Draft HAZOP Study

HAMS-GPS : HAZOP Study for : Sample-Cokeoven
Date: 14/01/2012:53:45 PM Detailed engineering stage Licensed To : HAMSAGARS Project/Plant stage at HAZOP :
ACTION REPORT
Part-1a Action by Report- Design intension wise Design intention (Operation): A.0
Node:
A.0 Whether Cokeoven Technology procured with HAZOP Study Report?
Description of design intention:
Hazop study Number: P and I Dwg. No. N.A. HAZOP GUIDE WORD (1) NO (NOT OR NONE) SIL/LOP: 1
A.0
Parameter :
A.0 N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Future Project Authorities Action taken: Action Date
Sop reference:
RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL
For future Technology Procurement agreements, may make it mandatory for all Projects to include HAZOP study as part of Technology package.
Design intention (Operation):
A. Separate Gas and Liquid at required Temperature
Node:
A.1 Gas from Battery to byproduct Separate Gas and Liquid at required Temperature
Hazop study Number:
A.1
Parameter :
A.1 Temperature N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Project authority Action taken: Project authority Action taken: Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. PD-1055 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (2) MORE OF
Sop reference:
SIL/LOP:
1. Consider HT Alarm for gas 2. Provide LP Alarm for ammonia liquor in CCR 3. Bleeding of gas requires ignition and auto ignition to be provided Provide on all cases of piping & all Flanges as per OISD-110. Normally bonding is done using round wires. Ihis is not correct. It is necessary to follow for Strip specs IS-3043 & IS-7689 and OISD-108.
(17) STATIC CHARGE SIL/LOP: 1
A.1 Separate Gas and Liquid at required Pressure
Node:
A.1 Gas fro Battery to Byproduct Separate Gas and Liquid at required Pressure
Hazop study Number:
A.1.1
Parameter :
A.1 Pressure N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Project authority Action taken: Page 1 of 11 Licensed To : HAMSAGARS Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. PD-1055 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (2) MORE OF
Sop reference:
As under High Temperature
SIL/LOP:
N.A.
Friday, January 14, 2012
30
Part-1a Action by Report- Design intension wise Design intention (Operation): A.2 To cool the gas by 2-stage Process water chilled water from 80 to 22 Deg C.
Node:
A.2 Primary Gas cooler To cool the gas by 2-stage Process water chilled water from 80 to 22 Deg C.
Hazop study Number:
A.2
Parameter :
A.2 Temperature N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Project authority Action taken: Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. PD-1055 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (1) NO (NOT OR NONE) SIL/LOP: N.A.
Sop reference:
Provide Nitrogen injection facility for purging at PGC
(2) MORE OF
Ptovide Steam line to lines CLLG-10abc & 18abc
Project authority Action taken:
SIL/LOP:
N.A. Provide drain point for water line in PGC Project authority
(16) MAINTENANCE SIL/LOP: N.A.
Action taken: Provide Air vent at CWRLG01abc Project authority Action taken: A.3 To eliminate tar residue from gas
(19) SAFETY
SIL/LOP:
Node:
A.3 ETP None
Hazop study Number:
A.3
Parameter :
A.3 Voltage N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Project authority Action taken: Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. PD-1055 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (16) MAINTENANCE SIL/LOP: 1
Sop reference:
Provide positive isolation of Gas Equipment to ensure LOTO.
A.3.1 To ensure Oxygen content in the gas ;ess than 0.8% vy vol.
Node:
A.3.1 ETP To ensure Oxygen content in the gas ;ess than 0.8% vy vol.
Hazop study Number:
A.3.1
Parameter :
A.3.1 Oxygen N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. ES.LG1.GY.22-0103 HAZOP GUIDE WORD
Sop reference:
Friday, January 14, 2011 2012
Page 2 of 11 Licensed To : HAMSAGARS
31
Part-1a Action by Report- Design intension wise (2) MORE OF 1. Consider airtight explosion flap or a rupture disk as appropriate that automatically relieves explosion pressure. Project authority Action taken: B.1 To suck the gas from cokeoven battery and supply to byproduct unit for cleaning
SIL/LOP:
Node:
B.1.1 Exhauster None
Hazop study Number:
B.1.1
Parameter :
B.1.1 Output Pressure N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Project authority Action taken: Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. ES.LG1.GY.22-0104 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (1) NO (NOT OR NONE) SIL/LOP: 2
Sop reference:
Provide independent drain valves CLLG25ab, 29ab.
(2) MORE OF
Down straem SOP adherence will keep down stream pressure under control
Production Action taken:
SIL/LOP:
1 Provide CO detector in the Exhauster house Project authority
(19) SAFETY
SIL/LOP:
Action taken: C.1 To cool the Gas before sending to Desulphurizer columns from 45 deg. C to 25 Deg. C
Node:
C.1 Precooling Tower of Desulphurizer To cool the Gas before sending to Desulphurizer columns from 45 deg. C to 25 Deg. C
Hazop study Number:
C.1
Parameter :
C.1 Pressure drop across column N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Project authority Action taken: Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. ES.TL1.GY.22-0104 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (16) MAINTENANCE SIL/LOP: 1
Sop reference:
1. Provide positive isolation system to enable short duration maintenance under LOTO.
D.1 To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas
Node:
D.1 Desulphurization tower To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas
Hazop study Number:
D.1
Parameter :
D.1 Pressure N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. ES.TL1.GY.22-0104 HAZOP GUIDE WORD
Sop reference:
32
Part-1a Action by Report- Design intension wise (1) NO (NOT OR NONE) SIL/LOP: 1 Provide positive isolation system to enable short duration maintenance under LOTO. Project authority Action taken: Provide isolation valves for both towers at outlet lines of water seal outlet VTL-01AB for both towers Project authority Action taken: D.1 To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas Provide Nitrogen inlet point at gas inlet line to both towers Project authority Action taken:
(16) MAINTENANCE SIL/LOP: N.A.
(19) SAFETY
SIL/LOP:
N.A.
Node:
D.1 Desulphurization tower To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas
Hazop study Number:
D.1.1
Parameter :
D.1 Temperature of Solution N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Project authority Action taken: Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. ES.TL1.GY.22-0104 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (2) MORE OF
Sop reference:
Provide Steam flushing at scrub liquor side and water flushing facilities at water side of heat exchanger tubes
SIL/LOP:
1 E.1 To regenerate Sulphur from H2S solution
Node:
E.1 Sulphur production To regenerate Sulphur from H2S solution
Hazop study Number:
E.1
Parameter :
E.1 Air flow N.A. Action by: Name , Designation, Department Project authority Action taken: Action Date
P and I Dwg. No. ES.TL1.GY.22-0104 (2) HAZOP GUIDE WORD (1) NO (NOT OR NONE) SIL/LOP: N.A. As under No-Air flow
Sop reference:
Provide Air flow controller for Tower A also
(3) LESS OF
Project authority Action taken:
SIL/LOP:
N.A. Provide a Exhaust Hood above the Sulphur Foam Tank and release the vapours at suitable height or send to scrubber as appropriate Project authority
(19) SAFETY
SIL/LOP:
Action taken:
33
HAMS-GPS : HAZOP Study for :
Sample-Cokeoven
Part-2a HAZOP Report-Recommendations only
Project/Plant stage at HAZOP : Detailed engineering stage

Hazop study Number: P and I Dwg. No. : N.A. A.0 Node: A.0 A.0
Parameter. :
Sop reference: N.A. Design intention (Operation):

Description of design intention: Existing controls: Units: Control Range: HAZOP GUIDE WORD LIKELY DEVIATION LIKELY CAUSES A.0
Licensed To : HAMSAGARS
Whether Cokeoven Technology procured with HAZOP Study Report?
LIKELY PRESENT RECOMMENDATICONSEQUENCES CONTROLS THEIR ON FOR BETTER LIMITATIONS HAZARD CONTROL Hazards and Pre-detailed Operability issues Engineering required to be HAZOP being done. addressed at technology procurement stage not covered may result in retention of certain Hazaeds and operability issues For future Technology Procurement agreements, may make it mandatory for all Projects to include HAZOP study as part of Technology package.
(1) NO (NOT OR NONE)
Cokeoven technolohy has not been procured with HAZOP study
Technology procurements did not include requirement of HAZOP study
RISK LEVEL: Risk level: MEDIUM DAMAGE and LOW CHANCE Future Project Authorities Action by:
Documentation
SIL/LOP
52
Part-2a HAZOP Report-Recommendations only
Any Any other other observations observations

n
Nil
Nil
Hazop study Number:
A.1
Node:
A.1 Gas from Battery to byproduct A.1 Temperature
P and I Dwg. No. : ES.LG1.GY.22-0103
Parameter. :
Sop reference: N.A. Design intention (Operation):

Description of design intention: Existing controls: Units: Control Range: HAZOP GUIDE WORD
Licensed To : HAMSAGARS A. Separate Gas and Liquid at required Temperature
Separate Gas and Liquid at required Temperature
Temperature Deg C 75-85
Pressure mm WC -120 to -300 LIKELY PRESENT RECOMMENDATICONSEQUENCES CONTROLS THEIR ON FOR BETTER LIMITATIONS HAZARD CONTROL
LIKELY DEVIATION LIKELY CAUSES
53
Part-2b HAZOP Full Report
Any Any other other observations observations

Nil
Nil
Nil
HAZOP team: Name, Designation, Department 1. Dr. Ram S. Hamsagar, Chair person, 2. Mr. Sunil Hamsagar, Softer Simulation Expert, 3. Mr. Amar Bountra, Process, 4. Mr. Sukumar, Process, 5. Mr. Yogendra Babu, Engg, 6. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Engg (Electrical), 7. Mr. Sethu Madhavan, Engg (Aut 8. Mr. L. N. Kumar, Engg (Safety), 9. Mr. Pramod, Engg-Env, 10. Mr. KB Panchal, Safety 11. Ms. Shikha Sirohi, HSE, 12. Mr. Ankur, Proj Planning EPIL, 13. Mr. Eldose, Proj quality, EPIL 14. Mr. Bhaskar, Proj Maint, EPIL 15. Mr. V. Subramanium, EPIL
SIL 4 3 2 1
Generalized View Potential for fatalities in the community Potential for multiple fatalities Potential for major serious injuries or one fatality Potential for minor injuries
143
Part-3 RBI-matrix.
Sample-Cokeoven
Summary of RISK BASED INVESTIGATION (RBI) MATRIX

Chance levels ----------->
TOTAL
%
0.0 0.8 5.4 0.8 93.0
RISK LEVELS
<----------------Damage level
TOTAL
0 0 0 0 556 556
0 5 30 5 0 40
0 0 2 0 0 2 0.3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
0 5 32 5 556 598
93.0 6.7
100.0
TOTAL
%
0.00 0.00 1.17 5.85 92.98 100.00
Applications of RBI-Risk Matrix: Following are the applications of an RBI-Risk matrix 1. As an indicator of the risk level of the installation, 2. To establish risk mitigation measures and evaluate their effects, 3. To compare units and processes on the basis of risk, 4. To develop trends of risk development of a unit over time and during its life cycle.
HIGH MEDIUM HIGH MEDIUM LOW SAFE
0 0 7 35 556 598
Page 1 of 1
144

Date: 11/6/2010 1:00:42 PM
Sample-Cokeoven
Summary of RBI-Matrix (conforming to European Process Safety Center's Standard) for selected HAZOP Studies: Part-4a Overall Risk levels-Design intension wise
Number of Risk (Damage-Consequence) level areas

Num. HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM Guide HIGH Words LOW SAFE

A. Separate Gas and Liquid at required Temperature
21
A.0
22
A.1 Separate Gas and Liquid at required Pressure
23
A.2 To cool the gas by 2-stage Process water chilled water from 80 to 22 Deg C. A.3 To eliminate tar residue from gas
22
22
A.3.1 To ensure Oxygen content in the gas ;ess than 0.8% vy vol.
22
B.1 To suck the gas from cokeoven battery and supply to byproduct unit for cleaning B.1 To suck the gas from cokeoven battery and supply to byproduct unit for cleaning C.1 To cool the Gas before sending to Desulphurizer columns from 45 deg. C to 25 Deg. C D.1 To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas
23
20
22
22
D.1 To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas
22
E.1 To regenerate Sulphur from H2S solution
22
F.1 To recover Ammonia from Coke oven gas
21
F.1.1 To recover Ammonia from Coke oven gas
22
G.1 To distill ammonia from Excess Ammonia Liquor
22
G.1.1 To Distill ammonia from excess ammonia liquer
22
H.1 To cool the Gas to ambient Temp
21
H.1.1 To cool the gas to Ambient Temperature
22
Friday, January 14, 201 2011 2
145
Part-4a Overall Risk levels-Design intension wise

Num. HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM Guide HIGH Words LOW SAFE

I.1 To compress air for different plants
22
J.1 To Separate Tar and ammonia water from gas condensate & Recycle Ammonia Liq. To Battery K.1 To generate Low Pressure Steam from gas Fired Boilers
19
17
K.1.1 To generate low pressure steam from gas fired boilers
22
L.1 To store and Load Tar for Dispatch and Unload Caustic lye and H2SO4 from tankers M.1 To produce coke and by product gas from coal
20
19
N.1 To provide water Pressure in the Firefighting network Min-8 Max-10 Bar O.1 To ensure early detection of any fire in the offices
21
0 TOTAL PERCENT
0 0 .00
0 0 .00
0 7 1.17
0 35
23 556
5.85 92.98
Note:Col.-2 gives No. of guie words (Deviations) used out of a total of 23-possible deviations. Col.-3 to 6 give Risk Levels of applied deviations and Col.-7 gives No. safe i.e. no Risk of deviations. Total of Safe levels divided by total of Risks and Safe levels multiplied by total Safe levels gives % Safety pf the facility.
146
Part-4b Overall Risk levels-Node wise
Sample-Coke Oven
Summary of RBI-Matrix (conforming to European Process Safety Center's Standard) for selected Nodes:

Num. HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW SAFE Guide HIGH Words
Node:
A.1 Gas from Battery to byproduct A.0 A.1 Gas fro Battery to Byproduct A.2 Primary Gas cooler A.3 ETP A.3.1 ETP B.1 Exhauster B.1.1 Exhauster C.1 Precooling Tower of Desulphurizer D.1 Desulphurization tower D.1 Desulphurization tower E.1 Sulphur production F.1 Ammonium Sulphate Plant F.1.1 Ammonium Sulphate Plant G.1 Ammonia Distillation Column G.1.1 Ammonia distillation column H.1 Final Gas cooler H.1.1 Final Gas cooler I.1 Air compressor station J.1 Gas condensation Plant K.1 Boiler K.1.1 Boiler L.1 Chemical Storage Area
2 1 0 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 6 1 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 4 6 6 1 1 3 3
21 22 23 22 22 22 23 20 22 22 22 22 21 22 22 22 21 22 22 19 17 22 20
147
Sample-Coke Oven
Summary of RBI-Matrix (conforming to European Process Safety Center's Standard) for selected Nodes:

Num. HIGH MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW SAFE Guide HIGH Words
Node:
M.1 Coke Oven Battery N.1 Fire fighting water Network O.1 Offices
4 2 0 TOTAL PERCENT
0 0 0 0 .00
0 0 0 0 .00
0 0 0 7 1.17
4 4 2 2 0 0 35
19 21 23 556
5.85 92.98
= = = = = 92.98 5.85 1.17 . .
SAFE : LOW : MEDIUM : MEDIUM HIGH : HIGH :
556 x 100 / 598 35 x 100 / 598 7 x 100 / 598 0 x 100 / 598 0 x 100 / 598
148
Part-4a SIL-LOP requirements-Overall
HAMS-GPS : HAZOP Study for : Sample-Coke Oven

Over all Risk Levels 1/14/2012 5:58:59 PM Risk Levels for HAZOP Count Remarks SIL/LOP Required 2 1 1 0 N.A. Licensed To : HAMSAGARS
Risk level: MEDIUM DAMAGE and MEDIUM CHANCE Risk level: MEDIUM DAMAGE and LOW CHANCE Risk level: MEDIUM HIGH DAMAGE and LOW CHANCE Risk level: LOW DAMAGE and LOW CHANCE Risk level: NO DAMAGE and NO CHANCE SIL 4 3 2 1 Generalized View Potential for fatalities in the community Potential for multiple fatalities Potential for major serious injuries or one fatality Potential for minor injuries
2 29 5 4 29
Medium Critical Medium Low Critical Medium Low Critical Low Critical Safe
Note: Design team to check and ensure the SIL requirements for safety instruementation system and LOP for equipments safety as applicable are avaible. If not the SIL/LOP requirements to be provided.
Page 1 of 1
149
Part-5b SIL-LOP requirements-Category wise

Summary of Category wise 1/14/2012 6:00:38 PM Risk Levels for HAZOP Category Engineering Hazard. Documentation Hazard. Hazard. Quality. Engineering Hazard. Maintenance Operability. SIL 4 3 2 1 Generalized View
Sample-Coke Oven
Count
Remarks
SIL/LOP Required 2 2 1 1 0 0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.
1 1 1 33 2 2 1 10 8 10
Medium Critical Medium Critical Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Low Critical Low Critical Safe Safe Safe Safe
Potential for fatalities in the community Potential for multiple fatalities Potential for major serious injuries or one fatality Potential for minor injuries
Page 1 of 1
150
Part-5c SIL-LOP requirements-Design Intention wise

Risk Levels (Design intention wise) 1/14/2012 6:01:43 PM
Sample-Coke Oven
Risk Levels for HAZOP Design Intention A.1 Separate Gas and Liquid at required Pressure A.2 To cool the gas by 2-stage Process water chilled water from 80 to 22 Deg C. D.1 To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas E.1 To regenerate Sulphur from H2S solution F.1 To recover Ammonia from Coke oven gas F.1.1 To recover Ammonia from Coke oven gas G.1 To distill ammonia from Excess Ammonia Liquor G.1.1 To Distill ammonia from excess ammonia liquer H.1 To cool the Gas to ambient Temp I.1 To compress air for different plants K.1 To generate Low Pressure Steam from gas Fired Boilers K.1.1 To generate low pressure steam from gas fired boilers M.1 To produce coke and by product gas from coal N.1 To provide water Pressure in the Firefighting network Min-8 Max-10 Bar O.1 To ensure early detection of any fire in the offices A.2 To cool the gas by 2-stage Process water chilled water from 80 to 22 Deg C. B.1 To suck the gas from cokeoven battery and supply to byproduct unit for cleaning A. Separate Gas and Liquid at required Temperature A.0 A.3 To eliminate tar residue from gas A.3.1 To ensure Oxygen content in the gas ;ess than 0.8% vy vol. B.1 To suck the gas from cokeoven battery and supply to byproduct unit for cleaning C.1 To cool the Gas before sending to Desulphurizer columns from 45 deg. C to 25 Deg. C D.1 To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas F.1 To recover Ammonia from Coke oven gas Friday, January 14, 2011 2012
Count
Remarks
SIL/LOP Required N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Page 1 of 2
1 3 2 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Medium Critical Medium Critical Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit
151
Part-5c SIL-LOP requirements-Design Intention wise

Risk Levels (Design intention wise) 1/14/2012 6:01:43 PM
Sample-Coke Oven
Risk Levels for HAZOP Design Intention F.1.1 To recover Ammonia from Coke oven gas G.1 To distill ammonia from Excess Ammonia Liquor G.1.1 To Distill ammonia from excess ammonia liquer H.1 To cool the Gas to ambient Temp H.1.1 To cool the gas to Ambient Temperature I.1 To compress air for different plants J.1 To Separate Tar and ammonia water from gas condensate & Recycle Ammonia Liq. To Battery K.1 To generate Low Pressure Steam from gas Fired Boilers K.1.1 To generate low pressure steam from gas fired boilers L.1 To store and Load Tar for Dispatch and Unload Caustic lye and H2SO4 from tankers M.1 To produce coke and by product gas from coal N.1 To provide water Pressure in the Firefighting network Min-8 Max-10 Bar E.1 To regenerate Sulphur from H2S solution K.1 To generate Low Pressure Steam from gas Fired Boilers N.1 To provide water Pressure in the Firefighting network Min-8 Max-10 Bar
Count
Remarks
SIL/LOP Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 2 4 1 1 2 1
Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Medium Low Crit Low Critical Low Critical Low Critical
SIL 4 3 2 1
Generalized View Potential for fatalities in the community Potential for multiple fatalities Potential for major serious injuries or one fatality Potential for minor injuries
Friday, Friday,January January14, 14,2011 201
Page 2 of 2
152

Draft HAZOP Study

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Draft HAZOP Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HAMS-GPS : HAZOP Study for : Sample-Cokeoven

A.0 Whether Cokeoven Technology procured with HAZOP Study Report?

Description of design intention:

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

Design intention (Operation):

A. Separate Gas and Liquid at required Temperature

Description of design intention:

Hazop study Number:

P and I Dwg. No. PD-1055 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (2) MORE OF

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

(17) STATIC CHARGE SIL/LOP: 1

Design intention (Operation):

A.1 Separate Gas and Liquid at required Pressure

Description of design intention:

Hazop study Number:

P and I Dwg. No. PD-1055 HAZOP GUIDE WORD (2) MORE OF

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

As under High Temperature

Friday, January 14, 2012

Description of design intention:

Hazop study Number:

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

Provide Nitrogen injection facility for purging at PGC

Ptovide Steam line to lines CLLG-10abc & 18abc

Project authority Action taken:

(16) MAINTENANCE SIL/LOP: N.A.

Design intention (Operation):

A.3 ETP None

Description of design intention:

Hazop study Number:

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

Provide positive isolation of Gas Equipment to ensure LOTO.

Design intention (Operation):

Description of design intention:

Hazop study Number:

P and I Dwg. No. ES.LG1.GY.22-0103 HAZOP GUIDE WORD

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

Friday, January 14, 2011 2012

Page 2 of 11 Licensed To : HAMSAGARS

Design intention (Operation):

B.1.1 Exhauster None

Description of design intention:

Hazop study Number:

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

Provide independent drain valves CLLG25ab, 29ab.

Production Action taken:

1 Provide CO detector in the Exhauster house Project authority

Design intention (Operation):

Description of design intention:

Hazop study Number:

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

Design intention (Operation):

D.1 To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas

D.1 Desulphurization tower To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas

Description of design intention:

Hazop study Number:

P and I Dwg. No. ES.TL1.GY.22-0104 HAZOP GUIDE WORD

RECOMMENDATION FOR BETTER HAZARD CONTROL

Friday, January 14, 2011 2012

Page 3 of 11 Licensed To : HAMSAGARS

(16) MAINTENANCE SIL/LOP: N.A.

Design intention (Operation):

D.1 Desulphurization tower To remove H2S from Cokeoven gas

Description of design intention: