Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF LAW
TORTS AND DAMAGES
COURSE OUTLINE
I.
II.
Elements
Article 2176, CC
Barredo vs. Garcia, 73 Phil 607
Elcano vs. Hill, 77 SCRA 98
Cinco vs. Canonoy, 90 SCRA 369
Baksh vs. CA, 219 SCRA 115
Dulay vs. CA, 243 SCRA 220 (1995)
Garcia vs. Florido, 52 SCRA 420
Andamo vs. IAC, 191 SCRA 195
Taylor vs. Manila Electric Company, 16 Phil 8
Tayag vs. Alcantara, 98 SCRA 723
B.
Distinctions
1.
Quasi-delict v. Delict
Article 2177, CC
Article 365, RPC
Barredo vs. Garcia, 73 Phil 607
Padilla vs. CA, 129 SCRA 558
Cruz vs. CA, 282 SCRA
Philippine Rabbit vs. People, GR No. 147703 (2004)
People vs. Ligon, 152 SCRA 419 (1987)
2.
III.
1
NEGLIGENCE
A.
Concept of Negligence
1.
Definition; Elements
Article 20, CC
Article 1173 CC
Picart vs. Smith, 37 Phil 809
2.
Standard of Conduct
2.1.
2.2
Special Cases
Children
Article 12, RPC & Comprehensive Juvenile Justice Law
Taylor vs. Manila Railroad, 16 Phil 8
Ylarde vs. Aquino, 163 SCRA 697
Experts/Professionals
Article 2187,CC
BPI vs. CA, 216 SCRA 51
Intoxication
Wright vs. Manila Electric, 28 Phil 122
Insanity
Articles 2180, 2182, CC
US vs. Baggay, 20 Phil 142
B.
Degrees of Negligence
Article 2231, CC
Marinduqe vs. Workmens, 99 Phil 48
C.
Proof of Negligence
1.
Burden of proof
Rule 131, Rules of Court (ROC)
2.
Presumption
Articles 2184-2185, 2188, 1734-1735, CC
3.
D.
Plaintiffs Negligence
Article 2179, CC
Contributory Negligence
Articles 2179, 2214, CC
Philippine Bank of Commerce vs. CA, 269 SCRA 695
3.
Fortuitous Event
Article 1174, CC
National Power vs. CA, GR Nos. 103442-45 (1993)
Southeastern College vs. CA, GR No. 126389, 292 SCRA 422 (July 10, 1998)
4.
Assumption of Risk
Ilocos Norte vs. CA, 179 SCRA 5
5.
Due diligence
Metro Manila vs. CA, 223 SCRA 521
6.
Prescription
Allied Banking vs. CA, 178 SCRA 526
7.
Double recovery
Article 2177, CC
IV.
PERSONS LIABLE
A.
The Tortfeasor
Articles 2176, 2181, 2194, CC
Worcester vs. Ocampo, (5932) 22 Phil 42 (1912)
Article 2184, CC
Caedo vs. Yu Khe Thai, G.R. No. L-20392 (Dec 18 1968)
Rodriguez Luna vs. IAC, 135 SCRA 242 (1995)
B.
Vicarious Liability
Quasi-tort Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, p.1489
Article 58 PD No. 603
Articles 216, 218- 219, 221, 236, FC
Articles 101-103, RPC
Sec. 6, RA 9344
Articles 2180 2182, CC
1.
Parents
Tamargo vs. CA, (85044) 209 SCRA 518 (1992)
Cuadra vs. Monfort, 35 SCRA 160 (1970)
2.
Guardians
Articles 216 and 218, Family Code
Articles 2180-2181, CC
3.
4.
5.
Employers
Philtranco vs. CA, (120553) 273 SCRA 562 (1997)
Ligh Rail Transit vs. Natividad, (145804) 397 SCRA 75 (2003)
6.
State
Merrit vs. Government (11154) 34 Phil 311 1916
Article 2189, CC
De los Santos vs IAC
Republic vs Sandiganbayan
V.
CAUSATION
A. Proximate Cause
1.
Definition
Bataclan vs. Medina, 102 Phil 181(L-10126) (1957)
Phoenix Construction vs. IAC, 148 SCA 353 (L-652095) (1987)
B. Others
Article 1723, CC
a.
Proprietors of Buildings
Articles 2190- 2192, CC
2.
Employees
Araneta vs. Joya, (L-25172) 57 SCRA 59 (1974)
3.
C.
VI.
Engineer/Architect
Defamation
MVRS vs. Islamic, GR No 135306, 396 SCRA 210 (January 28, 2003)
2.
Fraud
Salta vs. De Veyra, 202 Phil 527
3.
Physical Injuries
Corpus vs. Paje, G.R. No. L-26737 (1969)
Dulay vs. CA, GR No 108017 (1995)
C.
Neglect of Duty
Article 34, CC
D.
VII.
INTENTIONAL TORTS
A.
Abuse of Rights
Article 19, CC
Velayo vs. Shell, 100 Phil 186
Saudi Arabia vs. CA, 297 SCRA 469
Amonoy vs. Gutierrez, 351 SCRA 731
UE vs. Jader, 325 SCRA 804 GR No 132344 (2000)
B.
Elements
1.
Examples
a.
b.
5
Malicious prosecution
Article 2219, CC
Lao vs. CA, 325 SCRA 694
Que vs. IAC, 169 SCRA 137
c.
d.
Public Humiliation
Unjust Dismissal
Medina vs. Castro-Bartolome, G.R. No. L-59825 (1982) 116 SCRA 597
VIII. LIABILITY
A.
Possessor of Animals
Article 2183, CC
Vestil vs. IAC. 179 SCRA47
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Presumption of Negligence
Articles 2185, 2188, 2190 to 2193, Civil Code
IX.
OTHER TORTS
A.
Dereliction of Duty
Article 27, CC
B.
Unfair Competition
Article 28, CC
C.
Article 26, CC
Concepcion vs. CA, GR No. 120706 (2000), 324 SCRA 85 (January 31, 2000)
X.
DAMAGES
A.
B.
Kinds of Damages
1.
Actual or Compensatory
Articles 2216, 2199, 2200, 205, CC
a.
Kinds
PNOC vs. CA, 297 SCRA 402
Integrated Packing vs. CA, 333 SCRA 170
b.
Extent
Articles 2201-2202, CC
c.
Certainty
DBP vs. CA, GR No. 118367 (1998)
d.
Damage to property
PNOC vs.CA, supra
e.
f.
Attorneys Fees
Article 2208, CC
Quirante vs. IAC, G.R. No. 73886, 169 SCRA 769 (January 31, 1989)
g.
Interest
Articles 2209-2213, CC
Crismina Garments vs. CA, G.R. No. 128721, 304 SCRA 356 (March 9, 1999)
h.
7
Mitigation of Liability
2.
Moral
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
3.
ABS-CBN vs. CA, G.R. No. 128690, 301 SCRA 572 (Jan. 21, 1999)
National Power vs. Philipp Brothers, G.R. No 126204, 369 SCRA 629
(Nov. 20, 2001)
Nominal
Articles 2221-2223, CC
People vs. Gopio, 346 SCRA 408
Armovit vs. CA, 184 SCRA 476
4.
Temperate
Articles 2224-2225, CC
People vs. Singh, 360 SCRA 404
People vs. Plazo, 350 SCRA 433, 161 SCRA 208 (May 9, 1988)
5.
8
Liquidated
Articles 2226-2228, CC
6.
Exemplary or Corrective
Articles 2229-2235, CC
PNB vs. CA, 256 SCRA 44
Del Rosario vs. CA, 267 SCRA 158