Professional Documents
Culture Documents
symmetry filter
H. Sims, K. Ramasamy, W. H. Butler, and A. Gupta
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.160.4.77 On: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:34:58
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 103, 192402 (2013)
(Received 9 August 2013; accepted 16 October 2013; published online 5 November 2013)
We present a theoretical investigation of the electronic and magnetic structure of spinel CdCr2Te4
using density functional theory, its extensions via onsite Hubbard U interactions, and a
screened-hybrid-functional exchange potential. We find that the ground state is semiconducting
within the latter approach, and within this magnetic-semiconducting system, we compute the
complex band structure, finding a slowly decaying evanescent D ~ 1 state possibly suitable for
realizing a spin-dependent symmetry filter effect. 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.
VC
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4827818]
Chromium chalcospinels have been heavily studied for but in fact a potential spin-dependent symmetry filter. We
their interesting electronic, optical, and magnetic properties predict that CdCr2Te4 has majority- and minority-channel
for decades.1–3,22–30,35 In particular, the (Cu,Cd)Cr2X4 band gaps of 0.49 eV (indirect) and 0.62 eV (direct), respec-
(X ¼ S, Se, or Te) series show a wide range of electronic tively. Further, we compute the complex band structure in
properties. Wang et al.3 studied CdxCu1xCr2S4 and both channels at kk ¼ 0, finding that the minority gap is
CdxCu1xCr2Se4 within the generalized gradient approxima- spanned by a slowly decaying evanescent state possessing
tion, reporting that half metals could be created from the ~ 1 symmetry.
D
metallic (CuCr2(S,Se)4) and semiconducting (CdCr2(S,Se)4) In our investigation, we employ calculations within
base systems at x ¼ 0.5. Among the tellurides, CuCr2Te4 has density functional theory6 (DFT)—using the generalized-
been reported to be a ferromagnetic metal22,25,26 with a gradient approximation of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof
Curie temperature near 300 K. We are not aware of any (PBE),7 “þU” corrections through the Dudarev formulation
experimental or theoretical studies of CdCr2Te4, but the of the local-(spin)-densityþU approximation (LSDAþU),8,9
properties of CdCr2S4 and CdCr2Se4 suggest that CdCr2Te4 and the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) hybrid functional
should also be semiconducting, likely with a rather small gap method,10 which has been shown to improve on the accuracy
due to the periodic trends within the chalcogen group. of LSDA or PBE band gaps, particularly in semiconductors
Looking beyond the current and upcoming generations and small-gap insulators.11 All calculations were completed
of spintronic devices, efficient spin injection into semicon- using the VASP code12 using the projector augmented-wave
ductors may provide a path to achieving low-power technol- (PAW)13 pseudopotentials of Kresse and Joubert.14,15 In the
ogies for processing, nonvolatile storage and memory, and PBEþU calculation, we apply Ueff ¼ 2.5 eV to the Cr 3d orbi-
other novel applications. Magnetic semiconductors and insu- tals. This value is typical for octahedrally coordinated mag-
lators are of great interest for such devices, as their spin- netic Cr ions.16–18 We find that the qualitative electronic
dependent barrier height should lead to highly spin-polarized structure (i.e., metallic, half-metallic, or semiconducting) of
tunneling currents without the need for a half-metallic elec- this material is insensitive to changes in the interaction param-
trode. The spin-filter effect is based on this concept; a prop- eter. All calculations were performed using the primitive 14-
erly designed magnetic tunnel barrier (or double barrier) atom supercell (space group Fd 3m) of the normal spinel struc-
could in principle provide the large on/off ratio needed for ture. In all cases, we consider the PBE-relaxed structure with
spin logic. The europium chalcogenides are the prototypical lattice constant a ¼ 11.491 Å and internal parameter x 0.264
spin filters,4 but their low Tc70 K, 17 K, and 5 K for EuO, (equivalent to u ¼ 0.389 in the more commonly reported set-
EuS, and EuSe, respectively, limit their usefulness in real ting). The real and complex band structures were computed
applications (the Curie temperatures of the Cu-based chro- using a Wannier basis obtained via the WANNIER90 package.19
mium chalcospinels are generally above 300 K). Other appli- In the following, we will show that the HSE06 screened
cations envision using a magnetic semiconductor as a spin hybrid functional method is alone among the methods we
aligner, a layer that polarizes incoming current and then employ in predicting a semiconducting ground state for
injects spins into a nonmagnetic semiconducting material, CdCr2Te4. It is therefore necessary to determine whether this
such as a GaAs/AlGaAs light-emitting diode.5 result is trustworthy. As there are no experimental results
In the following, we will present calculations that against which to compare, we attempted to determine
suggest that CdCr2Te4 is not only a magnetic semiconductor whether the screened hybrid-functional method could accu-
rately describe the electronic structure of other materials in
a)
Current address: German Research School for Simulation Science, 52425 the (Cu,Cd)Cr2(S,Te)4 family. We summarize the results
J€ulich, Germany. in Table I. In each of these calculations, we use the
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.160.4.77 On: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:34:58
192402-2 Sims et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 192402 (2013)
TABLE I. Calculated electronic and magnetic structure of other chalcospi- states is widened further, resulting in a ferromagnetic semi-
nels within HSE06. The lattice parameters and internal parameters were cal- conductor with spin-dependent band gaps—about 0.49 eV
culated within PBE and are in good agreement with experiment. The
magnetic moments and band gaps (if any) are calculated within HSE06.
and 0.62 eV in the majority and minority channels, respec-
Experimental data are those quoted in Refs. 3 and 30 unless otherwise noted. tively. The differing orbital character of the majority and mi-
The HSE06 band gap for CdCr2S4 is spin dependent, but we only report the nority band edges gives rise to this spin-dependence, also
smallest gap here for comparison with experiment. seen in other magnetic insulating spinels (see Refs. 32–34, in
which similar behavior is reported in NiFe2O4
Mag. Mom. (lB/f.u.) Gap (eV)
and CoFe2O4). This should be a general property of insulat-
HSE06 Expt. HSE06 Expt. ing or semiconducting spinels (and perhaps other ternary
transition-metal oxides and chalcogenides) in which the
CuCr2S4 5.08 5.20 — —
valence states of one (possibly magnetic) transition metal
CuCr2Te4 5.52 5.42 — —
species sit well below the valence band and the other species
CdCr2S4 6.00 6.00 2.2 1.99–2.61a
is magnetic. Such a property may allow for the individual
a
Refs. 27–29. tuning of majority and minority band gaps via, for example,
the electronegativity of the anion.
The HSE06 band structure along the line CX 2p/a
PBE-relaxed structure. First, we see that HSE06 correctly
(0 0 1) can be found in Figure 2, with the majority bands on
predicts the presence of the band gap in CdCr2S4 while
the left and the minority bands on the right. The open squares
correctly identifying CuCr2S4 and CuCr2Te4 as metals. The
are the bands calculated directly within the electronic struc-
magnitude of the gap in CdCr2S4 reported in the literature
ture method, while the dotted lines are computed from a
varies between 2 and 2.6 eV,27–29 with our calculated gaps
Wannier basis containing only Cr d and Te p states. In the
fitting into that range. In contrast, PBE and PBEþU (using
minority channel, one can see that the bands are in near-
the same Ueff ¼ 2.5 eV) predict band gaps of 1 eV and
perfect agreement, particularly near the Fermi energy. The
1.3 eV, respectively.
small error near C in the minority channel is due to our
It has been reported that HSE06 can badly overestimate
exclusion of the Cd s states. The error is somewhat greater in
the magnetic moment in bcc Fe20,21 and possibly other mag-
the majority channel, although once again the accuracy is
netic metals. However, we do not observe any such problem in
best near the band edges. We note that the HSE calculation
these results. Comparing with Refs. 3 and 30, we find that our
on which the Wannier bands are based uses a finer k mesh,
moments are all in reasonably good agreement with experi-
and so it is possible that not all of the error lies in the
ment and with past computations. This is likely due to the
Wannier bands. The agreement of the bands calculated in the
more localized nature of the Cr magnetic moments.
two methods is of special importance here as we will use
Considering both the level of agreement between our calcula-
the Wannier Hamiltonian to compute the complex band
tions and past experimental and computational reports and the
structure.
indications in the PBE and PBEþ U electronic structure of an
incipient semiconducting state, we propose that we can draw
conclusions from our HSE06 results with some confidence.
We find that within PBE and PBEþU, CdCr2Te4 is
nearly half-metallic, with a minority valence band composed
almost entirely of Te 5p states.31 Incorporating a portion of
the Fock exchange potential using the HSE06 method yields
a slightly different picture (Figure 1). As in PBE, the top of
the valence band has predominantly Te p character, but the
Fock exchange pushes all other occupied states deeper, with
the Cr t2g now lying between 6.3 and 1.2 eV. A gap is
created in the majority channel, and the gap in the minority
FIG. 2. Band structure for CdCr2Te4 within HSE06, with the majority spin
channel shown in the left panel and the minority channel on the right. We
note that the majority gap is indirect, while the minority gap is direct at C.
The open symbols represent bands computed directly within HSE06, while
the dotted lines are those obtained with a Wannier Hamiltonian. The color
FIG. 1. Density of states for CdCr2Te4 for the HSE06 method. The site- and of the latter is indicative of the pz or dxy character of the band (with warmer
l-decomposed partial densities of states for the Cr 3d and Te 5p states are colors indicating more orbital character). Near C, the bottom of the minority
provided in each plot. Note that only HSE06 is capable of completely open- conduction band also has Cd s character. We note that the majority CBM
ing the gap in both spin channels. has significant d3z2 r2 character as well.
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.160.4.77 On: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:34:58
192402-3 Sims et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 192402 (2013)
lead to electron currents strongly polarized with minority 3 3 3 (but remained at 12 12 12 for other portions of said
spin, despite the smaller gap in the majority channel. calculation).
16
H. Sims, S. J. Oset, W. H. Butler, J. M. MacLaren, and M. Marsman,
Only experimental and theoretical investigations into Phys. Rev. B 81, 224436 (2010).
realistic heterostructures containing CdCr2Te4 can truly 17
A. N. Yaresko, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115106 (2008).
18
predict the prospects for application. Nevertheless, the K. Gupta, P. Mahadevan, P. Mavropoulos, and M. Lezaić, Phys. Rev. Lett.
111, 077601 (2013).
spin-dependence of the symmetry filtering, band-edge transi- 19
A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N.
tions, band gaps, and conduction electron effective masses Marzari, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008).
20
provides fertile ground for optimization and design of future Y.-R. Jang and B. D. Yu, J. Magn. 16, 201 (2011).
21
spin-based technologies. H. Sims, W. H. Butler, M. Richter, K. Koepernik, E. Şaşıo glu, C.
Friedrich, and S. Bl€
ugel, Phys. Rev. B 86, 174422 (2012).
22
K. Ramasamy, D. Mazumdar, R. D. Bennett, and A. Gupta, Chem.
The authors wish to acknowledge funding from an NSF- Commun. (Cambridge) 48, 5656 (2012).
23
NRI supplement as part of NSF MRSEC Grant Nos. DMR- K. Ramasamy, D. Mazumdar, Z. Zhou, Y.-H. A. Wang, and A. Gupta,
0213985 and NSF CHE-1012850. H.S. and W.H.B. also J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 20716 (2011).
24
K. Ramasamy, H. Sims, R. K. Gupta, D. Kumar, W. H. Butler, and A.
wish to acknowledge conversations with J. Zhang and X.-G. Gupta. Chem. Mater. 25, 4003 (2013).
Zhang. All calculations were performed on the University of 25
T. Kanomata, H. Ido, and T. Kaneko, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 29, 332
Alabama MINT High Performance Cluster. (1970).
26
T. Suzuyama, J. Awaka, H. Yamamoto, S. Ebisu, M. Ito, T. Suzuki, T.
1 Nakama, K. Yagasaki, and S. J. Nagata, Solid State Chem. 179, 140
P. K. Baltzer, P. J. Wojtowicz, M. Robbins, and E. Lopatin, Phys. Rev.
151, 367 (1966). (2006); R. Li, C. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, Solid State Commun. 152, 173
2 (2012).
N. Menyuk, K. Dwight, R. J. Arnott, and A. Wold, J. Appl. Phys. 37, 1387 27
(1966). A. M. Salem and M. E. El-Ghazzawi, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 19, 236
3 (2004).
Y.-H. A. Wang, A. Gupta, M. Chshiev, and W. H. Butler, Appl. Phys. 28
Lett. 92, 062507 (2008). V. V. Todkar, R. S. Mane, C. D. Lokhande, H. M. Pathan, O.-S. Joo, H.
4 Chung, M.-Y. Yoon, and S. H. Han, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69, 1802
T. S. Santos and J. S. Moodera, Phys. Rev. B 69, 241203(R) (2004).
5
R. Fiederling, M. Keim, G. Reuscher, W. Ossau, G. Schmidt, A. Waag, (2008).
29
and L. W. Molenkamp, Nature 402, 787 (1999). H. B. Patil, K. S. Chaudhari, and S. V. Borse, Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 3, 465
6 (2011).
W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965). 30
7
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). V. N. Antonov, V. P. Antropov, B. N. Harmon, A. N. Yaresko, and A. Ya.
8 Perlov, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14552 (1999).
V. I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 943 (1991). 31
9
S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4827818 for
discussion of PBE and PBEþ U electronic structure.
Sutton, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998). 32
10
J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 Q.-C. Sun, H. Sims, D. Mazumdar, J. X. Ma, B. S. Hollinsworth, K. R.
(2003); 124, 219906 (2006). O’Neal, W. H. Butler, A. Gupta, and J. L. Musfeldt, Phys. Rev. B 86,
11 205106 (2012).
J. Paier, M. Marsman, K. Hummer, G. Kresse, I. C. Gerber, and J. G. 33
Angy an, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154709 (2006). B. S. Hollinsworth, D. Mazumdar, H. Sims, Q.-C. Sun, M. K. Yurtisigi, S.
12 Sarker, A. Gupta, W. H. Butler, and J. L. Musfeldt, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103,
G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993); 49, 14251 (1994);
G. Kresse and J. Furthm€ uller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996); Phys. 082406 (2013).
34
N. M. Caffrey, D. Fritsch, T. Archer, S. Sanvito, and C. Ederer, Phys. Rev.
Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
13
P. E. Bl€ochl, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994). B 87, 024419 (2013).
35
14
G. Kresse and J. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999). J. Zhang, X.-G. Zhang, and H. F. Han, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 222401
15 (2012).
We use a plane-wave cutoff of 274.3 eV (20.16 Ry). A 16 16 16 C- 36
centered Monkhorst-Pack mesh of k-points was necessary to achieve con- W. H. Butler, X.-G. Zhang, T. C. Schulthess, and J. M. MacLaren, Phys.
Rev. B 63, 054416 (2001).
vergence, with a finer 20 20 20 mesh used for the PBE and PBEþU 37
density of states calculations. For the computation of the short-range Fock W. H. Butler, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 9, 014106 (2008).
38
Y.-C. Chang and J. N. Schulman, Phys. Rev. B 25, 3975 (1982).
exchange potential in the HSE06 method, the k mesh was reduced to
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the abstract. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
130.160.4.77 On: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:34:58