!

COMENIUS
Ref. MOST_502610-llp-1-it-comenius-cmp

Questionnaire evaluating satisfaction with the Training Course

Deliverable No 9 WP 3
Date 30/10/2010

Status: Final
MOST Partners & Staff
Dipartimento di Scienze dell Educazione, Universit degli Studi di Salerno, Mauro Cozzolino, Francesco Gramegna Tota, Antonio Iannaccone ! Italy ITC Terra di Lavoro Caserta, Rosalba Arena, Giulia Petrarca, Vincenza Rendina, Brunella Arena ! Italy ISPPREF Istituto di Psicologia e Psicoterapia Relazionale e Familiare, Zuzana Simonova, Giovanna Celia, Mirella Calisto! Italy ANP Associazione Nazionale Dirigenti della Scuola, Elisabetta Barone, Franca Principe, Carmela Santarcangelo ! Italy UAB Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Pilar Escotorin, Robert Roche, Maria-Carme Cicera Amores ! Spain FACTUM Chaloupka & Risser OHG, Christine Chaloupka-Risser, Elke Sumper, Ralf Risser ! Austria GEORGE CALINESCU, Alina Diana Codreanu, Monica Niciporuc ! Romania
HRDC Patras Port Business Center, Guido Scagno ! Greece

"!

WP1 Deliverable 3 Kick-off Meeting in Salerno

MOST_502610-llp-1-it-comenius-cmp!

This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

! !! MOST Feedback and Self Assessment questionnaire!! !!

moderately! not at all!

quite! 4 4 4 4 quite! 4 4 4 4

A1 The level of discussion was appropriate to my knowledge.

1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3

A2 The objectives of the course were clear.

A3 The content was consistent with the objectives of the course.

A4 The teaching method was effective.

moderately!

not at all!

slightly!

B1

The length of the course is appropriate to cover thoroughly the objectives.

1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2

3 3 3 3

B2 The documentation distributed is sufficient.

B3 The quality of the documentation distributed is appropriate.

B4 The course is well organized.

very! 5 5 5 5

INDICATORS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCES USED IN THE VT COURSE

very! 5 5 5 5

INDICATORS FOR ASSESSMENT OF GENERAL IMPRESSIONS ON THE VT COURSE.

slightly!

#!

WP1 Deliverable 3 Kick-off Meeting in Salerno

MOST_502610-llp-1-it-comenius-cmp!

! C!

!
moderately! not at all!

quite! 4! 4! 4! 4 quite! 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

How important is theoretical knowledge about the causes of early C1 ! school leaving and dropout for your professional profile? How important is theoretical knowledge about the solutions to early C2 ! school leaving and dropout for your professional profile? How important is theoretical knowledge about basic principles of C3 ! communication for your professional profile? C4 How important are motivational competencies (know-how) for your professional profile?

1! 1! 1! 1

2! 2! 2! 2

3! 3! 3! 3

D1

Has the training course enhanced your knowledge about how to motivate pupils to study?

Do you think that the materials and methodologies proposed may D2 systematically enhance the focus on the pupils motivation to study? Has the course helped in understanding the connection between D3 intersubjective quality of the relationship with the pupils and the chance of affecting their motivation to study? Has the training course helped to understand the importance of D4 negotiating personal objectives with the students in order to have them meet school requirements? D5 Did the creation of a relational map to enhance a sense of belonging give you the chance of improving your competencies? Did communicative strategies and use of relational approaches give you the chance of improving your competencies? Did the building up of solutions through case analysis encourage you towards group work?

1 1 1

2 2 2

3 3 3

D6

D7

! ! ! $!

very! 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

INDICATORS FOR EVALUATING INTERSUBJECTIVITY- MOTIVATION TOPICS

THE

moderately!

not at all!

slightly!

very! 5! 5! 5! 5

INDICATORS FOR EVALUATING THE IMPORTANCE OF THE TOPICS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PROFILE

slightly!

WP1 Deliverable 3 Kick-off Meeting in Salerno

MOST_502610-llp-1-it-comenius-cmp!

! !

not at all!

slightly!

INDICATORS FOR EVALUATING PROSOCIALITY AND

moderately!

quite! 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4

E QUALITY COMMUNICATION AS RESULT OF SEMINAR

ON PROSOCIALITY THROUGH MOST
Are the contents of the pro social program feasible in daily life (work, family, etc.)? Has the pro social program provided me with ideas and methods for changing my behaviour? Has the program encouraged me to try and match my gestures, tone, expression, etc., with my words? I desire and intend to act in a more pro- social manner with my colleagues . I desire and intend to act in a more pro- social manner with my students. Now, I understand and need to find always something positive in what my colleagues tell me, and share it with them . Now, I understand and need to find always something positive in what my students tell me, and share it with them. I have discovered some critical issues that I could work on to improve my empathy towards my colleagues. I have discovered some critical issues that I could work on to improve my empathy towards my students. I will try to respond empathically to the input I receive from my students and my colleagues

E1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1

2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2

3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3

E2

E3

E4

E5

E6

E7

E8

E9

E10

! ! !

Very! 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5

%!

WP1 Deliverable 3 Kick-off Meeting in Salerno

MOST_502610-llp-1-it-comenius-cmp!