Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e t.
di
t
pla ne
HEALTH
SUSTAINABLE DIET
CLIMATE CHANGE
The Connection and the Solution
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS’ REPORT
2009 UPDATE
1
“Improving dietary habits is a societal,
not just an individual problem.
Therefore it demands a population-based,
multi-sectoral, multi-disciplinary,
and culturally relevant approach.”
HEALTH OVERVIEW 8
National and International Figures 8
Dietary Factors 8
Costs of ill Health 9
DISEASES 9
Obesity 9
Cardiovascular Disease 10
Diabetes 10
Cancer 11
Swine Flu 13
CONCLUSION 25
APPENDIX 1 - FISH 28
APPENDIX 2 - QUOTES 30
REFERENCES 32
The contents of this publication
have been endorsed by the
following health professionals
and scientists.
What we eat is important in the creation its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, with
and prevention of major diseases such as a minimum reduction of 26% by 2020 (NHS
cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes 2009). As a pro-active ‘corporate citizen’, the
and obesity. The detrimental effects of sat- NHS is not only leading by example, but
urated fats and lack of fibre are well docu- showing that benefits are to be gained by
mented in high profile studies, such as the improving health which contribute to sus-
European Prospective Investigation into tainable development.
Cancer (EPIC), the largest study of diet and
health ever undertaken, and many other This paper summarises the medical evi-
studies in respected scientific publications; dence which links the dramatic rise of ma-
these studies also show that a good diet jor chronic disease worldwide to high in-
including fruits and vegetables can be a takes of saturated fats and animal protein,
powerful weapon for the prevention, even and the reversal of these once a healthful
reversal, of chronic illness. diet containing more vegetables, grains
and legumes is adopted. It also highlights
Related to our health and diet is the press- how these same food choices can have a
ing issue of climate change. In the report, very significant impact on Greenhouse Gas
‘Managing the Health Effects of Climate Emissions (GGEs) and climate change. The
Change’, a joint commission between the paper shows how eating further down the
Lancet and University College London food chain is not only more sustainable and
(UCL), lead author, professor Anthony Cos- supports good health, but is also one of the
tello states: “there are major health benefits quickest and most effective ways that we
from low-carbon lifestyles, which can reduce can help mitigate climate change – more
obesity, heart and lung disease, diabetes and than by reducing emissions from transport.
stress” (UCL News 2009). Our food choices, It is hoped that through health profession-
which are a contributory factor to major als’ leadership vital plans can be promptly
chronic diseases, also have a direct impact adopted for the implementation of such
on climate change and our planet’s finite re- dietary measures for the benefit of people’s
sources; similarly, climate change has direct health, our national economy and for ad-
and indirect impacts on human health. dressing the many environmental crises we
are all facing.
In its Carbon Reduction Strategy for Eng-
land, the NHS recognises the urgency of
climate change and commits to reducing
7
National and International Figures
HEALTH
In the UK, around 70,000 fewer people would die prematurely each
OVERVIEW year if diets matched nutritional guidelines on fruit and vegetable,
saturated fat, added sugar and salt intake (Strategy Unit 2008). The
EPIC Study has found that diets rich in fruit and vegetables are as-
sociated with reduced mortality (Am J Clin Nutr 2007). Globally,
the WHO has stated: “Low intake of fruit and vegetables is estimated
to cause about 31 percent of ischaemic heart disease, 11 percent of
strokes worldwide and 19 percent of gastrointestinal cancers. Overall,
2.7 million deaths are attributable to low fruit and vegetable intake”
(WHO 2004).
Dietary Factors
Data show a major change in diet at a global level since the middle
of the twentieth century whereby traditional, largely plant-based
diets have been replaced by high fat, energy dense diets that are mi-
cronutrient poor, with a substantial content of animal based foods
(WHO/FAO 2003). This change, as well as an increase in sedentary
lifestyles and smoking, has had disastrous effects on health, with the
burden of chronic disease rapidly increasing worldwide. Many stud-
ies have implicated dietary factors in chronic disease: according to
the WHO, a diet insufficient in fruit and vegetables is an independ-
ent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and cancer, including lung,
stomach, colorectal and oesophageal cancers (WHO Media Centre
2007, CVD). In 2001, chronic disease caused approximately 60% of
the 56.5 million reported deaths in the world and 46% of the global
burden of disease (WHO 2002). Cardiovascular disease accounts for
almost half of chronic disease deaths; obesity and diabetes are on
the rise and appearing earlier in life (WHO/FAO 2003). The rapid in-
crease in chronic disease is not limited to developed regions: devel-
oping countries are also plagued (WHO 2002). It has been estimated
that by 2020, chronic disease will account for almost three quarters
of all deaths worldwide (WHO 1998). Yet chronic diseases are largely
preventable, and primary prevention is considered to be the most
cost-effective and sustainable course of action (WHO/FAO 2003).
DISEASES Obesity
Obesity has reached pandemic proportions. There are at least 400
million obese adults and over 1.5 billion overweight people (age 15+)
in the world; at least 20 million children under the age of 5 are over-
weight. The WHO estimates that 10% of children and 20% of adults in
Europe and Central Asia will be obese by 2010 unless action is taken.
In England, almost 1 in 4 adults are obese, and if it remains unchecked,
by 2050, 9 in 10 adults will be overweight or obese. Worldwide, about
2.5 million deaths annually are attributed to overweight/obesity (WHO
Media Centre 2006, Obesity).
Costs of obesity are considerable: the NHS in the UK spends £4.2 bil-
lion/year on overweight/obesity, forecast to more than double by
2050. The cost to the economy is £16 billion/year, predicted to rise to
£50 billion by 2050 (DoH, Obesity).
Risk factors for obesity and overweight are rising dramatically (WHO
Media Centre 2006, Obesity), but overweight, obesity and related chron-
ic diseases are largely preventable (WHO Media Centre 2006, Obesity). A
move from saturated to unsaturated fats, increasing consumption of
fruit and vegetables, as well as legumes, whole grains and nuts, limit-
ing sugar and increasing physical activity are recommended measures
for prevention and control (WHO Media Centre 2006, Obesity). Choles-
terol lowering foods, including viscous fibres (eg, fibres from oats and
barley) and plant sterols, increase the effectiveness of diet in treating
hypercholesterolemia (high blood cholesterol) (JAMA 2003).
9
Cardiovascular Disease
Globally, around 17.5 million people died from cardiovascular dis-
ease (CVD) in 2005: some 30% of all deaths. By 2015, the number
of deaths from CVD is expected to be about 20 million (WHO Media
Centre 2007,CVD). It is the world’s number one killer. CVD also plac-
es a heavy burden on national economies: it is estimated that Chi-
na will lose $558 billion in national income from 2006-2015, due to
heart disease, stroke and diabetes (WHO Media Centre 2007, CVD).
Causes of CVD are well established: the most important are un-
healthy diet, physical inactivity and tobacco use. At least 80% of
premature deaths from heart disease and stroke could be avoided
through healthy eating, regular physical activity and avoiding to-
bacco smoke (WHO/FAO 2003).
Diabetes
Diabetes has rapidly become a global pandemic. More than 180
million people worldwide have diabetes. This figure is expected
to more than double by 2030 without intervention. In 2005, an
estimated 1.1 million people died from diabetes. However, taking
into account deaths in which diabetes was a contributory condi-
tion (such as kidney failure or heart disease), this figure increases
to 2.9 million deaths per year (WHO Media Centre 2008, Diabetes).
10
The EPIC Study (Norfolk), with nearly 22,000 participants and a 12
year follow up, was the first large population-based prospective
study to report that an energy-dense diet is positively associated
with incident diabetes independently of baseline BMI, total energy
intake and other risk factors (Am Diab Assoc 2008). Another pro-
spective study involving 42,500 male participants with 12 years of
follow up concluded that total and saturated fat intake was associ-
ated with a higher risk of type II diabetes (not independent of BMI)
and that frequent consumption of processed meats may increase
risk (Am Diab Assoc 2002).
Cancer
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for 7.4
million deaths in 2004; this figure is projected to rise, with an esti-
mated 12 million deaths in 2030. Lung, stomach, colorectal, liver,
and breast cancer cause the most cancer deaths each year. More
than 30% of cancer deaths could be prevented by avoiding key risk
factors, which include tobacco and alcohol use, being overweight,
low fruit and vegetable intake and physical inactivity (WHO Media
Centre, Cancer 2009).
The EPIC Study has found that bowel cancer risk increases by a third
for people who consume two daily 80g portions of red or processed
11
meat, compared with those who eat just 20g a day (J Natl Cancer
Inst 2005). The World Cancer Research Fund recommends reducing
consumption of red and processed meats in its 2007 report, stat-
ing them to be a convincing cause of colorectal cancer (WCRF and
AICR 2007); and a meta-analysis of prospective studies published
through March 2006 also confirmed that high consumption of red
and processed meat is associated with increased risk of colorectal
cancer (Int J Cancer 2006). There is growing evidence linking red
meat to pancreatic and stomach cancers: EPIC found that people
eating over 100g of meat a day had over 3 times the risk of stomach
cancer (J Natl Cancer Inst 2006), while another study, involving over
500,000 individuals over 5 years, found that those consuming most
red or processed meat have a 40-50% higher risk of pancreatic can-
cer (Cancer Epidemiol 2007). Prostate cancer is associated with the
intake of animal fat, especially fat from red meat, which was the
conclusion of a prospective study involving 51,000 participants (J
Natl Cancer Inst 1993). Breast cancer has also been associated with
saturated fat intake, by a study of over 13,000 women over a four
year period (Lancet 2003a).
12
Swine Flu
Swine Flu, now with over 255,000 officially reported cases world-
wide, has highlighted the exposure of humans to animal patho-
gens. The pandemic has been linked by experts to factory farms,
which are perfect breeding grounds for new viruses such as H1N1,
the genetic lineage of which has been traced to a strain that
emerged in US factory farms in 1998, when it spread and mutated
at an alarming rate (Wired Science 2009).
The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) tells us that 60% of
human pathogens and 75% of recent emerging diseases, includ-
ing TB, are zoonotic (OIE 2005). All areas of meat, poultry, egg, and
dairy production (e.g. meat transportation and processing, animal
rendering, manure handling practices) can contribute to food con-
tamination and zoonotic disease (Env H Persp 2007). Several high
profile recalls involving E. Coli O157:H7 and Salmonella serve as
reminders of the risk.
13
Other meat-related diseases which can be fatal, such as CJD, Blue
Tongue Disease, Avian flu and Listeriosis, have also been a cause of
increased concern, and question the safety of eating meat. Meat
recalls around the world are becoming more frequent with millions
of kilos of meat found to be contaminated.
The Link
DIET, DISEASE AND In the recent report of a year-long commission held by the Lancet
GLOBAL WARMING and University College London, which included academics from
many different disciplines across the university, Professor Anthony
Costello, lead author, director of UCL’s Institute for Global Health and
paediatrician, described climate change as a ‘clear and present dan-
ger’, the impacts of which will be felt ‘in our lifetimes and those of
our children.’ (Times Online 2009). According to Professor Costello,
climate change will change patterns of disease, food security, water
and sanitation and extreme weather events for the worse.
Data show that the sharp increase in meat production and con-
sumption in the last 50 years has not only been linked to chronic
disease reaching pandemic proportions (WHO/FAO2003), but has
also caused environmental devastation, responsible for our planet’s
dwindling resources of land and water, further threatening food se-
curity, among other things.
14
Continuing Trend
Meat is the principal component in most people’s diet, and as such
is a main source of protein and iron for the majority: it has become
tradition to serve certain meat dishes in many cultures. Meat is also
a source of high saturated fat, lacks fibre and some micronutrients,
and if not organic, contains a multitude of chemicals, antibiot-
ics and hormones, all detrimental to human health. High profile
studies such as EPIC and others clearly cite the effects of too much
saturated fat and lack of fibre, absence of sufficient fruit and veg-
etables in the diet and physical inactivity as contributory risk factors
to many of our chronic but largely preventable diseases; statistics
from WHO show this trend is likely to continue unless concerted ac-
tion is taken.
Most people do not know they are able to replace protein from ani-
mal flesh with protein from pulses, grains, nuts and vegetables with
their many advantages and without detrimental health effects.
Despite this very real threat to the planet and its inhabitants, huge
subsidies are given for meat production every year: EU interven-
tions and direct support to the livestock industry in 2007 cost over
15
3.5 billion Euros. This figure does not include the financial aid given
for marketing (GUE/NGL 2007).
If the meat industry fulfils its predicted growth, with staunch mon-
etary support from governments, we must be prepared for serious
adverse consequences with regard to global health, financial costs
and runaway (uncontrollable) global warming.
NHS Strategy
The NHS Carbon Reduction Strategy for England prioritises tack-
ling its carbon footprint by reducing emissions from buildings
(22% of footprint) and transport (18%), although it also calls for
more use of seasonal, local food, and sustainable, nutritionally val-
uable produce, such as fish (see appendix 1), reducing reliance on
meat, dairy and eggs. Although food accounts for only 2% of the
footprint, provision of support for patients to reduce and eliminate
meat results not only in addressing today’s prevalent and rising di-
et-related diseases, but also creates huge environmental benefits
on a global scale in the vital short term period.
16
rates “five times higher than previously estimated.” This could cre-
ate an uncontrollable feedback effect, dramatically warming the
atmosphere, which would in turn warm the land, lakes and seabed,
further melting the permafrost and releasing more methane. Once
that threshold is reached, there will be nothing humans can do to
reverse it (Nature 2006). Research at the University of Alaska, USA,
has shown that a two to three-degree rise in air temperature could
cause the Arctic tundra to change from an area of carbon sink to
one of carbon source releasing into the atmosphere carbon diox-
ide, methane and other gases (Science Daily 2008).
629 km
Vegetarianism
1978 km
2427 km
*equivalent to the CO2 emissions of a BMW 118d with 119g CO2 /km
Source: Foodwatch
18
audit of the GGEs of our food choices, comparing transportation
vs food production emissions has shown that locally sourced food
does not have a significant impact on GGEs because the emissions
associated with food are dominated by the production phase, not
by its transportation. The report concludes that dietary shift is a
more effective means of lowering carbon footprint than buying lo-
cally, and “shifting less than one day per week’s consumption of red
meat and/or dairy to other protein sources or a vegetable based diet
could have the same climate impact as buying all household food
from local providers” (Carnegie Mellon University 2008).
One billion people in the world do not have access to clean water;
more than 2 billion do not have proper sanitation. The UN Food and
Agriculture Organization (UN FAO) estimates that by 2025, there
will be 1.8 billion people living with absolute water scarcity, and
2/3 of the world’s population could be living under water-stressed
conditions (UN FAO 2006). With global population expected to
reach 8.1 billion by 2030, 14% more fresh water would be required
for agriculture to keep pace with the growing demand for food (UN
FAO News 2007). But even now, the global amount of fresh water
available per person is falling rapidly (UNEP 2002).
Meat production also uses up to 20 times more land than grain and
vegetables to support the same number of people (WHO/FAO 2003).
19
One hectare of land produces:
• potatoes 22 people
• rice 19 people
• lamb for 2 people
• beef 1person
Hence, meat production uses the majority of agricultural land
(70%) – which can be rendered infertile for years due to overgraz-
ing, compaction and erosion. Seventy percent of all grazing land in
dry areas is considered to be degraded (UN FAO 2006).
The livestock industry is the single largest user of land and water
in the world (UN FAO 2006). Our diminishing reserves of land and
water cannot sustain a growing human population while mainly
being used for, and damaged by, the raising of 58 billion livestock
each year (FAOSTAT).
Food Insecurity
There are more than 1 billion people in the world who do not have
enough to eat. Hunger claims 25,000 lives every day and every six
seconds a child dies of hunger. (WFP Hunger Stats). Meanwhile,
760 million tons of grain are fed to animals every year (UN FAO Food
Outlook 2008). During 2007-2008, 36% of the global grain utilised
was to feed animals, whilst 47% was used for feeding humans, and
5% used on bio-fuel (UN FAO Crop 2008). During the same period
about 70% of the global soya consumption was in the form of ani-
mal feed whilst only 16% was used for humans (USDA Review 2008).
20
Raising animals for human consumption is one of the major causes
of world hunger (EVANA).
Deforestation
Forests play a key role in mitigating climate change. Apart from stor-
ing carbon, they act as a climate buffer, generate rainfall, store water,
stabilise the soil, maintain biodiversity and much more (GCP). Deci-
mating them for pasture has a very high environmental cost. Every
year about 2.4 billion tons of carbon dioxide is released into the atmos-
phere as a result of deforestation for livestock maintenance (UN FAO
2006). By 2010 cattle are projected to be grazing on some 24 million
hectares of neo-tropical land that was forest in 2000 (UN FAO 2006).
The declaration signed by 300 climate experts at the 2007 United Na-
tions Conference in Bali says: “If we lose the forests, we lose the fight
against climate change.”
Species Extinctions
In 306 of the 825 terrestrial eco-regions identified by the World-
wide Fund for Nature, livestock are identified as “a current threat”,
while 23 of Conservation International’s 35 “global hotspots for
biodiversity” - characterized by serious levels of habitat loss - are
affected by livestock production. The International Union for Con-
servation of Nature (IUCN) estimates that species loss today is
1,000 to 10,000 times higher than the expected natural extinction
rate. Livestock production is a major culprit, contributing to all the
most important direct drivers of biodiversity loss, such as climate
change, habitat change, invasive alien species, and pollution (UN
FAO 2006).
21
Tropical forests hold half of the world’s species and many have be-
come or are becoming extinct at an alarming rate, largely for meat
production. The few species of animal raised for meat and milk
now account for about 20% of the total terrestrial animal biomass,
and this proportion is still growing ‘invasively’. “The sheer quantity
of animals being raised for human consumption is a threat to the
Earth’s biodiversity” (UN FAO 2006).
They report that vegetarians have a lower body mass index, lower
blood cholesterol, lower blood pressure and rates of clinical hy-
pertension, less type II diabetes, and a lower incidence of prostate
and colon cancer. Vegetarians also have lower rates of death from
ischaemic heart disease (ADA 2009). A vegetarian diet prevents
meat-related diseases and can reverse some of them: Research
over the last 30 years has demonstrated that coronary atheroscle-
rosis can be reversed through comprehensive lifestyle changes,
including a vegetarian diet; and more recently, a randomized con-
trolled trial showed that comprehensive lifestyle changes may stop
or reverse the progression of prostate cancer (JAMA 1998). The
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition has also published studies
showing the benefits of a vegetarian diet in the prevention and
treatment of type II diabetes as well as its significant impact on car-
diovascular disease (Am J Clin Nutr 2003).
Many steps are being taken to curb climate change all over the
world, such as the use of renewable energy, eco friendly cars and
aeroplanes, recycling and planting trees, to name a few. Even the
meat and dairy industries are moving to reduce their environmen-
tal footprint through less packaging, improving fuel efficiency, re-
ducing water use, etc. Clearly, all of these are important and much
needed. Yet, even collectively, they are not sufficient to resolve the
environmental crisis we are facing now within a short time-frame,
if we continue to raise 58 billion animals for human consumption
every year (FAOSTAT). Nor would a continuation of current levels
23
of meat consumption reduce the worldwide pandemic of chronic
disease. Increasing scientific evidence shows that the high satu-
rated fats and lack of fibre in meat not only have a direct role in the
increase in major chronic diseases, but also, animal agriculture in
its current levels of production is literally stripping the planet of its
finite resources, as well as having a major role in global warming,
affecting many eco-systems. Furthermore, the rearing of billions of
animals in factory farms is breeding new and virulent pathogens,
as evidenced by the recent pandemic of Swine flu, posing an even
greater threat to human health and lives.
Based on the above studies showing how our dietary choices can
have a significant impact on our health and well-being as well as
an enormous impact on our planet’s resources and climate change,
NHS, GPs and other health practioners can implement novel envi-
ronmentally and economically effective measures such as:
24
The 20th century change from largely plant-based diets to energy-
CONCLUSION dense diets high in fat and animal foods has played a key role in
the upsurge of diet-related, preventable health problems: obesity,
cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes and some cancers; even the
swine flu pandemic has been clearly linked to meat production
and consumption. The healthiest individuals are those who con-
sume a diverse, plant-based diet, rich in whole grains, fruits and
vegetables.
The focus on CO2 emissions, whilst important, is not the short term
solution that is required, because even if the entire world switched
to a zero carbon economy and lifestyle today, it would take 100 to
1000 years for CO2 to dissipate out of the atmosphere. It becomes
very clear then why many scientists are now placing a greater im-
portance on limiting shorter term GHGs, such as methane, as a
better and essential strategy for mitigating global warming. This
would have a major influence in slowing planetary heating, giving
us valuable time to deal with CO2 emissions.
25
As Professor Tim Lang, adviser to the Government on food security
and tackling obesity, has said: “We’ve got to have new criteria that
take into account all the new concerns – sustainability, water short-
age, climate change, obesity, malnutrition and so on.” He advises
cutting down on eating animals and dairy foodstuffs to reduce
the amount of GHGs produced in rearing livestock (Daily Telegraph
2008).
26
27
Appendix 1 FISH
Fish is linked to many health benefits including protection from car-
diovascular disease. Until the publication of DART-2 Trial in 2003 (Eur
J Clin Nutr 2003), evidence appeared to show that Omega 3 from oily
fish or supplements reduced the risks of fatal myocardial infarction,
sudden death and overall mortality among people with existing dis-
ease (Am J Med 2002). Surprisingly, DART-2 did not confirm this (Eur
J Clin Nutr 2002) and more recently, in 2006, a high quality system-
atic review was published in the British Medical Journal which drew
attention to uncertainties of comprehensive benefits of consump-
tion of Omega 3 fats (BMJ 2006). The claim that Omega 3 fats reduce
the risk of cancer was not supported either (JAMA 2006). Earlier in
2004, the US Food and Drug Administration suggested that women
of child-bearing age, pregnant women, nursing mothers and very
young children should not eat long-lived predatory fish to minimize
exposure to methylmercury (EPA/FDA 2004). Clearly, this is a field in
which knowledge is still evolving.
28
the livestock sector for feed which is seriously affecting the world’s
fish population (UN FAO 2006).
Due to increasing concern about the state of our oceans and fish-
eries and the safety of eating fish, alternative sources of long chain
polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) have been or are being devel-
oped. One such lipid is stearidonic acid (SDA), a naturally occurring
(n-3) PUFA that may have similar biological properties to eicosapen-
taenoic acid (EPA), a major (n-3) PUFA in fish oil. Existing and novel
plant sources rich in SDA are being cultivated and promoted as po-
tential alternatives to marine-based (n-3) PUFA (J Nutr 2009).
Given the state of severe crisis of our global fisheries, the health risks
in fish consumption and the incomplete knowledge surrounding its
health benefits, it would seem responsible to refrain from advocat-
ing to people in developed countries that they increase their intake
of long chain Omega-3 fatty acids through fish consumption.
29
Appendix 2 REDUCING MEAT CONSUMPTION FOR
OPTIMUM HEALTH AND FOR THE PLANET
“The doctor of the future will give no medicine, but will in-
terest his patient in the care of the human frame, in diet and
in the cause and prevention of disease.”
Thomas Edison , Inventor
30
“People often say that humans have always eaten animals
as if this is a justification for continuing the practice. Accord-
ing to this logic, we should not try to prevent people from
murdering other people, since this has also been done since
the earliest of times.”
Isaac Bashevis Singer, Author, Nobel Prize 1978
“For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each oth-
er. Indeed, he who sows the seed of murder and pain cannot
reap joy and love.”
Pythagoras, Mathematician
31
References
(in alphabetical order)
ADA 2009, Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian Diets, July 2009, Vol 109, No. 7
http://www.adajournal.org/article/S0002-8223(09)00700-7/abstract
Am Diab Assoc 2002, van Dam RM et al “Dietary Fat and Meat Intake in Relation to Risk of Type II Diabe-
tes in Men”, American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care March 2002, Vol 25, no. 3 417-424
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/25/3/417.abstract?ijkey=d111e0c9910461d550f777851404
652453501357&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha
Am Diab Assoc 2008, Jing W et al, “Dietary Energy Density Predicts the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes,
The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk Study, American Diabetes Associa-
tion, Diabetes Care November 2008 vol. 31 no. 11 2120-2125
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/31/11/2120.full
Am Diab Assoc 2009, Tonstad S, Butler T, Yan R, Fraser GE, “Type of Vegetarian Diet, Body Weight and Preva-
lence of Type II Diabetes”, American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care May 2009 vol. 32 no. 5 791-796
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/32/5/791.abstract
Am J Clin Nutri 2003, Jenkins D J A et al “Type II diabetes and the vegetarian diet”, American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition, September 2003, Vol 78
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/78/3/610S
Am J Clin Nutri 2007 Agudo, A., et al. “Fruit and vegetable intakes, dietary antioxidant nutrients,
and total mortality in Spanish adults: findings from the Spanish cohort of the European Prospective
Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition” (EPIC-Spain). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, June
2007. 85(6): p. 1634-42
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17556703
Am J Epidemiol 2004, Genkinger JM et al, Fruit, vegetable, and antioxidant intake and all-cause, can-
cer, and cardiovascular disease mortality in a community-dwelling population in Washington County,
Maryland, American Journal of Epidemiology 15 Dec 2004, 160(12):1223-33
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15583375
Am J Med 2002, Bucher HC, Hengstler P, Schindler C, Meier G. “N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in coro-
nary heart disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”, American Journal of Medicine
March 2002;112(4)298-304
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11893369?dopt=Abstract
Ann Nutr Metab 2008, Arnold Vang e al. “Meats, Processed Meats, Obesity, Weight Gain and Occur-
rence of Diabetes among Adults: Findings from Adventist Health”, Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism
2008;52:96-104
http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&file=000121365
ASTDR 2007, Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry Mercury Nov 2007
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts46.html
ATSDR 2008, for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry Mercury April 2009
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html
32
BMJ 1992, Singh RR et al “Randomised Controlled Trial of Cardioprotective Diet in Patients With
Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results of One Year Follow up, British Medical Journal, 18 April
1992, 304:1015-1019
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/304/6833/1015
BMJ 2006, Hooper L, Thompson RL, Harrison RA, Summerbell CD, Ness AR, Moore HJ, et al. “Risks and
benefits of omega3 fats for mortality, cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review”. British
Medical Journal 2006;332: 752-5
Cancer Causes Control 2006, Boeing H., et al “Intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of cancer of the
upper aero-digestive tract: the prospective EPIC-study”, Cancer Causes & Control, Sep 2006. 17(7):
p. 957-69.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16841263
Cancer Epidemiol 2007, Stolzenberg-Solomon, R.Z., et al “Meat and meat-mutagen intake and pancre-
atic cancer risk in the NIH-AARP cohort”, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention Dec 2007.
16(12): p. 2664-75
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18086772
Cancer Epidemiol 2008, Benetou V et al “Vegetables and fruits in relation to cancer risk: evidence from
the Greek EPIC cohort study”, Cancer Epidemiology February 2008; 17(2):387-92
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18268122
Cancer Res 2005, Sinha R et al “Meat, meat cooking methods and preservation and risk for colorectal
adenoma”, Cancer Research September 2005 1;65(17):8034-41
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16140978
Carnegie Mellon University 2008, Weber CL and Matthews HS “Food Miles and The Relative Climate Im-
pacts of Food Choices in the United States” Environmental Science & Technology 2008, 42, 3508-3513
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1021/es702969f
Daily Telegraph 2008, Government Advisor: eat less meat to tackle climate change, 15 October 2008
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/3353377/Government-advisor-eat-less-meat-to-tack-
le-climate-change.html
Earth Save International 2005, A New Global Warming Strategy, Mohr M, August 2005
http://www.earthsave.org/news/earthsave_global_warming_report.pdf
Emerg Infect Dis 1999, Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, Tauxe
RV “Food-related illness and death in the United States”. Emerging Infectious Diseases, September
19999 5(5): 607-625.
Energy Bulletin 2004, Atcheson J “Methane Burps: Ticking Time Bomb” Energy Bulletin, 15 Dec. 2004
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/3647
33
Env H Perspec 2007, Gilchrist MJ, Greko C, Wallinga DB, Beran GW, Riley DG, Thorne PS “The potential
role of concentrated animal feeding operations in infectious disease epidemics and antibiotic resist-
ance”. Environmental Health Perspectives 2007 115: 313-6.
EPA/FDA 2004, What you need to know about mercury in fish and shellfish, Advice for women who
might become pregnant, women who are pregnant, nursing mothers, young children. Rockville (MD):
US Department of Health and Human Services and US Environmental Protection Agency; 2004
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/fish/advice/advisory.pdf
Eur J Clin Nutr 2002, Ness AR, Hughes J, Elwood PC, et al. “The long-term effect of dietary advice in men
with coronary disease: follow-up of the Diet and Reinfarction trial (DART)”. European Journal of Clinical
Nutrition June 2002;56:512-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12032650?dopt=Abstract
Eur J Clin Nutr 2003, Burr ML, Ashfield-Watt PAL, Dunstan FDJ, Fehily AM, Breay P, Ashton T, et al. “Lack
of benefit of dietary advice to men with angina: results of a controlled trial”, European Journal of Clini-
cal Nutrition February 2003; 57: 193-200
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12571649?dopt=Abstract
FAOSTAT
http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=569#ancor
Foodwatch 2008
http://www.foodwatch.de/kampagnen__themen/klima/klimastudie_2008/ergebnisse/index_ger.
html
GUE/NGL 2007, Holm J and Jokkala T “The livestock industry and climate – EU makes bad worse”, Par-
liamentary Group (pp17-18)
www.guengl.eu/upload/backup/meat_climate_report.pdf
Inst Env Studies 2008, van Beukering P et al “Meat the Truth”, and “The contribution of meat consump-
tion in the UK to climate change”, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University, Amsterdam, the
Netherlands. HM Government (2006) Climate Change, the UK programme 2006
http://www.meatthetruth.nl/download/20080517_Carbon_Savings_UK.pdf
Int J Cancer, 2004 Miller, AB et al “Fruits and vegetables and lung cancer: Findings from the Euro-
pean prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition”, International Journal of Cancer, Jan 2004.
108(2): p. 269-276.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14639614
Int J Cancer 2006, Larsson SC, Wolk A ‘Meat Consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-
analysis of prospective studies’ International Journal of Cancer, 1 December 2006, 119(11): 2657-64
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16991129
34
Int J Epidemiol 1997, N Ness A R, Powles J W “Fruit and Vegetables and Cardiovascular Disease: A Re-
view, International Journal of Epidemiology 1997, 26:1-13
IPCC 4th Assessment, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report – Synthesis Report 2007
http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm
chapter 2 - http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html
J Cardiovasc Risk 1999, Ness A R, Powles J W, “The Role of Diet, Fruit and Vegetables and Antioxidants
In The Aetology of Stroke”, Journal of Cardiovascular Risk 1999, 6(4):229-234
J Epidemiol 2005, Rayner M and Scarborough P “The burden of food related ill health in the UK”, Jour-
nal of Epidemiology and Community Health
http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/59/12/1054
J Food Protec 2005, Frenzen PD, Drake A, Angulo FJ. “Economic cost of illness due to Escherichia coli
O157 infections in the United States”. Journal of Food Protection 68: 2623-2630.
J Natl Cancer Inst 1993, Giovannucci E et al, A Prospective Study of Dietary Fat and Risk of prostate
Cancer, Journal of the National Cancer Institute Vol 85, No 19, 1571-1579, 6 October 1993
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/85/19/1571
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005, Norat T et al., “Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective In-
vestigation into cancer and nutrition”, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, June 2005. 97(12): p. 906-16
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15956652
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, Gonzalez C.A., et al “Meat intake and risk of stomach and esophageal adeno-
carcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)”. Journal of
the National Cancer Institute, March 2006. 98(5): p. 345-54.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16507831
J Nutr 2009, Whelan J “Dietary stearidonic acid is a long chain (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acid with
potential health benefits”, Journal of Nutrition January 2009, 139(1):5-10.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19056654
JAMA 1998, Ornish D et al “Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease: Five-year
follow-up of the Lifestyle Heart Trial”, Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998; 280: 2001-2007
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/280/23/2001 http://www.webmd.com/dean-ornish-md
JAMA 2003, Jenkins DJ et al 2003, “Effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods vs lovas-
tatin on serum lipids and C-reactive protein”, JAMA 2003 Jul 23; 290 (4):531-3.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/290/4/502
JAMA 2006, MacLean CH, Newberry SJ, Mojica WA, Khanna P, Issa AM, Suttorp MJ, et al. “Effects of
omega-3 fatty acids on cancer risk: a systematic review”. Journal of the American Medical Association
2006;295: 403-15
35
Lancet 2003 (a), Bingham SA et al. “Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast
cancer?” Lancet July 2003, 19;362(9379):182-3
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12885485
Lancet 2003 (b), Bingham, S.A., et al. “Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer
in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study”
Lancet May 2003. 361(9368): p. 1496-501
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12737858
Lancet 2007, “Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health” Vol 370, Issue 9594,
Pages 1253 - 1263, 6 October 2007
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)61256-2/abstract
Lancet 2009, Costello A et al ‘Managing the Health Effects of Climate Change’ Lancet 16 May 2009,
373:693-733 http://www.ucl.ac.uk/global-health/ucl-lancet-climate-change.pdf
Mutat Res 1997, Gooderham NJ et al “Assessing human risk to heterocyclic amines”, Mutation Research
May 1997 12;376(1-2):53-60.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9202738
Nature 2006, Walter K M, Zimov S A, Chanton J P, Verbyla D and Chapin III F S “Methane bubbling from
Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming”, Nature 443; 71-75, 7 Sept. 2006
http://www.alaska.edu/uaf/cem/ine/walter/publications_docs/Walter_nature05040.pdf
New Scientist 2009, Eating Less Meat Could Cut Climate Costs, 10 February 2009
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16573-eating-less-meat-could-cut-climate-costs.html
OIE 2005, Vallat B “International animal health response” at OIE Meeting on avian influenza and human
pandemic influenza, Geneva, November 2005
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/2005/avian_influenza_meeting_presentations/en/index.html
Perspectives from OIE [pdf 239kb]
Pew Commission, Putting Meat on the Table: Industrial Farm Animal Production in America
http://www.ncifap.org/_images/PCIFAPFin.pdf
Science Daily 2008, Ping C, Michaelson G J, Jorgenson M T, Kimble J M, Epstein H, Romanovsky V E and
Walker D A “Arctic Soil May Contain Nearly Twice Greenhouse Gas Producing Material Than Previously
Estimated”, Science Daily, 8 October 2008
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081008091129.htm
Science Direct 1995, Barnard N D, Nicholson A, and Howard J L 1995 “The medical costs attributable to
meat consumption”, Preventive Medicine, Vol 24, Issue 6, November 1995
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WPG-45R89SB-H&_user=10&_
rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_
userid=10&md5=80ba4d089f9f176bd494e695eea4f075
36
SIWI and IWHI 2008, “Saving Water from Field to Fork”, Stockholm International Water Institute, In-
ternational Water Management Institute, Chalmers, and Stockholm Environment Institute May 2008
http://www.siwi.org/documents/Resources/Policy_Briefs/PB_From_Filed_to_Fork_2008.pdf
Strategy Unit 2008, UK “Food Matters: Towards a Strategy for the 21st Century”
http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/strategy/assets/food/food_matters_es.pdf
Times Online 2009, Professor Anthony Costello: climate change biggest threat to humans, 14 May 2009
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article6283681.ece
UCL News 2009, Climate Change the Biggest Global Health Threat of the 21st century, 14 May 2009
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0905/09051501
UNEP 2002, Global Environment Outlook GEO-4 United Nations Environment Programme
http://www.unep.org/geo/geo4/report/GEO-4_Report_Full_en.pdf
UN FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture Department 2009, The State of Word Fisheries and Aquaculture 2008,
ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0250e/i0250e01.pdf
http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0250e/i0250e00.htm
USDA Ag Stats 2008, “Grain and Feed” (extrapolated from data therein)
http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Ag_Statistics/2008/index.asp USDA Agricultural Statistics
WCRF/AICR 2007, “Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a global perspec-
tive”, World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research 2007
http://www.dietandcancerreport.org/
37
WHO 1998, The World Health Report 1998: Life in the 21st century: a vision for all. Geneva
WHO 2002, The World Health Report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva
WHO 2004 Global Strategy on diet, Physical Activity and Health, May 2004
http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_english_web.pdf
http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/fruit/en/index.html
WHO Media Centre 2006 Obesity and Overweight, Fact Sheet 311, September 2006
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html
WHO Media Centre 2009, Cancer Fact Sheet 297, February 2009
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/index.html
WHO/FAO 2003, Diet, Nutrition, and The Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Geneva 2003, P43
http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/who_fao_expert_report.pdf
Wired Science 2009 “Swine Flu Ancestor Born on US Factory Farm”, 1 May 2009
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/05/swineflufarm/
38
“One of the most helpful is actually a vegetarian diet,
it produces much less greenhouse gasses than a meat diet.”
Dr. James Hansen, Director, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
o rg
e t.
di
t
pla ne