Engineering Guide

Please refer to the Price Engineers HVAC Handbook
for more information on Radiant Heating and Cooling

S E C T I O N H
Engineering Guide
Radiant Products
H-2
All Metric dimensions ( ) are soft conversion. Copyright Price Industries Limited 2011.
Imperial dimensions are converted to metric and rounded to the nearest millimetre.
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Introduction To Radiant Heating and Cooling
Radiant heating and cooling systems offer an
energy effcient alternative to all-air systems.
In most cases, the supply air volume of
the air handling system is limited in size
to satisfy only the ventilation and latent
loads, with the radiant system making up
the balance of the heating and cooling
loads. This comfortable method of heating
and cooling may save energy, space and
building maintenance costs. The following
pages offer an introduction to the products,
systems and design methodology, as well
as the advantages and limitations of radiant
heating and cooling.
Management of heat loads can generally
be classifed into two different types: all-
air systems or hybrid systems. All-air
systems have been the most prominent
in North America during the 20th century
and have been in use since the advent of
air conditioning. These systems use air to
service both the ventilation requirement as
well as the building cooling load. In general,
these systems have a central air handling
unit (or rooftop unit) that delivers enough
cool or warm air to satisfy the building load.
Diffusers mounted in the zone deliver this
air in such a way as to promote comfort and
evenly distribute the air. In many cases, the
amount of air required to cool or warm the
space or the fuctuations of loads make
designing in accordance to these principles
diffcult. Draft is not uncommon, and some
ceiling diffusers have been known to dump
at low capacities.
Hybrid systems have two components: an
air-side ventilation system and a hydronic
(or water-side) radiant system. The air-side
is designed to meet all of the ventilation
requirements for the building, as well as
satisfy all latent loads. It is a 100% outside
air system and because the primary function
of the supply air system is ventilation as
opposed to cooling, it can be supplied at
higher supply air temperatures than is typical
of overhead air distribution systems. The
water-side is designed to meet the balance
of the sensible cooling and heating loads.
These loads may be handled by water based
products, such as radiant panels, which
transfer heat mainly by thermal radiation,
and chilled sails, which transfer heat using
a combination of thermal radiation and
natural convection. Radiant panels have
been used for sensible heating and cooling
in North American buildings for over half a
century, and are a widely recognized and
well-established technology. Chilled sails
were originally developed in Europe in
the late 1990s, and are a relatively new
technology in North America.
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Copyright Price Industries Limited 2011. All Metric dimensions ( ) are soft conversion.
H-3
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Figure 1: Examples of radiant heating and cooling
Radiant heating and cooling systems
provide an effective method for satisfying
the heating and/or cooling loads of a space
while promoting a high level of occupant
comfort and energy effciency.
Hydronic systems have been successfully
used in several applications having
dramatically different characteristics.
Some examples of areas where radiant
systems have been applied include:
Green Buildings Hospitals
Burn Centers Isolation Rooms
Schools Data Centers
Offce Buildings Airports
Cafeterias Television Studios
Theaters Casinos
Benets of Air-Water Systems
There are many benefts to heating and
cooling using radiant panels and chilled
sails. Advantages of these water based
heating and cooling systems over other
mechanical systems include:
Energy and system effciency
Reduced system horse power
Indoor environmental quality
Improved indoor air quality
Increased thermal comfort
Reduced mechanical footprint
Lower maintenance costs
Improved system hygiene
Radiant systems are a good choice where:
Thermal comfort is a major design
consideration
Areas have high sensible loads
Areas require a high indoor air quality
(100% outdoor air system)
Energy conservation is desired
Energy Efciency
The heat transfer capacity of water allows for
a reduction in the energy used to transport
an equivalent amount of heat as an all-air
system (Stetiu, 1998). These reductions can
be found primarily through reduced fan
energy.
The higher chilled water supply (CHWS)
temperatures used with active and passive
beam systems, typically around 58 F
[14.5 C], provide many opportunities for a
reduction in energy use, including increased
water-side economizer use. This increased
CHWS temperature also allows for more
water-side economizer hours than would be
possible with other systems where CHWS
temperatures are typically ~45 F [7 C].
Concepts and Benets
Indoor Air Quality
Depending on the application, under
maximum load, only ~15 to 40% of the
cooling air fow in a typical space is outdoor
air and is required by code to satisfy the
ventilation requirements. The balance of
the supply air fow is recirculated air which,
when not treated, can transport pollutants
through the building. Radiant systems
transfer heat directly to/from the zone and
are often used with a 100% outdoor air
system which exhausts polluted air directly
to the outside, reducing the opportunity
for VOCs and illness to travel between air
distribution zones.
Noise
Radiant systems do not usually have
fan powered devices near the zone. This
typically results in lower zone noise levels
than what is achieved with all-air systems. In
situations where passive beams are used in
conjunction with a quiet air system, such as
displacement ventilation, the opportunities
for noise reduction increase further.
Reduced Mechanical Footprint
The increased cooling capacity of water
allows the transport system to be reduced
in size. It is generally not unusual to be able
to replace ~60 ft [6 m] of air shaft with a
6 in. [150 mm] water riser, increasing the
amount of foor space available for use or
lease. Due to the simplicity of the systems
(i.e. reduction in the number of moving parts
and the elimination of zone flters, drain
pans, condensate pumps, and mechanical
components), there tends to be less space
required in the interstitial space to support
the HVAC system.
Lower Maintenance Costs
With no terminal unit or fan coil flters or
motors to replace, a simple cleaning is all
that is required in order to maintain the
product.
H-4
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
When To Use Radiant Systems
Hygienic System
With the elimination of the majority of
flters and drain pans, there is a reduced
risk of mold or bacteria growth in the entire
mechanical system.
Radiant systems such as radiant panels
and chilled sails are well-suited to some
applications and less so to others. As a
result, each application must be reviewed
for potential benefts as well as the suitability
of these types of systems. One consideration
which can assist in the decision to employ
hydronic systems as opposed to an all-air
system, is the air-side load fractionor
the percentage of the total air supply that
must be delivered to the zone to satisfy
code and dehumidifcation requirements.
Table 1 shows the load fraction for several
spaces. In the table the best applications for
hydronic systems are those with the lowest
air-side load fraction as they are the ones that
will beneft the most from the effciencies
of hydronic systems. Another factor which
should be examined is the sensible heat
ratio or the percentage of the cooling load
that is sensible as opposed to latent. The
latent loads must be satisfed with an air
system and offer some sensible cooling at
the same time because of the temperature of
dehumidifed air. If the total sensible cooling
load is signifcantly higher than the capacity
of the air supplied to satisfy the latent loads,
a radiant system might be a good choice.
Commercial Ofce Buildings
In an offce building hydronic heating and
cooling systems provide several benefts. The
lower supply air volume of the air handling
system provides signifcant energy savings.
In addition, the smaller infrastructure
required to move this lower air fow allows
for small plenum spaces, translating into
shorter foor-to-foor construction or higher
ceilings. The lower supply air volume and
elimination of fans at or near the space
offers a signifcant reduction in generated
noise. Often the lower air fow translates
to reheat requirements being reduced. In
the case of 100% outside air systems, the
lighting load captured in the return plenum
is exhausted from the building, lowering the
overall cooling load.
Schools
Schools are another application that can
beneft greatly from radiant panels and chilled
sails systems. Similar to offce buildings, the
benefts of a lower supply air volume to the
space are lower fan power, shorter plenum
height, reduced reheat requirement, and
lower noise levels (often a critical design
parameter of schools).
Hospital Patient Rooms
Hospitals are unique applications in that
the supply air volume required by local
codes for each space is often greater than
the requirement of the cooling and heating
load. In some cases the standard or code
requires these higher air-change rates for
all-air systems only. In these cases the
total air-change rate required is reduced if
supplemental heating or cooling is used.
This allows for a signifcant reduction in
system air volume and yields energy savings
and other benefts.
Furthermore, because these systems are
generally constant air volume with the
potential to reduce the primary air-change
rates, reheat and the cooling energy discarded
as part of the reheat process is a signifcant
energy savings opportunity. Depending on
the application, a 100% outside air system
may be used. These systems utilize no
return air and no mixing of return between
patient rooms, potentially lowering the risk
of hospital associated infections.
Hotels / Dorms
Hotels, motels, dormitories, and similar type
buildings can also beneft from hydronic
systems. Fan power savings often come
from the elimination of fan coil units located
in the occupied space. The energy savings
associated with these local fans is similar
in magnitude to that of larger air handling
systems. It also allows for the elimination
of the electrical service required for the
installation of fan coil units as well as a
reduction in the maintenance of the drain
and flter systems. The removal of these
fans from the occupied space also provides
lower noise levels, which can be a signifcant
beneft in the sleep areas.
Application
Total Air
Volume (Typ.)
Ventilation
Requirement (Typ.)
Air-Side
Load
Fraction
Offce 1 cfm/ft
2
[5 L/s m
2
] 0.15 cfm/ft
2
[0.75 L/s m
2
] 0.15
School 1.5 cfm/ft
2
[7.5 L/s m
2
] 0.5 cfm/ft
2
[2.5 L/s m
2
] 0.33
Lobby 2 cfm/ft
2
[10 L/s m
2
] 1 cfm/ft
2
[5 L/s m
2
] 0.5
Patient Room 6 ach 2 ach 0.33
Load-driven Lab 20 ach 6 ach 0.3
Table 1: Typical load fractions for several spaces in the United States
Limitations
There are several areas in a building where
humidity can be diffcult to control, such
as lobby areas and locations of egress.
These areas may see a signifcant short
term humidity load if the entrances are not
isolated in some way (revolving doors or
vestibules). In these areas, a choice of a
complimentary technology such as fan coil
units or displacement ventilation is ideal.
Other applications may have high air fow/
ventilation requirements, such as an exhaust
driven lab. The majority of the benefit
provided by the hydronic system is linked
to the reduction in supply air fow. As such,
these applications may not see suffcient
beneft to justify the addition of the hydronic
circulation system, making them not likely
to be a good candidate for this technology.
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-5
Products - Radiant Panels
Operation
Radiant panels mainly use thermal radiation
to handle the heating or cooling loads of a
space. Thermal radiation heat exchange is
based on differences in surface temperatures
as discussed in Chapter 3Introduction to
Heat Transfer from the Price Engineer's
Handbook. Radiant panels add energy to or
remove it from a room mainly using radiation
with surfaces in the room, but also directly
to occupants (Figure 2). To a lesser extent,
the panels also heat or cool a room through
convection of the room air as it is heated or
cooled by the panel surface.
Because radiant panels can handle the
sensible portion of a building load they must
be paired with an air system for ventilation
and latent load removal. In heating, for
example, heat from warm water is transferred
to the panel surface via conduction. The heat
passes through the tubing, the mounting
extrusion (the fn), and the panel itself, to
the panel surface. At the surface, heat is both
radiated to other surfaces in the room and
transferred to room air via natural convection.
The heat transfer through a radiant panel can
easily be modeled with a thermal resistance
circuit, as in Figure 3. The resistance circuit
represents the actual components of a
radiant panel. The nodes represent various
temperatures of the panel component
surfaces, and the resistors represent the heat
conduction through the panel components
and to the surrounding room. The tw node
represents the mean water temperature that
transfers through the copper tubing to the
actual panel components. To achieve the
maximum possible surface temperature
of the panel, Tsurf, the conduction from the
pipe to the fn to the panel surface must
be maximized, or, inversely, the resistance
must be minimized. This can be achieved by
using materials that are highly conductive
such as copper tubing and aluminum for the
fn and panel. Even surface contact between
the water tubing and the fns decreases
resistance, along with thermal paste which
can be applied between the fn and the panel
surface to help spread heat evenly to the
panel surface (Figure 4)
RADIATION
Figure 2: Radiation pathways
R
conv,s
T
air, ceiling
T
panel, outer insulation
R
insulation
AUST,
ceiling
R
rad,s
R
conv,room
T
air, room
Fin
Surface AUST,
room
T
surf, panel
R
rad,room
R
fin
T
fin, ave
R
panel surface
Copper tubing with
Towards slab
Towards room and occupants
AUST = Area-weighted temperature
of all indoor surfaces of walls, ceiling,
floor, windows, doors, etc.
Figure 3: Thermal resistance circuit diagram of a modular radiant panel
Without Thermal
Paste
With Thermal Paste
Figure 4: Surface temperature distribution of a radiant panel
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
H-6
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Interconnect
Return
The amount of thermal energy that is
transferred to the room surfaces via radiation
is dependent on the view factors from the
panel to the various room surfaces, along
with the emissivity of the panel surface. A
larger temperature gradient results in greater
thermal radiation. Also, the view factors from
the panel to the room, as well as the emissivity
of the panel surface affect the temperature of
the receiving surface. Refer to Chapter 3
Introduction to Heat Transfer of the Engineer's
Handbook for further details on the theory of
radiant heat transfer. Insulation on the back
of the panel helps decrease the amount of
heat that travels by radiation or convection
to the ceiling.
Applications
Radiant panels can be applied to virtually
any space, especially areas with high
sensible loads, areas that require a high
indoor air quality, or areas where thermal
comfort and energy conservation are major
design considerations. Typical applications
of hydronic radiant panels are hospitals
including patient rooms, isolation rooms,
and burn centers schools, data centers,
offce buildings, and airports.
1. Linear Radiant Panels
Linear radiant panels are constructed of a
series of integrated aluminum heat sinks
and copper tubing. Multiple heat sinks
form the visible face of the panel and are
joined via tongue-and-groove connections.
Insulated backing helps keep the radiant
exchange limited to the occupied space. The
components of linear radiant panels can be
seen in Figure 5.
2. Modular Radiant Panels
Modular radiant panels are designed to
be integrated into or alongside standard
suspended ceiling systems or to suspend
from the ceiling in an exposed application.
The visible side of the modular radiant panel
is a formed steel or aluminum sheet to
which the aluminum heat sinks are attached.
Copper tubing runs through the heat sinks,
and insulated backing helps keep the radiant
exchange limited to the occupied space. The
components of modular radiant panels can
be seen in Figure 6.
Connecting Radiant Panels
Both linear and modular radiant panels can
be connected in series, as shown below. The
panels are supplied with straight tubing,
using 180 return connections for end panels
and interconnects between panels. A typical
series application of panels is a perimeter
layout with the panels running from wall to
wall where an even temperature distribution
across several panels is desired. The loose
connection pieces allow the panels to be
trimmed in order to ft. In these applications,
the fnal connections are done in the feld
(Figure 7).
Products - Radiant Panels
Figure 5: Components of a linear radiant
panel without insulation
Figure 6: Components of a modular radiant
panel without insulation
Figure 7: Series connection details for linear radiant panels
DESIGN TIP
Linear and modular radiant panels can be connected in series in a cloud confguration,
provided the panel surface temperatures do not vary signifcantly and water-side
pressure drop is maintained at acceptable levels. A grouping of 4 to 6 modular
panels at 2 ft [600 mm] wide and 4 ft [1200 mm] long is common as the panel surface
temperature will typically be within 2 to 4 F [1 to 2 C] across the grouping in cooling
or 10 to 20 F [6 to 12 C] in heating.
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-7
Products - Chilled Sails
Operation
Chilled sails provide a functional and
unique alternative to conventional radiant
panels. Sails couple the radiant cooling
effects of standard radiant panels with a
convective component. In cooling mode,
chilled sails create natural convection by
cooling the surrounding air as it passes over
the surface facing the plenum. As the air
falls into the occupied zone, where warm
air is pulled over the sail, the convective
cooling capacity of the sail is coupled with
the radiant capacity of the cool sail surface,
resulting in a cooling capacity greater than
that of standard radiant panels. In cooling,
the approximate breakdown of heat mode
transfer of chilled sails is 30% by thermal
radiation and 70% by natural convection.
A general air fow diagram of an exposed
chilled sail in heating and cooling mode can
be seen in Figure 8. In certain applications,
sails can also be used for heating. In heating
mode, the sails use radiation only to heat
the zone below. Because sails have no
insulation on their reverse side, heat is
radiated not only towards the room, but
also towards the building structure. As the
slab warms, it in turn helps heat the room
to a small extent by thermal radiation and
natural convection.
Like radiant panels, chilled sails can also
be analyzed using a thermal resistance
circuit diagram, as seen in Figure 9. The
resistance circuit represents the actual
components of a chilled sail. The nodes
represent various temperatures of the sail
component surfaces or the conditions of the
room, and the resistors represent the heat
conduction through the panel components
or heat transfer between the sail and the
room. The mean water temperature, tw, node
represents the mean water temperature that
transfers through the copper tubing to the
actual sail. Most chilled sails are one single
extrusion, which means that the fn and
sail are one solid piece of aluminum. To
maximize heat transfer through the sail,
or, conversely, to minimize resistance, a
material with high thermal conductivity,
such as aluminum, is typically used.
As seen in Figure 10, a chilled sail transfers
heat to a room with a combination of
radiation and natural convection. Because
chilled sails have no insulation on their
reverse sides, heat is transferred from the
copper tubing/fn to the slab and plenum.
The heat transfer from the sail to the room
has three components: natural convection
with the room air, thermal radiation with the
room surfaces, and thermal radiation from
the top of the sail with either the suspended
ceiling or the fxed ceiling, depending on the
design details.
Figure 8: Air fow pattern of an exposed chilled sail in cooling and heating mode
Cooling
Heating
Sail
Sail
Figure 9: Thermal resistance circuit diagram of a chilled sail
Figure 10: Typical chilled sail
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Towards slab
Towards room and occupants
T
air, room
AUST,
room
R
rad, room
R
rad, ceiling
T
air,ceiling
R
conv, ceiling
R
conv, room
R
fin/sail
AUST,
ceiling
T
surface, fin/soil
Sail/Fin
Copper tubing with
Top Bottom
H-8
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
In cooling mode, the majority of the heat
transfer occurs by natural convection as
warm air rises due to natural buoyancy
forces, passes over the chilled sails, cools,
and then sinks down into the occupied
zone. In heating mode, heat is transferred
mainly through thermal radiation with room
surfaces, where it increases the average
unheated surface temperature of the room
(AUST). As warm air rises past the heated
sails, natural convection occurs, which
results in warmer return air. Because sails
are water-only systems, they can only handle
the sensible portion of a building load and
must be paired with a fresh air system for
ventilation and latent load removal.
Applications
Their cooling capacity and unique design
make chilled sails an excellent alternative to
panel systems, particularly in applications
that have an architectural focus. Typical
applications of chilled sails include offces,
meeting/conference rooms, theaters,
studios, lobbies/foyers, waiting areas, or any
areas were radiant panel use is appropriate.
Chilled sails are designed for architectural
appeal and are typically installed in T-bar
ceiling grids or freely suspended.
Figure 11: Exposed chilled sails
Figure 13: Active and inactive sections
Figure 12: Continuous chilled sail sections
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Components
Chilled sails are typically constructed from
copper piping and aluminum extrusions
designed to optimize capacity, as well
as for architectural appeal (Figure 11).
Exposed chilled sails are often installed as
the fnished ceiling by either installing as a
cloud, as shown in Figure 11, or combining
active and inactive sections for a continuous
look, as seen in Figure 12.
Chilled sails are designed to be installed
either open to the room or below or behind
a perforated ceiling, and may be installed
in large or discrete sections. In either case,
the operation of the chilled sail requires that
a portion of the ceiling is open to allow air
circulation to the rear of the assembly. For
installations behind a perforated ceiling or
installed as a cloud in an open ceiling, this
is generally not an issue. For installations
where the sails are installed in a ceiling
system, this is often accomplished by using
non-active sections of sail to allow air to
pass up to the area above the ceiling, as
show in Figure 13.
Passive Elements for Return Passive Elements for Return
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-9
0
75
80
90
100
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y

o
f

S
a
i
l
,

%
Free Area as a Percentage of Sail Area
Figure 16: Typical piping of a sail with an odd number of passes
Figure 17: Typical even number of passes
Figure 14: Free area vs. active area of sail Figure 15: Clearance between chilled sail and slab
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150
E
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e

C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y

o
f

S
a
i
l
,

%
Clearance Between Chilled Sail and Slab, in.
Clearance Between Chilled Sail and Slab, mm
Water Supply
Sail 1 Sail 2 Sail 3
Water Return
Flex Hose Flex Hose
Water Supply
Flex Hose
The amount of free area vs. active area of sail will affect the performance of the sail system according to Figure 14. In all cases, the
amount of space between the back of the sail and the structural slab will affect the level of circulation, and thereby the convective cooling
component. This capacity is affected according to Figure 15.
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Connecting Chilled Sails
Depending on the width of the unit, the sails
may have connection locations on opposite
ends. Sails with an odd number of sections
will have connections on opposite ends,
and even number of sections will have
connections on the same ends, as seen
in Figures 16 and 17 below. Flex hose is
generally used to connect the water fow
between the units.
H-10
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
1. Determine the ventilation requirement
The ventilation requirement should be calculated to meet ventilatiown codes. For example, using ASHRAE Standard 62-2004 to determine
the minimum fresh air fow rate:
L1
where
Qoz = minimum fresh air fow rate, cfm [L/s]
Rp = outdoor air fow rate per person, cfm/person [L/s(person)]
Pz = zone population or maximum number of occupants in zone
Ra = outdoor air fow rate per unit area, cfm/ft
2
[L/sm
2
]
AZ = zone foor area or net occupied area of the zone, ft
2
[m
2
]
2. Determine required supply air dew-point temperature to remove the latent load
L2
where
qL = latent load, Btu/h [W]
Qs = supply air fow rate, cfm [L/s]
W = difference in humidity ratio between the supply air and the room condition,
lbm,w/lbm,DA or gr/lbm,DA [kgw/kgDA or gw/kgDA]
Typically, the moisture content of the ventilation air will be suffciently low in the heating season to offset the internal gains.
3. Determine the occupied zone humidity ratio if there is excessive latent cooling
From equation L2:
L3
where
Woz = humidity ratio of the room condition, lbm,w/lbm,DA or gr/lbm,DA [kgw/kgDA or gw/kgDA]
WSA = humidity ratio of the supply air, lbm,w/lbm,DA or gr/lbm,DA [kgw/kgDA or gw/kgDA]
If Woz is determined to be too low for comfort, humidifcation of the ventilation air should be considered.
4. Determine the supply air volume
The supply air volume is the maximum volume required by code for ventilation, and the volume required for controlling the latent load:
L4
where
QL = air fow rate required for controlling the latent load, cfm [L/s]
5. Determine the heating capacity of the supply air
IP L5
SI L5
where
qs,air = heating capacity of the supply air, Btu/h [W]
= fuid density, lbm/ft
3
[kg/m
3
]
cp = specifc heat at constant pressure Btu/hlbF [kJ/(kgK)]
Qair = supply air fow rate, cfm [L/s]
tair = air temperature change (treturn - tsupply), F [K]
Design Procedure Heating
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-11
6. Determine the heating required from the water side
L6
where
qs, hydronic = heating capacity of the water side, Btu/h [W]
qt = total sensible heating capacity, Btu/h [W]
7. Determine an appropriate temperature loss through the panels
Specify a panel surface temperature, then fnd the related mean water temperature, tw.
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Figure 18: Connection between mean water temperature and panel surface temperature or, tpanel - troom = 0.74 (tw

- troom)
0 10 120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
5
35
45
50
t
w

-

t
r
o
o
m

[
R
]
t
w

-

t
r
o
o
m

[
K
]
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
10
15
20
25
30
40
tpanel - troom [K]
tpanel - troom [R]
8. Determine the heat transfer coefcients for the radiant panels
The natural convection coeffcient is:
IP L7
SI L7

Where
hc,natural = natural convection coeffcient, Btu/hft
2
F [W/m
2
K]
ta = room temperature, F [K]
tpanel = panel temperature, F [K]
Dh = hydraulic diameter, ft [m]
Dh = 4Apanels / Ppanels L8
Where
Apanels = surface area of active panels, ft
2
[m
2
]
Ppanels = the pipe internal perimeter, ft [m]
H-12
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
The forced convection coeffcient is:
IP L9
SI L9
Where
hc,forced = forced convection coeffcient, Btu/hft
2
F [W/m
2
K]
ach = air change rate, cfm/ft
2
[m
3
/hm
2
]

The total convection coeffcient is:
L10
Where
hc,total = total convection coeffcient, Btu/hft2F [W/m2K]
9. Determine the specic capacity of the radiant panels
The convective heat transfer per square foot to the panel is determined:
L11
where
qc = convective heat fux or convective rate per cross sectional area, Btu/hft
2
[W/m
2
]
qc = convective heat transfer rate, Btu/h [W]
A = surface area of the medium, ft
2
[m
2
]
Assuming that the wall temperature is equal to the air temperature, the radiant heat exchange with the panel is determined:
IP L12
SI L12

where
q
r
= radiant heat fux, Btu/hft
2
[W/m
2
]
AUST = area-weighted temperature of all indoor surfaces of walls, ceiling,
foor, windows, doors, etc. (excluding active panel surfaces), F [C]
The total heat transfer per unit of face area is
L13
where
qo = total heat fux, Btu/hft
2
[W/m
2
]
10. Determine the area of panels required
L14
where
Apanels = area of panels, ft
2
[m
2
]
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-13
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Example 1 - Patient Room (IP)
Consider the patient room shown in the fgure below. The patient room includes a television, monitoring equipment and overhead
lighting. The temperature set-point is 75 F with a minimum relative humidity of 40%. The room is 10 ft wide and 20 ft long, with a 9
ft ceiling. The attached toilet room is 5 ft wide and 7 ft long, with an 8 ft ceiling. There is one exterior wall and window. The supply air
temperature in heating mode is reset to 95 F, with the heating water temperature at 175F.
Determine
The water fow rate and pressure drop for the heating panels required to handle the heating load, assuming 15 F outdoor air temperature
Overnight in winter, the envelope loss is 4800 Btu/h and the internal gains at that time are limited to the patient load:
Design Considerations
Patient 160 Btu/h
Medical Staff/Visitors 0
Television 0
Medical Equipment 0
Overhead Lighting 0
Envelope -4800 Btu/h
Total -4640 Btu/h
Patient latent load 155 Btu/h
Determine the Ventilation Requirement
For this example, local code refers to ASHRAE Standard 170-2008 for the HVAC system. According to ASHRAE Standard 170-2008,
patient rooms with auxiliary heating require 4 ach of supply air, of which two are outdoor air.
Determine the required supply air dew-point temperature to remove the latent load
From equation L2:
Using the ventilation rate:
PATIENT ROOM
Corridor
10 ft
20 ft
5 ft
7 ft
H-14
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
In this case, the supply air is a mix of the return air and the ventilation air. This mixture of outdoor air (at the outdoor conditions, assuming
saturated air at 15 F with a humidity ratio of 12.5 gr/lb) and return air (assuming that it is at the design conditions of 75 F, 40% RH 52.5
gr/lb), will have more than enough capacity to handle the latent load. In applications where humidity is critical, further analysis may be
done to determine the requirement of humidifcation. For more information refer to Chapter 5Introduction to Psychrometrics of the
Price Engineer's Handbook.
Determine the heating capacity of the supply air
Using equation L5:

Determine the heating required from the water side

Determine an appropriate temperature loss through the panels
Using a mean water temperature of:

Determine the heat transfer coefcients for the radiant panels
Using equation L7 and the relation for Dh from equation L8, the natural convection coeffcient is determined:
Due to the confguration of the room, it can be assumed as a frst estimation that the panels will be arranged at the perimeter where the
load is, and run the width of the exposure (10 ft). Assuming also a 2 ft width of panel:

Using equation L9, the forced convection coeffcient is determined:

Using equation L10, the total convection coeffcient is determined:

Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-15
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Determine the specic capacity of the radiant panels
Using equation L11, the convective heat transfer per square foot to the panel is determined:

The outside air temperature has a signifcant impact on the inside surface temperatures of exterior walls. The exterior wall temperature
is determined with an h value, convective heat transfer coeffcient of a vertical wall, of 1.46 Btu/(hft
2
F) and a U value, overall heat transfer
coeffcient, of 0.315 Btu/(hft
2
F):

The average unheated surface temperature is:
t

Calculating the radiant heat exchange:

From equation L13, the total heat transfer per unit of face area is:

Determine the area of panels required
Using equation L14:

H-16
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Therefore, the assumption of panel size (20 ft
2
) used to calculate the hydraulic diameter is appropriate.
The fow rate required to manage the load with a panel T of 10 F is:
For simplicity, a 2 ft 10 ft Price RPL linear radiant panel is selected.
This panel with 0.41 gpm will have a pipe velocity of 0.55 fps, which corresponds to a Reynolds number of 1900, which is in the laminar
range. For a better selection, the fow rate is increased to 1.3 gpm, which corresponds with a Reynolds number of 6400, which is in the
turbulent region. From the performance chart, this also increases the pressure drop from 0.31 ft to 3.7 ft, which will allow better fow
control of the panel.
Recalculating the temperature loss in the panel as well as the capacity:
This increase in capacity will result in only requiring 15.7 ft
2
, though it is more practical to stay with the original size in order to maintain
aesthetics (the panel will run the length of the perimeter) as well as a standard module size (24 in. wide). Panels can be designed to
have both active and inactive sections to maintain aesthetics.
When running the entire length of the room, the trim and series option will allow the panel to be trimmed on site if the room size varies
slightly during construction.
PATIENT ROOM
Corridor
Panel
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-17
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Consider the patient room shown in the fgure below. The patient room includes a television, monitoring equipment and overhead
lighting. The temperature set-point is 24 C with a minimum relative humidity of 40%. The room is 3 m wide, 6 m long, and has a 3
m ceiling. There is one exterior wall and window. The supply air temperature in heating mode is reset to 35 C and the heating water
temperature is 72 C.
PATIENT ROOM
Corridor
3 m
6 m
1.75 m
2.25 m
Determine
The water fow rate and pressure drop for the heating panels required to handle the heating load, assuming -10 C outdoor air temperature.
Overnight in winter, the envelope loss is 1400 W and the internal gains at that time are limited to the patient load:
Patient 50 W
Medical Staff/Visitors 0
Television 0
Medical Equipment 0
Overhead Lighting 0
Envelope -1400 W
Total -1350 W
Patient latent load 45 W
Determine the Ventilation Requirement
For this example, local code refers to ASHRAE Standard 170-2008 for the HVAC system. According to ASHRAE Standard 170-2008,
patient rooms with auxiliary heating require 4 ach of supply air, of which two are outdoor air.
Determine the required supply air dew-point temperature to remove the latent load
From equation L2:
Example 1 - Patient Room (SI)
H-18
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
In this case, the supply air is a mix of the return air and the ventilation air. This mixture of outdoor air (at the outdoor conditions, assuming
saturated air at -10 C with a humidity ratio of 1.8 g/kg) and return air (assuming that it is at the design conditions of 24 C, 40% RH 7.4
g/kg), will have more than enough capacity to handle the latent load. In applications where humidity is critical, further analysis may be
done to determine the requirement of humidifcation. For more information refer to Chapter 5Introduction to Psychrometrics of the
Price Engineer's Handbook.
Determine the heating capacity of the supply air
Using equation L5:

Determine the heating required from the water side

Determine an appropriate temperature loss through the panels
Using a mean water temperature of:

Determine the heat transfer coeffcients for the radiant panels
Using equation L.7 and the relation for Dh from equation L.8, the natural convection coeffcient is determined:
Due to the confguration of the room, it can be assumed as a frst estimation that the panels will be arranged at the perimeter where the
load is, and run the width of the exposure (3 m). Assuming also a 600 mm width of panel:



Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-19
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Using equation L11, the convective heat transfer per square foot to the panel is determined:

The outside air temperature has a signifcant impact on the inside surface temperatures of exterior walls. The exterior wall temperature
is determined with an h value, convective heat transfer coeffcient of a vertical wall, of 8.29 W/(m
2
K) and a U value, overall heat transfer
coeffcient, of 0.055 W/(m
2
K):


Calculating the radiant heat exchange:


Using equation L14:

H-20
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Therefore, the assumption of panel size (1.8 m
2
) used to calculate the hydraulic diameter is appropriate.
The fow rate required to manage the load with a panel T of 5 K is:
For simplicity, a 600 mm 3000 mm RPL linear radiant panel is selected.
This panel with 0.027 kg/s will have a pipe velocity of 0.24 m/s, which corresponds to a Reynolds number of 4300 with a pressure drop
of 1.2 kPa, which is a good selection.
When running the entire length of the room, the trim and series option will allow the panel to be trimmed on site if the room size varies
slightly during construction.
PATIENT ROOM
Corridor
Panel
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-21
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Design Procedure Cooling
1. Determine the ventilation requirement
The ventilation requirement should be calculated to meet ventilation codes. For example, using ASHRAE Standard 62-2004 to determine
the minimum fresh air fow rate:
L1
2. Determine required supply air dew-point temperature to remove the latent load
L2
If the required humidity ratio is not practical, recalculate the supply air volume required with the desired humidity ratio.
3. Determine the supply air volume
The supply air volume is the maximum volume required by code for ventilation and the volume required for controlling the latent load:
L4
4. Determine the sensible cooling capacity of the supply air
IP L5
SI L5
5. Determine the sensible cooling required from the water side
L6
6. Determine an appropriate temperature rise through the panels
A panel temperature correction is unnecessary because the temperature differential between the water and air is small in cooling mode.
For panels and sails that are designed well, the surface temperature can be approximated to be the mean water temperature:
L15
where
tw = mean water temperature, F [K]
tCHWS = chilled water supply temperature, F [K]
tout = chilled water return temperature, F [K]
7. Determine the heat transfer coefcients for the radiant panels
The natural convection coeffcient is:
IP L16
SI L16
H-22
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Design Procedure Cooling
The forced convection coeffcient is:
IP L9
SI L9

The total convection coeffcient is:
L10
8. Determine the specic capacity of the radiant panels
The convective heat transfer per square foot to the panel is determined:
L11

Assuming that the wall temperature is equal to the air temperature, the radiant heat exchange with the panel is determined:
IP L12
SI L12

The total heat transfer per unit of face area is:
L13

9. Determine the area of panels required
L14
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-23
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Example 2 - Small Ofce (IP)
Consider a small offce with a southern exposure. The space is designed for two occupants, a computer with LCD monitor, T8 forescent
lighting, and has a temperature set-point of 75 F. The room is 10 ft wide, 12 ft long, and 9 ft from foor to ceiling. The owner expressed
interest in using radiant panels.
12 ft
9 ft
10 ft
SMALL OFFICE
Window
Space Considerations
One of the primary considerations when using a radiant heating and cooling system is humidity control. As previously discussed, it is
important to consider both the ventilation requirements and the latent load when designing the air-side of the system.
The assumptions made for the example are as follows:
Load/person is 250 Btu/h sensible and 155 Btu/h latent
Lighting load in the space is 6.875 Btu/h/ft
Computer load is 300 Btu/h (CPU and LCD Monitor)
Total skin load is 1450 Btu/h
Specifc heat and density of the air are 0.24 Btu/lbF and 0.075 lb/ft respectively
Design conditions are 75 F, with 50% relative humidity
Design dew point is 55 F
Occupants 2
Set-Point 75 F
Floor Area 120 ft
Exterior Wall 108 ft
Volume 1080 ft
qoz 800 Btu/h
ql 825 Btu/h
qex 1450 Btu/h
qT 3075 Btu/h
Determine
a) The ventilation requirement.
b) The suitable supply air and supply water temperatures.
c) The total convective heat transfer coeffcient for radiant panels.
H-24
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Solution
a) Determine the ventilation requirement
the minimum fresh air fow rate for a typical offce space:
b) Determine required supply air dew-point temperature to remove the latent load
From equation L2:

At the design conditions (75 F, 50% RH), the humidity ratio is 65 gr/lb, requiring a difference in humidity ratio between the supply and
room air of:
From the fgure below, the dew point corresponding to the humidity ratio is 40 F, which is too cool for standard equipment.
Evaluating the humidity ratio at several temperatures led to the selection of a dew point of 50 F in order to use less expensive common
equipment while also minimizing the supply air volume required to control humidity.
Humidity Ratio
Dew Point lb/lb gr/lb
40 0.00543 38
45 0.0065 46
50 0.0075 53
55 0.0095 67
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.010
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.020
0.022
0.024
0.026
0.028
0.030
35 40
1
2
.
5
1
3
.
0
1
3
.
5
10%
20%
30%
4
0
%
5
0
%
6
0
%
7
0
%
8
0
%
9
0
%
1
4
.
0
1
4
.
5
1
5
.
0
45 55 60 65 70 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
65
Dry Bulb Temperature, F
E
n
t
h
a
l
p
y
-
B
t
u
/
l
b
o
f
D
r
y
A
i
r
H
u
m
i
d
i
t
y

R
a
t
i
o
,

l
b
w
/
l
b
D
A
70
75
80
85
1
5
2
0
2
5
3
0
3
5
4
0
4
5
5
0
6
0
6
5
Volume - ft
3
/lb of Dry Air
Saturation Temperature, F
Relative Humidity
40
45
50
55
60
35
0.0075
50
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-25
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
The required air volume to satisfy the latent load is:
The supply air volume to the offce is the maximum volume required by code for ventilation and the volume required for controlling
the latent load:
c) Determine the heat transfer coefcients for the radiant panels
For panels and sails that are designed well, the surface temperature can be approximated to be the mean water temperature.
Assuming a chilled water supply temperature 2 F above the dew point in order to minimize the potential for condensation and a
temperature rise of 4 F through the panel leads to a mean water temperature of:
Using equation L16, the natural convection coeffcient is determined:


H-26
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Example 2 - Small Ofce (SI)
Consider a small offce with a southern exposure. The space is designed for two occupants, a computer with LCD monitor, T8 forescent
lighting, and has a design temperature set-point of 24 C. The room is 3 m wide, 4 m long, and 3 m from foor to ceiling. The owner
expressed interest in using radiant panels.
Space Considerations
One of the primary considerations when using a radiant heating and cooling system is humidity control. As previously discussed, it is
important to consider both the ventilation requirements and the latent load when designing the air-side of the system.
The assumptions made for the example are as follows:
Load/person is 65 W sensible and 55 W latent
Lighting load in the space is 25 W/m
Computer load is 80 W (CPU and LCD Monitor)
Total skin load is 425 W
Specifc heat and density of the air are 1.007 kJ/kgK and 1.3 kg/m respectively
Design conditions are 24 C, with 50% relative humidity
Design dew point is 13 C
Occupants 2
Set-Point 24 C
Floor Area 12 m
Exterior Wall 12 m
Volume 36 m
qoz 210 W
ql 300 W
qex 425 W
qT 935 W
Determine
a) The ventilation requirement.
b) The suitable supply air and supply water temperatures.
c) The total convective heat transfer coeffcient for radiant panels.
3 m
4 m
3 m
SMALL OFFICE
Window
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-27
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Solution
a) Determine the ventilation requirement
the minimum fresh air fow rate for a typical offce space:
b) Determine required supply air dew-point temperature to remove the latent load
From equation L2:

At the design conditions (24 C, 50% RH), the humidity ratio is 9.5 g/kg of dry air, requiring a difference in humidity ratio between the
supply and room air of:
From the fgure below the dew point corresponding to the humidity ratio is 5 C, which is too cool for standard equipment.
Evaluating the humidity ratio at several temperatures led to the selection of a dewpoint of 10 C in order to use less expensive equipment
while also minimizing the supply air volume required to control humidity.
Humidity Ratio
Dew Point g/kg
5 5.5
7.5 6.75
10 8
12.5 9.25
Dry-Bulb Temperature, C
E
n
t
h
a
l
p
y
-
k
J
/
k
g
o
f
D
r
y
A
i
r
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
0
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
50
55
60
65
70
75
85
90
95
100
105
105
110
115
120
125
Volume - m
3
/kg of Dry Air
Saturation Temperature, C
Relative Humidity
H
u
m
i
d
i
t
y

R
a
t
i
o
,

g
w
/
k
g
D
A
30
10
5
15
20
0
.
7
8
0
.
8
0
0
.
8
2
0
.
8
4
0
.
8
6
0
.
9
0
0
.
9
2
0
.
9
4
0
.
9
6
10%
2
0
%
3
0
%
4
0
%
5
0
%
6
0
%
7
0
%
8
0
% 9
0
%
25
8
H-28
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
The required air volume to satisfy the latent load is:
The supply air volume to the offce is the maximum volume required by code for ventilation and the volume required for controlling
the latent load:
c) Determine the heat transfer coefcients for the radiant panels
For panels and sails that are designed well, the surface temperature can be approximated to be the mean water temperature. Assuming
a chilled water supply temperature 1 K above the dew point in order to minimize the potential for condensation and a temperature rise
of 2 K through the panel leads to a mean water temperature of:
Using equation L16, the natural convection coeffcient is determined:


Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-29
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Performance
Radiant panels performance depends on
several factors:
The difference in surface temperatures
between the panel and the surrounding
surfaces
The mean water temperature and the
panel thermal resistance
View factor of the panel to the surfaces
to be cooled/heated
Water fow rate
Emissivity and absorption of affected
surfaces
The water fow rate in the coil affects
two performance factors. First, the heat
transfer between the water and the panel is
dependent on whether the fow is laminar
(poor), transitional (inconsistent) or
turbulent (good). Secondly, it also affects
the mean water temperature.
The higher the fow rate, the closer the
discharge temperature will be to the
inlet, thereby changing the average water
temperature imposed on the panel. As
the separation between the mean water
temperature and the surrounding room
temperature (T) increases, so does the
capacity. In heating, the T is limited by
thermal comfort. In cooling, the T is also
limited by two factors, thermal comfort and
condensation prevention. Good practice
for panel selection in cooling avoids
condensation by limiting the entering
water temperature to the rooms dew
point + 2 F [1 K]. The most common
design condition for spaces in cooling is
75 F [24 C] at 50% RH, producing a dew
point of 55 F [13 C] and limiting entering
water temperature to a minimum of 57 F
[14 C].
Figure 19 shows the effect on the fow
rate, indicated by Reynolds number, on
the capacity of a typical radiant panel. As
indicated on the chart, increasing the fow
rate into the transitional range (Re > 2300,
shown in blue on the graph) increases the
output of the panel.
Product Selection
Figure 19: Radiant panel capacity vs. water fow
40
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
50
60
70
80
90
100

C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
,

%
Re
The water fow rate is largely dependent on the
pressure drop and return water temperatures
acceptable to the designer. In most cases
the water fow rate should be selected to
be fully turbulent (Re > 4000) under design
conditions. The difference between the mean
water temperature is defned as:
L17
and the room/surrounding surface
temperatures are the primary driver
of panel performance. The larger this
difference is, the greater the radiant and
convective transfer rates are. As noted in
equation L12, the radiant energy exchange
between two surfaces is based on the
absolute temperature to the fourth power.
Conversely, a lower temperature difference
will reduce the amount of potential energy
exchange, and thereby capacity. As a result,
it is desirable from a capacity standpoint
to select entry water temperatures as low
as possible in cooling, while maintaining it
above the dew point in the room to ensure
sensible cooling only.
The location of radiant panels relative to
loads in the space infuences their capacity
and is greatly dependent on the view factor
of the panel to the objects that are to be
conditioned. When used in spaces with
high solar gain, such as perimeter zones,
the capacity increases as the surrounding
surface temperature increases. As surface
temperatures change throughout the
day, panel capacity changes accordingly.
Furthermore, as the distance between the
panel and the affected surface increases, the
view factor diminishes, thus reducing direct
radiant exchange between the two surfaces.
Panel placement is based on a combination
of surface temperature and distance to the
occupant in order to ensure an effective
operative temperature is achieved. Locating
panels along glass perimeters without low
emissivity coatings may have a negative
effect on energy use as some energy will be
lost to the outdoors through the glass.
H-30
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Example 3 - Small Ofce Panel Selection (IP)
Occupants 2
Set-Point 75 F
Floor Area 120 ft
Volume 1080 ft
qoz
800 Btu/h
ql
825 Btu/h
qex
1450 Btu/h
qT
3075 Btu/h
hc, total
0.823 Btu/hftF
Qs 38 cfm
Ts 50 F
tCHWS 57 F
tpanel 59 F
Determine
a) The area of panels required.
b) The area of panels required assuming 95 F outdoor air temperature.
c) The fow rate for the panels from (b).
d) A practical layout and piping arrangement for the panels from (b).
12 ft
9 ft
10 ft
SMALL OFFICE
Window
Consider the small offce presented in the previous example.
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-31
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Solution
a) Determine the sensible cooling capacity of the supply air
Using equation L5:
Determine the sensible cooling required from the water-side

Using equation L11, the convective heat transfer to the panel is determined:
Using equation L12 and assuming that the wall temperature is equal to the room air set-point temperature, the radiant heat exchange
with the panel is determined:


Using equation L14:
Using multiples of 4 ft
2
, which is a standard ceiling tile sized at 2 ft 2 ft, the total area required is 76 ft
2
.
H-32
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
b) The area of panels required assuming 95 F outdoor air temperature
The exterior wall temperature is determined with an h value, convective heat transfer coeffcient, of 1.46 Btu/(hft
2
F) and a U value, overall
heat transfer coeffcient, of 0.693 Btu/(hft
2
F):

Recalculating the radiant heat exchange and total heat transfer from (a):

Using equation L14:

Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-33
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
SMALL OFFICE
Light
Panel
Panel Panel
Panel Panel
SMALL OFFICE
Panel Panel
Panel
Panel
Light
c) The ow rate for the panels from (b)
d) A practical layout and piping arrangement for the panels from (b)
In order to ft the panels from (b) in a lay-in ceiling, a 48 in. 24 in. RPM modular panel is selected. Referring to the product data
sheet, a fow rate of 1.02 (~1 gpm) has a water pressure drop of 0.17 ft.
Using these panels would require a quantity of:

If these panels are connected in series, the total loop pressure drop would be:
H-34
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Example 3 - Small Ofce Panel Selection (SI)
Occupants 2
Set-Point 24 C
Floor Area 12 m
Exterior Wall 12 m
Volume 36 m
qoz
210 W
ql
300W
qex
425 W
qT
935 W
hc, total
4.71 W/m
2
K
Qs 22.5 L/s
Ts 10 C
tCHWS 14 C
tpanel 15 C
Determine
a) The area of panels required.
b) The area of panels required assuming 35 C outdoor air temperature.
c) The fow rate for the panels from (b).
d) A practical layout and piping arrangement for the panels from (b).
3 m
4 m
3 m
SMALL OFFICE
Window
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-35
Solution
a) Determine the sensible cooling capacity of the supply air
Using equation L5:
Determine the sensible cooling required from the water-side

Using equation L11, the convective heat transfer to the panel is determined:
Using equation L12 and assuming that the wall temperature is equal to the room air set-point temperature, the radiant heat exchange
with the panel is determined:


Using equation L14:
Using multiples of 0.36 m
2
, which is a standard ceiling tile sized at 600 mm 600 mm, the total area required is 6.48 m
2
.
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
H-36
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
b)The area of panels required assuming 35 C outdoor air temperature
The exterior wall temperature is determined with an h value, convective heat transfer coeffcient, of 0.255 W/(m2K) and a U value, overall
heat transfer coeffcient, of 0.121 W/(m2K):

Recalculating the radiant heat exchange and total heat transfer from (a):

Using equation L14:

Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-37
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
SMALL OFFICE
Light
Panel
Panel Panel
Panel Panel
SMALL OFFICE
Panel Panel
Panel
Panel
Light
c) The ow rate for the panels from (b)
d) A practical layout and piping arrangement for the panels from (b)
In order to ft the panels from (b) in a lay-in ceiling, a 1200 mm x 600 mm RPM modular panel is selected. Referring to the product data
sheet, a fow rate of 0.07 (~0.075 kg/s) has a water pressure drop of 0.69 kPa.
Using these panels would require a quantity of:

If these panels are connected in series, the total loop pressure drop would be:
H-38
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Example 4 - Small Ofce Chilled Sail Selection (IP)
Occupants 2
Set-Point 75 F
Floor Area 120 ft
Volume 1080 ft
qoz
800 Btu/h
ql 825 Btu/h
qex
1450 Btu/h
qT
3075 Btu/h
Cooling Capacity of Hydronic System 2049 Btu/h
tCHWS 57 F
tpanel 59 F
Determine
The required area and possible location of chilled sails.
Solution
The difference between the room air temperature and the mean panel temperature is:
Referring to the product data page, the specifc capacity of the chilled sail is determined using this temperature difference:

12 ft
9 ft
10 ft
SMALL OFFICE
Window
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-39
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Example 4 - Small Ofce Chilled Sail Selection (IP)
Determine the area of sails required
Using equation L14:
Selecting a sail that is 10 ft long and 4.5 ft wide provides 45 ft
2
of sail area. From the performance table, this piped-in series will result
in a pressure drop of 2 ft.
24 in. 96 in. Price CSA
(troom - tw), F Capacity, Btu/h Water Flow Rate, gpm Head Loss, ft
14 635 0.35 0.356
16 740 0.41 0.488
18 848 0.47 0.642
20 959 0.53 0.816
Based on 4 F water temperature drop
SMALL OFFICE
Sail
H-40
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Example 4 - Small Ofce Chilled Sail Selection (SI)
3 m
4 m
3 m
SMALL OFFICE
Window
Occupants 2
Set-Point 24 C
Floor Area 12 m
Exterior Wall 12 m
Volume 36 m
qoz
210 W
ql 300 W
qex
425 W
qT
935 W
Cooling Capacity of Hydronic System 557 W
tCHWS 14 C
tpanel 15 C
Determine
The required area and possible location of chilled sails.
Solution
The difference between the room air temperature and the mean panel temperature is:
Referring to the product data page, the specifc capacity of the chilled sail is determined using this temperature difference:

Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-41
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
Example 4 - Small Ofce Chilled Sail Selection (SI)
Determine the area of sails required
Using equation L14:
Selecting a sail that is 3 m long and 1.5 m wide provides 4.5 m
2
of sail area. From the performance table, this piped-in series will result
in a pressure drop of 6 kPa.
600 mm 2908 mm Price CSA
(troom - tw), K Capacity, W Water Flow Rate, kg/h Head Loss, kPa
8 186 79 1.06
9 217 93 1.46
10 249 107 1.92
11 281 120 2.44
Based on 4 C water temperature drop
SMALL OFFICE
Sail
H-42
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
References
ASHRAE (2004a). Standard 55-2004Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American
Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
ASHRAE (2004b). Standard 62.1-2004Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. Atlanta, GA: American Society for
Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2005). Standard 138-2005Method of testing for rating ceiling panels for sensible heating and cooling.
Atlanta, GA: American Society for Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2007). Humidity control design guide. Atlanta, GA: American Society for Heating, Refrigerating and Air-
Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2008a). ASHRAE handbookApplications. Atlanta, GA: American Society for Heating, Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2008b). Standard 170-2008Ventilation of health care facilities. Atlanta, GA: American Society for Heating,
Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2009). ASHRAE handbookFundamentals. Atlanta, GA: American Society for Heating, Refrigerating and
Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE (2010). Standard 55-2010Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American
Society for Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
Awbi, H.B. & Hatton, A. (1999). Natural convection from heated room surfaces. Energy and Buildings, 30, 233-244.
Babiak, J,. Olesen B.W., & Petras, D. (2009). REHVA guidebook no. 7: Low temperature heating and high temperature
cooling. Brussels, Belgium: Federation of European Heating and Air-conditioning Associations (REHVA).
Beausoleil-Morrison, I. (2000). The adaptive coupling of heat and air fow modelling within dynamic whole-building
simulation. PhD Thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Behne, M. (1999). Indoor air quality in rooms with cooled ceilings, mixing ventilation or rather displacement ventilation.
Energy and Buildings, 30, 155 166.
Berglund, L., Rascati, R., & Markel., M.L. (1982). Radiant heating and control for comfort during transient conditions.
ASHRAE Transactions, 88 (2), 765-775.
Conroy, C., & Mumma, S.A. (2001). Ceiling radiant cooling panels as a viable distributed parallel sensible cooling
technology integrated with dedicated outdoor-air systems. ASHRAE Transactions, 107 (1), 571-579.
CSA (2010). CSA Z317.0-10Special requirements for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems in
health care facilities. Mississauga, ON: Canadian Standards Association.
DIN (2003). Ventilation for buildingsCeiling-mounted radiant panels supplied with water at a temperature below
120 C Part 2: Test method for thermal output (English version of DIN EN 14037-2). Berlin, Germany: Bueth
Verlag GmbH.
DIN (2004). Ventilation for buildingsChilled ceilings -Testing and rating (English version of DIN EN 14240). Berlin,
Germany: Bueth Verlag GmbH.
Fisher, D.E. (1995). An experimental investigation of mixed convection heat transfer in a rectangular enclosure. PhD
Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
Fitzner, K. (1996). Displacement ventilation and cooled ceilingsResults of laboratory test and practical installations.
Proceedings from Indoor Air 96. Nagoya, Japan.
Incropera, F.P. & DeWitt, D.P. (1996). Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer (4th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
ISO (2005). ISO Standard 7730-2005Ergonomics of the thermal environmentAnalytical determination and
interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria.
Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G

G
U
I
D
E

-

R
A
D
I
A
N
T

P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
H-43
Radiant Products
Engineering Guide
References
Jeong J. & Mumma, S. A. (2003). Impact of mixed convection on ceiling radiant cooling panel. HVAC&R Research,
9 (3), 251-257.
Kochendrfer, C. (1996). Standard testing of cooling panels and their use in system Planning. ASHRAE Transactions,
102 (1), 651-658.
Min, T.C., Schutrum, L.F., Parmelee, G.V., & Vouris, J.D. (1956). Natural convection and radiation in a panel heated room.
Heating Piping and Air Conditioning (HPAC), 153 160.
Mumma, S. A. (2002). Chilled ceilings in parallel with dedicated outdoor air systems: Addressing the concerns of
condensation, capacity and cost. ASHRAE Transactions 2002 (2), 220 231.
Mundt, E. (1990). Convection fows above common heat sources in rooms with displacement ventilation. Proceedings
from Roomvent 1990. Oslo, Norway.
Nickel, J. (2002). 1.3 - Heating and cooling with ceilings. Technical report 87/2002e: Cooling and heating systems.
Aachen, Germany: Krantz Komponenten.
Novoselac, A., Burley, B., & Srebric, J. (2006). New convection correlations for cooled ceiling panels in rooms with
mixed and stratifed airfow. HVAC&R Research, 12 (N2), 279-294.
Novoselac, A. & Srebric, J. (2002). A critical review on the performance and design of combined cooling ceiling and
displacement ventilation systems. Energy and Buildings, 34 (5), 497-509.
Olesen, B.W., Sliwinska, E., Madsen, T.L., & Fanger, P.O. (1982). Effect of body posture and activity on the thermal
insulation of clothing: Measurements by a moveable thermal manikin. ASHRAE Transactions, 88 (2), 791-801.
Price Industries (2011). Price engineer's HVAC handbookA comprehensive guide to HVAC fundamentals. Winnipeg,
MB: Price Industries Limited.
Schiavon, S, Bauman, F., Lee, K.H., & Webster, T. (2010). Development of a simplied cooling load design tool for
underoor air distribution systems, nal report to CEC PIER program. Berkeley, CA: Center for the Built Environment,
Center for Environmental Design Research, University of California at Berkeley.
Stetiu, C. (1998). Radiant cooling in U.S. offce buildings: Towards eliminating the perception climate imposed barriers.
Doctorial Dissertation, Energy and Resources Group, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
Tan, H., Murata, T., Aoki, K., & Kurabuchi, T. (1998). Cooled ceiling/displacement ventilation hybrid air conditioning
systemDesign criteria. Proceedings from Roomvent 98. Stockholm, Sweden.
Virta, M., Butler, D., Grslund, J., Hogeling, J., Kristiansen, E.L., Reinikainen, M., & Svensson, G. (2004). REHVA
guidebook no. 5: Chilled beam application guidebook. Brussels, Belgium: Federation of European Heating and
Air-conditioning Associations (REHVA).
Yin, Y., Zhang, X., & Chen, Q. (2009). Condensation risk in a room with high latent load and chilled ceiling panel and
with air supplied from liquid desiccant system. HVAC&R Research, 15 (2), 315-327.
Zhang, H., Huizenga, C., Arens, E., & Yu, T. (2005). Modeling thermal comfort in stratied environments. Berkeley, CA:
Center for the Built Environment, University of California.

Engineering Guide

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Engineering Guide

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Please refer to the Price Engineers HVAC Handbook

for more information on Radiant Heating and Cooling

You might also like