Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.-//
NASA
Contractor
Report
198300
Aircraft Noise Prediction Program (ANOPP) Fan Noise Prediction for Small Engines
Joe W. Hough AlliedSignal and Donald Engines, Phoenix, S. Weir Arizona
Contract April
NAS1-20102
1996
National Space
Aeronautics Administration
and
AIRCRAFT NOISE PREDICTION PROGRAM (ANOPP) FAN NOISE PREDICTION FOR SMALL ENGINES
Final
Report
Prepared
for
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center Contract NAS1-20102 Task Order 6
By
Joe W. Hough and Donald S. Weir
SUMMARY
ANOPP has been successfullyrevised to include a module which improves fan noise prediction capability with small turbofan engines. The modifications have been verifiedwith measured data from three separate AlliedSignal fan engines. Comparisons of the revised prediction show a significantimprovement in overall and spectral noise predictions. The revised technique provides predictions which now coincide with the measured data spread from the AlliedSignal engines. The most notable revisions to the Heidmaun method include the reduction of peak discrete tone levels and combination tone levels.
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
Pa.e
1.0 STATEMENT 1.1 I. 2 1.3 2.0 OF WORK 1 1 1 2 3 Approach Small Engine 3 5 6 6 7 Versus Versus Revisions Prediction Method Data 8 Predictions Engine Noise Data 9 I0 11 13 17 20 23 25 DATA 28 28 29 30 REVISION TEST CASE 31 32
RESULTS 2.1 2.2 Technical Update of 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5 2.2.6 2.3 Develop 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5
Data
Base
Engine Fan Design Dominant Engine Fan Noise ANOPP And GASP Predictions From Engine 1 ANOPP And GASP Predictions From ANOPP Engine 2 And GASP
3 Small Fan
Discrete Tone Noise Combination Tone Noise Broadband Noise Discrete Broadband COMPARISONS Tone Noise Noise WITH MEASURED
Discharge Discharge
3.0
PREDICTION 1 2 3
REFERENCES
iii
OF
C_S
(Contd)
APPENDICES I II ANOPP THEORETICAL DATA I, MANUAL UPDATE (15 pages) GASP, AND HEIDMANN,
MEASURED ENGINE
VERSUS
REVISED
PREDICTION,
III
MEASURED DATA VERSUS ENGINE 2, (28 pages) MEASURED DATA VERSUS ENGINE 3, (20 pages) MEASURED DATA VERSUS ENGINE 1, (5 pages) MEASURED DATA VERSUS ENGINE 2, (7 pages) MEASURED DATA VERSUS ENGINE 3, (4 pages) SMALL ENGINE REVISION;
IV
REVISED
PREDICTION,
GASP,
AND
HEIDMANN,
REVISED
PREDICTION,
GASP,
AND
HEIDMANN,
VI
REVISED
PREDICTION,
GASP,
AND
HEIDMANN,
VII
REVISED
PREDICTION,
GASP,
AND
HEIDMANN,
VIII
FAN
NOISE
PREDICTION
TEST
CASE
(9 pages) IX SMALL ENGINE REVISION (15 pages) USER'S MANUAL AND ANOPP CODE
DEVELOPMENT X
INTERIM PREDICTION METHOD FOR FAN AND COMPRESSOR SOURCE NOISE, M. F. HEIDMANN, LEWIS RESEARCH CENTER (SELECT FIGURES ONLY) AND AIRCRAFT NOISE PREDICTION PROGRAM THEORETICAL MANUAL, W. E. ZORUMSKI, LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER (SELECT TABLES ONLY) (20 pages)
iv
FINAL REPORT AIRCRAFT NOISE PREDICTION PROGRAM(ANOPP) FAN NOISE PREDICTION FOR SM_LL ENGINES
1.0 1.1
OF
WORK
Engines Program
(then to
Garrett the
Predict
CR-168050) General to
identified in the
Aircraft of
Prediction from
Program engines in
better to
noise
the made
3000by the
since noise
that
revise
method
smaller
1.2
Objective
The large
NASA
ANOPP
has
been
used
successfully of ANOPP
for to
of
transport and
aircraft. business
Application has
a need of this
the ininto
The
tegrate ANOPP.
capability
smaller
engines
Four
subtasks
of
small
engine engine a
data fan
small
noise
and
revised results
ANOPP
Document
1.3
S_ary ANOPP has fan been successfully prediction have been fan significant revised capability verified engines. improvement to with with include small measured a module which engines. from the and three revised spectral
improves The
noise
turbofan data of
Comparisons in overall
predictions.
the
improved
as
compared technique
to
the
which
data
Heidmann and
levels
tone
into with
the
ANOPP
measured
has _
demonstration
purposes.
----"'"
.... (lt]r)d
GASP : 1.5 _%
I05.0
,
i ..o
,85.0
0.6 I 0.7 I 0.8
-I-I"
I 0.9 I 1.0 I 1.1 I 1.2 I 1.3 l 1.4
R_isionimpmv_fannoisepredi_onby2_SdB Revised In Fan Noise Module Small Shows Engine Overall Prediction.
I Improvement
Figure
1.
AlliedSignal
2.0
RESULTS
2.1
Technical
Approach
proposed are
fan
noise to
revisions the
in
the
small
intended
developed improved of is M.
direction noise
Heidmann modules:
prediction
fan
divided
separate
Broadband
noise
emitted
from
the
inlet
and
discharge
ducts
Discrete ducts
tone
noise
emitted
from
the
inlet
and
discharge
Combination
tone
noise
emitted
from
the
inlet
duct
each a of
module total
one-third and a
octave
band
level, source.
Total of
calculated each of
through the
logarithmic
summation
within
modules.
engine within
performance this
parameters and
and drive
engine the
build
three
engines some
were of and
for
influential
prediction
parameters
below:
Performance
Parameters
Mass
flow
rate
Total
temperature
rise
across
the
fan
Design remained 5
rotor nearly
tip
relative constant
Mach three to
number
This
engines, the
(Mtr) Heichnann
percent. where
No
modify
rections
used
Operating
rotor
tip
relative
inlet
Mach
number
Engine
Build
Parameters
Spacing to
(RSS) improve
the
RSS RSS
for
the
three
engines
did
correction.
of not to
Vanes
(IGVs)
the
AlliedSignal"s corrections
enwhich
Therefore, be adjusted.
Presence operation) inlet into were have use flow the not
of -
Inlet During
Flow
(ground
effects;
eliminate flow
future
on
the
adjustments adjustments
directivity of three
within
small
engines.
No attempt was made to add new modules porate different prediction procedures approach. 2.2
Update Subtask nesses engine data it same current and is of the Of 1 Small calls Heidmann Figure correlation that the function fan fan tone and, noise noise to a 2
or to incorthe Heidmann
Engine
for and
Base identification predictions comparison Lewis fan of based of full-scale noise fan data small fan strengths on the engine data. not and weak-
shows of small
does
data.
discharge content,
spectrum and
spectrum
content.
u Engine #2
.=
"3" :.1.
o
,30
o A o & u & A A A
o.
Figure
2.
Small HASALewis
Engine Fan
Data Data.
Does
Not
Correlate
2.2.1
Engine
Fan
Desiqn
Provided three has ground IGVs control and a AlliedSignal single idle
in
Table test
are
the
fan Each
for
engines.
stage. to 6500
Corrected pounds is at
pounds not
speed. with
inlet device
the
inlet
engine
acoustic
testing.
TABLE
1.
AlliedSignal
FAN
DESIGN
PROPERTY
R&NGES
Rotor Tip Design Relative Rotor Tip inlet Macl Math Number Number, (Mtr)d Idt 0.3-1.2 1.45-1.53
2.2.2
Dominant
Engine
Fan
Noise
Frequencies
engine reflecting
noise plane.
with All
engine
speed in
operating microphone
the
strong
noise bands,
by only
other shown
in octhe
kHz
to computed
kHz. from
noise
provided
are
frequency
2.2.3
_NOPP
And
GASP
Predictions
Versus
Data
Frc_
Enqine
shows
the fan
of
sound
power the
for
associated For
using Heidmann
subsonic provide
GASP 6-
a of
average spectrum
content
mismatched
tip
fair
better
against by 2 to
However,
combination
than
test
iD Heiclmann 150
!
u GASP
> o..z-
_m
140
X D
a
X
130
_ g'"
0 120 1000
g
x
I
il
X I 2OO0
I I I I I I
1500
2500
:3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Discrete Figure 3.
Tones
and Combination
_ For
Tones
Require
To
Revision
Fan Noise
Moderate
2.2.4
ANOPP
And
GASP
Prediotions
Versus
Data
Frc_
Engine
shows 1,
the
of
power
levels
for are
Engine the
blade
measured for
4tone
measured underpredicted
data
early
introduction
buzz-saw
overpredicted
as
increases.
Broadband distribution
noise appears to
is peak
predicted at a lower
well,
however, than
the 2.5f b.
spectral
frequency
b.
|
D
X D
_.
5 0
o
is0
120
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
ShaftHorsepower,SHP
and Combination
Figure
4.
HeidBann
And
GKSP For
Show Engine
Moderate 2.
Fan
Noise
Overprediotion
2.2.5
ANOPP
and
GASP
Predictions
Versus
Data
From
Engine
shows
the to
of
sound speeds
for
transition noise by
evident are
spectra 2 to
combination levels by 3 to
noise
overpredicted
especially
130 x
R
g x x
t
x
_o"
0 120 1000
! I I I I I I
I 5000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Discrete
Tones
and
Combination
Tones
Require
Revision
Figure
5.
Fan
Noise
2.2.6
Generalized
Small
Engine
Revisions
For are
each
of to
the the
it
is
clear levels,
that
many
necessary
and in
100-degree were
midarc so
angles,
and
combination they
predictions of the
overpredicted
that
dominated
a majority
spectra.
review
of
the
predictions a summary is
and of
their the
or
dis-
the
measured Further
data,
revisions 2.3.
below.
discussion
supplied
Inlet proach:
prediction
revisions
relative
to
the
Heidmann
ap-
of
the
fundamental
tone
has
been
de-
first
harmonic
has
been
increased
from
Rolloff Rolloff
u
harmonic
is
1.6
dB 3 dB
harmonics slightly
Tone Peak
directivity pressure
been
combination
noise
has
been
Broadband quency
spectrum
has
been
shifted
lower
in
fre-
10
Discharge proach:
prediction
revisions
relative
to
the
Heidmann
ap-
of
the
fundamental
tone
has
been
de-
first
harmonic
has
been
increased
from
9.2
harmonic harmonics
is
1.6
dB 3 dB
been
slightly noise
broadband
been
decreased
Broadband quency
spectrum
has
been
shifted
lower
in
fre-
changes Figures I.
in 6
the to
engine ANOPP
module been
are updated
provided as
in well,
Appendix
2.3
Develop
Small
Engine
Fan
Noise
Prediction
Method
The two-stage
procedure process:
for
predicting
inlet
and
discharge
fan
noise
is
(a)
Calculate
the
characteristic
one-third
octave
band
SPL,
L c
Lc + C
20
log(aT/AT
o)
i0
log(m/m
O)
Fl[Mtr,
(Mtr)d]
F 2[RSS]
F 3[e]
where:
L c
octave level of
band a
characteristic single-stage
partial fan at
sound 1-meter
11
AT AT m m o
= = = = = = = =
total
rise T,
fan,
through of m, mach of
ib/sec
point
spacing or polar
at
rotor to
angle
relative
correction
for
IGVs
The or
F1
determines The
the
peak
inlet of the F1
or is
discharge determined of F3
discrete by the
broadband of Mtr
level. (Mtr) d.
variance
values spacing
influence
rotor-stator the
with
distortion.
determines
directivity
contributor.
(b)
Calculate
the
spectrum
shape
function,
SPL(f)
SPL(f) pressure
shape
function,
which For is
multiple tip
blade
frequency. component
supersonic and
speeds, spectral
combination shape
included
own
function.
of
calculating components
Lc
and
SPL(f)
is
performed
separately
noise
listed:
tone
Discharge Discharge
discrete broadband
12
fan
noise
is
obtained These of
through calculations
the
summation one-third at a
of
the
free-field
one-meter
accelerate
the
PC-
Excel of the
and
each
fan in
As
parameters and
the
readily the
version
Using ponent process ment diction AlliedSignal provided revision model are in or with and was
the
were
made
to
each
compared repeated
three
engines.
prediction is a revised
achieved. a The
significant to each to
revisions are
following
and for
referred
revision.
further
improvements
in
this
requested.
2.3.1
Inlet
Discrete
Tone
Noise
characteristic
peak
sound
pressure
level
for
the
fundamental
L c -- 20
log(AT/ATo)
i0
log(m/mo)
+ F l[Mtr
(Mtr) d]
+ F 2[RSS]
+ F 318]
13
(a)
Changes the
to
(Mtr)d]: SPL
Figure
6 shows FI. A
the 6-dB
revisions reduction
to was
function,
chosen tone
overall data
of three
the
fundamental
measured
engines.
Notes Mtr is
for
of
FI:
value between
of
0.72
for
used
parameter indicates to
measured increased
that the
this value to
possibly is
investigation of this
required value.
determine
approximation
transition
F=[RSS] + Fa[0]
201og(Mtr)d 201og(Mtr)d
Heidmann, GASP
Reference
Figure
10a shown
in
Appendix
Figure
6.
Inlet
Discrete
Tone
Noise
Revisions
Improve
Peak
SPL.
14
(b)
to
F3[0]: function,
Figure F 3. the
shows slope
the of
revisions the to
to
the
The
directivity 40 degrees)
relative
to
maximum
angles
(20
slightly
decreased.
for can
future be used
investigation to better
of evaluate
F3: the
data in
studies.
The
sound -
pressure Lc + I0
level log[ 10
spectrum 0.1F4(f/fb
is: ) ]
SPL(f)
+ F,[RSS]
+IF,[0] !
Revision -3.0
in Appendix
1 J Improve
Revisions
15
(c)
Changes
to
F4(f/fb): interaction
Figure
shows
the tone
revision harmonic
to
the
discrete second of
of
the Rolloff
has
been
harmonic rolloff.
remaining
harmonics
retain
for
of
F4: speed
one not
of
the
three
revised low
For
operating level is
speed,
1/3-octave broadband
barely with
sources,
inconsistent
Harmonic may
tone a
rolloff closer
for
fans
operating for
at
low-speed studies.
points
require
examination
follow-up
: I. c + 10 log
[1010"IF4(U J])
Revision
4
Harmonic Level, L
Harmonic
order, k
Harmonic order, k L=Lc L = Lc - 8 8< 1.05 L = Lc- 9.2; L=Lc -3k- 1.8; 8 > 1.05'_ k=l 8 < 1.05 J k=2 k>3
k>2
Reference Figure 8a shown in Appendix X Figure 8. Inlet And Discharge Improve Interaction Discrete Tone Tone Harmonic Noise Revisions Levels.
16
2.3.2
Inlet
Combination
Tone
Noise
characteristic
peak
sound
pressure
level
for
the
fundamental
Lc =
20
log(_T/ATo)
I0
log(m/m
o)
+ F l[Mtr]
+ F 2[el
+ C
(a)
to
9, SPL 1/8 F 1
10,
and
11
the The
revipeak
for
1/4, of peak
The match
measured
rather Heidmann
than curves.
(f/fb = 1/2)
B E
F2[0] + C
O_
&GASP
X Smmll_
,
80.0
-J _
70.0
,_.o
4o.0
.j_
30.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
I Figure 9.
Reference Figure 15a shown in Appendix X Inlet Combination SPLCorrection. Tone Noise Revisions
} Improve Peak
17
future
of
peak to
tones,
for peak
tones. may
The not
measured be solely
suggests on will
levels
dependent likely
value the
Also, to
further the
improve
normalized
curves.
+ C
.oo 600
"_ so.o
m ._ E,Z
O
40.0
o "
30.0 0.0
I 1.0
I 2.0
I 3.0
I 4.0
I 5.0
I 6.0
Reference
Figure
15a shown
in
Appendix
Figure
I0.
Tone
Noise
Revisions
Improve
Peak
18
._- '.L.
80.0
_!
i _ 70.0 60.0
so0
....... _ Z_ 40.0 I ...... "_ " " _ ....... ............ "& ............ t ............
30.0 0.0
1.0 2.0 3.0
I 4.0
I 5.0
I 6.0
Reference
Figure
15a shown
in
Appendix
Figure
11.
Tone
Noise
Revisions
Improve
Peak
(b)
to
F2[e]: function,
Figure F 2.
12 The
shows slope
the of
to
the has
decreased.
The
sound
pressure
level
spectrum
is:
SPL(f)
Lc
F 3(f/fb
(c)
to
13
shows content.
the
revision The
to
the
301og 1/4
151og 1/8
for
the
1/2
combination
19
Lc = 201og(ATIATo)
Theta 10 20 3O 40 5O 60 7O 8O 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 150 170 180 Reference
+ 10log(mira
Heidmann -_5 -7.0 -5.0 -2.0 0.0 0.0 -,%5 -7.5 -9.O -9.5 -10.0 -10_ -11.0 -11._ -12.0 -12.5 -13.0 -1:L5
o) + FI[M_]
GASP, Revision -4.5 -3.O -1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.5 -5.0 -6.0 -6.9 -7.9 -8.8 -9_ -10.7 -11.7 -12.6 -13.6
Figure
12.
Tone
Revisions
Improve
Directivity
for were
future so
of
F3:
The that
combination revisions to
tone the
content
Measured F 3.
suggests
significant
2.3.3
Inlet
Broadband
Noise
The
peak
sound
pressure
level
for
the
single
fan
Lc :
20
log(AT/AT
o)
i0
log(m/m
o)
F l[Mtr,
(Mtr)d]
F 2[RSS]
+ F 3[e]
20
(f/fb = 1/2)
SPL(f)
= Lc +IFa=(flfb) I
, 0
I Revision:
"151og(f/fb) I
-10
-20
I
g(flfb)
1.0
5.0
Dimensionless
frequency, flfb
Figure
13.
Tone
Noise
Revisions
Improve
(a)
Figure function,
14
shows F I. A
the 3-dB
of is
the
inlet
noise. measured
parameter
agreeable
The
sound
pressure
level
spectrum
is:
SPL(f)
Lc
+ F 4(f/fb
21
L c = 201og(ATIATo)
+ 101og(m/m o) +IF,[M_,(I_)_]I+
F=[RSS]
+ F318]
For (M_)_.I, -
M_0.9 d)
I
Figure 14. Inlet
Reference
in Appendix X Improve
I Peak SPL.
Broadband
Revisions
(b)
to
F4(f/fb):
Figure
15
the
revision
to
the
The
level f/fb'
rolloff and
has increased
for
future suggests
investigation that normal the data broadband distribution other agree need
of
F4: spectral
NASA
Lewis
data content
noise one 20
two f/fb
log and
f/fb"
distribution spectrum
possible
second
22
SPL(f) = Lc +_
Reference
Figure
3a shown
in
Appendix
Figure
15.
Revisions
2.3.4
Discharge
Discrete
Tone
Noise
characteristic
peak
sound
pressure
level
for
the
fundamental
L
c
20 F318
log(AT/AT ] + C
o)
I0
log(m/m
o)
F l[Mtr,
(Mtr)d]
F 2[RSS]
(a)
Changes to the
to
Fl[Mtr,
Figure function,
16 F 1.
shows A
the 4-dB
normalized
chosen
level
due
with
to
the
overall
data.
improvement
of
the
blade
passage
measured
23
++ c
Mv<I
For (M_)d>l,
Heidmann, GASP - 63.0 + 201og((Mtr) d) revision - 59.0 + 201og((Mtr) d) For (l_r)d >1, M_I
Reference
Figure
16.
Discharge
Discrete
Tone
Noise
Revisions
Improve
Peak
SPL.
(b)
to
F318]: function,
Figure F 3. peak
17 The
the of (110
revisions the to
to
the
below
the
level
slightly
decreased.
The
sound
pressure
level
spectrum
is:
SPL(f)
Lc
+ F4(f/f
b)
(c)
Changes harmonic
to
F 4 (f/fb) is
Revisions in Figure
to 8.
the
discrete
tone
rolloff
provided
24
i. c = 201og(ATIL_T o) + 101og(m/m
Theta 10 20 30 40 50 6O 70 8O 9O 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180
o) + FI[Mu,(I_)
GASP
d] + F2[RSS ] _
Revision -3O.O -2_0 -22.0 -1_0 -14.0 -10.5 -6.5 -4.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.0 -3J -7.0 -11.0 -16.0
Iteidmann -,15.0 -31.0 -27.O -23.0 -19.0 -15.0 -11.0 -_0 .9.O -_0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 -2.0 o5_ -9.0 -1_0 -18.0
-28.5 -24.q -20._ -16.5 -12.5 -8.5 -S.5 -2-5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.0 -_5 -9.0 -I:L0 -18.0
Reference
Figure
17.
Discharge Directivity
Noise
Revisions
Improve
2.3.5
Discharge
Broadband
Noise
characteristic
peak
sound
pressure
level
for
the
single
fan
Lc
20
log(AT/AT + C
O)
i0
log(m/m
O)
F l[Mtr,
(Mtr)d
F 2[RSS]
F318]
(a)
to
Fl[Mtr,
18 F 1.
shows A
peak
made with
improvement
inlet
broadband
noise
measured
25
For
(Mtr)d
>1,
I_r<l
201og((Mtr)d) - 201og(M_)
revision
Reference
Figure
18.
Discharge
Broadband
Noise
Revisions
Improve
Peak
SPL.
(b)
to
F3[0]: function,
Figure F 3. maximum
19 The
shows slope
the of
to
the
below
the
level
angle
decreased.
The
sound
pressure
level
spectrum
is:
SPL(f)
Lc +
F4(f/f
b)
(c)
Changes spectrum
to
F4(f/fb): are
Revisions provided in
to
the
discharge 15.
broadband
content
Figure
26
Figure
19.
Discharge Directivity
Revisions
I_prove
27
3.0
REVISED
PREDICTION
COMPARISONS
WITH
The data and inlet and levels IV. and fan from
small three
engine
revisions
have engines.
been
verified
against of the
measured predicted of
- midangle and
spectral data
AdB
kHz. of and
The the
spread
speeds band 10
percent
design level
Tabulated
octave angles,
level to 160
overall in
differences V, VI,
provided
Appendices
VII.
3.1
Engine
(See
Appendices
II
And
Five from 65 to
data 99
points percent
were speed. in
used
for The
Fan
speeds method
inlet
noise
and
75
percent
noise noise
still
slightly to 160
over-predicted
angles,
100
degrees.
engine as seen
seems in
have inlet
an
abrupt
tone perhas
this
speed, for
prediction
improved
predictions
worsened.
95
and
99
percent
speeds method.
show
prediction and
Predictions tones
discharge
discrete
improvement.
28
Notes o
future and
prediction discharge
improvements: discrete for low tones fan speeds and broadband noise are
overpredicted
Inlet dicted
and for
broadband speeds
noise
is
slightly
underpre-
Combination speeds
tone
noise
is
still
overpredicted
for
higher
fan
3.2
Engine Seven
2 data
(See
III used
V I) this revised noise engine. prediction for all Fan speeds method fan ranged shows but for is not a
points percent
from
61
to
100
improvement is slightly
speeds,
percent 65
the
percent show
speeds,
begins
characteristics
similar
prediction.
Buzz-saw ment of 10 dB
noise and
has in
An
improve-
levels.
For broadband
the
higher show
fan
speeds
inlet with
tones, prediction
harmonics method.
and
noise
improvement
Notes
for
future
prediction
improvements:
Inlet slightly
and
discharge underpredicted
discrete for
and speeds
harmonics
are
now
Inlet fan
broadband speeds
noise
is
slightly
underpredicted
for
lower
29
3.3
Engine
(See
]qopendices
IV
And
VII)
Four from 60
data to 87
points percent
were
used
for The
this revised 75
engine.
Fan
speeds method
ranged shows
speed. the 60
to
percent speeds
Agreement noise
higher
fan
buzz-saw
improved
fundamental but by
tones only 2
are to
still 5 dB
overpredicted of but 9 is to 15
with dB
the with
GASP. as
Broadband well.
noise
has
still
slightly
overpredicted
Notes
for
future
prediction
improvements:
Inlet still
and
discharge
discrete
tone for
and
broadband speeds
noise
are
slightly
overpredicted
high
fan
Combination
tone
noise
is
overpredicted
for
the
1/4
tone
30
4.0
SMALL
ENGINE
REVISION
TEST
CASE
A revision Appendix
fan
prediction compared
test to
case measured
using
the
small 1 data,
engine see
Engine
for
1,
fan
noise Engine in
GASP, predictions
Small
provided
tables
show
following:
O O
sound sound
power
level
pressure
Third-octave inlet
sound
pressure
level
spectra
80
degrees
from
Third-octave inlet -
sound
pressure
level
spectra
120
degrees
from
The revisions
ANOPP in the
manual
has
been
modified see
to
reflect I.
the
Revision
procedure,
Appendix
Appendix
IX
contains
description
of
the
ANOPP
code
changes.
31
5.0
REFERENCES
Interim F.
Prediction NASA
Method Lewis
For
Fan
And
Compressor NASA
Source TM
Noise,
M. June
Heidmann,
Research
Center,
X-71763,
1975.
Aircraft Zorumski,
Noise NASA
Prediction Technical
Program Memorandum
Manual, 1 and 2.
W.
32
APPENDIX
ANOPP
THEORETICAL
UPDATE
33
(D
_1 _ T-T--
O O
iim
VI Y VI
y '1Y
VI
y Y
VI
y o3
T--
T"
_p-
ql_
t_ C
iin
oE:
X
U v V
LI.
o
Illl
t_
iin
C O
IlK
E
"O
ul
ft.
in
O 13.
3:
ILl
m m
t_
34
U) C O C: O
li
(_1 9 VI V VI V (9 V
_1
tn
_m _m
VI
V V
VI
V 9
(0 C
am
(m)
C_l
& (_
,ira
=E
18
,.: :E _F 5
V
=E
(D
,we |
c;
|
LI..
o
II10
O
_1 _
m_
C C
HI
I1. (n
E
Ilmmm
,:1:
im
O (n > (11
"O
in
(.1 :3 1.1.
!.-
rr
4)
im
O) C
3:
a.
O
UJ
m m
35
VI
v,
C
am
E_
O
w
| | | | | |
O O
O O
O O
mlnl
C C m
@
mm om
E
lanDeD llm
C EL
L_
C
llm
@ a.
m m
36
iim
Z
C 0
I-I-IIm
C 0
C C O0
lmlm
C .(2.(2
II llmm Ilmll
EoEo
I,i.
. _o
n _
3'7
llm
O G) (1) _Z C
A
oo
C C OO
IE_II II _lll
C
Ilm
C
Ilm A A A
88
mm
<
38
(1)
iim
Z
C C O0
,4-,I
,4,,,I
iim
EE
O0
t_C_
(1) IJ,
C 0
U.
_0
Eo _o.
.A_o
D 0 0
(/9
39
iim
U) 0
"0 C .Q "0 0
Im 1,1=
.It
m,,
4) O
"1_
tim
a.
4o
s_
_J
0 0
u_
rr'
r-.
__.o
c_
C
Ill
ii _"
X
0 0
---
II
43.
Z _
m o
w,,,.=..
i1_
rc
0 n_ o
iim
nn
0 0
42
,4_
rr
yi
rr
III _
o
O.
It
o
II II
l=
0
0
43
mm
mm
mm
.it
44
im
Z
C
4)
I-
0
Im im
rt45
C O
IIm
(.1 C 1.1.
Imam
q,.
ibm mid
m
_
AI
b
(.1 Q.
p,,,-- I
U)
"O C .Q "O O
k,.
U)'_'
gm
in
rn
4) [3)
Im
>
C X I_
c;
X X
O U)
iim
(2
"O C (0
m
"0 ,-
Ed
II
-(/)
d
II
d
II
U)
(/)
G) C:
imB
46
li,=, ,imp
,,,,,, C 0 0:3 o
'11 _
II C
^ C
II
II C
A C
n'u.
!._ le_
b
,11.=.
b
X
X
m I I i
__
_i I
_o _
0
I I
,_o_
I I
i_
II
_)
II II II
o. ,-: GrJ II
o. _.
II
l=
Ii i
rr.
4"7
0
iim
0 t_ I,i.
m
0 Vl
0 A
0 Vl
0 A
iim
a.
im
mm
0
_
I_,
|
t_
CO
ClJ-
t_ II
Eo
0
m
C
m
48
APPENDIX
II
MEASURED
DATA
REVISED PREDICTION, GASP, ENGINE 1 1/3-OCTAVE BAND LEVEL DIFFERENCES FROM 1 TO 10 kRz, dB
VERSUS
AND
RR.IDMANN
49
o o o o
II er
11) ro
em
o o o
a.
"0
e-
o (D
"o
II
oo "0
u_
i)
O'J
o o
im
> IlC
C C
E
o
i
I I I I
0 o 0") o cN
I q
o
I q
0
o.
o
--
u0!_!pea_epuN
50
uo!_!peJ_e^O
r_
"O
oo
a.
_,,_
OA
Q; U LG
!_.
.E O a. 14J
"O
im
g) > Q_
u0!p!peJclJeAo
51
II
_llm
e-
IIC
E
-r
I
I
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
q
0
q
0
q
0
"-
uo!_',_peJd_epuN .,_ m
52
uo!:lo!peJc:lJeA 0
(01
r_l
rr
IJJ
OA
*.r.
11.-I
*O
mm
m >
ira
I:I:
E
Q) "I"
iii
uo!_,o!peJcbepun
53
uo!_,o!peJcbeAO
iw m
o o o o
O. 0
II
0
V,I
54
_o.
_III A
"OC
-_o=
_.-
ff
-_ g
0=--I "0
II
o o
I])
uo!;o!peJ_eAO
55
mo.
_ II_)
_,
"r
.Oe _ (p I_
a.
ee-
I1:
E
ID
III
m,-I
uo,_'!pe.lcbepun _
5_
uo!;o!peJ_eAO
i1)
_o.
"D
mm
m.-I
v
uo!_,o!pe,,_epun
57
uo!],o!peJcLleAC)
==,=41=
m m m lu
C_
"10
i
-,-_
E
g_
.Q
11.111 "0 (I)
lib
I
C rE "1o
>
-iII
uo._peJdJepurl
58
uo!},o!peJ_eAO
_w
II_
_._
_E
._
g
II
nW "0
mm
>
lera
E
ID
11
uop, o!peJdJeAO
59
"o
II rr
LU
Ill
'i
t
\
il | I
Iz-_ _c
'_
im
Ue_
q)
0
I
o rc (0
E
I "1-
i
w -i
o o
o o
o o
o o
uo!io!peJ_epun
60
uo!lo!pe.icLieAo
r_
"0
.o
II rr
Q.W
o o
im
tC
rr
E
"0
_
-r
m
o o o o o o o o "-
m-J
uo!_,o!peJdJepuA <_m
61
uop, o!peJclJe^o
,--',ll-
"0
,I
n(P II C
lu
C O_
"10 n
LLI
==
_= ,.
i
t_
=_,
el_
nljU
"0 U}
iim
rC
n-
(I)
E
'10 D
II
I i I i
o c'J
o c_
uo!],o!peJdJepun
62
uop,0!peJdJeAO
e_
P,
_lm
il(_
i
_
-_oe-
_._
CO
0,,--I "0
mm
>
re-
E
"0 0
uo!;o!peJcbepuN
63
m m
II C
11,
e-
O.
=.o _c
8 8
i
1
-r_
0,i_
.QE_
I
im
0 I=
C e-
1
I I l l
i
_ o o o
uo!_Tpe_d_epun < _
64
UOp, O!peJd_eAO
tO
B_
II
O.
LU
(Do
a.w -o
8m
o C c
E -r
uop,_'._peJdJepuR
65
uop,o!peJ_a^O
D
"10
.o
03
neD
O. cA
O) fLU
,1:
_= ,.
_=
O. 1.1.1
"0
JB
m ==
c m
E
"I-
iii
uo!_!pe.JdJepul'l
66
uo!_!peJ_eAO
L_
0')
P,
W
_lm
-Or-
_.-
_
II1
"0
im
o c e-
>
E
I1)
I
i i i I I
"-
uo!_!peJcbepun 6"7
(/)
"o
oo oo oo o oo
O,,W "0
om
uo!io!pea_epuFl
68
uop,0!peJdJeAo
C_
II
rrE G)
JJJ
CO-J
II1...._
uo!_,o!paJdJapurl <_e
69
uop,o!pej(:lJe^O
_PPENDIX
III
MEASURED
VERSUS I/3_VE
GASP,
ARD
HEIDMRJN
70
_D c u)
o o o
n_ c/)
c C_
c O on
.-_o
n
m
LU
m
_8
(D <C
C
Im
(D
" n-
,m.
._'_) (.1
oo O
a. uJ
"0 (I) U) >
mm
L.. :
m C
rr
E -a
a)
l
i | m,
O o
o.
"-
u0!_!peJcbepuN
"/1
uo!_.o!peJ_eAO
Q "10
8
o:
==
OA
_=gE
= "_
0,, I11 "0
im
I=
W > Q
rr-
E
o
"I-
11
uo!_.lpeJdJepul'l
'72
uo!:_o!peJ_eAO
E_
0
{P,
i
OA
_.-
._
CO
.="_
O,,UJ
im
ee-
II}
E
o T
III
uo{;o{peJcbepuN
73
UO{_O{peJd.leA0
._g
w
13.
e-
LLI
<
=$8 _'-E :S
_.o
O,,w
"0
im
>
rc
IE
m,-I
uoi;o!peadJepuN
?4
uo!_!peJdJeAO
._o
eeW
m n
(n
_o
II
'D
=_
__
g
o
a. ul
"0 (1
m
t,III
E
"0 (1)
uo!),o!peJ_epurl
'75
uo!_,o!pajclJa^O
._o
II
e-
i
_ii
_" o
m
No
a,,w
im
C e-
E
"I-
11
uo!_'!peJ_epuN
"76
uop,o!peJcbeAO
011_
_O
0.1,1
m,.i
uo!_.lpeJcbepurl
?'7
uop,o!peJcbeAO
C3
"10
.:_o
g3 > _0
rr
==
,I
_= ,,== 8
._==_,
.= ==_
a.w -[3
mm
== Q
C rE
IZ:
"I-
.oa.
m,=,l
uo!J,o!pe.=(:bepun
"/8
uo!_!peJcbeAO
{=
._o
_
(D
rr
e_
e"
O. (0
LU
m m
<
(.o.
_.
,,
==,.
=m _
"0
a. UJ "0
lie
>
r-. rE (I)
IZ:
-r-
III
(_
tO
lO
(_
tO
uo!),o!pe.]_epurl
?9
< _"
uop, o!peJcbeAO
+m
> (D
n-
mo.
_itm
_-
..r
iii
m-J
uo!io!pe_epun
8O
uo!;o!pe._cbeAO
ml
m m
.o
U) _ 0
I I
a'r"
0 C
a. (0)
e--
LLN
m n
<
"0
N
E
00
,v--A
-r
-oe"m- _ (i,)
,,In
o o. mmm "0
amm
> Jr'
E '-r
mlm
uo!;o!peJcbepuN
81
'10
=,-
O O O
._o
nC
ou
II e,O
O O _D
.-_o
"10 13.
13.
LU
=o
D
1D
==
,-_o =
-==-e, .=O
"0
=. oE
==
O,. 1,1.1
1O
mB
W == O
O O ,D ce-
E
0
"1-
i
O 0 O_ 0 0 C3 C3
0 0 0
o.
0
o.
0
o
0
"-
0 c_
m,.-I
u0!_',lpeJcbepuFI
82
UOJ_!pgJ_JJgA 0
a
"0
U_
im nm
O. w
i.
II
O:
uo!},_peJdJepun
83
uop,o!peJcbeAO
_u m _M
"O
f/3
ll
II
==
LU
m
D.
"_
r
f/l
C
IZ:
11
|
o o
o o
o o m.-I
"OD.
u0p,0!pe.Jcbepul'l
84
u0.r.lo!peJ_eAO
m m
i ,
(I)
._=
LLI '
"0 (P
II
0 0
>
rr
E
-r-
II
uo!),_peJ_epun '_(_
85
uo!),o!pej_Ve^o
C_I
QI
IDI
>
e-
I1.
eU.I
mo _
e_'_
_
"o
Q
im
e-
IE
E
-r
II
uo!_o!pejclJe^O
e-
._o
rom
e-
W
I
E C
II
Cd
"0
I
im
E
-r
!
!
uo!l_peJd.lepurl
87
UO!lO!pe.i_eAO
.o
I O:
C 0
o o o o
I1.
LU
II
.|
>
C C
O:
E
"1-
m--I
"On uo!_!peJdJepurl
88
uo!_!pejclJe_O
"3a
"0
P,
I=
_A
II
(I)
.Oe,,
o.
_,-
._
a,,w
im
e-. c
1=
ID
E -r II
m.-I
uo!;_peJ_epurl
89
"o_. ._(/)
uo!_,o!peJdJeAO
r_
"0
UJ
O.-J
>
C C
rr
E
-r
m-J
V
uo!_!peJdJgpur'l < u_
90
UO!_,O!_JCLIeA 0
"0 o o o o
e-
.9
(/)
II
o_
C 0
o o co
11.
C LU
n
"o
o
m
<
*0
c_
E (0
co
'ID
a. (o < C
=o) Oct"
im im
_= v
41
O=U,I "0
im
>
n-
E
-r-
uop,0!pe._cl.,epun UO!;o!pe.EbeAo
91
._g
II
_mm
.8=
_._
_E
._
"O
II
C e-
IT"
E I
a)-J
V
uop, o!pe.=d.=epuN
92
UOp,O!peJdJeAO
=o
oo
0=
,,11,,=
=
-r_o
"OC
IJ.
.8 =
o_
IZI
q,_. .,O
.= ===-..
a.w
oo o
m-I
uo!
. eJ_epun
93
uo!],0!pe._eAO
' .o
c w
Im
uo!_!p_JcLieA
U_ "Oc L_
am
O.c
II
rr
95
"o
._g
II
!
m,_ _"
-rlU_
tU
mi
o o re-
III
m-J
uo!_!peadJepuN <_e
96
uo_!pe._d_e_::)
P,
m _ II_
i
_
0
"OC Q_U
_--
im
I_,
eW
ee-
E
I]) -r
III
I11_-1
r
uo!_o!peJdaepuN 97
UO!p!pe_d_eAO
._o
.E
o o o o
ID t-
0 0 o
O.
r-
oo
_'-
._ 8 m
oo 0
"U
m
o o ee-
W > Q
I1:
E
ID
$
o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0
m,-I
u0!_!peJdJepurl
98
"IDa. <3U)
UO!:lO!peJ_eAO
APPENDXX
IV
MEASURED
DA_%
VERSUS I/3_VE
RJND HEIDMANN
99
_u
a -lo
i00
o o o o
Oi (n
o co
mm. _,im
"0=
"vmm
<
e..
4..'
0 c-_ J-.
u Q,) .-_o
o
r.-
r'C
E
"0
11
I01
0
L_
._o
(D
O.
O.m
_o=
_._
E
!-
n_l. -o
mm
>
ec
llC
E
ID
uo!_o!peJdaepurl
102
_M m m
C_
oo o
O_
i
|
m
o
11.111
m
>
103
"o
0 o o co
0 O.W Q
W
mi
o o
104
"1o
mo.
.__
_mm
_U
,,
m
_;.-
O,,Ul "D
em
r-
ID
E -r
III
uop,o!pe._cbeAO
105
w m m _M
mq _,,m o
"o=
8.
"_
.-_
uo!_!paJdJepun
106
0 o o o
O.
C
ILl E
=o.
Im
O:
E -r
107
w m
p
o
C
n,C
O.
ILl
= ,.
a.l"0 0 W ==
Illm
.C =
E
o
'-r-
II
q
0
q
0
o
0
o
0
uo._._pe.J_epul"l
108
uo!_!pe._cbeAO
a.
.oe-
_.-
0 _-ul
tD
ii
109
8 oo
II
e-
g I1. ,< 8
.=
oo -o a. ul oo g oo 0
q
0
--
uo!p!p_JcLIeA 0
110
"0
II 0
C
o=
o) LIJ
t-
|
03
oo m
o
0 ) 0 lid
0 0 0
q
0
0 o
O. o
0 o
"-
m.-I
"0O.,
u0!_,0!pe._cL=epurl
iii
u0!],0!peJdJeAo
.o
q) C
O.
II
O. UJ "0
q)
m ;
n-
E
q)
-i-
il
uo!m!peJ_epuN
112
uo!;o!pe.JcbeAO
"0
n"
LU
I1_
=i
o "
13. O3 <
_.= .__
_9 C 0
mm _
0 __o
= n"
U .--CO
41
o
O. UJ "0
Im
>
C C
rr
E
3:
u0!_0!pejclaepun
113
a
R_.
m
(i)
._o r-
0 0 0 0
._o
I1)
.c_
I1.
"0
W
m I /
<
'!'- A
lie
"l-
o e_
W
_.
oC
0 II.m "0 ID
mm
erE
fD
III o
0
o
0
q
0
o
0
UO!_O!p@J_@AO 114
"0
>
n-
a. 1.1.1 -o
Ill
>
C C
ii
115
II
uJ
O. LU Q a)
im
0 13:
C C
E
"1"
116
)
eo 0 0 0 0
II
>
e_
ID
ee-
eo
Dm
0 0 0
U)
UJ
<
II
1
CL a.
_oe-
i
oo a.w
' J 0 0 0 0 ' | 0 0 ' | 0 0 I
lWl _ i
m 0
m 0 0
0 0 "
m-I
uo!_!pe._epuN _ (_
117
uo!_,0!peJ_eAO
mm. .m oo
mm
.Ea,
"0 W
II
ee-
ID
E
-1I
III
uo!_o!peJcUepuN < e
118
UO!p!peJ_gAO
"E"
"0 (/)
n"
(n
e,-
(1)
ILl
=E_
,,
D. Ill
"0
iiim
(/) > (D
e-
n-
E
3=
11
uo!_!pejcbepuN
119
APPENDIX
MEASURED
DATA
VERSOS
ARD
RRIDM_RN
120
! -i _
121
__
_0_
i_
. _ _ _ _ o. _ _. _. -.
_o_
.o
-_
I !
122
0__0_
S_, e)
qr
c0
_1'
T_T--
, _
8
9 _ c) --. --. _ --. _. --. m. --. _ _ m. -TT_ ' --_-_
o o. _ _. _. e_ _ _. _ _. ,_. _ _
i oooo,o 1
123
_!.o.o
__.
ti-''''
124
__
"_
"
"_
125
_%PPEHDIX
VI
ME/_SORED
D3L_I VERSOS
REVISED PREDICTION, GILSP, ENGIRE 2 1/3-OC21VE BARD LEVEL DIFFERIWCES FROM 1 TO I0 EHZ, dB
Z%RD HEIDMAB_
126
o___
ff
/ II
,li
127
R ,_. _. _. e.:. e_ o. _. _.
_o__
_'___
_ _o_o_o_
I i i,0,0,,,,, I i ooo,,o
128
._
._
s_=____
E
. . .
g " 'o
129
_o
8 q ,':. q q q _q-- w ,e q o
_ ,, o. ,, o _ _ ,e:o.,/_
8__'_'_'_'_''_
"i "_
8
_2_m__
,
_ i / ,p ---
------_--_
ff
iioooo,oooo,o
130
131
132
133
J_PPERDIXVII
MEASURED _ REVISED PREDICTION, C_LqP, ENGIRE 3 1/3-OCTAVE BARD LEVEL DIFFERENCES FRCE I TO I0 EHZ, dB VERSUS AND HEIDMANN
134
,i_,#_
._ ,
_'_'_'_'_':_'_
"i _ "
'0
_ _II_ _ _,,. ,_ ,_ L_ ID _ 0 in _. _, i_
ff
I!
135
_._
__
o _
_Z
--" =""--
"-- _
|t
! |J
e._.-.o-_--
_..oo...
_ _ _=,,_ _,,.. _,1 ,,. C_ _. _,_ _ _ _ 0 "
._
....
.._..
c_
i'i
__
___ _ __
_lll|
.......
_--__
_T--T--TT--T--T
._-
......
'
138
139
APPEHDIX
VIII
S_LL
_GIHE
R_VlSIOM TEST
PREDICTION
140
Engine
#1 Input
parameters
for Small
Engine
Revision
test case Enqine #1 3O 61 10006 5OO3 132.48 2.455 537 617 1.200 80 1.44( 17(
Engine Information: Fan blade #: Stator blade #: Fan speed,rpm: Fan blade pass,Hz: Fan physical flow,lb/s: Fan diameter,R: Inlet total temp,R: Discharge total temp,R: Rel. Tip mach #: T,R: Rel. Tip mach # (design): RSS, %: Reference mass flow,lb/s: Reference total temp,R: GASP(G), Heidmann(H), or Small Engine Revision(J)?(G,H,J):
141
ID e-
-_
Q)
D.
._=.
i
I I
I \
%
im
\ \
I])
Z
e_
ID
I
0 0
_1
0 0
I
0
0 0
c5
CO
o
_
c5
_"
o
CO
o
Od
142
"'8
E
Ill
i
i
7"
'- \l
,,,
I
I
_-._
t ",.r
0 0 0 T-
<I
I,,I,,.
:I
0 O '_-0
o
0
o
(3)
c_
_0
o
I_
143
,z, .F:;
_rr
I--_
In
0
"0
C I.I.
=E
144
ID
E
/
<
E . .= "_
i-
LL
"E
8 =>
c3
145
146
147
IIII
III
000 ++ _MM mm
-4 _ ...
,-
IIII
III
ca _J I-4 0 2= Z
_ o
000 +++ ooo oo_ o0o
z I
o _ _
0 + o o o
IIII
IIII GZG_
lllllllll
148
qP r-q
Z 0 E_
! _J U3
,,..4 0 0
0 t,a 0 Z 0
::
0 .... 0 r_ o ...................
:a:
o
0 ........ o..,0 ........... ,
g
X
.......................
0.
Z 0
0_' 0
O_
,_
0 0 Z
::
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 .................... 0 ....
.L:,
0 ...... 0 . .................. o
i 0 ...................... 0 ..
0 .... ....................
e,
m o _ 0_
_000000000000000000000000 _000000000000000000000000
__mwmo_om_oomo0
149
000 ++,
illI
Ill
,-I
v I-I r_ ,.i
vvv
_|
00_
"
"
llll
IIII
v_
000 +++
000
150
0 Z O ,-4 0 O | .J _D 0 u_ ,-4 _D Z O m
O m
O 0 0 + I-4 0 O c_
Z ,% D: _a _a D M ba D
_ _
0 0
Z 0 ! ! 0 I-4 Z r_ _a
0 0 0
r_
_a t) 0 0 0 ,_ Z 4_ a3 I_
Z 0
O_
C_
O_
_0 I-4
0 0 0 ,-4
f,
e_
! M z Z 0
0 0
0 I-4 e_ M 0
o z e_
0 0
g
OX_
151
APPENDIX
IX
SNALL
ENGXI_ _NOPP
REVISION CODE
USER'S
MANUAL
DKVKLOPMKHT
152
The input
small
engine through
routine
discussed
in this data
report
can be
accessed in the
in data
ANOPP
PARAMETERS
input
as shown
attached
section. T provides
USER original
The
specific I.
changes An approval
used of the
small
engine coded
method changes
have will
been module.
provided
in to NASA
Appendix following
electronic
of the small
be provided
engine
revision
153
_ee
PURPOSE
PURE THE
FOR AN METHOD M. F.
REFERENCE
INTERIM SOURCE
PREDICTION
AUTHOR INPUT USER AE RS AFAN DIAM MD RSS MDOT MA N DELTAT CA REOA METHOD
- CBF(L03/00/00)
DSW(
PARAMETERS ENGINE DISTANCE FAN FAN FAN INLET ROTOR ROTOR
REFERENCE FROM
AREA SOURCE
(RS), TO
M**2 AREA
OBSERVER
DESIGN BLADE
ROTOR AE
AIRCRAFT ROTATIONAL
AMBIENT DENSITY (RS), PREDICTION METHOD FLAG i, 2, ORIGINAL ALLIEDSIGNAL OF 1/3 HEIDMAN SMALL OCTAVE (I) BLADES VANES
NUMBER
FOR
SHIFT
NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER INLET i, 2, DIS INLET i, 2,
. .
(I)
OF OF OF GUIDE FOR A FOR A ENGINES ROTOR STATOR (I) (I) (I) INLET GUIDE VANES
INLET
GUIDE
VANES
INDEX (I) INLET FLOW DISTORTION FLOW OUTPUT DISTORTION OPTION (I)
INLET PRINT
STIME IOUT
SOURCE TABLE 0 -i -2 -3 1 2 3
GENERATE TABLE HDNFAN(XXXNNN) IN DB UNITS, BUT DO NOT FORM (XXXNNN) AND GENERATE FORM AND TABLE BUT DO
GENERATE TABLE HDNFAN(XXXNNN) PRINT OUTPUT IN DIMENSIONLESS NOT BOTH PRINT GENERATE OPTIONS OUTPUTIN IN TABLE HDNFAN -i AND -2 DB UNITS
IPRINT
PRINT FLAG (I) 0 NO PRINT DESIRED 1 2 3 INPUT OUTPUT BOTH PRINT PRINT INPUT VALUE, MEMBER LETTER NAME UNITS ONLY ONLY AND NNN, OUTPUT .GT. 0 PRINT USED TO FORM FORM TABLE TABLE UNIT
NAME CODE
7HENGLISH,
154
SIX
CODES
HAVE
THE
FOLLOWING
VALUES) ) ) TONES
DO NOT INCLUDE INCLUDE IN TOTAL PREDICTION INLET ROTOR-STATOR INTERACTION COMBINATION INLET FLOW DISCHARGE TONE NOISE DISTORTION BROADBAND TONES INTERACTION
INCT INDIS IDBB IDRS INBB REAL USER PARAMETER AE RS AFAN DIAM MD RSS MDOT MA N
NOISE TONES
DISCHARGE ROTORSTATOR INLET BROADBAND NOISE PARAMETER LIMITS MINIMUM 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -i00.0 PARAMETER 0. 1076 0.03281 0.I 0.3 0.5 0.2 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -I00.0 PARAMETER MINIMUM 1 1 1 -3 0 2 -3 1 i0 001 1312 LIMITS - ENGLISH - SI UNITS
MAXIMUM 50.0 i00.0 i0.0 4.0 2.0 i0.0 I0.0 0.9 0.5 i. 3 400.0 i. 5 500.0 UNITS MAXIMUM 500.0 328.084 I0.0 4 .0 2.0 10.0 I0 . 0 0.9 0.5 I. 3 .336 500.0 LIMITS MAXIMUM 2 2 2 3 3 i00 3 6 200 999 0 .0029105
DEFAULT 0.785398 0. 886227 1.0 1.128 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 340.294 1.225 0.0
DELTAT CA RHOA STIME REAL USER AE RS AFAN DIAM MD RSS MDOT MA N DELTAT CA RHOA STIME INTEGER/LOGICAL/ALPHA PARAMETER METHOD DIS IGV IOUT IPRINT NB NBANDS NENG NV SCRNNN INRS INCT INDIS IDBB
PARAMETER
MINIMUM
DEFAULT 8. 454 2.908 1.0 i. 128 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 1116.45 0. 0023769 0.0
DEFAULT 1 1 1 3 3 20 0 1 50 001 .TRUE TRUE .TRUE .TRUE .TRUE TRUE 3HXXX 2HSI
155
DATA
BASE
UNIT
MEMBERS (DESCRIBED SFIELD ( FREQ SFIELD SFIELD (PHI) UNDER ) DATA BASE STRUCTURES)
(THETA)
OUTPUT USER RS SYSTEM NERR PARAMETERS DISTANCE PARAMETERS .TRUE., DURING .FALSE., DATA BASE UNIT MEMBERS SEE NOTE FROM OUTPUT BY DATA BASE STRUCTURES 1 RECORD MEMBER IN *RS FORMAT OCTAVE BAND CONTAINING VALUES CENTER FREQUENCIES SFIELD(THETA) " 1 RECORD CONTAINING DIRECTIVITY SFIELD(PHI) 1 RECORD CONTAINING DIRECTIVITY HDNFAN(XXXNNN) - TYPE 1 ACOUSTIC (i) AND ERRORS NONi. 2. FATAL REMARKS REFERENCES HEIDMAN, AND JUNE HOUGH, M. F., INTERIM SOURCE D., PREDICTION NOISE, ANOPP FAN METHOD NASA NOISE ENGINES TM FOR FAN COMPRESSOR 1975. J. AND WEIR, ENGINES, 1995. X-71763, PREDICTION REPORT FOR 21-8700, FATAL INSUFFICIENT MEMBER MEMBER. NONE MANAGER LOCAL ERROR DYNAMIC OCCURRED STORAGE. ON SPECIFIED UNIT (3) OF 1/3 IN HZ USER FORMAT MEMBER USER OF UNDER NAME PARAMETERS THIS TABLE PARAMETER DATA BASE XXXNNN IS SCRXXX IS IOUT. STRUCTURES. FORMED AND SCRNNN. IMPLIES MODULE NO ERROR AN ERROR WAS ENCOUNTERED EXECUTION ENCOUNTERED FROM SOURCE TO OBSERVER
HDNFAN(XXXNNN)
e
CONTROLLED
SFIELD(FREQ)
e
MEMBER IN *RS FORMAT VALUES OF THE POLAR ANGLE MEMBER VALUES ANGLE IN IN OF IN DEG FORMAT AZIMUTHAL THE DEG MEAN SQUARE FUNCTION OF ANGLE *RS
FREQUENCY,
DIRECTIVITY
ALLIEDSIGNAL
LENGTH
* NTHETA + NTHETA
* +
NPHI) NPHI
+ +
(NTHETA 3 *
NPHI) * NTHETA )
( NFREQ
OF OF OF
156
APPENDIX
FOR 1 NOISE-
AI_
157
o o
q
J_
_1_
O"
=e
0 r-
,-
W C
.E
C3
I o
'T,
"T
_,
158
q
0
0 A
n" I--
o ','-n,n'-
,,i,m
o "4o
C> "_,_.
V i-
E
tO
_c
rE
o
,,l==,
d ..-.a._
v_
',r--
"1o
._c ._>
.=_ E-
E_o_o
+ IZ') aO LO II
_ ,,,==,
n-
o o o,
,_=
o c_
I_.
q m
ill:)
q o
4)
d
tO
8P '(otu/tu)OOlOl.-Ol
159
O A
n'I--
:E
qo:
,,i==
V
ni-
A
nI-
:E
q) ..o :3 t" CO
:E:E
o
'tO a)
v ,=._o) =:_.. o ==
0_
11-
G) a) o') o_ O
O nv_
_o_o
..+ 000 +
ddo
II II II
O O I.O
160
O o O
T_
.__ 0 ec.Q
05
Or)
mS "o _Oo
.,0 _ _C
j_
_.-
_c =
(J 0. U)
0
_ t0
0"-"
o o I1:
BP 'uo!]oeJJoo6u!oeds JOlels-JoloEI
161
b_ m C
"0
=.I-
< Z
I
0 0
v
8P 'uo.qoeuoo _!O
162
0 CO
G:)
.m
t"' CO CO "tO
G)
_J,< < z c)
0 0
0 O0
J 0 0 0 0
0 G:)
17,,
8P 'uo!_oeJJoo/_!^!J,o_J!(:]
163
I I I ! I I I I I I I I ! ! ! I I I I m m> (-- ._ 0 : _ f_'_ c_ "*"I CO "C_ I c_ I I I o_ i I I I I I I I I ! o ',^ .-_ 03 o ._J _II "_ .. # I
l
v,
b,.
I I G_ 0 t.0 C_ "I" c_
cu ^ -._ c? _+ _J
I t
'
I ! ! I ! I I I
t
t t t t t 1:0 "1_ co
t %
t
"1 'le^el _uou.ueH
164
q
0
d
V
mi-
q)
E
--i re" 0
d
o_
t-
o..-V i-
._>
0_
e,_
a
n-
n-"
v=E _o =Eo
.
LO I,,0
cSd
165
--
O o
o A
n!(3 "O
_E
=z 4) ..Q
tO "10 4) r_=_
I-v
I-
e.4Z O
E o
"O
>= ==
O
=E cc_.
o
z C)
..cq
a
rr
rt-
_-.
E3
3) O)
ooo
e6 e6
II _1 II _J II --!
Q.
C) I_
Q.
Iz3 QD
o.
O (D
q
LO 143
8p '(ow/w)6oloL-ol
//
6olOEo'ldSO0
_/L)
166
0 0 0
_"
o_,
_0 o
o o
CO rr o
.__ _ "_o
oo =
Q. /)
o_
J o rr
167
T _
{
._m
O_ t'CO CO CO 'ID C/) a)
o
"0
< co Z
0
o_
_,_
{ 0
'
0
_
0
'
0
BP 'uo_-_uoo _{^{{0_J{O
168
I "{
{ { F
0 .,e,,=.
/) m f-. m m m
._>
_{-
00 < z
0 0
0 0 0 0 0
BP 'u0p,0e_o0 _}A{IOaJ{O
169
.Q
qe-
II _t
o e.=_ o=
"6
.e
iX3 /3
>=
_e
) 13.
_e
e= o
_
j_o
._E
E3
I 0 0
i
0
I
I
0
8/I. e_._eleEl
170
1---
>
"-
E
e-
o ecO e-
Q,.
o_ <_
.o_
r. o .3
E
0
(3
o
eP '(otu/uJ)6olOL-O.L ol "ldS
/.L. 6OlOE-"idSSO
/1.)
_tged _Z!leU_0N
171
T _
'F-
1
_D
0
"l"-
tt_
"0
"0
_
.>
--I-
,( Z
0 ,,m"
l 0 0
, 0
{ 0
8P 'uo_.uoo
_{^.q0,_J{Cl
172
g--. c;
Vl A Vl _D OD c_E
if-. c;
o E VI ',O _0 _D OO t, _0 v O_ C_ E OE
A ,--4 ',.D V
VI
A t_
o
V!
c;
A
o
V!
S
A
VI
v V V
p_
._o
S
v
,-I
_'_ ,.=4
I _" P'_ pm
I ,-'4 _.O
,.=4 I $.1 _
v 0
0 I-I O0 0
{_,
l_ 0
,-,-I I I O O O
c;
Z .Q n_ 0
Z 0 I-4
v m
v _
,o
o,
E-* Z
r_ Z 0 U v I _
m u,%
o (N
c;
_
if3 I'N
_D
I 0
! 0
I 0
! O
X OD O0
_O
173
,-4 VI A Vl _.
:E =E Vl =E
=E
=E
1.4 v
! UD
f_ I r-i = v I
1,4
I-I
'O '13
I: 0 O "I
r_
A O O
r--'----q
0 0
I.-I A r_ ,,-I
,o
v E,
o,
L._
r-_ ,-T ,_ 6 6
r
CO u"1 (",,I CO
c;
A ,-I
L_
_1
,J
,q
L_
I O f_ ! 0 I 0 ! 0 ,.-I X P'1 e_ u_ 0
x
O O
,4
e. o '0 ! O I.,I 0 4J _ I 0 4.1 _ -,_ 0 _n I0 e' U tO 0 _-I m -,-_ 0 _I_ _Oee O0_O _-_ O= _0
,., _: 8 8
--4
174
0 C 0
>, _
_ _ 0 o,- .-4 0 I I
t, ueu.-I,-.ee-eOOO I I I I I I I I
-O
O I
_ I
o 0
oe fnc_NN,..eP.l,=40 I I J I I
e I
I I
ee O I
OO I
e OO.DOO),-'l,-I
c_ 0
-,-4 [E 0
,-4
._-,_
O_ OOO _,.t,,O_O ._
_ e_) er
_o._t'O" "_J I I
" e-_ I I
I-4
o ,.-4 0
.6_O
""
N I
m I
175
TABLE
IV.-
SPECTRUM
FUNCTIONS
FOR
FAN
NOISE
Source
Spectrum
function
nu _ n=n S (n,i,j)
where
-o.499
S(l,i, j) = 0.799
0.136
0.387
iInlet
flow S (n) = 9
nu _ n=n i0 -n
distortion tones
1/8
176
TABLE
IV.-
Concluded
Source
Spectrum
function
1/4
funda-
0. 520
(4q)
(q
-< 0.25)
s(q)
=
0.52O (4n) -5 (rl > 0.25)
1/2
funda-
(n > 0.5)
C
exp S(n,i,j)
-0.5_
in
2.2
nu s(n) =
n=n
where
0.136-
0.387
177
REPORT
DOCUMENTATION
PAGE
3. REPORT TYPE ANDDATES COVERED Contractor Report 5. FUNDING NUMBERS NAS1-20102, 53803-11-01 Task 6
Aircraft Noise Prediction Program (ANOPP) Engines 6. AUTHOR(S) Joe W. Hough and Donald S. Weir 7. PERFORMING ORATION
NAME(S) ANDADORESS(ES) (SubconlTactor) AlliedSignal Engines P.O. Box 52181 Phoenix, AZ 85072
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) ANDADDRE$S(ES) National Aeronaubcs and Space Administration Langley Research Center Hampton, VA 23681-0001 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Langley Technical Monitor: Robert A. Golub Final Report 12a.DISTRIBUTION I AVAILABILJTY STATEMENT Unclassified-Unlimited Subject Category 71
13. ABSTRACT I'Mwxknum 200words) The Fan Noise Module of ANOPP is used to predict the broadband noise and pure tones for axial flow compressors or fans. The module, based on the method developed by M. F. Heidmann, uses empirical functions to predict fan noise spectra as a function of frequency and polar directivity. Previous studies have determined the need to modify the module to better correlate measurements of fan noise from engines in the 3000- to 6000-pound thrust class. Additional measurements made by AlliedSignal have confirmed the need to revise the ANOPP fan noise method for smaller engines. This report descdbes the revisions to the fan noise method which have been verified with measured data from three separate AlliedSignal fan engines. Comparisons of the revised prediction show a significant improvement in overall and spectral noise predictions.
14. SUBJECT TERMS Jet Engine Noise, Fan Noise, ANOPP Noise Prediction, Fan Noise Spectra, Heidmann Fan Noise Code
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION :18.SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 11. SECURrrY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OFABSTRACT OFTHISPAGE OFABSTRACT OFREPORT Unclassified Unclassified NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 29e (Rev.2-1))) Pm_cnl_d byANSI Sial. Z3e-18
_.lrn