You are on page 1of 1

4 theSun | FRIDAY AUGUST 21 2009

news without borders

Some of Karpal’s words


‘Applicants to quash Balkis missing: Witness
by S. Tamarai Chelvi
newsdesk@thesundaily.com
appears to have been omitted?
Aishah: I think (it is) missing ... the

dissolution are busybodies’


KUALA LUMPUR: The Selangor mentri Corp are among the 10 applicants who “The applicants in this matter can only
KUALA LUMPUR: A paragraph in
which lawyer Karpal Singh stated
that he “got nothing personal”, was
missing in a transcript of a press
conference, a witness in his trial
for sedition said yesterday.
paragraph is missing.
Aishah agreed that she wrote
what was said in the video record-
ings in a note book and later typed
it into a computer.
She said she typed the paragraph
although it was not in the transcript
besar’s wife and nine other parties were filed for a judicial review to quash the ROS be considered as donors who donated or Aishah Ahmad Azam, 25, an RTM from pages 6 to 7.
mere “busybodies” for disputing the dis- decision. sponsored the donee, which in this case reporter who transcribed video Asked whether she had cut out the
solution of Balkis, the welfare and charity “The applicant (Salbiah) was never a is Balkis, as gifts,” she said. recordings of the press conference paragraph, Aishah answered that she
organisation of the wives of Selangor as- member of Balkis. The fact that she is the She also submitted that the applica- on Feb 6, agreed that the paragraph had not. She said she did not know
semblymen and MPs, the High Court here mentri besar’s wife does not give her an tion for judicial review was filed out of was missing when counsel Jagdeep who had cut out the paragraph.
was told yesterday. automatic right to membership of Balkis. time, which is in contravention of Order Singh Deo suggested that it ap- Jagdeep: Do you agree the state-
Federal counsel Maisarah Juhari “The applicants are mere busybodies. 53 Rules of the High Court. peared to have been omitted. ment is important as it states
submitted that all the 10 parties have no They have failed to show they are persons “There is an appeal provision available She agreed with Jagdeep that Karpal’s stand that he has “nothing
sufficient interest to challenge the deci- who have been adversely affected by the to the applicants, therefore they should Karpal had said in the video record- personal”?
sion of the Registrar of Societies (ROS) to decision of the ROS,” Maisarah said in exhaust their domestic remedy by ap- ings that he “got nothing personal” Aishah: Yes.
dissolve Balkis on Feb 11. objecting to the leave application. pealing to the minister as provided for by because she had written the words Jagdeep also asked Aishah
The Selangor mentri besar’s wife, She also said the applicants could not section 18 of the Societies Act.” in her note book. whether Karpal had said “I will sue
Puan Sri Salbiah Tunut, Permodalan Negri be deemed as interested parties just be- Judicial commissioner Mohamad (The court was told earlier that the Sultan”.
Selangor Bhd, Kumpulan Darul Ehsan Bhd cause they had donated sums of money Ariff Md Yusof fixed Sept 11 for decision. Karpal had said: “But I’ll make it very Jagdeep: You said Karpal (wanted
and the Selangor State Development and two parcels of land to Balkis. – Bernama clear, I got nothing personal in this to) sue the Sultan. Where is it said
matter. It is a constitutional point “I will sue the Sultan”?
and I think one which should be res- Aishah: He said “we”.
pected by all, including the Ruler.”) Jagdeep: He did not say at the press
Jagdeep also asked about the conference “I will sue the Sultan”?
numbering on the pages of the 10- Aishah: No (he did not).
page transcript. Aishah agreed Karpal had ex-
Jagdeep: Do you agree that on plained in Malay during the press
page 7, the page number is not at conference that he would not be the
the bottom right as it is on the other plaintiff and that Datuk Seri Nizar
pages. It is slightly above? Jamaluddin (the former Perak mentri
Aishah: Yes. besar) would file the suit instead.
Jagdeep: Do you agree that if the The hearing before Judicial
page number is brought down just Commissioner Azman Abdullah
as on the other pages, one paragraph continues.

AG seeks declaration against Selangor ruling


PETALING JAYA: The Attorney-General’s Chambers filed an application
at the Shah Alam High Court yesterday to declare null and void a circular
by the Selangor government restricting the time and place at which
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers can question
members of the state government and their staff.
In a statement, the AG’s Chambers said it is seeking a declaration that
the Selangor State Government Secretariat Circular No. 4 2009, dated
July 28, concerning directives to attend interviews by the MACC to aid
investigations is invalid and should be cancelled. An affidavit was also filed
along with a certificate of urgency to get an early hearing date.
The circular prohibits Selangor government staff from talking to MACC
officers after office hours. A statement if taken, was to be taken in the
presence of a lawyer.

Subra gets injunction against Samy Vellu’s son


KUALA LUMPUR: Seputeh MIC division chairman Datuk S. Sub-
ramaniam obtained an interim ex-parte injunction from the High
Court yesterday to restrain Vell Paari, son of party president Datuk
Seri S. Samy Vellu, and two others from further publishing alleged
defamatory articles against him.
Justice Datin Zabariah Mohd Yusuf made the order in cham-
bers after hearing submissions from Subramaniam’s counsel, G.
Rajasingam and K. Saraswathy. Rajasingam said the inter-parte hear-
ing would be on Sept 10. In his application, Subramaniam, a former
MIC vice-president, said the publication of the alleged defamatory
words had tarnished his reputation and good name. – Bernama

You might also like