMF) wave. Contained in the electromagnetic emission from the brain are spikes and patterns called "evoked potentials."

Every thought, reaction, motor command, auditory event, and visual image in the brain has a
corresponding "evoked potential" or set of "evoked potentials." The EMF emission from the brain can be decoded into the current thoughts, images and sounds in the subject's brain. NSA SigInt uses EMF-transmitted Brain Stimulation as a communications system to transmit

information (as well as nervous system messages) to intelligence agents and also to transmit to the brains of covert operations subjects (on a non-perceptible level).
EMF Brain Stimulation works by sending a complexly coded and pulsed electromagnetic signal to trigger evoked potentials (events) in the brain, thereby forming sound and visual images in the brain's neural circuits. EMF Brain Stimulation can also change a person's brain-states and affect motor control.

Two-way Electronic Brain-Link is done by remotely monitoring neural audio-visual information while transmitting sound to the auditory cortex (bypassing the ears) and transmitting faint images to the visual cortex (bypassing the optic nerves and eyes, the images appear as floating 2-D screens in the brain). Two-Way Electronic Brain Link has become the ultimate communications system for CIA/NSA personnel. Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM, remotely monitoring bioelectric information in the human brain) has become the ultimate surveillance system. It is used by a limited number of agents in the U.S. Intelligence Community. RNM requires decoding the resonance frequency of each specific brain area. That frequency is then modulated in order to impose information in That specific brain area. The frequency to which the various brain areas respond varies from 3 Hz to 50 Hz. Only NSA Signals Intelligence modulates signals in this frequency band. An example of EMF Brain Stimulation: Bioelectric ResonanceFrequency Motor Control Cortex 10 HZ Auditory Cortex 15 HZ Visual Cortex 25 HZ Somatosensory Cortex 09 HZ Thought Center 20 HZ Brain Area Information Induced Through Modulation Motor Impulse Co-ordination Sound which bypasses the ears Images in the brain, bypassing the eyes Phantom Touch Sense Imposed Subconscious Thoughts

This modulated information can be put into the brain at varying intensities from subliminal to perceptible. Each person's brain has a unique set of bioelectric resonance/entrainment frequencies. Sending audio information to a person's brain at the frequency of another person's auditory cortex would result in that audio information not being perceived. Additionally, A 1994 congressional hearing reported that nearly half a million Americans were subjected to some kind of cold war era tests, often without being informed and without their consent. In addition, experimentation law is well grounded in constitutional and international law. It is an under-

reported fact that two major reports on human rights and torture in the U.S. recently listed illegal radiation experiments. Many more facts are documented below. Therefore, human
research subject protections should be a high priority and are just as significant as current issues of torture and illegal wiretapping. It is time for America to wake up. It is time for America to protect its Whistleblowers who are our last line of defense against dictatorship and despotism. It is time for America to take responsibility for oversight of its tax dollars and elect leaders who will assume such responsibility now. Yes, the war on terrorism is important. It is even more important and fearful if the terrorism is from

within and unknowingly funded by hard working American citizens. There is no


Special Access Program beyond the oversight of political leaders elected by the people and for the people. If these political leaders jeopardize national security then that shall be handled in a court of law. But to tell America, to tell the American people, to tell the political leaders elected by the American people that America does not deserve to know what happening in the NSAs dark, black rooms, with billions of dollars, behind closed doors, when we know that privilege has already been abused; that is the true definition of terrorism. That is the true definition of Communism and a Police State, no oversight. So fellow Americans, you may hem and haw in the face of truth but know that one

day you will realize that your country has been usurped from the very principles upon which it was founded. Godspeed, Russ Tice, the Patriots are with you. Followed by Democracy Now interview if and cant tell!

EXCLUSIVE: National Security Agency Whistleblower Warns Domestic Spying Program Is Sign the U.S. is Decaying Into a Police State
INCLUDEPICTURE "http://www.democracynow.org/images/story/72/2172/TiceRussell.jpg" \* MERGEFORMATINET Former NSA intelligence agent Russell Tice condemns reports that the Agency has been engaged in eavesdropping on U.S. citizens without court warrants. Tice has volunteered to testify before Congress about illegal black ops programs at the NSA. Tice said, The freedom of the American people cannot be protected when our constitutional liberties are ignored and our nation has decayed into a police state. [includes rush transcript] HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/email/story/6496" Email to a friend HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/pages/help/streaming" Help HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/2006/1/3/exclusive_national_security_agency_whistleblower_warns" Printer-friendly version HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/store/show/2006/1/3" Purchase DVD/CD

HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/2006/1/3/stream" LISTEN


WATCH HYPERLINK "http://play.rbn.com/? url=demnow/demnow/demand/2006/jan/video/dnB20060103a.rm&proto=rtsp&start=00:10:29" Real Video Stream HYPERLINK "http://play.rbn.com/? url=demnow/demnow/demand/2006/jan/audio/dn20060103.ra&proto=rtsp&start=00:10:29" Real Audio Stream HYPERLINK "http://www.archive.org/download/dn2006-0103/dn2006-0103-1_64kb.mp3" MP3 Download HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/2006/1/3/stream" More We turn now to the growing controversy over President Bushs decision to order the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens inside the country without the legally required court warrants. Bushs decision was first revealed in the New York Times in mid-December. The Times published the expose after holding the story for more than a year under pressure from the White House. The paper reportedly first uncovered the illegal order prior to the 2004 election. When the editors at the Times decided last month to go ahead with the article, President Bush personally summoned the papers publisher, Arthur Sulzberger, and executive editor, Bill Keller, to the Oval Office in an attempt to talk them out of running the story. Since the story broke, calls for Congressional hearings and the possible impeachment of the president have intensified. Conservative legal experts have even admitted Bush may have committed an impeachable offense by ordering the NSA to break the law. On Sunday, the New York Times revealed there was dissent within the upper echelon of the Bush

administration over the legality of the presidents order. According to the Times, Attorney General John Ashcrofts top deputy, James Comey, refused to sign on to the continuation of the secret program in 2004 amid concerns about its legality and oversight. At the time, Comey was serving in place of then Attorney General John Ashcroft while Ashcroft was hospitalized for a medical condition. Comeys refusal prompted senior Presidential aides Andrew Card and Alberto Gonzales to visit Ashcroft in his hospital room to grant the approval. The Times reports Ashcroft expressed reluctance to sign on to the program. It is unclear if he eventually relented. Both Ashcroft and Comeys concerns appear to have led to a temporary suspension of parts of the program for several months. But the administration has repeatedly defended its actions. President Bush, speaking on Sunday: If somebody from al-Qaeda is calling you, wed like to know why. In the meantime, this program is conscious of peoples civil liberties as am I. This is is a limited program designed to prevent attacks on the United States of Americaand I repeat limited. It is limited to calls from outside the United States to calls within the United States. But, they are of known numbers of known al Qaeda members or affiliates. I think most Americans understand the need to find out what the enemy is thinking. And thats what we are doing. Were at war with a bunch of cold blooded killers who will kill in a moments notice. I have a responsibility to act within the law which I am doing. The program has been reviewed constantly by Justice Department officials. A program to which the Congress has been briefed. A program that is in my judgment necessary to win this war and to protect the American people. Meanwhile, the Washington Post is reporting that the NSA passed on records of intercepted email and phone calls to other government agencies including the FBI, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the CIA and the Department of Homeland Security. This news come on the heels of several other reports that the FBIs Joint Terrorism Task Force, military intelligence and local police departments have all been engaged in monitoring peaceful groups including Greenpeace, PETAthe People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Catholic Worker, anti-war groups and even bicyclists in New York City. During the 1960s and 1970s, the military used NSA intercepts to maintain files on U.S. peace activists. It was this domestic surveillance that led Congress to intervene and pass Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 in order to prevent future such abuses. The statute permits domestic intelligence surveillance with the approval of a court order from the FISA court. In 1975, Senator Frank Church, a Democrat from Idaho, said, We have a particular obligation to examine the NSA, in light of its tremendous potential for abuse. . . . The interception of international communications signals sent through the air is the job of NSA; and, thanks to modern technological developments, it does its job very well. The danger lies in the ability of the NSA to turn its awesome technology against domestic communications. Now Congress is considering holding a new round of hearings on Bushs domestic spying program. A bipartisan group series of Senators have already issued their public support including several top Republicans including Senator Dick Lugar of Indiana, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. Two weeks ago, a former NSA intelligence officer publicly announced that he wants to testify before Congress. His name is Russell Tice. For the past two decades he has worked in the intelligence field both inside and outside government, most recently with the National Security Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency. He was fired in May 2005 after he spoke out as a whistleblower. In his letter, Tice wrote, It is with my oath as a US intelligence officer weighing heavy on my mind that I wish to report to Congress acts that I believe are unlawful and unconstitutional. The freedom of the American people cannot be protected when our constitutional liberties are ignored and our nation has decayed into a police state.

Russell Tice, former intelligence agent at the National Security Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency. He worked at the NSA up until May 2005.

Rush Transcript
This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution. HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/contribute/donate_money" Donate HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/cart/add_donation?donation%5btype %5d=amt&donation%5bamt_selected%5d=25" $25, HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/cart/add_donation?donation%5btype%5d=amt&donation %5bamt_selected%5d=50" $50, HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/cart/add_donation? donation%5btype%5d=amt&donation%5bamt_selected%5d=100" $100, HYPERLINK "http://www.democracynow.org/get_involved/donate" More... AMY GOODMAN: This is President Bush speaking on Sunday. PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: I can say that if somebody from al-Qaeda is calling you, wed like to know why. In the meantime, this program is conscious of peoples civil liberties, as am I. This is a limited program designed to prevent attacks on the United States of America. And I repeat: limited. And its limited to calls from outside the United States to calls within the United States. But, they are of known numbers of known al Qaeda members or affiliates. And I think most Americans understand the need to find out what the enemy is thinking. And thats what we are doing. Were at war with a bunch of cold-blooded killers who will kill on a moments notice. And I have a responsibility, obviously, to act within the law, which I am doing. Its a program has been reviewed constantly by Justice Department officials, a program to which the Congress has been briefed, and a program that is in my judgment necessary to win this war and to protect the American people. AMY GOODMAN: That was President Bush speaking Sunday. Meanwhile, The Washington Post is reporting the N.S.A. passed on records of intercepted email and phone calls to other government agencies, including the F.B.I., the Defense Intelligence Agency, the C.I.A. and the Department of Homeland Security. This news comes on the heels of several other reports that the F.B.I.s Joint Terrorism Task Force, military intelligence and local police departments have all been engaged in monitoring peaceful groups, including Greenpeace, PETA (the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), the Catholic Worker antiwar groups, and even cyclists in New York City. During the 1960s and 1970s, the military used N.S.A. intercepts to maintain files on U.S. peace activists. It was this domestic surveillance that led Congress to intervene and pass the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, in order to prevent future such abuses. The statute permits domestic intelligence surveillance with the approval of a court order from the FISA court. In 1975, Senator Frank Church, a Democrat from Idaho, said, quote, We have a particular obligation to examine the N.S.A. in light of its tremendous potential for abuse. The interception of international communications signals sent through the air is the job of N.S.A., and thanks to modern technological developments, it does its job very well. The danger lies in the ability of the N.S.A. to turn its awesome technology against domestic communications, Church said. Congress is now considering holding a new round of hearings on Bushs domestic spying program. A bipartisan group of senators have already issued their public support, including several top Republicans, including Senator Dick Lugar of Indiana, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. This is Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont. SEN. PATRICK LEAHY: This warrant-less eavesdropping program is not authorized by the PATRIOT Act, its not authorized by any act of Congress, and its not overseen by any court.

According to the reports its being conducted under a secret presidential order, based on secret legal opinions by the same Justice Department, lawyers, the same ones who argued secretly that the President could order the use of torture. Mr. President, it is time to have some checks and balances in this country. We are a democracy. We are a democracy. Lets have checks and balances, not secret orders and secret courts and secret torture, and on and on. AMY GOODMAN: That was Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy. Two weeks ago, a former N.S.A. intelligence officer publicly announced he wants to testify before Congress. His name is Russell Tice. For the past two decades he has worked in the intelligence field, both inside and outside of government, most recently with the National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency. He was fired in May 2005, after he spoke out as a whistleblower. In his letter, Tice wrote, quote, Its with my oath as a U.S. intelligence officer weighing heavy on my mind that I wish to report to Congress acts I believe are unlawful and unconstitutional. The freedom of the American people cannot be protected when our constitutional liberties are ignored and our nation has decayed into a police state. Russell Tice joins us now in our Washington studio. Welcome to Democracy Now! RUSSELL TICE: Good morning. AMY GOODMAN: Its good to have you with us. RUSSELL TICE: Thank you. AMY GOODMAN: What made you decide to come forward? You worked for the top-secret agency of this government, one that is far larger and even more secret than the C.I.A. RUSSELL TICE: Well, the main reason is, you know, Im involved with some certain aspects of the intelligence community, which are very closely held, and I believe I have seen some things that are illegal. Ultimately its Congresss responsibility to conduct oversight in these things. I dont see it happening. Another reason is there was a certain roadblock that was sort of lifted that allowed me to do this, and I cant explain, but I will to Congress if allowed to. AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about the letter you have written to Congress, your request to testify? RUSSELL TICE: Well, its just a simple request under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act, which is a legal means to contact Congress and tell them that you believe that something has gone wrong in the intelligence community. AMY GOODMAN: Can you start off by talking overall? Since most people until recently, until this latest story of President Bush engaging in these wiretaps of American citizens, as well as foreign nationals in this country, perhaps hadnt even heard of the N.S.A., can you just describe for us what is the National Security Agency? How does it monitor these communications? RUSSELL TICE: Well, the National Security Agency is an agency that deals with monitoring communications for the defense of the country. The charter basically says that the N.S.A. will deal with communications ofoverseas. Were not allowed to go after Americans, and I think ultimately thats what the big fuss is now. But as far as the details of how N.S.A. does that, unfortunately, Im not at liberty to say that. I dont want to walk out of here and end up in an F.B.I. interrogation room. AMY GOODMAN: Russell Tice, you have worked for the National Security Agency. Can you talk about your response to the revelations that the Times, you know, revealed inperhaps late, knowing the story well before the election, yet revealing it a few weeks agothe revelation of the wiretapping of American citizens? RUSSELL TICE: Well, as far as an intelligence officer, especially a SIGINT officer at N.S.A., were

taught from very early on in our careers that you just do not do this. This is probably the number one commandment of the SIGINT Ten Commandments as a SIGINT officer. You will not spy on Americans. It is drilled into our head over and over and over again in security briefings, at least twice a year, where you ultimately have to sign a paper that says you have gotten the briefing. Everyone at N.S.A. whos a SIGINT officer knows that you do not do this. Ultimately, so do the leaders of N.S.A., and apparently the leaders of N.S.A. have decided that they were just going to go against the tenets of something thats a gospel to a SIGINT officer. AMY GOODMAN: Were talking to Russell Tice. We will go to break and come back to him. Hes a former intelligence agent with the National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency, worked at the N.S.A. up until May of this past year, May of 2005. [break] AMY GOODMAN: We talk to Russell Tice, former intelligence agent with the National Security Agency, formerly with the Defense Intelligence Agency, worked with the N.S.A. up until May 2005. Russell Tice, what happened then? What happened in May 2005? RUSSELL TICE: Well, basically I was given my walking papers and told I was no longer a federal employee. So AMY GOODMAN: Why? RUSSELL TICE: Some time ago I had some concerns about a co-worker at D.I.A. who exhibited the classic signs of being involved in espionage, and I reported that and basically got blown off by the counterintelligence office at D.I.A. and kind of pushed the issue, because I continued to see a pattern of there being a problem. And once I got back to N.S.A., I pretty much dropped the issue, but there was a report that came across my desk in April of 2003 about two F.B.I. agents that were possibly passing secret counterintelligence information to a Chinese double agent, Katrina Leung, and I sent a secure message back to the D.I.A. counterintelligence officer, and I said I think the F.B.I. is incompetent, and the retaliation came down on me like a ton of bricks . AMY GOODMAN: What would you say to those who say you are speaking out now simply because you are disgruntled? RUSSELL TICE: Well, I guess thats a valid argument. You know, I was fired. But, you know, Ive kind of held my tongue for a long time now, and basically, you know, I have known these things have been going on for a while. The classification level of the stuff I deal with, basically what we call black world programs and operations, are very, very closely held. And you know, whether you think this is retaliation or not, I have something important to tell Congress, and I think they need to hear it. Id like to think my motives arent retaliation, but, you know, after what I have been through, I can understand someones argument to think I have been jaded. AMY GOODMAN: What about the risks you take as a whistleblower? I wanted to play a clip of F.B.I. whistleblower, Sibel Edmonds. She was working for the F.B.I. after 9/11 as a translator, translating intercepts, and ultimately she lost her job. And I asked her if she was afraid of speaking out. SIBEL EDMONDS: There are times that I am afraid, but then again, I have to remind myself that this is my civic duty and this is for the country, because what they are doing by pushing this stuff under this blanket of secrecy, what they are hiding is against the publics welfare and interest. And reminding that to myself just helps me, to a certain degree, overcome that fear. AMY GOODMAN: That was Sibel Edmonds. Russell Tice, you are a member of her group, the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition. RUSSELL TICE: That, I am. National Security Whistleblower Coalition is basically put together of

people who are in sort of the same boat that I am in, that have brought whistleblower concerns to the public or to their perspective chain of supervisors and have been retaliated against. And the intelligence community, all of the whistleblower protection laws arepretty much exempt the intelligence community. So the intelligence community can put forth their lip service about, Oh, yeah, we want you to put report waste fraud abuse, or You shall report suspicions of espionage, but when they retaliate you for doing so, you pretty much have no recourse. I think a lot of people dont realize that. And Sibel has basically started this organization to bring these sort of concerns out into the public and ultimately to get Congress to start passing some laws to protect folks that are going to be in a position to let the public or just, you know, to let Congress know that crimes are being committed. And thats what were talking about. Were talking about a crime here. So, you know, all of this running around and looking for someone who dropped the dime on a crime is a whole lot different than something like the Valerie Plame case. AMY GOODMAN: What do you think of the Justice Department launching an investigation into the leak, who leaked the fact that President Bush was spying on American citizens? RUSSELL TICE: Well, I think this is an attempt to make sure that no intelligence officer ever considers doing this. What was done to me was basically an attempt to tell other intelligence officers, Hey, if you do something like this, if you do something to tick us off, were going to take your job from you, were gonna do some unpleasant things to you. So, right now, the atmosphere at N.S.A. and D.I.A., for that matter, is fear. The security services basically rule over the employees with fear, and people are afraid to come forward. People know if they come forward even in the legal means, like coming to Congress with a concern, your career is over. And thats just the best scenario. Theres all sorts of other unfortunate things like, perhaps, if someone gets thrown in jail for either a witch-hunt or something trumping up charges or, you know, this guy who is basically reporting a crime. AMY GOODMAN: And what do you think of the news that the National Security Agency spying on American citizens without a court order and foreign nationals is now sharing this information with other agencies like, well, the other agency you worked for, the Defense Intelligence Agency? RUSSELL TICE: Intelligence officers work with one another all the time. As an analyst, you might have a problem. Everybody gets together. Its just common sense to find out what everybody knows, you know, come to a consensus as to what the answer is. Its sort of like a puzzle, you know, chunks of the puzzle. And maybe you have a few chunks as a SIGINT officer, and the C.I.A. has a few chunks in their arena and D.I.A. has a few elements of it, and everybody gets together and does a little mind meld to try to figure out whats going on. So its not unusual for the intelligence community to share information. But when were talking about information on the American public, which is a violation of the FISA law, then I think its even something more to be concerned about. AMY GOODMAN: Were you ever asked to engage in this? RUSSELL TICE: No, no, and if I did so, I did so unwittingly, which I have a feeling would be the case for many of the people involved in this. More than likely this was very closely held at the upper echelons at N.S.A., and mainly because these people knewGeneral Hayden, Bill Black, and probably the new one, Keith Alexander, they all knew this was illegal. So, you know, they kept it from the populace of N.S.A., because every N.S.A. officer certainly knows this is illegal. AMY GOODMAN: What do you mean if you did so, you did so unwittingly? RUSSELL TICE: Well, there are certain elements of the aspects of what is done where there are functionaries or technicians or analysts that are given information, and you just process that information. You dont necessarily know the nitty gritty as to where the information came from or the

its called compartmentalization. Its ironic, but you could be working on programs, and the very person sitting next to you is not cleared for the programs youre working on, and theyre working on their own programs, and each person knows to keep their nose out of the other persons business, because everythings compartmentalized, and youre only allowed to work on what you have a need to know to work on. AMY GOODMAN: What about the telecoms, the telecommunications corporations working with the Bush administration to open up a back door to eavesdropping, to wiretapping? RUSSELL TICE: If that was done and, you know, I use a big if here, and, remember, I cant tell you what I know of how N.S.A. does its business, but I can use the wiggle words like if and scenarios that dont incorporate specifics, but nonetheless, if U.S. gateways and junction points in the United States were used to siphon off information, I would think that the corporate executives of these companies need to be held accountable, as well, because they would certainly also know that what theyre doing is wrong and illegal. And if they have some sort of court order or some sort of paper or something signed from some government official, Congress needs to look at those papers and look at the bottom line and see whose signature is there. And these corporations know that this is illegal, as well. So everyone needs to be held accountable in this mess. AMY GOODMAN: When you come on board at these intelligence agencies, as at the National Security Agency, what are you told? I mean, were you aware of the Church hearings in the 1970s that went into the illegal spying on monitoring, of surveilling, of wiretapping of American citizens? RUSSELL TICE: Well, thats something thats really not drummed in your head. Thats more of a history lesson, I think. And the reasoning, ultimately, for the FISA laws and for whats called USSID 18, which is sort of the SIGINTers bible of how they conduct their business, but the law itself is drilled into your head, as well as the tenets of USSID 18, of which the number one commandment is Thou shalt not spy on Americans. AMY GOODMAN: Were talking to Russell Tice, former intelligence agent with the National Security Agency, worked at the N.S.A. up until May of 2005. What is data mining? RUSSELL TICE: Data mining is a means by which youyou have information, and you go searching for all associated elements of that information in whatever sort of data banks or databases that you put together with information. So if you have a phone number and you want to associate it with, say, a terrorist or something, and you want to associate it with, you know, Who is this terrorist talking to? you start doing data on what sort of information or what sort of numbers does that person call or the frequency of time, that sort of thing. And you start basically putting together a bubble chart of, you know, where everybody is. Lord help you if youve got a wrong phone call from one of these guys, a terrorist overseas or something, and youre American. Youre liable to have the F.B.I. camping out your doorstep, apparently, from everything thats going on. But its basically a way of searching all of the data that exists, and thats things like credit card records and drivers license, anything that you can get your hands on and try to associate it with some activity. I think if we were doing that overseas with known information, it would be a good thing if were pinning them down. But ultimately, when were using that onif were using that with U.S. databases, then ultimately, once again, the American people are their civil rights are being violated. AMY GOODMAN: Do you expect you are being monitored, surveilled, wiretapped right now? RUSSELL TICE: Yes, I do. As a matter of fact, inyou know, sometimes you just dont know. And being, you knowwhat theyve basically accused me of, I cant just walk around thinking that everybody is looking at my heels and are following me around. But in one scenario I turned the tables

on someone I thought was following me, and he ducked into a convenience store, and I just walked down thereand I saw him out of my peripheral visionand I basically walked down to where he ducked into and in the store, I walked up behind him. He was buying a cup of coffee, and he had a on his hip and his F.B.I. badge. I dont think it takes a rocket scientist to figure out what was going on there. AMY GOODMAN: The National Security Agency, or I should say the United Nations Security Council, there was a scandal a year or two ago about the monitoring of the diplomats there. It was in the lead up to the invasion, the U.S. wanting to know and put pressure on these Security Council ambassadors to know what they were saying before any kind of vote. What is the difference between that kind of monitoring and the monitoring of American citizens? RUSSELL TICE: Well, if the monitoring was done against foreigners and the monitoring was done overseas, as far as I know, thats perfectly legal. Its just a matter of who you are monitoring and where youre doing the monitoring. If its done at home and theyre Americans, then you have a different scenario. And were all trained that, you know, hands off. If you inadvertently run across something like that in the conduct of what youre doing, you immediately let someone know; if its involved in something being recorded, its immediately erased. So, you know, its something that we all know you just dont do. Overseas, okay; here at home, not so okay. AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to play for you the clip that we ran of President Bush earlier and get your response. This is President Bush on Sunday. PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: I can say that if somebody from al-Qaeda is calling you, wed like to know why. In the meantime, this program is conscious of peoples civil liberties, as am I. This is a limited program designed to prevent attacks on the United States of America. And I repeat: limited. And its limited to calls from outside the United States to calls within the United States. But, they are of known numbers of known al Qaeda members or affiliates. And I think most Americans understand the need to find out what the enemy is thinking. And thats what we are doing. Were at war with a bunch of cold-blooded killers who will kill on a moments notice. And I have a responsibility, obviously, to act within the law, which I am doing. Its a program has been reviewed constantly by Justice Department officials, a program to which the Congress has been briefed, and a program that is in my judgment necessary to win this war and to protect the American people. AMY GOODMAN: President Bush. Russell Tice, youre with the National Security Agency, or you were until May 2005. If al-Qaedas calling, the U.S. government wants to know. Your response? RUSSELL TICE: Well, thats probably a good thing to know. But thats why we have a FISA court and FISA laws. The FISA courtits not very difficult to get something through a FISA court. I kinda liken the FISA court to a monkey with a rubber stamp. The monkey sees a name, the monkey sees a word justification with a block of information. It cant read the block, but it just stamps affirmed on the block, and a banana chip rolls out, and then the next paper rolls in front of the monkey. When you have like 20,000 requests and only, I think, four were turned down, you cant look at the FISA court as anything different. So, you have to ask yourself the question: Why would someone want to go around the FISA court in something like this? I would think the answer could be that this thing is a lot bigger than even the President has been told it is, and that ultimately a vacuum cleaner approach may have been used, in which case you dont get names, and thats ultimately why you wouldnt go to the FISA court. And I think thats something Congress needs to address. They need to find out exactly how this system was operated and ultimately determine whether this was indeed a very focused effort or whether this was a vacuum cleaner-type scenario.

AMY GOODMAN: Did you support the President, Russell Tice? Did you vote for President Bush? RUSSELL TICE: I am a Republican. I voted for President Bush both in the last election and the first election where he was up for president. Ive contributed to his campaign. I get a postI mean, a Christmas card from the White House every year, I guess, because of my nominal contributions. Butso, you know, its not like, you knowI think youre going to find a lot of folks that are in the Department of Defense and the intelligence community are apt to be on the conservative side of the fence. But nonetheless, were all taught that you dont do something like this. And Im certainly hoping that the President has been misled in whats going on here and that the true crux of this problem is in the leadership of the intelligence community. AMY GOODMAN: Youre saying in the leadership of your own agency, the National Security Agency? RUSSELL TICE: Thats correct, yeah, because certainly General Alexander and General Hayden and Bill Black knew that this was illegal. AMY GOODMAN: But they clearly had to have authorization from above, and Bush is not contending that he did not know. RUSSELL TICE: Well, thats true. But the question has to be asked: What did the President know? What was the President told about this? Its justtheres just too many variables out there that we dont know yet. And, ultimately, I think Congress needs to find out those answers. If the President was fed a bill of goods in this matter, then thats something that has to be addressed. Or if the President himself knew every aspect of whats going on, if this was some sort of vacuum cleaner deal, then it is ultimately, I would think, the President himself that needs to be held responsible for whats going on here. AMY GOODMAN: And what do you think should happen to him? RUSSELL TICE: Well, you know, its certainly not up to me, but Ive heard all of the talk about impeachment and that sort of thing. You know, I saw our last president get impeached for what personally I thought should have been something between his wife and his family, and the big guy upstairs. Its not up to me, but if the President knew, if this was a vacuum cleaner job and the President knew exactly what was going onand ultimately what were hearing now is nothing but a cover-up and a whitewashand we find that to be the case, then I think it should cause some dire consequences for even the President of the United States, if he indeed did know exactly what was going on and if it was a very large-scale, you know, suck-up-everything kind of operation. AMY GOODMAN: This investigation that the Justice Department has launchedits interesting that Alberto Gonzales is now Attorney General of the United Statesthe latest story of The New York Times: Gonzales, when he was White House Counsel, when Andrew Card, chief of staff, went to Ashcroft at his hospital bedside to get authorization for this. Can he be a disinterested party in investigating this now, as Attorney General himself? RUSSELL TICE: Yeah, I think that for anyone to say that the Attorney General is going to be totally unbiased about something like this, I think thats silly. Of course, the answer is No. He cant be unbiased in this. I think that a special prosecutor or something like that may have to be involved in something like this, otherwise were just liable to have a whitewash. AMY GOODMAN: What do you think of the term police state? RUSSELL TICE: Well, anytime where you have a situation where U.S. citizens are being arrested and thrown in jail with the key being thrown away, you know, potentially being sent overseas to be tortured, U.S. citizens being spied on, you know, and it doesnt even go to the court that deals with these secret things, you know, I mean, think about it, you could have potentially somebody getting the

wrong phone call from a terrorist and having him spirited away to some back-alley country to get the rubber hose treatment and who knows what else. I think that would kind of qualify as a police state, in my judgment. I certainly hope that Congress or somebody sort of does something about this, because, you know, for Americans just to say, Oh, well, we have to do this because, you know, because of terrorism, you know, its the same argument that we used with communism years ago: take away your civil liberties, but use some threat thats, you know, been out there for a long time. Terrorism has been there forcertainly before 9/11 we had terrorism problems, and I have a feeling its going to be around for quite some time after whatever we deem is a victory in what were doing now in the Middle East. But, you know, its just something that has to be addressed. We just cant continue to see our civil liberties degraded. Ultimately, as Ben Franklin, I think, had said, you know, those who would give up their essential liberties for a little freedom deserve neither liberty or freedom, and I tend to agree with Ben Franklin. AMY GOODMAN: And your colleagues at the N.S.A. right now, their feelings, the National Security Agency? RUSSELL TICE: Boy, I think most folks at N.S.A. right now are just running scared. They have the security office hanging over their head, which has always been a bunch of vicious folks, and now theyve got, you know, this potential witch hunt going on with the Attorney General. People in the intelligence community are afraid. They know that you cant come forward. You have no protections as a whistleblower. These things need to be addressed. AMY GOODMAN: What do you mean you have no protection? RUSSELL TICE: Well, like I said before, as a whistleblower, youre not protected by the whistleblower laws that are out there. The intelligence community is exempt from the whistleblower protection laws. AMY GOODMAN: So why are you doing it? RUSSELL TICE: Well, ultimately, I dont have to be afraid of losing my job, because I have already lost my job, so thats one reason. The other reason is because I made an oath when I became an intelligence officer that I would protect the United States Constitution, not a president, not some classification, you know, for whatever, that ultimately Im responsible to protect the Constitution of the United States. And I think thats the same oath the President takes, for the most part. So, something likeimagine if somethingif we were like, I dont know, taking Americans and assassinating them for suspicions of suspicions of terrorism, and then we just put some classification on it and said, Well, this is super top secret, so no one can say anything about that. Well, at what point do you draw the line and say enough is enough. We have to say something here. AMY GOODMAN: What was your classification? How high up was your clearance? RUSSELL TICE: Well, clearances go up to the top secret level. But once you get to the top secret level, there are many caveats and many programs and things that can happen beyond that point. I specialized in whats known as black world operations and programs that are very closely held, things that happen in operations and programs in the intelligence community that are closely held, and for the most part these programs are very beneficial to ultimately getting information and protecting the American people. But in some cases, I think, classification levels at these specialwe call them special access programs, SAPscould be used to mask, basically, criminal wrongdoing. So I think thats something ultimately Congress needs to address, as well, because from what I can see, there is not a whole lot of oversight when it comes to some of these deep black programs.

AMY GOODMAN: Russell Tice, did you know anyone within the N.S.A. who refused to spy on Americans, who refused to follow orders? RUSSELL TICE: No. No, I do not. As far asof course, Im not witting of anyone that was told they will spy on an American. So, ultimately, when this was going on, I have a feeling it was closely held at some of the upper echelon levels. And youve got to understand, I was a worker bee. I was a guy that wrote the reports and did the analysis work andyou know, the detail guy. At some point, your reports have to get sent up up the line and then, you know, the management takes action at some point or another, but at my level, no, I was not involved in this. AMY GOODMAN: Has Congress responded to your letter offering to testify as a former employee of the National Security Agency? RUSSELL TICE: Not yet. Of course, the holidaysyou know, we just had the holidays here, so everybody is out of town. I cant condemn Congress too much yet, because I faxed it out on, I do believe, the 18th of December, and were just getting into the new year. AMY GOODMAN: And who did you send it to? RUSSELL TICE: I sent it to the chairs of the Senate Intelligence Committee and the House Intelligence Committee, the SSCI and the HPSCI. AMY GOODMAN: Well, I want to thank you very much for being with us. Is there anything else that you would like to add? RUSSELL TICE: Well, I cant think of a whole lot, except ultimately I think the American people need to be concerned about allegations that the intelligence community is spying on Americans. You know, one of my fears is that this would cause, just going into the N.S.A. and just tearing the place up and making the good work thats being done at the N.S.A. ineffective, because the N.S.A. is very important to this countrys security. And I certainly hope that some bad apples, even if these bad apples were at the top of N.S.A., dont ultimately destroy the capabilities of N.S.A.s ability to do a good job protecting the American people. AMY GOODMAN: Russell Tice, former intelligence agent with the National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency, worked for the N.S.A. up until May of last year. Thanks for joining us. RUSSELL TICE: Thank you.

You might also like