You are on page 1of 14

Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms

Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms


JOHN STERLING

JOHN STERLING

PUBLISHED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH


Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms
is published by Ark Group

UK/EUROPE OFFICE NORTH AMERICA OFFICE ASIA/PACIFIC OFFICE


Ark Group Ltd Ark Group USA Ark Group Australia Pty Ltd
Paulton House 4408 N. Rockwood Main Level,
8 Shepherdess Walk, 83 Walker Street
Suite 150
London N1 7LB North Sydney NSW
Peoria IL 61615
United Kingdom Australia 2060
Tel +44 (0)20 7490 0049 Tel +1 773 529 5750 Tel +61 1300 550 662
Fax +44 (0)20 7324 2373 Fax +1 773 529 5760 Fax +61 1300 550 663
info@ark-group.com info@ark-groupusa.com aga@arkgroupasia.com

Commissioning editor Publishing director US marketing enquiries


Anna Shaw Lucy Brazier Daniel Smallwood
ashaw@ark-group.com lbrazier@ark-group.com dsmallwood@ark-group.com

Head of editorial Asia/Pacific marketing enquiries ISBN: 978-1-906355-55-5


Kate Clifton Steve Oesterreich
kclifton@ark-group.com aga@arkgroupasia.com Copyright
The copyright of all material appearing within
this publication is reserved by the author and
Head of production UK/Europe marketing enquiries Ark Conferences 2009. It may not be reproduced,
Danielle Filardi Adam Scrimshire duplicated or copied by any means without the
dfilardi@ark-group.com ascrimshire@ark-group.com prior written consent of the publisher.
Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms
JOHN STERLING

PUBLISHED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH


Contents

Executive summary ............................................................................................................VII

About the author................................................................................................................IX

Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................XI

Part One: Theory and practice of implementing balanced scorecards in law firms

Chapter 1: The balanced scorecard – an overview of Kaplan and Norton’s system .............. 3
The balanced scorecard in its most basic form ........................................................................ 4
The balanced scorecard as a management tool ...................................................................... 5
Rationale and arguments for the balanced scorecard .............................................................. 8
Looking forward towards law firm adoption............................................................................. 9

Chapter 2: Applying the balanced scorecard in a law firm environment –


opportunities and challenges............................................................................................ 11
Nature of the opportunity .................................................................................................... 12
Linkages to profit per partner ............................................................................................... 12
Effective implementation ...................................................................................................... 13
Practice group performance ................................................................................................. 15
Challenges to adopting balanced scorecards in law firms ...................................................... 15

Chapter 3: Financial measures – applying the financial element ....................................... 21


High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 21
Profit drivers ....................................................................................................................... 22
The constricting denominator – equity partnership ................................................................. 25
Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 26

Chapter 4: Client relationship measures – applying the client satisfaction element ........... 27
High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 27
Strategies and action plans driving client relationships ........................................................... 29
Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 30

Chapter 5: Business process measures – applying the business process element .............. 31
High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 31
Strategies and action plans for internal process improvement ................................................. 33

III
Contents

Alternative fee arrangements................................................................................................ 33


Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 34

Chapter 6: Learning and growth measures – applying the people/capability dimension ... 37
High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 37
Strategies and action plans .................................................................................................. 40
Organisational capability assessments – an alternative approach for aligning capabilities
with strategy ....................................................................................................................... 40
Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 42

Chapter 7: Implementing the balanced scorecard at the firm level –


a ‘how to’ primer ............................................................................................................. 43
Information gathering and background analysis .................................................................... 43
Vision and strategic plan development.................................................................................. 44
High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 45
Engage the practice groups ................................................................................................. 46
Dialogue, evaluation and adjustment ................................................................................... 48

Chapter 8: Implementing the balanced scorecard at the practice group level –


a secondary ‘how to’ primer............................................................................................. 49
Information gathering and background analysis .................................................................... 49
Vision and strategic plan development.................................................................................. 50
High-level objectives ........................................................................................................... 51
Action planning and balanced scorecard development .......................................................... 51
Dialogue, evaluation and adjustment ................................................................................... 51

Part Two: Applying the balanced scorecard: case studies

Case study 1: Client relationship drive at Mallesons Stephen Jaques ................................ 55


Background ........................................................................................................................ 55
Vision, strategy and high-level objectives .............................................................................. 56
Integrated implementation and metrics ................................................................................. 56
The results .......................................................................................................................... 57

Case studies 2-4: Using client feedback to inform relation strategies ................................ 59
Background and strategic context ......................................................................................... 59
Overview of firm experiences with client feedback ................................................................. 60
Differentiation ..................................................................................................................... 63
Case study: moving from pilot to purposeful programme ....................................................... 64
Case study: client feedback and strategic planning ................................................................ 65

IV
Balanced Scorecards for Law Firms

Case study 5: Bryan Cave – An integrated, balanced approach to


strategy implementation ................................................................................................... 69
Background and introduction ............................................................................................... 69
Strategy development .......................................................................................................... 69
Integrated approach to implementation ................................................................................ 70
Results ............................................................................................................................... 72

Index ............................................................................................................................... 75

V
Executive summary

IT HAS been over ten years since Robert throughout the law firm, adoption of
Kaplan and David Norton published their balanced scorecards yields superior
landmark strategy book, The Balanced performance. Naturally, Kaplan and
Scorecard1. The book and the concept Norton’s own research underscores this
of a balanced scorecard (BSC) are now performance improvement, but independent
so entrenched in the field of strategic researchers have found similar advantages.
management that application of balanced Most recently, a study published in Advances
scorecards is literally ‘old news’ to strategists. in Accounting found that “firms who adopt
Yet the concept is only beginning to take the BSC significantly outperform firms
hold within law firm management circles. that do not adopt the BSC over a three
In commercial, manufacturing and other year period”2. Simply, shareholder returns
service industries, balanced scorecards are better at firms that employ balanced
have proven to be an extremely useful scorecards to drive strategy implementation.
tool in translating strategy into meaningful In an era in which law firm performance is
action and understandable, measurable increasingly public – and a determining factor
outcomes. Naturally, that includes tracking for where the best lawyers decide to practise
financial outcomes, but in a law firm – it seems axiomatic that firm management
environment it reaches well beyond revenue would want to adopt tools that are proven to
per lawyer and profit per equity partner. It improve performance. This report provides
calls on management to identify meaningful the necessary introduction for firms wanting
measures and actions related to the to adopt the balanced scorecard to improve
development of top quality people, highly their own performance.
satisfied clientele and superior business The report includes:
practices and processes.
The balanced scorecard is not a „ An overview of the balanced scorecard
‘silver bullet’ solution or an off-the- concept and tool – from Kaplan and
shelf prescription for effective strategy Norton’s original conception to its
implementation. On the contrary, it requires practical application around the world
creative thinking that connects firm and and the results achieved from its adoption;
practice level strategies to action plans and „ A discussion of how the balanced
measures that answer a critical question scorecard applies in a law firm
for lawyers and staff. Namely, an effective environment – including a discussion
balanced scorecard answers the question, of the central opportunities created by
“what does this strategy mean for me?” balanced scorecard adoption, as well as
Beyond the qualitative benefit of the central challenges the tool presents
answering this critical question for people for law firm management; and

VII
Executive summary

„ An in-depth discussion of each of the context. It includes pragmatic advice for


major elements of a balanced scorecard tailoring the core elements of the balanced
– with an emphasis on their meaning in scorecard to law firms’ unique structural
a law firm environment: constraints. Finally, it includes real world case
studies that illuminate how other firms are
… Financial measures – the using financial and non-financial measures
most straight forward and easily to drive effective strategy implementation.
understood element;
… Client measures – client satisfaction References
is generally understood and highly 1. Kaplan, R., and Norton, D., The Balanced
valued in most law firms; Scorecard, Harvard Business Press, 1996
… Learning and growth – a set of 2. Crabtree, A., and DeBusk, G., ‘The effects
measures focused on the firm’s of adopting the Balanced Scorecard on
people, their knowledge and their shareholder returns’, Advances in Accounting,
capabilities; and Volume 24, Issue 1, June 2008
… Business processes – the most
difficult element for most firms to
conceptualise and measure, and an
area that requires creative thinking
and strong linkages to firm strategy.

This report is not about dogmatic application


of the balanced scorecard. On the contrary,
a rote and dogmatic application of the tool
is almost certain to fail in a law firm context.
Yet, there are many examples where all or
parts of the balanced scorecard have been
used quite successfully – within and outside
the legal sector. For firms that have struggled
with implementation in the past (i.e., that
have agreed on a compelling strategy but
fallen well short in implementation), this is
a tool that can dramatically improve focus,
accountability and execution. However, the
balanced scorecard should be coupled with
other factors that are equally important
in driving successful implementation (for
example, communication, involvement in
the strategy development process, resource
allocation and budgeting, organisational
and technology alignment, etc.).
This report provides insights into how
the balanced scorecard can be adapted
for application in a law firm management

VIII
About the author

JOHN STERLING is a founding partner with SmockŠSterling Strategic Management Consultants


with 25 years’ experience in strategic management and market research. Mr. Sterling has worked
extensively with law and other professional service firms, as well as with industrial and consumer
product companies and not-for-profit organisations. His work with TimeLine Theatre Company in
Chicago led to their winning the Richard Goodman Award for excellence in strategic planning from
the Association for Strategic Planning in February of this year. Mr. Sterling is president of the Strategic
Management Association in Chicago and is a contributing editor to Strategy & Leadership. Prior to
co-founding SmockŠSterling in 1989, Mr. Sterling was a senior consultant with Ernst & Young and a
senior policy analyst at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

IX
Acknowledgements

THE AUTHOR wishes to acknowledge and recognise the work of Robert S. Kaplan and David P.
Norton – originators of the balanced scorecard. It is on their considerable shoulders that works like
this stand.
The author also thanks the contributors of case study materials – indispensible and greatly
appreciated – and the firms profiled in those case studies.
Finally, the author thanks his partners, John Smock and Peter Giuliani, for their continuing
support throughout the development of this report.

XI

You might also like