Increased awareness about using a highly technical process called hydraulic fracturing to recover natural gas trapped deep within the Marcellus shale has created questions about related human-health and environmental impacts. Associated arguments, both pro and con, have often been subjective, emotional and unscientific. This publication by the American Council on Science and Health is aimed at a systematic, objective review of documented types and rates of hydrofracturing-fluid-and chemical-related incidents affecting human health, to date, in the region of the Marcellus Shale Play.
Increased awareness about using a highly technical process called hydraulic fracturing to recover natural gas trapped deep within the Marcellus shale has created questions about related human-health and environmental impacts. Associated arguments, both pro and con, have often been subjective, emotional and unscientific. This publication by the American Council on Science and Health is aimed at a systematic, objective review of documented types and rates of hydrofracturing-fluid-and chemical-related incidents affecting human health, to date, in the region of the Marcellus Shale Play.
Increased awareness about using a highly technical process called hydraulic fracturing to recover natural gas trapped deep within the Marcellus shale has created questions about related human-health and environmental impacts. Associated arguments, both pro and con, have often been subjective, emotional and unscientific. This publication by the American Council on Science and Health is aimed at a systematic, objective review of documented types and rates of hydrofracturing-fluid-and chemical-related incidents affecting human health, to date, in the region of the Marcellus Shale Play.
!"# %&'#(!')'& )*&!% *+,-! !"#$%&'( !#$*+ ,+- !&$*&.' Water, Health and the Environment !"#$% "' ($)*(++* ,-./-01 '")2%+$* 34$35+ #3*6 *(#'' 1ames E. Enstrom, Ph.D., M.P.H. University oI CaliIornia, Los Angeles Thom Golab Media Research Center Herbert I. London, Ph.D. London Center Ior Policy Research Stephen Modzelewski Maple Engine LLC Paul A. Offit, M.D. Children`s Hospital oI Philadelphia Fred L. Smith, 1r. Competitive Enterprise Institute Daniel T. Stein, M.D. Albert Einstein College oI Medicine 37890.8: Robert L. Brent, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc. (Hon) Thomas JeIIerson University / A. I. duPontHospital Ior Children ;9<- 37890.8: Nigel Bark, M.D. Albert Einstein College oI Medicine =0-19>-:? Elizabeth M. Whelan, Sc.D., M.P.H. President, ACSH 1osh Bloom, Ph.D. Director oI Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Ruth Kava, Ph.D., R.D. Senior Fellow in Nutrition Erik Lief Director oI Communications Ana Marcelo Executive Assistant to the President Cheryl Martin Associate Director and Director oI Development William McCain Development Associate Gilbert Ross, M.D. Executive and Medical Director Ariel Savransky Associate Director oI Public Health Ana Simovska Director oI Video Productions Richard Weeks, CPA Accountant Elizabeth M. Whelan, Sc.D., M.P.H. President, ACSH Norman E. Borlaug, Ph.D. (1914-2009) (Years oI Service to ACSH: 1978-2009) Father oI the 'Green Revolution Nobel Laureate Fredrick 1. Stare, M.D., Ph.D. (1910-2002) (Years oI Service to ACSH: 1978-2002) Founder, Harvard Department oI Nutrition This publication was adapted by Dr. Josh Bloom, Director oI Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, ACSH. It is based on the peer-reviewed book Hvdraulic Fracturing in the Marcellus Shale. Water and Health, Facts vs. Fiction (ISBN, 978-0-9910055-1-2) written Ior ACSH by Dr. Theodore F. Them and the respective annotated summary book, Fracking and Health. Facts vs. Fiction (ISBN 978-0-9910055-2-9) edited by William Kucewicz. To purchase copies oI the related books visit Amazon.com; To view them online visit ACSH.org. For more general inIormation contact ACSH. |I Ik| 1IkI |kM Ik| /M|kl|/N |JN|l| N 1|l|N|| /NJ k|/|Ik Wk/I l1 |k/|KlN! Short Ior hydraulic Iracturing (HF), Iracking is a method oI using a Iluid mixture at high pressures to release natural gas95 percent oI which is methanethat is trapped deep in underground shale deposits. Shale is a type oI rock that contains mud, clay, quartz, and other minerals. Depending on its exact composition, shale has diIIering degrees oI hardness and porosity, and these properties determine the particular Iracking method used to extract the gas. The U.S. has enormous quantities oI 'shale gas trapped in deposits throughout the country. Not only would obtaining this gas minimize our dependence on oilIoreign or otherwise but it also provides an opportunity to signiIicantly reduce air pollution. Natural gas is easily the cleanest burning Iuel available. The combustion products oI methane gaswhich itselI is colorless and odorlessare water and carbon dioxide. No soot, Iumes, or smog are Iormed. Although some minor technical and logistical issues could be improved (Ior example, more eIIicient recovery oI Iracking Iluid, managing unrecovered Iluid, and minimizing the disrup- tion in drilling localities), these obstacles can be overcome, and they pale in comparison to the enormous beneIits oI harnessing and utilizing these valuable natural gas resources. In Iact, the industry has employed enormous scientiIic and engineering resources to overcome these important challenges, since saIety is proIoundly important to the HF process. / Jkl|| kl1IkI Although Iracking has received a huge amount oI news coverage in recent years, the concept oI exploring Ior natural gas itselI is hardly new. The Iirst well intended to speciIically provide natural gas was built in Fredonia, NY in 1821. Drilling in Pennsylvania and Ohio began shortly thereaIter, and by the 1920s West Virginia, Indiana, and Kentucky, where the largest gas deposits in the world are Iound, Iollowed. By the mid-1930s it became apparent that enormous amounts oI gas were trapped in shale; however, Iracturing the shale was required to liberate the gas. This was done primarily by use oI explosives, which was Iar Irom an ideal method. By the late 1940s, explosives were gradually phased out and replaced by the use oI high-pressure liquids. This set the stage Ior the large-scale production oI natural gas that continues today. kW J|1 lI WkK! The concept behind Iracking is rather simple. A vertical well is drilled down, The average depth oI a deep shale gas well is about 7,500 Ieet. As drilling progresses, steel casings are cemented to the sides oI the well to prevent the Iracking Iluid and natural gas Irom entering groundwater. Then horizontal underground drilling begins, which greatly increases the amount oI gas than can be obtained. Following drilling, a mixture oI water, 'proppants (usually sand), and certain chemicals is injected under high pressure into the rock. This causes Iractures in the rock and allows the gas to escape. The Iunction oI the proppants is to keep the Iractures open. WkI l1 lI 1 |NIk\|k1l/| NW! It is ironic that some oI the same environmental groups that were calling Ior a wider use oI natural gas not that long ago are now leading the Iight against it. Yet, while their concerns are primarily based on the theoretical adverse health eIIects Irom contamination oI groundwater, virtually all oI their claims are baseless. Additionally, as is so oIten true in the United States, celebrities, despite having little or no knowledge oI subjects they become involved with, nonetheless have a lot to say and attract a large audience oI listeners. Moreover, it is not uncommon Ior their protestations to be based on selI-interest. For instance, Yoko Ono and her son Sean Lennon Iormed a group called Artists Against Fracking when she became concerned that Iracking might impact her Iarm in upstate New York. At the time, Ms. Ono said, 'Fracking kills, and it doesn`t just kill us. It kills the land, nature, and, eventually, the whole world. Artists Against Fracking now has over 200 celebrity members and is partially responsible Ior exerting pressure on New York`s Governor Cuomo to ban Iracking in New York State, which contains huge shale gas reserves in the Marcellus Shale near the Pennsylvania border. Propaganda, which is easily spread on the Internet, also plays a big role in inIluencing public opinion. There is no better example than the 2010 documentary 'Gasland by Josh Fox, which contains a scene in which tap water in a home is ignited with a match. Ingenious, but grossly misleading, it created an indelible image oI water pollution and hidden health hazards. It was later revealed that the methane in question came Irom a private well and was biogenic (Iormed Irom decomposition oI organic matter) and had nothing to do with Iracking whatsoever. The presence oI methane in water wells is common and widespread. For example, methane is Iound in 15 percent oI water wells in upstate New York where no Iracking is being done. Scare tactics are a highly eIIective method oI inIluencing and manipulating public opinion, and this case is no exception. J|1 |k/|KlN |1| /NI J/N|k I kJM/N k|/|Ik! II one looks beyond the hype and scare tactics, there is no credible evidence that there has been any adverse impact oI Iracking on human health. Both the Iederal EPA and its counterpart agencies in individual states where Iracking is employed have extensively studied this issue. Many oI the reports, investigations, and studies on the health impact oI Iracking arise Irom reported incidents in the Marcellus Shalean enormous sedimentary basin that spans nine states in the eastern US. Active drilling is currently ongoing in Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. There have been no oIIicially documented adverse human-health events in Ohio and West Virginia, even with hundreds oI wells already having been drilled there. In Pennsylvania, more than 10,000 wells have been drilled since 2008, and while there have been 40 reported environ- mental incidents that triggered an EPA review, none oI these has risen to the level oI adverse impact on human health. Furthermore, the Pennsylvania Department oI Environmental Protection has been actively investigating claims oI alleged contamination oI water supplies Irom Iracking. OI the 973 complaints that were investigated, none were Iound to be a result oI the Iracturing oI the shale. However, 156 incidents, such as surIace spills were veriIied, but these types oI problems may occur during any gas or oil drilling operation, and were not related to the Iracking process itselI. It is important to note that the diIIerence in depth oI water and Iracking wells provides a natural saIety barrier. While aquiIers are Iound no more than 300 Ieet Irom the surIace, Iracking wells are between one and two miles below this, making the possibility oI intermingling oI Iracking Iluid and ground water very unlikely. It is impossible to say that anything is completely saIe, however, to-date, there is still not one conIirmed case oI contaminated water due to Iracking. Wk/I /k| Ik| J|N||lI1 | |k/|KlN! The beneIits oI Iracking are economic, and paradoxically environmental. In the past decade, the US has increased its production oI all natural gas by 34 percent, and is now the leading producer in the world. Much oI this can be attributed to the quadrupling oI shale gas produced by Iracking between 2004 and 2009. Consequently, since 2007, US imports oI natural gas have been cut by halI, and account Ior only 8 percent oI all natural gas usage in the country. Virtually overnight, exploitation oI our natural gas resources has radically transIormed America`s tenuous position Irom being alarmingly dependent on imported Ioreign oil to being the world`s largest producer oI natural gas. As such, the US is predicted to pass Saudi Arabia as the top-producing petroleum and gas producer in the world by 2017, and is predicted to become energy independent by 2020. As a result, natural gas prices have dropped, saving America an estimated $100 billion in 2011 alone. More than halI oI the states in the nation have joined the 'Iracking revolution. The resulting eIIect on the economy is predictable: approximately 900,000 jobs (both directly and indirectly attributed to Iracking) were created in 2012, and this number is predicted to rise to 1.5 million by 2020. Environmentally, the use oI natural gas is enormously beneIi- cial. Replacing combustible energy sources such as coal and oil with natural gas will have a proIound eIIect on air quality. While anti-Iracking groups Iocus only on theoretical health risks oI water contamination, they Iail to take into account the beneIits oI a much more cleanly burning Iuel. All Iorms oI energy have risks and beneIits, so the Iailure to consider both can only lead to Ilawed conclusions and bad public policy. J|1 |k/|KlN k/kM Ik| |N\lkNM|NI! By Iar, the greatest concern oI those who Iear and oppose Iracking is that it will lead to widespread water pollution. Yet the Iacts reveal that there is no documentation that Iracking causes water pollution. OI the components used in the Iracking process, 90 percent is water. OI the remainder, 9 percent is proppant, and about one percent oI the mixture consists oI chemical additives (see illustration). These Iunction in important ways, Ior example as Iriction reducers, biocides to prevent bacterial development, and scale inhibitors. Almost all oI these chemicals are Iound in commonly used household and consumer products. Some examples include: isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol), borates (in laundry detergents), ammonium persulIate (bleaching agent used in detergents and hair coloring), citric acid (Irom Iruit), and mineral oil (Iound in candy, laxatives, and makeup removers). Recycling oI Iracking Iluid is a major Iocus oI the industry. The current recovery rate ranges Irom 20 to 90 percent, depending on location. The industry goal is to recover and reuse 90 percent oI all Iluid. The possibility oI earthquakes resulting Irom Iracking has also generated many Ialse scares. However, the data do not support this Iear. In Iact, other human activities, such as building dams and mining, have resulted in virtually all oI the quakes. OI the 198 reported man-made quakes since 1929, only three were attributed to Iracking and these were barely strong enough to be Ielt by humans. Even the seismic activity is largely a consequence oI deep disposal oI waste water, not a direct result oI the Iracking process per se. More recycling oI waste water would help reduce any such problems; improved methods Ior this are being developed. Ik| |JIJk| | |k/|KlN - Wk/I'1 Ik| JIIM |lN|! In 1973, in response to the Yom Kippur War, OPEC retaliated by announcing an embargo against the US and several allies, resulting in the quadrupling oI oil prices within a six-month period. And anyone who owned a car in 1979 will no doubt recall the gasoline shortagea result oI the Iranian revolutionthat resulted in rationing, long lines, and a spike in the price oI gasoline. It became clear that America was highly vulnerable to geopolitical events because oI its reliance on other countries to meet its energy needs. But by the early 2000s, the tide began to turn as America began to harvest its own Iuel in suIIicient quantities. We are on our way to being energy independentsomething that was unimaginable a Iew decades ago. Fracking has provided the means to saIely harvest huge amounts oI natural gas, a key source oI energy Ior the Iuture. The U.S. will beneIit in multiple ways, both economically and environmentally Irom this previously underused, inexpensive, clean source oI energy. It would be quite unIortunate to let unIounded health scares propagated by anti-Iracking groups derail this important advance toward energy independence in the United States. !"#$%& ()*+,- .#/$%& )*01- !"#$& )*2)- %&'()'&& )*))))3- %("*'&#"#$'+%#,"#$'& )*)+)- -,&&,.#,/ 1/2#3#*,&& )*)))3- 4&#"*#,/ 5'$6"'&& )*)(- 7'88#/9 !9'/*& )*))4- 1&,/ -,/*&,8& )*)+)- :"(8' 1/2#3#*,&& )*)+- :6&*("*(/*& )*4)- 5%677"8#& (*44- \l1lI J1 /I WWW./|1k.k !"# %&'#(!')'& )*&!% *+,-! Wk/I l1 |k/|KlN! Short Ior hydraulic Iracturing (HF), Iracking is a method oI using a Iluid mixture at high pressures to release natural gas95 percent oI which is methanethat is trapped deep in underground shale deposits. Shale is a type oI rock that contains mud, clay, quartz, and other minerals. Depending on its exact composition, shale has diIIering degrees oI hardness and porosity, and these properties determine the particular Iracking method used to extract the gas. The U.S. has enormous quantities oI 'shale gas trapped in deposits throughout the country. Not only would obtaining this gas minimize our dependence on oilIoreign or otherwise but it also provides an opportunity to signiIicantly reduce air pollution. Natural gas is easily the cleanest burning Iuel available. The combustion products oI methane gaswhich itselI is colorless and odorlessare water and carbon dioxide. No soot, Iumes, or smog are Iormed. Although some minor technical and logistical issues could be improved (Ior example, more eIIicient recovery oI Iracking Iluid, managing unrecovered Iluid, and minimizing the disrup- tion in drilling localities), these obstacles can be overcome, and they pale in comparison to the enormous beneIits oI harnessing and utilizing these valuable natural gas resources. In Iact, the industry has employed enormous scientiIic and engineering resources to overcome these important challenges, since saIety is proIoundly important to the HF process. / Jkl|| kl1IkI Although Iracking has received a huge amount oI news coverage in recent years, the concept oI exploring Ior natural gas itselI is hardly new. The Iirst well intended to speciIically provide natural gas was built in Fredonia, NY in 1821. Drilling in Pennsylvania and Ohio began shortly thereaIter, and by the 1920s West Virginia, Indiana, and Kentucky, where the largest gas deposits in the world are Iound, Iollowed. By the mid-1930s it became apparent that enormous amounts oI gas were trapped in shale; however, Iracturing the shale was required to liberate the gas. This was done primarily by use oI explosives, which was Iar Irom an ideal method. By the late 1940s, explosives were gradually phased out and replaced by the use oI high-pressure liquids. This set the stage Ior the large-scale production oI natural gas that continues today. kW J|1 lI WkK! The concept behind Iracking is rather simple. A vertical well is drilled down, The average depth oI a deep shale gas well is about 7,500 Ieet. As drilling progresses, steel casings are cemented to the sides oI the well to prevent the Iracking Iluid and natural gas Irom entering groundwater. Then horizontal underground drilling begins, which greatly increases the amount oI gas than can be obtained. Following drilling, a mixture oI water, 'proppants (usually sand), and certain chemicals is injected under high pressure into the rock. This causes Iractures in the rock and allows the gas to escape. The Iunction oI the proppants is to keep the Iractures open. WkI l1 lI 1 |NIk\|k1l/| NW! It is ironic that some oI the same environmental groups that were calling Ior a wider use oI natural gas not that long ago are now leading the Iight against it. Yet, while their concerns are primarily based on the theoretical adverse health eIIects Irom contamination oI groundwater, virtually all oI their claims are baseless. Additionally, as is so oIten true in the United States, celebrities, despite having little or no knowledge oI subjects they become involved with, nonetheless have a lot to say and attract a large audience oI listeners. Moreover, it is not uncommon Ior their protestations to be based on selI-interest. For instance, Yoko Ono and her son Sean Lennon Iormed a group called Artists Against Fracking when she became concerned that Iracking might impact her Iarm in upstate New York. At the time, Ms. Ono said, 'Fracking kills, and it doesn`t just kill us. It kills the land, nature, and, eventually, the whole world. Artists Against Fracking now has over 200 celebrity members and is partially responsible Ior exerting pressure on New York`s Governor Cuomo to ban Iracking in New York State, which contains huge shale gas reserves in the Marcellus Shale near the Pennsylvania border. Propaganda, which is easily spread on the Internet, also plays a big role in inIluencing public opinion. There is no better example than the 2010 documentary 'Gasland by Josh Fox, which contains a scene in which tap water in a home is ignited with a match. Ingenious, but grossly misleading, it created an indelible image oI water pollution and hidden health hazards. It was later revealed that the methane in question came Irom a private well and was biogenic (Iormed Irom decomposition oI organic matter) and had nothing to do with Iracking whatsoever. The presence oI methane in water wells is common and widespread. For example, methane is Iound in 15 percent oI water wells in upstate New York where no Iracking is being done. Scare tactics are a highly eIIective method oI inIluencing and manipulating public opinion, and this case is no exception. J|1 |k/|KlN |1| /NI J/N|k I kJM/N k|/|Ik! II one looks beyond the hype and scare tactics, there is no credible evidence that there has been any adverse impact oI Iracking on human health. Both the Iederal EPA and its counterpart agencies in individual states where Iracking is employed have extensively studied this issue. Many oI the reports, investigations, and studies on the health impact oI Iracking arise Irom reported incidents in the Marcellus Shalean enormous sedimentary basin that spans nine states in the eastern US. Active drilling is currently ongoing in Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. There have been no oIIicially documented adverse human-health events in Ohio and West Virginia, even with hundreds oI wells already having been drilled there. In Pennsylvania, more than 10,000 wells have been drilled since 2008, and while there have been 40 reported environ- mental incidents that triggered an EPA review, none oI these has risen to the level oI adverse impact on human health. Furthermore, the Pennsylvania Department oI Environmental Protection has been actively investigating claims oI alleged contamination oI water supplies Irom Iracking. OI the 973 complaints that were investigated, none were Iound to be a result oI the Iracturing oI the shale. However, 156 incidents, such as surIace spills were veriIied, but these types oI problems may occur during any gas or oil drilling operation, and were not related to the Iracking process itselI. It is important to note that the diIIerence in depth oI water and Iracking wells provides a natural saIety barrier. While aquiIers are Iound no more than 300 Ieet Irom the surIace, Iracking wells are between one and two miles below this, making the possibility oI intermingling oI Iracking Iluid and ground water very unlikely. It is impossible to say that anything is completely saIe, however, to-date, there is still not one conIirmed case oI contaminated water due to Iracking. Wk/I /k| Ik| J|N||lI1 | |k/|KlN! The beneIits oI Iracking are economic, and paradoxically environmental. In the past decade, the US has increased its production oI all natural gas by 34 percent, and is now the leading producer in the world. Much oI this can be attributed to the quadrupling oI shale gas produced by Iracking between 2004 and 2009. Consequently, since 2007, US imports oI natural gas have been cut by halI, and account Ior only 8 percent oI all natural gas usage in the country. Virtually overnight, exploitation oI our natural gas resources has radically transIormed America`s tenuous position Irom being alarmingly dependent on imported Ioreign oil to being the world`s largest producer oI natural gas. As such, the US is predicted to pass Saudi Arabia as the top-producing petroleum and gas producer in the world by 2017, and is predicted to become energy independent by 2020. As a result, natural gas prices have dropped, saving America an estimated $100 billion in 2011 alone. More than halI oI the states in the nation have joined the 'Iracking revolution. The resulting eIIect on the economy is predictable: approximately 900,000 jobs (both directly and indirectly attributed to Iracking) were created in 2012, and this number is predicted to rise to 1.5 million by 2020. Environmentally, the use oI natural gas is enormously beneIi- cial. Replacing combustible energy sources such as coal and oil with natural gas will have a proIound eIIect on air quality. While anti-Iracking groups Iocus only on theoretical health risks oI water contamination, they Iail to take into account the beneIits oI a much more cleanly burning Iuel. All Iorms oI energy have risks and beneIits, so the Iailure to consider both can only lead to Ilawed conclusions and bad public policy. J|1 |k/|KlN k/kM Ik| |N\lkNM|NI! By Iar, the greatest concern oI those who Iear and oppose Iracking is that it will lead to widespread water pollution. Yet the Iacts reveal that there is no documentation that Iracking causes water pollution. OI the components used in the Iracking process, 90 percent is water. OI the remainder, 9 percent is proppant, and about one percent oI the mixture consists oI chemical additives (see illustration). These Iunction in important ways, Ior example as Iriction reducers, biocides to prevent bacterial development, and scale inhibitors. Almost all oI these chemicals are Iound in commonly used household and consumer products. Some examples include: isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol), borates (in laundry detergents), ammonium persulIate (bleaching agent used in detergents and hair coloring), citric acid (Irom Iruit), and mineral oil (Iound in candy, laxatives, and makeup removers). Recycling oI Iracking Iluid is a major Iocus oI the industry. The current recovery rate ranges Irom 20 to 90 percent, depending on location. The industry goal is to recover and reuse 90 percent oI all Iluid. The possibility oI earthquakes resulting Irom Iracking has also generated many Ialse scares. However, the data do not support this Iear. In Iact, other human activities, such as building dams and mining, have resulted in virtually all oI the quakes. OI the 198 reported man-made quakes since 1929, only three were attributed to Iracking and these were barely strong enough to be Ielt by humans. Even the seismic activity is largely a consequence oI deep disposal oI waste water, not a direct result oI the Iracking process per se. More recycling oI waste water would help reduce any such problems; improved methods Ior this are being developed. Ik| |JIJk| | |k/|KlN - Wk/I'1 Ik| JIIM |lN|! In 1973, in response to the Yom Kippur War, OPEC retaliated by announcing an embargo against the US and several allies, resulting in the quadrupling oI oil prices within a six-month period. And anyone who owned a car in 1979 will no doubt recall the gasoline shortagea result oI the Iranian revolutionthat resulted in rationing, long lines, and a spike in the price oI gasoline. It became clear that America was highly vulnerable to geopolitical events because oI its reliance on other countries to meet its energy needs. But by the early 2000s, the tide began to turn as America began to harvest its own Iuel in suIIicient quantities. We are on our way to being energy independentsomething that was unimaginable a Iew decades ago. Fracking has provided the means to saIely harvest huge amounts oI natural gas, a key source oI energy Ior the Iuture. The U.S. will beneIit in multiple ways, both economically and environmentally Irom this previously underused, inexpensive, clean source oI energy. It would be quite unIortunate to let unIounded health scares propagated by anti-Iracking groups derail this important advance toward energy independence in the United States. been cut by halI, and account Ior only 8 percent oI all natural gas usage in the country. Virtually overnight, exploitation oI our natural gas resources has radically transIormed America`s tenuous position Irom being alarmingly dependent on imported Ioreign oil to being the world`s largest producer oI natural gas. As such, the US is predicted to pass Saudi Arabia as the top-producing petroleum and gas producer in the world by 2017, and is predicted to become energy independent by 2020. As a result, natural gas prices have dropped, saving America an estimated $100 billion in 2011 alone. More than halI oI the states in the nation have joined the 'Iracking revolution. The resulting eIIect on the economy is predictable: approximately 900,000 jobs (both directly and indirectly attributed to Iracking) were created in 2012, and this number is predicted to rise to 1.5 million by 2020. Environmentally, the use oI natural gas is enormously beneIi- cial. Replacing combustible energy sources such as coal and oil with natural gas will have a proIound eIIect on air quality. While anti-Iracking groups Iocus only on theoretical health risks oI water contamination, they Iail to take into account the beneIits oI a much more cleanly burning Iuel. All Iorms oI energy have risks and beneIits, so the Iailure to consider both can only lead to Ilawed conclusions and bad public policy. %"+* '$#3@42A 6#$, (6+ +2;4$"2,+2(B By Iar, the greatest concern oI those who Iear and oppose Iracking is that it will lead to widespread water pollution. Yet the Iacts reveal that there is no documentation that Iracking causes water pollution. OI the components used in the Iracking process, 90 percent is water. OI the remainder, 9 percent is proppant, and about one percent oI the mixture consists oI chemical additives (see illustration). These Iunction in important ways, Ior example as Iriction reducers, biocides to prevent bacterial development, and scale inhibitors. Almost all oI these chemicals are Iound in commonly used household and consumer products. Some examples include: isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol), borates (in laundry detergents), ammonium persulIate (bleaching agent used in detergents and hair coloring), citric acid (Irom Iruit), and mineral oil (Iound in candy, laxatives, and makeup removers). Recycling oI Iracking Iluid is a major Iocus oI the industry. The current recovery rate ranges Irom 20 to 90 percent, depending on location. The industry goal is to recover and reuse 90 percent oI all Iluid. The possibility oI earthquakes resulting Irom Iracking has also generated many Ialse scares. However, the data do not support this Iear. In Iact, other human activities, such as building dams and mining, have resulted in virtually all oI the quakes. OI the 198 reported man-made quakes since 1929, only three were attributed to Iracking and these were barely strong enough to be Ielt by humans. Even the seismic activity is largely a consequence oI deep disposal oI waste water, not a direct result oI the Iracking process per se. More recycling oI waste water would help reduce any such problems; improved methods Ior this are being developed. (6+ ')()$+ "' '$#3@42A C D6#(E* (6+ !"((", 542+B In 1973, in response to the Yom Kippur War, OPEC retaliated by announcing an embargo against the US and several allies, resulting in the quadrupling oI oil prices within a six-month period. And anyone who owned a car in 1979 will no doubt recall the gasoline shortagea result oI the Iranian revolutionthat resulted in rationing, long lines, and a spike in the price oI gasoline. It became clear that America was highly vulnerable to geopolitical events because oI its reliance on other countries to meet its energy needs. But by the early 2000s, the tide began to turn as America began to harvest its own Iuel in suIIicient quantities. We are on our way to being energy independentsomething that was unimaginable a Iew decades ago. Fracking has provided the means to saIely harvest huge amounts oI natural gas, a key source oI energy Ior the Iuture. The U.S. will beneIit in multiple ways, both economically and environmentally Irom this previously underused, inexpensive, clean source oI energy. It would be quite unIortunate to let unIounded health scares propagated by anti-Iracking groups derail this important advance toward energy independence in the United States.