EVALUATION OF WEAK INFEED TRIPPING TECHNIQUE ON THE ESKOM TRANSMISSION NETWORK
Adam Bartylak*
ABSTRACT
To enable fast operation of the impedance relay in case of lack or insufficient fault current at the supplying substation, a "weak infeed" function has been developed on feeder protection schemes which operate in permissive intertripping mode. Since the introduction of this functionality to modern protection relays, ESKOM has experienced some high-risk incorrect operations, resulting in the overtripping of parallel lines. The investigation identified two areas of possible lack of proper co-ordination. Timing co-ordination due to unforeseen drop off delays of the relays, and impedance co-ordination due to lack of required overlapping of relays' characteristics as a result of different measuring principals, different polarising, sometimes contradictory requirements and some limitations of the relays. Limited benefits of weak infeed functionality as applied on the ESKOM Transmission system are indicated. The risk analysis is then provided with conclusion to either disable weak infeed function or make sure that very careful studies are provided in order to evaluate all possible scenarios that could lead to incorrect operations.
In line with technological and scientific advancements, more and more sophisticated protection relays are reaching the market every year and new features and enhancements are available to protection engineers with the aim of improving the performance of electrical power systems and attracting new customers. An introduction of electronic (static) relays in the early eighties opened an era of continuous improvements in protection algorithms and additional functions. Weak infeed tripping logic is an example of such advancement designed to speed up the operation of protection schemes in situations where there is lack or insufficient current for the relay to operate reliably. This feature is well recognised and used wherever permissive transfer tripping scheme is utilised instead of blocking. On the ESKOM Transmission network, the weak infeed tripping has been implemented but some incorrect operations dangerous to system integrity have occurred over the last few years, which prompted an in-depth investigation.
The Transmission network in South Africa consists of 160 substations interconnected via 27000km of 220 - 765kV lines and is operated by a vertically integrated organisation - ESKOM. The South African Transmission network is exposed to large numbers of primary faults, as indicated in Figure 1.1, that can be classified into four major groups in terms of their cause as shown in Figure 1.2 below.
* Power System Operations Performance Manager, ESKOM Transmission, South Africa 318 - 1
Figure 1.1. Number of Transmission Faults 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 Figure 1.2 Transmission fault reasons Fires 27% Lightning 25% Bird Polution 30% Other 18% Figure 1.3. Histogram of fault resistance 1 10 100 1000 10000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Fault Resistance [primary ohms] N u m b e r
o f
o c c u r r e n c e s Over a quarter of all faults on the ESKOM Transmission network are caused by fires under the lines which often result in very high resistance faults when a flash-over occurs in the mid-span of the line. A very dry winter in most of the country in South Africa results in difficulties in maintaining tower footage resistance within required limits and additional fault resistance at the entry point of the fault arc to ground. A histogram of fault resistances measured over four years on the ESKOM network is shown in Figure 1.3. 16% of all recorded faults have resistance above 10 primary ohms, which is a significant value. The dynamic behaviour of a long arc may also result in substantial changes in arc resistance during the fault. For such faults the impedance measured by the relay changes with time during the fault. As a result, a high enough fault resistance may cause the fault impedance locus not to enter the tripping characteristic of the relay or to leave the characteristic during the fault. Such faults are difficult to detect and isolate properly and pose many challenges to protection equipment. One of such problem, which is relevant to weak infeed tripping, is possibility of impedance locus entering areas of relay characteristics where appropriate impedance co-ordination is not available. This issue will be described in more details later in this paper.
As a result of changes in protection technology over the last few decades a great variety of protection relays are installed on the ESKOM Transmission system from electromechanical, through electronic, digital to highly sophisticated programmable Intelligent Electronic Devices. Feeders are equipped with over twenty different types of impedance relays, each with different options available, different shapes of characteristics, type of polarisation, sequence components used, measuring algorithms, starting quantities etc. As long as both ends of the line are equipped with the same vintage of impedance relay the co-ordination of different functions is fairly straightforward. Problems are becoming more challenging where different types of relays have to be co-ordinated with each other. A composition of different protection technologies applied on ESKOM's network is presented in Figure 1.4. Figure 1.4. Comprosition of protection technologies on the ESKOM Transmission system Electromech. 48% Electronic 32% Digital 17% Programable 3% Since the introduction of electronic relays in the early eighties, ESKOM adopted permissive overreach transfer tripping scheme as most beneficial for local conditions and weak infeed functionality is utilised since then. Another words, over half of ESKOM Transmission feeders are presently set to operate using weak infeed facility. 318 - 2 2 WEAK INFEED TRIPPING BACKGROUND
The weak infeed function is an addition to the distance protection scheme set to operate in permissive tripping mode to improve its performance in situations where there is insufficient fault current to operate the protection relays (low fault current substations or open remote breaker). Figure 2.1 below illustrates such a situation where the source impedance Z sA behind substation A is very high or there is no source behind it. The fault current I fA is therefore very low and may be insufficient to operate the starting elements of the relays.
Fault B A Z sA >> ~ I fB >> Z sB << ~ I fA ~ 0
Figure 2.1. Weak infeed conditions during line fault
In this case the fault will be cleared at the substation B which has sufficient current to operate the protection relays but at the substation A, the current may be lower than that required to operate the protection.
To ensure correct tripping of the circuit breaker at substation A in the above conditions the following logic has been applied:
With insufficient current at the substation A to operate the distance relays for fault in the forward direction the forward looking measuring elements will not pick-up. If there is a genuine fault on the line in forward direction then at strong substation B, the forward elements of the distance relays will operate and initiate transmission of permissive carrier to the substation A. Substation A will receive the permissive carrier with no measuring elements picked up. This could be sufficient information to trip the breaker in permissive underreach scheme where the underreaching zone sends permissive signal. In permissive overreach mode of operation the protection at strong end B will send permissive carrier also for faults beyond substation A as indicated in Figure 2.2. To prevent incorrect tripping at end A in case of reverse faults, additional, reverse looking impedance elements are employed to block unnecessary weak infeed operation in case of reverse faults, in the same way as for blocking inter trip scheme.
During reverse faults there is sufficient fault current at substation A supplied from strong substation B (see Figure 2.2) and reverse, blocking elements will operate reliably.
Fault Z relay A Z sA >> ~ I fA >> I fB >> B Forward elements picked-up Permissive signal Z relay Z sB << ~
Reverse elements picked-up
Figure 2.2. Blocking of weak infeed tripping for reverse faults
Once the weak infeed conditions are detected, the protection trips the breaker, initiates autoreclose cycle and sends permissive signal back to the substation B. This so-called "echo carrier" is necessary to speed up the protection operation at the substation B in case the fault is close to the substation A. 318 - 3
The simplified logic diagram for activation of the weak infeed tripping is shown on Figure 2.3 below.
Reverse looking measuring elements are NOT operated Trip local breaker Initiate ARC Send permissive carrier (Echo) Forward looking measuring elements are NOT operated Permissive carrier is being received Additional security features e.g. undervoltage/overcurrent monitoring, contact racing timers, breaker status monitoring etc. AND
Protection manufacturers often include additional security features such as undervoltage, undercurrent monitoring, contact racing timers, breaker status monitoring etc. to prevent weak infeed function from unnecessary operation. These are indicated by dotted line in Figure 2.3 above.
3 APPLICATION AND BENEFITS OF WEAK INFEED TRIPPING
To evaluate benefits of the weak infeed tripping sequence many local aspects of fault environment, protection philosophies, automatic re-closure (ARC) policies, available relays, teleprotection equipment, installed circuit breakers and application of switch-onto-fault (SOTF) tripping function have to be considered.
Weak infeed tripping may contribute to faster fault clearance in two different scenarios on the power system: During the first occurrence of a fault on the Transmission line when breakers at both ends of the line are closed and one substation does not have sufficient fault current to operate relays; during ARC cycle or manual closing when dead line charging breaker is closed onto a fault and the remote end breaker is opened.
The discussion below evaluates expected benefits of weak infeed tripping as applied on the ESKOM Transmission network in these different scenarios and indicates possible alternative options to ensure fast fault clearance.
3.1 Genuine Weak Infeed Conditions
Substations with fault level too low to operate protection relays are not common on the ESKOM Transmission system since most of the network is well meshed with very few radial connections.
Figure 3.1. Fault Level Histogram 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Fault Level [kA] N u m b e r
o f
b u s b a r s The fault level histogram shown in Figure 3.1 indicates only 4 busbars out of 190 with fault level below 2000A. Weak infeed could be expected practically only at these four substations but even there, with sufficiently low CT ratio (e.g. 600/1A or less), the secondary current required to operate any electronic or digital impedance relay would be available. Some of old electromechanical relays require currents as high as 250mA on the secondary side to ensure reliable operation but on these relays weak infeed functionality is not available. With a current sensitivity setting of 10%, which is common practice in ESKOM, fault currents as low as 60A primary can be detected with a CT ratio of 600/1. Fault resistance, however, can limit the magnitude of fault current significantly even at high fault level substations, which can not be ignored. Figure 3.2 318 - 4 indicates the impact of fault resistance on the magnitude of fault current for a single phase to ground fault on a line terminating at a 2000A fault level substation. Even with very high fault resistance at the end of a 300km long 275kV standard Transmission line, the fault current does not decrease below 400A which is far above the required minimum of 60A. On radial feeds where three phase fault level of the supplied substation may be equal to zero, if contribution of customers' rotating machines is ignored, most of the faults - single phase to ground faults, will still be detected due to zero sequence contribution of remote transformers. In the case of multiphase or three phase faults the lack of fault contribution does not jeopardise the network or equipment as fault will be cleared once strong end breaker opens. The only disadvantage of tripping only one breaker in such situations will be more complicated faultfinding. Figure 3.2. Line fault currents for different fault resistan 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 0 100 200 300 Fault distance [km] F a u l t
c u r r e n t
[ A ] 0 50 100 150 Fault Resistance [ohm]
On the ESKOM Transmission network weak infeed substations that would not be able to deliver fault current of at least 10% of maximum load of the line for most common, single phase to ground faults, practically do not exist.
3.2 Weak Infeed During ARC Cycle or manual closing
Weak infeed tripping can play a role during ARC cycle when one breaker of the opened line is being closed onto the remote fault (beyond zone 1 reach) as indicated on the Figure 3.3 below.
I fA = 0 I fB B Z sB Z sA A Fault Zone 2 Zone 1 ~ ~
Figure 3.3. Fault beyond zone 1 reach during ARC cycle when remote breaker is open.
In such case the fault can not be rapidly cleared at substation B as it is beyond zone 1 reach. Assuming that permissive overreach intertripping scheme is employed, weak infeed logic would result in "echo carrier" transmission from end A to end B speeding up protection operation (ref. Figure 2.3 Simplified weak infeed tripping logic diagram). In such a scenario, a very clear benefit could be obtained from the application of weak infeed logic i.e. instantaneous or slightly delayed fault clearance, as only small co-ordinating timer in range of 50 milliseconds is necessary to accommodate contact racing. Another benefit is better resistive coverage of the protection scheme. The fault beyond zone 1 due to its high resistive nature, as illustrated in Figure 3.4, will still be cleared instantaneously with "echo carrier" transmission. This benefit is particularly important on short lines where resistive coverage of zone 1 is often limited unless independent settings of resistive part of the impedance characteristics are available on the relays (e.g. quadrilateral characteristics). With limited resistive coverage of zone 1 even high current resistive faults, on lines close to power stations, would have to be cleared in zone 2 time. Instantaneous trip in ARC cycle, when the breaker is closed onto a sustained fault is very important also from another perspective. Once the breaker is open after the initial fault clearance, the relay has lost its memory voltages often used to enhance polarisation. For a very close up fault, where secondary voltages are very low, there is also a possibility that the R Figure 3.4. High resistance fault beyond zone 1 characteristic. Z line R f Zone 2 Zone 1 X 318 - 5 relay may not detect the fault in directional zone 1 on closing with no fault resistance. Such situations could have a detrimental impact on the stability margins of the Transmission network as well as stability of auxiliary plant at the power stations which is not acceptable on highly stressed Transmission networks.
For these reasons, however, a "line check" or "switch-on-to-fault" (SOTF) protection function has been developed and is successfully utilised world-wide. The SOTF function provides instantaneous operation of the relay on closing of the breaker by insertion for a short duration either a simple overcurrent relay or a unidirectional fault detector (starter) to enhance the reliability of tripping on closing onto the fault. On many relays this functionality can also be inserted during ARC cycle providing more reliable instantaneous fault clearance than that provided by weak infeed logic, as communication channels are not require for SOTF.
The benefits of weak infeed tripping during ARC cycle are covered by SOTF function if the relay settings allow to insert this function during short ARC dead time. During manual closing SOFT function is always activated.
4 CO-ORDINATION OF WEAK INFEED TRIPPING FUNCTION
Weak infeed tripping function requires quite sophisticated co-ordination to ensure reliable and, more importantly, secure operation in all possible, practical system conditions. Focus of this co-ordination should be on security more than reliability as unnecessary operation of weak infeed function results in the simultaneous loss of two Transmission circuits instead of one, which in many cases may result in cascading tripping leading to a major incident with serious, if not catastrophic, consequences. Failure to operate on the other hand may result only in prolonged fault duration (zone 2 tripping time) for low fault current faults assuming failure of SOFT function, which in most practical cases will not jeopardise equipment, safety or system stability.
There are three aspects of weak infeed co-ordination that have to be taken care of to ensure adequate performance: timing co-ordination; co-ordination of tripping and blocking impedance polygons; co-ordination of undervoltage and undercurrent guards.
4.1 Timing Co-ordination
The most important role of timing co-ordination in weak infeed tripping logic is to prevent possible incorrect tripping for faults on parallel feeder as illustrated on Figure 4.1 below.
Z sA ~ Zone 2 + Carrier Sent Z sB A B 2 1 Blocking Zone + Carrier Receive ~
Fault
Figure 4.1. Possible incorrect tripping due to lack of timer co-ordination.
During fault on feeder 2 as indicated in Figure 4.1 above, at substation B the zone 2 will operate on healthy feeder 1, and send permissive inter trip signal to substation A. At substation A this signal will be received but reverse "looking" blocking elements will prevent any unwanted operation. As soon as the breakers open on faulty feeder to clear the fault, all measuring elements on healthy feeder have to drop off. If the blocking element at substation A drops off faster than zone 2 at substation B then there will be a situation when all the requirements of weak infeed tripping are met resulting in incorrect operation and sympathy trip. The weak infeed tripping has to be therefore delayed by the difference of drop-off times between them. Moreover after the zone 2 at substation B drops off, the transmission of permissive signal will be maintained for a certain time until relevant relays in teleprotection equipment drop off at both ends of the telecommunication channel. Finally the propagation delay of the channel has to be considered plus some safety margin. 318 - 6
The effective time delay that has to be introduced to prevent overtripping is equal to:
T d = (T d/o Zone 2 - T d/o Blocking Zone ) + T Teleprotection + T propagation + T safety margin
Where: T d - required delay setting; T d/o Zone 2 - zone 2 drop delay off at substation B; T d/o Blocking Zone - blocking zone drop off delay at substation A; T Teleprotection - delay of teleprotection equipment at both substations A and B; T propagation - propagation delay; T safety margin - safety margin.
As long as relays at both ends of the line are of the same manufacturers their drop off delays should be comparable and the first part of the equation (T d/o Zone 2 - T d/o Blocking Zone ) becomes negligible. In such cases delay of 50 - 100 milliseconds seems to be sufficient. Where different relays are installed, however, the drop off delays have to be carefully evaluated from records of past performance or tested, as from ESKOM's experience they can be surprisingly long on certain relays. Where high differences are detected, the T d delay has to be increased accordingly reaching possibly 150 - 200 milliseconds. If such delays are necessary, the whole application of weak infeed has to be carefully thought through as reduction of zone 2 timer to 200 milliseconds would give the same result.
The selection of this delay is critical for the security of weak infeed tripping. In cases where the difference in the drop off delays of the relays at substations A and B are substantial, the application of weak infeed may jeopardise security of the entire protection scheme unless long co-ordination delays are selected. Long delays on the other hand make the application of weak infeed function questionable as same results can be achieved by reduction of zone 2 time delay with much lesser risk.
4.2 Co-ordination of Tripping and Blocking Impedance Characteristics
Co-ordination of tripping and blocking characteristics of the relays on the X/R impedance plain is the most critical to avoid incorrect tripping. Many factors have to be considered such as shapes of the characteristics, types and depths of polarisation, algorithms used in digital relays, particularly the dynamic expansion of the resistive part of the characteristic during earthfaults and impact of series compensation of the line. There is usually little explanation in manufacturers' manuals how this co- ordination should be provided with a few guidelines recommending that the reverse blocking zone must overreach the remote end forward zone 2 as indicated in Figure 4.2. This is to ensure effective blocking for every reverse fault (or fault on parallel line) that can be measured by the remote end zone 2. Such co- ordination can easily be achieved for the reactive parts of the characteristics. Where fault resistance reaches significant values, however, the co- ordination can be lost. A very simplified illustration of such a situation on relays with pure mho characteristics is shown in Figure 4.3. In this example, due to significant value of fault resistance R f , the impedance locus falls outside the blocking characteristic of the relay at substation A but inside the forward zone 2 characteristic of the relay at substation B. In this case the weak infeed function will result in "sympathy trip" of the line AB for an external fault. The area of lack of co-ordination has been shaded in Figure 4.3. To ensure that proper co-ordination is maintained for high resistance faults, the blocking characteristic of the relay at end A must cover the entire part of the forward zone 2 at end B that can B A Reverse Blocking Zone Forward Zone 2 Figure 4.2 Simple example of tripping and blocking elements co-ordination. B A Reverse Blocking Zone R f Forward Zone 2 Figure 4.3 Simplified example of possible lack of co- ordination during high resistance fault. 318 - 7 operate for faults beyond substation A. This part of forward zone 2 characteristic is indicated with bold line in Figure 4.3.
In practice, many factors influence shape of the area where co-ordination may be lost. Let's consider the more realistic situation with cross-polarised relays as indicated on Figure 4.4 below. In order to ensure appropriate co-ordination, the polarisation of the blocking characteristic at substation A should be much stronger than that of the tripping characteristics at substation B. Assuming that the same relays are installed at A and B, with the same type and percentage of polarisation for blocking and tripping characteristics, the areas where the co-ordination requirements are not met (shaded on Figure 4.4) are much smaller but they are still there. Such areas are exposing the protection scheme to overtripping.
The co-ordination of tripping and blocking characteristics becomes more complicated where relays with different polarisation methods and/or depths are used. Protection engineers have to examine the whole range of operating conditions for a particular feeder in order to evaluate possible scenarios that could lead to incorrect operations. Factors such as loading of the line (magnitude and direction), possible configurations of the surrounding network and generation patterns that influence source impedances as well as expected fault resistance have to be included in order to predict possible shapes of polarised characteristics. Such calculations are very complicated and require intimate knowledge of relay algorithms and filtering techniques. Relay manufacturers normally do not provide such information in their manuals. B A Reverse Blocking Zone Forward Zone 2 Figure 4.4 Example of lack of co-ordination between cross polarised relays.
Some impedance relays use negative sequence voltages and currents to enhance their operation. Co-ordination of such relays with relays that measure positive sequence only creates another challenge. One of such application was examined on the ESKOM Transmission network and due to different profiles of positive and negative sequences along the network for a variety of faults and system configurations, co-ordination was not possible.
Quadrilateral characteristics with well-defined borders of resistive reach are much easier to check for co-ordination of weak infeed functionality. Reverse Blocking Zone A B Forward Zone 2 Figure 4.5. Simple example of proper co-ordination of quadrilateral characteristics.
Figure 4.5 illustrates a simple example of required co-ordination where the entire forward zone 2 polygon of the relay at substation B that can operate for faults beyond substation A is covered with sufficient safety margin by the reverse blocking zone of the relay at substation A.
Such co-ordination is possible, however, only on relays that are equipped with independent resistive reach settings for blocking and tripping characteristics, which is not always available.
The real characteristics are often carved to avoid load encroachment, which introduces another complication and may expose certain areas on the X/R impedance plain for maloperations. One such example is shown in Figure 4.6, where characteristics of the relays installed at both ends of the line are plotted together to highlight required overlapping areas.
Relay characteristics at end A of the line are indicated by continuous line and characteristics of the relay installed at end B are rotated 180 deg. and indicated by dotted line. On this particular application, digital relays are installed which use the reverse reach of fault detector (FDR) characteristics for blocking in the weak infeed logic. 318 - 8
Only zone 2 and fault detector characteristics are plotted to make the picture more readable. The following abbreviations were used: FD A - Forward reach of fault detector at end A; FDR A - Reverse reach of fault detector at end A; FD B - Forward reach of fault detector at end B; FDR B - Reverse reach of fault detector at end B; Z2 A - Zone 2 at end A; Z2 B - Zone 2 at end B;
The four shaded squares indicate areas where co- ordination has not been achieved.
The above picture, although complex and difficult to read, is still a simplification of real values of impedances that the relays measure during faults, particularly high resistance faults, when load plays significant role. For precise evaluation, the impedances measured at end A and B should be plotted on separate X/R planes. The Figure 4.6 is just for illustration of required overlapping in no load condition on "homogenous" system.
During this incident, a healthy line tripped for a high resistance fault on a parallel line in heavy loaded corridor of the network, almost resulting in system islanding. Investigation based on plots of measured impedances recorded during the incident together with relay characteristics on the X/R plain revealed areas of lack of co-ordination between blocking and tripping characteristics on this line as approximately illustrated in Figure 4.6. During the investigation separate impedance plots were done for end A and end B. Max load B Z2 B FD B FDR B Max load A Z2 A FD A 20 40 60 80 100 -60 -40 0 20 40 60 -20 -40 -60 FDR A -20 X [sec ohms] R B A Figure 4.6. Example of incorrect co-ordination areas identified on ESKOM 400kV network. - Relay characteristics at end A of the line - Relay characteristics at end B of the line - Incorrect co-ordination areas - Movement of impedance locus during incident
In this particular application two adjustments to the relay settings could be considered in order to avoid incorrect tripping: increase the resistive reach of fault detectors at both ends of the line to +/- 36 ohms to maintain required 20% safety margins of overlapping, which would result in possible load encroachment or reduce resistive reach of zone 2 at both ends of the line to +/- 15 ohms, which would result in poor resistive coverage of the relay.
Figure 4.7. Illustration of increased reactive reach of zone 2 d
ue to series compensation. A B Reverse Blocking Zone Forward Zone 2 A B Reverse Blocking Zone Forward Zone 2 Both solutions or any compromise between the two would result in increased risk to reliability and/or security of the protection scheme, considering ESKOM fault environment and possibility of short time line overloading as a result of disturbance development.
On series compensated lines, care has to be taken to ensure that proper overlapping by the blocking zone is provided in the worst case scenario when the series capacitor does not by-pass. In such cases, which are common for faults in reverse direction, the reactive reach of forward zone 2 is much higher due to compensation of the capacitor as illustrated on Figure 4.7.
This situation can become much more complicated for adequate analysis where series capacitors are protected by MOV without spark-gap and bypass breaker. The MOV during fault conditions will introduce nonlinearity to this circuit, which may impact shapes of relay characteristics. 318 - 9
In summary, to ensure acceptable security of weak infeed tripping function co-ordination has to be achieved on the entire X/R plain with sufficient security margins of 20%. Proper co-ordination on the reactive axis alone is sufficient for low resistance faults. High resistance faults move fault impedance locus away from line characteristics into the insecure areas.
Over the past ten years ESKOM has experienced six incorrect operations of the weak infeed function due to lack of proper co-ordination, all with potentially series consequences. Four of them were due to incorrect co- ordination of relays using different sequence components for their impedance measurements (positive and negative). One was as a result of long drop off delay of measuring elements. In one case "blind spots" on relays using quadrilateral characteristics, as described in this chapter, caused sympathy trip.
4.3 Effectiveness of undervoltage and undercurrent guards
Monitoring of voltage and currents as supervising quantities can provide additional security in weak infeed tripping algorithms and most manufacturers of protection relays include such supervision. To evaluate effectiveness of undervoltage and undercurrent guards again two situations should be considered: Fault on the Transmission feeder where one substation is not able to deliver sufficient fault current - genuine weak infeed, and weak infeed as a result of closing the feeder onto the fault during ARC cycle or manual closing During the low resistance fault on the line on which one end is a weak infeed end the voltage and current distribution is highlighted in Figure 4.8. The following observations can be made: At strong substation B, where source impedance is low (Zs B <<), voltage during the fault on the line remains significant (Vf B >0) unless fault is very close to the busbars B, and the fault current is high (If B >>). At the weak substation A, where source impedance is high (Zs A >>), the fault current is very low and assumed to be insufficient to operate protection relays (If A ~0). Voltage during the fault on the line is close to zero (Vf A ~0). If A ~0 If B >> B ~ Vf B >0 Rf~0 Vf A ~0 Zs B << ~ Zs A >> A Figure 4.8. Current and voltage distribution during low resistance fault
The weak infeed conditions at substation A can be easily detected by monitoring of the level of voltage and/or current. Undervoltage and undercurrent supervision therefore is a very effective method to differentiate between strong and weak conditions to improve security of the weak infeed function. Setting level of 10-15% would be appropriate for both undervoltage and undercurrent relays.
For high resistance faults, however, the situation becomes more complicated as voltages and currents may not drop significantly enough for reliable detection of a weak infeed condition. The distribution of voltages and currents for high resistance faults is illustrated in Figure 4.9 with the following observations:
At strong substation B similar conditions exist as for a low resistance fault with lower level of current and higher level of voltage. At substation A, the current level may reach significant values (If A +I L >0), up to 1p.u., due to load still being transferred through the high resistance fault. Similarly the voltage will not be insignificant anymore (Vf A >0) and theoretically, with increasing fault resistance, may reach any value between 0 and 1p.u. If A +I L >0 If B > B ~ Zs A >> A Zs B << ~ Vf>0 Vf B >>0 Rf>> Vf A >0 Figure 4.9. Current and voltage distribution during high resistance fault
With settings of supervising undervoltage and undercurrent relays in range of 10-15% the weak infeed function would not be activated. With settings higher than that, in the range of 50-60%, the supervision would be ineffective in preventing incorrect operations in case of incorrect co-ordination of impedance characteristics. 318 - 10
During ARC cycle when the breaker at substation B (Figure 4.10) closes onto a fault while the breaker at substation A is still open (dead line charging), the substation A becomes a weak infeed end due to open breaker. In this case undercurrent supervision would enable weak infeed tripping but undervoltage relay could measure any value between 0 and 1p.u. depending on fault resistance. ~ If A =0 If B > B Zs B Zs A ~ Vf B >>0 Vf A >0 Rf>> Vf>0 A
The undercurrent and undervoltage supervision with low settings could provide desired security against incorrect operations for high resistance faults. Very complicated studies would have to be provided, however, to evaluate areas of possible lack of co-ordination and to calculate values of corresponding voltages and currents for which weak infeed should not be activated. Values of such currents depend on actual system configuration and generation patterns that can be predicted only with limited confidence level. During the development of a disturbance the network may be severed beyond N-2 condition which is very difficult to study due to multiple possible scenarios. Figure 4.10. Current and voltage distribution during high resistance fault and open breaker at substation A
The undervoltage supervision with low setting would disable weak infeed operation in ARC cycle for high resistance faults where most of the benefits could be expected.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The weak infeed function was developed to improve sensitivity of protection relays at the substations where the fault current could be insufficient to reliably operate protection relays. Some of the older electromechanical relays require as much as 250mA secondary current for operation. With the introduction of more sensitive electronic and digital relays and growth of ESKOM Transmission network the necessity for weak infeed tripping diminished to a degree that the benefits of this functionality are very limited. Possible faster fault clearance for end zone faults during the ARC cycle when one breaker of the line is open are reliably covered by the use of SOTF function in the ARC cycle.
At the same time increasing load of Transmission network moved focus of protection co-ordination towards improved security of protection schemes. Sympathy trips can result in cascading tripping of parallel connections leading to major disturbances. Over the past few years, lack of appropriate co-ordination of weak infeed function was a major contributor to overtripping of Transmission feeders in ESKOM. Very complex protection co-ordination analysis, as indicated in this paper, is required to ensure acceptable security level of weak infeed tripping. In many cases required data is not available for adequate studies and in some cases relays' limitations do not allow for appropriate co-ordination. High resistance faults are major contributors to incorrect operations and Transmission system in ESKOM is exposed to high percentage of such faults. Small deterioration of drop off delays of the impedance relays may also result in a lack of weak infeed tripping co-ordination and overtripping.
The high level of potential insecurity and very limited benefits of application of weak infeed tripping led ESKOM to a decision to use this functionality only on selected and very carefully studied applications where benefits are apparent and justifiable and uncertainties can be quantified and minimised.
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
For secure operation of weak infeed facility overlapping of the zone 2 characteristic has to be provided by reverse blocking zone on the entire X/R plain and for all possible system configurations that influence shapes of the dynamic characteristics of the relays. Co-ordination of the reactive components alone is insufficient to avoid overtripping during high resistance faults. On relays where resistive reach of blocking zone can not be set independently from tripping zones used in weak infeed logic, very careful studies have to be conducted to ensure acceptable security via undervoltage and undercurrent guards. 318 - 11 Weak infeed should not be used on relays that are not compatible in terms of measuring principals unless performance of such relays is well known and co-ordination well studied. In some cases it may not be possible to co-ordinate positive sequence measuring relays with relays that are equipped with zero and/or negative sequence directional overcurrent measuring elements. To ensure proper time co-ordination of weak infeed function, the drop off time of impedance relays at both ends of the line should be known, either from tripping records or tests, for adequate time delay settings. Wherever deterioration of drop off time is detected, the co-ordination time setting should be increased or weak infeed function disabled. Undercurrent and undervoltage guards provide only limited security improvements during high resistance faults. In well-interconnected areas of Transmission networks where genuine weak infeed does not occur, benefits of weak infeed tripping / echo carrier transmission are very limited once switch-onto-fault function is inserted during ARC dead time.
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] M. J. Mackey "Optimisation of Protection Performance during System Disturbances" - CIGRE WG B5.09 Final Report [3] IEEE Special Publication, Application of Fault and Disturbance Recording Devices for Protective System Analysis, IEEE Publication No. 87TH-0195-8 PWR, Operations Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1987. [2] Adam Bartylak Application of Disturbance Recorders as near real time information support for National Control in ESKOM - IEE Conference Developments in Power System Protection, (Amsterdam, April 2001). [4] Protective Relays Application Guide, GEC Alsthom, Stafford 1990.
Digital Filmmaking: The Ultimate Guide to Web Video Production for Beginners and Non-Professionals, Learn Useful Tips and Advice on How You Can Create, Film and Edit Your Videos