Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New York, commenced a lawsuit against J. Ezra Merkin (“Merkin”) and Gabriel Capital
Corporation (“GCC” and collectively, “Defendants”), alleging claims for, inter alia, securities
fraud offenses in violation of the Martin Act (G.B.L. § 352, et seq.), persistent fraud or illegality in
violation of Executive Law § 63(12), and breach of fiduciary duty in violation of Non-Profit
director of GCC, completely controlled and dominated GCC, commingled his personal funds with
GCC brokerage and bank accounts, and used the GCC accounts for his personal benefit, including
investors who were allegedly defrauded by Merkin (“Merkin Investors”) and disgorgement by
Merkin of all property allegedly constituting or derived from proceeds traceable to the commission
of the alleged offenses, including but not limited to valuable works of art owned by Merkin and
PaceWildenstein LLC, as agent for Kate Rothko Prizel and Christopher Rothko, in the amount of
$42,000,000;
WHEREAS, there is a lien held by HSBC Bank USA, N.A., in the amount of
$19,301,741.58 on certain of the Subject Property and fourteen lesser works of art, which fourteen
works of art remain subject to the Order of this Court dated April 7, 2009;
Stipulation by which the Defendants were enjoined, without the prior permission of the Attorney
General, from removing, transferring or conveying any assets, including any works of art acquired
by or controlled by Merkin;
WHEREAS, Merkin and Lauren K. Merkin have entered into a sales contract to sell
the Subject Property for $310,000,000, subject to the approval of the Attorney General;
2
WHEREAS, a recent appraisal conducted by Christie’s Appraisal, Inc., on behalf of
the Attorney General, indicates the purchase price of the Subject Property to be fair; and
WHEREAS, the Attorney General believes that an interlocutory sale of the Subject
Property is in the best interests of the Merkin Investors insofar as it liquidates and preserves assets
that might be available to satisfy the claims of the Merkin Investors pending conclusion of this
lawsuit; and
WHERERAS, the Attorney General and Merkin have agreed that the net proceeds
of the sale as described below will be held in escrow pending further order of this Court;
1. The Attorney General consents to the interlocutory sale of the Subject Property.
2. Merkin shall not take, or cause to be taken, any action intended to have the effect of
depreciating, damaging, or in any way diminishing the value of the Subject Property.
to be executed, any documents which may be required, consistent with this Stipulation and the
Contract (defined below), to complete the interlocutory sale of the Subject Property, including but
4. The Subject Property shall be sold in an arms-length transaction under terms and
conditions of a written contract (the “Contract”) approved by the Attorney General for the total
sum of $310,000,000.
5. Merkin and Lauren K. Merkin declare that the buyer of the Subject Property is not
3
6. Merkin and Lauren K. Merkin shall seek to cause the closing of the sale of the
7. The buyer shall pay, in accordance with the Contract, the sum of $310,000,000.00
8. The Escrow Agent shall pay, in accordance with the Contract, from said amount the
following sums:
Property and fourteen lesser works of art specifically identified as collateral for
d. $26,500,000 to TLIA, LLC, as its fee for advising the seller in connection with
Said sum shall be deposited in an account located in New York State (the
“Merkin Escrow Account”) by the Merkin Escrow Agent and shall thereafter be
4
f. in the event the payment to HSBC Bank USA, N.A., to satisfy the lien on the
Subject Property, cannot be made until July 1, 2009 or thereafter, a per diem fee
of $1,457.80 may be paid to HSBC for each day after June 30, 2009, in addition
in per diem fees if the payment to HSBC is made on July 15, 2009. The
9. The Attorney General and Merkin consent to the Merkin Escrow Agent paying the
sum of $19,263,132.00 to the order of Dechert, LLP, attorneys for Merkin (“Dechert”). Said sum
shall be deposited in an account located in New York State (“Merkin Art Sale Escrow Account”)
to be used solely for the purpose of paying federal, state and local taxes that Merkin believes are
due upon the sale of the Subject Property, as well as other expenses, including legal fees, directly
10. Upon a determination made by the applicable tax authorities that Merkin owes
additional taxes as a result of the sale of the Subject Property, and with notice to the Attorney
General, Dechert shall have the right to seek from the Merkin Escrow Agent the funds necessary to
make appropriate payment of Merkin’s tax obligations to the respective tax authorities as required
by law.
11. No later than five business days prior to any payment from funds held in the
Merkin Art Sale Escrow Account, Dechert shall provide to the Attorney General notice of such
proposed payment, identifying the amount, payee, and service provided; and, (a) a sworn statement
(if the payment is not related to legal fees and expenses) or (b) an attorney affirmation (if the
5
payment is related to legal fees and expenses), that the payment is made to satisfy an expense
12. Any balance remaining in the Merkin Art Sale Escrow Account after payment by
Dechert of Merkin's tax obligations, expenses and legal fees directly related to the sale of the
13. Without limiting other rights he may have, Merkin shall have the right to make
application to the Court, on notice to the Attorney General, for funds from the Merkin Escrow
Account necessary to pay his legal fees unrelated to the sale of the Subject Property.
14. Neither the Attorney General, Merkin nor Lauren K. Merkin waives any arguments
or defenses that each may have with respect to the net proceeds realized from the sale of the
Subject Property or any other matter at issue in this action. Nothing herein shall constitute an
admission or prejudice any party in any subsequent litigation, claim, dispute, proceeding or action
with respect to the net proceeds realized from the sale of the Subject Property or any other matter
15. The signature pages of this Stipulation and Order may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one
16. The Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the interpretation and enforcement
6
17. This Stipulation and Order may not be amended except by further Order of the
Court.
ANDREW M. CUOMO
Attorney General of
the State of New York
BY/~~/
navid A. MarkOWitZ
Date: ~ - 3~ -~/
By: _ Date:
---------
Andrew J. Levander
DECHERTLLP
Attorneys for Defendants and Lauren K. Merkin
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
(212) 698-3683
SO ORDERED: