DIHFEU-NFL vs. WATERFRONT INSULAR HOTEL DAVAO G.R. No. 174040-41. Respondent Waterfront Insular hotel Davao suspended operations for a period of six months due to severe and serious business losses. The company assured the DOLE that if the company could not resume its operations within the six-month period, the company would pay the affected employees all the benefits legally due to them.
Original Description:
Original Title
Insular Hotel Eu-nf vs. Waterfront Insular Hotel Davao
DIHFEU-NFL vs. WATERFRONT INSULAR HOTEL DAVAO G.R. No. 174040-41. Respondent Waterfront Insular hotel Davao suspended operations for a period of six months due to severe and serious business…