You are on page 1of 10

Scientific Journal of Earth Science

June 2013, Volume 3, Issue 2, PP.49-58

A Discussion of the Geological Characteristics


and the Typical Disastersin Karst Areas,
Southwest China
Zhengjiao Qin1,2# , Daoxian Yuan1,2,3, Guiqiang Huang4,Yu Wang5
1. Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin Guangxi 541004, China
2. Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Land and Resources, Guilin Guangxi 541004, China
3. International Research Center on Karst (IRCK) under the Auspices of UNESCO, Guilin Guangxi 541004, China
4. General Academy of Geological Survey of Guangxi, Nanning Guangxi 530023, China
5. Yunnan Geo-environment Institute, Kunming Yunnan 650216, China
#

Email: qinzhj-2002@163.com

Abstract
As the implementation of the western Development Strategy, economic and engineering construction of west China have been
greatly improved, but simultaneously series of engineering and environmental geological problems and disasters have arised,
especially in the karst rock mountain areas. After multiple on-the-spot investigations, the team of the project A Research on the
Major Environmental Geological Problems and Their Countermeasure in the Southwest Karst Area has found that the major
problems include: (1) karst collapse due to the change of ground water dynamic and mined deformation, (2) karst rockslide
triggered by arised by engineering construction, and (3) seepage and contamination caused by engineering construction and
mining. The main reasons why these problems arised are lack of understanding the specificity and inherent vulnerability of karst
environment; lack of investigation and monitoring before engineering construction, and inadequate processing of the waste in
mining.
Keywords: Karst Area; Groundwater Dynamics; Geological Environment; Aquifer; Cause of the Disaster

1,2 1,2,3 4 5
1. 541004
2. 541004
3. 541004
4. 530023
5. 650216

(1)(2)
(3)

- 49 http://www.j-es.org/

[1]

[2][3][4]

( 1)

:[],, 114 ,,,


,,,.

1 ()
- 50 http://www.j-es.org/

1.1
,

1.2

()
77
1.8 / 22 28.6%

1.3
( 1)

6001200m 250500m
[5]
90%

1.4

1/3

2.1

- 51 http://www.j-es.org/

1536 8735
74.16% 25.84%
51.20% 48.80% 94.20% 5.80%

( 2)
2.1.1

( 2)

1536 8735 1441 8200


93.88% 95 535
6.12%

10m

6m 1

- 52 http://www.j-es.org/

4890 56%

[6] 10km2
17046m3/d 8 5
40 4 /km2

2.1.2

06m

610m

>10m

52.13

32.70

15.17

74.61

24.45

0.94

68.60

25.40

6.00

2010 3 10
1 6 1

2010 6 3 14 150m
2 20m6 4
6 5
8
200 m3 800 m
210cm 220
750 m 2010 6 1 20
0.91m 1.7km 60m
30 /

2.2
2.2.1

- 53 http://www.j-es.org/

2.2.2

1727 514 1051


7.142km 3
73989
2.2.3


(P2q-m)(P2l)
(C2m)
P2q-m

20m 7080m 610m


12000m3 3

2009 1
2009
1 3

3 ()

2.3

- 54 http://www.j-es.org/


160 t/a 320 320
t/a 2
4.3km 1 4 4 40cm
2008 1 2008 2 2km
2 S0316S0316-1 1 5 2008 3 22
2008 15
3 2012 5 26 30
58 240 32 135 438.39
304.78 1 6

3
3.1

[7]

3.2
3.2.1

100400m 15
0.5km2 1985 35m 2
3m 1993 3 5040m22522m2 30m 1994 6
1997 6 1993
192m 108m 45m 4 3
- 55 http://www.j-es.org/

510m
3.2.2

50

620

28
1300m 700

4
141.1km
1.5km 1.0km 33.27km
24.322km 8.33km 617.55m 5.73-10.303km
2 5.38 m3/d
2

(m)

(Km) (m2)

08 7 2
(m)

08 6 17
(m3)

1860

2.66

710

937

1854

1.10

710

1022

1853.15

7.55

710

1700

1851.78

1849.31

1849

0.73

710

440

1810.39

10.303

710

2460

20602.08

1609.08

1971

28909.44

4025.38
203.67

1350

52.7

4.1

4.2
1609-1810m 5

200-1000m
18 3
- 56 http://www.j-es.org/

45000
23000

5 ()
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.
13.14.(l/s)(..)15.16.17.18.
(m3/d)

5.1

5.2

5.3
1

- 57 http://www.j-es.org/


114

REFERENCES
[1] , , , . .[M]. . . 1990
[2] , . [J]. . 2009 1 : 94-95
[3] . [J]. [J]. 2002 3 : 75-76
[4] , , . [J]. . Vol.18, No.3, Sep. 2007: 44-48
[5] , , . [J]. . .
. 2003, 226-231
[6] , , , . [J]. . Vol.32, No.1, Jan.2011: 107-113
[7] , , , . [J]. . Vol.33, No.3, May 2012: 341-348

1955-

1933-

Email: qinzhj-2002@163.com

1963-

1960-

4
- 58 http://www.j-es.org/

5 S0316

You might also like