You are on page 1of 2

Prevention of Progression of Kidney Disease S25

Uric acid
Date written: February 2004
Final submission: July 2004
Author: David Johnson

GUIDELINES

No recommendations possible based on Level I or II evidence.

SUGGESTIONS FOR CLINICAL CARE Occasional renal patients with hyperuricaemia and CKD
have demonstrated histologic findings of urate crystals in
(Suggestions are based on Level III and IV sources) the renal cortical, medullary or papillary interstitium with
• Treating hyperuricaemia does not retard the progression surrounding giant cell reaction.6,12,13 It is uncertain whether
of renal failure and cannot be recommended for this indi- this contributes to renal dysfunction, is a consequence of
cation. (Level IV evidence; limited case series; clinically renal injury or is merely an epiphenomenon.
relevant outcomes; consistent effects) A case-control study by Fessel14 demonstrated that
• Physicians should be aware that the use of protein- azotaemia occurred in only 2 of 113 patients with asymp-
restricted diets in chronic renal patients treated with tomatic hyperuricaemia compared with 4 of 193 normouri-
allopurinol may require further reduction of the dose of caemic controls over a mean follow-up period of 8 years.
allopurinol due to inhibition of urinary excretion of oxy- Similarly, long-term follow-up studies of 524 gouty patients
purinol. (Level II evidence; single randomised cross-over failed to demonstrate any adverse effect of hyperuricaemia
study; surrogate outcome; moderate effect) on renal function.15
Therapy directed at lowering plasma urate levels (urico-
BACKGROUND surics or allopurinol) in patients with familial hyperuricae-
mia has not been successful in preventing the development
Hyperuricaemia is an almost invariable feature of renal fail- of renal insufficiency.10,11
ure.1 Long-standing hyperuricaemia has occasionally been Case series reports16 have generally not observed an
associated with the development of chronic kidney disease alteration in the rate of progression of renal disease after
(CKD),2–11 although it has been difficult to establish correction of hyperuricaemia by allopurinol.
whether the elevated plasma urate levels in these patients In a retrospective case series, Fairbanks et al17 examined
reflect a cause, consequence or accelerant of renal dysfunc- the effects of allopurinol commencement in 32 patients
tion. The aim of this guideline is to evaluate the available with familial juvenile hyperuricaemic nephropathy.
clinical evidence that treatment of hyperuricaemia retards Twenty-seven patients started immediately on allopurinol
the progression of CKD. (serum creatinine <0.2 mmol/L) experienced mild deterio-
ration of renal function compared with five patients who
SEARCH STRATEGY commenced allopurinol with a serum creatinine concentra-
tion > 0.2 mmol/L, all of whom progressed to end-stage kid-
Databases searched: Medline (1999 to November Week 2, ney disease (ESKD) with an average period of 6 years. The
2003). MeSH terms for kidney diseases were combined with study’s results were significantly limited by the absence of a
MeSH terms and text words for allopurinol and hyperuri- control group and lead-time bias.
caemia. The results were then combined with the Cochrane The unproven benefit of allopurinol in preventing renal
highly sensitive search strategy for randomised controlled failure progression in the setting of asymptomatic hyperuri-
trials and MeSH terms and text words for identifying meta- caemia must be balanced against the documented small
analyses and systematic reviews. The Cochrane Renal incidence of serious adverse reactions to allopurinol, includ-
Group Specialized Register of Randomised Controlled ing drug hypersensitivity syndromes. For example, a review
Trials was also searched for relevant trials not indexed by of allopurinol hypersensitivity reactions by Lupton and
Medline. Odom18 reported that 97% of such reactions occurred in the
Date of search: 16 December 2003. setting of pre-existing renal failure and that in over 60% of
cases, allopurinol was prescribed for the treatment of asymp-
WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE? tomatic hyperuricaemia; 10% of the reported patients died
from allopurinol hypersensitivity.
There are no randomised or prospective controlled trials The use of protein-restricted diets has been shown in a
addressing the effect of treatment of hyperuricaemia on randomised crossover trial19 to significantly diminish the
progression of renal failure. excretion of allopurinol and its active metabolite oxypu-
S26 The CARI Guidelines

rinol by 28% and 64%, respectively. This results in a 3-fold 2. Foreman JW, Yudkoff M. Familial hyperuricemia and renal insuf-
increase in the half-life of oxypurinol. ficiency. Child Nephrol. Urol. 1990; 10: 115–8.
3. Yu TF, Berger L. Renal disease in primary gout. a study of 253 gout
patients with proteinuria. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1975; 4: 293–305.
SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE 4. Coombs FS, Pecora LJ, Thorogood E. Renal function in patients
with gout. J. Clin. Invest 1940; 19: 525–35.
There are no randomised or prospective controlled trials 5. Gutman AB, Yu TF. Renal function in gout with a commentary on
addressing the effect of treatment of hyperuricaemia on pro- the renal regulation of urate excretion, and the role of the kidney
gression of renal failure. The majority of the small numbers in the pathogenesis of gout. Am. J. Med. 1957; 23: 600–22.
of published case series and anecdotal reports suggest that 6. Talbott JH, Terplan KL. The kidney in gout. Medicine 1960; 39:
treatment of hyperuricaemia per se does not appreciably 405–67.
7. Barlow KA, Beilin KJ. Renal disease in primary gout. Q J. Med.
influence renal failure progression.
1968; 37: 79–96.
8. Duncan H, Dixon ST. Gout, familial hyperuricaemia and renal
WHAT DO THE OTHER GUIDELINES SAY? failure. Q J. Med. 1960; 29: 127–35.
9. Rosenbloom FM, Kelley WN, Carr AA. Familial nephropathy and
Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative: No recom- gout in a kindred. Clin. Res. 1967; 15: 270–1.
mendation. 10. Van Goor W, Koorker CJ, Mees CJD. An unusual form of renal
disease associated with gout and hypertension. J. Clin. Pathol 1971;
UK Renal Association: No recommendation.
24: 254–9.
Canadian Society of Nephrology: No recommendation.
11. Massari PU, Hsu CH, Barnes RV et al. Familial hyperuricemia and
European Best Practice Guidelines: No recommendation. renal disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 1980; 140: 680–4.
International Guidelines: No recommendation. 12. Sokoloff L. The pathology of gout. Metabolism 1957; 6: 230–43.
13. Brown J, Mallory GK. Renal changes in gout. N Engl. J. Med.
IMPLEMENTATION AND AUDIT 1950; 243: 325–9.
14. Fessel WJ. Renal outcomes of gout and hyperuricemia. Am. J.
Med. 1979; 67: 74–82.
No recommendation.
15. Berger L, Yu TF. Renal function in gout IV. An analysis of 524
gouty subjects including long-term follow-up studies. Am. J. Med.
SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH 1979; 59: 605–13.
16. Emmerson BT. Gout and renal disease. In. Smyth, CJ Holers, VM,
A multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial of eds. Gout, Hyperuricaemia and Other Crystal-Associated Arthro-
allopurinol therapy on the progression of renal failure would pathies, 1st edn. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1999: pp. 241–60.
17. Fairbanks LD, Cameron JS, Venkat-Raman G et al. Early treat-
help to clarify the issue, although such a study would not be
ment with allopurinol in familial juvenile hyerpuricaemic nephro-
a very high priority. The study would need to be stratified for
pathy (FJHN) ameliorates the long-term progression of renal
sex, diabetes and severity of renal dysfunction. disease. QJM 2002; 95: 597–607.
18. Lupton GP, Odom RB. The allopurinol hypersensitivity syn-
REFERENCES drome. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1979; 1: 365–74.
19. Berlinger WG, Park GD, Spector R. The effect of dietary protein
1. Ifudu O, Tan CC, Dulin AL et al. Gouty arthritis in end-stage on the clearance of allopurinol and oxypurinol. N Engl. J. Med.
renal disease: clinical course and rarity of new cases. Am. J. Kidney 1985; 313: 771–6.
Dis 1994; 23: 347–51.

You might also like