Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the Introduction, we presented a number of commonly expressed opinions about how languages are learned. \7e asked you to indicate how strongly you agreed with these opinions. Now that you have read about some of the theory and research in second language acquisition, take another look at those ideas. Have you changed your mind about the importance of imitation or feedback on errors, or whether starting second language instruction early is the best approach? Do you feel that your views about second language acquisition have been changed or only confirmed by what you've read in the preceding chapters?
To conclude this introducdon to second language acquisition research, here are some of our own reflections on these popular ideas about language learning.
In
It is difficult to are learned m"ltlilthtqqgh imitaflqn. For one thing, learner. {'".'d''ie man}' noGl
sentences that thev could not have heard befbre. These sentences are based
of how the I t in childrent sentences as 'I'm hiccing up and I cant stop', and 'It was upside down but I turned it upside right', and with second language
learners who say'The cowboy rided into town',
him is angry. These examples and many others provide evidence that language learners do not simply internalize a great list of imitated and
memorized sentences.
Thi
not mea
role to
in lan
t!441qt lanUege,
the
wellas thoseFho i*it"t. stratesv but it is not a uiTilffiil characteristic of lansuase learners.
ne
ar
le
1 Languages are
mainly
imitation
ea
id
tB4
Popular
Like first language learners, second language learners produce many sentences that they could not have heard. Some-may lqllIbj{lhglbg4qfit
from opportunities to imitate samples of the new-lt;zuase, and i,rrirarion is clearly important in developing pronunciation and intonition. For some ;a"anGl learneri pronunciation, careful listening and imitation in a language laboratory can be veryvaluable. But for beginning learners, the slavish imitation and rote memorization that characterized audiolingual language approaches to language teaching can lead to a dead end. Learners need to do more than recite bits of perfectly accurate language. They learn as they make the effort needed to understand and make themselves understood in genuinely meaningful interaction. Otherwise, theymayhave acquired limle more than a collection ofsentences, waiting for the moment when those sentences will be useful!
3L
la
The I
predic
metali
guage
nor b
Parents usually correct young children uilten they mahe grammatical errors
sroun
catlon choicr
enSag
There is considerable variation in the extent to which parenrs correct their on age-andchidi.n'r speech. vaiiation is und. tX/henon the oarerGGZiIllfi chilclren are very young, parents rarely comment on grammatical errors, Tl altnougn thev mav correct lapses rn poltteness or the chorce of a word thar iloesnt make sensc, Al ch-ildien reafh-tEliooi age, parenrs may corrc.t th. kindi ofnon-standard speech that they hope their children will outgrow, for example, 'Me and Fred are going outside now'.
f[t
's
envirc
47
Every,
who
\W
f<
as
a r,rle, parent"
highh
tend to focus on meaning rather than form when rhey correcr childrent speech. Thus,Tflf correct an incorrect word choice, an incorrect
kr
adul$
langur
langul
learnir
sryles
Teach
secon(
The case for second language learners is more complex. On the one hand, both children and adults can acquire a great deal of language without any formal instruction or feedback on error-On the orher haqd, the evidene suggests that, without corrective feedback and guidance, ,..oil age ln qstlaTljg_ gng-ramma!]l1l ror4s ror years.
ffi-r
learn
rvhich
motiv
studer
age, --"-
1:
stuoer
---motl
v
that
d'r
;fi.
fieta
<
learners
ag
on
IQ
on settlnss a
n se
re
en
ga
environment.
be
ed
ict
pr
acquisition is motiuation
-a" q& ho .y "r
\=
lea
who want to
tend to
better than
ar
?h12 ,-i-
i-_
_-
_'
cu rs
le
Te sty
les
ref
an
dp
rounds
is
ffiT-if.-.*periences, all of which have contributed to their motivation to learn and attitudes toward the target language and the community with which it The princ:Sal way that influence motivation by maki classroom a ruve envlfonment ln w
culturalln
'n
gr
i@opriatetotheir
srt po rv
success.
ter
ea
te to
sso
isa
he
ac
no infuence
er
learning aptitude or how the instruction interacts with individual for learning.
ar ilo
ne
rs'
le
er
rn
are n,
ea
cv
la
ra se
co tn g.
rne
Everyone aere{that
ne
as
no
or
st
4 The
ge
with wide ltles "$Ei"lly ttue if the emphasis is on oral communication skills rather than metalinguistic knowledge. Most important, perhaps, is the fact that lanlearning involves a variety of skills and abilities. S;udenushSgl{ not-be excluded from opportunities to learn another language on the ablllty to . In manyeouI"tion"l .ont.xts, students from immigrant or rru-nority groups have no choice about learning a is findingways to the different kinds of ability that students bring to the learning
ar
rte
re ln
c sa er
ofi
ca
eg
gu
ag
lc
re
ndl
se
co
lan
ab
Popular ideas
learning
out
18i
ng
ar
le
ni
186
reuisited
esp
intr
bas
learning
cia
On
aov
std
instruction
se l
particular
exposure to
co
performance in the
th Ho mo str
then it may be
ee arl
as possible.
Ti
gth ubt
to
even in cases
rec
\7hen an early srart means th"t cb4dEg h"* littleppport,tnity io conttnue to resulting bili tlve conseouences. .bor chr rom mlnofltvJ
ng ar le ni . ,th es m m rs a
og
ant to
stt
likely
on
that
who begin
language as
The research evidence is fairly learning at an early age arc be indistinguishable from speakers.
Firs
fi
Ger lear
sofi
On ,h9
ho
e or
ol
will be able
val ua un de rs
[ean:
earlv
elfsc
mo
res
Iear
lanE
time in a
freq
un
de
gra
re
strong commitment to mainraining and developing the childt first lalguage, it more efficient to begin later. Qld*.Sb:ldren (for ren olds) are to up quickly to those w prglammgq o only a rnstructton.
lec ex pl ab nb ca e, m a
For foreign instruction or for instruction of proficiency that is is not native-like all the situation is quite different. of is basic communicative skill for all and where there is a
lan
lev den gu
rst ch
many children, is no opportqnity to have their in their first language. They are of minoriry where It is not practical for to offer them educational programme in their - language, or first in jurisdictions legislatlon has a single language for children, regardless their For these children, it crucial to have who resfect difficulry who encourage parents to maintain language, and who that second language takes time and effort.the me mb ols ho ofe the sc yliv iss chil dre
For
tn s
just to
at ls
ln
e ctassroom,
Arp not
that
en du
at
an
take
that
Hol leal
erfo
tes
learr
thar
co
fru
t87
especially true if the foreign language course includes a period of more intensive exposufe to the new language. All school programmes should be based on realistic estimates of how long it takes to learn a second language.
One or
a week-even
frustration as learners I
ffi
for seven or eieht vears-will not uce fhis'drip-feed' approach to havE stuoyln rs wttnout are sometimes right a ts,
firtt language
First, we should recognize that
languages are relatively close cousins (for example,
Germ
*r*^^^"--
-- - f
learners already'knov/-including the alphabet, cognate w6Jds, as well some basic princi synrix.
o"6;;[=;;L""d, thetra
the nat
leirners' oerceotion ofsomer.'rrtial similarity bcnareen the first and second lan learners are
,h",--4Exjeil"r. Second language learning is not simply a process of putting < .. r a I set5ndJanguage words into first-language sentences. In fact, learners may not always be able to take advantage of similarities unless they are pointed out to them. \7e saw can be
take ad
Similarities because
assl{rl] eL mcogq
ctll r o_nqetlmes'
gu
dg
ye
af
an
major source
ad re
tar
se
throu
1n
the amount of
se
co
ad
I lrom
rcn evl
read
Secor
go
op
an ide
od
ww
ne
will benefit more than those who simply on getting the main from -il/hat is most striking in research that in order to successfully the of in text, reader needs to know or moie of
he ist wo ha rd st
the
dre
as
in ac<
tion i
learn, do doing
tte
xt. th ea y
er
emffi
appthe
sp
world are
rh. ""d*r.ble fact that most languages of in many different Thus, it no longer seems
et ear rop
learners
and tl
to pr
practi
ar
that
Rather,
unirl
hearir unit r.r
no
will
the
the
me
permit
em
yar
to likely
interlocutors
1I
Rsel
vel
asl
la
necess
all the indiaidual sounds in the secon; language R.:.lr.h l" p*gtation second languagespe* liry ,p@.tr ro d.p.rrd*6 "'. o..thet "6'iliE' r.p ro drr..
wn ho
ha ss
restru Some
t@-the
lhrs(
me
so
ne
w pr
features
ag
that number ofwords sentenFF6dR unoerstand ancl to make themselves rstanclrng ot of the
an d cu fo
sp
ue
rel
ati mo
rte
to
-ffi;
Ieaturc
ker
so6EiifrE-iiGT[ffor them to
respect,
their ait@oros
ea
or
Pe
ce
tron
la
one I
yc
in
att le m
er
nt
that
es
and important
t@
iali
dre
s,
This statement is absolutely true. But it does nor tell the whole story. 'e d ram a t i c al ly dililr g l r r-
,ar"-ffi".;,
t0
co
through reading
orm
th
ar
1BB
reuisited
ele
lan
in
learnin
I-ea tner",
attempt i,)g
r,3g94
ting that they have the form (or make errors when they
The decline
inacnracy at stageymay show that learners are incorporating new information about the language into their interlanguage. \7e saw, for example, how
sa
learners may ask correct formulaic questions such as '\Zhatt that?', or'How do you procheinEnglish?', and then produce questions like qil/hat you're
doing with that?' at a later time. Language development is not just adding one rule after another. Rather, it involves processes of integrating new
language forms and patterns inro an existing interlanguage, readjusting and restructuring until all the pieces fit. Some st
are based on the false assum
tlon
second
tlsasorto
on or ru
rs can be seen in the organization oftex language feature in the first unit and reinforce it in several subsequint units,
and then mor'e on the next feature, with only rare opporrunities for learners to practise the ones previously taught. This isolated presentation and practice of one sffucture at a time does not provide learnei, with an opportunity to discover how different language features compare and contrast in normal language use. It is also likely that, without opportunities to continue hearing, seeing, and using them, the language feaiures learned in the first unit will have been forgotten long before the last.
"g
isolated-pffiTltion, orderi
practrce of slmple
to com
-,------i--
ab
ea
sp
ke
Te slo
we
forms are so that to use, int of providi tnem. not difficult or complex forms. As we in r 6 (Study 31) some common language forms turn out to be extremely rare in
must in' la learn them ifthe
ac cla ss ne a an rar rs lea o sh ro rn m er ces ssr cla oo ml
he
rra
of delive ry,
rs
At the time, there is no doubt that second language learners benefit from the efforts of native and fuent bilin[ual to modify their speech to help them understand. The in modified interacion may contain a variety of linguistic structures, some 'simple' and 'complex'. However, it also includes a range of adjustments that second language learners to in interactions with native and more advanced of the second language more easily-more repetition,
sa m e ea sp ke gu rs lan ag so en ga ge en
re
Popular ideas
language learning
out
19
Immr
othert
pe se e eu ab m le e
13
d e
Su
meanl
------=
or wrl
an m
,E"t
"-ilffi
la
nd
co
la
-\posu
.Fhen r
systemf-showing where
or th e
where
tter-n to
":fi'fi
-.f+ngs
:raterla
rne rsd lea to
Teachers have a
hel
their
lnstructlc)n
this includes
err or.
--a-rners
tne Drovrslon
acl as s,
n errors students rn
perslstent,
lt lS lfllpr
e@
:enainl
::laStere
ar e
ne
ce
ss
ar
ssi es
tr
Ex
ce
many
sth
feedback ive effect on motivation. of course, a to their reactlons to coirectlon. The amount and rype of correction that offeredii ",ii J' ;:11 1"' relationship with the with other. Children and adults with little education in their first lan will not benifii atly from tl nrversrty students of lan find explanations ofgreat
ve
:ffi.:il'::
;T
is
form or structure immediately or consistentty. f the error is based on a developmental pattern, instruction be useful onlywhen the learner is ready for it. It may be to ,.p."t feedback on error
the orf
14u
ee
-;e
cu
(t
c(
an
ch
er
gu
r91
some studenG
to
errors in an oral
nlcatlon se
sh
hn
gu
ea
alr
dy
been taught
can provide ensible i
Such a
t ofcou
ne
meanl
or wntten texts t
classroom second materials to t that is new m quences. I here wlll undouQted.ly be 4 loss of motivation if students aie not #,..:ry t@ Students also need to develop strategies for diiling with 'real' or 'aurhentic' material if they are eventually goingto b. prep"r.J for language use outside the classroom. They do this first with the teaiher's
'mastered' Jhus, restrictin
(*-=.-*7..''
,r1fr
t ln a context things.seern easy, But would be a ts to use -r-s:_.----- .--!materials exc_lu-ively 9r jIgn_ppdglsinqntly. \7e remember that lefun6rs who succesrfully ".q,rir. a second'language outside classrooms certainly are exposed to a great variery of forms and structures they have not
mastered.
If the activi4gs lle ryellJlqsjgqed aryl learners 1p__prop_1i1telymatch,e1lp4r and group work provides far more practice in speakins and particioatins in conversatlons mewhat surprisifi-fly, research has shown that lg,allersdo-nor+Joduce3ny more errors in their speech when talking to learners at similar levels of proficien or to natrYe research also shows, however, that
i'*s
:-it
ag
students onb to
ld
use
ou
13 Teacbers
that expose
192
way learners working together can discover express meaning the second language. In order this happen, the tasks must be carefully planned to give learners access to new language they need.
th
ort
at
Res
inf
tivi
an
dp
air
ac
Group
of
nt. Used
nt
and teacher-centred activities, it nlng.
ua
lw
comtination with
rm po
tF
m
CVCI
Inc
feed
imn
hear
thes
th
ht directlv. teaching typically give opportfiry to only number of and sentence types. Even when language provides richer language input, the fact something is or made available in input does not learners will acquire it right away. example,
ar ho or m m et e
tnan
ds
has
th le
expr
sayli
et au
att
th
wh
fro
en
some aspects of the second language emerge and evolve according to sequences and learners may be more likely to learn certain language features they are 'ready'.Thuq ?ttempts
vel
de
op
teach aspects oflanguage that are too far away ot development wlll usua.lly be frustratrng.
the
ml
currenr srase
ea
en g ug ht
lncr(
rnhe
of
*her *.@mple,
att
any
as
ac
te
hi
and the
th
an
an
dr
leilrnmuch more
el
are needs, experiences, and learning sryles. p6-nul@yJgrners can learn a grear deal one ever teaches them. qre able to use their [earning mechanisms to discover of the rules
e,l
im
vocabulary, can be interested in the opportunity to learn to the learner's age, interesrs,
ta
.-:-
on
at
,kt
;oG
.losln
subjr langr
Reser
"nI
classt
tive
Th
foun,
al'
ur
at
'n
I7
been to be true for at different ages and in instructional models-from to based instruction. It the advantage of not interrupting the flow of interactioq. It ir r.. ffidEGTE-. .--information they need without embarrassing them.
di ar
le
au
ha
contc
st
on ln
clifr
cei
rangr
exam
accul
--
which learners in
exactly which
In content-based instruction (for example, immersion classes) and in communicative instruction with younger learners, more explicit forms of
feedback have been found to be more effective in getting learners to respond immediately. Recasts often to be misin Learners seem to hear them as cohffiati n as cofrectlon 3i-tuations, recasts have been found to be moreEffiEiiGl teacher has a method of signalling to the student-rone of voice, gesture, or facial
sayrng, and I'm telling you how you can say it better'.
^----. Co-nEn r-based i nrcrilrio-ffi to spend d6iFiimeln lghgut out on ln ect matter. The ranse of vocabularv
a!
i6-learn the I
uage sffucture that students encounter in learning academic subjects is more varied than that which is rypically available in foreign
language classes.
Research has confirmed that students in content-based and immersion classes develop comprehension skills, vocabulary, and general communicative competence in the new language. Teachers and researchers have also fo und, hs\a'tygSlbC[he ab iliry tJun-ders taffi tr.,Oi i.t .1" especially in areas ofaccuracy on l-anguage fbatures that do not usually interfere with meaning. Thus, for example, students can spend years in French immersion without achieving accuracy in marking nouns for gender or verbs for tense. Experimental studies in which an elemenr of form-focused instruction was added to the content-based instruction have shown that, with guidance, students can
r94
Popu lar
improve in these areas as well. Both students and teachers need to keep in mind that content-based language teaching is also language teaching.
GI
Conclusion
Knowing more about second language acquisition research will not tell you what to do in your classroom tomorrow morning. -We hope, however, thar
this book has provided you with information that encourages you to reflest on your experience in teaching. \7e hope, in addition, that this refection will contribute to a better understanding ofyour responsibilities as a teacher and those ofyour students as language learners.
As we have seen, language learning is affected by many factors. Among these
Theg langu
are in
not ir
a dict
ACCU
langu
ofthe learner, the social and cultural environment both inside and outside the classroom, the srructure of the native and target languages, opportunities for interaction with speakers of the target language, and access to correction and form-focused instruction. It is clear that teachers do not have control over all these factors. Nevertheless, a befter understanding of them will permit teachers and learners to make the most of the time they spend together in the twin
are the personal characteristics and experiences processes ofteaching and learning a second language.
than i order
ACTI(
classrr
questi
North
langu:
rhroul
NUDI(
reachi
structl
ilstrur
repetil
each o
.{UDIT
tbr exa
BEHA\