Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
Waves
To be covered:
Superposition of oscillations
2. Mechanics introduction
Goals:
5. Many-particle systems
7. Interference
8. Diraction (qualitative treatment)
1.1
k
m
E =T +V =
1
1
mx2 + x2
2
2
(1)
Figure 2
show that
a2 = a2 + a2 + 2a1 a2 cos(1 2 )
r
1
2
Figure 1
tan(r ) =
this can also be written as:
x = A cos(t) + B sin(T )
a1 sin(1 ) + a2 sin(2 )
a1 cos(1 ) + a2 cos(2 )
(2)
xr = 2a cos
1.3
1.2
Superposition of Oscillations
1 + 2
.t cos
2
1 2
.t
2
Coupled Pendula
Systems are often subject to more than one excitation. For a linear system, displacement is the combination of the corresponding Simple Harmonic Motions (although some complex or heavily driven systems are not in linear response). The total response
under two excitations has the form:
Ex 1.3
Write down the coupled equations of motion of each
pendulum. Denote the displacements of the bobs as
xr = x1 +x2 = a1 cos(1 t+1 )+a2 cos(2 t+2 ) (3) x, y.
Ex 1.1
2
Ex 1.4
Show that the coupled motion reduces to Simple Harmonic Motion in the coordinates:
X = x + y; Y = x y
For this combined oscillation, each mode acts
like an independent oscillator with its own frequency.
Note that the energy is transferred between the pendulums over time, but not between the modes. The
combined motion (for our tuned system) is subject
to beating. The frequency of each pendulum is the
average of the pendulum, and the spring natural frequency is modulated. This works because we tuned
the spring and pendulum constants to be close.
1.4
Figure 3
Normal Modes
Figure 5
E = EX + EY = [X 2 + 0 X 2 + Y 2 + s Y 2 ]
2
In general, each excited mode contributes independently to the total energy of the system.
Ex 1.5
What are the normal modes of vibration of the CO2
molecule?
1.6
Another Example:
Pendula
(d) (2 marks)
Describe an experimental technique that could
be used to directly measure the normal mode
frequencies.
1.7
Large N Systems
Figure 7
Ex 1.6
Show that the transverse restoring force on the nth
mass is given by:
Figure 6
T
(yn1 2yn + yn+1 )
yn =
(a) (3 marks)
md
Explain briey what is meant by a normal mode of
The system comprises of a set of N coupled oscila vibrating system, and sketch the normal modes of
lators
the double pendulum.
T
(b) (5 marks)
0 =
md
Using the small angle approximation, and noting that
We expect to nd N normal models with N
the masses are subject to forces both due to gravity
and the tension in the rods, show that the coupled normal frequencies
equations of motion of the two masses can be written
j
as:
j =
N +1
1 = g (21 2 ) 1 + 2 = g 2
Ex 1.7
l
l
What are the modes of the system for N = 2
(c) (6 marks) The normal coordinates of the system Ex 1.8
have the general form:
Show that for large N, the behaviour of the system
is described by
1 + k2
an = C sin(nj )
Where k has a dierent value for each mode. By
2
2
j = 20 (1 cos j )
writing down the most general equation of motion of
4
1.9
Systems with large N will have a minimum frequency where all are in phase (Fig. 8)
Waves in 3D
Figure 8
(x, t) = Aei(kxt)
and a maximum frequency with alternating phases
(Fig. 9)
where k is the wave number, related to wavelength
by k = 2 such that v =
k
In 2D and 3D, we can replace the wave number by
a wave vector:
(x, y) = Aeik .r t
Figure 9
for plane waves, the wave vector points in the direction of propagation and has magnitude,
1.8
2
2
2
|k | = (kx + ky + kz )
2 y(x,y)
t2
yr1 y(x x, t)
Ex 1.9
Show that these replacements lead to
1 2
v 2 t2
2 y
T 2 y
=
t
x2
(4)
2
2
x2
+ y2 + z2
1.10
Summary
Oscillations:
Very general behaviour of a wide range of physical systems
Superposition of close-frequency oscillations can
lead to beating
Normal modes:
Systems of coupled oscillators can undergo complicated motions
These are always separable into independent
normal modes of oscillation
The number of normal modes depends on the
number of degrees of freedom
For very large d.o.f. we obtain characteristic behaviour
Wave motion:
The limiting case of coupled oscillators, for a
continuous medium
Arbitrary waves can propagate in 1D, 2D and
3D media
Often useful to build up arbitrary waves from
plane spherical, harmonic waves
3D spherical waves obey the inverse-square law
Mechanics
2.2
Vector Operators
Overview
To be covered:
Energy
Angular momentum
Conserved quantities
dr
i+ j+ k
x
y
z
2.1
2.3
Vectors
We are used to working in the Right Handed orIn physics we often deal with vector quantities. Vec- thonormal Cartesian basis - The unit basis vectors
tor quantities have both a direction and magnitude are all at right angles and xed in space. This does
and are independent of the coordinate system used - not generally apply.
this means that we can choose the coordinate system
that is most convenient to make calculations in.
Other useful coordinate systems are:
There are a number of well dened transformations
Cylindrical polar coordinates with basis vectors
that apply to the components when we change
z
between these coordinate systems.
{r , In this system, basis vectors are instan, }.
taneously at right angles, but not xed
Some familiar vectors are the displacement, veloc Spherical polar coordinates with basis vectors
dr
d2 r
ity and acceleration: r ; v dt r ; a dt2 r .
{r , } where the basis vectors are neither at
,
Later we will also deal with force, momentum,
right angles or xed
angular momentum, angular velocity, torque etc.
Ex 2.1
show that a particles general velocity in 2D polar
Scalars(no direction) Vectors(1 direction)
2.4
Newtons Laws
2.6
F , or equivalently F = ma
Angular Momentum
Law 3: Action and reaction are equal and opposite The angular momentum about the origin of a
For two particles, i and j, acting upon each other
via a force F ji = F ij . This immediately im- particle is dened as L = r p = r mr which is a
vector quantity.
plies the conservation of total momentum.
2.5
Energy
2
The potential energy is due to the position of a An extended body has rotational kinetic energy
particle, F (x) = V (x ). If there is no dependence distinct from its linear motion as we will see later.
2.7
Summary
Physical quantities are often vectors
Which we can manipulate according to welldened rules
Not tied to a single coordinate system, they have
a reality of their own
Newtons Laws
1. Inertial systems exist, and observers will agree
on the dynamics in them
2. Particle motion is governed by forces, which may
be conservative
3. Momentum is conserved when particles interact
Energy
The kinetic energy of a particle depends only on
its velocity
Central Forces
3.2
Keplers Laws
Overview
To be Covered
The nature of central forces
Goals:
Understand the general applicability of central
force motion
Be able to perform calculations on orbits and
scattering
Understand how an eective potential can be
used to model a system
Figure 11
3.3
Central Forces
Examples of non-central forces include the magnetic force and, in general, any force depending upon
velocity such as friction, air resistance etc.
3.4
Figure 10
(6)
3.5
Ex 3.3
In general, the motion is in a xed plane. This Show that this is the case.
reduces our 3D problem to a 2D one. The orbit is
dened in the plane by scalar variables r and .
We have therefore made the two-body, 3D central
force problem into a single body, 2D problem. UnforSince the force is conservative, the energy is a con- tunately there is no such short-cut for the three-body
stant that uctuates between kinetic and potential problem.
energy, depending on r. We can check this formally
by showing that
F = 0. The motion is gov3.7 Energy Diagrams
erned by the nature of the associated potential, V (r).
The main features of this motion can be seen on an
Angular momentum is also conserved because energy diagram (Fig. 12) which shows the limits on
there is never any sideways force on the particle. the radial motion of the particle (V (r)
11
leqE and kinetic energy, T = 0 at these points). The 3.9 The Eective Potential
equilibrium points are at V (r) > 0 and are stable if
The angular momentum (a constant) of the orbiting
V (r) > 0
particle is given by:
l = rr = r2
Which means the Kinetic Energy can be written:
T =
Figure 12
3.8
1 2
1
1
1 l2
v = (r2 + r2 2 ) = r2 +
2
2
2
2 r2
E =T +V =
1 2 1 l2
r +
+ V (r)
2
2 r2
(8)
1 l2
+ Vcentral (r)
2 r2
(9)
1
k(x xmin )2
2
3.10
Figure 13
1 l2
k
+
2
2 r
r
E > 0: The body is free and can obtain an arbitrary radius (hyperbolic - > 1)
(Note, there is still a minimum radius imposed
by the centrifugal barrier potential for non-zero
l)
has
escape
velocity
r0
1 cos
l2
r0 =
|k|
r=
=
Ex 3.5
Calculate the Earths escape velocity
2El2
k 2
Ex 3.6
Comet is 0.5AU from sun at perihelion, and has
50km/s orbital speed; will it ever come back?
3.11
1+
Ex 3.7
A satellite orbiting the earth (2000kg) has maximum
and minimum distances from the surface of 4100km
and 1100km respectively.
What are its energy
and angular momentum? How fast is it going at
perigee(furthest point)?
The exact shape of the energy level diagram will depends on the relative size of terms (Fig. 14)
Ex 3.8
Try the orbit simulator at <http://www.ist.edu.
pk/upload/OrSim1.html>
Or try ying in orbit yourself (not easy): <http:
//orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk>
3.13
Figure 14
Law 2:
3.12
l = r2
13
2
direct consequence of the conservation of angular
momentum under a central force
Law 3: The period depends on the orbit major axis and a < 0 for hyperbolas).
?
See problems for this. Note that Keplers 3rd law
Ex 2.8.1
is not exact - T depends weakly on the planets Show that
mass
1
1
/2
!/2
GM
2r2
v =
1
Is this all physically realistic? Well, not really. The
r1
r1 + r2
sun and planets are not point-like, nor spherical or
1
/2
even of uniform density. The deviations from ellipGM
2r1
v =
[1
tical orbits are not large (though they are measurr2
r1 + r2
able), and become important for calculating satellite
orbits. In addition, there are more than two bodies
in the solar system. The presence of outer planets
was rst deduced from perturbations in the orbit of
Jupiter and Saturn. The overall is also not strictly
conservative, for example, comets can be captured
and destroyed.
3.14
/2
Orbital Manoeuvres
3.15
Inverse-Square Scattering
3. Change the velocity again after a time t to enter We now turn to the electrostatic case. For a negative
a circular orbit of radius r2
k, the problem is analogous to the gravitational case
(although it should be noted that in atoms E and l
In practise, nite accelerations mean that real
are quantised ). If k is positive however, we have a
orbits are less energy-ecient and take longer - big
have a repulsive force between the like charges. This
thrusters are good.
means that only a hyperbolic orbit is possible.
To work out the change in velocity, v, we need to
use the Vis Viva equation:
Central forces:
Act along the line of separation of two bodies /
particles
Are conservative
3.16
Rutherford Experiment
Two-body motion:
Ex 3.9
Show scattering angle related to impact parameter:
|k|
b = 2E0 cot 1
2
Ex 3.10
Try this out at <http://www2.biglobe.ne.jp/
~norimari/science/JavaApp/e-Scatter.html>
When we increase E0 , the impact parameter is
also decreased for a given angle. For faster (accelerated) alpha particles the inverse-square law breaks
down. Relativistic quantum mechanics is required
to understand this phenomena and is the basis of
modern particle physics.
Summary
15
Non-Inertial Frames
Overview
To be covered:
Transformations between reference frames
4.2
Fictitious forces
Goals:
Understand the nature of transformations between frames
Understand the equations of motion in a rotating
frame
Become familiar with the ideas of inertial equivalence and relativity
4.1
Inertial Frames
Figure 17
16
F f ict mA. These forces are not due to phys- 4.5 Tidal Forces
ical interactions, but account for the non-inertial
As distance is varied the gravitational force also
movement of the frame. They are real in the
changes. This leads to tidal forces on non-point-like
sense that you can detect and measure them. Note
bodies. The force is related to the dierential of force
that ctitious forces are always proportional to mass.
with distance: F tidal r13 .
The forces tend to change the shape of a exible body.
Ex 4.1
To the rst (and second) order, the volume of a uid
Evaluate furry dice (pendulum) in the frame of an
body remains constant however.
accelerating car.
Ex 4.2
Do the same for a cylinder on a moving platform.
Figure 18
4.4
Figure 19
4.6
v = rr+ r
r = ( r2 )r+ (r + 2r)
r
ence between acceleration and gravity (although you
can globally since gravitational elds vary with position). This is known as the equivalence principle and (Note that this is general, and has nothing to do
pursuing this idea leads to general relativity.
with rotating frames - the extra forces apparent here
17
4.8
Rotating Frames
i
j
b = bx + by + bz k
describe the inertial (Newtons 2nd Law) motion.
rot
rot
rot
When we change the radial distance or direction
such that
we implicitly alter the rotational speed.
db
dby
dbz
dbx
These same terms appear when we consider rotating
=
i +
j +
k
dt rot
dt rot
dt rot
dt rot
reference frames.
4.7
Angular Velocity
Ex 4.6
Show that the rate of change in an inertial frame
(since the rotating basis vectors themselves change
in
rot
around the x axis, then the same around the y
2
axis. Now return the object to its original orientation
Now transforming the acceleration we get:
and try rotating through the y axis followed by the
by: r = r . This applies to the physical rotation It points outwards from the rotation axis, dependant
of an extended body or to a point in a rotating frame upon speed and position. Since centrifugal force
18
The Foucault pendulum is a slow moving demonstration of the Coriolis eect. The plane of motion
of a simple pendulum rotates as the Earth moves
(i.e. it stays xed, whereas we dont)
Ex 4.7
Does a plumb line actually point towards the earths
centre? we actually measure g = g ( r ),
but note that the Earths solid surface is also not
horizontal.
Summary
Non-inertial frames
Newtons 2nd Law only applies directly in inertial
frames
Ex 4.8
What is the shape of the surface of a rotating liquid? Can you think of a practical application of this?
What is the water rotating with respect to?
4.10
Coriolis Force
aCoriolis = 2 v rot
4.11
Ex 4.9
Why will a falling object land to the east of where
you would expect?
19
Centrifugal force: acts outwards from axis, depends on position and velocity
Coriolis force: acts sideways to direction of
travel
Many important (and also unimportant) eects
depend on the Earths rotation
5.2
Centre of Mass
Overview
To be covered:
Ex 5.1
Translation and rotation of a system of particles Show that for the system P = F ext where P =
Angular momentum of a rigid body
Pi
Ex 5.2
Show that M R = P if R =
Goals:
Understand basic dynamics of extended bodies
Understand separation of translational and rotational motion
Understand separation of orbital and spin angular momentum
Be able to calculate moments of inertia of symmetrical rigid bodies
mi r
i
mi
5.1
Imagine the body to be made up of many pointlike particles, 1, 2, , i. These particles have mass
5.3
Angular Momentum
position, velocity etc. mi , ri , r i , and feel external The angular momentum of the system is the sum
and internal forces, m r = F ext +
F . Since of the constituent particles angular momenta:
i i
ij
Ex 5.5
Ex 5.10
Use the perpendicular axis theorem (Iz = Ix + Iy )
for laminar objects (thin plates). Keep in mind
the stretch rule: The moment of inertia does not
depend upon the extension along the rotational axis.
where L =
mi r i r
5.5
Energy
5.4
Moment of Inertia
Ex 5.12
Ex 5.8
How fast does a sphere roll down a plane?
Show that we can dene the moment of inertia to
be I =
mi 2 so that L = I. (you should treat
i
L and as scalars here. They are not in general as
Ex 5.13
follows from the collapse of the cross-product).
What is the centre of mass motion of a stick falling
over onto a table?
For symmetrical bodies the moment of inertia
through the centre of mass is easy to calculate, and
gives the radius of gyration: I0 = M k 2 and k R.
(This requires a volume integral and comes down to
the trivial thin ring)
Summary
Centre of mass motion:
System moves as a whole like a particle at the
centre of mass
Ex 5.9
21
Overview
To Be Covered:
Separation of motion:
Angular momentum can always be split into orbital and spin parts
This applies even under acceleration
For a rigid body, KE can also be split into rotational and translational parts
Goals:
Rigid bodies:
Particles are xed in their relative position but
the body can rotate
For rotation about a xed axis, we can calculate a moment of inertia that relates the scalar
angular momentum and angular velocity
Rotational kinetic energy of a rigid body depends on the moment of inertia and the angular
velocity
6.1
22
Figure 21
Figure 20
Ex 6.2
The full behaviour of the gyroscope is more complex,
Show that the torque on the rod is perpendicular to
and precession is just one type of steady-state
the rod and to L. What is the physical origin of this
behaviour that depends on the initial conditions.
torque?
Experiment with this at <http://faculty.ifmo.
ru/butikov/Applets/Gyroscope.html>
In general L and are not parallel.
6.2
The Gyroscope
6.3
Practical Applications
as a matrix:
Ixz
x
Iyz y
Izz
z
2
2
mi (yi + zi )x
mi xi yi y
mi xi zi z
6.5
6.4
Ex 6.6
Show that the angular momentum of a rigid body is
ri mi ( ri )
given by L =
Math/documents/Tensors_TM2002211716.pdf> and
Recall the toy gyroscope: it was free to rotate
<arXiv:math/0403252v1>
about a xed pivot point. We often need to calculate
the dynamics about a xed pivot or axis outside the
body itself. We can extend the parallel axis theorem
6.6 Principle Axes
to be:
You can always nd a special set of axes for which
Ixx = Ixx |0 + M (Y 2 + Z 2 ) Ixy = Ixy |0 M XY
the inertia tensor is diagonal (i.e. the products
of inertia are all zero and we are back to simple
Note that a shift of origin alters the principle axis,
moments of inertia). This follows directly from except when the shift takes place along an original
the properties of a 3 3 symmetric matrix. These principle axis.
principle axes are xed in the body and rotate with
it. The corresponding moments of inertia are known
6.7 Eulers Equations
as the principle moments of inertia.
Given a set of external torques how does a body alter
There are a few special cases to this. If an axis is its orientation? Using principle axes, L takes a simple
a reection or rotational symmetry axis, it is also a form:
principle axis. Sometimes there are many choices of
L = I1 1 e1 + I2 2 e2 + I3 3 e3
principle axes. For example for a totally symmetric
direction of and the principle axes move with the to give a single equation of motion: L + L =
body making it very dicult to solve the motion.
Note that the products of inertia are themselves a
In terms of angular velocity components,
function of time.
I1 1 + (I3 I2 )3 2 = 1 , and likewise in other
unstable motion?)
Ex 6.10
Show that rotation about a principle axis is stable
only if it corresponds to the smallest or largest
principle moment of inertia.
When considering torque-free precession consider
the falling penny eect: the angular velocity rapidly
precesses as the at disk settles. We can solve this
system with Eulers equations and by using some
approximations (Much larger angular velocity about
the normal axis to the disk than about the other
axes; Amplitude of procession if small (angular
velocity vector is at a small angle to the symmetry
axis)).
Ex 6.11
Show that a torque-free disk precesses twice as fast
as it spins.
Torque-free precession is a characteristic motion of
rigid bodies. The Earth, for example, has a torquefree precession superimposed upon the precession
of the equinoxes, and a gyroscope released from
rest will also precess about its own axis. Combined
motion is called nutation.
Summary
Rigid bodies
Subset of general extended body motion; size
and shape of body are xed
For non-symmetrical bodies the angular velocity
and angular momentum are not parallel; the angular velocity is not generally xed in direction.
Gyroscopic precession
System with large spin angular momentum will
reacts to a torque with sideways motion
General gyroscopic motion is more complex
26
Interference
Overview
I E 2 + E 2 + 2E 1 .E 2
1
2
To Be Covered:
Conditions for interference
Interferometers
Multiple source interference
LASERs
Goals:
7.2
7.1
Wave Interference
A linear system can support any number of superposed wave disturbances. The total displacement at
a point is the sum of these disturbances. Interference takes place when we measure the energy delivered at a given position (otherwise the the waves
do not aect each others propagation - Think about
two crossed light beams). In optical terms we can
place a screen at the point of interest. Recall that
the expression for amplitude due to waves of equal
frequency is:
a2 = a2 + a2 + 2a1 a2 cos(1 2 )
r
1
2
Figure 23
27
Ex 7.1
7.4 Coherence
Show that for equal-strength sources the irradiance
Practical sources of visible light do not emit a continis given by:
uous harmonic sine wave (e.g. incandescent sources,
Figure 24
7.5
7.6
ya
s
7.7
Thin Films
Figure 25
Figure 27
Ex 7.3
Show that bright fringes appear for reection angles
of
cos f = (sm 1)
f
4d
Figure 28
This has a historical (and current) role in distinguishing close spectral lines (close lines have a slightly
dierent fringe spacing. Cancellations in these fringes
can appear at high orders and by using the interferometer we can count the wavelengths over standard
lengths); in disproving the concept of aether drag
since the speed of light in both arms is constant; and
in measuring very small distances (mirror movement
of x
can be detected, allowing us to detect
gravitational waves).
7.9
Multi-Beam Interference
7.8
Michelson Interferometer
Figure 29
Ex 7.4
Show that
Where the Airy function and the coecient of Finesse are given by:
A() =
F =
1
1 + F sin2
2r
1 r2
Figure 31
7.11
Stimulated Emission
Figure 30
7.10
Fabry-Perot Etalon
The rates of spontaneous against stimulated emisThe Fabry-Perot etalon (Fig. 31)is a multi-beam sions is related by
interferometer. It is based on a thin lm reection
Rspont
A
8h
with very high reectivity. The multiple interferences
=
Rstim
B
c3
allows a very sharp selection o a narrow bandwidth.
The resolution is dened by the nesse (the ratio of
The optical amplier maintains a population of
separation of adjacent maxima to their half width) - excited atoms in a medium. The equilibrium dis
F = 2F
tribution of excited states is given by the MaxwellBoltzmann distribution. Such a population inversion
The Fabry-Perot interferometer can be used to requires some external source of energy. A single phostudy closely spaced emission lines (e.g. in the Zee- ton passing through this medium will be amplied
man eect); to separate adjacent wavelengths in op- coherently.
31
7.12
The LASER
from the Helium to the Neon. Neons radiative decay is the lasting transition and decays to the ground
state by collisions with the walls. (Fig. 33)
Figure 32
7.13
Figure 33
Practical LASERs
7.14
LASER Gyroscopes
The ring (Sagnac) amplitude division interferometer combines counter-rotating beams (Fig. 34). A
constant rotation changes the eective path for both
beams, since the speed of light is xed. Counting the
fringes reveals the rotation speed.
Interferometers
May be used to analyse spectral properties of
light (e.g. emission lines)
May be used to accurately measure small distances, less than one wavelength
LASERs
Figure 34
Summary
Interference
A medium can support multiple superposed
wave trains
Superposed waves from two or more sources can
interfere when observed
Interference term depends on relative phase of
contributing elds
For constant frequency, is a function of the difference in optical path length
33
Diraction
8.2
Overview
To Be Covered:
Propagation of waves & Huygens Principle
Diraction by an aperture
Fraunhofer approximation
Fourier optics
Goals:
Understand wave propagation and the relevance
of interference
8.1
Wave Propagation
8.3
Diraction
We will deal with diraction at an aperture as being a hole in an otherwise completely absorbing barrier. The linearity of the theory of electromagnetism
allows up to replace this hole with a source. The resulting eld will be very similar for a very absorbing
barrier. We just need to calculate the far-eld interference for a given set of sources, where the sources
are distributed over distances comparable with
8.4
The peak positions depend on and the source spacing. This is the principle behind the diraction grating. A large number of reecting or refracting obstacles will act as an array of point sources. The
pattern is further modied by diraction eects.
8.5
Cherenkov Eect
Figure 35
Ex 8.1
Show that the irradiance distribution at innity is:
I = I0
sin2
N
2
sin2 2
where = kd sin
Figure 37
8.6
where =
8.7
kD
2
sin
kD
2
sin .
Double-Slit Diraction
sin .
Figure 39
I() = 4I0
sin
cos2
Figure 38
Figure 40
For a 2D slit, of width b (Fig. 38), each subslit
(parallel to the long axis) will be a source of circular
waves. Applying the same logic as before, we can
Note the presence of missing fringes where a
show that
2
diraction minimum coincides with a double slit insin
I() = I(0)
terference maximum.
36
Summary
8.8
General Apertures
Wave propagation
ik(Y y+Zz)
R
dS
Diraction
The expression EA (y, z) is the aperture.
An important example is the circular aperture.
Diraction at a circular aperture limits how well
we can collimate any light beam. By time-reversal
it also limits the resolution of optical systems. A
system of nite size must impose some aperture
on the incoming light, resulting in a pattern as in
Figs. 42a, 42b, 42c.
Diraction patterns
8.9
(b)
(c)
(a)
38