1. Comparative analysis of all cut to length line in tata ryerson
Limited. Parameters may be:- (a)Idle time of all machines causes (lac! of supply "aterials should also be considered) (b)Processing time vs. production (c)#o of manpo$er involvement (d)Production vs. re%ection &ty ratio '' (eparately for high lo$ end lines )."achine configuration related issue:- (a)Positional advantage (for e*ample:-shear before Leveller) (b)Interfacing issues (not manufacture base) (c) (crap+re%ected sheet handling ,.-uality control:- (a)"ar!ing of particular machine +material as a (cratch source (for e*ample:- nylon roll.hylum sheet on shear ) (b) /iagonal difference and its sources remedy. (c) Leveller gap ad%ustment flatness control (d) (hear blade gap ad%ustment and bar control (e) Length variation issues and control (If any -IP $e had done so far) 0."aintenance approach:- (a)/etails of recurrent non recurrent fault. it s sources. e*ecution time analysis consistent solution. (b)Preferred ma!es of all spare parts (c)PLC configuration issue:- If there any need of spare i+p 1+p then #os+percentage. If ne$ items have to include li!e uncoiler bac! tension control etc etc. (d) (ervice support rating of all manufacturers. (e) "achine capacity+production 2s Po$er consumption details (f) Chec! list driven maintenance for recurrent faults in hydraulics. pneumatic electrical drive.
Prepared By:- Saraswata Palit 3.(egregation pac!aging :- (a) Comparison in pac!aging time (b) Comparison in pac!aging cost (c) Comparison in re%ected pac!aging materials and its handling (d) 4mount of manpo$er involved vs. amount of material pac!aged. 5.Customer focusing:- (a) 1rder vs. delivery time (b) -uality complains against each machine in 6ata 7yerson 8.2ariable cost estimation and control 9.Comparative study on material handling time :.Inclusion of ne$ technology in 6ata ryerson practices:- "agnetic stac!er. flying die shear
(the Lean Guidebook Series) Mascitelli, Ronald_ Mascitelli, Ronald-The Lean Design Guidebook _ Everything Your Product Development Team Needs to Slash Manufacturing Cost-Technology Perspectives (2004)