You are on page 1of 20

11th International Conference and

Exhibition on Emissions Monitoring


14th-16th May 2014
Renaissance Polat Istanbul Hotel, Turkey
www.cem.uk.com
CEM Cover.indd 1 24/04/2014 16:22
CEM IFC.indd 1 24/04/2014 16:22
Welcome to CEM 2014
1
Welcome to Turkey
The 11th International Conference and Exhibition
on Emissions Monitoring comes to Istanbul
where East meets West or West meets East?
It has been 17 years since the first CEM was held
in England in 1997, we have become a little older
and I hope a little wiser. After leaving the shores
of the UK CEM has enjoyed its journey to the
Netherlands, Denmark, France, Switzerland, Italy
(twice), the Czech Republic and now the historic
city of Istanbul.
The CEM exhibition and conference continues to
grow in size and influence. This years exhibition has
grown yet again; I would like to welcome many of
the new exhibitors who have joined us especially
those from Turkey. I would also like to give a warm
welcome to the 200 plus delegates who have
travelled from all corners of the World including countries such as Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan,
USA, South Africa, India, Qatar, Australia, Canada, South Korea, New Zealand, Bolivia, Oman,
Singapore, Mongolia and Iraq.
I would very much like to encourage visitors, delegates and exhibitors to network around the
exhibition and poster areas to see what new products and technologies are currently available
and what future developments are being planned. We have set aside extra time for you to do
this in the lunch and coffee breaks, as well as at the Gala Dinner on Wednesday night and the
Poster Mixer on late, Thursday afternoon.
The CEM series of conferences was initially organised by IEA Coal Centre and the Source
Testing Association by our Scientific Chairman, Dr Lesley Sloss and Dave Curtis our Conference
Co-ordinator, who are still leading up the programme today.
The Source Testing Association (STA) was established in 1995 and has a corporate membership
of over 200 companies from process operators, regulators, equipment suppliers and test
laboratories. The STA is a non-profit making organisation.
The STA is committed to the advancement of the science and practice of emission monitoring
and to develop and maintain a high quality of service to customers.
IEA Clean Coal Centre is a collaborative project established in 1975 involving member countries
of the International Energy Agency (IEA). The service is governed by representatives of member
countries, the European Commission, and industrial sponsors. The IEA Clean Coal Centre
programme of work contains studies of considerable significance for all countries involved in the
use of supply of coal.
The IEA was established in 1974 within the framework of the Organisation for Economic co-
operation and Development (OECD). A basic aim of the IEA is to foster co-operation among the
twenty-four IEA participating countries in order to increase energy security through diversification
of energy supply, cleaner and more efficient use of energy, and energy conservation. This is
achieved, in part, through a programme of collaborative research and development of which IEA
Clean Coal Centre is by far the largest and longest established single project.
The next CEM event will be scheduled for Spring 2016 so please make a note in your diaries
and watch out for announcements on the CEM website www.cem.uk.com
Enjoy yourselves!
Marcus Pattison
Contents
Conference Schedule
Wednesday 14th 2,3,4
Thursday 15th 5,6,7
Friday 16th 8,9
Poster Presentations 10
Exhibition Floorplan 12
Company Profiles 14,15,16
A big thank you
to the CEM 2014
Scientific Committee
We would like to thank all members of the
CEM 2014 Scientific Committee for their
help in organising this event.
Lesley Sloss, IEA CCC, Chairperson, UK
Dave Curtis, STA, Conference Co-ordinator, UK
Mrs. Canan DERINZ GENCEL,
Turkish Cement, Local liaison, Turkey
David Graham, E.ON, Power Industry, UK and Europe
Rod Robinson, NPL, CEN and ISO standards, UK and Europe
J Sutton, Entec Services, USA Liaison, USA
Robert Baxter, B3 Systems, USA Liaison, USA
Jean Poulleau, INERIS, France
Peter Wilbring, TUV, Germany
William Averdieck, PCME, Equipment Suppliers, UK
Environmental Technology Publications Ltd
Welcome Page.indd 1 24/04/2014 16:23
Conference Schedule
2
09:15 - 09:30 OPENING
SESSION 1 : INTERNATIONAL, EUROPEAN AND INDUSTRIAL REGULATION
9:30 - 9:50
John T Sutton,
MEC Entec
Services, LLC
United States
Source Testing - Accreditation and Regulation in the U.S. - The Changing Landscape
The Presentation will focus on three main areas
1. The evolving industry accreditation requirements in the U.S. and how this has started to impact the marketplace. The source testing industry has started to see a
round of consolidation that is attributable both to the lingering uncertainty as well as changing market conditions.
2. The internal changes required to become compliant with the ASTM accreditation standard. Also, the business issues that surfaced related to its implementation as well
as the practical issues and problems that arose and how Entec has chosen to deal with them.
3. Other changes and issues in the regulatory arena related to source testing
a. The stationary source audit sample program
b. Electronic reporting of data
c. Major new EPA regulations that will impact source testing
d. Lowering of source emission limits and the concerns with existing test methods
9:50 - 10:10
Thomas
Eisenmann,
DURAG Data
Systems GmbH
Germany
Predictive Emission Monitoring (PEM): Suitability and Application in View of U.S. EPA and European Regulatory Frameworks
Predictive Emission Monitoring (PEM) represents a novel and cost-effective approach for continuous monitoring of source emissions as alternative to Continuous
Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS). In order to be accepted as full compliance solution, PEM needs to be strictly in line with applicable regulations for source
monitoring.
At present PEMS is mainly applied in countries following U.S. EPA regulations, because these standards are in place for some years already and demonstration programs
have been executed. Consequently, the technology already gained signicant interest not only in the U.S. but in the Middle East and parts of Asia. PEMS installations exist
as stand-alone compliance solutions or as part of an integrated environmental monitoring approach capable to address multiple sources in one plant. One prerequisite
is seamless integration of PEMS and DAS and integration in the plant-wide IT and communication networks. An additional benet is that a PEMS-DAS package is a viable
diagnostic tool to lower emissions and improve combustion efciency.
10:10 - 10:30
Karl R. Wilber,
Tekran
Instruments
Corporation
United States
A Review of the Evolution, Status and Compliance Initiatives Associated with Process Mercury Emissions Monitoring
Standards in the United States
As a result of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments in the United States, the role and authority of the U.S. EPA was signicantly expanded to regulate hazardous air
pollutants (HAPS). As a result, National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) were established, leading to both continuous emissions monitoring
requirements and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) for these pollutants on specic processes.
This paper provides a brief history of the regulations that ultimately evolved from the above-mentioned law. More importantly, it addresses key challenges in
measurement of specic HAPS with focus on mercury emissions. Included in this are details of specic technologies for mercury emissions monitoring and challenges
encountered in the transport and measurement of trace-level mercury in coal-red power plant and process (e.g. cement, incineration, steel, etc.) ue gas. Example data
from these processes will be provided along with an overview of some of the mercury control strategies that have been applied.
It will also include experience with mercury Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) Systems with details of operating and maintenance costs.
Coffee Break
11:00 - 11:20
Frans Blank,
DNV GL
Energy Advisory
Netherlands
Continuous Flue Gas Flow Calculation in the New ISO Standard EN ISO 16911 for volume ow rate in ducts
Operators of combustion plant need to know the ue gas ow rate to calculate the mass release of pollutant emissions. For many standard fuels, the calculation of
ue gas ow rate gives reliable results, with a dened uncertainty, using relatively simple procedures. The primary aim of this VGB-funded project was to establish and
document the calculation of ue gas volumetric ow rate based on the European boiler performance standard EN 12952-15. The validation of the calculation approach
is performed using compilations of measured fuel characteristics. The quality and robustness of the calculation methods is assessed by means of uncertainty calculations.
This work is incorporated in two parts of an EN ISO standard on ow measurement: ISO 16911-1 Reference methods (Annex E Calculation of ue gas volume ow
rate from energy consumption) and ISO 16911-2 Automated measuring systems in which calculation is allowed as a continuous measurement procedure. As in all
automated measurement procedures, the calculation is subject to the prescribed quality assurance procedures. The most important is the Annual Surveillance Test,
whereby the calculation procedure is checked against reference measurements.
11:20 - 11:40
William
Averdieck,
PCME Ltd
United Kingdom
The impact of revised BREFs (Best Available Techniques Reference Documents) on AELs (Achievable Emission Limits)
in the metals industries
The Industrial Emissions Directive is being implemented throughout Europe with guidance on BAT (Best Available Technique) being given in the BREF Notes. The BREF Notes
are being revised to become more prescriptive on emission limits to support a more uniform implementation of requirements within specic industries across the EU.
This paper documents changes in emission limits and monitoring requirements for the aluminium, copper, zinc and lead industries covered by the Industrial Emissions
Directive. It also focusses on the revised structure of the BREF Notes and discusses the types of monitoring that the BREF requires with examples from PCMEs
experience in monitoring particulate.
11:40 - 12:00
Rudi Spinner,
SIEMENS AG
Germany
Monitoring of Air Emissions on Ships
The regulatory IMO framework sets new and more stringent targets for reducing air emissions from the marine industry. The most important gases in terms of emissions
are currently sulphur oxides (SOx) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). With the 0.1% sulphur target in 2015 for emission control areas CEMS will play an important role to
prove compliance.
What are the latest developments in this technology?
Can CEMS help to reduce the fuel costs?
How can CEMS and analyzers prove robustness, reliability and high operational availability in extreme conditions expected in marine applications?
Lunch Break
Wednesday 14th May - Session 1
Exhibition Schedule NEW.indd 8 24/04/2014 16:24
3
SESSION 2 : STANDARDS, QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL
13.20 - 13.40
Nathalie Faniel &
David Graham,
E.ON New
Build &
Technology
United Kingdom
Changes to the CEM Quality Assurance standard EN14181
European Directives that limit emissions to air from industrial processes require the implementation of Quality Assurance (QA) standards for CEMs, principally
EN14181:2004, which is undergoing various amendments having been elaborated by means of a Technical Report. This standard species three Quality Assurances
Levels (QALs) relating to instrument certication (QAL1), calibration/verication using an accredited test laboratory (QAL2) and on-going control (QAL3) of the CEMs,
which requires regular zero and span drift checks.
After 10 years of experience, including feedback from the European Power Industry at an earlier CEM conference, the standard is being adapted to include: i) a
new method for situations when pollutant concentrations are very low and it is not possible to verify the CEM performance (reference materials can be used in
combination with the QAL2 test data); ii) reduction of the required number of QAL2 test points in certain circumstances and the identication and reporting of
outliers; iii) greater QAL3 exibility relating to control chart development; iv) greater exibility when measuring water vapour and v) elaboration of functional check and
QAL2 requirements for peripheral parameters (O2 and water vapour). There is also signicant updating to ensure consistency with more recent standards relating to
instrument certication (EN 15267) and the specication of measurement locations (EN 15259).
13.40 - 14.00
Jean Poulleau,
Ineris
France
New good practices for the accredited control laboratories and relevance of the SRM with respect to these requirements
LAB REF 22 species the way in which it is advisable to calculate the limits of detection and quantication for the manual and automatic methods. Thus, the control
laboratory must adapt the duration of its sampling and/or use an analytical technique making it possible to reach a limit of quantication (LoQ) lower than 10% of the
emission limit value for the measurand aimed by the ELV (for an individual compound or a sum of compounds). The laboratory must show that it made the provisions
to implement this requirement by providing the values of LQ expressed in the same units as the VLE in his test report.
AFNOR also studied the relevance of the current SRM with respect to the requirement: LoQ < 10% ELV and has checked that the level of uncertainty of
measurement results at the level of the constraining daily ELV dedicated to incineration facilities, starting from the data of uncertainty estimation of SRM from the results
of intercomparison test bench of INERIS, is acceptable.
Some recommendations for implementation of these SRM are given and it appears that an evolution of a few SRM is necessary.
14.00 - 14.20
Isaline Fraboulet
(Jean Poulleau),
Ineris
France
European inter-comparison campaigns on test methods to determine particle matter emissions (PME) from residential
heating appliances and boilers burning solid fuels performed within the EN_PME_TEST Eranet project
Domestic heating using biomass combustion is strongly involved in the development of renewable energy. However, it can be associated to high emissions of
particulate matter (PME) characterized by a distribution of very ne particles and large amounts of organic condensables, which strongly contribute to PM ambient
air concentrations. Recent discussion within the CEN TC 295 WG 5 looking at methods for the measurement of atmospheric emissions from residential wood
combustion (RWC) have come to the selection (EN 16510 upcoming standard) of two methods based on the DINplus (heated lter) and the NS3058 (dilution
tunnel). Yet, until now, there has been no agreement on the choice of a unique European method for the determination of particle matter emissions (PME) from
residential heating appliances and boilers burning solid fuels.
The objective of the EN_PME_TEST project is to develop and validate a common European test method to determine PME from residential heating appliances and boilers
burning solid biofuels which shall be the basis for a European standard for PME-measurement. Special emphasis is given to the scientic basis for the candidate method and its
relevance to health and environmental issues. The work is performed by a consortium of 17 partners (research and test establishments) from ten countries, under the umbrella
of the Eranet with the nancial support of public authorities, national environment agencies as well as self-funding of some of the partners.
14.20 - 14.40
Bergmans
Benjamin
Ing, Institut
Scientique
de Service Public
(ISSeP)
Belgium
Particles sizing in stack: A Review on techniques available for PM and UFP
During the last past years, several International Standards dealing with the measurement of PM10 and PM2.5 in stack have been published [1, 2, 3, 4]. Particles size is
an important parameter in term of health and this type of measurements should be promoted. Nevertheless, the number of comparative studies is really limited and is
usually focused on a specic sector or restricted to a comparison of the same types of instruments [5].
This lack of references results in a very limited legal imposition for such measurements. The present paper summarizes the results of a one year project where all
types of normalized systems (impactors, virtual impactors, cyclones) have been compared. Results of parallel measurements in two different types of sectors (biomass
burning and municipal waste incinerator) are presented. Pro and contra of each equipment are discussed keeping in mind general stack emission constrains.
Dilution systems also open the door to some techniques used in ambient air, including PM and UFP monitoring devices (OPC, APS, SMPS ) Literature is available [6]
but is generally more focused on the characterization of the particles
than on the measurement systems themselves. A specic work package of the project was focused on UFP measurements. Different dilution systems combined with
various detection techniques (OPC, SMPS) have been investigated. The study also included measurements performed with other commercial techniques (ELPI+ ).
Depending on the followed specications [3] the dilution step can simulate the interactions of stack gas components with the atmosphere as they mix after the stack
exit and thus allow measurement of secondary particles. Particular attentions have been put on the dilution parameters and their impacts on the nal result.
14.40 - 15.00
Marc Coleman,
National Physical
Laboratory
United Kingdom
Analysing the Performance of the UKs Stack Testing Industry from 2000 to 2011 using Prociency Testing Data
We report an examination of the UKs stack monitoring industrys performance from 2000 to 2011using prociency testing (PT) data for SO2, NO and dust. The data
were acquired from three PT schemes operated by the National Physical Laboratory in the UK: Gas Measurement Scheme (testing the entire measurement system
using NPLs Stack Simulator Facility), Calibration Gas Scheme (use of certied reference materials to check calibration) and Dust Scheme (foil shims and salt solutions
i.e. lter and probe washing simulants). Analysis of z-scores (participant deviation from assigned value normalised to an allowable deviation) across each round of
each scheme indicated if as a whole the industry was improving, deteriorating or maintaining capability. For the two gas based schemes it was found that the industry
possessed a greater prociency for SO2 than NO, but that for both species there was an overall improvement with time. With respect to dust it was found that
performance for shims (lter simulants) had been maintained whilst that for salt solutions (washing simulants) had improved.
15.00 - 15:20
Peter Adam,
Linde AG
Germany
Zero gases developments
Several European standards (EN 15267-3, EN 14181) are describing the regular calibration and validation processes for Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
(CEMS) or Automated Measuring Systems (AMS). The requirements to the traceability and uncertainty of span gases, used for the calibration of an AMS, are very
detailed specied. But the provenance of zero gas standards and
specic issues of accreditation, traceability and measurement uncertainties are currently not described for AMS.
Very ambitious specications for zero gases were prepared by the technical committee CEN/TC 264 Air quality. This paper describes the challenging requirements
for zero gases, set in EN documentary standards related to the air quality directive reference methods (e.g. EN 14211) and how these requirements can be adopted
for CEMS in terms of measurement technologies and certication protocols.
Coffee Break
Wednesday 14th May - Session 2
Conference Schedule
Exhibition Schedule NEW.indd 9 24/04/2014 16:24
Conference Schedule
4
SESSION 2 : STANDARDS, QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL
16:30 - 16:50
Luigi Fiorani,
Loccioni Group
Italy
myLeaf: a predictive maintenance tool for the performance optimization of a CEM system
Remote data control of emission monitoring systems represents an important goal in order to perform predictive maintenance actions or prompt interventions in case of system
failure. In this paper are shown experimental results from real application of a multivariate analysis performed on data collected by a Continuous Emission Monitoring System
(CEMS) that Loccioni Environment has engineered and installed for a cement industry in Italy. The core of the CEMS is GIGAS 10M FT-IR Spectrometer (TV certied) aimed
to measure HCl, HF, NOx, SOx, CO and CO2, equipped with a FID (Flame ionization detector) and ZrO2 analyzer for TOC (Total Organic Carbon) and O2 measurements
respectively. All data have been collected for a period of three months through the Meter Data Management System (MDMS) myLeaf, developed by Loccioni Energy: 29
parameters were considered in total, including stack and cabinet sensors. Analysis was performed using principal components analysis (PCA), in order to identify those parameters
that during the time period analyzed - have the greatest impact on the CEM system performances. Among these, the most important variables were identied in some FT-IR
analyzer parameters, as interferometer peak and laser signal, and in the sample conditions, such as ue gas temperature. For each of these parameters it was then performed a
univariate analysis, whereby it was possible to monitor their signals over time: on the basis of the collected data has been developed an algorithm able to extrapolate the trendline
into the future in order to predict when there will be a possible system failure, so that it is possible to intervene in a targeted and timely manner before failure occurs.
16.50 - 17.10
Berthold
Andres,
Consulting fr
Emissions-
und Prozess-
messtechnik
Germany
New Requirements for the Measurement of Ammonia Emissions
In June 2013, the rst draft for the BREF (Best Available Techniques Reference Document) for LCPs (large combustion plants) was published. As the IED 2010/75/EU
puts now much more weight on BREFs and its BATCs (Best Available Technology Conclusions), BREFs are getting more attention in the public. The draft BREF now
requires the measurement of ammonia as slip control for the DeNox technologies SNCR and SCR. Low limit values in the range of a few mg/m, salt formation and high
solubility of ammonia in water are bearing high challenges for the measurement solutions.
The paper gives a short introduction to the new BREF draft requirements and summarizes the current activities on CEN, ISO und national levels for emission monitoring
of ammonia. Main focus of the paper is a review of the state of the art technology and measuring principles, resp. their strength & weakness for different measuring tasks.
The review includes Fourier Transform Infra Red spectroscopy, NDIR Photometer with gas lter correlation, Chemiluminescence detectors with ammonia converters
and Tunable Diode Laser Spectroscopy. The paper will close with an overview on AMS according to EN 15267 certied by MCERTS and / or UBA/TV.
17:10 - 17:30
Anna Bokowa,
Independent
Consultant
Canada
Inuence of the Particulate Matter When Sampling for Odours
This paper will introduce the inuence of particulate matter also known as dust when sampling for odours. The particulate matter is very common in the industries
such as iron melting, animal food processing facilities or agriculture industry. Foul-smelling dust plays a major role in the spreading of odour, especially for odour nuisance
outside the livestock buildings because odorous molecules which are absorbed to a dust can travel long distances. A strong correlation exists between the presence of
odours and particles from livestock buildings.
How to deal with particulate matter during the odour sampling? The recognized standards such as European standard EN13725 Air Quality-Determination of Odour
Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry 1 address briey the collection of odour samples with the presence of the particulate matter. However, is it correct to remove
the particulate matter before actual sampling for odours? Should the particulate matter be ltered before collection of the samples? How the ltration would affect the
nal results?
This paper is based on extensive studies when the particulate matter was present during the collection of the odour samples at the sources with their high
concentrations.
The studies include the sampling at the same time at the same source with the lter attached to the sampling equipment and without the lter. All collected samples were
analyzed used the dynamic olfactometry and the same group of the screened panellists used for the panel evaluation in order to minimize any deviations caused by other
factors.
This paper is based on three separate studies. The results show the signicant odour losses when the particulate matter was removed before collection of the odour
samples.
Wednesday 14th May - Session 2 Continued
15:50 - 16:10
Michael Hayes,
Linde Gases
North America
United States
Multi-Component ISO 17025, Guide 34 VOC Standards at Part Per Million Levels and Below
Current and proposed worldwide regulations are mandating lower monitoring levels and/or control of VOC (volatile organic compound) gas emissions. With the ever-
increasing awareness of the potential for negative health effects from the air we breathe, the requirements for low-level traceable calibration standards are becoming
of greater importance. ISO 17025 and Guide 34 Accreditation are an important step in the traceability of these multi-component low level VOC calibration standards.
This presentation will focus on the production of gaseous multi-component ISO 17025 and Guide 34 VOC calibration standards. This presentation will also focus on the
process of determining the proper cylinder material and treatment process, evaluating the compounds of interest for compatibility, concentrations, stability, traceability
and uncertainty.
16:10 - 16:30
Gnter
Haberzettl,
ABB Automation
GmbH
Germany
How to make extractive operating Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) more affordable
To grant highest availability of an Automated Measuring System (AMS) by keeping the expenditures for maintenance at a minimum becomes more importance as this
ever was known in the past. This is caused by the upcoming 2nd edition of EN 14181 which leads to alterations of the QAL3 procedures. Reduced condence intervals
and down to weekly drift checks if CUSUM - control charts are requirements which will come to use in the future. This will be a challenge for all AMS, if the required
high availability shall still be kept.
Known practice in validation and adjustment needs to be extended with new solutions in conducting the procedures fully automated and keep the validation times as
short as possible. Technologies are preferred to do all checks without test gases. By this reason the application of reference materials like gas lters and lm technologies
becomes more importance. The time frames conducting the validation checks for Multi-component measuring systems, measuring a higher number of pollutants is an
integral part of an entirely solution package.
Highest availability with no losses of half hourly average values by keeping the maintenance efforts as short as possible and the substitution of test gases are the main
drivers. Having control at any time of an AMS will require predictive maintenance to fulll legal requirements. Predictive maintenance in conjunction with remote service
facilities is a further step to take care of the required high availability of a CEMS. In principle all kinds of modern digital communication can be provided. Service on
demand is the keyword. Depending of customer needs individual service package solutions can be provided by AMS suppliers.
A QAL3 evaluation tool according the EN 14181, fully implemented into the AMS makes value storage and reporting as simple as possible. A Web Browser can be used
for direct access and communication and permits intuitive operation. All this measures supports plant operators to make maintenance more affordable by increasing the
availability of the CEMS, independent whether running cold/dry or hot/wet systems.
Exhibition Schedule NEW.indd 10 24/04/2014 16:24
5
SESSION 3 : INNOVATION IN EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEM RELATING TO EMISSION MONITORING
9:10 - 9:30
Johannes Mayer,
E.ON New Build
& Technology
Germany
Measurement of low Mercury Concentrations in the Flue Gas of Combustion Plants
In the context of forthcoming mercury monitoring requirements, related to the European Industrial Emissions Directive, there is a need to reliably measure low level
mercury concentrations in ue gas. For plant tted with a wet ue gas desulphurisation unit, mercury speciation is especially important for understanding mercury
removal processes. The European, wet chemistry, standard reference method for the determination of total mercury in ue gas (EN 13211) gives 2.6 g/m3 as
the relative detection limit and 1.7 g/m3 as the repeatability. This is not sufcient to control at potential emission levels below 6 g/m3. In addition, the standard
reference method measures total mercury without any information concerning speciation.
In this VGB-funded project, various manual and automated measurement systems, utilising sorbent traps, and various continuous monitoring systems, have been
compared with the European standard reference method and each other. Technicians from Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg and from the power plant
operators E.ON, Laborelec/GDF Suez and ENEL participated in this project. Based on two measurement campaigns, the performance data required to establish
equivalency of the alternative methods with the standard reference method have been determined. Conventional, and newly developed, continuous monitoring
systems have been included in the comparison. During this work, the so-called Dowex/Charcoal method, used for determining both oxidised and elemental mercury,
was validated for the determination of total mercury. This allows a signicant simplication of ue gas measurements in the future which focus on further optimisation
of mercury oxidation by SCR catalysts and removal of mercury from the ue gas in a wet scrubber.
9:30 - 9.50
Eric M.Prestbo,
Tekran
Instruments
Corporation
Canada
Mercury Control Technology Development in the Laboratory: HgCEM Research System, Performance and Applications
The fundamental understanding of the chemical and physical capture of mercury often starts in the research and development laboratory. The engineer-scientist
doing the research requires compactness, accuracy and robustness to generate precise mercury speciation data, in real time, at the inlet and outlet of the test rig.
Furthermore, the mercury measurements often must be accomplished at outlet concentrations below 0.3 g/m3 and very high levels of potential interfering gases,
like NH3, SO2 and HBr, to name a few. Considering the potential economic benets of high-quality mercury control technology research, it is no wonder that the
demand for a reliable system is paramount. We will describe a dual-probe, inlet/outlet mercury continuous emission monitor (HgCEM) that is now being used for
mercury control research on non-combustion gases in laboratory settings. By adding standard ue gas probes, the dual-probe, inlet/outlet HgCEM system can also be
used on pilot-plant or full-scale combustion sources for evaluation and optimization of mercury control equipment. Key components and design features of the dual-
probe, inlet/outlet HgCEM system that ensure and enhance performance will be described, including examples from independent challenge studies of the HgCEM.
Research application examples for the dual-probe, inlet/outlet HgCEM will be discussed, such as activated carbon injection (ACI) products, catalysts used to oxidize
and enhance mercury capture and polymer composites designed for adsorption of mercury. Also discussed will be the HgCEM conguration used to determine
mercury speciation, in order to evaluate baseline conditions of emission sources necessary for compliance planning.
9.50 - 10.10
Jrgen Reinmann,
Environnement
S.A Deutschland
Germany
Ongoing experiences on emission monitoring of micro-pollutants as dioxins/furans, mercury and heavy metals
Long term sampling of micro-pollutants as e.g. dioxins/furans, mercury and heavy metals, was demonstrated over the last 18 years as a good approach for continuous
emission monitoring. Specic as for dioxins/furans does not exist any possibility for online emission monitoring the CEN/TC 264 WG1 started some years ago the
standardization work for the CEN/TS 1948-5 as automatic continuous dioxin sampling. The rst draft of this technical specication will be published in the year 2014
and the WG applied for a mandate to do the validation measurements which are needed to establish the technical specication nally as a standard. As the automatic
dioxin sampling generate several differences to the manuals standard reference method (SRM) it was necessary to establish this standard, but also dene the limits
of the necessary adaption. With one system there were realized several new tests to determine e.g. maximum sampling periods of 6 weeks, by higher adsorption
cartridge temperatures (> + 50 C) combined with concentrations higher than the limit value of 0.1 ng TEQ/Nm3. Beside the presentation of such results this
paper will give an overview of several positive impacts on the environment which were gained over the last 18 years due to the installation of such systems. It can be
assumed that due to the different movements the continuous emission sampling of dioxin emissions will nd attention in future BAT/BEP considerations.
10.10 - 10.30
Peter G. Zemek,
MKS Instruments
Inc.
United States
Ultra Low Level HCl/HF CEMs for Combustion Facilities Using TV Certied CEM FTIR Analyzers
and Associated Performance Specications
The European Union (EU) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have implemented more stringent hydrogen chloride (HCl) and Hydrogen
Fluoride (HF) emission requirements from boiler and incineration furnaces that utilize coal and other fuels. The regulations require continuous emission monitoring
(CEM) of HCl and HF to levels signicantly below 1 part per million by volume (ppmv) to meet the associated Performance Specications (PS). The EU, and EPA
and others in the affected industries, are presently evaluating different technologies and their corresponding PS and TUV requirements in order to achieve these low
detection limits.
Coffee Break
11:00 - 11:20
Ivar Olsen,
Norsk Analyse AS
Norway
True trace emmission monitoring systems
To be able to measure true trace levels of emission components, one must focus on all aspects of the complete analytical package. Selection of materials in contact
with the sample, vapor phase versus liquid phase, chemical reactions, absorbance, fractionations, delay and transport lag time, maintenance requirements, accessibility,
selection of analytical principals, utilities, signal conditioning etc.
Short-cuts very seldom pay off. One must also focus on the environment for the analytical package itself. Heat and dust loads, accessibility for operator and
maintenance staff. Cost of Ownership. Expected lifetime.
What analytical standards are required, and how to comply. How to verify and calibrate an analytical package.
Special focus on trace measurements of sulphurs, such as SO2, H2S, Mercaptans, COS and CS2. How to dene the acid dew point in exhaust stacks.
Trace measurements of amines and ammonia from amine scrubbers (CO2 capture). Trace measurements of NOx and SO2 from ship engines, and other marine ue gases.
11:20 - 11:40
Antti Heikkil,
Gasmet
Technologies Oy
Finland
Periodic Formaldehyde monitoring at biogas plants using FTIR gas analysis
Power generation from Germanys Biogas industry produces emissions to air that are regulated by TA Luft, and as part of the approval process, the emissions from
each plant have to be tested regularly. Formaldehyde is one of the pollutants of greatest concern because of its carcinogenicity and the TA Luft emission limit is 60
mg/m. However, the German Government has also created a nancial incentive scheme to encourage process managers to push their emissions below this value.
Formaldehyde monitoring presents a number of challenges, but portable FTIR analyzers have proved to be highly effective for this purpose.
A new VDI method (VDI 3862-8) for the measurement of formaldehyde by FTIR is being established and this is likely to be published at the beginning of 2014. A
CEN committee is also working on the use of FTIR for monitoring a broader group of species.
This presentation will provide comparison data between FTIR and wet chemistry, and will outline the current status of the standards and demonstrate how portable
FTIR has overcome the costs and limitations of laboratory techniques for formaldehyde monitoring. By detailing the current regime for Biogas monitoring in Germany,
it is anticipated that this presentation will be helpful to other countries.
Thursday 15th May - Session 3
Conference Schedule
Exhibition Schedule NEW.indd 11 24/04/2014 16:24
Conference Schedule
6
SESSION 3 : INNOVATION IN EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEM RELATING TO EMISSION MONITORING
11:40 - 12:00
Carlo Bruno
Pollution S.r.l.
Italy
The Portable FID for Stack Emissions: lightweight, compact, ergonomic, safe
VOCs are emitted by wide range of different industries. For example, emissions can arise through the evaporation of organic compounds used as solvents; through
incomplete combustion of fuels; and through biological degradation of organic matter as in fermentation processes.
A variety of primary and secondary legislation has been introduced to impose limits on industrial VOC emissions.
The concentrations of VOCs are commonly reported measuring:
the concentration of individual VOCs using different sensors and detectors
as total organic carbon (TOC) in the gas stream using the FID or PID detector.
the sum of the concentrations of specic, individual VOCs in a sample
Lunch Break
13.30 - 13.50
Damien BAZIN,
Chromatotec
France
airmoTWA: New TRAP-GC-MS-FID instrument for ambient air monitoring designed for onsite use
To ensure people safety and a good repeatability of industrial process, the analysis of ambient air is crucial. Especially, electronic boards are produced in clean air room
by complex lithographic process using very reactive chemicals. The nature and concentration of volatile compounds can be different depending on the chemical process
and can also vary rapidly. There is a need to analyze precisely and continuously gas process in air with an instrument designed for industrial use.
13.50 - 14.10
Michael Boness,
Sick AG
Germany
Cost Efcient Solutions for Process and Emission Monitoring at Waste to Energy Plants
The main topics for this presentation are: Overview of typical waste-to-energy plant operation Introduction to important scrubber technologies System design for
reliable raw gas monitoring (extractive and in-situ) Industrial applications and case studies CEMS with and without FTIR Quality assurance and validation. An overview
about different possibilities and technologies which can be chosen for process and emission monitoring would like to be presented. There is not only one right answer if
cost efciency is in focus. Different technologies for different types of incineration processes are available in order to provide reliable measuring data without complicated
preparation steps. The necessary maintenance by the plant operator is reduced to a minimum. All given examples for CEMS are certied according to EU directives (e.g.
WID 2000/76/EN, LCD 2001/80/EN) and norms EN14181, EN 15267.
14.10 - 14.30
Antti Lehtonen,
Oy Indmeas Ab
Finland
Determination of CO2 emission of a coal power plant by using stack measurements
A new method for determining the CO2 emission of a coal power plant is presented. The method is based on accurate in-stack measurements of ow rate and CO2
concentration, and is demonstrated to full the new measurement uncertainty requirements of the CO2 emission trade scheme.
The method was demonstrated at the 230 MW power plant unit of Vantaan Energia Oy which uses coal as its primary fuel and natural gas as the secondary fuel.
The calibration of the stack gas ow measurement was carried out by Indmeas Oy, an accredited on-site calibration laboratory. The on-site calibration of the CO2
concentration meter was possible by calibrating the natural gas input ow meter and by determining the CO2 concentration reference value from the carbon balance of
the boiler. The balance was accurate in a process situation where the boiler was red by natural gas only.
14.30 - 14.50
Guido Baum,
TV Rheinland
Energie und
Umwelt GmbH
Germany
Determination of CO2 and N2O emissions with CEM systems within the scope of greenhouse gas trading
New regulation for the continuous measurement of CO2 and N2O mass ow - requirements for the installed measuring systems with respect to the EU Monitoring
Regulation No. 601/2012.
This presentation will give an overview of the measuring systems (combined concentration and ow measurement), the qualication procedures for CEMS used in the context
of greenhouse gas monitoring (QAL1 and EN 15267) as well as the ongoing quality assurance for the eld installations in accordance to the EN 14181. Problems for the
determination of the overall measurement uncertainty in relation to the required uncertainties from the European Monitoring Regulation will be discussed.
As an independent test institute, TV Rheinland has been involved in investigations for CO2, N2O and stack ow measurements for many years. TV Rheinland is the
leading test institute for QAL1 certications as well as accredited test house for EN 14181 services.
14.50 - 15.10
Nicholas A Martin,
National Physical
Laboratory
United Kingdom
The development of instrumentation for application to carbon capture and storage measurements
New continuous emissions monitors (CEMs) must now be designed and operated so that end users can demonstrate that they meet the measurement requirements
enshrined in the most recent environmental legislation.
We report on the project C-Save, which is an industrial collaboration between Signal Group, NPL and BP, with aims of developing and improving instrumentation
applicable to carbon capture and storage (CCS) measurements. The work involved the development of a mid-infrared CO2 gas sensor, based on the technique of gas
lter correlation, which underwent laboratory and then eld testing at a pilot power plant in the UK employing CCS technology.
In addition, we describe NPLs dedicated suite of facilities that are accredited under ISO 17025 to carry out tests to the MCERTS Performance Standards and Test
Procedures for Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems together with the harmonised International Standard EN 15267-3.
Thursday 15th May - Session 3 Continued
Coffee Break
Telford, International Centre, UK
22-23rd April 2015
www.aqeshow.com
E: info@aqeshow.com T: +44 (0) 1727 858840
@AQE_Show
The Air Quality and Emissions Show
AQE 2015 Filler.indd 1 23/04/2014 09:22
Exhibition Schedule NEW.indd 12 24/04/2014 16:24
Conference Schedule
7
Thursday 15th May - Session 4
SESSION 4 : INDUSTRIAL CASES STUDIES RELATING
TO EMISSION MONITORING AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
15.40 - 16.00
Martin Schlgl
Linde Gas
Czech Republic
CEM at the Prague Waste incinerator: an end-user case study from the Czech Republic
Waste incineration is an integral part of many national environmental strategies and is often used close to urban areas where high amounts of domestic
consumer waste are produced, and high numbers of people live. So, effective CEM systems to monitor and thereby help to control and regulate emissions is
critical in these applications. Accurate calibration and maintenance of these CEM systems is critical for legislative compliance and also increasingly important for
commercial reasons such as emissions trading and operation within emissions consent levels. This paper will examine the practices and Specialty Gases products
used at the Prague city municipal waste incinerator to ensure reliable operation of the CEM system. Aspects of technical compliance to local safety policies and
local metrological regulations will also be covered.
16.00 - 16.20
Morgane
RIVIERE,
Air Liquide
Germany
Analytical campaign for measurement of oxycombustion ue gas from Coal Fired Plants
Oxycombustion is one of the competitive solutions for CO2 capture on several industrial processes and could, in medium term, have an impact on
greenhouse gas abatement generated from fossil fuel combustion (especially coal) which is the main energy source. Air Liquide is a key contributor
to the evolution of this technology with the development and improvement of CPU (Cryogenic Purication Unit) through different collaboration
project. However, the reliable analysis of the impurities in the process stream(s) through the whole process plays a key role to demonstrate the
capabilities of oxycombustion. Indeed, a mobile laboratory featuring analyzers for all major ue gas components and key impurities has been
designed and installed on site and connected to more than twenty different sampling points on the CPU. Specic attention has been paid to the
materials selection and the design of the equipments used in the sampling lines systems to achieve reliable measurements. Different types of
analyzers like multi-component analyzers based on NDIR or chemiluminescence are used to determine efuents composition at different steps of
the process. Those analyzers have been rst tested in our research facilities
mainly to check the possible interferences and their effect on measurements.
This presentation will then illustrate the complexity of measurements of impurities in CO2 rich streams with some results from the test campaign
carried out in 2013 at the Callide Coal-red power station (Queensland, Australia).
16.20 - 16.40
Robert Baxter,
B3 Systems, Inc.
United States
An Update on PM Monitoring in the USA
During the previous CEMS conference we presented a paper on some of our early experiences with utilizing our method of spiking particulate matter (PM) to elevate
the PM concentration in the off gases while performing calibration efforts on PM continuous emission monitoring systems (PM CEMS) calibration. Since 2011, this
method has been successfully used on over 15 applications, on both wet and dry stack conditions. The information and knowledge gained on not only our PM spiking
operation but also the operation of PM CEMS equipment has been tremendous. This presentation will be a case study of these experiences and what we have learned.
16.40 - 17.00
Jurij Cretnik,
RACI d.o.o.
Slovenia
Case Studies Of Dust Ams Calibration At Extreme Conditions
Emission measurements are required by EU directives and national legislations, especially continuous monitoring of large pollution sources. One of the parameters,
important for ambient air quality, yet difcult to measure continuously, is particulate matter (dust). Several different measurement principles for particulate matter
automated measurement systems (AMS) exist, which all have their pros and cons for different applications. Most of them do not measure particulate matter directly,
but some other physical quantity, and need to be calibrated by a manual reference method, i.e. gravimetrically. This may not be a problem with typical applications,
but the difculty increases rapidly when dealing with extreme conditions, such as large stack dimensions above 15 m internal diameter, large stacks combined with
high concentrations of particulate matter, or very low concentrations of particulate matter below 1 mg/m3 (low clusters). This paper deals with available measurement
principles for dust AMS, basic quality assurance requirements for dust AMS, manual techniques for calibration of dust AMS and several case studies of dust AMS
calibration (QAL2 and AST) at extreme conditions, which were performed during last ve years by RACI d.o.o. in different industries.
17.00 - 19.00 DRINKS RECEPTION - POSTERS
PETROLEUM, REFINING & ENVIRONMENTAL
MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES
CONFERENCE EXHIBITION & WORKSHOPS
18th - 19th NOVEMBER 2015 - ANTWERP, BELGIUM
CONFERENCE EXHIBITION & WORKSHOPS
CONFERENCE EXHIBITION & WORKSHOPS
18th - 19th NOVEMBER 2015 - ANTWERP, BELGIUM
www.peftec.com
PEFTEC 2015 Filler.indd 8 23/04/2014 09:28
Exhibition Schedule NEW.indd 13 24/04/2014 16:24
Conference Schedule
8
SESSION 5 : CONTINUED INDUSTRIAL CASES STUDIES RELATING
TO EMISSION MONITORING AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
9:10 - 9:30
Thomas
Rosenoern,
Force
Technology
Denmark
Factors controlling condensed phase emissions from gas engine red combined heat and power plant (CHP) a eld study
As increasing evidence of the effects of ne and ultrane particles on human health and climate is mounting, greater focus has been directed to potential sources. Among these, stationary
sources with low stack heights that are situated in or near urban areas, are identied as potentially problematic. This study focuses on one such group of plants, namely the gas red
Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plants. Recent studies have shown that a relatively high number of ne and ultra ne particles are emitted from gas red CHP plants. Since combustion
of Natural gas, which for the main part is methane, is not expected to produce signicant numbers of particles, it is expected that the particles originate from the engine lubrication oil.
Results will be presented from: A study comparing emissions from gas engines at ve different CHP plants, an investigation of the effect of gas engine service (including
change of cylinder liners and piston rings) on the emissions, and an exploration of emissions changes resulting from changing air/fuel mixing ratio and/or ignition timing.
Particle number concentrations were measured using an Electric Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI) after a dilution and drying system. The volatile fraction of the condensed
phase was probed using a thermo denuder in front of the ELPI. A number of gas phase parameters have also been measured for use in the data analysis.
In depth analysis of correlations between engine parameters, gas phase concentration, and particle number and mass concentrations, show that a number of parameters
may be contributing factors with respect to particle emission abatement. The Figure below show an example of the correlation found as part of this study, particularly
between particle number concentrations and NOX levels in the exhaust stream from a CHP gas engine selected for extensive studies.
9:30 - 9.50
Nathalie Faniel
Laborelec, GDF
SUEZ
Belgium
Characterising aerosols in ue gas using impinger methods, FTIR and ELPI+
Over the last few years, a need to characterise the ue gas behind coal red power plants (and other industrial applications) with respect to its aerosol content became obvious.
The need was expressed by utilities observing large amine emissions from their pilot post combustion carbon capture (PCCC) installations as a result of aerosols (PM and/
or sulphuric acid) entering these installations. Fourier Transformed Infra Red (FTIR) measurements revealed the origin and driving factors of these emissions including aerosol
formation phenomena at different EU pilot plants. Only very recently, it was proven that H2SO4 aerosols with a particle number concentration in the order of 108 per cm3 can
lead to amine emissions in the range of 600-1100 mg Nm-3. For the design of both countermeasures types (upstream or downstream), it is crucial to have an idea of the aerosol
size distribution and numbers entering or leaving the absorber as well as correct measurements of the associated concentrations.
This study presents data characterising the ue gas entering and leaving an amine CO2 scrubber through the simultaneous use of impinger methods, Fourier
Transformed Infra Red (FTIR) and Electronic Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI+) measurements .
9.50 - 10.10
Olli Antson,
Technical
Research Centre
of Finland
Finland
Ammonia measurement challenges in SCR units
SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) technology has been utilized in energy production and nowadays also in large marine diesels. To study and test these catalyst units in
a smaller scale VTT has developed a test bench (Lehtoranta et al. 2012, 2013) which utilizes a proper exhaust gas from a medium speed engine. SCR utilizes ammonia
(NH3) in the form of water solutions of urea for reducing NOx to N2. Water solutions of urea are injected into the exhaust gas stream and evaporated, followed by
decomposition of urea. To have a good decomposition the mixing of urea with the exhaust gas is important, as well as the residence time in urea injection to catalyst
entrance. In addition, exhaust temperature and space velocity (gas ow through the catalyst reactor) are important variables inuencing the conversion efciency of SCR
system. Naturally the urea or the ammonia amount is to be optimized in order to avoid ammonia emissions downstream of SCR.
10.10 - 10.30
Guido Lenaers,
VITO
Belgium
Ftir As Hcn Measurement Method In A Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit
In the cracking process of a Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) hydrogen cyanide (HCN) is formed during the regeneration of the catalyst. The goal of this study is to
investigate if Fourier Transform InfraRed spectroscopy (FTIR) is an alternative HCN measurement method to the EPA OTM-29 wet chemistry method.
The Gasmet DX-4000 FTIR-analyser used in this investigation proved during laboratory tests to have potential for the measurement of HCN in a typical ue gas matrix
by behaving linear between 0.5 en 150 mg/Nm3 HCN. During the FTIR measurement campaign executed on the chimney stack of the catalytic regenerator unit also
wet chemical sampling was performed according to EPA OTM-29 that served as the reference method.
The measured actual gas matrix is generated in the laboratory and a dedicated FTIR-library le is established for HCN-concentrations ranging from 5 to 150 mg/Nm3.
This library le consists of the components present in the gas matrix, the list of interfering components per component, the selected and -according to the interferences-
optimised infrared areas for analysis per component, and advanced corrections for cross interferences. The difference between the generated HCN-concentrations
and the measured values are maximum 2.1 ppm at 125 ppm; 0.2 ppm at 42 ppm; 0.6 ppm at 20 ppm en 0.4 ppm at 4 ppm. All interferences have been successfully
corrected for. The comparison for the other gas components between generated and measured values shows differences of a few percent.
Also during the generation of the actual gas matrix HCN is determined over the OTM-29 method. The generated concentrations and the measured values compare
within 2%. This proves that the OTM-29 method can serve as a reference method when performing emission measurements on the FCCU.
Finally, the FTIR-measurements on the FCCU have been processed with the dedicated library le and the results for HCN compared to those of the OTM-29
determinations yielding an average difference of -5.5% +/- 9.4%. It is concluded that FTIR has the potential for an alternative HCN measurement method on a FCCU.
Coffee Break
Friday 16th May - Session 5
11:00 - 11:20
Luigi Fiorani,
Loccioni Group
Italy
Simultaneous process and emission monitoring through two automatically switching FT-IR Gas Analyzers
In this paper experimental results from the real application of a system made by two FT-IR analyzers on a fertilizer industry in Italy are shown.
The system has been studied, engineered and installed in order to measure NO, NO2, N2O and NH3 at two sampling points, before and after the DeNOx reactor:
this allows to monitor the gaseous streams in order to optimize the ue gas denitrication process, as well as the emissions at the stack. Both analyzers are based on
GIGAS 10M FT-IR Spectrometer, TV certied (EN 14181 and EN 14956), the rst and unique Made in Italy multi-component gas analyzer.
The main particularity of the engineered system is the possibility of automatically switching the two sampling lines on both the analyzers: in case of failure or maintenance
of one FT-IR analyzer, it is possible to use the other one as backup system in a very fast and easy way. Furthermore the switching system allows the automatic
adjustment of measuring gas range depending on the two sampling points, since concentrations of measured gas are very different before and after the DeNOx reactor.
Finally a discussion of benets due to a more precise emission and process control allowed by the use of such a kind of system.
11:20 - 11:40
Jane Thomas,
Emissions
Analytics
United Kingdom
New truths about emissions from real-world data
The EU proposal which seeks to cap CO2 emissions at a eet average of 95g per kilometre is worrying the German manufacturers.
Using Emissions Analytics database of new car tailpipe emissions we decided to look at whether the big German car manufacturers Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz,
Porsche and Volkswagen - really do have something to be worried about.
Of all the cars tested to date, CO2 emissions are an average of 24 per cent higher than ofcial gures. Some cars perform better than others, although only two percent
meet or improve on their ofcial gures and the worst offender is over 70 per cent higher than claimed.
Exhibition Schedule NEW.indd 14 24/04/2014 16:24
Conference Schedule
9
11.40 - 12.00
Steve Beynon,
FLIR
United Kingdom
Optical Gas Imaging for VOC visualisation and its role in new EU IED Regulation
One of the most signicant advances in infrared thermographic cameras over recent years has been the introduction of Optical Gas Imaging (OGI). OGI cameras
use spectral wavelength ltering and sterling cooler cold ltering technology to visualise the Infrared absorption of VOC/Hydrocarbon; SF6; Refrigerant and Carbon
Monoxide and other gases whose spectral absorption matches the response of the camera. By using OGI technology industry is now able to incorporate a Smart
LDAR program that safely and efciently visualise gas leaks that, by using previous methods and techniques alone (LDAR), would have taken many hours or even days.
Studys tell us that a typical renery has less than 1% of the potential leaking components that actually leak, therefore using a traditional sniffer probe method where
all the potential leaking components need to be checked some also very difcult to reach - is an inefcient process. Using an OGI camera to pinpoint leaks safely,
efciently and then guide the sniffer probe in for quantication what is termed Smart LDAR- is much more safe, efcient and cost effective. Safety is also of paramount
importance and in many cases the number one justication, with the performance of sensitivity and the HSM (High Sensitivity Mode) you can scan for leaks from a safe
zone or greater distance. In addition to safety, the benets OGI can provide to the environment are also signicant, allowing industry to comply with new industrial
emissions regulations & procedures as set by the new IED (Industrial Emissions Directive) within the EU. This paper will cover the technology, techniques and the
applications of Optical Gas Imaging and how it is implemented in industrial and environmental applications.
12.00 - 12.20
Sujata Tilak,
Ascent
Informatics
(India) Pvt. Ltd
India
Proposed Data Acquisition & Handling System for Pilot Emission Trading in India
Power, cement, chemical, textile and so many other industries are indicators of a countrys progress, however all these industries have adverse impact on environment,
particularly air quality. In other words they create problem in air shed management. To incentivize industries to keep emissions under check, an Emission Trading
Scheme (ETS) using Particulate Matter (PM) as marker pollutant is being planned in India. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and Ministry of Environment and
Forest (MoEF), Government of India are spearheading this project and a pilot for the same is being rolled out in few states. Aggregating reliable, accurate and complete
emission data from all participating industries is most crucial aspect in initial demonstration of ETS program. Such a solution must be an integrated aggregator platform to
acquire, monitor, analyze, validate and benchmark emissions data across multiple plants. The paper discusses key challenges in designing such a system. It introduces a
Data Acquisition and Handling System (DAHS) designed for this project and also demonstrates approaches to overcome the anticipated challenges.
12.20 - 12.30 CLOSING REMARKS
W
eb
D
isp
lay
Mercury
Dioxins
HCl
NH
3
NO
2
H
2
S
CH
4
SO
2
CO
2
CO
NO
HF
NOx
VOC PM 10
PM 2.5
D
A
S
D
A
S
D
A
S
C
o
n
tin
u
o
u
s E
m
issio
n
a
n
d

P
ro
c
e
ss M
o
n
ito
rin
g
S
y
ste
m
s
A
m
b
ia
n
t A
ir Q
u
a
lity
M
o
n
ito
rin
g
S
y
ste
m
s
M
o
b
ile
A
Q
M
S
F
ix
e
d
A
Q
M
S
M
in
ia
tu
re

S
e
n
so
rs
Central D
ata
M
anagem
ent
Supervision
D
ata Validation
D
ata Processing
D
ata Reporting
D
ata M
odeling
Environnement S.A - 111, Bd Robespierre CS 80004
78304 Poissy Cedex 4 FRANCE
Tel. : +33 (0)1 39 22 38 00 Fax : +33 (0)1 39 65 38 08 http://www.environnement-sa.com
Visit stand 39: the unique manufacturer supplying
from universal pollutant monitoring systems to the
end-user display
D
A
S
Exhibition Schedule NEW.indd 15 24/04/2014 16:24
Poster Presentations
10
NO. POSTER TITLE PRESENTER
1
Automotive gaseous emissions trends and transferrable
implications for the CEM sector
Stephen Harrison, Linde Gas
Germany
2
Practical experiences of PM Monitoring in wet stack FGD
applications to satisfy stringent US PS-11 Rules
William Averdieck, PCME Ltd
United Kingdom
3
Requirements for emission data acquisition, handling and
evaluation in the context of
David Triebel, DURAG Data Systems GmbH
Germany
4 Smart Environmental Management of an Industrial Site
Jacques Mediavilla,
ENVIRONNEMENT S.A
France
5 CEM in the Aluminium smelting industry
Stephen Harrison, Linde Gas
Germany
6
Product innovations for efficient specialty gases supply in
the CEM sector
Martin Schlgl, The Linde Group
Czech Republic
7
A laboratory simulator for accuracy evaluation of rice paddy
methane emission monitoring
Namgoo KANG, Korea Research Institute
of Standards and Science
South Korea
8
Development of Stove Emission and Efficiency Testing
Laboratory
Sereeter Lodoysamba,
National University of Mongolia
Mongolia
International Environmental Technology is a leading magazine for
news and updates on analytical and monitoring technology.
This magazine covers a world market, bringing you the latest innovations
in the areas of water, waste water, air, soil and gas detection.
For more information and a free subscription visit our website
www.envirotech-online.com
tel: +44 (0)1727 858840 fax: +44 (0)1727 840310 email: info@envirotech-pubs.com
IET 170 x 75.indd 1 24/04/2014 15:56
Posters.indd 8 24/04/2014 16:26
Leading International
Stack Emissions Monitoring and Testing
www.esg.co.uk
sales@esg.co.uk
+(44) 1283 554 400
ESG is the largest established MCERTS accredited stack emissions monitoring
consultancy. With a proven track record of monitoring throughout Europe, Africa, the
Middle East and India, our team of over 40 MCERTS accredited personnel and
extensive equipment resource, can offer rapid response to sampling requests for even
the most complex of monitoring projects. We provide international clients with
market-leading, professional and competitive stack emissions monitoring and testing
services including:
Routine periodic monitoring to determine compliance with PPC permit requirements and obligations
Calibration of Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) to EN 14181
Investigative and process optimisation trials, including use of FTIR
Monitoring of substitute fuel trials and co-incineration plant
Plant commissioning and abatement efciency monitoring projects
ISO 17025 (UKAS) accredited analytical services for stack gas samples
For more information about ESGs stack emissions monitoring and testing services,
please visit stand 25 at CEM 2014.
Consultancy services and liaison with regulators
Training and bespoke guidance services for operators in relation to MCERTS requirements
011 - ESG.indd 1 24/04/2014 16:24
Exhibition Floorplan
12
ABB 45
Axetris 29
Alpeknik Konrol Sistemleri Ltd 45 & 46
Analitica Strumenti Srl 51
Ankersmid Sampling BVBA 15
Apex Instruments Inc 18
Artek Muhendislik Cevre Olcum ve Danismanlik Hiz. Tic. A.S. 6
Ascent Informatics (India) PVT Ltd 36
BEST A.S. 7a
Buhler 46
Chromatotec 26
Dekati Ltd 32
DURAG Sales & Marketing GmbH 17
Eco Physcis 16
Econorm Ltd 34
Ekosis 23
Environnement SA Group 39
Environmental Scientics Group 25
Envitech 21
Fives Pillard 5
Fresenius Umwelttechnik GmbH 4
Gasmet Europe 43
General Impianti srl 22
Horiba GmbH 12
IMR 20
Indmeas 3
JCT 33
KNF Neuberger Gmbh 19
Linde AG - Linde Gas Divisions 38
LN Industries 11
Loccioni Group 22
Mercury Instruments GmbH 48
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc 18
M&C TechGroup 14
MKD Grup 44
MKS Instruments 28
NC Department of Commerce 18
Nexus 24
Norsk Analyse AS 16
Opsis 10
PCME 30 & 31
Polltion SRL. 35
Qualist 47
SAL 40
SET TEKNIK AS 49 & 50
SICK 7,8
Signal Group Ltd 37
Tesla Olcu Kontrol Sistemleri ve Cevre Tek. Ltd 27
Testo Elektronik 9
TECORA 13
Tekran Instruments 2
Turkish Environmental Industry 1
Turnkey Instruments 41
TUV Rheinland Energie 42
List of Exhibitors
012_013 - Floorplan.indd 8 24/04/2014 16:25
Exhibition Floorplan
13
7
a
012_013 - Floorplan.indd 9 24/04/2014 16:25
Company Profiles
ABB
Stand 45
Stierstadter Stasse, 5, 60488,
Frankfurt an Main, Germany
Email: cga@de.abb.com
Web: http://new.abb.com/
Alpteknik Kontrol Sistemleri Tic.
San. Ltd. Sti
Stand 45
Isiso Sanayi Sitesi 8.Yol M-Blok 9-10
34517- Esenyurt Istanbul, Turkey
Tel: 0090 212 623 22 80
Email: info@alpteknik.com
Web: www.alpteknik.com
AMS Analitica SRL
Stand 51
Via Degli Abeti, 148, Pesaro
Pesaro - PU, 61122, Italy
Tel: 0039 0721 2643
Email: info@amsanalitica.cm
Web: www.amsanalitica.com
Ankersmid Sampling BVBA
Stand 15
Neerlandweg 21, Wilrijk
Antwerpen, 2610, Belgium
Tel: 0049 170 566 8834
lars.kaminke@ankersmidsampling.com
Web: www.ankersmidsampling.com
Artek Mhendislik evre
lm ve Dan. Hiz. Tic. A.S.
Stand 6
Mehmet Akif Mah. Elalms Cad.
Tark Bugra Sok. No.:15 mraniye,
Istanbul, 34774, Turkey
Tel: 009 021 649 90249
Email: artek@artekcevre.com.tr
Ascent Informatics (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Stand 36
40, Vrushabh, Mrutyunjay Society
Mayur Colony, Kothrud, Pune
Maharashtra, 411038, India
Tel: 00 912 06500 4608
Email: amol.joshi@aiplindia.com
Web: www.aiplindia.com
Axetris AG
Stand 29
Schwarzenbergstrasse 10
CH-6056 Kaegiswil, Switzerland
Tel: 0041 41 662 7630
Email: axetris@axetris.com
Web: www.axetris.com
Best A.S
Stand 7a
Anadolu Caddesi No:41 Megapol Is Merkezi
Bayrakli - Izmir / Trkiye
Tel: +90 232 4636426
Email: infobest@best-as.com.tr
Bhler Technologies GmbH
Stand 46
Harkortstrasse 29, DE-40880,
Ratingen, Germany
Tel: +49 (0) 21 02 / 49 89 716
Email: info@buehler-technologies.com
Web: www.buehler-technologies.com
Chromatotec
Stand No 26
15 rue dArtiguelongue, Saint-Antoine
33240, France
Tel: 0033 557940626
Email: info@chromatotec.com
Web: info@chromatotec.com
Dekati Ltd
Stand 32
FI-3620, Kanasala, Finland
Tel: 0035 833 578100
Email: sales@dekati.fi
Web: sales@dekati.fi
DURAG GROUP
Stand 17
Kollaustrasse 105, Hamburg
22453, Germany
Tel: 0049 40 5542180
Email: info@durag.de
Web: www.durag.de
Eco Physics Ag
Stand 16
Bubikower Strasse 45, Duernten
8635, Switzerland
Tel: 0041 55 240 8585
Email: info@ecophysics.com
Econorm Ltd.
Stand 34
Kabil Cd. 1350 Sk. 4/A veler
Ankara, 06000, Turkey
Tel: 0090 312 4833 040
Email: aytunc@econorm.com.tr
Web: www.econorm.net
EKOSIS
Stand 23
evre ve Is Gvenligi Teknolojileri Elektronik
San. Tic. Ltd. Sti,Salih Omurak sokak, No.27
Kosuyolu Mahallesi,
34718 Kadikey, Istanbul
Tel: 0090 216 327 1371
Email: levent.nayir@ekosisltd.com.tr
Envitech Ltd.
Stand 21
1 Korazin St., Givataym, Gush Dan,
5358301, Israel
Tel: 009 723 573 1944
Email: david.farhi@envitech.co.il
ENVIRONNEMENT S.A
Stand 39
111, Bd Robespierre, 78304
Poissy, Cedex, France
Tel: + 33 5 59 41 55 66
Web: www.environnement-sa.com
Envronmental Scientifics Group
Stand 25
Ashby Road, Burton on Trent,
Staffordshire, DE15 0YZ,United Kingdom
Tel: 0845 6032112
Email: Oona.Richards@esg.co.uk
Web: www.esg.co.uk
Fives Pillard
Stand 5
13 Rue Raymond eissere,
1308 Marseille, France
Tel: 0033 90) 4 91 80 90 21
Email: anne.didomenico@fivesgroup.com
Web: www.fivesgroup.com
Fresenius Umwelttechnik GmbH
Stand 4
Doncaster-Platz 5, Herten,
NRW 45699, Germany
Tel: 0049 236 693 96155
Email: info@fresenius-ut.com
Web: www.fresenius-ut.com
Gasmet Europe Oy
Stand 43
Pulttitie 8 A 1, Helsinki, 00880, Finland
Tel: 0035 8975 900 400
Email: antti.heikkila@gasmet.fi
Web: www.gasmet.fi
Horiba GmbH
Stand 12
Hans-Mess Strasse 6, D-61440,
Oberursel, Germany
Tel: 0049 06172 1396 226
Email: zalmai.bazgar@horiba.com
14
014 - 016 Company Profiles.indd 14 24/04/2014 16:25
Company Profiles
15
E CO P HYSI CS CLD 60 NOxOx



















No NOx without Ox(ygen)

Combining the reference methods chemiluminescence
detection (CLD) with a paramagnetic cell to determine
NOx values with O2 correction possibility offers the
ultimate compact solution to minimize NOx taxes: NOx
with O2 in one compact device!


Boiler and burners
Ship diesel engines
Turbines
Fuel optimization
Stack emissions
Savings in NOx-Tax





ECO PHYSI CS AG BUBI KONERSTRASSE 45 CH- 8635 DUERNTEN
TEL. +41 55 220 22 22 I NFO@ECOPHYSI CS. COM WWW. ECOPHYSI CS. COM
IMR GmbH
Stand 20
Robert-Mayer-Str 12, 74172,
Neckarsulm, Germany
Tel: 0071 32 96 06 32
Email: markus.werner@imr-germany.de
Indmeas Oy
Stand 3
Tietjntie 12, Espoo, 02130, Finland
Tel: 00 35840 5520 127
Email: jana.nyren@indmeas.com
Web: www.indmeas.com
JCT Analysentechnik GmbH
Stand 33
Werner Heisenberg-Strasse 4
Wiener Neustadt, 2700, Austria
Tel: 0043 262 287201
Email: sales@jct.at
Web: www.jct.at
KNF Neuberger Gmbh
Stand 19
Alterweg 3, 79112, Freiburg, Germany
Tel: 0045 0764 59090
Email: info@knf.de
Web: www.knf.de
LNI Schmidlin SA (LN Industries)
Stand 11
46 Chemin de LEtang, Chatelaine,
Geneva, 1219, Switzerland
Tel: 0041 229 793724
Email: e.multin@ini-schmidlin.com
Web: www.ini-schmidlin.com
Loccioni Group
Stand 22
Via Monteschiavo 3, Moie di Maiolati
Ancona, 60030, Italy
Tel: 0039 0731 8161
Email: info@loccioni.com
Web: www.loccioni.com
014 - 016 Company Profiles.indd 15 24/04/2014 16:25
Company Profiles
M&C TechGroup
Stand 14
Rehhecke 79, 40885, Ratigen, Germany
Tel: 0049 2102 935 0
Email: info@mc-techgroup.com
Web: www.mc-techgroup.com
Mercury Instruments GmbH
Stand 48
Liebigstr.5, Karlsfeld,
Bayern 85757, Germany
Tel: 0049 813 1505720
Email: bi@mercury-instruments.de
MKD Maden Kimya Danismanlik
Stand 44
Site Mh.Atay Cd. No:56, Istanbul,
34760, Turkey
Tel: 009 216 492 0088
Email: mert@mkdgrup.com
MKS Instruments
Stand 28
2 Tech Drive, Suite 201, Andover,
MA, 01810, USA
Tel: 001 978 645 5500
Email: mks@mksinst.com
Web: www.mksinst.com
NC Dept of Commerce
Stand 18
301 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina,
27699-4320, United States
Tel: 001 919 715 5742
Email: rhill@nccommerce.com
Web: www.nccommerce.com
Nexus Solutions Inc.
Stand 24
36-1828 Blue Heron Drive
London, Ontario, Canada, N6H 0B7
Tel: +1 519 649 6100
Email: sales@cemview.com
Web: www.cemview.com
Norsk Analyse AS
Stand 16
Ryenstubben 2 , N-0679, Oslo, Norway
Tel: 0047 4153 7009
Email: chris.torjussen@norskanalyse.no
Web: www.norskanalyse.no
Opsis AB
Stand 10
skyheskogsv 16, Box 244, Furulund
SE-244 02, Sweden
Tel: 0046 46 72 25 00
Email: info@opsis.se
Web: www.opsis.se
PCME Group
Stands 30 & 31
Clearview Building, 60 Edison Road,St Ives
Cambs, PE27 3GH, United Kingdom
Tel: 0044 1480 468200
Email: contact@pcme.com
Web: www.pcme.com
POLLUTION
Stand 35
Via Guizzardi, 52, Budrio (Bologna),
40054, Italy
Tel: 0039 051 6931840
Email: pollution@pollution.it
Web: www.pollution.it
QUALIST
Stand 47
Bykdere Caddesi NO:38
Istanbul, Mecidiyeky, 34387, Turkey
Tel: 0090 5309 771 349
Email: gakdemir@qualist.com
Web: www.qualist.com
Scientific Analysis Laboratories
Stand 40
Hadfield House, 9 Hadfield Street
Manchester, M16 9FE, United Kingdom
Tel: 44 (0) 161 874 2400
Email: duncanc@salltd.co.uk
Web: www.salltd.co.uk
Set Teknik A.S
Stands 49 & 50
Merkez: Kaysdag Cd. Smbl Sk.
Smbl Apt. No:3/1 34750,
Kkbakkalky - Kadky, Istanbul
Tel: 0090 216 577 51 05
Email: erdalgullu@set-ltd.com.tr
Web: www.set-ltd.com.tr
SICK
Stands 7 & 8
Bayraktar Bulvari No 23, 34775,
Serifali - Umraniye, Istanbul
Tel: 0090 216 528 5000
Email: mevluto@sick.com.tr
Signal Group Ltd
Stand 37
Standards House, 12 Doman Road,
Camberley, Surrey, GU15 3DF
Tel: 01276 682841
Email: zahid.salim@signal-group.com
Tecora
Stand 13
Via Alessandro Volta 22, 20094,
Corsico, Milan, Italy
Tel: 0039 024 5055 0208
Email: margherita.vitariello@tecora.com
Web: www.tecora.it
Tekran Instruments Corporation
Stand 2
230 Tech Center Drive, Knoxville,
TN, 37912, Canada
Tel: 001 865 688 0688
Web: www.tekran.com
Tesla Measurement Conrol Sys.
and Environmenta Tech.Co. Ltd
Stand 27
Yenisehir Mah.Battal Gazi Sk. No.2/3
Istanbul, Atasehir, Turkey
Tel: 009 0216 364 02 79
Email: osman.sirmali@teslakontrol.com
Web: www.teslakontrol.com
Testo Elektronik ve Test lm
Cihazlar Ds Tic. Ltd. Sti.
Stand 9
Fulya Mah. Vefa Deresi Sok.
Gayrettepe Is Merk.
C-Blok No:5/1 D:2-3-4-5
Sisli, Istanbul, 34394, Turkey
Tel: 9021 122 170 155
Email: infotesto@testo.com.tr
Web: www.testo.com.tr
The Linde Group
Stand 38
Seitnerstr, 82049, Munich, Germany
Tel: 0049 897 446 1661
Email: hiq@linde-gas.com
Turnkey Instruments Ltd
Stand 41
1-2 Dalby Court, Gadbrook Business Centre,
Northwich, CW9 7TN
Tel: 01606 330020
E: dave.brooks@turnkey-instruments.com
TV Rheinland Energie
und Umwelt GmbH
Stand 42
Am Grauen Stein, Cologne
NRW, 51105, Germany
Tel: 0049 221 806 5200
Email: teu-service@de.tuv.com
Web: www.tuv.com
16
014 - 016 Company Profiles.indd 16 24/04/2014 16:25
HiQ

ISO accredited calibration gas mixtures support a clean environment and


a sustainable future.
HiQ

Precision matters in everything we do.


Linde AG
Linde Gases Division, Seitnerstrasse 70, 82049 Pullach, Germany
Phone +49.89.7446-1661, hiq@linde-gas.com, http://hiq.linde-gas.com
HiQ

is a registered trademark of The Linde Group.


Maximum precision
for quantiable success.
CEM IBC.indd 1 24/04/2014 16:22
Untitled-2 1 4/14/14 6:19 PM
CEM OBC.indd 1 24/04/2014 16:23

You might also like