OPCW chief says it is an "open question" if hidden chemical weapons remain in Syria. Director general says more clarification is needed before declaring country free. He said if new evidence emerged of chemical weapons attac.s within the country, the / 0C would respond swiftly and the consequences would be "severe"
OPCW chief says it is an "open question" if hidden chemical weapons remain in Syria. Director general says more clarification is needed before declaring country free. He said if new evidence emerged of chemical weapons attac.s within the country, the / 0C would respond swiftly and the consequences would be "severe"
OPCW chief says it is an "open question" if hidden chemical weapons remain in Syria. Director general says more clarification is needed before declaring country free. He said if new evidence emerged of chemical weapons attac.s within the country, the / 0C would respond swiftly and the consequences would be "severe"
The head of the global chemical weapons watchdog tells Channel 4 News it is an "open question" if hidden chemical weapons remain in Syria, two days after the last shipment was supposed to have left. !"N!S"#$ %& '(N! %)*4 #hmet (+umcu, director general of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) said more clarification was needed before he could pronounce Syria chemical,weapons free. -owever, he said that if new, conclusive evidence emerged of chemical weapons attac.s within the country, the /0C would respond swiftly and the consequences would be "severe". -e also said he believed it was unli.ely that any chemical weapons were in the hands of the more e1treme fringes of the Syrian opposition or 2ihadist groups in the region li.e the 3slamic State of 3raq and al,Sham (Isis). -e told Channel 4 News4 "5egarding Syrian chemical weapons, whether there are some hidden assets in certain locations in Syria , this is clearly an open question. #nd at the moment the /0C is addressing some questions based on the Syrian declaration and we want to clarify certain aspects." hether there are some hidden assets in certain locations in Syria , this is clearly an open question.Ahmet !"mc"# OPCW /n 6onday this wee., the /0C said that the last shipment of dangerous chemicals which had been declared by the Syrian regime had left Syria, on the way to eventual destruction on board a (S ship. Several deadlines for destruction have already been missed but #mbassador (+umcu said this process was due to begin ne1t wee.. -owever, whether this means all chemical weapons are gone from Syria is a different matter , because that depends on whether Presi$ent %ashar al&Assa$ declared all of the weapons his regime has stoc.piled. Spea.ing in Copenhagen, #mbassador (+umcu said4 "The Syrians have been quite cooperative in the process. e don7t .now how long it is going to ta.e but our goal is to give the necessary assurances to the membership as well as the international community that the Syrians have declared all the chemical weapons they possessed." 7Systematic7 chemical attac.s The OPCW itself sai$ '"st last wee( that chemical attac(s were still )systematic) in Syria# including with chlorine gas. Chlorine was not on the list of to1ic agents the /0C ordered #ssad to hand over, although it is banned by the organisation. #mbassador (+umcu said if more evidence emerges of chemical attac.s after the supposedly final shipment of declared weapons left the country, it would be a serious situation. "3f there are some uses of chemical weapons in Syria, we could send our teams of inspectors... and we would be able to say whether these allegations were true or not and , if the perpetrators of the attac. could be identified , the consequences would be severe." Syria agree$ to han$ o*er its chemical weapons last year after international pressure, including the threat of (S air stri.es, after horrific e*i$ence emerge$ of a go*ernment chemical attac( on the e$ges of +amasc"s which (ille$ aro"n$ ,#-.. people & as well as other similar attac(s. 8oth sides in the Syrian conflict have accused the other of using chemical weapons. 8ut #mbassador (+umcu suggested it was unli.ely that the opposition had the capability for such attac.s at this point. "hether some groups do possess or have access to chemical substances, or could produce weapons , clearly, at a small scale some groups could produce small quantities, but large,scale production is required with well,equipped facilities, therefore 3 don7t thin. that it is possible," he said. "The Syrian authorities did not inform us about any access or sei+ure of their stoc.piles by individual groups or factions." 9ears about the potential use of chemical weapons in Ira/ have also been raised in recent days, afterIsis too( o*er one of Sa$$am 0"ssein1s former chemical weapons comple2es , although most of the chemicals in the facility are believed to either be inaccessible or redundant. #mbassador (+umcu added4 "e don7t have any evidence from other sources too about the possession of chemical weapons by armed groups in Syria or 3raq."