Stormwater Management Report-2

PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE CAMPUS TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, NEW YORK
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
Prepared for: PACE UNIVERSITY Mount Pleasant, New York
Prepared By: DIVNEY TUNG SCHWALBE, LLP One North Broadway, Suite 1407 White Plains, New York 10601
December 2011
PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE CAMPUS MOUNT PLEASANT, NEW YORK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................I-1
II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................II-1 A. Site Location ............................................................................................................II-1 B. Purpose and Objective ..............................................................................................II-1 C. Site Characteristics and Drainage Summary ..............................................................II-1 1. Site Characteristics ............................................................................................II-1 2. Existing Conditions ...........................................................................................II-2 3. Proposed Conditions .........................................................................................II-7 III. STORMWATER QUANTITY .......................................................................................III-1 A. Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................III-1 B. Developed Conditions ..............................................................................................III-1 C. Proposed Stormwater Management ..........................................................................III-1 D. Runoff Reduction.....................................................................................................III-3 E. Flood Zones .............................................................................................................III-7 IV. STORMWATER QUALITY ..........................................................................................IV-1 A. Stormwater Quality Analysis ....................................................................................IV-1 1. Existing Conditions ...........................................................................................IV-1 2. Post-Development Conditions Without Treatment ...........................................IV-1 3. Post-Development Conditions With Treatment ................................................IV-1 B. Stormwater Quality Management Measures .............................................................IV-1 1. Wet Extended Detention Pond ..........................................................................IV-6 2. Rain Garden / Bioretention Filters ....................................................................IV-8 3. Porous Pavement...............................................................................................IV-8 4. Open Channels ..................................................................................................IV-8 5. Catch Basin Sumps ............................................................................................IV-8 6. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ..............................................................IV-9
PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE CAMPUS MOUNT PLEASANT, NEW YORK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
V.
TECHNICAL APPENDIX .....................................................................................V-1 A. Methodology .....................................................................................................V-1 1. Zero Increase in Watershed Peak Runoff ..................................................V-1 2. Storm Frequencies......................................................................................V-1 3. Technical Approach ....................................................................................V-1 4. Soil Classifications ......................................................................................V-2 5. Detention Requirements ............................................................................V-2 6. Rainfall Intensity ........................................................................................V-2 B. Calculations .......................................................................................................V-3 1. Curve Numbers ..........................................................................................V-3 2. Times of Concentration and Travel Times ..................................................V-3 3. Pipe Sizing .................................................................................................V-3 4. Channel Protection Volume .......................................................................V-4 5. Water Quality Volume ...............................................................................V-4 C. Pond Pack Modeling 1. Existing Conditions ....................................................................................V-C-1 2. Proposed Conditions ..................................................................................V-C-2
PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE CAMPUS MOUNT PLEASANT, NEW YORK STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT LIST OF TABLES
TABLE No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PAGE NO. Existing Drainage Conditions............................................................................... II-5 Proposed Drainage Conditions............................................................................. II-10 Design Flow Summary ......................................................................................... III-2 DEC List of Approved Stormwater Measures Green Infrastructure................... III-4 DEC List of Approved Stormwater Measures Standards Management Practices IV-2 Water Quality Volume and Runoff Reduction Volume Calculations ................... IV-7 Existing Conditions Curve Number Calculations ................................................. V-5 Proposed Conditions Curve Number Calculations ............................................... V-6 Existing Time of Concentration ........................................................................... V-7 Proposed Time of Concentration ......................................................................... V-8
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE No. 1 2 3 4
PAGE NO. Overall Site Plan ................................................................................................... I-3 Existing Soils Map ................................................................................................ II-3 Existing Drainage Conditions............................................................................... II-4 Developed Drainage Conditions........................................................................... II-9
I.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In support of the Pace University Master Plan Update, this Stormwater Management Report evaluates potential changes in stormwater runoff quantity and quality and the measures proposed to improve the stormwater conditions on the project site in connection with the redevelopment of the Pleasantville Campus of Pace University.
The approximate 202-acre project site is located in the Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, New York. Figure No. 1, Master Plan Update presented on the following page depicts the full build-out project, including all future phases of development. Under the Master Plan Update it is proposed to construct nine (9) new buildings and either relocate, renovate or put additions onto six (6) existing structures. Work consists of the construction of six (6) new Residence Halls, Field House, Theater, and Welcome Center. Also included is the expansion of the existing student union, renovations to Martin and North Halls, and relocation of the existing Environmental Center. The Master Plan Update also includes the demolition of 15 existing building. There will be new roadways and parking lots associated with the new buildings. The plan will increase the impervious surfaces within the site by approximately 3.5 acres from approximately 34.2 acres to 37.7 acres. This increase in impervious area is expected to cause an associated increase in stormwater peak flow rates and an increase in nutrient and contaminant loads discharging to surface waters. However, the Proposed Action also includes plans for the implementation of both structural and non-structural best management practices to mitigate the potential impacts from development.
Present development of the site provides minimal water quality treatment and detention of surface water runoff (from either buildings, roads, or parking lots) prior to conveyance of the runoff to the unnamed stream along the Taconic State Parkway.
Under the Proposed Action, the projects stormwater quality management objective is to meet or exceed the requirements set forth in the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for
I-1
Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity (Permit No. GP-0-10-001) regarding post-development stormwater quantity and stormwater quality.
As such, a combination of Stormwater Management Practices (SMPs) are proposed herein, including the expansion of an existing stormwater basin and pond, the installation of new bio-retention basins, and the construction of new pervious pavement areas to detain and treat the sites stormwater runoff. The SMPs are designed to treat the runoff from new buildings and parking lots from 90% of expected rain events, as defined by the 2010 New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual. The SMPs will also provide detention for storm events up to and including the 100-year storm.
I-2
II. BACKGROUND
A. SITE LOCATION
The approximate 202-acre project site is located in the Town of Mount Pleasant, Westchester County, New York. The site is located to the east of the Taconic State Parkway, to the north of New York State Route 117 (Bedford Road), to the west of Choate Lane, and to the south of Pleasantville Road. Briarcliff High School is located to the northwest of the campus.
B. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this report is to evaluate the stormwater management requirements of the proposed site plan. The report quantifies stormwater runoff on the site for both existing and post-development conditions.
The projects stormwater quality management objective is to improve the quality of stormwater runoff from the on-site redevelopment areas as well as to manage the stormwater quantity and quality of runoff in the areas of new construction, all in accordance with the requirements set forth in the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity (Permit No. GP-0-10-001).
C. SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND DRAINAGE SUMMARY
1.
Site Characteristics
The project area is generally limited to the existing campus development area. The developed area consists of buildings, driveways, parking lots, and lawn areas. Outside of the developed portions of the campus, the site is mostly wooded. The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service has classified soil types as shown
II - 1
on Figure No. 2, Existing Soils Map.
2.
Existing Conditions
The existing conditions of the campus are shown on Figure No. 3, Existing Drainage Conditions along with the existing drainage patterns. Development of the campus is generally comprised of residence halls, academic buildings, a library, athletic fields, sports and recreation facilities, utility infrastructure systems and appurtenances, and associated parking facilities. The subject site contains sloping land that drops from a high point elevation of approximately 580 feet (above average sea level) in the east central quadrant of the site to an elevation of approximately 240 feet along the stream leaving the western edge of the site in the area adjacent to the Taconic State Parkway (Taconic) northbound lanes. Though approximately 70 acres of the site drains through Choate Pond, located in the center of the campus development, it too discharges to the stream system located along the Taconic. In total, runoff from approximately 150 acres of the developed site discharges ultimately to the Pocantico River via the existing stream system adjacent to the Taconic. Further, this 150-acre portion of the site contains the majority of development on the site. The remaining approximate 52 acres of the site is, with a minor exception, undeveloped and drains toward Choate Lane, Pleasantville Road, and Briarcliff High School and ultimately tributary to the Saw Mill River. The site contains USACOE, NYSDEC, and locally regulated wetlands. Presented below is a more detailed description of the individual watershed areas which comprise the project site.
The project area has been divided into eight (8) watershed sub-basins for evaluation within this report. The drainage characteristics of each of the existing sub-basins are shown on Table No. 1, Existing Drainage Conditions, and described below.
II - 2
TABLE NO. 1
PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE, NEW YORK
EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID
AREA (AC) IMPERVIOUS Roof Pavement

IMP. TOTAL
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
PERVIOUS
TOTAL AREA
I
(%)
Rv
CN
Ia
Tc (HRS)
DESIGN POINT #
A B C D E F G H
2.63 3.00 0.00 0.12 0.60 0.02 0.63 0.00
6.14 10.88 1.30 1.88 1.95 2.31 2.27 0.46
8.77 13.88 1.30 2.00 2.55 2.33 2.90 0.46
41.71 40.51 14.22 5.98 0.78 2.09 2.05 2.35
50.48 54.39 15.52 7.98 3.33 4.42 4.95 2.81
17.37 25.52 8.38 25.06 76.58 52.71 58.59 16.37
0.21 0.28 0.20 0.28 0.74 0.52 0.58 0.20
67 69 64 71 92 82 82 67
1.0 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.0
0.28 0.26 0.23 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.16 0.00
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
TOTAL AREA
7.00
27.19
34.19
109.69
143.88
69
1. I=Percent Impervious, (Impervious Area/Total Area)*100% 2. Rv = 0.05+0.009(I), Minimum Rv=0.2 3. CN=Curve Number 4. Tc=Time of Concentration, Tt=Travel Time
728 Stormwater Analysis GP-0-10-001 Updated.xls 12/21/2011
Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP
Sub-Basin A This sub-basin is located in the north central portion of the development and includes the existing Townhouse residence halls, the Administration Center, and Goldstein Fitness Center. The sub-basin drains through an on-site stream to the off-site stream along the Taconic State Parkway.
Sub-Basin B This sub-basin is located in the central portion of campus and includes Martin Hall, Kessel Student Center, Mortola Library, North Hall, Goldstein Academic Center, Paton House, Environmental Center, Wilcox Hall, Entry Drives 2 and 3, and Choate Pond. Though runoff within the basin drains to Choate Pond, the ponds outflow discharges through a series of pipes and open streams located in Sub-basin F to the off-site stream along the Taconic State Parkway.
Sub-Basin C This sub-basin is located in eastern portion of the development. The sub-basin is mostly undeveloped but includes two parking lots, a basketball court and a beach volleyball court. In addition, there is a depression adjacent to the largest parking areas that forms a wetland and allows limited ponding with the sub-basin. Runoff from this sub-basin is conveyed to Choate Pond located within sub-basin B.
Sub-Basin D This sub-basin is located in the western portion of the campus and includes the football field, field house, and student/athletic facility parking areas. The sub-basin drains to the off-site stream along the Taconic State Parkway.
Sub-Basin E This sub-basin is located in the western portion of the campus and includes part of Lienhard and Miller Hall, as well as parking areas. The sub-basin drains to the off-site stream along the Taconic State Parkway.
Sub-Basin F This sub-basin is located in the southwestern portion of the campus and includes the tennis courts, a parking lot and the on-site portion of the stream that conveys the outflow from Choate Pond to the off-site stream along the Taconic State Parkway.
II - 6
Sub-Basin G This sub-basin is located in the southern portion of the campus along Bedford Road and includes Dyson Hall, the Costello House, associated parking areas, and a portion of the Entry 1 access drive. The sub-basin drains to the off-site stream along the Taconic State Parkway.
Sub-Basin H This sub-basin is located in the southwestern portion of the campus and includes all three (3) campus entrances and the former 901 Bedford Road property. The sub-basin drains to the Bedford Road.
Design Point The design point for the analyses contained herein is the off-site stream adjacent to the northwest corner of the property and is shown on Figure No. 3.
3.
Proposed Conditions
The Pace University Master Plan Update involves the redevelopment of the existing Pleasantville Campus. Under the Master Plan Update it is proposed to construct nine (9) new buildings and either relocate, renovate or put additions onto six (6) existing structures. Work consists of the construction of six (6) new Residence Halls, Field House, Theater, and Welcome Center. Also included is the expansion of the existing student union, renovations to Martin and North Halls, and relocation of the existing Environmental Center. The Master Plan Update also includes the demolition of 15 existing building. There will be new roadways and parking lots associated with the new buildings. The Master Plan Update will provide additional student residences and facilities for the University while improving the on-site campus circulation, enhancing the on-site natural features, and the allow for the implementation of a stormwater management plan. The planning techniques incorporated into the Master Plan Update include:
Preservation of Undisturbed Areas
II - 7
Preservation of Buffers Reduction of Clearing and Grading Locating Development in Less Sensitive Areas Open Space Design Soil Restoration Roadway Reduction Driveway Reduction Building Footprint Reduction
Post-development site conditions are shown on Figure No. 4, Proposed Drainage Conditions. The amount of impervious area will increase by approximately 3.5 acres, from 34.2 to 37.7 acres. The eight (8) existing sub-basins identified in Section 2, Existing Conditions have been further divided into 11 sub-basins for the purposes of evaluation and sizing of proposed stormwater treatment measures. The drainage characteristics of each of the sub-basins are shown on Table No. 2, Developed Drainage Conditions, and described briefly below.
Sub-Basin AA-1 This Sub-Basin located on the northwestern portion of the site will remain mostly unchanged, with the exception of the baseball field which will have its natural grass field replaced with an artificial turf material complete with an integral underdrain system.
Sub-Basin AA-2 This Sub-Basin located on the northern portion of the site will have three (3) existing residence halls removed and three (3) new residence halls constructed. There will also be an expansion of the northerly most parking areas, and the Environmental Center will be re-located to southerly end of this sub-basin, adjacent to the Paton House. Runoff from this sub-basin will be routed to an expanded wet extended detention pond located north of the Goldstein Fitness Center.
II - 8
TABLE NO. 2 PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE, NEW YORK
DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID
AREA (AC) IMPERVIOUS Roof Pavement IMP. TOTAL PERVIOUS TOTAL AREA
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
I (%)
Rv
CN
Ia
Tc (HRS)
DESIGN POINT #
AA-1 AA-2 BB1 BB2 BB3 CC DD EE FF GG HH
0.01 2.57 3.46 1.35 0.83 0.00 0.37 0.39 0.03 0.53 0.00
0.31 5.59 7.27 3.85 1.88 1.43 2.15 1.64 2.08 1.68 0.28
0.32 8.16 10.73 5.20 2.71 1.43 2.52 2.03 2.11 2.21 0.28
15.07 25.23 18.07 17.64 2.61 14.09 5.44 0.96 2.11 2.43 2.53
15.39 33.39 28.80 22.84 5.32 15.52 7.96 2.99 4.22 4.64 2.81
2.08 24.44 37.26 22.77 50.94 9.21 31.66 67.89 50.00 47.63 9.96
0.20 0.27 0.39 0.25 0.51 0.20 0.33 0.66 0.50 0.48 0.20
62 69 74 67 79 64 73 90 82 78 65
1.2 0.9 0.7 1.0 0.5 1.1 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.5 1.1
0.28 0.28 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.08 0.08
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
TOTAL AREA
9.54
28.16
37.70
106.18
143.88
70
1. I=Percent Impervious, (Impervious Area/Total Area)*100% 2. Rv = 0.05+0.009(I), Minimum Rv=0.2 3. CN=Curve Number 4. Tc=Time of Concentration, Tt=Travel Time
Sub-Basin BB-1 This Sub-Basin located in center core of the campus will have three (3) new residence halls, a new theater/academic building and an addition to the existing student union. The road and walkway system will be revised to improve vehicle and pedestrian circulation. Choate Pond will be enhanced through forebays, bank stabilization and improvements, possible dredging. Stormwater runoff from the new buildings will be directed to grass infiltration areas, bioretention basins, porous pavement, and vegetated swales. All runoff from this sub-basin, as well as sub-basin BB-2, BB-3 and CC outlined below, drains to Choate Pond.
Sub-Basin BB-2 This Sub-Basin located east of Choate Pond includes Martin and North Halls and a portion of new Residence Hall C. The runoff from this sub-basin drains to an existing wetland just south of new Residence Hall B before entering Choate Pond. Bioretention basins will be used to treat the runoff from the new buildings, and the wetland and watercourse will be enhanced by day-lighting a segment closest to Choate Pond. Porous pavement will also be used in the new parking area to be constructed adjacent to new Residence Hall B. Runoff from subbasin CC will also drain through the wetland located within this sub-basin.
Sub-Basin BB-3 This Sub-Basin located in the southern portion of the site will have a new administrative building, welcome center and parking lot. Stormwater runoff from the sub-basin will be directed to a bioretention basin before draining to Choate Pond.
Sub-Basin CC This Sub-Basin is mostly unchanged from existing conditions, with the exception of the construction of a new parking lot in the area of the existing basketball and beach volleyball courts.
Sub-Basin DD This Sub-Basin located on the western portion of the site will have the existing grass football replaced with an artificial turf field and recreational track. Additionally there will be a new Field House, bleachers, and expansion and
II - 11
modifications to the existing parking lot at the top of the hill behind the existing Choate House. The stormwater measures in this sub-basin will include porous pavement, bioretention areas, vegetated swale, and an underdrain/infiltration system for the turf field.
Sub-Basin EE This Sub-Basin will remain unchanged, with the minor exception of the addition of a small bioretention area adjacent to the new Field House.
Sub-Basin FF This Sub-Basin will remain mostly unchanged with the exception of the addition of one (1) tennis court to the three (3) existing courts.
Sub-Basin GG This Sub-Basin located in the southwest portion of the site will include a new parking lot and softball field. The stormwater measures in this subbasin will include porous pavement and vegetated swales.
Sub-Basin HH This Sub-Basin will remain mostly unchanged with the exception of the revised entrance road at existing Entry 1.
II - 12
III.
STORMWATER QUANTITY
A. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Refer to Section II.C.2. for a description of existing conditions.
B. DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
Under proposed conditions, the total volume of runoff from the Project Area is expected to increase due to an approximate 3.5-acre increase in on-site impervious area. However, any increase in peak rates of runoff will be mitigated by the use of stormwater basins and outlet controls on Choate Pond and two (2) on-site wetlands. Stormwater runoff from developed areas will be directed to the stormwater basins via a combination of underground piping and surface swales. The outlet controls of the detention systems will control the rate of release of the detained water such that the peak rate of runoff at each of the design points is less than or equal to existing runoff rate for up to the 100-year storm event. A comparison of the pre- and post-development peak runoff rates is shown on Table No. 3, Design Flow Summary.
C. PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
One objective of a stormwater management plan is to limit the proposed peak rate of off-site stormwater runoff to levels equal to or less than the existing peak rates of off-site flows. This will be accomplished by temporarily detaining a portion of the stormwater runoff in the stormwater basins, Choate Pond, and the wetlands. Orifices are set on the outlet control structure to detain the 1-year storm for 24 hours, and control the release rate of storms up to the 100-year storm. An emergency overflow weir is located at the top of each stormwater basin to safely convey the runoff if it exceeds the capacity of the outlet control structure. See Table No. 3 for storage volumes associated with various size storm events.
III - 1
DESIGN FLOW SUMMARY
DESIGN POINT NO.

Westchester County Rainfall (IN)
(1)
1-YEAR
2-YEAR
10-YEAR
25-YEAR
100-YEAR
SW Flow Runoff Volume SW Flow Runoff Volume SW Flow Runoff Volume SW Flow Runoff Volume SW Flow Runoff Volume (CFS) (AC-FT) (CFS) (AC-FT) (CFS) (AC-FT) (CFS) (AC-FT) (CFS) (AC-FT) 3.0 3.5 5.0 6.3 8.5
Existing Dev w/o SWM Developed Delta
45.6 46.7 31.3 -14.3
7.36 7.83 6.70 -0.66
68.5 69.8 49.2 -19.4
10.43 11.02 9.85 -0.58
149.0 150.5 169.5 20.5
21.34 22.25 20.98 -0.36
226.2 246.1 280.2 54.1
32.18 33.31 31.97 -0.21
460.2 490.4 459.1 -1.1
52.26 53.69 52.23 -0.03
(1) Northeast Regional Climate Data Center
D.
RUNOFF REDUCTION
As described in the NYSDEC Stormwater Manual (August 2010), runoff reduction is the reduction of the total Water Quality Volume (WQV) by application of green infrastructure techniques and Stormwater Management Practices (SMP) to replicate pre-development hydrology. Table No. 4, DEC List of Approved Stormwater Measures Green Infrastructure provides a list of the Green Infrastructure techniques, the design requirements and recommendations for each technique, and identifies whether or not the practices are feasible at the project site. The minimum required Runoff Reduction Volume (RRV) is defined as the Specified Reduction Factor (S), a percentage of the WQV.
The Green Infrastructure Techniques and their feasibility for this phase of the project are summarized below:
a.
Conservation of Natural Areas While conservations easements are not being offered, approximately 114 acres of the 200-acre site will remain undeveloped. The majority of this land is wooded.
b. Sheet Flow to Riparian Buffers or Filter Strips The 100 wetland buffers will generally be maintained on the site, however the steep slopes on the site are not conducive for directly discharging runoff from impervious areas.
c. Vegetated Swale Wherever feasible the project has proposed to use open channels. The open channels will be vegetated swales in areas of low slopes. Approximately 1,700 feet of open channels will be provided.
III - 3
DEC LIST OF APPROVED RUNOFF REDUCTION STORMWATER MEASURES Practice Design Requirements Design Recommendations RR-Volume RR-Area
1.
Conservation Area
10,000 sf min.
Uses: Forest, stream and river corridors, wetlands, vernal pools
Area & Contributing Area
On-site contribution area of WQV. Not disturbed during construction Not managed turf
2.
Sheetflow/Filter Strips
150' max contibuting length - pervious
Area & Contributing Area
75' max contibuting length - impervious Level spreader req'd for 3% - 15% slope Min. Width: 50' @ 0-8%, 75' @ 8-12%, 100' @ 12-15% C soils increase buffer width 15% D soils increase buffer width 20% 3. Vegetated Swales Drainage area less than 5 acres WQV peak flow less than 3 cfs A and B Soils 20% Runoff Reduction C and D Soils 10% Runoff Reduction C (modified) Soils 15% Runoff Reduction D (modified) Soils 12% Runoff Reduction 100' minimum length 10 minute detention from point source 5 minute detention from sheet flow or multiple points Velocity less than 1 fps Depth less than 4 inches Check Dams as needed Trapezoid or parabolic shape, bottom width 2' min, 6' max Max side slope 3:1 Slope between 0.5% and 4% Convey 10-year storm w/6" freeboard 20% A & B 10% C & D N
728 DEC Approved Stormwater Measures.xlsx - Green Techniques
Practice 4. Tree Planting
Design Requirements New Trees: Trees from approved list Within 10' of ground-level directly connected impervious area Deciduous trees 2-inch min. caliper Evergreen trees 6 feet tall Max 5% average slope for contributing area Existing Trees: Directly connected impervious coverage equal to 1/2 canopy area Trees from approved list Within 20' of ground-level directly connected impervious area Min. 4" caliper Within drainage area Maximum reduction of 25% of directly connected impervious area
Design Recommendations
RR-Volume N
RR-Area 100 sf
Min. 1,000 cubic feet of soil material
1/2 canopy
5.
Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff
Encouraged in A and B soils
Imp. changed to Perv. for calc's
C and D soils evaluate permeability and water table depth Maximum contributing flow length 75 feet Downspouts 10 feet minimum from impervious surface Maximum contributing area 500 sf, 2,000 sf w/level spreader Drain through swale/filter strip equal to contributing flow length Vegetative area average slope less than 5% 6. Stream Daylighting Stream channel capacity equal to or greater than culvert N Y
7.
Rain Gardens
Ponding depth should not exceed 6" Recommended Drainage area to infiltration area 5:1 max Contribution area should be 1000 sf maximum Typical Section 12"-18" Soil Media, 6-12" Washed Stone Underdrain when required Within 30' of downspout Soil media 50%-70% sand, 30%-50% topsoil w/5% organic 2:1 flow path 5 components: Roof Structure Waterproofing Drainage System Soil Planting Types
100% A & B 40% C & D
8.
Green Roofs
100%
Practice 9. Stormwater Planters
Design Requirements
Design Recommendations Recommended maximum contribution area 15,000 sf Infiltration should be 10' min from structures Should pond water for less than 12 hours and max 12" depth For rooftop or courtyard runoff Min. widths, 1.5' flow-through, 2.5' infiltration Planter soil material 2 in/hr infiltration Planter drainage layer 5 in/hr infiltration Growing material 18" min. depth Drainage material 12" min. depth Native soil for infiltration planter min. 2 in/hr infiltration 3' min. infiltration depth to rock or groundwater Infiltration planters should have no slope C Soils Flow through 45% RRV credit D Soils Flow through 30% RRV credit
RR-Volume 30-100%
RR-Area N
10. Rain Barrels/Cisterns
Min volume equal to WQV Provide water budget analyis
100%
11. Porous Pavement
Bottom of reservoir 3 feet minimum above ground water

10-year 24 hour storm not to rise to pavement level Infiltration design IAW infiltration trenches of Ch 6. Underlying soils should have minimum infiltration of 0.5 in/hr 25' down gradient from structures and septic systems
A, B or C Soils
2' wide stone edge drain Slopes should not exceed 5%
100%
Legend RR - Runoff Reduction Y - Yes, can be used for runoff reduction credit N - No, can not be used for runoff reduction credit A, B, C, D - Hydrologic Soil Group Description (SCS)
d.
Tree Planting/Tree Pit The plan provides for approximately 1,000 new trees.
e. Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff The stormwater management plan is to direct rooftop runoff from the new buildings to bioretention basins, infiltration areas, or open channels wherever feasible. Approximately 167,000 square feet of new roofs will be directed to these systems.
f.
Stream Daylighting There are currently two (2) wetlands that the discharge is mostly piped to Choate Pond. The design will remove 600 feet of piping and replace with an open channel to the extent feasible.
g. Rain Gardens Bioretention areas, which will function similar to rain gardens, will be located next to most of the new buildings.
h. Stormwater Planters The bioretention areas will function similar to stormwater planters. (See also Rain Gardens above)
i.
Rain Barrels and Cisterns Cisterns are proposed for the animal shelters.
j.
Porous Pavement Porous asphalt parking areas are proposed for new parking lots that are not located in large cut or fill areas or subject to potential sediment load.
E. FLOOD ZONES
The site is located entirely out of the FEMA 100-year flood zone.
III - 7
IV. STORMWATER QUALITY
A. STORMWATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
1.
Existing Conditions
Refer to section II.C.1. and II.C.2 for a description of existing conditions.
2.
Post-Development Conditions Without Treatment
The change in land use and increase in impervious area will result in the increase in pollutant loading. Without treatment the pollutant loads would increase for Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Phosphorus (TP), Total Nitrogen (TN), Metals, and Bacteria.
3. Post-Development Conditions With Treatment
The use of wet extended detention ponds, porous pavement, bioretention filters, rain gardens, and vegetated water quality swales are expected to reduce the pollutant loading from the stormwater runoff. The treatment methods will be designed in compliance with the NYDSDEC Stormwater Management Design Manual, dated August 2010.
B.
STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT MEASURES
The strategy of the Stormwater Management Plan is to tailor the treatment measures for the various proposed land uses. A variety of measures will be used to maximize infiltration of runoff into the ground when possible. Table No. 5 summarizes the standard stormwater management practices and the feasibility of each for the project.
IV - 1
DEC LIST OF APPROVED STORMWATER QUALITY MEASURES STANDARD MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Practice I. Stormwater Ponds Design Requirements Forebay: 10% min. of WQV, at each inflow w/10% of flow, 4'-6' deep Maintenance access to forebay Protection at outlet, non-erosive velocities Minimum Length to Width ratio 1.5:1 Minimum Surface Area to Drainage Area 1:100 Safety Bench 10 min at 6% max slope, unless 4:1 or flatter side slopes Aquatic Bench up to 15 and a maximum depth of 18 below normal water surface Pond Buffer 25 from maximum water surface Woody Vegetation 15 min from toe of slope and 25 min from spillway Provide low flow orifice Pond Drain, unless local slopes prohibit, capable of draining within 24 hours Adjustable Gate Valve on WQ pipe and Pond Drain Side slopes to the pond shall not exceed 3:1 Design Recommendations Drainage Area size P-2 to P-5 discouraged on Trout waters Stabilize inlet for 2-year storm Partially submerged inlet pipe Sediment depth in forebay Harden forebay bottom to ease sediment removal Provide WQV treatment off-line Provide multiple treatment pathways Long flow path, irregular shape Maintenance access to safety bench, riser and outlet w/vehicle turn around Maintenance access 12' wide, 15% max slope Protect low flow orifice w/trash rack or internal orifice protection Size WQV-ED pipe and Pond Drain one pipe size larger than calculated Pond fencing not encouraged
Soils P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 Micropool Extended Detention Wet Pond Wet Extended Detention Pond Multiple Pond Pocket Pond HSG A may Require Liner HSG A may Require Liner HSG A may Require Liner HSG A may Require Liner OK
Water Table OK OK OK OK Below WT
Drainage Area Site Slope (acres) 10 min. 15% or less 25 min 25 min 25 min 5 max 15% or less 15% or less 15% or less 15% or less
Head (ft) 6' - 8' 6' - 8' 6' - 8' 6' - 8' 4'
Additional Requirements Permanent Pool 20% min. of WQV Permanent Pool 100% min. of WQV Permanent Pool 50% min. of WQV Permanent Pool 50% min. of WQV Permanent Pool 50% min. of WQV
RRV No No No No No
728 DEC Approved Stormwater Measures.xlsx - Standard Practices
Divney Tung Scwhalbe, LLP
Practice II. Wetlands Design Requirements Maximize flow paths Minimal flow path of 2:1 (length to width) Surface area at least 1% of contributing area At least 35% of surface area to have depth of 6" or less At least 65% of surface area to have depth of 18" or less At least 25% of the WQV shall be in deepwater zones with depth of greater than 4' Max water surface 3' above permanent pool. Wetland plant buffer 25 from maximum water surface 15' setback to structures from wetland buffer Forebay 4' to 6' deep and stores 10% of WQV Design Recommendations Discouraged on Trout waters Use microtopology to enhance wetland diversity Maximize internal flow length
Soils W-1 Shallow Wetland W-2 Extended Detention Wetland W-3 Pond/Wetland W-4 Pocket Wetland HSG A may Require Liner HSG A may Require Liner HSG A may Require Liner OK
Water Table OK OK OK Below WT
Drainage Area Site Slope (acres) 25 min 8% or less 25 min 25 min 5 max 8% or less 8% or less 8% or less
Head (ft) 3' - 5' 3' - 5' 3' - 5' 2' - 3'
Additional Requirements
RRV No
50% of WQV in Permanent Pool
No No No
Practice III. Infiltration Design Requirements One test hole per 5000 sf 2 borings per facility Clay content less than 20% and silt/clay content less than 40% Can not be located in fills, except top quarter of trench/dry well Bottom 3' min. above seasonally high ground water 100' min from water supply well De-water entire WQV within 48 hours Design as off-line practice 25% of the WQV in pretreatment 50% of the WQV in pretreatment, if fc greater than 2 in/hr 100% of the WQV in pretreatment, if fc greater than 5 in/hr Exfiltrate WQV through bottom, sides not considered Do not use practice area as sediment trap Observation well required for trench and dry well Provide direct access Soils I-1 Infiltration Trench Infiltration > 0.5 in/hr Water Table 3' Separation Design Recommendations Non-erosive velocities for 10-year overflow Line trench and dry wells side with filter fabric Stone bottom should be flat
Drainage Area Site Slope (acres) 5 max 15% or less
Head (ft) 1'
Additional Requirements 25' min from structures sand or fine gravel coarse above gravel 25' min from structures 10' min. from structures
RRV 90%
I-2 I-3
Shallow Infiltration Basin Dry Well
Infiltration > 0.5 in/hr Infiltration > 0.5 in/hr
3' Separation 3' Separation
10 max 1 max
15% or less 15% or less
3' 1'
90% 90%
Practice IV. Filters Design Requirements Off-line if from storm pipe Overflow for percentage of WQV and 10-year storm 4" min. perforated pipe underdrain 25% WQV pre-treatment Temporarily hold 75% of WQV Sedimentation pretreatment if impervious cover less than 75% 12" min. filter bed depth, 18" typical Soils F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 Surface Sand Filter Underground Sand Filter Perimeter Sand Filter Organic Filter OK OK OK OK Water Table 2' 2' 2' 2' Design Recommendations Drainage Area size
Drainage Area Site Slope (acres) 10 max 6% or less 2 max 2 max 5 max 6% or less 6% or less 6% or less
Head (ft) 5' 5' - 7' 2' - 3' 2' - 4'
Additional Requirements 18" min. Sand 18" min. Sand 12" min. Sand Peat/sand mix or leaf compost
RRV No No No No
F-5
Bioretention
OK
2'
5 max
6% or less
5'
2.5' - 4' planting soil, mulch layer, 6" surface ponding Recommended pretreatment: filter strip, gravel diaphragm, mulch layer
80% A & B 40% C &D
V. Open Channels Design Requirements Max. slope 4% Peak 2-year velocity 5.0 fps Convey 10-year storm w/6" of freeboard 48 hour maximum ponding time 2:1 max side slope, 3:1 typical 10% min WQV in pre-treatment Store WQV, to be released over 30 minutes Bottom width 2' min., 8' max Soils Water Table Design Recommendations Check dams as required to retain WQV Pea gravel diaphragm and gentle side slopes for lateral sheet flow to channel Max ponding depth 12" at midpoint, 18" at end point.
O-1 Dry Swale

O-2 Wet Swale
Made Soil
OK
2'
Below WT
Drainage Area Site Slope (acres) 5 max 4% or less 5 max 4% or less
Head (ft) 3' - 5' 1'
Additional Requirements
RRV
30" Permeable Soil, 6" gravel, 4" Perf. PVC

Not for use in residential areas
20% A & B 10% C &D No
Under the proposed master Plan Update a portion of the redevelopment areas will use the alternative practices defined in Chapter 9, Redevelopment Projects, of the NYS Stormwater Management Design Manual. The Stormwater Management Plan is based on the analysis of the existing and proposed stormwater conditions discussed in the previous section of this report and the design criteria of the stormwater management practices noted below. As the Proposed Action will involve the construction of an approximately 3.5-acre increase in on-site impervious surfaces associated with pavements and roofs, higher pollutant loadings would be expected to occur on the developed site. The total water quality volume provided is shown on Table No. 6. An outline of the varying stormwater quality management BMPs, both structural and non-structural, to be implemented both during construction and/or after project completion is presented below.
1. Wet Extended Detention Pond
Wet extended detention ponds will provide treatment of the NYSDEC required water quality volume through extended detention. Each pond incorporates a pool of water at its outlet to reduce sediment re-suspension. The treatment system includes a stonelined sediment forebay, stone rip-rap berm, permanent pool, outlet control drain structure, and emergency overflow weir. The wet extended detention pond will treat the 90% rainfall event through filtration and detain all storm events up to and including a 100-year storm. In addition, each ponds outlet control structure is designed such that downstream flows will be less than or equal to existing conditions. The modifications to Choate Pond are intended to allow the pond to function as a wet extended detention pond.
IV - 6
TABLE NO. 6
WATER QUALITY AND RUNOFF REDUCTION VOLUME CALCULATIONS
Sub-Basin
Bldg Name
Bldg Area (sf)
Adjacent Imp. (sf)

1,000 1,000 1,000 1,700 13,000 16,000
Total Area (sf)

1,930 2,630 2,630 9,989 15,693 16,957 22,731 26,173 18,916 11,042 9,100 12,104 15,716 19,776 12,700 12,400 61,533 1,970 16,000 12,000 28,000 5,800 12,000 6,700 14,400 10,700 11,500 15,000 406,090 9.32
Required WQV (cf)

199 271 271 1,028 1,615 1,745 2,339 2,694 1,947 1,136 937 1,246 1,617 2,035 1,307 1,276 6,333 203 1,647 1,235 2,882 597 1,235 690 1,482 1,101 1,184 1,544 41,793 0.96
Soil
Green Infrastructure Min.Req'd Technique Volume (cf)

79 108 108 308 646 698 936 1,077 779 455 375 498 647 814 523 510 2,533 61 659 494 1,153 239 494 276 593 440 473 618 16,594 0.38 Rain Garden Rain Garden Rain Garden Bioretention Bioretention Bioretention Bioretention Infiltration Infiltration Infiltration Infiltration Bioretention Bioretention Bioretention Bioretention Bioretention Bioretention Cistern Porous Pavement Porous Pavement Bioretention Porous Pavement Porous Pavement Porous Pavement Porous Pavement Bioretention Porous Pavement Porous Pavement
Area (sf)
350 500 500 1,000 1,300 3,400 2,000 5,500 1,282 2,400 2,000 3,600 2,800 1,600 2,800 1,600 5,000 n/a 4,860 3,780 2,300 1,764 3,740 2,000 4,387 900 3,600 4,680
Provided WQV (cf)

228 325 325 1,300 1,690 4,420 2,600 2,750 641 1,200 1,000 4,680 3,640 2,080 3,640 2,080 6,500 200 1,944 1,512 2,990 706 1,496 800 1,755 1,170 1,440 1,872 54,983 1.26
Downstream Practice
Pond AA2 Pond AA2 Pond AA2 n/a Choate Pond Choate Pond Choate Pond Choate Pond Choate Pond Choate Pond Choate Pond Choate Pond Choate Pond Pond AA2 Pond AA2 Pond AA2 Choate Pond Pond AA2 n/a n/a Choate Pond Choate Pond n/a Choate Pond Choate Pond Choate Pond Pond AA2 Pond AA2
Notes
AA2 AA2 AA2 DD BB1 BB1 BB3 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB3 AA2 GG GG BB1 DD BB1 BB1 BB2 AA2 AA2
ENV CTR ENV CTR ENV CTR Field House Future Theater Kessel Student New Marks RH A - E RH A - W RH B - N RH B - S RH C - E RH C - W RH D RH E RH F Welcome Center Animal Shelters Other Areas Parking - Softball-S Parking - Softball-S Entry Road Parking - Theatre Parking - Choate Parking - RHB - S Parking - RHA - W Parking - North Hall Parking RH E Parking RH F Total (sf - cf) Total (ac / ac-ft)
930 1,630 1,630 9,989 13,993 16,957 9,731 10,173 18,916 11,042 9,100 9,604 13,216 12,276 10,400 10,400 7,533 1,970
2,500 2,500 7,500 2,300 2,000 54,000
B B B C B B B B B B B B B B B B B C B B B B B B B B B B
0.40 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Future Bldg
1500 gal cistern
16,000 12,000 28,000 5,800 12,000 6,700 14,400 10,700 11,500 15,000 169,490 3.89 236,600 5.43
2. Rain Garden/Bioretention Filter
Rain Gardens and Bioretention Filters are stormwater management practices that manage and treat stormwater runoff using a conditioned planting soil bed and planting materials to filter runoff stored within a shallow depression. The method combines physical filtering and adsorption with bio-geochemical processes to remove pollutants.
3. Porous Pavement
Porous pavements infiltrate rainfall through the surface, thereby reducing stormwater runoff from a site and providing some pollutant uptake in underlying soils.
4. Open Channels
A vegetated channel designed to filter stormwater runoff and meet velocity targets for the water quality design storm and the two year storm events. A grass channel is parabolic shaped with a minimum 2-foot wide center section and side walls at 2:1 slope or flatter.
5. Catch Basin Sumps
All new catch basins will be provided with sumps to capture and collect sediment and debris prior to it entering the stormwater conveyance system. Each catch basin sump will be cleaned out periodically to remove the dirt and debris as part of routine campus maintenance.
IV - 8
6. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
In compliance with requirements established for the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit For Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity (Permit No. GP-0-10-001) a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be prepared and implemented. As a result, an Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared as part of the contract documents and will require that the erosion and sedimentation controls set forth thereon be implemented before the start of construction and further such controls will be monitored and maintained during construction. Stabilization of the site shall also comply with the conditions or requirements set forth therein and as shall further be established by the Town of Mount Pleasant.
Several temporary structural practices to be utilized to mitigate any potential impacts include, but shall not be limited to, surrounding material stockpiles with silt fencing and hay bale dams, excavated and embankment areas will be graded to permit drainage and the runoff will be intercepted in ditches with silt barriers or collected in settling basins to permit sedimentation, and stabilized construction entrances will be constructed and maintained during construction to minimize the off-site migration of sediment.
IV - 9
V. TECHNICAL APPENDIX
A. METHODOLOGY
1. Zero Increase in Watershed Peak Runoff
As typical for standard development practices, the peak rate of stormwater discharge from the site after the completion of development will not exceed the estimated predevelopment peak discharge.
2. Storm Frequencies
The storm frequencies to be used as a basis for computing peak rate of discharge shall be storms expected once every 1, 2, 10, 25, and 100 years with durations of 24 hours as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service.
3. Technical Approach
The method used for estimating peak discharge shall be as per the document released by the Engineering Division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service titled Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release No. 55, dated June 1986, Type III Storm Distribution. This criterion governs the data that is input into the software, namely the Haestead Methods Quick TR-55 computer program. A summary of the flows under existing and proposed conditions is provided. The complete input and output data is available upon request.
V-1
4. Soil Classifications
The soil classifications and their limits were provided from mapping compiled by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service.1
5. Detention Requirements
The continuity equation and level pool reservoir routing methods are used to route watershed inflow hydrographs through detention basins.
6. Rainfall Intensity
Frequency and intensities, which have been used in this report, are as follows:
WESTCHESTER COUNTY RAINFALL INTENSITY BY STORM FREQUENCY2
Storm Frequency Year 100 25 10 2 1
Rainfall Intensity (24-Hour Period) (Inches) 8.5 6.3 5.0 3.5 3.0
1 2
USDA, Soil Survey of Westcheter County, New York, 2002. Northeast Regional Climate Data Center
V-2
B.
CALCULATIONS
1.
Curve Numbers
Curve numbers have been calculated for the sub-watersheds using curve numbers for various land uses provided in Tables 2.2a 2.2d in TR-55, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, June 1986. The curve number calculations for pre- and post development are shown on Table No. 7 and 8.
2.
Times of Concentration
The times of concentration (Tc) have been estimated to determine the time of the longest hydraulic route within the sub-watershed being analyzed. These routes include overland, shallow-concentrated and channel or pipe flows. The time of concentration for pre- and post development are shown on Table No. 9 and 10.
3.
Pipe Sizing
The pipe capacity design is determined by using the Rational Method, which is well suited for small areas and will include standard practices that take into consideration headwater, velocity, slope, area and diameter. Mannings Equation is used for pipes that have sufficient length and constant slopes to establish uniform flow at normal depth without backwater or pressure head. The storm pipes conveying water to the stormwater basins will be sized for the 10-year storm with a minimum diameter of 15 inches. The outlet pipes from the stormwater basins will be sized for the 100-year storm.
V-3
4.
Channel Protection Volume
Stream Channel Protection Volume (CPv) requirements are designed to protect stream channels from erosion. Typically, in New York State, this goal is accomplished by providing 24-hour extended detention of the one-year, 24-hour storm event. The detention time is calculated by the storm modeling software PondPack. To reduce the risk of clogging an anti-clogging device will be used for the bottom orifice of the outlet control structure.
5.
Water Quality Volume
The required water quality volume has been calculated in accordance with the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, August 2010.
V-4
EXISTING CONDITIONS CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATIONS
Watershed A
Total Area (ac) 50.48
Imp (ac) 8.77 13.88 1.30 2.00 2.55 2.33 2.90 0.46
Wooded (ac) 25.98 19.82 12.08 1.28 0.11 0.72 0.34 0.00
Open (ac) 15.73 20.69 2.14 4.70 0.67 1.37 1.71 2.35
B (ac) 37.41 41.60 8.80 6.86 0.56 2.55 4.80 2.81
C (ac) 9.33 0.79 4.64 1.12 2.77 1.87 0.15 0.00
B/C (ac) 3.74 11.45 2.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Rev B (ac) 40.40 52.84 10.16 6.86 0.56 2.55 4.80 2.81
Rev C (ac) 10.08 1.55 5.36 1.12 2.77 1.87 0.15 0.00
Wood B Wood C (ac) (ac) 20.79 5.19 19.25 7.91 1.10 0.02 0.42 0.33 0.00 0.57 4.17 0.18 0.09 0.30 0.01 0.00
Open B (ac) 12.59 20.10 1.40 4.04 0.11 0.79 1.66 2.35
Open C (ac) 3.14 0.59 0.74 0.66 0.56 0.58 0.05 0.00
Imp B (ac) 7.02 13.48 0.85 1.72 0.43 1.34 2.81 0.46
Imp C (ac) 1.75 0.40 0.45 0.28 2.12 0.99 0.09 0.00
CN 66.7 68.6 64.1 70.7 91.7 82.3 82.4 67.1
S 0.38 0.40 0.37 0.39 0.32 0.36 0.40 0.40
B C D E F G H
54.39 15.52 7.98 3.33 4.42 4.95 2.81
1. Hydrologic Soil Group classification, see Soil Survey of Putnam and Westchester Counties, New York. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 2. S=Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Specific Reduction Factor 2. Cover Type as listed per Tables 2-2a.-c.-Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2-5. 3. Hydrologic Condition either Poor, Fair or Good per Tables 2-2a.-c.-Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2-5.
4. Specific Reduction factors for the HSGs per NYSSMDM, Chapter 4, HSG SectionA 4.3:
HSG B HSG C HSG D
0.55 0.40 0.30 0.20
5. CN values from Tables 2-2a.-c.-Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2-5.
728 Stormwater Analysis GP-0-10-001 Updated.xls12/21/2011
TABLE NO. 8
DEVELOPED CONDITIONS CURVE NUMBER COMPUTATIONS
Watershed AA-1 AA-2 BB1 BB2 BB3 CC DD EE FF GG HH
Total Area Imp Wooded Open B C B/C Rev B Rev C Wood B Wood C Open B Open C Imp B Imp C CN S (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) 15.39 0.32 10.56 4.51 10.78 4.61 0.00 10.78 4.61 7.40 3.16 3.16 1.35 0.22 0.10 61.9 0.37 33.39 28.80 22.84 5.32 15.52 7.96 2.99 4.22 4.64 2.81 8.16 10.73 5.20 2.71 1.43 2.52 2.03 2.11 2.21 0.28 14.83 5.20 11.23 0.50 12.04 1.01 0.00 0.67 0.30 0.00 10.40 24.94 4.71 3.74 28.09 12.87 26.41 0.46 0.59 26.99 6.41 11.68 0.30 10.86 22.27 2.11 2.05 4.43 0.96 1.44 2.13 2.53 5.32 0.00 0.00 5.32 5.30 1.81 0.57 0.00 5.36 1.13 2.76 1.86 0.15 0.00 12.47 4.87 10.95 0.50 7.88 0.87 0.00 0.37 0.29 0.00 2.36 0.33 0.28 0.00 4.16 0.14 0.00 0.30 0.01 0.00 8.75 12.06 6.25 2.11 1.34 3.80 0.07 0.81 2.06 2.53 1.65 0.81 0.16 0.00 0.71 0.63 0.89 0.63 0.07 0.00 6.86 10.06 5.07 2.71 0.94 2.16 0.16 1.18 2.14 0.28 1.30 0.67 0.13 0.00 0.49 0.36 1.87 0.93 0.07 0.00
69.1 0.38 74.2 0.39 66.7 0.40 79.3 0.40 64.4 0.37 73.2 0.39 90.0 0.31 81.6 0.36 78.5 0.40 64.7 0.40
8.80 4.64 2.08 10.16 6.83 1.13 0.00 0.23 2.76 0.00 2.36 1.86 0.00 4.49 0.15 0.00 2.81 0.00 0.00 6.83 0.23 2.36 4.49 2.81
1. Hydrologic Soil Group classification, see Soil Survey of Putnam and Westchester Counties, New York. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 2. S=Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Specific Reduction Factor 2. Cover Type as listed per Tables 2-2a.-c.-Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2-5.
3. Hydrologic Condition either Poor, Fair or Good per Tables 2-2a.-c.-Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2-5. 4. Specific Reduction factors for the HSGs per NYSSMDM, Chapter 4.3: HSG 4, A Section 0.55
HSG B HSG C HSG D
0.40 0.30 0.20
5. CN values from Tables 2-2a.-c.-Runoff Curve Numbers for Urban Areas, TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Second Edition, June 1986, page 2-5.
728 Stormwater Analysis GP-0-10-001 Updated.xls12/21/2011
TABLE NO. 9
EXISTING TIME OF CONCENTRATION (OR TRAVEL TIME)
SHEET FLOW 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Surface Description (See Table Below) 1 n Mannings Roughness Coefficient L Flow Length (Total L<100FT) P2 2-YR 24-HR Rainfall 2 s Land Slope Travel Time Tt Tt = (0.007(nL)0.8)/(P20.5*s0.4)
ft in ft/ft hr
A 9 0.4 100 3.5 0.15

0.15
B 9 0.4 100 3.5 0.09

0.19
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID C D E 9 6 6 0.4 0.24 0.24 100 100 80 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.10 0.07 0.05
0.18 0.14 0.13
F 6 0.24 40 3.5 0.08

0.06
G 9 0.4 85 3.5 0.14

0.14
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Surface Description (paved or unpaved) L Flow Length s Watercourse Slope V Average Velocity 3 Tt Tt = L / 3600V unpaved 2000 0.13 5.50 0.10 unpaved 1100 0.22 7.50 0.04 unpaved 800 0.55 12.00 0.02 unpaved 100 0.35 9.00 0.00 Paved 130 0.07 5.20 0.01
ft ft/ft ft/s hr
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
CHANNEL FLOW 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Cross Sectional Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Hydraulic Radius, r = a/pw Channel Slope Manning's Roughness Coefficient 4 Velocity = (1.49r2/3s1/2)/n Flow Length Tt = L / 3600V
a pw r s n V L Tt Tc ft2 ft ft ft/ft
ft/s ft hr hr
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.05 0.015 13.46 1400 0.03
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.04 0.015 11.28 1300 0.03
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.02 0.015 8.00 880 0.03
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.03 0.015 10.48 800 0.02
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.03 0.015 10.52 540 0.01
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.05 0.015 12.79 580 0.01
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.01 0.015 5.93 390 0.02
TOTAL WATERSHED Tc
0.28
0.26
0.23
0.16
0.15
0.08
0.16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4
ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS (Manning's n) FOR SHEET FLOW 1 Smooth (conc, asphalt, gravel, bare soil) 0.011 Fallow (no residue) 0.05 Cultivated Soils, Residue Cover < 20% 0.06 Cultivated Soils, Residue Cover > 20% 0.17 Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grass 0.24 Bermuda Grass 0.41 Range (natural) 0.13 Woods (light) 0.4 Table 3-1. - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for SHEET FLOW, TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, page 3-3. Westchester County Rainfall, NYSDEC Amendment NY-1, November 7, 1990, page 2-14.5 Figure 3-1. - Average velocities for estimating travel time for shallow concentrated flow, TR-55 Urban Hydrology forSmall Watersheds, page 3-2. Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for CHANNEL FLOW. See Handbook of Hydraulics or equal.
DEVELOPED TIME OF CONCENTRATION (OR TRAVEL TIME)
SHEET FLOW 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Surface Description (See Table Below) 1 Mannings Roughness Coefficient n Flow Length (Total L<100FT) L P2 2-YR 24-HR Rainfall 2 Land Slope s Travel Time 0.8 0.5 0.4 Tt Tt = (0.007(nL) )/(P2 *s )
ft in ft/ft hr
AA-1 9 0.4 100 3.5 0.15 0.15
AA-2 9 0.4 100 3.5 0.15 0.15
BB1 9 0.4 100 3.5 0.09 0.19
WATERSHED/ SUBBASIN ID BB2 BB3 CC 1 1 9 0.011 0.011 0.4 0 0 100 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.18
DD 6 0.24 100 3.5 0.07 0.14
EE 6 0.24 80 3.5 0.05 0.13
FF 6 0.24 40 3.5 0.08 0.06
GG 9 0.4 85 3.5 0.14 0.14
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Surface Description (paved or unpaved) Flow Length L Watercourse Slope s V Average Velocity 3 Tt Tt = L / 3600V unpaved 2000 0.13 5.50 0.10 unpaved 2000 0.13 5.50 0.10 unpaved 1100 0.22 7.50 0.04 unpaved 800 0.55 12.00 0.02 unpaved 100 0.35 9.00 0.00 Paved 130 0.07 5.20 0.01
ft ft/ft ft/s hr
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00 0.00
CHANNEL FLOW 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Cross Sectional Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Hydraulic Radius, r = a/pw Channel Slope Manning's Roughness Coefficient 4 Velocity = (1.49r2/3s1/2)/n Flow Length Tt = L / 3600V a pw r s n V L Tt
Tc ft2 ft ft ft/ft
ft/s ft hr hr
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.05 0.015 13.46 1400 0.03
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.05 0.015 13.46 1400 0.03
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.04 0.015 11.28 1300 0.03
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.02 0.015 8.00 880 0.03
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.03 0.015 10.48 800 0.02
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.03 0.015 10.52 540 0.01
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.05 0.015 12.79 580 0.01
1.25 2.71 0.46 0.01 0.015 5.93 390 0.02
TOTAL WATERSHED Tc
0.28
0.28
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.16
0.15
0.08
0.16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4
ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS (Manning's n) FOR SHEET FLOW 1 Smooth (conc, asphalt, gravel, bare soil) 0.011 Fallow (no residue) 0.05 Cultivated Soils, Residue Cover < 20% 0.06 Cultivated Soils, Residue Cover > 20% 0.17 Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grass 0.24 Bermuda Grass 0.41 Range (natural) 0.13 Woods (light & dense) 0.4 Table 3-1. - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for SHEET FLOW, TR-55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, page 3-3. Westchester County Rainfall, NYSDEC Amendment NY-1, November 7, 1990, page 2-14.5 Figure 3-1. - Average velocities for estimating travel time for shallow concentrated flow, TR-55 Urban Hydrology forSmall Watersheds, page 3-2. Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for CHANNEL FLOW. See Handbook of Hydraulics or equal.
C. POND PACK MODELING
The Pond Pack Modeling results are available in PDF format upon request.
V-C
POND PACK SUMMARY EXISTING CONDITIONS
V-C-1
Add lin k 12 0
lin Add
tC O utle Pond C
0 k 11 C
Pond B D
B Ou tlet
Addlink 100
Addlink 90
Add lin k 10
Addlink 80
0 Add lin k 2
Addlink 70 DP 1
Addlink 60
Addlink 50
Addlink 40
Addlink 30 Junc G
Junc A
Junc D
Junc E
Junc F
Type.... Master Network Summary
Page 1.01
Name.... Watershed File.... J:\728 Pace - Pleasantville - Master Plan\728 Engineering\Stormwater\PondPak\728 Existing Condi
MASTER DESIGN STORM SUMMARY Network Storm Collection: Sleepy Hollow
Return Event -----------1 2 10 25 100
Total Depth in -----3.0000 3.5000 5.0000 6.3000 8.5000
Rainfall Type ---------------Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve
RNF ID ---------------TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr
MASTER NETWORK SUMMARY SCS Unit Hydrograph Method (*Node=Outfall; +Node=Diversion;) (Trun= HYG Truncation: Blank=None; L=Left; R=Rt; LR=Left&Rt)
Node ID ----------------A A A A A B B B B B C C C C C
Type ---AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA
Return Event -----1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -2.460 3.575 7.583 11.602 19.092 3.035 4.323 8.870 13.362 21.650 .606 .912 2.044 3.206 5.410
Qpeak hrs --------12.2440 12.2440 12.2070 12.2070 12.2070 12.2360 12.2020 12.2010 12.2010 12.2010 12.2340 12.2040 12.1740 12.1740 12.1730
Qpeak cfs -------19.57 31.01 72.24 113.38 188.67 26.22 39.79 87.85 134.53 218.83 4.57 7.87 20.20 32.93 56.67
Max WSEL ft --------
Max Pond Storage ac-ft ------------
S/N: Bentley PondPack (10.01.04.00) 6:40 PM
Bentley Systems, Inc. 12/21/2011
Page 1.02
Node ID ----------------D D D D D *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP E E E E E F F F F F G G G G G JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC A A A A A 1 1 1 1 1
Type ---AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT
Return Event -----1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.506 .707 1.407 2.089 3.335 7.357 10.432 21.340 32.176 52.261 .600 .732 1.134 1.488 2.091 .508 .656 1.134 1.570 2.333 .569 .735 1.270 1.758 2.613 7.357 10.432 21.340 32.176 52.261 R R R R R R R R R R
Qpeak hrs --------12.1560 12.1380 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.2070 12.2070 12.2060 12.1800 12.2440 12.1190 12.1190 12.1190 12.1190 12.1190 12.1090 12.1090 12.1080 12.0990 12.0990 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.2070 12.2070 12.2060 12.1800 12.2440
Qpeak cfs -------5.28 7.71 16.06 24.04 38.25 45.58 68.52 148.97 226.16 460.16 6.80 8.22 12.44 16.06 22.13 6.39 8.24 14.00 19.11 27.78 6.53 8.46 14.52 19.89 29.01 45.58 68.52 148.97 226.16 460.16
Page 1.03
Return Node ID Type Event ----------------- ---- -----JUNC D JCT 1 JUNC D JCT 2 JUNC D JCT 10 JUNC D JCT 25 JUNC D JCT 100 JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND E E E E E F F F F F G G G G G B B B B B B B B B B IN IN IN IN IN OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -5.178 R 7.230 R 14.422 R 21.502 R 34.546 R 1.560 1.982 3.324 4.539 6.653 .995 1.292 2.250 3.127 4.666 .526 .682 1.188 1.651 2.464 3.238 4.704 9.979 15.271 25.143 3.238 4.704 9.978 15.271 25.142 R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
Qpeak hrs --------12.1370 12.1380 12.1380 12.4260 12.2680 12.1180 12.1160 12.1160 12.1160 12.1100 12.1160 12.1160 12.1100 12.1100 12.1100 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.2360 12.2340 12.2010 12.2010 12.2010 12.6050 12.5800 12.5630 12.4590 12.2940
Qpeak cfs -------28.79 40.31 80.24 127.03 278.30 19.57 24.74 40.71 54.74 78.51 12.77 16.53 28.30 38.75 56.48 6.53 8.46 14.52 19.89 29.01 30.63 46.89 103.26 153.22 240.93 14.77 22.89 51.52 97.97 210.49
280.84 281.14 282.19 282.93 283.31
.744 1.154 2.653 3.792 4.465
Page 1.04
Node ID ----------------POND C IN POND C IN POND C IN POND C IN POND C IN POND POND POND POND POND C C C C C OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT
Type ---POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND
Return Event -----1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.531 R .810 R 1.856 R 2.939 R 5.007 R .531 .810 1.856 2.939 5.007
Qpeak hrs --------12.2340 12.2040 12.1740 12.1740 12.1730 12.2700 12.2690 12.3150 12.4130 12.5090
Qpeak cfs -------4.57 7.87 20.20 32.93 56.67 4.48 7.44 16.25 20.15 24.36
311.02 311.34 312.16 312.78 313.60
.008 .020 .117 .352 1.005
POND PACK SUMMARY DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
V-C-2
BB3 AA-2
d lin Ad 50 k1
Add lin k 1
Add lin
Ad dl in k
BB1
13 0
k 16 0
BB2
20
in dl d A
C 10 1 k
Route 60 Add lin k 140 Pond C Junc 10 Pond B
Addlink 90
GG
Addlink 70
DP 1
Addlin k 60
Addlink 50
Addlink 40
Junc A
Add lin k 30
Junc D
Junc E
Junc F
Junc G
Add lin k 20
Pond AA-2 Ad dl in k1 0
te 5 Rou 0
DD
O utl et B
AA-1
k Add lin 100
Addlink 80
EE
FF
Page 1.01
Name.... Watershed File.... J:\728 Pace - Pleasantville - Master Plan\728 Engineering\Stormwater\PondPak\728 Proposed Condi
MASTER DESIGN STORM SUMMARY Network Storm Collection: Sleepy Hollow
Return Event -----------1 2 10 25 100
Total Depth in -----3.0000 3.5000 5.0000 6.3000 8.5000
Rainfall Type ---------------Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve Synthetic Curve
RNF ID ---------------TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr TypeIII 24hr
Node ID ----------------AA-1 AA-1 AA-1 AA-1 AA-1 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB1 BB1
Type ---AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA
Return Event -----1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.511 .789 1.844 2.947 5.062 1.863 2.654 5.445 8.203 13.291 2.179 2.975 5.673 8.251 12.897
Qpeak hrs --------12.3160 12.2800 12.2430 12.2070 12.2070 12.2440 12.2440 12.2070 12.2070 12.2070 12.2020 12.2010 12.2010 12.2010 12.2010
Qpeak cfs -------3.26 5.97 16.73 28.13 49.71 15.70 23.77 52.53 80.61 131.37 20.62 29.04 57.15 83.43 129.61
Page 1.02
Node ID ----------------BB2 BB2 BB2 BB2 BB2 BB3 BB3 BB3 BB3 BB3 C C C C C DD DD DD DD DD *DP *DP *DP *DP *DP EE EE EE EE EE 1 1 1 1 1
Type ---AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA
Return Event -----1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -1.113 1.618 3.431 5.249 8.638 .527 .694 1.242 1.750 2.648 .606 .912 2.044 3.206 5.410 .569 .782 1.512 2.214 3.485 6.696 9.850 20.983 31.968 52.233 .494 .610 .966 1.280 1.818 R R R R R
Qpeak hrs --------12.2360 12.2340 12.2010 12.2010 12.2010 12.1590 12.1580 12.1580 12.1580 12.1580 12.2340 12.2040 12.1740 12.1740 12.1730 12.1380 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1590 12.4100 12.3360 12.2620 12.2360 12.1190 12.1190 12.1190 12.1190 12.1190
Qpeak cfs -------9.10 14.36 33.59 52.60 87.34 5.65 7.52 13.55 18.99 28.33 4.57 7.87 20.20 32.93 56.67 6.11 8.69 17.35 25.49 39.84 31.31 49.17 169.48 280.22 459.05 5.68 6.95 10.77 14.05 19.55
Page 1.03
Node ID ----------------FF FF FF FF FF GG GG GG GG GG JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC 10 10 10 10 10 A A A A A D D D D D E E E E E
Type ---AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT
Return Event -----1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.485 .627 1.083 1.499 2.227 .436 .579 1.048 1.486 2.263 1.517 2.259 4.986 7.769 13.023 6.696 9.850 20.983 31.968 52.233 5.707 7.893 15.468 22.851 36.359 1.312 1.689 2.901 4.011 5.954 R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
Qpeak hrs --------12.1090 12.1090 12.1080 12.0990 12.0990 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.2360 12.2360 12.2020 12.2010 12.2010 12.1590 12.4100 12.3360 12.2620 12.2360 12.1380 12.4200 12.3270 12.2900 12.2360 12.1180 12.1180 12.1160 12.1160 12.1100
Qpeak cfs -------6.10 7.86 13.37 18.25 26.52 4.92 6.61 12.06 17.01 25.53 13.51 21.69 49.01 71.29 109.44 31.31 49.17 169.48 280.22 459.05 29.08 43.36 112.93 176.82 282.97 16.55 21.24 35.93 48.96 71.15
Page 1.04
Return Node ID Type Event ----------------- ---- -----JUNC F JCT 1 JUNC F JCT 2 JUNC F JCT 10 JUNC F JCT 25 JUNC F JCT 100 JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC JUNC POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND G G G G G AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 AA-2 B B B B B B B B B B IN IN IN IN IN OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT IN IN IN IN IN OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT JCT JCT JCT JCT JCT POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.849 R 1.116 R 1.989 R 2.799 R 4.229 R .400 .533 .975 1.390 2.127 1.661 2.390 4.985 7.568 12.359 1.494 2.211 4.776 7.338 12.097 3.973 5.612 11.380 17.072 27.569 3.973 5.612 11.380 17.071 27.568 R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
Qpeak hrs --------12.1160 12.1160 12.1100 12.1100 12.1100 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.1370 12.2440 12.2440 12.2070 12.2070 12.2070 16.4190 13.1110 12.3590 12.2620 12.2440 12.2050 12.2020 12.2010 12.2010 12.1850 12.5900 12.5130 12.3900 12.3380 12.3120
Qpeak cfs -------10.87 14.30 25.18 34.97 51.70 4.92 6.61 12.06 17.01 25.53 15.70 23.77 52.53 80.61 131.37 1.22 4.64 42.28 76.64 127.35 39.11 57.53 118.93 172.53 265.84 18.11 32.26 87.01 136.78 218.27
272.01 272.11 272.73 273.09 273.54
1.326 1.361 1.583 1.722 1.903
280.97 281.21 281.79 282.18 282.79
.999 1.377 2.293 2.954 4.013
Page 1.05
Node ID ----------------POND C IN POND C IN POND C IN POND C IN POND C IN POND POND POND POND POND C C C C C OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT
Type ---POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND
Return Event -----1 2 10 25 100 1 2 10 25 100
HYG Vol ac-ft Trun ---------- -.531 R .810 R 1.856 R 2.939 R 5.007 R .531 .810 1.856 2.939 5.007
Qpeak hrs --------12.2340 12.2040 12.1740 12.1740 12.1730 12.2700 12.2690 12.3150 12.4130 12.5090
Qpeak cfs -------4.57 7.87 20.20 32.93 56.67 4.48 7.44 16.25 20.15 24.36
311.02 311.34 312.16 312.78 313.60
.008 .020 .117 .352 1.005

Stormwater Management Report-2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Stormwater Management Report-2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE CAMPUS TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, NEW YORK

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT

Prepared for: PACE UNIVERSITY Mount Pleasant, New York

B. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE

C. SITE CHARACTERISTICS AND DRAINAGE SUMMARY

on Figure No. 2, Existing Soils Map.

EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

AREA (AC) IMPERVIOUS Roof Pavement

2.63 3.00 0.00 0.12 0.60 0.02 0.63 0.00

6.14 10.88 1.30 1.88 1.95 2.31 2.27 0.46

8.77 13.88 1.30 2.00 2.55 2.33 2.90 0.46

41.71 40.51 14.22 5.98 0.78 2.09 2.05 2.35

50.48 54.39 15.52 7.98 3.33 4.42 4.95 2.81

17.37 25.52 8.38 25.06 76.58 52.71 58.59 16.37

0.21 0.28 0.20 0.28 0.74 0.52 0.58 0.20

1.0 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.0

0.28 0.26 0.23 0.16 0.15 0.08 0.16 0.00

728 Stormwater Analysis GP-0-10-001 Updated.xls 12/21/2011

Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP

Preservation of Undisturbed Areas

TABLE NO. 2 PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE, NEW YORK

DEVELOPED DRAINAGE CONDITIONS

AA-1 AA-2 BB1 BB2 BB3 CC DD EE FF GG HH

728 Stormwater Analysis GP-0-10-001 Updated.xls 12/21/2011

Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP

Refer to Section II.C.2. for a description of existing conditions.

C. PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

TABLE NO. 3 PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE, NEW YORK

DESIGN FLOW SUMMARY

DESIGN POINT NO.

Existing Dev w/o SWM Developed Delta

45.6 46.7 31.3 -14.3

7.36 7.83 6.70 -0.66

68.5 69.8 49.2 -19.4

10.43 11.02 9.85 -0.58

149.0 150.5 169.5 20.5

21.34 22.25 20.98 -0.36

226.2 246.1 280.2 54.1

32.18 33.31 31.97 -0.21

460.2 490.4 459.1 -1.1

52.26 53.69 52.23 -0.03

(1) Northeast Regional Climate Data Center

728 Stormwater Analysis GP-0-10-001 Updated.xls 12/21/2011

Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP

TABLE NO. 4 PACE UNIVERSITY PLEASANTVILLE, NEW YORK

Uses: Forest, stream and river corridors, wetlands, vernal pools

Area & Contributing Area

150' max contibuting length - pervious

Area & Contributing Area

728 DEC Approved Stormwater Measures.xlsx - Green Techniques

Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP

Practice 4. Tree Planting

Min. 1,000 cubic feet of soil material

Disconnection of Rooftop Runoff

Encouraged in A and B soils

Imp. changed to Perv. for calc's

100% A & B 40% C & D

728 DEC Approved Stormwater Measures.xlsx - Green Techniques

Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP

Practice 9. Stormwater Planters

10. Rain Barrels/Cisterns

Min volume equal to WQV Provide water budget analyis

11. Porous Pavement