Professional Documents
Culture Documents
European Commission
Science Research Development
'-'
Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in
Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers
Report
EUR 18366 en
STEEL RESEARCH
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Edith CRESSON, Member of the Commission responsible for research, innovation, education, training and youth
DG XII/C.2 RTD actions: Industrial and materials technologies Materials and steel
*V;
*'*
I::
Contact: Mr H. J.-L. Martin Address: European Commission, rue de la Loi 200 (MO 75 1/10), B-1 049 Brussels Tel. (32-2) 29-53453; fax (32-2) 29-65987
European Commission
Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers
J. B. Schleich,
P.
Chantrain
J. Anza, E Espiga
Ensidesa and Labein Cuesta de Olabeaga, 1 6 E-4801 3 Bilbao
Contract No 7210-SA/520/321/935
1
Final report
1998
EUR 18366 en
LEGAL NOTICE
Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information.
A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int).
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication.
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1 998
ISBN 92-828-4894-9
PRELIMINARIES
This Guide for plastic analysis has been elaborated in the scope of the ECSC research project
entitled:
"Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocode 3 and 4, practical tools for designers (rotation capacities of profiles, ...)"
This Guide for plastic analysis is the separate Annex aforementionned ECSC research project (Ref. 16).
13
Acknowledgements are addressed to the Commission of the European Community and to all members of the C.E.C. F6 Executive Committee "Steel Structures".
Many thanks are also due to all, who by any means may have contributed in this research and in the elaboration of this guide for plastic analysis, especially MM. Klsak Maciej, Linh Cao Hoang, Conan Yves and Mauer Thierry.
Acknowledgements
This research project n P3263 which has been sponsored by C.E.C., the Commission of the European Community, has been performed from 01.07.1993 to 30.06.1995 by the working group composed of :
-
We want to acknowledge first all the financial support from the Commission of the European Community, as well as the moral support given during this research by all the members of the C.E.C. Executive Commitee F6 "Steel Structures".
Many thanks are also due to all, who by any means may have contributed in this research :
ProfilARBED-Recherches RPS Department (Luxemburg):
MM. Klosak M.
CTICM (France)
:
and
M. Couchman G.
Table of Contents
7
11
13 15
Introduction
1.1. 1.2. 1.3.
17
17
17 18
Final report
2. 3.
Bibliography
Generalities
3.1. 3.2. 3.3.
19
19
19
22
25
3.4.
26
4.
33
33
4.2.
4.3.
34
34
4.4.
5.
49
67 67 67
67 68 70
Introduction
Influence of second order effects
Influence of load level (design loads or collapse)
Influences of loading path
Continuous steel beams
Frames
5.3. 5.4.
5.5. 5.6.
72 76 79 80
83
5.7.
6.
7.
Conclusions
Annexes
Annex 2
Annex 3 Annex 4
91
101
121
Annex 5
Annex 6
147 195
Annex 7
Annex
8
379
381
Annex 15
Annex 16
395 407
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Latin symbols
A
Atotal
A5.65
Ay
Ayy
shear area of cross-section about y-y axis shear area of cross-section about z-z axis
A^
AWeb
of H or I cross-section (= A - 2btf)
ASD
b
CL
d
DL
E
distributed load
modulus of elasticity or Young Modulus
elastic global analysis
concentrated load concentrated load (for which the 1st plastic hinge occurs)
EGA
F
Fi
Fu
fu
fy
fy A fy w
h
yield strength
iz
I
ly
Iz
moment of inertia of cross-section about y-y axis moment of inertia of cross-section about z-z axis
kr
ku
factor in formula
factor in formula
system length
L
Lgq
Lj
L0
LTB
lateral-torsional buckling
bending moment
Mpi z
Mjd
Nfl
Npi
Nsd
Pc
point load
specific term in formula
Ppl
Pu
plastic point load for which plastic hinge appears in 3 point bending beam
PGA
q q
qu
R
Rav
Rreq
rad
radian =
180
tf
tw
ULS
Vcr
Vp]
Ay .fy /3 )
Vga
Wei
We
Wj
Wpi
Wpi y
Wpi z
2.
Greek symbols
length factor (showing the position of point load)
Ym
YmO
Ymr
7
virtual displacement
coefficient = j
(with fy in N/mm^)
ey
<pav
<pav.d
9b> 9c
9remaining
<Preq
9req.d
<Preq.u
<prot
maximal rotation of plastic hinge obtained by the intersection between decreasing part of experimental (-) curves from 3-point bending tests and the plastic moment level Mpi of the profile
load factor
"
critical load factor for elastic instability in a sway frame critical load factor for elastic instability in a sway frame with hinges
reduced slendemess of member according to lateral-torsional buckling
X\jl
Arax, Xy
3.
Drawing symbols
perfect hinge
-O
plastic hinge
t7
y
fr
10
List of Figures
Figure 1 : Moment rotation curve of 3-point bending beam Figure 2 : Moment rotation curve for different lateral restraints Figure 3 : Flow-chart for plastic global analysis Figure 4 : Parameters influencing the rotation capacity R of plastic hinges Figure 5 : Definition of critical slope Xoit in (-) curve Figure 6 : (-) curve for fully supported and uniformly loaded beam (A) Figure 7 : (-) curve for fully supported and uniformly loaded beam (B) Figure 8 : (-) curve for uniformly loaded continuous beam Figure 9 : Definition of required rotation <pieq in function of slope in (-) curve Figure 10 : Example of fully supported and uniformly loaded beam
Figure 11: Definition of critical slope
Figure 12 : Plastic hinge stability related to negative slope in (-) curves Figure 13 : Flow-chart : Safety evaluation for rotation capacity checking Figure 14 : Definition of parameters in ( - ) curves Figure 15 : Influence of flange slendemess on <pav (b = constant) (Feldmann's model) Figure 16 : Influence of flange slendemess on <paV (tf = constant) (Feldmann's model) Figure 17 : Influence of web slendemess on q>aV (h = constant) (Feldmann's model) Figure 18 : Influence of steel grade on <pav (Feldmann's model) Figure 19 : Influence of steel grade on Rav (Feldmann's model) Figure 20 : Influence of span length on Rav (Feldmann's model) Figure 21 : Comparison of rotation capacity Figure 22 : Ratio of Rav/Rm for experimental data Figure 23 : Buckling mode related to unbraced length Lt_TB Figure 24 : Inelastic rotation of plastic hinge in function of unbraced length LltB Figure 25 : Unbraced lengths Lt_TB for different moment gradients Figure 26 : Flange local + lateral global buddings Figure 27 : Flange local + web local buddings Figure 28 : Moment diagram and moment rotation curve for 3 points-bending system Figure 29 : Equivalent length L to 3-point bending system Figure 30 : Plastic hinge in structures Figure 31 : Summary table (issued from Annex 10) Figure 32 : Equivalent length L for different moment gradients Figure 33 : Concentrated Load Figure 34 : Distributed Load Figure 35 : Bending moment diagrams for concentrated and distributed loads Figure 36 : Lower flange lateral deformation Figure 37 : Continuous beam with distributed loads Figure 38 : Continuous beam with concentrated loads Figure 39 : Portal frame Figure 40 : (-) curves Figure 41 : Evolution of the plastic rotation in a first plastic hinge Figure 42 : Influence of the loading path on cprgq at collapse Figure 43 : Continuous beam Figure 44 : Continuous beam Figure 45 : Continuous beam Figure 46 : Design curves Figure 47 : Continuous beam Figure 48 : Design curves Figure 49 : How-chart for "step-by-step method" Figure 50 : Indicative values of required rotation capacity Rreq of plastic hinges in steel frames Figure 51 : Indicative values of required inelastic rotation <preq of plastic hinges in steel frames Figure 52 : Diagram of Ototal / ^elastic function of moment redistribution for 3 spans composite beams Figure 53 : Diagram of Ototal / ^elastic m function of moment redistribution for 2 spans composite beams
11
Annexes
Annex
1:
(7 pages)
Annex 2: Annex 3:
(9 pages)
(20 pages)
Document 3263-3-12 (LABEIN) "Conclusions from simulation results : Deformation buckling modes moment gradient & LTB restraints influence" Document 3263-3-17 (LABEIN) "Continuous beam simulation"
Documents 3263-3-10 & 32-3-13 (LABEIN) (excerpts) "Numerical simulations of Spangemacher and Seldacek tests" "Numerical simulations of RWTH tests & nominal cases results"
Annex 4: Annex 5:
(25 pages)
(46 pages)
Annex 6:
Document 3263-2-9 (CTICM) "Numerical simulations performed by CTICM" Document 3263-3-10 (LABEIN) (excerpts) "Numerical results: Spangemacher tests, clamped-clamped supported beam, moment gradient and LTB restraints influence" Document 3263-3-9 (LABEIN) (excerpts) "Numerical simulations with centered concentrated loads, distributed loads and biased concrentrated loads"
Document 3263-2-12 (CTICM) "Required rotation capacity for a 15% redistribution of elastic peak moment"
(12 pages)
(7 pages)
Annex 7:
Annex 8:
(3 pages)
Annex 9:
(8 pages)
Annex 10:
Document 3263-2-6 (CTICM) "Evaluation of the required rotation capacity for various types of portal frames"
(38 pages)
Annex
1 1:
Document 3263- 1-27 (ProfilARBED) "Available rotation capacity of plastic hinges Ravailable- Tests results and models."
Document 3263-1-48 (ProfilARBED-RWTH) "Background document to Eurocode 3 about ductility evaluation of plastic hinges" Document 3263-1-36 (ProfilARBED)
(49 pages)
Annex 12:
(66 pages)
Annex 13:
(203 pages)
Annex 14:
Documents 3263-3-15 & 3263-3-14 (LABEIN) (excerpts) "Numerical simulations of singular cases" "Numerical simulation of CTICM tests & nominal cases"
Annex 15:
Annex 16:
Document 3263-3-18 (LABEIN) (excerpts) "M - intersection" (simulations) Document 3263-3-21 (LABEIN) (excerpts) "Feldmann's model checking within LTB limits"
(10 pages)
(25 pages)
13
References
Ref. 1:
Eurocode 3, ENV 1993-1-1, Design of Steel Structures, Part 1.1, General Rules and Rules for Buildings, CEN European pre-standard. ENV 1993-1-1 : 1992/A1, Annex D of Eurocode 3 (ENV 1993-1-1 [3]) : "The use of steel grades S460 and S420", CEN, December 1994.
Ref. 2:
Eurocode 4, ENV 1994-1-1, Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures, Part 1.1, General Rules and Rules for Buildings, CEN European pre-standard.
Ref. 3:
"Elasto-plastic behaviour of steel frameworks"; by J.C. Grardy & J.B. Schleich, E.C.S.C. agreements 7210-SA/508; Draft of final report, ProfilARBED-Recherches, Luxembourg, August 1992.
"Elasto-plastic behaviour of metallic frameworks- Interaction between strength and ductility" ; by D'Haeyer R., Delooz M., Defoumy J.; ECSC agreement 7210-SA/204; Draft of final report 1992.
Ref. 4:
Ref. 5:
Ref. 6:
"Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers (rotation capacities of profiles,...)", E.C.S.C. agreements 72 10-S A/520/32 1/935, Technical report n 1, ProfilARBEDRecherches, Luxembourg, March 1994. "Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers (rotation capacities of profiles,...)", E.C.S.C. agreements 72 10-SA/520/32 1/935, Technical report n 2, ProfilARBEDRecherches, Luxembourg, September 1994.
:
Ref. 7:
Ref. 8
"Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers (rotation capacities of profiles,...)", E.C.S.C. agreements 72 10-S A/520/32 1/935, Technical report n 3, ProfilARBEDRecherches, Luxembourg, April 1995.
Ref. 9
"Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers (rotation capacities of profiles,...)", E.C.S.C. agreements 72 10-SA/520/32 1/935, Technical report n 4, ProfilARBEDRecherches, Luxembourg, September 1995.
:
Ref. 10
"Rotation Capacity of wide-flange beams under moment gradient", by Lukey A.F. and Adams P.R., Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE Vol. 95, n ST 6, pp. 1173-1188, June
1969.
Ref.
11 :
: "Zur Rotationskapazitt von I-Profilen statisch und dynamisch belasteten Trger" (Aachen; Heft 30; 1994; ISSN 0722-1037).
Ref. 12 Ref. 13
"Experimentelle ermitung der Rotationskapazitt biegebeanspruchte I-Profile", by Roik K. and Kuhlmann U., Stahlbau 56, n 12, December 1987, pp. 353-358.
Projekt P169 "Untersuchung der Auswirkungen unterschiedlicher Streckgrenzen -Verhltnisse auf das Rotations- und Bruchverhalten von I-Trgem"; von Sedlacek G., Spangemacher R., Dahl W., Hubo R. und Langenberg P.; Studiengesellschaft Stahlanwendung e.V-Forschung fr die Praxis; 1992. EPFL Thesis n1308 (1994) of Mr. Couchman G., Lausanne, EPFL, 1995 : "Design of continuous composite beams allowing for rotation capacity."
Ref. 14
Ref. 15 Ref. 16
Ref. 17
"Available rotation capacity in steel and composite beams" by Kemp A.R. & Deckker N.W., The structural Engineer, volume 69, n 5/5, March 1991.
PEP-Micro Version 2.01, Plastic Analysis Computer Program, User's manual by Y. Galea, A. Bureau, CTICM, France.
"Improved classification of steel and composite cross-sections: new rules for local buckling in Eurocodes 3 and 4", E.C.S.C. agreements 7210-SA/519/319/934, Draft of final report, ProfilARBED Recherches, Luxembourg, January 1996.
Ref. 18
Ref. 19
ECCS european recommendations on plastic global analysis of steel structures, R 7, 1976. Excerpt from Chapitre 13 - Calcul plastique des constructions - Volume I Structures dpendant d'un paramtre, 3eme dition, Massonnet Ch., Save M., 1976.
Ref. 20:
Ref. 21 Ref. 22
"Lateral stability of steel beams and columns - common cases of restraint", D.A. Nethercot, R.M. Lawson, The steel Construction Institute 1992.
EN 10025 + Al : "Hot-rolled products of non-alloy structural steels - Technical delivery conditions (includes amendment Al : 1993)", CEN, March 1990 (EN 10095), August 1993.
EN 10113 : "Hot-rolled products in weldable fine grain structural steels", Part 1,2,3, CEN, March 1993.
"Capacit de rotation d'une section plastifie : Extension du calcul plastique", Frdric Mazuy, Mmoire de fin d'tudes. CUST - CTICM 1994.
Ref. 23
Ref. 24
"Safety considerations of Annex J of Eurocode 3", M. Feldmann, G. Sedlacek, Third International Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures, AISC, ECCS, Trento, 1995.
16
1.
Introduction
Objectives of the research project
Presently in Eurocode 3 (design of steel structures) (Ref. 1) and in Eurocode 4 (design of composite steel and concrete structures) Ref. 2), the plastic analysis is governed by two criteria. The first one refers to mechanical characteristics of steel and the second one to the geometry of the used profiles.
Previous researches on the rotation capacity for plastic analysis, performed by ARBED (Ref. 3), CRM (Ref. 4) and RWTH Aachen (Ref. 5) have allowed to understand the behaviour of plastic hinge formation for conventional steel. The results of these researches have shown that the requirements of Eurocodes 3 and 4 (b / 1 - ratios and its yield stress dependence, fu / fy > 1.2, u > 20. y, Aj > 15 %) are very safe sided and could be substantially reviewed especially for high strength steels {S 460).
1.1
A new single criterion called rotation capacity allows to quantify the capacity of a profile to develop a plastic hinge without discrimination for high strength steels. This rotation capacity of plastic hinges includes a lot of parameters: geometrical and mechanical characteristics of the cross-sections, ductility, deformation range, local buckling problems, influence of welding procedures, influence of defects and, the analysed structure (geometry, loads).
Nowadays the more competitive plastic design is not often used on the market because guides and practical tools, which evaluate available rotation capacities of cross-sections and required rotation capacities for different structures, are missing.
The first aim of this research is to determine the available rotation capacities for composite crosssections (steel beam collaborating with a concrete slab) and for all the steel shapes included in sales programme and in function of different steel grades.
The second aim is to determine the required rotation capacities for different types of structures.
These both practical tools ensure a real promotion of plastic analysis because the designer will be able to know easily and quickly if a plastic analysis is possible by comparing the required rotation capacity fornis structure with the available rotation capacities of the used cross-sections.
The final aim of this research is to introduce these new rules of plastic analysis for steel and composite cross-sections in Eurocode 3 and Eurocode 4, with the support of expertises.
In such
a way the competitivity of steel and composite cross-sections will be improved and with this advantage their market share will increase substantially.
1.2
(1) The following financially independent partners participated in the research project:
(3) During this research project, the main works were distributed between partners as follows:
-ProfilARBED:
. .
management of the project, comparison of existing design models evaluating available rotation capacities of plastic hinges (see chapter 4.3),
17
development and safety evaluation of models about available inelastic rotations of plastic hinges (with RWTH Aachen University as subcontractor) (see Annex 12), development of chapter 1 (Generalities) and chapter 3 (Available inelastic rotations of plastic hinges) of the "Guide for plastic analysis" (see chapters 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2 and Annex 13),
CTICM:
numerical simulations of continuous beams and frames to evaluate required rotation capacity of plastic hinges (see chapters 5.5 and 5.6 ), development of chapter 2 O^equired inelastic rotations of plastic hinges) and chapter 4 (Design examples) of the "Guide for plastic analysis" (see chapter 5 and Annex 13),
:
- LABEIN
safety evaluation of rotation capacities of plastic hinges (see chapter 3.4), numerical simulations of tests results (see chapter 4.4.1), numerical simulations about nominal cases (see chapter 4.4.2), numerical simulations about beams submitted to My - loading (see chapter 4.4.3), numerical simulations of LTB limits for Feldmann's model (see chapter 4.4.4), numerical simulations of double clamped beams (see chapter 4.4.5), numerical simulations about influence of lateral restraints (see chapter 4.4.6), numerical simulations about equivalent length evaluation for continuous
beams (see chapter 4.4.7).
1.3
Final report
The present final report compiles all results of works done in the scope of this research project. This final report presents :
in chapter 2, bibliography,
the concept of plastic hinges ductility, the influence of lateral restraints, . the guide of plastic analysis, . the safety evaluation for rotation capacities based on plastic hinge stability considerations, in chapter 4, available rotation capacity of plastic hinge (generalities, comparison of design models, Feldmann's model, numerical simulations) ,
in chapter 5, required rotation capacity of plastic hinge (introduction, influence effects, load level and loading path, continuous beams, fimes),
of second order
18
2.
Bibliography
(1) Collection of information according to Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) and Eurocode 4 (Ref. 2) has been performed by all partners : bibliography, technical reports, papers, results from tests, statistical evaluations, conclusions of previous or in progress researches, existing rules or new proposals of rules, development of calculation models,....
(2) For convenience a specific numbering has been introduced for the documents distributed in the scope of this research project. The list of the numbered documents distributed up to December 95 is given in Annex 1. The convention ofthat numbering is proposed as follows (for example 3263-1-10) :
"number of the partner" ("1", "2" or "3" respectively related to ProfilARBED, CTICM or LABEIN),
"number of the paper in the chronological order of distribution".
3.
Generalities
3.1
(1) The plastic hinge method may be used for the ultimate limit state design of steel structures subject to static loading.
By this method plastic zones and zones with local buckling are modelled by plastic hinges which exhibit a simplified bilinear moment-rotation-characteristic with unlimited rotation capacities on the level Mpi (plastic moment resistance of cross-section). Hence it is necessary to verify by a rotation assessment that the rotation requirement resulting from the moment redistribution at ultimate limit state does not exceed the actual available rotation capacity.
(2) Using plastic analysis, required inelastic rotation <Preq of plastic hinge can be determined, and computer programs can give directly these values for all plastic hinges in the frame.
On the other hand, tests results, numeric simulations and, now, analytical models and formulae allow to determine an available inelastic rotation <pav of plastic hinge for a given cross-section (see Figure 1). These studies are carried out especially on 3-point bending systems.
The following limit states criterion for ductility in bending (to be checked in all cross-sections) naturally yields for checking the validity of the plastic state of a frame under a given loading:
9req.d
where
9av.d
with
9av.d=JLa
9av
(3.1)
This criterion (3. 1) is sufficient in so far as the available inelastic rotation <pav can be given by formulae or in tables. The inelastic rotation can be expressed in radians.
19
(3) A great number of authors have preferred to talk about "rotation capacity" (R) instead of "inelastic rotation" (<pav, <Preq) of plastic hinge by introducing an elastic rotation of reference (<ppi) (determined at Mpi level) in order to adimensionalize the problem. It is understood that the available rotation capacity Rav related to the available inelastic rotation <pav in the hinge is to be determined for a 3-point bending system and is given by (see Figure 1) :
Rav _9; av
where
9pl
with
9pl =
_ Mpl.L 2.E.I
L
<Ppi
is the length of the beam is the sum of the elastic rotations (determined at Mpi level) at the ends of the beam. is the plastic resistance moment of the cross-section
is the modulus of elasticity of steel is the moment of inertia of the cross-section
Mpl
E
/2
lF
*'2
j '
Mpi-
9av
/
Tav
9pl
9rot
Figure
1 :
So, the validity and the consistency of a plastic analysis can also be checked in all cross-sections by the following limit states criterion for ductility in bending which is equivalent to criterion (3.1):
Kreq
<ay_
YMR
(3.2)
(4) The concept of rotation capacity R introduces a supplementary parameter such as the length L of a reference beam. It must be noted that this parameter is a structural and not local parameter. Rreq is to be calculated from frame plastic analysis as explained in chapter 3 of Annex 10.
The available rotation capacity Rav can also be given in tables but it must refer to a particular beam length because (ppi depends on the length.
Because the verification has to be consistent, the required rotation capacity Rreq must be computed by considering the same length of reference which will be used to determine Rav.
As explained in chapter 4.4.7.1, difficulties may appear to clearly identify the length of reference in order to calculate <ppi. On the other hand, computer softwares usually provide required inelastic rotations <preq at each formed plastic hinge for each load level till structural collapse (mechanism,...). Thus the most simple way to check ductility of plastic hinges clearly consists in comparing directly required and available inelastic rotations of plastic hinges instead of converting those values in rotation capacities R.
Therefore, it would be advisable to refer to the criterion (3.1) dealing with inelastic rotations <Preq) and not the criterion (3.2) with rotations capacities (Rav, Rreq)
20
(<pav>
(5) The proposed method which compares required and available inelastic rotations () or rotation capacities (R) for each relevant plastic hinges, is an alternative to the use of width / thickness limits (rules for classification of cross-sections) existing in Eurocodes 3 and 4 (Ref. 1 and 2) , for the verification of sufficient ductility of plastic hinges.
Eurocode 3 Q^ef. 1) provides general rules fnceming rotation requirements of plastic hinges:
" 5.3.3 Cross-section requirements for plastic global analysis (...) (2) At plastic hinge locations, the cross-section of the member which contains the plastic hinge shall have a rotation capacity of not less than the required rotation at that plastic hinge location.
(3) (4)
To satisfy the above requirement, the required rotations should be determined from a rotation analysis.
For building structures in which the required rotations are not calculated, all members
containing plastic hinges shall have class
1
(6) A general flow-chart is proposed in Figure 3 defining the scope of the research project which concerns the evaluation of the ductility of plastic hinges. (7) A table of parameters influencing the rotation capacities of plastic hinges, is provided in Figure 4: required rotation capacity ^required (concerning structures) and available rotation capacity ^available (concerning cross-sections). More details will be provided in respective chapters 5 and 4. (8) A specific design method has been proposed by Mr. Couchman G. (Ref. 14) for continuous composite beams (see Annex 2 (1/9 and 2/9)).
is applicable to beams with plastic (Class 1), compact (Class 2) or semi-compact (Class 3) sections,
That design method allows considerable increases in beam load capacity for beams with compact or semi-compact critical sections.
Details concerning available and required rotation capacities of composite beams, are given respectively in chapters 4.3.5 and 5.7.
At present state, more developments (tests results, numerical simulations, statistical evaluations; ...) are necessary to exploit that method for continuous composite beams in order to elaborate design aids or charts which will help designers in their daily works.
21
3.2
(1) In order to realize the necessary inelastic rotations at plastic hinge locations a member must have sufficient lateral restraints to ensure that the plastic moment at these hinges locations is not reduced by lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) before a mechanism has formed. Local buckling is controlled by limiting the width/thickness ratios of the flanges and the web; lateral-torsional buckling should be controlled by limiting the unbraced length of the member.
(2) The rotation capacity depends largely upon its unbraced length on either side of a plastic hinge. Based on tests results (Ref. 10) and on numerical simulations (see chapter 4.4.6), Figure 2 shows, qualitatively, for different L/iz ratios, the moment-rotation relationship of a beam under uniform moment As L/iz decreases, the rotation capacity increases. In order to maintain the plastic moment and provide adequate rotation capacity, the L/iz ratio must be controlled.
L
iz
is the member span, is the radius of gyration about minor axis of the member.
22
X^type of joints^
assumption :\
semi-rigid
R required (structure)
i
I
o
d
rs
M
O)
WD
<
S 2
.
4-1
c
ca
R available (cross-section)
>
R required is deduced from tables (or results of plastic global analysis) and, R available is issued from tables or formulas: i) ! R required < ( R available / ) \
s
u
'ig
a
fa
ce (
Plastic global analysis of the frame considering the global and local stability (geometry of the frame, boundary conditions, loading, yield strength) => maximum load multiplicator of design loads: Xmax
I
Sufficient bearing capacity of the frame if: >1
O JS
.2 o
J3
e
>
"rt
yes^
R required is deduced from results of plastic global analysis and, R available is issued from tables or formulas: not fuelled R required < ( R available / *)
Notes : R = rotation capacity of plastic hinges / M = bending moment/ = axial load /V = shear force
1)
= tables of Ravailable
: . .
ok if no lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) (if rules of maximum spacing of lateral supports; ...) difficult if influence of LTB
Parameters
1.
Rrequired (Structure)
(Cross-section)
no
^available
(X)
2.1. cross-section 2.2. cross-section slendemess: for web and flange of steel profile: d/tw and cAf
2.3. concrete slab reinforcement (amount of rebars): ratio of support to span plastic moment resistance, Mp/Mp
no
X?
if no LTB
2.4. degree of steel-concrete shear connection, N/Nf 2.5. type of slab reinforcement (mesh, rebars)
3. Material characteristics
^(X)
^no
(X)
of different members:
fy (constant or not in the structure)
^ J
no no if no LTB no if no LTB no if no LTB
r ^x
>}
M
-'
()
() ()
no if no LTB
no if no LTB no if no LTB
no
no no
24
(4) Presently lateral-torsional buckling is not explicitly forbidden by Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) but it is related to strength and limited as follows: if the relative slendemess ^ > 0,4, then the ultimate bending moment resistance of the beam (= XLT-Mpi) is lower than the plastic moment resistance of class 1 and 2
cross-sections (= Mpi) because the reduction factor %lt is lower than 1,0. The factor Xjjr includes the unbraced length of the member (_). In order to respect the process of plastic analysis which excludes lateral-torsional buckling as regards
strength of frames and rotation capacity of plastic hinges, the Eurocode 3 condition
Xlt ^0,4
:
shall be
When plastic global analysis is used, lateral restraint shall be provided at all plastic hinge locations at which plastic hinge rotation may occur under any load case.
The restraint should be provided within a distance along the member from the theoretical plastic hinge location not exceeding half the depth of the member."
(6) In alternative to Eurocode 3 rule (Xlt), other existing rules defining maximum distances between lateral restraints should be provided to designers : for instance rules from CM66-Additif 80 (French code) (Ref. 18), from ECCS recommendations (Ref. 19) or from SCI publication (Ref. 20).
3.3
This stand-alone document of Annex 13 ("Ductility of plastic hinges in steel structures - Guide for plastic analysis") contains the following chapters :
Chapter 1 : "Generalities" ; this chapter 1 presents : the concept of plastic analysis, the concept of inelastic rotation of plastic hinges, the influence of lateral-restraint, the parameters influencing the inelastic rotation, the design rules for ductility of plastic hinge , the concept of plastic analysis based on inelastic rotation.
Chapter 2 : "Required inelastic rotation of plastic hinges in structures" ; this chapter 2 details the influence of parameters on required inelastic rotation, the cases of continuous beams, the cases of frames.
Chapter 3
presents
:
this chapter
Feldmann's model : assumptions, limitations, formulas for different load cases, extension to other load cases, the influence of parameters on inelastic available rotation <pav , tables with <pav values for I and hot-rolled sections (IPE, IPEA, IPEO, HEAA, HEA, HEB, HEM, UB and UC) and for different steel grades (S 235, S 275, S 355, S 420 and S 460), graphs with (Dav values for I and H hot-rolled sections and for different steel grades.
Chapter 4 : "Design examples" ; this chapter 4 provides four examples about continuous beam with concentrated load, continuous beam with uniform distributed load, simple portal frame,
25
:
Appendix 1: "Plastic resistance of I and H cross-sections"; this Appendix gives tables with plastic resistance values for I and H hot-rolled sections (IPE, IPEA, IPEO, HEAA, HEA, HEB, HEM, UB and UC) and for different steel grades (S 235, S 275, S 355, S 420 and S 460).
3.4
3.4.1
Safety evaluation for rotation capacities based on plastic hinge stability considerations
Introduction
This section presents a safety evaluation approach for rotation capacities based on considering the stability requirements of the plastic hinge expressed in terms of the required rotation.
This safety evaluation method presented in this chapter 3.4 is provided only for information because our working group selected Feldmann's model to determine <pav values and because which are partial safety factors to be applied to those <pav values, have to be determined in full conformity with usual standardized statistical procedure defined in Annex of Eurocode 3 (see Annex 12).
>
An assessment of the rotation capacity by checking the fulfilment of the following condition is
assumed:
*%
where
7c
(3.3)
is the partial safety factor evaluated by the standardized statistical procedure for test results outlined on Annex of Eurocode 3 (see Annex 12).
An improved safety factor is proposed on the basis of calculating an additional value for the factor taking into account the criteria for the plastic hinge stability:
9pi^
where:
<9av
(3.4)
y = max(yc,ys)
(3.5)
and Ys is the partial safety factor to be evaluated from considerations about the requirements stability of the plastic hinge.
for the
The rotation capacity approach used in plastic design assumes implicitly that a given required rotation can be reached by the plastic hinge provided that, in the moment-rotation curve, the value of the moment remains over the plastic moment level (available rotation definition). However, this condition does not guarantee the plastic hinge stability in the structure since this stability depends not only on the moment level corresponding to the required rotation but also on the descendant branch slope of the moment-rotation curve at that rotation.
A value for the critical slope of the descendant branch, Xcnt, will be derived and expressed in terms of the required rotation and the load redistribution factor. On the other hand, the actual value of the slope for the moment rotation curve, at the point where the available rotation is reached, will be expressed, assuming certain simplifications, as a function of the available rotation.
This will allow the checking of the plastic hinge stability (X < XCrit> to be integrated as part of the rotation capacity checking by means of the introduction of a modified safety factor as shown in (3.4)
and (3.5).
26
3.4.2
Stability requirements
X<Xcrit
(3.6)
where X is the actual value of the slope of the moment rotation curve and Xcrit is the critical slope to be evaluated. Xcrit is mainly dependent on the structure and the load conditions and will be expressed in terms of the required rotation capacity and the load redistribution factor.
Mi k
Mpi.
kf
^^^\ k ^ <~STABILITY
^p X>Xc~INSTABILITY
**
-3
Kp
>*
In the first stage (A), the load is incremented until the moment at the end locations, Mi, reaches the plastic moment level, Mpi .
Figure 6 : (-) curve for fully supported and uniformly loaded beam (A)
The load and the end moment Mi at the plastic hinge formation moment are: 12. M pi
v=
-7f
Ml = Mpl
From this point on, the beam ends can be assumed to behave as elastic supports with a variable stiff ness, K(<pi) determined by the slope of the moment-rotation curve associated to the plastic hinge. The case for this boundary conditions can be solved by superposition of the two cases indicated: the simply supported beam (B-I) and the built-in beam (-), imposing additionally the compatibility relationship
between the angle and the moment .
27
Kr
.W
AR
*?
>
AR
(B-g
is
(t
() =
aP=aR+/P, ,= *
Figure 7 : (-) curve for fully supported and uniformly loaded beam (B)
Thus, an expression for the angle in function of the total load can be derived:
24. E. I
.,
f\
() =
.2
The plastic hinge will start to loose the stability at the moment in which an increment in the angle may occur without applying any external force:
12;
<0
-* K<
-2.E.I L
X>
E.I
Mpi
2*s
,
#
plastic hinge
AR
= +2
=().
,
AR
L
28
It
When the plastic moment level (Mpi) is reached, the plastic hinge can be assumed to behave as a tor sional elastic spring with a variable stiffness, () determined by the slope of the moment-rotation curve. The new case can be solved by superposition of two cases as indicated: the first one introducing a simple support at the plastic hinge location (B-I) and the second keeping the original boundary condi tions (B-II). In addition, the compatibility relationship between the angle and the moment needs to be applied. Thus, an expression for the angle in function of the total load can be derived:
0) ^
+().
Cm
The plastic hinge will start to loose the stability at the moment in which an increment in the angle may occur without applying any external force:
<0
c9
x>
Cm
2.C,<P
Next, this critical value for the slope in the moment-rotation curve will be expressed as a function of the required rotation. Let (preq the required rotation at the plastic hinge to be checked. As the required rotation is calculated under the hypothesis of elastic perfect-plastic global analysis, the moment incre ment between the points A and is assumed to be null.
M1
Mp,
k.
<P*z
-*
to
Kp
AM = 0 -4 2| = 0 -> APJJ = )
=
and the increment
-> |* = .||
2.1| =2.<:.
following way:
expressed in terms
being the value of the external load at the moment of reaching first Mpi (A):
9req
~~
Mpl = CM.P
Kp"
2.C
CM
1<P_
Mpl=Rreq-9pl
29
Amt Lcnt
_ CM _ KP
2.C<p
(Pjgq
Rreq 9pl
Mi =
M2 =
RU
12
= MD,-P =
pl
12.M pi
2 =
=
Lz
8
. =
MDl
2
S-
->
= 0,33
P.L2 _ M mpi 24
1
4.
^->=
Mpl.L
Rreq
_ 9pl =
Mpl.Lpl
.
'Lpl = 1-
1,58
91
158
Kp = 0,33
->Xi,= Lcnt
-2- = 0,21
Teq
30
3.4.3
An expression of the actual slope of the moment-rotation curve at the point of crossing down the Mpi level as a function of the available rotation, X = X(<pav), can allow the checking of the plastic hinge stability (X < Xcrit) to be integrated as part of the rotation or rotation capacity checking. An alternative safety factor ys to be introduced in the standard rotation checking will be derived from the stability
requirement:
***?
y = max(yc,Ys)
where Yc is the partial safety factor derived from statistical evaluations on test results and ys is the partial safety factor to be evaluated from the stability criteria
A number of assumptions will be considered about the moment-rotation curve in order to derive the required relationship for the slope:
1.
The ultimate moment is taken to be the plastic moment multiplied by a constant . The available rotation is dependent on the rotation value at the ultimate moment level through the constant Kav. The slope of the curve at (fret is taken to be two times the slope corresponding to a descendant straight line between (<pu, My) and (%0t, Mp]).
2.
3.
M
pl
(1+)
9av~Kav9u
Taking into account these relations the plastic hinge stability condition can be expressed in the follow ing way:
L- (Kav-l).<pu 2 - 2* (Kav-l)-<pav pl
,
-r-rit Lcnt
_ CM _ KP .JV1 M
2-C<p
9req
pl
x<x
where:
y
ent
2.Kav
(Kav-!)
^
K IL ^ < "P
9av
>
9req
2.K a* av
(Kav-l) Kp
31
Taking the following realistic values for the parameters involved in the formula:
Kav =2
Kp
a safety
=0,2 =1/3
3.4.4
Flow chart: safety evaluation for rotation capacity checking based on the plastic hinge stability approach
CROSSSECTION MATERIAL
STRUCTURE
LTB conditions
RftEQ
KD
FU or Tj,
J =MPX\yc
,8
*r
REQ
Rmv
t>
4.
4.1
As the load increases, a plastic hinge appears under the load; the plastic hinge is usually accompanied by local buckling of the compressed parts of the cross-section.
The bending moment M in the hinge is plotted versus the sum of the two rotations at supports. Then the available rotation capacity ^available CSJ1 be deduced.
Referring to the following graph, the commonly accepted definition of available rotation capacity ^available (Rav) is given (with different designations) as :
M.max
Test curve
Mpi
Elasto-plastic bilinear model
= +; inelastic
Figure 14 : Definition of parameters in ( - ) curves
R
Kav where
_9av
9pl
or
p
vav
_ 9rot
9pl
is the bending moment in the plastic hinge, is the theoretical plastic resistance bending moment of the cross-section,
33
Mpi
(= = eelstic)
is defined as the particular elastic rotation (= level (upwards intersection),
(Prot
9av (= 9rot = ^inelastic = = av) is the available inelastic rotation of the plastic hinge,
(= )
is a rotation defined as the sum of the rotations of both extremities of the beam; = + 2 (see Figure 14), in the case of three-point bending tests .
4.2
Tests results
(1) The following 90 available 3 point bending tests results according to major axis yy are provided in Annex 1 1. Those tests were used to compare Feldmann's and Kemp's models (see chapter 4.3) :
15 tests
11
9rot}
<=
) (Feldmann's model),
(2) In Annex 12 a more complete database of tests results is presented and used in order to evaluate partial safety factors for Feldmann's formulas related to different load cases (My, Mz, N-My).
4.3
4.3.1
^ 9av.c[
Rav
,
with
9av.d
(3.1)
or,
r>
where
p
av
_9av
~ m 9pl MpiL
(3.2)
and
* = 2EI
(2) Such a rotation check so far could not be carried out because the rotation capacity could only be determined from tests or sophisticated numerical simulations. The background document to Eurocode 3 which is enclosed in Annex 12 presents a simple procedure developed by Feldmann M. (Ref. 11) for calculating the available inelastic rotation <pav as well as the available rotation capacity Rav of plastic hinges, from formulae for static (monotonic) loading up to the ultimate load.
(3) The basis of Feldmann's method is the modelling of the non-linear buckling phenomena in the yielding zones by a plastic folding mechanism that allows to determine the rotation capacity in a reliable way. Formulae have been developed for the rotation capacity of I-profiles and -profiles in bending about the major and the minor axis, for bending with and without shear as well as for bending with axial force (Ref. 11) (see Annex 11, Annex 13 or chapter 4.3. 1.2). The reliability of those formulae is proved by a comparison with tests results (see Annex 12). These new formulae permit to apply the plastic hinge method to cross-sections and steel grades which so far have been excluded from plastic design by the limitations of b/t ratios which characterize the classification of cross-sections.
(4) ProfilARBED applied Feldmann's formulae for I and H hot-rolled cross-sections submitted to bending about major axis My, to bending about minor axis Mz and to combined axial compression and bending about major axis N-My .
The "Guide for plastic analysis" included in separate Annex 13 provides practical tables and graphs with characteristic values of available inelastic rotations <pav of plastic hinge for European I and H hotrolled cross-sections (TPE, IPE A, IPE O, HE AA, HE A, HE B, HE M) and for all steel grades (S 235,
S 275, S 355, S 420, S 460).
(5) The values of inelastic rotations of plastic hinges (tv are mainly influenced by the dimensions of the cross-sections as well as by the steel grades of web and flange (see Figures 15 to 18). Rotation capacity Rav is dependent on (j)av but is also function of related to the span length Lspn (see Figures 19 and 20).
<Pav
0,2
[rad]
0,18
,;
0,16 -
0,14 -.
0,12 -0,1
-.
0,08 -. 0,06
..
0,04 .. 0,02 ..
bAf
-410 12 14
16
18
0 -8
20
22
24
26
35
<Pav[rad] 0,14 _
fy = 320 MPa
0,13
0,12 -.
0,11
--
0,1
12
16
20
24
28
32
av[rad]
0,18
-,
0,1 -
0,08
0,06 0,04
0,02
fy = 320 MPa
h = 0,27 m b = 0,135 m tw = 0,0102 m
15
dAw
20
25 30
35
40
45
(pav (h =
36
0,2 Tav
0,18
-
0,16
IPE 270
0,14
0,12 .
0,1
-
0,08 0,06
0,04 0,02
0
fy [MPa]
275
315 355 395
235
435
475
q>av
(Feldmann's model)
37
20
16
--
270
12
--
-.
4 -.
L span [m]
0
-i
I 1
lili
(6) Feldmann's model (see Annex 11) delivers always positive values of fev and Rav for all considered profiles and steel grades, because no limits are imposed to the model. In the "Guide for plastic analysis" (chapter 3 of separate Annex 13) tables and graphs which provide available inelastic rotation <pav of plastic hinges for different profiles and steel grades, furnish zero values if concerned cross-sections are not Pass 1 or 2 (= "plastic" cross-sections) according to present rules of Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1). Those rules are too conservative as shown in another research project (Ref. 17) but no improved alternatives are officially proposed at the present time. (7) Feldmann's model does not take into account the lateral-torsional buckling and its interaction with local buckling. Consequently its field of application should be limited to structures where lateral-torsional buckling is prevented with sufficient lateral restraints. Anyway the same condition has to be fulfilled when doing plastic global analysis of a structure : no instability phenomena (local and global Ducklings) can appear before the occurrence of last hinge forming the articulated mechanism of collapse (see chapter 3.2, chapter 4.4.4 and separate Annex 13). (8) Several numerical simulations have been performed to check the validity of Feldmann's model
:
comparison with tests results (see chapter 4.4. 1), simulation of normal cases without tests results (see chapter 4.4.2), check of formulas (4.3) and (4.4) for beams submitted to combined My - loading
(see chapter 4.4.3),
check of lateral-torsional buckling limits for Feldmann's model (see chapter 4.4.4).
In the scope of Feldmann's model, the values of partial safety factor have been determined by statistical evaluation of available tests results (see Annex 12). The values of partial safety factor yt<p applied to 3 have been evaluated (see option 1 of Annex 12 considering formula (3.1) as a single standing ultimate limit state check) independently from () which applies to the plastic resistance bending moment of the cross-section Mpi (=Wpi fy), (see Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) and Appendix 1 of Annex 13 for tables with plastic resistance of I and cross-sections : Mpi.y.Ra, Mpi.z.R<j, ...)
Therefore a structure shall be analysed by separate checks of cross-section resistance and of plastic hinge ductility (3.1), using respectively :
38
the design value of plastic bending moment for the resistance of cross-sections : MplJld = Mpi/TMo . with partial safety factor ymo according to Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) ( Ymo = 1,1) or to NAD's values, and,
the design value of available inelastic rotation for ductility of formed plastic hinges : 9av.d = 9av / . with the proposed design model in chapter chapter 4.3.1.2 for <pav values (Ref. 11) and with related partial safety factors for different load cases :
Load cases
Formulas
of chapter
4.3.1.2
1,52 1,73
j My
j Mz
2,02
^-y
My-
235 MPa < fy < 460 MPa. Indeed the reliability of the model has been demonstrated by tests results with steel grades m that range (see Annex 12).
Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) allows for plastic global analysis with steel materials characterized according to EN 10025 (Ref. 21) and EN 101 13 (Ref. 22) as given in following table :
Nominal
Steel grade
Thickness t (mm) *)
t<40mm
40mm<t< 100 mm
A5.65
y
EN 10025
standard
S 235 S 275 S 355
fy
[Mpa]
235 275 355
fu
[Mpa]
360 430 510
fu/fy
[-]
1.53 1.56 1.44
fy
[Mpa]
215 255 335
fu
[Mpa]
340 410 490
fu/fy A5.65
[-]
1.58 1.61 1.46
ey
[%]
26 22 22
0.11 0.13 0.17
[%]
24 20 20
[%]
0.10 0.12 0.16
EN 10113-3
Standard
S 275 M S 355 M S 420 M S 460 M
275 355
390
420 460
24 22
19 17
430
24 22
19 17
Note:
*) t is the nominal thickness of the element : - of the flange of rolled sections (t = tf ), in general, or - of the particular elements of welded sections
^7^
*
1
1
1
^ -
"t
39
Eurocode 3 Part 1.1 (Ref. 1) gives a simplified variation of fy in function of the material thickness (thickness ranges: lower than 40 mm, from 40 mm to 100 mm), with values of fy - for certain thickness ranges - greater than the values specified by EN 10025 (Ref. 21) and EN 10113 (Ref. 22) (thickness ranges: lower than 16 mm, from 16 mm to 40 mm, from 40 mm to 63 mm, from 63 mm to 80 mm, from 80 mm to 100 mm, from 100 mm to 150 mm) (see following figure). As Eurocode 3 always provides yield strength f y equal or greater than values guaranteed by the specifications of delivery conditions (EN 10025, EN 10113), the available inelastic rotation <pav resulting from fy of Eurocode 3 are always safesided (equal or lower) in comparison of the inelastic rotation q>av resulting from fy of EN 10025 or
EN 10113.
Minimum guaranteed yield strength RcH (or Rp0,2) m function of nominal thickness t of material
Steel grades' RcH(orRpO^) [Mpa]
S 460
4 60
460
440
430
430
S 420
-42
420
-
410
400
390
390
400
S 355
355
355
370
360
345
335
335 340
325 315
S 275
275
-ZU
265
^
1
255
255
1
S 235
235
235
225
245
2/5
215
235
225
195
t {mm]
150
]6
40
63
80
100
Legend:
.
-EN 10113 ( for S 275, S 355. S 420 & S 460 steel grades). Euroc ode 3 specifications (for S 235, S 2?5,S3SS,S420& S 460 steel grades).
The real yield stresses of the steels delivered by mills are always greater than the nominal values of the steels indicated in the specifications EN 10025 (Ref. 21) and EN 10113 (Ref. 22). As presented in this chapter 4.3.1.1 clause (9), a statistical procedure has been used to evaluate partial safety factors ^ related to available inelastic rotation <pav issued from model proposed in chapter 4.3.1.2 (see Annex 12). That statistical procedure took into account the difference between nominal and expected value of steel grade, even considering decreasing of inelastic rotation <pav by increasing the yield stress of the steel. That is safesided as another fact is that for many structures the rotation requirement is decreasing by increasing the yield stress whilst the ultimate load target (i.e. the design load level) remains using the nominal yield values (Ref. 24) ( see following figure : <preq.over < 9req ) Ttms witn resp^ t0 safety the unexpected overstrengthening is well considered.
40
Decreasing of the rotation requirement in case of actual yield stress which are greater than the
iHiiimmimnfTTTTrmr
--
i^reqWi
A. type of load: concentrated load with bending about major axis y-y of cross-section (My),
B. type of load: concentrated load with bending about minor axis z-z of cross-section (M),
C. type of load: concentrated load with combined axial compressive force, bending about major axis y-y of cross-section (My - N).
In all formulas
fy.fi
fy.w
=150 MPa,
= yield strength in flange must be introduced in MPa, = yield strength in web must be introduced in MPa,
= modulus of elasticity (= 210 000 MPa),
E
Npi
= plastic axial resistance of cross-section (=Afy), = plastic resistance moment of cross-section (=Wpi fy),
Mpi
41
..
type of load:
Plastic folding mechanism in compression flange of beams submitted to bending about major axis yy (Ref. 11):
5,2
<P av
4Et>4
f ,
V400
^
M
+ 0,25 (
17"
- ^.whtw + -J(^.whtw )
+ 4fy-wbtf twMa
[rad]
(4.1)
15.
type of load:
42
Plastic folding mechanism in H beams submitted to bending about minor axis zz (Ref. 11)
This formula is only valid when stiffeners are applied at the loading point.
Wpi.zfy
2tf
<Pav
(h-2tf)twfy-w
[rad]
(4.2)
= , +
}|.+)
0.2
;
where
?1 =
('-f)
In practical cases the ratio 2b/l are rather small. One can therefore assume the safesided value of , = <2
v.".
type of load:
concentrated load with bending about major axis y-y of cross-section combined with axial compressive force
43
Plastic folding mechanism in H beams submitted to bending about major axis yy combined to axial compressive force (Ref. 11) :
if
<pav is
>-^
neutral axis
<-N
)My
r
<Pav
CI)
j
fy.w ht w + (fy.w ht w J
5,2
f 4Ebr3
i
ry.fl
400
5h
+ 4fy .w bt f l w
[rad]
(4.3)
if
A-2btf > Pi
_ Aweb
V
Atotal )
f* <-N
v.
JMy
neutral axis
>
[rad]
where:
(4.4)
MN.y = WpLyfy
1-
(4.5)
13)
or Appendix
of present Annex
44
Nfl=(tf-tM)bfy.fl
XM
(4.6)
-' 2b
1-
Af,
(4.7)
yj
(4.8)
_ 4EbtS
Pc 51?"
Pu
= btf(fy.fl+a)
(4.9)
The following value of Niimit defines the border between formulas (4.3) and (4.4) for q>av- Niimit is related to the case where neutral axis hes in the border between the web and the flange of the crosssection.
h-tf
neutral axis
<-N
JMy
Niimit=(A-2btf)fy.w
4.3.2
(4.10)
(1) Kemp and Dekker have developed two models for predicting the rotation capacity of steel beams (Ref. 15). The first proposed model is based on a theoretical consideration of the strains in the section and of the length of plastic region of the flange for which local buckling is assumed to occur. Complicated formulae of the first model are given for information in Annex 11.
The second model is a semi-empirical approach, which is based on comparisons with tests results and results produced using the first theoretical model. More details are given about the second simplified model in Annex 1 1 .
(2) ProfilARBED has applied formulae of Kemp's simplified model for I- and H-cross-sections submitted to bending according to the major axis (3 point bending beams), in order to evaluate available rotation capacities (Rav) (see Annex 11).
4.3.3
(1) The available inelastic rotation <pav of plastic hinges has been studied by statistical evaluation of tests results and by observation of buckling mechanisms. The ratios tf/d, h/b and fy/fy have been demonstrated being the most significant. A model is proposed for I and cross-sections submitted to bending according to major axis yy (see Annex 1 1 and Ref. 4).
4.3.4
(1) Comparison has been made between 26 experimental results on steel section and calculation models determining available rotation capacity, allowing local buckling: the Kemp & Dekker theoretical and simple models (K & D simp.), the Johnson & Chen best fit (J & best) and lower bound (J & lower) models, and the Spangemacher & Sedlacek (S & S) model (see Figure 21a), issued from document 3263-1-19: "Design rules for continuous composite beams using Class 1 and 2 steel sections Applicability of EC 4").
45
the spread of errors is less than for the other models (better scatter of values).
Kemp model and others give relative precise values of the ultimate load of the tested beams (differences of 5 %) but provide less precise values for >0, the largest rotations which are decisive to evaluate the
available rotation capacities.
(2) On the other hand, Feldmann's model which has been recently developed (Ref. 11), intends to determine as accurately as possible the values of <Pr0t and hence to furnish the values of available inelastic rotations <pav which can be directly compared with required rotations <Preq provided by global plastic analysis. Afterwards rotation capacities (Rav) can be deduced from these plastic rotations (<pav) if
needed.
(3) ProfilARBED compared the efficiency of both models on the basis of a databank of tests reults (see chapter 4.2 and Annex 1 1).
Therefore rotations capacities are compared with tests results in Annex
11
as
follows
R experiments are plotted versus R models (Feldmann's model, Kemp's simplified model and CRM's model) (Figure 21 b)) and Annex 1 1)
experimental results with >60, meaning !zc*e occurrence of lateral-torsional buckling (see clause 3.2 (5)), are excluded,
assumptions for Feldmann's model
:
assumptions
1zc^
for
Kemp's
simplified
model
11
experimental
results
with
or Ref. 15).
in (Ravaiiable - Lspan(= span length)) graphs (Annex 11), the curves are calculated with nominal dimensions of profiles and measured yield points in using Feldmann's model, Kemp's simplified model and Kemp's theoretical model; experimental results are given and local values of models with measured geometry are sometimes evaluated.
(4) Conclusions
:
In order to elaborate practical tables or charts for designers, the working group of this research project has preferred Feldmann's model to Kemp's model and CRM's model for the following reasons, on basis of presented databank of tests results (see chapter 4.2) :
more results from Kemp's model are on the unsafe side, even if extreme cases of tests are excluded (see Figure 21b) and Annex 11),
with Feldmann's model the evaluation of ductility of plastic hinges can be carried out by comparisons with either inelastic rotations (pav or rotations capacities Rav; and, on the other hand as explained in chapter 4.4.7.1, the criterion (3.1) comparing inelastic rotations <pav should be easier to use instead of criterion (3.2) comparing rotation capacities Rav,
Kemp's model assumed (see Ref. 15) that the ratio between <p^ (= <pav) and %iax was typically equal to 2,0; Figure 22 shows that there is no representative value for that ratio, Kemp's model and CRM's model are only applicable to My loading case (bending about major axis) whereas Feldmann developed formulas for My (bending about major axis), Mz (bending about minor axis) and N-My (combined axial load and bending about major axis) loading cases, Feldmann's model is related to partial safety factors evaluated from statistical procedure according to Annex of Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) (see Annex 12); this model is directly applicable according to Eurocode 3 philosophy of ultimate limit states.
46
av. experiments
20 -
15
SAFE
^ /
>o
w
10
y
K&D simp. J&C best J&C lower
S&S
"VM**
5
fl*
UNSAFE|
1
fill
)
10
15
20
R av. model
(Spangemacher and Sedlacek values (S&S) given for fu / fy = 1,4)
a) : Comparison
R av. experiments
24 23 22
21
X CRM's model
20
19 18 17
16
15
14 13 12
11
10 9 8
7 6
5
4
3
2
1
0 0
1
6 7
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
R av. model
b) : Comparison of rotation capacity from tests results and from models of CRM, Feldmann and Kemp
Author Test N
dl6b3m dl9a4m
d20b4m d01a4m d02b4m d09a3m
Rm
17.0 11.4 6.8
Rav
22.5 20.0 13.2 6.4 7.8 18.9 19.8 32.9 12.0 9.3 15.4 2.8
1.5
Author
TestN
A-2
Ymax
()
(1)
B-l
B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5
5.0 6.0
13.6 18.7 15.6 5.1 2.8 5.7 1.6
dl0b3m
EA22312 EA2233 EA2234 EA22412 EA2243 EA2244 EB28312 EB2833 EB2834 EB28412 EB2843 EB2844 EA28312 EA2833 EA2834 EA28412 EA2843 EA2844
C-l
C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5
0.6
18.9 19.8 16.5
D-6 E-6
0.122 0.028 0.048 0.051 0.030 0.029 0.023 0.048 0.029 0.021 0.031 0.062 0.036
0.272 0.042 0.120 0.092 0.052 0.048 0.049 0.112 0.078 0.045 0.068 0.136 0.083
4.3 4.3
4.6
14.8 8.3
4.6
5.3
1.5 1.3
6.4
16.5
CRM
2
3
6.0
15.0 7.9 19.1
4
5
6
7 8
7.8 6.9
13.3
9
10
11
12
13 15 17 18
19
20
21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
20.7 9.2 6.9 12.2 9.1 6.4 8.0 8.95 9.2 8.5 5.6 10.49 8.2 8.1
6.0
6.25
4.6 4.6
8.5
4.4
10.5 17
6.4 4.1 11.25 23.4 12.2 28.4 17.7 17.6 23.3 40.4 15.2 11.4 21.5 13.5 9.3 11.6 11.5 12.8 9.5 8.3 14.35 12.9 12.5 8.6 8.7 6.1 6.75 8.5 5.7
15.3
max
_?rot Rav
(PD
R_ m Lm
rmax
R Kav _ M 9rot
m
9max
20
I
fa.
i5
io
o nSl ~ _*
o o
32
Rav/Rm
48
4.3.5
(1) The purpose of the thesis of Mr. Couchman (Ref. 14) is to investigate the behaviour of continuous composite beams with plastic (Class 1), compact (Class 2) or semi-compact (Class 3) critical sections. (2) The software Compcal developed at EPFL has been used to compute the available rotation capacities of beams with plastic and compact sections by introducing Kemp's model (Ref. 15). A wide variety of parameters have been chosen to study the influential factors to the available rotation capacities. These factors were :
slendemess of the cross-section,
reinforcement at the support, represented by the ratio of hogging to sagging plastic resistance moment (the plastic moment ratio),
structural steel characteristics,
number of spans,
4.4.
4.4.1
(1) In order to check the efficiency of the finite elements modelization LABEIN has carried out numerical simulations of different 3-point bending tests from RWTH (Aachen) (Ref. 5 and Ref. 13) (Tests documentation: Annex 5 (6/46)) :
the tests n 16 to 18 of table 2 (n EA28412, EA2843, EA2844) concerning HEA 280 profiles, with yield strength of 504 Mpa, which are in class 4 according to Eurocode 3 and nevertheless which furnish available rotation capacities from 4,1 to 16,5 ! * other tests specimens as n 4 to 6 of table 2 (n EA22412, EA2243, EA2244) concerning HEA 220 profiles, with yield strength of 420,5 Mpa, which are in class 3 according to Eurocode 3 and neverheless which furnish available rotation capacities from 1,5 to 15,4 ! * here is the list of profiles related to the numbers of tests specimens: . HEB 220 for tests n 1 to 8 of table 1 (class 1 for S235 and S460 steel grades), . HEA 220 for tests n 1 to 6 of table 2 (class 1 for S235 and class 3 for S460), HEB 280 for tests n 7 to 12 of table 2 (class 1 for S235 and class 2 for S460), HEA 280 for tests n 13 to 18 of table 2 (class 2 for S235 and class 4 for S460). The tables and figures included in Annex 5 present a summary of these simulations :
49
a) Assumptions of
b)
The tables of Annex 5 (7/46 and 10/46) shows a synthesis of the results presented in an appropriate way to be compared with the experimental results. Beside this, the available rotation capacity given by Kemp's and Feldmann's models have been also included together with the computed and tests results. It can be observed how the finite element results correlate reasonably well with test data. Feldmann's model always provides conservative results and Kemp's model is often unsafe.
c)
The graphical layouts of Annex 5 (9/46 and 1 1/46) present the correlation between the calculated and measured values of different parameters for every case: maximum moment (Mu), rotation at the maximum moment (Qmax = ), inelastic rotation (Qr0t = 9av)>
f
rotation capacity defined with Qmax Rmax
~ _9max-9pl
"\
=R
^^-
,
<Ppl
d)
The figures of Annex 5 (8/46 and 12/46 to 29/46) give the comparison between calculated and measured moment-rotation curves for the cases where experimental relations were available. The Figures of Annex 5 (30/46 to 46/46) also provide deformations of beams related to the most right hand intersection between respective moment-rotation curve and plastic moment level. Those simulated deformations can be compared to tested specimens.
(2) CTICM has performed 5 types of numerical simulations in order to evaluate the available rotation capacity of a I-profile. The ahn of these simulations was to identify the main parameters which govern the available plastic rotation. More information is given in Annex 6 (document 3263-2-9) :
a)
Firstly, comparisons were made between experimental results and numerical simulations from LABEIN (ABAQUS Program) and from CTICM (ANSYS Program). These results were not different in the increasing part of the curves, but after the top, significant deviations have been
noted.
b)
The influence of a global imperfection, the influence of an eccentric load (biased load) and the case of a cantilever beam have been investigated (see also chapter 4.4.6.2).
4.4.2
(1) In order to check if Feldmann's model is valid for all I or steel cross-sections, simulations were performed for different nominal cases for which no tests results are available. As numerical simulations have been successfully calibrated to existing tests results (see chapter 4.4.1), they are considered as representing the reality to which Feldmann's model has been compared (see Annex 14).
(2) Labein simulated following 3-point bending beams without tests results using nominal values of dimensions and yield strengths :
- IPE A 300, with fy = 460 Mpa (EC3: class 3f) and span = L = 2,80 m ((L/2)/(iz.e) = 58,6 < 60), [Feldmann's model: <pav = 0,06 rad = 3,43; Ravailable = 2,91, for L = 2,80 m], - HE AA 450, with fy = 235 Mpa (EC3: class 3f) and span = L = 8,3 m ((L/2)/(iz) = 59,9 < 60), [Feldmann's model: <pav = 0,09 rad = 5,16; Ravailable = 7,05, for L = 7,3 m], - HE AA 450, with fy = 460 Mpa (EC3: class 4f) and span = L = 5,8 m ((L)/(iz) = 58,6 < 60), [Feldmann's model: <pav = 0,06 rad = 3,43; Ravailable = 2,15, for L = 5,8 m], - HE AA 120, with fy = 460 Mpa (EC3: class 4f) and span = L = 1,7 m ((L/2)/(iz) = 40,6 < 60), [Feldmann's model: <pav = 0,14 rad = 8,02; Ravailable = 4,0, for L = 1,7 m], - HE A 280, with fy = 355 Mpa (EC3: class 3f) and span = L = 6,8 m ((L/2)/(iz) = 59,7 < 60), [Feldmann's model: <pav = 0,1 1 rad = 6,30; Ravailable = 3,23, for L = 6,8 m],
50
- HE A 280, with fy = 235 Mpa (EC3: class 2f) and span = L = 7,9 m ((L/2)/(iz) = 56,4 < 60), [Feldmann's model: <pav = 0,14 rad = 8,02; RaVailable = 6,33, for L = 7,9 m], - HE AA 120, with fy = 235 Mpa (EC3: class 2f) and span = L = 3,0 m ((L/2)/(iz) = 51,2 < 60), [Feldmann's model: <pav = 0,20 rad = 11,46; Ravailable = 9,75, for L = 3,0 m],
- HE A 650, with fy = 460 Mpa and span = L = 5,9 m ((L/2)/(iz.e) = 59,2 < 60), [Feldmann's model: (pav = 0,07 rad = 4,01; Ravailable = 3,3, for L = 5,9 m], - IPE A 500, with fy = 460 Mpa and span = L = 3,7 m ((L/2)/(iz.e) = 59,1 < 60), [Feldmann's model: <pav = 0,05 rad = 2,86; Ravailable = 2,9, for L = 3,7 m],
model:
HEM 100, with fy = 235 Mpa and span = L = 3,0 m ((L/2)/(iz.e) = 54,7 < 60), [Feldmann's <pav = 2,07 rad = 1 19 (!); Ravailable = 100 (!), for L = 3,0 m].
:
HE AA 1000, with fy = 460 Mpa (EC3: class 2w) and span = L = 4,9m ((L/2)/(iz.e) = 59,1 < 60), [Feldmann's model: (pav = 0,04 rad = 2,29; Ravailable = 3,33, for L = 4,9 m].
for HE A 200 and EAA 200 profiles, for spans of respectively L = 2 m & 4 m and L = 2 m, for fy = 235 MPa, classifying the sections respectively in class 1 and class 3 and, for fy = 460 MPa, classifying the sections respectively in class 3 and class 4, in order to quantify the influence of the yield strength fy on the rotation capacity and on the classification of cross-sections.
:
(3) The tables and figures included in Annex 14 present a summary of these simulations
a)
the tables and graphical layouts of Annex 14 (3/13 and 10/13) provide a synthesis with comparison between Abaqus simulations and Feldmann's model results.
of the
results
<Ppi;
<pav
and Rpl = R.
Feldmann's model fits very well with simulations results and moreover if partial safety factor Tm<p (= 1.52) was applied, Feldmann's model should furnish conservative results for all analysed
cases.
b)
the Figures of Annex 14 (from 4/13 to 9/13 and from 11/13 to 13/13) show moment-rotation curves and deformed shape of beams for several singular cases.
4.4.3
(1) In order to check Feldmann's model about My-N interaction loading, simulations have been carried out to determine the available inelastic rotation for different (N/Npi) values especially when the neutral axis moves from web to flange providing big differences of available inelastic rotations <pav values (see Annex 15). The bending moment resistance of cross-section has been evaluated with precised formulas related to the position of neutral axis (in flange or in web) (see Annex 15 (2/10)).
(2) For the profile HEA 200 in S235 steel grade submitted to My-N loading, Feldmann's model provides following design values of available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge :
^1
if
Npi
<^^A
51
A2
Npl
'N^
VNPlAimit
-Aweb=0j257A
(3) Figure 3
of Annex 15 (7/10) shows the plot of <pav (= PHI_AV) versus N/Npi as well as the maximum and minimum <pav values corresponding to Feldmann's model for HEA 200 and S235 steel grade. This model furnishes safesided results for maximum and minimum <pav values and it suitably represents the
transition between those 2 <pav values
ll/^Aimit
N/T
= 0,257
J
4.4.4
(1) An important topic concerns the rules delimiting the application field of Feldmann's model in regards to lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) of members. In the formulas of Feldmann's model the length of member is not considered. But it is well known that for different levels (L/iz), the collapse of bended members with plastic hinge(s) is influenced : - either, only by LTB of members without occurrence of plastic hinge(s), - or, by an interaction between LTB of members and local buckling in plastic hinge(s), - or, by local buckling in plastic hinge(s) followed by LTB of members. (2) In order to check if Feldmann's model is valid within lateral-torsional buckling limits (of Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) or CM66 (Ref. 18)) and on the other side in order to determine which limits from Eurocode 3 or CM66 are more realistic, numerical simulations have been realized by Labein. (3) Concerning the results for HEA 200 cross-section (see Annex 16 (9/25)) available inelastic rotation <pav (= phi av) behaviour for Lj/lz values between 50 and 80. On the other hand a sudden fall of <pav is obtained for S235 and Li/iz values lower than 30 (beam length = 3 m), due mainly to a change in the deformation mode. This change in the deformation mode occurs for lower values Li/iz in comparison with the linear buckling case for which this modification in the deformation pattern appeared for beam lengths higher than 5 metres. A mesh refinement at the web (doubling the number of elements) has been introduced in one of the cases (L = 2 m) for which a local web deformation mode appeared. The results confirm the fall of <pav, giving a 10 % lower value of <pav in comparison with the coarse mesh.
(4) In figures presenting <pav (=phi av) = f(Lfi) (see Annex 16 (9/25) and (10/25)), the results obtained for both profiles, HEA 200 and IPE 200 and for both steel grades S235 and S460, show that the Feldmann's model is in the safe side within the LTB limits (CM66) for most of analysed cases (see "phi-Feldman" values = (pav). If the partial safety factor ^ = 1,5 is used Feldmann's model is safe in comparison with all the simulation cases (see "phi-Feldman/1,5" values = (pav.d) No simulation results are situated in the area with hatching : this means that Feldmann's model provides safesided values of <pav.d if lateral-torsional buckling rules from Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) or CM66 (Ref. 18) are applied to ensure sufficient lateral bracing, in the scope of these simulations.
52
LTB rules
/777
--
Yy *
Lateral restraints
\i
S-r-Zr l
=0
=0
CM6:
Eurocode 3
Standards
HEA200
CM66
Eurocode 3
63,3
IPE 200
60
S 235
61,4
CM66
Eurocode 3
42,9
S 460
44,2
42,4
In these cases, the maximum length Lj between lateral restraints is quite similar according to CM66 and Eurocode 3 rules.
(5) The differences between prescriptions from both design standards CM 66 and Eurocode 3 are presented for all standard I and H profiles (, IPE A, TPE O, HE AA, HE A, HE and HE M) and for both steel grades S 235 and S 460 (see Annex 16 (24/25) and (25/25) : Figures with L/^ = ()), for simple cases with linear moment gradient and with ratio between extreme bending moment :
-1<
M2
<1.
:
when
= 0,
-1 <
< 0.
53
4.4.5
(1) A 6 meters long beam clamped at both ends and subjected to distributed load has been modelled by LABEIN in order to evaluate how the behaviour of the plastic hinge in this configuration differs from the simply-supported case. The data of the test case "17-EA2843" included in document 3263-1-8 (Spangemacher & Sedlacek) have been taken for the cross-section (HE 280 A ; b = 281 mm; tf = 12,6 mm; h = 275,6 mm; tw = 9 mm).
In this case, a first hinge is developed at the end locations, while the central section is still subjected to half of the plastic moment From this moment, the end hinges have to rotate up to the point in which the
plastic hinge appears at the central section.
The figures included in the working document 3263-3-10 (see Annex 7) show, on one hand, the deformed shape after the formation of the first plastic hinge just before the maximum load (P/Po = 1 .46) (Annex 7 (1/7)) and, on the other hand, the deformed shape after the maximum of the load when all plastic hinges (at supports and at mid-span) have been developed (P/Po. = 1-29) (Annex 7 (2/7)) . Po indicated the load at which the plastic moment is reached.
A slightly buckled lower flange can be appreciated at the end plastic hinge just before the maximum of the load (the figure is affected with a magnification factor of 5) although the maximum end moment Mi is not reached yet, indicating that the local buckling starts to happen before the maximum moment Nevertheless, the figure representing the evolution of both moments, Mi (end section) and M2 (central section) show clearly how the first plastic hinge is capable of rotating without falling into instability until the last plastic hinge starts to form at the central section. The rotation has been taken at the section of zero moment to be consistent with the curves coming from the 3-point bending tests.
(2) The same 6 meters long beam described above has been subjected to central load, extracting the same kind of results. In this case, both the end section and the central one reach the plastic moment at the same time. Because of this, both plastic hinges are simultaneously developed as shown in the figure representing the deformed shape (Annex 7 (5/7)) .
(3) The comparison between the moment (at end section) - rotation (at zero moment section) curves obtained for the two cases, distributed and concentrated load, can been appraised in the figure (Annex 7 (6/7)) : the resulting available rotation capacity is very close one to each other. It is worth to note that the equivalent span for the concentrated load case (Leq = 3 m) is a bit larger than that for the distributed case (Leq = 2,5 m), due to the different sections where the zero moment appears. In the last figure (Annex 7 (7/7)) , the two curves have been represented together with the moment rotation curve coming from the 3-point test simulation and with the experimental one. It is interesting to note the good correlation with the experimental curve obtained for the clamped concentrated load case simulation.
4.4.6
4.4.6.1 Introduction
This section presents some conclusions about the combined influence of the moment gradient and the lateral restraints on the resulting available rotation capacity on the basis of interpreting the results of a number of numerical simulations carried out by LABEIN.
Four different models have been considered moving the concentrated load from the center towards one of the beam ends but keeping constant the total length. The results are in good agreement with other simulations carried out on the basis of changing the beam span at the same time that the load was moved (document 3263-3-7) : the moment-rotation response, the predicted rotation capacity and the ultimate moment do not change significantly when moving the position of the load from the beam center provided that the load is not placed very close to the beam end. In this case, the deformation
54
mode changes suddenly due to shear effects. In this case when the load is near the support (25% for example), high shear deformation dramatically diminishes the available rotation capacity if the reference level remains Mpi.
But in case of high shear the reference level to evaluate the rotation capacity should not be the plastic moment resistance Mpi but the assumed ultimate resistance defined by the reduced plastic resistance moment allowing for the shear force My. For example that value My could be obtained from Eurocode 3; then the interaction between shear force and bending moment should be considered if the applied shear force is greater than half the plastic shear resistance of the cross-section. In that case of lower reference level (My < Mp]) , if moment-rotation curves are similar, the available inelastic rotation <pav of plastic hinge will be greater.
Load Position (L = constant)
Elastic rotation
Total rotation
Inelastic rotation
100 % (CENTER)
9rot
29,99 33,90
31,81
9av = <Prot-<Ppl
28,79
32,69
1,2046
1,2048
75%
50%
25 %
|
1,2049
30,60
1,2049
?heJn?lusions of CTICM simulations about biased concentrated loads (see Annex 6) are similar to
LABEIN results.
Concentrated Load
Distributed Load
19
24
34
33
The simulation results corresponding to cases with distributed load allow to observe a general trend in their behaviour in contrast with the concentrated load cases. The distributed load increases the sensitivity of the beam to suffer from lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) simultaneously interacting with the local buckling. As a consequence of this, the combined inelastic buckling mode (global and local deformation) makes the instability to happen at lower levels of load and rotation providing that no provision is made to avoid the global LTB deformation mode. The results is a lower rotation capacity caused by a combination of both factors: a very flat moment diagram and an insufficient lateral restraint ot the beam.
This effect can be clearly appreciated in the calculated moment-rotation curves (see Annex 8 (3/3)) if we compare the cases with concentrated and distributed load, the rotation capacity keeps constant in case of restraining the lateral displacement at the plastic hinge location. However, if this lateral restraint is removed, the rotation capacity becomes lower for the distributed load than for the concentrated one.
Thus, there seems to be an interaction between the moment gradient and the lateral torsional restraints in such a way that one of the factors strongly affects the influence of the other on the calculated rotation capacity. A critical minimum length (Lb) for providing lateral restraints may be assumed to exist in order to ensure the calculated rotation capacity to be unaffected by the type of loading or the moment
gi duldlL.
It is worth to note the presence of the stiffener at central section in the cases of concentrated load provides an additional torsional restraint compared to the distributed load case. This effect has been proved by applying the distributed load to a model with central stiffener. The calculated rotation capacity (Rav = 23) is increased compared to the case without stiffener (RaV = 19)
55
The interaction between both factors can be appraised by defining the following two parameters:
*-!=-<
- Lltb- Lb:
length between lateral restraints. length of the region of significant yielding determined by the moment gradient (flatter moment diagrams give rise to higher Lb values).
IOC BaMPPOIICWtNRflinrilwOTR)
I)
When sufficient lateral restraints are provided to avoid the global lateral deformation to interact with the local buckling (Lltb Lb) a single local flange buckling occurs and the available rotation seems to be unaffected neither the restraint length (Lltb), nor the moment gradient (Lb).
"
j
1
ftF*{U,Xt>)
In case of high Lltb values in comparison to Lb (Lltb Lb), the combined inelastic buckling
mode (local flange and global lateral) appears and the available rotation seems not to be depending on the restraint length (Lltb) being only influenced by the moment gradient (Lb).
U>U>
.-OS
11
) In the intermediate case with a restraint length Lltb partially avoiding the global lateral buckling, a combined dependence of the available rotation on Lltb and Lb seems to happen.
--
Figure 23 : Buckling mode related to unbraced length Lltb
(2) If we compare the cases with concentrated and distributed load, the available rotation keeps nearly constant in case of providing sufficient lateral restraints at the proximity of the plastic hinge location. However, if the lateral restraint is relaxed, the available rotation becomes lower for the distributed load than for the concentrated one.
Concentrated Load Distributed
Lb'
Load
lili.
Mmax
-i.
A U.Lb
,
*
U-,
-X
L,.
"
L,,.-Lb
i^vi
4-
>
K^
K *
-E
X-
Ut,
x-x-
The simulation cases modelled with the lowest values of Lltb (providing lateral restraints along all the upper flange or restraining the rotation at the plastic hinge location) gave, unexpectedly, lower available rotations than those obtained for the higher Lltb values. The reason for this behaviour is a change in the buckling deformation mode. The additional lateral restraints have avoided the lateral global buckling to interact with the local one but, at the same time, it has introduced a different mode con sisting in a coupling between the flange local deformation and a local web buckling (B).
57
The following cases have been modelled combining different lateral restraint conditions (varying the length between lateral restraints) with different moment gradients (varying the length between vertical supports) in order to evaluate the interacting influence of both factors on the calculated available rota tions. The total length of the beam has been adapted, for each case, to the maximum required distance between vertical or lateral supports. The table shows the calculated available rotation (<pav = 9rot - ) and the resulting buckling deformation mode for every case :
Cross-section:
HE 280 A
Material:
Load:
1,35
58
Available Rotation
Type of beam
S m
<Pav
Lateral restraints
f"
-
4 m
Li /M
41,8
4 m
0,21
0,10
All
AH
-X-
3 m
0,17
0,10
31,4
1.2 m
-x-
0,20
0,10
0,30
0,18
AH AI
12,6
0,24
0,13
X XXX X XXX
SS- S3
0,29
0,36
XXX XXX
ttppor fiLis)
BI
0,30
0,38
AI
*AII
*AI
"^
&
Local flange + limited global lateral Local flange + free local web Local flange + limited local web
*
*BI
^"""W^ r*er
-s-^
,
A further detailed description of the results is found on working document 3263-3-12 (Annex 3).
4.4.7
<Preq
9av
(3.1)
59
or,
<
:
av
(3.2)
Ymr
7^
rot
^^*^1^-*"^
with
1?
-^av Kav -
and
Mpl.L
E.I
Figure 28 : Moment diagram and moment rotation curve for 3 points-bending system
(2) The concept of rotation capacity R introduces a supplementary parameter such as the length L of a reference beam. It must be noted that this parameter is a structural and not local parameter. Rreq is to be calculated from frame plastic analysis as explained hereafter.
The available rotation capacity Rav can also be given in tables but length because (ppi depends on the length.
Because the verification has to be consistent, the required rotation capacity Rreq must be computed by considering the same length of reference which will be used to determine Rav
(3) By analogy with the 3-point bending system, this length of reference (or equivalent length) L related to a plastic hinge in a frame can be defined as the distance between zero-moment points on each side of the hinge :
Plastic hinge
.b.
A "^ujjiipf
<
"
^W
Figure 29 : Equivalent length L to 3-point bending system
(4) For a beam where a plastic hinge occurs under a single concentrated load, the zero-moment points are often easy to identify. For more complex configurations, it is not so easy to determine the reference length, such as the following common examples in Figure 30 :
60
l\
A\\
\
\
m
I
Plastic hinge ..
Plastic hinge
Pjueq
f J_
_1_
+ 2
9p.req- 9p.avail
Teq K
M Pi Leq=2.Mpl/T
-req
Mpi
Rreq ~
_ 2.E.I.T M2 ^P-req
Leq=2.Mpl/T
Figure 31 : Summary table (issued from Annex 10)
(6)
At supports, when the moment is linear in the vicinity of the plastic hinge, the problem is the same that
for a concentrated load on a beam.
TI /fff|Yiv T2
il iibl W
.Hastic hinge
TL
i
Figure 32 : Equivalent length L for different moment gradients
61
When the moment diagram is not linear (due to distributed loads), the reference length is given by the tangent on each side of the plastic hinge as shown in Figure 32. Therefore it does not correspond to the distance between zero-moment points, but this seems to be more realistic since the required rotation capacity depends only on the shape of the moment diagram near the plastic hinge.
(7) Conclusions : It is difficult to clearly identify the length of reference (or equivalent length) L by analogy of 3 point bending beam in order to calculate . On the other hand, computer softwares usually provide required inelastic rotations (preq at each formed plastic hinge for each load level till structural collapse (mechanism,...). Thus the most simple way to check ductility of plastic hinges clearly consists in comparing directly required and available inelastic rotations of plastic hinges instead of converting those values in rotation capacities R.
Therefore it would be advisable to refer to the criterion (3.1) dealing with inelastic rotations () and not with rotation capacities (R) (criterion (3.2)). This conclusion is highlighted by the results of LABEIN numerical simulations presented in chapter 4.4.7.4.
Two cases of 2-span continuous beams with concentrated and distributed load respectively have been modelled and simulated by LABEIN in order to evaluate the equivalent length to be considered for the checking of required rotation capacity in comparison with the available rotation capacity evaluated from the equivalent 3-point bending test in cases of different moment gradients.
4.4.7.3 Model description
Geometry & cross-section:
L
A
*
.
"
.1
XL
n
L2 = 3m L2 = 2,17m L2 = 4m
Material:
Meshing:
Type of element: 8-node shell with parabolic shape functions (S8R Abaqus) A more refined mesh has been provided at the areas where local buckling behaviour is expected to
happen.
62
Concentrated
Distributed
616
1913
Number of elements
Number of nodes
Degrees of freedom
640
1973
11.838
11.478
Initial imperfection:
Pattern:
the first positive elastic buckling eigenmode is used as the initial imperfection shape.
Magnitude:
maximum of
Load application:
Concentrated load:
Incremental-iterative solution procedure has been employed using displacement control. Appropriate constraints to degrees of freedom at upper flange of the loaded section have been applied to ensure the same vertical displacement of mese nodes.
Distributed load: Load control has been used in the load-displacement analysis together with an arc-length integration method (Riks) to cope with the post-buckling unstable response. The load has been applied by means of equivalent node forces at upper flange central line.
Boundary conditions
Vertical supports have been introduced at every node of the lower flange located at the
corresponding support sections.
Longitudinal support has been provided in the loaded section at the centre of the upper flange.
Lateral restraints have been introduced on the compressed flange of the support and load application sections and additional sections according to Additif 80 - DPU 22-701 (CM66) (Ref. 18):
concentrated load case: a moment ratio of 0 has been considered in all the length (leading to L = 1,81 m between lateral restraints) excepting the part between both plastic hinges, where the moment ratio is - 0,87 (L = 2,87 m).
distributed load case: a moment ratio of 0 (L = 1 ,8 1 m) has been taken for the right part of the beam, the first hinge influence area, while a conservative moment ratio of 1 has been considered for the left part (2nd hinge zone) leading to L = 1,05 m between lateral supports.
3-point bending cases: a moment ratio of 0 is assumed leading to L = 1,81 m between lateral
supports.
63
Distributed Load
1
15
>^JL+
15
_!_
y/W
%l17
S
--wu*
N-U
1-L-5
^UJJILP^
"'
1
fr-**L
2.17 J
1.6-L-2.1
JL
m
1.9-L-4
3-L-3
the length determined by the tangent to the bending moment diagram on each side hinge.
of the plastic
4.4.7.4 Results
Comparison with 3-point bending case results
CASE
Continuous beams with concentrated load
(deg)
1,7
(deg)
8,3 8,7 8,5
15
<Pav
= -
(deg)
6,6
7,1
Rav
3,9
Li = l;L2 = 5
3-point bending beam 3-L-3
1,65 1,65
4,3
Li = 3;L2 = 3
Continuous beams with distributed load
6,9
13,9
7,1
8,1
4,2
12,6
14
1,62
1,03
8,7
4,4
7,8
Li =
9,1
64
Concerning the concentrated load case (Figure 38), a very good agreement can be observed between the moment-rotation curve of the continuous beam and that of the corresponding 3-point testing case (Li = 1 m; L2 = 5 m). Also the case of central load (L\ = 3 m; L2 = 3 m) gives the same result as expected.
In the distributed loads case (Figure 37), however, a clear disagreement is observed when comparing the moment-rotation curve of the continuous beam and the corresponding curves of the 3-point bending
cases
In view of simulation results it seems better to evaluate rotation capacity R with equivalent lengths determined by tangent to the bending moment diagram on each side of the plastic hinge (case 1.6-L-2.1)
The discrepancy seems to be caused by the interaction taking place between the lateral deformations induced by both hinges in the continuous beam and giving rise to a stiffening effect This interaction is caused by the fact that the continuous beam has got positive and negative moments along its length. The lower flange, compressed near the first hinge location (negative moment region), is subjected to tension stresses in the positive moment region. This tension, acting on the lower flange at second hinge location, is responsible for the suffer post-buckling response appreciated in the moment-rotation curve of the first hinge in comparison to the 3-point bending case. It can be seen as a sort of stress stiffening effect that produces a positive influence on the side of increasing the actual rotation capacity of the
beam.
This effect is avoided in the concentrated load case since the lateral deformation at both hinges is mainly local and does not interact one to each other.
Thus, the rotation capacity of continuous beams subjected to distributed loads (this load case is more likely to induce coupled lateral deformations) may be significantly higher than that given by the 3-point bending test due to the described stiffening effect
<- Compressed
lower Hange -
S-8-X
Figure 36 : Lower flange lateral deformation
A further detailed description of the results is found in Annex 4 (working document 3263-3-17).
65
16
^-,
10
12
14
16
13
Rotation (dag)
48
10
12
14
16
18
Rotation Weg)
66
5.
5.1
Introduction
The work performed by CTICM has mainly consisted in developing practical tools in order to facilitate the verifications of the plastic rotations obtained from a plastic global analysis of a steel frame. For several simple cases of continuous beams, formulas and abacuses have been developed. For more complex cases, a general methodology has been established. All these results are explained in the "Guide for plastic analysis". CTICM has written the second chapter of that guide : "Required plastic rotation of plastic hinges in structures" (see chapter 2 of Annex 13). The content of that chapter is :
2.1
We give hereafter the main results of that chapter 2 of the "Guide of the plastic analysis" (see Annex
5.2
1.22J
320 kN
1.20
2*""
1.15 1.10 1.05 1.00
1.000
Jlst order
4
IPE 300
IPE 240
h =6 m
0.95
l/^
3 TZp-
' S S*
/' ^ y\
!
|2nd order
]*~
L=8m
Zk
0.80
10
10.9
15
= plastic hinges
] 225 F 20 25
32.7'
30
10"3rad
35
Due to the second order effects, the collapse is reached before a full plastic mechanism is obtained. Therefore, only three plastic hinges occur instead of four and the required inelastic rotation is much lower, at the ultimate limit state, from a second order plastic analysis than it is from a first order plastic analysis. But for a given load factor ( = 1 for instance), the second order effects generally increase the required inelastic rotations in plastic hinges.
5.3
(1) Influence of the parameter 10.2 of Figure 4 : practical methods give directly the plastic mechanism for frames, and also the plastic rotations in the hinges and the internal forces just before the last hinge occurs. So, an usual way is to check TJLS criteria just before collapse, comprising rotation capacity in hinges. However, design rules only require to check these criteria under the design loads; especially, the designer has to check that a plastic mechanism is not reached. Computer programs can calculate the plastic behaviour of frames under design loads by increasing applied loads proportionally to a common load factor, for instance. So, it can be shown that the inelastic rotation in the first plastic hinge can be far greater at collapse than it is under the ULS design loads. For most cases, checking the plastic rotation at collapse can be too conservative if so far as the frame design is never accurately optimised for all the limit states (ultimate limit states, serviceability limit states, ...).Therefore it is sufficient and economical to check the rotation capacity criterion under the ULS design loads.
67
Load factor =
Collapse
In view of that parameter, the required rotation capacity chosen by the designer (Rrequiredl; as an example related to = X) must be clearly specified in the calculation note. Indeed, afterwards the building could be used or refurbished with other conditions (higher loads, other boundary conditions,...) and, the required rotation capacity in that context (Rrequired2; as an example related to .2 with < < %2 < %max) could be greater than the previous one (Rrequiredl) and so the available rotation capacity of the members should be checked (Ravailable ^ ^required^ )
On the other hand, at ultimate limit state, the design of a building would not be optimised if the difference between design load level (<0 and complete plastic mechanism load level (Amax), was too high. But mat big difference between load levels could also be explained by restrictions at serviceability limit state or other reasons (instability of the frame,...).
5.4
(1) On one hand Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) states, about global analysis, that "It may be assumed to be sufficient, in the case of building structures, to adopt simultaneous proportional increases of all loads" (clause 5.2.1.1 (5) of Eurocode 3). (2) On the other hand, in case of plastic global analysis, for a given loading arrangement the mechanism and the ultimate load factor do not depend on the loading path, but the order of occurrence of the plastic hinges in the structure depends on the loading path. The required inelastic rotations also depend on the loading path under the design loading and at collapse.
(3) The examples of Figure 42 shows a continuous beam with different loading path
path A corresponds to a proportional increase of all loads as allowed by Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) and, path defines a specific increase of loads which is not always proportional.
The collapse mechanisms are reached for the same load level (Pi ; P2 )whatever the loading path. But the required inelastic rotations of plastic hinges (<preq.l ; <Preq.2) are greater for loading path in comparison with proportional loading path A because elastic returns (or unloadings) occurred in some plastic hinges.
(4) It can be concluded that whatever the loading path is, required inelastic rotations in plastic hinges <Preq at collapse will be the same if the same mechanism is reached and if no elastic return (or unloading) occurs in any plastic hinge during loading.
68
Different loading paths lead to the same at collapse if the same mechanism is reached and if no elastic return occurs in any plastic hinge during loading. The following examples highlight differences in (preq at collapse because of elastic returns :
Pl
P2
Qi = 8P1
160
S 235
*~~Z
L
2m
=
*H-
4m
Path A : Path :
All loads increase proportionaly Pi and Qi increase together with P2 = 0, then P2 starts while Pi and Qi are also increasing
mechanism
1746
Path A
<Preq.l
(preq.2
=0 = 0,002623
[daN]
2196
3265
3534
P2
Pl
1717
[daN]
jjxamplj^
= OJ004170
= 0,009012
[daN]
2917
3583
4364
P2
5.5
5.5.1
i
,
ocL
0<a<1
if os-^c+5-.
^=^^(<*2+2"2
In the "Guide for plastic analysis" (see Annex 13), other formulas are given to allow the designer to calculate the ultimate load and the ratio of the ultimate load to the load for which the first plastic hinge occurs. Moreover, abacuses supply these results in relation to the relevant parameters.
5.5.2
<<1
SO
coq
km
Required inelastic rotation
JELL
If 2<
^ =
2!_2(
3
EI
12
If 2>1
First plastic hinge on intermediate support
:
_Mpl_L
*- EI
+1
3 + 2/2
+ anf
12
- EI
5.5.3
Two equal span beam with a concentrated load and an uniform distributed load
The relative influence of a concentrated load and an uniform distributed load has been evaluated by using the PEP micro program because for this case, formulas are too complex.
iF |||||||||j|]|||||||]|lillilllllllllllli!lllilllll
^
I
<xL
Ll
L
,
req ~ *r
E.I
-F/CqL)
Figure 46 : Design curves
71
5.5.4
A more general method is proposed to calculate the required inelastic rotation when the position of the plastic hinge is known from an elastic analysis of the beam, whatever the load arrangement is. It is assumed that the maximum moment Mmax in the beam exceeds the plastic moment Mpi. So : = Mmax ~ Mpi
BL
I
1
|<<
HL
_AML
The abacus plotted in Figure 48 gives the factor kr versus for several values of , with
,
^"
+1 32
AML
Conclusions
The results show that it is difficult to give a value of the required inelastic rotation to a type of structure (continuous beam, portal frame, ... ). This value could be too conservative for some cases or on the unsafe side for other cases.
5.6
Frames
5.6.1 Plastic analysis using specific programs In order to make a plastic design of a frame and determine the required inelastic rotations in plastic hinges, a global elastic-perfectly-plastic analysis (see 5.2.1.4 of Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1)) of a frame can be performed with the help of a plastic analysis computer program. Those programs are generally based on the step-by-step method and can automatically take into account particular aspects such as elastic returns, second order effects, semi-rigid behaviour of connections and also N-M interaction in bending resistance of sections. All these aspects have direct influence on the required inelastic rotations (see chapter 3.1 for the influence of second order effects).
72
5.6.2
The aim of this part is to explain how to perform a plastic analysis of a frame with the help of a simple elastic analysis program provided the axial force and the shear force do not reduce the bending resistance of the cross-sections in which plastic hinges may occur. This method is known as the "step-by-step method". The following flowchart is a summary of the method.
Geometry - Steel Support conditions
Load
*
Initializations
Moment diagram : Shear force : Displacements : Hinge rotations :
t
i=0
M = 0
V0 = 0 Dn = 0 = 0
"~'
'
-"^^^
^^~^*
no
*
An - Ai
m v
8
Elastic return
Suppression of the perfect hinge
**""^
^>0?
^"lyes
^^^
Step number : j = i + 1
Research of die cross-section for which
Load factor
= Aj + AL
State
step
D: = Dj +
; 8
+\}%
i=j
73
Particular phonema such as elastic returns in plastic hinges may happen during a plastic analysis. This is explained in the "Guide for plastic analysis" (see chapter 2 of Annex 13). A simple example is also included to this guide (see chapter 4 of Annex 13).
5.6.3
Type of frame
At collapse Min
Max
Mean
Min -i'-
Max
Mean
au
15
0,06
0,49
0,21
0,46
0,85
0,66
^
-
xb
ss
Uli
19
0,00
2,12
1,11
1,04
4,02
2,58
-j^
^
LL
14
.V?
0,06
2,41
1,10
0,66
3,59
1,75
15
0,57
2,08
1,07
0,83
2,52
1,37
12
0,05
1,34
0,41
0,40
1,36
0,76
"V
i {
" i
,,-,
w w :w w
0,23
0,55
0,34
0,64
1,42
0,90
Figure 50 : Indicative values of required rotation capacity Rreq of plastic hinges in steel frames
(1) A study has been conducted in order to determine the required inelastic rotation (Preq and the required rotation capacity Rreq of formed plastic hinges for different types of frames (Ref. 23). Six types of frames have been identified, and for each type, a parametric study has been made. So, 79 frames have been studied (see Annex 10). A simplified method was adopted in order to obtain a realistic design. An elastic analysis was first performed in order to check Serviceability Limit State requirements. Then a plastic analysis was made in order to check Ultimate Limit State criteria and to determine required inelastic rotations under design loads ( = 1) and at collapse (Xu) : mechanism or instability. Some of the frames were sway frames according to Eurocode 3 and the second order effects were taken into account. All analyses have been conducted with the PEP micro program of CTICM (Ref. 16). Required rotation capacities Rreq have been calculated from required inelastic rotation (preq directly given for PEP-Micro program and with the relations summarized in Figure 31 (chapter 4.4.7.1) and detailed in Annex 10.
74
(2) Figure 50 issued from Annex 10 gives a summary of the values of required rotation capacity Rreq of plastic hinges under design loads and at collapse for different steel frames (n = number of calculated frames). It is not possible to consider all types of structures, so the results are not necessarily fully representative. These results can show that it is rather difficult to associate a value of the required rotation capacity to a type of frame : the values are strongly scattered. If this was to be done, the maximum value should be considered but this leads to too conservative methodology.
Type of frame
At collapse
ill*
0,009
0,020
^ !_jfc_3r_i_3 '
0,015
0,032
au
0,026
ss>
0,035
0,034
to
0,040
Si
ft
0,013
sx-
0,014
,--,
?*?
0,006
0,008
TO
sic
q>req
(3) As explained in chapter 4.4.7.1, it is more simple to evaluate the ductility of plastic hinges with inelastic rotation (Preq instead of rotation capacity Rreq. Figure 51 issued from Annex 13 provides a summary of the maximum values of inelastic rotation (Preq (in radian) of plastic hinges under design loads and at collapse for the different steel frames identical to the ones given in Figure 50.
75
5.7
(1) In the document 3263-1-20 following comments may be given about the 2 diagrams ("Ototal / elastic" in function of "moment redistribution") concerning continuous composite beams:
the required rotation capacities of continuous composite beams is much greater than for continuous steel beams :
for 3 spans composite beams: ^required (to reach the full span plastic moment resistance) =
10 (Figure 52),
for 2 spans composite beams: ^required (to reach the full span plastic moment resistance) = 20 (Figure 53),
for 3 spans steel beams: ^required = 3 (see document 3263-1-2: Figure 3.6).
Those differences between composite and steel required rotation capacities may be explained by the non-linearities of the concrete which induces large non-linear response in "moment-rotation curves" in span behaviour of continuous beams (the shape factor, = ( Wpiastic / Weiastic)> is greater for a composite cross-section than for a steel I section), while no differences appear in support behaviour (nearly ideal elastic-plastic behaviour for both composite and steel crosssections).
the rotation capacities required to form a mechanism in continuous composite beams are dependent of the degree of shear connections ("Fc / Fpf" or "N / Nf") which defines the limit of the plastic bending moment resistance of the cross-sections and so influences the moment redistribution.
design curves with rotation capacities given in function of moment redistribution could be established; consequently for a given rotation capacity the required moment redistribution related to the given "M'p / Mp", could be deduced from those abacuses.
(2) In the scope of the design method proposed by Mr. Couchman G. (Ref. 14; see chapter 3.1), the required inelastic rotation 8req (=req) has been graphically represented as a function of moment redistribution (). The use of such curves allows for the parameters which affect the rotation capacity required by a beam to achieve a given moment redistribution. These parameters are:
Elastic moment ratio (6) and span type (external or internal). These two parameters affect the basis form of Oreq vs. curves.
Plastic moment ratio () , which affects values of moment redistribution but not the form of 9req vs. curves.
Degree of shear connection and construction method (propped or unpropped). These two arameters may necessitate modification to the value of moment redistribution which is given by a
req vs.
curves.
76
7
O"
ir
S
_
J4S
o o o
<o
o o
IO tn
o o
o q in ^#
o o o
;
-
in*
co
&
3
\ \
:
*.
o o o co
o o
\
<$
Vf
o
7-
n r
o
O o
LO
lil
r r r
o
CVi
o-O
*
l8
ID
Figure 52 : Diagram of Ototal / elastic in function of moment redistribution for 3 spans composite beams
77
J
S
<
in
rr
V) "
o y/i
o
o
r r r
o o
o o o
c\2
tv
00
Figure 53 : Diagram of Ototal / elastic in function of moment redistribution for 2 spans composite beams
78
6.
(1) The clause 5.3.3 (4) (which is a principle) of Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) may be unsafe in certain cases
" 5.3.3 Cross-section requirements for plastic global analysis (...) (4) For building structures in which the required rotations are not calculated, all members containing plastic hinges shall have class 1 cross-sections at the plastic hinge location."
Indeed it may happen that class 1 cross-sections would have not enough available rotation capacity Rav compared with rotation requirements depending on the percentage of redistribution of moments and the structural arrangement.
The two following examples (2 span beam with a concentrated load) illustrate this problem in using Feldmann's model (see Annex 13) and formulae of required rotation capacity for continuous beams (see chapter 5.5 and Annex 13) :
Example
1 :
cross-section
M<p =
<Preq
= 0,37
<Pav
= 1 L = 5,8m
<
YMR=l,5
Vsd/Vpl.Rd = 0,59
(not fulfilled !)
(not fulfilled !)
= 0,069 rad
<
1
Rreq= 2,792
Example 2
cross-section
= 0,33
<Pav
L= 11,0m
< <
YM<p=YMR = l,5
(Preq = 0,0794 rad
Vsd/VpLRd = 0,47
(not fulfilled !) (not fulfilled !)
:
Rreq = 3,389
(2) The clause 5.2.1.3 (3) (which is a principle) of Eurocode 3 (Ref. 1) may be unsafe in certain cases
the internal forces and moments in the frame remain in equilibrium with the applied loads, and
b)
all the members in which the moments are reduced have class 5.3)."
In Annex 9, the problems of that rule are precised for 2 common examples :
a)
b)
In example a), the required rotation capacity is shown to be quite limited (Rrequired < 0,6) and so class 2 cross-sections may be used in that case.
In example b), for certain cases (concentrated loads,...) the required rotation capacity may be very large (Rrequired > 4) and the use of class 2 or even class 1 cross-sections with a 15% redistribution of peak
moment may be unsafe regarding the rotation capacity.
79
7.
Conclusion
:
(1) Generalities
The plastic global analysis of structures may be more competitive than elastic global analysis but, despite "easy" evaluation of structural resistance, some difficulties limit or prevent its common use : practical tools for checking the ductility of plastic hinges are missing.
Previous researches on the rotation capacity of plastic hinges (Ref. 3, Ref. 4, Ref. 5) have allowed to understand the behaviour of plastic hinge formation for conventional steel. The results of these researches have shown that the requirements of Eurocodes 3 and 4 (rules for classification of crosssections : b/t - ratio and its yield stress dependence; material properties : fu/fy ^ 1,2, eu > 20 ey, A5.65 ^ 15 %) are very safesided and could be substantially reviewed especially for high strength steels (S460)).
In the scope of this research project the ductility of plastic hinges is evaluated by inelastic rotation (<Preq> <Pav) instead of non-dimensional rotation capacity (Rreq. Rav) for reason of simplicity : design softwares usually provide required inelastic rotations <preq at each formed plastic hinge and for each load case till structural collapse (see chapter 3.1). Moreover in certain cases difficulties may arise to determine rotation capacities : problems to identify equivalent lengths (see chapter 4.4.7).
Eurocode 3 provides general rules concerning rotation requirements of plastic hinges
:
"5.3.3 Cross-section requirements for plastic global analysis (...) (2) At plastic hinge locations, the cross-section of the member which contains the plastic hinge shall have a rotation capacity of not less than the required rotation at that plastic hinge location.
(3) To satisfy the above requirement, the required rotations should be determined from a rotation analysis."
In order to respect these Eurocode 3 requirements, a new limit states criterion is presented in detail in this research project : a comparison between the required inelastic rotation <preq of each plastic hinge appeared in a structure submitted to design loads and the available inelastic rotation <pav for each relevant cross-section, should be proceeded for each load case (see chapter 3.1) :
4 ^ 3.
with
<pav d
av
This new criterion could be directly proposed as an Application Rule to Eurocode 3 as explained in the Background Document 5.09 for chapter 5 of Eurocode 3 (see Annex 12) : <preq is issued from plastic global analysis of the structure and <pav is calculated with a design model (Feldmann's model (Ref. 11) that have been selected after comparison to other models (Ref. 4, Ref. 15)) including related partial safety factors , that have been determined by statistical evaluations of available tests results according to Annex of Eurocode 3. The present method allows to analyse a structure by separate checks of cross-section resistance and of plastic hinge ductility (see chapter 4.3. 1 ). This new criterion constitutes a safer and more realistic alternative to following principles of Eurocode 3 that have been demonstrated to give unsafe results in certain cases (see chapter 6) :
80
a) the internal forces and moments in the frame remain in equilibrium with the applied loads, and
b) all the members in which the moments are reduced have class
(see 5.3)."
or class 2 cross-sections
On the other hand this new criterion applies to all cross-sections able to develop their plastic bending moment resistance, then it is explicitly applicable for class 1 and class 2 cross-sections. According to tests results and numerical simulations, present rules of Eurocode 3 for cross-section classification are shown to be too many conservative. Those rules could be improved and thus could extend the application field of plastic global analysis (Ref. 17).
In order to help designers involved in plastic global analysis of structures, a guide has been developed (see separate Annex 13) presenting a simple tool for the evaluation of ductility of steel plastic hinges.
Beside generalities (concept, concerned parameters,...) explanations and recommendations are provided in detail for the new aforementionned limit state criterion :
about required inelastic rotation (preq of plastic hinge
the influence of parameters is shown,
:
formulas and charts are given for simple cases of continuous beams,
<Preq
at each plastic
assumptions and limitations of Feldmann's model are given : the model is applied to class 1 & 2 cross-sections (according to present rules of Eurocode 3) and to conventional steel grades (S 235, S 275, S 355, S 420 and S 460 : with f^/fy > 1,15, > 20 ey, 5.65 ^ 17 %); different load cases are considered (bending about major and minor axes (My;M^), combined bending about major axis and axial compression (My - N)),
tables and graphs are provided with <pav values for standard I and hot-rolled sections (, IPE , O, HE AA, HE A, HE B, HE M, UB and UC) and for conventional steel grades,
The guide clearly specifies that provisions for sufficient lateral restraints are obligatory in order to avoid occurrence of lateral-torsional buckling of members with plastic hinges. Lateral-torsional buckling mat influences a lot the values of inelastic rotation <pav of plastic hinges, is forbidden in plastic global analysis in order to maintain the plastic bending moment and to ensure adequate values of <pav
A lot of numerical simulations that were calibrated to tests results, have been carried out to check the validity of Feldmann's model, to understand the influence of parameters and to investigate cases
without tests results (see chapter 4.4).
:
14)
is applicable to beams with plastic (Class 1), compact (Class 2) or semi-compact (Class 3) sections,
81
That design method allows considerable increases in beam load capacity for beams with compact or semi-compact critical sections.
Available rotation capacities of composite beams have been computed in relation with Kemp's model and with Kubo and Galambos model. A wide variety of parameters have been selected to study the influential factors to available rotation capacities (see chapter 4.3.5).
For several continuous composite beams, required inelastic rotation (Preq of plastic hinge have been computed and graphically represented as a function of moment redistribution. Differences of required inelastic rotation between steel and composite continuous beams have been highlighted (see chapter
5.7).
But, at present state, more developments (tests results, numerical simulations, statistical evaluations,...) are necessary to exploit that method for continuous composite beams in order to elaborate design aids or charts which will help designers in their daily works.
(4) Proposals for numerical simulations
: :
Finite element modelling for the simulation of unstable inelastic behaviour of beams
Study of suitable modelling strategies concerning the shape and magnitude of initial imperfections to be introduced in the original geometry with the aim of attaining the right deformation pattern when the instability occurs during the load-displacement analysis.
The first elastic buckling eigenmode has been used until now for this purpose but, in some cases, important differences have been detected between this elastic deformation pattern and the right one corresponding to the non-linear behaviour. Also the magnitude of imperfection changes the postbuckling behaviour of the beam.
Numerical simulation of continuous beam and frame cases considering the formation of successive plastic hinges for different theoretical situations : ieq > tyav and ^eq< - Appraisal of the effect of strain stiffening and yielding spread on the required rotation. Analysis of the collapse by instability of the plastic hinge taking into account those effects.
Parametrical analysis on composite beams in order to obtain the typical deformation modes and to evaluate the effect of different parameters on the available rotation capacity.
Additional simulation series to evaluate, in more detail, the influence of lateral-torsional buckling restraints and moment gradient on the deformation mode appearing and, therefore, on the available rotation capacity and local buckling sensitivity.
82
Annex
** 3263: "Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers (rotation capacities of profiles,...)" **
3263-1. From ProfilARBED-Recherches :
3263-1-1 the draft final report of the ECSC research nr. 7210-SA/508, realized by ARBED-Recherches, Esch/Alzette, August 1992Arbed: "Elasto-plastic Behaviour of Steel Frame Works",
3263-1-2 the summary - written by a working group - of 3 complementary ECSC researches dealing with plastic hinges and their rotation capacity: " Rsum of the coordinated Project: Elastic-Plastic Behaviour of Steel Structures Requirements and Material Properties", Mars 1993, common rsum of the 3 ECSC researches: - nr. 7210-SA/l 13: RWTH (ffiHK, LfS), Aachen, - nr. 7210-SA/204: ULG (CRM, MSM), Lige, - nr. 7210-SA/508: ARBED-Recherches, Esch/Alzette.
3263-1-3 the data (extracted from the report 3263-1-1) for the numerical simulation n 1 to be carried out by CTICM and LABEIN (simulation n S 10 of the report)
3263-1-4 paper issued from "Acier-Stahl-Steel" nr. 3 / 1978: "Rsultats de recherches CECA: Effet de la forme du diagramme contrainte-dilatation sur la performance des ossatures mtalliques ", A. Bernard and M. Da Rin.
3263-1-5 excerpt from a paper issued from the journal "Construction mtallique" nr. 1-1983: "Flexion gauche des poutres-colonnes mtalliques", G.H.P. Opperman and P.-A. Matthey. 3263-1-6 paper issued from "Structural Engineering International" n 3 / 93: "Structural analysis: elastic or plastic ?", J. Blaauwendraad and J. Schneider.
3263-1-7 paper of Prof. Sedlacek G. (RWTH, Aachen University) presented in TU Delft in 1993: "Stability aspects of high strength steels". 3263-1-8 paper issued from "Stahlbau" n61 (1992): "Zum Nachweis ausreichender Rotationsfhigkeit von Fliessgelenken bei der Anwendung des Fliessgelenkverfahrens", R. Spangemacher and G. Sedlacek.
3263-1-9 paper issued from "Bauingenieur" n66 (1991): "Abschtzung maximaler Randdehnungen bei Anwendung der Traglastverfahrens im Stahlbau", U. Vogel.
3263-1-10 paper from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Icom - Steel Structures, Lausanne, Switzerland: "Continuous composite beams using class 1 and 2 steel sections - Applicability of EC4, and a proposition for a new design method", G. Couchman and J.-P. Lebet
84
3263-1-1 1 paper issued from the JCSR Journal ("Journal of Constructional Steel Research") nr. 4 (1984): "Slendemess Limits Normal to the Plane of Bending for Beam-columns in Plastic Design", A.R. Kemp.
3263-1-12 list of "references for tests on continuous composite beams, and studies of required rotation", by G. Couchman (Icom) on 9.12.1993.
3263-1-13 work paper with figures about the effect of axial load on the rotation capacity obtained from 3 points bending tests on high strength steel section, by M. Feldmann (RWTH) on 9.12.1993.
3263-1-14 excerpts from Mr. Spangemacher' s thesis about the formula of available rotation capacity, by M. Feldmann (RWTH) on 9.12.1993
3263-1-15 work paper with figures showing the influence of fu/fy ratio on different theoritical models compared to tests results, by G. Couchman (Icom) on 9.12.1993.
3263-1-16 data and results about numerical simulations to evaluate available rotation capacities of hypothetic steels (fu/fy = 1,20, 1,10 and 1,00): excerpts from the report 3263-1-1 and figures (Bild 4.6 up to Bild 4.10) issued from the draft final report of RWTH - Aachen european research n7210-SA/118, September 1993.
3263-1-17 paper issued from technical report of University of Cambridge, 1971, England : "Moment-rotation curves for locally buckling I-beams and composite beams", by JJ. Climenhaga and R.P. Johnson.
3263-1-18 paper "Composite Beams", by A. M. Price and D. Anderson, University of Warwick, Coventry; UK. 3263-1-19 paper from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ICOM-Steel Structures, Lausanne, Switzerland : "Design rules for continuous composite beams using Class 1 and 2 steel section- Applicability of EC4", by G. Couchman and LP. Lebet 3263-1-20 work papers from ICOM about rotation capacities in composite beams, 1994, by Couchman G.
3263-1-21 work paper from RWTH about models of available rotation capacity for different types of loading, 1994, by Feldmann M.
3263-1-22 work paper from ProfilARBED applying the model of available rotation capacity (developed by Feldmann M.) to H and I hot-rolled shapes, by Chantrain Ph.
3263-1-23 paper issued from "The Structural Engineer", volume 69, N. 5/5, March 1991, "Available rotation capacity in steel and composite beams", by Kemp A.R. & Dekker N.W.
3263-1-24 paper issued from the journal "Construction mtallique" nr. 3-1994: "Analyse des poutres et dalles mixtes au moyen d'un modle numrique et comparaison avec des rsultats d'essais", by P. Ren, G. Couchman et M. Crisinel.
3263-1-25 paper issued from "Stahlbau" n 63 (1994): "Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Rotationkapacitt von Verbundanschlssen ", by R. Kindmann & KKathage.
85
3263-1-26 letter from Icom about the relation between the length of beam and the available rotation capacity, 09.1994, by Couchman G.
3263-1-27 work paper (14.12.1994) from ProfilARBED applying Kemp's and Feldmann 's models of available rotation capacity to H and I hot-rolled shapes: "Available rotation capacity of plastic hinges R available - Tests results and models", by Chantrain Ph. & Klosak M. 3263-1-28 paper issued from "The Structural Engineer"/volume 64B/N2/June 1986, "Factor affecting the rotation capacity of plastically designed members", by Kemp A.R.
3263-1-29 EPFL thesis n 1308 (1994) of Mr. Couchman G., Lausanne, EPFL, 1995: "Design of continuous composite beams allowing for rotation capacity". 3263-1-30 RWTH thesis of Mr. Feldmann M.: "Zur Rotationskapazitt von I-Profilen statisch und dynamisch belasteter Trger" (Aachen; Heft 30; 1994; ISSN 07221037).
3263-1-3 1 floppy-disk from Mr. Feldmann M. with a databank of worldwide tests results in the field of rotation capacity (for Excel application on IBM or compatible PC).
3263-1-32 publication: "Plastic Design in Steel - A Guide and Commentary", published by ASCE, second edition, 197 1.
3263-1-33 workpapers (3 pages given on 16.12.1994) from ICOM about parameters influencing rotation capacities in beams, by Couchman G.
3263-1-34 work paper (1 page given on 16.12.1994) from RWTH about evaluation of available rotation capacities from CTICM tests, by Feldmann M.
3263-1-35 working document from ProfilARBED about the problem of overstrengthening of steel profiles in plastic global analysis.
3263-1-36 new version of the document previously given in Bilbao, on 23 March 1995 (first draft): work document from ProfilARBED : "Ductility of plastic hinges in steel structures - Guide for Plastic Analysis", by Chantrain Ph. & Klosak M, second draft (June 1995).
3263-1-37 see document 3198-1-15. 3263-1-38 paper issued from "Stahlbau"n 56, Heft 12 (Dezember 1987): "Experimentelle Ermittlung der Rotationskapacitt biegebeanspruchter I-Profile", by . Roik and U. Kuhlmann.
3263-1-39 paper issued from JCSR Journal ("Journal of Constructional Steel Research") n 32 (1995) published in 1994: "Prediction of Local Buckling and Rotation Capacity at Maximum Moment", by MX. Daali & R.M. Korol. 3263-1-40 document for COST Cl/ECCS TCI 1 draft group of Annex J of EC4, 25 March 1995, Luxembourg: "Available and Required Rotation Capacities for Composite Beams and Frames", by Dr R.Y. Xiao.
3263-1-41
paper issued from JCSR Journal ("Journal of Constructional Steel Research") n 32 (1995) : "Determination of Rotation Capacity Requirements for Steel and Composite Beams", by T.Q. Li, B.S. Choo & D.A. Nethercot
86
3263-1-42 thesis n1991:15L from Lulea University (Sweden), Division of Steel Structures, by Agneta Wargsj, May 1991:"Plastik rotationskapacitet hos svetsade stalbalkar" (Investigation on rotation capacity and postbuckling behaviour of girders with slender webs).
3263-1-43 paper issued from "Stahlbau" n 62 Heft 1 1 (1993): "Ein dehnungsorientiertes Verfahren zur Ermittlung der Duktilitt bzw. Rotationskapazitt von Trgem aus I-Profilen", by Vayas I. & Psycharis I.
3263-1-44 report from S AES about Projekt 124 :"Traglast von Verbund-Durchlauftrgern fr den Hoch- und Industriebau unter besonderer Bercksichtigung einer nachgiebigen Verdbelung", by Prof. Bode H., 1987.
3263-1-45 report N 95Fe05 from RWTH (Lehrstuhl fr Stahlbau): "Safety Evaluation for Rotation Capacities of I- and -shaped Sections and for Correlated Strength", by Feldmann M., Aachen, June 1995.
3263-1-46 paper presented in the Third International Workshop on Connections in Steel Strucutres (Trento, May 1995): "Safety considerations of Annex J of Eurocode 3", by Feldmann M., Sedlacek G. and Weynand K.
3263-1-47 working document presenting document 3263-1-36 and open questions, by Klosak M., June 1995.
3263-1-48 paper issued from JCSR Journal ("Journal of Constructional Steel Research") n9 (1988) : "Strength and Deformability of -Shaped Steel Beams and Lateral Bracing Requirements", by Takeshi Nakamura.
3263-1-49
paper issued from JCSR Journal ("Journal of Constructional Steel Research") n34 (1995) : "Differences in Inelastic Properties of Steel and Composite Beams", by A.R. Kemp, N.W. Dekker & P. Trinchero. paper issued from JCSR Journal ("Journal of Constructional Steel Research") n34 (1995) : "Factors Influencing the Strength of Continuous Composite Beams in Negative Bending", by A.R. Kemp, N.W. Dekker & P. Trinchero. paper issued from JCSR Journal ("Journal of Constructional Steel Research") n35 (1995) : "Required Rotations and Moment Redistribution for Composite Frames and Continuous Beams", by D.A. Nethercot T.Q. Li & B.S. Choo.
3263-1-50
3263-1-51
3263-2-1 paper issued from the JCSR Journal ("Journal of Constructional Steel Research") nr. 13 (1989) published in 1989: "Rotation capacity of H -section members as determined by local buckling", by Ben Kato.
3263-2-2 paper issued from the journal "Construction mtallique" nr. 1-1990: "Scurit des assemblages dans les structures calcules en plasticit Condition sur la rsistance des assemblages pour viter leur plastification' by J. Berthellemy.
87
3263-2-3 work paper from CTICM (given on 09.12.1993) : "Proposal for the required rotation capacity R req"+ 1 figure about "load-deflection curve" from ANS YS numerical simulation.
3263-2-4 work paper from CTJCM (given on 18.03.1994) : "About Rotation Capacity verifications"; "Computation step" (evaluation of R required in portal frame); 1 figure about "moment-rotation curve" from ANS YS numerical simulation of "S10".
3263-2-5 Report CTICM nr 8.009-3, April 1993, "Evaluation of partial safety factors for the check of resistance of steel cross-section from UNTMETAL profiles", "Final Report n 2", "Analysis of tests series, by A. Bureau. 3263-2-6 new version of the document previously given in Bilbao, on 27.06.94 and in Paris, on 16.12.94; this new version was given in Bilbao, on 23.03.95 and includes the document n 3263-2-4: work paper from CTICM: "Evaluation of required rotation capacity for various types of portal frames'V'Working document for ECSC Project 3263".
3263-2-7 work paper from CTICM (given on 27.06.1994) : "Projet CECA SA/520woriring document: Influence of second order effects and the load factor of reference on the required rotation capacity of frames", YG 8/6/94.
3263-2-8 work paper from CTICM (given on 27.06.1994) : "Numerical simulations with
ANSYS".
3263-2-9 working document from CTICM (given on 16.09.1994) : "Numerical simulations performed by CTICM".
3263-2-10 new version of the document previously given in Esch-sur-Alzette, on 16.09.1994; this new version was given in Paris, on 16 .12.94: working document "Moment-rotation curves", issued from the results detailed in document n 32632-5, (Report CTICM nr 8.009-3, April 1993).
3263-2-11 paper issued from "Engineering Journal'XAISQ, 1994 "Local Buckling Rules for Rotation Capacity", by M.L. Daali and R.M. Korol.
3263-2-12 work paper from CTICM (given on 16.12.1994): "ECSC Projects SA/319-SA 321 working document: Required rotation capacity for a 15 % redistribution of elastic peak moment", YG 14/12/94.
3263-2-13 new version of the document previously given in Paris, on 16.12.1994: work paper from CTICM about "Required rotation capacity for continuous beams", 04.01.1995.
3263-2-14 work paper (1 page) from CTICM (given on 16.12.1994): "Plastic Analysis of a Portal Frame with variable V/H ratio".
3263-2-15 work paper from CTICM, Bilbao, 23.03.1995: "ECSC Projects P3263: Required rotation capacity for continuous beams - Working document based upon document 3263-2-13". 3263-2-16 working document from CTICM, Esch, 21.06.1995: "Guide for plastic analysis Chapter 2: Required rotation capacity of plastic hinges in structures".
3263-2-17 work paper (1 page) from CTICM, Esch, 21.06.1995: "Influence of the loading path on (Prequired at collapse".
3263-3-1 work paper from LABEIN (given on 09.12.1993) : results from numerical simulations with ABAQUS (5 figures).
3263-3-2 paper issued from "Computers & Structures" Vol. 48, nr 3, 1993 "On the correlation of analyses and tests of the inelastic flexural behavior of wide-flange steel beams", by G. Greschik, D. W. White, W. Mc Guire and J.F. Abel.
3263-3-3 work paper from LABEIN (given on 18.03.1994) : results from numerical simulations with ABAQUS (S10 simulation with concentrated local and distributed load).
3263-3-4 paper about "Experiments on Wide-Flange Beams Under Moment Gradient", by A.F. Lukey, R.J. Smith, M.U. Hosain and P.F. Adams.
3263-3-5 paper about "Local buckling of I-sections in plastic regions of highmoment gradient", by A.R. Kemp. 3263-3-6 paper issued from "Journal of Structural Engineering" Vol. 1 14, No 1, January 1988:"Moment-rotation tests of steel bridge girders", by Charles G. Schilling. 3263-3-7 work paper from LABEIN (given on 27.06.1994): "Inelastic buckling of beams: numerical approach", results from numerical simulations with ABAQUS (S10 and S 4 simulations with concentrated and distributed loads; biased concentrated load). 3263-3-8 work paper from LABEIN (given on 27.06.1994) : summary of the results from numerical simulations with ABAQUS (S10 simulations with concentrated load).
3263-3-9 work paper from LABEIN (given on 16.09.1994) : summary of the results from numerical simulations with ABAQUS (simulations with centered concentrated and distributed loads; biased concentrated load).
3263-3-10 work paper from LABEIN (given on 16.12.1994): "Numerical results: Spangemacher tests, clamped-clamped supported beam, moment gradient & LTB restraints influence".
3263-3-1 1 work paper from LABEIN (given on 16.12.1994): "Plastic hinge stability considerations - Proposal of practical rules based on rotation capacities".
3263-3-12 work paper from LABEIN (given on 23.03.1995): "Conclusions from simulation results: deformation buckling modes, moment gradient & LTB restraints influence".
89
3263-3-13 work paper from LABEIN (given on 23.03.1995): "Numerical simulation of RWTH tests & nominal cases results".
3263-3-14 work paper from LABEIN (given on 23.03.1995): "Numerical simulation of CTICM tests & norninal cases results".
3263-3-15 work paper from LABEIN (given on 23.03.1995): "Numerical simulation of singular cases results".
3263-3-16 work paper from LABEIN (given during May 1995): "Numerical simulation of CTICM tests: updated results".
3263-3-17 work paper from LABEIN (given during May 1995): "Continuous beam simulation".
3263-3-18 new version (August 1995) of work paper from LABEIN (firstly given on 21.06.1995): "Numerical simulations of 3 point bending beams in case of M-N interaction".
3263-3-19 workpaper from LABEIN (given during December 1995): "Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools fordesigners (rotation capacities of profiles,...); Technical report n 4 : Period from 01.01.95 to 30.06.95 (ENSIDESA-LABEIN contribution) ".
3263-3-20 work paper from LABEIN (given during December 1995): "Continuous beam simulation (Additional results)".
3263-3-21 work paper from LABEIN (given during December 1995): "Feldmann's model checking within LTB limits".
90
Annex 2
of the
.W^rj.'-Vj.'rtjj.-j
jar
JUL
M*
PLASTIC
or
M
SEMI COMPACT
Mel
M
=
M*
COMPACT
Ht7.2
ea
fig. 73
HJ.7.S
EQ7.1
or
eav
2.0
ea
^.-
a
Kp 7.6
e 'av
COMPARISON OF
VERIFICATION OF SECTION
92
yes
Preliminary calculations
J
no
yes
Calculate
Calculate
Dtermine,
Determine \
>
req vs.
Calculate applied
moments
Verification of the
section
Revise section
no
Resistance moments
>
yes
Section
Applied moments.
OK
Figure 7.7- Flowchart of the detailed procedure used to verify that a given beam can support a given
load.
93
Table 7.1 - Identification of curves in Figure 7.2 to be usedfor different combinations ofLjjrand a.
LLr=
(m)
1.0
1.25
1.5
1.75
2.0
5
10
2.5
7
11
3.0
8
3.5
9
15
4.0
10 16
5.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
a=0.50 o=0.75
2
6
10
3
8
11
4
9
13
11
12
-
14
-
14
-
4
8
13
17
a=1.00
Note
:
15
17
values are not given for cases where a is less than 2.0, since plastic or compact sections will normally exceed this value. Available rotation capacity of steel section alone ( )
1
20.0
/
/
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
^,
8.0
9
6.0
10
11
4.0
12
13
2.0
-^.
14
15
17
0.0
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
f =235 N/mm2
steel.
Figure 7.2 - Relationship between and steel section. Example for IPE sections with Fe E 235
Curves showing a as a function of the steel section are not only useful in simplifying the new design method, they also enable the influence on a of changing the steel section or the proportion of the web depth in compression to be appreciated. For curves 1 1 to 17 a small change in section size does not
Thse EPFL 1308
94
produce much change in a, whereas this is not the case for curves 1 to 7. For a given curve there is generally an increase in a as steel section size increases, but because section size is related to span length the same curve would not normally be used for a wide range of sections. Curves are given in Figure 7.2 for values of equal to 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00. Definitive design curves would consider smaller intervals of a, and because it is possible to group curves this would not lead to a large increase in the number of curves needed.
_/.
0.95 -
d, = 175 mm
d4= 100 mm
d. = 50 mm
0.900.85 -
For Fe E 355
increase /4 by:
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.0
0.05
0.45 -
0.00
-]
250
200
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
Figure 7.3- Relationship between (/ and steel section. Example for IPE sections.
Figure 7.3 gives values of the adjustment factor aVa ^ a function of ^e sie section for IPE sections. This adjustment factor takes into account the influence of compsite action on the steel section. Values of av/a depend on the slab reinforcement lever arm (dg), the proportion of the web depth in compression (a) and the yield strength of the steel (fy). Curves are given for Fe E 235 steel. To allow for the use of Fe E 355 steel, values of av/a can be increased by an amount which is independent of the section and given for each curve on the figure. For example when = 0.6 values of y/ can be increased by 0.05, 0.04 or 0.03 appending on the reinforcement lever aim, as noted on the respective curves. In deriving the curves in Figure 7.3 it was assumed that S500 reinforcing steel is used. Separate curves are needed for different families of sections.
95
of the
7.3.2
Semi-compact sections
It is shown in chapters 4 and 6 that to enable calculation of load capacity for beams with semi-compact sections it is necessary to calculate either the peak resistance moment (^1) at which buckling occurs, or the post-buckling resistance moment which corresponds to an available rotation capacity of the composite section (av) of 2.0. av and the resistance moment of the section are dependent not
only on the section properties but also on the arrangement of spans and loads.
As explained in chapter 6, two distinct cases can be identified. When the arrangements of spans and loads give an elastic moment ratio of 1.3 the shape of the curve showing required rotation capacity as a function of moment redistribution is such that, as required rotation capacity increases from 0.0 to 2.0, the gain in moment redistribution leads to an increase in beam load capacity which is balanced by the loss in load capacity due to the decrease in section resistance moment For an elastic moment ratio greater man 1.3 there is a greater increase in moment redistribution, and for an elastic moment ratio less than 1.3 there is less increase in redistribution. The consequences of this are that - "When span and load arrangements give an elastic moment ratio less than 1.3 ultimate load may be assumed to be reached when the section buckles, so the resistance moment of the section is taken as titie peak resistance moment QA^^ which is given by equation 4.11, 4.13, 4.15 (LRFD), or 4.2 (EC4). The value of av which corresponds to the rotation at which buckling occurs is derived from equation 4.21 and given by:
=2
'av
M Mpl'
(7.1)
M, -max
Mpl'
available rotation capacity of the composite section peak resistance moment plastic resistance moment
- When span and load arrangements give an elastic moment ratio equal to or exceeding 1.3 ultimate load may be ?sCT""^ to be reached when the rotation capacity equals 2.0. The resistance moment which corresponds to this value of av is the post-buckling value M^', given by equation 4.17. A summary of the values of resistance moment and available rotation capacity to be used for different cases with semi-compact sections is given in Table 7.3.
Table 7.3 - Values of resistance moment and to be usedfor different cases with semi-compact
sections.
Pd*
2.0
1-3
Mmax
M2'
av
3Mmax',Mpl')
[Equation 7.1]
In conclusion, using the procedure described above av and resistance moment can be determined for a beam with a semi-compact support section. Because these are the same two parameters which define
Thse EPFL 1308
96
Ljjj
i2
: largest value of for which buckling is inelastic : xmrestrained length of beam in hogging : radius of gyration about minor-axis
=-(/-)
=The elastic resistance moment again allows for a residual stress of 69 N/mm2 in the flanges. Web local buckling,
(4.13)
(4.14)
M_'=M/-(M/-Md')|^^L
=-
(4.15)
(4.16)
d depth of web. No allowance is made for residual stresses in the steel section when calculating the elastic resistance moment for this failure mode.
The resistance moment of the section is taken as the lowest of the three values for these failure modes, i.e. it is determined by the most critical of lateral torsional buckling, flange local buckling or web local buckling.
Kubo and Galambos [33] showed that resistance moments calculated using the LRFD model agree well with peak moments measured in tests. They also considered results from three-point bending tests to show that a linear falling branch on the moment vs. rotation curve may be used to represent postbuckling behaviour. The form of this linear falling branch is given by.
M'=Mpl'
M' Mpl' M'max
*
^-.( '
(4.17)
support moment
d'
plastic resistance moment, calculated using a stress-block model peak resistance moment, calculated using LRFD model rotation at the support rotation at the support which corresponds to the attainment of Mp]', assuming elastic rigidity.
A typical moment vs. rotation curve predicted by this model is shown in Figure 4.3.
97
behaviour of a beam with a plastic or compact support section, the same design method can be used for beams with any of these three types of section.
7.4
The graphical representation of required rotation capacity (req) as a function of moment redistribution () is considered in detail in chapter 6. The use of req vs. curves is an effective way of allowing for all the parameters which affect the rotation capacity required by a beam to achieve a given moment redistribution. These parameters are: - Elastic moment ratio (jy) and span type (externai or internal). These two parameters affect the basic form of ,^, vs. curves. - Plastic moment ratio (Up]), which affects values of moment redistribution but not the form of req vs. curves. - Degree of shear connection and construction method (propped or unpropped). These two parameters may necessitate modifications to the value of moment redistribution which is given by a rea vs. curve. The way in which they are taken into account is discussed in section 7.5.
To identify the appropriate ieq vs. curve for a given example, the distribution of "uncracked elastic" moments must firstly be determined. This distribution shows whether a mechanism would fonn first in an external or internal span, and gives the elastic moment ratio. Knowledge of the span type and the elastic moment ratio allows the moment redistribution which corresponds to a required rotation capacity of 1.0 to be found from Figure 7.5. This figure shows moment redistribution as a function of elastic moment ratio, and is basically the same as Figure 6.4 except that, specific Compcal results are not presented. Two curves are shown, one for external spans and the other for internal spans, for beams with a plastic moment ratio of 0.57. Curves are given for this value of plastic moment ratio so that they agree with the choice of axis used for the curves shown in Figure 7.6. Any value of plastic moment ratio could have been used to establish these curves provided the two figures are in agreement. Curves shown in Figure 7.5 can be used for a beam with any plastic moment ratio. As stated above, both curves in Figure 7.5 relate to a required rotation capacity of 1.0, but any value of rotation capacity could have been chosen since the purpose of Figure 7.5 is merely to fix both co-ordinates of a point on Figure 7.6. The required rotation capacity value of this point is not important, provided that it corresponds to the correct value of moment redistribution.
Knowing the value of moment redistribution which corresponds to a required rotation capacity of 1.0 for a plastic moment ratio of 0.57 enables the appropriate curve to be chosen from Figure 7.6 a) for external spans, or 7.6 b) for internal spans. These figures are derived from Figures 63 and 6.5 respectively, and the form of the curves is fully described in section 6.3.1. So that tiae curves shown in Figure 7.6 are applicable to beams with any value of plastic moment ratio, required rotation capacity is not simply given as a function of moment redistribution, rather required rotation capacity is shown as a function of
-(.57-1)*
*
moment redistribution plastic moment ratio constant given in Table 7.4 as a function below.
(7.2)
The choice of abscissa comes from the fact that curves shown in Figure 7.6, although being ^q vs. curves for a plastic moment ratio of 0.57, may be used for beams with any value of plastic moment ratio. This is possible because changes in plastic moment ratio merely lead to a series of paralld curves
Thse EPFL 1308
98
on a req vs. diagram, as discussed in chapter 6. These parallel curves can all be represented by the same curve if the abscissa is revised to allow for the differences in moment redistribution between them.
40 -
30-
20 -
External span
Internal span
10
0-h7/-/n
0.0
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Figure 7.5 -Moment redistribution vs. elastic moment ratio for required rotation capacity of 1.0.
Firstly it is necessary to calculate the rate of change in moment redistribution with plastic moment ratio, given by the parameter *. Knowing this rate of change, differences in moment redistribution can be ra1m1at<>ri for given differences in plastic moment ratio. To establish values of * for various arrangements of spans and loads, the difference in moment redistribution between curves for plastic
moment ratios of 0 5 and 0.6 was calculated using equation 6.5. Plastic moment ratios of 0.5 and 0.6 were chosen since they are representative of values likely to be found in practice. Values of * were then calculated by dividing the difference in moment redistribution by the change in plastic moment ratio, i.e. 0.6 - 0.5. It was found that * varies as a function of the elastic moment ratio (u^j) of the beam. Results are presented in Table 7.4, which gives * for various values of elastic moment ratio. T^rer interpolation is possible to calculate * for other arrangements of spans and loads. It should be noted that values of * given in Table 7.4 are only valid when the elastic moment ratio exceeds the plastic moment ratio, so that redistribution is away from the support.
Having calculated * for different arrangements of spans and loads, the value of plastic moment ratio can be calculated for a given beam from a consideration of span and support resistance moments. Knowing * and the plastic moment ratio, allowable moment redistribution can be calculated from the value of -(0.57-)* derived from Figure 7.6.
W
*
1.8
65
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
108
0.6
133
69
74
82
92
99
40
50
-(0.57-1)* [%]
a)
Required rotation capacity (^,)
40
50
60
70
-(057-1)* [%]
b)
Figure 7.6 - Required rotation capacity as afunction /"-(0.57- )A*, a) external span, b) internal
span.
Curves shown in Figure 7.6 represent the results of specific calculations using Compcal. These differ from definitive design curves which would be based on a large number of simulations, adopting small load steps, using the procedure described in section 6.3.3 to group the curves. Definitive curves would not contain the irregularities evident in the curves shown for specific cases. However, definitive curves
Annex 3
Document 3263-3-12
"Conclusions from simulation results : Deformation buckling modes moment gradient & LTB restraints influence"
(20 pages)
i'
ST
4r
4r
4rX^K
yr
yr
"A
X-
g^_---'X
X'""~~-Z---,--S
S-
102
(I)
Concentrated Load
Distributed Load
Mmax
~z\
L,TB^Lb "LTB
-----X
-----X
^
"
A"
Lb
x-x-x
X~^
k
w
-LTS
Ut
103
(II)
a
j
*-LL,
7\
Plastic hinged
rotation
_\
1
-LTB
(Lb^<Lb)
Lb
\
N.
(u/>Lb)
Lb
-Lb
-LTB
I.
Lb
-LT8
zsr
&<t>(UyB,]_b)
LLTB
^ Lb
(Lb)
--Z~--')
L. < L
Lb
*(Lb.LtTt)
--
104
FREE LTB
-LTB
-> t/HOT
Lb
LUTB
Lb
105
Lb
CASE (,)
3 m
->
m
C44
(0.10)
4 m
C34
(0.21)
3 m
C33
(0.17)
C43
(0.10)
1.2 m
C312
(0.20)
C412
(0.10)
C3R
(0.24)
C4R
(0.30)
106
AVAILABLE ROTATION
(&OT)
A
4-
1
3 m
f-
1
4 m
4 m
0.21
0.10
3 m
0.17
0.10
Al
1.2 m
0.20
0.10
Al
0.24
0.30
AH
(upper flange)
0.13
0.18
Bl
XffiSS
0.29
0.36
Bil
(upper flange)
%
A
(upper flange)
0.30
0.38
All
Local flange + free global lateral Local flange + limited global lateral Local flange + free local web Local lateral + limited local web
X
* gi
* Bu
*)
l^@f
gi~~~;
"
'V
107
C
r3
I
+
ta
O
S
<
Eu
I
JJ
c-*
<
I
--
<
.-rfcc
"-.: O
r<
-.
108
<
CD
O
_i
O
_J
<
rr
LU
LU LU
CE LL.
DX3
#"
E
S
LL
t>K3
11
y^i=
:
109
->*
*5 - ;
;
/
;
*
>'.
"=
"
j; * ij -
!"
:*:
<
-J
CO
: jF
'
O o
-J
<
I3J!3
CE
LU
D*
-r-
LU
E
^r
O
z. <
-"*$
1X3
J^-
110
ss
&
*
i
S i
'
V
?:
'*.
h<
i
'
;.?
I
S
V
.'::
'.
-'
'1:
::
'^,
:.1
-:
LU
"
...
_*.
--
'IV
.-
<
_
.-
_j
!I;
-
-.
t;
LU LU
{XI
D<1
rf;"T
E.
U_
DC
'*
-.
E
co
1!
-:
~
';
'-.VOTiiS:
"".
LU
1X3
,-
-*-
lu
;<
DM
~-ta
_LL
.
txi
.^..
io
.;-&*
V.:
.*q
: :-"*?;
Ill
:ii
!8Z
3:1
J!SS
m
LU
<
I
1
DXJ
D<!
t^-
+
<
LX] DC
LU
'i
_1 LL.
"
DJC
Dkl
DX!
LX!
O
i
<
LX]
-J.
112
fM
O
ca
\>
C>J
th
o Ei 3
to
3
1
cc 03
o o
CM
to
ri
c o
s
CD
4->
ro
co
co
ta
cc
-
o
co
w ci
csj
o
\>
O
3
OOJ
CM
OH
o
oo
on
o ^r
vo
0)
C-i->
'JJC
S^2
2X
i- SS
t-t < SS
113
IO OJ
csj
to
rH
O O
CC
O O
m
C
(D
m
I
-3
1
C
O
-H
-!_>
rs
.u
O
*J
ce
<!
IO
a
!
iH
'
w O"
+ +
CD
o
a
o
CsJ
U U
O O oo
eea. + *--w w
o o t >
<g-
OLD
so<c-i->
^--uc
e>
i-t
>-< G
>'. X
> >
114
co
tt
o
II
evi
-43
11
mm
IX:-*?-.
zm?
r<*f-.
-"-^r
m$ i
WM& I
i2:iS
'.:,.
t*
r-?$
:-:-:; >
=*
M j
32
,-.53
iWii
.--:'
115
-.."y^w-
.::fo
116
1
*-
".
"
"'1,
?
""
'
r-fi
_i_
2h.
^\
<J
"3
j
:7
*
CO
<
3
!!
*
I
:?T-.rlrt
* .-.
t
~l
.
:
"-431
3r
.
VI
-J:.v-
i.
-1
-ria
117
rffst
?.
ife
i wr
^jrrr
i-.lft'i"
:-:jfl..|r
**O"f*
:
?'
J
*
|}*t"
\\ " IL?
ili
"
'-.
"
':
* EH
'
:
-ir
- F
*
E
t
*
'
-
-vr'**
TP***
Mi'
t. 3ir.-
118
*
:a
?
S
*
:.:
::
3' '.-:
.
-
:?
'?'
."-
' ;"
--
J
-
.*."
-
'
.
-
-_"
'"
-
j;
't
.1" .;."
\>
.'*'
"-
;:
-,:.
-
-*
-.-.tri
119
tfl M M
t
|l ti
t
*-4
t*3
c
(
rs
4-)
4->
CC
co
CM
CM
w-u
o^
ovo
o -7
vera to
20 Cu
^-^G
s
1-C
CM
:
<
s
-t
S S
S S
120
Annex 4
Document 3263-3-17
'Continuous beam simulation'
(25 pages)
* Concentrated load
L= 10 m
landa=0.5 alpha=0.8
case:
L
0< <
2
&
XL
* Distributed load
L= l()m
landa=0.4
gainma=l
case:
0< <1
>
rq
jjjiilji!^
"
L
XL
* 3-point bending
1)
cases:
Ll=lm
L2=5m
2) Ll=3m
L2=3m
3)
Ll = l,6m L2=2,17m
4) LI = 1,9m L2=4m
Material:
Meshing:
Type of element: 8-node shell with parabolic shape funcuoas (SKR Ahaqus)
Concentrated
Distributed
616
1913
Number of elements
640
1973
Number of nodes
Degrees
of freedom
11.838
11.478
122
Distributed Load
8
I
~2K
10
Ii
A
5
>
yr
yr
<
is
1-
^wc
zs
5 >i
1 n
M
n
t
ri
LBO^
2i
<
217
1-L-5
1.6-L-2.1
<
3
>4
J -\
nI^P^
1
3-L-3
.9-L-4
123
By means of web and flange overthickness calculated for keeping constant the total section area
- Initial imperfection:
Pattern: the first positive elastic buckling eigenmode is used as the initial imperfection shape
- Load application:
* Concentrated load:
Incremental-iterative solution procedure has been employed using displacement control. Appropriate
constraints to degrees
of freedom at upper flange of the loaded section have been applied to ensure
* Distributed load:
Load control has been used in the load-displacement analysis together with an arc-length integration
method (Riks) to cope with the postbuckling instable response. The load has been applied by means
Boundary conditions:
Vertical supports have been introduced at every node of. the lower flange located at the
corresponding support sections.
Longitudinal support has been provided in the loaded section at the center of the upper flange.
Lateral restraints have been introduced on the compressed flange of the support and load application
sections and additional sections according to Additif 80 - DPU 22-701 (CM66):
a moment ratio
to L=l,81 m between lateral restraints) excepting the part between both plastic hinges, where
124
the moment ratio is -0.87 (L = 2,87 m). The following figure shows the precise location of the restraints.
* distributed load
of the beam, the first hinge influence area, while a conservative moment ratio of 1
considered for the left part (2nd hinge zone) leading to
* 3-point bending
lateral supports
125
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Concentrated Load
A
1.8
25
ZX
<
1.8
p\ <
1.7
1.7
>\
Distributed Load
XXI
126
2.- RESULTS
of
2) Deformed shape after the beginning of the plastic hinge instability (A)
3) Deformed shape with updated initial imperfection magnitude (B)
4) Deformed shape after the beginning of the plastic hinge instability: 2nd hinge
5) 1st hinge moment-rotation curves for both deformation cases A and B.
6) Evolution
of the
The deformation (A) initially obtained shows a 2nd order lateral deformation mode suggesting that
a bifurcation point is
likely to have
of
an
updated model with a higher initial imperfection magnitude has lead to the valid result (B). In this
case the
a magnitude
of
1%
of the
flange thickness at the compressed lower flange, where the instability is to be developed, instead of
evaluating the magnitude to be the 1% at the maximum point.
The moment values at the plastic hinge locations have been evaluated from the corresponding values
127
CONTINUOUS BEAM
Monwn-ratation rant
CONCENTRATED LOAD
10
12
14
16
IS
CONCENTRATED LOAD
14
12 +
.^S^k^^E^aao^
Mill
hing)
C
-
2
M2 2nd hing)
Mpl
10
12
14
16
18
128
rK]
OJ
Q.
129
coi
130
131
CQ
en
a_
cvj
32
o
co
LO
<N
O
CNJ
rj\
<D
r-
CD
LO
c C O
-H
4-3
<d 4->
O
T-i
O
C
LO
O
^>
LO t-i
lO
ca o o
rf^.
O *-l o o - + tu ca
CO co CO
LO
CM
<"
cr> ^T
C\J
O 2 C -->
'*-
2ta*
-.
>2*
....
w.
<C
!:
133
2) Deformed shape after the beginning of the plastic hinge instability (A)
3) Deformed shape after the beginning
4) Evolution of Ml (1st hinge moment) and M2 (2nd hinge moment) in function of the
rotation at both hinges
134
baaesaiLaum
DISTRIBUTED LOAD
10
12
14
16
18
DISTRIBUTED LOAD
10
12
14
16
18
20
135
iH
ca
136
_C-t.
137
138
CASE
pi
(deg)
rot
rot (deg)
6,6
13,9
pl
(deg)
8,3
15
Concentrated
1,7
1,1
4
i.
Distributed
8,6
ij.
L2=5 L2=3
;
8,7 8,5
7,1
4,3
6,9
7,1
8,1
42
4,4
7,8
L2=4
L2=2,17
8,7
9,1
Ll=l,6
Concerning the concentrated load case, a very good agreement can be observed between the
moment-rotation curve of the continuous beam and that of the corresponding 3-point testing case
(Ll=lm
expected.
as
In the distributed load case, however, a clear disagreement is observed when comparing the momentrotation curve of the continuous beam and the corresponding curves of the 3-point bending cases.
The discrepancy seems to be caused by the interaction taking place between the lateral deformations
induced by both hinges in the continuous beam and giving rise to a stiffening effect. This interaction
is caused by the fact that the continuous beam has got positive and negative moments along its
length. The lower flange, compressed near the first hinge location (negative moment region), is
subjected to tension stresses in the positive moment region. This tension, acting on the lower flange
at .second hinge location, is responsible for the stiffer postbuckling response appreciated in the
moment-rotation curve of the first hinge in comparison to the 3-point bending case. It can be seen
139
as a sort
of increasing
the
This effect is avoided in the concentrated load case since the lateral deformation at both hinges is
Thus, the rotation capacity of continuous beams subjected to distributed loads (this load case is more
likely to induce coupled lateral deformations) may be significantly higher than that given by the 3point bending test due to the described stiffenins effect.
<
140
DISTRIBUTED LOAD
10
12
14
16
18
Retallen (deg)
CONCENTRATED LOAD
16
IS
141
OJ
o-j
LO
i
<0
LO
CO
X\
'0
/
<H
o
CN
Ol
M
142
co
I
1-H
I
CO
Cu
s
LO co
o
*CN
Cu M
143
1-q
I
Cu
S
LO
co
CN
>.
O
c-LO
cu
144
ii?
4
I
<0
CL,
LO
CO CN
>.
O
r--
<n
Cu
145
Annex 5
"Numerical simulations of Spangemacher and Seldacek tests" 'Numerical simulations of RWTH tests & nominal cases results"
(46 pages)
Element type
S8R-Abaqus (parabolic 8-node shell element)
Load application
* Control displacement
* Constraints: Vertical
together
Boundary conditions
Vertical supports: both ends
LOAD
Initiai imperfection
First linear-elastic buckling eigenmode (antimetrical deformation) has been used as an initial
imperfection shape.
148
ta
G o
ca
E-f
-^
P
W W
E-i E-i
-
o m o
M
e
H
-H
ca
O
CU
m o
>1
id
I
w ta
Eh
H
,-t
u>
rji
C
-H i
1
ta
f4
03
r Q
1
O
OS
149
**
In order to simulate the roof fillets, an overthickness has been used for the elements near the web to flange connection. The overthickness is evaluated from equivalence of area of the web to flanges junction for the real hot-rolled beam and for the beam discretised into finite elements. We have supposed that thickness of elements (web or flanges) are constant along the first 1/5 of the fillet. For the evaluation of statical characteristics (A, Wpi, I,...) no recovering of shell finite elements is taken into account (Ref. 3).
Area of the real connection
:
1FI
K-
lw
tf
tf + 2a
.
'
=U,
/
"l/
'
L2
*
tw
e
+ 2a
..
"
tw
fl
Characteristics
L!=4/5R
L2=4/5R
+ tw/2,
+ tf/2,
overthickness (Ref. 3) obtained from equivalence of Ar and area of finite element modelization of root fillet :
150
A = 2btf
--a)
16L3a + tfb3+(tw+2a)3
[l2-*+ lw_(h_tf_2L2),
:
Iz=^
moment of inertia according to the major axis y-y
ly = -jJO - tf - 2L2)3 +
i(v + 2a)L2 - 1 2
-l_Y_2, 2 4 '
_JaY
l)
WeLy=^,
plastic section modulus according to the major axis y-y
:
2Iy
-a)
+ (2L2
+ ^tw(h-tf-2L2)2
151
**
Mechanical characteristics :
The following stress-strain curves have been used for non-linear numerical simulations
0,05
0,1
0,15
02
0.25
0,3
Strain
200-
100
+-
0*0
0.05
0,1
0,15
02
025
0.3
Strain
152
0
rt
* *. * 1 * rt rt. ~f ,_ ?
*- m rt *
**
f tf
**
tf tf
* o ; 3 W rt rt *-
__
S 7
7 V
>.
0 40
c
=
2 S j * S
1
*"
<
rt
** _ "* J ; "^
e "* tf tf tf tf tf
ite*
e
4
r 1 . *l
a)
rt
j . f. j ~ -
I
*..*"_
O O
o
o o
rtrt
o o t
*
O
rt
tn *
rt
40
4M
rt
rt
rt o o
I
4M
rt
*9
o o
se
rt
o* c
0_
o^
o* o
-
rt
o" o
f*
rt
rt
(X
t*
rt o o o
rt
rt
_____
"
o ** S S
>* *
' "
2*-rOrt
"*^ O^
o' o*
rt_r*ei-tn4_
O
tftftfotftfoo*
rtrtortoo
m
siili
O
9
ASSISI
o
o o
i
40
o* o*
.1
5
*
"
et
PI
S.
1
rt
o^
oooortrt
o o
o_
tf tf o o"
O
oo
-*-
Ift
o
rt
4.
L_
o~
tf
.
m ^
)>.
*-rt^*>GrtOO
t
Jta-
o M
o
o
B
o
o rt
o
o
o
O o
V
o o
rt
a.
rt
r^^
QOOOrtrt0_ 0_ O^ _ O
*-rtrt
O O
C1
..
5 s s
o*
Vl
o o
rt
^
rt
fta
^.
^.".rt^rtrtrttrt
W>
V>
-
o
40
rt
_^0_0
rt>
f-
tftftfe'tftf
^T^rt
W n
* . "t, . ^
rt**-
"" ~
to.*
rt
O *
T. !
rt
o
"_
rt
3j 3[
-Ortrtoooe
rtrtrtGOOO
5
O
A
tf
o ^
-
y
*__
tftftftftftftfV
rto
Od)
rtrtrt^ortrt
rt to
tnoeirtrt
o
o f~
X.
S
J
O.
<3 zz
je
* * O rtrtrtrtoertrt rtrtrt
rtrt
C C
_.
rt
rt * * K*
rt
rt
frt
rt
r **-
-w >
rt
vt f-
MA_rtrt*H.^-*>
rt
&
^? o
*> &
TJ
V
ntntnintnrtrt
- '^rrtr
" -r
e-
J
-
^l
O
rt
J ^
tnwsrtrtrtrtiniA
^rtrtlQlDIt
tf
tf
tf tf tf tf
--rtrt
3 >
(Nrtviv*
c c
S
rt
wt
^r
K' N*
rt
^
*>
*n
tn
yt
M. n
vt tn
rt
rt
Ci
* OJ
i^rt^rt^^ioet^o
"
"
rt
o*
rt
w*
rt
*
>
1to
arto
>.
>
*^ rt
rt rt
rt
<
e c -o
co
" * * * rtM(Brtrtrtrt
O
rt
rt
*.
e*
es
CJ
CJ
40
40
s=
.*.
co c
.
tf ^ tf tf tf rt rt rt r r
w 0
Jta.
tn
c
Kl
u.
^.,
tftftftffttftftf
***_'"_.
rt_
*.
?..
>*
tn
m
rt
CJ
rt
>
rt
rt
rt
rt
***"
rt
rt
V W V
rt rt rt
f.
.a
.
"S o c
c IO o
5
*
~ *
4_
tf
tf
tf tf tf tf
*<
e. "^ *, . >\ ^ O rt tf
rt rt rt rt rt
rt
tn
_ ^ *-_ rt ^ tf 2 tf tf tf tf tf tf
^
c C
o
JO
*.
o e o
3
-C
..;
rtrtrtrtrtrtrtrt
*
'rtrt
c o
a
O
i
w^Ortrtrtrt*
_5
^rtWOrt W V
* * w o V -w *. v. rt rt rt rt
O
tftftftftftftftf
"**><*
*
CJ
j*.
rt
3 -
.'
rtrtrtrtrtrtrtrt
rt
2 2 r tf tf tf
S S 2 2 S o o o
rt
^ r
tft
>
j
HH
is
rt
*"~"rt
rt
-rt
wt
*rt
>
j
O O rt yr
o
^
So
rt
o o
o o
o o
.a
-?
EEEEEEEE rtrt r
J3
*
J3
rt
rt *
O
ci
ut tu 2 tu w
m
f
rtrt
*-
>< s
u w S u
O
i:
"
O
rt
an.*
H H
153
ts;
tf tf
rt
E z
* V
ent
. * >
* rt
rt
rt
tf s
n
a
tf tf tf tf ^ tn r
*r r O
rt
CO
o*
rt
** -
rt
M
w n
~ (Q
5?
rt o
**
rt
rt
SS'
WttnoOrtrtOO
SS'
tftftftftftftf"
DO'
tIT02 ,003 ,1T59
.0740
o
10
OMO
,4323 ,2922
o
o
o o
o
o
M
o o
1
o
m
o
rt
o
n
o
V
..
*
",
8 S
o* o" o*
*rt
S S
"*
*
*
e
SC8C
**
t o
ss'
,M6 4022
rt
01B7
^
10 S900
1339 0446 1424
** **
40
~"
_
0 o
yr
*cf
n
rt 2
"- T. *^ . e_*
rt
rt
v>
*"
o
3053 2070 3423 0370
rt
rt
rt o
? -
O*
tf o o" *
--
- i
1
rt
rt
2S63 2614 0606 oost
90S
rt
_
o
o
t
M
)
= 8 S
5
^
>o
3071 3233
rt
rt o
O
o
1305 0217 1602 1222
rt
rt
ces
o
e
^0
rt
v to
4j
n o
*.
yr -
io
n
yr
rt
S , _
e o s 2 o o .
o"
j*.
BBCO
in *
CO
o 2 = a s s
si
i
tf rt tf )>
n tn
40^
to*
.
tf
tn
rt
to
m fw
->.<= -* 2 = 5 s ? s
ir.
rt*
tf
c- e.
<
tn
tn
^ c
3 5 =
i
47
5 5'.
Z.
*2
*l"l g *" i
__,;)
W"
rt e- ee- e-o rt ; * rt 4C ;
J5
rt
rt
rs
*
y
o o o
rt
rt
tf tf tf tf*
tr
*-
rt
rt
rt rt rt
*~. et. rt
rt
tn
=t-j
*
V) ___^_^^^^
a
r^
*
:
>
j
cSTT""^1 ** rt s
rt rt
m
v
CJ
-.
.
-
tf
o" tf
rt
rt
tn
V ni
jt
ea
CJ
C
-*J
<
*
-_*
rt tf tf r *
rt rt rt rt
ea
c
C
^-
rt
*"
tf tf tf tf n rt
o_
o_
:
-
tf
rt
rt" tf
rt r
tf
rt
rt*
rt
fl
CJ
4B"
rt
c
w
JJ
"
o" tf
o_
oe
o* o" '
c
c
c o
<z
-J o o
c
* *
g
c
M *
O . O . *o
4_
to
rt
te
4M
r
rt
IA
s. rt
VI *
rt
o o" w tn
rt r
oa
"
n rt
o" ir
rt
.? "c o o E
"^
**
o^ o_ _ O
tf tf
mi
tf
tf
VI
-S
e Eo
n tf tf tf tf o o o o
r r
in
in
\n
4-
O rt
o
o
O o
o
*
O o
43 rt
o o
o o
*
>
Kl
o
1-1
*"
*.
*
1
rt
rt
o
n
r*
%*t
.
Z*~
rt
rt
ota
U
rt *
rt1
rt
rt
rt
u ui u
rt ^
") tu u
O
CJ
.a
a
o .
<
-' X
***
t rt
c
tft
rt
rt
irt
c
u
<-*
(0
W
r
tn
Ul
ta
M
iw
p
cs_ r
^
*
C3 ^
CO CM CO
CS tn
CO CO
tn
CM
*~
CM CM
*.
Lk.
ci tn" ^
"
CM
es
CO
cs
CO
CO
CO
e" CO CM
CO
co
_
oa
"1 ci
* ca.
es
tn" j-C C3
CO
CM CM
*~
CS cn *r
cri"
tn
CO
CS
^JCM
>
CO UJ
in
en
ca
^r CS
cs
CO
't?
CM
^_
BC
ca
CJ tn CM tn
CS *T
CO_
CM
CO
*r
CS
CS
CS
t co
=>
co ^r
CO
4M O
CO CO
CO
CO
tn
CO
^JCO
CM
tn
CO
...^
^_
tn
co
j c CO
t' en
*.
tn CS
CS
O
rr
O o
CM
o
CO
CM CS
tn
cn
CM
CS
CS
CS
CO
ku
^
- ^
CO
cs
CM
o
CO
e
CM
o o o
-
CS
CO CO CM CO CS
CM o CS CO
^
cn
CM
CS
o tr
CS
CO
CS
CO
=3
"cs .
CM CO
tn
o>
o-j
<
^ C
co
^
CS
CS
CS CS
CO CS
^
CS
CM CM CM
^
cn cn cs CS
CO
CS CS
o
CS
CO
d
".
> co
CS
^r
CS CS CS
,
CS
o
co
o a
tn
cn
tn
TT o CS
CO
CS
CS
CO CM
cs cs
CS
cs
CO
CM
CJ
tn
to
CM
tn
CM
F
__
VU
co
co
*
r.
CM
tn
CM
tr
CO *"
CO CS
CM CM
CO
*"
*~
O
*
f CO CS
^_
*~ """ *CM CO
C
_,
tn cs
CS
P.
CM
o
evi
o
o
m
o
es
CO
CS
.
cs CS
tn
*~
CS CS
CM CM
CM
cs cs
cs
CO
cn
CS CS
CO
cs
cs
^
tn
CO
ca
tn
CS
CM
CO CM
cn
tn r*
CM
CO
*r
tn
CO
154
1V-EA2843
15
20
1-28412
SIMULATION RESULTS
H6-EA28412and17-EA2843)
155
Qmax
0,2500
' 0,2000
0,1500
0.1000
0,0500
0,0000
123456788
156
IA
<-
*^
CT CJ
COC0C0C0'~,"''~C0C0C0C0C0C0'tf'tf^t
*~-
-i
M-
*t
'1 .
-.
.*.
m.
: s ep
_1
*-
co
tiad/tVM
IO
CO
ffl. n. - tf
co co co
o o o * id rC r-C to
CO
CN
CO CN
_vl'tftfcocoi-cMcoiowcj*-tN<of'tf
CM^C^r^cOtOOCOCOCOCOtf-COCNCMCM tS<SCM-i-i-CMNWMNWWWW
J3
. 2
to
(O
co
r- q c *
CO
cm
to
rC <*"
j; 5 -
* ^ t q f; rC
u> ro
O O
rf CO
en
CN
*05 >
* CO <tf q *. IO r- t ^ CD ^.cfCOg^J^^JOTfg^cOCOCOCM
(0
<
I-
<
't
CO
r*:
*"- co
o"
2 o q q
co"
o * 2 2 2 2 ^ 2
*-;
qqqo*
<"
OJ
CM
CN
co
tO
CM
* co io * ~ q q io o * q * * * 5 - ? S 8 rf g <o *
CO'-
2 <
CO
UJ
-
CO
co io
tf
<o"
t^ CO *" -" tf
CM
q
2
CM
J2 o>
tf"
q
co"
CM
CO
io"
*" O 0- 0-
*~. OTTO
J3
<
1J
io"
OJ
CO CO CM
o
i-
0)
o
C?
>UJ
O)
CO
(O
CO
tOCOCM*
lOr^COtf'tf'CO
< <
o
o.
o ddd
co tf
OJ
CM
OJ
CM
<o 1"^
3
05
o
to
,_
O
to
CO
CMr^r^rvTj-05C005CMOtO>.COtOtOCM Or^cMcoocD'-OtfOcMcntf'cnioco
iorto> tocMcncNtf'iorooj" o5top~
.>-'-'--'tftf--CMCOCMcO^>-CM-
co tu
'S" to
-
to tCM
CO CM
-tOr>.r.tocMtocoroto<ocMcotf-cs
o" o" o"
W CJ
d o" d d d
co CJ CM
CM
o*
d d d d d
o"
o*
<0{N|CO-tfCMlO-tf'tfC005IOJ.COlOCOCO
. ^^MfMMN^iOMNNt-r-
3 t- tf
to
*~~
tf
C0{vlO5'tf-tfCOC0C0rlD-C0C0CMtOCM
.OOtOCNCMCMCMCMTfi-OCMi-Tto tf- r. to r co r
^ to
co
O-
o o
ddddd d d
ooooooooo
05 co o> CM CJ tu *""
-^tf^qcMcocMOO-tOCMOcotf
-CMCM
CMCO
OOOCTOTdr^^OIOtO^Tr^CMrCcMfv
COCMtfcNC<OcO<OCOlDOC005CNIOlO
IOrrCMCMCM^t-lO0
CM
CO-<t.tOtOr^C0050"~0,t0'*,0<or*0>
157
Mu/,
1.8 1.6
Test
OAbaqus
1.4 1.2
1
0,8 ,
0.4
0.2
1
I
4 4
10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18
Ql-Ot
BTest
Rmajt
70
Tot
0.6 0.6
0.4
Abattus
C Abacus
. 60
60
40 30
0.3 0.2
0.1
2 3
IMI
6
6
7
ni
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18
Ulli -ill
Rpl
20 10
Han .nan
12
3
.1
6 6 7
inijL.JL.n
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 IB 16 17 18
120 j
i
I
i
Abaqus
Test
40
20
/
---'I
1
/
3E2L
KB r~hsa
7
mrm\
14
m
16
17
10
11
12
13
IS
18
158
CN
O
CM
CO CM CM
<
UU
" E
CO
co
CU
._
LO
co
3
o
cu
ca
<
<
~ C
CO
IHd
)
CE
<
C
CD
Z3
F
a
o 2
._
O O
tn
r-
to
s
1
co ca
_J
NOI
<
CO
LU
CE
i
LO
co
1 130
159
cn
LO
CN
o
CN
en
tu
en
3
CO
co
co
CM CM
LO
<
I-
<
Ui
CM
CO
g
--
cu
< <
CL
c
03
CE
co
Z3
F
cu
o
>j
S
CO
O
O
r
co
<
1
X LU
I
co co
0.
1
_J
LU
CE
C
1
_L
en
LO
O
CN
00
r-
co
CN
160
LO
CN
O
CN
"tf
CO CM CM
<
UJ
CO
tic
co
co cu
LO
tn
ca
S3
<
4-
O
r-
cu
cr XI
CO
*w
o 5
jo
CL
!
I
<
CE
CL
<
O
O
!
<
I
LU
co
:
!
I
H _i 3
CO
I
1
LU
CE
161
o
CN
00
CD
__
"tf
las
CM ^ CM CM
en
CD
CN
to
cr
<fr
r /l
co
S3
<
__ O
<
. g
r-
UJ
<
CE
--
<
-r co
CD
CL
4-*
ce
Ol
CD
tn
(0 S3
3 cr
o 5
o
*->
O
_] 3
O co
CL
<
LU
CO
LU
CE
-I
co
"*
CN
-ZO
C7
LO
CN
O
CN
LO
162
o
CN
CO
CO
._
"tf
in
CD
CN
to
CT
CO
CO
tf
S3
CM CM
<
_L
<
o
g <
CE
LU
tn
*-
CL
<
o
r-
tD
to
C
CD
-1CO
cn
F
"xZ
CD
**3
CO CO
O
to
_l
cr
CO
S3
i
<
1
X LU
CO
CL
|
!
LU
CC
CO
i
1
i
1
aV
IT
\
CN
O
CO
LO
CN
O
CN
LO
163
o
CN
._
co
CD
~ Ex
/
'tf
-_
CN
CM CM
<
Ui
co
tu
ca
c
CD
i/
co
xi
1
F
tu
s
o
o
*-*
co
to
co
<
CL
--
CD
"3"
-r
cn
LO
CN
O
CN
LO
164
LO
CN
._
o
CN
/
LO
*-*
co
CD
CD
CM
*-*
co
co co
CD
co
co
CM
m
UJ
F
CD
s
o
-
3 cr
<
CD
S3
Q.
X
1
tn
CD
<
<
LU
Q.
ce
< <
._
O
O
co
3
CO
LU
CE
LO
C--
-G
-LO
LO
tf
LO
ri-
co
co
LO
CN
O
CN
LO
131101
165
__
o
tf
LO
co
o ro
co
/ /
co co co
CM
LO CN
CD
tn
; /
I
o
cu
cr to S3
Ui
co
O
CN
"
_
<
4-
CD
CE
co
CD
co
3 cr
LU
!
o 2
o
-
< <
Q.
CO
<
Q.
cn (O
Q.
i
1
O
O
_i
co
3
1
CO
LU
'
CE
UJ.1 1310
166
LO
CN
O
CN
CO CD
LO
CO
co
CM
'-
CD
ui
f
u
\
1
CO
CU
tn
3 cr
ca
F
CD
o 5
o
+J
CD
<
S3
Q.
<
X LU
co co
.
r-
CL
j
I
<
i
1
CC
<
._ O
Cl
O
O
co
CO
LU
CE
\
LO
-eo
CD
o
LO
o tf
o
CO
o
CN
13011
167
LO
CN
O
CN
;
tn
CD
LO
co
CM -
3 cr
TjCO
CM
XI
co
<
ca ui
/
__ O
*->
<
CE
<
a.
O
O
co
h_! 3
c
..
CO
LU
CE
cu
CO
c
CD
tn
F
CD
o 2
~ co
co
\\
CT co
,/\
\ m
Q.
<
LU
CL
LO
m
I I
-CO
co
o
"
o co
o
LO
o tf
co
o
CN
168
LO
CN
O
CN
^f
ffl
co
co
-CM
LU
tic eri I ^
to
CD
LO
CO
3
CT co
+*
<
CD
co
CD
co
F
Q.
o
co
<
CE
CT
CO
<
XI
<
X LU
1
CL
._
O
O
co
D
i
3
CO
LO
o o
co
co
r*-
co
IO
o
tf
co
o
CN
169
LO
CN
O
CN
~ Ex
tt *t
CO CM CO
co cu
LO
-4-
tn
cr
co
<
g
r-
LU
CD
co
C
CD
CM
co
cr
o 2
CJ *-
<
<
0_
CC
co
S3
cn co
<
u
A
1
co
3
CO
LU
cc
W
LO
"?**..
co
-.
CD
LO
"-
co
CN
170
o co
LO
CN
o
CN
tn
tu
cn
CM -
cr
co
Ui
XI
co
CM
<
LO
<
g <
CC
co
<
CL
O
U
r-
co
/
f
_1
__
CO
LU
CE
i
1
/
LO
LO
CO
o co
LO
CN
O
CN
LO
LO
171
co
LO
CN
o
CN
to
CD
3
CO
co
co co
CM
X
LO
CT co
< g
r-
<
UI
<
CC
<
CL
*-
O
o
r-
CO
c
CD
co
CT
CO
*1
F
CD
<
co
JU
en
3
_!_
_1
CO
XI
CL
LU
CE
<
X LU
co
CL
f
1
LO
\
C-,
-cO tf
LO
co
co
LO
IN
O
CN
LO
LO
172
LO CN
O
CN
en
CD
LO
CO
co
CM
CT to
<
UI
LO
*-*
<
g <
CE
CD
CO
C
co
F
CD
o
JU
en
<
_ O
CL
CT
CO
S3
<
Cl X LU
j
1 1
o co
ra
co cc
LU
G
1 1
-r
lo
-o tf
LO
co
co
LO
CN
O
CN
LO
173
O
CN
CO
CO
-_
tf-
tn
tu
CN
CM
r-
co
3
*-*
<tf
CO
CM
cn
X!
CT co
CD
LU
CO
<
CO
"D
< g
r-
//
I
i
CD
CO
3
CT
CO
CD
2
o
+^
< <
CL
XI
Q.
<
|
1
cn co
CC
1
LU
!
1
0-
co
O o
3
CO
co
LU
--
CD
CE
\ /
>
CN
O
CD
O
LO
O
tf
O co
o
CN
*1310
174
-^
LO
CN
--
O
CN
LO
CO TI
CO CM
4-
CD
<
CD
UI
3
tn
4^
co
CU
F
X UJ
1
o "E
tn
ca
cr
X!
ca
<
CL
!
1
CD
LO
tf
co
CN
"J.I
131101
175
LO
CN
o
CN
ai
tf 'tf
CO CM
tn cu
LO
cn
3
CT ca
<
UI
<
g
r-
-*-
co
c
CD
<
CE
4-f
co
E
o
CD
IO
CT co
*^
E
X
CL
<
O
r-
S3
o.
co co
CJ
<
co
I
LU
!
3
CO
LU
CC
91
-T"
LO
o
CD
o
LO
o tf
co
176
li
;.;
ja: ; * . vS
&
1
:>
&
.
A' ' SS
t.
~ST
177
Sal
-yJ
178
**!
179
.*
;:>',
?..
?:.
; V
:S
^
i
;
; . !
fe??
jfi
"V;. :*>
'-35
?. v3*. '.
j-
\-j .' "
."t .
-
180
Il
*j
181
"<
=}-
182
**
"*
* * * r\
183
-J
184
\.*
.-
." "."
ili*.
se
Sri
~y V.:".
fe- %;.*
:<>
-.
^-
.-<:
185
Sa>ii
.5t.
L.
'
>$: f
if-i
<!.
r' f'
- *
-:
Itr
:' m '*L.
Ir
I-' '^
i IlU
tl*
186
It
187
*" *
t: :'
l.
:'!
-i^"^
.:
"T^
"S^Vt
-H**.* "cu." -
_crf' tu
? " ""'^
".'Voi
.-.
>; - .-.,-
-^
-%>.>
-fe-
.-
\ :'-"* -^;
1
'safe U*tV
".' '
* '3*\:-
* - -*
V-X-.
188
189
P>J
o*j
190
It
r.""
':'.
.- . Vas-
".'"""'
.' ?** t^
T?f"
''T. : 'j;
- ',- """""1
r--.,^
.;>*
;;*-
..V;
i
;
j
;
...
I
,,.,.
-^-,
\-
"->"
"'
""
i"/ iii"
.-r *
'*
191
192
li
193
Annex 6
Document 3263-2-9
INTRODUCTION
CTICM has performed 5 numerical simulations of a 3-point bending test in order to obtain additionnai information on the rotation capacity of a i-section at plastic hinge location.
Calculations are executed with the ANSYS program on power station HP 9000 (serie 700). The profile is modelled by shell elements. The global analysis takes into account the material and geometrical non linearities for reproducing, as far as possible, the real behaviour of the beam.
The first simulation (1.1) has been that of the test S10 (HEB 200 section 3m span - load at mid-span - global sinusoidal imperfection) performed in a previous research project1 This simulation has been made in order to calibrate the ANSYS program and determine the best values of the different parameters of the global analysis (ANSYS uses the Newton-Raphson method), and to compare the numerical results with the test results.
For the 4 other simulations, the influence of some structural parameters on the rotation capacity have been investigated :
- In the second simulation (1.2), the global imperfection has been removed in order to evaluate its influence on the rotation capacity, and to be taken as reference for the further simulations.
- in the third simulation (2.1), the distance of the left support of the beam to the load point has been half reduced (150 cm to 75 cm) in order to verify the assumption of the dependance of the rotation capacity only on the greater distance of the load point to the supports. - in the fourth simulation (2.2), the load point has been eccentred and set to 1/5 of the span. - in the fifth simulation (3.1), the mid-section has been fully restrained except against the vertical displacement in order to study the rotation capacity in a
ARBED Recherches : ELASTO-PLASTIC BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL FRAMEWORKS - Draft of the final report. August 1992
1
196
..1
The model is automatically generated from a paramtrica! process. The model contains only one type of element. It is a 4-nodes shell element with 6 degrees of freedom by node. This element allows the non-linear material behaviour and large deformations. Shear deformations are taken into account.
The cross-section has the following dimensions which were measured on the test specimen :
h
tf
tw
re
= = = = =
In order to simulate the fillets, an overthickness has been used for the elements near the web to flange connection. Thus the cross-section is modelled as shown in figure 2.
364
12 58
17 59
2.rc+tw
- ... a a
1/5 re
f
tw
D'S.
-
tf
200 4
4/5 re
a a
Figure
Figure 2
a = 0,25 (4,8 r + tw -
/)
)2 - 4 (4 -
avec = (4,8 r + tw
r2
197
2.2
Material behaviour
The stress-strain relationship can be input point by point. It is different for the web, the flanges and the stiffeners.
Figure 3
fy
fu
Est
Eu
(MPa)
(MPa)
(MPa)
Web
Flanges
205000
291 261
437
410 517
0,00142 0.00127
0,00171
0,0130
0,0144
'
0,0475 0,0549
0,0534
0.156
205000
205000
0,153 0.172
Stiffeners
350
0,0199
Semelle
Raidisseur
3 4
5
6 7 8 9
' Stesi
IMP a
F Unce
0.05
0.1
0.15
02
Q2
0.3
CUS
198
2.3
Imperfections
No local imperfection has been introduced in the model.
For the simulation 1.1, a global imperfection has been introduced with a sinusoidal shape in the plane of the web (a) and in the plane of the flanges () as shown hereafter.
ctsin(pi x/L)
sin(pi x/L)
F'iQure 4
2.4
Stiffeners
Transverse stiffeners are located at each support and under the point of load application. The thickness is taken equal to 14.6 mm.
2.5
The application of the load is reproduced by imposing a displacement to the nodes on the upper flange in the loaded cross-section.
0 uz
Displacement uz
imposed
uy -
uz * 0
Figure 5
Restraints to lateral displacements are located on the nodes of the lower flange at both ends.
For the simulation 3.1. all the nodes in the section under the load are fully restrained except against the vertical displacement.
199
RESULTS
The following table gives the values of the parameters and the main results
Sum of the rotation at both ends Rav Available rotation capacity
Rav-
_ -
Figure 6
Simul. n
Ll
(cm)
150 150
L2
Imp.
Imp.
Rav
(cm)
150
150
(cm)
0.14
0 0
(cm)
0.07
0 0 0 0
(deg)
1,24 1,24
0,90 1,24 1,24
(deg)
36
1.1
28,0
26,5
1.2
2.1
34
30
75
60
150
150
32,3
19,16
2.2
3.1
240
150
0
0
25
200
Moment (t.m)
25
MZk-
\
\
^.
20
&
.
X-'^
\
\
Mpl
15
>:
10
Simulation 1.2
Simulation 2.1 Simulation 2.2
Rotation (degrees)
I
J2
10
15
20
Figure 7
201
A Moment (t.m)
25
_B
-Q-
---- --
-O
20
/
\
15
Simulation 1.2
Simulation 3.1
Rotation (degrees)
0
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Figure 8
202
m
W
><
< *r cn
,-<
^3"
CM
,-(
E-i
co
O
O
cri in
z H Q
Q
i-i
ca
co
r-t in r~
r- r,- cm licrcfi cm m r1
s: Q m
II
2DHjHt<OHn2 <<^CwQco3e-io;q
coo
o U 2<vocMvooin CM J 1! II II II U o -i cu eu w otnaens^x
cm
HHrlrlri
INO
II
<
*
II
II
II
II
>>>[1(^&
-i
C/J
11
II
11
ce
E-
, 2
CM
4J
(0 -M
S!
3
en
< u
u
J-i
o
-
O u Ol
203
2
ca
E-i
en
,- m m -)
r
en en
,-
ii il
en vo m
in r~
Q
co m en r
D
M zz
i-to
,-
O
t-t
co
* W
2DOJv-iE-<3MC/32 <<<:
m J ii li rr -i Cu Cu
Z"voi-(voorr>
Cd CO
m
il
ih ** en
ih
11
11
i-i ,-
II
cs
II
CC
<
II
CO
II
II
w >>>MDuCjuCi4DIil
Cu
o XmNOX>iN>U
CM
o
<0
E
CO
u
C
U
0)
-
204
205
206
Annex 7
'Numerical results: Spangemacher tests, clamped-clamped supported beam, moment gradient and LTB restraints influence"
(7 pages)
208
c.
-c
c
o
209
rH
CO
Cr
1
o
w
o
>
MOO
J I-
V.
LO
<
LO
C^CLO
O.
+ i-
o
.
210
r-
LO
'
>
Ij
\
\
\
CT"
\
w
c
u
c
o
\
(3
-s.
\
.
-*
ia
f
c
:7
~
Ca
* *
c
--
%,
SXDSbJZH
o
^--^C
>
211
au
Cl
O)
c
u
i->
C c:
212
c u c C'
cc
C"
TS
W -3
O
a;
>
~
J
-M
-I
"*
sosuzh
jjc
-s
5.
213
4
'3
v-I u
re
en
u
j
c
ai u
o
o
tu
03
tn
CO
o
JJ
W
O
c
i-l
a
I
s
<<
to
a>
>
LO
C
Gl
E O
"V -s " ^ *
*
aoswsh
-jJC
g~
<
w
:
e, *
s.
W ' .a. h
w-
*.
<
^
*
V
A. S
*>
214
Annex
Numerical simulations with centered concentrated loads, distributed loads and biased concrentrated loads"
(3 pages)
S?
" _S
.D
**
<J
tn ^
CS
rV
-Pi^"
tf*
iP &J
1^
<\
r JTx S JT X
<3
CM
^,
in
s
^
^.
O
w
*
m
C*
CS
1 >
<>
in
t
1
'
",
1
** *-
1
'
"
Ci
es
cs
in
CM
o
CM
in
(DI IQ) W
216
(de
JO
100% I
in cs
cs
US
CM
OS
e CC
OS
O-
J3
(UIIQ)W
217
Concentrated load
Distributed toad
* If " * If
L LL
LTB
-* e ROT
'ROT
LTB
< l;
ROT
^-
vROT
Ma
II,
llc
->
Concentrated load
Distributed load
No lateral restraint at plastic hinge location
(
LTB
ROT
Ila
Ban ROT
218
Annex 9
Document 3263-2-12
CTICM
YG 14/12/94
Working Document
- the internal forces and moments remain in equilibrium with the applied loads
- ail the members in which the moments are reduced have Class
1
or Class 2 cross-
sections
This
procedure is equivalent to a plastic analysis, in which the redistribution of moments would be limited and compatible with the reduced rotation capacity of Class 2 cross-sections.
The question which comes up is : is "this allowance of 15% redistribution always safe for Class 2 cross-sections, that is to say, is the required rotation capacity always small?
The required rotation capacities for two common cases are studied hereafter.
q
I
min
L
I
A
1
XL
nun
<1
1
Figure I
The first plastic hinge always occurs at the centrai support for
8 MP|
:
ql
2(2-+1)
1
for :
qu=-[r-(3
2 Mp|
+ 2V2)
220
(1
+ )
0 + )
El
! I
1
f \_^Jr~"~" 0.176S
chanisrT
-
/^-H
'
0.2
El
H
1
_^
!
1
preq MplL
k^fc^ii
V\
L--_ ---
1
1
^-1
1
r^i
i
1
0.15 0.12
0,1
t^i^lrri^0
0.1 0.2
J
i
1
j 0.05
,
0.3
a<
es
o.
o.?
c.
0.9
Figure 2
q<qu that
is
to say if
<j
(3 + 2>/2J (2 is
+1 ) -
2)
= 0,85
=0,1765
221
0.5 1
0.45
'
TI 1 1
- . o.* "
0.35 0.3
\l
II
1
'
'
1
'
1
'
1
I
1
i
I
VI
I
1
/.
1/ A
r-r-J
I I I
~}--r-W~
I
X
I
l:
M
1:
)
^-a
--H
-
1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.2604
X
Figure 3
O.i
0.7
o.a
0.9
0,7396
given by
Mp| d
(Ppl= 2 El
where
d = d] +02
is
assumed to be the distance between zero moment points at the current load level q =
(1
A ^^UilJJliiiUU^
Figure 4
L
"^UUiiiiiiiiJ^1
XL
di=4-TTir-L
and
d = ^(l+Ti)
L
1
2 -
and
d d2-
-^
+ 3
with
(1
d<d) +XL
given by
The rotation
capacity at q =
p.req
n).qi
is
vreq
222
that
is
to say
</-
>/2-1
Rreq
is
0+)4(1+)++*. + 1
3(1 +
(1 +
1
Rreq =
+ 3
req
Notes
- The parts of curves above the dotted line are invalid because in this zone, the
(1
+ -qi
is
reached.
< /2 -
d2 is limited at
XL.
Conclusion
For this sketch, the required rotation capacity is quite limited Class 2 cross-sections may be used in that case.
(
223
aL
'
'
XL
Figure 6
Two ranges for a are to be considered
:
a < yJ2{X+
1)
at loading point
a > ^/2( + lj -
at central support
B.l
a < \)2(X
+~Y) -
F^-f-ffca)
For
F
Wpi
= (1 +
tiI.Ft
d = Lg(aA,Ti)
(,).(,,)
Rreq = 3
g(a.X^)
where
(.)=(_1)[(
2(+1) + 1).2(+
9(..) -
(1+) a(a2-i)
+ "2(+1)
(..)= (1-)
[2 + 3(1 - ) +~(1 -
)(+ -)]
1
224
is
^(a-MHl-jTTTT)-]-1
B.2
a>-v/2fX +
11
F^-f-flca)
For
F
MP|
= (1 + ti).Ft :
is
given by
Mp,L
ep.req =
{(.).(,)
The distance d between zero moment points each side of the plastic hinge is
is
given by
,).(,,)
Rreq ~ 3
9(,,)
where
2(+1)
f(a^=a(l-a2)
g(a,M)
=
^7^
1+2(+1)(1+)
(1=(1
-a2)
All these expressions are valid if the mechanism is not reached, that is to say
F^1+Tl
and this condition becomes
- 2(+1)"1
(1
12 +O.V
225
For
[q~c -
= 0,1765), Rreq
is
MUNII
I
I
11
jilillllll in umi
MM
>l
III Ml
1
MM II
II
1
II Ml Ml II MIM
I
II
"
1
"\|_
m
I I
1U
II UN IN
1 1
M
1
MM MM
III
I
it
._
TT
II
R
req
/
b
Mill |v mn HIM 1 M.\! 1 r \. mn IMI i\r\i INJIIII' l'i *m mix MII IKK illl IU, Jill , l\l V-iUllf. rm 1 MIHI Tv mi
I
Mimmi m m im m.
Kl
1 1
1 1
II Ml || MIM Mill
II /
Hl -__._!
| |
= 0,1765 (15/oMpeak)
>
1
\\ IN
I
Il
I
IL
L
II
rm rtkK -kl L- - - .[ Jill TrM-.L 1.. um li ^iiiiim4XH43^L ri- 1. ' |l__i,-rTr7 III ITU-mil T^^ttK INR M Ml fm 0Li ii unir L jrtr
1
IMI
II
I
ft**XL/HJ
V^2A >..
'-.
mim
Hi
I
nimmm.
1
1
..iT-:rr-H-w-u-LLMiiimTJi
1
0,2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0,4
0.45
0,5
0,55
0.6
0,65
0,7
0,75
0,8
Figure 7
Conclusion
For values of X land if the point load acts in the left half-span of the first span, the required rotation capacity may be very large (> 4), and the use of Class 2 crosssections with a 15% redistribution of peak moment may be unsafe regarding the
rotation capacity.
226
Example :
Section
Mp| =
IPE 270
11 3,74
kN.m -
= 5790 cm4 -
= 21000 kN/cm?
:
Ft =
l, 95 kN
:
Fy = 73,3 kN
given for
= 61,95/0,85 = 72,88 kN
F :
plastic rotation
= 640
cm
= 2 = 003
Rreq = 0,189/0,03 = 6,3
rad
= 0,189
is
which
is
rad
IPE
270
is
a Class
cross-
b) It would be possible to find Class 2 (near Class 3) cross-sections with the same characteristics Mpl and I as IPE 270 for which the rotation capacity or available plastic rotation could be still lower.
For example
:
227
Annex 10
Document 3263-2-6
Evaluation of the required rotation capacity for various types of portal frames"
(38 pages)
NOTATIONS
1
Frame n
Units
Frame height
cm cm
L
Column/R
Column/C
Beam
Length of span
Section for edge column
Horizontal load
daN
CT
Vertical load
Horizontal displacement (elastic analysis)
daN
cm
Load
factors
Nsd
ULS
daN
MSdl
Msd2
daN.cm daN.cm
=1.0
Tf
SLS
cm
deflection
= 0.7
cm
^deflect
M]
1
daN.cm
cm4
>v
Hinge n
plastic
hinge
ep.d
radian
daN
Td
in the
Rdreq
middle
Su
Tu
*^u.req
radian
daN
of a beam
Hinge n
plastic
hinge
at the end
ep.d
radian
daN
Td
Rdreq
epu
of a beam
radian
daN
Tu
^u.req
Mechanism
230
SCOPE
The aim of this study is to determine the required plastic rotation 8req and the required rotation capacity Rreq for a given type of portal frame. First a simplified method has adopted in order to obtain a realistic design. The assumptions and the method are explained in the paragraph 2. Then six types of portal frames have been identified, and for each type, a parametric study has been made.
It must be pointed out that the selected criteria for the design are somewhat arbitrary. Moreover the chosen types of frame do not cover all the real structures. However, the results give a good idea of the plastic behaviour of frames and they lead to some
79 frames have been studied.
interesting conclusions.
DESIGN METHOD
In order to facilitate the design of the frames, some simple design criteria have been selected. An elastic analysis is executed in order to check Serviceability Limit State requirements and to calculate the critical amplification factor. Then a plastic analysis is made in order to check Ultimate Limit State criteria and to determine required plastic rotations.
The two analyses are made for one reference loading corresponding to ULS loading (weighted loads) with the program PEP micro.
2.1
The value of 0,7 is arbitrary. One can consider that it is close to the value corresponding to the non weighted loads.
2.2
First the critical amplification factor acr is calculated from the results of the elastic analysis, for the reference loading, as follows :
(H + <PV)h
<*cr-
vcr acr~Vsd
231
where
H V
h
Horizontal load Total vertical load Frame height Global imperfection Horizontal displacement
The value of acr allows us to classify the frame and to deduce the type of analysis
txcr<10
acr>
10
Sway fame
The buckling resistance in the plane of the frame can be checked with the non-sway buckling length for each column in conformity with Eurocode 3. By simplification the buckling length is taken as the system length (this is conservative) :
= system length
5.5.4
Nsd
kyMy.sd
XyAfy/
It necessarily assumed that it is Class
1
wpl.yVMl"
cross-sections (plastic analysis).
It is also assumed that no buckling phenomena can occur out of the plane of the frame.
3.1
Figure
p.avail
- "{"avail -
232
(D
where
Sum
_Mpi
1
= 2EI .L
:
(2)
"tavail
Sum
"*" ""**"1/
T = "ivail
pi
I
p.avail
y
V ^
w
Figure 2
The available rotation capacity can be defined as follows
:
_ ^p.avail _ 2 EI
Ravail
M^jT ep.avail
(3)
From (2) and (3), and when 9D_avaii is reached, the shear force is equal to
'
_2Mpi ~~ avail ~ L
:
(4)
EI Tavaji 9p_avaji
Ravail ~
M pl
(5)
By making a sufficient number of tests, it is possible to propose an empiric or semi-empiric formulation of the required rotation capacity, in particular for a given cross-section, in function of L or (moment gradient). This can be supported by a mechanical model.
This formulation of 6p>ava and RaVaiI is assumed hereafter to be known; therefore, one can determine for a given cross-section (L is known) :
MpiL
Qp.avail
2 EI
availvw
(6)
233
32
Required rotation capacity in a statically unrleterminate system - Symmetrical local hendinff configuration
There is a "symmetrical local bending configuration" when the cross-section, the material and the moment gradient are identical for each side of the plastic hinge. These are the conditions of the three point bending test.
We consider the equivalent three point bending system that gives the similar conditions at the plastic hinge location.
Statically
undeterminate
system
-*
ep.req (Computed by
PEP micro)
~* "p.avail (Computed by
an empiric
-.
2.ME
formula)
Figure 3
The available plastic rotation 6p.avan can be computed from (6) with Ravail determined for L = Leq calculated from the shear force from (4). GpTeq is directly computed by the analysis program (here PEP micro). The configuration in the vicinity of the plastic hinge is similar in the undeterminate system and in the 3-point bending test, so the following requirement must be checked :
p.req
- ^p.avail
of the inequality can be multiplied by
t7)
and considering (5), we obtain
:
Each side
Mpl
ep.req < R-avail(Leq)
M:pl
(8)
The notion
6p-req ^ 9p-req
^req "*
H
M2
pl
Mpl Leq 1= J EI
(9)
RreqCD
* Ravail(Leq)
^en
Leq
2 Mpi -
(10)
234
By definition the required rotation capacity Rreq associated to the frame for a loading level is the largest one for all the plastic hinges existing at this loading level. This required rotation capacity could be defined either when at collapse, or under design loads for Ultimate Limit States checks.
33
We only consider hereafter the case of a different moment gradient for each side of the plastic hinge.
Direct approach
We also consider hereafter the equivalent three point bending system that gives the similar conditions at the plastic hinge location. The length of this equivalent system is given by :
Leq^MplOf + f^)
()
ii
ii
, -
l-e,-Mpl(J-J-)
'1
2
Figure 3 bis
Noticing that the sum of elastic rotations at supports is independent on the load position in the equivalent system, we also decide to adopt hereafter the definition of Rreq adopted for
symmetrical three-point bending system, that is
6p.req
:
Rre<i~
M MplLeq_Mpi
where
,m
! 2
(12)
It yields
Rreq "~
12
Tm
. '"1
where
Tm = ai+T2)/2
(13)
pi
235
Rreq(Tl>T2) ^ RavailfLeq)
where Leq given by (1 1) and Rreq by (13)
(13 bis)
Indirect approach
This approach only uses the definition of R
system (expre >sion (9)).
Because
adopted for a symmetrical three-point bending
of the strain hardening, the moment exceeds Mpj at the loading point.
\/
.
*2
approximation
Figure 4
In the part of strain hardening, there is an increase of the moment
:
= Mm - Mpi
The plastic elongations are assumed to be developped on the following distances
(approximativeiy)
1=2TJ-
,
and
2 =
2jj
(14)
The plastic rotation is expressed as a function of the plastic elongation Sp in the extreme fibres, and by considering 8pj from the part 1 and 2 from the part 2 of the plastic zone.
236
ep.req = J p(xi).dxi +
2r
1} -J p(x2).dx2
1 + 2 =
(15)
pl.req
6p2.req
epl.req = K^l
where
:
and
ep2.req =
^2
(16)
= proportion factor
epl.req-Tl = ^.req^
and from the relations (15) and (17)
(17)
.req
<
ep.req i \+ T2
(18)
Similarly to the case of a constant shear force for each side of the plastic hinge (in absolute values), we look for an equivalent 3-point bending system. This equivalence is searched for each side of the plastic hinge with the corresponding shear force.
eq
T,
Figure 5
From (9), and condidering each symmetrical system, it yields
EiTj epl-req
Ri
req
and
EI T2 ep2.req
R2. req
Pl
M:pl
Rl.req = R-2.req
237
it yields
R req =
+ P-re<l
*
2
:
12
(19)
Pl
_ 6p.req
re(l"
where is the sum of elastic rotations at supports for a equivalent beam of length
Leq = (M.eq + L2.eq)/2 = Mpi -From the following basic requirement to be checked
p.req
:
(20)
- p.avail
:
Rreq(Tl,T2) ^ Ravail(Leq)
where Leq given by (20 or 1 1) and Rreq by (19)
(21)
3.4
Summary tabk
ep.req
* ep.avail
or
KreqCTi.Tj) Ravail^eq)
Rreq(TlT2) ~
Figure 6 a
Leq-Mp^-U + i-)
p.req
- ep.avail
El P-rcq
or
RreqCr) ^ Ravail(Leq)
Rreq~'
Figure 6 b
-eq
M Pl 2M,pl
<>r
preq
p.req^ep.avail
RreqCT) *
^vaild-eq)
2 P-rcq
^req
M
2M
pi
pi
238
Required plastic rotation for the reference loading (load factor = 1 ) Required plastic rotation at failure (ay)
:
^
T(j]
:
_
"
2
TdlTd2
EITdl+Td2ep<i
Mpl2
^EiTdepd x. ->
factor
(U.L.S)
Tjj2
of the plastic
TulTu2
^ E 1 Tu 6pU
^.req
Ru-re<i
Mpl2
:
x. 2 Mpl
Tu]
Ty2
of the plastic
239
ANALYSIS OF FRAMES
Six types of portal frame have been studied. They are submitted to concentrated loads indicated in Figure 1.
as
illllii
1
li li lili
1
Type Numbe
r
2
19
4
15
15
14
12
of
cases
Figure 7
For each type of portal frame, many cases are considered by varying the parameters such the height, the span, the profiles ...
The following results are given
:
as
- Tabic containing the mean values and the maximum values of the plastic rotations and of the plastic rotation capacities, under the design loads and at collapse. Graph of the plastic rotations
4.1
1-
1-
1-
Figure 8
240
1
<=
BO
Frame n
Ll
300 300 IPE 240
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.81
h
1
|Coiumn/R j Column/C
Beam
H V aer al
53000
41000
1,92
300 700 IPE 240 IPE 140 IPE 220 650 26000
1,81
23000
1,78
48000
2,41
40000
2,39J 4,761
2,04 4,35
0,939 1,018
13248 639870 0,98
1,69
4,62
0,982 1,046
10101
4,79
0,993
1,047
4,90
0,980 1,022
6343 568020
1,44
4,99
0,987 1,024
5614 563850
1,14 0,57 2,83 0,70
4,72
0,983 1,050
12283 616030 0,93
1,93
0,968 1,014
0,962|
1,028
Tf
558780 0,84
7377 602870
1,49 0,75 1,75 0,58
10018 627840
0,911
L54
0,77 0,89 0,44
1,92
I Deflect.
1
TDeflect.
0,74
1,25
0,50
0,97
0,61
0,40
I
|
Mpl
iy
Hinge 9pd
670680 2772
670680 2772
670680 2772
670680 2772
670680 2772
670680 2772
Tdl
Td2 Rd.req
Opu
Tul
Tu2 J Ru.req |Mechanis
S
0,00864 4563
8931
0.01511 3567
0,67
1
0.81
2
5567 0.85
2
Node 3 0,00174
4021 7978 0,12
0,30
0,00920
3601
6705 0,56 2
Table
1.1
241
Frame n
1.9
1.10
1.11
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
L
Column/R Column/C Beam H
V
aer
34000
300 600 IPE 240 IPE 140 IPE 220 967 29000
2,31 4,93
25000
2,23 5,10
0,991 1,035
300 800 IPE 240 IPE 140 IPE 220 750 22500
2,23 5,10
0,983 1,022
300 400 IPE 270 IPE 160 IPE 220 1050 42000
1,74 5,09
35000
1,72 5,16
350 500 IPE 270 IPE 160 IPE 220 850 34000
2,37 4,80
2,36 4,39
0,978 1,027
8487 620560J 0,69
1,91
al
au
0,957
1,012
0,970 1,018
0,981 1,036
0,984 1,030
8696 607680 0,67
1,36 0,68
1,23
Tf
Deflect. TDeflect.
7147 604120
1,84
6154 573510
1,77
5532 588820
1,77 0.88 2,93 0,73
0,92
1,81
0,60
670680 2772 Node 3
0,00601 2834 4416 0,27
0,49
Mpl
iy
Hinge 6pd
Tdl
Td2 Rd.req 8pu
Tul
Tu2 Ru.req
Mechanis
m
Table 12
242
For type
1,
one mechanism has been obtained, but plastic hinges can appear in two different ways.
Rd mean
Rdmax
Rumean
Rumax
0,21
0,34
0,54
0,64
9pd mean
Qpdmax
Gpu mean
Bpumax
Mechanism n1
0,00298
0,00446
0,00842
0,00950
Rdmean
Rdmax
Rujnsaii
Rumax
0,19
0,41
0,59
0,69
9pd mean
-
.
Opdmax
9pu mean
e_u_max.
Mechanism n2
0,00398
0,00880
0,01296
0,01970
Table 13
These graphs show the required rotation capacities and the plastic rotations for the frames at load factor 1 .00 and at collapse.
'V
IiiIIIIjii
Graph
1.1 :
IB
J--4J 1 g
PM*
IS
hi II
B
-1- -
M1
243
4.2
1- 1-
Figure 9
244
Frame n
2.1
2.2
300 400 LPE240
2.3
2.4
2.5
L
|
Column/R C0lumn/C
Beam
180
IPE 220
1125
220
950 38000
1,16
H
1
5700
45000
1,26
300 600 IPE 240 IPE 180 IPE 220 800 32000
1,06
261 300 800 IPE 240 IPE 180 IPE 220 600 24000J
0,91 9,75
1,26
acr al au
Nsd Central Msd Central
7,04
0,918
1,065
7,63
8,37
8,90 0,896
1,015
0,889
1,018
0,898
1,025
0,928 1,044
12357 86140 0,50
Tf
1
19345
159311 0,85
rf
527290 0,85
0,97 0,49 0,47 0,31
Deflect.
0,79 0.40
1,53
| rDeflect,
8
0,45
0,51
Mpl
Hinge
6pd
ly
670690 2772
670690 2772
670690 2772
670690 2772
670690 2772
670690 2772
Node 3
0,00159 5297 8953 0,14
0,0219 6284 8928 2,09
Node 3
0,00574 4543 6707 0,40
0,0271 5061
Node 3
0,01317 4147 5352 0,80
0,0306 4357 5328
2,11
Node 3
0,01147 3544 4456 0,59
Node 3
0,01458 3190 3810 0,66
Node 3
0,00376 2659 3340 0,14 0,02716 . 2968
3311 1,16
I
1
Tdl
Td2 Rd.req
6pu
I
}
Tul
Tu2 Ru.req
1
6680 2,34
Hingen0
ePd
Node 5 0,00230
8953 0,53
Node 5
0,00452 6707 0.78
0.01753 6664 3,02
1
Node 5
0,00908 5352 126
0,02030
5327
Node 5
0,00856 4456 0,99
0,01947 4422 2,23
2
Node 5
0,01054 3810
1,04
Td
Rd.req
6pu Tu Ru.req
0.0189C 3784
1,85
2
2,80
2
Mechanism
Table 2.1
245
Frame n
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.11
2.12
2.131
h L Column/R Column/C
Beam
H
V
57000
1,69 6,13
56000
55000
45000
1,65
44000
2,31 5,13
42000
3,01 4,41
a.cr
2^8
4,97
0,854
1,017
2,85 4,67
0,820 1,019
3,66 4,04
0,823 1,017
6,27
0,875 1,026
a.l
a.u
0,866 1,044
0,872 1,014
22651 253890 0,96
11531
0,891 1,026
Nsd/C Msd/C
Tf I
Nsd/R Msd/R
28956 336720
1,00
22014 250940
0,95J
109251
Tf
Deflect.
1
631840 0,95
1,84
591850 0,90
2,471
231
0.77 0,48 0,32
rDeflect. Mpl
3,05 0.92
0,69
0,81 0,41
040 033
670690 2772 Node 3
0,77 0,39
670690 2772 Node 3
0,01075 4546 6704 0,75
0,82 0,82
0,41
iy
Hinge
8pd
Tdl
Td2
1
0,00834 4299
8951 0,63
Rd.req
pu
8948 0,80
Tul
Tu2
Ru.req
1
0,01429 5317
8943
1,23
U4
Node 5
0,00915 8948 2.12
0.01202 8943 2,71
3
Ui
Node 5
0,00936 6704
1,62
Hinge
God
Node 5
0,00573
.8950
1,33
Node5
0,00780 8950
1.81
Node 5 0,00854
8951
1,91
Node 5 0,00816
6703
1,42
Node 5
0,00663 6709
1,15
Td
Rd.req
9pu
0.0174C
893C
1
0.0104C
Tu
Ru.req
894]
2.41
3
0,02132
667S
3.6S
>
0,01165
>
669S)
4,02
2,6
3
2,:
>
Mechanism
; 2
;5
Table 22
246
2.17
300 600 IPE 300 EPE 200 PE 270
1375
Frame n
2.14
500 400 IPE 240 IPE 220 IPE 220 1000 40000
2.16
300 500 EPE 300 IPE 220 IPE 270
1625
2.18
2.19|
300 800 EPE 330 IPE 200 IPE 300
1350
L
Column/R Clumn/C
Beam
v
aer
57000
1,09
65000
0,94 9,44
0,891 1,018
33 005 266 900 0,92
16 665!
1
55000
60000
0,89 9,97
0,946 1,036
54000
0,85 10,44
337
4,39
0,889
1,065
0,97 9,14
ai
au
Nsd Msd
0,904
1,011
0,905 1,047
27 656
178 970
21411
260350 0,77
10241
29 980
171 490
|
I
30 924
174 020
| I
1 1
rf Nsd
Msd
0,88
14 223
0,94
14 047
1
0,90
1
0,85
1
rf
508630 0,79
681 820
0,80
0,83 0,42
108 600
0,94
0,73 0,37 1,32 0,44
1
I
!
Deflect.
j rDeflect.
Mpl
0,69 0,35
861 5101
1
0,66 0,33
1,55
0,44
1
137 400
476 740
8356,1
I |
1
1
ly Hinge
6pd
3891,6
Node 3
5789,8
5789,8
Node 3
0,01143 7186 9064 0,86
Node 3
0,01320 6208 7442 0,84 0,02840 6393 7507
1,84
Node 3
0,00555 6602 8398 0,33
Node 3
0,01062 6171 7329 0,57 0,02598 6474 7271
1,43
0,00150
5661
Tdl
Rd.req
j
1
1
Td2
6pu
8589
0.11
Tul
Tu2 Ru.req
i
|
Hinge
6pd
Node 5
Node 5
0.00205 8589
Node 5
Node 5
0,00827 7442
1,16
Td
Rd.req
8pu
1
039
0.0 1520
8554
2.86
1
1
Node 5 0,00384
8398 0,52
Node 5
0,00669 7379 0,79 0,01890
7271 2,21
Tu Ru.req
0,01466
8346
1,9:
1
\ Mechanism
Table 23
247
Rd mean
*2
Rd may
Ru mean
Ru max
0,24
0,40
1,96
2,34
9pd mean
.
9pdmax
\ mean
Opumax
Mechanism 1
0,00360 Rd mean
0,00570
RiLmax.
0,00241
0,0271
Rumean
Rmnax
0,57
0,86
1,58
2,26
3pd mean
-.
9pdmax
9pu mean
9pu max
Mechanism n2
0,0095
0,0140
0,0247
0,0310
Rdmean
<--
Rdmax
Rumean
Rumax
0,59
0,83
1,16
1,23
9pdmean
L L
gpdmax
9pumean
Qpumax
Mechanism n-3
0,00810
0,0128
0,0158
0,0170
li.i.. . iirmirrprriiirni
I
1
1 1
!
ir
r rip
Graph 2.1 : Plastic rotation for hinge at mid
span
248
Rdmean
--"
1
Rdmax
0,78
Rumean
2,81
Rumas
3,36
0,55
9pd mean
9pd max
9pu mean
9pu max
Mechanism 1
0,00320
0,00450
Rd max
1,41
0,0155
0,01750
Rd mean
0,97
Kiunsan
2,35
Klimax
4,02
9pd mean
9pdmax
9pu mean
9j2u_max.
Mechanism n2
0,0070
0,0105
RsLmax.
0,0168
0,0213
Rdmean
<-
Rumean
2,37
Rumax
2,78
1,54
2,12
Qpdmean
fpdjnax.
9pu mean
fipujnax.
A Mechanism n3
.0.
0,0074
0,0094
0,0118
0,0135
flllN I III
; V
fis jJjLiIii,
V
II lilil ir
li \'
V
\'
<
\'
\'
'
249
4.3
Figure 10
250
Frame n
h
3.1
33
500 300 EPE 300
EPE 180 EPE 220
L
| | |
PE 200 PE 270
1933
PE 200 PE 270
1933
PE 220
PE 300
2467 74000
2,64 7,18
0,896
1,053
18 251
3.71
50|
8001
IPE 360
PE200J
IPE 3301
18001
v
dx5f=0.7
2267 68000
2267 68000
3,09 6,13
0,827 1,048
16 983
58000
0,89 12,78
58000
2,85 6,64
74000
0,72 12,34
72000|
1,13
132
8,61
i
1
.1 a.u Nsdf=l.
13.09J
0,860
1,047
16 931
0,939
1,046
14 194
0,884
1,035
14 378 -1 066 500
1
0,960
1,064
17 983
0,929| 1,050|
17 585J
-664 890
657 720 0,98 0,50
-1 293 500
1
ft
1
rf dx5f=0.7
dy3f=0.7
Tdeflect
-1 272 9001
1
lj
130
0,36 0,67 0,45
034
0,12
1,13
0,90
j
j
rdx
035
0,58 0,39
030
1,16
037
1,14
130
038
1
0,39
1
0,38
1
0,37
1
030!
1
Mpl
ly
N Hinge mi trave
1
137 400
5 790
137 400
5 790
Node 3
0,01924 8078
8921
Node 3
0,02193 8072 8928
2,41
Node 3
0,00912 6917 7582 0,62 0,01565 7582 7582
1,12
Node 3
0,02550 6972 7528
1.74
Node 3.
0,01950 8716 9783
1,45
Node 3.
0,00505
8661
Node 3 j
0,013241
8553 9447 0,82
pd
S S
Tdl
Td2 Rd.req
6pu
9838
f
1
1
2,11
O37
0,01310 9837 9838
1,04
Tul
Ru.req
1 J
Tu2
N Hinge sur
I
1
Node 5
0,00861 7529 0.84
Node 5
0,00475 7352
Node 5
0,00119 9480
0,11
Node 5
0,00902 9735
0,71
Node
Node 5
0,00861 8502 0,51
appuis pd
Rd.req
]
1
Td
0,00268
9389
033
0,01672 7582
03c
0.0127Sl
983S
1,01
>
6pu Tu Ru.req
0.00938
8913
0,01515 7504
>
1.0
1
MS
1,01
1
>
Mechanism
:I
Table 3.1
251
Frame n h
3.8
300 300
PE 180 PE 240
1650
180
PE 240
1350
PE 270
1250 50000
PE 180 PE 300
1375
180 220
750 30000
0,92 9,64
H V
dx5
|
68000
1,10 8,06
66000
0,94 9,44
0,908 1,036
54000
0,91
55000
a.cr
a.l
a.u
9,75
0,878 1,048
16 790
0,906
1,011
0,70 12,67
0,980
1,073
13 328 -722 440 1 161000 0,76
0,936 1,028
0,914 1,010
6 922 -440 950 629 760 0,87
Nsd
Msdl
Msd2
-582235
615 100 0,94
rf (5)
Deflect
20216
-1 103 300 1 578 000
0,83
0,39
038
0,14 0,77 0,38
861 510
3 892
035
0,12
1,11
030
0,55 0,37
0,14 0,07
1,19
0,15 0,07
1,14
032
0,11
\ rDeflect. t Mpl
1
0,44
861 510 3 892
1
033
137 400 5 790
1
0,30
033
1
2,07 0.59
670 6901 2 272
\
I
1
Hinge
pd
ly
890 105
11767
Node 3. 0,00645
10203 10797
Tdl
Td2
Rd.req
|
1
0,47
0,01171 10796 10796 0,87
6pu
TuI
Tu2 Ru.req
139
Node 5 0,00859 6857 0,65
0,00999 6853
1,51 3
Hinge pd Td
Rd.req
Node 5 0,00622
8501
0,58
038
0,00948 6498
1.16 2
Node 5 0,00346
10797
036
0,00784
10796
0,00932 8582
1,76
1
1.
2
Table 32
252
Rd mean
Rd max
Rumean
Ru max
1,79
2,40
2,74
3,58
9pu mean
Spdjnsx
9pu mean
firn-m^
Mechanism 1
0,0194
Rd msan
0,0255
Rd max
0,0283
0,0348
Rumean
Ru max
?.
0,46
0,82
1,01
1,41
6pd mean
gd-max
9pu mean
piunax
Mechanism n2
0,0071
0,0132
Rd max
0,0147
0,0216
Rdmean
Rumean
Ru max
^~0,89
1,14
1,01
1,28
Qpdmean
9pd max
9pu mean
piLmax
Mechanism n3
0,0157
0,0160
0,0176
0,0182
l PI
II
Graph 3.1 : Plastic rotation at mid span
I II III
1 1
253
Rdmean
?,
1,33
Rdmax
Rumean
Rumax
1,81
2,18
3,07
9pd mgan
9pdmax
9pu mean
9pumax
Mechanism nl
0,0067
0,0090
0,0111
0,0151
Minean
Rdmax
RujnejQ
F*!
0,54
1,01
Rumax
1,59
2,38
9pdmean
Mechanism n2
0,0041
fpdmax
flpu mean
9pumax
0,0110
0,0086
0,0167
RjLmsan
Rdmax
Rumean
Ru max
^r1,08 1,29
1,26
1,50
9pd mean
Mechanism n3
9pdmax
9pu mean
Opumax
0,0096
0,0107
0,0112
0,0126
ill I Pilli
1
fc
il
I I I I |: V V I Ivl
1
1 li I
uni
FI II IF
pr
I
Ulf
PI
254
4.4
Figure
11
255
Frame n
4.1
4.2
350 600 IPE 270
4.3
4.4
500 600
4.5
600 600
4.6
300 600
4.7
4.8
500
L
Column
Beam H
400 600
PE240
562,5 22500
PE270 PE240
562,5 22500
PE270
PE240
562,5 22500
PE270 PE240
562,5 22500
PE270
IPE 240
1125
600
PE270|
IPE 240J
11251
22500
O33
22500
0,49 44,72
0,861 1,019
22500J
aer
0,12 84,68
037
44,78
0,861 1,019
0,48
3135
0,836
1,019
0,79 22,78
7237
0,89 1,019
0,90 30,73
al
au
0,875 1,019
0,814
1,019
0,836
1,019
Nsd.
11337
-475 750 860 100 0,93
11340
-494 990 860 100 0,93
0,13 0,06
1,65 0,55
861 510
11342
-513 200 860 090 0,92
Msdl.
Msd2
Tf
11347
-548 290 860 090 0,92
0,55 0,14
1.95
Deflect.
1
0,09 0,04
1.58
0,19 0,07
1,71
0,62 0,19
1,84 0,61
861 510
rDeflect. MdI
0,53
0,57
861 510
0,61
861 510
0,65
0,53
861 510
0.57
861 510
861510
3891,6 Node 3
0,00925 5516 5734 0,57
861510
3891,6 Node 3.
0,02522 5516 5734
1,56
ly
Hinge epd
3891,6 Node 3
0,01154 5516 5734
0,71
3891,6 Node 3
3891,6 Node 3.
0,01932 5516 5734
3891,6 Node 3
0,01134 5516 5734 0,70 0,01540 5734 5734 0,97
20
1
3891,6 Node 3
0,01769 5516 5734
1.10
3891,6 Node 3
0,02511 5516 5734
1,55
Tdl
Td2 Rd.req
6pu
130
0,02480 5734 5734
1.57
Tul
Tud
1
Ru.req
0,01590
5734 5734
1.00
Mechanism
V/H
40
1
40
1
40
1
40
1
20
1
20
1
Table 4.1
256
Frame n
h
4.9
600 600
4.10
300 300
4.11
4.12)
4.13
4.14
300 700
4.15J
3001
L
|
Column Beam H
PE270 PE240
1125
300 500
300 600
PE270
PE240
1350
PE270
PE300
IPE 270
1275
PE240
1700
PE240
1125
IPE 270
1125
v
depl
22500
1,46
34000
0,30 54,64
0,841
1,012
17 076 -675 290 860 100 0,97
27000
22500
25500
22500
035
66,80
0,856 1,019
036
63,95
0,871
1,019
13 670 -597 850
033
72,37
0,89 1,019
037
60,66
0,901 1,02
12 844 -700 890 1 137 400 0,94
0351
66,001 0,9051
1,0111
.1
a.u
22,60
0,814 1,019
Nsd.
11346
-751 280 860 100 0,90
1,02
Msdl. .Msd2
Tf
1 1
031
0,11
Deflect.
036
1.95
0,82
0,41
861 510
| rOeflect
I
3
0,65
Mpl
Hinge 6pd
Iy
137 400
137 400
3891,6 Node 3
0,01139
11032 11468
1.41
3891,6 Node 4
3891,6 Node 5
3891,6 Node 3
5789,8 Node 3
5789,8 Node 3.
I
1
Tdl
Rd.req
8PU
0,01558 8399
8601
Td2
1,46
0,01390
11468
11468
1,76
0,01770
8601 8601
1,68
Tul Tud
|
1
Ru.req
134
20
1
V/H
Mechanism
20
1
20
1
Table 4.2
257
Rdmax
Rumean
Rumax
1,06
2,08
1,37
2,52
9pd mean
6pd max
9pu mean
Bpu max
Mechanism
0,0159
0,0330
0,0202
0,0399
Table 43
258
4.5
I
a...
Figure 12
Frame n
5.1
52
350 600 IPE 270 IPE 240 500 20000
0,83
12,65 0,951 1,074
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.7
h
j j
L Column/R
Beam
H
1
500 600
PE270
IPE 240 500 20000
1,95
PE270
IPE 240 500 20000
2,48 6,65
0,887 1,016
10630 834180 0,93
1,91
PE240
500 20000
1,50 9,02
PE240
500 20000
3,80l
4,74
0,874
1,003
10705
acr
al
au
7,69
0,969
1,084
0,934
1,064
10391
0,915 1,040
10492 793230 0,88
1,12
0,900
1,028
|
I
Nsd Msd
rf
10340
743500 0.82
0.56 034
1.59
758490 0,84
0,78
856630 0,96
2,43 0,61
1,92
0,39 0,19
1.51
039
1.66
0,37
1,73
0,44
1,80
0,52
1,86
Deflect. f TDeflect.
1
0.50
860100 3891.6 Node 3
0,53
0.55
0,58
860100 3891,6 Node 3
0,00798 4500 5500 0,44
0,60
860100 3891,6 Node 3
0,62
860100 3891,6 Node 4
0,64
860 100 3891,6 Node 3
Mpl
ly
|
Hinge
6pd
i
1
S
Tdl
Rd.req
Td2
Qpu
033
0.01030
4941
.
032
0.01 140
0,01340 4288
5711
0,73
j
1
Tul
Tu2
Ru.req
|
1
5743 0.61
1
Mechanism
Table 5.1
259
Frame n
h
5.8
5.9
500 600
5.10
5.11
5.12
L
Column/R
Beam
400 600
500 600
600 800
600 900
PE270 PE240
1750
PE300 PE240
1600
PE330 PE240
1700
PE330 PE270
1600 16000
PE300
IPE 270
1475 14750
H V
5
1
17500
3,41
16000
17000
acr al
au
1232
0,988 1,026
9964 861500 0,94
4,57 11,49
0,961 1,064
9391 861500 0,72
434
12,38
5,77 10,92
0,993
1,081
5,70 11,05
0,993
1,071
0,875
1,001
Nsd Msd
rf
239
0,90
1,46
330
0,96
2,97 0,89
3,99
1,00
138
0,43
134
0,41
0,49
860 100 3891,6 Node 4
2,00 0,50
1
2,52 0,56
1
860 100
ly
Hinge
6pd
3891,6 Node 4
0,00322 5400
137 400
137400
5789,8 Node 4
5789,8 Node 4
Td
Rd.req
0,01060 5737
038
0,00849 5743
1,08
2
134
0,01070
5743
j
I
1
6pu
Ru.req
Tu
136
2
| Mechanism
Table 5.2
260
Rd mean
RgLmax.
RiLTJK
Rmnax.
9pd mean
Opdmax
9pu mean
9pu max
Mechanism
Table 53
Id
l li I 1^ li l 1^ li u i
;
lUil^niMPUHPP
3ffi
i I
<|4?
Graph 5.2 : Required rotation capacity
261
4.6
il
J
Ij
Sfc:
1
3&
Figure 13
Three cases have been treated with full restrained supports and one case has been treated with pinned supports.
262
Frame n
h
6.1
62
300
63
300 500 500
6.4
350
700
1000
LI
L2
1-2-5-6
3-4
500
500
PE270 PE270
IPE 300
PE 270 PE 270
IPE 300
IPE 270
IPE 300
270
IPE 300
1-2-7-8
3-4-5-6
PE300
75000
7500
PE 300
90000
PE 300
84000
7200o|
6000
V Full restrained
supports
4500
2400
1,97
31
Pinned supports
134
25,9
0,922
1,078
1,13
2,07
29
! I
1
acr
8,54
0,921
1,113
ai
au
0,923
1,189
0,857
1,008
rf p3 Tf P7
Tf
P8
0,99
0,8
0,86
0,7
0,89
0,75 0,73
0,75
0,78
0,6
0,97
0,6
0,99 0,36
0,33
038
034
0,36
rdeflect (node 9)
03
noeud 7
1
031 034
noeud 7
1
0,62
| j
Hinge
noeud 7
1
noeud 12
1
Mpl
137 400
137 400
137 400
889 400
5789
Iy
1 1
5789
5789
0,002
8415
11770|
0,0053
6pd
0,0015
7978
0,232
0,0015
8598
j
1 1
Td Rd.req
6PU
7557
0,55
035
0,003"'
9099
0,64[
0,31
0,0068
9095
0,00831
0,0084
!
Tu Ru.req
9:
7557
0,87
1,1"
1,4:
Table 6.1
263
CONCLUSION
Type of frame
1
.
0,06
1
0,49
0,21
0,46
0,85
0,66
1
1
2
1
1
1 1 1
0,00
2,12
1,11
1,04
4,02
238
3
.
0,06
1
2,41
1,10
0,66
3,59
1,75
0,57
2,08
1,07
0,83
2,52
137
5
L
0,05
1,34
0,41
0,40
1,36
0,76
i
S
6
y
Ij
t ^>
0,23
0,55
034
0,64
1,42
0,90
Table 7 : Summary of the results for the required rotation capacity Rreq
The table 7 shows that the required rotation capacity at collapse can vary from 0,4 to 4. The values are rather scattered. It is difficult to associate a value of Rreq to a type of frame because of many reasons.
First in order to be on the safe side, we could keep the maximum value for each type of structure. This can be too conservative in most of the cases and this does not agree with our purpose which is to promote the plastic design of steel structures.
This study is not exhaustive and one can easily find cases with greater required rotation capacities than those found here.
However the values of Rreq are not generally very high. This is to say that some slender profiles could be used in a plastic design. It could also be sufficient to check the required rotation capacity under design loads instead of a checking just before collapse.
264
Annex
11
'Available rotation capacity of plastic hinges Ravailable - Tests results and models."
(49 pages)
flange
IO O en OJ o o O O o IO IO IO IO IO o o o Tf Tt CO CM CM o IO IO IO IO CM CM CM IO IO Tf Tf Tf IO io
IO
IO IO IO O CO CO co Tf
IO
CO CM
cn o IO CO Tf co o o
>>
ts c
*~-
LO
o o o o 00 CO o o
CO
CO
o o 00 o co
O O O o o o IO IO IO IO IO o - N- s. CM CM cn CO co CO IO IO CO Tf Tf Tf CM CM io
o o O O o IO IO IO O o en en IO IO T CO CO co co T IO IO CO CO CO IO IO O o O O
rT-
O o O o IO en CM co CO O IO IO CO o O
O o o IO o o o 00 CO o CO Tf CM en Tf CO en
o o cn
CO
cn
s
>
o O o IO CM CM Tf Tf IO CO - - CM CO CM CM IO *
o o O IO co Tf
Tf
O o o o o O IO IO IO IO IO IO <o CO co CM CM CM o 00 - - 00 00 co CM Tf CM CM CM CM CM Tt
CM
O O O O o o IO IO IO IO o o o o 00 00 en en Tf CO co CM CM Tf Tt Tf CM CM Tf Tf O O O
CO
o o en co
Tf
o IO <o NCM
O O IO IO <o CO N- NCM CM
O O
o o
o O
Tt Tf Tf o o o IO IO IO Tf
o o IO o
O
O O o o o o o IO o o o tn en IO O CO CD - o CO 00 N- CO. Tf co o o
CM
Tf
CM
Tf
cn
O
00
CM
O
T-
O
Tf
CM
O
CO
-
,_,
00 IO o
o
CM
co Tf o O
CM
CM
O
CM
o
CM
O
CM
O
CM
N- 00 o en en o
T_
O O O IO CO CO Tf en CO O en O
CM
o
CD
O
CO
o
-
O O IO Tf
O
CM
en Tf IO co N> CM CO CO CO CO IO <o CO co CO Tf IO IO CO CO
CM
CM
''-
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM o N- io CM Tf co co en cn co CM CM T~ co
co
CM
o o
o o
IO IO IO co co co co co co
o o o o o o
"
o o O o - Tf co CM CM io io IO o o
00
O IO O IO
O O
CO
O O en "
O o IO co co en TCM co N- CM Tf IO Tf IO IO IO IO m
CM
o o co o
o o
O o O O O <o CM co CM Tf
<o co 00 O IO en en O
o o
Tf
CM
CO
T-
en
O O o o O 00 Tf en Tf CO CM IO CM CM oo en en o O O
CO
CM
o O en Tf
CM
CM
00 en o o o cn Tf IO CM CM CM CM co co co co T_ "r~ o o
Tf
CM
o o o
*_
o o
CO
O O
CO
O O to
o o
O o O o o o o o O o O o o o o o co 00 00 00 co 00 co 00 Tf
CM
O O
Tf
CM
o o
Tf
CM
o o
Tf
CM
Tf
CM
o o Tf
CM
O o Tf
CM
o o
Tf
CM
O O
Tf
CM
O O
Tf
CM
O O
CO
"-
o O o oo o -
o o o
o o
o
o o io o o
o o o
o o io
o o
**
o o O o o o o o o o o IO O CO CM co T- IO IO o o IO <o co <o ( co o o T_ o o o 00 m o o
Tf
o o
o o
IO io o o o
o io
**
"
,__,
o o o o o o O O O O Tf IO IO Tf IO IO IO en 00 IO o O en en en en N N N- N- h- No O
Tf
CO
o o < Tf
o o o
'
o o o IO IO o
,_,
o o o o o o o o o IO co CM CO (O o Tf IO o o o cn CO 00 cn 00 o o
Csl
CM CM CM
o o
-
o o o IO IO o
CO
co o
CM
CM
IO IO
CM CM
CM CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM CM
cn cn N- 00 00 00
CM
CM CM
CO CM
oo
CM
CO CM
00 00 00 oo
CM CM CM
CM
CM CM
CM CM
o o o o o o o o co co co co o o o o o o
o o
O IO Tf O
CM CM
o Ci co
CM CM
O O o Tf co O o CO N- 00 N- co en T o o O O
CM
CM CM CM CM
CM
O r-.
O O O IO CO O
O
CO
o o
CM CO CM
O o
O
CM
-
O O O IO CM O
O O
o
T-
O
CO
O O
O O IO O
O
CO
o o
IO O
Tf
<o
NCM
co 00
CM
CM
Tf IO oo IO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO CO CM
en co IO to CO CO o o o o CO N- - I O O io IO IO IO CM CM CM CM CM CM CM co co co co
m m m m
(0 c >
tn
CD
m m <<<<<<
o
CM CM
m m
O
CM CM CM CM
CO CO
o
CM CM
o
CM CM
CM CM
o
CM CM
O o
CM CM CM CM
o
CM CM
CM CM CM CM
O O o
CM CM CM
o
CM
CO CO
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ LU UJ UJ UJ
X X X X X X
Ui UJ UJ UJ LU UJ LU LU UJ LU LU LU LU UJ LU LU UJ UJ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
ffi < < < < < < m < < "O a rs o O O O o O O O o O O co co CO CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 CM CM o TD CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM <1) <1> (1)
o
3 3 3 3
(ff
co co Tt ta ja ta CO ja IO IO > CM Yo O
Tt
D
o
CM
o co co S3 en O
CO
CM CM
co Tt CO co Tt
CM CM CM CM
CM
CM CM
0 m m ffl
CM
CM
CM
LU LU LU LU UJ
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO
CM
co ro in co
r-
CM
CM
<
<
co co TT (O en in m m co co co
UJ
LU UJ UJ LU UJ UJ LU
cc
OC
! ! ! s
% !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! ! ! ! i ! ! !
CC
cc cc ce cc te oc oc cc oc oc ce oc
oc
C CC C CC CC CC
cc
be
CC
cc ce cc cc ce
CM
CO
Tf
N.
CO
en
T-
CM
co Tf
in
CO
r-
co cn o
CM
,_
CM
CM
co Tf
CM CM
in
CM
(0
CM
rCM
CM
co en o CM CM co
T-
"
266
O) c
co
OKD^T-COOONOOOXOOSO) CMOOCOIOlOCMIOTtcOCM-r-TflOCO
o
Tf
0(0
IO Tf
Tf
cn cn otocnoooocncn co co Tfi-COTtTfTtTfCMCM
Ss
J3
o o o O IO IO -TfooN-N-iOT-iocoiocniOT-coiOT-iocniococoiocncoioioioioioio
enoOCOCON.IOTfCON-OTfON-COON-CON-ON.OON.OON-N.N.N-TfTf TfcncOTfCMCMTfCVICOCOTfTfcOCMCOCOCMCOTfCOCOCOCOTfcOCOCOCOCOTfTf
s a o
oooooocococoocoTtN-cnN.cocoioN.eocncnT-N.T-001-TfTt
lOCMCMCMCMCOTftOCOCOTfcncOIOCOCOCOOCncOCMCMTfcncOCOCOCOCOCOTf
o o co o
cototococoeocococoeocooocococococococococococoeocococococococo COCMCMWCMT-T-T-T-T--i-T-T-T-T-T-T-T-T-T--i-T-T--r--r-T-T-T-T--i-
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo
cooooooocooooooocooocooooooooocooooooooocooooooooo
o"
o o o o o
co co
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
OOOOOOT-CON.CD-1-cnN.COlON-lOCOOOCOCOCOCOOOlOOON.COCOOT-
io
^r*
in" m"
gggggoooooiooooooog
....OlOtOlOCOTfTfiniOOT-CO-TfCMOOeO
IO OOOOIOOOO TfCnCMT-OOCOCM
OOOOOOIOTfCMIOIOCnTftOTteOCO-i-enCMCOCOCOOCOTtCMTfCMCMTooooocM-r-oooT-cnoooocnoenooooooooooT-T-
ooocococooooooocnoooocnocnoooooooooooo COCJCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMt-CMCMCMCM-t-CMt-CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
OOOOOON-TfOCON-COTflOCMIOt-COIOCOIOlOCniOCOCOCOCMCMCOT-
o O O O O 00 CO CO CO O o
CO
CM
en cn O
-
CON-CnTfcOOCOCOCOlO 0)0)0)00)00)9)00)
t-t-1-CMt-CMt-t-CMt-
Tf
o
CM
N- N- 00 TfN-CON-COCOOOCn en en en en 00)0)0)0)0)0)0)
CO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
T-
CM
T-
__.___OfflfflnfflnfflnfflnfflmfflfflnfflfflfflfflfflnnfflfflncD
03
> 5
S S UJUJUJLULULULUIUUJLUUJUIUJUJIUUJUJLULULUUJIUUJUJUJ
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
Tf
<
OCMNNNN
in oo oo co oo ce
co co co _H-
Tf
__
co
ifl(ONeoo)rrrrT,rT.rfl|eiNWO,NNNN
H H r- t-
LU UJ UJ LU LU
oc
oc oc oc oc oc cc
NnlO<ONCOO)OrOinIO(DNOO)OT-(Mn9IO(ONaC40rCI
cocococococococoTfTfTfTtTfTfTfTtTtTtininmininininioinin
267
[
flange
cn to
CO
en . CO Tf co Tf to io
CM
to
m Tf to to
CM
IO IO IO IO IO to co co to IO IO Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
fr
CM
***
CM
CO
CM
o o
-
o o
o o
Tf
CO
Tf
CM in ) Tf Tf CM co CM
o o NiCM
o o io to
CM
o o co CO co
CO
Tf
00
- -
CM CM
o o o to
CM
o o
CM
o o O
CO
CM
o o
CM CM
o o
CM CM
o o
CM
in
CM
IO to
to
CM
o o - - N- cn cn i- O o CM CM CM - No o
o o
o o
o o
o o o o cn en en o O O N- N- No o
o o o o o o o o o o en cn cn cn cn
O Tf
CO
Tf
Tf
CO
Tf
CO
N-
co
CM
%=
>. t-
*-*
^^
O O
CO
o
CO
O o O o O) To <o Tf CM
o tn
o o
o o
o
o
co m o Tf co CM
o o N- IO tO 00 to t - IO CO - CO co CO
o o
CM
o o
CM
CO
Tf
O o - - - N. co 00 00 00
CM
CM
O o
O o
o o Nco
CM
o o
o o to to co co co co
CM CM
CM
o o
o o o o co CO co CO
CO CO
o o
o o
CO CO CO
o o
CO CO CO
o o
CO CO CO
o o
CO CO CO
o o co co co
o o
CO CO CO
o o
CO
CO
CO CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
co co co
CO
o Tf
o o to cn co 00 N- CM co co 00 00
o O N. CM co Tf - CM
CO
O O - CO Tf - CO CM - - CO CM O Tf O
CO
o o co o O) CD co co
CO
CM
o o
o o co en 00 co
CM CM
o o o o to N. co CO
CM
CM
o o
o o o o co o to 00 00 00 N- - to CO O) O) - 00 00 00 00 co 00 00 Tf Tf Tf IO CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM o o o o o o o o
o o
o o O CM
o o O) NCM
o o 00 00
CM
o o o o o o cn O) O) 00 CO 00
Cvl
CM CM
,_^
) Tf
CM
CM
Tf
o
Tf
-
O Tf Tt Tt
CM
00
o
CM
o
CM CM
o o
- - CM co co co co _ - - -
cn co CM co 00 00 Ten o Tf en . - to
CM
CM CM
o o co IO
CM
o o cn IO
CM
o o o o o o 00 CO
CM CM
o o NCM
o o
o o o o o o o to o CM en co oo en O) N- . N- CO CO co
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
o to oo Tf io o o
o
CM
o o o O
CM
o o o o cn eo CO NCM CM
o o
o o en cn cn N- N- NCM CM
CM
m.
o O o o o o o o o o o o o co co oo co - N- N- N-
og
$o
? O
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
o o o
o o o
o o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o o
o o o
o o o
o o o
o o
o o Tf o
o o o
o O
o o o
o O O
o o o
o O O
o o o
o
o o o o o o
o o o o o o
o o - co in Tf Tf Tf
Tf
O o o o co CO CO
co
o
CO
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o IO co co" 00 00 co co 00 CO CO co 00
o co
^ o
o
o
00*
m,
o
-
o o - Tf
o
Tf
en en ) 00 O)
o o o o
CO
o o o o
CO
o o o
? 1 o S
o o o o
-
<=>
o o
o o IO to o o o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o to
IO Tf IO IO IO IO to
o o o to
o o o o o o o o o o
o o o o O O O O o o o to to IO to to io to o o o o IO IO IO IO IO IO IO CO <o CO (D
o o
CO
CM
ja
,__,
o o
CM
o o
CM
o o en co en o en o
CM
O o o O co
o o
o o
cn O) cn O)
CM CM
Tf
o o IO to o o
o o o o <o co co to
o o o o o o o o
o o o CM O N- co ) Tf
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o o to o o
o o
o o
o o IO to o o O) oo IO IO
o o
CM
CM
O O co to
o o
cn to
CO
O to
o o
o
CO
o No
o o O) co co - CO en o o - CM CM
o o N- CM o cn en co - CM CO
o
Tf
o o o en
o o o o o CO en CM
CO
o o
o o en Tf Tf Noo en en NCO
CM CM
o o
O O Tf to to to IO IO Tf Tf N- N- en en en cn en cn o o o o
CM
CM
O o O to
CM
o o
o o o o co cn en en cm oo en O) en en
CM
o o
CO CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
c O) (0
o
CM
o
o
CM
o o
CM
o
CM
X X X X X XXX
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
"O TJ o o o o o O Tf o Tf O O O " co CO Tf CO co
<>
*
!"55555555$555555
TJ T3 o 73 ~Z - a
TJ o a 3 TJ 3 TJ
T3 "D
<<<<<<
4*
(ff
en o
CM
tj-
CO
CO
o o o o o o Tt O O Tf co co CO Tf CO co Tt
CM
CM
Tf
to
oo en
CM
CO
Tf
to
co en o
CM
CM
CM CM
UJ UJ UJ
X XXX
Ul
LU
_ F JE
_
2 ^
oc
CO
tp
wS ffS
(ff
^
CCC
W
(ff
m.
(fl
(ff
m.
<)
m.
(ff
3 3
(ff m.
im
m.
-c
JC
f f 3 3 3
m.
3
mC
3
m
3 3 3 3
m. m
imi mt\ mt
mt mt
:****
3
m.
3
m
3
-m
o o
Q. . . . .
-!
CM
o9 00 c C e o " o
oc oc oc oc
CO
S S S e8 *-*-<-< m< -< m< m* C m* m< m< lm mm ' : : : o ' ' o o " ' ' " o " oc oc oc oc oc oc oc cc oc cc oc oc cc oc te oc oc
N- co cn o - - - 00
CM
(ff
_J
to
Tf to
to to
to oo cn (O ( (
mm
Tf
- -
m to -
CO Tf in (O co cn o - CM CO co 00 oo 00 00 co co oo en ) en en
268
flange
Tf
Tf
to to
IO O o o o o o O IO co co CO co co Tf Tf Tf
o
Tf
o Tf
3 <-
Ol
S
*^
CM
-**-
O IO IO O CM CM ) en en en Tf Tf o o co co co co
co to Tf Tf
O) en O) en cn en en en en en CO co co co to en en O) en O) m m IO IO co co co co co co co CO CO co
Tf
to
(O to
Tf
Tf
o o
O o N- CM m CO Tf co - Tt co Nco 00 co co CO
o o
o o
o o
O O to Tf
CO
o o o o o o N. O) o Tf CM Tf
CO CO
o o
o o o o CM O) in Tf N- to
CO CO CO
o o
CO
o o
o o
00
CM
o iri
- o
en
CM
00 Tf
co en
CM
CO
to
tri
o o
tO
,_,
O O
o o
IO IO
en
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
en O
en O) en O) cn o
o o
o in
o o
O O
o to
-
>.
co co Tf Tf co co co co CO co co CO co co o to co O co co co 00 - - N- N- N- - - N- N- N- CM en o co co CM CM co co CO CO CO co co co CO co co CM co }
o o Tf Tf N- co CO to
CO
O o o O IO to o O to CM en o o
CO CO
O O m
-
co
CM
o o o o IO o o o CO N- CO o en en 00
CO CM CM Tf
o
CM
en -ir to o
- - N- N. N- 00 en en 00 en o N- - N- N- Nin
Tf
CM
00 00 en O) Tf Tf Tf Tt Tf m co CO co co en en en en O) Tf
CM
CM
to to IO IO IO o en Tf Tf Tf 00 NCM
CM
N to
CM
-
o to oo to
O IO 00 Tf
CM
CM
CO
en o cn cn cn o N- 00 00 N- N- N- co
o
OO
IO o co to CM en en o - N- 00
o O
o o
-
o o
Tf CM co to
CM CM
o o
CM
CM
CM
CM
O Tf
co CO CM co o o Tf Tf o o o o Tf Tf Tf o o o O) o cn en cn to T- T- Tf - T- 00 to o CM en N- Tf co 00 co 00 O) en en en en en O) en en en Tt Tf Tf Tf Tf Tf CO Tf Tf Tf CO Tt CO N- - o o CO to co co co - co co CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 00
CO
CM
o to
Tf
Tf
co co Tf
en co
Tf
en en
Tf Tf
Tf
o o o en IO 00 Tt
CM
o o Tf Tf
CJ
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
O O O O
CO
o o o o
CM
o o o
o
o o o o
o o o
o o o
o o o
o o o
o o o
O O O
O O O to
O O o
O O O
o o o to
o o
o o
o o
O O
o o
o o
CO
O O
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 o
o"
o o o o o
CM
o o
o o o
"
C0 00
(_) <_)
00 co 00 co 00
CM CM CM CM
CM
+m
CO CM
IO IO IO IO IO m
o tO co 00 o to o io 00 co CO IO IO IO to N- IO CO to m m to NIO IO IO O) en en en o cn en O) O) en en en O)
CM CM
co to
CM
CM
s w
IO o 00 o
O Tf
CM CM
o o IO o en co
-
m-.
o o o o co to
o o
IO IO IO IO IO in to to Tf Tf Tf Tf
IO o
Tf
O
CO
O
CO
co
Tf
O to
o
CO
o
CO
o
CM
o
CM
O to
. - Tf
Tf
Tf
Tt Tf
Tf
Tt Tf
to
CO
Tf
- N-
IO Tt o o
CM
o o o o o o o o o o o o CM T- T- -i- CO CM CO o o to o N- N- N. N- N- N- N- N- N- N- CO 00 *
o
Tf
o
o o en
CM
ja
m-.
o o CO o co en
IO CM O Tf o O en co co CO co o - O - co CM
~~~
00 - m to cn - co to
-
NTf
SiS
co CO co to CO O) en - 00 O) "*m o o o
CM
ss
Tf Tf O O
IO o o
CM
o
-
IO o
CO
-
o
CO
Tf
o
CM
CM
o o
CM
o o
CM
O 00 O) en
O in en to o o
CM
tn o
-
o to
o o
Tf
CM CM
O
CM
o o
CM
O
CM
o o o
co NCM
CM
o o
Tf
Tf
en en en cn
CM
o io
CM
IO o O o IO o
Tf Tf
CM
to o o o
CM
to o
to o o o
CM
Tf Tf
Tf Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf Tf
o o
CM
O O O O m IO IO to
CM
O io
o o o o to CM Tf o cn O en en en O en O) en en en 00 00 00 en oo CO CO CO
CM
CM
CO
O to en co
O o O tn CO O) en en en oo oo CO
O o
1-
o o
o
CM
o o
CM
cm CO Tf
CM
O 00 00
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
co
CT
(ff
O o o o o o o o O O O O <M CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM o o o o ce ce oc cc oe cc ce oc cc OC ce oe UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ LU LU UJ CC oc ce cc
o =
"O 0) 0)
?o
< < < < < < < < < < < < <
o o o o o o o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
o o
8*
T3 "O
X X
X X X X X X X X X X
co Tf
CM
CM
CM
CM
co Tf
fflfflOOOOO10
CM
Tt
CO
o to
CM
m
t
tt)
to to
tO N- N. f NT-
CM
2< x <
CO
Tf CO Tt
UJ UJ UJ UJ
U C
3
m.
3
mm
>
m
00
-m
C m<
>
>
m<
3 3 3 -J -J -I
3 _l
c 3
>
mm
-<
> >
m
3 3 3 3 -1 _J _l -J -J
>
frs o s s s s S2222SS2X o O CJ cj O
3 F
<_>
'
(ff
-l u
o
o
5 5
0
CM
5
Tt
E 5
o O
CM
\j
<- ET
l L' L
cc cc oe
cc oc
_l
Tf m O) O
f CO O) o en O) en o o
CM CO Tf m t - O O O o O o o
en o
mm
CO
m t n>
TCM
CM CM
CO
CM
Tf
CM
269
CO CM CM
CO
CM
O
CO
Tf
to o Tf
- en Tf
en
CM
CM
co
CM CM
CM CM
IO to
T-
o to
T-
co
Tf
CM
- to
CO CM
Tf
CM
Tf N- CM CM m CO to N- Tf Tf IO N. co en co CO N. - CM CM CM IO
to
coN-encotoin^SS lOlOCOTfTftTr^i^
lOION.T-CMTf0.^^
N-TfinT-TftOtOtDCO tOOTfN-CMCOCOCOlO tN-IOCn-r-N-N-N-N
TtTfcOT-CMCOtOtOCD
Tf
CO
-
.m]
CM
CM
O Tf cn ) to T IO IO IO CM cn - CD CO O O 00 co CO co N- co 00 en CM CM CM CM CM - CM CM
CM
-
co to to N- cn Tt Tf T- to to
Tf
Tf co
to Tf to
CO to O IO IO to to to to to to Tt Tt
cn
CO
CM
to Tf
Tf t Tf
>.
CM
en Tf en O 00 to en en 00 o . - co 00 . 00 O) CO
CO
IO 00 Tf CO IO tO cn co CO - IO to IO IO IO
Tf
IO IO IO
<
>
CM
o
Tf
CO CM
IO CM CM co o o 00 - IO IO o IO Tf co - CO - 00 -
CM
00 en 00
CM
CO
N.
CO o CO Tf
O
CM
to
CO
- cn
Tf Tf
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM CM
CM
CM
Tf
Tf
Tf
to to o CO cn CM CO TO) - O Tf CM CO CO 00
<
co co
. Tf 00 CM O) en N- CO to CO CO en en Tf CO 00 O) O CO CO CO to Tf cn N- CO N. O CO O) IO N. O CO to 00 to CO en o O CM O) O CM o CM o CO CO IO to to Tf CO Tt Tf CO CO CO co cn cn cn en 00 en O) en en en en to to CO to t to o o
CM
cnco>coIO,0,
OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO
SenS^^CMCMCMS
o o
CM
o o
CM
o o
T-
o o to IO CO co
o o IO co
o O o O to CM co -
O O O co
O O o
Tf
O O
CM
O O o co
o o o
Tf
O O O
o o o
O
CM
CO Tf
o o co
o o
Tf
o o
CM
o o o
o o o
o o
CM
CO Tf
T--
COTfcOTtTtcOCOCOCO
3
LU
CO
CM
T-
co
CO
00 co co
co co
CO
co Tf
TtTfeOCOCOCMCOTfTf
co co
fi
o
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 $55555555
co co
5
*
'~~'
mmt
CM
- -
co co co co co co
co co co co co co Tf
TfTfCOCOCOCMCOTfTf
CM
o
-
tn CO en oo Tf
CM
"
CM
o O - to O) - CM CO to - Tf CO co - - 00 co CO oo - co OO CM " CM CM CM CM CM CM -
co
CM
tir
^~
''
1_|
- ) OO 00 - Tf CO Tf to m O en en Tf CM - -
- CM N- CO CM CM m Tt - O en O Tf Tf - Tf CO CM CM - - - to - CM CM CM - CM CM
CM
CM CO
to
CO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO
COCOCMCMCMCMCMCOTf
ffl
co
O O O o
CM CM
fflfflfflfflffiffl<<<<<<fflffifflffiffi<<<<<<ffi<<T3.aT3T3
CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
O O o
o O O o o o o o o co CO CO 00 00 00 CO 00 oo 00COCOCMCMOT3OT3
CM
CM
CT
CM
CM
CM
CM CM CM
CM
CMCMCMCMCM-J-J-J^
(ff
X X X X X
LU UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ LU UJ UJ UJ UJ LU UJ UJ UJ
X X
X X X X
UI UJ LU
LU UJ
U1UJU1UJUJ5555
X X
co co Tf Tf Tt co co ta (0 CO co to t O) - CM o O
-
O o - < 75 UJ
CM CM CO Tt co Tt CM CO Tf CO Tf CM co Tf CO o Tf Tf Tf co CO Tf Tf Tf CO CO CO Tf CO CM CM CM CM co CO .00 00 CO co oo co CM CM CO CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
CM
;!ScMCMmmfflcQ < < < < < ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl < < < < mmffl<<l-'-f-" UJ uj UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ LU UI UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ ""JjjUJUJUJUJUJUJ
! t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
c
C C
! ! H
ce ce e
cc cc oc ce cc
C DC
cc
C Se CC
oc oc oc be OCOCOCCCCCflCXOCOC
ululili
coTfwtoN-cocnoT-
Ij
(0
CM
co Tf
m to
CO
CM CO
Tt
in
to
N 00 en
CM CM
CM CM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCOCOl
270
Cn^OCMCDN.COCON-CON.N.COCOtON.tOCON-N.N.N.tON-tOTftDinC010
oo^^T-wtocotocococotocotooocotocotococococotocococococooooo OO^^N-tTt-CMt-CMt-CMCMCNIt-t-CMt-CMCMCMt-t-CMCMt-CMCMCMCMCMCM
cococococoTteocMOiocoN.iocococMT-N.TfoocncntoN.tocncncncoo lOCOOOOOeOCMtOtON-COtOCON-tOTfN.COTtN.COIOIOOON.TtcOtOCOCOTf NIOIOIOIOO)00)0)0)00)aO)0)0)0)00)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0 COtOtOCO<OT-CMT-T-T-CMT-T-T-T-T-T-CMT-T-T-T-T-T-T-T-T-T-T-CM
oo to
CO
CO
to
to io
^^,,^
OOOOOOOlON-CnTfCOlOCMOCOOT-TtTfCMCOCOIOTfOCMTtT-CMN-lO
OTtTfTfTtTfN.C0TtT-t0t7)t0N-l0C0T-C0CnOT-T-0)0)C0ON-N.t0CMT-
to CMtOIOTfcOtOOOTf
lOCOTftOTfOOTfCOCOIOCOCO
O Tf N- CM N- CO 00 O IO Tf O) CM Tf Tf Tf Tf m to
<
>
CMTfTtTtTftOIOlOIOTtlOlOIOIOTtTttOtOtOIOTfTfTflOTttOTfTtTfiniO COCMOJCMCMt-CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
o O
CM CM
o o o Tf CM CM CM O IO IO IO tO CM CM CM CM CM NCM
Tf
2
CO
co
CO
Tf
CO
CM
m co
UJ
<
5555555555555555555555555555555
Sg
co
CO
Tf
CO
CM
lOCOOTtT-T-ON-OOIOT-TfTfiniOOOTTf Tf Tf
coenTfootOTtN-cocDT-cocoN-oocoioo 00 O) IO to 00 oeniocococncncoioN-entoNCO
CM
CMt-t-t-t-t-1-t-t-t-t-t-t-
o"
CM
o
CM
oo en Tt
oo N- oo en cn
CO CO
co CM
cn CM
to
-
io
co cn o
CO
CO
o
CM
) tO O Tf
CO CO
CO CM
T-
fflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflffifflfflfflfflfflfflfflffiffifflfflfflfflffl
2>
ro c
^^J^-J^CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
to
3 5 5 5 5 3UJUJUJUJUJUJLUUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJJ
CO CO CO CO CO ^m CO CO CO
Tf
IO 00 00 00 00 oc
Tf
CM
CO
HHHHHg
IO 00 enoT-cMcoTfintN.00 T-CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
o c
oc
Sm,
oe oc oe cc ce oc
J2
CMCOTfiO(ON-OOCnOT-CMCOTriOt0N-COO>OT-CMCOTtintON>OOO)OT-CM cococoeococococoTfTfTtTtTfTtTtTfTfTfinmininininmininioiototo
271
Tf 00 co co to - 00 IO en Tf O) 00 to to CO - CM co to O en CM CO t Tf - O) **
00 CM - Tf
CM
CM
CO
Tf 00 to CO co -
co
CM
CO CM
to Tf
00 to O CO CM CO CO CM to en co co en en en o
-
Tf CO - to CM to CM Tf en CM IO en O en en en CM CM io - 00 to
CM
CO Tf O - to CO Tf en 00 - IO to 00 CO Tf IO
CO
to
to
Tf
to
IO
Tf to O
to
IO - 00 o - to 00 en Tf IO
- co to
co co co en en oo en co oo co to to to to co co co
>
,__,
to 00 co en Tf co CO IO in m to to
Tf
to IO en Tf N. CO IO en CT) o CO N- to Tf 00 to CM Tf CM
O
Tf
O co m Tf m
IO 00 Tf Tf co - co O 00 O CM Tf Tf CM CM O Tf o CM - 00 IO CM - CM CM to en CM - CM IO IO IO to to ) co to N- IO
Tf
mm
mm
CM CM
- - CM cn CO 00 - CO - -
00 co 00
CM
<
>
-*
Tf en
m
Tf
CM
Tf to - 00 N- to O t O to TTf en en to en co en en en to CO o m Tf CO en N- O O) N- - co CO IO CM o Tf CM CM CM CO Tf CO CO Tf co
O O Tf
IO IO en O) co IO to - O en cn CM CM O co co IO IO 00 CO CO -
00 Tf Tf Tt 00 CO - - -
Tf
CO
tO
CO
tO
<
CM o in N- IO cn IO to 1 - N- N- N
T
Tf
en
Tf
CO CM
CM
CM CO
N00
CO
Tf
Tf
O
CO
IO
o o o IO o O O
to Tf co to
o to o en CM IO N- co co CO Tf co
Tf
to O O en CO to IO O) O) co co CO
IO IO Tf IO cn T- Tf co Tf Tf
_
O en Tt IO CO t en ~ CO 00 O io co to O CO Tf Tf Tf Tf Tf Tf
T_
.00
Tf
Tf
Tf
O CO - - - 00 00 00 Tf Tf Tf Tf
-I
O O o O O o 00 CO 00 o
CO CO
CO
CM
o o o IO
o o o to
O O O IO IO
O o o in
O
Tf
CO
Tf co to co to co CM CM O O cn O) cn O O O O O o Tf co N- IO co - N- - IO co O Tf O CM 00 CM CM CM - CM CM CM CO CO CO CO
00 Tf Tf O O CM Tf CD O O O O O O O O IO CO CM - O Tf CO Tf co CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
UJ
co
ffl
co co
co co
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
CM CM CM
< _
"
^^
s
73
I-J
00 00 to CD to N- CO tn 00 . O) to CO CM CM - - - T" CM CM
tu'
C
*m**
""^
_
) en co to CO O to o o - Tf N- to o CM T- in to m N- Tt io co CO to tn en - " CM - CM CM
CM
CO
to
CM
O O
CM
CM
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
X X X
**
CM
o co
Tf o CM o CO CO CO Tf
> * oc
O t O .
CO
Tf
m to
t
to
to
co
CO
CO
CO
co
CO
CO
co
CM
CM
CM
5 5 5
CM CM
CM
*"
CO
r-
T-
co -
"
CO
CO
CO
co co co co co
CM
CM
CM
TT
Tf
TT-
CM
CM
en Tf
to
Tf
CO
CM
NCM
CO
o CO co to
en co N- Tf - en CO to co 00 IO Tf IO to
en co CM N- - 00 en N- to IO to Tf
CO
CO
en CO CO
IO
Tf
CO
en Tf
CO
- - co co to
N- CO IO to
OO
Tf
00 IO IO Tf to Tf N- - . Tf
co co co to IO IO IO IO
o O o o o o o O O O O 00 CO 00 CO to Tto 00 CM CM CM CM CM CM T- CM CM CM CM CM CM CM
-
O O o O en CO N- O
O
O
O
O
O
CM
00 O
N-
CO
CO
en -
en cn en o
CM
CO CO Tf
Tf
O O Tf
CO CO
Tf
73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73
X X
555555553ssS555sS55B:
Tf
o o
CO CO
TT -
CM
Tf
IO - 00 en
CM
CO
Tf
to
>
cm
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
X X X X X X
flC
S 00 8 00 0 00 CO OO CO * ^ *** c m< e m< m< J J j J J J J -m J J JO J . CL . O. a. : ' 'S ' ' : '3 '5 'o 'o " " O ' o : o OC oc oc te OC OC cc oc oc ce cc oc te te cc oc cc cc cc cc cc
r (0 o I
f"
m.
fm.
f-
(ff (0
1_
(0
3
f
3
m.
3
m-
(ff
m.
3 3 3 mt * *
3
m.
3
m.
3
mm
3
m-
3 3 ari
mm
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 mt J - J J J J S
m.
'
- en - CM co Tt m ( N- CO co o ( t (O - - - N- - - N- - - co
m.
CM
CO
co Tf ta to - co cn o - cm co 00 co CO 00 co co oo oo cn ) o o>
272
"
CM CM
io
CM CM
Tf 00
ro m CM
Tf
CM
CM
00 co
00 en N- N-N-CON-TfOOCOCMlO CM 00 CM CMCMCOCMCMCOO-n-Tf
o
^
- to to 00 O co IO to CM Tf IO to - co - 00 cn CO - CO en co IO - to - - CO
CD
CM
CO
>.
- - Tf 00 - en - to en CM IO to ) 00 to 00 co io CO co to O) to - o CM CO ) - co co O - CM CM CM 00 o CD 00 ) - to CM CM CM CM CO
to CM Tf Tf to cn to en - m IO IO IO C0 co CO co co CO 00
^_
0 0)--(?
CM
<
>
CM
<
Tf
00 - O CO co - T CM to N to IO CM 00
en
co CM co Tf Tf to to O) - CO CO co CM co O) en oo O) - T- Tf 00 CO - " - oo - CM CM CM IO IO
co
CM CM
^_
^_
,_
IO
CO
N- CD to Tf IO en CM to
o co co IO IO
ocMCMoocnocoSm TtlOT-T-T-00C0S_r
C0COTfTfTfC0C03 ifltoiowmo^"
OOOOOCOCMlOtO
_J
O to co CM CO to o o 00 Tf co IO en Tf N- O) Tf O co to Tf en - Tf IO O CM co 00 O) CM CM O CM CM CO CM
CM
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo CM CM CM CM CM
OOOOOCMCOIOO
OOOOOOCOOTf
CMCMCMCMOOinTftOin
CO
CM
00
CM
CO
CM
co
CO
CO
CM
CO
CM
CO
co co co co co
CO
00 C0COCOCOCOCMCOT-C0
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 555555553
CM
co
CM
co -
CM
co
CO
CO
CM
CO CM CO
co co 00 co co co co OOCOOOCOCOCMCOt-OO
^m
**
73
IO IO to IO
en Tf
Tf
CO
-
IO to IO
CO
-
- N- N- N- N- Tf Tf Tt Tf Tf O) en en cn en 00 Tf Tf Tf Tf Tf IO
"ST
>_
o
CM
CM CM
Tf IO co 00 co CO cn O to 00 en IO IO to CM 00 - IO co N- en IO to IO Tf O Tf to IO CO IO CM IO en o 00 - CM TO - Tf - o CM CO Tf - o CM - Tf co CO Tf co co Tf Tf CM '* CM "I CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM 00 CM CM CM co
co
CT
(ff
T3o
CC
< < < < < < < < < < < < <
o o
CM
o o
CM
o o
CM
o o
CM
o o
CM
o o
o o
CM CM
ui
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
X X X
X X X X X X X
MMNWOO UjUjUjUjljjGCCCCCCC
2 2 2 2 2 = 00000 = =
_____73737373
co Tt
CM CM
CM
CM
co Tf
mcQfflOoooo10
CM
r> Tt
in
00 o
IO to
IO to o (O t (O N- ~^^--
-
CM
*.
m.
CO
Tf
CO
Tf
UJ UJ UJ UJ
c
^
3
JC*
J J J J j o 00 3 3 3 3 3 J J _l -1 -J _l _l
>
>
J j
-I
tl) J J J j 3 3 3 3 3 -J _l -i _)
>> >
>
>
^SSSSSSSSSSSSSXXXX
OC
'
OC CC
35
Cv
g0
-
55
co Tf
m
uoobeececeoe
(ff
-J
Tt (f) N- ro en O en en O) O O) en o
CM
CO
Tt
O O O
IO (O o
en o o
CM
lON-COCnOT-CMCOTf
273
(0
*
A
en
S
~
^
M
ce
>
ja
a
mS
s &
VI
5 ,_
c
jsn
i
>
to
CT
ja
>
>
o to
7
s
>
TJ
SE
. O
O
mm.
c o
o
m,
) O)
>
VI
(0 (0 (0
73
ce Q.
>
o c
co
<n
a.
oc
(0
>
mCD
<^
c
o
ro c
CT
(O
(O
mm
ococccocococoeocccocococoeoeccccceoeccccocccococccocccccccccoc
OC
8
en oo o - to CM CM co
CO CO
-
IO
CM
NNIO
en
NCM
CO
to
Tf
oo
Tf
IO Tf CO
COtOCOtON-OOCON-N-T-Tf
en -
OOi-N-OOlO-n-N-N-TftON-OCMCMN-IOTf
CO
NTf
to
-
en
tococoeoenio^^to en
^
tn
co to N- en Nn- cm en O oo oo -~ to Nco co O o
cm -- -
Tf
CM
oo io
CO
CM
IO Tf en o
Tf
LO
CO
Tf co to
to to
IO
00 o - o O) CM CM en
-
to en Tf
Tf
to
co . o co co o o co en
en o CM o
Tf
-
CD CO
CO
- co 00 co CO - CM
co
to
CM CM
00 CO CO co co IO CO co CM IO
-
to to
CM
CO CO CO
o to
-
CM
Tt
IO
CM
CM
cn o Tf CM o Tf
*
CM
to Tf - co co en ^_
-
h.__N-oencnio_.cococniOTfT-
Tf IO IO CM - - CM ,rtirt'T-<ON.COCO-rCMN.TtcOIOOCOOTtT-1>"cntOtOO)OTtoOCON.COO
^T-N-T-lOOO^IOTfCOlOlOCM
cMiocotoioenT-TfocoT-to OOCOOOCOlOTflOIOIOlOCOtO
IO 00
^"T-CMCMT-T-^CMCMT-COTtT-T-T-CMCO^T-CMT-COlOOOCMTfT-TfN-
fflfflfflfflfflfflffl<<<<<<ffiffifflfflffl<<<<<<ffl<<
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM0O0O0O00QO0O0OCO00COCOCOCMCM73737373
CMOMCMCMCMCMCMOMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM-^-JJ-JJ
73 73 73 73 - - _ _
ujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujujuj
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
3 5 5 5
Tf Tt co co ^ Tf Tf COCOTfTfTfcOCO<52f5^^^SSTf2,2LCOrrTf2L2; m w
N
1-T-T-OOOT-rf<<rf<
BC0CMSCM2SSSSSco2S20C)S2eoS2S IOtOCT-CMO)OCMS??CM23ScM2;SCM22;CM5S
uj uju2ujujujujJ2uiuj2ujuj2ujujgS3 '" "
f <<3<<<<<<<<<<
#
|122
m CO
o Tf
co
CO
Tt
CM
CO
.S^ffifflcocococo
ScoTfininmin S CM CM CO CO CO CO w ffl ffl ffl -+ W CM CM ffl H H \- rn
Tf
M
m* m*
m*
73 73 73 73 73 73 73
UJ LU LU UJ
T-CMCOTflOCON-COO)
cMcoTfintoN-ooenoT-cMcoTfmioN.oocnoTT-T-T-T-T-T-T-T-CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCOCO
274
**
co
en (
TJ
(ff
m.
O
CJ
>
ja
TJ
O
mZ
I
1
IIIIIII11III1IIII
^^
>
"
VI
73
-
CT
tj
GC
^^
5
^m.
Je 3
>
ja
'
lili
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
.
o
p^^
cc
S to >
00
o 0)
>
in to
CO
in
O Tf
co
TCO
-
CM
CM
1
cn to Tf
llltlltllllllllll
>
>
>
-o
to
VI
( (
(0
o
.
73
OC
o
o c
CO
>
o.
-^
o.
TJ
>
tn
2
3s.
c
C
O
CO
c
CT
(0
Q
co co co co 00 Tf 00 to Tf co S m co co co 00 cc co CM CM CM CM
-*
(0
c
m.
i.
OC
*
<
o a a.
O o_
fl
CO
IO co - N- IO
O O O
CM
Tf
Tf
co io
CM
CM
io
CM
en
CO
CO
tn
|BBBJ
CM O IO en CD CD Tf IO en to ) 00 Tf io IO CO CO - N- Tf CM en 00 -
cn
to to en -
co
-
CM
00 N
CM CO IO IO IO ) N- cn - - -- co Tt CM Tf -n- en to Tt 00 CO 00 CO CM Tf CD Tf CO CO IO
IO coN-oococoenTfTfcocotocnoococniOTf
Tt
CON-t-t-OMt-OOIOCOIOt-CMCOOIOt-
00 - 00 CM Tf en - m ) co
N- O Nco Tf O
CM CM
CM
CO 00 CO CO
O O O O O N-N-N-N-oocoN-ON-oooco-n-ooen
O
co N-
Tf
CM
Tf O
en -
00 O
O O O co CO N- - to oo 00 CO CO
co co
io - co IO CM
OO
co
CD
no)N
CO
CO CO
;>"
l . .
73 73 73 73 T3 T3 cd n ffl m co m 73 ~ 73 73 73 Q O O O
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
5 5 5 5 5 5
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
X X X X X X X X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
LU LU LU LU LU UJ UJ UJ
LUUJUJUIUJUJLUUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJ
CM
CO
Tf m co n- oo en
OT-CMcoioN-oocnOT-cMcoTtinioN-eo
3 Wt
3
< <
oc oc oc oe cc oc
O Q O O
S n S S ff ff ff ff UOOOOOOOCJU
mm
mm
ss ff ff s ff is pc pc pc pc pc pc pc
mm
mm
mm
^m
mm
CM
CO
Tt IO t - co en co co co co co CO Tt
CO
Tf
iN co ^
^r
IO (NC9CDOrMCO^U)(DNQO)OrN
t
^^U)IOIOIOIOIAU)U}IOU)(D(0(0
275
m.
ta
cn (O
TJ
ja
TJ
*^
1111
1
cn co oo
1
CM
I
**
*-
^ '
>
VI
o" o* o"
co o
73
^
to
m.
CT
en co
TJ
ce
--
'
5
^m^
j 3
>
J5
en -- N00 CO iT
m CD
CO
IO to
IO
IO
2
S
a.
TJ
"
lili
1
>
co
CM
co co CM co
-
I I
1 1 1 1
CO
"
00
>
*
TJ co
TJ
O
C
> >
a.
O O ^
ll
o
I
cm
CM
CM
en
CO
CM
CO CM
TJ
to
VI
00 co ) co CM co O) - - co cn oo N- N- in co en - CO - O CM CM CM CM CM co CO - Tf - ID Tf - CO - - - CM CM CM Tf Tf IO O O O o o O O O O O O o o o O O O
(0
m.
o O
73
OC
wm.
IO IO Tf CM - ) Tf o O 00 co - Tf CM
en en co
CM CM
O) 00 co cn -- Tf
CO CO CO
CD
Tf
. >
- CO - OO O N- en oo CO CO 00 CO - - CO en co IO Tf CO Tf Tf IO CO -
to
o
CO CO
Tf O Tf - IO - - co - " OM
m ) en co - 00 co io co IO - co co co o o CM CM -
i- o oo co to - CO OO en - IO Tf CM Tf - en o ) en co oo - - to
en N co co to
- in CM to - CM IO CM CD -- Tf IO
co io
CO CO
Tf cn O co
CO CO
co CO CO O O O co co co N. - CO
IO o
Tf
CO
co
CO CO
CO CO
TJ
>
to
SI!
cm
to CO CM Tf O co co CO CM co co O co O to IO CM IO IO - CO CO
CM
CM
CO
Tf Tf CO to IO IO
CM
CM CM 00 O co - CO Tf 00 IO en to en CM Tf o CM o to Tf CM CM o CM ) co - CM o co CO
CM
O -
00 co cm o N- Tf N- en en
CM
00 CM CM o ) O o en CO CO Tf CM CM CO - N- en en CO
- CD co CO IO co o - CO co CO IO
CO
<
C O
*
en co en CO CM to CM Tf O o - IO 00 Tf io o IO 00 o - OM - - CM - CM O
T-
lO CM - O co Tf CO
ID - m CM Tf in
CO
Tf
co IO 00 o en 00 CO CO CM Tf IO ) CM - - o CO CO en CO - CD CM - oo IO Tf en N- CO CD - IO o to CM IO to - -- co en ID - CO en O IO Tf 00 Tf Tf co co Tf co CO Tf Tf Tf Tf CM CO CO CM co Tf CO
CO
^_
ta c
CT
o o
o o
o o
co
O o Tf O
CO
(0
73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Tf
X X X X X
UJ UJ UJ
555555555555555555555
<0
t-
o O o en - cm o Tf o CM co co co co CO Tf
UJ
co
Tf
CO
O Tf
CM
Tf
( > 00 O)
CM
CO
Tf to - 00 en O
CM
CM
CM CM
UI UJ UJ
UJ LU
X X
CS
m.
c
_
im
(ff
c
m.
(0
cc
. . . . . .
c 3
3 3 3 J JC* mC 00 00
J j
3 3 3 mt J * 00 O 00 J J J J J 3 J 00
3 3 S 3 3 mt mi. mi. j * c o o 00 00 e 00
3
mm m mi.
3 J
! : ! ! : ! !
OC
ce oe oe cc oc oc oc oe cc oc ce oc oe cc cc cc oc
CM
' ! :
J J J J J J J J J J
"
e5
O
CC
! :
ce oe
z .j
co Tt m to - 00 cn - CM CO Tf m to - co en o to to to to ( ( to - - - - - - - - - - co 00
CO
co Tt m to - CO o O - CM CO 00 00 CO 00 oo co co en ) en en
276
co
en to
TJ
(ff
A
^-v
-*
u c
co
**
> >
ja
TJ
>
-'
VI
73
fr
to
(ff
,.
CT
C_
TJ
1_
3
U
cc
^^^
5
^m.
>
ja
(0
*""*
III
llllllllll
.
TJ
CC
"
I
I I
1
1
TJ co
>
llllllllll
00
>
TJ co
TJ
cc
-*
> >
a.
CM
C -3
TJ
co
VI
o co O) o CO CO - - IO CM CM co CO CO CO Tf o o o o o o O O
- - 10 co oo CM co co O O O o
CO
>_
o
o
73
OC
co en
CO
CO
*-
>
- - CM CM m 00 CM CO IO CM co co 00 00 Tf co co CO CO CM
CM CM CM CM
CM CM CM CM
TCM OO
CM CM
CO CM
O) O) to
CO
en Tt
CO
O
CO CO CM
Tf
CM
Tf
CM
Tf
CM
Tf
CM
CO CM 00 Tf CM 00 00 o C0 T- O - - 00 N- CO IO co to to - Tf
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO
CO
co co OM 00 - IO ) - CO
CM
Tf
-
co m
00 co O
CO
oo O
en IO IO Tf Tf N-
^^
".
oe
>
co
2
%-*
en . CD en co - O) cn - to
00
00
CO
CO
in N-
CO CD
in o
- CO IO CO CM N- cn io N- ca s s
-I
CO
rt o
m in CM O en CM CO CM N- - co en - en Tf CM CO O) CM en CM o co m
OOOOOOOOOO N-COIOOCMIOt-COIOCO
CMTfCMCMtOCnCOTflOT-
TtT-OOCOCOCDCDN-CMNCMCOCOCMCMCMCMCMCOCM
i" Sff
io
cn IO co Tf ) Tf oo
--
o IO -
T_
IO o
-
CM
CD
CM
Tf
<rf
C
co
CM
00 Tf -
in
tn ) en co co CM CM Tf CO Tf
IO CO Tf Tf
Tf - CO oo cn -T- oo in in CO Tf
Tf
cm
Tf
co CO ) - - cn - CO CO CM CO IO CM Tf
J?
(ff
5 5
8 o <*
OC
o o
CM
OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO
CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
si
CM
<
73 73 73 im lm
uj UJ UJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJUJ X X xxxxxxxxxx
o " uj cc te
oe cc
l-
co Tf
CM
CM
CMCOTfinT-CMCOTf
CM
< <
fflfflfflfflOOOO
00 -CMintOOT-CMtON m lDCOCOlOlONN.N-N.N-
<
Tt
CO Tf
LU UJ UJ UJ
c 3
mi.
OC
3 mt
00 00 3 3 3 J J -1 -J -J
J J J J J J J J J J J J
3 3 3
1 1
> >
3 3 -1 _l
3 J
3 1
O o 3 g -J
*2222222222222^
! !
oc
Tf
CC
CM
5555555555
ojoouujuuij
sc
^ t t t
oc cc cc cc
(0
in to - 00 en en en en en O)
CO
Tt m o o
to o
- CO en OT-cMcoTftntoN-oocn o
CM
CM
CM CM
00 Tt
CM CM
277
73
2
ce
C C
eldma
.
-*-.
N-
CO
Tf en
CM
Tf cn - T~ Tf oo
N. o to CM
CM
l ' ? S
Tf co N. 00 m
o
>" <*
CO
-
Tf
cm"
00
00
Tf
CO - co Cn to" CM ^
CO
Tf
- Tf
A28 A2 42 42 B B B t
ce
Cl e (ff
2
cc
Q.
CL
cl
cc
CL
9-
UJ
ce
9-
*>
9-
II
-i
Ill
2
mm
9-
h-
-S1-1
"5
o
TS
>
Ui
2
jm^
( (
c*
co
CT
(0
_l
111,9
lifi
cu
iet re
73
U.
OC
--,
<o
". .
00
o CD 00 o 00 Tf
CM
N. W.
CO CM
CO
io"
CO
CM
00 o
-
tn
Tf
CM
it)
CM
CM
co*
CO CM
00 N- 00
co
"*
CM
) (
co
o" o"
U.
73
73
116,3
--,
--1
37,4
in
IO - IO CM IO N- "* co O) IO N- Tf CM **- CM CM Tf
K- co - * "^
CO
CM
00 IO o
IO O) IO oo
to
CM
"l "I
cm
en
--*
cn -- co
cm"
en
2 Tt
t-
10,1
9,8
27,8
f* i
Tf N-
27,0
1 co IO co co
o to o
CM CM
CM
"1 "1
'
'
'
to" N-"
* " T-
cn
CM
'
CM
to
S "* CM
co cn IO o O) CO U) 00 *1" Tf '
CO
CD
o
CM
""".
OO
to cn
en cm
00
CO
"""L
co en
" o o"
NO
CD
to o*
-
*~
00
73
k
N- CO CM to to en TCD
CM
co
CM
CO
Tf o co oo O) Tf 00 O) CD N- CM CM IO CM co CO CO CM CM CM o
-
Tt cn 00 o o
- ) O co CM O Tf co o Tf CO o o o
CO CO CO CO
T-
Tf
O cn
o
CM
CM
CO CO CO -
to
- CM IO IO co CM Tf Tf Tf en CO IO 00 CO CM CO CM o - - CM CM - o o o o o o
CO CO CO
T-
to
N- CM CD IO CO 00 O O O o o o Tf Tf
CO
,_,
73
m.
CO
CM CO CO co IO - IO IO co - CO CO IO CM - - CO CO CM o o o o o
co en co IO co - CM IO oo CM CM CO CM
CM CM
Tf N- Tf CM CO o en en co co o - co co co CO CO co
CO
CD
co O) io N- IO 00 en CO CM o o - CM o o o o
Tf Tf 00 o
N- CO Tf CO O) CO - O o o
O O O OJ o o
CO
CO CD
CM
O o
CO
O o
CM
73
CO >_
en m co o o co co Tf - CO co co en io CM en CM oo o N- en oo en IO to en en co - - IO O CO Tf CO IO - Tf Tf - CO - co Tf Tf co to co Tf CO IO CO - cn en CO O) - o CM CM CO CO CM CM CM CO CO o o o o o o o o O O O o
N- Tf tO O N- IO CM CM CO IO NT- CM o o o
io to to
- O N- NO O
CM
CM
CM
T3
CO
oo o o
oo o o
in o o
Tf o o
en Tf o o
- CO Tf co co co CM CM o o o o o o o
en N- o 00 00 o o N- CM o Tf
CM
CM
-
o o
_
o o
co - o o o
co en CO - o o o o
io co to - CO to CM CO o o o o o o o
en en IO o
-
en Tf
CM
o o
- N. N- N- CM CM 00 CM CM Tf o o o o o o o o o o
co co oo cn - IO N- CO - CM CO Tf
o o
o o
o o
o o
Tf
oo o cn en oo - - oo -- en O - CO CO CM CM o CM CM O O O O O O O o o o
IO Tf CO o en cm en - OO O CM OO o CM co o o O O O o o
CM CM
en co
o o
CM
o CM N- CO IO CM N- O) 00 CM CM CO - CM CM CM o o o o o o o o
O to
to in o IO CD -
oo co cn co to CO - CM o
Tf Tf
Tf
CO
CM
Tf
Tf
CO
CO
co 00 o en Tf 00 00 CM
o CM i- Tt - IO - to IO 00 o 00 oo N- co to - en 00 CO IO NIO co co Tf
-
O
CD
O)
CM
CM
CO
O Tf
o CM CM O en co 00 Tf CO CM co -
00 - N- Tf CM IO IO - CD O) IO NCO 00 O 00 N- o
CO
Tf
CO
CM
CO
Tf
^C *o ^C ^C ^C ^C
O O O O O O o
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM
o
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM
CM CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UI UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X
CM
NNW, lu uj 5 3 5 3 X XXX
CM
Tf Tt Tf ta co co tn to cn - cm - - - O O 73 73 73 73 73
CO
CO
CO
CM
co Tf
CM
CO Tf
CO
Tf
CO
Tf
co cn o O T73 73 UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ yj
00
CO CO
00 co
UJ LU
Tf (7)
CM
co Tf
f? ffl ffl CO CO co co S: Tf Tt co Tf to co 2 co tt tn to tn m
5
CM CM ffl ffl ffl ffl m < < H H H- rCM CM
CM CM
co co co co
< <
UJ UJ LU LU UJ UJ
SJ
jjj
UJ LU LU LU LU UJ
mnn
CM
! ! ! ! ! ! !
OC
te te cc cc cc cc cc cc
ce cc oc oc oc ce ce cc cc ce ce ce oc cc cc te te te te te te te
iiii
tn to
! ! ! ! I !
num
w
CM
CO
Tf m
to
N> 00 en
T-
CM
CO
Tf
N- oo en o
CM
CM
CM
CM
co Tf
CM CM
co n
CM
to
CM
en
CM
CO
CM
CO
278
"
,_,
en
Tf
CM
73
o
oc
c c
eldma
IO cn co cn o CM co
CM
Tf
CO
T-
co en N- N- O
CM CM
N IO
CM CM
CO
CO
0J
OJ
CM
-
CO
CM
00 Tf
OJ CO
N-
CM
O) en co NTf CM N- Tf
CO
CM
CM
CM
IO tn en en"
CO
CO
O)
to
TJ
&.
9.
UJ
2
w
9"5
c
f)
UJ
<-<c
^,
co
to
CM
co
CT
(ff
r-
ce oc bc
.j
R
CL
re iet
>
co
73
u.
U. oc
Tf N- O CO o -
N- O Tf to
Tf
T-
N-
CO
en
to
en ) OJ CM
00 en O) O to CD co IO 00 f
CO
CM
CO
CM
OO
N.
CO
m N- 00 N- oo - co N- to co co CO N- 00 CO CO co - Tf
TJ
cc
73 73
CL
fc
(0
CO
en N.
CM
in
CO
N- N- IO CM 00 - CO - CM - CM CD CD O N- - Tf Tf 00 Tf Tf N- O N- NCM CM CO Tf CM CM 00 to OO -
CM
Tf
CO CO
o
CM
cn IO N- m
CO
-
00 00 o w
CM
N- in
CM
-
cn - o en N- - 00 CM
T-
CM
O
-
T-
CM
CL
JMM^
r-
oc
CL
co m co
IO
-
O CM Tf en CO ) IO O CM CM
'
-
Tf - N- co Tf 00 - N- co O
IM
' '
00 Tf
O
CM
Tf
CO
00 co
)
-
IM Tf
IO CM
T-
IM
CM
T
in
'
CM CM
N- ) IO 00 m CO Tf io
CM CO
t_
CO
-
to
CM
00 N. 00 ) 00 en <o <
73
co
1
9-
LU
co N- co CM CO CM co Tf N- 00 - co CM o O - CO O O
Tf
O) co o
Tf CO IO CO O) O T 0J CM cn in en N N- CM Nco Tf CO Tf Tf co O O O O
IO NCO O N- Tf O O
NCO
CO
co
IO Tf IO 00 CO Tf Tf O O
to O O
CO
en
CM
co co
O
CM o CM Tf CM co N- CD co CO io to Tf - O O) 00 CD o CO CO co CM CM co Tf 00 co co OJ
o
-
^,^
TJ
(
73
CO 1
N-
9-
cn OO - cn 00 Tf co en CO 00 en o CM io CO Tf o o O CM Tf o O O O
CD
m.
co en CD N
CD
CO
CM
CM CM
Tf O
en co co CM o O
-
m
-
en en
00 IO CM CM Tf O O O
T-
NTf 00
o
CO CO CO CM
NTf Tf
oo IO IO co in IO Tf m to IO oo CO oo co co 00 CO co TCM co N- co CO co co Tf - co co CO co CM co CO CM OJ co CM CM CM O O o O o o o o o o o
O CO co IO to
CM CM
O
-
O
-
O
CM
73
CO -
CM CO N- CM CD N- CM O O CM CO CM co Tf O) CD 00 CO CO N- CM 00 Tf CO 10 CO - CO N- IO CM CTI en en IO 00 IO CO T to Tf IO O CO N- ) CO to IO O O o CM Tf CM Tf 00 CO CM CM CO Tf CO CM Tf CO CM CO O o o O O O O o O O o O O O o O
io Tf co co co co CO in co CM co CO en CD co o co co CM CM co 00 o o o o o o
-
o Tf cn Tf en O
CM
00
O
-
CO
O CD IO 00 CM CM
O
-
- m
73
CO V.
CM
CD
- Tf 00 en N- CO
Tf o o
cn oo o
CM
-
CO
T
o
-
O
CM
CO
-
OJ
Tt
O O
io o o
-
CM
CO CO
Tf
O O
to o
CM
CM
Tf
-
00 O co
CO
CM
- co co o
O O O
CM
CM
CM
CO
CM
CO
O O
O O
CO CM
O O
o o
O O
CO
CM CM
CM
o O IO IO co CO CM CO o O o o
o O
O
CM CM
N- 00 o co O o CM IO o O co 00 CM co 00 o o o o O o o o o O
N- co to
CM
CM
00 ) ) tn co co Tf O O o O o
Tf O
o
Tf
CO
CO
-
CM
CM
CM CM
co co O) en
CM
IO
O
CO CM
CM
CO CM
co co to
CM
to
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO
CM CO
Tf
CO
CD
CM CM
to
)
CM
CD CD
CJ)
Tf
co
00 - co 00 CD CO co Tf ID ID co CM to IO CO CO OO in T Tf CD Tf - o - Tf co IO Tf CD co O CM O en Tf Tf CO to Tf Tf Tf Tf 00 CO Tf ) CM O O - N- CM N- CO IO - - - en - CO CO - en co - - - N- TCM CM
Tf
CO
-
co
CO
OJ
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO
CO
00
CO
co co co co co co
CO
Tf
Tf
lO
73 TJ 71 TJ TJ TJ
ffl ffl ffl ffl ffi ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl ffi ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl ffl
00
O O O O O O O o O O O O o o o o o o O O O o o 73 73 73 73 73 73 o o o O O O o o O O O O o o o o o o o O O O o o CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM OM CM CM i -e =: SS UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UI UI UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UI UJ UJ
X X X X X X X
X X
X X X X X
CO
CO co co Tt 00 to Tf
CO CO
&
CM
00 Tf
to to
N-
GO
en
CM
CO
IO - 00 en o
CM
TCM
CM
CM
CO CM
Tf
CM
tn
CM
t
CM
N- 00
CM
CM
LU UJ LU UJ LU
H 1- t-
! ! !
! !
CC
oc cc
CM
CO
Tt
tn
CO
to
CO
co co
- 00 en o T- CM CO Tf co co co co Tf Tf Tf Tf Tf
tn
Tf
to Tf
- oo cn O Tf Tf Tf m
m-
CM
tn
co Tf tn tn
m to tn to
. 00 O) O - CM IO tn m to 10 te>l
279
2.
o
oc
73
LU
rl
CO
-
lete
oc
73
O) oo IO CO co 00 m to CM* N. co co 00 co CM
OM
Tf
00
OM
CT)
00
co
CO
CM
00 )
CO
- IO
co*
CO
CD
co - to
IO
to
O) W. Tf O) co
co"
oc
CL
R R R
UJ
&.
9-
TJ
CS
9- 1?
TJ
9-
LU
<-m
LU
2
+m
9-
H-
2.
1-I
8 UJ
to
<<
"
t 2
CM
co
CT
1_
CC
(ff
~j
R lifi L
c
dman
mm.
73 CL LU
Jmt
) 00 IO
en Tf O) O
co
CM
IO 00
Tf
co CM CM - co - co
en - to
co oo 00 IO IO oocncoeocoN.Ttioco CO 00 - to tOTfCON-N-N-lOIOtO
cc
TJ
73
CL
F^
t en IO TCO
(0
CL CL
T^
CM CM
CO
CM o T- - to
to CM Tf en Tf co 00 Tf Tf
CO
IO - 00
IO CM CO co IO IO Tt
Jmt
- 00 to 00 IO to
00
CM
O
CO
en Tf co en o o - co CM ro Tf < co - CM CO Tf
-
-
CO
-
co
I
en CD co N- IO
CO CO
'
CO
73
03
cn 00 CM - co Tf 00 io IO CO 00 N- CM to CO o N- 00 CM CM Tf Tf CM O o o O O O
CO N- CO NT N. CO 00 - IO Tf 00 00 CM Tf 00 00 CM o O o o O O
co 00 Tf Tf IO Tf Tf co ) CD N. CM OJ IO IO Tf - en CM o co o - CM to CM O O - o O
OOCMt-t-t-t-t-t-
ooooooooo
O)
CM
73
CO
CO
00 to o - O) CO O) to on IO CO CD . - CM 00 - to o O) en CM CM CM 00 Tf - 00 o o o CO - 00 00 00 O CM o o O O O o o o o o O O o
OOOOOOOOO
73
m.
03
IO Tf en o 00 Nco N- 00 co CM Tf o O o
co
,_
Tf 00 Tf 00 O
to CO CM to co Tf Tf o CM to - 00 CM en 00 Tf to Tf co oo CM IO Tf Tf 00 CO oo to CM - Tf oo CM - O O) en ) O) CM CM CM o O o
to
Tf
CM OO
O
Tf
-
OOOOOOOOO
N-cocniococncMiocM
T-COCON-CMT-TftDTf
73
*_
ce
o o
Tf O O
NID oo o o
o -
- en O
CO
-
Tf
to
-
en O O
CM
O o
en ID Tf Tf co CM o o o o o
CM
00 o IO oo CM CM IO Tf Tf Tf en o o o o o o o
CO
-
CO
00
O
CM
Tf
-
Tf
CM
CMCMCMt-t-t-t-t-t-
OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO
Tf
en 00 N- to
CO CM
-
Tf
co IO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO CM
O
t
CM
Tf
o O - CO 00 IO CM 00 CM N- O) CO N- to O IO co CM cn en CM Tf CM to o IO co 00 CM CO CO 00 Tf Tf Tf
IO oo co IO
Tf
to 00 IO co CO io co
to to
O CM IO 00 00 CM
CM
CM CO
00 to
CO CO
CO CO
CO
CO CO
to
co
ffl ffl ffl < < < < < < 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 737373737373737373 o o o O o O O o o o o o o O O Tf O o Tf o 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 737373737373737373 CM CM CM CM co CO Tf co co Tf m cl) ffi ffi m m
X X X X X X
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ LU
*"""""
O) o
CM
CM CO CO
o o
Tf
co co Tf
UJ
o o
CM
Tf
to
- 00 on
CM
CO
TfintoN-cocnoT-cM
X X X X
UI UJ
EEEEEEEEE
3
3
m.
Mm
eS
^m
eCm
o "j o
c (ff w im . -* . * . * . 0- o. . .
c
m.
(1)
3
m.
3
m.
mH
*********
333333333
00 00 00 eeeoooeoe
lm
lm
Kmm-mKK-mmmlmK
' '
CO
Tt
(O t
IO to - 00 c - CM co Tf tn to - 00 > to to to to (O - - - N> - - N- - - oo 00
CM
co Tt
CO
co
CO
280
oc
C C
,
en on to
en -
73
N- to
00
- Tf CM IO ) co co - Tf Tf IO en - to
73
m.
co
CL
73
LU
73 IJCC
I _.
oo to
CD
CM
io
- oo CM O 00 en Tf - IO IO IO -
00 Tf to Tt Tf co 00 CM
Tf
CO
CO
- in 00 N- 00 - to
CM
CM
CO
CO
t_
CM
CM
00
CM
CM
CM
00 Tf
CM
en
CM
TJ
73
ce
CL
h
(0
0)
Ni!
73
.
Cl
oe
N- O) O) _ o Tf CD io 00
CO
OJ CD Tf
CO
CM
CM
co IO Tf
Tf
00 -
Tf
00 O
-
00 cn 00 IO co 00 co
CM
CO CO
cm
cn Tf 00 en to CO CM - co in 00 N- oo 00 N- en O - 00 00 Tf CM
CL
*
**
) (0
CL
OC
73
CO
NCO
CM
co to
en
CM
Tf_
IO - CO "~ '
o"
'
CM
I
-
00* m '
Tf
-
oo Tf <
00 co N. o Tf Tf 00 N- co co Tf CD Tf
CD
T
Tf en o O) T- m
T
CO
CD
00
TT
CM
CO
T-
T-
9-
LU
"
m.
IO en Tf CD IO co o oo 00 - - o 00 IO Tf en o CM CM O - o o O O o co CM CO O o en Tf 00 en CO . o o - o o
N
I
Tf
-
Tf
O
00 O
CM CM co 00 CO co IO CM io - Tf CM CO o O O CO CM co O O o O o CM
CD
cn 00 CO - CO N- CM co cn CM CM to CO 00 en oo to cn to Tf CM co CM CM CM 00 CM CM o
-
o
CO CM
-
o en
CO
-
O
CO CO
-
to to CO o O) CO oo OO O o O
CO CO
CM
IO 00 N- to CM en co o co CM o o O
CO CM CM CM
TJ
ce
73
9- I?
TJ u.
.
"
n
i_
CD ^
co 00 N- O O
CM
- o
CM
- - N. O O O O O O
CM
_
O) IO O O O O
O
CO
- - O co 00 (O 00 OJ T in o ) CO - 00 CM 00 CM -
CM
CM
. N00 00
ID co Tf co
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
00 CM CM CM O O O
9-
o to o
-
o io o
-
CO
- CO co CO ) O) 00 o o
CM -
CM cn to IO co co 00 co 00 O o O O
Tf
CM CO
CO
CO
O O
o
o
-
O O CM IO CM Tco cn to Tf O CO CO co Tf en CD O N- CM - CO lO co cn o O ) IO co Tf CO 00 Tf Tf Tf Tf CO CM CM 00 CO CO Tf IO N- 00
CM
CM
CM
CM
OO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CO CO
-
O
CM CO
-
O
IO N00 O O
-=
to
UJ
73
CD
m.
Tf
-
IO
-
co Tf IO O
-
9-
2.
O
Tf
CM
00 00 CO IO CM co Tf O - ) O o O o o o o O O o o
CM > o
O to
-
CM o IO O O N- CO Tf - N- CO N- N- CD ID -
-
O o
o
CO
o
CO
en IO en IO 00 m o o o o
CM -
"5
e?
8 UJ
-5
3
Tf
O A
IO - . o o o o co CO en O) ) CM 0J CM co co co co co CM CM 00 CM CM o o o o O O o O
co co - N- to o
-
O O
to o
- co
Tf cm 00 oo_ CO Tf "L O CD o
CO
<5
(O to
?
*
CM
o t
CO CO
CO CO
IO 00 IO to o co 00 - o IO CO CO Tf IO oo 00 00 Tf Tf
Tf
o o
oo CM Tf to to o to O o CO IO IO CM IO io Tt Tf Tf Tf Tt Tf Tf
.
to Tf
CM
- m
CO CM CM
CO CO
CM
CM CO
CO OO
T-
Tf
to
in
N- o
CM
CM
IO O
CM CM
00
CO
CO
CM
00 00 00 00 CM CM 00 OO
CO
CM
OO
CM
00 co CM
O 00 co to en c*> Tf Tf Tf to Tf IO
~*
co
CT
73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 < < < < < < < < < < < < < 73 73 73 73 01) o o o O O o O O O 73 73 o o o o o O o o o O o O O " " O " " " " " CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM " " "
(ff
oc
DC
cc cc oc ce oc cc
OC OC
oc oc LU UI UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
CC
cc cc
DC
X X X X X X
CO Tf
CM
CM
CM
CM
co Tf
tn -
cm
co Tt m
m
CO
CM
IO (O to
m to o (0 (O t
T-
( - o < N N- - . 00 X >
CM
>
X
>
>
UJ UJ UJ UJ
u c 3
OC
> > 00 o 3 3 3 3 3 _1 _1 -I _l _
>> >
>
3 _l
3 _l
3 _l
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
0s
Cj
O O ce oc
65
y-
CJ
O O O
5
to
febfeb
N- 00 en o
CM
[i
CC
a*
ce oc cc
(0
*J
Tf If) t. co O) en o> en ) en en
CM
CO
Tf
( CO cn o o o
CM
CO
Tt
TCM
CM CM
co Tt
CM -3T
CN
281
1 .
t
y"
tf
,-y
- X
M y.Sd
282
I
--1
CpO-
4k,
f4Ebw}
r-~
-I
Him
---1-i
I
(pi)
2t
b3
(h-2t)w"f
(fy*Ao)
--
JP
JP
- -tUeff
(p0=
J^.,
(f7HTAo)bh\ 5h"
"^
\_ L
---H
1/2f1/2-
.2
1
h
^Mp^
p_ha
-(Nh-P)!
P h
;
"=(^+^W)2+4f^hA-f^
Jk^, Acr-^-irJ/^i,
iv
1,4
^40*. i/4,0
LOI.'t4L
f.
*f*
yL ^VX
^/^
K. - W -
\0J5
0,38()
Pc =
4Ebw'
Sh2
283
Mi
/
Mp/
>---
>-
available
SP-
-^Sl+0,25 (fvJ1+a).h.b
400
5.h
-/^..^] +4.fyW.h.b.tf.tw.Ao ^.
yM
R
a.
= < 1 2- .
1.1.2) Limitations :
9l+9r
Li
Li
Class 4 sections (which mean elastic local buckling) should not be evaluated with Feldmann's model but the present tables do.
1.2.1) "Class"
1.2.2) "S 235, S 355, S 460" 1.2.3)
= classification of cross-section submitted to pure bending, according to Eurocode 3 (" = class 1; "3w" = class 3 web; "2f ' = class 2 flange)"
= Steel grades (fy = 235, 355 or 460 Mpa) = flange slendemess = web slendemess with = 0,5 (pure bending) ; =^235/ f y (fy in [Mpa])
"b/tf." "a.d/tw.E"
".? trad]"
1.2.4)
"RavaLxLM"
=> to obtain the available rotation capacity for a given span, the number furnished in the table shall be divided by that span [given in meters].
284
1.2.5.1)
maximum span [in meters] allowable according to ULS and SLS criteria of Eurocode 3, for 3 point-bending beams, (with partial safety factors =1,0 for SLS and yp =1,5 for ULS):
SLS criterion: arbitrary limitation elastic deflection)
P.LJ
(here,
L
250
48E.I
,
L^
250.P
M max
1,5-P.L
_ Wpf .f y <Mpf =
YmO
4.Wpf.fy
max
'
l,5.L.Ym0
_i
c 12-E-LYmO
250.Wpf.fy
tables)
Class 3 and 4:
M max
lvlrtf V
TfrnO
-'fm max
l>5-L.Ym0
Hnax
_i
c 12.E.LYm0 1-~,- ,.
250.Wef.fy
(=
1.2.6.1) "LmaxKemp"
- Lmax =
'-^
- Lmax ULS, SLS according to ULS and SLS criteria of EC3 (see above item 1.23.1)
1.2.6.2) "RavaiL (Lmax Kemp)"
1.2.7)
was introduced here to easily compare Feldmann's model with Kemp's model (see Part 2, item 2.3.6). According to ECCS recommendations concerning graphs on pages 18-25, we introduce Li / (iz . ) = 60, which is maximum distance of distance between two adjacent lateral bracing in order to avoid LTB of 3-point bending beams.
285
tf
X
M y.Sd
286
2.1. Presentation of Kemp's theoretical model (extract from the paper of Kemp and Dekker "Available rotation capacity in steel and composite beams", The Structural Engineer/Volume 69/N" 5/5 March 1991)
X : lolcrot
restraint
177!
It,
li
Lb
Ar
.lp
lg.
pHp
HpV./Cli-lp)
Strain el etnt/ of
compression nan
,
t
rty.<Lp/(ti-lp)
fig. 7
Actual cuvelcM
strut Unetfc Cj l
T~V
Cn&ct of
Stoetxmoouka
stratn-hcrdennq
el elasticity. E
<*Ei,
fig. 8
Strain
Appendix A. Theoretical model for predicting available rotation capacity due io local and lateral buckling of steel elioni Local bueillnt The theoretical models proposed in this section refer to the ease or linear moment tradicnt shown in Fij 7, representnx approximately the rejion adjacent to an internai support ora continuous beam or to an caves joint in portal frames. Foltowint the proposals of Lay & Galambos", the local buckle is assumed to develop when the length of plastic rcjion of the ftanje
287
Piper: Kemp/Dekker
(1 in fix 7(o)) extends sufficiently fir to accommodate the futi wavelength of the cucile. Xerap* is rearranged the expressions and modified the assumption! of Lay it Gabmooi, Southwsrd . xnd Stowtll". resulting n the following formulae which may be solved jccraiivcly to give the plxstie length L^ at which fiante buekling would occur theoretically in the absence of membrane restraint:
on the strain condition in the compression flange are evaluated separately and thea coeibincd. The maximum vertical out-of-planc deflection *, of the extreme fibre of the flange due to local buckling may be assessed as:
*.<-
0-014
Xi-tL/LJHm/LJi
....(A.1)
'r
"V
U-5S-C/. ["/ji
....{.
where
l-/t Is the flange widih-to-ihiekaess ratio C 0-3 for no web restraint or 1-0 for optimum web restraint , is the longitudinal strain at buckling in the comprcssoo fiante at the aire of the buckled length and may be determined from ? 7 M as:
.,,(,+0-3 i-)
3 and
_<
....(A J)
"Web slendemess his been observed in tests as not causing significant strain-
weakening in isolation and having only a secondary effect ea strain* weakening behaviour due to local buckling of the liante aad distortion of the cross-section. From an assessment of test results it is proposed that he intencin between web aad fiante budini be considered by deiinint C, in eqn. (A.I) as:
where the initial imperfceon is assumed to be 0-Ol. ^ is the full wsefcigth of the local buckle given by eqn. (Al), and L> is the length bcr-c:a seesior-s of maximum and aero moment at which lateral buckSng is predicted by eejn. (At) for a denned length of the plastic region ,. This reflects the common observation, confirmed in "Dekker'j tests" and described above, that local buckSng Itnot itself an unstable strain-weakening process n the absence of lateral buckling which, nierai!. , release the membrane restraints to local buckling. . The shortening In length of a strut with a deflected shape represented by * sin(aVZO Is given approximately by A7*. in which L. a the half wavelength. The buckling of a flange with maximum veniea amplitude *, in eqn. <A) and a half wavelength of X. - 0-3L, therefor produ: a shortening in length of th extreme fibre of the flange rdadv to the atre of the flsnge of A,'/!, over a full wavelength L,. This obviously amplifies the lateral buckling of the compression flange. It is modelled approximately by considering an additional maximum amplitude of lateral dcilccson , over lh wavelength C-i. of the equivalent stmt from eqn. (AS) which gives the same shortening of th extreme fibre the fiante relative to Its centre, because of equal nd routions of -r*y Cij, I.e.
(A-3)
fc*,<P-36y<cu, - A.Vjy
Je.i -.-i-S-h.
....(A.S)
i-Urehtersienai
AucJtnr
LatcraJ-tonional buckling is considered' in terms of the lateral buckling of a strut comprising the compression flange and portion of the web in compression over the length'Q /*). between lateral restraints ia Tig 7. The results are adjusted nominally to allow for the cahaaccacnt of resistance due to torsional rigidity. This length is subdivided Into elastic and plastic portions as shown in Hg 7(d) which are adjusted to effceive lengths X-, and Lm allowing for moment gradient In the normal way and for the reduction from elastic modulus JTto strain-hardening modulus , sn the plastic region as follows:
This reflects the interaction between local and lateral bucking and should be added to th ntaximum amplitude of sinusoidal deflection of the flange due to lateral buckling t^ which is assessed as:
. _ .-caiLfi-e-i
*. U-(L/Lfl
in -which the initial imperfection is assumed to be -CtJlL -fi)
is again given by eqn. (A4).
(A.10)
and
L%
.The lateral curvature* a,* across the width of the flange due to these dfierions at distane:: from the yielded end of the equivalent strut Is given
-slist:
Plastic
....(.)
.by:
,...(AJ)
-A.+ ajrintrce/^A^1 ..'..(A.!!. At the entre of the local buckle in the equivalent strut a: - 0-3,, from
of the flange A falls below the yield strain ,. Le.
iii irAfr from "fig 7 at which the minimum strain on one extreme fibre
where at is the ratio of maximum moment to resistance moment M_/Mr L/Um, L) for Ener moment gradient In fig 7 and t E/E,
uriti.
These two lengths are combined to reflect an elastic dement subjected to a uniform axial force equal to that required to fully yield this strut. The critical buckling length i, between sections of maximum and zero moment is obtained by determining the value of L{ at which this equivalent strut reaches Its elastic buckling load: .
. *.C---3Mf-.. " ....(.) in which , Is the average strain in the flange at this section given by cqa.
(A2). Alternatively, In
value of i^andm.
eases of relatively compact flanges and large lateral slendemess ratios, the criterion or eqn. (A12) is applied at the centre the equivalent strut where 0-3<^i, from eqn. (A) to give a lower
.(A.)
where lm the radius of gyration of the flange and portion of web in compression and C, a the enhancement due to distortion-! restraint by the web and based en the analyses of Svensson", and the second author is given by:
-if.
.(A.7)
Rotation capacity Assuming the idealised stress-strain curve for steel shown In Fig t and simplifying the elasto-plastic transition, it is convenient to adopt trilinear moment-strain and moment-curvature relationships Illustrated In Figs 7(b) and (c) along each length i, between sections of maximum and aero moment. These distributions are based oa Lay's discontinuous yield theory"' and reflect the conditions at maximum load prior to the onset of strain-weakening behaviour. The following relationship between available rotation capacity and length of the plastic region Lf may then be derived from the area under the simplified curvature distribution in Fig 7(c). assumine the rotation capacity at which the moment falls below M, in "Fig 1 Is twice that at maximum moment:
'V-^;1
where ' is the proportion of the depth centres of th two flanges
(A-)
288
vav
= 2a.
<Pe
2.2.1.1)
<pJ5
(Feldmann)
(Kemp) = (ppfFeldmann)
<Pe=9L+<PR =
R
-
Mpf.Rd-L 2.E.I
Yield
Onset of strain-hardening
,
e=E/Es s=Ss/6y
Strain
e
= 50
,s
= 10.
where
Xe-Kf.Kw.
Ct,
L ^
where
= ^235/fy (f y in [Mpa])
Kf = ^f->
20
289
KW2=-
txd
f L,
OJalnf.tr
Kwl = 460-
|WKw2
400
{izc.z)}
b) 20 < --
,. 2c c
= classification of cross-section submitted to pure bending, according to Eurocode 3 ("1" = class 1; "3w" = class 3 web; "2f" = class 2 flange) = class of sections according to the ancient Eurocode 3 (1988) used in Kemp's model ("l/2f ' = class 1, 2 flange; "3/4f ' = class 3, 4 flange; "lw" = class 1 web; "2w" = class 2 web; "3w" = class 3 web).
Code
"Class Kemp"
Type of section
Class 2
Class 3
20. 20.
Elastic form
" "./,."
2.3.4)Particularcase 1:
"(ULS,SLS)Lmax[m]"
. SLS
elastic deflection)
P.L3
^ L
250
48 E.I
=>L2<48-EJ
250.P
290
- Class
and 2 :
Mm max =
1.5.P.L
WDf.fv
max
4-Wpr.fy
YmO
l,5.L.7mo
_
tables)
Class 3 and 4:
12.E.LYm0
250.Wpf.fy
Mmax =
=>P max
_ 4-Wef.f y
'
l,5.L.YmO
250.Wcf.fy
2.3.5)
n
= ^235/ f y (f y in [Mpa])
2.Lj = L in case of 3-points bending beams.
- Ljmax
2.2.2)
J-c'
(see limitations
- Lmax ULS SLS according to ULS and SLS criteria of EC3 (see present item 4)
'R-avail. min
2.3.7) "Lp"
TMp
*
Mrn=m.MD
=MpJLi/(Li-Lp)
291
in [radians]
Ravailable
(ppl
-1.
where 1 =
F
_ Mpl.L
2.E.I
292
4.3
Rotation capacities according to Kemp's simplified model which are presented in these graphs respect its limitations (see chapter 2.2.2).
293
E
\_
+m+
tn
>
|
Ol
Q.
"O o
>
<0
--m
vi
>
"
to
to
>
o
te
'o. E
mt
LL
<
mod
<
c%
expe sim
pli
oc
(
ment nn's
a-
co
o 00 IO
CJ
mode
o
CM
IO
IO
IO
<o
o
<D
IO IO
O to
IO *
IO co
co
IO
evi
o
CM
IO
-
IO
294
+m*
k.
E
.
tn >
3
O
Q.
.
tn
>
---
<0
>
3
^
15
3 L
<
CS
a.
>
CE
rnt
"
u.
<
mod
*
expe sim
. >
<
CC
CM
pli
CO CM
CM
CM
ment nn's
CM
O
CM
en
CO
hCD
IO
*
CO
CM
en
co
hco io
co
m.
CM
295
rnprn^
k.
tn
>
Q.
XJ o
.
.
>
tn
>
M
vi
"
TJ
TJ o
tn
>
OC
tn CL
CO
-C
"
TJ
<
5
<
mod
expe sim
pli
CO
ment nn's
CM
en
CO
co
--
io
co
CM
t-
CO
CM
CO
CO
IO
CO
CM
296
of beam length
In
some graphs, beside curves corresponding to nominal cross sections, there are "" (black points) which equal to Rav calculated for measured sections of experimental beams.
297
40
60
80
100
120
Li/(2*epsylon)
1 1
I I
|
1
4
L span
==
10
2*Li (m)
(EC3)
298
100
Li/(iz*epsylon)
1 1
120
I
1
I
1
I
I
1 1
t I
I
1
10
12
(EC3)
299
15
40
35
Feldmann model nom
30
*
25
CRM tests
5 20
>
a
15
10
-r
20
40
60 Li/(iz"epsylon)
80
100
120
T"
10
Lspan = 2 Li {m)
(EC3)
300
CRM Lige:
40
35
30
Kemp simplified model
25
CRM tests
S3
5 20
15
10
0 -r 0 20
40
60
80
100
120
Li/(iz*epsyIon)
I
1
1 1
10
L span = 2* Li {m}
(EC3)
301
Feldmann model
o -
20
40
60
Li/Uz'epsylon)
1
80
100
120
-1_
I
4
Lspan = 2 Li (m)
10
12
(EC3)
302
6
{m)
10
Lspan = 2*Li
303
20
40
60
80
100
120
Li/{iz*epsylon]
1 1
'
t
1
10
12
14
16
Lspan = 2* Li (m)
304
40
Feldmann model
20
40
60
L5/(z*epsylon)
80
100
120
-i
I
I
I
1
I I
6
Lspan = 2* Li Im)
10
12
Kemp application
range
305
60
Li/{iz*epsylon]
i i
1
8
Lspan = 2* Li
10
{m)
12
14
16
(EC3)
306
RWTH Aachen:
307
(EC3)
308
Li/liz^epsylon)
1 1 1
6
(m)
10
Lspan = 2*Li
(EC3)
309
RWTH Aachen:
Feldmann model
40
60
80
L/(iz*epsylon)
>
468
L span = 2e Li
10
12
lm)
310
-i
20
40
60
80
100
Li/Uz'epsylon)
4
L span
10
= 2* Li (m)
Annex 12
1.
(1 )
(ENV 1 993-1-1) presents a classification system for cross-sections according to the slendemess b/t of cross sectional parts in compression, that allows to take profit of plastic reserves of the cross-section or the plastic reserves of systems as for as moment redistribution may have an effect, see fig. 1.
1.1
Mpl
M el
b/t
21
Global
analysis
^ujjjj^
Class
Behaviour model
Design resistance
Available rotation
capacity of plastic
of
structures'
hinge
PLASTIC
across full section
important
elastic
or.
Mp/j--/
kxal^"^
buckling
f
PLASTIC
across full section
plastic
iM Mpi,
local budding
<P
limited
elastic
f
ELASTIC
none
elastic
Mp< /c
"
f
M
local
bc buckling?
r
ELASTIC
across effective
none
elastic
Uit]
buckling?
local
section
'
314
(2)
So far the sections allowing for moment redistribution due to the formation of plastic
hinges are class 1 -section. The strength level is the full plastic moment M^ of the cross-
section.
(3)
Class 2 sections need to consider the maximum bending moments from an elastic
analysis without moment redistribution but allow to exploit the plastic resistances of the
(4)
For class 3-sections yielding in the extreme fibre of the full cross-section is limiting the resistance, whereas for class 4-sections yielding in the extreme fibre may only be allowed when local buckling to teken into account by reducing the cross-sections to the effective zone.
(5)
As the controlling parameter for the classification of a cross section the b/t-ratio of its compressed parts is considered. The numerical values for the b/t-ratios for the different cross sectional classes as presented in Eurocode 3 are given in fig. 2.
(6)
The values have been determined for 235 N/mm2 only. An adjustment to other steel
Class
Class 2
of
distribution for
Web
Flange
Web
Flange
classi
&.
classi
d/twS
33
W
c/tfS
10
d/twS
38
C/tf
11
i
"comiiprcssion
fy
9
10
10e
Mv
--7
iL_ljL~J"
C
lie
72
W
83
9
10
10
11
M,
9
10e
10
rttjnm, " My
U-^
J
cofAS:
396e
W
11
13a-l
10e
+ : Stiesses in compression R = rolled sections W = welded sections - : Stresses in tension 235 fy (H/mm2) e=^235/f, fif t 40 mm)
275
355
0,81
420
0.75
0,78
460
0,71
0,92
0,96
0.84
0,74
315
235
*
2
"ki
=fy
2)
/t\2
12 (1
lb
(7)
The transition from plastic cross sectional resistances Mp, to elastic resistances M^, is stepwise. Only for class 4-sections, where local elastic buckling reduces the crosssectional resistance, the influence of such local buckling an "effective" cross-sections by the reduction factor is continuous:
MR=a4ff M^cc^
where
WeI
i;
aeff=
(8)
<_
1.0
316
(9)
The moment-rotation curves as shown in fig. 3 are the result of bending tests. These tests are able to give information about which level of resistance can be achieved and how great is the rotation. As aforementioned the certain sorts of moment-rotationcharacteristics gave rise for the classification system. In particular the b/t-limits for class 1 are such that they guarantee a certain plastic rotation on ,,,-level so that plastic zones, which can be modeled as plastic hinges, are able to rotate.
One can introduce a value which is able to describe the ability of a plastic hinge which
(10)
<pav
up to the point of intersection of the moment-rotation curve after that it drops below the ,-level. We also can introduce the rotation capacity R, which compares the magnitude of the inelastic rotation ^ with the elastic rotation <pp] related to Mp, of a beam.
p
^available
_ <Pav _ ~ ~~
<Prot
<Ppl
<Prot
(1 1)
Introducing a general value for the rotation requirement, coming out from the static analysis, and which might be in the range of R^, = 3.0, one can identify those section allowing for moment redistribution along the structure, i.e. those sections with
R * 3,0
(12)
The sectional rotation capacity depends on the geometry, slendemess and the steel grade
of the cross-section and also depends on the loading arrangement Slendemess limits in terms of b/t should comprise all these demands to allow for plastic analyis.
(13)
However the design models used in Eurocode 3 - part 1 .1 are in some parts extremely safe sided and not realistic. The diagrams in fig. 4 show the rotation capacities of a great amount of so called "Three-Point-Bending"-tests (both rolled and welded sections) versus the b/t-slendemess as well as the present b/t-regulations of Eurocode 3 (for hot rolled sections) , see also annex (3) in which the data are given in detail.
(14)
In fig. 4a to fig.4e the test results are presented. The conclusions for the present EC 3 rules are as follows:
The presentation of the available rotation capacities terms of angles ("<pvalues") gives more information on the actual inelastic behaviour rather than the presentation in terms of nondimensional "R-values" which is the the comparison of the rotation of inelastic deformation of the plastic hinge and the elastic deformation of the beam. The slendemess limits for both the flange and the web are not realistic by far. One can identify available rotation capacities for cross-sections which are ace. EC 3 at present not allowed for moment redistribution or even not allowed for plastic resistance or even not allowed for full elastic resistance, see fig. 4d.
317
The present classification rules for the web slendemess show little more
correlation than the present classification rules for the flange slendemess, however not satisfying at all, see fig. 4ax and fig. 4b.d. The present consideration ace. to EC 3 of the higher yield stresses than fy =235 MPa by introducing e = (235/fy) os shows only tendencies but not more and is also not satisfying, see fig. 4ax and fig. 4b.d. Having the most tests in the steelgrade range from 235 N/mm2 up to more than 500 N/mm2 and also some up to more than 950 N/mm2 it is visible that even in the higher steelgrade ranges sufficient rotation capacities in most cases can be provided, see fig. 4e.
318
25.0
20.0
15.0
3-
Rex
10.0
m
S
5.0
^4
0.0
\
15.00
10.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
b/t
25.0
20.0
15.0
Rex
10.0
:
t
5.0
'-"
0.0
?:
20.00
f
40.00
0.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
(h-2t)/w
Fig. 4a: Rotation Capacities R of three point bending tests versus simple siendemesses
319
25.0
J_L
20.0
.w
-i+
i
15.0
*"
1
_
Rex
10.0
\-
5.0
:*v
415.00
m~.
m
0.0
10.00
R
20.00
j
25.00
30.00
35.00
b/t * (fy/235)*0.5
25.0
1 ta
1
20.0
1
15.0
! ,7_
%
B
Rex
10.0
m.
B fl
a
5.0
I
0.0
1
1
'.
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
(h-2t)/w*(fy/235)'0.5
Note:
= class 1 2 = class 2
1
= class
Fig. 4b: Rotation Capacities R of three point bending tests versus siendemesses ace. EC3
320
0.6
0.5
I
a
h
'i
V fl
j'
W
0.4
-,
^Sc
phi av
0.3
I
BB
f
li
\
*
0.2
0.1
s-.'20.00 25.00
10.00
15.00
30.00
35.00
b/t
0.6
fl
0.5
.
0.4
,m
phi av
0.3
m
i
li
0.2
ki
1
0.1
!"
40.00
0.00
20.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
(h-2t)/w
Fig. 4c: Rotation Capacities of three point bending tests versus simple siendemesses
321
0.6
11
0.5
fl
0.4
phi av
0.3
'T
f
Vfl
't-
r^A
-e
0.2
A
I
0.1
Ai
1,
' u
U
25.00
3,
30.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
35.00
b/t * (fy/235)"0.5
0.6
1
0.5
I*
0.4
phi av
0.3
t.
0.2
%
"1
;, af
IJ*
40.00
0.1
V
60.00
2,:
>
0.00
20.00
80.00
100.00
Note:
Fig. 4d: Rotation Capacities of three point bending tests versus siendemesses ace. EC3
322
25.0
20.0
li
-4c
1S.0
Rex
10.0
'-^
'.
m
m
W4
-
5.0
0.0
200
400
600
800
1000
0.6
fl
0.5
0.4
1I
phi av
0.3
'
02.
k't
m
"f..
! l
mt
200
0.1
400
600
800
1000
Fig. 4e: Rotation Capacities of three point bending tests versus yield stress
323
(14)
Not only b/t-regulations are unrealistic, but also the maximum resistance is limited to
MpI. Many tests have shown, that sections often exhibit more resistance than Mp, even
1.80
!
1.60
1
1.40 1.20
1.00
Mu/Mp!
ffl
A
-ll- /
b
Jc
0.80
0.60
'
! i
0.40
0.20 0.00
10.00
0
;
1
t>
15.00
20.00
3
t>
4tI
1
4r
.1
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
b/t*(fy/23S)A0.5
60
40
20
I
1 .
00
- t'
JU1
1
1
__
fll
Mu/MpI
0 80
0 60
040
0 20
No te:
= 2 =
1
cias;sl
cla<:s 2
i
1
:s3
!
0.000.00
10.00
1,.
60.00
2 t>
80.00 90.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
70.00
h/w* (fy/235)A0.5
324
(15)
The b/t- and h/w- values are developed from elastic theory basis with extension
2.
3.
4.
5.
to plasticity which originally are intended to have a criterion for resistance but with poor consideration of the rotation capacity. The important interaction between flange and web has not been considered in the present rules. Resistances are limited to Mp,, though the moment rotation curves show that higher resistances are possible. The magnitude of resistances is defined stepwise neglecting the actual continuous resistance distribution. The minimum rotation requirements for class 1 -section has been assumed to R = 3.0 for usual buildings without taking into account the actual rotation requirements which are often smaller.
2.
Experimental and numerical investigations on cross-sectional resistance and rotation capacities of beams in bending
In order to overcome the shortcomings of the present b/t- and h/w- rules of Eurocode 3, Part 1.1, bending tests, which were performed in the past have been re-evaluated and also new test series on bending tests have been established. Single span beams with several kinds of loading were tested.
Three-Point-Bending tests with bending about the strong axis. Three-Point-Bending tests with bending about the weak axis. Bending tests with normal forces, with bending about the strong axis. Four-Point-Bending tests with bending about the strong axis.
The test-setup, the test-procedure and the test-evaluating of typical three-point-bending tests are described in annex (1) of this background document.
(1)
(2)
Additionally a lot of computer-simulations were carried out to obtain more and "synthetic" results of the plastic behaviour of beams in bending, in particular for high strength steels the computer-simulations are described in annex (2). The simulations are welcome for those investigations for which experiments would produce much effort, e.g. for the question of the influence of the load position along the span of the three point bending beam. The simulated rotation capacities for this question are also shown in annex (2).
325
3.
(1)
The most realistic and homogeneous procedure to predict the strength capacity of a structure is to introduce the true moment-rotation curve of the section, depending on moment shape, type of loading, geometry, slendemess and steel grade, see fig. 6a. No further concern about slendemess of section or rotation capacity must be made. However this may increase evaluation time due to strong nonlinearities not only due to nonlinearities in the hinge but also in cases of large and complicated structures.
Alternatively a uniform definition of the cross-sectional for all b/t- and h/w- ratios can be achieved by applying the format of class 4-sections:
(2)
MR=a ,, = Wd ,
where M is the elastic moment resistance is a modification factor that may attain
values cc>1.0e.g.
=
aP>
or values a<1.0e.g.
(3)
eff
In general the behaviour of plastic hinges in statically nondetenninated structures is deformation controlled as a function of the rotation capacity, except for the last plastic hinge that leads to a completion of the plastic mechanism, the behaviour of which is force controlled reaching the ultimate load of the frame. Due to this fact not only the stable plastic part of the --curve, but also the instable part ofthat curve may be used in the design, see fig. 3. By the choice of resistances cc < , the rotation capacities can be significantly increased thus allowing for complete moment redistribution on a reduced level cc. This concept is applicable to all cross-sectional classes, e.g. also for
class 4-sections.
(4)
In the present Eurocode 3, Part 1 the plastic hinge method is only allowed and defined for = , for class 1 -sections. For this case one can reduce the spectrum of -cases, described in clause 3(2), to one case = with an a priori nonlimited deformation of plastic hinges on Mp, -level, but with an a posteriori check of the ductility by slendemes limits (class 1 sections only, see EC 3, 5.3.3 (4)).
326
Fig. 6a,b,c:
(5)
To obtain the true --curve of a beam in bending either experiments are necessary or sophisticated Finite Element simulations have to be performed. Furthermore the use of the whole --curve in the global plastic analysis of a structure costs time, as indicated.
Thus the use of modelized --curves as they are in fig. 6b and in fig. 6c will be necessary. In the following a new rotation check of plastic hinges is presented using constant Mpl-level of the plastic hinges,see fig. 6c.
(6)
4.
(1)
Both the rotation requirements and the rotation capacities are to be obtained using the defined ,-resistance level.
(2)
(3)
The rotation capacity results from experiments or, if not available, from computer simulations or, if also not available, from engineering models.
Fig. 7 illustrates th procedure of the rotation assessment Having a two-spancontinuous beam with distributed load it is visible that the first plastic hinge occurs
(4)
327
above the support, whilst the load-deformation curve is still increasing to ultimate load
at that point where the second plastic hinge forms in the span.
Beyond the last hinge the system becomes kinematic. From the beginning of plastification of the first hinge up to the last hinge the first hinge has to rotate. This rotation ,^ can be mathematically determined either by hand for simple cases or by
computers.
(5)
The required rotation in terms of dimensionless R, can be calculated by deriving rcq by the sum of the plastic rotations at the ends of the single equivalent beam. The length of this equivalent beam can be taken as the distance either between the points of inflexion (points of zero moment) of each side of the relevant plastic hinge (1st option) or the tangents to each side of the plastic hinge's moment peak in the moment diagram (see fig. 7. 2nd option) in the ultimate limit state:
rq
lrtPbutlc Hinge
2ndPUiticHinge
1 it
-*3
-
"*
Plaide Hinge
opfionl
(6)
The shape of the moment distribution can vary from "peakshaped" to "parabolicsmooth". However the determination of the rotation capacity is based on having
constant moment gradient byside the plastic hinges, that means also with moment peak.
If no lateral buckling phenomenae occur the peakmoment-hinges are to be assumed to produce the smallest available rotation capacities for I- and H-sections.
328
(7)
</
or
Rfeq<Rav/YM())
5.
(1)
The determination of the rotation requirement is the individual result of the global analysis, whereas the rotation capacity depends on the cross-section to be used.
(2)
As aforementioned the rotation capacity can be determined by experiments, computer simulations and by engineering models.
The demand for useable and practical tools gave rise to suggest the development of a simple model which does not make much effort to use. Such an engineering model might be the following formulae for I- and -shaped sections for different kind of loadings. The basis of these formulae is the modelling of the nonlinear buckling phenomena in the yielding zones by a plastic folding mechanism that allows to determine the rotation capacity in a reliable way. The formulae have been developed for the rotation capacity of I- and -profiles in bending about the strong and the weak axis, for bending about the strong axis with axial forces. The reliability of this formulae is proved by the comparison with test results, see fig. 8 and annex (3).
However in fig. 8 the comparison is given in terms of R whereas the following formulae are expressing the available inelastic rotation in terms of angles .^. That is no problem considering the relationship Rav = <pav / ^ (where (Dp, = Mp, tf (2E1) for pure three point bending). In fig. 8 for any pair of values both the experimental values and the theoretical
values are diveded by the identic same angle disturbing the presentation.
<ppl.
(3)
(4)
329
(5)
Thus the following formulae can be used for the determination of the rotation capacity R of a beam and also for the determination of the available inelastic rotation <pav of a plastic hinge.
(6)
As the rigid plastic model describes the whole instable part of the --curve, it also can be used for further plastic approaches with non constant Mpf-level, ace to fig. 6a and fig. 6b.
For pure bending about the strong axis the available inelastic rotation of plastic hinges (given in radians) can be determined as:
4kfy
Tav
(7)
w3 4Ebw3
5h:
(fy.Fi+Aa)bh ^
ff \2 + V WwebhwJ + 4y.webbtwhA<y
" ^.webhw
with =
1,3
For three point bending with about the weak axis with a load introduction stiffener the available inelastic rotation of plastic hinges (given in radians) can be determined with Mp, and with Las the whole span of the simple beam as:
f
0,2_ 2b
,
2t
(9)
For bending with normal for as about the strong axis the available inelastic rotation of plastic hinges (given in radians) can be determined as given in sentence (5) if the
amount of axial load fulfills:
Npl
with Aweb = A - 2bt. If the axial load is greater ( / , > Aweb / a) then the following
formula applies:
330
<Pav
=2
tM.pl,N
h
t(Nn-Pc)
bt(fyF1+Aa)h
bt^
+ AaJh2
with Mp, N acc. e.g. EC 3, 5.4.8.1 (4) and with Nn as the part of the axial load which is in "the flange:
Nn = t
2b
1-
N
N.
pi
\^
Wy.n
JJ
_ 4Ebw3
C
5h2
(given in
(10)
In fig.
9 sample values
<pav
In annex (3) of this Background Document all necessary information on all available
bending tests being properly documented for rotation capacity evaluation are given. These are three point bending test with bending about both the strong and the weak axis and bending tests with bending about the strong axis with axial forces.
(12)
All
applied in the proposed engineering model: 235 N/mm2 fy 460 N/mm2. Indeed the reliability of the model has been demonstrated by test results with steel grades in that range. Eurocode 3 allows
steel grades available
3 Part 1.1 can be
in Eurocode
for plastic global analysis with steel materials characterized according to EN 10025 and EN 10113 as given in table 1.
(13)
As given in annex (2) Finite Element simulations have shown that the rotation capacity does not strongly depend on centric or excentric location of the load of the equivalent three point bending beam.Consequently rotation capacity values obtained from the symmetrically loaded three-point bending beams are always safesided even for high shear forces (according to EC 3-rules: 0.5 ^(1 <Vsd<.1.0 Vp, M with VpURd = ultimate shear resistance). In case of excessive shear forces (according to EC 3 - rules: V^ > Ypl Rd) the cross-section is rejected by insufficient resistance capacity and then there is no need of rotation capacity values which might be not safe enough.
Lateral Torsional Buckling phenemonae have to be avoided not only when Mp, - level is reached even during the whole rotational process. The proposed engineering model is applicable if lateral torsional buckling is prevented e.g. according to Eurocode 3 rules (LT s 0,4 )(or CM 66 rules: CLTQ <; 60 with = 0, for instance).
(14)
331
(15)
Local instabilities e.g. due to introduction of concentrated loads also have to be avoided during the whole rotational process in the plastic hinges, by introducing at location of plastic hinges: sufficient stiffening of webs for My- and My-N - load cases, sufficient stiffening of flanges for M. - load cases. Sufficient stiffening can be provided with usual welded steel plates but also by other means or by considering of real service conditions in order to ensure economical design: support of secondary beams, support of slabs, masonry, concrete walls, concrete infillments, steel sheet decks (floor, wall, root) with sufficient stiffness. In case of distributed load stiffening of location of plastic hinges should not be necessary.
Nomimal
Steel grade
Thickness t (mm) *)
t<40mm
EN 10025
standard S 235 S 275 S 355 EN 10113-3 Standard S 275 M S 355 M S 420 M S 460 M
Notes:
40 mm <t< 100 mm
A5.65
ro/.i
fu
[Mpa]
235 275 355
fu/fy
1.53
[Mpa]
*y [Mpa]
0.11 0.13
fu
[Mpa]
340 410 490
fu/fy
[Mpa]
1.58 1.61 1.46
A* 5.65
24 20 20
1.56 1.44
26 22 22
0.17
1.42 1.38
1.19 1.15
24 22
19 17
0.13 0.17
0.20 0.22
24 22
19
17
*) / is the nominal thickness of the element - of the flange of rolled sections (t = tf)
- of the particular elements of welded sections
JL
Tt
Table 1:
332
24
20
16
Ji
Hup,
4-1-1
R,ex 12
-5
[-
-1
BP ^ SE"/"
4
til
.
8
.
12
16
20
24
R,th
i
.00
i
i
1
4_
1
7.00
coo
1/
i
'
j
3-& n
w
j-
S.O0
! 4.00
>
,
;
3.00
j
2.00
1.00 0.00
...j
-
1
0.00
7^
1.00
:-
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
.0
7.00
OO
S.00
Rth
,'
120 100
:"7
1
._.
*
._.
y,
80
...
'.
-H-m
4-^-4 --j-
ex
60
j
[
40
.'
j
/
20 0
i
1
/*
V\
20
; ;
40
60
Rth
80
100
120
140
Fig. 8: Comparison of the experimental rotation capacities with the theretical rot. capacities
333
04SO
O4S0
OjKO
O3S0
0353
av
OJCO
av
0300 -
0253
0.2S0
0200
02
CIS)
&0
-i
&.0
1-
H-
aiso
-t
l-
10
IM
13.3
IojO 200
26J
7.3 IOjO 12.7 15.3 16J0 20.7 23.3 24.0 28.7 31.3
b/I
b/I
- &20.19.1524
b-3CU>C0.v<*l.iaf*24
- 1-1h-19.v*aoitv.24
1-2mH-30.w.l.l0.fr-24
- U3.G0.h-42.w.l -24
- t>-tah-4aw>i/ifr-34
Variation of h/w
CLSOO
O4S0
OJOO
0.400
O2S0
(X3S0
0.200
(pav
osco
av
0.150
0.253 -
0.103
0200
aoso
0.150
omo
23SO
33SJ0
-4435.0
-+S3S.0
-+63SJ0
-+73SJ0
- 1>3.1-1.9024
t>mnrmAmU-Q.tr-3*
- t~zxtmXu\.ta.tr-2a
b-aah-sai-i.gw-i.io
Fig. 9: Functions of theoretical rotation capacities, dependend on slendemess and yield stress
334
6.
(1 )
Safety evaluation
The verification procedures of Eurocode 3 - Part 1 . 1 take into account semi probabilistic safety approaches in the Ultimate Limit State. So far the reliability is considered by introducing partial safety factors. The Annex of Eurocode 3 - Part 1.1 presents a procedure which allows to evaluate partial safety factors from experimental results. Thus, from the comparison between the design model values and the experimental values, it is possible to determine a design value of the resistance and a partial safety factor.
(2)
(3)
Annex (3) of this background gives an overview of the statistical analysis, performed for all available rotation tests with different sort of loading.
(4)
.
In general the real yield stresses of the steels delivered by the mills are greater than the nominal values of the steels indicated in the catalogues. The following statistical procedure takes that difference between nominal and expected value of steel grade into account, even considering decreasing of rotation capacity by increasing the yield stress of the steel. That is safesided as another fact is that for many structures the rotation requirement is decreasing by increasing the yield stress whilst the ultimate load target (i.e. the design load level) remains using the nominal yield values [40], see fig 10. Thus with respect to safety the unexpected overstrenghtening is well considered.
1
A
freq
-
tmnHinuimrrrrTTTTnr
-^-
i^reqjiverj
Fig. 10 :
Decreasing of the rotation requirement in case of actual yield stresses which are greater than the nominal yield stresses.
(5)
Eurocode 3 Part 1.1 gives a simplified variation of fy in function of the material thickness (thickness ranges: lower than 40 mm, from 40 mm to 100 mm), with values of fy - for certain thickness ranges - greater than the values specified by EN 1 0025 and EN 10113 (thickness ranges : lower than 16 mm, from 16 mm to 40 mm, from 40 mm to 63 mm, from 63 mm to 80 mm, from 80 mm to 100 mm, from 100 mm to 1 50 mm).
335
As Eurocode 3 always provides yield stresses fy equal or greater than values guaranteed by the specifications of delivery conditions (EN 10025, EN 10113, see fig. 11). the available rotation capacities resulting from fy of Eurocode 3 are always safesided in comparison to the rotation capacities resulting from fy of EN 10025 or EN 10113.
yWditiingdifyJtccoollneioTiMtl.l
(EC3|
ffmiufd
/to
315
f 430
f MO
"Ss~
ftlfylKltS
250
INckrMu (mm)
FiE460 fi
E 420
Ft355
Fl27S
Sic! grada
If
43
100
tfilcVnaat (mm]
Fig. 11:
to EN 10025 and
(6)
However, for the statistical safety evaluation of the rotation capacity in the frame of resistance safety there are several options:
336
1.
The first option is considering the assessment of the rotation capacity as a single-standing Ultimate Limit State check as follows:
<
^ <
<Pavailable
This check has to be fulfilled seperately in addition to the check of the resistance of the cross-section.
For that the wide spread horizontal distribution, see fig. 12. for the determina tion of the partial safety factor will be relevant That wide spread distribution is due to the in general very small negative slope of the descending branch of moment rotation curve and for that any good prediction formula will produce a more or less large scatter.
The comparison is graphically given in annex (3), also the statistical distribution
for three point bending in linear presentation and as well on gaussian paper is shown in annex (3).
For this evaluation to which all the data of all kinds of loading and bending are available, the safety elements are shown in table 2.
of the rotation capacity simply as a means of where the resistance has to be determined. It is just that rotation on the Mp, - level at which the section is fully rotationally exploited
(fig. 6c) in the last expected rotation degree.
That means detenriining the rotation capacity with the formulae given in chapter
5, and determining with that rotation the resistance My = f
This resistance function describes the descending branch of the moment rotation curve (which is in reality at the point of <prot (see fig. 3) nothing more than the level of the resistance function for Mp, = Wp, fy).
(<pav) .
That resistance design model Mp,=Wp,-fy now can be compared with the resistances of the moment-rotation curves at the vertical rotation-capacities" levels. That would be presented by the vertical distribution in fig. 12. The safety elements for that vertical distribution has been determined for pure three point bending and is also given in table 2 for information. Thus within this option a safety factor related to rotations will always be = 1,0.
As both option 1 and option 2 are safety considerations only at the cross-section they do not take into account the global structural behaviour except for statically determinant structures. However for statically non detenninant structures the
337
interrelationship between option 1 and option 2 is linked with the slope of the descending branch of the 1. to the (n-1). plastic hinge. The magnitude of this slope is indeed an indicator whether the structure fails rapidly or not if the rotation capacity has been fully exploited. Fig. 13 gives an example for that: even if one uses a class 2 -section for the first hinge rotations of the descending branch can be exploited such that the global load is increasing, however having benefit from the strain hardening of the second hinge. Certainly this depends also on the remaining elastic stiffness of the structure before ultimate load has
been reached.
This approach has not been yet investigated within this report Thus the model approach ace. to fig. 6a and fig. 6b has to be attended with respect to the global structural response.
338
Op-
Statistical Parameters
tion
1
load cases
k '
Dmcan
s*
0,080
vR
kc
1,239
Y Mo
mo
1,10*
My
1,3
<p,R
1,3
1,229
0,159
1,52
Ym,2
My
Ym<T Mpi
1,041
0,070
0,110
1,004
1,00
1,17
My + Nx
1,090
0,050
0,210
1,500
2,02
1,10*
,
1
<P,R
-
M,
<P,R
1,397
0,329
0,360
1,120
1,73
1,10*
Table 2:
Safety elements for rotation capacities (* ace. ENV 1 993-1-1 , or NAD values)
Fig 12:
339
Example: 2-Span-Continuous-Beam
=1,0
^r
XL
I
2nd Plastic Hinge
t Plastic Hinge
1
1
Constant MpI-LeveI
it Plastic Hinge
2
M
Nonconstant Mp,-Level
"(21 *)
1st Plastic Hinge
4
2-3
Mr
...
23
bh
2 nd Plastic Hinge
-
q/qr
-
"{}
",
^
(1
ft
feqF+
* )<2-
- 11)^ 8vf
-2y2~
Fig 13:
Example of a two span continuous beam using constant Mp, - level and nonconstant Mp, - level
340
7.
List of symbols
flange width
cross-section depth
h
d
t, tF w, t^
r LL A I
Wd
Wpl
E
fy
plastic moment of inertia plastic benefit factor excentricity of load position along the beam span
elastic modulus
fu
phi p,
<ppl q
yield stress of material tensile coupon tensile strength of material tensile coupon POISSON's ratio stress amplification =150 Mpa to consider material hardening
rotation
-IIelastic limit rotation of the beams' ends reaching plastic moment Mpl (e.g.= Mpl { / (2 E
p, y
<Pp,
(pl)
<pav
I) for three point bending beams) elastic limit rotation of the beams' ends reaching Mp, Q elastic limit rotation of the beams' ends reaching Mpl v elastic limit rotation of the beams' ends reaching Mp, N inelastic rotation of a plastic hinge or plastic zone inelastic available rotation of a plastic hinge on Mp, - level in terms of radiant
inelastic rotation requirement in terms of radiant
elastic and inelastic available rotation of a beam on Mp, - level in terms of radiant
m
cprot
-iirotation capacity in terms of ratio of plastic rotation and elastic rotation rotation requirement .- // rotation capacity theoretically derived from formulae rotation capacity experimentally detemuned
R^
Rjjq
R,h
R^
341
M
Mp,
Mpi,
Mp, q
Mp, v
Np,
NH
moment plastic moment resistance ace. EC 3, exeptions are explained plastic moment resistance, interacted ace. EC 3 with axial load ace. EC 3 plastic moment resistance, interacted ace. EC 3 using Qpl plastic moment resistance, interacted ace. EC 3 using VpI axial load full plastic axial load resistance part of axial load which is in the flange, having plastic stress distribution
Q,V
Qp,
shear force
Vp,
Pc
nom
".a,"
C<
indicator for nominal values instead of measured as indicator for values of the flange
as
-
<
-li
web
as
342
8.
References
[I]
[2] [3] [4] [5]
ENV 1993 -1-1 (Eurocode 3), Design of Steel Structures, Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, 1993 prENV 1994 Part 1-1 (Eurocode 4), Design of composite steel and concrete structures, Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, 1992 DIN 18800, Tl: Stahlbauten, Bemessung und Konstruktion, 1990 DASt 008: Richtlinien zur Anwendung des Traglastverfahrens im Stahlbau, 1973 SIA 161: Verstndigung; Grundstze der Projektierung und Ausfhrung; Berechnung,
Bemessung und Nachweise; Bemessung von Bauteilen; Werkstoffe; Herstellung und
[6] [7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Sedlacek, G.; Spangemacher, R.; Dahl, W.; Langenberg, P.: Untersuchung der
[II]
frameworks - Interaction between strength and ductility; ECSC agreement 7210SA/204; Draft of final Report, 1992
[12]
Sedlacek, G.; Feldmann, M.; Spangemacher, R.; Dahl, W.; Langenberg, P.; Schleich,
J.B.; Chantrain, Ph.; Gerardy, J.-C; Maquoi, R.; Lognard, B.; Defourny, J.; D'Haeyer,
R.: Resmee of the coordinated Project "Elastic Plastic Behaviour of Steel Structures,
Requirements and Properties", EGKS-F6 Projects SA 113, SA 204, SA 508, Aachen,
[13]
Lukey, A.F.: Rotation Capacity of Wide-Flange-Beams under moment gradient, Structural Engineering Report No. 10, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 1967
Lukey, A.F.; Adams; P.F.: Rotation Capacity of Wide-Flange-Beams under moment gradient ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 95, No. ST 6, pp. 1173-1188,
Paper 6599, 1969
[14]
343
[15]
[16] [17] [18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
Lay, M.G.: Yielding of uniformly loaded Steel Members, ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 91, No. ST 6 pp. 49-66, Paper 4500, 1965 Lay, M.G.; Galambos, T.V.: Inelastic Steel Beams Under Uniform Moment; ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 91, No. ST 6, pp. 67-94, Paper 4566, 1965 Lay, M.G.: Flange local Buckling in Wide-Flange Shapes, ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 9, No. ST 6 pp. 95-116, Paper 4554, 1965 Kuhlmann, U.: Rotationskapazitt von I-Profilen unter Bercksichtigung des plastischen Beulens, Dissertation Bochum 1986 Roik, Kl, Kuhlmann, U.: Rechnerische Ermittlung der Rotationskapazitt biegebean spruchter I-Profile Teil 1, Der Stahlbau (56), Heft 11, 1987 Roik, KL; Kuhlmann, U.: Rechnerische Ermittlung der Rotationskapazitt biegebean spruchter I-Profile Te 2, Der Stahlbau (56), Heft 11, 1987 Roik, K.; Kuhlmann, U.: Rotation Capacity of I-Profiles considering the Effects of Plastic Plate Buckling, Contribution to the International Colloquium "Stability of plate and shell structures", Ghent 1987 Petersen, Ch.: Bericht ber Versuche zur Rotationskapazitt von Walzprofilen in
Fliegelenken fr die Fliezonen- und Fliegelenktheorie, 7. StaWbau-Seminar 1988,
Fachhochschule Mnster, 1988
[23]
/ 1990
[24] [25]
[27]
[28]
Projekt 235, Studiengesellschaft Stahlanwendung, Dsseldorf, 1994 Kulak, G.L.; Perlynn, MX: Web Slendemess Limits for Compact Beam-Columns, Structural Engineering Report No. 50, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton Canada, 1974 Spangemacher, R: Zum Rotationsnachweis von Stahlkonstruktionen, die nach dem Traglastverfahren berechnet werden, Dissertation Lehrstuhl fr Stahlbau, RWTH
Aachen, 1992
Roik, K; Lindner, J: Einfhrung in die Berechnung nach dem Traglastverfahren, Stahlbau-Verlags-GmbH, Kln, 1972 Murray, N.W.: Introduction to the theory of thin-walled structures, Oxford
Engineering Science Series, 1984
344
[32] [33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37] [38]
[39]
[40]
Murray, N.W.: Das aufnehmbare Moment in einem zur Richtung der Normalkraft schrg liegendem plastischem Gelenk, Die Bautechnik, 50, 1973 Zhao, X.L.; Hancock, G.J.: Theoretical Analysis of Plastic Moment Capacity of an Inclined Yield Line Under Axial Force, Research Report, No. R648, School of Civil and Mining Engineering, University of Sydney, 1992 Zhao, X.L.; Hancock, GJ.: Experimental Verification of the Theory of Plastic Moment Capacity of an Inclined Yield Line Under Axial Force, Research Report, No. R649, School of Civil and Mining Engineering, University of Sydney, 1992 Bakker, M.C.: Yield Line Analysis of Post-Collapse Behaviour of Thin-Walled Steel Members, Heron, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1990 Dahl, W.; Hesse, W: Auswirkung der Beurteilung von Sthlen auf die Anwendung im Hochbau und im Anlagenbau, Stahl und Eisen 106, Heft 12, 1986 Dahl, W.; Hesse, W; Krabiell, A: Zur Verfestigung von Stahl und dessen Einflu auf die Kennwerte des Zugversuchs, Stahl und Eisen 103, Heft 2, 1983 Haaijer, G.; Thrlimann, B.: On Inelastic Buckling in Steel, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Paper 1581, 1958 Adams, P.F.; Lay, M.G.; Galambos, T.V.: Experiments on High Strength Steel Members, Welding Research Council, Bulletin No. 1 10, 1965 Feldmann, M.; Sedlacek, G.; Weynand, K.: Safety considerations of Annex J of Eurocode 3, Third International Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures, AISC,
ECCS, Trento, 1995
[41]
345
To obtain the rotation capacity of sections with momentgradient the three point bending
test may be performed; to obtain the rotation capacity of sections with momentgradient
and axial forces the three point bending test with axial load may be performed; to obtain
the rotation capacity of sections with moments but without gradient the four-point bending test may be performed.
(2)
Bending experiments are time and cost intensive. For that it is necessary to take care about full and precise documentation.
(2)
For three-point bending tests the following values should be recorded and documented.
1.
1.1
1
Cross-sectional parameters
.2
Beam length and position of load Measured thickness of both flange and web, possibly at several locations along
1 .3 1 .4
the beam length Nominal thickness of both flange and web Measured depth and width of the sections, possibly at several locations along the
beam length
1 .5
1 .6
1.7
1.8
2. 2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4 2.5
(3)
rotation, obtained from rotation of each beam end) Eventually strain measurements of deflection measurements of buckles in the flange and in the web Eventually strain measurements of the tension flange Further observations
In following pages these parameters and measurements of interest are illustrated by Data Sheets for the 3-Point-Bending Test
346
DS1
jI
_B&z2BL
^
U;
-l/4-t
zr>
"
t*7z.-r-r
-Wr
-Vac*
Z:
- tyntf-yfitw
Test-No.
2S
r-|-yvi-h3
b-j,
tl-rHb1,b2
l^-tn
b-j,b2^
b2,s
[mm]
t,
2
J-
t,
t<
br
h,
h,
ha
G= 3 b2 *"-
b,
b2
s
347
DS2
Test-No.
1.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Location across the section Geometry of coupon Strain rate of the test
Test temperature
Documentation of the measured and the true stress strain curve (whole curve) Values for the lower yield stress and tensile strength both for flange and web as well as values for fracture strain A5 and strangle
two
HEB
700
220 460
st
soo
o.
co
soo
--
Zugproben:
88
40 Flansch
too
SI
E
BS2S Steg
-.,4
o 1
Lower Flange
tNWl
TOO
(00
<n
Upper Flange
C) C
tn tn
Web
tn o
m.
300
"
oo
S3
200
(SO
100
f Ionsch
r
2
0
10
ta i. O)
20
30
(0
Strain [%]
S Location of Coupons
HEB
220
@~
/-
8S2S Steg
uuu
700
(S
o.
600
SOO
I
Web
f/.l S
lUpper Ff lange
<
tn
Lower Flange
D
tn tn
Ci
*
(00
300
70
i.
o 3
200
2
Sii
Flore
(60
g }
rt
1
a
(0
20
30
i:
Jit
sv
LU.
348
DS3
Records of Moment-Rotation
Beam-No.
Test-No.
E
"
No. of -e curve
= >" 2 - - CD mm
WMMfO) 11 II II
It II
<
Q
|| 0 - o
.
**>
ce
< _
c f
i.
o
s
8!
to'
c2
m to II
m a c
! si
o
CN CS
m
ui
*= -- > 3 >
co
CD
*^
0)
*-
s-
-**
** .2
lm* 73
*" (
!.?
^1
II
II
X12C "1
t.
** c-;.
<
Sili
,.
?
**
t^V
S
349
DS4
'
a
CM
(S
co
CM
CM
o
t
*->
cc
CD
E E
CM
CO
CM
Q. O &. Q.
75
mm
cc
cn
CM CM
>
CO
*
.5
sz
L.
co
CM
-
CO
v.
O
CM
C
CS
CD
co
"c
M
#-
E E
z"
co
o U
-
c
"c
E E
*E Z
N-
o ,
cc
E E
z
co
co
E E
S5
CM
1?
ta
0)
c
V.
CC
4-1
t-
350
DS 5
Observations
(Failure modes, buckling shape, etc)
351
Finite Element Simulations may be a tool to produce artificial results on the rotation behaviour of beams in bending without and with axial forces. Using nonlinear
constitutive laws and nonlinear calculation procedures the whole moment-rotation curve including the elastic, the stable plastic and the nonstable plastic part beyond ultimate moment should be produced.
(2) (3)
The Finite Element results should be compared and calibrated with test results.
Having calibrated and improved the finite element model, parameter studies can be carried out such that combinations of parameters which have not been tested in experiments so far now arteficially can be derived. Thus the population of results can be enlarged and all the phenomenae can be investigated more clearly. A further advantage is that the resulting data files provides stresses, strains, forces and deformations of each point of the specimen.
(4)
As there are different kinds of finite element computer programs in the following recommendations, not to regard as rules, are established for the modelling of the Finite Element mesh and for the calculation procedure.
Basis for a computer-simulation is the whole measured data of geometry and material.
(5)
If a program calculates stresses on the actual deformed section, then the true stress strain
curve has to be introduced.
(6)
Not only for that nonlinear elements should be used. These elements should perform large deformations and also large strains with nonlinear geometry consideration and
nonlinear material consideration.
(7)
The elements might be shell elements with three degrees of freedom for translations and three degree of freedom for rotations per node or volume elements with three degrees of freedom for translations per node. The shape function may be linear or quadratic, however in case of linear deformation the mesh has be refined very well and very condensed. By the way this also controls the number of nodes per element The number of integration points (gaussian points) should be sufficient such that accurate extrapolation to the boundaries of the element can be provided. In case of shell elements sufficient procedures to calculate the normal and shear stress distribution across the thickness should be provided.
352
(8)
The mesh should be modelled such that in areas of high strain and stress gradient (buckling process-zones) a proper and high refinement is provided with length to width ratio of about 1.0 to 2.0.
(9)
In order to simulate buckling the imperfections have to be considered either as geometrical "out of straightnesses" or producing them by little imperfection loads,
perpendicular to the flange. The local equivalent imperfections might have 1/500 1/2000 (as indicative values) of the flange thickness. Also the global out of straightness imperfections (in y-direction) should be considererd with e.g. t/1000 (as indicative value). However all the imperfections should be calibrated to known tests, thus the magnitude of the initial imperfections can differ from the above given values. In cases where small rotations are expected, the residual stresses might be respected.
(10)
(11)
(13)
In the following figures an example of finite element modelling of a beam in bending with axial forces.
353
[%]
= (
= In (
1
+
+
RWTH Aachen
354
S8R
RWTH Aachen
355
RWTH Aachen
356
o in cv
LEGENDE
o cu
lm
4J
tn
\s
C
CU
t
s
t)/t h/w
Laenge
nun
nun
Steg
.00
502.00 N/mm2
.05
.10
.15
.20
Rotation
rad
RWTH
Lehrstuhl fuer
Aachen
Stahlbau
LEGENDE
o
o
CM
t
'
C
(U
o
<=
b/t h/w
Laenge
nm
ewn
/
.00
.10
.15
.20
Rotation
R W
rad
T.H
fuer
Aachen
Stahlbau
Lehrstuhl
Fig. A(2) - 4:
Comparison of M-phi-curves: FEM - Test Example for bending with axial load
RWTH Aachen
357
12,0
HE
220
9,0
t
R
^:,&^:
6,0
-ol=.,50;St37
1=,50,$}
3,0
-b135Q;SU7
0,0
2,0
3,0
WI
=,,50;St37
U^STEISQ
Bl=3t50;St37
U30,STE10
Fig. A(2)-5:
FEM-investigation on rotation capacities dependent on load position of the equivalent single beam span
358
However this report recognizes the problem whether rotation capacity is an alone-standing Ultimate Limit State or not, i.e. the safety considerations on rotation capacity then should be regarded with respect to the safety considerations on resistance.
The Procedure
An Ultimate Limit State Design procedure should in general based upon a statistical distribution of both the action effects S and the resistancy effects R. This statistical distribution is represented by the distribution-function, the mean value m and the standard deviation . The
safe condition is
R4-Sd>0
a safety index is defined to guarantee that there is sufficient distance between the loading effect S and the resistance effect R:
see
fig.
1.
In Eurocode 3
mR - m s
fi[ + 0s
>
3,8
In this definition of the resistances and the action effects are combined in In a safe sided approach the resistance can be seperated from the action side:
(mR
a nonlinear way.
QfcftrR)
- (ra. + ^
)>0
with
and
ccR
as
= -0,8 = 0,7.
Due to this separation the resistancies can be investigated independently if experimental results are available. The resistance functionian be calibrated with experimental results . By comparing the resistance function with the the experimental results the mean value correction^ and the error term Ss can statistically determined, see fig. 2.
359
Rd =
bmRe(*-c^
= -0,8 3,8 = -3,04
with
aR
The characteristic value RK can be considered as the 5%-fractile of the log-normal distribution:
RK =
bmRe<"164^"0^
The variation coefficient cR considers the errorterm S4 and the individual coefficients of variation of the different geometries and strength parameters which have not yet been considered in the test population:
'R-/E
tflCLi
SS
The values for the individual coefficients of variation are of = 0,07 for stress and strength, , = 0,05 for thicknesses t and ob =0,005 for width and depth. If then Rk and RD are known, the pariai safety factor applies:
Normally the nominal value of the yield stress f}. is used for the design. However that is not the 50% - tractile but it is the 5% or less - fractile of the distribution of the material property. This fact is considered by a correction-factor Ak:
Ak= -5
be<-1*** " *%>
kYM
360
S*
S,
Rrf R*
S.R
Hgure
yA k
'-
S
ijstandard deviation o error term
rx
Hg.
362
(i)
(2)
Test data obtained from [7][8][9][10][11][14][18][22][23][24]. Some tests (No. 1,2,3) have been excluded. However they provided sufficient great rotation capacity but away from the test population (may be due to high shear effects).
(3)
of Aachen and Munich series) have been corrected such as they now are evaluated on real M^ - level of the --curve. That means for cases where
Some tests (some
Mp], calculated from the yield stress is obviously lower and thus not in accordance
with that resistance which the moment rotation curve shows, as for example:
ifi (real)
That effect
(4)
(h-t)2/4wfyiW
the error to the EC3-value is very small. Both the welded and the rolled specimen were calculated with that formula.
(5)
Test beams with lateral torsional buckling (LTB) during the plastic rotation do
sometimes produce low rotation capacity results. These tests have been deleted from
the test population, and they are not in the chart anymore.
363
33.33-
99.90-
99.B099.70 -
99.50 -j
99.00
-j
98.00 -j 97.00
00.00
'
!
|
/'
3-.00
90.00 -J
! !
80.0070.00 -
I
1
30.0020.0016.00 -
i
'
y /
I
(_/
4.00 3.00
2.00
1.00 0.50 -
0.30 0.20
0.10
i
h
0.6
f
s
II
0.05
0,7
03 0,9
1JD
tl
12
13
^4
15
1j6
17
1,8
2,0
fai
364
99.9S
99.90
1
---
! t
.
1 1
1
1
/
-4-
!
:
90.00
1
1
84.00 80.00
70.00
i
j
I
1
60.00 -t 50.00
40.00 30.00
20.00
/ / /
,
i
1
1
16.00 10.00
I
1
/ j
f
1/ i /
EZ
-~
0.10
0.05
I
0.7
0,8
0 10
12
13
365
No
1
Project
Designation
<J1Sa3m
facta
P169
facta P169
facta Pir
416b3m
d19*4m
3
4
facta PI 69
Anchen P169
6
7 a
s
to
12 13 14 15
EA2233 EA2234
EA22412
EA2243
EA2244 EB2833 EB2834
facta SM 13
facta
SM
If
17 IS 1$
EB28412
EB2S43 EB2844
20 21 22
23 24
25 2S
27 28
29 30
31
facta 113 facta 113 facta SMU facta 1U facta 113 facta 113 facta 113 facta 113 facta 1)3 facta 113 facta 113 facta 113 facta 113
facta 113
fach./ege118
28312 EA2833
EA2834
I 1200 1200 1200 3500 3S00 3500 3500 1200 3000 000 1200 3000 4000 3000 4000 1200 3000 4000 1200 3000
t>
220.50
220.60 219.20 218.80 218.60 219.00 218.40 220.S0 220.00 221.00 22S.S0 225.50 222.00 279.30 279.00
4000
1200 3000 4000 3000 4000
4000
3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000
3000
30030
300.50 300.00 300.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 202.00 201.50 200.40 200.20 200.50 201.50 199.90 200.40 200.60 200.40 200.30 199.80 200.10 199.90 200.20 200.30 200.30 200.30 200.00 200.30 200.40 200.20 200.40 200.20 201.20 201.10 200.80 200.20 199.90 200.30 300.00 300.00 300.00 299.00 299.00 301.00 141.00 150.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 170.00 182.00 190.00 141.00 150.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 161.00 160.00
32
33 34 35
36
fcctv./lige11
fach/liege SU 18 fachjtitge 118 fachjljege 116
fadi/ljegeSma
fach/Ueqe1U
liege CRH 204 liege liege liege
37
3a
39
40 41 42
CSI2W
3
4 5 6 7
8
liegt CR204
43
44
4S 46
47
48
9 10
11
12 13 NMS
7 18 9
49
SO
SI S2
S3
54 55 SB 57
53
20 21 22 23
24 2S
liege CRU204
59 60 61 62
UgeCKU204
63
64 65 66
67
204 liege CRU 204 liege CSU 204 liege CRU 204 liege CSU 204 liege CSU 204 liege OBI 204
lege
CSU
26 27
28
29 30 31 32
HE 300
2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2800 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3000 3800 3800 3800 3800 3800 3800 3800
2000 5000
wichen
Petersen
68
lunchen Petersen lunchen rel etsen lunchen Petersen lunchen Petasen lunchen Petenen Bochum Km/fatmoMi
Bochum KM/Kuhfcnonn
Bochum Roit/Kuhlmonn Bochum RoiyKuhfcnonn
340
400
HE 300 HE 340
69 70
71
72 73 74 75 75 77 78 79
SO
400
1
2
4
S
6 7
S
oochufn
Bochum Kov/Kuninonn
81 82 83
84
oochufn ncik/iCunhTsnn
Bcchum RrA/KiMmcm
10
11
Bcchum Roft/Xuhlmonn
Bcchum Ro^Kunnonn
Bochum Koc/Kuhfenonn Bochum RrA/KuMmm
as
86
12 13 1
IS
3000 3200
3S08 2304 2204
87 88 89
SO
Bochum
RoVfaNrrm
16
17
Bochurn HotyruMtncra
Bochum RotyKuNrran
Bochum
/Kiraiuii
IS 19
2100 2000
bnom 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280X0 220.00 220.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 200.00 200X0 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 140.00 150.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 170.00 180.00 190.00 140.00 150.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00 160.00
tnorn
16.10 10.50 10.50 11.00 11.00 11.00 10.70 17.80 17.70 17.40 17.40 17.40 12.70 12.60 12.80 12.60 12.60 12.70 17.30 10.30 11.10
15.00
15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 '18.00 18.00 18.00 14.00 14.00 15.10 15.00 14.60 15.00 14.70 15.00 14.60 15.00 15.10 15.00 14.90 15.00 14.70 15.00 14.60 15.00 14.50 15.00 14.70 15.00 14.50 15.00 15.30 15.00 14.80 15.00 14.80 15.00 14.60 15.00 14.60 15.00 14.80 15.00 14.80 15.00 14.50 15.00 14.80 15.00 14.70 15.00 14.80 15.00 14.80 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.10 15.00 14.50 15.00 15.10 15.00 14.30 15.00 14.50 15.00 13.30 13.50 15.80 16.00 18.30 18 JO 13.70 13.50 15.60 16.00 19.40 18.50 8.00 8.00 3.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 3.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 10.20 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.40 10.00 10.20 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.00 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 18.00 1030 10.50 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 18.00 18.00
h 220.00 219.50 220.40 219.10 217.30 218.70 217.40 208.30 209.00 211.00 215.50 210.30 214.00 276.80 282.00 283.00 281.20 284.50 255.20 266.00 269.00 276.10 275.60 275.00 281.50 206.00 208.30 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 200.00 199.70 200.40 198.00 197.60 199.70 204.30 198.40 200.50
19S.20
hnewn
wneffl
hrt
h/w
19.29 18.81
Lfb
220.00
220.00
210.00
9.80 10.00 9.40 9.80 9.40 9.60 9.40 7.50 7.50 7.40 7.50 7.50
9.50
14.23
14.05
9.50
9.50
7.50
7.S0
280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 280.00 270.00 270.00 270.00 270.00 270.00 270.00
280.00
7.50 10.90
10.80 11.50
11.40
22.83
2138
21.61 21.71
8.50
8.50
8.50
8.50
8.50 8.S0 10.50
210.00 210.00
350.00
730
730
10.00
350.00
3S0.O0
350.00
350.00
198.50 203.10
19S.80 204.50 198.60 197.50 197.50 198.90 204.50 197.60 198.60 197.80 198.20 198.20 138.80 199.10 197.90 203.60 201.80 197.40 292.00 330.00 390.00 290.00 328.00 389.00 294.00 294.00 277.00 274.00 275.00 296.00 296.00 295.00 295.00 294.00 294.00 260.00 259.00 258.00 169.00 220.00 289.00 298.00
200.00 200.00
290.00
330.00
390.00 290.00
330.00 390.00
295.00 295.00
10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10X0 10.00 10.00 9.00 9.50 9.60 9.S0 8.80 9.45 9.40 9.S0 9.50 9.00 9.10 9.60 10.00 9.40 9.20 8.80 8.80 9.15 9.40 8.90 9.20 9.10 9.05 9.00 9.30 9.20 9.00 9.40 9.10 8.70 9.40 10.30 11.90 9.20 10.40 12.10 5.00 5.00 6.00
s.oo
10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
9.00
16.32 22X5 2222 21.88 2226 22.30 22.13 16.36 21.89 2032 20.03 20.03 20.03 20.00 20.00 15.56 1536 1S36 15.56 14.43
13.34
29.46 30.10 32.45 2831 27.82 26.84 21 .7S. 2537 2433 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 32.00 24.40 24.40 24.40 24.40
19.11 17.84 17.83 17.75 19.14 17.94 1856 17.79 18.03 18.80 18.58 18.14 16.52 18.61 18.37 19.13 19.13 18.50 18.61 18.94 18.37 18.51 18.63 18.73 18.1S 18.36 18.77 18.4S 19.03 19.36 28.23
2.72 6.82 9.05 2.66 6.65 9.01 S.37 7.17 2.13 5.29 7.04 2.14 5.36
7.14
2.14
534
13.73
13.62
7.49
7.49 4.99
4.96 S.0O
13.73
13.34
13.42 13.63
13.74
730 730
7.49
7.49 7.49
7.49 730 7.49 7.49 7.49
9.48
9.49
13.62
13.S4
1353
13.41
10.00 1130
9.44 9.45
9.46
9.49
950
4.99 8.33
2837
29.70 2834
9.00
10.00 11.50 5.00
21.82
19.17 1S32 17.63 18.75
2834
28.94 55.60
5.00 6.00
5.00
4.00 5.00
S.OO S.OO
4.00
5.00
5.00
12.35
734
8.24 8.49
5.61
295.00 295.00 295.00 295.00 295.00 260.00 260.00 260.00 270.00 220.00
290.00
5.00 5.00
S.SO
530
5.50
5.50
S.SO
S.50
5.0 5.50
6.00
530
S.SO
300.00
6.00
56.00 56.00 55.80 55.80 50.55 50.55 43.56 43.45 43.13 27.02 3636 48.91 46.33
6.86 8.12
8.24 8-2S
35
10.64
366
No
1
88.40
2 3
4
89.65 89.36
SUO
S 6 7 8
89.73
90.82
9
10
11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20
21
22 23
24 ~2S
26 27 28 29 30
31
89.25 61.14 61.09 63.42 64.95 6436 62.76 127.66 127.31 128.44 128.66 12935 90.04 90.83 90.90 93.87 94.48 95.77 12730 60.64
65.1 S
I 7858.68 7912.18 801034 8030.95 7813.32 799030 7778.36 5017.12 5044.04 5360.24 5726.27 5426.10 S438.56 18279.18 18935.54
190*4.41
fy.n
fy.flanom
27430 27430
525.20
235.00 235.00
455.00 455.00 4SS.00 235.00
486.20
486.20
27850
278.50
28230 28230 282.50 420.50 42030 42030 24830 24830 489.00 489.00 489.00 27630 276.50
fr.wcb 34830 348.50 541.30 S31.70 531.70 286.10 286.10 308.00 308.00 308.00 43730 43730
fy.w*bnom
235.00 235.00 455.00
455.00
Mpl.Q 199.84
Mpl.Q/Mpl
CW
O/Qpl
0.88
0.88
40533 396.78
22935
22437
151.97
43730
25230 252.50 539.00 539.00 539.00 31130 31130 31130 S35.00 535.00
53S.O0
135
1.55 1.55
235.00 235.00
455.00
18920.91 19478.38
1139234
32
33
34
35
36 37
38
123.65 123.65 123.65 122.00 122.00 125JO 125.20 12S30 125 JO 73.30
74.39
12421.00 12823.23 13620.73 13618.72 13684.76 18855.78 4904.63 5360.93 2844236 28442.56 2844236 27998.17
27998.17
817.00
S60.50
39 40
41
42 43
44
45 46 47
18536.07 18536.07 18536.07 18536.07 5383.73 5693.82 5573.76 5442.14 5361.44 5691.19 588534 5471.91 5579.73 5378.02
5454.94
490.00 98130
864.50 468.00 277.50 25730
455.00 235.00 235.00 235.00 455.00 455.00 455.00 455.00 235X0 455.00
236.00 885.00 685.00
202.60 327.69 402.12 394.37 228.40 223.49 132.83 151.06 156.65 203.77 239.72 231.95 364.53 371.43 460.70 742.42 751.15 172.57 287.09 291.31 351.00
SS2.S7
55736
73938 14536 245.85 465.10 1011.62 1461.78 1719.82
551.56 738.94
142.44
24137
465.10
885.00
685.00 455.00 235.00 235.00 455.00 235.00
355.00
445.00
261.00 375.00
303.00
813.00 969.00 S3630 984.00 813.50 535.60 323.00 268.00 462X0 291.00
130 1.05
1.06
98736
1448.69
170634
885.00
455.00 885.00 685.00
139 1.06
1.04
455.00
235.00
131 133
70730 420.60
1SS.51
235.00
455.00
158
139 137 1.40 139
286.11
235.00
355.00 295.00
421X0
342.00 462.00 426.00
295.00 455.00
415.00
455.00
415.00 355.00
139
1.16 1.40 1.57 1.39 1.40 157 1.40 1.16 1.40 1.39 139 1.40 1.16 139 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 139 139 139 1.16 137 139
1.47
303.00
375.00
261.00
48
49
SO
51 52 S3 54 SS 56 57 58 59
SO
61 62
63
64 65
66
67
68
69
70
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
79.28 77.00 76.17 74.58 7438 76.13 77.03 74.38 76.23 7532 75.92 75.77 77.45 77.66 74.74 78.18 74.23 74.00 106.00 127.16 154.03 107.35
12S.78
421.00
291.00 342.00
24132
26537 236.93 18733
355.00
295.00
295.00
355.00
355.00 355.00 355.00
455.00
'
375.00 375.00
375.00 445.00 445.00 303.00 409.00 261.00
303.00
18733
237.30 265.68 186.64 237.14 234.18 236.02
235.64
455.00
17203.40
25422X5
4501131 5509.70 S8043S 5521.45 524S31 514239 6224.45 6224.45 6177.88
6507.44
418.00
375.00 236.00
1643S 233.67 186.70 285.10 264.94 236.22 16S.65 186.88 233.61 165.69 239.09 26433 235.18 186.08 186.08 235.61 264.35 185.33 235.40 232.50 23139 231.00 278.78
280.54
0.76 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.99 038 0.82 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.99 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.64 1.00 039 1.00 038 0.98 1.00 0.98 0.99 039 1.00 0.99 038 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 039 0.99 1.00 039 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
0.99
377.6
385.1 411.6 416.1
059 0.45
1.31
9505
9353
033
0.42 138 0.50 037 053
7S33
933.2 247.4 390.6 624.7 1914.8 1572.4 18743 1037.7 14883
0.30 031
0.50
035
0.62
0.61 037 0.66
0.69
058 0.58 0.40
0.41
0.39
0.37 037 0.40
039
0.40 039 038 0.39 031
038
038 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00
0.99
401.2
4SS.9
031
0.33
0.33
4513
325.9 435.8 286.7
314.2
317.16
378.34
374.80
135
1.42 1.55 1.55 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.55
16131 36.46
3730 41.26
355.00
235.00
236.00 287.00
287.00
235.00
235.00 235.00 235.00 235.00
38.50 35.96
39.60 39.60 3935 41 .15
44.41
287.00 287.00
287.00 287.00 236.00
80
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
236.00 236.00
333.00
252X0
252.00 217.00 217.00 217.00 709.00 709.00 709.00 709.00 709.00 709.00 349.00
235.00
235.00 23S.00
333.00
333.00
235.00
235.00
155 1.55
1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
333X0 333.00
333.00 333.00
235.00 235.00
235.00
235.00
685.00
235.00
235.00
625.17 439.28 715.16 964.30 98.32 103.18 127.04 120.01 116.62 13133 13133 131.38 114.46 122.68 127.00 180.47 184.82 196.96 110.88 154.88 225.47 196.87
61933
434.41 707.41
957.90
9S.S2 100X1 126.18 119.93
0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.89 0.89 0-89 0.95
0.9S 0.97 1.00
370.6 40S.S
651.2
493.1 784.1
9683
179.2
1793
242.3
193.5
0.47
034
160.3
2093 209.5
208.8 179.8
197.1
0.70
057
0.48 0.45
0.41
197.1
562.4 560.6 SS7.4
357.5
472.8 628.1 348.2
14731
217.87 196.12
0.30
0.34 0.57
367
ut**
0.0083
0.0083
pujo
0.0073 0.0073 0.0117 0.0417
pN.av.th
phi. av. *x
0.01S3
0.0420
4.2
6.4
8 9 10
11 12
13
14
IS 16 17 18
13
0.0423 0.0239 0.0240 0.0087 0.0216 0.0285 0.0124 0.0317 0.0415 0.0143 0.0187
7.7
1S3
15.5 30.3 10.5 9.3 12.3 23 23 31.5 20.5 14.5 8.6 7.9 43.5 1S.0 8.9 10.3 5.7 4.0 10.1 93 2.9
14.1
0.2667
03253
03692
03711
03290 03246 03588 0.1251 0.0694 0.0894 0.4487
0X406
0.0142 0.0187 0X069 0.0280 0.0367 0.0043 0.0165
0.0216 0.0074
23.4 17.0
0.0112
0.0280
203
S.O
0.0370
0.0069 0.0165
3.8 43.1
20
21 22
103
7.7
11.4
0.0217
0.0116
23
24 25 26 27
0.0290 0.0384
3.0 2.4
0.0280
0X277 0.0429 0.0117 0.0248 0X364 0.043S 0.0226 0.0SS8
43
8.1 3.1
28 29 30 31 32 33 34
0.0117
0.0254
0.0367
0.0439
0.6
3.4
0.0227
0.0565
0.0494
0.7
1.0
03838
03628 0.1243 0.1647
0.0570
0.0263
0.0769 0.0398
0.0487 0.1289 0.2598 0.4104 0.2216 0.4609 0.2876
0.3381
35
36 37 3 39
0.0274
0.0163
0.0207 0.0360 0.0213 0.0310 0.0167 0.0240
13
5.0 20.0
193
9.8 23.4
40
41
213 9.4
20.4
lil
28.4 17.7 17.7
42 43
44
93
0.0216
0.0206
0.0142
103
13.9 32.0 1S.0 8.7 21.6 105
0.2197 0.2345
03864
45 46 47 48 49
SO
0.0233
0.0308
0.4513
0.0210
0.0314
22.0
13.4
0.0323
0.0308
51
52
S3 54
0.0250
0.0250
55
56 57 58 59
0.0308 0.0323
0.0250 0.0308
0.0309
0.0391 0.0391 0.04S8 0.0457 0.0316
0.0411
60 61
62 63 64 6S 66
67
0.0267 0.0167
0.0219
4
69
70
77 72 73 74
75 76
77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 8S 86 87
0.0173 0.0173 0.0303 0.0335 0.0255 0.0145 0.01S7 0.0139 0.0144 0.0147 0.0091 0.0111 0.0132
0.0117
0.0311 0.0322 O.0306 0.0248 0.0248 0.0305 0.0322 0.0248 0.0306 0.0307 0.0383 0.0383 0.0451 0.0451 0.0309 0.0405 0.0261 0.0166 0.0216 0.0171 0.0171 0.0300 0X331 0.0253 0.0141 0.01S2 0.0138 0.0143 0.0147 0.0088 0.0110 0.0132 0.0117 0.0126 0.0141
0.0224
73
8.9 13.6 13.6 8.8 7.3 13.8 8.9 8.7 6.9 6.9 4.8 4.7 11.3 S3 15.8 20.0
10.1 14.7 12.1
0.4918 03715 0.4713 0.4229 0.3790 0.4785 0.5707 0.3522 03487 0.4562 0.4163 03061
0.3615
0.2922
0.3250 0.2971 03862
03634
0.2630
0.2153 0.211S 0.3489 0.2372 0.4113
03317
8.7
5.8 1S.6
0.3107 0.2685
0.2359
0.4058
0.4732
4.9 3.4
0.2186 03517
03073
0.1475 0.1120 0.1337
0.1078
0.1623 0.1S45
0.1124
S3
7.7 7.0
0.1079
0.1066 0.1009 0.0896 0.0799 0.0825 0.0825 0.0828 0.1089 0.1080 0.1150 0.1130 0.1159
0.1974
7.0
12.7 8.7 4.6 13.7 113 7.8
73
6.2
0.1064 0.1755
0.1244 0.0674
S3
9.4
0.1198
73 63
8.7 7.7
5.1
0.1269 0.1026
0.1118
0.1073
90
4.8 4.5
73
63 6.5 73
0.1142 0.0899
0.0924
0.2752 0.1891
0.1004
0.1463
368
No 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109
Project
Bochum Rot/Kuhhrom
Bochum RrA/KuNmom
Designation 20 21 22 23
I 2402
2804
2406
2500
U*ey/Aobms
Ubke//Wrm
Ulukrr/Mcms U liirr/Woms
24 Al A2
SI B2 83
84
SS
U luke//A<joms
Uliier/Adoms
UUfar/AiJcm= UUte>/Ar!oms UUitar/Adoms
CI
C2
C3 CA CS
155
Cmi-lleb
CTCU-Uetl
110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 }19 120
121 122 123 124
CTDI-Uel2 CTOI-UeU
CTDI-Ueb
CltU-Ue
CTOMIe
CTDMiek
960 1168 1296 1240 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
b 160.00 160.00 170.00 183.00 190.00 203.45 176.02 103.00 73.91 86.11 93.98 96.77 101.85 73.66 85.8S 93.47 8932 20135 200.45 200.55 200.10 201.65 200.40 200.60 199.80 20030 201.65 201.05 200.60 200.85 224.00 224.00 280.00 279.00
bftoin
160.00 160.00 170.00
180.00
190.00 203.45 176.02 103.00 73.91 86.11 93.98 96.77 101.85 73.66 85.85 93.47 89.92 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 220.00 220.00 280.00 280.00
10.00 10.00 10.00 1030 10.20 10.80 10.80 538 538 5.28 5.28 S.28 536 536 536 536 536 9.70 9.55 933 9.68 9.70
9.SS
9.70
12.00 12.00
1930
18.00
h 10.00 299.00 10.00 299.00 10.00 299.00 10.00 299.00 10.00 299.00 10.80 250.44 10.80 250.44 538 200.0S 538 200.05 538 200.05 538 200.05 538 200.05 536 250.44 536 250.44 5.26 250.44 536 250.44 5.26 250.44 10.00 190.00 10.00 ' 189.20 10.00 189.20 10.00 189.80 10.00 19030 10.00 18930 10.00 189.40 189.00 10.00 189.90 10.00 10.00 189.60 10.00 18930 10.00 189.30 189.90 10.00 12.00 212.00 12.00 213.00 19.50 284.00 18.00 280.00
tnorn
hnem
vr
wnom
300.00
300.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
bft 16.00
16.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
250.44
250.44
250.44 190.00 190.00 190.00
6.00 6.00 6.00 7.6S 7.6S 4.45 4.45 4.45 4.45 4.45 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 4.60 7.30 7.20
1 7.51 8.76
7.08 6.83
7.11 8.55 8.37 734 7.01
46.43 29.91
29.91
4.60
6.50 6.50 630 6.50 6.50 6.50 630 6.50 6.50 6.50 630
6.S0
2039
21.04
730 7.60
7.40
190.00
190.00 190.00 190.00 210.00 210.00 280.00 280.00
730 730
8.00 8.00 10.50 10.00
20.67 20.79 20.98 20.90 20.92 2038 21.06 20.78 2057 20.71 18.67 18.67 1436 15.50
42.58 42.58 4238 42.58 4238 52.16 52.16 52.16 52.16 52.16 23.37 23.63 23.63 22.43 23.12 2430 23.64 2333 24.05 24.01
23.31
439 439
5.00
436 4.99
4.99
S.01
4.98
369
Ate
91 92
A 48.74
I
7770.23
V-tla
93
94 95 96 97 98 99 too 101 102 103 104 IOS 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
114
48.74 50.74
54.40 55.48
373.02 373.02
373.02 373.02
311.90
311.90
124338
2175.45 1729.71 1922.46 2042.95 1986.75 35373S 343931 3435.76 351530 3564.48 3429.47 346432 3417.05 3477.40
373.02
373.19 373.19 373.19 373.19 373.19 320.00
115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124
19.03 20.31 21.11 20.74 5236 S132 51.16 52.43 52.50 S0.85 51.46 5030 5138 51.40 52.03 62.04 52.12 69.76
69.84
fy.wab 349.00 349.00 349.00 349.00 349.00 309.24 309.24 396.46 396.46 396.46 396.46 396.46 351.99 351.99
fy*WQO (MAI
fa/fy3a
1.41 1.41
-
235.00 235.00
Mpl 197.70
MpLO 197.56
MpLOrMpI
1.41
1.41 1.41
197.70 207.33
224.84 230.04
311.90
311.90 31130
1.30 1.30
130
31130 31130
311.90
130
1.40
31130
311.90
296.00
30330
31130 311.90
235.00 235.00
235.00
184.00 163.77 S634 45.08 49.76 52.78 S3.85 7335 59.78 65.65 69.32 67.61 132.79
196.08 207.32 224.80 230.02 179.75 160.28 55.02 44.83 49.10 51.84 52.81 7334
Opt 349.4
Q/0pl 0.47
59.60
65.64
6931
67.SS 132.76 119.90 124.24 131.43 132.09 123.20 128.56 126.95 126.81 127.43 132.42 127.15
0.98 0.98 0.99 039 0.98 038 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
327.3 198.4
198.4
0.32 034
0.36
0.44 0.40 038 0.37 0.47 0.S4 0.49 0.47 0.48 052 0.51 0.48 0.49 0.46
0.49
198.4
198.4 198.4
229.2
11932
12437
131.43
317.00 310.00
30130 316.50 312.50
347632
3501.81 3503.06 3522.19 591S.78 5977.72 20752.89
235.00
235.00
342X0
373.00 355.00 338.00 294.00 528.00
235.00
235.00 235.00 23S.00
2513
244.4
256.7 2513
252.4
0.53 0.49
050
aso 0.46
0/48
235.00
235.00 235.00 235.00
13235
127.18 12430 182.65
302.54
2873
265.0 256.7 271.6 490.2 466.6 7S7.1
297.00
296.00
12438
0.48
235.00
455.00 235.00 455.00
481.00
269.00 601.00
455.00
235.00 455.00
136.97 126.64
291.00
S 00.50
187623S
44132 745.09
370
No St
Pnt.pl
..
0.0145 0.0168 0.0145
*
6.2 5.4
R.ex
. av. th
92
S3 94
95
96
63 6.0 5.5
8.0
0.0905 0.0905
0.0896
0.1265 0.1221
0.1450
53
11.8 13.6 2.9 10.4 6.7
0.0903 0.0892
0.1745 0.1781
0.1005 0.0839
03574
97
98 99 too 101 102 103
104 IOS
0.0186 0.0164 0.0113 0.0135 0.0149 0.0154 0.0113 0.0081 0.0098 0.0108 0.0103 0.0184 0.0171
4.8 6.9
5.6
5.1
43
13.7 8.0
43
6.5 17.7 13.6
0.0471
0.1114
53 11.6
77
0.0183 0.0182 0.0176 0.0182 0.0182 0.0179 0.0180 0.0185 0.0178 0.0173 0.0375 0.0595 0.0312 0.0519
115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124
0.0171 0.0177 0.0183 0.0182 0.0176 0.0182 0.0182 0.0179 0.0180 0.0185 0.0178 0.0173
0.0375
133
12.7 12.6 12.6 12.4 11.6 11.7 12.0
173
16.3 18.7 14.9 16.4 14.4 19.4 113 15.0 20.1 16.8
7.1
0.2310 03256
03323 03066
03986 0.3399
03303
0.2291 03186 0.2113 0.2128
03623
0.2983 0.2621
03466
0.2137 03782
03575
03905 03673 0.0975 0.3668 0.2126
63
2.1
93 23
1.6 11.8
4.1
371
372
(3)
Some theoretical rotation capacities have been added with a certain extra rotation ^
Distribution:
99.95-
L- 2b
t
.0-1
39.70 -j
"^i
sls-,
39.00
j
1
)
i
r
'
-j
;
98.00 -j
97.00 -\ 96.00 A
9S.00
j j
!
1
-j
90.00 -j
i
80.00
-|
;
i
J
i
f
70.00 -_
i
1
;
!
!
=
50.00
-j
1
/ /
+ f
/
^
40.00 -j
30.00-:
! !
20.00
10.00 -j
5.00
4.00 3.00
2.00
t F
0*
e*
- 4-
M,
373
000----000-*-.-<'lfi
m
m <* o e. o 1 *. m.
f*
0. 0. 6 3 2 . 5 0 4 8 3 1 : 0
,
316.88 48.00 627.01 64.60 48.00 48.00 8859,70 18.78 8.40
0.80
9,09 8.10
9.08
t.82
.46
st
>
>
*-<j--*'r.0*-*-n*'ttmm
lOtlONOl * C <N
!
<
ci a
- d ~ d d t
*^
^W^tr>n^r
^ -- tt
,L00ttrfttA110C<jO*.r*
_CBD0OO<BOOO<O4OOOO
y
v io
^
tt
A tt "*
rt 'r
m rt
> F* f > f* rt rt rt w rt rt A A tt tt A A
r>.
-r
rt m to
<5
<*
oooooooooooooo
<>
,-,-
CTM<**---
* ,- ^
A r
m - tt n tt
'
OQOOQOOQOOOQQO OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
tt tt tt tt tt
1
itttttttttotttttt
^ tu lu Ml iu tu a^Ort^^-rt^rO^rt^-A tu tu iu tu tU UJ IU
et t*
o q q
111 111
t4
ni t
tt
m
mW
(OMO
tu
tu
4rrtrtrtrt^<<rt^->-'*^*^-r^^~d
s
OOQQOQOOOOQQQ
yf
*-
tt>
O ** ti
o A
uddddddttdttddddd
o
t
o
t
o
t
o
t
OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
o -^ d d d d
f^
*>
d d d
rt rt rt rt rt
-g88S888S88888g
rtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtWrtrtrtrtrt toOOiOOttOOttOOrtrt
o o o o o o
rt
l8gggg'8'88g'g'gS"S t'
^^^l-JrQjlJJO
OOOOOOttttttttttttOtt Ul tu tu w
V t V V ^'
. -
f*.
**
^
ti ti
*-
tt tt
An
*- M
pooSSSoooooooo
tu til
111
C
4
t**t4ty\t*ty+'+-~y-~*r**'*
tu
*UI
s
UI ui
1*1
tt
AAA<C44rtrtAdArt
ttiooaattcfiN
r o
._
0OO^'^
e'**'*'tt
lu
ttOOttOOttOOttOOOO
& & ^
o o o o o o
* 4N rt
a*'?**
5 5-S-5-S-S-S-S-S-S-5-5-S
S
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
lilil
mi ji
a a
unii
j
a
mt\
o
-X JE je
a a a
<S
*
o
t
< <
fttttttA**-*ttrttt*t^
3 3 3 3 3 3
K * X
rrSa**e22e
*
l> A ^ tt
o ti rt tt r* r*
l o o o t > o q
>C -
Kr,>eMi<S;22|sS!:S2S
9 >
O O i**,
o s:
** ** *}
"> <o a
rv i * O
374
375
376
(W^^^.ttoqA**t
!
ttOOgO<NOtttt
* *
et **
* * ' O
O*
OOttttttArtrttOttOO
lOttrtMtOttrtrttttt*-
qottttqqqqwtoqq
OOrtCTttttttttttttrtrt >.<^*^^*->
ndt>t>tfCtttt<rtAA
'
ttttttttOOOOttttOO
>
"^
A -
"
rtOO^^AAtttttttt cOttiNrttttt^r^a^Vtttt
qqo0oooo-o * . i t J d
*d
~ ti
ti
Pi ti
<i
oooooooooooo
ttttJS!
CTrtttOttttOOttOOK tt^ttrtr^ttttttttttrtio
rtdtdrtttrtdo^ttWtt
a>rt*-A0rttOrt*OOtt
*?
<i<$o<Sot<>o
0<
8J^no^*Q4--n
*-^nA^4Nttrtrt4Nmo AtviraAttena^rtcoAnif
*9*4<<
OOOOOOOOOOO
OOtttt<r>tt^rtt>*OCTCT
M)d<BVlAr-9iNn
ttttttttttttr!ttqq'*,<;
oooooooooooo
dddddddddddd
;
O O O O
O O IO
M O O O O ( C h t^ dd'-i-llOlOieNISNN
IO
qtottttOioqqqqqo
ddtttt^^*^dt>rtn
qoooooooooo
- CT -
:gg
^
__
**
u.u.u.u.ii.tt-U-u.tLU.iL
<<<<<<<<<<<<
mZJmmCmtmCmCJZmCmZJZmC
cccccccccc aa.
OttOttOttOttOttOtt
nOrtONOCtOrtOrtO
o*S<S<$<S<
* rt, >
tt
tt
f*
<
>
K>
< M
377
Annex 13
Annex 14
"Numerical simulations of singular cases" 'Numerical simulations of CTICM tests & nominal cases"
(13 pages)
Meshing
The following figure shows the mesh containing 616 elements and 1913 nodes.
Element type
S8R-Abaqus (parabolic 8-node shell element)
Load application
* Control displacement
* Constraints: Vertical displacement of the central section upper flange nodes linked
together
Boundary conditions
Vertical supports: both ends
LOAD
Initial imperfection
First linear-elastic buckling eigenmode (antimetrical deformation) has been used as an initial
imperfection shape.
382
1-5
ta
CJ
*\
>-_
S
ta
Cu
E-i
ta
-t
E-4
w
-H m
m o
m o
icd
C
-H 1
<D
P
THREE
KJ
Dl,
odea Number
1913
D3
Number
-H
*
616
O
OS
383
IA
ep.
^
,
l
.
co co *t
**
co
CS CM
r-
CS
las
oS
_J
CO o in in co en en rf co oo in in in in
So
cn o
m
cof
o o o
.
o
8. 00
<
^ ^
^
_ co
in in cs cs cs cs
5^
co
2
CO
< <
tu
CO
CS
^ CS
<
S3
Q.
(D
OJ
o o
IO
u.
.
4.
*i
CM
CS CS
S3
NN ^ CS CS
C - lo (JlOrcs rin
rt en oo m en CO CS T r^~ T~ t co in rt CS CS cs CS CS
00 in
ri- riin
CS
D
tn
.
CC
Tf
cs
co co cs co co co cn
S en
"
CS
o w w
*~ co
qus
.
man
09
cn -t
rt oo in
<
co cs co in - cs rt IX) o rt co CO 00 00 - co cs in 00 co CS
co
<
<
rt
C
TO
CO
e-
co CO CO rt o o o ^ 13 o o o
o o
in
1^ rt
CS
o o
o
ra
te
00 in rt
Q.
S3
< O
r, S. 3
cs co en en cn rt co co in '** r co m O r- o - - CS
eo r* Ti 00 CO O 00 in
<
CC
co o
<
,
O O
O O
<
< <
a.
CJ
2
3
O y- O 2 -9 ._ < o o o o
_,-,_
cn co co co t-~ cs in r. en to m CD cs in en lo co in CO in
r
io
CS
cs cs r-
co
en in
o o
o o
CO
LU
.
D
(
_
.
< <
cr
Q,
r-- en Is 00 co co co r^ CO es es co co "- co o o o o o o o o o o o r
co *
en -
rt CO 03 in co co cs CO o o O O o o o o o
mm
00 in
cs
to
<
<
.
,
2
"5"
CO co rt CS co m o cs en O co co rt cs cs
cs tn f- cs in
m rt
oo en in in cs "t
Ico
omo
CD
CO CO
rt
mm
CS rt
o in in o o o co in co co co co co co rt co cs CS rt rt CS rt
00
CO
rt
CS
>
_1
CO
CO CO
cs
co in
r~ 00 cn co r*
~ m CO
in
r _ en co co rt
'
o in o g in cs o 00 00 co * "* CS cs < < < < < < LU " " < tu Ul n LU LU LU
XX
X X
U ,
m-i-r
co in
o o
<
LU LU "*. OL
52
X ^ m X
384
ft
o co
O
CM
SOSSH
JJ-K
co
LO
J-i
1
co
LO
o
1
T-i T^.CO
r3
LO
e^
o oo + + - 1ra ca
co co
lo
un
<=r
o o
coce
> O
TH -!-l
-<$
Cu
-*
<
385
ta
386
LT.
I-H
ffi
ft
KD
SOSHSH
.- S
co
1-3
O CO O
i
O oo o o
-r
O
o T-i
- -Cd DJ
\D KD
^? CD -r* t
- T-i
O O
C\J
T-l
ft
c;
CJ
..... y^
s- ir-.
~H kj m^ t^t
387
ti
U8?i
388
ffi
ft
CO
SOSaSH
;<
j*
>-3
1
-) >JCn3 O O o o + + + +
o
rf3
o o
ta a
O o o
<y>
tata
cr>o LOToco
l'I
ft
vo
m-\
<5
r3
389
390
0 0 0 r t
20,08 10,31 28,09 14,42
| I
t
tri
>*CO
eo
**-
CO
rt
O *m
w
<
i o
2
oc
acn
-J
ta
O
c
c u.
cn
tai
72
cs
CM
25,00
rt rt
27,98
14,42 56,18
20,32 12,18
Ib
I
SS
3
S?
I
If
cu
s at
I5
<3
25
i
CM
CM
391
"
* **
"
-' *"-
^ f*T
*Tl~1n'T
--"--
-----
.>.-^.V^J.VJf.-....>
.--J^..
%.*..**-*-**.*..*..-,
l.Vml.
..m..-*
.rn.-Tm.-m-
f . ^^
. . '.
.- 1 ^ -VJ J
ra
es
o
co
KD
CM
I
1
CS
I
1
LO o CO i>
CO
I
LO
CO
1
KD
I
c*
"~
3"
O o
CO
CO
o o
CO
C
o o
CM
CO
OS
LO
o
LO a
I
co
co
(0
f-1
C C
~l "h
c
-3
ft ft S
r3
cc
<3
<!>
O -H
E
-
a
co
o
co
LO
CO
SOSMSH
HC*
<0
C
-
**
392
<>
CO
CJ
LO
CO OO
1
O
KD ra
I
C
LO
CO CO
o o
co
o O
CO
CO
o
LO
a*
(t
I
.c ,,
O
H
3
I
cess
ft
ri ft
m
O
CC
Nom Din
1
t!?
O
'-t
-H
.0
LO
LO
c>
co
rt
rH
SOStaSH
HC-K s
393
CS
C
"
Cu
<
ft,
LO
CO
Cs
>.
O
<N
\/
rH 5
-H
"
394
Annex 15
HEA-200
Span:
2m
S235
Material:
Meshing:
Element type:
Loads:
Two diffrents loads have been applied. At first, a compression load for
several values of N/Npl and next a bending load controlled by
displacement (no proportional case load)
* Control displacement
* Constraints: Vertical displacement of
the central section upper flange nodes
LOAD
linked together
RESTRAINS
Boundary conditions
Initial imperfection Erst linear-elastic buckling eigenmode (antimetrical deformation) has been
used as an initial imperfection shape.
397
Evaluation of MNjIld
The level of the reduced design plastic resistance moment taken for each simulation has been
calculated according to the following precised formulas (where Aw = A - 2-b-tf ):
* If
N/NpLBd
< Aw/A
MNyXd
- Mpfyd
W*
*If
f
MNyd
=
/
1
plJRd
2WP..y
pl&d
2b
Mpfyd
According to this formulas the value which corresponds to the transition of neutral axis from
web to lower flange would be 0.256 (Aw/A for HEA 200).
398
At the moment when the curve M-phi above crosses the line Mpl for the second time, axial
stress value has been taken at several points on the same beam section (closest possible to the
central section). The position of the neutral axis has been calculated interpolating the relative
distance between the nearest two points with reverse sign stress (tension and compression
axial stress).
N/Npl
0.1
17.5
0.2
13.2
0.3
0.4 7.5
0.5 6.5
(mm)
7.9
Concerning the results, it is also important to mention scattering that has been obtained for
each simulation, since we have used local stress values at several points
regardless
of the influence of some factors over these stresses such as overthicknesses and the
399
Figures
* Figures
and 2 show for each simulation, that is for N/Npl values from 0.0 to 5.0, the plot
of Moment (Tn-m) versus Rotation (degrees). The reduced design plastic resistance moment
Mny.Rd is also plotted in the same colour as its corresponding M-R curve.
* Figure 3 shows the plot of Phi available (radians) versus N/Npl as well as the maximun and
minimun Phi-av values corresponding to the Feldmann model for HEA 200 and S235 with this
type of charge. Figure 4 shows the plot of Phi-max versus N/Npl value.
* Figure 5 shows the plot of axial stress at the intersection between the web
lower flange would take place at about N/Npl = 0.21.
flange versus N/Npl value. By interpolating, the transition of the neutral axis between web to
* Finally, figure 6 displays the local deformation mode corresponding to N/Npl = 0.15. The
mode obtained for the other cases considered is similar to this one.
400
*f=
LO
lo c-I
lo
CO
CJ
LO
LO
LO
CO
O O O O O O 'I
'
r-j
T-j CJ
SSSSEISftftft-ftftft W
03
> m ,"
S1
S"
\
-1
LO
t
- --
<>
<
4>
'?
d
o
ft
LO
>fcz
EOSWSE-4
HC*
-H
fo
401
LO
CO CO
LO
CO
LO
3
31
LO
LO
LO
LO
O O O .Q .O
co
!
co
I
co
J
-si
I
<a*
I
lo
1
S S S r-l E M S W S r-H M W
in tn tn
x j
03
;_:
<i
"il ^
LO
X + i: Jj
I-O
EOEWSH
Eng
fo
402
403
404
^>1-.,-^^^,^^-^^^^^^^^.1>^^71^1
"~
LO
rr)
-il
Cu
ft
tri
Eh
O
ft
2
o
co
1
<=
LO
O
v-i
!
Cd>J-HtrH
W +J Sj l [il
Cm
405
LO
O
CU
?
- tu
406
Annex 16
INTRODUCTION
The following series of simulations have been carried out in order to check Feldmann's model
within LTB limits for HEA200 and IPE200 cross sections. Two steel grades have been used S235
and S460.
MODELLING
Meshing
The mesh used in the simulations is made up of 616 elements and 1913 nodes.
Element type
S8R-Abaqus (parabolic 8-node shell element)
Load application
* Control displacement * Constraints: Vertical displacement of the central section upper flange nodes linked together
Boundary conditions
* Vertical supports: both ends
Initial imperfection
First linear-elastic buckling eigenmode (antimetrical deformation) has been used
imperfection shape.
as an
initial
409
INITIAL IMPERFECTION
The tables bellow show for different beam lengths the relative deformation at three points of
interest corresponding to the first positive antisimetric linear buckling mode.
-----
\s
'j: '"f
Kzl
HEA 200
'L(m)
1.5
f
1
1
1
0.010
0.254
0.240
2
2.5
3
0.014 0.022
0.031
0.232
0.233 0.237 0.258
1 1 1
1
1 1
4
5
0.065
0.230
1
6 7
8
0.5
1 1
0.46
0.44
Note that the local lateral web deformation is coupled with the global lateral deformation for beam
lengths longer than 5 metres.
410
IPE 200
L(m)
1
f
0.759
0.417 0.283 0.248
0.233
0.253
1.5
0.936
2.5
3
4
5
0.217
0.204
0.193
1
6
8
0.172
For this beam type local lateral web deformation is coupled with the global lateral deformation
for all beam lengths tested except for the shorter ones.
1%
nY
direction
Type of web deformation
coupled
1
Imperfection Amplitude
0.1 /M
uncoupled
1%
411
A sensitivity analysis for the HEA200 beam has been done modifying the magnitude of the global
lateral imperfection between 0.1
10%
in
412
a
U
o
16
ri 43 U
KU
IO
U S
rrj
-y
o - m
rH
ro'
0
u o
UJ
S)
rH en
o
rH
U
<D
tn
-P
rtS
S
c
.M
'4-1
rH rH
S
13
ru
rH
u 3
4)
rH
O
C7>
sf
>-l
o to
4-1
) Ti
u
to
o
H
rH
C-J
O
CJ r:
4J
9
o
S
o <L(
o
H
S
ku
(O
TS
0)
-24-
-l
413
II
h.
# # ; #
d d d
E
W)
>
1-
Q.
E
c o
*
.
*
_l
co
m co
*m
CM
o o
CN
<
LU
U)
m.
X**
O
C
0)
S
*^
E
>
?
(ui-ui) }uauioyj
414
#
S
s*
<S
>
s
*
a.
**
c o
E
t^ II
o
-1
F
rs
.-
tn
_
c n (0
1_
o o
CN
^
LU
>
S
^
>
(ujujJ juautoyg
415
RESULTS
Concerning the results for HEA200 cross section, phi-available seems to show a uniform
behaviour for li/iz values between 50 and 80. More detailed analysis is required to obtain a
description of the phi-ay curve for li/iz values higher than 80.
On the other hand a sudden fall in the phi-av is obtained for S235 and li/iz values lower than 30
(beam length = 3 m), due mainly to a change in the deformation mode. For this range, local web
deformation is uncoupled from the global lateral one whereas for the rest of values (higher than
30) this local deformation does not appear within the deformation mode. This change in the
deformation mode occurs now for lower li/iz values in comparison with the linear buckling case
for which this modification in the deformation pattern appeared for beam lengths higher than 5
metres.
one
A mesh refinement at the web (doubling the number of elements) has been introduced in
of the cases ( L = 2m) for which a local web deformation mode appeared. The results confirm
the
fall of phi-av, giving a 10% lower value of phi-av in comparison with the coarse mesh.
The obtained results for both profiles, HEA200 and 200, show that the Feldman's model is
in the safe side within the LTB limits (CM66) for most of the analyzed cases. If the partial safety
factor = 1.5 is used Feldman's model is safe in comparison with all the simulation cases.
416
SIMULATION RESULTS
-X,,, ,_ ._ ..
Feldmann's model / 1 ,5
,
0,4-
v
>
03
7
0,2
Jf
.^
>
*_ ^ ^___^
JL "
0,10-
y///
20
10
30
40
:
50
60
70
80
90
li/iz
*-
-X0,25
417
IPE
200
Abaqus
-a
-
phi (rad) 0,15
phLFeldman
CM66
/1. 5
-o
50
100
150
200
Li/iz
-
-
phLFeldman
CM66
phLFeldman/ 1.5
20
40
60
80
100
Li/iz
418
"""""-".'"""n"-rirr
r~y*"-"-~"-
lywi-aiTrrvTT-rrT-iimiiM^iivi^-sT^MmTT^^.n.^.^-.
,..,.,
Lf)
o
cu
LO
CO
CS]
I
io
t
u
>
u 3
O
c o
o
ei tr>
-r>
-{
is)
LO
ft
r-3
CM
M -
ta
4-1
_3
1
<>
<
o
o
L)
<->
4-
es;
C
o
-a
o o
CM
<
LO
HoSWSE-t
MC*
419
JjMriBllBCEi
^^^
"
Lf)
oa
cri
Cu
o kO
"f
_.
OJ
en
>
MJ
1-0 11
ti
!-l
7i U O H
.!_>
o
E-i
OO
18
JJ
CO
-55'
-
LO
1*3
&
t=-3
?'-
O
I
CO
(4
(-3
.!->
: x
C
<U
tak
?'--,.
X
"
o
T-1
o o
CN
<
L0
CD
_.JL
U3
1-0
03
'/ 'c'r-i '''.
r' t. j0'
420
tn
ro
LO
rH
!
ro
iti
n-f
(D
.C
.)
LO
CS]
I
Li
4-1
ro
> *w
o o
CSI
c o
H
O
<w
ia
^^
<_
f>ll 4*4 t*^J
-CS.
?-?????
421
tn
CM
ro
LO
CO CM
1
Cu
<
,e
4-1
cu
4->
>!
M-l
M-l
rt
c o
-I
4->
O O
CM
ro
n o
tu
0>
te
CO.
422
cn S3
ro
o
,-1
3
-H c
ro
j->
CSI
1
0) -
Li
kJ iti
(34
M 4->
Pi
s
10
CU
<d
4J
<M
LO
s
o
H
4-)
en
OJ t
>
o
C-J
O
w
<D
03_
423
S3
o
r-l
LO
CS]
I
ri
ri
CU
cd
4.)
LO
U
4-1
co csj
ro
e o
4->
o o
cs
o
w
IJj|g|jS
s
CM_
jr.
-Im
424
co
3>
CO
!
co
r-3
cd
4J
J
>i
1
l^-l
LO
co
CM
1
4->
o Q
ro
<
tM
C-3__
425
LO
LO
co
}
I
<
in
^}
1
^
a
^
I
w
W
'
a
M
a
M
ta
a
Cl
LO
OD
VO
CNJ
EOSMSrH
4-C-K
426
LO
LD
LO
r!CMNO<Jin3CDO
rH!Hrlr5HlHHl^
"
1^
ftftftftftftftftft
r-fWMUJ-iMr-lr-ljE
ri
LO
O
fi
LO
SOSBJZH
4JC-K S
427
m CO
rt
- o
Ti
rlrlrt O O
$$!$ ai
rv
1
O o
o o
Tt o
rt
rt O
T*
Tl
1 1 o ".
T
!
%
i
-f rl
wrt
J
1
I + + +
S
ft $ ft c U) + +
428
Mr-
* 4- s. + +
0 '>
CO
ri
rt
co
o o
Tl
ri a
rlrt
Q
rl
C5 O
ft O
ftftftft
IA
^jf
429
Mi1
Iftftftftftftftftftft ftftftft
mot
rt
Ero OOOOOOOOO
rtrinrlOOOOrt
tiri
ri
NMrlrlttNMIS
+ +
Vi
430
mT
no
gftftftftftfti Iftftftftlft
*
<r> CI
ri
ri
ri
oo
ri
i-I
oo
ti
rt
rt
ri
ri
Tf r> m
o r
trt co
- c *
+ + ++
431
ui .
tn
tu .
jQ
Vi
k.
,g
CA
<>
3 w
Z3
CO
CO
LU
CO
LU
S235
S460
sz
ca
3
X.
cd co
LO_
O*
CO
LU
CM
CO
Q.
<y<DO0mmmm-
uojisde/zin
432
JO
co
LU
CJ
co
co
co rr
I
L.
LU
,
3 les
,2
Iw
to
co
3
co co
<J
\-rn-
CO
LU
CO
LU
<
co
w
CO
O
CO
J=
_!
X
co
co
LO
co
LU
CM
CO
Q.
IO
cT
uojisda/zin
433
Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4 practical tools for designers
Partii
Guide for plastic analysis
Table of Contents
437
438
441
441
List of References
1.
Generalities
l.L
1
Introduction
Concept of plastic analysis
.2.
444
446
448
450
453 461
.6. .7.
2.
467
Introduction
Influence of parameters on required inelastic rotation req
Continuous beams
Frames
467 467
47
487
492
3.
492
492 496
498
501
3.2.
3.3.
3 .4.
504
538
of cpav
Design examples
4.1. 4.2. 4.3. 4.4.
553
553
1:
Introduction
Design example
Continuous beam with concentrated load
553
Design example 2 : continuous beam with uniform distributed load Design example
3
:
556
558
4.5.
568
437
LIST OF REFERENCES
I]
"Elastic plastic behaviour of steel structures. Requirements and material properties", Rsum of the three coordinated project ESCS-F6-7210, March 1993
"Plastic design in steel. A guide and commentary", by a joint committee of the Welding Research Council and the American Society of Civil Engineers, Second Edition, ASCE, New York 1971
3] 4] 5] 6]
7] 8]
ENV 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3: "Design of steel structures; Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings", CEN, February 1992 ENV 1993-1-1: 1992/A1, Annex D of Eurocode 3 (ENV 1993-1-1 [3])
grades S460 and S420", CEN, December 1994
:
"Rgles de calcul des constructions en acier", Additif 80 - DPU P 22 - 701 Construction Mtallique n 1-1981 France
(CM66),
Merchant W., "The failure load of rigid jointed frameworks as influenced by stability", The Structural Engineer, volume 32, 1954, 185-190
"Zur Rotationskapazitt von I-Profilen statisch und dynamisch belasteter Trger", Ph.D thesis, Markus Feldmann, Stahlbau, RWTH-Aachen, 1994, heft 30, ISSN 0722-1037
Background Document 5.09 for chapter of Eurocode 3, Part 1.1, "The b/t ratios controlling the applicability of analysis models in Eurocode 3, Part 1.1", G. Sedlacek, M. Feldmann, Aachen, December 25th, 1995.
9]
10]
"Available rotation capacity in steel and composite structures", A.R.Kemp, N.W.Dekker, The Structural Engineer/Volume 69/n 5/5 March 1991
"Lateral stability of steel beams and columns - common cases of restraint", D.A.Nethercot, RM.Lawson, The Steel Construction Institute 1992
II]
EN 10025 + Al: "Hot-rolled products of non-alloy structural steels - Technical delivery conditions (includes amendment Al: 1993)", CEN, March 1990 (EN 10025), August 1993
(Al)
12]
13] 14]
EN 10113: "Hot-rolled products in weldable fine grain structural steels", Part 1,2,3, CEN, March 1993
"Capacit de rotation d'une section plastifie : Extension du calcul plastique", Frdric Mazuy, Mmoire de fin d'tudes. CUST - CTICM 1994
"Application de l'Eurocode 3 : classement des sections transversales en I", by Yvan Galea & Alain Bureau, Construction Mtallique n 1-1991, (EC3-STA 1-91)
PEP-Micro Version 2.01, Plastic Analysis Computer Program, User's manual by Yvan Galea, Alain Bureau, CTICM, Saint Rmy-ls Chevreuse - FRANCE
"Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers (rotation capacities of profiles, ...)", C.E.C. agreements 72 10-SA/520/32 1/935, Final Report Part L ProfilARBED-Recherches, Luxembourg, February 1996.
15] 16]
17] 18]
"Safety considerations of Annex J of Eurocode 3 ", M. Feldmann, G. Sedlacek, Third International Workshop on Connections in Steel Structures, AISC, ECCS, Trento, 1995.
"Essentials of Eurocode 3 - Design Manual for Steel Structures in Building", ECCS Advisory Committee 5, Application of Eurocode 3, First edition, 1991, ECCS n 65.
439
1.1
Introduction [1][2][3]
An engineering structure is satisfactorily designed if it can be built with the required economy and if, throughout its useful life, it carries its intended loads and otherwise performs its intended function. In the process of selecting the members for a steel frame structures it is necessary, first, to make a general analysis of structural strength and, second, to examine certain details (usually covered by codes or specifications) to ensure that premature local failure does not occur.
The design of a steel frame can be based on a number of criteria, any of which may actually constitute a "limit of structural usefulness". These criteria are:
1/
2/
3/
4/
5/
fracture.
It becomes more and more common to utilise design models taking into account plastic behaviour of steel, thus replacing the usual design concept based on elastic range of steel strength. It has been
long known that an indeterminate steel frame has a greater load-carrying capacity than that indicated by the allowable-stress concept. Such frames are able to carry increased loads about the yield value because structural steel has the capacity to yield. Although the allowable-stress concept is satisfactory for simple structures, its extension to indeterminate steel structures has overemphasized
the importance of stress rather than strength as the basis of engineering design. Furthermore, introduced a complexity that is unnecessary for many structures.
it has
Indeed, mere is no basis for an assumption that at no time should the stress in a steel structure go beyond the elastic range. As the matter of fact, it is necessary to consider plasticity in all structural design. An actual structure is a complex body with an extremely complicated state of stress. It is an assembly of many individual members joined together to form a working unit. The individual structural elements, such as beams and columns, come from the mills with residual stresses which are often over one-third the yield stress. In connecting the parts local stresses are produced by welding, by other fabrication and erection methods, and by misfits. There are over-all assembly stresses. The structure is sometimes pierced by many holes, reinforcement of all kinds are present, and many secondary stresses arise owing to continuity of the structure. Because of the deformations caused by the loading, bending and torsion may occur in what are assumed to be simple tension members, and axial force and torsion may occur in beams. As a consequence of these factors (the combination of unknown initial stress, stress concentration, and redistribution due to discontinuities of the structure), it is inevitable that local plastic flow will take place in any kind of design.
Numerous examples have been given elsewhere in which benefits of plasticity are used consciously or unconsciously in allowable-stress design. In continuous beams, for instance, a reduction of the negative moment is permitted at points of interior support. This is to recognize the moment redistribution which results from ductility.
From the foregoing it is evident that local yielding undoubtedly will occur in most steel frames by the time full service loads are reached. Furthermore, parts of these structures will enter appreciably into the plastic range before reaching their assumed limit of carrying capacity.
This situation will also exist in a structure designed on the basis of plasticity. Nethertheless it is important to note that at working load, the plastically designed structure is normally in the so-called
441
"elastic" range. A plastic analysis is based on a load which is equal to the working load multiplied by a load factor. Local inelastic deformations at working load may develop at first loading, just as such deformations may develop in a structure designed by the allowable-stress method. With either method of design, when the working load is removed from the structure a permanent set remains, and with it a corresponding system of residual stress. The change in stress and strain from the residual state produced by subsequent reapplications and removals of the working load would then be purely
elastic.
It
is emphasized that plastic design is not a technique that is intended to replace all other design procedures. Factors such as buckling, fatigue, and deflections may become the design criteria. As an example of a limitation that comes because of column buckling, most trusses would be excluded from plastic design (with the exception of Vierendeel type); the method discussed herein requires that "hinges" form, and chord members would not exhibit the necessary deformation capacity in compression. In ordinary building construction, limitation such as fatigue and buckling are usually the exception and not the rule. Therefore plastic theory is finding considerable application in continuous beams and low building frames where the members are stressed primarily in bending.
simple example of a beam fixed at both edges highlights the benefit of plastic analysis in comparison with elastic analysis either assuming plastic resistance (Mpi = Wpi fy) or elastic resistance (Mei = Wei fy) of the cross-section (see figure 1.1 and table 1.1).
Figure 1.1
442
Table 1.1
Type of
design
Stress
Redistribution
distribution
over cross-
of bending
moments
Limit load
Benefit of strength
section
(*)
no
ASD
elastic
ULS
elastic
>P *iP
tyg
P'el=12Mel/L
Pei=12Mpi/L
Ppl = 16Mpi/L
100
no
109 to 124
ULS
Notes to table 1.1:
plastic
l<y
yes
145
to 165
ASD = allowable stress design ULS = ultimate limit state design Mpi = Wpify Mel = Welfy (*) : Wpi/Wd = from 1.09 to 1.24 for available H and I profiles
Modern rules of design of steel structures, for example Eurocode 3 [3], are based on limit state design. Limit states are states beyond which the structure no longer satisfies the design performance req uirements. In general, three categories of limit states are recognized: serviceability limit states (deformations, vibrations), ultimate limit states (resistance of cross-sections and members) and fatigue limit states. The present Guide deals with ultimate limit states design.
Ultimate limit states (ULS) are those associated with collapse, or with other forms of structural failure which may endanger die safety of people. For ULS assessments one can use models which are able to describe the actual failure mechanism like buckling, plastification or cracking.
Depending on the chosen concept of resistance, different types of global analysis of a structure may be used to determine the effects of actions (internal forces and moments - N,V,M, deformations - , rotations - ...) - see table 1.2.
Table 1.2
Concept
Types of global analysis of a structure
1st order theory
of resistance
EGA
Allowable stress design
Ultimate limit state design
Notes to table 1.2:
X X
PGA
-
EGA
X
X
PGA
-
cgl
1st order theory uses the initial geometry of the structure 2nd order theory takes into account the influence of the deformation of the structure (- effects) EGA= elastic global analysis PGA= rigid-plastic or elastic-plastic global analysis "x" = applicable "-" = not applicable "cgi" = applicable, scope of the present Guide
443
1.2
1.2.1
Assumptions
The important concepts and assumptions with regard to die plastic behaviour of structures according to "simple plastic theory" are as follows:
a/
The structure and die loads are all in die same plane, and each member has an axis symmetry lying in die plane. The material is ductile. fracture.
of
b/
c/
d/
e/
It
of undergoing
Each member cross-section has a maximum resisting moment (die plastic moment, Mpi), a moment drat is developed tiirough plastic yielding of die entire cross-section.
Because of me ductility of steel, rotation at relatively constant moment considerable angle; in other words, a plastic hinge will form.
Connections proportioned for full continuity will transmit die calculated plastic moment. The condition is idealized as a plastic hinge at a point.
il
Plastic hinges will first form at sections where die moments under elastic condition reach Mpi. With diese sections rotating at constant moment, additional loading will be accompanied by a redistribution of moments in die structure, so that plastic hinges will appear at some other locations where die moments under elastic conditions were less tiian Mpi.
g/
The plastic limit load is reached when enough plastic hinges have formed to create a
mechanism.
hi
The deformations are small, and dierefore die equilibrium equations can be formulated for the undeformed structure (as in ordinary elastic analysis). Similarly, virtual-work expressions for mechanism displacement are based on small deflections (first order theory meaning no allowance for die influence of die deformation of die structure or meaning no - effects).
i/ j/
k/
No instability will occur before die attainment of die plastic limit load.
The loading is proportional, tiiat is, die ratios between different loads remain constant during loading.
The influence of normal force and shearing force on die plastic moment is not considered.
That "simple plastic tiieory" can be refined by die use which concern the following items:
analysis methods
h/ with improved hypothesis - effects could be taken into account (second order theory),
1.2.2
A usual method for a realistic elastic-plastic modelling of steel structures is die plastic hinge metiiod. In tiiis method die material behaviour of steel is modelled by an idealized elastic-plastic contitutive material law, 'which neglects die strain hardening behaviour of steel. From tiat simplified stressstrain curve die plastic section resistance Mpi at die location of plastic hinges may be defined (see
figure 1.2).
444
Material model
"y
fy
c fy
VYp
I,
'
IVlpl-
[fy
Figure 1.2
The principle of the formation of plastic hinge mechanisms can be best shown with a single span beam (see figure 1.3). At a certain deformation 6e\ the full plastic moment Mpi is reached. The fibres of die section on the load level Ppi are fully plastified. The other parts of die beam remain still fully elastic.
System
J^/7/
=t8"plastic hinge"
f.
P,M4
y^_
Kinematic
mechanism
pi
-X
elastic i{
Mpl 12EI
plastic '
4X
Figure 1.3
445
A kinematic mechanism forms when further energy is introduced. Further deformation is possible without any increase of die resistance. During this process die elastic parts do not change their
deformation line. The moving system may be interpreted as a rigid body mechanism or as civil engineers say. a plastic hinge mechanism (see figure 1.4).
Figure 1.4
1.3
The behaviour of a real beam is quite different from the assumption made in the plastic hinge theory. The moment-rotation diagram presents not only a curve shape between the elastic and die plastic moment, but it also goes over the value of the plastic moment because of die strain-hardening of steel. The curve reaches a maximum which corresponds to the maximum bearing capacity of the beam, and then the moment must decrease because of local instability phenomena (see figure 1.5). The fact of reaching the plastic moment corresponds to die full plastification of a cross-section, i.e die apparition of the plastic hinge. When the moment continues to increase, die plastic hinge rotates inelastically. This available inelastic rotation denoted as tpav is a feature characterising the ductility of plastic hinge or, in other words, die usefulness of the given cross-section for plastic analysis. The available inelastic rotation cpav of plastic hinge is clearly defined in figure 1.5 which presents a typical - curve for 3-point bending beam and can be expressed by die following formula:
* rav
where
tprot
= *- PP1
(1.1)
is the reached rotation when the bending moment gets back to die plastic moment value (Mpi) in the descending part of die moment-rotation curve, expressed in radians, is die elastic rotation corresponding to die theoretical plastic bending moment (Mpi) of the beam, expressed in radians,
<Ppl
MpiL
In die plastic analysis of structures, one deals with so-called "required inelastic rotation" and
"available inelastic rotation"
(preq
the required inelastic rotation which corresponds to die greatest rotation which is necessary in plastic hinge to ensure die formation of a plastic mechanism; it is a feature of the structure. the available inelastic rotation is the rotation furnished by a given cross-section and feature of this cross-section (its dimensions and steel grade).
cpav
it
is a
446
Mi
M
M pi
<PL+
<PR
M pl
Figure 1.5
Inelastic rotation could also be defined as the parameter necessary to allow redistribution bending moments M.
of
Inelastic rotation of plastic hinge is mainly influenced by local buckling in the concerned crosssections and often by lateral-torsional buckling (LTB). In this Guide, no interaction between local buckling and LTB is considered (see chapters 1.4 and 1.6.3).
A common check consisting on the comparison of both values 1.6.2 of this Guide.
defined as (based on tests results
<Preq
In international references [1] [2][9], one often deals with the term "rotation capacity R" which is
R^<Prot-<PpI^cPav
(1.2)
447
In general, dus nondimensional parameter is not recommended, because it contains die term "Leci tile equivalent length L of a reference beam which is difficult to evaluate. For more information
about rotation capacity R, refer to [1], [7], [9], [13].
On die other hand, die physical parameter (pav (expressed in radians or degrees) is easily evaluated without reference to die length L of a reference beam as presented in chapter 3.
1.4
In order to realize die necessary inelastic rotations at plastic hinge locations a member must have sufficient lateral support to assure that the plastic moment at diese hinges locations is not reduced by lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) before a mechanism has formed. Local buckling is controlled by limitting die width/thickness ratios of the flanges and die web, and lateral-torsional buckling is controlled by limiting die unbraced length of die member.
The schematic relationship between die unbraced length and die moment capacity is illustrated in die figure 1.6. When the unbraced lengtii is very large, die member will fail by elastic lateral-torsional buckling. When die lengtii is relatively short, die full plastic moment will be attained or exceeded. Between diese two extremes tiiere is a transition range in which part of die member has yielded, but buckling occurs before Mpi is reached. The lower part of figure 1.6 shows die variation of available inelastic rotation witii die unbraced lengtii. In die region of elastic buckling, die available inelastic rotation is small. When die unbraced length is small, the available inelastic rotation is much larger.
Moment Capacity
Figure 1.6
448
The available inelastic rotation depends largely upon its unbraced length on either side of a plastic hinge. Figure 1.7 shows, qualitatively, for different Lj/iz ratios, die moment-rotation relationship of a beam under uniform moment. As L/iz decreases, die available inelastic rotation increases. In order to maintain die plastic moment and provide adequate available inelastic rotation, die 1 ratio must be controlled.
In general, lateral-torsional buckling shall be avoided in plastic global analysis and this restriction is applicable to this Guide.
M
Mpi
J!
1.0
/>)
r
"-.
A \
/L\
Ori
(.
/
f\
W4>W3>W2>\Wi
"
Figure 1.7
449
1.5
This chapter gives a general view of parameters which influence die required and available inelastic rotation (^, &). More detailed explanations are provided in chapters 2 and 3, dealing with tibe required rotations and die available rotations, respectively. The parameters are presented in die table
1.3.
Table 1.3 Parameters influencing die inelastic rotation of plastic hinges (*)
Parameters required (structure)
available (cross-section)
1.
YES
NO
YES
YES
3. Material characteristics 3.1 Yield strength, fy and ultimate strength fu (constant or not in die structure) 3.2 Maximum elongation, A5 5 3.3 Modulus of elasticity, E
plastic
YES YES
NO NO
(*)
Parameters influencing die available inelastic rotation are considered with die assumption tiiat no LTB (lateral-torsional buckling) occurs in members, tiiat is, if sufficient lateral restraint exists in die members (see chapter 1.6.3).
450
Parameter
1: see
- Parameter 2:
*'/ />
f-^
T^-fe-T
stiffeners
I
m^ m
3
<r-
t(-
2/3 h
stiffeners
^ - ^_
or
Figure 1.8
Parameter 3: table 3.1
for
fy-
^^^^
H\E
ey
^N
;
eu
a565
Figure 1.9
451
Parameter 4: see chapter 2 for details concerning cpreq or chapter 3 for details about cpav .Chapter 2.2.1 presents some remarks about die influence of loading patii that is different from usual assumption of simultaneous proportional increase of all loads.
- Parameter 5: interaction formulas between M-V, M-N or M-N-V are provided in Eurocode or in other standards.
[3]
V, i
Vpl
.
Npi
pai rameter
5.1
M pi
M
parameter 5.2
Mpi
Figure 1.10
Parameter 6: see chapter 2 for details. For parameter 6.1, see explanations in chapter 2.2.2 (influence of second order effects on required inelastic rotation of sway portal frames). For parameter 6.2, see explanations in chapter 2.2.3 (influence of die load factor of reference).
452
1.6
1.6.1
Classification of cross-sections
According to chapter 5.3 of Eurocode 3 [3], steel profiles are categorized in section classes (see table 1.4) which depend on:
slendemess
The aim of this Guide is to introduce new tools permitting to calculate a real value of plastic hinge rotation, replacing die existing terms "sufficient" and "limited" in regard to the available inelastic rotation.
Eurocode 3 allows plastic global analysis of structures if plastic hinges occur in class 1 crosssections, but not in class 2 cross-sections. However, test results [1] have delivered available inelastic rotation of class 2 cross-sections which were not negligible. Therefore plastic global analysis might be used when die full plastic section capacity and die required inelastic rotation can be reached by die used steel profiles provided that cross-section is class 1 or 2.
Subsequent improvements are required in cross-section classification, because recent researches have revealed tiieir conservatism (which exists mainly due to simple assumptions made for setting diese limits): even class 3 and class 4 cross-sections delivered non negligible inelastic rotations according to 3-point bending tests. More developments are necessary, but die scope of tiiis Guide is limited to class 1 and 2 cross-sections defined by present rules of Eurocode 3 31.
Figure 1.11
453
Table 1.4
Ppi
q>
= <pL + <pR
Global
analysis
Class
Behaviour model
Design resistance
of
structures
*M
Mp,
7sr-
important
elastic
or,
4M
Mpi
PLASTIC
across
local buckling
plastic
fy
limited
elastic
full section
fy
-r^ /
L
M
Mp,
M
none
elastic
fy
ELASTIC
M
Mp| M,
none
elastic
Md
r<
local buckling
fy
454
Table 1.5a
Classification of cross-section : limiting width-to-thickness ratios for class
Types
Stresses
1
& class 2
I-cross-sections
Class 2
Classi
Web
of
loading
distribution for
class
1
Flange
Web
Flange
& class 2
"to*
33
c/tf
d/tw
38
C/jfS
fy
4-
N,compression
N
W
+
My
fy
^>My
72
10
83
Mz
r-kkr
396
~*
I
10
456
13-1
fy
ced:
R
W
<
N,comp.
My
5
R = rolled sections W = welded sections
13 -
W
2dtfL w y
fy (N/mm2)
235
420
0,78 0,78
460
0,71
t- fes ft,
0,92 0,96
0,81
0,84
0,74
455
Table 1.5b
Classification of cross-section : limiting width-to-thickness ratios for class 3 I-cross-secons
Types
Stresses
Class 3
of
loading
distribution for
class
1
Web
Flange
& class 2
d/tw*
42
c/tf<
fy
15
N,compression
+
w
I
14
fy
My
^My
124
15
14
+-7
+
I
r
W
23zJi\S7
2teV0,57
,comp. .-My
fJ
(lvfy|<|fyl)
"*-\My
15
0 >
>
42
-1
14
0,67+0,33
+ : stresses in compression - : stresses in tension
R = rolled sections W = welded sections
Values of d, c, t^, and tf are defined in figure 1.11
275
355
0,81
fv(N/mm2)
235
420
460
0,71
^fes/fy
8(ift^40mm)
0,92 0,96
0,78
0,78
0,84
0,74
456
1.6.2
Application rules
The text quoted hereafter is issued from die present Eurocode 3 [3]. concerning rotation requirements of plastic hinges.
It provides
general rules
(...)
(2)
At plastic hinge locations, ue cross-section of die member which contains the plastic hinge shall have a rotation capacity of not less tiian die required rotation at that plastic hinge
location.
(3)
To satisfy the above requirement, the required rotations should be determined from a rotation analysis.
(4)
For budding structures in which die required rotations are not calculated, all members containing plastic hinges shall have class 1 cross-sections at die plastic hinge location."
hi order to respect diese Eurocode 3 requirements, a comparison of die required inelastic rotation 9req of each plastic hinge appeared in a structure submitted to design loads with die available inelastic rotation qw for each relevant cross-section should be proceeded. It can be expressed by die following ultimate limit state rotation check :
or
rn
<
av
YMq>
(1.3)
<Preq.d
design value of required inelastic rotation in die considered plastic hinge (calculated from plastic global analysis of die structure submitted to design loads) (see chapter 2), design value of available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge appeared in cross-section,
<Pav.d
<Pav
characteristic value of available inelastic rotation section (see a model proposed in chapter 3),
of plastic
hinge appeared in
cross-
YMcp
partial safety factor; in die scope of die model proposed in this Guide (see chapter 3), die values of have been determined by statistical evaluation of available tests results [8]. The values of partial safety factor applied to <pav have been determined (see option 1 of [8] considering formula (1.3) as a single standing ultimate limit state check) independently from 0 which applies to die plastic resistance bending moment of die cross-section Mpl (=Wpi fy), (see Eurocode 3 [3] and Appendix 1 for tables with plastic resistance of I and cross-sections : Mpj y j^j, Mp z $&, ...)
Therefore a structure shall be analysed by separate checks of plastic hinge ductility (1.3), using respectively :
* die design value of plastic bending moment for die resistance of cross-sections : Mpl.Rd = Mpi/yMo, witii partial safety factor \ according to Eurocode 3 [3](0 =
1 5 1)
* die design value of available inelastic rotation for ductility of formed plastic hinges : 9av.d = <Pav/YMq> , with die proposed design model in chapter 3 for <paV values [7] and witii related partial safety factors for different load cases [8] (see table 1.6).
457
1. Generalities
Table 1.6
?
1,52
Load cases
Formulas
j My
J Mz
1,73
2,02
My-N
(3.4)
Such a rotation check so far could not be carried out, if die available inelastic rotation could only be determined from tests or sophisticated numerical simulations. But die present Guide provides a possibility of a quick check of dus condition (1.3) which makes it much easier to satisfy die quoted requirements of Eurocode 3 [3]. References shall be made to chapters 2 and 3 to find die needed tools permitting evaluation of required inelastic rotation (ft-eq and available inelastic rotation <PaV, respectively.
Chapter 1.7 presents the new concept of plastic analysis based on inelastic rotation . To facilitate understanding of this concept, first an overview is presented, tiien more details are given in a flow chart and related comments.
The example in figure 1.12 highlights the need of checking die ductility of each formed plastic hinge. The figure shows the evolution of die lateral displacement of a portal frame and of die inelastic rotation } in die first plastic hinge versus loads. Soon after die occurrence of die titird plastic hinge, die required inelastic rotation in die first plastic binge exceeds die available inelastic rotation <piav allowed in die section and die redistribution of bending moments cannot operate any more because of a lack of ductility in die first plastic hinge.
Figure 1.12
458
1.6.3
Some general remarks concerning lateral restraint can be found in the Eurocode 3 [3]:
"5.4.2 (3) When plastic global anlysis is used, lateral restraint shall be provided at all plastic hinge locations at which plastic hinge rotation may occur under any load case.
5.4.2 (4)
The restraint should be provided within a distance along the member from the theoretical plastic hinge location not exceeding half the depth of the member."
Presently lateral-torsional buckling is not explicitiy forbidden by Eurocode 3, but strength and limited as follows (see 5.5.2 (7) of [3]):
it
is related to
if die relative slendemess Xuj > 0.4, then the ultimate bending moment resistance of die beam (=%LT-Mpi) is lower tiian die plastic moment resistance of class 1 and 2 cross-sections
(=Mpi), because die reduction factor
unbraced length of the member (lt)
In order to respect the process of plastic global analysis which excludes lateral-torsional buckling as
regards strengdi
of
of plastic
13).
M Mpi,
I
1,0
0,8 0,6
0,4
-
0,2
Effective slendemess ^
0
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
Figure 1.13
In alternative to Eurocode
3 rule, otiier existing rules defining maximum distances between lateral restraints should be provided to designers. As an example, the ones of CM66 - Additif 80 [5] are quoted below, which seem realistic for present concept of design:
"In the case of the member in bending which contains at one of its ends the plastic hinge allowing for redistribution of sollicitations, the conditions of lateral restraints given by 5.21 of Additif 80 - DPU 22-701 (CM66) should be satisfied in the neighbourhood of the plastified section to avoid die lateral-torsional buckling (LTB).
459
If die moment varies linearly along a member with the length L which is free to buckle laterally, the
conditions are as follows:
L:
< 35
0.625<<1
(1.4)
L: 1- < (60-40)
where
-1<<0.625
(1.5)
Li
of die member or of die portion of that member where the linear distribution of bending moment is applied,
is die lengtii is die ratio of bending moments at both ends tiiat member (-1 < <1),
is the radius
iz
with
of gyration about minor axis (= ^Jlzl A) Iz - moment of inertia about zz minor axis of the cross-section,
Ill Ei7
-
-1 -0,8 -0,6 -0,4 -0,2
35
-
0-> tf
Figure 1.14
460
0.5 L
0.5 L
-m+e-
-3X
"
-zi"
LR
L2
= 0.5 L
, =-5/6
0.5 L ^93,3
,
2 = 0
0.5 L
i,
^60
i
z
>. "-S
60
Figure 1.15
This Guide does not consider interaction between local buckling in plastic hinge and lateral-torsional buckling of elements where plastic hinges occur. Therefore designer should avoid die appearance of lateral torsional buckling (LTB) by applying sufficient lateral bracing to fulfil the requirements of Eurocode 3 [3] (or CM 66 - Addditif 80 [5], for instance).
Lateral bracing should possess adequate strengdi and stiffness. General requirements and practical solutions concerning strengdi and stiffness of lateral bracing can be found in [2],[5] and [10].
1.7
This chapter gives a general view of die proposed concept of plastic analysis based on inelastic rotation of plastic hinge, . An overview is first presented, then a flow-chart furnishes more details. Hints and references are given in comments on the flow-chart.
461
Flow-chart n
Input data
462
Flow-chart n
row:
. .
Type of frame or beam (geometry, boundary conditions) Load cases for ULS
ULS plastic global analysis of the structure Results: . maximum load multiplicator of design loads : Xmax . internal forces and bending moments : NSd, V^j , MSd . required inelastic rotations of plastic hinges : rreq
4a 4b 4c
yes
no
*rnax-
yes
not fulfilled
joints
Evaluation of available inelastic rotation of plastic hinges from cross-sections yiels strength and joints (see row 2) and from values of N^, VSd , MSd (see row 4b)
yes
no
^req ~Tav'
463
of plastic hinges, )
AVAILABLE INELASTIC ROTATION
required
l.Data
Structure
available
*{
,^ J
V
required rotation
Notes
^
,
vertical load
- horizontal load
- normal force
LTB
*
- shear force
bending moment
,
Xma
464
row
1:
ULS means Ultimate Limit State ULS load cases are defined in Eurocode 3 (chapter 2.3.3) [3].
row 2: This flow-chart concerns structures using pinned and/or rigid joints. In the case of semi-rigid joints whose behaviour is between pinned and rigid joints, the designer shall take into account the moment-rotation characteristics of die joints (moment resistance, rotational stiffness and rotation capacity) at each step of the design. The semi-rigid joints should be designed according to chapter 6.9 and the Annex J of Eurocode 3 [3].
Indicative values of (preq for plastic hinge in portal frames are given in chapter 2 table 2.3,
row3:
of <preq are provided for certain continuous beams in chapter 2.3 table 2.1. Sufficient lateral restraint shall be provided in order to avoid lateral-torsional buckling of
Precised values
members and its interaction
witii local buckling in plastic hinges which influences the value of available inelastic rotation (see chapter 1.4 and 1.6.3). For rules defining maximal
-7777
'-max
die internal forces and bending moments (Nsd, Vsd, Msd), die required inelastic rotations of each plastic hinge
q>req,
Eurocode 3 ([3] : chapter 5.2) allows to use different types of plastic global analysis:
either, first order analysis using the initial geometry of die structure,
or, second order tiieory taking into account the influence structure.
dien die structure has sufficient bearing capacity. To optimize the solution (^max 1), new proposals of cross-section, steel grade and/or joints (row 2) should be checked by a new global analysis.
1,
465
^max
=1
If
Xjnax < 1, dien there is a need for strengthening section, stronger joints and/or higher steel grade.
=1
max
shall be determined by
cpreq
? is the partial safety factor affected to the model (see chapter 1.6.2 and [8]).
466
2.1
Introduction
This chapter deals with die calculation of required inelastic rotations that plastic hinges develop when performing an elastic-perfectly-plastic analysis (see 5.2.1.4 of Eurocode 3). Formulas and abacuses are provided for two-span continuous beams under basic loadings and procedures or flow charts are also given for simple frames. For two-span continuous beams under basic loadings, information are also provided on collaspe loads and on first occurrence of plastic hinges. General procedures are explained for more complex loading cases or frames, based on die use of classic analysis programs (linear elastic global analysis) or specific ones (plastic global analysis). Particular aspects concerning frames are also discussed.
2.2
<preq
Some general remarks on influence of parameters have been presented in table 1.3 of chapter 1. Among all parameters which are to be taken into account for the determination of required inelastic rotations, die questions about the influence of die loading patii, the second order effects and die load level at which these required rotations are calculated are detailed hereafter.
2.2.1
During tiieir life, structures are submitted to permanent and variable actions. Eurocode 3 defines ULS combinations which allow to determine the ULS loading acting on die structures and to check tiieir resistance. To reach a given ULS loading, different loading patiis may be followed, with expected consequences on die calculated values of ,.
Firstly, it can be said tiiat whatever die loading patii is, ,,, at collapse will be the same if the same mechanism is reached and if no elastic return (see 2.4.2.2 of this chapter) occurs in any plastic hinge during loading [16].
Secondly, about global analysis, Eurocode 3 states tiiat "it may be assumed to be sufficient, in the case of building structures, to adopt simultaneous proportional increases of all loads" (5.2.1.1 (5)). Where necessary, this assumption will be adopted in tins chapter, and will be die common load factor for all loads.
2.2.2
Influence of second order effects on required inelastic rotation for sway portal frames
The example given hereafter illustrates parameter 6.1 frames (see 5.2.5.2 of Eurocode 3),
of table
a) die collapse load level determined widi a second order plastic analysis may be much lower tiian die one obtained from a first order plastic analysis. The decreasing of die collapse load level depends on the critical load factor
-^where
(2.1)
is the total vertical load applied to die frame at the considered loading level is die value of the total vertical load for elastic instability in a sway mode
V
Ve-
467
<?=<1-
withXCT>4,
(2.2)
where ^} and ^ are collapse load factors for first order and second order plastic global analysis, gives a good approximation of the collapse load level taking into account die second order effects (this formula is valid for portal frames with one or two levels).
b) consequently die required inelastic rotation obtained witii a second order analysis may be much lower than the one obtained from a first order analysis. In die latter case, a complete plastic mechanism is reached at collapse, while in die first case, an "elasto-plastic instability" often occurs with a reduced number of plastic hinges.
The number of plastic hinges at collapse in a second order analysis may be evaluated by considering
die different
values determined for die frame wfth the first plastic hinges (n = 1, 2, ... ) here
treated as perfect hinges. When ^. falls down below die current load factor , all supplementary plastic hinges to die first ones tiiat occur in die frame in die first order analysis are not valid because, from stiffness considerations, die -hinged frame becomes unstable under the reached loading. The required inelastic rotation may then be taken as tiiat determined in die governing plastic hinge when the nth hinge occurs, and may sometimes be much lower than die one at die complete plastic mechanism.
The following example (see figure 2.1) is an industrial portal frame supporting a total vertical load
V=776kN.
The critical load ratio is equal to
^ = 5,47. Therefore, the frame is classified as a sway frame according to 5.2.5.2 of Eurocode 3 (^ < 10). Under die SLS loading Get us say related to load factor = 0,7), the horizontal deflection is equal to h/260 and the vertical deflection of die beam is
L/396.
320 kN
17kN/m
IPE 300 (S235)
320 kN
23_kN
h=6m
^Z w
L = 8m
468
die first order behaviour (-) curve. Therefore, die 4tii plastic hinge is not valid and die collapse load factor taking into account die second order effects will be equal or less than die load factor at which die 3rd hinge occurs. Then, the required inelastic rotation may be determined at die 3rd hinge occurrence if first order plastic analysis is performed.
10
12
14
[cm]
Horizontal displacement
Figure 2.2
Ml
<
<
L3
L2
=5.47
1.39
= 1.222
4
1
st
= 0.39
=0
n-4
horizontal displacement
n-0
n-1
n=2
n-3
il ir
<
4.3
>
Figure 2.4 Evolution of the critical load factor witii plastic hinges occurences
469
Considering die required inelastic rotation, let us assume tiiat die governing hinge is the hinge number 1 . Figure 2.5 shows die evolution of its inelastic rotation versus the load actor in a first and in a second order analysis. From this figure, it can be said that :
If the required inelastic rotation is determined at collapse ((preq.u), die value fells down from 32,7
IO3 rad when considering the second order effects (-42,5%). The value obtained at die occurrence of the 3rd plastic hinge in the first order analysis is 22,5 10~3 rad and is a better approximation of the true required rotation (18,8 10~3 rad).
IO"3 rad to 18,8
125
1.20
1222
*&"*
1.15
list order
1.10
1.05 1.00
1.000
0.95
OSO
^
i
0.85
l/^X
T\
/~2
\ !
|2ndordcr
0.80
jlOS
10 15
hi
20
22.5
32.7
30 35
[io"3id]
25
<Preq.d
(2.3)
where ,^ is the required inelastic rotation under design loads and is the partial safety factor (see chapter 1.6.2).
But, for simplicity, the designer may want to check this ductility at collapse (mechanism of structure, instabity,...) :
<Pmj.u
<Pa
(2.4)
^ ).'
An advantage of checking at collapse is tiiat, under die conditions mentionned in 2.2.1, tp^.u is
independent of die loading patii.
Assuming that the first order analysis in die example presented in chapter 2.2.2 (see figure 2.5) is valid, then die difference between required inelastic rotations at collapse (tpreq.u) (here 32,7 10"3 rad, for = 1.22) and under design loads (<preq.d) (here 10,9 IO"3 rad, for = 1.0) may be very large . This reasoning is also valid for a second order plastic analysis if the collapse is reached for example at a load factor equal to 1,2 or more.
470
2.3
Continuous beams
This paragraph gives, for two-span continuous beams, formulas for the required inelastic rotation ,,.,, at collapse (plastic hinge mechanism) when performing an elastic-perfectiy plastic analysis (see 5.2.1.4 of Eurocode 3). The formulas are exact. Abacuses are provided to help die designer. Information are also given for ultimate load and first plastic hinge occurence.
If elastic return occurs in plastic hinge, then the formulas for (preq given hereafter are not applicable and particular detailed analysis shall be made (see chapter 2. 2. 1 and 2. 4. 2. 2).
Table 2. 1 is a summary table which presents the different load cases and die references to formulas and charts given further in this chapter.
Table 2.1
Summary table of load cases, formulas ("Eq.n) and charts ("Fig.") for two-span continuous beams
Loading case
aL 0<<x<l
Fi,qi
Eq. 2.6 to 2.8
Fu>qu
Fu/Fh q^
Eq.2.5
Eq.2.9to
2.11
Eq. 2. 12 to
2.14
JT
0<<1 >0
^
nL
Fig. 2.11
Gq
Eq.2.19,
Eq. 2.18, 2.20, 2.24 or 2.26
Eq. 2.16 or 2.22
I UT
7//~
Fig. 2.15
Fig. 2.16
Eq. 2.34
| Eq. 2.35
or
JT
1ST
f
"Zr-
Eq. 2.32
Eq. 2.33
2.36
Fig. 2.18
Fig. 2.19
k
gL
I
am
I
Fig. 2.21
any loading
777?
I
1
471
For information, Table 2.2 allows to cany out quick plastic global analysis. The table provides for end spans and intermediate spans of continuous beams whh constant cross-section.and steel grade :
- die plastic bending moment resistance Mpl required to form die plastic mechanism at collapse, - die collapse loads Fu or qu and, - die position of plastic hinge in span at collapse.
Table 2.2 Plastic global analysis of continuous beams with constant cross-section
Loading case
Mpi
*%>
End Span
Intermediate span
Hi
M*
Mp!
M*
required Mpi
required Mpi
Collapse load
"uflu
16 M pl
16
ll,66Mpl
11,66
a
= 0,414 j
a = 0,5l
fi
6
6M pl
a = 0,5l
F
8
8M,pl
c-
F 4
a=
4M pl
Hi
6
6 M pl
i
3
<a<
21
3
:
1
:'
>'
FFF
3M,Pi
3
a
El
4
= 0,5
4M
I-
Fab li
2M,Pi
Fab b+e
2.3.1
(b+l)Mpl
ab
ab
Figure 2.6
472
Only one plastic mechanism may be reached. The ultimate load Fu can be determined by using the kinematic theorem : the external work We done by the load as it moves through a virtual displacement is equal to die internal work W absorbed at die plastic hinges as they rotate through corresponding angles (see figure 2.7).
We = W
with:
and:
We = FaA
Figure 2.7 From above expressions and geometrical considerations, we can obtain
M pl 1+a
M_
F.=" L a(l-a)
Note :
=k
"
(2.5)
91
-21
20
1Q
__
ty
18
17
17
16
ku
15
14 14
14
13
^
\\ \ \
12
11
lu
>
^ Y
r
0.
o.:2
0.
0.'y
o.:5
0.<s
o: 7
0.Si
0.<
a
Figure 2.8
Let us assume that the first plastic hinge occurs for the load Fj. The expression of this load can be derived by considering that the maximum moment in the beam calculated from an elastic analysis, reaches the plastic moment Mpl. Two cases must be investigated depending on where the maximum moment occurs :
473
Case A
<^2(+1)-1
(2.6)
then
F, = -
2(+1)
L (-1)[(+1)-2(+1)]
>^2(+1)-1
(2.7)
then
F,
M Pi 2(+1) =L (1- )
1 :
F,=-
M pi
L (-1)(
+-4)
(2.8)
(<^2( + 1)-1 = 1)
1
0,8 -
()
0,6 0,4 -
>I^
]
0
1
>
^.
oa .
0
0,
-.
0,7 0,8
0, 9
oa
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
Figure 2.9
The ratio FJF1 is an indicator for die interest of die plastic analysis. This ratio is easily derived from die previous expressions.
Case
<^2(+1)-1
f
-^
Case
= ( + 1) 1V
r (+1)
(2.9)
2(+1)
:
>]2(\+)-1
Fu
_ (q + ir
F,
2(+1)
= 0,25( + 1) (4 - - 2 )
(2.10)
= 1
Fi
(2.11)
<<1
474
17
1.6
]L
m. i
1.6
5
1.5
-
(p^ ^sT
0.1
1.4 -
Fa/Fi
1.3 -
0?
f / /
4
- 1.5
- 1.4
l
-
Jm>^_^IS1.2 -
1
1.0
0.3
- 1.3
/
- 1.2
-C \2 L/
0.4
0.5
[
- 1.1
1.1 -
^fo .5 ^
0.1 N
0.2
0.3
0. 1
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0. 9
a
Figure 2.10
Note :
Figure 2.10 shows that the loading capacity is increased up to about 22% for equal spans owing to a plastic analysis, when the concentrated load is near the middle of the span.
The required inelastic rotation may be obtained by integrating the bending moment under the load increment (Fu - Fj) along the beam in which a perfect hinge has been introduced at die plastic hinge location. Therefore the required inelastic rotation is die rotation in the perfect hinge under (Fu - Fj).
If </2(+1)-1
(case A
point)
MpiL -2-2+2+1
req.u
6EI
(2.12)
475
If >>/2(+1)-1
(case
(2.13)
If =1 Mp,L (q + 3)(l-a)
Treq.u
6EI
(2.14)
MP,L
.=1
(2.15)
of die ratio .
Figure 2.11
476
2.3.2
Figure 2.12
Note : Uniform loads are assumed not to vary independently in each span (proportional loading).
2.3.2.1 Ultimate load
Three possible mechanisms may occur (see figure 2.13), but we assumed that 0. Therefore the mechanism C is not considered. Depending on die values of and , mechanism A or mechanism will be formed witii the first hinge occuring eitiier at support or in span (see figure 2. 14).
Figure 2.13
The methodology is similar to the one described in
If 2 < 1
Case
(2.16)
The first plastic hinge occurs on the intermediate support condition is fulfilled :
if the following
4 (3
< 4 (3 + 2 V2 )
(2.17)
or
0,6863 <
Let us assume that qt is the loading for which the first plastic hinge occurs, then :
477
8Mpl
q'
qu
so
<1
"
(2.18)
L2
1+3
3+2-J 1+3
4
(2.19)
1+
109
\
\ \
8765
-
\
\
\
\
2
\
\ \
\ 2^-58 "*--.
32
=
^"--.^
"""""--
c-i
1
S-
0()
'-"
0.1
*J -*<
0.6
Ja
-mW-
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.9
Figure 2.14
b) First plastic hinge in the first span
1+
3+4-
qi=-
(2.20)
q^ 3+2V2
so
3+4-
(2.21)
64
1+
478
If 2>1
Qu"
u=-|-(6+4V2)
L2
._
l
-.
(2.22)
The first plastic hinge occurs at the intermediate support if the following condition is satisfied :
4(3-2^2) <
(1+)
<4(3+2/2)
(2.23)
or
0,6863 <-
1+
(1+)
occurs, then
Let us assume that qi is the loading for which die first plastic hinge
:
8Mp,
i+
1+3 1+3
qi~
so
(2.24)
L2
iL
<li
3 + 2V2
(1+)
(2.25)
128
4_.
1+ 3 Y
(2.26)
2(1+).
so
qu_3+2j2
q,
64
4
.
1+
'(1+);
(2.27)
If 2 = 1
479
Figure 2.15 shows the evolution of the ratio q^ related to for various values of (boxed values). The curve peaks indicate die limit between mechanism A and mechanism B.
1.5
1.457
1.4
1.3
%^l
1.2
1.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.5
1.457
Figure 2.15
2.3.2.2 Required inelastic rotation ,,.,
Case :
2<1
:
EI
-!
+l
3
3+2-J
12
(1+3)
(2.28)
480
EI
(2.29)
Case 2 >
11
+1 3+2^2 1+3
12
EI
(2.30)
EI
+1- (/2+1)2
, 1 1+
(2.31)
Figure 2. 16 shows curves giving a factor k,. versus the ratio for various values and so die required inelastic rotation , u can be obtained by :
Mp,L
of the ratio
. =
0.3
J.
"""
lio
-""'
"
.-
kr
0.2
-
-\
4)
\\
-.
r
TJ
3
1
7~
[.
|3
?
4
0.1
>
\
c
1/
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
481
0.4
0.3
ii-
kr
0.2
I51
0.1
]
IOTI
0 0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Figure 2.16
Note
In the case of increasing the loading from zero to reach the plastic mechanism, the first plastic hinge may occur in one of both spans. This first plastic hinge is accurately located at the maximum moment location which is determined from an
elastic analysis. While the loading increases to reach the ultimate loading, the yielding spreads in the zone of this first plastic hinge because of redistribution of bending moment. At collapse the final position d of the concentrated plastic hinge in the span will be differentfrom its initial position:
d = fsj2-l)L1'span
The designer should be aware of this phenomenon when applying stiffeners. Stiffeners must be applied at the position of plastic hinges according to the state of collapse.
d = 0,414 L
^Q_ Mechanism A
0,414 L
X-
-X
Mechanism
&
X-XFigure 2.17
2.3.2.3 Same uniform distributed load for both spans ( = 1)
r,L
-X
<h=-
-+1
(2.32)
482
(2.33)
of die
first span.
1.5
The following ratio is an indicator for die interest of die plastic analysis :
1,4
1,3
q u/q,1
1,2
qu
3+2-J t ,
(2-+)
(2.34)
1,1
()
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
Figure 2.18
%*.
=-=
Mp]L 3+2/2
12
2 l+) ( --11+*/2)
(2.35)
or:
,. = 0,4857 -f
M..L
(1+) (2 -+0,3137)
(2.36)
M,L EI
^, u
= kr
03
0,25
.
0,15
0,1
0,05
C>
0,1
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
Figure 2.19
483
2.3.3
Two equal span beam with a concentrated load and an uniform distributed load
In order to evaluate the relative influence of a concentrated load and an uniform distributed load, a numerical study has been carried out using die PEP micro program of CTICM [15] instead of a complex analytical study.
Figure 2.20
As for the previous cases, the required inelastic rotation ^.may
MplL
be expressed as:
= req.u
EI
:
(2.37)
0.5
0.45
0.4
\
0.3 r
0.35
0.3
0.2S
02 J
\?s ^r \s
0.2
0.15
0.1
^>
0.8
\~
-"
y"U _u
X >*
0.2
a. V ^^ yjo-sl
0.3
I0.7L
Jst
'
^0.6
0.05 0
0.1
i^^v i-St/^
0.4 0.5 0.7
0.8
0.9
Figure 2.21
484
In die left part of the curves, the distributed load is predominant and the first plastic hinge occurs at the intermediate support. In die right part, the concentrated load becomes predominant and the plastic hinge occurs at the load location.
23.4
is rather difficult to give formulas and abacuses dealing witii complex loading cases for which parameters could be :
It
A more general method based on elastic analyses is given hereafter in order to calculate the required inelastic rotation , d under design loads, that is for a load level between the first plastic hinge and
the second one for which the collapse occurs.
After an elastic analysis, we assume that, under design loads, the maximum moment Mm exceeding die plastic moment Mp, , is located at a distance L from the origin of the beam.
Figure 2.22
So, = M,.,* - Mp! is to be redistributed. For tiiis, the following diagram has to be added to the one resulting from the elastic analysis.
Figure 2.23
485
This diagram is obtained by considering the beam witii a perfect binge at the maximum moment location, and moments - applied each side of this hinge. The required inelastic rotation is the rotation in this hinge subjected to -AM.
Therefore the expression of the required inelastic rotation ,^ is given by :
AML +1
req.d
32
(2.38)
Note :
It
must be checked that the plastic moment is not exceeded somewhere else in the beam mechanism must not be reached.
the
= pi
"-
Loading factor for the first plastic hinge Loading factor at collapse
AML m Figure 2.24 gives the factor k, versus and the lengtii parameter .
%co.d=K
M -
10 -
\ \
^ U\
Zi
^ ^ s|v TS^sN
J~
\jT_
>x *N
..
0.1
0.2
03
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Figure 2.24
486
2.4
2.4.1
Frames
Plastic analysis using a specific program
In order to make a plastic design of a frame and determine die required inelastic rotations in plastic hinges, a global elastic-perfectly-plastic analysis (see 5.2.1.4 of Eurocode 3) of a frame can be performed with die help of a plastic analysis computer program. Those programs are generally based on die step-by-step method and can automatically take into account particular aspects such as elastic returns (see 2.4.2.2 of this chapter), second order effects, semi-rigid behaviour of connections and also M-N interaction in bending resistance of sections. All these aspects have direct influence on required inelastic rotations (see paragraph 2.2 for second order effects influence).
The M-N interaction in bending resistance of sections is often necessary for columns where the influence of axial force may be not negligible. Then, an interaction curve has to be considered. During die step-by-step method, moment and axial force may vary in such a way that they remain on the interaction curve. Moreover, axial plastic elongations and inelastic rotations have to be evaluated witii respect to a "normality law".
For instance, in case of I sections with bending about strong axis, the interaction curve may be approximated by a bi-linear curve as shown in figure 2.25. This leads to introduce two types of plastic hinge : without (type M) and witii N-interaction (type M-N). Consequently, the type of a plastic hinge may change as the axial force increases during loading and a specific program can take tiiis phenomenon into account.
N/Npl
i
teraction curve
MMpl
Figure 2.25
2.4.2
2.4.2.1 Scope
A global elastic-perfectly-plastic analysis can however also be performed with the help of a simple elastic analysis program if the following assumptions are satisfied.
Assumptions :
The axial force and the shear force must not reduce the plastic bending moment resistance. The frame is "rigid" according to Eurocode 3 (5.2.5.2) so that second order effects need not be taken into account in global analysis.
487
These assumptions are needed because a plastic hinge is considered hereafter like a perfect hinge acting under a constant moment Mp,. If it is expected that die bending moment resistance in a section will be reduced by die axial or shear force effect, the user can take that into account by reducing Mp, before starting the method.
2.4.2.2 Methodology
This method is known as die "step-bv-step method" and consists in a succession of elastic linear analyses in which plastic hinges are replaced by perfect hinges to ensure no variation of bending moments in the yielded sections (see figure 2.26). Each analysis, that is each step, is performed on the frame witii a perfect hinge more tiian in die previous step, at die location where a new plastic hinge occured in die previous analysis. Each step is limited at a variation of the load factor by the occurence of a new plastic hinge where the plastic moment is reached in a new cross-section somewhere in the structure. Inside each step, variations of displacements, internal forces and moments, and rotations in perfect hinges are calculated and can be summed through all the previous steps in order to determine tiieir total values.
mechanism
4.
A3
9j=o i
, D
<Pu
.
Figure 2.26
Figure 2.27 shows a flowchart of die methodology, considering tiiat die loading increases in proportion to the load factor . This metiiod allows die designer to calculate the required inelastic rotation in die plastic hinges just before collapse and even for each step of die incrementation.
This metiiod is radier easy to apply for a simple structure (simple frame, continuous beam, ... ). However, in case of more complex structures where the state of the structure under design loads or at collapse may involve a great number of plastic hinges, this methodology may become tedious and a specific plastic analysis program is necessary.
The user must be aware of a particular phenomenon which may occur and has to be taken into account : an elastic return of a plastic hinge (see figure 2.28). During the step-by-step procedure, die sign of die rotation in a perfect hinge may change. This means that, because of die bending moment
488
redistribution, the corresponding plastic hinge takes an elastic behaviour. Then die structure must be modified by suppressing the perfect hinge and die elastic analysis is to be started again, hi the plastic hinge where elastic return occurs, die remaining inelastic rotation Remaining (see figure 2.28) constitutes a local discontinuity in the structure and must be kept for following step of calculations.
Geometry - Steel Support conditions Loac
I
Initializations
i =0
Moment diagram : M0- 0 Shear force diagram :Vo=0 Displacements := 0 Hinge rotations : <,-0
Moment diagram : m
Shear force diagram : v
Elastic return
Suppression of the perfect hinge
Step number : j - i +
*
Research of the cross-section for which
Akj
= (Mpl - M y m is minimum
Load factor:
Xj = X +
kj
j
Xj F)
- g.
I
Rotations in the hinges at the end of the step
<&j=
, +
AXj,
i-j
Figure 2.27
489
<L
Mpi
_^_
<
Elastic return
<0
"^^>
Mpl
0
"^^^^
'^mm-f'^^T."
inelastic rotation
'remaining
Figure 2.28
2.4.3
A study has been conducted in order to determine the required inelastic rotation ,, of formed plastic hinges for a given type of portal frame. Six types of portal frames have been identified, and for each type, a parametric study has been made [13]. So, 79 frames have been studied. A simplified method
was adopted in order to obtain a realistic design. An elastic analysis was first performed in order to check Serviceability Limit State requirements. Then a plastic analysis was made in order to check Ultimate Limit State criteria and to determine required inelastic rotations under design loads ( = 1) and at collapse () : mechanism or instability. Some of die frames were sway frames according to Eurocode 3 and the second order effects were taken into account. All analyses have been conducted witii the PEP micro program of CTICM [15].
Table 2.3 summarises the calculated indicative maximum values of ^ which have been determined for each type of frame. This table gives to die designer an idea of die magnitude of ^ for such frames and must be considered as a help in order to choose a starting section in a pre-design
procedure.
490
Table 2.3 - Indicative maximum values of ^ [rad] for pre-design of simple portal fimes
Under design loads
fTBq.d
Type of frame
At collapse
9req.ii
[
1
0,009
0,020
i
0,015
2
;
0,032
'
0,026
I
0,035
l
1
0,034
0,040
0,013
0,014
i
]
l\
li
0,006
0,008
s
i
;
^s
491
3.1
This chapter deals with available inelastic rotation of plastic hinges. It presents a simple procedure for calculating the inelastic rotation <pav of plastic hinges developed by Feldmann [7].
The basis of the metiiod is the modelling of the nonlinear buckling phenomenon in the yielding zones by a plastic folding mechanism that allows to determine the available inelastic rotation of plastic hinges in a reliable way. Formulas have been developed for the available inelastic rotation of plastic hinges for I-profiles and -profiles in bending about the major and the minor axis, for bending witii or without shear as well as for bending witii axial forces. The extension of Feldmann's formulas to other load cases is presented in chapter 3.5. The reliability of these formulas is proved by a comparison with test results [8]: partial safety factors ^ to be applied to <pav have been determined (see chapter 1.6.2).
3.2
1/
concentrated load, bending about minor axis z-z of cross-section : Eurocode 3 [3] provides a formula for the design plastic resistance bending moment about minor axis Mpi z r :
492
concentrated load combined with axial compressive forces, bending about major axis y-y of cross-section : Eurocode 3 [3] proposes formulas for the reduced design plastic resistance bending moment allowing for the axial force, MN y Rd :
The extension of Feldmann's model to other load cases is presented in chapter 3.5. Tables of Appendix 1 provide design plastic resistance of I and H cross-sections (Mpl y Rd , Mpl 2 Rd , MN.y.Rd > )
2/
classification of cross-sections: this model applies for all Eurocode 3 class 1 and class 2 crosssections (plastic distribution of stresses over the cross-section); Eurocode 3 class 3 (elastic distribution of stresses over die cross-section) and Eurocode 3 class 4 (local elastic buckling) cross-sections shall be excluded (see [3] and chapter 1.6.1 for definition of classes);
steel grades: all steel grades available in Eurocode 3 Part
3/
can be applied in the formulas: 235 MPa < fy < 460 MPa. Indeed the reliability of the model has been demonstrated by tests results witii steel grades in that range [8]. Eurocode 3 [3] [4] allows for plastic global analysis witii steel materials characterized according to EN 10025 [1 1] and EN 101 13 [12] as given in table 3. 1;
1. 1
Remark 1 about nominal values of yield strength fy : Eurocode 3 Part 1.1 [3] gives a simplified variation of fy in function of the material thickness (thickness ranges: lower than 40 mm, from 40 mm to 100 mm), with values of fy - for certain thickness ranges - greater than the values specified by EN 10025 [1 1] and EN 101 13 [12] (thickness ranges: lower than 16 mm, from 16 mm to 40 mm, from 40 mm to 63 mm, from 63 mm to 80 mm, from 80 mm to 100 mm, from 100 mm to 150 mm) (see figure 3.1). As Eurocode 3 always provides yield strength fy equal or greater than values guaranteed by die specifications of delivery conditions (EN 10025, EN 10113), the available inelastic rotation (pav resulting from fy of Eurocode 3 are always safesided (equal or lower) in comparison of the inelastic rotation q>av resulting from fv of EN 10025 or EN
10113.
Remark 2 about overstrengthening of steel material : The real yield stresses of the steels delivered by mills are always greater tiian the nominal values of the steels indicated in the specifications EN 10025 [11] and EN 10113 [12]. As presented in chapter 1.6.2, a statistical procedure has been used to evaluate partial safety factors Yta, related to available inelastic rotation <pav issued from model proposed in this chapter 3 [8]. That statistical procedure took into account die difference between nominal and expected value of steel grade, even considering decreasing of inelastic rotation <pav by increasing the yield stress of the steel. That is safesided as another fact is that for many structures the rotation requirement is decreasing by increasing the yield stress whilst the
493
ultimate load target (i.e. die design load level) remains using die nominal yield values [17]
( see figure 3.2 : (plover < <Preq ) ^^ with ^& to safety me unexpected overstrengthening is well considered. Table 3.1 : steel materials allowed for plastic analysis by Eurocode 3 [3] [4]
Nomimal Steelgrade
Thickness t (mm) *)
t<40mm
[Mpa]
235 275 355
EN 10025
standard S 235 S 275 S 355 EN 10113-3 Standard S 275 M S 355 M S 420 M S 460 M
Notes:
fu [Mpa]
360 430 510
fu/fy
A5.65
Sy
Sy
[%]
26 22 22
24 20 20
24 22
19 17
24 22
19 17
*) r is the nominal thickness of the element : - of the flange of rolled sections (t = tf), in general, or - of the particular elements of welded sections for definition of parameters see figure 1.9 (chapter 1.5)
Steel grades
Minimum guaranteed yield strength ReH (or Rp0,2) in function of nominal thickness t of material
460
a
S 460
ReH(orRpO,2)[Mpa]
460
440
S 420
430
420
430
410 400
390
420 390
355
400
S 355
370
360
335
340
325 315 295
S 275
275
275
265
S 235
255
235
255
245
235 225
215
235 225
195
215
0
Legend:
16
63 80 100 - EN 10025 (for S 235, S 275 & S 355 steel grades), - EN 10113 (forS 275, S 355, S 420 & S 460 steel grades). ; Eurocode 3 specifications (for S 235, S 275, S 355, S 420 S 460 steel grades).
:
40
150
Euronorms specifications
t [mm]
Figure 3.1
494
Figure 3.2 : Decreasing of the rotation requirement in case of actual yield stress which are
greater tiian the nominal yield stress
4/
lateral restraint: the model does not take into account die lateral-torsional buckling, therefore, the ordinary rules of plastic analysis concerning lateral restraint shall be respected (see chapters 1.4 and 1.6.3 or [3], [5], [10]).
effect of stiffener: the given formulas are only valid when stiffeners are applied at the location of plastic hinges. On the otiier hand, if several stiffeners ( more than necessary) are applied in the zone of plastic hinges, the available inelastic rotation can be multiplied by a factor 2 or 3.
5/
In practice, local instabilities due to concentraded loads have to be avoided during the whole
rotational process in plastic hinges, by introducing at location of plastic hinges
:
sufficient stiffening of web, for My and My - load cases and, sufficient stiffening of flanges, for Mz load cases.
Sufficient stiffening can be guaranteed witii usual welded steel plates (see figure 1.8) but also by other means or by consideration of service conditions to ensure economical design : support of secondary beam, support of slab, steel sheet deck (floor, wall, roof) with sufficient stiffening, masonry, concrete walls, concrete infilments, .... In case of distributed loads the need of stiffening is to be appreciated by the designer.
6/
effect of shear forces: the model provides conservative results in case of high shear (meaning Vsd > 0.5 VpiRd and reduced plastic design resistance bending moment MyRd (^ Mpi j^j) as defined in chapter 5.4.7 of Eurocode 3). The model shall respect Eurocode 3 rules about shear resistance of cross-sections, Vsd ^ Vpi.Rd (see Appendix 1 for tables witii plastic resistance of I and cross-sections (Vpi.y.Rd, Vpi^Rd, ...)).
7/
8/
9/
type of loading: only static loading is permitted (no seismic loading, no dynamic loading).
495
3.3
<pav
The values of inelastic rotations of plastic hinges are mainly influenced by die dimensions of die cross-sections as well as by the steel grades of web and flange. They do not depend on die span length (L span) if lateral-torsional buckling is avoided. Some general remarks on influence of parameters have been made in table 1 .3 of chapter 1 . The graphs which follow give an idea of influence of cross-section dimensions and of steel grade on die inelastic rotation (paV. Note tiiat (pav decreases widi increase of slendemess of cross-section members as well as witii increase of yield strengdi.
Pav
[rad]
0.2
0.18
0.16 f
0.14
0.12
0.1
-
0.08 "
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
t
8
b/tf
I
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.11
496
[rad]
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
15
d/tw
1
20
25
30
35
40
45
0.2
0.18
. Id]
-
0.16
IPE 270
f y [MPa]
275
235
315
355
395
435
475
497
3.4
A. .
C.
type of load: concentrated load witii bending about major axis y-y of cross-section (My), type of load: concentrated load witii bending about minor axis z-z of cross-section (M~), type of load: concentrated load whh combined axial compressive forces, bending about major axis y-y of cross-section (My - N).
The following symbols are used to describe cross-section dimensions:
Figure 3.7
In all formulas:
=150 MPa,
fy A = yield strengdi in flange must be introduced in MPa,
fy.w = yield strengdi in web must be introduced in MPa,
498
..
type of load:
concentrated load
[rad](3.1)
D,
type of load:
concentrated load
&r
tF-
-^>2-
^)MZ
0<<1
aL
,. (1-C0L
v
/
tF
This formula is only vahd when stiffeners are applied at die loading point.
w
2t, <Pav=<PK,pl+-
Pl-z y
(h'2tf)^fy 4
2C
\
w
[rad]
(3.2)
b3(fyfl+ACT)
where
,=7
0.2
~^\
'>
499
In practical cases die ratio 2b/l are rather small. One can therefore assume die safesided value
of , = 2
C/.
type of load:
of cross-section
_ Aweb Afflai
<pav
is evaluated
from (3.3):
ty
""^
____J.
neutral axis
N^My
fyB
[rad](3.3)
if
;>
Npi
then the neutral axis hes m flange and 9av is calculated from
formula (3.4):
fy
^N^My
-t^Jl'Ura
imPfm^mVm^.
ft,
[rad]
(3.4)
where:
1-
~ ^p
1-2A
Af.
(3.5)
Nfl=(tf-tM)bfyil
N
(3.6)
*="2b 1-
*v
(3.7)
_4Ebtj
5hz
(3.8) (3.9)
Pu=btf(fy.fl + Aa)
The following value of Niimit defines the border between formulas (3.3) and (3.4) for <pav Nlimit is related to the case where neutral axis lies in die border between die web and the flange of the cross-section.
.si
fy
h-tf
N^)My
neutral axis
1
fy^
(3.10)
Nlimit=(A-2btf)fy.w
3.5
This chapter contains practical information about application of Feldmann's model to other load cases inducing gradients of moments different from the case of 3-point bending beams:
other load cases (distributed loads, concentrated loads witii combined axial tensile forces), other spans arrangements (continuous beams, frames, ...), other load arrangements (alternative distributed or concentrated load, ...).
It should
tiiat because cpav does not depend on spans arrangement if sufficient lateral restraint is imposed to avoid lateral-torsional buckling (die lengtii L does not interfere in the Feldmann's formulas), the same model is valid to all possible plastic hinges, no matter if they appear in die span (with sagging bending moments) or at die support (with hogging bending moments).
be noted
501
Table 3.2
Load case
&
^iH
=>
i ^H
^w
l.J
^ujll^
The available inelastic rotation av for plastic hinges (h) or (x), (y) and (z) are all identical and equal to : values given by formula A (3.1) fori values given by formula (3.2) forH
=>
-^jp-
1H
MJXX>" @
The available inelastic rotation av for plastic hinges (h) or (x) are all identical and equal to : values given by formula A (3.1) for I values given by formula (3.2) for
=>
ws
xqijp7
The available inelastic rotation <pav for plastic hinges (h) or (x) and (y) are all identical and equal to : values given by formula A (3.1) for I values given by formula (3.2) for
,
=>
-w
sfr
^qjp^
If compression (->H
If tensioni-
H*j : The available inelastic rotation av for plastic hinges (h) or (x), (y) and (z) are all identical and equal to values given by formulas C (3.3) and C (3.6) fori
Conservative values for the available inelastic rotation <pav for plastic hinges (h) or (x), (y) and (z) are given by formula A (3.1) fori
502
In case of distributed load, a realistic approach consists in considering the case of concentrated load, because there are no experimental results to confirm the model for this kind of load case. On the other hand, test results on 4-point bending beams have delivered greater available rotation capacities in comparison with 3-point bending beams [7]:
<Pav(
trit
avi cr Jj ><Pav(,
-^r>
According to numerical simulations presented in figure 3.8, if sufficient lateral restraint is ensured. cpav (for distributed load) = cpav (for concentrated load). For lateral restraint rules - see chapter 1.6.3.
il
MpLj
<Pav
(-"*)
"-
-DL/LR1
CL/LR1
"
C CL/LR2
DL/LR2
m.
load case
77
7ff7
* restraint (LR1) :
"
I
i
(LRl)
(LRl}
(LR2)
(LR2)
Figure 3.8
Therefore,
503
3.6
The tables which are included in this chapter are derived from the Feldmann's formulas presented in chapter 3.4 and based on assumptions detailed in chapter 3.2. They have been prepared to give a quick and easy estimation of <Pav values instead of applying die equations of the model. The tables concern standard European and British I and H hot-rolled steel profiles:
Inelastic rotations can be provided only for "plastic" cross-sections, therefore only classes 1 and 2 cross-sections according to present Eurocode 3 rules [3] [4] are covered in the tables. For crosssections in classes 3 and 4 , there are no available inelastic rotations (<pav = "-" is introduced in the tables). In case of My-N interaction, where the web class which depends on the position of neutral axis cannot be given a priori, the value of maximal normal force (Nmax) applied to the cross-section limits the application of the model.
The border between class 2 (plastic) cross-sections (=> cpav^O) and class 3 (elastic) cross-sections (=> (pav=0) is in Eurocode 3 [3] [4] defined by the highest (the least favourable) limitation of its compressed elements (web and/or flange). These limitations are presented in table 3.3 (issued from table 1.5a).
Table 3.3 : Border between class 2 and class 3 cross-sections according to Eurocode 3 [3] [4]
Load
cases
*
1
1 1
y
r
L-
tw
d
Flange class
c/+ <11
N<Nborder 456 13 -1
Web
class
d/t
w
<83
which is equivalent to
_d_
t...
where 0,5 <
-+0,5
<l
2dVy
420
j
460
0,71
Note:
stresses m tension
235
275
355
= ^235/fy
0,92
0,81
0,78
0,78
8(if40mmtl00mm)
0,96
0,84
0,74
504
A.
B.
C.
concentrated load with bending about major axis v-v of the cross-section (My): given in the column 2, they are calculated from the formula (3.1).
concentrated load witii bending about minor axis z-z of the cross-section (M21: cpav values are given in the column 3, they result from the formula (3.2) (witii safesided . = 0,2). concentrated load with bending about major axis v-v of the cross-section combined with axial compressive force (My-N): tables provide four columns for this load case, because the values of tpav are not constant for a given cross-section and depend on the applied normal force N. Figure 3.9 shows the influence of that force on inelastic rotation cpaV. In formulas of Feldmann's model, the normal force is also expressed in terms of N/Npi ratio,with Npi meaning axial plastic force (=A fy).
, [rad]
0,1
0,4
N/Npi [-]
0,3
0,4
force [kN]
Nlimit
0,5 Npi
Figure 3.9 Column 4 furnishes values of maximal normal force which can be applied to the cross-section, in other words, the limit of application of the model ,- is calculated as a minimum of the two
following values:
limit of application of <pav model for My-N interaction which is set to N=0,5 Npi (half the
plastic axial resistance) (see figure 3.9), NjjQj^gj = normal force defining the border between class 2 web (plastic) and class 3 web (elastic) for My-N loading [3] [4] [14] (see table 3.3).
Therefore, if applied values of are greater than Nmax, there are no available inelastic rotations in plastic hinges: = 0.
Values of Numit (see formula (3.10)), listed in column 6, correspond to the transition of neutral axis from web to flange (see figure 3.9). Thus, if values of are lower than Ninit, <Pav should be taken from column 5, otherwise we use values delivered by column 7. Column 5 presents <paV corresponding to the neutral axis lying in web - these values are deduced from the formula (3.3) and they are constant for different values of N. In column 7, the case of the neutral axis in flange is given - these values are calculated from formula (3.4) with = Ny^. Depending on value, inelastic rotations slightly change, but for reason of simplicity a constant value (given in column 7) is assumed for cases where > Niimit.Obviously N]^ can not be greater than
Nmax
505
For sections in classes 3 or 4 in case of My loading, tables deliver no available inelastic rotations for N-My loading (<paV = "-") and ,^ & Ni^ values do not mean anything OW = "-* and Njimit = "-" in tables).
All available inelastic rotation (pav given in radians [rad] in tables are characteristic values and must be divided by appropriate partial safety factor to obtain design values of available inelastic
rotation <pj,v.d (see chapter 1.6.2, table 1.6)
<Pav.d
:
= <Pav/TM(p
where
1,52 1,73
in columns 2 & 5
in column 3 in column 7
2,02
Mv Mz
Nmax
available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge, [rad]; applied bending moment about major axis y-y; applied bending moment about minor axis z-z; applied axial force; limit of application of die formula My-N, [kN], ="-" in tables, if sections are in class 3 or 4 for My loading, =minimum (0,5 A fy; ,^ between class 2 web and class 3 web for My - loading),
where ^^
d
W j
4
6.5
(Note : if the class of a cross-section submitted to My loading is lower or equal to 2 and if, the web class for loading is also lower or equal to 2, then border does not exist); Niimit border between two Feldmann's formulas : (3.3) and (3.4) (see formula (3. 10)) (with Numit < Nmax , in tables) fkN]; Npi plastic axial force (=A fy).
The following flow-chart n2 explains the elaboration of the tables and the way to use them.
506
Flow-chart n2
Internal force and/or bending moment applied to the cross-section
U
My.Sd*0
Nsd
My.Sd
*0
Mz.5d
"0
(compression)
<Pav
=0
column 2
of tables
column 7
<Pav*0
of tables
3"0
columns of tables
507
3.6.1
508
IPE
IPE A -IPE O
1
6
r
0
r^
pl
L L-
-J
c
L/2
Nmax
<Pav
>K L/2
1
iA
Designation
_>y
<Pav
u IJMZ
<Pav
5 My-
trad]
Nllmit
<Pav
[rad]
[rad]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750 137 IPE 750 147 IPE 750 173 IPE 750 196 IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE O 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600
[rad]
0,356 0,343 0,336 0,331 0,325 0,322 0,317 0,316 0,313 0,304 0,299 0,299 0,303 0,304 0,306 0,311 0,313 0,319 0,290 0,289 0,312 0,332
0,326
[kN]
90
121
[kN]
67 95
121
for N N,Imit
0,149 0,108 0,087 0,074 0,065 0,059 0,054 0,051 0,048 0,043 0,040 0,038 0,038
-
0,520 0,390 0,321 0.278 0,248 0,227 0,211 0,201 0,191 0,174 0,163 0,157 0,156 0,149 0,144 0,141 0,139 0,141 0,096 0,103 0,127 0,147
0,398 0,307 0,247 0,202 0,178 0,169 0,158 0,159 0,152 0,139 0,134 0,130 0,130
149 187
221
0,122
0,119 0,119 0,117 0,120
0,318 0,310 0,306 0,299 0,299 0,297 0,297 0,295 0,289 0,285 0,286 0,293 0,292 0,295 0,300 0,303 0,310
0,335 0,329 0,326 0,322 0,324 0,316 0,315 0,318 0,318 0,327 0,330
75 103 130 157 190 230 276 332 391 259 312 346 326 347 380 452 499 582
318 376 439 514 633 738 853 989 1133 1382 1606 1834
0,273 0,245 0,234 0,224 0,212 0.197 0,188 0,188 0.176 0,179 0,175 0,168 0,188
0,332 0,348
2312
0,273 0,245 0,234 0,224 0,212 0,197 0,188 0,188 0,176 0,179 0,175 0,168 0,188
248 296 342 408 485 569 679 789 939 1177 1409 1655 2097
0,073 0,064 0,061 0,058 0,055 0,050 0,047 0,047 0,043 0,044 0,042 0,040 0,045
509
HE AA
S 235
|
HEA
1
Pi
,
______
0 \<r |C
1
pl
L/2 *-' Pf1-.
,
1
. L/2 -
r
Designation
J My *
j
H>
JMy-N
Nmax
<Pav
<Pav
<Pav
[rad]
Nlimit
<Pav
trad]
[rad]
HE 100 AA
[rad]
0.276 0,263
-
[kN]
183 218
-
[kN]
108 126
-
HE120AA HE140AA
HE 160 AA HE 180 AA HE 200 AA HE 220 AA HE240AA HE 260 AA HE 280 AA HE 300 AA HE 320 AA HE 340 AA HE 360 AA HE400AA
0,451 0,309
-
HE450AA
HE 500 AA
0,133 0,132 0,124 0,118 0,115 0,106 0,104 0,098 0,628 0,434 0,381 0,343 0,280 0,264
1243
-
0,033
-
0,628 0.434 0,381 0,343 0,280 0,264 0,255 0.247 0,218 0,212 0,209 0,213 0,214 0,214 0,213 0,200 0,191 0,180 0,172 0,165 0,163 0,147 0,140 0,131
0,310 0,292 0,284 0,278 0,273 0,269 0,269 0,269 0,266 0,264 0,265 0,271 0,276 0,281 0,288 0,297 0,306 0,311 0,315 0,320 0,325 0,329 0,338 0,343
250 298 369 456 532 633 756 903 1020 1143 1322
1461 1568
0,255 0,247
0,218 0,212 0,209 0,213 0,214 0,214 0,213 0,200 0,191 0,180 0,172 0,165 0,163
1677 1868 2092 2321 2488 2661 1571 1788 1699 1771 1640
1797
I
0,195 0,133 0,116 0,103 0,084 0,078 0,076 0,073 0,064 0,062 0,061 0,062 0,062 0,062 0,060 0,055 0,052 0,048 0,044
-
0,147 0,140
0,131
"
510
6
r
pl
L
0 L/2
-
.
'T-
L/2
-
Pav
Designation
_>y
<Pav
HV
<Pav
X->y-N
Nmax
<Pav
[rad]
Nlimit
[rad]
2:
[rad]
HE 100 8 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000
HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
[rad]
0,338 0,327 0,319 0,312 0,308 0,304 0,301 0,298 0,293 0,289 0,288 0,295 0,299 0,304 0,311 0,320 0,329 0,334 0,339 0,343 0,348 0,352 0,362 0,366
0,461 0,431 0,409 0,392 0,379 0,368 0,360 0,379 0,368 0,359 0,374
[kN]
306 400 505 637 767 917 1070 1245 1392 1544 1752 1896 2008 2122 2324 2561 2804 2985 3172 3364 3600 2703 2810 2672
[kN]
142 179 220 297 349 425 485 573 645 718 824 901 985 1072 1264 1456 1660 1881 2114 2358 2688
-
for
N,imit
0,879 0,699 0,589 0,579 0,515 0,467 0,431 0,403 0,349 0,330 0,318 0,314 0,308 0,303 0,292 0,265 0,247 0,230 0,216 0,205 0,200 0,178 0,167 0,154
3,216 2,381 1,866 1,660 1,393 1,199 1,053 1,153 0,977 0,889 0,974 0,871
0,278 0,220 0,185 0,180 0,160 0,144 0,133 0,124 0,107 0,100 0,096 0,095 0,092 0,089 0,084 0,075 0,069 0,062 0,057 0,053 0,051
-
1543 1756 2345 2581 2822 3561 3667 3711 3746 3828 3941
4045 4164 4273 4391 4500 4750 4978 3646
255 317 383 486 563 665 750 960 1068 1177 1440 1524 1613 1702 1884 2111 2338 2575 2812 3049 3286 3804 4278
-
1,039 0,767 0,600 0,531 0,445 0,382 0,335 0,369 0,312 0,283 0,312 0,277 0,248 0,223 0,183 0,148 0,123 0,104 0,090 0,078 0,070 0,056 0,047
-
511
UB
<pav
1
r-
"
I
c U2
>|c L/2
Irad]
Designation
3 Mu
<Pav
fl
<Pav
M,
^My-N
max
[kN]
285 345 376
449
<Pav
[rad]
Nlimit
<Pav
[rad]
UB 178 X 102 X 19 UB 203 X 102 X 23 UB 203 X 133 X 25 UB 203 X 133 X 30 UB 254 X 102 X 22 UB 254 102 X 25 UB 254 X 102 X 28 UB 254 X 146 X 31 UB 254 X 146 X 37 UB 254 146 X 43 UB 305 X 165 X 40 UB 305 165 X 46 UB 305 X 165 X 54 UB 356 X 171 X 45 UB 356 X 171 X 51 UB 356 X 171 X 57 UB 356 X 171 X 67 UB 406 X 178 X 54 UB 406 X 178 X 60 UB 406 X 178 X 67 UB 406 X 178 X 74 UB 457 X 1S2 X 52 UB 457 X 152 60 UB 457 X 152 X 67 UB 457 152 X 74 UB 457 152 82 UB 457 X 191 X 67 UB 457 X 191 X 74 UB 457 X 191 X 82 UB 457 X 191 X 89 UB 457 X 191 X 98 UB 533 X 210 X 82 UB 533 210 X 92 UB 533 X 210 101 UB 533 X 210 X 109 UB 533 X 210 122 UB 610 X 229 101 UB 610 X 229 X 113 UB 610 X 229 125 UB 610 X 229 X 140 UB 610 X 305 X 149 UB 610 X 305 X 179 UB 610 X 305 X 238 UB 686 X 254 125 UB 686 X 254 X 140 UB 686 X 254 152 UB 686 X 254 X 170 UB 762 X 267 X 147 UB 762 X 267 X 173 UB 762 X 267 197 UB 838 X 292 X 176 UB 838 X 292 X 194 UB 838 X 292 X 226 UB 914 305 X 201 UB 914 305 224 UB 914 X 305 X 253 UB 914 X 305 X 289 UB 914 X 419 X 343 UB 914 419 X 388
[rad]
0.308 0,327 0,281 0.300 0,293 0.314 0,336 0.282 0.303 0.320 0.286 0.299 0,314 0,279 0,293 0.305
0,326
[kN]
194 246
0,055
0,051
0.135 0,158
0,181
280 376
424
466 554
644
0,122
0.140 0.160
0,194
580
1005
0,192 0,237 0.135 0.158 0.181 0.156 0.184 0.222 0.136 0.159 0.195 0.122 0.140 0.160
0.194
263
294
0,065 0.038
0,044 0,040 0,049
0,060
541
0.051
0,050
0.119
0.134
0.170 0,191 0.111 0.127 0.142 0,156 0.178 0.108 0,123 0.139
0,158
0,285 0,300 0.311 0.324 0,299 0.321 0,335 0,353 0,369 0,293 0.306 0.316 0,328 0.341 0,288 0.303 0.315
0,324 0,340
0,119
0,134
871
0,043
1826
674
1168
0,048
1530
0,044
0,290
0,305
823
1039 1403
0,319
0,333
0,123 0.139
0,158
0,290
0.307
1028
1764 3564
0.340 0,289
0,304
2533
0.063
0.121
0.134
1835
1284
1561
2098 3072
3120
5807
4381
0,044
512
<pav
pl
t
Designation
m,
Nmax
<Pav
U
-
L/2
'T-
L/2
-
_>y
<Pav
HI
[rad]
.
-^My-N
<Pav
[rad]
N|mit
<Pav
[rad]
[rad]
UC 152x152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152 152x37 UC 203 203 46 UC 203 203 52 UC 203 203 60 UC 203 203 71 UC 203 203 86 UC 254 254 73 UC 254 254 89 UC 254 254 107 UC 254 254 132 UC 254 254 167 UC 305 305 97 UC 305 305 118 UC 305 305 137 UC 305 305 158 UC 305 305 198 UC 305 305 240 UC 305 305 283 UC 356 368 129 UC 356 368 153 UC 356 368 177 UC 356 368 202 UC 356 406 235 UC 356 406 287 UC 356 406 340 UC 356 406 393 UC 356 406 467 UC 356 406 551 UC 356 406 634
-
[kN]
_
[kN]
|
for N s NlimIt
0,112 0,167 0,085
0,101
0,374 0,548 0,283 0,334 0,450 0,506 0,784 0,270 0,364 0,530 0,734 1,125 0,240 0,330 0,421 0,536 0,759 1,077 1,604 0,211 0,273 0,352 0,444 0,537 0,787 1,196 1,568 2,113 2,891 3,609
0,285 0,303 0,275 0,285 0,296 0,316 0,336 0,277 0,294 0,310 0,334 0,366 0,270 0,284 0,297 0,312 0,339
0,364 0,393 0,266
450 554 690 779 897 1063 1288 1094 1331 1602 1976 2501 1451 1765 2049 2366 2966 3593 3875
1931
0,278 0,289 0,300 0,306 0,327 0,350 0,370 0,398 0,427 0,456
2289 2650 3022 3518 4297 4655 5381 6395 7546 8681
0,374 0,548 0,283 0,334 0,450 0,506 0,784 0,270 0,364 0,530 0,734 1,125 0,240 0,330 0,421 0,536 0,759 1,077 1,604 0,211 0,273 0,352 0,444 0,537 0,787 1,196 1.568 2,113 2,891 3,609
562
489 579 711 844 1051 691 828 945
513
3.6.2
514
6
f
pl
*
Designation
!=
<Pav
c
L/2
^*max
<Pav
>K L/2
j
<Pav
My
Hk
[rad]
0,352 0,339 0,332 0,327
0,321 0,318 0,314 0,312 0,310 0,302 0,296 0,297 0,300 0,301 0,303 0,308 0,310 0,316 0,287 0,287 0,309 0,328
< ^My-N
[rad]
Nlimit
<Pav
[rad]
at
[rad]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750 137 IPE 750 147 IPE 750 173 IPE 750 196
[kN]
105 142 182 226 276 329 392 459 538 632 740 530 586 657 747 844 990 1133 526 1003 1403 1853
88 121 152 184 222 269 195 239 252 258 311 344 318 335 360 426 465 541
[kN]
79
111
for
Numit
0,427
0,321 0,264 0,229 0,205 0,188 0,175 0,166 0,158 0,144 0,135 0,130 0,129 0,124 0,119
0,136 0,098 0,079 0,068 0,059 0,054 0,049 0,047 0,044 0,039 0,037
-
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE O 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600
0,323 0,315 0,307 0,303 0,297 0,296 0,294 0,294 0,293 0,287 0,283 0,284 0,291 0,290 0,293 0,298 0,300 0,307 0,332 0,325 0,323 0,319 0,321 0,313 0,312 0,315 0,314 0,323 0,327 0,328 0,344
0,327 0,252 0,204 0,167 0,148 0,140 0,131 0,132 0,126 0,115 0,111 0,108 0,108 0,102 0,099 0,099 0,097 0,099 0,226 0,203 0,194 0,185 0,176 0,163 0,156 0,156 0,146 0,148 0,145 0,139 0,155
373 439 514 601 740 864 998 1157 1325 1618 1379 1495 2706
290 346 400 477 568 666 794 923 1099 1377
.
0,066 0,058 0,056 0,052 0,050 0,046 0,043 0,043 0,039 0,040
-
2454
0,041
515
<pav
Designation
pl
,
Nmax
<Pav
pl
L/2
--
. L/2
-
ID HV
My
<Pav
T-'
[rad]
[kN]
214
-
) My -N
Nlimit
<Pav
[rad]
HE 100 AA
9av [rad]
0,274
-
[rad]
[kN]
126
-
0,372
-
0,109 0,103 0,098 0,095 0,088 0,086 0,081 0,517 0,359 0,315 0,284 0,233 0,219 0,212 0,206
-
0,267 0,270 0,272 0,276 0,281 0,290 0,294 0,307 0,290 0,282 0,276 0,271 0,267 0,267 0,267
-
0,109 0,103 0,098 0,095 0,088 0,086 0,081 0,517 0,359 0,315 0,284 0,233 0,219 0,212 0,206
-
0,077
0,071 0,069 0,067
-
0,178 0,178 0,179 0,177 0,167 0,160 0,150 0,143 0.137 0,135 0,122 0,117 0,108
0,270 0,274 0,279 0,285 0,294 0,303 0,308 0,312 0,317 0,321 0,326 0,335 0,339
1710 1835 1963 2186 2448 2716 2912 1544 1573 1786 1660 1699 1523
0,178 0,178 0,179 0,177 0,167 0,160 0,150 0,143 0,137 0,135 0,122 0,117 0,108
516
\r-
Pi
L
pl
-
l^
I:
ff
<Pav
Designation
_) My HV
<Pav <Pav
T-'
Nmax
<Pav
My-
Niimit
[rad]
[rad]
[rad]
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000
HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
[rad]
0,334 0,323 0,316 0,309 0,305 0,301 0,298 0,295 0,291 0,287 0,285 0,292 0,297 0,301 0,308 0,317 0,326 0,330 0,335 0,339 0,344 0,348 0,357 0,362 0,454 0,425 0,403 0,387 0,374 0,364 0,355 0,374 0,364 0,355 0.370 0,375 0,375 0,375 0,376 0,376 0,376 0,376 0,377 0,377 0,378 0,378 0,379 0,379
[kN]
358 468 591 746 897 1074 1252 1457 1629 1806 2050 2218 2350 2484 2719 2997 3281 3493 3712 3937 4213 2717 2789 2601 732 913 1108 1334 1557 1805 2055 2744 3020 3302 4167 4291 4343 4384 4479 4612 4734 4873 5000 5139 5266 5559 4102 3623
[kN]
166 209 257 348 408
for N s N|imlt
0,254 0,201 0,169 0,164 0,146 0,132 0,121 0,113 0,098 0,092 0,088 0,086 0,084 0,082 0,077 0,069 0,063 0,057 0,052 0,048 0,046
-
497 568
671 755 841 965 1054 1152 1255 1479 1704 1943 2202 2474 2759 3145
-
| |
2,620 1,943 1,524 1,357 1,140 0,982 0,864 0,946 0,803 0,731 0,800 0,717 0,647 0,589 0,494 0,411 0,351 0,304 0,269 0,242 0.220 0,186 0,162 0,144
2,620 1,943 1,524 1,357 1,140 0,982 0,864 0,946 0,803 0,731 0,800 0.717 0,647 0,589 0,494 0,411 0,351 0,304 0,269 0,242 0,220 0,186 0,162 0,144
298 371 449 569 659 778 878 1124 1250 1377 1685 1783 1887 1991 2205 2471 2736 3013 3291 3568 3845 4451
-
517
<pav
I
cr
Designation
1
Mv
<Pav
"
M,
1
fe L/2
>|c L/2
ff
<Pav
ID )
<Pav
z^
max
[kN]
334 404
440
Mu-N
Niimit
<Pav
[rad]
[rad]
[rad]
UB 178 X 102 X 19 UB 203 X 102 X 23 UB 203 X 133 X 25 UB 203 X 133 X 30 UB 254 X 102 X 22 UB 254 X 102 X 25 UB 254 X 102 X 28 UB 254 146 X 31 UB 254 X 146 X 37 UB 254 146 X 43 UB 305 X 165 X 40 UB 305 X 165 X 46 UB 305 X 165 54 UB 356 171 45 UB 356 X 171 X 51 UB 356 X 171 57 UB 356 X 171 67 UB 406 X 178 X 54 UB 406 X 178 X 60 UB 406 X 178 X 67 UB 406 X 178 X 74 UB 457 X 152 X 52 UB 457 X 152 X 60 UB 457 X 152 X 67 UB 457 X 152 X 74 UB 457 X 152 82 UB 457 191 67 UB 457 X 191 74 UB 457 X 191 X 82 UB 457 191 X 89 UB 457 191 98 UB 533 X 210 X 82 UB 533 X 210 X 92 UB 533 X 210 101 UB 533 X 210 X 109 UB 533 X 210 X 122 UB 610 X 229 X 101 UB610X229X 113 UB 610 X 229 X 125 UB 610 X 229 X 140 UB 610x305x149 UB 610 305 X 179 UB 610 X 305 X 238 UB 686 X 254 X 125 UB 686 X 254 140 UB 686 254 X 152 UB 686 X 254 170 UB 762 X 267 147 UB 762 X 267 X 173 UB 762 267 X 197 UB 838 X 292 X 176 UB 838 X 292 X 194 UB 838 292 X 226 UB 914 X 305 X 201 UB 914 305 X 224 UB 914 X 305 X 253 UB 914 305 X 289 UB 914 X 419 X 343 UB 914 419 X 388
[rad]
0.305 0.323 0.279 0.297 0.290 0.311 0,332 0,280 0.301 0,317
0.284
[kN]
227 288 308 344
0.170
0,174
0,131
0,150 0.130 0.153
0.184 0.113
419 477
0,044
0.055
0.296 0,311 0.277 0.291 0.302 0.322 0.283 0.297 0.308 0,320
0.297
0.105 0.120
0.134
0.151 0.101
0.113
0.128
0,141
0,158 0,092
0,106
0.337 0.285 0,301 0.312 0.320 0,336 0.288 0,302 0.316 0,330 0,287
0.304
366 440 583 1175 412 451 643 813 309 402 591 733 970 482 591 809 970 1236 579 699 683 1114' 1468 628 783 1009 1391 1001
1774
0.113 0,132 0,162 0.101 0.117 0.133 0.161 0.099 0.111 0.127 0,143 0,088 0.105 0.120
0.134
634
0,047
855
0.046
0.151
0.101 0,113
0,128
0,141
0.158 0.092
0.106
4171 767
967 1218 1674
0.118 0.129 0,148 0.089 0,102 0.115 0,131 0,110 0,137 0.197 0.087
0.100
2964
0,058
0,325
0,289
0.085
0,104
879
1364
0.122
0,083
0.309 0.328
0.287
1850
1014
0.122
0,083 0.094
2019
3041
3102 4186
518
(f>av
Wi
"1
L
l^
Designation
^i -
L/2
[rad]
.
->K
1
L/2
. H>,
<Pav
<Pav
5 My -
Nmax
<Pav
Niimit
<Pav
[rad]
_
[rad]
UC 152 152 23 UC 152 152 30 UC 152 152 37 UC 203 203 46 UC 203 203 52 UC 203 203 60 UC 203 203 71 UC 203 203 86 UC 254 254 73 UC 254 254 89 UC 254 254 107 UC 254 254 132 UC 254 254 167 UC 305 305 97 UC 305 305 118 UC 305 305 137 UC 305 305 158 UC 305 305 198 UC 305 305 240 UC 305 305 283 UC 356 368 129 UC 356 368 153 UC 356 368 177 UC 356 368 202 UC 356 406 235 UC 356 406 287 UC 356 406 340 UC 356 406 393 UC 356 406 467 UC 356 406 551 UC 356 406 634
-
[rad]
-
[kN]
_
[kN]
_
for Niimit
0,102 0,153 0,077 0,092 0,125 0,144 0,225 0,074 0,102 0,150 0,211 0,326 0,065 0,091 0,117 0,151 0,217 0,311 0,437
.
0,309
0,451 0,235 0,276 0,371
0,418 0,644
0,224 0,301 0,437 0,604
0,922
0,200 0,273 0,347
0,283 0,301 0,273 0,283 0,293 0,313 0,333 0,275 0,291 0,307 0,331 0,362 0,268 0,282 0,295 0,309 0,335 0,360 0,387
-
526 648 808 911 1050 1243 1508 1280 1558 1875 2312 2927 1697 2065
2398 2769
3471 4205 4595
-
262 319 383 418 493 523 657 572 677 833 988 1230 809 969 1106 1259 1510 1807 1944
_
0,227 0,292 0,367 0,443 0,646 0,969 1,269 1,707 2,331 2,907
0,276 0,286 0,297 0,303 0,324 0,346 0,366 0,393 0,421 0,449
2679 3101 3537 4117 5028 5521 6382 7585 8950 10296
0,227 0,292 0,367 0,443 0,646 0,969 1,269 1,707 2,331 2,907
1139 1324 1509 1677 2047 2225 2552 2977 3492 3942
0,076 0,099 0,126 0,154 0,227 0,326 0,429 0,580 0,795 0,994
519
3.6.3
520
IPE
IPE A -IPE O
1
<Pav
<&
Wi
pl
L
>\
l^
Designation
% U2
"
>\<l
1
L/2
ff
[rad]
_>y
<Pav
I
I
\*\ M I JM2
<Pav
^My-N
''max [kN]
136 183 234 292 357 425 506 592 694 447 491 529 579 644 721 803 937 1065 313 815 1240 1720
113 156 196 238 171 186 195 240 251 250 298
<Pav
[rad]
Nlimit
<Pav
[rad]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750 137 IPE 750 147 IPE 750 173 IPE 750 196
[rad]
0,346 0,333 0,327 0,322 0,316 0,313 0,309 0,308 0,305 0,297 0,292 0,292 0,296 0,296
[kN]
102 144 183 225 282 333 408 466 554
. -
0,303 0,228 0,188 0,164 0,146 0,135 0,125 0,119 0,114 0,104 0,097 0,093 0.093 0,089 0,086 0,084 0,083 0,084
0,057
0,061
0,075 0,087
0,232 0,180 0,146 0,120 0,106 0,101 0,094 0,095 0,091 0,083 0,080 0,078 0,078 0,073 0,071 0,071 0,070 0,072
0,161. 0,145 0.139 0,133 0,126 0,117
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE O 500 IPE 550 IPE 600
0,318 0,310 0,303 0,299 0,293 0,292 0,290 0,290 0,289 0,283 0,279 0,280 0,287 0,286 0,289 0,293 0,296 0,303 0,326 0,320 0,317 0,314 0,316 0,308 0,307 0,310 0,310 0,318 0,321 0,323 0,338
327
291
567
664 776 956 699 772 890
0,145 0,139
0,133 0,126 0,117 0,112
942
1200 1382 1484 2243
521
<pav
1^
"l
I L
^
j
pl
o -
l^t
j
L/2
'T
, L/2
r
Designation
LJMy
9av
[rad]
HV
"
JMy-N
Nmit
<Pav
9av [rad]
-
Nmax
<Pav
[rad]
-
[rad]
-
[kN)
-
for
< Niimit
-
[kN]
-
for N S Nmit
-
HE100AA HE 120 AA HE140AA HE 160 AA HE 180 AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE 340 AA HE 360 AA HE 400 AA HE 450 AA HE SOO AA HE550AA HE 600 AA HE650AA HE 700 AA HE800AA HE 900 AA HE 1000 AA
HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A HE 500 A HE 550 A HE 600 A HE 650 A HE 700 A HE 800 A HE 900 A HE 1000 A
0,058
0,368 0,257 0,226 0,204
-
186 218
270 354
-
0,130 0,129 0,121 0,116 0,109 0,104 0,099 0,098 0,088 0,084 0,078
0,275 0,282 0,290 0,299 0,303 0,308 0,312 0,316 0,320 0,329 0,333
0,130 0,129 0,121 0,116 0,109 0,104 0,099 0,098 0,088 0,084 0,078
522
6
t
r^
P
L L
^I
-
0
i1-
L/2
'T-
L/2
Designation
_>y
9av [rad]
0,512
0,410 0,347 0,340 0,304 0,276 0,256 0,240
JMZ
I
I->y-N
**max
9av [rad]
0,329 0,318
0,311 0,305 0,301 0,297 0,294 0,291
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
0,512
0,410 0,347 0,340 0,304 0,276 0,256 0,240
Niimit
9av [rad]
for N Nmit
0,216 0,172 0,144 0.140 0,124 0,112 0,104 0,097 0,083 0,078
[kN]
462 604 762 963 1158 1386 1616 1881
[kN]
214 270 332 449 527 642 733 866 974 1085 1245 1361 1487 1620 1909 2200 2508 2842
-
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
0,312 0,321 0,325 0,329 0,334 0,338 0,342 0,351 0,355 0,443 0,415 0,395 0,379 0,367 0,357 0,349 0,367 0,357 0,348 0,363 0,367 0,367 0,368 0,368 0,368 0,369 0,369 0,370 0,370 0,370 0,371 0,371 0,371
4510 2605
2621 2884
2662 2656
2361
1,836 1,365 1,073 0,956 0,804 0,694 0,611 0,670 0,570 0,519 0,568 0,510 0,461 0,420 0,353 0,294 0,252 0,219 0,193 0,174 0,158 0,134 0,117 0,103
1,836 1,365 1,073 0,956 0,804 0,694 0,611 0,670 0.570 0.519 0,568 0,510 0,461 0,420 0,353 0,294 0,252 0,219 0,193 0,174 0,158 0,134 0,117 0,103
385 479 579 735 851 1004 1133 1451 1613 1778 2175 2302 2436 2570 2846 3189 3532 3890 4248 4606 4964
-
0,806 0.597 0,467 0,413 0,346 0,297 0,261 0,288 0,244 0,221 0,244 0.218 0,195 0,175 0,144 0,117 0.097 0,082 0,070 0,062 0,055
-
"
523
mu$t
0
le-
Pi
,
"il 't
\c Nmax
P
L/2 *-'
-.It-
--
L/2
'i
Designation
_>y
9av
[rad]
0.122 0.125 0.114
0,141
Kk
9av [rad]
0.301 0.318 0.276 0.293 0.287 0,307 0.327 0.276 0.296 0.312 0.280 0.292 0,306 0.273 0.287 0.298 0.317 0,279 0,293
0,304
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
0.122 0.12S
0.114 0.141
My"
Nmit
9av [rad]
for N S Nmit
0,042
-
[kN]
431
316 567
[kN]
294
-
203 X 102 X 23 203 X 133 25 203 X 133 X 30 254 X 102 X 22 U8 254 X 102 X 25 UB 254 X 102 X 28 UB 254 X 146 X 31 UB 254 X 146 X 37 UB 254 X 146 X 43 UB 305 X 165 X 40 UB 305 X 165 X 46 UB 305 X 165 X 54 UB 356 X 171 X 45 UB 356 X 171 X 51 UB 356 X 171 57 UB 356 X 171 X 67 UB 406 X 178 X 54 UB 406 X 178 X 60 UB 406 X 178 X 67 UB 406 X 178 74 UB 457 X 152 X 52 UB 457 X 152 X 60 UB 457 X 152 X 67 UB 457 X 152 X 74 UB 457 152 X 82 UB 457 X 191 X 67 UB 457 X 191 X 74 UB 457 X 191 X 82 UB 457 X 191 X 89 UB 457 191 X 98 UB 533 X 210 X 82 UB 533 X 210 X 92 UB 533 X 210 X 101 UB 533 210 X 109 UB 533 X 210 X 122 UB 610 229 X 101 UB610X229X 113 UB 610 X 229 X 125 UB 610 X 229 X 140 UB 610 305 X 149 UB 610 X 305 X 179 UB 610 X 305 X 238 UB 686 X 254 X 125 UB 686 X 254 X 140 UB 686 X 254 152 UB 686 X 254 170 UB 762 X 267 X 147 UB 762 X 267 173 UB 762 X 267 X 197 UB 838 X 292 176 UB 838 X 292 X 194 UB 838 X 292 X 226 UB 914 305 201 UB 914 X 305 X 224 UB 914 X 305 X 253 UB 914 X 305 X 289 UB 914 X 419 X 343 UB 914 419 X 388
UB UB UB UB UB
178 X 102 X 19
397
444
-
0.079 0.093 0.107 0,093 0,110 0,133 0.082 0,096 0.117 0.073 0,084 0,096
0,116
678 273 324 378 335 390 972 251 376 635 338 417 571
826
0,040 0,050
-
0.079 0.093 0.107 0.093 0.110 0,133 0.082 0.096 0.117 0.073
0.084
616
-
0.047
-
0,096
0.116
0,071 0,080 0.092 0,103 0.063 0,075 0,086 0.096 0,109 0.073 0.082 0,092 0.101
0.114
368 409
616 800
0,315 0.293 0.313 0,326 0.343 0.358 0.287 0.299 0.308 0.319 0.332 0.282 0,297
0.307
948
1238
0,071 0,080 0.092 0,103 0.063 0.075 0.086 0.096 0.109 0.073 0.082 0.092 0.101
0.114
493 621
818
0.315 0,330
0.284
0.083 0.094
0,079
0.298 0.311
0.324 0,284
0,091 0,061 0.075 0.087 0,059 0.067 0,081 0,059 0.069 0.079 0.093 0.091 0.105
0.285
0.305
1066 1450 507 671 912 1322 907 1741 5384 612 825 1092 1581 682 1197
1717
0.083
0.094
0.079 0.099 0.142 0,063 0,072 0.080 0.091 0.061 0,075 0.087 0.059
0.067
3826
-
0.049
-
0.093 0.091
0.105
524
\4
1
pl
L
^l
\r~
L/2 L/
-il 'T-
L/2
Designation
_>y
9av [rad]
-
HV
9av
[rad]
-
>'^My-N
Nmax
9av [rad]
for < Num
.
Nmit
9av [rad]
for N > Num
_
[kN]
.
[kN]
.
UC 152x152x23 UC 152 152 30 UC 152 152x37 UC 203 203 46 UC 203 203 52 UC 203 203 60 UC 203 203 71 UC 203 203 86 UC 254 254 73 UC 254 254 89 UC 254 254 107 UC 254 254 132 UC 254 254 167 UC 305 305 97 UC 305 305 118 UC 305 305 137 UC 305 305 158 UC 305 305 198 UC 305 305 240 UC 305 305 283 UC 356 368 129 UC 356 368 153 UC 356 368 177 UC 356 368 202 UC 356 406 235 UC 356 406 287 UC 356 406 340 UC 356 406 393 UC 356 406 467 UC 356 406 551 UC 356 406 634
0,221 0,321
-
0,280 0,296
-
679 836
-
0,221 0,321
_
338 412
.
0,087 0,130
.
0,079
0,217 0,312
0,429 0,652
-
3778
-
0,379
-
2554
,
0,164 0,210 0,263 0,316 0,459 0,675 0,881 1,181 1,608 2,003
0,272 0,283 0,293 0,299 0,319 0,339 0,358 0,384 0,411 0,438
1470 1709 1948 2165 2643 2923 3353 3911 4588 5179
0,672 0,839
525
3.6.4
S 420 steel
grade
526
IPE
IPE A -IPE O
1
<pav
Pi
%
Designation
!=
ff
9av
trad]
0,342 0,330 0,323 0,319 0,313 0,310 0,306 0,305 0,302 0,295 0,290 0,290 0,294 0,294 0,296 0,300 0,303 0,308 0,281 0,281 0,302 0,319
0,314 0,307 0,300 0,296 0,290 0,290 0,288 0,288 0,286 0,281 0,277 0,278 0,285 0,283 0,286 0,291 0,294 0,300
Ye
L/2
>l<
L/2
ff
9av [rad]
for Nmit
0,104 0,075 0,060 0,052 0,045 0,041 0,037
-
j
9av
[rad]
0,238 0,179 0,148 0,129 0,116 0,107 0,099 0,094 0,090 0,082 0,077
My
H>,
Nmax
- ^My-N
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
0,238 0,179 0,148 0,129 0,116
Niimit
[kN]
161 217 277 345 422
[kN]
120 170 216 267 334 394 482
-
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750 137 IPE 750 147 IPE 750 173 IPE 750 196
0,107 0,099
0,094 0,090 0,082 0,077 0,074 0,074 0,071 0,068
0,067
0,066 0,066 0,045 0,048 0,059 0,069 0,182 0,142 0,115 0,095 0,084 0,080 0,075 0,075 0,072 0,066 0,064 0,062 0,062 0,058 0,057 0,057 0,056 0,057
1565
134 184 232 167 172 184 192 235 244 237 281 305 260 257 250 283 290 327
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
IPE 0 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
0.182 0,142 0,115 0,095 0.084 0,080 0,075 0,075 0,072 0,066 0,064 0,062 0,062 0,058 0,057 0,057 0,056 0,057 0,127 0,115 0,110 0,105 0,100 0,093 0,089 0,089 0,083 0,084 0,082 0,079 0,088
105 152
189
-
0,323 0,317 0,314 0,311 0,313 0,305 0,304 0,307 0,307 0,315 0,318 0,319 0,335
569
671 785 918 654 704 774 889 933 1186 1357 1444 2219
0,127 0,115 0,110 0,105 0,100 0,093 0,089 0,089 0,083 0,084 0,082 0,079 0,088
729
-
527
Pi
,
^.
pl
0
~i
L/2
'T-
. L/2
-
9av [rad]
for N > Nmit
-
Designation
LM H>2
'
J
"
JMy-N
Niimit
9av [rad]
HE 100 AA HE 120 AA
-
9av [rad]
.
NfTiax
9av [rad]
for < Num
-
[kN]
-
[kN]
-
HE320AA
HE 340 AA HE 360 AA HE400AA HE450AA
HE900AA
HE 1000 AA HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A HE 500 A HE 550 A HE 600 A HE 650 A HE 700 A HE 800 A HE 900 A HE 1000 A
0,048 0,046
0,290 0,203
-
0,284 0,288
854 707
446 532
-
0,300 0,284
-
220 258
-
0,136 0,093
-
0,102 0,096 0,092 0,087 0,083 0,079 0,078 0,070 0,066 0,062
0,280 0,288 0,296 0,301 0,305 0,309 0,313 0,317 0,326 0,330
3339 1509 1511 1498 1479 1455 1635 1366 1264 911
0,102
0,096 0,092 0,087 0,083 0,079 0,078 0,070 0,066 0,062
1889
-
0,042
-
528
Wi
Pi
L
l^
Designation
ff
9av [rad]
for N
2:
_>y
9av [rad]
0,403 0,323 0,274 0,269 0,240 0,219 0,203 0,190 0,166 0,157 0,151 0,150 0,147 0,144 0,139 0,127 0,118 0,110 0,103 0,098 0,095 0,084 0,079 0,073 1,433 1,067 0,840 0,748 0,630 0,545 0,480 0,526 0,448 0,409 0,447 0,402 0,363 0,331 0,279 0,233 0,199 0,173 0,153 0,138 0,125 0,106 0,092 0,082
H>2
9av [rad]
0,325 0,315 0,308 0,302 0,298 0,294 0,292 0,289 0,285 0,281 0,280 0,286 0,290 0,294 0,301 0,309 0,317 0,322 0,326 0,330 0,334 0,338 0,347 0,351
0.437 0,410 0.390 0,374 0,363 0,353 0,345 0,362 0,353
Nmax
^My-N
Nmit
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
0,403 0,323 0,274 0,269 0,240 0,219 0,203 0,190 0,166 0,157 0,151 0,150 0,147 0,144 0,139 0,127 0,118 0,110 0.103 0,098 0,095 0,084 0,079 0,073 1,433 1,067 0,840 0,748 0,630 0,545 0,480 0,526 0,448 0,409
[kN]
547 714 902 1139 1370 1640 1912 2226 2487 2759 3131 3388 3589 3793 4153 4578 5011 2624 2618 2606 2853 2558 2481 2095 1118 1395 1692 2038 2378 2757 3138 4191 4613 5043 6365 6553 6632 6695 6841 7044 7230 7442 7637 7848 8043 4689 3973 3242
[kN]
254 319 393 531 624 759 867 1024 1153 1284 1473 1610 1760 1917 2259 2603 2967.
.
Nmit
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 8 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
455 566 685 869 1007 1188 1341 1716 1909 2104
2574 2724
2882 3041 3367 3773 4179 4602 5026 5449 5872
-
0,721 0,534 0,418 0,370 0,310 0,267 0,234 0,259 0,219 0,199 0,219 0,196 0,175 0,158 0,130 0,105 0,087 0,074 0,063 0,055 0,049
-
529
UB
<T
Designation
1
Mv
"
M:
^max
cr L/2 r*"
I
>lc
^
Nmit
ID KJ
9av [rad] 9av
[rad]
0.298
X->y-N
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
0.097 0,099 0.112
0.062 0.074
9av [rad]
for N 2 Nmit
-
[kN]
257 318 802
260
[kN]
-
UB 178 X 102 X 19 UB 203 X 102 X 23 UB 203 X 133 X 25 UB 203 X 133 X 30 UB 254 102 X 22 UB 254 102 X 25 UB 254 102 X 28 UB 254 X 146 X 31 UB 254 X 146 X 37 UB 254 X 146 X 43 UB 305 X 165 X 40 UB 305 X 165 X 46 UB 305 X 165 X 54 UB 356 X 171 X 45 UB 356 X 171 X 51 UB 356 X 171 X 57 UB 356 X 171 X 67 UB 406 X 178 X 54 UB 406 X 178 X 60 UB 406 X 178 X 67 UB 406 X 178 X 74 UB 457 X 152 X 52 UB 457 X 152 X 60 UB 457 X 152 67 UB 457 152 74 UB 457 X 152 X 82 UB 457 X 191 67 UB 457 X 191 X 74 UB 457 191 82 UB 457 191 X 89 UB 457 X 191 X 98 UB 533 X 210 X 82 UB 533 X 210 X 92 UB 533 X 210 X 101 UB 533 X 210 X 109 UB 533 210 X 122 UB 610 X 229 X 101 UB610X229X 113 UB 610 X 229 X 125 UB 610 X 229 140 UB 610 X 305 X 149 UB 610 305 X 179 UB 610 X 305 X 238 UB 686 X 254 125 UB 686 254 140 UB 686 X 254 X 152 UB 686 X 254 170 UB 762 X 267 147 UB 762 X 267 X 173 UB 762 X 267 X 197 UB 836 X 292 176 UB 838 X 292 X 194 UB 838 X 292 X 226 UB 914 305 201 UB 914 305 X 224 UB 914 X 305 X 253 UB 914 X 305 X 289 UB 914 X 419 343 UB 914 X 419 X 388
0.315 0.290
0.284 0.304
525
-
0,045
-
0.074 0,085 0.088 0.106 0.065 0.076 0.093 0.067 0.076 0.092 0,056 0,063 0.073 0.082 0.050 0,059 0,068 0.076 0.086 0.057
0,065
0.323
0.294
313 371 384 S82 228 358 631 387 549 817 321 364 580 772 172 273 482
641
0,085
0,088
0,106
0.309 0.278 0.290 0,304 0,285 0,295 0,314 0.277 0.291 0,301
0,312
0.065 0.076 0.093 0.067 0.076 0.092 0,056 0.063 0,073 0,082 0.050 0.059 0.068 0.076
0.086
0,353 0,284
0.296
0,073 0.080 0.090 0.052 0,060 0.067 0.073 0.084 0,051 0.058 0,066 0.075 0.063 0.079 0.112 0.049 0.057 0.063 0.072 0.048 0.059
0,069 0,047
909 361 482 726 909 1213 406 538 742 1001
1404
0.281
0.294 0.304
0,053 0,064
0.047 0.054
0.315
0,284
387 555 805 1233 804 1676 3931 459 678 955 1464 490 1021 1560 530 783 1355 601
914
0.051 0.058 0.066 0.075 0,063 0,079 0.112 0,049 0.057 0.063 0.072 0.048 0,059 0.069 0.047 0,053
0,064
0,310
530
ffja
pl
!=
ff
9av
[rad]
-
Designation
Ve
L/2
>!<:
L/2
ff
9av [rad]
for N S Nmit
,.
J HV
My
zNmax
^My-N
Niimit
9av
[rad]
UC 152 152 23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152 152 37 UC 203 203 46 UC 203 203 52 UC 203 203 60 UC 203 203 71 UC 203 203 86 UC 254 254 73 UC 254 254 89 UC 254 254 107 UC 254 254 132 UC 254 254 167 UC 305 305 97 UC 305 305 118 UC 305 305 137 UC 305 305 158 UC 305 305 198 UC 305 305 240 UC 305 305 283 UC 356 368 129 UC 356 368 153 UC 356 368 177 UC 356 368 202 UC 356 406 235 UC 356 406 287 UC 356 406 340 UC 356 406 393 UC 356 406 467 UC 356 406 551 UC 356 406 634
-
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
_
[kN]
_
[kN]
_
0,175 0,253
-
0,278 0,294
-
804 989
-
0,175 0,253
_
400 487
_
0,078 0.117
_
0,277 0,287
0,306 0,324
-
0,172
0,246 0,338 0,511
.
531
3.6.5
532
IPE
<pav
IPE A -IPE O
1
6
r
Pi
^
Designation
L L
_>y
9av [rad]
0,208 0,157 0,130 0,113 0,101 0,093 0,087 0,083 0,079 0,072 0,068 0,065 0,065 0,062 0,060 0,058 0,057 0,058
-
* u JM2
I
L/2
> U2
5
ff
9av [rad]
for N 2 Nmit
0,097 0,070 0,057 0,049
0,042
-
XNmax
My-
Nmit
9av [rad]
0,340 0,328 0,322 0,317 0,312 0,309 0,305 0,303 0,301 0,293 0,288 0,289 0,292 0,293 0,295 0,299 0,301 0,307 0,280 0,280 0,301 0,318 0,313 0,305 0,298 0,295 0,289 0,288 0,286 0,286 0,285 0,280
-
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
0,208 0,157 0,130 0,113 0,101 0,093 0,087 0,083 0,079 0,072 0,068 0,065 0,065 0,062 0,060 0,058 0,057 0,058
-
[kN]
176 237 304 378 462 347 377 395 427 441 476 506 546 598 652 708 822 921
.
[kN]
132 186 237 292 366
-
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750 137 IPE 750 147 IPE 750 173 IPE 750 196
0,042 0,052 0,060 0,159 0,124 0,101 0,083 0,074 0,070 0,066 0,066 0,063 0,058
-
0,042 0,052 0,060 0,159 0,124 0,101 0,083 0,074 0,070 0,066 0,066 0,063 0,058
_
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE 0 600
238 228 212 235 230 255 623 735 860 611 656 702 770 883 921 1169 1332 1409 2189
0,112 0,101 0,096 0,092 0,088 0,082 0,078 0,078 0,073 0,074 0,072 0,069 0,077
533
1^
pl
L
P
.j -
0 fs.
L/2
P|s.
- L/2
^|
Designation
_>y
9av [rad]
-
I I
H M JM2
I
X^->y-N
Nmax
9av [rad]
-
9av [rad]
for N < Nmit
-
Nmit
9av [rad]
for N > Nlimit
-
[kN]
-
[kN]
-
HE HE HE HE HE
AA AA AA AA AA
HE200AA HE220AA
HE 240 AA HE 260 AA HE 280 AA HE 300 AA HE 320 AA HE 340 AA HE 360 AA HE 400 AA HE 450 AA HE 500 AA HE 550 AA HE 600 AA HE650AA HE 700 AA HE 800 AA
HE900AA
HE 1000 AA HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A HE 500 A HE 550 A HE 600 A HE 650 A HE 700 A HE 800 A HE 900 A HE 1000 A
0,282 0,287
0,299 0,283
-
694 499
488 583
-
241 282
-
0,128 0,087
-
534
wr=-
pl
I
-si
\c Nmax
pl
L/2 L/
-jit.
'T-
L/2
Designation
_>y
9av [rad]
0,352 0,283 0,240 0,235 0,210 0,192 0,178 0,167 0,146 0,138
-
I I
ft M JMZ
I
I9av [rad]
for < Nmit
0,352 0,283 0,240 0,235 0,210
^My-N
Nmit
9av [rad]
0,324 0,314 0,306 0,301 0,297 0,293 0,290 0,288 0,283 0,280
-
9av [rad]
.
[kN]
599 782 988 1248 1501 1796 2094 2438 2724 3021
-
[kN]
278 350 430 582 683 832 949 1122 1262 1406
-
for N Nmit
0,182 0,145 0,122 0,118 0,105
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000
HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
0,095
0,088 0,082 0,070 0,066
-
0,132 0,129
0,127 0,122 0,111 0,104 0,097 0,091 0,086 0,083 0,074 0,069 0,064 1,248 0,929 0,732 0,653 0,550 0,476 0,420 0.459 0,392 0,357 0,391 0,352 0,318 0,290 0,245 0,204 0,175 0,152 0,134 0,121 0,110 0,093 0,081 0,072
0,285 0,289 0,293 0,299 0,308 0,316 0,320 0,324 0,328 0,332 0,336 0,345 0,349
0,434 0,407 0,387 0,372 0,360 0,351 0,343 0,360 0,351 0,342
0,132 0,129 0,127 0,122 0,111 0,104 0,097 0,091 0,086 0,083 0,074 0,069 0,064
1,248
2851 3249
-
0,929 0,732
0,653 0,550 0,476 0,420 0,459 0,392 0,357 0,391 0,352 0,318 0,290 0,245 0,204 0,175 0,152 0,134 0,121 0,110 0,093 0,081
0,356
0,361 0,361 0,361
0,362
0,362 0,362 0,362 0,363 0,363 0.363 0,364 0,364 0,364
0,678 0,502 0,394 0,348 0,292 0,251 0,220 0,244 0,206 0,187 0,207 0,185 0.165 0,149
0,122
0,099 0,082 0,069 0,060 0,052
-
0,072
"
535
1
"
"
L/2
1
*-
L/2
Designation
Z^
9av
[rad]
0.085 0,087 0,098 0.055 0,065 0.074 0,077 0,093 0.067 0,082 0.058 0.067
0.081
Mv
fl
9av [rad]
0.297
M,
>y max
[kN]
257 317 879 250
304
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
0,085
Niimit
9av [rad]
for
at
[kN]
Nmit
0,314
0.087
UB254X 102x22 UB 254 X 102 X 25 UB 254 X 102 X 28 UB 254 146x31 UB 254 X 146x37 UB254X 146X43 UB305X 165x40 UB305X 165x46 UB30SX 165 X 54 UB356X 171 X45 UB356X 171 X 51 UB356X 171 57 UB356X 171 X 67 UB406X 178 X 54 UB406X 178 60 UB 406 X 178 67 UB406X 178 X 74 UB4S7X 152 X 52 UB457X 152 X 60 UB457X 152 X 67 UB4S7X 152 X 74 UB457X 152 X 82 UB457X 191 X 67 UB457X 191 X 74 UB457X 191 X 82 UB457X 191 X 89 UB457X 191 X 98 UB533X 210 X 82 UBS33X 210 92
UB 533 X 210 X 101 UB 533 X 210 X 109 UB533X 210 122 UB 610 X 229 X 101 UB 610 229 X 113 UB 610 229x125 UB 610 229 140 UB 610 X 305 X 149 UB 610 X 305 X 179 UB 610 X 305 X 238 UB 686 X 254 X 125 UB 686 X 254 X 140 UB 686 X 254x152 UB 686 X 254 X 170 US 762 X 267 147 UB762X 267 X 173 UB 762 X 267 X 197 UB 838 X 292 X 176 UB838X 292 X 194 UB 838 X 292X226 UB914X 305 X 201 UB 914 X 305 X 224 UB 914 305 X 253 UB 914 305 X 289 UB 914 419 X 343 UB 914 419 388
575
0,043
366 531
806
0,056
0.064
0.351
0,283
0.295
0.304
331 552 749 127 228 440 603 877 318 440 690 877 1189
480
0.056
0.064
0.072
0.044
0,044
0,051
0,057
0.065
0.055 0.069 0.099 0.043 0.050 0.055 0.063 0,042 0,052 0.060
0.041 0,047
0.056
0,041
0,306 0.319 0.280 0.296 0.325 0.280 0.293 0,303 0,315 0.282 0.301 0.318 0.280 0.292 0.313
0,283
730 1166 731 1622 3942 356 578 859 1378 361 898 1448 370 626 1206
414
0.074 0,044 0.051 0.057 0,065 0,055 0.069 0.099 0.043 0,050 0,055 0.063 0.042 0,052
0.060 0.041 0.047
0.056
0.041
0,047
0,298
0.314
0.055
0.064
0.063
0.073
0,047 0,055
0.064
0.063 0.073
536
r*
pl
L
Y<
L/2
-
sic L/2
1
ff
9av [rad]
for > Nmit
_
Designation
j
9av
[rad]
-
My
I I
ft M IJM2
9av [rad]
.
^My-N
max
9av [rad]
for < Nmit
.
Niimit
[kN]
.
[kN]
_
UC 152 152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152 152 37 UC 203 203 46 UC 203 203 52 UC 203 203 60 UC 203 203 71 UC 203 203 86 UC 254 254 73 UC 254 254 89 UC 254 254 107 UC 254 254 132 UC 254 254 167 UC 305 305 97 UC 305 305 118 UC 305 305 137 UC 305 305 158 UC 305 305 198 UC 305 305 240 UC 305 305 283 UC 356 368 129 UC 356 368 153 UC 356 368 177 UC 356 368 202 UC 356 406 235 UC 356 406 287 UC 356 406 340 UC 356 406 393 UC 356 406 467 UC 356 406 551 UC 356 406 634
0,221
-
0,293
-
1084
-
0,221
_
534
_ _
0,110
_
0,447
-
4012
4631 5806 7033 7749
-
0,172
0,218 0,305 0,428 0,628
.
537
3.7
<pav
I and
of Feldmann's formulas
In regard to me load case, the following 2 series of die diagrams are available:
3 .7. 1 Concentrated load witii bending about major axis y-y
of cross-section (My).
3.7.2 Concentrated load with bending about minor axis z-z of cross-section (My.
Five steel grades (see table 3.1 with fy depending on material thickness according to Eurocode 3 [3] [4]) are used to calculate (pav presented in graphs :
S 235
S 275
(fy = 235 MPa for tf < 40 mm), (fy = 275 MPa for tf < 40 mm), S 355 (fy = 355 MPa for tf < 40 mm), S 420 (fy = 420 MPa for tf < 40 mm), S 460 (fy = 460 MPa for tf < 40 mm).
Each graph evaluates the value of 2 in function of the cross-section and steel grade. Considering tiiat present Eurocode 3 rules [3] [4] about classification of cross-section are respected in tiiis Guide, all cross-sections having class 3 or 4 have been excluded from the graphs. This is indicated by the missing of marks on the graph curves.
The values of available inelastic rotation <pay are given in radians ([rad]) in the left co-ordinates axis and in degrees ([deg]) in the right co-ordinates axis in each diagram. The graphs furnish characteristic values of available inelastic rotation (pav of plastic hinge which shall be divided by appropriate partial safety factor ^ (see chapter 1.6.2, table 1.6) to obtain design values of available inelastic rotation :
9av.d = 9av/YMq>
1,52
Load cases
<pav
formulas
j My
1,73
j Mz
(3.2)
538
3.7.1
Concentrated load with bending about major axis y-y of I and H crosssections
"
~3>-J
zo
M,
539
IPE cross-sections
[rad]
"-
ZO
[deg]
M>
9av
0,30
-F-17.2
0,25
14,3
0,20
11.5
--S
8,6
235 l
0,15
-D-S
275
--S355
0,10
5,7
-O-S420 S 460
0,05
2,9
0.00
4-0,0
oooooooooooooooooof*-r>
ajocy^tDcoocj^r^ococpomotooTO^r^
IPE
^^^T-^-wcMCjcvjcocoH-e-'WinintO'-'-^-
o tn
r-
o in
o to
o to
r-
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
IPE A cross-sections
^-
ZO
9av[deg]
17,2
14,3
11,5
--S235
8,6
-D-S
--S355
275
5,7
-O-S420 S 460
2,9
0.0
^ to to
CO
IPE A
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge cpav for A cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by yj^m (see chapter 3.7))
540
VJ
cross-sections
"
"-
Mv
--S
235
-D-S275 --S
355
-O-S420 -S
460
IPEO
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for O cross-sections (Note: (pav values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
541
XTjt/
[rad](j)av
0,50
AJ\
cross-sections
"-
ZO
9av
(de9l 28,6
]
M>
0,450,40
1
25,8
\
A
22,9
;
0,35
0,30
\
1
20,1
1
172
14,3 11.5
-B-S235
-D-S275
0,25
0,20 0,15
0.10 0.05
-S355
-O- S 420
8,6
--S
460
5^a1
Tt^
5.7
-*!
<(=}(
2.9
0.0
0.00
HEAA
cv^cocoocsj^rcocoocM^rtootnoinotnoo
^rtniototot^coo
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge (pav for HE AA cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
JrlJC/
[rad]
A. cross-sections
-&~
l^
9av
[deg] 17,2
14,3
9av
0,30
0,25
0.20
11,5
--S235
0.15 8,6
-Q-S275
--S355
0,10
5,7
-O-S420 S 460
0,05
2.9
0,00
0.0
oooooooooooooogogooooogo OCM-J-UJCOOCMfttJCOOCgtlOOlOOlOCJtOOOOO ^-^.^^Y-cMCMCMCMCMcoconn^r^-toiococo^Gocno
HEA
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge (pav for HE A cross-sections (Note: cpav values must be divided by yjvf (see chapter 3.7))
542
HEB
[rad]
0.30
cross-sections
"
--J
^
9av
Mv
9av
[deg]
172
0.25
14,3
0.20
11,5
--S235
0,15
8,6
-O-S
275
--S355
-O-S420
0,10
5,7
S 460
0,05
25
0,00
-o-toioo<or~coe>
0.0
HE
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for HE cross-sections (Note: cpav values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
HEM
lfl
0.30
cross-sections
&-
*a-
ZO
<J>av
M>
(pav
Ideg] 17,2
025-
14,3
020-
11,5
--S235 0,158,6
-D-S275 *-S355
0.10-
5,7
-O
S 420
--S460
0.052,9
0.00oooooooooooooooooooooooo OCM-'J-DdOCiJ'^-tDCOOCMTfiOOlOOtfOiOOOOO
-'-^--cMcacj<MCiCTc5co^-'<Ttoto<o cor^coeo
co
HEM
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge (pav for HE M cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by ^| (see chapter 3.7))
543
UB cross-sections
tradl (pav
0.20
-*
a*.*
^
<Pav
M,
|V
Ide9l 11,5
0,15
0.10
MXXXMKMXXKXX
***-*4*<4-*~**>**^**-*''*'*^
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for UB cross-sections (Note: <p3v values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
UB cross-sections
[rad] ,
*&-
Z-0
[deg]
M>
020
0,15
0,10
SI5Sssssg5
sassassssxxss
S3SS8SS22
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for UB cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by (see chapter 3.7))
544
UC cross-sections
[rad]
-3*-
- 3
9av
[deg] 34,4
M.
9av
0,60
0.50
28,6
0.40
22,9 --S235
-Q-S275
17,2
-S
355
O-S420
11.5
--S
5,7
460
0.0
<M<v<t<i<-><t<i-*<<*
x xxxxxxx"-"---"***-
UC
ssassssaasasSsssss XXXXXXX*X**tWWP*
M O
J 3
333S3ISS3
SS8888SS88SS8888S
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for UC cross-sections (Note: cpav values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
545
3.7.2
Concentrated load with bending about major axis z-z of I and H crosssections
&-
HO
M,
546
IPE cross-sections
[rad]
~--
O
<
M,
9av
0.36
i
<
frteg] Pav
'
20,6
20,1
^ ^^ k ^ pj^'s
1
19,5
:
'
185
k
T.
0,30-
g b
--S235
--S355
185 -D-S275
17,8
il/i
V
;
0,29
0280,27
<M
CM CM
1 1
16.0
"
15,5
CM
CO
IPE
CT
CT
IO
IO
tO
y-
i-
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for IPE cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
IPE A cross-sections
[rad]
Pav
-^-
tO
<Pav
Mz
033-1
18,9
I
0,32
0 31
^^
<\
18,3
"\V
0,30
^^
kl
17,8
0,29-
KS5?000oooooooooooo
-i
fc!
-^1 ri''/)
r^\ Y
'
17,2
16,6
028
16.0
0.27
15.5
IPE A
^'-'-'-'-CMcycyoiejriS^Trwoo
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge (pav for IPE A cross-sections (Note: 3 values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
547
lx
JE/
kJ cross-sections
"
~3>-
HO
<Pav teg] 20,1
M,
0,34
19,5
0.33
18,9
--S235
0,32
18,3
-O-S
--S
275
355
0,31
17,8
O-S420
17,2
0,30
--S
460
0,29
16,6
0,28 4
180
200
220
240
270
300
330
360
400
450
500
550
16,0 600
IPE O
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge (pav for IPE O cross-sections (Note: (pay values must be divided by (see chapter 3.7))
548
HE AA cross-sections
[rad]
0 30
"-
3
<Pav
M2
,IV
17,2
029
028
I t
0 27
026
W'
16,6
16,0
--S
235
-D-S275
15,5
-S
355
-O-S420
14,9
--S
460
025
14,3
0.24
13 s
HEAA
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge ^ for HE AA cross-sections (Note: q>av values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
-LXC/
[rad] (pav
0,34
. cross-sections
&-~
-&-
HO
9av
[deg]
M2
'-in 19,5
18,9
18,3
--S235
17,8
-D-S275
--S35S
172
16.6
-0-S42Q --S460
16,0
15,5
14,9
*r-*rioio<otor^coo
HEA
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge cpav for HE A cross-sections (Note: q>av values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
549
HEB
cross-sections
~4 IO
Pav
M,
[deg]
21,2
--S235 -D-S275
--S355
O-S420
--S460
15.5
HEB
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for HE B cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by < (see chapter 3.7))
&--
-&-~
O
'av [deg]
-
M,
0,45
0,44
r
<
258
l\\
0,43 0,42
0,41
^ 4
!
-25 2 -24 6
-24
--S235 -D-S275
-235
0,40 0,39
0,38 0.37
;
:229
223 I-
i i^ f
--S355|
^S42oj
*-S460|
0,36
;
0,35
;
y ^ ^ y/p&$ ^^ ^
'{
Xv5^
21 8
r^Jw
tt
>=<
>212
f=4
f=y
^20
o o
1
0,34
oooooooo
-19,5
U) U)
CMCgojcgCM<oco
o co
o a>
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for HE M cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by (see chapter 3.7))
550
UB cross-sections
[rad] Pav
-&-~
tO
Pav
M,
Ideg]
0.37
0.36
212
20,6
20,1
--S235
-D-S275
--S355 -O-S420
17,8
0,30
172
16,6
S 460
0,29 0,28
0,27
16,0
15,5
Ct
*3-
3
<M <* rt rt
S
r
I^j
UB
r.
r~
8 8
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for UB cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
UB cross-sections
[rad] Pav 0,34
to
Pav [deg]
Mz
19,5
0.33
18,9
0,32
18,3
--S235
0.31
-D-S275
17,8
--S355 -O-S420
0,30
17,2
-S460
029
16,6
028
*^
<e
e*
<
16.0
UB
N4MOCJ4*OJO<rtrtrt040J<M<*tSI<VO<5c3<5rtrtrtrt
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for UB cross-sections (Note: <pav values must be divided by ]^ (see chapter 3.7))
551
UC cross-sections
Jra
pav
&-
-&-~
O
Pav
M,
[deg]
-264
-252
241
229
^21 8
-
--S235
-D-S275 -S
355
206
195
-
-- S 420
-S
460
183
: :
172
16 0
0?6-
:14,9
<* ftp
UC
oicvc**!'*''*****
~
no
s s ? s
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ti*tw*<<ato<a<
r-iMCKtc4i<nyrmi
<0
CH
c*
,...,,,.,,-,
Available inelastic rotation of plastic hinge <pav for UC cross-sections (Note: (Dav values must be divided by ^ (see chapter 3.7))
552
4.1
Introduction
Four design examples are given in ds chapter. Only die checking methods for die inelastic rotation and for die bearing capacity of structure are considered under a loading system for verification at die Ultimate Limit State. Otiier limit states should be investigated (deflection at die Serviceability Limit
State...).
Design examples 1 and 2 use formulas (developed in chapter 2) to calculate die required inelastic rotations <preq- Design example 3 is performed by using die computer program PEP [15] for plastic global analysis. In design example 4 the step-by-step metiiod, presented in chapter 2.4.2.2, is applied eitiier witii die help of a computer program for elastic global analysis (or according to a usual manual metiiod).
In all four design examples, die following values of different partial safety factors have been used:
for bending moment resistance of cross-sections (Mpi.Rd)
:
ymo
As explained in chapter 2.2.3, it is more conservative to check die ductility of plastic hinges at collapse instead of at die design load level (ductility requirement : <preq.u instead of <preq.d)Therefore die check of die required inelastic rotation in all examples hereafter is related to die state of collapse ; die ultimate limit state check is :
Preq.u <<Pav.d
4.2
4.2.1
Design example
: continuous beam
Data
Fd
/
X-
3m
= 45kN
E200
6m
6m
-x
Figure 4.1
fy = 235MPa
E = 210000 MPa
Class
b=100
J
'
Iy=1943xl0-8m4
Wpl y = 220,6 IO"6 m3
Design plastic moment resistance:
=8,5_~
tw=5,6_
h = 200
M pl.y.Rd
_ WpLyfy _ 220,6x235
M0
= 47,13 kNm
11
200
553
4.2.2
Structural resistance
From formulas (2.5) and (2.6) (using Mpi = Mpi.y.Rd) w load a* collapse (Fu) and the load at occurrence of first plastic hinge (Fl) can be determined (see figure 4.2).
2nd ptate hinge : Fu = 47 kN
F1 = 38.SS kN
-47.13 kNm
Mp = 47,13 kNm
31.3 kN
Figure 4.2
Bending resistance
The load at collapse is reached for F = 47 kN, greater tiian die applied load
Shear resistance
Av.z=14.10-4m2
Vpi.z.Rd = 0,577 Av.z fy / YMO = 0,577 14. "4
235000 /
1,1
= 172,6 kN
So, Vz.sd < 0,5 Vpi Rd : die shear force has no influence on the moment resistance (EC3
5.4.7(2)).
Moreover, die slendemess of die web is less than 69 (d/tw = 28,4), it is not necessary to check die shear buckling resistance (EC3 5.6.1(1)).
LTB resistance
Let's assume tiiat die distance between lateral restraints is most critical part is at die origin of the second span.
.1m
1
Figure 4.3
Therefore, in tiiis less favourable case, the moment ratio between the two lateral restraints is
:
= 0,833
From tiiis, one can calculate the critical moment from EC3 Annex F, and die reduced slendemess
= 0,39
554
It is not necessary to check die lateral torsional buckling resistance because die reduced slendemess is less then 0,4 (EC3 5.5.2(7)).
Note :
lateral restraints according to " Additif 80 - CM66 " is Lmin =35ize since the moment ratio is between 0, 625 and 1, 00. So Lmj = 0, 783 cm.
The minimal spacing between
F(kN)
rth toed
10
20
30
40
50 S
M (kNm)
Mp
4.2.3
The required inelastic rotation is given by formula (2. 14) and must be calculated for die first plastic hinge :
_ Mpl.y.Rd L ( + 3)(1-)
with = 0,5
(0,5 + 3)(l-0,5)
0,5
(Prequ
^req.u^040^
4.2.4
In case of bending about major axis y-y of cross-section, die available inelastic rotation is given by formula (3.1) (or can be issued from column 2 of die table of chapter 3.6.1 or from graphs of chapter 3.7.1): 5,6 4 Eb _ ^ ht^ +^(fy htw)2+4 fy btf tw hA(T <Pav =
'4W+0,25)f* + ACT'bh
with : = 150 MPa
Therefore
:
5h
cpav
= 0,211 rad
rad
555
4.2.5
Conclusion
F 47 a) The load factor at collapse is Xu = -^ = = 1,04 > 1,0, tiierefore the structure has the necessary Fd 45
resistance to bear the applied design load Fd (= 45 kN);
b) The inelastic rotation of the first plastic hinge that is required to reach the mechanism is lower than the design available inelastic rotation; therefore regarding ductility of the plastic hinge the
"req.u
av.d
4.3
4.3.1
Data
Figure 4.5
Geometrical properties of the cross-section are tiiose from die design example
1
4.3.2
Structural resistance
From formulas (2.16) and (2.20) (using Mp[ = Mp y Rd) the load at collapse (qu) and the load at occurrence of first plastic hinge (qi) can be determined (see figure 4.6).
Mp = 47,13 kNm
y = 38,5kN
'""immillili
V = 7,85kN
I
iiiniimmiiiiiiimiill
V = -52,8kN
Figure 4.6
556
The collapse is reached for q = 15,23 kN/m, greater than the applied load.
Shear resistance
Av.z=14.10-4m2
Vpl.z.Rd = 0,577 Av.z fy / YMO = 0,577 14. "4 235 000 / 1,1 = 172,6 kN
So, Vz.sd < 0,5 Vpi z Rd : the shear force has no influence on die moment resistance (EC3
5.4.7(2)).
Moreover, die slendemess of die web is less than 69 (d/tw = 28,4), check die shear buckling resistance (EC3 5.6.1(1)).
it is not necessary to
LTB resistance
The configuration is similar to the previous example, except tiiat we have to consider tiiat the less favourable portion of the beam is located in die middle of die first span.
In die vicinity of the plastic hinge, the moment ratio is about 1,00 : this is a conservative value. Then die reduced slendemess is about 0,41. In order to obtain a value less or equal to 0,4, die distance between the lateral restrains may be reduced in die vicinity of die plastic hinge, and taken equal to 95 cm for example.
4.3.3
^.u'-^f^UM
_
<Prequ
i-t+i)2
47,13
+ 4(1 + )
Mpl.y.Rd
L 3^2 +1 _
12
El
0,4369
HT8
9req.u = 0,030rad
4.3.4
The design value of available inelastic rotation has been calculated in example 1 (see chapter 4.2.2) for a concentrated load. According to chapter 3.5, the same value of available inelastic rotation can be used in case of a uniform distributed load.
yav.d=0'139rad
557
4.3.5
Conclusion
b) The inelastic rotation of the first plastic hinge tiiat is required to reach die mechanism is lower than die available inelastic rotation; dierefore regarding ductility of die plastic hinge the chosen profile is acceptable :
req.u
TSv.d
4.4
In this example, it is assumed tiiat the columns and the beam are laterally and continuously restrained in such a way tiiat out-of-plane buckling is not a potential mode of failure.
4.4.1
Data
100
kN
45,45 kN
270
-X
300
IPE 300
6m
X-
8m
Figure 4.7
Steel grade : S 235
fy = 235 MPa
Class
1
(for My and
235)
Mpl.y.Rd=
484x235
= 103,4 kNm
Cross-section : 300
Mpl.y.Rd =
628,4x235
1,1
= 134,25 kNm
558
4.4.2
Structural resistance
The plastic analysis has been carried out witii PEP micro program [15] and witii die assumption that the loads are increased in a proportional way Goad factor ). The plastic mechanism is plotted in figure 4.8. Two plastic hinges occur in the beam (IPE 270), then two plastic hinges occur at die bases of ti columns (TPE 300).
2nd plastic hinge
:
2 = 0,832
1 =0,790
= 38,6 kN
/s
"""
'""""
"""'
INIIMIIHI
N = 49,7kN
N = S1.7kN
3 = 0,900
V = -48.7kN
M = -95.3 kNm
M = 103,4 kNm
V = 51,7kN
V=
kN
M = -134kNm
M=
Figure 4.8
Bending resistance
5.2.5.2(3))
0,0403x100
hH
Influence of axial force
6x45,45
1, 10 1, 1 0
149
kN
= 980,6 kN
The applied axial force is very low in comparison witii the axial resistance. So diere is no influence on the moment resistance (lower tiian Npi/4, see EC3 5.4.8(3)). The plastic collapse is reached for a load factor equal to 1,014 greater than 1,00.
559
Shear resistance
In the columns :
235000/1,1 = 316 kN
In die beam :
The shear force is lower than half the shear plastic resistance, diere is no influence on die moment resistance. Moreover, the slendemess of die web is lower tiian 69 , it is not necessary to check die shear buckling resistance (d/tw = 33,3 for 270 profile, and d/tw = 40,4 for IPE300 profile, see EC3 5.6.1(1))
Buckling resistance
The buckling lengtii for die columns may be calculated for a non-sway mode. Let's assume that die buckling lengtii is equal to the system lengtii :l- 6 m for die columns. The critical axial force is NCT = 48 1 1 kN. The reduced slendemess is
By using die buckling curve a (EC3 table 5.5.3), the buckling resistance is
Nb.Rd = Xy A fy / YM1 = 0,92 0,00538 235 000 / 1,1 = 1058 kN
Since die plastic moment is reached in die column under die design loads, die buckling criterion which takes into account die interaction between axial force and bending moment is not satisfied (see EC3 5.5.4).
The french NAD adds die following condition : if Nsd / Nb.Rd does not exceed 0,10, necessary to check die buckling resistance. This condition is here fulfilled :
Nsd /Nb.Rd = 51,7/1 058 = 0,0489
it
is not
1.1
I
,1.014.0.9 0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
r-B-i
I -
0.4
0.3 0.2
0.1
0
()
10
2030405060
70
809
1O0J
110
120
130
1'
|M| (kN)
IPE 300
560
4.4.3
Just before collapse, die inelastic rotations in the tiiree first plastic hinges are given in table 4.1. It should be mentioned tiiat it is not die first formed plastic hinge which requires the highest inelastic rotation.
Table 4.1
Plastic hinge
Load factor
Cross-section
radi
1st
2nd 3rd
4.4.4
For the steel grade S 235 and the two used profiles, available inelastic rotations are given by formulas (3.1) and (3.3) or are given in die table of chapter 3.6. 1 . :
for 270 : die value of <pav is taken from column 2 of the table (cross-section submitted to bending about major axis y-y, My).
must be taken from column 5 of die table, because die two last formed plastic hinges are submitted to normal compression force and bending moment My and because die maximum applied normal compression force is less tiien Nlimit (which is given in column 6 of die table).
for 300
<pav
<pav = 0, 174
rad
cpaV
= 0,163 rad
=>
design value:
<pavd
(witii maximum compressive load in die right column of die frame,N = 52,43 kN < Niimit = 510 kN)
4.4.5
Conclusion
a) The load factor at collapse is = 1,014 > 1,0, tiierefore die structure has the necessary resistance to bear the applied design loads;
b) The highest inelastic rotations of different plastic hinges that are required to reach die mechanism are lower tiian die design available inelastic rotations for both profiles; tiierefore regarding ductility of plastic hinges the chosen profiles are acceptable :
561
4.5
Design example 4 :
4.5.1
Data
A plastic analysis of a three span beam with distributed loads, as shown in figure 4. 10, will hereafter be performed. This example is meant to highlights the calculation procedure given in figure 2.27 of
chapter 2. For tiiis example, an elastic analysis computer program can be used, but die elastic calculations could also be made witii die help of a manual metiiod.
30 kN/m
25 kN/m
"2
a
2
C
b
6m
d
6m
X-
-X-
8m
-X-
-X
Figure 4.10
Cross-section : 270
Mpi.y.Rd =
484x235
1,1
= 103,4 kNm
562
4.5.2
Structural resistance
30 kN/m
26 kN/m
2S
2\
6m
6m
8m
Mpl - -103,4
Mpl
-103,4
93,81
Mpl = -103,4
Final moment diagram
103,4 kN
71,169
76,82 kN
rrrC
34,78 kN
kN
-110,3 kN
-103 kN
Shear force diagram
Figure 4.11
Bending resistance
The collapse is reached for a load factor equal to 1,03 15, greater than 1,00.
Shear resistance
The shear plastic resistance is Vpi.z.Rd = 273 kN. So die maximal shear force (1 10,3 kN) does not exceed half die shear plastic resistance. Therefore it has no influence on the bending moment
resistance.
The web slendemess is lower tiian 69 , die shear buckling is not a potential mode of failure.
LTB Resistance
The most critical portion is in the middle of the second span : The moment is nearly constant and equal to the plastic moment. If we consider tiiis assumption (constant moment), the condition from Additif 80 (CM66) for the spacing of lateral restraints may be used : L = 35 iz = 35 1,00 3,02 = 105,8 cm. It would be recommended to have a distance of 1 meter between each lateral restraints.
If
Xlt ^ 0,4 ,
563
4.5.3
4.53.1
First step
Elastic calculation
Figure 4.12
First plastic hinge
The maximum moment is at support b, so
:
= +
-136,89
! = 0,7554
The state of the structure can be determined at die end shear force, the deflections ..., by the load factor }.
of tiiis
mo :
Figure 4.13
There is no inelastic rotation to calculate at the end of die first step.
4.5.3.2
Second step
A perfect hinge is introduced at die place where die first plastic hinge was formed, and a new elastic
analysis is performed on die following structure.
564
30 kN/m
25 kN/m
A
b
0
>c
-162,5
45,75
kNm]
135
127
Figure 4.14
We must check that die rotation (obtained from die elastic analysis) in the first hinge at support b has the same sign as the plastic bending moment which was reached in previous step (Ml):
9b = -0,04825 rad
=>
Span ab Span
Span
bc :
:
Support C
cd :
= (103,4 - 56,538) / 135 = 0,3471 = (103,4 - 52,773) / 127 = 0,3986 = (-103,4 + 93,203) / -162,5 = 0,0628 = (103,4 - 44,3) / 45,75 = 1,2918
The lowest increment is 2 = 0,0628. Therefore, the second plastic hinge is located at support C and it occurs at die load factor :
2 = + 2 = 0,7554 + 0,0628
2 = 0,8182
=>
Mpl = -103,4
Mpi = -103,4
[kNm]
65,016
60,749
47,173
Figure 4.15
565
of step
b given by die
(Preq =
IO"3 rad
4.5.3.3
Third step
A new perfect hinge is introduced at the place where the second plastic hinge was formed and a new
elastic analysis is performed on die following structure.
30 kN/m
25 kN/m
[kNm]
0
135
200
112,5
Figure 4.16
The rotations obtained from die elastic analysis are
1st plastic hinge (at support
:
b)
<pb
:
= -,06607 rad
<pc
= -0,06237 rad
M cpb = (-103,4 -0,06607 rad) > 0 M epe = (-103,4 -0,06237 rad) > 0
The rotations in the hinges have the same sign as the plastic bending moments which were reached in previous step (M2). This means that there is no elastic return. The lowest value of 3 =
Spaa ab
Span
Spaa,
be
cd
= (103,4 - 65,016) / 135 = 0,2843 = (103,4 - 60,749) / 200 = 0,2133 = (103,4 - 47,173) / 1 12,5 = 0,4998
The lowest increment is 3 = 0,2133. Therefore the last plastic hinge occurs in the middle
of span
566
Mpi--
,4
Mpi =-103,4
[kNm]
93,81
Mpi =
103,4
71,169
Figure 4.17
The inelastic rotation in the hinge at support b is
(Preq
:
= 3,0301
IO"3 + 0,2133
0,06607 rad
(Preq
= 0,01712 rad
:
4.5.4
The plastic analysis is now completed because a plastic mechanism is obtained in span be. To reach die mechanism, the highest required inelastic rotation corresponds to the plastic hinge at
(Preq
u = 0,01712 rad
4.5.5
For the profile 270 and S 235 steel, the design value determined in design example 3 (see chapter 4.4.2) :
(Pav d
of available
= 0,1 14 rad
4.5.6
Conclusion
a) The load factor at collapse is = 1,0315 > 1,0, tiierefore the structure has the necessary resistance to bear the applied design loads;
b) The highest inelastic rotation of plastic hinge at support b that is required to reach the mechanism is lower than the design available inelastic rotation; therefore regarding ductility of plastic hinges the chosen profile is acceptable:
<Preq.u<<Pav.d
567
Appendix 1.
(1) Following tables concern standard European and British I and H hot-rolled steel profiles :
, , O, HE AA, HE A, HE B, HE M, UB and UC
(2) The following steel grades are considered (see table 3.1 witii fy depending on material thickness according to Eurocode 3 [3] [4]) :
S 235 S 275 S 355 S 420 S 460
(fy = 235 MPa for tf < 40 mm) (fy = 275 MPa for tf < 40 mm) (fy = 355 MPa for tf < 40 mm) (fy = 420 MPa for tf < 40 mm) (fy = 460 MPa for tf < 40 mm)
(3) Classification of cross-sections : only class 1 and class 2 cross-sections can develop plastic resistance; the rules for classification of cross-sections are issued from Eurocode 3 [3] [4]. In the tables, the following legend is assumed :
44 , ,
means class 4 cross-section without plastic bearing capacity of Npijr<j (see table 1.5b),
- "**"
means class 3
or class 4 cross-section without plastic bearing capacity of Mpi,y.Rd Mpi.z R or MNy .Rd (see table 3.3).
:
if
of a cross-section is %
ms
"--"
see figure 1.11; convention forces, shear forces and bending moments applied to the cross-section:
for axial
& &
z.Sd
Nx.sd
N.x.Sd
* The characteristic values of plastic resistance in following tables (Npi, Vpi.z, Vpi.y, Mpi.y> Mpi.z, MN.y) are calculated assuming die partial safety factor \ equal to 1,0 in Eurocode 3 [3] rules which define following design values of plastic resistance (Npi.Rd Vpi.z.Rd> Vpi.y.Rd, Mpi.y.Rd, Mpi.z.Rd, MN.yd) :
568
column 2
N.pl.Rd
_Npl
Ymo
_Afy
Ymo
column 3
where A = 2btf+(h-2tf)tw + (4-3t)r2, design plastic shear resistance related to bending about yy major axis My.sd
_ "pl.z _ Ayz fy
"pl.z.Rd
Ymo
Ymo^/3
([3] 5.4.6(1)),
where
column 4
design plastic shear resistance related to bending about zz minor axis Mz.sd
([3] 5.4.6(1)),
([18]Table 5.14)
,
column 5
M, , - MpLy 1. .Rd
Ymo
where
- WpLy fy
Ymo
([3] 5.4.5.2(1)),
W, -
Pl.y=-l-+(b-tw)(h-tf)tf+^r2(h-2tf) + ^r3,
4
*
""
"*
column 6
M pl.z.Rd
M pl.z _ "pl.z *y
Ymo
Ymo
([3] 5.4.5.2(1)),
column 7
limit axial force Niimit over which allowance shall be made for the effect of the
axial force on the plastic resistance bending moment about yy major axis (=> MN.y.Rd ^ Mpi.y.Rd)>
column
ratio between Niimit (column 7) and NpijRd (column 2) over which allowance shall be made for die effect of the axial force on the plastic resistance bending moment about yy major axis (=> MN.y.Rd ^ MpLy.Rd),
limit pLRd
= minimum
for N-M
(A-2btf) 4' 2A
1
column 7^
column 2
569
column 10 : design value of applied compressive axial force Nsd related to the design plastic NSd resistance of die gross cross-section Npi Rd, for the given ratio - = 0, 15 ,
Npi R
NSd=0,15
At,
Ymo
where formula for A is provided for column 2, column 11: reduced plastic design resistance bending moment about yy major axis allowing for axial force NSd,
MN.y.Rd =
A.fy
NSd
MN.y _ "pLy^y
Ymo Ymo
Ymo
A-2btf 2A
where
^1<0,25)
2A
formula for Wpi_y is given for column 5, formula for A is provided for column 2,
Ncrf
A.Iy
.y
Ymo
columns 12&13, 14&15, 16&17, and 18&19 are similar to columns 10&11 but related to other NSd ratios, respectively 0,20, 0,25, 0,30 and 0,35 instead of 0,15.
pl.Rd
In
case of high shear (if Vsd > 0,5.Vpi.Rd) , the design resistance bending moment Mpi.Rd of the cross-section should be reduced to M\r.Rd The following formulas are not used in tables and are provided for information according to Eurocode 3 ([3] 5.4.7 (3)):
M V.y.Rd -
My.y
YMO
-1
kvz
wpi.y-
Vpl.z.Rd
4t w
Ymo
Where
where
Mv\z<Rd ^ Mpl.z R (defined for column 6), formula for Wpi#z is defined for column 6,
formulas for Vpi.yj^d is given for column 4.
(6) Partial safety factor Ymo : As several values of plastic resistance given in tables are characteristic, they must be adapted if partial safety factor Ymo is different from 1,0, in order to obtain design values of plastic resistance needed for checks at Ultimate Limit States (see Eurocode 3 formulas presented in clause (5)). In present version of Eurocode 3 [3] [4], ymo isfixed to 1,1 in general ([3] 5.1.1 (2)) but other values of YMO are provided by several NADs to Eurocode 3.
In practice, all the values given in the following columns of tables must be divided by the partial
safety factor ymo"
- columns 2 to 7 : Npi, Vpi.z, Vpiy, Mpi.y, Mpi.zand Niimit for N-My respectively, - columns 10 to 19 : Nsd and MN.y for Nsd / Npi.Rd = 0,15 and respectively 0,2, 0,25, 0,3 and 0,35.
* Remark : In
case of web classification for cross-section submitted to combined N-My, the Eurocode 3 rule that defines die border between class 2 and class 3 webs, is used (see table 3.3) :
d ^
Lw
456.
13
+1 2 vdtwfy
where
(
0,5 <
In tables, = Nsd from different columns (10, 12, 14, 16 or 18 respectively). As explained above if YM0 differs from 1,0 those values of Nsd must be divided by Ymo Therefore the web classification calculated in tables is safesided.
(7) Flow-chart explaining the elaboration of tables and the way to use them.
571
4
o -g
*5
vi 'S C
3 o
3
(M
jo
2
O
f 3
GO B. ~
< s a o
<s\
es
572
IPE
IPE A
1
-IPE O
2
Npi
4
vpi.y
[kN]
69
91
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpl.z
7
Nfimit
Designation
(Nihnh/Npi.Rd)
for -My
IkN]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750 X 137 IPE 750 147 IPE 750x1 73 IPE 750x196 IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600 IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
180 243 310 386 472 563 669 784 919
[kN]
49 69 86 104
131
[N.m]
5456
9 261 14 270
20 761
[N.m]
1367 2149 3191
4 523
[kN]
34 48 60 75 93 110 135
154 183 216 255
for -My
0,187 0,196 0,195 0,193 0,198 0,196 0,202 0,197 0,199 0,200 0,202 0,206 0,203 0,212 0,219 0,223
0,231
6133 8131
10 484 13 656
303 347
421
509 605
731 851
193
654946 825414
1
++
++ ++
++
143 313
461 295
1001
1
1200 825
1
101
1685 932
225318
1
1245 1347
30 42 53
61
103
1771 2580
31802
42 689 56 449 73 219
76
91 111
1093 1286
++
++ ++
++ ++
++
1090
237 278 327 378 473 549 624 720 806 965
25 222
31317
40 386
47486 57750
70 881 84 953 103 886
637
751
9 379
12195
15 724 19 833
879
75470
96 414
806 953
1
3668
4 624
122
1416
27661 35 858 43 473 53 326 63 238 80 133 96 005 112921 150 420
1049
0,194 0,197 0,194 0,199 0,192 0,193 0,199 0,199 0.207 0,213 0,219 0,226 0,227
573
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npi.Rd-0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
5456 9 261
14 270 20 761
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd [kN]
36 49 62 77 94 113 134 157 184 216 253 294 342
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
45
61
Nsd/NPi.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
54 73 93 116 142 169
201
Nsd/Npi.Rd=0,35
Nsd [kN]
63 85 109
135 165 197
MN.y [N.m]
5369
9 218
MN.y [N.m]
5034 8 642
13 292
MN.y [N.m]
4698 8066 12 406 18 016 25 404 34049 45 459 58 448 75 331 99 558 129 487 166661 210 389 272980
MN.y [N.m]
4 362
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750 137 IPE 750x147 IPE 750x173 IPE 750x196
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
27 36 47 58
71
29107
39108 51850 67070 86162 113739 147664 189 018 239499 307180 399921 515618 654946 825 414
*
78
7490 11520
16 729 23 590
97
118
141
19303
27 219 36 481 48 706 62 623 80 712 106 670
31617
42 212 54 273 69 950 92 447
120 238 154 757 195361
'
1.
397 464
543 632 733
**
113739 147664 189018 239499 307180 399921 515 618 654946 825414
*
427 496
581
358577
464 518
234 274 322 378 443 515 598 695 813 950
1
k*
100
**
*
596399 752354
**
**
*
106
.. ..
'
t.
1283
*
ft k*
780 884
22
31
881
1040
1
179
101
1300 1474
37
52 65 79 95 115 138 166 196 230 273 322 376 429
**
**
1440991 1639166
1560 1768
45 62 78 94 114 138 165 199 235 276 328 386
** *
**
**
1529 888
3 887 6 829 10 307 14 626
20 401 27 752
2063
52 72
91
4460
7 750 11720 16 826 23 287
30
41
4443
7 750
11720
16 716
23 287
21858
29 735
110 133
161
31717 42689
56 449 73 219 96 935
40109
52 937 68 730 90 877 119871
37435
49 408 64 148
*
*
*
193
232 274
** *
213090
268 817
351 158
156144
* *
**
**
**
*
.* ..
**
** * **
**
*
**
**
**
**
*
*
644
127 150 176 205 253 295
341
**
IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
96
113 132 154 190
221
44142
58 382 74 951 96 242 133672 173 227 221231 278 546
41383
54 733 70 267 90 227 125318 162400 207404 261 137
191
221555
278 730
353010
480 872 614051
353010
480 872 614051
803 917
1
225 264 308 380 443 512 593 680 829 964 1 100
223 263 308 360 443 517 597 692 793 968
1
78197
108609 140 747
179 750
124
156
019 141
1387
1284 1618
574
2
Np,
3
Vp,.z
4
Vp..y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpl.z
7
Nlimit
8
(Nfimit /NpiRd)
Designation
for -My
[kN]
HE100AA HE120AA
HE 140 AA
[kN]
83 94 107
141
[kN]
158 188
[N.m]
13 714 19 768
[N.m]
6684 9546
[kN]
54 63
*
for -My
0,147 0,144
367 436
541
HE160AA HE180AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA
HE 1000 AA HE HE HE HE HE
713 858
1834
2 089
2223
2 362
2505
2 766
237 316 380 452 527 610 697 789 890 933 977 1021
1 1 1
**
**
* *
*
**
2986 3 217
3 592 3 855
++ ++
1
1226
1361
++ ++
++
152585 164180 170250 176404 187932 201289 225 050 238 701
621
9668
13 830 19 939
0,123
0,121 0,121
28 080 40 771
57610
76 340
27644
36 776
HE200A
HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A
564 680
811
914
1022
1
2644
2 923
3137 3355
3 736
4184
4 642
181
4976 5322
5 678 6121
++ ++
136
1306 1390 1475 1603 1770 1936 2021 2106 2191 2280
2 371 2 542 2 628
47897
63 590 82 648
101090
121 761
150674
166 789
602023
755 729 927981
0,129 0,122 0,128 0,124 0,125 0,126 0,126 0,127 0,126 0,129 0,132
0,141
0,146
0,151
1086127 1257340 1442 028 1652 478 2044 380 2540 350
3 012 700
1006
1
157
++
2504
332402 345382
575
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npi.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
Mfg.y
Nsd/NpI.Rd=0,2
Nsd [kN]
73 87
tttt * *
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd
[KN]
92 109
** *
Nsd/Npi.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
110
131
tt*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
Nsd [kN]
128 153
**
*
[N.m]
13 671 19 635
tt
MN.y [N.m]
12 867
MN.y [N.m]
12 063
MN.y [N.m]
11259 16170
tt
Nky
[N.m]
10 455 15 015
**
.*
55 65
tttt *
18480
'
ka
17325
**
*. *.
tt
*
'* *
**
** ** **
*
**
'*
k. k*
**
tt
*
*
**
**
**
tt*
**
**
*
*
tt
tt
HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA
HE 1000 AA HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A
'*
k.
**
* *
**
* tttt
* tt*
*
** ** *
**
tt
tt*
**
tt tt tt
tt tt tt
*
>*
tt
**
**
tt
**
*tt * tt*
k.
tt
**
k. k
tt* tt
"
k.
**
** ** **
**
*
* *
**
**
'* '*
643 718
771
600 279
734986
851 419
562762
693 881 815081
1
965
525 244
126
487727
tt
1078
1
647622
760 742
157
977566
137431 1 462 828 1879 720 2 297531
1
977566
137 431 1462 828 1879 720 2 297 531
1
1033
1
122
948352 112072
462 828
**
**
185
1326
100 119 148 182 213 253 302 361
885129
tttt tt **
**
* *
**
*
*
**
18 914
27157
39 436
17801 25 559
37116
52 889 69 567 92 645
121 981
56194
73 915
227
271
150 179
221
15 576
175
22364 32 477
46 278 60 871
510
571 661 731
81064
106 733
140017 173047
209 280 260 579
1006
1
208 258 319 372 443 529 632 714 800 926 1023
14 463 20 767
30157
42 972 56 523 75 274
1098
1
174
121
1046
1
161
1008
1
1064
1
136
130
1223
..
742
*
1863
*
99110 130016 160687 194 332 241966 284 578 324575 367631 455 790 575 286 710 217 840444 983 257
*
.
1931368
*
*
* *
*
..
**
576
2
Np,
5
Mpl.y
7
Nlimit
Designation
Vplz
[kN]
123 149 177 239 275
Vpl,
[kN]
286 375 474 589
711
MpU
[N.m]
12084 19028 28149
39 941 54 288
{Nfimit /NpLRd)
for - My
[kN]
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M
[N.m]
24 490 38 825
[kN]
71
for -My
0,116 0,112 0,109 0,117 0,114 0,116 0,113 0,115 0,116 0,116 0,118 0,119 0.123 0,126 0,136 0,142 0,148 0.158 0,167 0,175 0.187 0,204 0,217 0,230 0,102 0,102 0.101 0,107 0,106 0,108 0,107 0.102 0.103 0.104 0,101 0,104 0,109 0,114 0,123 0,134 0.144 0,155 0,165 0.174 0,183 0,200 0,215 0.228
612 799
337 379
451
847
991 1 149
2 783 3 087
3503
3 792 4 016 4 245
1281
4648
5 122
2194
2 361
57675 83182 113140 150999 194356 247489 301484 360592 439138 505071 565905 630502 759458 935857
131 423 313 792 1509 907 1 720 172 1 956 876 2 404 050 2 956 300
1
71866
92 562 117128 141528
5608
5 970
6344
6 729
7200 7853
8 725
++
2446
2 532
315168 326899
338 732
1057
1
2 617 2 706
179
2799
2971
3 057
351335 364986
389 710
2883
245 287 332 418 470 557 615 815 908 977
3492100
55 416 82 394 116049
403323
27334
40 333 56 520 76 483 99 919
|_
2466 2686
3 417
3 491
127656 159460
236 394
280229
328 219
7883
8 091 8 328
3 491
3480
3 469
942 1056
1
HE600M
HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 Ml HE 1000 M
8546
8 783
9 001
454024
455 267
169
9500
9 955 10 439
453639 454883
453 264
3436 3434
3 423 3 423
453642
453 286
455825
577
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npuw-0,15
Nsd [kN]
M[M.y
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
122 160 202 255
Nsd/N ?l.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
153
Nsd/Nlpl.Rd=0t3
Nsd [kN]
184 240 303 382 460 550 642 747 835 926 1051 1 137
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0I35
Nsd [kN]
214 280 353 446 537 642 749 872 974
[N.m]
23 546
MN.y [N.m]
22161
34 971
MN.y [N.m]
20 776 32 785 48 543 70 621 95 752 128078 164 404
MN.y [N.m]
19391 30 599 45 307 65 913 89 368 119 540
MN.y [N.m]
18 006 28 414 42 070
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550
92 120
151
37156
55 015 80 037 108519 145156 186325
191
230 275
321
175365
223 730 272 791 326 451
398153
458 543 515 972
697
768
841
200 252 319 383 459 535 623 696 772 876 948
61205
82 985 111001 142484 181780 221643 265 241
153444
195 763 238 692 285 645
209747 255742
306 048 373 268
429884
483 724 541243 659 218 818 214 995 973 1 169 629
1004
1061
1
1024
1 1
HE600B
HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE HE HE HE HE HE
896 952
122 194
1009 1080
1
178
1309 1410
188 234 284 342 399 463 527 704 774 847
577326 703166 872762 1062 372 1247604 1449 420 1668 467
1
162
1281
924 783
745
1880
250 312 379 456 532 617 702 938 1032
1
323499 372566
419 228
013 678
1903
2 019
2160 2356
2 617 2 820
HE220M
HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
129
1068
1
1
1 1 1
1057196
1
124 291
1268 873 1460 151 1656 424 1864180 2 061440 2269 385
2 476 900
141950 185 746 239169 298765 443377 529183 622442 852816 930467 995008
878 173
280092
415 666
43187 64194
90 388 124 206
162528
209 273
1290
1411 1781
496109 583539
799 515
1058156
194 234 1374 260
1
872313
932 820 992021 1 119 594 1288 369
814159 870632
925 886 1044 955 1202 477
2598
2 622
2680
2 759
150919 194325 242746 360244 429961 505 734 692913 756 004 808444 859 752 970315
1
800
1558 987 1764 082 1973 897 2196 803 2423 941
2365 2 427
116 586
2832
2 915 2 991 3 074 3 150 3 325 3484
1900
1991
2935150
3 393 400 3 893 950
2850
2 987
2489
2 610
2088
3132
3 531030
3654
578
2
,
4
Vp..y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpi.z
7
Nlimit
8
{Nfimit /Np|.Rd)
Designation
Vp,z
[kN]
134 168 174 198
for - My
[kN]
UB 178x102x19 UB 203x102x23 UB 203x133x25 UB 203x133x30 UB 254 x 102x22 UB 254 102x25 UB 254x102x28 UB 254 x 146 31 UB 254 X 146 X 37 UB 254 146 43 UB 305 X 165 40 UB 305x165x46 UB 305x165x54 UB 356x171 x45 UB 356x171 51 UB 356x171 x57 UB 356x171x67 UB 406x178x54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406x178x67 UB 406x178x74 UB 457 152 52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457 152 67 UB 457 152 74 UB 457 152 82 UB 457 191 67 UB 457 191 74 UB 457 191 82 UB 457 191 89 UB 457x191 98 UB 533x210x82 UB 533 210 92 UB 533 210 101 UB 533 210 109 UB 533 210 122 UB 610 229 101 UB 610 229 113
[kN]
225 266 292
361 198
[N.m]
40 245 55 006 60 567 73 876 60 868
[N.m]
9 774
[kN]
97
123
131
for N-My
0.170 0,178 0.175 0,164 0,250 0,233 0.217 0,183 0,162 0,158 0,172 0,167 0,167 0,210 0,196
0,191
570
691 751
11692 16 672
20 733 8 760
10 812 12 890
212 227
241
108
287
++
1381 1 616
++ ++
1705 2009
++
++
2 010 2 221
++ ++
++
++
222 239 274 273 306 360 363 389 427 485 452 469 523 568 495 534 595 639
701
2 457
++ ++
2 455 2 673
2944
++
++ ++
3263 3 652
++ ++
556 593 653 696 759 735 782 840 903 994 907 967
243 289 352 445 522 469 545 638 467 553 628 762 544 637 716 805 469 572 649 738 826 676 773 858
951
71799
82 910 92 370 113559 133087 146423
169 211
22119
28 053 33 153 33 307 38 900 45 973 34 443 40 937 46 707
179
204 208
231 271
114
1269 947
1
107
++
1043
1
4 188
++
153
5360 7128
++ ++
++ ++ ++
144
198828 182036 210561 237383 284552 247840 281875 316316 352689 257570 302509 341472 382248 425701 345 691 388391 430352 473206 524 616 483775 554620 613823 664680 750964 677065 770990 863831 973388 1079 488 1303 627 1759 258 938 623
1 1
++ ++ ++
++
++ ++
++ ++ ++
10 277
11614
1223 1307 1441 1389 1565 1721 1678 1775 1967 1956 2 079 2 277 2 575 2 593 2 875
1354
1501 1704
284 299 326 365 355 364 404 436 392 418 463 493 539 438 463 508 539 584 582 612 653 700 765 723 764 817 898 822 977
1266
911
964 1024
1 1
123 100
795 427
273409 322078
376 296 679048 785110
2953950
3637800 4152 450
3 748 4308
1236 1345 1316 1409 1540 1504 1648 1790 2013 1991 2190
0,196 0,250 0,233 0,230 0,222 0,219 0,218 0,208 0,207 0,201 0,198 0.237 0,222 0,216 0,215 0.210 0.239 0,226 0,218 0,215 0,184 0,182 0,178 0,243 0.230 0,225 0,220 0,250 0.239 0,228 0.250 0,243 0,227 0,250 0,246 0,236 0,233 0.194 0.189
579
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0.15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
40 245 55 006 60 567 73 876 60 868
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd [kN]
114 138 150 180 132
151
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
143 173 188 224 165 188 212 233
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
171
Nsd/Np,.nd=0,35
Nsd [kN]
200 242 263 314 230 264 297 326 388
451
**
*
MN.y [N.m]
38 813 53 532 58 731 70 660 60 868
MN.y [N.m]
36 387 50186 55 061 66 244 60 868
MN.y [N.m]
33 961 46 841 51390 61828 56 811 65 513 74 097
MN.y [N.m]
UB254X 102x22
UB 254 102 25 UB 254 102 28 UB 254 146 31 UB 254x146x37 UB 254 146 43 UB 305x165x40 UB 305x165x46 UB 305x165x54 UB 356x171x45 UB 356 171 51 UB 356 171 57 UB 356 171 67 UB 406x178x54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406 178x67 UB 406 178 74 UB 457 152 52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457 152x67 UB 457 152x74 UB 457 152 82 UB 457 191 67
31535
43 495 47 719 57 412 52 753 60 834 68 805 73 519 88 048 102796
**
a.
71799 82910
92 370 113559 133087
146 423 169 211 198 828
71799
82 910 90 485
70193
79 390 84 829 101594 118610
**
170 186
222 257
241
108367 126518
141 481
182036
210 561
162 540
237383
284 552
79174
94 821 110 703
* *
334 368
401
442 369 414 454 490 548 454 507 562 628 670 804
247840 281 875 316316 352689 257570 302509 341472 382248 425 701 345 691 388391 430 352 473 206 524 616 483 775 554620 613 823 664 680 750964
247840
281 875
414 485 404 458 512 603 486 539 603 666
**
*
'
167 182
566
**
**
155241
a.
597 703
**
**
226090
*
~
**
277156 307111
**
*
704 777
**
aa
285 175
*
.
381658
**
'
**
354397
**
*
402 445
491
430352
473 206
1069
562 629 684 764 660 777 884 790 870
1 1
535 589 492 552 605 653 730 606 677 749 838 893 1072 1426 750 839 912
523519
483 775
**
385172 425359
* **
634732
712 534
tt* tt
**
1
1
**
*
*
142 278
617530
** *
123
**
1256
1608 2138
867441
**
1
1466
"
* *
-*
116
1
1711433 938623
1 1
1876 2 495
*
1390 539
**
a
"*
1
"
**
140
136 648
1368
1529
*
1
1019
880 1036
1
178
1053
1
795 427
160
1274
1
1272 997
188 130
*
**
1783
.a
**
** **
100
1017
902 1 007
1
2 151 381
138
1298
1
1541 742
1962 541
2 240 611 2 570 900
1554 1767
**
aa
**
527 893
*
* **
.
2 062
..
**
"
**
**
**
2 087 734
** **
2034
**
..
"* **
.
**
"
2 276
2904
3838 202
2 502135
3 326 442
580
2
Np,
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpl.z
7
Nfimit
Designation
Vplz
IkN]
135 157 194 230 254
301
Vy
IkN]
291
{Nfimft/NpLRd)
for -My
IkN]
UC 152x152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203x203x52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203x203x71 UC 203 203 86 UC 254x254x73 UC 254x254x89 UC 254x254x107 UC 254x254x132 UC 254x254x167 UC 305x305x97 UC 305x305x1 18 UC 305x305 137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305x305 198 UC 305 x 305 x 240 UC 305x305 283 UC 356x368x129 UC 356x368x153 UC 356x368x177 UC 356x368x202 UC 356 406x235 UC 356x406x287 UC 356x406x340 UC 356x406x393 UC 356x406x467 UC 356x406x551 UC 356x406x634
{N.m]
*
IN.m]
IkN]
for -My
687 899
1
107
2188 2663
3 205 3 951 5 002 2 901
3530 4099
4 732 5 932
329 416 348 418 517 627 799 483 586 676 778 956
1
58 201
26 224
32801
54 253 62 099
1203
1
223
281
006
206418 267258
170 645
7186
7 749 3 862 4 578
165
1377
576 682 798 916
1097617 582629
696 711 811981 933 358
1
2127
2 464 2 816 3 319
1027 1272
1516 1765 2105 2308 2664
101 328
15 092
17362
210411 247348 289074 371 472 458388 503564 281812 337170 392 640 451090 560058 693078 761894 893050 1082 375 1302 461 1528 300
244 289 356 422 525 346 414 473 538 645 772 820 415 487 566 645 716 875 938
1076
1
255
1472 1662
0,107 0,105 0,119 0,117 0,115 0,114 0.109 0.107 0,106 0.107 0,106 0.107 0.107 0,102 0,102 0,101 0,100 0,098 0,098 0,096
581
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y IN.m]
Nsd/Npi.Rd0.2
Nsd IkN]
Nsd/Npi.Hd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
tt
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd IkN]
**
Nsd/Npi.Rd=0.35
Nsd [kN]
*tt
MN.y [N.m]
tt
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
tt
UC 152x152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203x203x52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203 X 203 71 UC 203 203 86 UC 254 X 254 X 73 UC 254 254 89 UC 254x254x107 UC 254 X 254 X 132 UC 254x254x167 UC 305x305x97 UC 305x305x1 18 UC 305 X 305 X 137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305x305x198 UC 305x305x240 UC 305 305x283 UC 356x368x129 UC 356x368x153 UC 356x368x177 UC 356 368 x 202 UC 356 406 235 UC 356 406 287 UC 356 406 340 UC 356 406 393 UC 356 406 467 UC 356 406 551 UC 356 406 634
135 166
180 221
53175 66196
106111 120493 139 742 167808
128024 148476
178 296
218975 223079
274 278 333 534
49 851
62059
99 479 112962 131008 157320
193 213 196 834
418069
540 952
361030 442974
518 526
604062 770996
950 486 1043 330
242010
294 295
46 528
315
387
483 545 628 744 902 766 932
1
167452
170 590 209 742 255 055 319 700
416916
488 025
1025
1
568529
725 643
1.83
961 185
186
1078
1
162
1437 1550
772 916
894575 981958
522 233 623 668
554872 662647 772674 888100 1042 245 1292 594 1422 398 1669 560
2 026 347
159
144
1325
1511
1759 2149
2 328 2691 3198
571 351
1907150
2 302 371 2 708 526
1787953
2 158 473 2 539 243
225876 274 675 344 292 445490 297319 364802 427022 497463 634938 782753 859 213 456 954 545 709 636319 731377 858319 1064 489 1 171386 1 374 932 1668 756
2 014 575 2369 960
122
1383 1751 1015 1235 1435 1656 2 076 2 515 2 712 1352 1602 1855 2116 2463 3008
3 259
424314
506 730
2604
3773
4 341
3 472
582
IPE
IPE A
1
-IPE O
2
Npi
5
Mpl.y
6
Mp|.z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nlimit /Np|.Rd)
Designation
Vpu
IkN]
57
81
.
Vpl,
IkN]
81
for - My
IkN]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750x137 IPE 750x147 IPE 750x173 IPE 750X196 IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE 0 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
[N.m]
[N.m]
1600
2 515
IkN]
39 56
71
for -My
0,187 0,196 0,195 0,193 0,198 0,196 0,202 0,197 0,199 0,200 0.202 0,206 0,203 0,212 0,219 0,223
0,231
6385
10 837 16 699
100
121
252 304
351
107 136 169 204 243 286 338 394 460 535 615 719 812
3735
5 293
87
109 129 158
181
7177 9 515
12 268 15 980
926
++ ++
++
++
849
766426
965 910
214 253 299 355 406 493 596 708 855 995
1
171
2 021
49 70 86 99 124 146 182 215 259 298 353 428 473 568
671
175
241
5 219 9 070
13 715 19 690 27 251
1290
2 073 3 019
4269
5 691
916
++
++ ++
++ ++
++
7689
10 047 13 333
17160 22645
29 515 36 648
47260
55 569
++ ++ ++
1
800 957
114
67580 82946
99 413 121568
10 976 14 270 18 400
1094 1275
277 326 382 443 554 642 730 843 943
1
0,200 0,203 0.208 0,194 0,204 0,209 0,213 0,219 0,219 0.194 0.197 0.194 0,199 0,192 0,193 0,199 0,199 0,207 0,213 0,219 0,226 0,227
745 879
52016
68 590 88 316 112825
158028
204 550 259 266 326 173
23 209 32 369
41962
50 873
3236
3 759
1
62403
74 002 93 772
129
413097 562722
718571 897429 1229 535
4 292 5 411
1313 1657
112347
132 142
176023
1227
583
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
6385
10 837 16 699 24 295 34 061
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd [kN]
42 57 73 90
111
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd IkN]
53
71 91
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd IkN]
63 85 109 136 166 198 235 275 323 379 444 517 600 697 815 953
1
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
NSd
MN.y [N.m]
6 283
10 787 16 591
MN.y [N.m]
5890 10113
15 554 22 589
MN.y [N.m]
5498 9439 14 517 21083
29 729 39 844
IkN]
74 99 127 158 193 230 274
321
MN.y IN.m]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750x137 IPE 750 147 IPE 750x173 IPE 750x196 IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600 IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
32 43 54 68
83 99 117 138
161
5105
8 765 13 480 19 577
24094 33976
45 536 60 676 78 168 100 746 133 099 172798
221 191
280 265
965910
**
132 157 184 215 253 296 344 400 465 544 635 739 858
**
31852 42690
56 997 73 282 94 450 124 826 162351
27605
36 998 49 397 63 511
53197 68 397
88 153 116 504 151 528 195 029
**
.
280 265
1072
aa
81857 108183
140 704
**
**
aa **
*
a*
109
*
*" **
1287
"
*
**
**
** ** *
1405 221
1
1031
710 026
1035
26 36 45 55 67
81
1972 899
5 219 9 070 13 715 19 690 27 251 37 215 49 955 66 057 85 682 113436 148 992 193030 249 361
1217 1380
35 48
61
1522 1724
44 60 76 92
111
**
1
**
"
**
*
918 173
2069
53 72
91
4 874
8563 12923
18 339
4549 7992
12 062
61
85
106 129 156 188
97 117 137
161
37115 49955
66 057 85 682
135
161
61948
80 429
tt
17116
23 873 32 476
22168 30156
* *
>
43 807
57818
*
226 272
*
** **
320 376
**
"
'
a
352 402
471
*
tt*
**
~
**
tttt
* *
*
*
*
**
"
k
556
tt
tt*
**
**
**
**
"
ka
51655
68 319 87 709 112 624
156425 202712
258 887
1082
45198
59 780 76 745 98 546
261
41970
55 510
308 360
421
190042
242 706
305586
390 857 536126 690 270 869171 1 192 612
971 128
500384
644 252 811 227 1 113 104
132
1073 1353
1288 1623
1033 597
584
2
Np,
3
Vp,.z
4
vPi.y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mp|.z
7
Nfimit
8
{NfimH /Np,.Rd)
Designation
[kN]
HE100AA HE 120 AA HE 140 AA HE160AA HE180AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA HE 1000 AA
HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A HE 500 A HE 550 A
for -My
[kN]
98 110 126 165 193 245 280
for -My
M
0.147 0.144
tt
[kN]
185
[N.m]
16 048
[N.m]
7822
[kN]
63 74
tt*
220 278 370 445 529 617 714 816 924 1041
23133
*"
**
*
*
*
'*
" '
tt
tt* **
**
*
*
* **
**
tt tt* *
1092
1
**
tt
a a
143 195
~
ft
868 983
1
154
tt
tt
192126
199 229
1291
996341
143 960 331 037 1 711 820 2 199 673 2688 600
1 1
++ ++
2117
268 318 393 477 563 660 796 948
161
11314 16185
23 333 32 349 43 036 56 050 74 414 96 715
457
504 592 653 714 777 910
1070
1
252937
305 861 380 399
197
3095
3 420
3 671 3 926 4 372 4 896 5 432 5 823
447724
508 881 574 330 704 494
726
1044
1
1876 2071
2 265
186
HE600A
HE 650 A HE 700 A HE 800 A
6228
++
++ ++ ++
HE900A
HE 1000 A
2 365
884363 1085 935 1270 999 1471356 1687480 1933 750 2392 359
2 972 750 3 525 500
317806 331317
345 604 360 871 388 981 404171
0,129 0.122 0.128 0,124 0,125 0,126 0,126 0.127 0,126 0,129 0.132
0.141
0.146 0,151
178
++
585
HE AA
HEA
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/NpI.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y IN.m]
15 999
* * * a *
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0>2
NSd
Nsd/NpI.Rd=0,25
Nsd
IKN]
107
tt tt tt Itt
.*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0>3
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,35
Nsd IkN]
150
**
aa
[kN]
86
* tttt *
MN.y IN.m]
15 057
**
MN.y IN.m]
14116
*
*
Nsd IkN]
129
tt
MN.y IN.m]
13175
** tt
MN.y IN.m]
12 234
*
HE100AA HE120AA HE140AA HE160AA HE180AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA HE 1000 AA
HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A HE 500 A HE 550 A HE 600 A HE 650 A HE 700 A HE 800 A HE 900 A HE 1000 A
64 77
*
** **
tt * tt *
**
tt
tt
**
**
* tt *
tt
**
**
**
**
** **
**
*
**
*
**
tt *
tt*
** **
* * tt*
**
**
**
tttt tttt
**
**
**
**
'*
*
*
** **
tt
* *
*
**
**
tt
*
tt
**
*
**
'* *
**
**
~
tt tt*
*
**
*
*
**
**
aa
**
**
**
**
*
**
*
aa
**
** *
**
*
**
**
'*
**
*a a*
860090 996341
1
841
860090
996 341 1 143 960 1 331 037
1051
1
143 960
902 967
128
1
811988 953818
109 774
1261
"*
1331037
711 820 2 199 673
1
1040
1
164
2688 600
1711820
*tt
1353 1450
**
"
tt
"
**
*
**
**
**
"
317 358
401
61891 81408
108 414 142 744
267
311
58023
76 320
187257
*
101639
133 822
54 155
71232
94 863 124901
175553
634
aa
163850
16925
24 302 35 290 50 287
66144
88 087
115979 152146
*
** **
464 513
551
**
**
1074
1
179
1322
1431
435484 496690 562578 697486 880347 1085 935 1270 999 1471356 1687480 1933 750 2 392 359 2 972 750 3 525 500
855 918
981
1026
1 1
358 634
197
333017
379 822 430 207
101
409039
463 300
178
1086
1
165
416 148
615429
776 777
958968
1
134 806
**
aa
*
*
aa a. aa
*
a*
**
a.
1965
**
** **
**
tt
**
586
2
Np,
3
Vp|.z
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpl-z
7
Nfimit
Designation
Vy
IkN]
335 438 555 690 832
991
{Nfimft/NpLRd)
IkN]
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
for -My
IkN]
143 174
[N.m]
28 659 45 433
[N.m]
14 141
[kN]
83
105 129 174
for -My
0.116 0,112 0,109 0,117 0,114 0,116 0.113 0.115 0,116 0,116 0,118 0.119 0.123 0,126 0,136 0,142 0,148 0,158 0.167 0,175 0,187 0,204 0,217 0,230 0,102 0,102
0,101
716 935
1
181
208 279
321
4100
4 437 4 700 4 967
962
1
111
7424
7 874 8 425
9190
++
++
2568
2 763
204 249 284 335 377 420 482 527 576 627 739 852
971
101
2863
2 962
3 062
3 167 3 276 3 477 3 577
396388
411 137
427112
456 044 471 974
1464 1826
2 215
719 889
2669 3114
3 610 4 110
719 954
1062
1
144
8685
8 767 8 959 9 225 9 468 9 745
10 001 10 278 10 533
11 117
327928 384086
526 125 536 449 536 995
534147 531886
533 281
330 389 439 562 625 689 843 892 944 996
1
102
741 029
11650
++
4034 4034
4 021 4 019
4006 4006
1950925 2181488 2 412323 2655 664 2898 500 3434 750 3 971000
4 556 750
531304
532 760 530 854
532310
530 416 530 858 530441 533 412
0,104 0,109 0,114 0.123 0.134 0,144 0,155 0,165 0.174 0.183 0,200 0,215 0.228
587
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
27554
43 481 64 379 93 660 126990 169863 218040 278 174
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0.2
Nsd [kN]
143 187
Nsd/NpI.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
179 234 295 373 449 537 626 729 814 903
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
215
281
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
Nsd [kN]
251
MN.y [N.m]
25 933 40 923 60 592 88151 119520 159871 205 214 261811 319 224
MN.y [N.m]
24 312 38 366
MN.y [N.m]
22 691 35 808
MN.y [N.m]
21071 33 250 49 231
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 8 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700
583
651
339175 405893 495044 570130 641535 717819 874282 1085149 1320 901
1
723 820
887
940 993
1025
1
109 175
1088
1
822854
1
199
021 317
192388 245448 299272 358141 436 803 503056 566060 633370 771425 957485
165 501 1368 715
1
874 977
1084 1230
1331
71622 97110
129895
166 736
140
1048
1
537 417
114
181
1766 912
2 012 967 2 289 961 2 813 250 3459 500 4086 500
1
1
264
HE800B
HE 900 HE 1000
1378 1532
1
528323
591 145
719 997
435982
490 586 548 920
668568
1
2445
2 598 2 756
1 1
970 855
aa
2949
* *
1586375 1830080
* *
a*
2553
2 750
366 457 554 667 779 903
3063
**
650
2200
293 365 443 534 623 722 822 1098 1208 1321 1667
"
HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M
61367 91218
128 439
176494
230 948
54147
80 487 113329 155 730 203 777
50 537
75121
105 773
HE300M
HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
1250 1287 1303 1315 1344 1384 1420 1462 1500 1542 1580 1668 1747
1
832
297371 371469 551273 657960 773914 1060 350 1 156 897 1237145 1315 659 1484 852 1708 687 1938 368 2181488 2 412 323 2655 664 2898 500 3434 750 3 971000 4 556 750
728389 997976 1088 844 1 164372 1238 268 1397 508 1608176 1824 347
2 064 351
2145 2171 2192 2240 2306 2367 2436 2500 2569 2633 2779
2 912 3 054
262386 327767 486 418 580 553 682865 935603 1020 791 1091598
1
1647 1812
1981
227402
284 065
421 562
503146 591816
810 856
2500
2 574 2606
3003 3040
3 069
884686
946 052
2630 2688
2 767
1006 092
1
2840
2 924 3000 3083 3160
135 475
1306 643
1
482 282
588
2
Np,
3
Vp,.z
5
Mpl.y
6
MpI.Z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Np,.Rd)
Designation
Vpi,
[kN]
263 312 342 422
231
for -My
[kN]
UB 178 102 19 UB 203x102x23 UB 203x133x25 UB 203 133 30 UB 254 X 102 X 22 UB 254x102x25 UB 254 102 28 UB 254x146x31 UB 254x146x37 UB 254x146x43 UB 305x165x40 UB 305 X 165 X 46 UB 305x165x54 UB 356 X.I 71x45 UB 356x171 51 UB 356x171 X57 UB 356x171 x67 UB 406x178x54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406x178x67 UB 406 178x74 UB 457x152x52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457x152x67 UB 457x152x74 UB 457x152x82 UB 457x191 67 UB 457x191 74 UB 457x191x82 UB 457x191x89 UB 457x191x98 UB 533x210x82 UB 533 210x92 UB 533x210x101 UB 533x210x109 UB 533x210x122 UB 610x229x101 UB 610x229x1 13 UB 610 229 125 UB 610x229x140 UB 610x305x149 UB 610x305x179 UB 610x305x238 UB 686x254 x 125 UB 686 X 254 X 140 UB 686x254x152 UB 686x254x1 70 UB 762 267 147 UB 762x267x173 UB 762x267x197 UB 838x292x176 UB 838x292x194 UB 838 292 226 UB 914x305 201 UB 914x305x224 UB 914 X 305 X 253 UB 914x305x289 UB 914x419x343 UB 914x419x388
[kN]
156 197 204
231
[N.m]
47095
64 369
[N.m]
11437
13 682 19 510 24 262 10 251 12 652 15 084
[kN]
114 144 154 172 193 205 215 200 210 239 243 270
for -My
0.170 0,178 0,175 0,164 0,250 0,233 0,217 0,183 0,162 0,158 0,172 0,167 0.167 0.210 0,196 0,191 0,182 0,219 0,202
0,201
70876
86 450
051
++
881
992 1091
1297
1506
++
71229
84 020
++
1891
++ ++
1995
2 351
++
++
++
2 599
++
++
++ ++
2 875
++
++ ++
3129 3445
++ ++ ++
++
319 358 422 425 455 500 567 528 549 613 665 579 625 696 748 820 650 693 764 815 888 860 915 983 1057
1
637
746 838 942 549 669 760 864 967
791
25 884 32 828 38 796 38 977 45 521 53 798 40 306 47 905 54 657 66 817 49 029 57 488 65 051 73 420 36 658 44 839
353999
399 595 447311 498161 404 532 454500 503603 553 752 613913 566120 649024 718304
51337
58 610 66 106 65 260 74 828 83 572 93 053
904 1004
1
113
1239
909
104198
82 600 97 785 109 848 119841 137421
1073
1201 1303
//7817
878 788 792311
4 273
++ ++
163 132
1484
1
1062
1
108
++
++ ++
6 272 8 342
++ ++ ++ ++
++ ++ ++
++
++ ++ ++
++ ++ ++
1221 1349 1251 1496 1967 1339 1431 1530 1687 1626 1832 2 014 1963 2 077
2 301
139 071
1263 231
525 521 2 058 707 1098 389 1 253 478 1 375 126 1548 460 1417 769 1704 362 1 970 810
1
317 332 350 382 428 415 426 473 510 458 489 542 577 630 513 542 595 630 683 682 716 764 820 895 846 894 957 1051 962
1
314559
432 833 149159
143
1482 1066
1 1
++
13 591
1872119
2 101 031 2 517574 2 296 591
175497 195302 223143 177981 222057 263613 231519 267796 333191 270044 319 947 376900 440346
794 631 918 746
128 199
759
0,198 0,237 0.222 0,216 0,215 0,210 0.239 0.226 0,218 0.215 0,184 0,182 0,178 0,243 0.230 0,225 0.220 0,250 0,239 0,228 0.250 0,243 0,227 0,250 0,246 0,236 0,233 0,194 0.189
589
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0f15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
NSd/Np,.Rd=0,2
NSd IkN]
133 162 176 210 154 176 198 218 259 301 282 323
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
167 202 220 263 193 220 248 273 324 377
**
NSd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
200 243 264 315
231
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
Nsd
JkN]
MN.y [N.m]
45 419
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
39 742 54 813
MN.y [N.m]
UB 178x102x19 UB 203x102x23 UB 203x133x25 UB 203x133x30 UB 254x102x22 UB 254x102x25 UB 254x102x28 UB 254x146x31 UB 254x146x37 UB 254x146x43 UB 305x165x40 UB 305x165x46 UB 305X165X54 UB 356x171x45 UB 356x171x51 UB 356x171x57 UB 356x171x67 UB 406x178x54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406x178x67 UB 406x178x74 UB 457x152x52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457x152x67 UB 457x152x74 UB 457x152x82 UB 457x191x67 UB 457x191x74 UB 457x191x82 UB 457x191x89 UB 457x191x98 UB 533x210x82 UB 533x210x92 UB 533x210x101 UB 533 X 210 X 109 UB 533x210x122 UB 610x229x101 UB 610x229x113 UB 610x229x125 UB 610x229x140 UB 610x305x149 UB 610x305x179 UB 610 305 238 UB 686 254 125 UB 686 254 140 UB 686 254 152 UB 686 254 170 UB 762 x 267 147 UB 762 267 173 UB 762 267 197 UB 838 292 176 UB 838 292 194 UB 838 292 226 UB 914 305 201 UB 914 305 224 UB 914 305 253 UB 914 305 289 UB 914 419 343 UB 914 419 388
100
121
47095
64 369
42580
58 729 64 433
62644
68 728 82 688
132 158 116 132 149 164 195 226 212 242 284 236 268 299
70876
86 450
60137
72 352 66 480 76 664 86 709 92 650 110961 129 546
**
**
71229
84 020
234 283 308 368 270 308 347 382 454 527
**
36903
50898 55842 67184 61732
71 188
80 516
*
103035
120 293
*
353 390
431
573
641
171346 198013 232671 213021 246401 277789 332987 290025 329 853 370 157 412722 301411 353 999 399595 447311 498161 404 532 454500 503603 553 752 613913 566120 649024 718 304 Til 81 7 878 788 792311 902222 1010 866
1
190 206
223587
213021 245 217 274859 325629 290025
329853 370157
410 726
*
404 473 394 446 499 588 474 526 588 650
*
**
209613
tt tt
567
tt
195 639
**
tt
662
181 665
tt a a
**
257680
305 277
599 705
** **
**
284925
**
823
264 573
*
**
347498 385056
tt
706 780
** *"
**
359386
*
tt
910
tt
139 071
1263 231
525 521 2 058 707
1
520 575 470 520 575 626 689 576 646 708 764 855 709 792 876 980 1045 1254
** **
**
*
**
446621
**
tt
1006
> *
*
a *
454500
503 603 553 752
718 782
861
476324
520 076
862 939
*
1
574340
tt *
1033
** ** **
1
485405 536050
**
*
095
**
**
1206
**
*
497 761
**
742772 833816
**
*
146
**
**
*
1282
778 229
**
*
1496
*
1010 866
1
139 071
**
1095 1225
**
**
** * *
1087597
tt
1470
tttt
..
tt>
1492 385
2 002 741
1668
877
981
1568 2085
1399111 1877569
1882 2502
**
752 398
** ** *
a*
2 920
*
1627 227
**
**
**
a.
**
tt * *
375 126
1067
1
193
1334 1491
*
**
**
1489 677
** **
1
1789
**
aa
1018
1
190
178
1056
1
2 621 991 3008 500 3456 750 4 257 000 4859 250
1030 1212 1379 1232 1358 1587 1408 1571 1776 2025 2405 2 718
**
1 1
**
1515 1723
**
**
915 671
*
2068
* **
**
aa
*"
aa
** **
**
**
2 517 574
*
1984
**
* ** * **
aa
* *
3008 500
3 456 750 4 224 033 4 790 947
** **
** ** **
**
3 378 497
3 038
3153 264
*
3545
**
3960 031
4 491 513
3608
4 077
4192079
4 757
**
590
2
Np,
4
vPi.y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpl.z
7
Nfimit
Designation
VpU
[kN]
158 184
{Nfimit /Npi.Rd)
for - My
[kN]
UC 152x152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203x203x52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203 X 203 71 UC 203x203x86 UC 254 254 73 UC 254x254x89 UC 254x254x107 UC 254x254x132 UC 254x254x167 UC 305 X 305 97 UC 305x305x118 UC 305x305x137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305 305 x 198 UC 305 305x240 UC 305x305x283 UC 356x368x1 29 UC 356x368x153 UC 356x368x1 77 UC 356x368 202 UC 356x406x235 UC 356x406x287 UC 356x406x340 UC 356x406x393 UC 356x406x467 UC 356x406x551 UC 356x406x634
IkN]
341 471
[N.m]
*
[N.m]
*
IkN]
**
for -My
*
804
68108
84 909 136 796
4131 4796 5 538 6 941 8409 9191 4 519 5 357 6 201 7074 8 234 10 057 11042
12 765
227 270 298 352 385 487 407 489 605 734 934 566 685
791
584
731
834 957
1
166
1407
1
177
131
246
261
514088
666 508
910
1
119
1363
1611 674 798 934
4350
2 091
301 825
102762 125465 127983 158 210 191 687 241553 312749 199690 246 225 289450 338 278 434 701 536411 597251
*
1072
1
202
681800 815301
950 191
15170
17 899 20 592
6102 7308
8 673 10 053
1092 228 1288 788 1598 431 1784 765 2096 723 2550 000 3080 400 3 631200
655387 811049
903 642 059 199 1 283 747 1544 779 1812 634
1
329 286 339 416 494 615 404 484 553 629 755 904 972 486 569 662 755 838 1024
1
1
113 276
0,124 0,123 0.119 0,115 0,117 0,105 0,109 0.112 0,109 0,111 0,107 0,105 0,119 0,117 0,115 0,114 0,109 0,107 0,106 0,107 0,106 0,107 0,107 0,102 0,102 0,101 0,100 0,098 0,098 0.096
591
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np|.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y IN.m]
*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
NSd IkN]
MN.y IN.m]
*
MN.y [N.m]
**
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
**
UC 152x152 23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203x203x52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203x203x71 UC 203x203x86 UC 254x254x73 UC 254x254x89 UC 254x254x107 UC 254x254x132 UC 254x254 167 UC 305x305x97 UC 305x305x1 18 UC 305x305x137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305x305x198 UC 305x305x240 UC 305x305x283 UC 356x368x129 UC 356 368 153 UC 356x368x177 UC 356x368x202 UC 356x406x235 UC 356x406x287 UC 356x406x340 UC 356x406x393 UC 356x406x467 UC 356 X 406 X 551 UC 356x406x634
tt
158 194
66115
82 305 131933
149 815
242 273 315 373 452 384 467 563 694 878 509 620 719
831
210 259 323 365 420 497 603 512 623 750 925
1
263 324 404 456 525 622 754 640 779 938
1
58336
72 622 116412 132190 153307 184098 226101 230338
283 203
123377 143087
171 825
344387
431 673
'
125
156
1041 1261
171
1463
849
397630 487881
571 093
1033
1
199
108
112 271
**
1379
678 804 930 1061 1 235
1237438
775438 904193 1039 266 1219 648 1512 610 1687030 1980176
2 403 342 2 901389 3 413 215
50 558
981415 1091857
*
188
195954 199626 245443 298469 374117 484081 323075 396403 464013 540556 689940 850 560 946 276
1071
2685
3 089
729824 851005 978133 1 147904 1423 633 1587 793 1863 695 2261969 2 730 719 3 212 438
684 210
797817 917000
1
076 160
638 596
1875 2171
2 476 2 882 3 520 3 865 4 468 5 310
592982
691 441 794 733
932672
1
156 701
4 475 5148
6265
7 207
3 011661
592
IPE
IPE A -IPE O
1
2
Np,
4
vpt.y
5
Mpl.y
6
,
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Np|.Rd)
Designation
for -My
IkN]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750x137 IPE 750x147 IPE 750x173 IPE 750x196
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600 IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
271
IkN]
73 104 129 157 198
231
IkN]
105 138 176 218 263
[N.m]
8 242 13 989
[N.m]
2065
3 247 4 821
IkN]
51
for -My
0.187 0,196 0,195 0,193 0,198 0,196 0,202 0,197 0,199 0,200 0,202 0.206 0.203 0,212 0,219 0.223
0.231
72
91
'
21557 31362
43 970 59 077 78 327 101 319
130 159 171 819
6833 9265
12 283 15 837
113
141
185
1389
1631
++
++
++
++
++
720 875
223066
285 537
1048
1
++
++ ++ ++
196
++ ++
++
2161 2 387
2609
63
91
111
1666
2 676 3 897 5 510
35178
48 041 64 487 85 274 110 608
7347
9 926 12 970
17212 22152
29 232
++ ++
++
++ ++ ++
++
38101 47 309
61008 71735
87 240 107076
128 333 156 934
635 765
911
1065
187 223 258 308 367 430 513 596 709 889
0.198 0,202 0,200 0.201 0,200 0,203 0.208 0.194 0,204 0,209 0,213 0,219 0.219
962
1
14169
18 422 23 753 29 961
135
1327 1552
1911
2230
2 578 2 987 3 422
++ ++ ++ ++
41786 54169
65 672 80 557 95 529 121 052
421060
533 271
726423 927609
1
1064
1 250 1584
0.194 0,197 0,194 0,199 0,192 0,193 0,199 0,199 0.207 0,213 0.219 0,226 0,227
593
IPE
IPE A -IPE O
9
10
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0t15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
8 242
13 989
Nsd/Npi.Rd-0,2
Nsd IkN]
54 73 94 117
143 170 202
Nsd/N pl.Rd=0|25
Nsd IkN]
68 92 117 146 178 213 253 296 347 408 478 556 645 750 877
.
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
81
NSd/N 3i.Rd=n>35
Nsd IkN]
95 128 164
MN.y [N.m]
8111 13925 21418
31 104
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
6 590 11314 17402
25 272 35 636 47 761 63 767
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750x137 IPE 750x147 IPE 750x173 IPE 750 196 IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600 IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
41
55 70
7604 13055
20 079
7097
12185
18 740
110
141
87
107 128 152 178 208 245
21557 31362
43 970 59 077 78 327 101 319
29160
41 118
175 214
55109
73 577 94 601 121926
161 139
130159 171 819 223066 285 537 361797 464037 604136 778 912 989 387
1
237 278 326 382 445 516 600 702 820 954
1
209580
*
81987 105669
*
*
** '*
**
** **
aa aa
'*
ka k.
aa
*
tt *
"
**
**
'
ka ka
246 901
*
107
*
*
aa
**
aa
** * ** ** **
930 998
1
**
*
**
**
*
a*
"
'
ka
179
1336
34 47 59
71
1571 1781
45 62 78 95 115 139 167
201
* **
tt
**
'
6 711
57
78 98 119 144 174 208
251
11708
17 704 25 417
11708 17704
25 252
6 292 11054
16 683 23 673 33 020 44 918
*
35178
48 041 64 487 85 274
35178
47913
64 487 85 274 110608
*
a.
5 873
10 317 15 570
22 095
*
**
aa aa aa aa
5453 9580
14 458 20 517
* *
'*
ka
296
**
** ** *
a. .
"
ka
* *
* tt
'*
" "
** **
"*
**
**
aa
tt
* **
aa
** **
*
'*
*
"
**
** **
**
" **
**
**
"
67148
88 544
192
66 682
88194
113 224
313312 394484
504561
58 347
77170
99 071
127214
176 689
228972
* tt
726423 927609
158 499
1048
1397
1587 218
692090 891076
1
122 021
1539 554
'
ka y
**
' '*
1436 917
2445
594
2
Np,
3
Vp,.z
5
Mpl.y
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Np,.Rd)
Designation
Vpl,
[kN]
239 284 359 477 574 682 796 922
MpLz
IN .m]
*
Itt
for -My
IkN]
HE 100 AA
IkN]
126
141
[N.m]
20 717 29 863
* * tt
[kN]
82 95
** **
for -My
0,147 0,144
*
HE120AA HE140AA HE160AA HE180AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA
HE 1000 AA HE HE HE HE HE
1078 1297
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
++ ++
tttt
>
k.
317
361 441
'*
'*
*
* tt
tttt
tt*
++ ++
4 178
++
1
++
++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
1053 1192 1344 1410 1476 1542 1670 1736 1802 1935
2 002
*
*
tttt
*
tt
**
*
tt
**
*
**
*
*
*
tt
**
* * * *
939
1
115
1286186
476 748 718 248 2209 803 2839 578 3470 738
1 1
1261
2538
3 018 3 529
155 173
283 898
304076
339 969 360 591
14 605
754 899
1
345
411
29 470
115
207
271
1376 1606
1911 2 284 2 728 3 082
297
371
HE200A
HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A HE 500 A HE 550 A HE 600 A HE 650 A HE 700 A
42 419 61591
20 893 30 121
1028 1224
1381
41760
** * ** **
3453
3 995 4 415
4 738
764 843
921
5068 5644
6 320
1003
1
175
1348
1531
7013
++ ++ ++
**
++ ++
++ ++
3348
3 783
741408 909438 1 141633 1401844 1640 745 1899 387 2178 383 2496 296
3 088 318
3837550
4 551 100
0,123 0.121 0.121 0,129 0,122 0,128 0.124 0,125 0.126 0,126 0,127 0,126 0.129 0,132 0,141 0,146 0.151 0,160 0,169 0,177 0,189 0,206 0,219 0,232
595
HE AA
HEA
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y IN.m]
Nsd/Npi.Hd-0,2
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
Nsd/N pl.Rd=0.25
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
a. a*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
*
*
N&J/N. >1.Rd=0,35
MN.y [N.m]
* *
*
Nsd [kN]
aa
MN.y [N.m]
HE100AA HE120AA HE140AA HE160AA HE180AA HE200AA. HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA HE 1000 AA
HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A
83 99
*
**
** * tt* *
**
tt k* tt k*
** "*
**
**
*
**
** ** **
**
**
aa
**
*
**
*
* **
**
** **
*
** ** ** **
* * * *
**
**
tt
'*
k*
ktt
**
**
aa
"
* *"
a.
**
tt*
* *
** **
tt*
*
**
*
** *
**
*
ktt
"
** **
"
**
**
1ktt
1017
1
718 248
*
aa
1356
ktt
**
163
** ** **
1343 1503
113 135 167 206 241
" "
**
'*
28 572
151
41024
59 573 84 889
tt tt* ** **
188
21849 31371
45 556
64915
tt
HE220A
HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A
HE300A HE 320 A
HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A
*
a.
**
**
* tt
**
** **
**
tt* * * *
**
tt
**
*
**
*
tt tt
**
**
*
**
** **
**
tt
**
*
**
**
tt*
**
tt
1014
1
129
1052
1
128
1267
1411
640 798
598078 741499
935 899
*
1774 1975
2 212
*
aa
555358
688 535 869 049
* *
* ** **
aa
**
**
**
k*
tt
**
*
**
*
*
*
**
** *
t ktt
**
*
**
596
2
Np,
3
Vp,.z
4
Vp..y
5
Mpl.y
.
6
Mp].z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Np,.Rd)
Designation
for -My
IkN]
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280
for -My
0,116 0.112 0,109 0,117 0,114 0,116 0,113 0,115 0,116 0.116 0.118 0,119 0,123 0,126 0,136 0,142 0,148 0,158 0,167 0,175 0,187 0,204 0.217 0,230
IkN]
185 225 268 361
[kN]
.
[N.m]
36 996 58 650
[N.m]
18 255
IkN]
107 135 166 225 264 321 366
924
432 566
716 890
28 744
87126
125658 170914 228104 293602 373867 455 433 544 724 663379 762980 854877 952461 1 147267 1 413 741
709 171 1984 665 2280 923 2 598 557 2 956 131
1
42524
60 337 82 010
2772
3 232 3 762 4 205
HE300B
HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M
4663 5 292
5 728 6 067 6 412 7021
2612
2 740
150
7738
8 472 9 019
2868 3063
3 315 3 567 3 695 3 824 3 953
100
1254
1421
9584 10165
++
4089
4 229
++ ++
++
3869 4355
370 434
501
4488
4 618
551363
588 711 609 275
1890
2 357
928
1
147
2860 3445
4 020 4660 5 305
632 710
841
124467 175308
239 471
7085
7 797 8 526 10 759
,_
HE300M
HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M
3 397
3 725 4 057
273 273 257 5 240 5 240 5 224 5 224
5 5 5 5
163
41291 60 929 85 382 115 538 150942 192842 240886 357106 423325
495 821
0,102 0,102
0.101
2099
2 258
679179
692 507 693 212
1088
1
151
2456 2654
2 861 3 067 3 274 3 481 3 982 4 395 4 817
5208 5208
5 191 5 188
5 171
687163
684 718 685 289 684 751 688 587
HE800M HE 900 M
HE 1000 M
5 171
5882350
3596
0,104 0,109 0,114 0.123 0,134 0,144 0,155 0,165 0.174 0.183 0,200 0,215 0,228
597
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
35 569
Nsd/Npi.Rd=0,2
Nsd [kN]
185 241
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd IkN]
231
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd IkN]
277 362 457 578 695 832 970
1
Nad/Npi.Rd-0,35
NSd
MN.y [N.m]
33 477 52 828 78 219 113 795 154289
MN.y [N.m]
31385
49 526 73 331 106682 144646 193480
MN.y [N.m]
29 292 46 225 68 442 99 570
[kN]
323 423 534 674
811
MN.y [N.m]
27 200 42 923 63 553
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450
139
181
56130 83108
120 907
302
381 481
163933
219 278
281469
359 098
933
1058
1
146
1053
1
128 618
161
1400 829
1
HE500B
HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M
705 163
1525
1631
248355 316851
386 333
970
1
131
129
1051
1
1261
166
462327
563 874
649399
730 732
2520 451
2 907651
817623 995840 1236 026 1504 556 1766 886 2 052 702 2362 923
2 725 923
**
aa
431506
526 282
92458 125360 167683 215 241 274604 334 822 400684 488690 562813 633 301
708 606 863061
153 624
2 708
1071222
1303 948 1531302
**
**
aa aa aa
2965
3 157
**
**
3263
*
.
2636 2840
378
471
2966
3 295
*
**
**
**
*
**
**
**
79 219
1063
1
170
HE450M
HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
1279 1614 1662 1682 1698 1735 1786 1833 1887 1936 1990 2040 2153
2 256
2365
117754 165 803 227838 298132 383 879 479533 711644 849367 999052 1368 815 1493 449 1597041 1698397 1916 809 2 205 760 2 502 257 2 816 102 3114090 3 428 221 3 741700 4 433 950 5 126 200 5 882 350
156050 214435 280 595 361298 451325 669 782 799404 940 284 1288 296 1405 599 1503 098 1598 491 1804 055 2 076 010 2355 066 2664 889 2 981844
3 318 575
1005
1
165
423118 627921
749441
3056 3145
3 227 3 317 3399 3588 3 760 3 942
881516 1207 778 1317 749 1409154 1498 585 1691302 1946 259 2 207874 2498 334 2795 479
3 111 164 3 432 842
661
825
1
001
1206 1407
1631
316136 394910
586 059
1857 2480
699478
822 749 1 127 259 1229 899
2729 2984
3 766 3 877 3 924
174229 227984 293555 366 702 544198 649516 763981 1046 741
1
142 049
3 774
3 873 3980 4 079 4305 4 512
tt*
1315 211 1398 680 1578 548 1816 508 2060 682 2331778 2609114
2 903 753 3 203 986 3880 663
**
aa
3 961
4048 4168
4 278 4 403 4 518
2654
2 719
4644
4 759 5 023
*
1221267 1298 774 1465 795 1686 758 1913 491 2165 223 2422 749 2696 342 2 975129
*
tt
**
598
3
Vp|.z
4
Vpl.y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpl.z
7
Nfimit
Designation
{Nnmn/Npi.Rd)
for N-My
IkN]
UB 178x102x19 UB 203 X 102 X 23 UB 203 133 25 UB 203 X 133 30 UB 254 X 102 X 22 UB 254 X 102 X 25 UB 254 X 102 X 28 UB 254 X 146 X 31 UB 254 146 37 UB 254 X 146 X 43 UB 305 X 165 X 40 UB 305x165x46 UB 305 x 165 X 54 UB 356x171x45 UB 356x171x51 UB 356x171 X57 UB 356 X 171 67 UB 406 X 178 54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406x178x67 UB 406x178x74 UB 457x152x52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457x152x67 UB 457 152 x 74 UB 457 X 152 82 UB 457x191x67 UB 457 191 74 UB 457x191x82 UB 457 X 191 89 UB 457x191x98 UB 533x210x82 UB 533x210x92 UB 533x210x101 UB 533x210x109 UB 533x210x122 UB 610x229x101 UB 610x229x1 13 UB 610 229 125 UB 610 229 140 UB 610 305 X 149 UB 610 305 179 UB 610 305 238 UB 686 254 125 UB 686 254 X 140 UB 686 254 152 UB 686 254 170 UB 762 267 147 UB 762 267 173 UB 762 267 197 UB 838 292 176 UB 838 292 X 194 UB 838 292 226 UB 914 305 201 UB 914 305 224 UB 914 305 253 UB 914 305 289 UB 914 419 343 UB 914 419 388
861
IkN]
202 254 263 299 320 342 365 336
361
IkN]
340 402
441
[N.m]
60 796
[N.m]
14 764
IkN]
147 186 199 222 249 265 278 258
271
for N-My
0,170 0,178 0,175 0,164 0.250 0,233 0,217 0,183 0,162 0.158 0.172 0,167 0,167 0,210 0,196 0,191 0,182 0,219 0,202
0.201
1044
1
135
++
1356
++ ++
++
++
1
944
++
++
2 441
++
++
++
++ ++
++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
414 412 462 544 549 587 645 732 682 709
791
545 299 368 437 532 672 789 708 823 964 705 835 948
1
139538
171 547
201047
221 192
151
822 963
++ ++
++ ++
858 748 807 898 965 1059 839 895 986 1051
1 1 1
1082 1216
709 864
981 1 115
477840
532 786
308 313 349 409 428 452 493 552 536 550
611
658
591 631
389095
456 981 515 841
47323
57 883 66 272 75 660 85 337 84 244 96 596
1248
1021
1
577438 643080
522 213 586 718
167
++
++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
146
111 181
174
++ ++
++ ++ ++
700 745 814 662 700 768 814 882 880 924
987 1058
1
1022801
1
10 768
++ ++
++ ++
848
1975 2177
2 098 2 365
2657603 1417920
1 1
++
++
1979 2452
2 893
++ ++
++
2600 2535
2 682
2 971
2339
2 699
++
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
3339
2 617
2 955 3 140
3440 3890
3 917
++
4343
5663 6508
2 416 736 2 712 240 3 249 959 2964 690 3 384 752 3883 700 4462 350 5 495 400 6 272 850
177398 142087 166588 190076 217063 332735 406067 558748 192551 226551 252117 288057 229 757 286656 340300 298870
345 700
156
154
1093
1
1235 1357 1242 1476 1913 1376 1456 1548 1697 1661 1866
2 032
1988 2129
2 327 2 271
2490
2 704
0.196 0,250 0,233 0.230 0,??? 0,219 0.218 0,208 0,207 0,201 0,198 0,237 0,222 0,216 0,215 0,210 0,239 0,226 0.218 0.215 0,184 0,182 0.178 0,243 0,230 0,225 0,220 0.250 0,239 0,228 0,250 0,243 0,227 0,250 0,246 0,236 0,233 0,194 0,189
599
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
60 796 83 095
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
172
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd IkN]
215
261
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
258 313 340 407 298
341
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0.35
Nsd [kN]
301
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
54 967 75 813
MN.y [N.m]
51303
70 759
MN.y IN.m]
UB 178x102x19 UB 203x102x23 UB 203x133x25 UB 203x133x30 UB 254x102x22 UB 254x102x25 UB 254x102x28 UB 254X146X31 UB 254x146x37 UB 254x146x43 UB 305x165x40 UB 305x165x46 UB 305x165x54 UB 356x171x45 UB 356 171 51
58632
80 868 88 722 106 742 91950 108 462
47638
*
192
211 251
209 227
271
199
UB356X171X57 UB356x171x67 UB 406x178x54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406x178 67 UB 406x178x74 UB 457x152x52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457x152x67 UB 457x152x74 UB 457x152x82 UB 457x191x67 UB457x191x74 UB457x191x82 UB 457 191x89 UB 457x191x98 UB 533x210x82 UB 533X210X92 UB 533x210x101 UB 533x210x109 UB 533x210x122 UB 610x229x101 UB 610x229x113 UB 610x229x125 UB 610x229x140 UB 610x305x149 UB 610x305x179 UB 610x305x238 UB 686x254x125
UB 686x254x140 UB 686x254x152 UB 686x254x170 UB 762x267x147 UB 762x267 173 UB 762x267x197 UB 838x292x176 UB 838x292x194 UB 838 292 X 226 UB 914x305x201 UB 914x305x224 UB 914x305x253 UB 914x305x289 UB 914x419x343 UB 914x419x388
292 273 313 366 305 346 386 455 367 407 456 503 355 406 456 503 557 455 504 556 606 667 557 625 685 739 827 686 767 848 949
201047
**
83177
100071 91950 106036 119929
**
a.
77632
93 399
** **
72 087 86 728
**
*
*
** *
384
**
aa
**
* *
* **
179177
**
583
**
167 232
**
* tttt
681
155 287
*
**
**
**
*
**
288 631
*
610
*
tt
270 591
*
*
732
**
**
** ** **
tt
** ** **
** ** * **
tt
*
374396
425 811
477840
532 786
354 817
420357
*
tt
644 759
**
*
**
394 085
910
** **
**
tt * tt
**
* *
tt
* *
477840
530 211
*
.
759 839
**
a. aa
**
**
*
* **
**
tt* * tt
**
**
*"
**
** **
515 841
607
671
**
** **
**
577438 643080
**
577438
643 080
** **
742
**
838 928
** **
** **
617729
* tt
tt*
113
*
**
tt*
tt * *
**
*
*
tt*
tt* *
586 718
650106
714 844 792 505
** *
*
1
650106
714 844 790 848
*
**
927 1010
1
**
*
tt
112
**
741 420
**
334
**
*
**
tt *
**
**
**
tt
** "*
**
**
914 986
1
1004 092
1
134 436
*" **
103
tt tt*
134 436
*
1232 1379
tt
**
1
** **
*
**
tt
076 381
"*
1655
**
"*
** ** **
tt tt
** **
1
**
** ** **
*
**
*w
**
** tt*
1304 937
1
131
tt*
470 437
**
1265
470 437
**
1581
**
** **
*
1619 2154
1926 534
2 585 356
**
tt
2024
2 692
**
tttt
**
**
2 423 771
"
"
3 230
**
* **
2 262 187
"*
*"
3 769
**
tt tttt
2100 602
tt
**
1
** ** *
**
775 162
1998 921
2 200 176 2 544 136
**
1378 1539
**
**
"* ** ** **
1998 921
*
1924
tt
**
**
"*
** **
** **
997
1
1565
1
"* **
tt
**
**
tttt
** **
1335
1
780
** **
**
tttt tt*
** * **
tt
**
*
** **
** **
**
*
1314 1537
** ** **
3 249 959
** **
2 049
*tt
**
**
**
*
**
**
*
**
*
1363
1521
**
*tt tt*
**
** **
**
**
tttt
1719
1961 2 329 2 632
**
**
**
*a
4 462 350
a
3268
**
*
tttt
**
**
**
*
6 184 678
4386
**
**
**
600
2
Np,
5
MpJ.y
6
Mp|.z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Np,.Rd)
Designation
Vplz
IkN]
204 237 292 348 384 454
Vp.,
IkN]
440 608 753 944 1076
for -My
IkN]
UC 152x152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203 203 x 52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203 203 x 71 UC 203 X 203 X 86 UC 254 254x73 UC 254 254 89 UC 254 254 107 UC 254 254 132 UC 254 254 167 UC 305 X 305 97 UC 305x305x118 UC 305x305x137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305 X 305 198 UC 305x305 X 240 UC 305 305 283 UC 356x368x129 UC 356x368x153 UC 356x368x1 77 UC 356x368x202 UC 356 406 X 235 UC 356x406x287 UC 356 X 406 340 UC 356 x 406 x 393 UC 356x406x467 UC 356x406x551 UC 356x406x634
IN.m]
**
IN.m]
**
IkN]
for - My
0.124 0,123 0,119 0,115 0.117 0,105 0,109 0,112 0,109
0,111
497
629 525
631 781
39 614 49 551
*
169
132656 161964
*
352184
434 471 526 973 663 641 860 402
204 234
7556
4 382 5 332
947 1206
730 885 1021
1
2798
3 572
247450 311822
403 731
~
1978
2 423 2 832
565185
694 923 815 276 951 557
1
317855
373 653 436 686
561 159
6 192
7148
8 961 10 856 12 074
175
1444
1
760
221 193
206 247 270 318 337 424 369 437 537 638 794 522 625 714 812 975
1
1507 711
1
2080
870
710 241
5834
6 916
692458 784624
*
166
2699
3 213 3 722
4 254 5 014
8006
9 131 10 630 12 983
14 507 16 769 19 929
6145 6903
8 017 9 601 11394 13 207
880141 052 479 1226 610 1409 967 1663 708 2 063 429 2 344 691
1
509 342
593137 681434
846 045
1046 991
1 1
23 515
27053
1686 492
2 029 416 2 381304
1277 627 735 855 974 1082 1321 1462 1676 1956 2294
2 589
0,107 0,105 0,119 0,117 0.115 0.114 0.109 0,107 0,106 0.107 0,106 0,107 0,107 0.102 0,102
0,101
601
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,25
Nsd IkN]
*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0>3
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
**
MN.y [N.m]
Nsd IkN]
*
MN.y [N.m]
tt*
MN.y [N.m]
"
UC 152 X 152 X 23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203x203x52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203x203x71 UC 203 203 86 UC 254x254x73 UC 254x254x89 UC 254x254x107 UC 254x254x132 UC 254x254x167 UC 305x305x97 UC 305x305x118 UC 305x305x137 UC 305 X 305 158 UC 305 X 305 X 198 UC 305x305x240 UC 305 305 X 283 UC 356x368x129 UC 356x368x153 UC 356 368 177 UC 356x368x202 UC 356 406 235 UC 356 406 287 UC 356 406 340 UC 356 406 393 UC 356 406 467 UC 356 406 551 UC 356 406 634
204
251
272 334
**
80 327 99 999
**
340 418
**
75 307 93 749
*
408 502
70 287
87499
**
475 585
**
65 266
81249
*
193398
224 293 269341 330 792
**
471
824 949
1
147893
171 518
221810 272417
124
1362
205967 252959
**
133
805 968
1
389962
474 211 594401
194
1511
769113
tt
1207 1452
1791 2 267
*
316844
385 296
482950 624904
**
669173 783306
912 519 1 164 695 1435 840 1625 654
1072
1
344
1628 1811 875 1037 1201 1370 1594 1947 2176 2 515 2 989 3 527 4 058
590447
691 152
1866
2167
2 502
511721 598998
243 147
*
1001020
1
167 230
1729
2 001
3157332 3 811629
4 484 028
883 253 1029 909 1 183 763 1389 225 1722 919 1955 553 2295 360 2 785 881 3 363 202 3 956 495
824369 961249
1
2 420 2 802
104 846
3196
3 720
5 979
7054 8116
765486 892588 1025 928 1203 995 1493196 1694813 1989312 2414430
2 914 775 3 428 963
602
IPE
IPE A
1
-IPE O
2
Np,
5
Mp|.y
6
Mp|.z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Np,.Rd)
Designation
Vpl,
IkN]
124 163 208 258 311 371
for - My
IkN]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750x137 IPE 750x147 IPE 750 173 IPE 750 196
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
IkN]
87
123 153 185 234 273
[N.m]
9 751 16 551
25 505
[N.m]
2443
3 841 5 704
IkN]
60 85
108 133 167 197
241
for - My
0,187 0,196 0.195 0.193 0,198 0,196 0,202 0,197 0,199 0,200 0.202 0,206 0,203 0,212 0,219 0.223
0,231
321
37105
52 021 69 894 92 668
8084
10 962 14 532 18 737
196
1402 1643
++
++ ++
++
++
119870
153 991
24 406
31048
40 719 52 592 64 545 80 262
203 279
++ ++ ++ ++
++ ++
++
96180
116 080
753 910
141069
168 225
2146155
2 611676 3 013 155
++
2 824 3 086
74 108
131 151
7971 13852
20 946 30 071
3166 4611
6 519 8 692
189
247
301
++ ++
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
++
.
++ ++
41619 56 837
76 295
11743
15 345
357
431
++
++
1025 1222
-
++
1
100888 130860 173 247 227551 294810 380842 480438 627601 817323 1039 357 1319 295
79 443 104 756
72179
84 869 103 213
126 681 151 831
905
1078
1
185668
16 763
260
221
0.200 0,203 0,208 0,194 0,204 0.209 0.213 0,219 0.219 0,194 0.197 0,194 0,199 0.192 0.193 0,199 0,199 0,207 0,213 0,219 0,226 0.227
IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
138
2639
++
++ ++
++ ++
1
115
1440 1702
2 005
2 531
++
++
134883 172315 241 352 312404 395 970 498155 630912 859431 1097453
1
77697
95 306 113021 143 216 171584
370 619
201816
268 835
1877836
603
10
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/NpuM-0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
9 751 16 551
25 505
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
64 87
111
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
80 108 139 172 211
251
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd IkN]
96
130 166
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
Nsd IkN]
112 152 194
241
MN.y [N.m]
9596
16 475
MN.y [N.m]
8996
15 445
MN.y IN.m]
8396
14 416
MN.y [N.m]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750x137 IPE 750x147 IPE 750x173 IPE 750x196 IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
48 65 83 103 127
151
7797
13 386 20 588 29 899
37105
52 021 69 894 92 668 119 870 153 991 203 279
25 339 36 799
51890
69 546
299 350
411
87049 111922
144 251
aa aa
22172 32199
45 404 60 853
81246
**
42161
56 507 75 443
**
*
**
263909
tt
482 565
**
tt*
**
*
** **
a
"
** * *
** '*
**
* tt
**
**
**
**
**
*
tt*
**
170 542
129
*
'*
*
tt
** **
100
181
**
**
aa
**
*
**
**
tt
**
"
1394 1580
40 55 69 84 102 123
148 178
'*
ktt
* **
**
**
tt*
**
7971
13 852
130860
1
7940
13 852
67 92
116
141
7444
13 077 19 737
80
111
6948
12 206 18 421
**
a.
94
129 162
*
20 946 29 875
41619 56 685
ktt ktt
ktt
170 206
** **
aa
28 008 39 066
**
a.
**
**
** **
**
**
tttt **
tt ktt
**
** **
** **
aa
**
** *
..
*'
*'
<
1
"
'*
ktt ktt
ktt
** **
** **
'*
** *
*
*"
**
**
* *
**
tt *
** *
**
k
**
**
1
** **
k*
**
aa
**
"
**
1PEO180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
79 443 104756 134883 172315 241 352 312404 395 970 498155 630912 859431
228 268 314 367 452 528 610 707 810 988
148 1311
1
861
1097453
370 619 1877 836
1
78 892 104342 133955 172007 238904 309 596 395391 497827 630912 859431 1097453
1
73 961
341
403
471 551
150506
**
tt
* **
"
ktt
**
tt
**
tt* *
ktt
ktt
*
983 1240
370 619
"
1653
1877836
2066
1821444
2 479
ktt
604
2
Np,
3
Vp,.z
4
Vp..y
5
Mpl.y
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Np|.Rd)
Designation
Mpi.z
for - My
IkN] IkN]
149 167 192 252 295
[kN]
283 337 424 564 679 807 942 1091 1246 1411 1590 1668
[N.m]
24 510
[N.m]
*
IkN]
97
112
**
k* k*
for -My
0,147 0,144
HE100AA HE120AA HE140AA HE160AA HE180AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA
HE650AA HE700AA
655 779
++ ++ ++
++ ++ ++
35330
**
*
* * **
* *
** **
++ ++
++
++
++
**
>
*
ktt
**
*
a.
**
*
**
**
k*
**
**
*
k*
*
tt
++
++
1023
1
163
**
*
**
*
k* k
**
++ ++
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
1326
1501
1762
1971
2192 2433
3 002 3 570
-
HE800AA HE900AA
HE 1000 AA
082 016 1 313 592 1 521 685 1 747 138 2 032 856 2614 415
1
110
* **
tt **
++ ++
3234
409 486 600 729 860
.. ka ka
HE100A HE 120 A
HE 140 A
HE160A HE 180 A
HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A HE 500 A
0,123
0,121 0.121
438
501
1090
1
187
HE550A
HE 600 A
++
++
++
++
1009 1216 1449 1633 1827 2110 2334 2 485 2636 2866 3163 3460
3 612 3 763 3 915 4 074 4 237
'*
'* '*
' "
777199 877159
075 955 1350 664 1658 519 1941 163 2 247 162 2 577 242 2 953 364 3 653 785 4540 200 5384 400
1
" '
366603
405 523 444 575 464 900 485 376 506011 527831
551 149 594 081
1
232 290 335 404 458 514 599 659 724 793 945
1093
250
0,129 0,122 0.128 0,124 0,125 0.126 0.126 0,127 0,126 0,129 0,132 0,141 0.146
0.151
HE650A
HE 700 A HE 800 A
1423 1606
1
798
2836
3366 3960
-
2068
2 474 2 951 3 378
++
HE900A
HE 1000 A
++ ++
4543 4 696
617279
605
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/NpLRd-0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
Nsd/Npi.Hd-0,2
Nsd [kN]
* **
Nsd/NpUM-0,25
Nsd IkN]
* **
*
Nsd/Npi.Rd=0,3
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
* *
Nsd/Npuw-0,35
Nsd IkN]
*
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
* *
HE 100 AA
HE120AA HE140AA HE160AA HE180AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA HE 1000 AA
HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A HE 300 A HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A HE 400 A HE 450 A
98 117
* *
**
*
**
**
* tt tttt *
* *
** *
**
* *
*
** **
**
* * * **
*
*
**
* *
* **
**
* *
k*
*
* **
862 963
'
k*
** **
aa
1034
1
**
a.
107
**
** **
**
aa
** *
aa
**
aa
*
**
**
33 803 48 535
178 213
* * *
31815 45 680
*
*
223 266
ka
29 826 42 825
**
**
** *
268 319
**
27838
39 970
**
312 372
**
25 849
37115
* *
** **
**
**
'"
ka ka
'*
k* k* k*
**
** * tt * tt
tt
*
** **
*
** ** **
tt*
*
"* * '* *
**
**
**
* tt
" "
k*
k
**
* *
**
* *
** *
*
" "
* '"
**
**
**
""
**
k*
899
tt*
**
**
1002
1
122
1244
1669 1869
**
*
939928
2003
* *
877 266
** *
2 337
**
814604
*
** *
*
**
*
* tt*
**
*
*
**
* **
tt
*
*tt
**
aa
*
**
*
"
*
**
** **
**
"*
** **
**
**
*
>
*tt
2185
**
**
606
2
Np,
3
Vp,.z
4
Vp..y
5
Mp|.y
6
Mp|.z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Npi.Rd)
Designation
for - My
IkN]
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 8 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000
HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M
[kN]
219 266 317 427
491
IkN]
511
[N.m]
43 769 69 389 103079 148 665 202 208 269 870
[N.m]
IkN]
127 160 196 266
for - My
0,116 0,112 0,109 0,117 0,114 0,116 0,113 0,115 0,116 0,116 0,118 0,119 0,123 0.126 0.136 0,142 0,148 0.158 0,167 0.175 0,187 0,204 0.217 0,230 0.102 0,102
0.101
21597
34 007 50 310
669 847
1053
1271
71385 97026
128441
1514 1770
2 054 2 289
150
7178 7587
8 307
9155
10 023 10 670
11338
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
1011404
1
126855
165430 209336 252944 301380 365459 394421 414003 433646 463695 503016 542492
563 280 584 244
312 380 433 512 576 642 737 805 880 958
1
129
1302 1483
1681
4837 5003
5 310
1889 2107
2 402
2860
3 387 3865
228 283 343 435 503 594 670 858 954
5153
437 513
593 747 840 995
5463
1098 1358 1637 1950
2 269
2236
2 789
3383
4 076 4 757
5 514 6 277
136693
178 579 228151 284992
8383
9 225 10 087 12 729
HE300M
HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
13106
13 265 13 390
2618 2976
4 019 4 407
596168 889117
059 917 1245 566 1 712 623
1
422492
500 836
4800 6108
6 239
586605
803 536 819 304
6239
6 219
13683
14 088 14 461 14 884 15 274 15 697 16 087
++ ++
6200 6200
6181 6181 6161 6161 6142 6138 6118
820138
815 788 812 336
1887
2 089
812982
810 089 810 765 810 128
++
5200 5699
6118
814666
0,104 0,109 0.114 0.123 0.134 0,144 0.155 0,165 0,174 0.183 0,200 0,215 0,228
607
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
219 286
361
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0.25
Nsd IkN]
273 357
451
Nsd/Np,.Hd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
328 428
541
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
Nsd IkN]
383 500
631
MN.y [N.m]
39 607 62 501 92 541 134630
MN.y [N.m]
37131
58 595 86 757 126 216
171 131
MN.y [N.m]
34 656 54 688 80 974 117801 159 722 213 646 274 240 349 875 426 599 510 514
MN.y [N.m]
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280
164 214
271
42082
66 407
32180
50 782
98325
143 045 193 948
342
411
HE300B
HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450
259427
333 006 424 848
518013
619 909 756 067 870 744 979 799 1096 305 1335 267 1 657 319 2 017 376 2 348 055 2 698 557 3 074 349 3 497395 4296 600 5 283 600
103
1077
1
138
228906
293 829 374 866
797 959
1
148
113
922164
1
031 817
HE500B
HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800
2268
2 405 2 574 2 807
HE900B
HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M
2747
3 007
*
2655
2 907
75190 109387 148313 198385 254652 324884 396128 474048 578169 665863 749258 838351 1021086
3204 3508
**
1267362
1542 699
**
**
** ** **
**
*
**
**
"
**
** **
*
*
**
* * **
** "*
**
*
*
*
3119
**
**
713
88 211
559
827
941
951 103
131120 184623 253698 331972 427451 533963 792418 945 774 1 112449
524 182 1662 962 1 778 313 1 891 172 2134 375
1
189
671
77184
114 730
500 590
783 976
1
184
827552
973 393 1333 659 1455 092 1556 024 1654 776 1867578
2 621
3182 3 277
71671 106535 150006 206130 269 727 347304 433 845 643840 768441 903865 1 238398
1
351 157
2653 2678
2 737
3316
3 347 3 421
2818
2 892 2 977 3 055
2456124
2 786 275 3 152 827
3522
3 615
3 721 3 818 3 924 4 022 4 245
2355
2 413 2 547 2 669
HE800M
HE 900 M HE 1000 M
2798
5209
5 346
5494 5630
*
1444 879 1536 578 1734 180 1995 601 2263 848 2561672 2866 350 3190 038
3 519 871
**
a*
4448
*
**
*
608
2
,
3
Vp,.z
4
vpi.y
IkN]
402 476 522 645 353 435 517 629 795 933 838 974
1
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpi.z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Npi.Rd)
Designation
for - My
IkN]
UB 178x102x19 UB 203 102 23 UB 203 133x25 UB 203 X 133 X 30 UB 254 X 102 22 UB 254 X 102 25 UB 254 X 102 X 28 UB 254 146 31 UB 254x146x37 UB 254x146x43 UB 305 165 40 UB 305 165 46 UB 305x165 54 UB 356 171 45 UB 356 171 51 UB 356 171 57 UB 356 171 67 UB 406 178x54 UB 406 178x60 UB 406 178x67 UB 406 178x74 UB 457 152x52 UB 457 152 60 UB 457 152x67 UB 457 152x74 UB 457 152 82 UB 457 191 67 UB 457 X 191 74 UB 457 191 82 UB 457x191x89 UB 457 191 98 UB 533 210 82 UB 533 210 92 UB 533 210 101 UB 533 21 109 UB 533 210 122 UB 61 229 101 UB 610 229 113 UB 610 229 125 UB 610 229 140 UB 610 305 149 UB 610 305 179 UB 610 305 238 UB 686 254 125 UB 686 254 140 UB 686 254 152 UB 686 254 170 UB 762 267 147 UB 762 267 173 UB 762 267 197 UB 838 292 176 UB 838 292 194 UB 838 292 226 UB 91 4 305 201 UB 914 305 224 UB 914 305 253 UB 914 305 289 UB 914 419 343 UB 914 419 388
IkN]
239 300
311
[N.m]
71928
98 309 108 247 132033 108 786 128 321 148179 165087
[N.m]
17468
20 896
**
IkN]
174 220 235 263 294 313 328 306 320 365
371
for N-My
0.170 0,178 0,175 0,164 0,250 0,233 0,217 0,183 0,162 0,158 0,172 0,167 0,167 0,210 0,196
0.191
1019
1
235
1343 1605
++ ++ ++
++ ++
2300
++
++ ++ ++
++
202957 237858
261 692
141
302419 355352
325 342
82165
**
834 988
1
376322
424 260 508 562
++
++
122
++
1361 973
1
442948
503 776 565 331
++ ++
++ ++
139
1015
954
++
++ ++ ++
1
630338
460 337 540 654 610 291
1063
142
161
1319
1253
993
1476
1
++ ++ ++
++ ++ ++
208
1059
1
167
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
++
722 778 700 747 828 882 962 783 828 909 962
1043
1041 1094
1
187 939
1342149
1
1377939
1
167
++
++
2549
2 993 3 620
++ ++
12 740
++
++ ++ ++
4898 2064
2 421
2186 2336
2 576
2683 3045
2 342 2 901 3 423 2 768 3 193
++
++
++
++ ++ ++
2798 3076
3 515
-
3 951
++ ++ ++ ++
++ ++
3096 3660
4 286 4 958
5279 400
6 501 600
6699
7 700
7421400
271826 339142 402609 353 593 408997 508 874 412431 488 646 575 628 672529 1 213 618 1 403 175
3598 3559
3 915
0,198 0,237 0,222 0,216 0,215 0,210 0,239 0,226 0,218 0.215 0.184 0,182 0,178 0.243 0,230 0.225 0.220 0.250 0,239 0,228 0,250 0,243 0.227 0.250 0,246 0.236 0,233 0,194 0.189
609
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npl.fld-0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd [kN]
204 247
**
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd IkN]
255 309
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,3
NSd
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,35
Nsd [kN]
tt*
MN.y [N.m]
69 367 95 674
**
MN.y [N.m]
65 032 89 695
**
IkN]
306 370
*
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
*
*
UB 178x102x19 UB 203x102x23 UB 203x133x25 UB 203x133x30 UB 254x102x22 UB 254 102x25 UB 254x102x28 UB 254x146x31 UB 254x146x37 UB 254x146x43 UB 305x165x40 UB 305x165x46 UB 305x165x54 UB 356x171x45 UB 356x171x51 UB 356x171x57
153 185
201 241
71928
98 309
**
321
401
118 394
tt
481
110 501
**
*
562
102608
148179
**
** ** ** **
**
**
**
**
**
**
*
202957 237858
**
**
396 460
tttt
**
* *
226117
** **
575
**
**
211984
* tt*
690
**
** ** ** *
**
**
**
*
**
**
* * **
355 352
*
578
tt*
341478
722
tt
**
**
**
UB356X171X67
UB 406x178x54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406x178x67 UB 406x178x74 UB 457x152x52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457x152x67 UB 457x152x74 UB 457x152x82 UB 457x191x67 UB 457 191x74 UB 457x191x82 UB 457x191x89 UB 457x191x98 UB 533x210x82 UB 533x210x92 UB 533x210x101 UB 533x210x109 UB 533x210x122 UB 610x229x101 UB 610x229x1 13 UB 610x229x125 UB 610 229x140 UB 610x305x149 UB 610x305x179 UB 610x305x238 UB 686 254x125 UB 686x254x140 UB 686 X 254 X 152 UB 686x254x170 UB 762x267x147 UB 762x267x173 UB 762x267x197 UB 838x292x176 UB 838x292x194 UB 838 292 X 226 UB 914x305x201 UB 914x305x224 UB 914x305x253 UB 914x305x289 UB 914x419x343 UB 914x419x388
409 457 539 434 482 539 595 420 480 539 595 659 539 596 658 717 789 660 739
811
**
tt
**
**
w
609 718
tt
tt
tt*
* * *
497324
**
**
tt*
898
**
**
**
**
tt*
*"
**
**
**
*
719 794
**
* **
**
tt
**
*
** ** ** ** *
**
** **
**
**
"
tt
** **
** ** ** "* ** ** ** **
**
**
**
**
**
tt w
**
**
794 878
**
tt
**
760 827
**
1098
tt> tt
** **
** ** **
*
*"
**
**
** **
**
**
* **
878 956
**
** **
*
w
**
**
* *
937612
**
1052
*
935 651
**
*
1315
** *
tt*
* **
**
** *
tttt
**
*
**
**
** **
1
**
**
** **
a *
1
1
187 939
166
**
**
*
** **
*tt
342149
1305
342 149
**
*tt *
1632
**
**
** **
1
** ** **
*
**
*" *" ** **
**
**
**
**
**
**
739 671
1497
*"
**
197
*" **
* **
1437
1911
1916 2548
tt
**
*
**
**
3 058 731
** ** **
*
3185
** "*
tt
2867560
3 822
* ** * ** **
2 676 390
4 459
**
1005
1
124
** **
**
** **
*
** **
1223 1366
1
**
** **
*
2 364 921
1821
**
**
179
**
tt *tt
**
**
* *
* ** **
**
*
** ""
** **
*
**
*
* *
**
** ** *
* *
**
**
tt
*"
*
**
*
tt
**
**
**
*
**
** ** **
tt tt
** * **
**
*
**
* **
*
**
**
* **
*
**
**
** * ** **
5 279 400
3 114
6 501600 7421400
** *
*
* ** **
**
**
**
610
2
Np,
3
VpLz
4
Vp..y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mpi.z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nlimit /Npi.Rd)
Designation
for -My
IkN]
UC 152 152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152 X 152 X 37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203x203x52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203 203 71 UC 203x203x86 UC 254x254x73 UC 254 254 X 89 UC 254x254x107 UC 254x254x132 UC 254 254 167 UC 305x305x97 UC 305x305x1 18 UC 305x305 137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305x305x198 UC 305 305 240 UC 305x305x283 UC 356 368 129 UC 356x368x153 UC 356x368x177 UC 356x368x202 UC 356x406x235 UC 356x406x287 UC 356x406x340 UC 356x406x393 UC 356x406x467 UC 356 406 551 UC 356x406x634
[kN]
242 280 346 412 455 537 589 744
621
IkN]
521
[N.m]
tttt
[N.m]
IkN]
*
for -My
0,124 0,123 0,119 0,115 0,117 0,105 0,109 0.112 0.109 0,111 0,107 0,105 0,119 0.117 0.115 0.114 0,109 0.107 0.106 0.107 0,106 0.107 0,107 0,102 0,102 0,101 0.100 0,098 0,098 0,096
719
891 1 117
1273 1462
1781
7062
8 940 5 185
104019 129679 208924 238306 275 552 335 479 410 227 416669 514 022 623461 785153
46 868 58 623
110985
128 241 156 945
191 619
**
241629
292 758
1427
864
1017940
668 669 822 162 964 551 1 125 785 1444 792
368917 477653
*
2340
2 867
376053 442069
516 643 663 907 819 246 913 442
**
200 244 293 319 376 399 502 437 517 636 754 939 618 740 845
1
961 153
1783 771
1
991 027
6 902
8182
9 471 10 803 12 576 15 360 16 888 19 522 23 201
1380 1487
742 870 1011
1
3193
3 801
1041294
1
245 186
4404 5033
5 932 7 270
701739
806 203 1000 955 1238 693
153
3155
3 762
8036 9333
177 13 265 15 376
11
1382 041
1
619 952
3900 000
4 711200
27375 31494
4186 4833
5553 600
611
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
NSd/ISlpI.Rd=0,2
NSd/N 3l.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
Nsd/N pl.Rd=0>3
Nsd IkN]
*
Nsd/N,3l.Rd=0,35
Nsd IkN]
tt
Nsd [kN]
tt*
MN.y IN.m]
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
*
MN.y [N.m]
**
UC 152x152x23 UC 152x152 30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203 203 52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203x203x71 UC 203x203x86 UC 254x254x73 UC 254x254x89 UC 254 254x107 UC 254x254x132 UC 254x254x167 UC 305x305x97 UC 305x305x118 UC 305x305 137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305x305x198 UC 305x305x240 UC 305x305x283 UC 356x368x129 UC 356x368x153 UC 356x368x177 UC 356x368x202 UC 356x406 235 UC 356x406x287 UC 356x406x340 UC 356x406x393 UC 356x406x467 UC 356x406x551 UC 356x406 634
241
321
95035
118 308
. **
396
*
402 495
89096
110914
482 594
**
83156 103520
**
562 693
tt
77216 96126
570
691
835 962
1
139
*
974
1
174 972
123
368339
**
151
1381
1329 1612
202923 243679
299 275
587
714 859 1059 1341 778 946 1099
490199 596103
747 187 966 807
*
952
1
146
461363 561038
703 234
190
1412 1788
**
909936
432528 525973
659 282 853 065
374 858
796194
tt
791698
926 728 1079 600 1377 950 1 698 740 1 892 552
* tt
1262 1465
1691
1577
1831
1893 2198
2 537
651986 763188
889 082
134 782 1398 963 1 558 572
1
2114 2650
3 211
3 514
**
aa
781 225
**
605416 708674
825 576 1053 726 1299 037 1447 246
*
**
**
1
**
**
1894 2161
2 515 3 072 3 378
1299 716
1
2368
2 701
493 876
1753163
2 174 275
4176395 4913141
2 841
137 252
3 315
1056 020
1
307 141 534 018 1 902 491 2124 840 2494 063
1 1
213 774
6833
8 121 9 581
7874
9448
11023
1424 445 1766 599 1973 066 2 315 915 2 810829 3 393321 3 991927
612
2
Np,
4
Vp..y
5
Mpl.y
6
MpI.Z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /NpLRd)
Designation
for - My
IkN]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750x137 IPE 750x147 IPE 750x173 IPE 750x196
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450
IkN]
95
135 167 203 256 299
IkN]
136 179
[N.m]
10 680
[N.m]
2 676 4 207 6 247 8 853
12 006 15 916
IkN]
66 93
118 146 183 216 264
for - My
0.187 0,196 0,195 0,193 0.198 0,196 0.202 0,197 0.199 0,200 0,202 0,206 0,203 0,212 0,219 0,223
0,231
227 282
341
18127 27934
40 638 56 975 76 551 101 494 131 287
102
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
++ ++ ++
1
1310
++ ++ ++
++
1350 1590
1921 2 225
-
407 478 566 660 769 894 1028 1202 1358 1549 1784 2 022
20 522
26 731
185
2335
2 462
223 399
2 237974
++
++ ++
2499
3 183 3 751
110 147 184 228
271
2350 551
2 860 407
3 092
3380
82 118 144 165
3300122
8 730
15 171 22 941
++ ++ ++ ++ ++
++ ++ ++
7140
9 520 12 862 16 807 22 303 28 704
110496
143 323 189 747 249 223
37879
* *
1082
1
199
++ ++
181
1380
242 289 334 399 475 557 664 772 919
1
1PEO180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
87009
114 733
147729
188 726
926
926
++
++
++
++
690999 941281
201 973 1501 154
1
152
2 056 677
0.194 0.197 0,194 0,199 0,192 0.193 0.199 0,199 0,207 0,213 0,219 0,226 0.227
613
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
10 680 18127 27934 40 638
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
70 95
122
151
Nsd/Npi.Bd-0,25
Nsd [kN]
88 119 152 189
231
Nsd/NpLRd0,3
Nsd IkN]
105 142 182
Nsd/Npuw-0,35
Nsd [kN]
123 166
MN.y [N.m]
10 510 18 044 27 752
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
9196
15 789
MN.y [N.m]
IPE 80 IPE 100 IPE 120 IPE 140 IPE 160 IPE 180 IPE 200 IPE 220 IPE 240 IPE 270 IPE 300 IPE 330 IPE 360 IPE 400 IPE 450 IPE 500 IPE 550 IPE 600 IPE 750 x 137 IPE 750x147 IPE 750x173 IPE 750 196
IPE A 80 IPE A 100 IPE A 120 IPE A 140 IPE A 160 IPE A 180 IPE A 200 IPE A 220 IPE A 240 IPE A 270 IPE A 300 IPE A 330 IPE A 360 IPE A 400 IPE A 450 IPE A 500 IPE A 550 IPE A 600
IPE O 180 IPE O 200 IPE O 220 IPE O 240 IPE O 270 IPE O 300 IPE O 330 IPE O 360 IPE O 400 IPE O 450 IPE O 500 IPE O 550 IPE O 600
53
71 91
9853 16916
26 018
8539
14 661
317
371
56 975 76 551 101494 131 287 168 657 222 638 289 044 369 992 468 807
185
601288
**
37785
53 280 71409 95 340 122 581
**
**
101494
130 754
168521
222638
ktt k*
22 549 32 747
46176
*
**
**
*
**
aa
**
**
** *
**
*
** **
*
k*
k*
**
**
**
**
k* k*
**
ft
"
~ * **
**
*
*
**
aa
**
*
**
tt tt*
** ** **
1294 1527
1731
44
61
**
* **
"
ktt
**
**
* *
ktt
59
81
8 697
73
101
101
32935 45 583
62 250 83 561 110 496 143323
aa
8 153 14 323
88
121
7 610
13 368 20 176
103
141
7066
12 413 18 735
62084
21617
30 675
152 185
*
a
178
**
**
**
"
**
** *
*
**
**
*
a
**
*
**
tt
**
a.
*
**
306
** ** ** *
**
*
**
*
**
** ** ** **
* *
a
* **
aa
* *
aa
**
*
aa aa
378
441
**
* * tttt
**
*
**
**
*
**
"*
**
*
*
**
* **
tt
**
ka
'
**
**
*
*
**
**
'*
*
**
"
**
**
258 302
371
147729
188 726 264 338
434
501 581
81005
107 137
374
441
137543
176 615
245303
aa
"
ta
70 204 92 852
119 204
** **
** ** ** * **
" **
"
1077 1358
108
'
a ka
* *
*
.
*
a.
1353 1572
*
aa
2056 677
2263
**
**
**
**
614
2
Np,
3
Vp,.z
4
Vpl.y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mp|.z
7
Nfimrt
8
{Nfimit /Np..Rd)
Designation
for - My
IkN]
HE100AA HE120AA HE140AA HE 160 AA HE180AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA
HE 1000 AA HE 100 A HE 120 A HE 140 A HE 160 A HE 180 A HE 200 A HE 220 A HE 240 A HE 260 A HE 280 A
IkN]
163 183 210 276
IkN]
310 369 465 618 744 884
[N.m]
26 845 38 695
,a
[N.m]
IkN]
106 123
for - My
0.147 0,144
717
++ ++ ++
++
**
>*
++
++
++
++
'"
ta ka ka ka
**
1032
1
195
++ ++
++ ++ ++
860 940
1028
1
120
++
++
++ ++
++
++
++ ++
* '* '*
ka
*
*
**
*
tt
2335 2508
2 594 2 681 2 847
++ ++
3032 3366
3 542
440523 467245
18 925
2901
3 245
120
141
977
1.165
201
1445
783 2 082 2 476
1
225 269
351
HE300A
HE 320 A HE 340 A HE 360 A
27072
*
105
1092
1
2556
2 721 2 887
194
HE400A
HE 450 A
7313 8189
++ ++
HE500A
HE 550 A HE 600 A HE 650 A HE 700 A HE 800 A
197563 261490 342 527 423094 511 623 636 305 748921 851218 960697 1 178 427 1479 299 1816 474
*
* **
*
**
**
**
*
793 868
1034
1
2126 035
2461 177 2 822 693 3 234 637 4 001764 4 972 600 5897 200
++
++ ++
++
4122
4 288 4 462 4 641 4 976
197
3107
3 687
HE900A IHE1000A
++ ++
4338
5144
3 232
3699
615
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,15
Nsd [kN]
MN.y [N.m]
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd
[kN3
*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,25
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
aa
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd [kN]
** * *
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,35
Nsd [kN]
-
**
MN.y [N.m]
* *
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
HE100AA HE120AA HE140AA HE160AA HE180AA HE200AA HE220AA HE240AA HE260AA HE280AA HE300AA HE320AA HE340AA HE360AA HE400AA HE450AA HE500AA HE550AA HE600AA HE650AA HE700AA HE800AA HE900AA
HE 1000 AA HE HE HE HE HE
108 128
*
*
*
**
**
**
* *
*
r*
** *
**
*
**
** **
**
*
*
* **
** **
**
*
* a
**
*
** ** **
** *
**
**
**
aa
** * **
**
**
** **
** *
**
**
*
k
tt *
944
'
k* ktt ktt
*
aa
a.
1055
1
132
* **
*" ** **
*
*
**
**
'*
**
* **
** **
**
**
'*
ktt
" ** *
**
**
37022 53158
** **
195 233
** ** * * **
34 845 50 031
*
244
291
aa
32 667 46 904
293 350
30 489 43 777
* *
342 408
** * **
28 311
40 650
a.
*
ktt
** **
**
**
**
**
**
**
a
ktt
**
a*
**
**
*
*
*
a.
**
"
ktt
**
**
"*
aa
* **
* * **
* *
**
** *
aa
776 858
921
"
tt ktt
"
" *
**
**
**
*"
*
*
985 1097
*
k
**
**
** **
1228 1363
1461
1472 581
816 474 2126 035
1
1638
'* " *
* tt tt
**
*
*
** * "
1817 1948
**
aa
**
** **
* **
**
**
* *
"*
.
** **
** *
**
**
**
** **
**
**
**
616
2
Np,
3
Vp|.z
4
Vp..y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mp|.z
7
Nfimit
Designatton
{Nfimit /Np,.Rd)
for - My
IkN]
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 8 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M
1
IkN]
240
291
[kN]
560 733 928
1
[N.m]
47938
75 998
[N.m]
23654
37 245
55 101 78 183 106 266
[kN]
139 175 215 291
for -My
0,116 0.112 0,109 0,117 0,114 0,116 0,113 0,115 0,116 0,116 0,118 0,119 0,123 0,126 0,136 0,142 0,148 0,158 0.167 0,175 0,187 0,204 0.217 0,230 0,102 0,102
0,101
198
4 875
347 467 538 659 742 882 998 1091 1260 1375 1490 1609 1858
154
140674
181 185 229 273
277034 330083
**
988650
1
107 728
4296
4 622 4 788 4 955
5123 5298
5 479 5 815 5 984
3 367145
3830 480
4 705 800 5 786 800
++ ++ ++
4296
5 013
5643
479 562 650 818 920
6835 600
108474
161 282
789483
53 504 78 950 110 635 149 711
703 807 882 964 1050 1237 1425 1625 1841 2069 2308 2 631 3 132 3 709 4233 249 310 375 476
551
2449
3 055 3 706 4464 5 210
227160
310 300 406 386
6039
6 874
195587
249 880 312 135 462 729 548 534
1090 1203
1
522168 652946
973 795
1
9181
10 104
595
11048
13 942 14 354
160 861
191
1364
1
HE400M
HE 450 M HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
875 730
152
2720
2 926
893483
889 701
3183 3439
3 707 3 975 4 242 4 510 5159 5 695
6790 6790
6 769
6 769 6 748 6 748 6 727 6 722 6 701
6 701
2562 484
2 912 267
892034
888 727
891 162
16 301 16 728
17192 17619
++
++
887975
890 409 887 241
2984
3 216 3 723 4 187 4660
887981 887283
892 253
!
++
6 241
0.104 0.109 0,114 0.123 0,134 0,144 0,155 0,165 0,174 0.183 0,200 0,215 0.228
617
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
46 090 72 732 107689 156668 212 420 284134 364 721 465 310
NSd/N pl.Rd=0,2
Nsd/NpI.Rd=0,25
Nsd IkN]
299
391
NSd/N pl.Rd=0,3
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0.35
Nsd IkN]
419 547 692 873 1051 1257
Nsd
IkN]
240 313 395 499 600 718 838 975
MN.y [N.m]
43 379 68 453
MN.y [N.m]
40 668
Nsd IkN]
359 469 593 749 900
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
35 245 55 618 82 351
HE 100 HE 120 HE 140 HE 160 HE 180 HE 200 HE 220 HE 240 HE 260 HE 280 HE 300 HE 320 HE 340 HE 360 HE 400 HE 450 HE 500 HE 550 HE 600 HE 650 HE 700 HE 800 HE 900 HE 1000 HE 100 M HE 120 M HE 140 M HE 160 M HE 180 M HE 200 M HE 220 M HE 240 M HE 260 M HE 280 M HE 300 M HE 320 M HE 340 M HE 360 M HE 400 M
37956
59 897 88 685 129 021 174 934 233 993 300 358
64175
95 020 138 236
817 906
567348
678 948
1090
1
209
*
599 072
tttt
1029
1 1
113 179
1246 1365 1504 1647 1753 1863 1976 2114 2306 2 562 2 760
367 458 556 670
781
2 337
2484 2634
2 819 3 074
2 227
785377
883 740 988 824 1204 358 1494 837 1819 594
** **
2358
2 493
2 598 2 751
729 278
2908
3 184
601 611
tt*
2729 3008
3 293
*
3509
3 842
1949 565
**
**
689 623
**
**
a
**
* * ** * *
**
**
a
*
a.
" **
**
**
*
** **
**
**
**
"
490
611 741
906 1031
HE450M
HE 500 M HE 550 M HE 600 M HE 650 M HE 700 M HE 800 M HE 900 M HE 1000 M
2509
2 579
2643
2 789 2 923
3065
295 226 386 312 497421 621 367 922130 1 100 588 1294 546 1 773 676 1 935 173 2069 406 2200 739 2483 752 2 858168 3 242361 3649 034 4 035159 4 442 201 4848 400 5 745 400 6 642 400 7622 200
893
96 612 143608 202 206 277860 363 588 468161 584 816
90 574
134632
189 568
735 916
1
84 535
125657
176 930
112
116
260 494
340864 438901
548 265 813 644
971 107 142 247 1565 008
1
2210
2 788 2 871
2906
2 933
867887 1035 847 1218 396 1669 342 1821339 1947676 2 071284 2337649
2 690 041 3 051634 3453 096 3863 798 4 300125 4 744 735 5 745 400
**
aa
563
3485 3589 3 632 3666 3 746 3858 3 959 4 075 4182 4298 4405 4649
**
295415 380381 475163 705158 841626 989947 1356 340 1479 838 1582487
1
682 918
5543
5 705 5 855 6 017 6 167
*
**
4890
5 018 5 158
1899 340 2185 658 2 479 453 2 805 641 3139 336 3 493 851
*
5286
5 579
**
*
*
**
**
**
618
UB
S 460
Designation
, 'Pi
'pl.z
[kN]
262 329 340
'ply
IkN]
440 522 572 707 387 476 566 689
871
M,
'pi-y
Mpl.Z
,limit
(Nfimit /NpLRd)
for - My
IkN]
UB 178x102x19 UB 203x102x23 UB 203 X 133 25 UB 203x133x30 UB 254x102x22 UB 254x102x25 UB 254x102x28 UB 254 146x31 UB 254 146 37 UB 254x146x43 UB 305x165x40 UB 305x165x46 UB 305x165x54 UB 356x171x45 UB 356x171x51 UB 356x171x57 UB 356 171x67 UB 406x178x54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406x178x67 UB 406x178x74 UB 457x152x52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457x152x67 UB 457x152x74 UB 457x152x82 UB 457x191x67 UB 457x191 74 UB 457 191x82 UB 457x191x89 UB 457x191x98 UB 533x210x82 UB 533x210x92 UB 533x210x101 UB 533x210x109 UB 533x210x122 UB 610x229x101 UB 610x229x113 UB 610x229x125 UB 610x229x140 UB 610x305x149 UB 610x305x179 UB 610x305x238 UB 686x254x125 UB 686x254x140 UB 686x254x152 UB 686x254x170 UB 762x267x147 UB 762 267x173 UB 762x267x197 UB 838x292x176 UB 838 X 292 X 194 UB 838 292x226 UB 914x305x201 UB 914x305x224 UB 914x305X253 UB 914x305x289 UB 914x419x343 UB 914x419x388
for -My
0,170 0,178 0.T75 0,164 0,250 0,233 0,217 0,183 0,162 0,158 0.172 0.167 0,167 0,210 0,196 0,191 0,182 0,219 0,202 0,201 0,196 0,250 0,233 0,230 0,222 0,219 0,218 0,208 0,207 0,201 0,198 0,237 0,222 0,216 0,215 0,210 0,239 0,226 0,218 0,215 0,184 0.182 0,178 0,243 0,230 0.225 0.220 0.250 0.239 0,228 0,250 0,243 0.227 0.250 0,246 0,236 0,233 0,194 0.189
[N.m]
78 778
[N.m]
19131 22 886 40 583 17146
21 164
IkN]
190 241
107672
118 556
1758
1022
918
1066 1250
914
1082 1228
1491
112
120
399 406 452 530 555 586 639 715 695 712
791
61320
75 004 85 873
164
1271
160
98039
110 577 109 161
125166
139 793 155 653 174 295
1521
1279
1371
281265
431 149 526 172
3 291
3964 5364
2 261
724 012
1837304
2 096 727 2 300 210
2 559 2 821
2651 2938
249503
293 559 326 686 373 257
1783 1887
2 005
3335 2565
3 177 3 749 3 031 3 497 4 327 3 391
3064 3369
297714
371 441
2198 2153
2 419
440 953
3131545
3 514 452 4 211215 3 841 570 4 385 876 5 032 400 5 782 200
3 849
4008
4 458 5 041 5 075 5 627 4 695 5430
7337
I
7120 800
8 128 200
8 433
387269 447949 557338 451710 535183 630450 736579 1329 200 1536 811
2943
3 227 3504
619
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
NSd/NpI.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
78 778
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
223 270
**
Nsd/Npi.Rd=0,25
Nsd [kN]
279 338
*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
NSd
MN.y [N.m]
75 974 104 786
MN.y [N.m]
[kN]
**
MN.y [N.m]
* *
UB 178x102x19 UB 203x102x23 UB 203x133x25 UB 203x133x30 UB 254x102x22 UB 254x102 25 UB 254x102x28 UB 254 146 31 UB 254 146 37 UB 254 146x43 UB 305x165x40 UB 305X165X46 UB 305x165x54 UB 356x171x45 UB 356x171x51 UB 356x171x57 UB 356x171x67 UB 406x178x54 UB 406x178x60 UB 406x178x67 UB 406x178x74 UB 457x152x52 UB 457x152x60 UB 457x152x67 UB 457x152x74 UB 457x152x82 UB 457x191x67 UB 457x191x74 UB 457x191x82 UB 457x191x89 UB 457x191x98 UB 533x210x82 UB 533x210x92 UB 533x210x101 UB 533x21 0x109 UB 533x210x122 UB 610x229x101 UB 610x229 113 UB 610x229x125 UB 610x229x140 UB 610x305x149 UB 610 305x179 UB 610x305 238 UB 686x254x125 UB 686x254x140 UB 686x254x152 UB 686x254x170 UB 762x267x147 UB 762x267x173 UB 762x267x197 UB 838x292x176 UB 838x292x194 UB 838x292 226 UB 914x305x201 UB 91 4x305x224 UB 91 4x305x253 UB 914x305x289 UB 914x419x343 UB 914x419 388
167 203
221
107672
*"
**
**
264 193
221
144 608
119147
140 542
162291
138314
**
439
**
129669
**
5 27
* * * * *
121025
** *
**
615
112380
**
** * * ** **
,.
140542 162291
368 415
** ** **
*
**
434 504
**
"
247652
**
* ** *
630
*
**
**
**
**
** *
* *
389195
** **
633
**
*
* *
*
**
*
**
..
**
** **
* **
**
** **
464665 556996
**
668 787
**
**
*
544 688
a
983
**
**
"
'"
** ** **
**
**
**
**
**
**
tt * tttt
**
tt
'
**
**
690371
869
**
*
'
'*
**
tt
**
**
*
aa
tt * *
** *
* *
**
**
**
tt
tt
'*
k k
c
*
833 287
**
*
962
**
*
*
**
590 653
721
*
tt* tt tt* *
**
** **
**
**
**
*
**
* * *
1047
1
**
1
tt
'*
*
** *
**
**
152
*
024 761
**
1441
**
**
'*
**
k
** ** ** ** **
**
**
**
**
*
*
*
**
k k* k
1072
890 993
1469 973
**
* **
1430
**
*
* **
**
** **
**
* *
**
*
**
**
** **
'* ** '*
**
**
**
**
** **
**
**
**
*
* ** **
2098
2 791
**
**
**
** **
3 350 039
**
3488
3 140 661
tttt
4 186
'* '*
'* *
**
**
**
tt
** **
**
**
"
** * **
**
**
*
**
"
**
tt
**
**
**
*" **
*
**
* ** ** ** **
** *
'*
tt k*
**
** ** **
**
**
** **
**
**
*
**
** ** ** **
*
'* * * '*
** ** **
** **
**
*
**
*
*
*
**
**
** *
**
** **
**
**
8 128 200
4 547
**
**
620
2
Np,
3
Vp|.z
4
Vpl-y
5
Mpl.y
6
Mp|.z
7
Nfimit
8
{Nfimit /Np!.Rd)
Designation
for -My
IkN]
UC 152x152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203 X 203 52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203x203x71 UC 203x203x86 UC 254 254 73 UC 254x254x89 UC 254x254x107 UC 254x254x132 UC 254x254x167 UC 305x305x97 UC 305x305x1 18 UC 305x305x137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305x305x198 UC 305x305x240 UC 305x305x283 UC 356x368x129 UC 356x368x153 UC 356x368x177 UC 356x368x202 UC 356 406x235 UC 356x406x287 UC 356 X 406 X 340 UC 356 X 406 X 393 UC 356x406x467 UC 356x406x551 UC 356 X 406 634
++
IkN]
265 307 379
451
IkN]
570 788 976
[N.m]
[N.m]
** **
[kN]
*
for - My
1760 2167
2 702 3049 3 513 4 160
5043
4 283 5 212 6 274 7 734 9 791 5 679
1223 1394
1601
6909
8 023
146
9263
11611 14 066 15 498 7 559 8 961 10 373
128
11832
13 774 16 823 18 621
1950 2354 1969 2418 2 905 3 625 4 628 2563 3140 3 670 4263 5 419 6609 7335 3 497 4164 4 823 5 513 6497
113926 142030 228 822 261002 301795 367429 449 296 456352 562977 682838 859930 1 114 887 732352 900463 1 056 414 1233 003 1582 391 1953 654
2 195 235 1 140 465 1363 775 1 589 410 1826 999 2155 790 2 673 739 3009 603 3 535 650 4300 000 5 194 400 6 123 200
64 207
* *
219 267
321
1029
677 810 925
1053
263 1511 1639 812 953
1
768571
107
7962 8860
10 12 14 16
21525
25 581
30183
34 725
0,107 0.105 0,119 0,117 0,115 0,114 0,109 0,107 0,106 0,107 0,106 0,107 0.107 0,102 0,102
0,101
2945
3 324
621
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Designation
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,15
Nsd IkN]
MN.y [N.m]
* **
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,2
Nsd IkN]
* *
Nsd/Npl.Rd=0,25
NSd
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,3
Nsd IkN]
*
Nsd/Np,.Rd=0,35
Nsd [kN]
**
MN.y [N.m]
*
IkN]
* tttt
MN.y [N.m]
MN.y [N.m]
**
MN.y [N.m]
.
UC 152x152x23 UC 152x152x30 UC 152x152x37 UC 203x203x46 UC 203x203x52 UC 203x203x60 UC 203x203x71 UC 203x203x86 UC 254x254x73 UC 254x254x89 UC 254 X 254 107 UC 254 x 254 x 132 UC 254x254x167 UC 305x305x97 UC 305x305x1 18 UC 305x305x137 UC 305x305x158 UC 305x305 x 198 UC 305x305x240 UC 305x305x283 UC 356x368x129 UC 356x368x153 UC 356x368x177 UC 356x368x202 UC 356x406x235 UC 356x406x287 UC 356x406x340 UC 356x406x393 UC 356x406x467 UC 356x406x551 UC 356x406x634
137674
433
**
aa
129 576
542
**
*
121477
650
113379
** **
759
aa
105280
**
**
290 634
349005
428 632
703 832
1009
**
878
1040
1261
**
1230 1456
1
765
**
941 160
1042
1
255
1547 1958
**
*
934310
a.
1824
2 196 2 707
3 427
**
a.
**
**
1014 988
1
182 419
2006
2 316
895 577
2903
3 517 3 875
2 407 2 779
3483 4220
4 650
*
2808
3 242
776167
1
4064
4 923 5 424
**
532 197
** **
841 170
1718 426
134
**
2 075
2366
2 755
2 593 2 958
2066
2 523
2 793 3 229 3 837 4 527
920 131
3365
3 724 4 305
2381349 2677454
3 142 702
3 814 301 4604 743 5 417 052
3 112 3 550
245 562
4132
5 047
3 631 4141
4 821
156 593
5888
6 517 7 534 8 953 10 564
5586 6 457
5209
7546
8 681
7674
9 055
10 417
12154
622
European Commission
EUR 18366
Promotion of plastic design for steel and composite cross-sections: new required conditions in Eurocodes 3 and 4, practical tools for designers
J. B. Schleich,
P.
Chantrain, B. Chabrolin,
Y.
F.
Espiga
622 pp.
21
29.7 cm
At present in Eurocode 3 (design of steel structures) and in Eurocode 4 {design of composite steel and concrete structures), the plastic analysis is governed by two criteria. The first refers to the mechanical characteristics of steel and the second to the geometry of the profiles
used.
Previous research on the rotation capacity for plastic analysis, performed by ARBED, CRM and RWTH Aachen, has allowed us to understand the behaviour of plastic hinge formation for conventional steel. The results of this research have shown that the requirements of Eurocodes 3 and 4 {b/t ratio and its yield stress dependence, 1Jiy > 1.2, eu > 20. sy, Ar > 15 %) are very safe-sided and could be substantially reviewed especially for high-strength steels {S460).
A new single criterion called rotation capacity quantifies the capacity of a profile to develop a plastic hinge without discrimination for high-strength steels. This rotation capacity of plastic hinges includes a lot of parameters: geometrical and mechanical characteristics of the cross-sections, ductility; deformation range, local buckling problems, influence of welding procedures, influence of defects and the analysed structure {geometry, loads).
Nowadays the more competitive plastic design is not often used on the market because guides and practical tools, which evaluate available rotation capacities of cross-sections and required rotation capacities for different structures, are missing.
The first aim of this research is to determine the available rotation capacities for composite cross-sections (steel beam in conjunction with a concrete slab) for all the steel shapes included in sales programmes and as a function of different steel grades.
The second aim is to determine the required rotation capacities for different types of structures.
These practical tools ensure a real promotion of plastic analysis because the designer will be able to know easily and quickly if a plastic analysis is possible by comparing the required rotation capacity for this structure with the available rotation capacities of the cross-sections used.
The final aim of this research is to introduce these new rules of plastic analysis for steel and composite cross-sections into Eurocodes 3 and 4, with the support of expert analysis.
In such a way the competitiveness of steel and composite cross-sections will be improved and with this advantage their market share will increase substantially.
Venta Salg Verkauf Sales Vente Vendita Verkoop Venda Myynti Frsljning
BELGIQUE/BELGI
NEDERLAND
SDU Servicecentrum Uitgevers Chrstoftel Plantijnstraat2 Postbus 20014 2500 EA Den Haag Tel. (31-70) 378 9880 Fax (31-70) 378 97 83 E-mail: sdu6sdu.nl URL: http://www.sdu.nl
CYPRUS
EGYPT
Jean D Lannoy Avenue du Ro 202/Koningslaan 202 B-1190 Bruxelles/Brussel Tl. (32-2)53843 08 Fax (32-2) 538 08 41 E-mail: jean.de.lannoyeinlofaoard.be URL- http://www.jearvde-lannoy.be
La librairie europenne/D Europa
STERREICH
INDIA
EE-0001 Tallinn Tel.{372)646 02 44 Fax 372) 646 02 45 E-mail: einfoekoda.ee URL: http://www.xoda.ee
EBIC India
3rd Floor, Y. B. Chavan Centre Gen. J. Bhosale Marg. 400 021 Mumbai Tel. (91-22) 282 60 64 Fax (91-22) 285 45 64 E-mail: ebicegiasbmOl .vsnl.netin URL: http://www.ebicindia.com
PORTUGAL
DANMARK
HRVATSKA Med la tra da Ltd Pava Hatea 1 HR-1 0000 Zagreb Tel. (385-1) 43 03 92 Fax (385-1) 43 03 92
MAGYARORSZAG
ISRAL
ROY International
41, Mishmar Hayarden Street PO Box 13056 61 130 Tel Aviv Tel. (972-3) 649 94 69 Fax 972-3) 648 60 39 E-mail: royiienetvision.netil
DEUTSCHLAND
Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda, EP Rua Marques S da Bandeira, 16-A P-1050 Lisboa Codex Tel. (351-1) 353 03 99 Fax (351-1) 353 02 94 E-mail: del.incmemail.telepacpt
URL: http://www.lncrn.pt
MALTA
SUOMI/FINLAND
LuqaLOA05 Tel.(356)6644 88
Fax (356) 67 67 99 E-mail: gwirtheusa.net
POLSKA
JAPAN
/GREECE
G. C. Eleftheroudakfa SA International Bookstore Panepismiou 17 GR-10564Athina Tel. (30-1) 331 41 80/1/2/3/4/5 Fax (30-1) 323 98 21 E-mail: elebooksenetor.gr
ESP ANA
Keskuskatu 1/Centralgatan 1 PL/PB 128 FIN-00101 Helsinki/Helsingfors PJtfn (358-9) 121 44 18 FJfax (358-9) 121 44 35 Shkposti: akatilauseakaleeminen.com URL: http://www.akateerninen.com
PSKIapan
Asahi Sanbancho Plaza #206 7-1 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 102 Tel. (81-3) 32 34 69 21 Fax 81-3) 32 34 69 15 E-mail: booksOpsHapan.co.jp URL: http://www.psi-japan.com
Ars Polena
KrakowsWe Przedmiescie 7 Skr. pocztowa 1001
SVERIGE
BTJAB
Traktorvgen11
PL-00-950 Warszawa Tel. (48-22) 826 12 01 Fax (48-22) 826 62 40 E-mail: ars_pol ebevy.hsn.com.pl
MALAYSIA
EBIC Malaysia
Level 7, Wisma Hong Leong 18 Jalan Perak 50450 Kuala Lumpur Tel. (60-3) 262 62 98 Fax 60-3) 262 61 98 E-mail: ebic-kiemol.netmy
S-22182Lund
TIn (46-16) 18 00 00 Fax (4646) 30 79 47
ROMANIA
Euronwdla
Str. G-ral Berthelot Nr 41 RO-70749 Bucuresti Tel. (40-1) 315 44 03 Fax 40-1) 315 44 03
RUSSIA CCEC
60-leb'ya Oktyabrya Av. 9
1 1
913841715(Suscrip.)
913841714(SusCrip.)
(bros),
-post btjeu-pubeb(.se
URL: http://www.btj.se
UNITED KINGDOM
Tha Stationary Office Ltd International Sales Agency 51 Nine Elms Lane London SW8 5DR Tel. (44-171)8739090 Fax (44-1 71) 873 84 63 E-mail: ipa.enquiriesetheso.co.uk URL: http://www.theso.co.uk
PHILIPPINES
EBIC Philippines
19th Floor, PS Bank Tower Sen. Gil J. Puyat Ave. cor. Tindalo St Makah" City Metro Manilla Tel. (63-2) 759 66 80 Fax 63-2) 759 66 90 E-mail: eccpcomeglobe.com.ph URL: httpdwww.eccp.com
SLOVAKIA
FRANCE
Island
Bokabud Larusar Blonda!
Sklavrdustig, 2 IS-101 Reykjavik Tel. (354) 551 56 50 Fax (354) 552 55 60
NORGE
Centrum VTI SR
Nam. Slobody, 19 SK-81223 Bratislava Tel. (421-7) 531 8364 Fax (421-7) 531 8364 E-mail: europ6fbb1 .sltk.stuba.sk URL http://www.sl1k.stuba.sk
Journal officiel
Service des publications des CE 26, rue Desa'ix F-75727 Paris Cedex 15 Tl. (33) 14058 77 31 Fax (33) 140 58 77 00
IRELAND
SOUTH KOREA
SLOVENIA
Gospodarskl Vestnlk
N-06060slo
Tel. (47-22) 97 45 00 Fax (47-22) 97 45 45
SCHWEiaSUISSE/SVIZZERA
TURKIYE
ITALIA
Ucosa SpA
Via Duca di Calabria, 1/1 Casella postale 552 1-50125 Firenze Tel. (39-55) 064 54 15 Fax (39-55) 064 12 57 E-mail: licosaeftbcc.it URL: httpwww.ttbcc.it/licosa
PF492
CH-8035 Zrich Tel. (41-1) 365 53 15 Fax (41 -1)365 54 11 E-mail: eicseosec.ch URL: http^/www.osec.ch/eics
Dunya kifotel AS 100, Yil Mahallessi 34440 TR-80050 Bagcilar-lstanbul Tel. (90-212) 629 46 89 Fax (90-212) 629 46 27 E-mail: infoteiedunya-gazete.com.tr
AUSTRALIA
EBIC Thailand
29 Vanissa Building. 8th Floor Soi Chidlom Ploenchit 10330 Bangkok Tel. (66-2) 655 06 27 Fax 66-2) 655 06 28 E-mail: ebicbkkOksc1S.1h.com URL: httpAvww.ebicbkk.org
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hunter Publications
PO Box 404 3067 Abbotsford, Victoria Tel. (61-3) 94 17 53 61 Fax (61-3) 94 19 71 54 E-mail: jpdavieseozemail.com.au
BLGARUA
LUXEMBOURG
Beman Associates
461 1 -F Assembly Drive Lanham MD20706 Tel. (1-800) 274 44 47 (toll free telephone) Fax 1-800) 865 34 50 (toll free fax) E-mail: queryebeman.com URL: http://www.beman.com
CANADA
ESKREPUBLIKA
SIS NIS-prodejna
Abonnements:
Messageries Paul Kraus 1 1, rue Christophe Plantin L-2339 Luxembourg Tl. (352) 49 98 88-8 Fax (352) 49 98 88-444
E-mail: mpkepUu URL http://www.mpk.lu
Havelkova22 CZ-130 00Praha3 Tel. (420-2)242314 86 Fax (420-2) 24 23 11 14 E-mail: nkpospedec.nis.cz URL: http://usiscr.cz
Las ditions La Ubarla inc. 3020, chemin Sainte-Foy G1X 3V Sainte-Foy, Quebec Tel. (1-418) 658 37 63 Fax (1-800) 567 54 49 E-mail: liberleemediom.qc.ca Renouf Publishing Co. Ltd 5369 Chemin Canotek Road Unit 1 KU 9J3 Ottawa, Ontario Tel. (1-613) 745 26 65 Fax (1-613) 745 76 60 E-mail: order.deptOrenoulbooks.com
URL http://www.rBnoufbooks.corn
Bitte wanden SI sich an ein Bro Ihrer Wahl / Please contact tha sales office of your cholos / Veuillez vous adresser au bureau da venta da votra choix
OJ
en
Euroabstracts
The European Commission's periodical on research publications, issued every two months. For more information, contact: RTD help desk, European Commission, DG XIII, L-2920 Luxembourg Fax (352) 43 01-32084; e-mail: rtd-helpdesk@lux.dg13.cec.be
1 1
ISBN ^a-flEfl-MflTM-T
*
"V
'789282"848944
>
ir
L-2985 Luxembourg