Central Information Commission, II,Floor,August Kranti bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place New Delhi- 110 067.

Madam/Sir, Re: Second Appeal under under Sec 19(3)of the Right to Information Act-2005 Name and address of the appellant: (Tel.01452644106) ShriGopal Soni, (revribhav@gmail.com) C231,PanchSheel Nagar,Ajmer-305 004.

Name and address of the CPIO: Pranab Kumar Sahu,,Chief MANAGER & CPIO, New India Assurance Co. Ltd,{NIACL},87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001. E-mail: <pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in> Name and address of the Central Public Authority against the order of whom the appeal is preferred: Renjit Gangadharan,Dy General Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd,{NIACL},87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001. E-mail not working.Fax:022-22700470 Particulars of the order against which the appeal is preferred: HO Appeal No. 241/2013 dated 11.12.2013

( annexure A4 )

Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per clause in Sec 19(8)* of the RTI Act to the detriment suffered because of prolonged denial of information Brief facts leading to the appeal: The appellant ,an honest citizen of India sought information under RTI dated 16.08.2013 ( A1) pertaining to bribe taking ,vigilance machinery ,confidential report on behalf of NIACL and protection of whisle blowers. The NIACL CPIO submitted a rhetorically drafted reply completely denying all the desired information .The appellant, vide appeal dt.11.11.2013 requested disclosure of information to FAA . However, the said Renjeet Gangadharn who abused needless public money by air travel to CIC on 20th May 2013 instead of attending prescribed mode video conference from Mumbai tried to justify the reply of CPIO Prayer or Relief sought: 1. The information pertains to Right to Life of the applicant as well as to wider public interests the full disclosure of which deserve immediately. 2. That obstruction to information be viewed seriously and responsible official be penalized under Section 20 (10) of the Act. Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per clause in Sec 19(8)* of the RTI Act related to the detriment suffered since long denial of information. Grounds for the Prayer or Relief: 1.The RTI officials of who have history of abusing public money preferring air travel to CIC deny information based on fallacy. 2. There is no attempt to ensure objective disclosure of information either by CIPO or FAA 3. Following pledge is violated by both the CPIO and FAA WE, THE PUBLIC
SERVANTS OF INDIA, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY PLEDGE THAT WE SHALL CONTINUOUSLY STRIVE TO BRING ABOUT INTEGRITY AND TRANSPARENCY without fear or favour.

Whether 2 sets of appeal attached:Yes Whether self -attested all documents:Yes Page numbering (bottom to top): A1: Application under RTI act with annexures.dt..16.08.13 (misprinted by CPIO as 16.09) A2: Reply of CPIO dt.23.10.2013 A3. First Appeal dt.11.11.13. A4. Order of FAA dt. 11.12.13 (extract). A5. Rule of law-confidential report cannot be denied A6 -7. E mail copy of a set sent to CPIO and 1st appellate authority . . I verify that the facts mentioned above are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief,the matters under appeal have not previously been filed,or pending with any court or tribunal or with any other authority. Yours Sincerely, (ShriGopal Soni),Appellant, Ajmer (Rajasthan). Dt. 7-February-2014 P.S. The appellant requests video conference hearing .

A 6-7
Email: to <pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in> Pranab Kumar Sahu,,Chief MANAGER & CPIO, New India Assurance Co Ltd, ( NIACL),87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001 Madam/Sir, Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005 With reference to My application under the R.T.I.Act 16.08.2013 reply by you CPI/Ho/2013-14/255 suppressing the information the applicant herewith files second appeal* against denial of information by you as the CPIO and against the decision of appellate authority under Appeal No.241/2013 .Kindly be informed as above. Shri Gopal Soni,C231,Panch Sheel Nagar,Ajmer -305004. (appellant) Enclosed: as above * Dt.7-02-2014 RTI 16.08.13:Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005 rev ribhav2 <revribhav2@gmail.com> Sat, Feb 8, 2014 To: renjit.gangadharan@newindia.co.in, "pranabkumar.sahu" <pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in>, "rti.ho" <rti.ho@newindia.co.in> Email: to renjit.gangadharan@newindia.co.in Renjit Gangadharan,Dy General Manager, New India Assurance Co Ltd, ( NIACL), 87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001 Dear Sir, Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005 With reference to RTI application dt.16.08.2013 Appeal to you dt.11.11.2013 the applicant herewith files second appeal* against denial of information by the CPIO and your mechanical reply,as appellate authority under Appeal No.241/2013 . Kindly be informed. Shri Gopal Soni,C231,Panch Sheel Nagar,Ajmer -305004. (appellant) Enclosed: as above * Dt. 7-02-2014

A5
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7631 OF 2002 Dev Dutt .. Appellant -vsUnion of India & Ors. .. Respondents JUDGMENT (relevant Quote )19. In our opinion, every entry in the A.C.R. of a public servant must be communicated to him within a reasonable period. 45. In our opinion, non-communication of entries in the Annual Confidential Report of a public servant, whether he is in civil, judicial, police or any other service (other than the military), certainly has civil consequences...

First Appellate Authority New India Assurance Co. Ltd,(NIACL) 87,M.G. Road, Fort,Mumbai-400001

11 November 2013

Re: Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005 application dated 16 August 2013* CPIO reply *CPI Cell/HO 2013-14/255 The CPIO,P.K. Sahu vide reply* dated 23.10.2013 denied all information pertaining to systematic abuse of authority including that of appointment of public servants,e.g. Chief Vigilance Officer, to cover up the deliberate acts of public servants causing gross financial loss of public money ,i.e. embezzlement in collusion & denial of Fundamental Right(s) without reading any content of RTI, hence the appeal in public interests for full disclosure of pointwise information. e.g. (point no.6) A list of insurance company executives who enjoyed air travel on 15.07.2013 while the mandate/ notice of CIC was to attend video conference .
S. No. Appeal/decision ref. Name of Insurance executive J.K. Lakhaniya A.L. Madan, Vinay Batra, S. K. Dash Rs. 80,000 on account of tour Enjoyed Tour /Air travel from Wastage of public money Yes from Indore /Bhopal Yes from Chandigarh Yes from Mumbai Yes from Mumbai

1.CIC/DS/A/2012/002690 2.CIC/DS/A/2012/002364 3.CIC/DS/A/2012/002272 4. CIC/DS/A/2012/002457 Estimated loss of public money

Appellant: Shri Gopal Soni, C231, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer-305004 *scanned copy enclosed.

tel.01452644106

CC: E-mail: Ministry of Finance,Deptt of Financial Services,Jeevan Deep,II Floor, Sansad Marg,New Delhi-110001. ( Ministry ref. 25/33/2013 Vig dated 16.09.2013).

Ministry ofFinance,(vigilance) Department of Financial Services III Floor,Jeevan Vihar, Parliament Street, New Delhi 110001 Re: application under the RTI Act: 2005

16'* August 2013

1 Appointment order issued to following chief vigilance officers (CVO) of New India Assurance Co. Ltd (NIACL) by the Ministry: (a) Mrs. Gopa Re (b) Mr. P. Nayak 2 (a) Name o f the act and (b) Rule(s)/regulations of vigilance that are being enforced by CVO of NIACL 3. Since 2008, Information as per record o f the CVO of NIACL in respect o f (a)Pending (b) disposed of (c) dismissed (d) action taken,if any in respect o f complaints of applicant forwarded by CVC/CBI/Govt.** 4. Information o f the specific Act including section/sub-section that empowers an authority of NIACL not to recommend suspension o f an employee accused o f bribe taking 5. (a) Information of the specific month and date since when whisle blowers are granted protection in the NIACL (b) Total yearwise Number of employees/ex-employees given protection as whisle blower(s) in the NIACL since 2008 (c) Information o f specific protection,rights and privileges accorded to whisle blowers in the NIACL 5. As on date,Total Number of employees o f NIACL charge sheeted under the prevention o f corruption neither placed under suspension nor recommendedfor suspension 6. Information o f the (a)act and the (b) rules on the basis o f which the officials/public servant o f NIACL participate in person at Central Information Commission hearings at Delhi, spending public money while the mandate is *** only to attend video conference. 7. Copies o f confidential reports in respect of the applicant for the year 1988 to date on the designation o f Hindi Translator as per record available in the NIACL (b) information o f the year from which upto which the record is destroyed
11

Yours Sincerely, (ShriGopal Soni) C231,PanchSheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004

revribhav@gmail.com Tel.0145-2644106 enclosed:IPO No. 399485

** One of the forwardings by central vigilance commission is enclosed. ***Notice for hearing dated June 14,2013 is enclosed in annexure.

Annexure to RTI 16.08.13 ShriGopal Soni

Central Information Commission Room No. - 307, 2'"' Floor, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi110066. Phone Nos. : 011-2610 502 /.

File No. : CIC/DS/A/2012/002304

Date : June 14, 2013

Notice for Hearing through Video Conferencing

: New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Jaipur / Mumbai. Dtd.:30/08/2012. Appeal N0.-I29/2OI2, Dtd.:05/10/2012.

Appellant

Shri Gopal Soni, Ajmer (Rajasthan). 08/08/2012. 05/09/2012.

Respondent/s

Date of RTI Date of l" Appeal

CPIO's Reply FAAO :

6. Ihe Appellant and the Respondents are also requested to intimate their telephone mobile numbers and E-Mail address to the undersigned.
Venue for the A ppe llant C onferenc ing Studio, Floor, Opp. S.D.O. Office, CoUcctorate; Ajnier-305001 - Mr. Officer j (Rajas than) (Contact I Ankur Goyal (Scientisl-C & DIO) & ! Contact No.: 0145-2627469). Ground N.l.C. Video Venue for the Res ponde nt/s National Infor matics Centre, Video C onferenc ing Studio, ll'' Floor, Ne w A dministrative Building, Oppos ite Mantralaya, M um ba i (M ahar as htra) Contact Otficer - IVlr. Hussain Ali fSior Technical Director) &

Contact Nos. 22837339).

(T. K. Mobapatra) cretary & Dy. Registrar

Central Public Information Officer under RTI Chief Manager, fhe New India Assurance Company Liu., Head Office : New India Assurance Building, 87, M. G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001 (Maharashtra).

First Appellate Authority under RTI, Deputy General Manager, The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Head Office : New India Assurance Building, 87, M. G. Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001 (Maharashtra).

Shri GopaLSoni fEjTeinpIoyee), C-231, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer-305004 (Rajasthan).

Page 1 o f 1

Preview A cknowledgment

Confid ent ial

-V 0.

TTf-orrw

CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION

Telegraphic Address: SATARKTA:N ew Delhi, Email:cenvigil@nic,in, Website: www.cvc.nic.in, EPABX:24651001-07, FAX: 24646286

Satarkata Bhavan, GPO Complex, Block A, INA, New Delhi-110023

Complaint N umbe r: 6910/2013A/igilance 3 Date:12/04/2013

To,
Shri Gopal Soni

Shri Gopal Soni C231 .Panchsheel Nagar, AjmBr-305004, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India,

'ss, ,

Subject : Complaint Against:OFFICIALS Organization Against;NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. Dear Sir/Madam, Please refer to your letter on the aforementioned subject.Your complaint has been duly examined by the Commission and having regards to the nature of the issues raised thereinjthe same has been fonwarded to CVO,NIACL for necessary action.As such while no further report is required to be sent to the Commission.The authorities concerned are required to look into the matter and take action as deemed fit.
Yours faithfully : VIG-3, Section Officer *This is system generated, no signature required

Print

A n n e x u r e to RTI 1 6 .0 8 .1 3 : ( p o i nt n o.6 ) A list o f i n su r a n c e company e x e c u t i v e s who e n j o y e d air t ra v el o n 1 5 .0 7 .2 0 1 3 whi l e the n o ti c e o f CIC was to attend v i d e o conference o nly . S. No. Ap p e a l / d e c i si o n ref. Name o f I n su r a n c e e x e c u t i v e J.K. La k ha niya A.L. Madan, Vina y Ba tra , S. K. Da sh Rs. 8 0 , 0 0 0 on account o f tour Rs. 2 0 , 0 0 0 loss o f pu bli c r e so u r c e s (The company pa i d p r o v i d e n t fu n d etc. t o sa id pu blic se r v a n t s) Tota l loss o f Pu blic money Pu blic s e r v a n t who fo l l o we d the mandate o f CIC Rs. O n e lakh fr o m Ja i pu r M.L. C h u l e t , P r e s e n t through v i d e o conference No Enj oy ed Tour/Air tra v el fr o m Wastage o f pu blic money Yes fr o m I n d o r e / B h o p a l Yes fr o m C h a n d i g a r h Yes fr o m Mumbai Yes fr o m Mumbai

l . C I C / D S / A/ 2 0 1 2 / 0 0 2 6 9 0 2 . C I C / D S / A/ 2 0 1 2 /0 0 2 3 6 4 3 . C I C / D S / A/ 2 0 1 2 /0 0 2 2 7 2 4. C I C / D S / A/ 2 0 1 2 /0 0 2 4 5 7 E st i m a t e d loss o f pu blic money