Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Primary Credit Analysts: Gregoire Buet, New York (1) 212-438-4122; gregoire_buet@standardandpoors.com Anna Stegert, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-128; anna_stegert@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Sarah E Wyeth, New York (1) 212-438-5658; sarah_wyeth@standardandpoors.com Research Contributors: Shweta Vora, Mumbai; shweta_vora@standardandpoors.com Sujit R Kumar, Mumbai; sujit_kumar@standardandpoors.com Vinayak Venkatraman, Mumbai; vvenkatraman@crisil.com
Table Of Contents
Regional Economic Trends Will Shape Performance This Year Again 2012 Ended On A Slow Note, But With Some Improvement In Sight Profitability Trends: Margins Remain Sound But Upside Appears Limited Prudent Financial Policies Are Key To Investment-Grade Ratings In 2013 For Speculative-Grade Issuers, Leverage Trends Are Steady, And After A Wave Of Refinancing, 2013 And 2014 Maturities Are Manageable Our Outlook For Select Key Capital Goods Segments
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
For the third consecutive year, upgrades outnumbered downgrades in U.S. capital goods ratings in 2012, although the trend faded in the later part of the year. In Europe, conversely there were more downgrades than upgrades, all among speculative-grade issuers. As of early 2013, the majority of ratings globally carry a stable outlook. The outlooks are supported by many companies showing good headroom against credits metrics commensurate with the ratings, and by still-high cash reserves, despite the weakening trend in operating and financial performances often observed through 2012. About 84% of U.S. capital goods companies carry a stable outlook, whereas the proportion of stable outlooks in Europe is significantly lower at about 69%. Negative outlooks represent 17% in Europe and 11% in the U.S., while positive outlooks account for 14% and 5% in Europe and the U.S., respectively.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 1
In the U.S., we see the recent political compromise to avoid the so-called fiscal-cliff as paving a first step toward a more solid economic recovery. This suggests that capital goods issuers might, despite ongoing uncertainties around a final budget resolution, face another year of moderate growth. On the other hand, our forecasts for Europe remain bleak with flat GDP growth for 2013, which is likely translate into moderate declines for equipment demand within the Eurozone. Demand from emerging markets, where capital good issuers are increasingly present, will continue to fuel growth. For China, following a relatively volatile 2012, we see increasing signs for a more robust growth track in 2013. Latin America should also see growth rising slightly from 2012 levels. For investment-grade issuers (those with 'BBB-' or higher ratings) we generally see some flexibility also for a less supportive economic climate given relatively strong credit metrics and cash reserves in excess of maintenance needs. Therefore, we see a move to more aggressive financial policies as one of the key risks to credit quality as opposed to performance-related downside risks. For speculative-grade issuers (those with 'BB+' or lower ratings), leverage metrics are broadly steady, and most of the issuers have adequate liquidity because refinancing needs for 2013 and 2014 have mostly been addressed. Still, covenants headroom remains a risk for some, and debt-funded dividend payouts are on the rise.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Table 1
Sources: Bloomberg; Institute for Supply Management; U.S Federal Reserve; Bureau Of Economic Analysis; EuroStat; Markit; China Federation of Logistics; Standard & Poor's. Gross fixed private investment--Equipment and software. Gross fixed private investment--Nonresidential structures. fc--Forecast.
In the U.S., recent manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) figures and industrial production data indicate a moderate growth trend in demand for capital goods. Equipment spending (which includes both industrial equipment and software) grew at a healthy pace in 2012 and we expect decelerating rate in 2013. Total industry capacity utilization continues its slow recovery as well, but it remains slightly less than its long-term average of 80%. Real nonresidential construction activity is another key indicator for demand in the sector. We expect 4%-5% growth in private nonresidential construction spending in 2013, partially offset by likely decline in public spending. Europe: The relatively weak picture for European capital goods is in line with the Eurozone's macroeconomic outlook. The region's manufacturing was consistently below 50 throughout 2012, whereas it showed an improvement from its trough in summer 2012 to reach 47.4 by year-end. Industrial production growth similarly declined modestly throughout 2012, after it grew for two years. Altogether, this led to Eurozone capacity utilization statistics that remain around 77% at year-end 2012, below the long-term historical average. The picture within the region, however, is fairly uneven: Utilization rates in Germany and France are above or in line with the long-term average, but they remain very weak in Spain and Italy. We expect European construction markets to experience some moderate decline for the year: Budget austerity, especially in Southern Europe, will likely force governments to curtail infrastructure spending, and the weak economy will weigh on private-sector investments. Other regions: We expect growth for equipment in other key emerging markets to stay relatively consistent with our economic growth expectations. PMI index readings in China and Brazil have also been strengthening modestly in recent months.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 2
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
operational inefficiencies. Along with other considerations, this has occasionally been cause for downgrades or negative outlooks. In Europe, we have seen margins holding up fairly robustly, declining on average by 50 basis points (bps) in 2012, with most issuers showing a relatively stable trend. Average EBITDA margins remain close to the previous average peak in 2007, with most notable declines among construction companies and those supplying equipment to the industry (Strabag SE, Peri GmbH). SKF was one exception to the trend of relative stability in 2012 among investment-grade issuers with its adjusted EBITDA margin declining by close to 300 bps largely due to high fixed costs as production was significantly lower. Despite many companies' attempt to intensify restructuring initiatives to counterbalance the impact of underutilization, we anticipate a continued moderation of profitability measures. We anticipate that charges related to these programs will also negatively weigh on profitability metrics of European capital goods issuers.
Chart 3
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 4
Margin performance will continue to depend primarily on changes in production volumes and their positive or negative effect on operating leverage. The effect of other potentially significant factors will be mixed. Factors that will affect profitability include: Inventory management and the destocking cycle Cost management and restructuring actions: Capital goods companies continue to embrace lean manufacturing and continuous improvement through "operational business systems," although with various degrees of success. With a focus on making products available to the market faster, enhancing quality, and reducing footprint, this can help improve productivity and reduce operating and nonoperating expenses. In addition, as growth slowed in the second half of last year, a number of management teams initiated new restructuring plans. This should help protect margins this year. Price competition: We expect demand for many capital goods products to remain moderately price-sensitive because they are often highly engineered, "mission-critical" components for their customers. Quality and service capability are frequently more important competitive factors than price for products that go into aerospace, energy, and mining applications for which the cost of failure and technical tolerance are very high. Still, in segments such as construction equipment or power supply competition from local players in emerging markets is intensifying as the quality of their products gradually improves toward Western performance standards, and supply capacity can exceed demand, if only temporarily. In addition, commoditization of certain products remains a key component of
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
price competition. Integration of acquisitions. Serial acquirers in the sector (e.g., ITW, Ametek, and Roper) rely on a well-tested blueprint to integrate the many small to midsize companies they acquire every year (scale leveraging, low-cost sourcing, overhead structure simplification), providing scope for margin expansion after a few years. Yet, the integration of acquisitions or realization of planned synergies often leads to a shortfall in performance. And recent impairment announcements at Caterpillar or Emerson related to acquisitions underscore the various risks of these transactions, even at issuers whose management abilities we otherwise regard positively. Commodities and component input costs. Managing the volatility of materials costs will remain tough for the sector's issuers. Although higher commodity prices generally tend to boost demand for the many original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and component makers that serve the energy, mining, and agricultural sectors, commodity cost swings can cut into profit margins if companies aren't able to quickly raise prices in response. Steel is often the most important commodity, but copper and a variety of other metals and resins are also common raw materials that capital goods companies use. Prices have generally declined in the past six months, so companies could continue to see some input cost benefit for a few more quarters. Currency volatility. We believe fluctuations in global currencies will also remain a concern for management teams. Global issuers, whether in the U.S. or Europe, tend to have a production base in local markets that provide a natural, if imperfect, hedge against currency swings. However, some manufacturers (AGCO, Xerium, or Blount for example) are more exposed than others to changes in currency rates because they export from various countries. Japanese players have started to benefit from the weakening of the yen against other major currencies. Supply chain risks. Supply chain disruptions remain another risk to profit margins, as natural disasters in Asia (the earthquake in Japan and flooding in Thailand in 2011) have shown. The near-term cost of having to replace a supply source can be significant. Although just-in-time manufacturing helps companies identify sources of the supply problems, disrupted supply for a product can mean lost revenue, higher materials costs (when all industry participants scramble to secure an alternative supply source, they drive up prices), and bulging inventory of unfinished products. And for highly engineered capital goods that need to meet specific quality and tolerance criteria, even if an alternative supply source for a component is readily available, the process of ensuring that the new supplier meets stringent quality standards can take several months.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 5
On the liability side, the magnitude of underfunded pension and postretirement obligations in the sector remains a credit negative. Issuers continue to take actions to address these liabilities, implementing de-risking strategies and using cash to fund pension plans (Pentair, Joy Global, Honeywell). Yet, while asset returns were also generally good last year, often exceeding expected returns assumptions, funded status haven't improved much because of the offsetting effect of lower discount rates. This continues to hurt adjusted credit ratios. We expect companies will continue to use cash to make voluntary contributions in 2013, but the magnitude will likely depend on interest rate trends. In Europe, we similarly expect postretirement obligations to increase because fewer companies have undertaken efforts to make contributions to their plan assets.
Large acquisitions and share buybacks remain key drivers of rating changes
Following the trend that started in 2011, 2012 was another active year for cash deployment featuring a number of transformational M&A transactions (mostly involving U.S. issuers), multiple midsize deals, and a variety of share buyback announcements. We expect continued active acquisition and buyback spending in 2013, although some of the large acquirers of 2012 will likely focus on integration this year. Further consolidation in sectors such as mining equipment, electrical products and distribution, or industrial pumps is possible, however. Issuers will likely generally continue to balance acquisitions and share repurchases in a manner that is consistent with
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
their cash flow generation and the capacity afforded by their credit ratios. With historically low borrowing costs, debt financing has been a preferred source for acquisition funding, although several large deals have included an equity component, limiting credit quality deterioration. Share repurchases, while credit-negative, appear to remain calibrated to excess cash generation, rather than being debt-funded, releveraging events. Most announcements, therefore, will likely not result in rating changes, but discipline in using funds for such initiatives is often a key rating consideration, especially when the economic outlook remains fragile. Among announcements over the past few months that resulted in rating changes or outlook revision were: Siemens' (A+/Stable/A-1+) execution of a $3 billion stock repurchase, which amid an expected weakening in operating trends, led us to revise the outlook to stable from positive; Eaton Corp.'s (A-/Negative/A-2) $12 billion acquisition of Cooper PLC, funded with a combination of equity and debt, which led to a revision of the outlook to negative from stable. Ingersoll Rand's (BBB+/Watch Neg/A-2) asset spin off and $2 billion buyback announcement, causing us to place the ratings on CreditWatch Negative; and Pentair's (BBB/Stable/A-2) $5 billion largely stock-based acquisition of Tyco Flow Control, which led to a one-notch rating upgrade. We expect the large acquirers of 2012 (United Technologies, ABB, Eaton, Ropers, Crane) to focus on integrating past acquisitions. Conversely, others have restored good capacity for larger deals and will likely be active in M&A (Danaher). If growth is slower than expected, strategic acquirers will look to bolster growth. On the other side, divestitures remain another lever for portfolio management and are often a source of funding for other growth opportunities, for compensating shareholders, or reducing debt (GE, Siemens, SPX). Over the past two years, former conglomerates like ITT Corp. and Tyco International Ltd. have spun off divisions to enhance shareholder value. In Europe, acquisitions were less pronounced over recent years with many companies focusing on making a number of bolt-on purchases as opposed to engaging into larger deals. ABB remained among the most active consolidators in 2012. It closed the $3.9 acquisition of Thomas & Bett's in May 2012, following a transaction of a similar size in 2011. The rating remained unchanged given the significant headroom the company's financial metrics had at that time compared to levels commensurate with the rating. Headroom to digest further medium to large deals in the short term has clearly dropped, however.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 6
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 7
For Speculative-Grade Issuers, Leverage Trends Are Steady, And After A Wave Of Refinancing, 2013 And 2014 Maturities Are Manageable
About 65% of our issuer ratings in the U.S. sector are speculative-grade, and the majority of those are ratings of 'B+' or lower. Generally, credit quality continued to improve for these issuers in 2012, marked by a combination of improved operating performance and adequate credit measures. At the end of the third quarter of 2012, leverage for speculative-grade companies had stabilized with the average of 4.8x, and the median at roughly 4x. These measures are comparable with the pre-recession levels of 2007. Most issuers have adequate liquidity largely due to the many refinancings that have taken place in recent quarters, and this has helped push back debt maturities largely beyond 2015. Most bank debt agreements require compliance with certain leverage or coverage ratios and many companies reduced debt last year to comply with gradually tightening covenants. In the U.S., 79% of our speculative-grade ratings on capital goods companies carry stable outlooks, reflecting our view of steady credit quality. A number continue to maintain good cushion in their credit measures, which should allow
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
them to maintain their credit quality in case of unforeseen decline in profits and cash flow, or if they temporarily incur somewhat higher debt. Others that are more or less meeting our respective rating expectations will have less room for underperformance, but their downside risk depends largely on the end markets they serve. We could upgrade four issuers (Oshkosh, Wesco, Sunstate, Mueller) if they can continue to improve or maintain their credit measures over the coming quarters. Meanwhile, eight issuers (all in the 'B' category) face some risk of downgrade. The reasons are varied but include elevated leverage either due to weak operating and financial performance (Tempel Steel, Xerium) or to liquidity challenges in the form of tight covenants and weak cash generation (Sensus, Maxim Crane). Another risk to ratings of many private equity owned speculative-grade issuers is debt-funded dividend payout to sponsors which is often a downside rating trigger. In Europe, only about half of the issuers we rate are speculative-grade. We have stable outlooks on about two-thirds of our speculative-grade issuer ratings. About another 25% carry a negative outlook, reflecting the uncertain economic outlook in their domestic European market (e.g., Dometic, Financiere SPIE), while others also face structural industry challenges (Heidelberger Druck). We expect that economic woes will limit those companies' ability to deleverage sufficiently and could also lead to violations of their financial covenants, particularly for Dometic. The companies that we rate with a positive outlook typically have significant headroom in their credit measures against levels we feel are commensurate with current ratings. For one issuer, KUKA, this could translate into an upgrade if the company maintains its strong financial performance over the coming year.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 8
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
that economy to slow along at about flat GDP this year. Mining. The outlook for mining equipment (Caterpillar, Komatsu, Joy Global, Sandvik, Atlas Copco, Metso) is comparatively somewhat weaker, and order trends in the second half of 2012 suggest mining equipment revenues at the largest OEMs (Caterpillar, Joy Global, Metso, Atlas Copco, Sandvik) will likely decline this year. Capital spending for large greenfield projects has generally been reduced globally, creating some headwinds, and for equipment providers serving the U.S. coal mining market, production declines are causing structurally lower demand. Still, mining companies continue to invest in production capacity to meet current and long-term demand and improve their mines' productivity. Although prices for key metals and minerals such as coal, copper, and iron ore fluctuate widely, they generally remain above levels that continue to spur capital investment.
Transportation equipment
Auto. Capital goods companies typically have only moderate exposure to the automotive sector, except for a few names (SKF and Sandvik) that derive more than 10% to 15% of sales from that segment. We expect U.S. auto sales to grow by some 6% in 2013 (see "U.S. Auto Sales Poised To Continue Recovery In 2013; 2012 Sales In Line With Standard & Poor's Expectations," published Jan. 4, 2013) after a strong increase for 2012 of about 13%. Our base case predicts another slow year for the Western European car market following the expected 8% decline in 2012. More specifically, we think growth, if any, in 2013 will be at best anemic and that a low single-digit sales decline this year is plausible (see "Top 10 Investor Questions For 2013: Global Autos and Trucks," published Dec. 5, 2012). Growth in the key emerging market of China is expected to continue, although at a flatter pace. A more severe recession in Europe or a return to recession in the U.S., on the other hand, would lead to more pronounced revenue declines for automakers and, in turn, would pressure margins and cash flow generation, in our view. This likely would hurt demand for capital goods issuers that are auto industry suppliers, in particular those that produce components rather than capital equipment. Trucks. The outlook for the global heavy-truck market is relatively hazy owing to uncertainty over the world economy. However, even if another recession hits, we don't anticipate as severe a slump in demand for trucks as during the global recession of 2008-2009, which decimated the market and wiped out huge chunks of business for Cummins and Eaton. But unlike then, the market is not currently overheated, order inventories are manageable, and the number of truck owners replacing older, worn-out vehicles will cushion a slowdown (see "Top 10 Investor Questions For 2013: Global Autos And Trucks," Dec. 5, 2012). Rail equipment. In 2012, rail orders for European players such as Siemens AG and Alstom S.A. (which primarily operate in the passenger railcar market) have shown robust growth that should bolster 2013 performances. Despite the good industry fundamentals, we consider the current economic uncertainties to be a major risk because order delays or cancellations could squeeze margins and cash generation. In the U.S., where rated issuers have often more exposure to freightcar than to passenger-railcar demand (except for locomotives at GE and Caterpillar), industry conditions remain sound overall, reflecting continued high demand for tank cars to support the transportation of shale oil. High product prices should help manufacturing profits, offsetting mixed demand for other railcar types and weak conditions for coal-carrying freightcars. While we are cautious about long-term strength of tank-car demand amid growing supply capacity, manufacturers are also investing in their lease fleets, which should improve business stability. Aerospace. Several diversified capital goods issuers (GE, UTX, Honeywell, Parker-Hannifin, Eaton, Timken) have significant exposure to commercial aerospace both through new aircraft and aftermarket parts and services. The commercial aerospace sector is in the midst of what we expect will be a prolonged period of increasing deliveries that could translate into consistent mid- to high-single digit revenue growth at many suppliers. This is supported by large order backlogs, the ramp-up of key platforms, and a pipeline of new model introductions for the current decade. Still, high fuel prices, specific platform development delays, and the possibility of reduced availability of aircraft financing remain inherent risks. In addition, demand for aftermarket parts and services should recover from somewhat weak
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
levels experienced in 2012 when airlines managed inventories very tightly, offsetting positive passenger traffic trends. On the negative side, these companies are also often suppliers to defense contractors, which are facing weaker demand because of military budget cuts leading to program reductions and cancellations.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Copyright 2013 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT