Threat N AntiVirus Report

SPSS OUTPUT and its analysis
Frequencies
St at is t ics
N
V alid Mis s ing Mean
A ge 119 0 2.16
Oc c upation 119 0 1.19
Depar tment 119 0 1.61
How of ten do y ou
119 0 1.92
us e inter net
Main pur pos e of
119 0 2.53
us ing inter net
Sec ur ity c onc er n
119 0 3.32
ov er inter net
Sec ur ity c onc er n
in 119 0 3.36
pur c has e/banking
Would y ou r epor t
119 0 3.40
s ec ur ity br eakin
c onc er n about
online bus ines s 119 0 3.38
in other c ountr ies
c onv enienc e or
119 0 2.45
pr iv ac y
c r edit c ar d s tolen 119 0 43.45
w ill y ou us e c r edit
119 0 44.20
c ar d on w eb
put name and
addr es s in 119 0 3.22
dir ec tor y
banking w ithout
s ec ur ity 119 0 3.50
pr oc edur es
par tic ipate in
119 0 3.23
online auc tion
inter net making
119 0 3.38
lif e eas y
s ec ur ity f eatur es
bas is f or 119 0 3.29
bus ines s
w ho to as k
ques tion about
119 0 2.17
br eac h/online
s ec ur ity
how s ec ur e
metr ic es help to 119 0 3.27
v alue
r egis tr ation on
119 0 3.52
s ite: time
r egis tr ation on
119 0 3.29
s ite: r eq name
r egis tr ation on
119 0 3.29
s ite:r eq e- mail
r egis tr ation on
119 0 3.23
s ite:r eq addr es s
r egis tr ation on
s ite:not aw ar e
119 0 3.23
how data w ould
be us ed
r egis tr ation on
s ite:not w or th
119 0 3.18
r ev ealing
inf or mation
r egis tr ation on
s ite:dont tr us t the 119 0 3.18
w ebs ite
r egis tr ation on
s ite:alw ay s 119 0 2.87
r egis ter
r egis tr ation on
119 0 3.32
s ite:other r eas on
s pam
e- mail:pr ac tic e is 119 0 3.42
f ine
s pam e- mail:law
119 0 3.26
to make it illegal
s pam
e- mail:agenc ies 119 0 3.28
liable
s apm
e- mail:mes s age
119 0 3.26
f ilter ing s hould be
s tr ong
Age
Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid 17 - 21 24 20.2 20.2 20.2
22 - 26 75 63.0 63.0 83.2
27 - 30 5 4.2 4.2 87.4
31 - 35 7 5.9 5.9 93.3
35 + 8 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
80
60
40
20
Frequency
0
17 - 21 22 - 26 27 - 30 31 - 35 35 +
Age
Occupation
Valid Cumulative
Valid Student 100 84.0 84.0 84.0
Teaching
15 12.6 12.6 96.6
Faculty
Non
Teaching 4 3.4 3.4 100.0
Faculty
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
120
100
80
60
40
Frequency
20
0
Student Teaching Faculty Non Teaching Faculty
Occupation
Department
Valid Cumulative
Valid Engineering 47 39.5 39.5 39.5
Non
72 60.5 60.5 100.0
Engineerin
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
80
60
40
20
Frequency
0
Engineering Non Engineerin
Department
How often do you use internet
Valid Cumulative
Valid Daily 46 38.7 38.7 38.7
Couple of
times a 49 41.2 41.2 79.8
week
Once a
17 14.3 14.3 94.1
week
Once a
2 1.7 1.7 95.8
fortnight
Once a
4 3.4 3.4 99.2
month
rarely 1 .8 .8 100.0
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
60
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
Daily Once a week Once a month
Couple of times a we Once a fortnight rarely
How often do you use internet
Main purpose of using internet
Valid Cumulative
Valid Just
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
surfing
collecting
study
66 55.5 55.5 66.4
related
information
collecting
leisure 7 5.9 5.9 72.3
information
keeping
touch with 31 26.1 26.1 98.3
friends
shopping 1 .8 .8 99.2
6 1 .8 .8 100.0
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
70
60
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
Just surfing collecting leisure i shopping
collecting study rel keeping touch with f 6
Main purpose of using internet

Security concern over internet
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
23 19.3 19.3 19.3
concerned
some
what 13 10.9 10.9 30.3
concerned
neutral 14 11.8 11.8 42.0
concerned 41 34.5 34.5 76.5
very
28 23.5 23.5 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
least concerned neutral very concerned
some what concerned concerned
Security concern in purchase/banking
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
22 18.5 18.5 18.5
concerned
some
what 7 5.9 5.9 24.4
concerned
neutral 33 27.7 27.7 52.1
concerned 20 16.8 16.8 68.9
very
37 31.1 31.1 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
Security concern in purchase/banking
Would you report security breakin
Valid Cumulative
Valid definitely
12 10.1 10.1 10.1
not
not 17 14.3 14.3 24.4
may be 28 23.5 23.5 47.9
yes 35 29.4 29.4 77.3
definitely
27 22.7 22.7 100.0
yes
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
definitely not not may be yes definitely yes
Would you report security breakin

concern about online business in other countries
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
17 14.3 14.3 14.3
concerned
some
what 15 12.6 12.6 26.9
concerned
neutral 30 25.2 25.2 52.1
concerned 20 16.8 16.8 68.9
very
37 31.1 31.1 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
concern about online business in other countries
convenience or privacy
Valid Cumulative
Valid convenience 13 10.9 10.9 10.9
privacy 42 35.3 35.3 46.2
both are
equally 62 52.1 52.1 98.3
important
neither 2 1.7 1.7 100.0
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
70
60
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
convenience privacy both are equally imp neither
convenience or privacy
credit card stolen
Valid Cumulative
Valid yes 14 11.8 11.8 11.8
no 54 45.4 45.4 57.1
dont have
a credit 51 42.9 42.9 100.0
card
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
60
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
yes no dont have a credit c
credit card stolen

will you use credit card on web
Valid Cumulative
Valid definitely
14 11.8 11.8 11.8
not
not 9 7.6 7.6 19.3
may be 13 10.9 10.9 30.3
yes 20 16.8 16.8 47.1
definitely
12 10.1 10.1 57.1
yes
dont have
a credit 51 42.9 42.9 100.0
card
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
60
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
definitely not may be definitely yes
not yes dont have a credit c
will you use credit card on web
put name and address in directory
Valid Cumulative
Valid definitely
17 14.3 14.3 14.3
not
not 19 16.0 16.0 30.3
may be 28 23.5 23.5 53.8
yes 31 26.1 26.1 79.8
definitely
24 20.2 20.2 100.0
yes
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
banking without security procedures
Valid Cumulative
Valid definitely
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
not
not 11 9.2 9.2 20.2
may be 31 26.1 26.1 46.2
yes 31 26.1 26.1 72.3
definitely
33 27.7 27.7 100.0
yes
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0

participate in online auction
Valid Cumulative
Valid definitely
17 14.3 14.3 14.3
not
not 20 16.8 16.8 31.1
may be 28 23.5 23.5 54.6
yes 27 22.7 22.7 77.3
definitely
27 22.7 22.7 100.0
yes
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
30
20
10
Frequency
0
internet making life easy
Valid Cumulative
Valid definitely
14 11.8 11.8 11.8
not
not 18 15.1 15.1 26.9
may be 23 19.3 19.3 46.2
yes 37 31.1 31.1 77.3
definitely
27 22.7 22.7 100.0
yes
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
internet making life easy
security features basis for business
Valid Cumulative
Valid definitely
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
not
not 16 13.4 13.4 24.4
may be 37 31.1 31.1 55.5
yes 29 24.4 24.4 79.8
definitely
24 20.2 20.2 100.0
yes
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
security features basis for business

who to ask question about breach/online security
Valid Cumulative
Valid to the
web 29 24.4 24.4 24.4
master
to the
contact 44 37.0 37.0 61.3
us link
dont
know who
the right
44 37.0 37.0 98.3
authority
is
4 1 .8 .8 99.2
5 1 .8 .8 100.0
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
to the web master dont know who the ri 5
to the contact us li 4
who to ask question about breach/online security
how secure metrices help to value
Valid Cumulative
Valid definitely
9 7.6 7.6 7.6
not
not 17 14.3 14.3 21.8
may be 38 31.9 31.9 53.8
yes 43 36.1 36.1 89.9
definitely
12 10.1 10.1 100.0
yes
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
how secure metrices help to value
registration on site: time
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
8 6.7 6.7 6.7
concerned
some
what 14 11.8 11.8 18.5
concerned
neutral 34 28.6 28.6 47.1
concerned 34 28.6 28.6 75.6
very
29 24.4 24.4 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
registration on site: time

registration on site: req name
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
11 9.2 9.2 9.2
concerned
some
what 13 10.9 10.9 20.2
concerned
neutral 45 37.8 37.8 58.0
concerned 30 25.2 25.2 83.2
very
20 16.8 16.8 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
registration on site: req name
registration on site:req e-mail
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
concerned
some
what 18 15.1 15.1 26.1
concerned
neutral 31 26.1 26.1 52.1
concerned 36 30.3 30.3 82.4
very
21 17.6 17.6 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
registration on site:req e-mail
registration on site:req address
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
concerned
some
what 20 16.8 16.8 27.7
concerned
neutral 33 27.7 27.7 55.5
concerned 33 27.7 27.7 83.2
very
20 16.8 16.8 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
registration on site:req address

registration on site:not aware how data would be used
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
15 12.6 12.6 12.6
concerned
some
what 17 14.3 14.3 26.9
concerned
neutral 36 30.3 30.3 57.1
concerned 28 23.5 23.5 80.7
very
23 19.3 19.3 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
registration on site:not aware how data would be used
registration on site:not worth revealing information
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
12 10.1 10.1 10.1
concerned
some
what 26 21.8 21.8 31.9
concerned
neutral 33 27.7 27.7 59.7
concerned 25 21.0 21.0 80.7
very
23 19.3 19.3 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
registration on site:not worth revealing information
registration on site:dont trust the website
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
concerned
some
what 23 19.3 19.3 30.3
concerned
neutral 35 29.4 29.4 59.7
concerned 26 21.8 21.8 81.5
very
22 18.5 18.5 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
registration on site:dont trust the website

registration on site:always register
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
20 16.8 16.8 16.8
concerned
some
what 26 21.8 21.8 38.7
concerned
neutral 36 30.3 30.3 68.9
concerned 24 20.2 20.2 89.1
very
13 10.9 10.9 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
registration on site:always register
registration on site:other reason
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
concerned
some
what 16 13.4 13.4 24.4
concerned
neutral 31 26.1 26.1 50.4
concerned 38 31.9 31.9 82.4
very
21 17.6 17.6 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
registration on site:other reason
spam e-mail:practice is fine
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
8 6.7 6.7 6.7
concerned
some
what 19 16.0 16.0 22.7
concerned
neutral 34 28.6 28.6 51.3
concerned 31 26.1 26.1 77.3
very
27 22.7 22.7 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
spam e-mail:practice is fine

spam e-mail:law to make it illegal
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
17 14.3 14.3 14.3
concerned
some
what 11 9.2 9.2 23.5
concerned
neutral 31 26.1 26.1 49.6
concerned 44 37.0 37.0 86.6
very
16 13.4 13.4 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
50
40
30
20
Frequency
10
0
spam e-mail:law to make it illegal
spam e-mail:agencies liable
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
12 10.1 10.1 10.1
concerned
some
what 21 17.6 17.6 27.7
concerned
neutral 29 24.4 24.4 52.1
concerned 36 30.3 30.3 82.4
very
21 17.6 17.6 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
spam e-mail:agencies liable
sapm e-mail:message filtering should be strong
Valid Cumulative
Valid least
22 18.5 18.5 18.5
concerned
some
what 10 8.4 8.4 26.9
concerned
neutral 27 22.7 22.7 49.6
concerned 35 29.4 29.4 79.0
very
25 21.0 21.0 100.0
concerned
Total 119 100.0 100.0
Total 119 100.0
Bar Chart
40
30
20
10
Frequency
0
sapm e-mail:message filtering should be strong

Data analysis:
The average age of the respondents is in the group 22-26.
The average respondents are students.
The average respondents’ belong to the Non-engineering
department.
The average respondents responded that they use internet
couple of times a week.
The average respondents use internet mainly for the purpose of
collecting leisure information.
The average respondents’ security concern over the internet is
neutral.
The average respondents’ security concern over the internet
banking is neutral.
The average respondents’ responded that they would report a
security break-in in the internet.
The average respondents’ concern about the security over
cross country trade over internet is neutral.
When it comes to convenience/privacy over the internet, the
average respondents responded that they are concerned about
their privacy rather that the convenience.
Only 42.9% of the respondents do not have a credit card.
When asked about the credit card loss or stolen credit card over
the internet, the average respondents responded that their
credit card was not stolen.
The average respondents responded that they use their credit
card over the internet.
Average respondents may enter their name/address in the
internet.
Average respondents responded that they may use banking
services when there is no proper security over the internet.
Asked about the online auction participation, average
respondents responded that they may participate in an online
auction.
Average respondents responded that internet is making their
life easier.
Average respondents said that they may be concerned about
the security over internet for business.
Chi Square Test:
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
convenience
or privacy *
put name
119 100.0% 0 .0% 119 100.0%
and address
in directory
convenience
or privacy *
banking
119 100.0% 0 .0% 119 100.0%
without
security
procedures
convenience
or privacy *
participate in 119 100.0% 0 .0% 119 100.0%
online
auction
convenience or privacy * put name and address in

directory
Crosstab
Count
definitely definitely
not not may be yes yes Total
convenience convenience 2 4 6 1 13
or privacy privacy 8 4 11 11 8 42
both are
equally 9 12 12 14 15 62
important
neither 1 1 2
Total 17 19 28 31 24 119
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp.
Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson a
12.030 12 .443
Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio 14.431 12 .274
Linear-by-Linear
.297 1 .586
Association
N of Valid
119
Cases
a. 10 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than
5. The minimum expected count is .29.
Directional Measures
Asymp. Approx.
a b
Value Std. Error Approx. T Sig.
Nominal Lambda Symmetric .014 .049 .277 .781
by convenience c c
Nominal or privacy .000 .000 . .
Dependent
put name
and address
in directory .023 .081 .277 .781
Dependent
Goodman convenience d
and or privacy .031 .021 .534
Kruskal Dependent
tau put name
and address d
in directory .025 .011 .462
Dependent
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals zero.
d. Based on chi-square approximation
Symmetric Measures
Approx.
Value Sig.
Nominal by Phi .318 .443
Nominal Cramer's V .184 .443
Contingency
.303 .443
Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
119

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the
null hypothesis.
convenience or privacy * banking without security

procedures
Crosstab
Count
convenience convenience 2 5 5 1 13
both are
equally 7 6 15 12 22 62
important
neither 1 1 2
Total 13 11 31 31 33 119
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp.
Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson a
11.058 12 .524
Chi-Square
Linear-by-Linear
.400 1 .527
Association
N of Valid
119
Cases
Asymp. Approx.
a b
Nominal Lambda Symmetric .063 .061 1.004 .315
by convenience
Nominal or privacy .018 .087 .200 .841
Dependent
banking
without
security .093 .061 1.474 .141
procedures
Dependent
Goodman convenience c
Kruskal Dependent
tau banking
without c
security .027 .013 .383
procedures
Dependent
c. Based on chi-square approximation
Symmetric Measures
Approx.
Value Sig.
Contingency
.292 .524
Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
119

null hypothesis.
convenience or privacy * participate in online auction
Crosstab
Count
convenience convenience 1 2 6 3 1 13
both are
equally 11 13 12 14 12 62
important
neither 1 1 2
Total 17 20 28 27 27 119
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp.
Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson a
11.751 12 .466
Chi-Square
Linear-by-Linear
.590 1 .442
Association
N of Valid
119
Cases
Asymp. Approx.
a b
Nominal Lambda Symmetric .061 .067 .890 .374
by convenience
Nominal or privacy .035 .088 .392 .695
Dependent
participate in
online
.077 .074 1.004 .315
auction
Dependent
Goodman convenience c
Kruskal Dependent
tau participate in
online c
.026 .015 .410
auction
Dependent
c. Based on chi-square approximation
Symmetric Measures
Approx.
Value Sig.
Contingency
.300 .466
Coefficient
N of Valid Cases
119

null hypothesis.
Privacy and putting name and address in directory

There is a positive correlation between privacy and putting their
name and address on the online directory
The lambda value is .781 this signifies that we can reduce the
error by 78.1% of predicting if the person has chosen privacy or
convenience if we know his response over the question whether
he will put his name and address in the directory.
Privacy and banking without security procedures
There is high positive correlation between the privacy and
The lambda value is .315 which signifies that we can reduce the
error by 31.5% of predicting if the person will participate in
banking without knowing the security procedures if we his
response over the question whether he chose privacy or
convenience.
Privacy and participation in online auctions
There is a positive correlation between privacy and
participating in an online auction
The lambda value is .374 this signifies that we can reduce the
error by 37.4% in predicting weather the person would take
part in online auction or not if we know whether he chose
privacy or convenience.
ANNOVA test:
To compare the student department with how often they use
internet and what is the main purpose of them using the
internet.
Oneway
ANOVA
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
How often Between
1.461 1 1.461 1.414 .237
do you Groups
use Within
internet 120.858 117 1.033
Groups
Total 122.319 118
Main Between
4.393E-02 1 4.393E-02 .038 .846
purpose Groups
of using Within
internet 135.603 117 1.159
Groups
Total 135.647 118
There is low degree of correlation between the department and

how often person uses internet but there is a high degree of
correlation in the main purpose of using the internet.
Oneway
ANOVA
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Security concern Between
3.516 2 1.758 .841 .434
over internet Groups
Within
242.350 116 2.089
Groups
Total 245.866 118
Security concern Between
.552 2 .276 .130 .878
in Groups
purchase/banking Within
246.910 116 2.129
Groups
Total 247.462 118
concern about Between
1.810 2 .905 .452 .637
online business Groups
in other countries Within
232.173 116 2.001
Groups
Total 233.983 118
Post Hoc Tests
Multiple Comparisons
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence
Mean Interval
Dependent (I) (J) Difference Lower Upper
Variable Occupation Occupation (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Bound Bound
Security concern Student Teaching
-.35 .400 .657 -1.30 .60
over internet Faculty
Non
Teaching -.75 .737 .567 -2.50 1.00
Faculty
Teaching Student .35 .400 .657 -.60 1.30
Faculty Non
Teaching -.40 .813 .875 -2.33 1.53
Faculty
Non Student .75 .737 .567 -1.00 2.50
Teaching Teaching
Faculty .40 .813 .875 -1.53 2.33
Faculty
Security concern Student Teaching
-3.00E-02 .404 .997 -.99 .93
in Faculty
purchase/banking Non
Teaching .37 .744 .873 -1.40 2.14
Faculty
Teaching Student 3.00E-02 .404 .997 -.93 .99
Faculty Non
Teaching .40 .821 .878 -1.55 2.35
Faculty
Non Student -.37 .744 .873 -2.14 1.40
Teaching Teaching
Faculty -.40 .821 .878 -2.35 1.55
Faculty
concern about Student Teaching
-.13 .392 .944 -1.06 .80
online business Faculty
in other countries Non
Teaching -.66 .721 .632 -2.37 1.05
Faculty
Teaching Student .13 .392 .944 -.80 1.06
Faculty Non
Teaching -.53 .796 .781 -2.42 1.36
Faculty
Non Student .66 .721 .632 -1.05 2.37
Teaching Teaching
Faculty .53 .796 .781 -1.36 2.42
Faculty
Homogeneous Subsets
a,b
Tukey HSD
Subset
for alpha
= .05
Occupation N 1
Student 100 3.25
Teaching
15 3.60
Faculty
Non
Teaching 4 4.00
Faculty
Sig. .509
Means for groups in homogeneous
subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean
Sample Size = 9.184
b. The group sizes are unequal.
The harmonic mean of the
group sizes is used. Type I
error levels are not
guaranteed.
Security concern in
purchase/banking
a,b
Tukey HSD
Subset
for alpha
= .05
Occupation N 1
Non
Teaching 4 3.00
Faculty
Student 100 3.37
Teaching
15 3.40
Faculty
Sig. .827
Sample Size = 9.184
guaranteed.
concern about online business in
other countries
a,b
Tukey HSD
Subset
for alpha
= .05
Occupation N 1
Student 100 3.34
Teaching
15 3.47
Faculty
Non
Teaching 4 4.00
Faculty
Sig. .579
Sample Size = 9.184
guaranteed.
ANOVA test to compare the occupation and their

concern over security on the internet and whether their
comfort level on making purchases online and
conducting business outside of the home country.
There is positive correlation between the occupation and the
security concern on the internet amongst students, teaching
faculty and non teaching faculty
There is very high correlation between the occupation and
whether the person would be making purchases over the
internet.
There is high correlation between the occupation and a person
conducting business online outside the home country.
Kruskal Wallis Test:

NPar Tests
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Ranks
Mean
Occupation N Rank
registration Student 100 57.24
on site: Teaching
time 15 70.57
Faculty
Non
Teaching 4 89.25
Faculty
Total 119
on site: req Teaching
name 15 65.90
Faculty
Non
Teaching 4 38.88
Faculty
Total 119
on site:req Teaching
e-mail 15 68.17
Faculty
Non
Teaching 4 60.88
Faculty
Total 119
on site:req Teaching
address 15 79.50
Faculty
Non
Teaching 4 47.50
Faculty
Total 119
on site:not Teaching
aware how 15 70.20
Faculty
data would Non
be used Teaching 4 62.25
Faculty
Total 119
on site:not Teaching
worth 15 76.47
Faculty
revealing Non
information Teaching 4 57.38
Faculty
Total 119
on Teaching
site:dont 15 58.10
Faculty
trust the Non
website Teaching 4 53.13
Faculty
Total 119
on Teaching
site:always 15 76.07
Faculty
register Non
Teaching 4 96.25
Faculty
Total 119
on Teaching
site:other 15 51.00
Faculty
reason Non
Teaching 4 56.38
Faculty
Total 119
Test Statisticsa,b
registration registration registration

on site:not on site:not on registration registration
registration registration registration registration aware how worth site:dont on on
on site: on site: req on site:req on site:req data would revealing trust the site:always site:other
time name e-mail address be used information website register reason
Chi-Square 5.252 2.100 1.034 6.140 1.635 4.113 .243 9.415 1.332
df 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Asymp. Sig.
.072 .350 .596 .046 .441 .128 .886 .009 .514
a. Kruskal Wallis Test

b. Grouping Variable: Occupation
To compare occupation & reasons as to why he doesn’t

fill out the online registration forms at websites
Occupation and time taken to fill the form has a low level of
correlation
Occupation and the fact that it requires to give the name on the
websites has a positive correlation
Occupation and the fact that it requires to give the email
address on websites has a high positive correlation
Occupation and the fact that it requires to give the address on
websites has a low level of correlation
Occupation and the fact as to how the registration information
entered by them on the websites has a positive correlation
Occupation and the fact that person feels that its not worth
revealing the information has a low level of correlation
Occupation and the fact that the person doesn’t trust the
website has a high degree of positive correlation
Occupation and the fact the person always registers on the
website has a very low level of correlation
Occupation and other reasons as to why a person doesn’t
register on the websites have a high positive level of
correlation.
Recommendations & suggestions:
• The websites need to make the registration process
shorter
• The websites need to make people aware as how their
personal information will be used or even give a
confidentiality information as to that the websites won’t
use the personal information given by the users
• Strict laws should implemented by the government to
make the spamming illegal.
• The rating of how secure a website is helps to attract new
users thus it should be highlighted on the website so as to
make people aware of the security strength of the website.

Threat N AntiVirus Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Threat N AntiVirus Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SPSS OUTPUT and its analysis

How often do you use internet

How often do you use internet

Main purpose of using internet

Main purpose of using internet

Security concern over internet

Security concern in purchase/banking

Security concern in purchase/banking

Would you report security breakin

Would you report security breakin

concern about online business in other countries

credit card stolen

credit card stolen

will you use credit card on web

put name and address in directory

put name and address in directory

banking without security procedures

banking without security procedures

participate in online auction

internet making life easy

internet making life easy

security features basis for business

security features basis for business

who to ask question about breach/online security

how secure metrices help to value

how secure metrices help to value

registration on site: time

registration on site: time

registration on site: req name

registration on site:req e-mail

registration on site:req e-mail

registration on site:req address

registration on site:req address

registration on site:not aware how data would be used

registration on site:not worth revealing information

registration on site:not worth revealing information

registration on site:dont trust the website

registration on site:dont trust the website

registration on site:always register

registration on site:other reason

registration on site:other reason

spam e-mail:practice is fine

spam e-mail:practice is fine

spam e-mail:law to make it illegal

spam e-mail:agencies liable

spam e-mail:agencies liable

sapm e-mail:message filtering should be strong

sapm e-mail:message filtering should be strong

Case Processing Summary

convenience or privacy * put name and address in

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

convenience or privacy * banking without security

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

convenience or privacy * participate in online auction

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

Privacy and putting name and address in directory

There is low degree of correlation between the department and

Post Hoc Tests

ANOVA test to compare the occupation and their

Kruskal Wallis Test:

registration registration registration

a. Kruskal Wallis Test

To compare occupation & reasons as to why he doesn’t