QUESTION 41 Pr (F) H0: All i=0 Ha: At least one i 0 =0.

05 MSE Root MSE R2 CV Parameters Intercept H0: 0=0 Ha: 0 0 =0.05 Gender H0: 1=0 Ha: 10 =0.05 Height H0: 2=0 Ha: 20 =0.05 Interaction H0: 3=0 Ha: 30 =0.05 Regression line Distribution Residuals RStudent Observed Cooks D Outlier Leverage QQ Plots Box and Whisker DFFITS DFBETAS

<0.0001, REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the model is significant in explaining the data

12.695 the error variability is moderate 3.56 0.9496 good fit for data 4.92588 0.0076; REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is significant to the model. therefore 0=-82.2203

0.4456; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 1=0

0.0001; REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is significant to the model. Therefore 2=0.90575

0.4601; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 3=0

y=-82.2203 0+0.90575 2 Skewed to the right curvature might have to add X2 variable 2 outliers are identified Deviation from the line Outliers are at observation 2 and 6 1 outliers and 1 outlier and leverage There is a deviation from normality Mean>median, therefore distribution is skewed to the right Outlier at observation 2 and 6 Intercept = at observation 11 Gender = at observation 2 and 6 Height =at observation 11 Interaction= at observation 2 and 6 All three regressors have small to large variation and this shows that the variances are not equal and it is HETEROSCEDASTIC.

Residuals by Regressors

REGRESSION LINE y= 0+ 1GENder+ 2Height + 3(Gender x Height) + ij if Gender = O then y = 0+ 2Height+ ij if Gender = 1 then y = (0+ 1)+( 2+ 3)Height + ij Since 0= significant 1= non- significant 2= significant 3=non- significant Then both our regression lines are y= 0+ 2Height+ ij Therefore the lines are parallel and have same slope and intercept, i.e. y= -82.2203+0.90575Height+ ij

QUESTION 42 Pr (F) H0: All i=0 Ha: At least one i 0 =0.05

A <0.0001, REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the model is significant in explaining the data

B <0.0001, REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the model is significant in explaining the data

MSE

166.55520 the error variability is too high

180.5727 error variability increased

Root MSE R2 CV

12.9056 0.6248 poor fit for data 15.68 not above 30, but there needs to be investigation

13.43606 - increased 0.8424 fit improved 15.43 not above 30, but there needs to be investigation

C <0.0001, REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the model is significant in explaining the data 137.43580error variability decreased but is still high 11.72330 decreased 0.7023 fit got worse 14.25037 - not above 30, but there needs to be investigation 0.0719; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 0=0 0.0517; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 1=0 0.370 FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. Therefore 2=0 0.1948; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a

D <0.0001, REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the model is significant in explaining the data 164.658 - error variability increased 12.831 increased 0.8618 fit improved 14.73 - not above 30, but there needs to be investigation 0.7073; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 0=0 0.0474; REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is significant to the model

Parameters Intercept H0: 0=0 Ha: 0 0 =0.05

0.5941; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 0=0

0.4967; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 0=0 0.1122; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 1=0 <0.0001; REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is significant to the model

Age H0: 1=0 Ha: 10 =0.05

0.1548; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 1=0

Height H0: 2=0 Ha: 20 =0.05

<0.0001; REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is significant to the model

Body Temp H0: 3=0

0.2153; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s;

0.6531; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5%

0.0996 FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. Therefore 2=0 0.9532; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a

Ha: 30 =0.05

therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 3=0

l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 3=0

BMI H0: 4=0 Ha: 40 =0.05

5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 3=0 0.0172; REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is significant to the model

Condition index

All condition indexes are <10 therefore there is no collinearity y=1.09826 2 Right skewed Fan shape might have to do a log transformation 3 outliers are identified Concentrated then reach out to the outliers Outliers are at observation 13,15,16 and 26 2 outliers, 3 leverages and 1 outlier and leverage There is a deviation from normality Mean>median, therefore distribution is skewed to the right

Regression line Distribution Residuals

All condition indexes are <10 therefore there is no collinearity Y=1.17974 2 Right-skewed Fan shape might have to do a log transformation 3 outliers are identified Concentrated then reach out to the outliers Outliers are at observation 13,15,16 and 30 2 outliers, 2leverages

All condition indexes are <10 therefore there is no collinearity Y = -6.88466 4 Left skewed Fan shape might have to do a log transformation 3 outliers are identified Deviation from the line Outliers are at observation 13,15,16 1 outlier, 1 leverage and 2 outlier and leverage There is a deviation from normality Median>mean, median, therefore distribution is skewed to the left Interval

5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 3=0 0.0729; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 4=0 All condition indexes are <10 therefore there is no collinearity Y=0.45013 1 Right skewed ??

RStudent (2;2) Observed

Cooks D = 0.133 Outlier Leverage = 0.266 QQ Plots

There is a deviation from normality Mean>median, therefore distribution is skewed to the right

Box and Whisker

4 outliers are identified Concentrated then reach out to the outliers Outliers are at observation 13,15,16 and 30 2 outliers, 1 leverage and 2 outlier and leverage There is a deviation from normality Mean>median, therefore distribution is skewed to the right Interval

COVRATIO

Interval (0.8667;1.399) at Interval

observation at 2,13,15,20,25

(0.8667;1.399) at observation at 2,13,15,16,20,25 Interval = (0.73;0.73) at observation 13,15,16,30 Intercept interval = (0.365;0.365) at observation 2,13,15,16,30 Age interval = (0.365;0.365) at observation 16 and 2 Height interval =(0.365;0.365) at observation 13,15,16,30 Body Temp = (0.365;0.365) at observation2, 15,16,30

DFFITS

Interval = (-0.73;0.73) at observation 13,15,16,26

DFBETAS

Intercept interval = (0.365;0.365) at observation 16 Age interval = (0.365;0.365) at observation 16 and 2 Height interval =(0.365;0.365) at observation 13,15,16 Body Temp = (0.365;0.365) at observation 15,16,26

Residuals by Regressors

Age fan shape Height fan shape Body Temp inverse fan shape

Age fan shape Height fan shape Body Temp inverse fan shape

(0.8667;1.399) at observation at 2,13,15,16,20,25 Interval = (0.73;0.73) at observation 13,15,16,30 Intercept interval = (0.365;0.365) at observation 2,13,15,16,30 Age interval = (0.365;0.365) at observation 16 and 2 Height interval =(-0.365;0.365) at observation 13,15,16,30 Body Temp = (0.365;0.365) at observation2, 15,16,30 Age- sinusoidal Height- fan BodyTempcurvature BMI inverse fan

(0.8667;1.399) at observation at 2,13,15,16,20,25 Interval = (0.73;0.73) at observation 13,15,16,30 Intercept interval = (0.365;0.365) at observation 2,13,15,16,30 Age interval = (0.365;0.365) at observation 16 and 2 Height interval =(-0.365;0.365) at observation 13,15,16,30 Body Temp = (0.365;0.365) at observation2, 15,16,30 Age- fan Height- fan BodyTempinverse fan BMI inverse fan

QUESTION 44 Pr (F) H0: All i=0 Ha: At least one i 0 =0.05 MSE Root MSE R2 CV Parameters Intercept H0: 0=0 Ha: 0 0 =0.05 INDICATOR 1 H0: 1=0 Ha: 10 =0.05 INDICATOR 2 H0: 2=0 Ha: 20 =0.05 Height H0: 3=0 Ha: 30 =0.05 Interaction 1 H0: 4=0 Ha: 40 =0.05 Interaction 2 H0: 5=0 Ha: 50 =0.05 Regression line Distribution Residuals RStudent Observed Cooks D Outlier Leverage QQ Plots Box and Whisker DFFITS DFBETAS

0.0001, REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the model is significant in explaining the data

180.375 the error variability is too high 13.4303 0.6249 poor fit for data 16.3254 0.1976;FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 0=0

0.3439; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 1=0

0.2002; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. Therefore 2=0

0.0045; REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is significant to the model. therefore 3=0.77041

0.3268; FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 4=0

0.1835;FAIL TO REJECT H0 at a 5% l.o.s; therefore the parameter is not significant to the model. therefore 5=0

y=0.77041 3 Slightly skewed Sinusoidal 2 outliers are identified Deviation from the line Outliers are at observation 12,13,15,16 2 outliers and 3 leverages There is a deviation from normality Mean>median, therefore distribution is skewed to the right Outlier at observation 12,13,15,16 Intercept = at observation 13 Indicator 1 = at observation 13

Residuals by Regressors

Indicator 2 = at observation12,13,15 Height = at observation 13 Interaction 1= at observation 13 Interaction 2 = at observation 12,13,15 All five regressors have small to large variation and this shows that the variances are not equal and it is HETEROSCEDASTIC.

REGRESSION LINE y= 0+ 1IND1+ 2IND2+ 3Height+ 4(IND1 x Height) + 5(IND2 x height)+ ij if IND1= 0 and IND2=0 then y = 0+ 3Height+ ij (group A) if IND1=1 and IND2=0 then y = (0+ 1)+ (3+ 4)Height+ ij (group B) if IND1=0 and IND2=1 then y = (0+ 2)+ (3+ 5)Height+ ij (group C) Since 0=non- significant 1= non- significant 2=non- significant 3= significant 4= non-significant 3= non-significant Then all three lines are y= 3Height+ ij Therefore the lines are parallel and have same slope and intercept, i.e. y= 0.77041Height+ ij