Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gallagher, Claire, Esquire Bikkal & Associates, P.C. 170 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 301 White Plains, NY 10601
OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - ELP 1545 Hawkins Blvd. El Paso, TX 79925
A 094-090-659
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,
DOYUtL ct1/lA)
Donna Carr Chief Clerk
Cite as: Constantino Santel-Montes, A094 090 659 (BIA Oct. 21, 2013)
File:
Date:
OCT tl ZOJ3
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS APPEAL ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: APPLICATION: Continuance Claire Gallagher, Esquire
This case was last before this Board on .January 11, 2012, when we dismissed the respondent's request for a continuance but remanded the case for the Immigration Judge to reassess the respondent's eligibility for voluntary departure. The respondent, a native and citizen of Mexico, now appeals from a July 17, 2012, decision of an Immigration Judge. The Immigration Judge found the respondent removable and declined to further continue these proceedings, but granted him the privilege of voluntary departure under section 240B(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1229c(b). The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not filed a briefor other response. The record will be remanded. The Board reviews an Immigration Judge's finding of fact, including findings as to the credibility of testimony, under the "clearly erroneous" standard. 8 C.F.R. 1003.l(d)(3)(i). The Board reviews questions of law, discretion, and judgment and all other issues in appeals from decisions oflmmigration Judges de novo. 8 C.F.R. 1003.l(d)(3)(ii). On appeal, the respondent argues that the Immigration Judge erred in denying his request for a continuance for a change of venue, administrative closure, or for termination based primarily on regulations which were pending at that time regarding a waiver relating to approved visa petitions such as that of the respondent (Respondent's Brief at 1-10; Respondent's Motion to Change Venue and to Reopen dated March 12, 2012). The Immigration Judge denied the However, during the pendency of the appeal, regulations for such a waiver (l-601A) have been finalized, and the new regulations include a provision allowing for administrative closure. Therefore, the respondent 1 may renew his request for such relief upon remand. See Matter ofAvetisyan, 25 I&N Dec. 688 (BIA 2012). Accordingly, the following order will be entered. ORDER: The record is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the foregoing opinion. respondent's motion during the hearing on July 17, 2012 (I.J. at 2-3).
Beginning March 4, 2013, certain immediate relatives ofUnited States citizens may apply for a provisional waiver of inadmissibility due to unlawful presence on Form I-601A. See 78 Fed. Reg. 536-01 (January 3, 2013) (to be codified at 8 C.F.R. 103 and 212), 2013 WL 24532.
1
Cite as: Constantino Santel-Montes, A094 090 659 (BIA Oct. 21, 2013)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT EL PASO, TEXAS
File:
A094-090-659
In the Matter of
CHARGES:
Nationality Act - alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled.
APPLICATIONS:
ROBIN BIKKAL
LORILEI FERNANDEZ
JUDGE
The respondent is a 32-year-old married male native and citizen of Mexico. 1, 2009. Exhibit He was served with a Notice to Appear on May
1.
of
the
'
The respondent had previously admitted the factual allegations in the Notice to Appear and conceded that he is removable through counsel. removable as charged. This case was previously before the Court when it denied continuances and granted the respondent "up front voluntary departure. " Appeals. The case was appealed to the Board of Immigration Once again, I found the respondent
The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed the but remanded the case
back to this Court for further review of voluntary departure based on the fact there was an appeal filed. On today's date, the respondent's counsel renewed a request as well
for a continuance and/or a change of venue to New York, as possible termination. requests.
there may be some changes to the law in the future that would permit the respondent to adjust status in the United States. However, when asked, the respondent's counsel indicates that at
this time such relief is not available and the Court once again, as previously, found no good cause for continuances for but would solely
limit the case today to a renewed request for voluntary departure without a change of venue. To that end, the respondent testified once again on the At this time he is married to
A094-090-659
July 17,
2012
a Un ited States citizen who filed a petition on his behalf. states he has not been arrested, made false claims to U.S.
He
citizenship.
in dicated that he has never been gran ted voluntary departure, based on further examination there does appear to be a voluntary departure perhaps in 2001. The respon den t understands that to
be granted voluntary departure he would have to agree to leave when required and not return back to the United States un less he had legal permission to do so. The Court does believe that the
respondent would in fact be once again entitled to voluntary departure. The Court is satisfied that this will be considered to wit: post-conclusion of the Act.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the respon dent's application for voluntary departure under Section 240B(b) of the Act is granted.
The respondent must depart the United States on or before September 17, 2012. The responden t must post a bon d of $500 If the respondent fails to post the required
bond or fails to depart by that date or by any extension granted by the Department of Homeland Security or appellate body, the
A094-090-659
July 17,
2012
'
I
without further notice or proceeding and the respondent shall be removed to Mexico.
A094-090-659
July 17,
r
. Cl..
CERTIFICATE PAGE
I hereby certify that the attached proceeding before JUDGE ROBERT S. HOUGH, in the matter of:
CONSTANTINO SANTEL-MONTES
A094-090-659
EL PASO,
a
TEXAS
is an
ccurate ,
by the Executive Office for Immigration Review and that this is the original transcript theeof for the file of the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
. .
Inc.
(Completion Date)