You are on page 1of 21

ENGC6353 Dr.

Mohammed Arafa Page 1



Design of Silos

Introduction

Silos and bunkers are usually used for storing granular materials. Silo ( also called deep bins)
and bunkers (shallow bins). The important difference between the two is in the behavior of
the stored material. This behavior difference is influenced by both bin geometry and
characteristics of stored material. Material pressure against the walls and bottom are usually
derermined by one method for silos and by another for bunkers. (The present ACI 313 Silos
standard, however, uses the same method for both silos and bunkers)
Silos and bunkers are made from many different structure materials. Concrete is the most
frequently used materials. Concrete can offer the necessary protection to the stored materials,
requires little maintenance, is aesthetically pleasing, and is relatively free of certain structural
hazards (such as buckling) that may be present in silos and bunkers of thinner materials.
Silos failures have alerted design engineers to the danger of designing silos for only static
pressures due to stored material at rest. Those failures have inspired wide-spread research into
the variations of pressures and flow of materials. The research thus far has established beyond
doubt that pressures during withdrawal may be significantly higher 1-4 or significantly lower
than those present when the material is at rest. The excess (above static pressure) is called
overpressure and the shortfall is called underpressure. One of the causes of overpressure
is the switch from active to passive conditions which occurs during material withdrawal.
While overpressures and underpressures are generally important in deeper silos, impact is
usually critical only for shallow ones (bunkers) in which large volumes are dumped suddenly.
Obviously, to design with disregard for either overpressure, underpressure or impact could be
dangerous.
Unless he elects to use silo static pressure equations for each, the designer must classify the
structure as either a silo or bunker. Empirical approximation are preferred by many engineers.
Tow such approximation are:
) 1.5
) 1.5 for circular silos
1.5 for rectangular silos
a H A
b H D
H a
>
>
>

Slipformed silos are constructed using a typically 4 ft. (1.2 m) high continuously moving
form. J umpformed silos are constructed using three typically 4 ft. (1.2 m) high fixed forms.
The bottom lift is jumped to the top position after the concrete hardens sufficiently.
A hopper is the sloping, walled portion at the bottom of a silo.
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 2

Stave silos are silos assembled from small precast concrete units called staves, usually
tongued and grooved, and held together by exterior adjustable steel hoops.

Loads
Vertical Pressure
'
/
'
1
kY R
R
q e
k


(
=

(J anssen Formula)
Where
=weight per unit volume for stored material
`=coefficient of friction between stored material and wall or hopper surface
=Angle of internal friction
1 sin k =
R =is the hydraulic radius (ratio of area to perimeter) of horizontal cross section of storage space
For Circular silos R=D/4
For polygonal silos R=D/4 for a circular shape of
equivalent area.
For square silos a or shorter wall of rectangular silos
use R=a/4
For the long wall b of rectangular silos use R=a`/4
where a` is the length of side of an imaginary square
silo
2
'
ab
a
a b
=
+


Horizontal Pressure p kq =
Vertical friction per unit length of wall perimeter ( ) V Y q R =
Note:
, k vary, the following combinations shall be used with maximum:
(1) Minimum `and minimum k for maximum vertical pressure q.
(2) Minimum `and maximum k for maximum lateral pressure p.
(3) Maximum `and maximum k for maximum vertical friction force V.

Load Factors
Load factors for silo or stacking tube design shall conform to those specified in ACI 318. The weight of and
pressures due to stored material shall be considered as live load.
For concrete cast in stationary forms, strength reduction factors, , shall be as given in ACI 318. For slipforming,
unless continuous inspection is provided, strength reduction factors given in ACI 318 shall be multiplied by 0.95.
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 3


Pressures and loads for hoppers
The initial vertical pressure at depth h
0 y y
q q h = +
y

where q
o

is the initial vertical pressure at the top of the hopper.
The initial pressure normal to the hopper surface at depth h
y

below top of hopper shall be the
larger of:
( ) ( )
2 2
tan
tan '
tan tan '
sin cos 1 sin cos
y
n n n
n y n y
q
q p and V p
or
q p q k and V q k



= = =
+
= = + =





ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 4


Square and rectangular silos
Horizontal Forces Due to Stored Material
The cross section of a rectangular silo is a rigid frame subject to outward pressure, p
des
The horizontal (unfactored) tensile force per unit height at depth Y are:
varying with depth. Each wall will have axial tension, bending and shear.
( )
( )
,
,
2 for wall
2 for wall
a b des
b a des
F p b a
F p a b
=
=












Regular Polygonal silos
The principle of design and detail of single or grouped polygonal silos are similar to those of
rectangular silos. Their walls subjected to similar loading and similar horizontal tension, shaer
and bending moment and vertical forces. The horizontal tensile force in any single regular
polygonal silos is:
( )
sin
2
1 cos
des
T p a

| |
=
|

\ .








ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 5



Sections with combined tension and bending

Strength design of walls subject to combined axial tension and flexure shall be based on the stress and strain
compatibility assumptions of ACI 318 and on the equilibrium between the forces acting on the cross-section at
nominal strength. For small eccentricity, the required tensile reinforcement area per unit height:
( ) ( )
Small eccentricity ''
2
' ''
'
' ''
u
u
u u
s s
y y
M h
e d
F
F e F e
A A
f d d f d d
= <
= =







Overpressure c
During initial filling and during discharge, even when both are concentric, overpressures
occur because of imperfections in the cylindrical shape of the silo, non-uniformity in the
distribution of particle sizes, and convergence at the top of hoppers or in flow channels. A
minimum overpressure factor of 1.5 is recommended for concentric flow silos even when they
are of a mass flow configuration. The recommended factor recognizes that even though higher
and lower point pressures are measured in full size silos, they are distributed vertically
through the stiffness of the silo wall and can be averaged over larger areas for structural
d

ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 6

design. The 1.5 overpressure factor is in addition to the load factor of 1.7 required by ACI-
318
design pressure =1.7 x c
d

x initial filling pressure.
The following Table shows the different C
d

factors at different depth zones

ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 7





Earthquake forces
Earthquake loads may affect stability and strength. The UBC or IBC may be used. Seismic
forces are assumed to act in any horizontal direction, but vertical acceleration forces are
usually neglected. In computing lateral seismic force due to the mass of the stored granular
material, the silo is assumed to be full, but the lateral force is less than it would be for a solid
mass. The reduction of lateral force is allowed because of energy loss through inter-granular
movement and particle-to-particle friction in the stored material. ACI 313 use not less 80% of
the weight of the stored material as an effective live load, from which to determine seismic
forces.
Wind forces
Wind may affect the stability of empty silos, particularly tall, narrow silos or silos group.
Foundation pressure and column stresses, however, may be worse with wind acting on the full
silo. Wind load reduction may be applied for cylindrical shape may be applied to single
circular for cylindrical
Wind forces on silos shall be considered generated by positive and negative pressures acting
concurrently. The pressures shall be not less than required by the local building code for the
locality and height zone in question. Wind pressure distributions shall take into account
adjacent silos or structures.
Thermal Loads
Temperature and shrinkage steel requirement of ACI 318 apply to silos. In addition, hot
stored materials may cause thermal stresses too high to be ignored. The approximate method
illustrated below was developed specifically for cement storage silos. Its principles, however,
should apply also to silos for storage of other not granular materials. In this method:
1- Tensile strength of the concrete is neglected
2- Wall temperatures are assumed to vary only radially.
In building, the usual practice is to ignore a certain amount of inside-outside temperature
difference (80
o
F or 27
o
The thermal effects of hot (or cold) stored materials and hot (or cold) air shall be considered.
For circular walls or wall areas with total restraint to warping (as at corners of rectangular
silos), the thermal bending moment per unit of wall height or width shall be computed by:
C for silos).
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 8

( )
2
12 1
c c
t
E h
M T


Computation of bending moments due to thermal effects requires determining the temperature
differential through the wall. To determine this differential, the designer should consider the
rates at which heat flows from the hot material to the inside surface of the wall, through the
wall thickness and from the wall to the atmosphere.
The temperature differential may be estimated by:
( ) ( )
0 0
80 27
0.08
4.09 0.08
o o
i t i
t
T T T F K T T C K
h
K
h
= =
=
+


Minimum wall thickness
The thickness of silo or stacking tube walls shall be not less than 6 in. (150 mm) for cast-in-
place concrete, nor less than 2 in. (50 mm) for precast concrete.
The following formula can also be used in service loading
sh
f f
=
100f f
s s ct
s ct
E n
t T
+

Load factors and strength reduction factors
Load factors for silo or stacking tube design shall conform to those specified in ACI
318. The weight of and pressures due to stored material shall be considered as live
load.
For concrete cast in stationary forms, strength reduction factors, , shall be as given in
ACI 318. For slip forming, unless continuous inspection is provided, strength
reduction factors given in ACI 318 shall be multiplied by 0.95.

Allowable ultimate Compressive load
The compressive axial load strength per unit area for walls in which buckling (including local
buckling) does not control shall be computed by
'
0.55
nw c
P f =





ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 9

Additional Load at Openings

The edges of bottom slab openings usually receive added line loads comprising the weight of
the hopper and equipment supported by it, the weight of stored material in the hopper and the
design vertical pressures of material above the top of the hopper.

Flat Bottom
The simplest flat bottom is a slab of uniform thickness. The flat bottom may also be a ribbed
slab or beam-slab system.
For a slab without hopper-forming fill, the design loads are dead load and pressure, q
des
1.4 1.7
u des
W DL q = +

computed at the top of the slab.

With earthquake vertical friction at the wall is assumed to be zero, so that the ultimate vertical
pressure on the bottom is:
( ) 0.75 1.4 1.7
u
W DL H = +
For a slab with hopper-forming fill, the weight of the fill itself and the material stored in the
hopper are added as dead load,.
Slab Shear stresses should be checked.

Conical Hooper
The design pressure, q may be computed from the above equation. In computing q
y
The conical hopper shell is subject to two tensile membrane forces. The meridional force, F
engineers
usually use the dimensions at the top of the hopper to obtain R for the J anssen formulas,
ignoring the reductions of cross section within the hopper.
m
,
is parallel to the generator line of the cone. The tangential force, F
t

, is in the plane of the shell
and horizontal. The meridional force per unit width at depth Y is computed from equilibrium
of the loads on the cone below that depth. These loads, shown on Figure, are the resultant of
vertical pressures, q (at depth Y) and W, the combined weights of the hopper itself and
material stored below depth Y plus any equipment
supported by the hopper.
2 2
1.7 1.4
4sin sin sin
1.7
2sin
sin cos
y g
L
mu
tu
q D W
W
F
D D
q D
F
q P q


( (
= + +
( (

(
=
(

= +




ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 10



Both forces are maximum at the upper edge of the hopper,
and approach zero at the lower edge.
A conical hopper is usually supported at its upper end by a
ring beam. This is merely a thickened portion of the
conical shell with a cross section to satisfy the supporting
condition and the loading. The ring beam depth should not
be less than one-tenth of the hopper diameter.

Pyramidal Hopper
Loads for pyramidal hoppers are the same as for conical hopper, Pyramidal hopper walls,
however, are subject to bending as well as tensile membrane forces. The bending always
include two-way, plate type bending and may include significant in-plane bending. The angles
of slope for walls a and b are
a
and
b
If some arbitrary factors c
, respectively.
a
and c
b
are selected to define the division of the load to area A
a
and
A
b
(such that for symmetrical case 2c
a
+2c
b
( )
( )
,
,
1.7 1.4
sin
1.7 1.4
sin
a L a a des b g
mau
a
b L b b des b g
mbu
b
c W A q c W
F
a
c W A q c W
F
b

+ +
=
+ +
=
=1.0) then the ultimate meridional forces per unit
width of wall are:

The ultimate horizontal forces F
tau
and F
tbu
, ,
1.7 sin and 1.7 sin
2 2
tau b des a tbu a des b
b a
F q F q


| | | |
= =
| |
\ . \ .
per unit length at depth Y may be approximated

Moment from two-way plate-type bending may be computed for inclined triangular walls
with fixed sides and subjected to either uniform or triangular loading.











ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 11





ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 12

Details and placement of reinforcement
Where slipforming is to be used, reinforcement arrangement and details shall be as
simple as practical to facilitate placing and inspection during construction.
Reinforcement shall be provided to resist all bending moments, including those due to
continuity at wall intersections, alone or in combination with axial and shear forces.
Horizontal ties shall be provided as required to resist forces that tend to separate
adjoining silos of monolithically cast silo groups.
Unless determined otherwise by analysis, horizontal reinforcement at the bottom of
the pressure zone shall be continued at the same size and spacing for a distance below
the pressure zone equal to at least four times the thickness h of the wall above. In no
case shall the total horizontal reinforcement area be less than 0.0025 times the gross
concrete area per unit height of wall.
Vertical reinforcement in the silo wall shall be (10 diameter) bars or larger, and the
minimum ratio of vertical reinforcement to gross concrete area shall be not less than
0.0020. Horizontal spacing of vertical bars shall not exceed 18 in. (450 mm) for
exterior walls nor 24 in. (600 mm) for interior walls of monolithically cast silo
groups. Vertical steel shall be provided to resist wall bending moment at the junction
of walls with silo roofs and bottoms. In slipform construction, jack rods, to the extent
bond strength can be developed, may be considered as vertical reinforcement when
left in place

ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 13



Reinforcement pattern at intersecting walls


Miscellaneous details
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 14




Typical Hooper Reinforcement

ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 15

Circular Concrete Ring-Beam and Column System Supporting a Steel Hopper

A steel hopper can do little to stiffen a concrete ring beam, therefore, all of the loads it applies
to the beamtorsion included must be considered. The tables and equations which follow
cover the design of such ring beams and columns having an even number (4 to 12) of equally-
spaced columns, fixed at their bases, and rigidly connected to the ring beam. (See Fig. 1.)
The following Equations are for working design loads (WSD) rather than ultimate. In this
type of structure live load is much larger than dead load. Consequently, it is simpler and
sufficiently accurate to apply a common live load factor, to the final answers in order to
determine the USD values. The external design loads acting on the ring beam
cos sin
1.7 1.7
mu mu
x y beam
F F
F and F w

= = +
where w
beam
,. is the weight of the ring beam per unit length. If the vertical pressure (by stored
material) acting on the face of the ring beam is significant, it should be added to F
y
The WSD uniform torsional moment is

M
t
=F
m
The Cross sectional Area of the ring Beam is
e
2 2
1 1
2
r
b a
A ab =
Coordinate of the centroid measured from the origin O are:
( )( )
( )( )
2
1 1 2 2 1 2
2
1 1 2 2 1 2
/ 2 / 2 /3
/ 2 / 2 /3
r
r
ab a b b b
x
A
b a a b a a
y
A

=

=

An equivalent rectangle of height a and b is substituted for the pentagon
2
r
a y
b A a
=
=

The column shear HA and upper end moment MA are found by solving the following
equations:
( )
( )
2 3 3 2
2
3
2 2
3 2
3
2 1
0
2 3 2
Re 12
0
ln 2
col
x A A A
r r r ry c col c
y A c t A A
r r rx r rx col c col c
F r H r K H L M L
A E E I E I E I
C F r C r M M r H L M L
E a r r E I E I E I E I
+ + + =

+ + + + =

The WSD moment at the column base is then
B A c A
M H h M =
The maximum WSD values of vertical shear, thrust, torque, and bending moment at the
supports, midspans, and points of maximum torsion, for ring beams on 4, 6, 8, 10, or 12
supports are tabulated in Table 16-9.
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 16

For USD, the final forces and moments given by the preceding equations or Table 16-9
should be multiplied by the live load factor, In all of the above equations, consistent units
must be used.

































Silo-Bottom: Steel Hooper supported on concrete ring
B
Ring-beam cross Section
ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 17






ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 18





ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 19

Appendix
Tables for Triangular Slab


ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 20







ENGC6353 Dr. Mohammed Arafa Page 21

You might also like