Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JOHN STERLING
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................XI
Part One: Theory and practice of implementing balanced scorecards in law firms
Chapter 1: The balanced scorecard – an overview of Kaplan and Norton’s system .............. 3
The balanced scorecard in its most basic form ........................................................................ 4
The balanced scorecard as a management tool ...................................................................... 5
Rationale and arguments for the balanced scorecard .............................................................. 8
Looking forward towards law firm adoption............................................................................. 9
Chapter 4: Client relationship measures – applying the client satisfaction element ........... 27
High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 27
Strategies and action plans driving client relationships ........................................................... 29
Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 30
Chapter 5: Business process measures – applying the business process element .............. 31
High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 31
Strategies and action plans for internal process improvement ................................................. 33
III
Contents
Chapter 6: Learning and growth measures – applying the people/capability dimension ... 37
High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 37
Strategies and action plans .................................................................................................. 40
Organisational capability assessments – an alternative approach for aligning capabilities
with strategy ....................................................................................................................... 40
Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 42
Case studies 2-4: Using client feedback to inform relation strategies ................................ 59
Background and strategic context ......................................................................................... 59
Overview of firm experiences with client feedback ................................................................. 60
Differentiation ..................................................................................................................... 63
Case study: moving from pilot to purposeful programme ....................................................... 64
Case study: client feedback and strategic planning ................................................................ 65
IV
Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms
Index ............................................................................................................................... 75
V
Executive summary
IT HAS been over ten years since Robert throughout the law firm, adoption of
Kaplan and David Norton published their balanced scorecards yields superior
landmark strategy book, The Balanced performance. Naturally, Kaplan and
Scorecard1. The book and the concept Norton’s own research underscores this
of a balanced scorecard (BSC) are now performance improvement, but independent
so entrenched in the field of strategic researchers have found similar advantages.
management that application of balanced Most recently, a study published in Advances
scorecards is literally ‘old news’ to strategists. in Accounting found that “firms who adopt
Yet the concept is only beginning to take the BSC significantly outperform firms
hold within law firm management circles. that do not adopt the BSC over a three
In commercial, manufacturing and other year period”2. Simply, shareholder returns
service industries, balanced scorecards are better at firms that employ balanced
have proven to be an extremely useful scorecards to drive strategy implementation.
tool in translating strategy into meaningful In an era in which law firm performance is
action and understandable, measurable increasingly public – and a determining factor
outcomes. Naturally, that includes tracking for where the best lawyers decide to practise
financial outcomes, but in a law firm – it seems axiomatic that firm management
environment it reaches well beyond revenue would want to adopt tools that are proven to
per lawyer and profit per equity partner. It improve performance. This report provides
calls on management to identify meaningful the necessary introduction for firms wanting
measures and actions related to the to adopt the balanced scorecard to improve
development of top quality people, highly their own performance.
satisfied clientele and superior business The report includes:
practices and processes.
The balanced scorecard is not a An overview of the balanced scorecard
‘silver bullet’ solution or an off-the- concept and tool – from Kaplan and
shelf prescription for effective strategy Norton’s original conception to its
implementation. On the contrary, it requires practical application around the world
creative thinking that connects firm and and the results achieved from its adoption;
practice level strategies to action plans and A discussion of how the balanced
measures that answer a critical question scorecard applies in a law firm
for lawyers and staff. Namely, an effective environment – including a discussion
balanced scorecard answers the question, of the central opportunities created by
“what does this strategy mean for me?” balanced scorecard adoption, as well as
Beyond the qualitative benefit of the central challenges the tool presents
answering this critical question for people for law firm management; and
VII
Executive summary
VIII
About the author
IX
Acknowledgements
THE AUTHOR wishes to acknowledge and recognise the work of Robert S. Kaplan and David P.
Norton – originators of the balanced scorecard. It is on their considerable shoulders that works like
this stand.
The author also thanks the contributors of case study materials – indispensible and greatly
appreciated – and the firms profiled in those case studies.
Finally, the author thanks his partners, John Smock and Peter Giuliani, for their continuing
support throughout the development of this report.
XI